alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

From:

Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 1:14 PM

To: RedHill

Subject: Protect Oahu Drinking Water from Jet Fuel NOW

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

I am writing to express my extreme concern about jet fuel leaking from Navy storage tanks on Red 

Hill into one of Oahu's main aquifers. It is ESSENTIAL that the leaked fuel is completely cleaned up 

IMMEDIATELY. The reported 25 years given to the Navy to take care of this problem created by the 

Navy is too long to wait. This is entirely UNACCEPTABLE. If the leaks cannot be immediately fixed, 

they must be emptied immediately and replaced. I also strongly urge that the public comment period 

on the negotiated agreement between the Navy, EPA, and Hawaii DOH be extended to allow the 

public to become aware, to understand, and to weigh-in on this critical issue for Oahu's future and 

sustainability. I expect that you will keep me informed as this process proceeds. 

Thank you,
No. 396.

#### United States *v.*Frankel, Executrix.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer*and *Wayne G. Barnett*for the United States. *J. M. George*for respondent.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
| (1)       | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)       | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |   |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Michael Prince            |   |   |   |   |
| Chief Executive Officer       |   |   |   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer  |   |   |   |   |
| September 14, 2010            |   |   |   |   |
exhibit106.htm










KODAK









March 14, 2016







Re:  Amendment to Employment Agreement







Dear John:







With Kodak’s implementation of the Exempt Employee Flexible Time-Off Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto (the “Plan”), an amendment to your employment agreement dated May 16, 2014, as amended by the letter agreement dated July 15, 2014 (your “Agreement”), is necessary.  Pursuant to this letter agreement, Section 5(b) of your Agreement is hereby amended, effective February 1, 2016, to provide that you are eligible for vacation benefits in accordance with the terms of the Plan.  The treatment of your accrued vacation as of March 31, 2016, is addressed by the terms of the Plan.  All other terms of your Agreement remain in full force and effect.







Please indicate your acceptance of the amendment to your Agreement by signing the acknowledgement below and returning this letter to me.







Thank you.


 


EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY


 


By:  Karen M Kelly


Name Karen M Kelly


Title  Director, Total Rewards and Operational Excellence and VP, Human Resources


 


EXECUTIVE


 


/s/John N. McMullen


John N. McMullen




 


Attachment:  Exempt Employee Flexible Time-Off Plan






  





1











  








Benefit Plan 1A.03b


Exempt Employee Flexible Time-Off Plan


Effective Date:  February 1, 2016


As Amended:  XXXXX XX, 2016


No. of Pages: 1







Exempt Employee Flexible Time-Off Plan












Effective on February 1, 2016, Exempt and Executive Employees do not accrue or track vacation time.  Exempt and Executive Employees will not receive a payment for unused vacation time upon termination from the Company.







Exempt and Executive Employees will be expected to take vacation at their discretion.  Scheduling of vacation by Exempt and Executive Employees is subject to departmental operating requirements and advance supervisory approval, unless it is substituted for unpaid leave protected under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (see the Kodak Family and Medical Leave Plan for more information regarding this option).







For Exempt and Executive Employees in California, Colorado or Illinois, with remaining accrued vacation on March 31, 2016, such vacation will be retained.  Vacation usage for such employees will continue to be tracked, and upon exhaustion of the remaining accrued vacation, such employees will become subject to the terms of this policy.







For employees who are reclassified as exempt or non-exempt during the middle of a calendar year, the provisions of section 4.05 of the Non-Exempt Employee Vacation Plan will apply.  At the beginning of the next calendar year, newly-classified Exempt and Executive Employees will start with a clean slate and there will no longer be carryover or accrued vacation.





















  





2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


                                                    






<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           5,147
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              32
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     81,146
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          20,080
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            19,954
<LOANS>                                        133,261
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,267
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 242,557
<DEPOSITS>                                     198,546
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,121
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,417
<LONG-TERM>                                     10,000
<COMMON>                                         1,778
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,695
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 242,557
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 11,406
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,288
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    92
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                17,786
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,865
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 802
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,119
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      517
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (38)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,541
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,113
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,130
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.70
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.58
<LOANS-NON>                                        267
<LOANS-PAST>                                       263
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    936
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,015
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      302
<RECOVERIES>                                        37
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,267
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,267
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            674
        


                                      






</TABLE>
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: November 21 , 2014 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR
- 2013 - 0602 FROM: Rob Lawrence

EPA/Region 6/PD SUBJECT: October 20 , 2014 Call with Environment Texas R egarding the Proposed Carbon

Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
**SUMMARY** A conference call presentation was made by EPA to Environment Texas on October 20, 2014, to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants, which was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES** Participant : Luke Metzger EPA Participant : Terry Johnson
----

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  June 9, 2011                   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                            |   |
|                                            |   |
| /s/ DANIEL LENDER      |   |
| Daniel Lender                                   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer                         |   |
| QAD Inc.                                        |   |

----
From: makisonx@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:39:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Max Suarez

Corona, CA 92881
EXHIBIT
 32(a)



CERTIFICATION
 OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
 connection with the report on Form 10-Q/A ofWWA
 Group, Inc. for thequarterly
 period endedMarch 31, 2008
 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,Eric
 Montandon, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in this report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of the registrant for the period covered by this report.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:
 June 12, 2009





/s/
 Eric Montandon

Eric
 Montandon, Chief Executive Officer    This certification accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed
 by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
 amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
 the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), irrespective of any general
 incorporation language contained in such filing.   A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has
 been provided to the registrantand will be retained
 by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
 request.





25
##### 



LNB Bancorp, Inc. Exhibit to Form 10 - K (For the twelve months ended December 31, 2003) Exhibit Number (32(b)) CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of LNB Bancorp, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Terry M. White, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Terry M. White Terry M. White
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Corporate Secretary
March 10, 2004
**Exhibit 3.1**

 

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENTOF THEAMENDED AND RESTATEDCERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATIONOFSENESCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

 

----

* *

*Pursuant to Sections 228 and 242of theDelaware General Corporation Law*

 

----

 

Senesco Technologies, Inc. (the “Corporation”), acorporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the GeneralCorporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”);

 

DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT:

 

FIRST:          The name of the corporation(hereinafter, the “Corporation”) is:

 

**SenescoTechnologies, Inc.**

 

SECOND:     The Amended and Restated Certificate ofIncorporation of the Corporation was filed with theoffice of the Secretary of State of Delaware on January 22, 2007 (the “Charter”).

 

THIRD:        The Charter is hereby amended asfollows:

 

(a)                                  The first section of Article FOURTHof the Charter is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced by the followingnew paragraph:

 

“The total number of shares of all classes of stock which theCorporation shall have authority to issue is One Hundred and Five Million(105,000,000) shares.  The Corporation isauthorized to issue two classes of stock designated “Common Stock” and “PreferredStock,” respectively.  The total numberof shares of Common Stock authorized to be issued by the Corporation is OneHundred Million (100,000,000), each such share of Common Stock having a $0.01par value.  The total number of shares ofPreferred Stock authorized to be issued by the Corporation is Five Million(5,000,000), each such share of Preferred Stock having a $0.01 par value.”

 

FOURTH:    That the foregoing amendments have been dulyadopted in accordance with the provisions of Sections 228 and 242 of the DGCL.

 

FIFTH:         This Certificate of Amendment shall bedeemed effective upon its filing with the Secretary of State of the State ofDelaware.

 

----

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Certificate of Amendment ofCertificate of Incorporation has been duly executed by the undersigned officerof the Corporation this 13th day of December, 2007.

 

**SENESCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Bruce C. Galton                   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Bruce C. Galton                       |
|   | Title: | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|        |        |                                       |  |

 

----
EXHIBIT 21
               LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF WARRANTECH CORPORATION

         1.       WARRANTECH CONSUMER PRODUCT SERVICES, INC.
                           a Connecticut corporation

         2.       WCPS OF FLORIDA, INC.
                           a Florida corporation

         3.       WARRANTECH AUTOMOTIVE, INC.
                           a Connecticut corporation

         4.       WDBS OF CALIFORNIA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.
                           a California corporation

         5.       WARRANTECH AUTOMOTIVE RISK PURCHASING GROUP, INC.
                           a Michigan corporation

         6.       WARRANTECH AUTOMOTIVE OF FLORIDA, INC.
                           a Florida corporation

         7.       WARRANTECH DIRECT, INC.
                           a Texas corporation

         8.       WARRANTECH (UK) LIMITED
                            company incorporated in England

         9.       WARRANTECH OF PUERTO RICO, INC.
                           a Puerto Rico corporation

         10.      WARRANTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                           a Delaware corporation

         11.      WCPS OF CANADA, INC.
                           a Connecticut corporation

         12.      WARRANTECH AUTOMOTIVE OF CANADA, INC.
                           a Connecticut corporation

         13.      WARRANTECH EUROPE Plc
                  a company incorporated in England

         14.      WARRANTECH REINSURANCE COMPANY, LTD
                                 a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands

         15.      WARRANTECH ADDITIVE, INC.
                           a Texas corporation

         16.      WARRANTECH HOME SERVICE COMPANY
                           a Connecticut corporation

         17.      WARRANTECH DEL CARIBE, INC.
                           a Puerto Rico corporation

         18.      WARRANTECH HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY
                           a Florida corporation

         19.      WARRANTECH HELP DESK, INC.
                           a Delaware corporation
From: jkillblane@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:45:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jennifer Killblane

Chandler, AZ 85226
No. 85, Misc.

#### Lambert *v.*New York.

Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Judicial Department. Certiorari denied.
No. 489.

#### Downum *v.*United States.

Certiorari, *ante,*p. 811, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The motion for the appointment of counsel is granted and it is ordered that *Richard Tinsman, Esquire,*of San Antonio, Texas, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for petitioner in this case.
#### CITY OF AKRON et al. *v.*OHIO ex rel. McELROY, ATTORNEY GENERAL.

No. 327.

Decided October 22, 1962.

*James V. Barbuto*and *Sal Germano*for appellants.

*Mark McElroy,*Attorney General of Ohio, and *Theodore R. Saker*and *Jay C. Flowers,*Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
No. 266.

#### Monem *v.*Cosmopolitan Shipping Co., Inc., et al.

*Jacob Rassner*for petitioner.

*J. Ward O’Neill*and *Richard L. Maher*for respondents.

Municipal Court of New York, New York, Borough of Manhattan, First District. Certiorari denied.