# Date: May 15, 2012

Subject: Costs, Environmental, and Ener gy Impacts for the Promulgated Subpart S

Risk and Technology Review

EPA Contract No. EP-D-11-084; Work Assignment No. 0-03

From: Thomas Holloway

Katie Hanks

Corey Gooden

To: John Bradfield

Bill Schrock

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

I. Introduction

Section 112(f)(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) directs the U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency (EPA) to conduct risk assessments on each source category subject to maximum

achievable control technology (MACT) standard s and determine if additional standards are

needed to reduce residual risks from the rema ining hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions

from the category. Section 112(d)(6) of the CAA requires EPA to review and revise the MACT

standards, as necessary, taking in to account developments in pr actices, processes, and control

technologies. The section 112(f)(2 ) residual risk review and sec tion 112(d)(6) tec hnology review

are to be done 8 years after promulgation. The national emission standards for hazardous air

pollutants (NESHAP) for the pulp and paper in dustry (40 CFR part 63, subpart S) were

promulgated in 1998 and are due for review unde r CAA sections 112(f)(2) and 112(d)(6). To

address a lawsuit filed by Sierra Club, the s ubpart S risk and technol ogy review (RTR) package

was proposed in December, 2011 (76 FR 81328) and is scheduled to be promulgated by July 31,

2012.

The purpose of this memorandum is to document the estimated costs and environmental

and energy impacts associated with the regulator y options considered for promulgation in the

subpart S RTR. This memorandum updates the cost analysis documented for the proposed RTR.

(RTI 2011) Section II discusses th e derivation of the costs and imp acts associated with the kraft

condensates regulatory options. Section III presents the costs associated wi th the proposed repeat

HAP emissions testing requirement. Finally, sect ion IV summarizes the nationwide costs and

impacts.

# 2 II. Cost and Impacts Estimates for Kra ft Condensates Regulatory Options

A. Kraft Condensates Regulatory Options

The kraft condensates standard s in subpart S limit the HAP concentration in various

process liquids (e.g., condensates from pulping equipment). Limiting emissions from process

liquids reduces emissions from the handling and re use of these liquids and wastewater treatment.

The kraft condensate standards apply to the following “named” pulping process condensate

streams: condensates from the digester system, turpentine recovery system, evaporator system

feed stages, high-volume low-concentration (HVLC) system, and low-volume high concentration

(LVHC) system. Subpart S specifies the amount of condensates to be collected for treatment.

Mills have three options for the c ondensate collection requirements:

1. Collect all named condensate streams.

2. Collect all LVHC and HVLC streams plus st reams that contain 65% of the total HAP

mass from the digester system, turpentine rec overy system, and evaporator system feed

stages.

3. Collect any subset of the named streams that contain in total 7.2 pounds (lb) of HAP per

oven-dried ton of pulp (ODTP) at mills that do not perform bleaching, or 11.1 lb HAP per

ODTP at mills that perform bleaching.

The EPA did not propose any changes to th e kraft condensate collection requirements

above as part of the technology review. Under the originally promul gated rule, collected

condensates must be treated by one of the following methods:

1. Route the condensates to equipment that m eets the subpart S kraft pulping vent gas

standards; or

2. Route the condensates to biologi cal treatment, steam stripper or other control device that

meets one of the following equivalent requirements:

 Reduce total HAP by at least 92 weight-percent; or

 For mills without bleaching, either remove at least 6.6 lb total HAP/ODTP, or

meet 210 parts per million by weight (ppmw) total HAP at the control device

outlet; or

 For mills with bleaching, either remove at least 10.2 lb total HAP/ODTP, or meet

330 ppmw total HAP at th e control device outlet.

A series of different kraft c ondensate treatment limits were considered for the proposed

technology review, including in creasing the requirement to reduce HAP emissions from 92

percent to a higher percent reduction (e.g., 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, or 98 percent). The impacts

analysis at proposal considered the incremental costs and emissi ons reductions associated with

each of these limits. The December 2011 propos al included revised condensate treatment

standards based on a 94 percent re moval. The analysis documented in this memo incorporates

public comments received on the 94 percent removal standard and associated cost analysis. For

the final rule, two kraft condens ates treatment standards are u nder consideration: 93% and 94%

removal. Table 1 lists the percen t removal treatment limits and their equivalents in lb/ODTP and

ppmw under consideration.

# 3 Table 1. Kraft Condensate Treatment Standards Considered for Promulgation

lb/ODTP removal 1 

# ppmw 2



# Percent removal

option Unbleached Bleached Unbleached Bleached

92% (baseline) 6.6 10.2 210 330

93% 6.7 10.3 184 289

94% 6.8 10.4 158 248

1. The equivalent lb/ODTP removal standards were calculated as follows: 0.93 x 7.2 = 6.7; 0.93 x 11.1 = 10.3; 0.94

x 7.2 = 6.8; 0.94 x 11.1 = 10.4.

2. The equivalent ppmw standards were developed by first back-calculating an uncontrolled ppmw, U [210 ppmw =

(1-0.92)U  U=2625 ppmw], and then applying the revised percent reduction to U [(1-0.93) 2625 = 184 ppmw].



# For the promulgation cost analysis, data fr om industry responses to Part I of the 2011

pulp and paper survey were reviewed to determin e the performance level of mills subject to the

kraft condensates standards. The Part I survey requested information on the control measures and

compliance options used by mills to meet the kr aft condensates standards. Mills typically use

either steam stripping of contaminated condensat es or hard piping of condensates to biological

wastewater treatment. Some mills may use a co mbination of treatment methods. A total of 97

mills are currently subject to the kraft condensates standards. Table 2 presents a summary of the

predominant kraft condensate trea tment methods used. We note that we have updated the number

of mills using each treatment method for this pr omulgation cost analysis based on further review

of the survey data.

Table 2. Number of Mills Using Vari ous Condensate Treatment Methods

Treatment Method No. of mills No. of mills

(proposal cost analysis)

Biotreatment 40 39

Recycle 7 5

Stripping or stripping/recycle 45 43

Stripping and biotreatment 4 9

Thermal incinerator 1 1

Total 97 97

B. Baseline Performance Levels and Consideration of Variability

Information in the Part I Informati on Collection Request (ICR) data base Kraft

Condensates and Wastewater tables was reviewed to determin e the baseline performance level

for condensate treatment for each mill. In the Kraft Condensates table, survey respondents

entered test dates and the condensate removal test result. The majority of mills appeared to base

compliance on the lb/ODTP or percent removal compliance options. Only one mill (the mill with

the thermal incinerator) appeared to use the ppmw compliance option.

The predominant condensate treatment method shown in Table 2 above was noted for

each mill (e.g., biotreatment, stripping, recycle, or a combination of these methods) based on mill

# 4 responses in the different columns of the Kraft Condensates table. The data in the ICR

Wastewater table was assumed to reflect only the biotreatment portion of kraft condensate

control for mills using multiple control me thods (e.g., stripping and biotreatment).

In a few cases, it was necessary to check performance tests submitted with the survey

results to determine a mill’s condensate performan ce level. While some mills provided results of

their initial perfor mance tests (e.g., 2001-2002 data) in the Kraft Condensates table, many other

mills provided more recent condensate performa nce data (e.g., 2009-2011 data). For mills using

biotreatment, we coupled th e data reported in the Kraft Condensates table with data reported in

the Wastewater table in order to evaluate which mills might be affected by the different

condensate regulatory options under consid eration. The data reflected in the Wastewater table

were assumed to reflect testing conducted in the 2009 (unless otherwis e noted by a respondent)

since this was the base year for wh ich ICR data were requested. In the Wastewater table mills

provided quarterly results for the fraction of methanol removed (F bioMeOH 

# ), total HAP percent

removal, and total HAP mass removal in k ilograms per megagram of oven-dried pulp

(kg/MgODP). Compliance is based on the total HAP percent removal or total HAP mass

removal, which we converted to lb/ODTP fo r comparison with the regulatory options.

To account for variability in treatment sy stem performance, mills with treatment

performance levels less than 4 percent above the 93/94 percent removal options under

consideration were considered to be affected (e.g., a mill with a performance level of less than

98 percent removal was considered to be affected by the 94 percent regulato ry option). Similarly,

mills with lb/ODTP condensate treatment le vel less than 50 percent above the lb/ODTP

regulatory option were considered to be affected. These “varia bility cushions” were based on

analysis of the typical operati onal and performance variability us ed in the industry. Our analysis

showed that the central tendency of the variabilit y margins reported in the ICR for facilities that

used a percentage treatment compliance demonstr ation approach was close to 4 percent removal

in excess of the standard. For facilities th at used a mass/volume approach, the typical

demonstration contained a variab ility margin of approximately 50 percent in excess of the

standard. See Appendix A1 for details on this an alysis. Table 3 presents the performance level

criteria, considering the variability cushion (V C) used to determine which mills would be

affected by the regulatory options.

Table 3. Performance Level Criteria for Determining Which Mill s Would Be Affected 1



# Percent reduction Unbleached, lb/ODTP Bleached, lb/ODTP

Limit Limit + VC Limit Limit + VC Limit Limit + VC

93% 97% 6.7 10.1 10.3 15.5

94% 98% 6.8 10.2 10.4 15.6

VC = variability cushion (4% reduction; or 1.5 x lb/ODTP limit for a 50% increase)

1. The mill using the ppmw compliance option exceeded its performance target and was determined not to be

affected. There was no need to develo p ppmw VC criteria for this analysis.



# Since mills can comply with either the lb/ODTP or percent reduction removal options, we

considered a mill showing compliance with either of the compliance options + VC for all of the

performance results for that option as bei ng unaffected by the 93 or 94 percent removal

regulatory options (e.g., a ssigned a “no” in the Require Upgraded Control column shown in

Appendix A2). Mills recycling condensates to eq uipment to meet the pulping vent gas limits are

# 5 subject to the 98 percent pulping vent gas limit (or equivalent) and were assumed not to incur

any costs associated with adjustments to the kraft condensate emission limits. The mill operating

a thermal incinerator also achieved greater than 98 percent control and would not be affected.

Mills using a combination of steam stripping and biotreatment were assigned costs based on

steam stripping. Using this approach, of 97 total kraft mills, we determined that 48 mills would

be affected at a treatment limit of 93 percent, an d 54 mills would be affected by a treatment limit

of 94 percent. See Appendix A2 for details on this analysis.

C. Cost of Biological Treatment System Upgrades

For the proposal cost analysis, cost es timates were derived from CapdetWorks v2.5

model runs for a complete-mix activated sludge system containing a bior eactor and secondary

clarifier, assuming that the wastewater treatme nt system upgrade would require an increase in

system capacity proportional to the increase in emission limit. This cost methodology is

described in the proposal cost memo.(RTI 2011) We use a separate methodology in this

memorandum, but note that the costs for biot reatment systems estimated here are not

dramatically different.

Public commenters noted that the types of bi otreatment systems used in pulp and paper

industry generally include aerated stabilization basins (ASBs), ac tivated sludge treatment (AST),

or UNOX systems. Although commenters sugges ted that AST and UNOX systems typically

have higher treatment efficiencies th an ASBs, we noted overlap in the F bioMeOH 

# values reported in

the ICR Wastewater table for all three system types, likely due to normal variability in

biotreatment system performance. See Appendix A3 for details. We also note that the cost to

upgrade and ASB to AST is in the $30 to 35 million range for a single system (EPA 2012c), and

UNOX systems would be “replacement” biotreatment systems (i.e., upgrade from an ASB is not

feasible). Therefore a change in biotreatment syst em type was not considered to be cost effective

(or feasible) for the incremental change in the kr aft condensate standards. Rather, it is expected

that mills would install a steam stripper for c ondensate control if their existing biotreatment

system could not consistently achieve th e regulatory options due to variability.

Of the 40 mills using biotreatment as th eir predominant treatment method, 20 and 23

mills were determined to be potentially affected by the 93 and 94 percent regulatory options

(considering the variability cushion described above), respectively. Mills with the following

characteristics were assigned costs for a new stri pper system as opposed to a biotreatment system

upgrade:

 For the 93% removal option : Performance levels below 95% removal, or equivalent mass

removal below 10.5 lb/ODTP (bleach mills) or 6.8 lb/ODTP (no bleaching)

 For the 94% removal option : Performance levels below 96% removal, or equivalent mass

removal below 10.7 lb/ODTP (bleach mills) or 6.9 lb/ODTP (no bleaching)

 CCA mills under either option.

# 6 Application of this criteria resulted in th e following mill cost assignments in Table 4.

Table 4. Number of Biotreatment Mills by Cost Assigned

Regulatory option

(percent removal) No. of mills affected

(out of 40 mills using

biotreatment) No. of mills assigned

biotreatment

upgrade costs No. of mills assigned

new stripper costs

93% 20 7 13

94% 23 8 15

Public commenters noted that an increase in biotreament system performance would be

achieved through increased aeration and increa sed nutrient addition, where possible. Although

increased retention time in a biotreament system could also increase treatment, this would

involve dredging or raising di kes or other means of increas ing the system volume (e.g., as

assumed in the proposal cost analysis). After multiple discussions, we incorporated the cost

estimates provided by commenters (which were based on mill experiences) into our

promulgation costs analysis.(AF&PA 2012, EP A 2012b, EPA 2012c) The promulgation costs for

biotreatment units are based on the parameters in Table 5.

Table 5. Biotreatment Cost Parameters

Cost parameter Value Notes

Capital cost to upgrade aeration in

biotreatment system $480,000 = 8 aerators (75 hp each) x $60K each

Annualized capital cost $45,120 

# = 0.094 * capital cost

Annual electric cost for new aerators

(75 hp x 8 aerators = 600 hp) $391,940 = 600 hp *8760 hr/yr *0.7457KWhr/(hp-hr)

* $/KWhr

$/KWhr $0.10 Used in proposal analysis 

# (CapdetWorks

v2.5 default electricity cost)

KWhr/yr 3,919,399 = 600 hp *8760 hr/yr *0.7457KWhr/(hp-hr)

Annual maintenance for upgrades

(aerators), $/yr $220,000 AF&PA 2012, Att 5. Assume 1/4 of this cost

is for incremental labor ($220,000/($25/hr) =

2,200 hours.

Nutrient costs (incremental), $/yr $60,000 Ch emical costs. Assumes mills already have

nutrient addition equipment in place.

Maintenance total, $/yr $280,000 $220,000 + $60,000 (aerator maintenance +

nutrients)



# As in the proposal analysis, the annualized capital costs were determined by applying a

capital recovery factor of 0.094 to the estimated capital cost. The capital recovery factor was

estimated assuming a 20-year equipment life and 7 percent interest rate.

D. Cost of Steam Stripper Upgr ades and New Steam Strippers

Steam stripper upgrade costs were developed for mills currently using steam stripping to

comply with the kraft condensates limit. Ne w steam stripper costs were applied for mills

currently using biotreatment, but wi th potentially insufficient margin of variability to continually

meet the more stringent regulator y options, as described above.

# 7 For the proposal cost analysis stripper co sts that originated from the 1993 Background

Information Document (BID) for Subpart S (EPA 1993) were scaled to 2010, and an assumption

of no incremental energy increase was made. For this analysis, we are basi ng stripper costs on

more recent information supplied by commenters, based on actual industry experience. The

revised analysis accounts for incremental energy use which is primarily increased steam usage

for new and upgraded strippers plus elect ricity usage for new strippers.

The cost specifications are shown below for new strippers (Table 6) and stripper

upgrades (Table 7). Mills currently operating st ripper systems are alread y incurring annual costs

associated with stripper operation, so the upgrad e costs provided represen t incremental costs due

to increased efficiency. Some ex isting strippers in the pulping industry are integrated systems

that use steam from the evaporator set. Differe nt upgrade costs were used for these types of

strippers as a result of public comments. Strippers integrated with the multiple effect evaporators

were identified in the ICR responses and are noted in Appendix A2. Of the 49 mills using

strippers, a combination of stripping and recycling, or stri pping and biotreatment as the

predominant form of condensate control, 24 were determined to have integrated stripper systems.

Stripper upgrade costs were assigned for 28 and 31 stripper systems under the 93 and 94 percent

regulatory options, respectively.

Table 6. New Stripper Cost and Energy Use Parameters

Cost variable Value Notes

Capital cost $7,400,000 AF&PA 2012, Att 5

Annualized capital $695,600 CRF = 0.094, b ased on 20 yr equipment life; 7%

interest

Steam, MMBtu/hr 40 AF&PA, Att 5 (revised). 100 MMBtu/hr @ 60%

energy recovery = 40 MMBtu/hr

Energy recovery 60% AF&PA, Att 5 (revised)

Steam, $/MMBtu 3 AF&PA 2012, Att 5

Stripper hr/yr 8,640 operating for 360 days/yr (24 hr/day)

Steam, $/yr $1,036,800 100 MMBtu/hr * 8640 hr/yr * $3/MMBtu* (100-

60)/100

Electricity, KWhr/yr 128,857 2 pumps @ 10 hp each (p. 5-30 of EPA 1993).

= 20 hp *8640 hr/yr *0.7475KWhr/(hp-hr)

$/KWhr $0.10

Annual Maintenance (including

labor), $/yr $200,000 Includes two outages per year for hydroblasting

($50K each). Remainder of cost is materials and

labor.(AF&PA, Att 5 revised) For maintenance

labor we assume 5 days x 24 hours x 4 people x

$25/hr x 2 outages = $24,000 and 960 hours.

Operating Labor, hr/yr $13,500 Assume 0.5 hr operating labor per 8-hr shift, as

noted on p 5-21 and 5-12 of EPA 1993. 0.5 hr *

3 shifts/day * 360 days/yr = 540 hr/yr @ $25/hr.

Property Taxes, Insurance, and

Administration, $/yr $296,000 4% of capital cost per OAQPS Control Cost

Manual

Note: AF&PA, Att 5 (revised) can be found in EPA 2012c.

# 8 Table 7. Stripper Upgrade Incremental Cost and Energy Use Parameters

Cost variable Value Notes

Capital Cost:

-Stripper Upgrade (stand-alone)

-Stripper Upgrade (integrated

with evaporator) $2,900,000

$5,800,000 AF&PA, Att 5

Annualized capital:

-Stripper Upgrade (stand-alone)

-Stripper Upgrade (integrated

with evaporator) $272,600

$545,200 CRF = 0.094, based on 20 yr equipment life; 7%

interest

Steam, MMBtu/hr for stripper

upgrades:

-1% removal improvement

-2% removal improvement 5

10 AF&PA, Att 5 suggests 10 MMBtu/hr

incremental energy for 2% improvement in

treatment. Used 1⁄2 of this for a 1% improvement.

No incremental changes in energy recovery or

electricity usage are assumed for upgrades.

Steam, $/MMBtu 3

Stripper hr/yr 8,640 operating for 360 days/yr (24 hr/day)

Steam, $/yr

-1% removal improvement

-2% removal improvement $129,600

$259,200 MMBtu/hr * 8640 hr/yr * $3/MMBtu

Annual Maintenance, $/yr $100,000 Incud es one additional outage per year for

hydroblasting ($50K). Remainder of cost is

materials and incremental labor. (AF&PA, Att 5

revised) For labor we assume 5 days x 24 hours

x 4 people x $25/hr x 1 outage = $12,000 and 480

hours.



# E. Costs for Clean Condensate Alternative (CCA) Mills

This section discusses the effects of the kraft condensates regulatory options for mills

using the CCA and presents cost estimates for CCA mills.

Costs for Mills with CCA Compliance Approach Negated . Commenters stated that

EPA’s proposal to change the kraf t condensate standards could poten tially affect or even negate

the site-specific CCA compliance approach in us e by some mills. The commenters noted that in

EPA’s two-step compliance process for CCA, “Phase 1” required mills to demonstrate

compliance with the kraft condensate standards, pulping vent gas standards (except HVLC), the

bleaching system standards, and the Effluent Gu idelines. Then, after the Phase 1 baseline was

established, in “Phase 2” of compliance m ills could offset HVLC emission reductions by

demonstrating greater emission reductions via CCA . The commenters noted that, of the 38 mills

using CCA, all but 4 mills based their CCA compliance approaches on systems involving

condensates. Commenters suggested that a $15 m illion (capital) HVLC system would need to be

installed at mills where changes in the conde nsate standards would negate the mill’s CCA

approach.

The effects of the revised condensate standa rds were not considered for CCA mills at

proposal. We have included costs associated with potential effects on CCA mills in the

# 9 promulgation cost analysis. However, we do not assign costs for all CCA mills. Rather we assign

costs based on performance level. It was assu med that CCA mills with condensate treatment

unaffected by the regulatory options based on thei r performance level (con sidering the variability

cushion described above) also would not have any effects on their CCA compliance approach.

We considered the $15 million (capital) cost for HVLC systems to be reasonable because of the

high vent gas flow rates through HVLC systems, the fact that these systems are made of stainless

steel and require a complex array of monitored pressure devices, and because this value was

based on actual system design experience for pul p and paper mills. We added to the estimate

capital recovery cost of $1,410,000/yr (assuming 20 yr life at 7% interest) and O&M cost of

$480,000/yr (based on the O&M cost from Radian 1996).

As noted above, mills using biotreatment as their baseline treatment methodology with

performance levels of 95 or 96 percent removal (o r equivalent lb/ODTP) or less were assumed to

install a new steam stripper for compliance with the 93 or 94 percent regula tory options. If a new

stripper were to be installed, then this new stripper could also be used for ensuring CCA

compliance should the CCA compliance approach at the mill be affected by the more stringent

condensate standards. Therefore, CCA mills assigne d a new stripper system were not considered

as potentially having their CCA negated, and were not assigned the HVLC cost.

All other mills using a CCA approach involving condensates that were determined to be

affected by the regulatory options (considering th e variability cushion) were assigned an HVLC

cost of $15 million capital and an annual opera ting cost of $1,890,000/yr (capital recovery +

O&M).

Costs to Repeat the CCA Compliance Demonstration. Commenters noted that revisions

to the kraft condensate treatment options coul d cause mills to revis it their CCA compliance

demonstrations which were originally comp leted before April 2006. Although the commenters

provided no specific cost estimates for repea ting the CCA compliance demonstration, we

estimate the costs to be in the ballpark of $130,000 per mill. This estimate is based on the

assumptions in Table 8.

# 10 Table 8. Repeat CCA Demonstr ation Cost Assumptions

CCA Demonstration Activity Cost Notes

Baseline emissions measurement for

all equipment in CCA affected source

affected by changes in condensate

treatment (after compliance with the

revised condensa te standard). $74,000 Three Method 308 tests for pulping vent gases from

various HVLC sources ($14,000 each), plus 2 Method

305 tests ($16,000 each) to measure Phase 1 baseline

emissions reduction across the inlet/outlet of a stripper.

Calculation of emission reductions

that would have been achieved

through HVLC compliance. $13,911 Prior analysis may need to be updated with new baseline

measurements. Assume mill technical labor of 40 hours

(at $97.78/hr*) plus consulting fee for 100 hours of labor

@ $100/hr.

Measure emission reductions

achieved by CCA $32,000 Assume 2 Method 305 tests ($16,000 each) to measure

CCA emissions reduction across the inlet/outlet of a

stripper. No biotreatment system costs were assumed

because these systems are tested quarterly.

Submit CCA demonstration and

coordinate with permitting authority

on approval $9,867 Assume mill technical labor of 60 hours (at $97.78/hr*)

plus consulting fee for 40 hours of labor @ $100/hr.

Total $130,000 Rounded. $120,000 of this is capital cost (for testing

contractors and consultants) subject to capital recovery,

assumed to occur over 5 years at 7% interest (CRF =

0.244) for an annualized cost of $29,300 per year.

*Consistent with labor rate used in Paperwork Reduction Act Supporting Statement



# F. Impacts of Kraft Condensates Regulatory Options

This section discusses the e nvironmental and energy impact s of the kraft condensates

regulatory options. The environmental impacts include HAP and non-HAP emissions reductions,

secondary emissions, and wastewater impacts.

1. Emissions reductions . Appendix B1 contains the methodology used to develop millspecific HAP and non-HAP emissions reductions for the condensate regulatory options. The

predominant HAPs from kraft condensates ar e methanol and acetal dehyde, representing

approximately 99 percent and 1 percent of th e HAP mass, respectively.(NCASI 2010) The

hydrophilic properties of methanol relative to acetaldehyde (and any othe r trace the other HAP

compounds) indicate that a given percent removal of methanol constitutes at least an equivalent

percent removal of total HAP .(EPA 1997) The non-HAPs eval uated are volatile organic

compounds (VOC) and total redu ced sulfur (TRS) compounds.

Strippers were used as the basis for th e kraft condensates emissions reduction

calculations because emission factors are readily available for strippers (unlike for biological

treatment systems, where modeling of emission ra tes is required). Biological treatment systems

are expected to achieve an equivalent emissions reduction.

Uncontrolled HAP emissions were estimated using an emission factor of 11 lb HAP/air

dried ton of unbleached pulp (ADT UBP), an approximate total HAP value associated with

stripper off-gas (SOG) from Technical Bulletin 973 (Table 4.14) prepared by the National

Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCAS I). (NCASI 2010) The amount of HAP in foul

condensate stream was back-calculated as 11.96 lb HAP/ADTUBP using the current regulatory

# 11 limit of 92 percent stripper HAP removal (leaving 0.96 lb HAP/ADTUBP in the stripped

condensate stream). The reduction in HAP per mill was calculated assuming a 1,000 ADTUBP

model facility operating 360 days per year and 98 percent removal of HAP in the SOGs via

incineration. This total was applied for each of th e mills determined to be affected by the kraft

condensates regulatory options. The HAP reduction was calculated as 20.6 tpy per mill for the 93

percent removal option, and was 42.6 tpy for th e 94 percent removal option. See Appendix B1

for details.

Based on information in NCASI Technical Bulletin 973, uncontrolled VOC emissions

were estimated to be essentially equal to unc ontrolled HAP (11 lb/ADTUBP), and are expected

to strip at the same rate as HAP, since VOC is predominantly composed of HAP. Uncontrolled

TRS emissions were estimated using an emissi on factor of 3.29 lb TRS/ADTUBP, based on the

emission factor for SOG from NCASI Technical Bu lletin 973 (Table 4.14). For purposes of this

incremental analysis, we assumed the stripping rate for TRS to be similar to that for HAP or

VOC. While the combustion of TRS in SOG combusti on devices will likely generate some sulfur

dioxide (SO 2 

# ), the additional amount of SOGs burned under the incremental standards for kraft

condensates would be small compared to the other fuels burned in the combustion device (e.g.,

boiler, lime kiln), so any incremental SO 2 

# emissions generated would also be relatively small.

See Appendix B1 for details.

2. Energy impacts . Energy impacts of the regulatory opt ions include electricity use by

upgraded aerators in biotreatment systems or fo r new stripper systems, and increased steam use

by upgraded or new steam strippe rs. The electrical demand and steam usage for each of these

systems is presented above on a per-mill basis. We converted the electricity estimates (in kWh

per year [yr]) to million British thermal units per year (MMBtu/yr) in order to estimate

secondary emissions. Energy impacts ar e shown for each mill in Appendix C.

Some auxiliary fuel is requi red for combustion of additiona l SOG or for combustion of

HVLC gases (at mills where CCA could potentially be negated), but since these vent gases were

assumed to be burned in existing combustion eq uipment, no energy impacts were estimated in

this analysis.

3. Secondary air emissions . Appendices B2 and B3 contain the methodology used to

develop mill-specific estimates of secondary ai r emissions. Secondary air emissions include the

criteria pollutant emissions—particulate matter (PM), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides

(NO X 

# ), and SO 2 

# —that result from the generation of electri city to achieve the biological treatment

system upgrades or for operation of new steam st rippers, or from generation of steam needed for

new or upgraded strippers. The electricity was as sumed to be purchased from offsite utilities,

rather than generated onsite. The steam was assu med to be generated ons ite in a power boiler.

We also developed secondary emissions estim ates for greenhouse gases carbon dioxide (CO 2 

# ),

methane (CH 4 

# ), and nitrous oxide (N 2 

# O) expected to be emitted from utilities or power boilers.

Energy impacts and associated secondary ai r emissions for stripper steam generation

were not estimated prior to proposal, based on an assumption that upgraded steam strippers

would likely be more efficient. We include d secondary air emissions estimates in the

promulgation analysis for steam strippers as a result of comments on the energy impacts of the

# 12 proposed standards. The secondary air emissions estimates associated with steam generation are

significantly higher than the secondary air em issions estimates for electricity usage.

Secondary emissions from offsite electricity generation . We used a variety of information

sources for the emission factors used to estima te the secondary emissions from electricity

generation. For natural gas, we used emission factors (i n pound per cubic foot [lb/ft 3 

# ] of natural

gas) from the AP-42 chapter on natural gas com bustion to estimate the secondary emissions for

PM, CO, NO X 

# , and SO 2 

# . (EPA 1998a) We used the AP-42 conversion factor of 1,020 Btu/ft 3 

# of

natural gas to convert the emissi on factors to lb/MMBtu to facilitate estimating the secondary

emissions for these pollutants from natural ga s. We used natural ga s emission factors (in

kilograms [kg]/MMBtu) from the General Stationary Fuel Combustion Sources subpart (40 CFR

part 98, subpart C) of the Greenhouse Gas Reporti ng Rule to estimate the secondary emissions

for CO 2 

# , CH 4 

# , and N 2 

# O. Global warming potentials of 1 for CO 2 

# , 21 for CH 4 

# , and 310 for N 2 

# O

(from Table A-1 to subpart A of pa rt 98) were used to estimate CO 2 

# equivalent emissions

(CO 2 

# eq).

For solid fuel combustion, we used emission limits (in lb/MMBtu) from the new source

performance standards (NSPS) for utility plants (40 CFR part 60, subpart Da) to estimate the

secondary emissions for PM and SO 2 

# . We used emission factors (in lb/ton coal) from the AP-42

chapter on coal combustion to estimate the secondary emissions for NO X 

# and CO. (We

specifically used the AP-42 emission f actors for bituminuous/subbituminous coal

combustion/spreader stokers. The NO X 

# emission factor was based on an average of the AP-42

emission factors for spreader stoker type boilers burning bituminous (11 lb/ton) and

subbituminous (8.8 lb/ton) coal. We used the AP- 42 conversion factor of 13,000 Btu/lb of coal to

facilitate estimating the secondary emissions for NO X 

# and CO from coal. We used emission

factors (in kg/MMBtu) from 40 CFR part 98, subpar t C to estimate the secondary emissions for

CO 2 

# (for units burning bituminous coal) and for CH 4 

# and N 2 

# O (for units burning coal/coke). As

before, we used the aforementioned global warming potentials for CO 2 

# , CH 4 

# , and N 2 

# O to

estimate CO 2 

# eq.

To estimate the secondary emissions, we multiplied the emission factors for the

aforementioned pollutants by the estimated energy impacts, assuming a specific mix of fuels

would be used to generate th e needed electricity. We used the projected fuel mix for 2015

(compliance deadline for subpart S RTR) from Version 3.0 of EPA’s Integrated Planning Model

(IPM), which is a forecast model of the U.S. el ectric power sector. The projected fuel mix is 53

percent coal, 21 percent oil and na tural gas, 17 percent nuclear, 6 percent hydroelect ric, 2 percent

renewable energy, and 1 percent other. We attr ibuted no secondary ai r impacts to nuclear,

hydroelectric, or renewable energy generation. The secondary air impacts for “other” were

assumed to be equivalent to those for natura l gas. See Appendix B2 for calculation details

Secondary emissions from power boiler steam generation . For secondary air emissions

associated with onsite steam generation, we assu med steam would be generated in a power boiler

co-firing hog fuel (woody biomass) and coal. Em ission factors were ta ken from AP-42, and

emissions were calculated for strippers using st eam at a rate of 5 MMBtu/hr, 10 MMBtu/hr, or

40 MMBtu/hr (i.e., 100 MMBtu/hr w ith 60% energy recovery). Emissions were calculated

# 13 assuming half of the needed boiler steam output was associated with hog fuel and the remaining

half associated with coal. See A ppendix B3 for calculation details.

The secondary emissions estimates are base d on conservative assumptions, several of

which are discussed above. In practice, there ar e potentially several implementation approaches

mills could choose which would change the seco ndary emission impact. The following scenarios

could have a mitigating impact on secondary emissions.

 It was assumed all new steam would come fr om power boilers at the mill, not other

sources like recovery boilers where sp ent liquor combustion occurs anyway.

 It was assumed that a certain percentage of facilities would switch fr om biotreatment to

steam stripping for the full condensate stream . However, mills could use a stand-alone

biotreatment unit or continue use of the cu rrent biotreatment approach and add limited

steam stripping to increase their marginal efficiency.

 It was assumed that new steam would come from existing power boilers co-firing wood

and coal. Marginal additions for steam requi rements could come from package boilers

burning natural gas, which has lo wer secondary emission impacts.

 Secondary impact are estimated based on AP -42, which does not incorporate reductions

to PM, NOx, and SO 2 

# emissions anticipated from the Boiler MACT rule (Subpart

DDDDD) expected to be promulga ted in 2012 and implemented by 2015.

Notably, though any of these changes would im pact secondary emissions, they would not

significantly impact the cost estimat es presented in this memorandum.

4. Wastewater impacts . Wastewater impacts were estimated for the proposal analysis

assuming that mills using biotreatment units would expand the capacity (volume) of their

biotreatment system. However, commenters indi cated that it is more likely that mills would

increase aeration and nutrient addition in their biotreatment systems. Co mmenters also indicated

that mills constrained by limitations on aerati on, nutrient addition, or biotreatment unit size

would likely install new steam strippers to meet the condensate regulatory options. Since mills

were not predicted to expand th e capacity of their wastewater treatment systems, we estimate

that there would be no significant incrementa l increase in wastewater associated with

biotreatment units. Similarly, the incremental amount of treated condensate generated by steam

strippers was determined to result in insignifican t wastewater impact. EPA is not increasing the

condensate collection requirements so the total flow of foul condensates to steam strippers (or

biotreatment units) should not increase. Rather the flow of treated condensate from the steam

stripper would decrease slightly as a result of increased treatment in the stripper which drives

more HAP through the stripper overhead.

III. Cost Estimates for Repeat Air Emissions Testing

The EPA is considering repeat HAP emissions performance testing once every 5 years

for facilities complying with the standards for kraft, soda, and semichemical pulping vent gases;

sulfite processes; and bleaching systems. Under this testing option, repeat air emissions testing

would be required for mills complying with the kraft condensate standards using a steam stripper

since stripper off-gases are, by definition, part of the LVHC system. The EPA is not considering

# 14 additional repeat testing for bi ological treatment systems to comply with the kraft pulping

condensate standards, because more frequent quarterly sampling is already required for

biological treatment systems. The EPA is also not considering additiona l repeat testing for

facilities complying with the CCA standards due to the complexity of this compliance approach

(though we note that mills would likely repeat th e CCA compliance demonstr ation if one of the

kraft condensate regulatory opti ons is adopted for the final rule, as discussed above).

The repeat emissions tests for chemical pul p mills (e.g., kraft, soda, and semichemical

pulping vent gases, and sulfite processes) woul d involve testing for methanol using EPA Method

308, 320, or 18. Facilities that perform bleach ing using chlorinated compounds would be

required to conduct repeat chlorine tests us ing EPA Method 26A. The subpart S supporting

statement (which is revised every 3 years by EPA) indicated emissions testing costs of $14,000

for Method 308 testing, and $10,000 for Methods 26A testing. These same testing costs were

used in this analysis. For the purposes of th is analysis, we assumed the costs for Method 308

testing to be equivalent to the costs for Methods 320 and 18 testing.

Testing costs were treated as capital costs because mills will contract with a testing

company to perform the testing. The capital costs were annualized at 7 percent interest over the

5-year testing period, assuming that mills would obtain a 5-year loan to finance the testing.

Table 9 presents estimated emissions testing costs.

Table 9. Emissions Testing Costs by Mill Process

Mill type Subpart S

standard Test

method

(surrogate

pollutant) Systems to be

tested (typical

number per mill) No.

tests

per

mill 1 

# Cost

per test Capital

cost per

mill every

5 years Annualized

capital cost

per mill,

$/yr

Kraft, soda, and

semichemical

mills §63.443(a) Method 308

(methanol) LVHC (1), HVLC

(1), and SOG (1) 3 $14,000 $42,000 $10,243

Kraft mills

using

biotreatment §63.443(a) Method 308

(methanol) LVHC (1) and

HVLC (1) 2 $14,000 $28,000 $6,829

Sulfite mills §63.444 Method 308

(methanol) Sulfite emissions

release point (1) 1 $14,000 $14,000 $3,414

Mills bleaching

with chlorinated

compounds

(e.g., ClO 2 

# ) §63.445 Method 26A

(chlorine) Bleaching system

vents for chlorinated stages (2) 2 $10,000 $20,000 $4,878

1 

# Typical number of systems to be tested per mill is based on review of the Part I survey data.



# There are a number of variables that aff ect actual emissions testing cost per mill,

including the numbers of equipment/systems to be tested and the subpa rt S compliance option

used. In lieu of conducting a mill-by-mill and process-by-process analysis, we reviewed

information submitted through Part I of the pulp a nd paper survey to determine typical numbers

of equipment/systems that may require testi ng (notwithstanding use of subpart S compliance

options that do not involve tes ting). The systems to be tested include LVHC and HVLC gas

collection systems at kraft, soda, and semichemi cal mills subject to the emissions standards in

§63.443(a) of subpart S. Stripper off-gases, thoug h by definition part of the LVHC system, are

# 15 often handled separately from LVHC and re present a separate emission point requiring

compliance demonstration.

We estimated that the typical kraft, soda, or semichemical mill could be represented by

one LVHC, one HVLC, and one stripper system that require testing. Kraft mills using

biotreatment as their predominant kraft conde nsates control option would not have a SOG

emission point. Sulfite mills typically route a ll process emissions through one emission point

(e.g., a recovery system scrubbe r). Therefore, only one emissi ons point requiring testing was

projected for sulfite mills. Major source mills performing bleaching using any chlorinated

compounds are subject to the subpart S bleaching sta ndards. The Part I survey data indicated that

typically two bleaching emission point s per mill would require testing.

Except for the unusual circumstance where a mill operates more than one LVHC, HVLC,

and stripper system and uses compliance options th at involve emissions te sting, the testing costs

presented in this memorandum are likely to be overestimated due to the following:

 The costing analysis does not account for mills that use compliance options that do not

involve emissions testing (e.g., mills that intr oduce vent gas streams into the flame zone

of a boiler, lime kiln, or recovery furn ace or mills meeting the design criteria for a

thermal oxidizer). Analysis of the Part I surv ey data indicates that roughly 85 percent of

mills use compliance options that do not i nvolve emissions testing for pulping vents.

 Overall testing costs may be reduced at mills where testing for multiple systems is

conducted through the same testing program (e .g., because fees for testing contractor

travel and mobilizati on would be reduced).

IV. Summary of Nationwide Costs and Impacts

The nationwide costs and impacts associated with the subpart S regulatory options under

consideration are summarized in Tables 10 and 11 below. Mill-specific estimates of the costs and

impacts are presented in Appendix C. Only major sources of HAP emissions are potentially

affected (171 mills).

The number of mills impacted by the increm ental efficiency increase in the kraft

condensates standards ranges from 48 mills ( 93 percent removal) to 54 mills (94 percent

removal). Mills already meeting each incremental limit are not impacted by either option (43 of

97 total kraft mills evaluated). Nationwide costs associated with the kraft condensate regulatory

options include the costs for upgrading equipment to meet the revised percent removal options

(e.g., adjustment from 92 to 93 or 94 percent), costs for a repeat CCA de monstration, and costs

for mills where the CCA option may be negated (i.e., costs for s witching from CCA to HVLC

compliance).



# The potential nationwide HAP emissions reducti on (based on emission factor calculations

for each affected mill subject to the revised st andards) ranges from 989 to 2,300 tpy, with cost

effectiveness values of $ 53,175 

# /ton and $27,508/ 

# ton, respectively, for the 93 and 94 percent

removal options. When the costs associated w ith the repeat CCA demonstration and switching

from CCA to HVLC are added, the cost effectiven ess of the kraft condensates regulatory options

becomes $ 75,000 

# /ton and $37,000/ 

# ton, respectively, for the 93 and 94 percent removal options.

# 16 Estimated costs are significantly higher than th e proposal estimates because a greater number of

mills were determined to be affected considering variability in performance and because we have

accounted for potential effects on CCA mills.

The nationwide energy impacts and secondary air emissions for these mills are

substantial compared to the HAP emissions reduc tion (see Table 11), primarily due to the power

boiler emissions associated with the increas ed steam demand needed for new and upgraded

stripper systems. Energy and secondary air emi ssions impacts for strippers were not considered

prior to proposal, but have been considered here as a result of public comments. When converted

to CO 2 

# equivalents, GHG associated with the 93 and 94 percent removal options would be

1,018,048 and 1,402,084 tpy CO 2 

# eq, respectively.

An estimated 114 mills are expected to be im pacted by the repeat testing option, based on

the number of chemical pulp mills and mills that bleach with chlorinated compounds. The

nationwide capital and annual co sts of repeat testing are estimated to be $5.4 million and $1.3

million, respectively. We could not quantify the specific emissions reduction associated with

repeat emissions testing. However, it stands to reason that repeat testing would provide incentive

for facilities to maintain their control systems and make periodic adjustments to ensure peak

performance, thereby reducing emissions and the potential for periodic episodes of acute risk.

Table 12 presents a summary of the labor hour s associated with initially implementing,

and operating and maintaining the technologies and procedures that form the regulatory options.

Additional reporting and recordkeeping labor hours and costs were developed as part of the

Paperwork Reduction Act supporting statement for 114 affected mills. The incremental reporting

and recordkeeping costs resulting from the propos ed amendments to subpart S are estimated to

be $4,344 per mill ($0.50 million nationwide) as a one-time cost to revamp existing

recordkeeping systems to be cons istent with the proposed revisi ons to the startup and shutdown

provisions, and $6,516/yr per mill ($0.74 million/yr nationwide) for two instances of affirmative

defense. Details on these cost estimates, as well as an accounting for the labor hours involved,

can be found in the supporting statement. (EPA 2011b)17Table 10. Summary of Nationwide Costs and Cost EffectivenessSubpart S regulatory optionCostsEmissions reductions, tpyCosteffectiveness,$/ton HAPNo. of millsaffected2Capital,$millionAnnualized,$million/yrHAP/ VOC1TRSKraft condensates:92%→93% $227 $52.6 989(979 methanol,10 acetaldehyde)336 $53,175 4892%→94% $254 $63.3 2,300(2,277 methanol,23 acetaldehyde)702 $27,508 54Repeat CCA Demonstration $4.42 $0.996 -- -- -- 34Switching from CCA to HVLC $165 $20.8 Not estimated3Not estimated3-- 11Total costs for condensate options:93%94%$396$423$74.4$85.19892,300336702$75,000$37,000Repeat testing $5.4 $1.3 -- -- -- 114Incrementalreporting/recordkeeping$0.50 $0.74 -- -- -- 1141HAP emissions are approximately 99% methanol and 1% acetaldehyde. VOC emissions reductions wouldbe essentially equivalent to HAPemissions reductions (989 tpy).2The number of affected major source mills out of atotal of 171 major sources subject to subpart S.3Because the CCA compliance approach, by design, must achieve greater HAP emission reduction than the HVLC compliance approach wouldhave achieved, it can be expected that HAP emissions may increase as a result of switching to HVLC if the mill were to abandonthe CCAtechnology generating emissions credits.18Table 11. Summary of Estimated Nationwide Environmental and Energy ImpactsSubpart Sregulatory optionEnergy impacts, MMBtu/yrSecondary emissions, tpyNo. of millsaffectedElectricitySteamPM1CONOXSO2CO2CH4N2O92%→93% 99,419 660 430 2,082 1,443 659 1,004,258 65 40 4892%→94% 113,685 910 593 2,870 1,986 901 1,383,081 89 55 541. Filterable PM.Table 12. Labor Hour SummarySubpart S regulatory optionNationwide labor(initial hr)Nationwide labor, hr/yrLabor wage rate,$/hrLabor notesKraft condensates92%→93% unknown 48,340 $25/hr $25/hr was default inCapdetWorks used for proposalanalysis92%→94% 54,440Repeat CCA Demonstration 240 not applicable Mill technical$97.78/hr* andConsulting$100Assumes total mill technical laborof 100 hours plus consultant laborof 140 hours.Switching from CCA to HVLC unknown not applicable not applicable O&M costs included capitalrecovery and HVLC equipmentonly. (Radian 1996) Assume anyoperating labor associated withthe HVLC system is offset by thelabor no longer needed to ensurecompliance with CCA.Repeat testing unknown unknown unknown embedded in testing costIncremental reporting/recordkeeping 5,244 7,866 $97.78 technical,$118.92managerial,$48.76 clericalLabor rates are based onmethodology customarily used insupporting statements. 85% oftotal presented is technical labor,5% is management labor, and10% percent is clerical labor.**Consistent with labor rate used in Paperwork Reduction Act Supporting Statement

# 19 V. References

AF&PA 2012 American Forest and Paper Association. Public Comments on the National

Emissions standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Pulp and Paper

Industry (76 Federal Register 81328, December 27, 2011). February 27, 2012.

Docket Item No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544-0162.

EPA 1993 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Industry –

Background Information for Proposed Air Emission Standards; Manufacturing

Processes at Kraft, Sulfite, Soda, and Semi-Chemical Mills. Document No. EPA453/R-93-050a. Research Tria ngle Park, NC. October 1993.

EPA 1997 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Industry –

Background Information for Promulgated Air Emission Standards;

Manufacturing Processes at Kraft, Su lfite, Soda, Semi-Chemical Mechanical, and

secondary and Non-wood Fiber Mills. Final EIS. Docume nt No. EPA-453/R-93-

050b. Research Triangle Park, NC. October 1997.

EPA 1998a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Compilation of Air Pollution Emission

Factors . 5th Edition. Research Triangle Park, NC. Volume I: Stationary Point and

Area Sources. Section 1.4: Na tural Gas Combustion. July 1998.

EPA 1998b U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission

Factors, AP-42 . 5th Edition. Research Triangle Pa rk, NC. Volume I: Stationary

Point and Area Sources. Section 1.1: Bituminous and Subbituminous Coal

Combustion. September 1998.

EPA 2003 S. Environmental Protection Agency. Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission

Factors, AP-42 . 5th Edition. Research Triangle Pa rk, NC. Volume I: Stationary

Point and Area Sources. Section 1.6: Wood Residue Combustion In Boilers.

September 2003.

EPA 2011a J. Bradfield and K. Spence, EP A. Memorandum to Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-

0544. Summary of Kraft Condensat e Control Technology Review . October 23,

2011.

EPA 2011b U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Supporting Statement: NESHAP for Pulp

and Paper Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart S) (Proposed Amendments)

. November 2011.

EPA 2012a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Meeting notes for the March 16, 2012

meeting with AF&PA.

EPA 2012b U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Meeting notes for the March 28, 2012

meeting with AF&PA.

# 20 EPA 2012c U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Meeting notes for the May 2, 2012

meeting with AF&PA. May 4, 2012.

NCASI 2010 A. Someshwar, NCASI. Compilation of ‘Air Toxic’ and Total Hydrocarbon

Emissions Data for Pulp and Paper Mill Sources – A Second Update. Technical

Bulletin No. 973. February 2010.

Radian 1996 Memorandum from Roy Oomen, Radian/RTP to Penny Lassiter, EPA. Changes

Made to the Design and Unit Costing of E quipment Used to Transport, Treat, and

Control Emissions From Pulp and Paper Vents. February 26, 1996. A-92-40, IVB-13.

RTI 2011 Memorandum from T. Holloway, K. Hanks, and C. Gooden, RTI, to to J.

Bradfield and B. Schrock, EPA. Cost and Environmental and Energy Impacts for

Subpart S Risk and Technology Review. November 17, 2011.

# Appendix A

Appendix A1. Analysis of Operatio nal and Performance Variability

(Basis for Variability Cushion VC)

Appendix A2. Performance Levels and Identifica tion of Affected Mills for Cost Analysis

Appendix A3. Variability in Quarterly F bioMeOH 

# Measurements

# Appendix A1

Analysis of Operational/Performance Variability (Basis for Variability Cushion [VC])

RTI ID NEI ID Bleaching with chlorine or

chlorinated compounds Predominant kraft condensate

treatment method (revised) KC Tab, mass/ODTP (or

ppmw where specified),

decimal percent WW Tab, mass/ODTP,

decmial percent KC Tab, %

removal WW Tab, %

removal CCA Mill?

100 NEI40686 bleaching w/ Cl compound Recycle

102 NEI42341A bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping/Recycle

103 NEI9201 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 3 Yes

104 NEI11251 no bleaching Stripping 0.11 Yes

105 NEI45182 no bleaching Stripping 0.61 Yes

107 NEI47074 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 0.64

108 NEI33025 no bleaching Stripping 0.48 Yes

109 NEI32869A bleaching w/ Cl compound Thermal Incinerator 0.95

111 NEI45206 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 5

112 NEI34064 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 0.26 Yes

114 NEI26506 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 1.13 3.3

115 NEI26476 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 0.27

116 NEI8619 no bleaching Stripping/Recycle 0.34 Yes

117 NEI42689 no bleaching Biotreatment 1.08 1.40 5.3

119 NEI46814 no bleaching Recycle

120 NEI26495 no bleaching Stripping and biotreatment 0.31

121 NEI12492 no bleaching Biotreatment 0.28

‐ 0.05 Yes

124 NEI8278 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 0.75 Yes

126 NEI42317 no bleaching Biotreatment 6.1 Yes

127 NEI7933 no bleaching Stripping 0.82 Yes

130 NEI18338 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 0.99 2.2 Yes

131 NEI42254 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 2.7

132 NEI8261 no bleaching Biotreatment 0.67 6.3 6.0 Yes

133 NEI13363 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 6.2 4.5 Current Compliance Variability

1 of 5

# Appendix A1

RTI ID NEI ID Bleaching with chlorine or

chlorinated compounds Predominant kraft condensate

treatment method (revised) KC Tab, mass/ODTP (or

ppmw where specified),

decimal percent WW Tab, mass/ODTP,

decmial percent KC Tab, %

removal WW Tab, %

removal CCA Mill? Current Compliance Variability

135 NEI33118 bleaching w/ Cl compound Recycle

136 NEI12368 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping/Recycle 0.47

137 NEI26581 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 0.30 4.7 Yes

138 NEI18652 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 1.3 3.1 Yes

139 NEI42357 no bleaching Biotreatment 0.00 1.02 Yes

140 NEI13340 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 0.26 1 Yes

142 NEI41552 no bleaching Biotreatment 0.76 0.79 Yes

143 NEI26504 no bleaching Stripping 6.1

145 NEI33135,

NEI706 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 4.3

146 NEI759 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 0.43

147 NEI6450 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 0.38 2.9

‐ 4.5

148 NEI46931 no bleaching Stripping 0.24

149 NEI40488 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 0.09

150 NEI6273 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping/Recycle 0.22

151 NEI41252 no bleaching Stripping 0.00 Yes

152 NEI11338 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 0.18 0.86

154 NEI42963,

NEI46739,

NEIWI7720116 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping/Recycle 0.16

155 NEI33883 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 0.32

156 NEI42338 no bleaching Biotreatment 0.77 0.55

‐ 8.3 Yes

157 NEI33104 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 6.3 4.8

159 NEI8177 no bleaching Stripping 2.15 Yes

2 of 5

# Appendix A1

RTI ID NEI ID Bleaching with chlorine or

chlorinated compounds Predominant kraft condensate

treatment method (revised) KC Tab, mass/ODTP (or

ppmw where specified),

decimal percent WW Tab, mass/ODTP,

decmial percent KC Tab, %

removal WW Tab, %

removal CCA Mill? Current Compliance Variability

162 NEI46760 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 0.41

163 NEI8560 no bleaching Stripping 5

164 NEI42710 no bleaching Biotreatment 0.45 4.6 Yes

165 NEI41628 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 0.46 0.38

166 NEI41314 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping and biotreatment 0.52 1.17 6 6.6

167 NEI34070 no bleaching Biotreatment 0.18 0.52

169 NEI33013 bleaching w/o Cl compound Recycle

171 NEI18658 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 0.89 4.4 Yes

172 NEI18335 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 0.05 0.36 Yes

173 NEI35908 bleaching w/ Cl compound Recycle

174 NEI40247 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 3.5 Yes

175 NEI26514 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 0.62 0.63 7.0

176 NEI47104 no bleaching Stripping and biotreatment 1.26 1.66

177 NEI33887 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping/Recycle 0.80

178 NEI26309 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 0.8 Yes

179 NEI45474 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 0.64 0.69

180 NEI26471 no bleaching Stripping 1.95 Yes

181 NEI6057 no bleaching Biotreatment 0.72 0.81

182 NEI7181 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 0.47 0.39

183 NEI33103 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 4.7 3.4

184 NEI46817 bleaching w/ Cl compound Recycle

185 NEI46599 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 0.50

186 NEI18334 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 0.60 0.59 5 5.9 Yes

3 of 5

# Appendix A1

RTI ID NEI ID Bleaching with chlorine or

chlorinated compounds Predominant kraft condensate

treatment method (revised) KC Tab, mass/ODTP (or

ppmw where specified),

decimal percent WW Tab, mass/ODTP,

decmial percent KC Tab, %

removal WW Tab, %

removal CCA Mill? Current Compliance Variability

188 NEI40600 no bleaching Biotreatment 0.83 6.4 6.7 Yes

189 NEI54342 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping/Recycle

190 NEI26491 no bleaching Stripping 0.67 Yes

195 NEI46835 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 0.15 7

196 NEI18660 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 0.37 0.66 Yes

197 NEI18657 no bleaching Biotreatment 0.35 1.81

198 NEI41565 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 6.2

199 NEI18390 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 0.34

200 NEI47077 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 0.71

201 NEI7559 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 0.32 Yes

202 NEI12411 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 5

203 NEI42410 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 0.30 1.79 Yes

205 NEI8601 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 0.77

206 NEI40282 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 1.00

207 NEI7104 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 7.0

226 NEI33023 no bleaching Stripping 2.3 Yes

240 NEI26526 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment

‐ 0.30 0.46 1.0 Yes

242 NEI34066 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 0.52 Yes

243 NEI8196 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 0.06

340 NEI46852 no bleaching Recycle

525 NEI8265 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 3

4 of 5

# Appendix A1

RTI ID NEI ID Bleaching with chlorine or

chlorinated compounds Predominant kraft condensate

treatment method (revised) KC Tab, mass/ODTP (or

ppmw where specified),

decimal percent WW Tab, mass/ODTP,

decmial percent KC Tab, %

removal WW Tab, %

removal CCA Mill? Current Compliance Variability

531 NEI8186 no bleaching Stripping and biotreatment 0.35

600 NEI18357 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 4.5

606 NEI47091 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 0.68 0.81 Yes

610 NEI6261 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 0.47 0.54 Yes

613 NEI11172 no bleaching Stripping 1.5 Yes

615 NEI40554 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 0.36 7.2

617 NEI42695 bleaching w/ Cl compound Stripping 0.68

208228535 NEI18373 bleaching w/ Cl compound Biotreatment 0.21

‐ 0.63 7.0



# TOTAL 38

59 32 28 19 Count

51% 72% 4.36% 3.77%

Average

46% 66% 4.65% 4.75% median

215% 181% 7.20% 7.02% Maximum

5 of 5AppendixA2RTIID NEIID100 NEI40686102 NEI42341A103 NEI9201104 NEI11251105 NEI45182107 NEI47074108 NEI33025109 NEI32869A111 NEI45206112 NEI34064114 NEI26506115 NEI26476116 NEI8619117 NEI42689119 NEI46814120 NEI26495121 NEI12492124 NEI8278126 NEI42317PerformanceLevelsfromKraftCondensates(KC)andWastewater(WW)TablesofSurvey%removalBleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised) KCTabWWTab(2009unlessnoted) KCTabWWTab(2009unlessnoted) PerformanceLevelNotes CCAMill? CCAmethod(ref:CCAmemo)CCAincludecondensateovercollection(NCASILIST)?Biotreatmentunittypebleachingw/Clcompound Recycle98 Recycle(98%control)ASTbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping/Recycle 98 Recycle(98%control).Hasmultipletreatmentmethods.ASTbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 95(2002) YesASBdredging zASBnobleaching Stripping 7.3(2002)YesCleanshowerwater yASBnobleaching Stripping 10.6(2001)YesLockoutNCGscrubberunderflowfromcausticizerandcondensatefromdissolvingtankscrubberyASBbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 16.7(2001)ASBnobleaching Stripping 9.8(2001)YesCleanwater‐showerwaterflowmonitoring,periodicsamplingandtestingformethanolconcentration.yASBbleachingw/Clcompound ThermalIncinerator 15.3ppmasmethane(2006)98 Incineration(98%control).Limit=330ppmw.ASBbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 97(2002) InitialPerformanceTest(IPT)ASBbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 12.9(2002)YesCleancondensatetorecaustyASBbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 21.8 95.3(basedonFbioMeOH)ASBbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 13.0(2001),18.8(2009)ASTnobleaching Stripping/Recycle 8.83(forstripping)(2002)YesMillwater,cleancondensatesofKraftMulti‐EffectEvaporator(4thEffect),andstrippedcondensatesareusedinpulpwasherstoreducedmethanolcarryovertoPaperMachineNo.1.yASBnobleaching Biotreatment 13.7(2001) 15.8 97.3UNOXnobleaching Recycle98 Recycle(98%control)ASBnobleaching Strippingandbiotreatment 8.66(strippingfollowedbybiotreatment)(2009)6.3(biotreatment) FromKCTab:3.16(stripping)+5.50(biotreatment)=8.66ASB/ASTnobleaching Biotreatment 8.46(2010) 6.3YesReductionofmethanolstrippedtoairattheASBbyinstallingandoperatingadditionalaeratorszASBbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 17.8(2007)YesSteamstripperxASB(POTW)nobleaching Biotreatment98.1 YesTradeduseofdigestercondensateforwashwateronbrownstockwasherswithfreshwateranddigestercondensateiscollectedandhard‐pipedtoPOTWUNOXbasinandtreatedto92%controlefficiencyxUNOX(POTW)lb/ODTPremoval(orppmw,ifnoted)1of6Biotreatmentunittypeisshadedformillswherebiotreatmentisnotthepredominantcondensatetreatmentoption.AppendixA2RTIID NEIID127 NEI7933130 NEI18338131 NEI42254132 NEI8261133 NEI13363135 NEI33118136 NEI12368137 NEI26581138 NEI18652139 NEI42357140 NEI13340142 NEI41552143 NEI26504145 NEI33135,NEI706146 NEI759%removalBleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised) KCTabWWTab(2009unlessnoted) KCTabWWTab(2009unlessnoted) PerformanceLevelNotes CCAMill? CCAmethod(ref:CCAmemo)CCAincludecondensateovercollection(NCASILIST)?Biotreatmentunittypelb/ODTPremoval(orppmw,ifnoted)nobleaching Stripping 12.03(2011) 12.03=8.89+3.14fromKCTab YesNewsteamstripperxASBbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 9.18(pro‐ratedbleach/unbleach)(2002)20.3 94.2 Respondentdidnotprovideprorationindatabase;back‐calculatedtoarriveat0.72bleached(0.28unbleached).0.72*10.2+0.28*6.6=9.19YesMaintainaminimumof60%controlefficiencyintheASBxASBbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 94.7(2011)UNOX/ASTnobleaching Biotreatment 11.0 98.3(2010) 98.0 YesReplacingthewastewatertreatment(WWT)coolingtowerwithnon‐contactheatexchangers,therebyeliminatingHAPemissionsfromHVLCoUNOXbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 98.2(2011) 96.5UNOXbleachingw/Clcompound Recycle98 Recycle(98%control)ASTbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping/Recycle 22.75(2002),15.04(2004).(Avgis18.9)Stripping[S]+other[O]treatment.3.41[S]+19.34[O]=22.75(2002).6.35[S]+8.69[O]=15.04(2004).(Overallavgis18.9)Notapplicable:PrimaryclarifiertoPOTWbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 13.3 96.7 YesStand‐alonebiologicaltreatmentunitxASBbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 93.3(2011) 95.1 YesCollectionandhard‐pipingofadditionalpulpingprocesscondensatesfromtheevaporatorandpre‐evaporatorareasofthemillxASBnobleaching Biotreatment 6.6(2011) 13.3(2010)YesUpgradeASBzASBbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 12.8 93(2009) YesCapturedBrownstockwashersanddeckerexitgases.Installedlowflowhoodsonbrownstockwashers.Thedeckerisnotrequiredtobecollectedbutitisalargesourceofmethanol.GasessenttoamethanolscrubberandthensenttothewastewatertreatmentxASBnobleaching Biotreatment 11.6(2011) 11.8YesUsefreshwateronlyonlaststageofeachbrownstockwasher,maintainpapermachinewhitewaterMeOHconcentrationof15mg/Lorless(28‐dayaverage),andcollectpulpmillcondensatestotaling7.2ln/ODTPMeOHandtreatingtoremoveatleast6yASBnobleaching Stripping 98.1(IPT) IPT91.5%collectedagainst65%collectionstandardASBbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 96.3(2009) 2009PerformanceTestASTbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 14.61(2009) Stripperperformance=14.61.Biotreatmentperformance=10.07.Botharebasedontherespondent'savgofmonthlytestsperformedin2009.AST2of6Biotreatmentunittypeisshadedformillswherebiotreatmentisnotthepredominantcondensatetreatmentoption.AppendixA2RTIID NEIID147 NEI6450148 NEI46931149 NEI40488150 NEI6273151 NEI41252152 NEI11338154 NEI42963,NEI46739,NEIWI7720116155 NEI33883156 NEI42338157 NEI33104159 NEI8177162 NEI46760163 NEI8560164 NEI42710165 NEI41628166 NEI41314167 NEI34070169 NEI33013%removalBleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised) KCTabWWTab(2009unlessnoted) KCTabWWTab(2009unlessnoted) PerformanceLevelNotes CCAMill? CCAmethod(ref:CCAmemo)CCAincludecondensateovercollection(NCASILIST)?Biotreatmentunittypelb/ODTPremoval(orppmw,ifnoted)bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 14.1 94.9(2010) 87.5ASBnobleaching Stripping 8.16(2001)ASBbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 11.1(2002)Collected11.4ASBbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping/Recycle 12.4(2001)ASTnobleaching Stripping 13.1(2001),6.6(2006),7.0(2006),10.9(2006).Avg.is9.5.Collectionrangedfrom7.7to14.7(avgof10.8).YesSteamstripperxASTbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 12(2009) 19.0ASBbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping/Recycle 11.85(2002)ASTbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 13.5(2001) Collected13.8dig/turp;alsocollect/treat2.4fromevapbuttakenocreditASTnobleaching Biotreatment 11.7(2011) 10.2 83.7 13.2collected YesAdditionalcollectionof~1,500additionalpoundsperday(1.0lb/ODTP),totalof>8.2lb/ODTPofHAPSon30dayrollingaverageasmeasuredathardpipeoutlet;destroyadditional1.0lb/ODTP(>7.6lb/ODTP)atWWoutletxUNOXbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 98.3(2009) 96.8ASTnobleaching Stripping 20.8(2006)YesSteamstripperxASBbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 14.4(2002)ASBnobleaching Stripping 97(2002) Avg.of3testrunsASBnobleaching Biotreatment 9.6(2002) 96.6 collected10.3 YesIncreasecondensatetreatmentzASB/UNOXbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 14.9(2011) 14.1ASBbleachingw/Clcompound Strippingandbiotreatment 15.5(2007) 22.1(bio) 98(bio)(2007) 98.64(bio)ASBnobleaching Biotreatment 7.78(2002) 10.1ASBbleachingw/oClcompound Recycle98 Recycle(98%control)ASB3of6Biotreatmentunittypeisshadedformillswherebiotreatmentisnotthepredominantcondensatetreatmentoption.AppendixA2RTIID NEIID171 NEI18658172 NEI18335173 NEI35908174 NEI40247175 NEI26514176 NEI47104177 NEI33887178 NEI26309179 NEI45474180 NEI26471181 NEI6057182 NEI7181183 NEI33103184 NEI46817185 NEI46599186 NEI18334188 NEI40600189 NEI54342%removalBleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised) KCTabWWTab(2009unlessnoted) KCTabWWTab(2009unlessnoted) PerformanceLevelNotes CCAMill? CCAmethod(ref:CCAmemo)CCAincludecondensateovercollection(NCASILIST)?Biotreatmentunittypelb/ODTPremoval(orppmw,ifnoted)bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 19.3 96.4(2007) YesClosedcollectionsystem,hard‐pipingtoWWTanddischargedbelowliquidsurfaceforbiologicaltreatmentxASBbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 10.7(2010) 13.9YesStand‐alonebiologicaltreatmentunitxASBbleachingw/Clcompound Recycle98 Recycle(98%control)ASTbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 96.2(2009),95.5YesweakblackliquorfromlagoontooASBbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 16.5(2009) 16.7 99.0 InKCtab,16.2+0.3=16.5 ASBnobleaching Strippingandbiotreatment 14.93(2002) 17.6 FromKCTab:8.3(stripping)+6.63(biotreatment)=14.93ASBbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping/Recycle 18.4(2002)ASTbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 92.8(2006) YesInstall2primaryclarifierszASBbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 16.73(2011) 17.3ASBnobleaching Stripping 19.47(2001)YesMaintainpapermachinewhitewatertemperaturetoequaltoorlessthan185degreesFtoensurevolatilizationofmethanolisminimized.oASBnobleaching Biotreatment 11.33(2011) 11.9ASBbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 15(2011) 14.2ASTbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 96.7(2011) 95.4ASTbleachingw/Clcompound Recycle98 Recycle(98%control)ASBbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 16.02(2007),15.27(2010).(Avg.is15.65)ASBbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 16.34(2011) 16.2 97(2011) 97.9 YesStand‐alonebiologicaltreatmentunitxASBnobleaching Biotreatment 12.1 98.4(2011) 98.7 Notedas0.984inKCtab YesOffsetHVLCemissionsthroughover‐collectionandover‐treatmentoffoulcondensate.xASBbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping/Recycle 98 Recycle(98%control)ASB4of6Biotreatmentunittypeisshadedformillswherebiotreatmentisnotthepredominantcondensatetreatmentoption.AppendixA2RTIID NEIID190 NEI26491195 NEI46835196 NEI18660197 NEI18657198 NEI41565199 NEI18390200 NEI47077201 NEI7559202 NEI12411203 NEI42410205 NEI8601206 NEI40282207 NEI7104226 NEI33023240 NEI26526242 NEI34066243 NEI8196%removalBleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised) KCTabWWTab(2009unlessnoted) KCTabWWTab(2009unlessnoted) PerformanceLevelNotes CCAMill? CCAmethod(ref:CCAmemo)CCAincludecondensateovercollection(NCASILIST)?Biotreatmentunittypelb/ODTPremoval(orppmw,ifnoted)nobleaching Stripping 11(2008)YesInstallationoffoamtankfognozzlesandbarometriccondensertominimizemethanollossesoASBbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 11.7(2001) >99(2001) collect11.8ASBbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 19.2(2002),14.0(2011)16.9YesHard‐pipingadditionalmethanoltoASBtreatmentsystemxASBnobleaching Biotreatment 8.9(2010) 18.5ASBbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 98.2(2001)ASBbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 13.7(2002)ASBbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 17.4(2004)ASBbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 13.5(pro‐ratedbl./unbl.)(2006)Removeproratedmassof10.3pounds/tonODP(includes3.0pounds/tonODPforCCAoption)YesSteamstripperxASBbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 97(2004)UNOXbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 13.3(2008) 28.4YesStand‐alonebiologicaltreatmentunitxASBbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 18.1(2002) 18.3collected(anaerobictreatment)Anaerobic(biogasrecovery)bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 20.4(2007)ASTbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment99.0ASTnobleaching Stripping 94.25(2001),98.56(2003).(Avgis96.41)YesCollectionandtreatmentofflashevaporatorcondensateswithadditiontoturpentinedecanterunderflowbeforeroutingthestroppedcondensatestothepulpwashingsystemyASBbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 7.11(Q4of2009) 14.8 93.0 YesReroutedhard‐pipedSubpartSregulatedcondensatestosubsurfaceinjectionintheMill'sNo.1AerationStabilizationBasinandinstalledadditionalcurtains,aerators,andmixerstofurthersegmentthebasin'streatmentstagesandincreaseoverallmethanolzASBbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 15.5(2001),17.3(2003)YesStand‐alonebiologicaltreatmentunitxASTbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 10.8(2001)Collected11.6ASB5of6Biotreatmentunittypeisshadedformillswherebiotreatmentisnotthepredominantcondensatetreatmentoption.AppendixA2RTIID NEIID340 NEI46852525 NEI8265531 NEI8186600 NEI18357606 NEI47091610 NEI6261613 NEI11172615 NEI40554617 NEI42695208228535 NEI18373%removalBleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised) KCTabWWTab(2009unlessnoted) KCTabWWTab(2009unlessnoted) PerformanceLevelNotes CCAMill? CCAmethod(ref:CCAmemo)CCAincludecondensateovercollection(NCASILIST)?Biotreatmentunittypelb/ODTPremoval(orppmw,ifnoted)nobleaching Recycle98 Recycle(98%control)ASBbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 95(2010)ASBnobleaching Strippingandbiotreatment 8.89(stripping)(2010)FromKCTab:8.57forbiotreatmentbackup.(Millperformsstrippingwithbiotreatmentbackup.)ASBbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping96.5 DateunspecifiedinKCTabASTbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 18.1(4yr.avg.) 18.4 10testsconductedfrom2007to2011averaged18.1lb/ODTP(rangedfrom17.1to18.9lb/ODTP)YesStand‐alonebiologicaltreatmentunitxASBbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 15(2010) 15.7YesOvercollectionoffoulcondensatethroughthehard‐pipewhichbypassestheprimaryclarifier(reducesemissionsfromtheprimaryclarifier).xASTnobleaching Stripping 93.5(2001),93.9(2005).(Avgis93.7)YesSteamstripper xASBbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 13.9 99.2(2009)ASTbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping 17.1(2001)ASB/UNOXbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment 12.3(2010) 3.8 99.0 FbioMeOHof0.993notedinKC&WWTabsAST6of6Biotreatmentunittypeisshadedformillswherebiotreatmentisnotthepredominantcondensatetreatmentoption.AppendixA2Overcollectiongroupingcodesandcounts:x(Stripper,Biotreatment,&Add'lCollection)21y(Cleanshowerwater,cleancondensates,&substitution)7z(WWTupgrades)6o(Otheralternatives)4TotalCCAmills:38AppendixA2(part2)‐IdentificationofAffectedMillsforCostAnalysisRTIID NEIID100 NEI40686102 NEI42341A103 NEI9201104 NEI11251105 NEI45182107 NEI47074108 NEI33025109 NEI32869A111 NEI45206BleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised)RequireUpgradedControlwith93%or6.7/10.3demonstration,4%or50%cushionRequireUpgradedControlwith94%or6.8/10.4demonstration,4%or50%cushionStripperIntegratedwithMEE CCAMill? CCAmethod(ref:CCAmemo)CCAincludecondensateovercollection(NCASILIST)?bleachingw/Clcompound Recycle no no Yesbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping/Recycle no nobleachingw/Clcompound Stripping yes yes YesASBdredging znobleaching Stripping yes yes Yes YesCleanshowerwater ynobleaching Stripping no no Yes YesLockoutNCGscrubberunderflowfromcausticizerandcondensatefromdissolvingtankscrubberybleachingw/Clcompound Stripping no nonobleaching Stripping yes yes YesCleanwater‐showerwaterflowmonitoring,periodicsamplingandtestingformethanolconcentration.ybleachingw/Clcompound ThermalIncinerator no no Yes*bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping no yes112 NEI34064114 NEI26506115 NEI26476116 NEI8619117 NEI42689119 NEI46814120 NEI26495121 NEI12492bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping yes yes Yes YesCleancondensatetorecaustybleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment no no Yes*bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping yes yes Yesnobleaching Stripping/Recycle yes yes Yes YesMillwater,cleancondensatesofKraftMulti‐EffectEvaporator(4thEffect),andstrippedcondensatesareusedinpulpwasherstoreducedmethanolcarryovertoPaperMachineNo.1.ynobleaching Biotreatment no nonobleaching Recycle no nonobleaching Strippingandbiotreatment yes yesnobleaching Biotreatment yes(s) yes(s) YesReductionofmethanolstrippedtoairattheASBbyinstallingandoperatingadditionalaeratorszMillsmarked"yes"receivedbiotreatmentorstripperupgradecosts.Millsmarkedwith"yes(s)"receivedcostsforanewstrippersystem.1of7 Integratedstrippersmarked"Yes*"arenotthepredominantcondensatecontrolmeasure.AppendixA2(part2)‐IdentificationofAffectedMillsforCostAnalysisRTIID NEIID124 NEI8278126 NEI42317127 NEI7933130 NEI18338131 NEI42254132 NEI8261133 NEI13363135 NEI33118BleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised)RequireUpgradedControlwith93%or6.7/10.3demonstration,4%or50%cushionRequireUpgradedControlwith94%or6.8/10.4demonstration,4%or50%cushionStripperIntegratedwithMEE CCAMill? CCAmethod(ref:CCAmemo)CCAincludecondensateovercollection(NCASILIST)?bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping no no Yes YesSteamstripperxnobleaching Biotreatment no no YesTradeduseofdigestercondensateforwashwateronbrownstockwasherswithfreshwateranddigestercondensateiscollectedandhard‐pipedtoPOTWUNOXbasinandtreatedto92%controlefficiencyxnobleaching Stripping no no Yes YesNewsteamstripperxbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment yes(s) yes(s) YesMaintainaminimumof60%controlefficiencyintheASBxbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment yes(s) yes(s)nobleaching Biotreatment no no YesReplacingthewastewatertreatment(WWT)coolingtowerwithnon‐contactheatexchangers,therebyeliminatingHAPemissionsfromHVLCobleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment no yesbleachingw/Clcompound Recycle no no136 NEI12368137 NEI26581138 NEI18652139 NEI42357140 NEI13340bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping/Recycle yes yes Yesbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment yes(s) yes(s) YesStand‐alonebiologicaltreatmentunitxbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment yes(s) yes(s) YesCollectionandhard‐pipingofadditionalpulpingprocesscondensatesfromtheevaporatorandpre‐evaporatorareasofthemillxnobleaching Biotreatment yes(s) yes(s) YesUpgradeASBzbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment yes(s) yes(s) Yespdeckerexitgases.Installedlowflowhoodsonbrownstockwashers.Thedeckerisnotrequiredtobecollectedbutitisalargesourceofmethanol.GasessenttoamethanolscrubberandthensenttothewastewatertreatmentxMillsmarked"yes"receivedbiotreatmentorstripperupgradecosts.Millsmarkedwith"yes(s)"receivedcostsforanewstrippersystem.2of7 Integratedstrippersmarked"Yes*"arenotthepredominantcondensatecontrolmeasure.AppendixA2(part2)‐IdentificationofAffectedMillsforCostAnalysisRTIID NEIID142 NEI41552143 NEI26504145 NEI33135,NEI706146 NEI759147 NEI6450148 NEI46931149 NEI40488150 NEI6273151 NEI41252BleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised)RequireUpgradedControlwith93%or6.7/10.3demonstration,4%or50%cushionRequireUpgradedControlwith94%or6.8/10.4demonstration,4%or50%cushionStripperIntegratedwithMEE CCAMill? CCAmethod(ref:CCAmemo)CCAincludecondensateovercollection(NCASILIST)?nobleaching Biotreatment no no YesUsefreshwateronlyonlaststageofeachbrownstockwasher,maintainpapermachinewhitewaterMeOHconcentrationof15mg/Lorless(28‐dayaverage),andcollectpulpmillcondensatestotaling7.2ln/ODTPMeOHandtreatingtoremoveatleast6ynobleaching Stripping no nobleachingw/Clcompound Stripping yes yes Yesbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping yes yes Yesbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment yes(s) yes(s)nobleaching Stripping yes yesbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping yes yesbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping/Recycle yes yesnobleaching Stripping yes yes Yesx152 NEI11338154 NEI42963,NEI46739,NEIWI7720116155 NEI33883156 NEI42338157 NEI33104Steamstripperbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment yes yesbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping/Recycle yes yes Yesbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping yes yesnobleaching Biotreatment no no YesAdditionalcollectionof~1,500additionalpoundsperday(1.0lb/ODTP),totalof>8.2lb/ODTPofHAPSon30dayrollingaverageasmeasuredathardpipeoutlet;destroyadditional1.0lb/ODTP(>7.6lb/ODTP)atWWoutletxbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment no yesMillsmarked"yes"receivedbiotreatmentorstripperupgradecosts.Millsmarkedwith"yes(s)"receivedcostsforanewstrippersystem.3of7 Integratedstrippersmarked"Yes*"arenotthepredominantcondensatecontrolmeasure.AppendixA2(part2)‐IdentificationofAffectedMillsforCostAnalysisRTIID NEIID159 NEI8177162 NEI46760163 NEI8560164 NEI42710165 NEI41628166 NEI41314167 NEI34070169 NEI33013BleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised)RequireUpgradedControlwith93%or6.7/10.3demonstration,4%or50%cushionRequireUpgradedControlwith94%or6.8/10.4demonstration,4%or50%cushionStripperIntegratedwithMEE CCAMill? CCAmethod(ref:CCAmemo)CCAincludecondensateovercollection(NCASILIST)?nobleaching Stripping no no YesSteamstripperxbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping yes yes Yesnobleaching Stripping no yesnobleaching Biotreatment yes yes(s) YesIncreasecondensatetreatmentzbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment yes yesbleachingw/Clcompound Strippingandbiotreatment no nonobleaching Biotreatment yes yesbleachingw/oClcompound Recycle no no Yes*171 NEI18658172 NEI18335173 NEI35908174 NEI40247175 NEI26514176 NEI47104177 NEI33887178 NEI26309179 NEI45474bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment no no YesClosedcollectionsystem,hard‐pipingtoWWTanddischargedbelowliquidsurfaceforbiologicaltreatmentxbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment yes(s) yes(s) YesStand‐alonebiologicaltreatmentunitxbleachingw/Clcompound Recycle no nobleachingw/Clcompound Stripping yes yes Yes Yesweakblackliquorfromlagoontoobleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment no nonobleaching Strippingandbiotreatment no nobleachingw/Clcompound Stripping/Recycle no nobleachingw/Clcompound Stripping yes yes YesInstall2primaryclarifierszbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment no noMillsmarked"yes"receivedbiotreatmentorstripperupgradecosts.Millsmarkedwith"yes(s)"receivedcostsforanewstrippersystem.4of7 Integratedstrippersmarked"Yes*"arenotthepredominantcondensatecontrolmeasure.AppendixA2(part2)‐IdentificationofAffectedMillsforCostAnalysisRTIID NEIID180 NEI26471181 NEI6057182 NEI7181183 NEI33103184 NEI46817185 NEI46599186 NEI18334188 NEI40600BleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised)RequireUpgradedControlwith93%or6.7/10.3demonstration,4%or50%cushionRequireUpgradedControlwith94%or6.8/10.4demonstration,4%or50%cushionStripperIntegratedwithMEE CCAMill? CCAmethod(ref:CCAmemo)CCAincludecondensateovercollection(NCASILIST)?nobleaching Stripping no no YesMaintainpapermachinewhitewatertemperaturetoequaltoorlessthan185degreesFtoensurevolatilizationofmethanolisminimized.onobleaching Biotreatment no nobleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment yes yesbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment yes yes(s)bleachingw/Clcompound Recycle no nobleachingw/Clcompound Stripping yes yesbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment no no YesStand‐alonebiologicaltreatmentunitxnobleaching Biotreatment no no Yesx189 NEI54342190 NEI26491195 NEI46835196 NEI18660197 NEI18657198 NEI41565199 NEI18390200 NEI47077OffsetHVLCemissionsthroughover‐collectionandover‐treatmentoffoulcondensate.bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping/Recycle no no Yesnobleaching Stripping no no YesInstallationoffoamtankfognozzlesandbarometriccondensertominimizemethanollossesobleachingw/Clcompound Stripping no no Yesbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment yes(s) yes(s) Yes* YesHard‐pipingadditionalmethanoltoASBtreatmentsystemxnobleaching Biotreatment yes yesbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping no no Yesbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping yes yes Yesbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping no noMillsmarked"yes"receivedbiotreatmentorstripperupgradecosts.Millsmarkedwith"yes(s)"receivedcostsforanewstrippersystem.5of7 Integratedstrippersmarked"Yes*"arenotthepredominantcondensatecontrolmeasure.AppendixA2(part2)‐IdentificationofAffectedMillsforCostAnalysisRTIID NEIID201 NEI7559202 NEI12411203 NEI42410205 NEI8601206 NEI40282207 NEI7104226 NEI33023240 NEI26526BleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised)RequireUpgradedControlwith93%or6.7/10.3demonstration,4%or50%cushionRequireUpgradedControlwith94%or6.8/10.4demonstration,4%or50%cushionStripperIntegratedwithMEE CCAMill? CCAmethod(ref:CCAmemo)CCAincludecondensateovercollection(NCASILIST)?bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping yes yes Yes YesSteamstripperxbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment no yesbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment yes(s) yes(s) YesStand‐alonebiologicaltreatmentunitxbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment no nobleachingw/Clcompound Stripping no nobleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment no nonobleaching Stripping yes yes YesCollectionandtreatmentofflashevaporatorcondensateswithadditiontoturpentinedecanterunderflowbeforeroutingthestroppedcondensatestothepulpwashingsystemybleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment yes(s) yes(s) YesReroutedhard‐pipedSubpartSregulatedcondensatestosubsurfaceinjectionintheMill'sNo.1AerationStabilizationBasinandinstalledadditionalcurtains,z242 NEI34066243 NEI8196340 NEI46852525 NEI8265andinstalledadditionalcurtains,aerators,andmixerstofurthersegmentthebasin'streatmentstagesandincreaseoverallmethanolbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping no yes Yes YesStand‐alonebiologicaltreatmentunitxbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping yes yes Yesnobleaching Recycle no nobleachingw/Clcompound Stripping yes yes YesMillsmarked"yes"receivedbiotreatmentorstripperupgradecosts.Millsmarkedwith"yes(s)"receivedcostsforanewstrippersystem.6of7 Integratedstrippersmarked"Yes*"arenotthepredominantcondensatecontrolmeasure.AppendixA2(part2)‐IdentificationofAffectedMillsforCostAnalysisRTIID NEIID531 NEI8186600 NEI18357606 NEI47091610 NEI6261613 NEI11172615 NEI40554617 NEI42695208228535 NEI18373BleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised)RequireUpgradedControlwith93%or6.7/10.3demonstration,4%or50%cushionRequireUpgradedControlwith94%or6.8/10.4demonstration,4%or50%cushionStripperIntegratedwithMEE CCAMill? CCAmethod(ref:CCAmemo)CCAincludecondensateovercollection(NCASILIST)?nobleaching Strippingandbiotreatment yes yesbleachingw/Clcompound Stripping yes yes Yesbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment no no YesStand‐alonebiologicaltreatmentunitxbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment yes(s) yes(s) YesOvercollectionoffoulcondensatethroughthehard‐pipewhichbypassestheprimaryclarifier(reducesemissionsfromtheprimaryclarifier).xnobleaching Stripping yes yes Yes YesSteamstripper xbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment no nobleachingw/Clcompound Stripping no no Yesbleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment no noMillsmarked"yes"receivedbiotreatmentorstripperupgradecosts.Millsmarkedwith"yes(s)"receivedcostsforanewstrippersystem.7of7 Integratedstrippersmarked"Yes*"arenotthepredominantcondensatecontrolmeasure.AppendixA3.QuarterlyFbioMeOHValuesReportedintheICRDataRTIID NEIIDPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised) CCAMill?Biotreatmentunittype Valueof"r" Q1_Fbio_MeOH Q2_Fbio_MeOH Q3_Fbio_MeOH Q4_Fbio_MeOHF‐bio‐avg(MeOH)F‐bio‐min(MeOH) F‐bio‐max(MeOH)F‐bio‐delta(variability)114 NEI26506 Biotreatment ASB0.0009 0.94 0.97 0.96 0.94 0.953 0.940 0.970 0.030117 NEI42689 Biotreatment UNOX0.009 0.978 0.993 0.969 0.9940.9840.969 0.9940.025120 NEI26495 Strippingandbiotreatment ASB/AST0.011 0.996 0.996 0.996 0.996 0.996 0.996 0.996 0.000121 NEI12492 Biotreatment Yes ASB0.0332 0.932 0.939 0.9240.932 0.9240.939 0.015126 NEI42317 Biotreatment Yes UNOX(POTW)0.012 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.990 0.990 0.990 0.000130 NEI18338 Biotreatment Yes ASB0.011 0.9846341610.9775504620.9168829640.9329853420.953 0.917 0.985 0.068131 NEI42254 Biotreatment UNOX/AST0.0301 0.9956 0.997 0.997 0.997 0.997 0.996 0.997 0.001132 NEI8261 Biotreatment Yes UNOX0.01518674133 NEI13363 Biotreatment UNOX0.0289 0.991 0.995 0.995 0.996 0.9940.991 0.996 0.005137 NEI26581 Biotreatment Yes ASB0.0323 0.9940.992 0.995 0.99 0.993 0.990 0.995 0.005138 NEI18652 Biotreatment Yes ASB0.0132 0.975 0.976 0.963 0.9440.965 0.9440.976 0.032139 NEI42357 Biotreatment Yes ASB0.05 0.92 0.986 0.989 0.995 0.973 0.920 0.995 0.075140 NEI13340 Biotreatment Yes ASB0.0163511440.9540.9213333330.915 0.916 0.927 0.915 0.9540.039142 NEI41552 Biotreatment Yes ASB0.06 0.95 0.95 0.93 0.92 0.938 0.920 0.950 0.030147 NEI6450 Biotreatment ASB0.0089 0.9911 0.9911 0.9911 0.9911 0.991 0.991 0.991 0.000152 NEI11338 Biotreatment ASB0.015 0.86 0.89 0.95 0.57 0.818 0.570 0.950 NR156 NEI42338 Biotreatment Yes UNOX0 1 1 0.716 0.628 0.836 0.628 1.000 NR157 NEI33104 Biotreatment AST0.0155 0.969 1 0.98 0.999 0.987 0.969 1.000 0.031164 NEI42710 Biotreatment Yes ASB/UNOX165 NEI41628 Biotreatment ASB0.018 0.7040.69 0.74 0.75 0.721 0.690 0.750 NR166 NEI41314 Strippingandbiotreatment ASB0.0126 0.97 0.99 1 1 0.990 0.970 1.000 0.030167 NEI34070 Biotreatment ASB0 0.9766666670.8933333330.8966666670.9866666670.938 0.893 0.987 0.093171 NEI18658 Biotreatment Yes ASB0.0091 0.996 0.997 0.9906 0.9982 0.995 0.991 0.998 0.008172 NEI18335 Biotreatment Yes ASB0.00157 0.9640.91 0.936 0.951 0.940 0.910 0.9640.054175 NEI26514 Biotreatment ASB0.0082 0.99940.9991 0.9991 0.9976 0.999 0.998 0.999 0.002176 NEI47104 Strippingandbiotreatment ASB0.0086 0.727 0.975 0.981 0.96 0.911 0.727 0.981 0.254179 NEI45474 Biotreatment ASB0.996 0.963 0.975 0.9898 0.981 0.963 0.996 0.033181 NEI6057 Biotreatment ASB0.045 0.86440.9827 0.9422 0.9733 0.941 0.8640.983 0.118182 NEI7181 Biotreatment AST0.009 0.896 0.9 0.91 0.9 0.902 0.896 0.910 0.014183 NEI33103 Biotreatment AST0.993 0.989 0.985 0.989 0.985 0.993 0.008186 NEI18334 Biotreatment Yes ASB0.013 0.9740.975 0.987 0.979 0.979 0.9740.987 0.013188 NEI40600 Biotreatment Yes ASB0.01 0.9958 0.9965 0.9933 0.996 0.995 0.993 0.997 0.003196 NEI18660 Biotreatment Yes ASB0.006 0.86 0.97 0.91 0.89 0.908 0.860 0.970 0.110197 NEI18657 Biotreatment ASB0.02 0.846 0.975 0.786 0.817 0.856 0.786 0.975 NR202 NEI12411 Biotreatment UNOX203 NEI42410 Biotreatment Yes ASB0.0208 0.7855 0.73640.843 0.89840.816 0.736 0.898 NR205 NEI8601 Biotreatment Anaerobic207 NEI7104 Biotreatment AST0.01 0.99 0.998 0.99 0.99 0.992 0.990 0.998 0.008240 NEI26526 Biotreatment Yes ASB0.04 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.970 0.970 0.970 0.000531 NEI8186 Strippingandbiotreatment ASB606 NEI47091 Biotreatment Yes ASB0.02140.986 0.961 0.9740.98 0.975 0.961 0.986 0.025610 NEI6261 Biotreatment Yes AST0.0098 0.925 0.926 0.9140.926 0.923 0.9140.926 0.012615 NEI40554 Biotreatment AST0.01 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.990 0.990 0.990 0.000208228535 NEI18373 Biotreatment AST0.008 0.993 0.993 0.993 0.993TOTAL 20NR=Notrepresentativeofnormalcompliantsystemperformance(e.g.,consideredassystemswithF‐bio‐avg<0.90)Valueof"r":F‐bio‐delta(variability)0.017averageaverage(withoutNRvalues) 0.040.060maxmin 0max 0.25median 0.021of1

# Appendix B

Calculations of Mill-Specific Impacts for Kraft Condensate Regulatory Options

Appendix B1. Kraft Condensate Standards In cremental Emissions Reductions per Mill

Appendix B2. Secondary Emissions from Offsite Electricity Generation

Appendix B3. Secondary Emissions Associated with Steam Production for New and Upgraded

Strippers

# B1-1 Appendix B1. Kraft Condensate Standards Incremental Emissions Reductions Per Mill

Parameters HAP/

VOC TRS Notes and equations

Baseline

SOG 11 3.29 lb/ADTUBP (approx. from NCASI TB 973 Table 4.14)

% condensate control 0.92 0.92

Pollutant in foul

condensate 11.96 3.58 (lb/ADTUBP) - back-calculated based on 92% reduction

Pollutant in treated

(stripped) condensate 0.96 0.29 lb/ADTUBP - calculated based on 92% reduction

Reduction in

condensate 11.00 3.29 lb/ADTUBP = pollutant in foul – pollutant in treated

Tons reduced from

condensate stream 1,980 592.2 Tons reduced from condensate stream for a 1000 ADTP/d mill

operating 360 d/yr

Tons incinerated 1,940.4 580 Tons reduced from the condensate stream become SOG which are

incinerated at 98% control

No. of mills 97 97

Nationwide reduction 188,219 56,295 Nationwide reduction (92% control) = 97 mills x reduction in

incinerator

If change to 93% reduction

SOG 11 3.29 lb/ADTUBP (approx. from NCASI TB 973 Table 4.14)

% condensate control 0.93 0.93

Pollutant in foul

condensate 11.96 3.58 (lb/ADTUBP) - back-calculated based on 92% reduction [see

above]

Pollutant in treated

(stripped) condensate 0.84 0.25 lb/ADTUBP

Reduction in

condensate 11.12 3.33 lb/ADTUBP = pollutant in foul – pollutant in treated

Tons reduced from

condensate stream 2,002 599 Tons reduced from condensate stream for a 1000 ADTP/d mill

operating 360 d/yr

Tons incinerated 1,961 587 Tons reduced from the condensate stream become SOG which are

incinerated at 98% control

Incremental

reduction per mill 20.6 7 Tons incinerated at 93% - Tons incinerated at 92%

If change to 94% reduction

SOG 11 3.29 lb/ADTUBP (approx. from NCASI TB 973 Table 4.14)

% condensate control 0.94 0.94

Pollutant in foul

condensate 11.96 3.58 (lb/ADTUBP) - back-calculated based on 92% reduction [see

above]

Pollutant in treated

(stripped) condensate 0.72 0.21 lb/ADTUBP

Reduction in

condensate 11.24 3.36 lb/ADTUBP = pollutant in foul – pollutant in treated

Tons reduced from

condensate stream 2,023 605 Tons reduced from condensate stream for a 1000 ADTP/d mill

operating 360 d/yr

Tons incinerated 1,983 593 Tons reduced from the condensate stream become SOG which are

incinerated at 98% control

Incremental

reduction per mill 42.6 13 Tons incinerated at 94% - Tons incinerated at 92%

# B2-1 Appendix B2. Kraft Condensate Standard s Energy and Environmental Impacts

Parameters Value Notes, units, and equations

Energy impacts

Electricity requirements mill-speci fic kWh/yr = biological system u pgrade annual energy O&M cost

($/yr) / ($0.1/kWh)

Energy impacts mill-specific MMBtu/yr = (kWh/yr) x (3415.179 Btu/kWh) x (MMBtu/1E 6



# Btu)

Secondary emissions

Percent of generation

Coal 53% Used for solid fuel

Oil/natural gas 21% Used for natural gas

Nuclear 17% No secondary emissions estimated

Hydroelectric 6% No seco ndary emissions estimated

Renewable 2% No secondary emissions estimated

Other 1% Used for natural gas (assumed equivalent)

Particulate matter

Emission factor (natural gas) 1.9 lb/MM ft 3 

# natural gas

0.00186275 lb/MMBtu natural gas

Emission factor (solid fuel) 0.03 lb/MMBtu solid, liquid, gaseous fuel

Secondary emissions mi ll-specific lb/yr = ∑ (MMBtu/yr) x (lb/MMBtu) x (% of generation), for

solid fuel and natural gas

Carbon monoxide

Emission factor (natural gas) 84 lb/MM ft 3 

# natural gas

0.0824 lb/MMBtu natural gas

Emission factor (solid fuel) 0.19 lb/MMBtu bituminous coal

Secondary emissions mi ll-specific lb/yr = ∑ (MMBtu/yr) x (lb/MMBtu) x (% of generation), for

solid fuel and natural gas

Nitrogen oxides

Emission factor (natural gas) 100 lb/MM ft 3 

# natural gas

0.0980 lb/MMBtu natural gas

Emission factor (solid fuel) 0.38 lb/MMBtu solid fuel

Secondary emissions mi ll-specific lb/yr = ∑ (MMBtu/yr) x (lb/MMBtu) x (% of generation), for

solid fuel and natural gas

Sulfur dioxide

Emission factor (natural gas) 0.6 lb/MM ft 3 

# natural gas

0.00059 lb/MMBtu natural gas

Emission factor (solid fuel) 1.2 lb/MMBtu solid fuel

Secondary emissions mi ll-specific lb/yr = ∑ (MMBtu/yr) x (lb/MMBtu) x (% of generation), for

solid fuel and natural gas

Carbon dioxide

Emission factor (natural gas) 53.02 kg/MMBtu natural gas

Emission factor (solid fuel) 93.4 kg/MMBtu solid fuel

Secondary emissions mi ll-specific lb/yr = ∑ (MMBtu/yr) x (kg/MMBtu) x (2.204623 lb/kg) x (% of

generation), for solid fuel and natural gas

Methane

Emission factor (natural gas) 0.001 kg/MMBtu natural gas

Emission factor (solid fuel) 0.011 kg/MMBtu solid fuel

Secondary emissions mi ll-specific lb/yr = ∑ (MMBtu/yr) x (kg/MMBtu) x (2.204623 lb/kg) x (% of

generation), for solid fuel and natural gas

Nitrous oxide

Emission factor (natural gas) 0.0001 kg/MMBtu natural gas

Emission factor (solid fuel) 0.0016 kg/MMBtu solid fuel

Secondary emissions mi ll-specific lb/yr = ∑ (MMBtu/yr) x (kg/MMBtu) x (2.204623 lb/kg) x (% of

generation), for solid fuel and natural gas

# B2-2 Parameters Value Notes, units, and equations

Carbon dioxide equivalents

Global warming potential-CH 4 

# 21 Unitless

Global warming potential-N 2 

# O 310 Unitless

Secondary emissions mill-specific CO 2 

# eq, lb/yr = [CO 2 

# (lb/yr)] + [21 x CH 4 

# (lb/yr)] + [310 x N 2 

# O

(lb/yr)]

Notes :

1. Assume electricity generated using the mix listed in th e table (from IPM Version 3.0 for the year 2015). IPM is

EPA’s Integrated Planning Model, which is a fo recast model of the U.S. electric power sector.

2. For natural gas combustion, used AP-42 emission factors for PM, CO, NO X 

# , and SO 2 

# . (EPA 1998a) Assumed

1,020 Btu/ft 3 

# of natural gas in estimating PM, CO, NO X 

# , and SO 2 

# secondary emissions. Used 40 CFR part 98,

subpart C emission factors for CO 2 

# , CH 4 

# , and N 2 

# O.

3. For solid fuel combustion, used NSPS emission factors for PM and SO 2 

# (40 CFR part 60, subpart Da, coal-fired

utility plants), used AP-42 emission factors for NO

x 

# and CO (bituminuous/subbituminous coal combustion/spreader

stoker). (EPA 1998b) The NO

x 

# emission factor was based on average of NO

x 

# emission factors fo r spreader stoker

type boilers burning bituminous (11 lb/ton) and subbituminous (8.8 lb/ton) coal. Assumed 13,000 Btu/lb of coal in

estimating NO X 

# and CO secondary emissions. Used 40 CFR part 98, subpart C emission factors for CO 2 

# (bituminous

coal) and CH 4 

# and N 2 

# O (coal/coke).

# Appendix B3. Secondary Emissions Associated with Steam Production for New and Upgraded Stripper s

Wood

‐ fired Boiler Emission Factors (AP

‐ 42, Section 1.6 ) Bituminous And Subbituminous Coal Combustion (AP

‐ 42, Section 1.1 )

Pollutant lb/MMBtu (heat input) Notes lb/ton coal (as fired) Notes

PM 0.066 Scrubber

‐ controlled 3.3 Uncontrolled spreader

‐ stoker (66 lb/ton).

Assumed 95% control for scrubber.

NOx 0.22 11 spreader

‐ stoker, bituminous

SO2 0.025 7.6 Spreader

‐ stoker, bituminous (38 lb/ton); applied

80% scrubber control

CO 0.6 5 spreader

‐ stoker, bituminous

CH4 0.021 0.06 spreader

‐ stoker

N2O 0.013 0.04 spreader

‐ stoker

CO2 195 6040 medium

‐ volatile bituminous

Btu/lb fuel 4,500 wet, as fired 13,000 wet, as fired

Boiler efficiency 50% 75%

Emissions Parameter Stripper Upgrade (93%) Stripper Upgrade (94%) New Stripper (93 or 94% ) Notes

Stripper, MMBtu/hr 5 10 40 For the new stripper, steam demand is 100

MMBtu/hr @ 60% energy recovery = 40 MMBtu/hr

Stripper, hr/yr 8,640 8,640 8,640 hr/yr if operating for 360 days/yr

Stripper MMBtu/yr (Boiler

Steam Output) 43,200 86,400 345,600 Stripper MMBtu/hr * hr/yr

Fuel

‐ specific boiler steam

output 21,600 43,200 172,800 Assuming 1/2 of steam output from wood and 1/2

from coal.

Wood MMBtu/yr boiler

heat input 43,200 86,400 345,600 Steam output / boiler efficiency for wood

Coal MMBtu/yr boiler heat

input 28,800 57,600 230,400 Steam output / boiler efficiency for coal

Wood firing emissions (tpy per mill): (Wood MMBtu/yr boiler heat input) * (emission

factor lb/MMBtu input) / (2000 lb/ton)

PM 1.4 2.9 11

NOx 4.8 9.5 38

SO2 0.54 1.1 4

CO 13 26 104

CH4 0.45 0.91 3.6

N2O 0.28 0.56 2.2

CO2 4,212 8,424 33,696

Coal firing emissions (tpy per mill): (Coal MMBtu/yr boiler heat input) * (emission

factor lb/ton coal input) / (13,000 Btu/lb coal) *

(10 6 

# Btu/MMBtu) / (2000 lb/ton) 2



# PM 1.8 3.7 15

NOx 6.1 12 49

SO2 4.2 8 34

CO 2.8 5.5 22

CH4 0.033 0.066 0.27

N2O 0.022 0.04 4 0.18

CO2 3,345 6,690 26,762

Total Boiler Secondary Emissions Associated with Stripper Steam Use (tpy per mill) Wood + coal firing emissions

PM 3.25 6.51 26

NOx 11 22 87

SO2 4.7 9.5 38

CO 16 31 126

CH4 0.49 0.97 3.9

N2O 0.30 0.61 2.4

CO2 7,557 15,11 4 60,458

Cost_Memo_Tables.xlsx, steam_sec

# Appendix C

Mill-Specific Cost and Impacts Estimates fo r Regulatory Options Under ConsiderationAppendixCRTIID NEIID Millname City State Smallbusiness Pulpingprocess PaperproductionBleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised)100 NEI40686 DomtarPaperCompanyLLC Johnsonburg PA No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Recycle102 NEI42341A WeyerhaeuserNRCompany Longview WA No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping/Recycle103 NEI9201 DomtarPaperCompany Plymouth NC No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping104 NEI11251 InternationalPaper Valliant OK No kraft,semi‐chemical Yes nobleaching Stripping105 NEI45182 InternationalPaperCompany Springfield OR No kraft,secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching Stripping107 NEI47074 DomtarPaperCompanyLLC Bennettsville SC No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping108 NEI33025 InternationalPaper Campti LA No kraft Yes nobleaching Stripping109 NEI32869A DomtarPaperCompany,LLC. Hawesville KY No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound ThermalIncinerator111 NEI45206 WeyerhaeuserNRCompany Vanceboro NC No kraft No bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping112NEI34064WeyerhaeuserNRCompanyColumbusMSNokraftNobleachingcompoundStrippingNEI34064WeyerhaeuserCompanyColumbusbleachingw/ClcompoundStripping114 NEI26506 WeyerhaeuserNRCompany Oglethorpe GA No kraft No bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment115 NEI26476 WeyerhaeuserNRCompany PortWentworth GA No kraft No bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping116 NEI8619 InternationalPaperCompany PineHill AL No kraft,semi‐chemical,secondaryfiberYes nobleaching Stripping/Recycle117 NEI42689 WausauPaperMills,LLC. Mosinee WI No kraft Yes nobleaching Biotreatment119 NEI46814 TINInc.dbaTempleInland BOGALUSA LA No kraft,secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching Recycle120 NEI26495 TINInc.dbaTemple‐Inland Rome GA No kraft Yes nobleaching Strippingandbiotreatment121 NEI12492 TINInc.dbaTemple‐Inland Orange TX No kraft,secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching Biotreatment124 NEI8278 SmurfitStoneContainerCorp PanamaCity FL No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping1of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID NEIID Millname City State Smallbusiness Pulpingprocess PaperproductionBleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised)126 NEI42317 SmurfitStoneContainerCorporation Hopewell VA No kraft Yes nobleaching Biotreatment127 NEI7933 Smurfit‐StoneContainerCorporation Florence SC No kraft,secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching Stripping130 NEI18338 Georgia‐PacificBrewtonLLC Brewton AL No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment131 NEI42254 Smurfit‐StoneContainerCorporation WestPoint VA No kraft,secondaryfiber Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment132 NEI8261 Smurfit‐StoneContainerCorporation FernandinaBeach FL No kraft,secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching Biotreatment133 NEI13363 SimpsonTacomaKraftCompany,LLC Tacoma WA No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment135 NEI33118 S.D.WarrenCompany‐SomersetOperationsSkowhegan ME No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Recycle136 NEI12368 SappiCloquetLLC Cloquet MN No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping/Recycle137 NEI26581 ClearwaterPaperCorp‐PPD&CPD,Idaho1Lewiston ID No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment138 NEI18652 ClearwaterPaperCorporation ArkansasCity AR No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment139 NEI42357 PORTTOWNSENDPAPERCORP PortTownsend WA Yes kraft,secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching Biotreatment140 NEI13340 CascadePacificPulp,LLC Halsey OR No kraft No bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment142 NEI41552 PackagingCorporationofAmerica Counce TN No kraft,secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching Biotreatment2of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID NEIID Millname City State Smallbusiness Pulpingprocess PaperproductionBleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised)143 NEI26504 PackagingCorporationofAmerica Clyattville GA No kraft Yes nobleaching Stripping145 NEI33135,NEI706LukePaperCompany Luke MD No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping146 NEI759 MeadWestvacoofVirginia,Inc Covington VA No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping147 NEI6450 WESTVACOTEXASLP EVADALE TX No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment148 NEI46931 MeadWestvacoCorporation Cottonton AL No kraft,secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching Stripping149 NEI40488 P.H.GlatfelterCompany‐ChillicotheFacility2Chillicothe OH No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping150 NEI6273 RumfordPaperCompany RUMFORD ME No kraft,stonegroundwoodYes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping/Recycle151 NEI41252 KapStone NorthCharleston SC No kraft Yes nobleaching Stripping152 NEI11338 WickliffePaperCompany Wickliffe KY No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment154 NEI42963,NEI46739,NEIWI7720116NewPage,WisconsinSystemsInc. WisconsinRapids WI No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping/Recycle155 NEI33883 EscanabaPaperCompany Escanaba MI No kraft,RMP Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping156 NEI42338 LongviewFibrePaper&Packaging,Inc.Longview WA No kraft,semi‐chemical Yes nobleaching Biotreatment157 NEI33104 LincolnPaperandTissue,LLC Lincoln ME Yes kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment159 NEI8177 InterstatePaper,LLC Riceboro GA No kraft Yes nobleaching Stripping162 NEI46760 InternationalPaper Eastover SC No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping163 NEI8560 InternationalPaperCompanyPrattville AL No kraft,secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching Stripping164 NEI42710 Thilmany,LLC Kaukauna WI No kraft Yes nobleaching Biotreatment3of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID NEIID Millname City State Smallbusiness Pulpingprocess PaperproductionBleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised)165 NEI41628 InternationalPaperCompany QueenCity TX No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment166 NEI41314 InternationalPaper Georgetown SC No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Strippingandbiotreatment167 NEI34070 InternationalPaperCo.‐VicksburgMillRedwood MS No kraft,secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching Biotreatment169 NEI33013 InternationalPaper Mansfield LA No kraft,semi‐chemical Yes bleachingw/oClcompound Recycle171 NEI18658 EvergreenPackagingInc PineBluff AR No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment172 NEI18335 InternationalPaperCompany Selma AL No kraft,secondaryfiber Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment173 NEI35908 InternationalPaperCompany Ticonderoga NY No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Recycle174 NEI40247 InternationalPaper,Inc Riegelwood NC No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping175 NEI26514 InternationalPaperCompany AUGUSTA GA No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment176 NEI47104 KapStoneKraftPaperCorporation RoanokeRapids NC No kraft Yes nobleaching Strippingandbiotreatment177 NEI33887 VersoQuinnesecLLC Quinnesec MI No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping/Recycle178 NEI26309 InternationalPaper Cantonment FL No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping179 NEI45474 Rock‐TennMillCompany,LLC DemopolisAL No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment180 NEI26471 GraphicPackagingInternational,Inc. Macon GA No kraft,secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching Stripping181 NEI6057 GraphicPackagingInternationalInc. WestMonroe LA No kraft,semi‐chemical,secondaryfiberYes nobleaching Biotreatment182 NEI7181 PHGlatfelter SpringGrove PA No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment183 NEI33103 RedShieldAcquisition,LLC OldTown ME Yes kraft No bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment184 NEI46817 Georgia‐PacificConsumerOperationsLLCPortHudsonOperationsZachary LA No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Recycle4of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID NEIID Millname City State Smallbusiness Pulpingprocess PaperproductionBleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised)185 NEI46599 GeorgiaPacificConsumerProducts(Camas),LLCCAMAS WA No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping186 NEI18334 Georgia‐PacificConsumerProductsLP(NaheolaMill)Pennington AL No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment188 NEI40600 Georgia‐PacificToledoLLC Toledo OR No kraft,semi‐chemical,secondaryfiberYes nobleaching Biotreatment189 NEI54342 Georgia‐PacificLLCCrossettPaperOperationsCrossett AR No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping/Recycle190 NEI26491 Georgia‐PacificCedarSprings,LLC CedarSprings GA No kraft,semi‐chemical,secondaryfiberYes nobleaching Stripping195 NEI46835WoodlandPulpLLC5Baileyville ME No kraft No bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping196 NEI18660 DomtarA.W.LLC Ashdown AR No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment197 NEI18657 DeltaNaturalKraft PineBluff AR No kraft Yes nobleaching Biotreatment198 NEI41565 AbiBowUSInc Calhoun TN No kraft,TMP,secondaryfiberYes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping199 NEI18390 AbiBowUSInc.‐CoosaPinesOperationsCoosaPines AL No kraft No bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping200 NEI47077 AbiBowUSInc. Catawba SC No kraft,TMP Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping201 NEI7559 BoisePackagingandNewsprint,LLC DeRidder LA No kraft,TMP,secondaryfiberYes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping202 NEI12411 BoiseWhitePaper,LLC InternationalFalls MN No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment203 NEI42410 BoiseWhitePaperLLC Wallula WA No kraft,sulfite‐Na Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment205 NEI8601 BOISEWHITEPAPERLLC Jackson AL No kraft,secondaryfiber Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment206 NEI40282 BlueRidgeHoldingCompany Canton NC No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping207 NEI7104 AppletonPapers,Inc. RoaringSpring PA No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment5of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID NEIID Millname City State Smallbusiness Pulpingprocess PaperproductionBleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised)226 NEI33023 Smurfit‐StoneContainerCorporation Hodge LA No kraft,semi‐chemical,secondaryfiberYes nobleaching Stripping240 NEI26526 RayonierPerformanceFibers,LLC JESUP GA No kraft No bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment242 NEI34066 LeafRiverCellulose,LLC NewAugusta MS No kraft No bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping243 NEI8196 GPCellulose,LLC.Brunswick GA No kraft No bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping340 NEI46852 GreenBayPackagingInc. Morrilton AR No kraft,secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching Recycle525 NEI8265 GeorgiaPacificConsumerOperations1Palatka FL No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound StrippingLLC1531 NEI8186 InternationalPaperCompany Savannah GA No kraft,secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching Strippingandbiotreatment600 NEI18357 InternationalPaperCompany Courtland AL No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping606 NEI47091 BuckeyeFlorida,LimitedPartnership Perry FL No kraft No bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment610 NEI6261 VersoAndroscogginLLC Jay ME No kraft,stonegroundwoodYes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment613 NEI11172 GeorgiaPacificMonticelloLLC Monticello MS No kraft,secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching Stripping6of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID NEIID Millname City State Smallbusiness Pulpingprocess PaperproductionBleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised)615 NEI40554 Georgia‐PacificConsumerProducts,LPClatskanie OR No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment617 NEI42695 DomtarA.W.LLC Nekoosa WI No kraft Yes bleachingw/Clcompound Stripping208228535 NEI18373 AlabamaRiverCellulose,LLC PerdueHill AL No kraft No bleachingw/Clcompound Biotreatment106 NEI41599 DomtarPaperCompany,LLC Kingsport TN No soda Yes bleachingw/Clcompound118 NEI34030 UPMBlandinPaperCompany GrandRapids MN No stonegroundwood Yes bleachingw/oClcompound122 NEI46866 TINInc.dbaTemple‐Inland Waverly TN No semi‐chemical Yes nobleaching128 NEI11461 Smurfit‐StoneContainerCorporation Coshocton OH No semi‐chemical,secondaryfiberYes nobleaching141 NEI46750 PACKAGINGCORPORATIONOFAMERICA‐TomahawkTomahawkWI No semi‐chemical Yes nobleaching158 NEI42385 Kimberly‐ClarkWorldwide Everett WA No sulfite‐NH3 Yes bleachingw/Clcompound187 NEI42211 GPBigIsland,LLC BigIsland VA No semi‐chemical,secondaryfiberYes nobleaching192 NEI42730 FlambeauRiverPapersLLC ParkFalls WI No sulfite‐Ca Yes bleachingw/oClcompound193 NEI39968 FinchPaperLLC GlensFalls NY No sulfite‐NH3 Yes bleachingw/Clcompound204 NEI40553 BoiseWhitePaperLLC StHelens ORNo none Yes nobleaching210 NEI13216 CatalystPaper(Snowflake)Inc. Snowflake AZ No secondaryfiber Yes bleachingw/oClcompound213 NEI34020 WausauPaperCorp. Brainerd MN No none Yes nobleaching215 NEI42690 WausauPaperMills,LLC. Brokaw WI No none Yes nobleaching216 NEI43202 WausauPaperMills,LLC Rhinelander WI No none Yes nobleaching223 NEI42961 NewPageWisconsinSystem,Inc WisconsinRapids WI No TMP,stonegroundwoodYes bleachingw/oClcompound224 NEIWI7500086,NEIWIT$8597NewPageWisconsinSystem,Inc. StevensPoint WI No none Yes nobleaching229 NEI12407 VersoSartellLLC Sartell MN No TMP Yes bleachingw/oClcompound230 NEI6284 VersoBucksport,LLC Bucksport ME No TMP,stonegroundwoodYes bleachingw/oClcompound231 NEI11108 AbiBowUSInc. Grenada MS No TMP Yes bleachingw/oClcompound232 NEI8122 AugustaNewsprintCompanyLLC Augusta GA No TMP,secondaryfiber Yes bleachingw/oClcompound241 NEI26382 RayonierFernandinaMill FernandinaBeachFL No sulfite‐NH3 No bleachingw/Clcompound244 NEI43472 SonocoProductsCompany Hartsville SC No semi‐chemical Yes nobleaching245 NEI18347 Smurfit‐StoneContainerCorporation Stevenson AL No semi‐chemical,secondaryfiberNo nobleaching247 NEI33945 PackagingCorporationofAmerica FilerCity MI No semi‐chemical,secondaryfiberYes nobleaching254 NEIWI0793640 WisconsinPaperboardCorporation Milwaukee WI No secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching275 NEICT3102 CascadesBoxboardGroupConnecticutLLC,VersaillesMillsVersaillesCT No secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching288 NEI11602 GraphicPackagingInternationalInc. Middletown OH No none Yes nobleaching289 NEI26304 Smurfit‐StoneContainerCorporation Jacksonville FL No secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching290 NEI40720 PaperWorksIndustires,Inc Philadelphia PA No secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching301 NEI11610 Rock‐TennConvertingCompany Cincinnati OH No secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching304 NEIVA00022 GreifPackagingLLC Riverville VA No semi‐chemical,secondaryfiberYes nobleaching311 NEW73505RepublicPaperboardCompany,LLC2Lawton OK No secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching315 NEI2INT16350 TINInc.dbaTemple‐Inland Cayuga IN No secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching322 NEIPA1013489 Newman&Company,Inc. Philadelphia PA Yes secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching7of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID NEIID Millname City State Smallbusiness Pulpingprocess PaperproductionBleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised)339 NEI23 OxPaperboardLLC Halltown WV No secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching341 NEI42486 GREENBAYPACKAGINGINC.MILL&SHIPPINGCONTAINERDIVGREENBAY WI No secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching363 NEIME0250002 MadisonPaperIndustries Madison MENo stonegroundwood Yes bleachingw/oClcompound365 NEI54400 DomtarPaperCompany,LLC Rothschild WI No sulfite‐Ca Yes bleachingw/oClcompound369 NEIGAT$3911 SPNewsprint Dublin GA No secondaryfiber Yes bleachingw/oClcompound370 NEI2WAT18798 PonderayNewsprintCo. Usk WA No TMP Yes bleachingw/oClcompound371 NEI42341B NorthPacificPaperCorporation Longview WA No TMP,secondaryfiber Yes bleachingw/oClcompound373 NEI11600 SmartPapersHoldings,LLC Hamilton OH No none Yes nobleaching375 NEI42800 ShawanoSpecialtyPapers‐ADivisionofLittleRapidsCorporationShawano WI Yes none Yes nobleaching382 NEIWI4710355 SCATissueNorthAmericaLLC‐MenashaPapermillMenasha WI No secondaryfiber Yes bleachingw/oClcompound387 NEI33072 S.D.WarrenCo.Westbrookmill Westbrook ME No none Yes nobleaching389 NEI40738 TheProcter&GamblePaperProductsCompanyMehoopany PANo none Yes nobleaching391 NEI26487 TheProcter&GamblePaperProductsCompanyAlbany GA No none Yes nobleaching403 NEI33866 NeenahPaper,Inc. Munising MI No none Yes nobleaching409 NEI208 WhiteBirchPaperCompanyBearIslandLLCDivisionAshland VA No TMP,secondaryfiber Yes bleachingw/oClcompound410 NEI40648 SPNewsprintCo. Newberg OR No TMP,secondaryfiber Yes bleachingw/oClcompound414 NEI42329 NipponPaperIndustriesUSACo.,Ltd. PortAngeles WA No RMP,secondaryfiber Yes bleachingw/oClcompound423 NEI33950 MenomineeAcquisitionCorporationdbaClearwaterPaperMenominee MI No none Yes nobleaching425 NEIMA10626 OnyxSpecialtyPapers,Inc. SouthLee MA Yes none Yes nobleaching428 NEI12980 Georgia‐PacificConsumerProductsLP Muskogee OK No secondaryfiber Yes bleachingw/oClcompound429 NEI33986 ManistiquePapers,Inc. Manistique MI No secondaryfiber Yes bleachingw/oClcompound430 NEI8178 Georgia‐PacificConsumerProductsLP Rincon GA No secondaryfiber Yes bleachingw/Clcompound433 NEI36019 KnowltonTechnologies,LLC Watertown NY Yes none Yes nobleaching435 NEI2TN0099,NEITN1050093Kimberly‐ClarkCorporation Loudon TN No secondaryfiber Yes bleachingw/Clcompound436 NEI42482 Georgia‐PacificConsumerProductsLP GreenBay WI No secondaryfiber Yes bleachingw/oClcompound451 NEI11645 AppletonPapersInc. WestCarrollton OH No secondaryfiber Yes bleachingw/Clcompound468 NEI33981 EBEddyPaperInc. PortHuron MI No none Yes nobleaching496 NEINY5533400 HollingsworthandVoseCompany Greenwich NY No none Yes nobleaching500 NEI42495 ThilmanyLLC DePere WI No none Yes nobleaching501 NEI7106 TeamTen,LLC Tyrone PA Yes secondaryfiber Yes nobleaching511 NEIIL0215971 AhlstromFiltration,LLC Taylorville ILNo none Yes nobleaching512 NEI11367 AhlstromFiltrationLLC Madisonville KY No none Yes nobleaching514 NEI6175 Hollingsworth&VoseCompany WestGroton MANo none Yes nobleaching515 NEIMA131179 Hollingsworth&VoseCompany EastWalpole MA No none Yes nobleaching516 NEIGAT$3909 Hollingsworth&VoseCompany Hawkinsville GA No none Yes nobleaching518 NEIWA0270002 GraysHarborPaper,LLC Hoquiam WA No none Yes nobleaching520 NEIWI4050324 Georgia‐PacificConsumerProductsLP GreenBay WI No none Yes nobleaching526 NEI43207 APPLETONCOATEDL.L.C.LOCKSMILL CombinedLocks WI No none Yes nobleaching8of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID NEIID Millname City State Smallbusiness Pulpingprocess PaperproductionBleachingwithchlorineorchlorinatedcompoundsPredominantkraftcondensatetreatmentmethod(revised)368611 NEIMN14904 NewPageWisconsinSystemInc. Duluth MN No pressurizedgroundwood,secondaryfiberYes bleachingw/oClcompound508513 NEINY5532600 HollingsworthandVoseCo. Greenwich NY No none Yes nobleachingTOTAL89of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID100102103104105107108109111112Capitalcost,$Capitalrecovery,$/yrSteam,MMBtu/yr Steam,$/yrElectricity,kWh/yrElectricity,MMBtu/yrTotalEnergyImpact,MMBtu/yr Electricity,$/yr O&M,$/yr Labor,hr/yrTotalannualizedcost,$HAPreduction,tpy2,900,000$272,600$5 129,600$5100,000$480502,200$20.65,800,000$545,200$5 129,600$5100,000$480774,800$20.62,900,000$272,600$5 129,600$5100,000$480502,200$20.65 800 000$545 200$5129 600$5100 000$480774 800$20 6Kraftcondensatesimprovement‐92%to93%1121141151161171191201211245,800,000$545,200$5129,600$5100,000$480774,800$20.65,800,000$545,200$5 129,600$5100,000$480774,800$20.65,800,000$545,200$5 129,600$5100,000$480774,800$20.62,900,000$272,600$5 129,600$5100,000$480502,200$20.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$20.610of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID126127130131132133135136Capitalcost,$Capitalrecovery,$/yrSteam,MMBtu/yr Steam,$/yrElectricity,kWh/yrElectricity,MMBtu/yrTotalEnergyImpact,MMBtu/yr Electricity,$/yr O&M,$/yr Labor,hr/yrTotalannualizedcost,$HAPreduction,tpyKraftcondensatesimprovement‐92%to93%7,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$20.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$20.61371381391401425,800,000$545,200$5 129,600$5100,000$480774,800$20.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$20.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$20.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$20.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$20.611of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID143145146147148149150151152154Capitalcost,$Capitalrecovery,$/yrSteam,MMBtu/yr Steam,$/yrElectricity,kWh/yrElectricity,MMBtu/yrTotalEnergyImpact,MMBtu/yr Electricity,$/yr O&M,$/yr Labor,hr/yrTotalannualizedcost,$HAPreduction,tpyKraftcondensatesimprovement‐92%to93%5,800,000$545,200$5 129,600$5100,000$480774,800$20.65,800,000$545,200$5 129,600$5100,000$480774,800$20.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$20.62,900,000$272,600$5 129,600$5100,000$480502,200$20.62,900,000$272,600$5 129,600$5100,000$480502,200$20.62,900,000$272,600$5 129,600$5100,000$480502,200$20.62,900,000$272,600$5 129,600$5100,000$480502,200$20.6480,000$45,120$3,919,39913,38513,385391,940$280,000$2,200717,060$20.61551561571591621631645,800,000$545,200$5 129,600$5100,000$480774,800$20.62,900,000$272,600$5 129,600$5100,000$480502,200$20.65,800,000$545,200$5 129,600$5100,000$480774,800$20.6480,000$45,120$3,919,39913,38513,385391,940$280,000$2,200717,060$20.612of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID165166167169171172173174175Capitalcost,$Capitalrecovery,$/yrSteam,MMBtu/yr Steam,$/yrElectricity,kWh/yrElectricity,MMBtu/yrTotalEnergyImpact,MMBtu/yr Electricity,$/yr O&M,$/yr Labor,hr/yrTotalannualizedcost,$HAPreduction,tpyKraftcondensatesimprovement‐92%to93%480,000$45,120$3,919,39913,38513,385391,940$280,000$2,200717,060$20.6480,000$45,120$3,919,39913,38513,385391,940$280,000$2,200717,060$20.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$20.65,800,000$545,200$5 129,600$5100,000$480774,800$20.61761771781791801811821831842,900,000$272,600$5 129,600$5100,000$480502,200$20.6480,000$45,120$3,919,39913,38513,385391,940$280,000$2,200717,060$20.6480,000$45,120$3,919,39913,38513,385391,940$280,000$2,200717,060$20.613of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID185186188189190195196Capitalcost,$Capitalrecovery,$/yrSteam,MMBtu/yr Steam,$/yrElectricity,kWh/yrElectricity,MMBtu/yrTotalEnergyImpact,MMBtu/yr Electricity,$/yr O&M,$/yr Labor,hr/yrTotalannualizedcost,$HAPreduction,tpyKraftcondensatesimprovement‐92%to93%2,900,000$272,600$5 129,600$5100,000$480502,200$20.67 400 000$695 600$401 036 800$128 85744048012 886$496 000$1 5002 241 286$20 61971981992002012022032052062077,400,000$695,600$401,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$20.6480,000$45,120$3,919,39913,38513,385391,940$280,000$2,200717,060$20.65,800,000$545,200$5 129,600$5100,000$480774,800$20.65,800,000$545,200$5 129,600$5100,000$480774,800$20.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$20.614of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID226240242243340525Capitalcost,$Capitalrecovery,$/yrSteam,MMBtu/yr Steam,$/yrElectricity,kWh/yrElectricity,MMBtu/yrTotalEnergyImpact,MMBtu/yr Electricity,$/yr O&M,$/yr Labor,hr/yrTotalannualizedcost,$HAPreduction,tpyKraftcondensatesimprovement‐92%to93%2,900,000$272,600$5 129,600$5100,000$480502,200$20.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$20.65,800,000$545,200$5 129,600$5100,000$480774,800$20.65316006066106135,800,000$545,200$5 129,600$5100,000$480774,800$20.62,900,000$272,600$5 129,600$5100,000$480502,200$20.65,800,000$545,200$5 129,600$5100,000$480774,800$20.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$20.65,800,000$545,200$5 129,600$5100,000$480774,800$20.615of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID615617208228535106118122128141158187192193204210213215216223224229Capitalcost,$Capitalrecovery,$/yrSteam,MMBtu/yr Steam,$/yrElectricity,kWh/yrElectricity,MMBtu/yrTotalEnergyImpact,MMBtu/yr Electricity,$/yr O&M,$/yr Labor,hr/yrTotalannualizedcost,$HAPreduction,tpyKraftcondensatesimprovement‐92%to93%23023123224124424524725427528828929030130431131532216of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID339341363365369370371373375382387389391403409410414423Capitalcost,$Capitalrecovery,$/yrSteam,MMBtu/yr Steam,$/yrElectricity,kWh/yrElectricity,MMBtu/yrTotalEnergyImpact,MMBtu/yr Electricity,$/yr O&M,$/yr Labor,hr/yrTotalannualizedcost,$HAPreduction,tpyKraftcondensatesimprovement‐92%to93%42542842943043343543645146849650050151151251451551651852052617of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID368611508513TOTALCapitalcost,$Capitalrecovery,$/yrSteam,MMBtu/yr Steam,$/yrElectricity,kWh/yrElectricity,MMBtu/yrTotalEnergyImpact,MMBtu/yr Electricity,$/yr O&M,$/yr Labor,hr/yrTotalannualizedcost,$HAPreduction,tpyKraftcondensatesimprovement‐92%to93%$227,160,000$21,353,040660$17,107,20029,110,93599,419100,079$2,911,093$11,208,00048,340$52,579,333988.848 count 41 41 20 20 48 20 48 48 48 4813 bio‐>newstripperHAPreductionspeciated:28 stripperupgrade$53,174.89costeff.Methanol978.97 bioupgradeAcetaldehyde9.918of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID100102103104105107108109111112Secondaryairemissions(tpyincrease)‐92to93%VOCreduction,tpyTRSreduction,tpy PM CO NOx SO2 CO2 CH4 N2O20.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020 673 316114 77 5570 490 3011211411511611711912012112420.673.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 26126873860,4883.92.419of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID126127130131132133135136Secondaryairemissions(tpyincrease)‐92to93%VOCreduction,tpyTRSreduction,tpy PM CO NOx SO2 CO2 CH4 N2O20.6 7 26126873860,4883.92.420.6 7 26126873860,4883.92.413713813914014220.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 26126873860,4883.92.420.6 7 26126873860,4883.92.420.6 7 26126873860,4883.92.420.6 7 26126873860,4883.92.420of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID143145146147148149150151152154Secondaryairemissions(tpyincrease)‐92to93%VOCreduction,tpyTRSreduction,tpy PM CO NOx SO2 CO2 CH4 N2O20.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 26126873860,4883.92.420.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 0.10920.8031.4954.2579030.08930.0128415515615715916216316420.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 0.10920.8031.4954.2579030.08930.0128421of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID165166167169171172173174175Secondaryairemissions(tpyincrease)‐92to93%VOCreduction,tpyTRSreduction,tpy PM CO NOx SO2 CO2 CH4 N2O20.6 7 0.10920.8031.4954.2579030.08930.0128420.6 7 0.10920.8031.4954.2579030.08930.0128420.6 7 26126873860,4883.92.420.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3017617717817918018118218318420.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 0.10920.8031.4954.2579030.08930.0128420.6 7 0.10920.8031.4954.2579030.08930.0128422of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID185186188189190195196Secondaryairemissions(tpyincrease)‐92to93%VOCreduction,tpyTRSreduction,tpy PM CO NOx SO2 CO2 CH4 N2O20.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020 6726126873860 4883 92 419719819920020120220320520620720.6726126873860,4883.92.420.6 7 0.10920.8031.4954.2579030.08930.0128420.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 26126873860,4883.92.423of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID226240242243340525Secondaryairemissions(tpyincrease)‐92to93%VOCreduction,tpyTRSreduction,tpy PM CO NOx SO2 CO2 CH4 N2O20.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 26126873860,4883.92.420.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3053160060661061320.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3020.6 7 26126873860,4883.92.420.6 7 3.316114.77,5570.490.3024of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID615617208228535106118122128141158187192193204210213215216223224229Secondaryairemissions(tpyincrease)‐92to93%VOCreduction,tpyTRSreduction,tpy PM CO NOx SO2 CO2 CH4 N2O23023123224124424524725427528828929030130431131532225of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID339341363365369370371373375382387389391403409410414423Secondaryairemissions(tpyincrease)‐92to93%VOCreduction,tpyTRSreduction,tpy PM CO NOx SO2 CO2 CH4 N2O42542842943043343543645146849650050151151251451551651852052626of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID368611508513TOTALSecondaryairemissions(tpyincrease)‐92to93%VOCreduction,tpyTRSreduction,tpy PM CO NOx SO2 CO2 CH4 N2O988.8 336 4302,0821,4436591,004,25865 4048 48 48 48 48 48 48 48 481,018,048tpyCO2e27of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID100102103104105107108109111112Capitalcost,$Capitalrecovery,$/yrSteam,MMBtu/yr Steam,$/yrElectricity,kWh/yrElectricity,MMBtu/yrTotalEnergyImpact,MMBtu/yr Electricity,$/yr O&M,$/yr Labor,hr/yrTotalannualizedcost,$HAPreduction,tpy2,900,000$272,600$10 259,200$10100,000$480631,800$42.65,800,000$545,200$10 259,200$10100,000$480904,400$42.62,900,000$272,600$10 259,200$10100,000$480631,800$42.62,900,000$272,600$10 259,200$10100,000$480631,800$42.65 800 000$545 200$10259 200$10100 000$480904 400$42 6Kraftcondensatesimprovement‐92%to94%1121141151161171191201211245,800,000$545,200$10259,200$10100,000$480904,400$42.65,800,000$545,200$10 259,200$10100,000$480904,400$42.65,800,000$545,200$10 259,200$10100,000$480904,400$42.62,900,000$272,600$10 259,200$10100,000$480631,800$42.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$42.628of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID126127130131132133135136Capitalcost,$Capitalrecovery,$/yrSteam,MMBtu/yr Steam,$/yrElectricity,kWh/yrElectricity,MMBtu/yrTotalEnergyImpact,MMBtu/yr Electricity,$/yr O&M,$/yr Labor,hr/yrTotalannualizedcost,$HAPreduction,tpyKraftcondensatesimprovement‐92%to94%7,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$42.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$42.6480,000$45,120$3,919,39913,38513,385391,940$280,000$2,200717,060$42.61371381391401425,800,000$545,200$10 259,200$10100,000$480904,400$42.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$42.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$42.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$42.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$42.629of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID143145146147148149150151152154Capitalcost,$Capitalrecovery,$/yrSteam,MMBtu/yr Steam,$/yrElectricity,kWh/yrElectricity,MMBtu/yrTotalEnergyImpact,MMBtu/yr Electricity,$/yr O&M,$/yr Labor,hr/yrTotalannualizedcost,$HAPreduction,tpyKraftcondensatesimprovement‐92%to94%5,800,000$545,200$10 259,200$10100,000$480904,400$42.65,800,000$545,200$10 259,200$10100,000$480904,400$42.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$42.62,900,000$272,600$10 259,200$10100,000$480631,800$42.62,900,000$272,600$10 259,200$10100,000$480631,800$42.62,900,000$272,600$10 259,200$10100,000$480631,800$42.62,900,000$272,600$10 259,200$10100,000$480631,800$42.6480,000$45,120$3,919,39913,38513,385391,940$280,000$2,200717,060$42.61551561571591621631645,800,000$545,200$10 259,200$10100,000$480904,400$42.62,900,000$272,600$10 259,200$10100,000$480631,800$42.6480,000$45,120$3,919,39913,38513,385391,940$280,000$2,200717,060$42.65,800,000$545,200$10 259,200$10100,000$480904,400$42.62,900,000$272,600$10 259,200$10100,000$480631,800$42.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$42.630of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID165166167169171172173174175Capitalcost,$Capitalrecovery,$/yrSteam,MMBtu/yr Steam,$/yrElectricity,kWh/yrElectricity,MMBtu/yrTotalEnergyImpact,MMBtu/yr Electricity,$/yr O&M,$/yr Labor,hr/yrTotalannualizedcost,$HAPreduction,tpyKraftcondensatesimprovement‐92%to94%480,000$45,120$3,919,39913,38513,385391,940$280,000$2,200717,060$42.6480,000$45,120$3,919,39913,38513,385391,940$280,000$2,200717,060$42.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$42.65,800,000$545,200$10 259,200$10100,000$480904,400$42.61761771781791801811821831842,900,000$272,600$10 259,200$10100,000$480631,800$42.6480,000$45,120$3,919,39913,38513,385391,940$280,000$2,200717,060$42.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$200,000$9601,945,286$42.631of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID185186188189190195196Capitalcost,$Capitalrecovery,$/yrSteam,MMBtu/yr Steam,$/yrElectricity,kWh/yrElectricity,MMBtu/yrTotalEnergyImpact,MMBtu/yr Electricity,$/yr O&M,$/yr Labor,hr/yrTotalannualizedcost,$HAPreduction,tpyKraftcondensatesimprovement‐92%to94%2,900,000$272,600$10 259,200$10100,000$480631,800$42.67 400 000$695 600$401 036 800$128 85744048012 886$496 000$1 5002 241 286$42 61971981992002012022032052062077,400,000$695,600$401,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$42.6480,000$45,120$3,919,39913,38513,385391,940$280,000$2,200717,060$42.65,800,000$545,200$10 259,200$10100,000$480904,400$42.65,800,000$545,200$10 259,200$10100,000$480904,400$42.6480,000$45,120$3,919,39913,38513,385391,940$280,000$2,200717,060$42.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$42.632of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID226240242243340525Capitalcost,$Capitalrecovery,$/yrSteam,MMBtu/yr Steam,$/yrElectricity,kWh/yrElectricity,MMBtu/yrTotalEnergyImpact,MMBtu/yr Electricity,$/yr O&M,$/yr Labor,hr/yrTotalannualizedcost,$HAPreduction,tpyKraftcondensatesimprovement‐92%to94%2,900,000$272,600$10 259,200$10100,000$480631,800$42.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$42.65,800,000$545,200$10 259,200$10100,000$480904,400$42.65,800,000$545,200$10 259,200$10100,000$480904,400$42.65316006066106135,800,000$545,200$10 259,200$10100,000$480904,400$42.62,900,000$272,600$10 259,200$10100,000$480631,800$42.65,800,000$545,200$10 259,200$10100,000$480904,400$42.67,400,000$695,600$40 1,036,800$128,85744048012,886$496,000$1,5002,241,286$42.65,800,000$545,200$10 259,200$10100,000$480904,400$42.633of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID615617208228535106118122128141158187192193204210213215216223224229Capitalcost,$Capitalrecovery,$/yrSteam,MMBtu/yr Steam,$/yrElectricity,kWh/yrElectricity,MMBtu/yrTotalEnergyImpact,MMBtu/yr Electricity,$/yr O&M,$/yr Labor,hr/yrTotalannualizedcost,$HAPreduction,tpyKraftcondensatesimprovement‐92%to94%23023123224124424524725427528828929030130431131532234of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID339341363365369370371373375382387389391403409410414423Capitalcost,$Capitalrecovery,$/yrSteam,MMBtu/yr Steam,$/yrElectricity,kWh/yrElectricity,MMBtu/yrTotalEnergyImpact,MMBtu/yr Electricity,$/yr O&M,$/yr Labor,hr/yrTotalannualizedcost,$HAPreduction,tpyKraftcondensatesimprovement‐92%to94%42542842943043343543645146849650050151151251451551651852052635of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID368611508513TOTALCapitalcost,$Capitalrecovery,$/yrSteam,MMBtu/yr Steam,$/yrElectricity,kWh/yrElectricity,MMBtu/yrTotalEnergyImpact,MMBtu/yr Electricity,$/yr O&M,$/yr Labor,hr/yrTotalannualizedcost,$HAPreduction,tpyKraftcondensatesimprovement‐92%to94%$254,040,000$23,879,760910$23,587,20033,288,048113,685114,595$3,328,805$12,484,00054,440$63,279,7652,30054 count 46 46 23 23 54 23 54 54 54 5415 bio‐>newstripperHAPreductionspeciated:31 stripperupgrade$27,508.16costeff.Methanol2277.48 bioupgradeAcetaldehyde23.036of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID100102103104105107108109111112Secondaryairemissions(tpyincrease)‐92to94%VOCreduction,tpyTRSreduction,tpy PM CO NOx SO2 CO2 CH4 N2O42.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142 6136 531229 515 1140 970 6111211411511611711912012112442.6136.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 26126873860,48842.437of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID126127130131132133135136Secondaryairemissions(tpyincrease)‐92to94%VOCreduction,tpyTRSreduction,tpy PM CO NOx SO2 CO2 CH4 N2O42.6 13 26126873860,4883.92.442.6 13 26126873860,4883.92.442.6 13 0.110.81.54.39030.0890.01313713813914014242.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 26126873860,4883.92.442.6 13 26126873860,4883.92.442.6 13 26126873860,4883.92.442.6 13 26126873860,4883.92.438of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID143145146147148149150151152154Secondaryairemissions(tpyincrease)‐92to94%VOCreduction,tpyTRSreduction,tpy PM CO NOx SO2 CO2 CH4 N2O42.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 26126873860,4883.92.442.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 0.110.81.54.39030.0890.01315515615715916216316442.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 0.110.81.54.39030.0890.01342.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 26126873860,4883.92.439of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID165166167169171172173174175Secondaryairemissions(tpyincrease)‐92to94%VOCreduction,tpyTRSreduction,tpy PM CO NOx SO2 CO2 CH4 N2O42.6 13 0.110.81.54.39030.0890.01342.6 13 0.110.81.54.39030.0890.01342.6 13 26126873860,4883.92.442.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6117617717817918018118218318442.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 0.110.81.54.39030.0890.01342.6 13 26126873860,4883.92.440of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID185186188189190195196Secondaryairemissions(tpyincrease)‐92to94%VOCreduction,tpyTRSreduction,tpy PM CO NOx SO2 CO2 CH4 N2O42.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142 61326126873860 4883 92 419719819920020120220320520620742.61326126873860,4883.92.442.6 13 0.110.81.54.39030.0890.01342.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 0.110.81.54.39030.0890.01342.6 13 26126873860,4883.92.441of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID226240242243340525Secondaryairemissions(tpyincrease)‐92to94%VOCreduction,tpyTRSreduction,tpy PM CO NOx SO2 CO2 CH4 N2O42.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 26126873860,4883.92.442.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6153160060661061342.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142.6 13 26126873860,4883.92.442.6 13 6.531229.515,1140.970.6142of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID615617208228535106118122128141158187192193204210213215216223224229Secondaryairemissions(tpyincrease)‐92to94%VOCreduction,tpyTRSreduction,tpy PM CO NOx SO2 CO2 CH4 N2O23023123224124424524725427528828929030130431131532243of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID339341363365369370371373375382387389391403409410414423Secondaryairemissions(tpyincrease)‐92to94%VOCreduction,tpyTRSreduction,tpy PM CO NOx SO2 CO2 CH4 N2O42542842943043343543645146849650050151151251451551651852052644of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID368611508513TOTALSecondaryairemissions(tpyincrease)‐92to94%VOCreduction,tpyTRSreduction,tpy PM CO NOx SO2 CO2 CH4 N2O2,3007025932,8701,9869011,383,08189 5554 54 54 54 54 54 54 54 541,402,084tpyCO2e45of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID100102103104105107108109111112CostsforrepeatCCAcompliancedemonstrationHVLCCollectionSystemCapital,$HVLCCollectionSystemCapitalRecovery,$/yrAnnualO&M,$/yrTotalAnnualizedCosts,$/yr Capital,$Annualizedcost(capitalrecovery),$/yr15,000,000$1,410,000$480,000$1,890,000$$130,000 $29,30015,000,000$1,410,000$480,000$1,890,000$$130,000 $29,300$130,000 $29,30015,000,000$1,410,000$480,000$1,890,000$$130,000 $29,30015 000 000$1 410 000$480 000$1 890 000$$130 000$29 300CostsifCCAisnolongerviable(e.g.,ifincreasedbothcollectionandtreatment;orformills11211411511611711912012112415,000,000$1,410,000$480,000$1,890,000$$130,000$29,30015,000,000$1,410,000$480,000$1,890,000$$130,000 $29,300$130,000 $29,300$130,000 $29,30046of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID126127130131132133135136CostsforrepeatCCAcompliancedemonstrationHVLCCollectionSystemCapital,$HVLCCollectionSystemCapitalRecovery,$/yrAnnualO&M,$/yrTotalAnnualizedCosts,$/yr Capital,$Annualizedcost(capitalrecovery),$/yrCostsifCCAisnolongerviable(e.g.,ifincreasedbothcollectionandtreatment;orformills$130,000 $29,300$130,000 $29,300$130,000 $29,300137138139140142$130,000 $29,300$130,000 $29,300$130,000 $29,300$130,000 $29,300$130,000 $29,30047of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID143145146147148149150151152154CostsforrepeatCCAcompliancedemonstrationHVLCCollectionSystemCapital,$HVLCCollectionSystemCapitalRecovery,$/yrAnnualO&M,$/yrTotalAnnualizedCosts,$/yr Capital,$Annualizedcost(capitalrecovery),$/yrCostsifCCAisnolongerviable(e.g.,ifincreasedbothcollectionandtreatment;orformills15,000,000$1,410,000$480,000$1,890,000$$130,000 $29,300155156157159162163164$130,000 $29,300$130,000 $29,300$130,000 $29,30048of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID165166167169171172173174175CostsforrepeatCCAcompliancedemonstrationHVLCCollectionSystemCapital,$HVLCCollectionSystemCapitalRecovery,$/yrAnnualO&M,$/yrTotalAnnualizedCosts,$/yr Capital,$Annualizedcost(capitalrecovery),$/yrCostsifCCAisnolongerviable(e.g.,ifincreasedbothcollectionandtreatment;orformills$130,000 $29,300$130,000 $29,30017617717817918018118218318415,000,000$1,410,000$480,000$1,890,000$$130,000 $29,30049of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID185186188189190195196CostsforrepeatCCAcompliancedemonstrationHVLCCollectionSystemCapital,$HVLCCollectionSystemCapitalRecovery,$/yrAnnualO&M,$/yrTotalAnnualizedCosts,$/yr Capital,$Annualizedcost(capitalrecovery),$/yrCostsifCCAisnolongerviable(e.g.,ifincreasedbothcollectionandtreatment;orformills$130,000 $29,300$130,000 $29,300$130 000$29 300197198199200201202203205206207$130,000$29,30015,000,000$1,410,000$480,000$1,890,000$$130,000 $29,300$130,000 $29,30050of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID226240242243340525CostsforrepeatCCAcompliancedemonstrationHVLCCollectionSystemCapital,$HVLCCollectionSystemCapitalRecovery,$/yrAnnualO&M,$/yrTotalAnnualizedCosts,$/yr Capital,$Annualizedcost(capitalrecovery),$/yrCostsifCCAisnolongerviable(e.g.,ifincreasedbothcollectionandtreatment;orformills15,000,000$1,410,000$480,000$1,890,000$$130,000 $29,300$130,000 $29,30015,000,000$1,410,000$480,000$1,890,000$$130,000 $29,300531600606610613$130,000 $29,300$130,000 $29,30015,000,000$1,410,000$480,000$1,890,000$$130,000 $29,30051of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID615617208228535106118122128141158187192193204210213215216223224229CostsforrepeatCCAcompliancedemonstrationHVLCCollectionSystemCapital,$HVLCCollectionSystemCapitalRecovery,$/yrAnnualO&M,$/yrTotalAnnualizedCosts,$/yr Capital,$Annualizedcost(capitalrecovery),$/yrCostsifCCAisnolongerviable(e.g.,ifincreasedbothcollectionandtreatment;orformills23023123224124424524725427528828929030130431131532252of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID339341363365369370371373375382387389391403409410414423CostsforrepeatCCAcompliancedemonstrationHVLCCollectionSystemCapital,$HVLCCollectionSystemCapitalRecovery,$/yrAnnualO&M,$/yrTotalAnnualizedCosts,$/yr Capital,$Annualizedcost(capitalrecovery),$/yrCostsifCCAisnolongerviable(e.g.,ifincreasedbothcollectionandtreatment;orformills42542842943043343543645146849650050151151251451551651852052653of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID368611508513TOTALCostsforrepeatCCAcompliancedemonstrationHVLCCollectionSystemCapital,$HVLCCollectionSystemCapitalRecovery,$/yrAnnualO&M,$/yrTotalAnnualizedCosts,$/yr Capital,$Annualizedcost(capitalrecovery),$/yrCostsifCCAisnolongerviable(e.g.,ifincreasedbothcollectionandtreatment;orformills$165,000,000$15,510,000$5,280,000$20,790,000$4,420,000 $996,20011 11 11 11 34 3454of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID100102103104105107108109111112EconomicImpactAnalysisInputsCondensatesTotal‐93% CondensatesTotal‐94% MILLTOTALCOSTS‐93% MILLTOTALCOSTS‐94%Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$ Annualcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$66,344$21,637$66,344$21,637$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$66,344$21,637$66,344$21,637$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$18,030,000$2,421,500$18,030,000$2,551,100$18,096,344$2,443,137$18,096,344$2,572,737$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$20,930,000$2,694,100$20,930,000$2,823,700$20,976,344$2,710,859$20,976,344$2,840,459$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$130,000$29,300$130,000$29,300$176,344$46,059$176,344$46,059$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$66,344$21,637$66,344$21,637$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$18,030,000$2,421,500$18,030,000$2,551,100$18,076,344$2,438,259$18,076,344$2,567,859$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$66,344$21,637$66,344$21,637$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$2,900,000$631,800$66,344$21,637$2,966,344$653,437$$62 000$15 1214 344$6 516$20 930 000$2 694 100$20 930 000$2 823 700$20 996 344$2 715 737$20 996 344$2 845 337$Repeattesting R/Rincrementalcost112114115116117119120121124$62,000$15,1214,344$6,516$20,930,000$2,694,100$20,930,000$2,823,700$20,996,344$2,715,737$20,996,344$2,845,337$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$52,344$18,223$52,344$18,223$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$5,800,000$774,800$5,800,000$904,400$5,866,344$796,437$5,866,344$926,037$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$20,930,000$2,694,100$20,930,000$2,823,700$20,976,344$2,710,859$20,976,344$2,840,459$$28,000 $6,829 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$32,344$13,345$32,344$13,345$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$46,344$16,759$46,344$16,759$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$2,900,000$502,200$2,900,000$631,800$2,946,344$518,959$2,946,344$648,559$$28,000 $6,829 4,344$6,516$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,562,344$2,283,931$7,562,344$2,283,931$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$130,000$29,300$130,000$29,300$196,344$50,937$196,344$50,937$55of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID126127130131132133135136CondensatesTotal‐93% CondensatesTotal‐94% MILLTOTALCOSTS‐93% MILLTOTALCOSTS‐94%Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$ Annualcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yrRepeattesting R/Rincrementalcost$28,000 $6,829 4,344$6,516$130,000$29,300$130,000$29,300$162,344$42,645$162,344$42,645$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$130,000$29,300$130,000$29,300$176,344$46,059$176,344$46,059$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,582,344$2,288,808$7,582,344$2,288,808$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$7,400,000$2,241,286$7,400,000$2,241,286$7,452,344$2,259,508$7,452,344$2,259,508$$28,000 $6,829 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$32,344$13,345$32,344$13,345$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$480,000$717,060$52,344$18,223$532,344$735,283$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$66,344$21,637$66,344$21,637$137138139140142$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$5,800,000$774,800$5,800,000$904,400$5,866,344$796,437$5,866,344$926,037$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,582,344$2,288,808$7,582,344$2,288,808$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,582,344$2,288,808$7,582,344$2,288,808$$28,000 $6,829 4,344$6,516$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,562,344$2,283,931$7,562,344$2,283,931$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,582,344$2,288,808$7,582,344$2,288,808$$28,000 $6,829 4,344$6,516$130,000$29,300$130,000$29,300$162,344$42,645$162,344$42,645$56of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID143145146147148149150151152154CondensatesTotal‐93% CondensatesTotal‐94% MILLTOTALCOSTS‐93% MILLTOTALCOSTS‐94%Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$ Annualcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yrRepeattesting R/Rincrementalcost$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$46,344$16,759$46,344$16,759$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$5,800,000$774,800$5,800,000$904,400$5,866,344$796,437$5,866,344$926,037$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$5,800,000$774,800$5,800,000$904,400$5,866,344$796,437$5,866,344$926,037$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$7,400,000$2,241,286$7,400,000$2,241,286$7,452,344$2,259,508$7,452,344$2,259,508$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$2,900,000$502,200$2,900,000$631,800$2,946,344$518,959$2,946,344$648,559$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$2,900,000$502,200$2,900,000$631,800$2,966,344$523,837$2,966,344$653,437$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$2,900,000$502,200$2,900,000$631,800$2,966,344$523,837$2,966,344$653,437$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$18,030,000$2,421,500$18,030,000$2,551,100$18,076,344$2,438,259$18,076,344$2,567,859$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$480,000$717,060$480,000$717,060$532,344$735,283$532,344$735,283$155156157159162163164$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$5,800,000$774,800$5,800,000$904,400$5,866,344$796,437$5,866,344$926,037$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$2,900,000$502,200$2,900,000$631,800$2,966,344$523,837$2,966,344$653,437$$28,000 $6,829 4,344$6,516$130,000$29,300$130,000$29,300$162,344$42,645$162,344$42,645$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$480,000$717,060$52,344$18,223$532,344$735,283$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$130,000$29,300$130,000$29,300$176,344$46,059$176,344$46,059$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$5,800,000$774,800$5,800,000$904,400$5,866,344$796,437$5,866,344$926,037$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$2,900,000$631,800$46,344$16,759$2,946,344$648,559$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$610,000$746,360$7,530,000$2,270,586$656,344$763,119$7,576,344$2,287,345$57of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID165166167169171172173174175CondensatesTotal‐93% CondensatesTotal‐94% MILLTOTALCOSTS‐93% MILLTOTALCOSTS‐94%Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$ Annualcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yrRepeattesting R/Rincrementalcost$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$480,000$717,060$480,000$717,060$532,344$735,283$532,344$735,283$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$66,344$21,637$66,344$21,637$$28,000 $6,829 4,344$6,516$480,000$717,060$480,000$717,060$512,344$730,405$512,344$730,405$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$46,344$16,759$46,344$16,759$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$130,000$29,300$130,000$29,300$182,344$47,523$182,344$47,523$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,582,344$2,288,808$7,582,344$2,288,808$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$66,344$21,637$66,344$21,637$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$5,800,000$774,800$5,800,000$904,400$5,866,344$796,437$5,866,344$926,037$176177178179180181182183184$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$52,344$18,223$52,344$18,223$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$46,344$16,759$46,344$16,759$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$66,344$21,637$66,344$21,637$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$18,030,000$2,421,500$18,030,000$2,551,100$18,096,344$2,443,137$18,096,344$2,572,737$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$52,344$18,223$52,344$18,223$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$46,344$16,759$46,344$16,759$$28,000 $6,829 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$32,344$13,345$32,344$13,345$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$480,000$717,060$480,000$717,060$532,344$735,283$532,344$735,283$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$480,000$717,060$7,400,000$1,945,286$532,344$735,283$7,452,344$1,963,508$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$66,344$21,637$66,344$21,637$58of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID185186188189190195196CondensatesTotal‐93% CondensatesTotal‐94% MILLTOTALCOSTS‐93% MILLTOTALCOSTS‐94%Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$ Annualcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yrRepeattesting R/Rincrementalcost$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$2,900,000$502,200$2,900,000$631,800$2,966,344$523,837$2,966,344$653,437$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$130,000$29,300$130,000$29,300$182,344$47,523$182,344$47,523$$28,000 $6,829 4,344$6,516$130,000$29,300$130,000$29,300$162,344$42,645$162,344$42,645$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$66,344$21,637$66,344$21,637$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$46,344$16,759$46,344$16,759$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$66,344$21,637$66,344$21,637$$48 000$11 7074 344$6 516$7 530 000$2 270 586$7 530 000$2 270 586$7 582 344$2 288 808$7 582 344$2 288 808$197198199200201202203205206207$48,000$11,7074,344$6,516$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,582,344$2,288,808$7,582,344$2,288,808$$28,000 $6,829 4,344$6,516$480,000$717,060$480,000$717,060$512,344$730,405$512,344$730,405$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$66,344$21,637$66,344$21,637$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$5,800,000$774,800$5,800,000$904,400$5,866,344$796,437$5,866,344$926,037$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$66,344$21,637$66,344$21,637$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$20,930,000$2,694,100$20,930,000$2,823,700$20,996,344$2,715,737$20,996,344$2,845,337$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$480,000$717,060$52,344$18,223$532,344$735,283$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,582,344$2,288,808$7,582,344$2,288,808$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$52,344$18,223$52,344$18,223$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$66,344$21,637$66,344$21,637$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$52,344$18,223$52,344$18,223$59of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID226240242243340525CondensatesTotal‐93% CondensatesTotal‐94% MILLTOTALCOSTS‐93% MILLTOTALCOSTS‐94%Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$ Annualcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yrRepeattesting R/Rincrementalcost$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$18,030,000$2,421,500$18,030,000$2,551,100$18,076,344$2,438,259$18,076,344$2,567,859$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,582,344$2,288,808$7,582,344$2,288,808$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$15,130,000$1,919,300$20,930,000$2,823,700$15,196,344$1,940,937$20,996,344$2,845,337$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$5,800,000$774,800$5,800,000$904,400$5,866,344$796,437$5,866,344$926,037$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$46,344$16,759$46,344$16,759$531600606610613$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$5,800,000$774,800$5,800,000$904,400$5,866,344$796,437$5,866,344$926,037$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$2,900,000$502,200$2,900,000$631,800$2,946,344$518,959$2,946,344$648,559$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$5,800,000$774,800$5,800,000$904,400$5,866,344$796,437$5,866,344$926,037$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$130,000$29,300$130,000$29,300$182,344$47,523$182,344$47,523$$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,530,000$2,270,586$7,582,344$2,288,808$7,582,344$2,288,808$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$20,930,000$2,694,100$20,930,000$2,823,700$20,976,344$2,710,859$20,976,344$2,840,459$60of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID615617208228535106118122128141158187192193204210213215216223224229CondensatesTotal‐93% CondensatesTotal‐94% MILLTOTALCOSTS‐93% MILLTOTALCOSTS‐94%Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$ Annualcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yrRepeattesting R/Rincrementalcost$48,000 $11,707 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$52,344$18,223$52,344$18,223$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$66,344$21,637$66,344$21,637$$48,000 $11,7074,344$6,516$‐$‐$‐$‐$52,344$18,223$52,344$18,223$$62,000 $15,121 4,344$6,516$66,344$21,637$66,344$21,637$‐$‐$‐$‐$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$46,344$16,759$46,344$16,759$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$46,344$16,759$46,344$16,759$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$46,344$16,759$46,344$16,759$$34,000 $8,292 4,344$6,516$38,344$14,808$38,344$14,808$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$46,344$16,759$46,344$16,759$$14,000 $3,414 4,344$6,516$18,344$9,930$18,344$9,930$$34,000 $8,292 4,344$6,516$38,344$14,808$38,344$14,808$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$230231232241244245247254275288289290301304311315322‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$$34,000 $8,292 4,344$6,516$38,344$14,808$38,344$14,808$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$46,344$16,759$46,344$16,759$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$46,344$16,759$46,344$16,759$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$46,344$16,759$46,344$16,759$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$$42,000 $10,243 4,344$6,516$46,344$16,759$46,344$16,759$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$61of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID339341363365369370371373375382387389391403409410414423CondensatesTotal‐93% CondensatesTotal‐94% MILLTOTALCOSTS‐93% MILLTOTALCOSTS‐94%Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$ Annualcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yrRepeattesting R/Rincrementalcost‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$$14,000 $3,414 4,344$6,516$18,344$9,930$18,344$9,930$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$425428429430433435436451468496500501511512514515516518520526‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$$20,000 $4,878 4,344$6,516$24,344$11,394$24,344$11,394$‐$‐$‐$‐$$20,000 $4,878 4,344$6,516$24,344$11,394$24,344$11,394$‐$‐$‐$‐$$20,000 $4,878 4,344$6,516$24,344$11,394$24,344$11,394$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$62of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswideAppendixCRTIID368611508513TOTALCondensatesTotal‐93% CondensatesTotal‐94% MILLTOTALCOSTS‐93% MILLTOTALCOSTS‐94%Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$ Annualcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yr Capitalcost,$Annualizedcost,$/yrRepeattesting R/Rincrementalcost‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$‐$$5,416,000 $1,320,911 $495,216 $742,824 $396,580,000 $74,365,533 $423,460,000 $85,065,965 $402,491,216 $76,429,269 $429,371,216 $87,129,700114 114 114 114 97 97 97 97 171 171 171 17163of63Fileis9pagestallx9pageswide