alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: becca_goebel@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:25:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rebecca McClenahen

Sacramento, CA 95842
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISS POWELL,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 493 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 11th day of April, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
No. 598.

#### United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, AFL-CIO, *v.*Humphreys.

*Beecher E. Stallard*and *Francis X. Ward*for petitioner.

Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Signature Eyewear, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael Prince, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Michael Prince
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
June 13, 2006
SUPREME COURT.

#### The Roosevelt Hospital agt. Patrick Dowley and others.

*Lien of purchaser at tax sale —Parties to action for the foreclosure of a mortgage.*

A purchaser at a tax sale, and to whom a lease is made of premises subject to a mortgage, secures thereby a lien, which entitles him to priority over the mortgage, for the consideration paid at the tax sale, with the interest allowed by law.

Such person is a proper party to an action for the foreclosure of the mort- . gage, and the judgment should provide for the payment out of the proceeds of the sale, of his prior lien.

*Special*Term, October, 1878.

Action to foreclose a mortgage.

*Lewis L.*Delafield,, for plaintiff.

*Anderson*Price, for defendant Williams.

*Francis T.*Oarrettson, guardian *ad litem.*

Van Vorst, J.

The defendant, Williams, is a proper party to this action.

The effect of his purchase at the tax sale, subsequent to the mortgage, and the lease to him thereupon, was to create a lien in his favor, which entitled him to priority over the mortgage, to the extent of his lien. There is no question of adverse title in Williams, involved.

In his answer he does not set up an adverse claim by title paramount. He says he has an interest in, or lien upon, the mortgaged premises. That his lien is a lien paramount to the mortgage sought to be forelosed. In thus defining his attitude it is conceded that he speaks truly. Having failed to serve the notice required by the Laws of 1871 *(chap.*381, *vol.*1, *p.*747, *secs.*13-16) he has acquired no title to the mortgaged premises.

*490But he has a valid prior claim for the consideration paid at the tax sale, with forty-two per cent interest to he added thereto. That is the extent of his claim and lien.

Prior incumbrancers — and the claim of the defendant, Williams, is of that nature — are proper parties to an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage *(Harris*agt. Beach, 3 *John. Chy., 459 ; Holcomb*agt. *Holcomb,*2 *Barb.,*20; *Walsh*agt. *Rutgers F. Ins. Co.,*13 *Abbott,*33, 38, 39; *Brown*agt. *Volkening,*64 *N. Y.,*76 ; *Moller*agt. *Muller,*12 *Hun,*674).

The propriety of this defendant being made a party is shown by *Becker*agt. *Howard*(66 *N. Y., 5).*

There must be judgment of foreclosure, but the defendant, Williams, must be paid first out of the proceeds arising on the sale, the amount of his lien, above recognized and established.
EXHIBIT 10.7




 








 


AMENDMENT TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


WHEREAS, Derma Sciences, Inc. (“Derma
U.S.”), Derma Sciences Canada, Inc. (“Derma Canada”) and Frederic Eigner (“Employee”) are
parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of March 12, 2012 (the “Agreement”).


 


WHEREAS, Employer and Employee desire to
amend the Agreement to remove Employee’s ability to receive severance benefits upon Employee’s voluntary termination
of employment within six months of the occurrence of a change in control of Employer.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
recitals set forth above, and for other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
Employer and Employee agree that the Agreement be amended as follows:


 


1.Section 7 of the Agreement is hereby
deleted in its entirety.


 


2.Sections 8, 9, 10 and 11 of the Agreement
are hereby re-numbered as Sections 7, 8, 9 and 10, respectively.


 


3.Section 8 of the Agreement (Option Exercise Extension)
is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:


 


In the event that Derma Canada, without cause, either terminates
Employee’s employment or fails to renew this Agreement upon expiration hereof, then the period to exercise any option to
purchase the securities of Derma U.S. of which Employee may be possessed shall be extended to the earlier to occur of (i) the expiration
thereof as set forth in the option instrument or (ii) the 10th anniversary of the original date of grant.


 


Except as set forth herein, all of the other provisions of the
Agreement shall remain in effect.


 


This amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall be considered one and the same agreement.


 


[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]


 



    	 



    	 



    

 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed
this amendment on the 20th day of December, 2012.


 










	 	 	DERMA SCIENCES, INC.
	 	 	 
	 		/s/   Edward J. Quilty
	 	 	By: Edward J. Quilty
Title: President and Chief Executive
Officer




















	 	 	DERMA SCIENCES CANADA INC.
	 	 	 
	 		/s/   Edward J. Quilty
	 	 	By: Edward J. Quilty
Title: President and Chief Executive
Officer











	 	 	EMPLOYEE.
	 	 	 
	 		/s/    Frederic Eigner
	 	 	Name:  Frederic Eigner



 








    	2
#### Victor Koechl, Appellant, *v.*Gate Development Company et al., Defendants. J. Alfred Berger, Jr., as Executor of Robert J. Freeman, Deceased, Respondent.

*Koechl Gate Development Co.,*149 App. Div. 239, affirmed.

(Argued April 30, 1912;

decided May 14, 1912.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered February 29, 1912, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a motion of the purchaser on a foreclosure sale to be relieved of his purchase.

*Lynn O. Norris*and *Edwin Kempton*for appellant.

*Alfred A. Wheat*and *William S. Woodhull*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of VTEX Energy,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending October 31, 2005 (the "Report"),  I,
Grant G. Emms, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/S/ Grant G. Emms
-----------------
Grant G. Emms
Chief Executive Officer
December 20, 2005
|   | (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date August 10, 2018 | /s/ Toni M. Perazzo                                                |
|----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Toni M. Perazzo                                                         |
|                 | Sr. Vice President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
|                 |                                                                    |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                 5
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1
<CURRENCY>                                           U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                        1
<CASH>                                                         2,391,575
<SECURITIES>                                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 18,242,594
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   (723,900)
<INVENTORY>                                                    1,938,922
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              23,475,824
<PP&E>                                                       152,805,751
<DEPRECIATION>                                                67,028,828
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               172,993,551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         16,191,750
<BONDS>                                                       86,881,107
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                                            0
<COMMON>                                                      41,148,148
<OTHER-SE>                                                    21,467,654
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 172,993,551
<SALES>                                                      126,316,467
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             126,316,467
<CGS>                                                         78,250,320
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                111,451,355
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             3,191,344
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               12,154,656
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   4,246,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                        0
<CHANGES>                                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   7,908,656
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       0.60<F1> 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       0.59

<FN>
<F1>
EPS-BASIC
</FN>

        


</TABLE>
From: Varneyr@nationwide.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:36:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rachael Varney

Columbus, OH 43207
From: pastorstancrbc@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Stop the insanity NOW, Freedom belongs to the People

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:11:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Stan Prewett

Trussville, AL 35173
### JUN 2 7 2016
IE K. LINDEMAN CLEtRACKSVPREME COUR 13 CLERK IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
QIAO Q. WANG, Appellant, vs. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF LXS 2006- 16N TRUST FUND; NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC; AND VERISE CAMPBELL, Respondents. No. 70450 

# FILED

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This appeal was docketed in this court on May 24, 2016, without payment of the requisite filing fee. On that same day a notice was issued directing appellant to pay the filing fee within ten days. The notice further advised that failure to pay the filing fee within ten days would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed.

It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT TRACE K. LINDEMAN
BY: 

## &kW \( 

# AWL" - cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge Qiao Q. Wang Akerman LLP/Las Vegas Fennemore Craig, P.C./Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER
10).1947 ex, 

# 2oc) )
From: gnish@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:41:27 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gary Nishmuta

Van Buren, AR 72956
<TABLE> <S> <C>


      <ARTICLE> 5
      <LEGEND>
      THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM COVER-
      ALL TECHNOLOGIES INC. FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND
      IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
      </LEGEND>
             
      <S>                 <C>
      <PERIOD-TYPE>       12-MOS
      <FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1996
      <PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1996
      <CASH>                          446,672
      <SECURITIES>                          0
      <RECEIVABLES>                 1,629,268
      <ALLOWANCES>                     43,870
      <INVENTORY>                           0
      <CURRENT-ASSETS>              2,039,231
      <PP&E>                        3,072,706
      <DEPRECIATION>                2,662,713
      <TOTAL-ASSETS>                8,243,355
      <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         3,332,359
      <BONDS>                               0
      <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
      <PREFERRED>                           0
      <COMMON>                        173,519      
      <OTHER-SE>                    4,737,477
      <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  8,243,355
      <SALES>                               0
      <TOTAL-REVENUES>              5,468,672
      <CGS>                                 0
      <TOTAL-COSTS>                 4,585,727
      <OTHER-EXPENSES>              6,491,267
      <LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
      <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    0
      <INCOME-PRETAX>               (5,608,322)
      <INCOME-TAX>                          0
      <INCOME-CONTINUING>           (5,608,322)
      <DISCONTINUED>                  (392,872)
      <EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
      <CHANGES>                              0
      <NET-INCOME>                  (6,001,194)
      <EPS-PRIMARY>                       (.40)
      <EPS-DILUTED>                       (.40)



</TABLE>