alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: rhous@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:39:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Randy Houston

New Windsor, NY 12553
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > To Provide for Loans to Certain Officers of Federal Credit Unions and Federal Reserve Member Banks

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking and Currency, 1865-1974					 and 	Ninetieth Congress, 1967-1969. 						*To Provide for Loans to Certain Officers of Federal Credit Unions and Federal Reserve Member Banks : Hearing Before the Committee on Banking and Currency, House of Representatives, Ninetieth Congress, First Session, on H.R. 7347, May 2, 1967*,												Washington: 								Government Printing Office, 										May 2, 1967,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/340,			accessed on September 12, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. (the company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 28, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Frey, Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Mark S. Frey       
|Mark S. Frey           
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 7, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      91,059,587
<SECURITIES>                               139,167,456
<RECEIVABLES>                               40,111,979
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           197,356,060
<PP&E>                                     165,626,818
<DEPRECIATION>                            (52,451,843)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,018,767,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       52,916,706
<BONDS>                                    738,804,796
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      191,565,329
<PREFERRED>                                    100,000
<COMMON>                                       473,152
<OTHER-SE>                                (63,149,240)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,018,767,598
<SALES>                                     69,372,724
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            69,372,724
<CGS>                                       20,552,966
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,552,966
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            47,225,817
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          17,928,579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (14,513,689)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,656,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (11,857,689)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (15,284,335)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (54.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. P68/440.

protests 64/15492, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Heads and Threads, Division of MSL Industries, Inc. *v.*United States,

Bao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bolts similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Heads and*Threads, *Division of MSL*Industries, *Inc.*v. *United States*(60 Cust. Ct. 308, C.D. 3374), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Charbonier, Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 696]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard Fried, J.), rendered January 27,1993, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 15 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

At the hearing the detectives testified that a woman appearing to be 19 or 20 years old answered their early morning knock on the door, that they told her in a nonthreatening manner that they wanted to speak to defendant and asked if he was home and whether they could come into the apartment, and that she was polite and friendly and invited them to enter. This testimony, which the hearing court credited, was consistent with and partially corroborated by the hearing testimony of defendant and the woman, who had been defendant’s girlfriend of five years *(see, People v Prochilo,*41 NY2d 759, 761; *People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88). Thus, the hearing court’s finding that the woman’s consent to enter the apartment was an act of free will is supported by the record *(see, People v Gonzalez,*39 NY2d 122,127-130) and is entitled to deference on appeal. Accordingly, the arrest was not unlawful and the subsequent confessions were admissible. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Williams, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.
#### Richard J. FULTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-5023.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 5, 2001.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R.App. P. 42(b).
No. 69608.

#### The Rembar Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 65/1313, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of integral, necessary components of electrical X-ray apparatus or instruments, which are not X-ray tubes or parts thereof, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
sourceTypeID roadTypeID roadTypeVMTFraction

11 1 0.000000

11 2 0.560033

11 3 0.439967

11 4 0.000000

11 5 0.000000

21 1 0.000000

21 2 0.560033

21 3 0.439967

21 4 0.000000

21 5 0.000000

31 1 0.000000

31 2 0.560033

31 3 0.439967

31 4 0.000000

31 5 0.000000

32 1 0.000000

32 2 0.560033

32 3 0.439967

32 4 0.000000

32 5 0.000000

41 1 0.000000

41 2 0.560033

41 3 0.439967

41 4 0.000000

41 5 0.000000

42 1 0.000000

42 2 0.560033

42 3 0.439967

42 4 0.000000

42 5 0.000000

43 1 0.000000

43 2 0.560033

43 3 0.439967

43 4 0.000000

43 5 0.000000

51 1 0.000000

51 2 0.560033

51 3 0.439967

51 4 0.000000

51 5 0.000000

52 1 0.000000

52 2 0.560033

52 3 0.439967

52 4 0.000000

52 5 0.000000

53 1 0.000000

53 2 0.560033

53 3 0.439967

53 4 0.000000

53 5 0.000000

54 1 0.000000
54

2 0.560033

543 0.439967

544 0.000000

545 0.000000

611 0.000000

612 0.560033

613 0.439967

614 0.000000

615 0.000000

621 0.000000

622 0.560033

623 0.439967

624 0.000000

625 0.000000
MEMORANDUM 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 4 

ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 

61 FORSYTH STREET 

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 

February 5, 2014 

SUBJECT: MOVES Modeling Files for Federal Register Document EPA-R04-0AR-2012-

0851; Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Designation of 

Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Georgia; Redesignation of the Macon, 

Georgia 1997 Annual Fine Particulate Matter Nonattainment Area to Attainment 

FROM: Joydeb Majumder :Jf"".. 

Regulatory Development Section 

TO: File and Docket EPA-R04-0AR-2012-0851 

Due to the MOVES modeling file type, the Region was unable to upload the MOVES files from 

Georgia's submittal to the Federal Docket Management System. An electronic copy can be 

viewed at the Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 

Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that, if at all possible, you schedule your 

inspection. Please contact Joydeb Majumder, listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 

CONTACT section of the February 5, 2014, Federal Register notice for an appointment. The 

Regional Office's official hours ofbusiness are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printec with Vegetable Oil Basec Inks on Recyclec Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)
Before the First Division,

January 6, 1969

No. P69/1.

protests 60/27877,etc. (Houston).

No. P69/2.

protest 67/2960 (Portland, Oreg.).

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States, Unitron Import Corp. and J. T. Steeb & Co. *v.*United States,

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of wooden doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *B. A. McKenzie & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(58 Cust. Ct. 460, C.D. 3020), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
***EXHIBIT 32(******b******)***

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of WWA Group, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Digamber Naswa, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to        the best of my knowledge and belief:

|  | (1)      | This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2)      | The information contained in this report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the small business issuer at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of the small business issuer for the period covered by this report. |
|--|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: November 19, 2008                  

/s/ Digamber Naswa

Digamber Naswa

Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the small business issuer for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not        be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.                 A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

28
| **Derivative Financial Instruments and Risk Management (Details 3) - USD ($) $ in Millions** | Sep. 30, 2016 | Dec. 31, 2015 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Derivative**                                                                               |          |          |
| Derivative instruments, notional amount                                                      | $ 2,910       | $ 3,540       |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Aggregate notional amount specified by the derivative(s). Expressed as an absolute value.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Regulation S-X (SX) -Number 210 -Article 12 -Section 13 -Sentence Column B
+ Details**Name:**invest_DerivativeNotionalAmount**Namespace Prefix:**invest_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Line items represent financial concepts included in a table. These concepts are used to disclose reportable information associated with domain members defined in one or many axes to the table.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_DerivativeLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
No. 208.

#### Sexton, Executor, *v.*United States.

*Justin A. Stanley*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, I. Henry Kutz*and *Morton K. Rothschild*for the United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit32.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10- K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ann F. Massey, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:
March 19, 2010
/s/ Ann F. Massey
Name: Ann F. Massey
Title: Chief Financial Officer
No. 264.

#### Pennsylvania Railroad Co. *v.*Gowins.

*Robert L. Barton*for petitioner.

*C. Richard Grieser*for respondent.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
From: haugstadl@sio.midco.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:28:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lynne Haugstad

Sioux Falls, SD 57103
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE OPTEL,
INC SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                          12,197
<SECURITIES>                                    87,507
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,726
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,523)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         251,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                (26,908)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 576,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        348,633
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          198,710
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                    (15,864)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   576,098
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,916
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,213
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,044
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,459
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (48,232)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (48,232)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (48,232)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (20.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (20.04)
        

</TABLE>