alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1507 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 280
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1507

                          [Report No. 110-891]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7110) making supplemental 
   appropriations for job creation and preservation, infrastructure 
  investment, and economic and energy assistance for the fiscal year 
           ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 26, 2008

   Mr. McGovern, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7110) making supplemental 
   appropriations for job creation and preservation, infrastructure 
  investment, and economic and energy assistance for the fiscal year 
           ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 7110) making supplemental 
appropriations for job creation and preservation, infrastructure 
investment, and economic and energy assistance for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes. All points of order 
against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under 
clause 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall be considered as read. All points 
of order against the bill are waived. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening 
motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by 
the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of H.R. 7110 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the 
Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as 
may be designated by the Speaker.
                                                 House Calendar No. 280

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1507

                          [Report No. 110-891]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 7110) making supplemental 
   appropriations for job creation and preservation, infrastructure 
  investment, and economic and energy assistance for the fiscal year 
           ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 26, 2008

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
No. 295.

#### Morris et al. *v.*United States.

*Francis W. McCauley*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Jones*and *Joseph Kovner*for the United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue


Registration No.  333-35460
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)
PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  049				Trade Date: 02/22/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated
  September 8, 2000)						Issue Date:  02/27/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement February 22, 2001

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION
OR REPAYMENT
  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or
     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any
Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivor's		applicable
                                                             regular or special
  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No
                                                                	record dates)

14911QCA7	   5.8%	02/15/05	100%	         1.0%	   Quarterly	      YES	    NO



Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:
____  Yes	  X   No						N/A



(1) The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not
affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the
effective date of the change.

(2) Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to
Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the
time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
From: brown.1817@osu.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:37:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

adamantly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs

and devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance. This is not just or fair.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sheryl Brown

, 43212-1529
From: Richard Parker [mailto:richardparkerdc@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 1:43 PM
To: Andrew Delaski; Art Rosenfeld; Bob Smith; Brian Coffey; Caitlin Johnson; Carlos Siqueiros; Caskey, John; Chad Kennedy; Chris Bolduc; Chris Brown; Creevy, Jim; Dan Cohen; Daniel Young; Eduardo Robles; Edwards, Brenda; Eric Petersen; Freeman, Je remiah; Gary Fernstrom; Greg Rosenquist; Jennifer Tiedeman; Jerry Schoen; Jim Raba; Joanna Mauer; John Cymbalsky; Katie Coughlin; Matthew Nardotti; Maxine Savitz; Meg Waltner; Michael Rivest; Millure , Dave; Phil Harter; Polinski, Raymond; Richard W. Parker; Rob Greeson; Robert Berman; Robert van Bu skirk; Robin Roy; Ryan, Paul; Scott Beck; Steve Nadel; Steve Rosenstock; Ted Johnstone; Thomas Patzner; Thomas Petrosino; Tim Ballo; Vijay Tendulkar; Wes Patterson; Zhimei Luo Subject: DOE Analysis of Small Business Impacts



### Colleagues,

Attached please find DOE's latest analysis of sm all business impacts for the LV space - prepared by Rob Carmichael at Navigant.

Best wishes, Richard Parker Facilitator
From: Felicia Messer

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 7:16:39 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Felicia Messer

1339 Buckhorn Trail

Mount Sterling, KY 40353
From: stmarysdre@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:08:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joseph Schmidt

Marietta, OH 45750
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10ii
                                                                  ------------



                     DESCRIPTION OF PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP
           NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTORS' TRAVEL ACCIDENT INSURANCE PROGRAM





Coverage:     Nonemployee Directors' Travel Accident

Insured:      All Nonemployee Directors of Pacific Telesis Group under age 72.


Limits:       $250,000 per     $250,000 to $62,500 for dismemberment,
              Director         depending upon the injury.  Beneficiary will
              $1,000,000       receive $250,000 for loss of life should
              Aggregate per    death occur while traveling on behalf of the
              accident         Corporation.

                               The Accidental Death  benefit will increase 10%
                               if  loss   of  life  results  from   a  covered
                               accident, while riding  in a private  passenger
                               car and wearing a seatbelt.
Deductibles:  None

Description:  The program  provides coverage for nonemployee  Directors' under
              the age of 72 while traveling  on behalf of the Corporation  for
              accidental  death and/or  dismemberment.   This  is an  accident
              policy  and  does not  provide coverage  for  loss caused  by or
              resulting from illness, disease, or bodily infirmity.

Exclusions:   Exclusions include:  Suicide, attempted suicide  or self-imposed
              injury,  while  sane  or insane,  war  or  acts  or war,  injury
              resulting from full time active duty in any armed forces, taking
              part  in a felony, travel or flight in any spacecraft, sickness,
              disease,  bodily or  mental  infirmity, or  medical or  surgical
              treatment thereof.
From: cannotsing@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:42:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Brenda Lewis

Hazlehurst, MS 39083
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1332 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 31, 2008.
Whereas, on any given day, there are more than 500,000 youth in foster care in 
        the United States;
Whereas an estimated 26,000 of these youth are discharged from the foster care 
        system or ``age out'' with little to no resources to start their own 
        lives;
Whereas the people of the United States have a sincere appreciation for the 
        circumstances that place children in foster care;
Whereas foster youth possess unique qualities and skills that make them ideal 
        candidates for employment, but compared to youth nationally and youth 
        from low-income families, they are less likely to be employed or 
        employed regularly;
Whereas, when afforded comprehensive support, this resilient population excels 
        in the job market;
Whereas, within 18 months after leaving foster care, 25 percent of foster youth 
        become homeless and comprise more than a quarter of the United States 
        homeless population;
Whereas, without positive intervention, youth who age out of foster care often 
        have bouts of homelessness, criminal activity, and incarceration;
Whereas addressing job readiness early in the transition to adulthood is 
        critical to shaping the future trajectories of these youth; and
Whereas youth who begin connecting to the workforce prior to discharge from 
        foster care maintain the highest probability of employment: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the importance of connecting foster youth to the 
        workforce through internship programs, such as the Orphan Foundation of 
        America's InternAmerica program, that provide foster youth the 
        foundation upon which to build their careers and to be successful 
        members of the work force; and
            (2) encourages employers of all sectors and Federal, State, and 
        local governmental agencies to increase employment of the young men and 
        women who have been discharged from foster care in the United States.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: ctcast@earthlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:20:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Christine Castillo

Waialua, HI 96791
From: cbaker42@columbus.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:49:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Craig Baker

Columbus, OH 43204