alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit






AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 TO RETENTION AGREEMENT


This Amendment Number 1 to the Retention Agreement dated January 1, 2016 (the “Executive Retention Agreement”), by and between Shutterfly, Inc. (the “Company”) and ______________ (“Executive” or “you”) is effective as of March 14, 2016.
Recitals
WHEREAS, you and the Company have previously entered into an Executive Retention Agreement dated______________, whereby the Company will provide you with certain severance benefits in the event your employment is terminated under certain specified circumstances;  
WHEREAS, you and the Company agree it is advisable to amend the Executive Retention Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt, sufficiency and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, you and the Company hereby agree to the following change to the Executive Retention Agreement:
(1)    Clause (i) of Section 1 (Term of the Agreement) is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:
“(i) December 31, 2017 (the “Expiration Date”).”   


(1)    The first sentence of Section 8(c) (Miscellaneous Provisions”) is hereby deleted and replaced with the following:
“This Agreement supersedes any and all cash severance rights and Equity Award vesting acceleration rights under any prior agreements, arrangements, programs and plans which were previously offered by the Company to the Executive, including pursuant to an employment agreement or offer letter, for the period that this Agreement is in effect, and Executive hereby waives Executive’s rights to such other benefits for such period; provided, however, that this Agreement shall not supersede, and the Executive does not waive any rights with respect to, any and all benefits to which Executive may be entitled in connection with Executive’s termination of employment within twelve (12) months following a change in control of the Company.”   


Miscellaneous.  This Amendment Number 1, together with the Executive Retention Agreement, contain the entire agreement between you and the Company, and supersede any previous agreements or understandings, whether written or oral, for the subject matter covered by the Executive Retention Agreement for the period that the Executive Retention Agreement is in effect.  The parties acknowledge and agree that this Amendment Number 1 does not affect the at-will nature of your employment relationship with the Company.  Except as otherwise amended in this Amendment Number 1, all provisions of the Executive Retention Agreement, shall remain in full force and effect.  This Amendment Number 1 may be amended solely in a written document executed on behalf of both parties.









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby execute this Amendment Number 1 to the Executive Retention Agreement as of the date first above written.
	
		
	EXECUTIVE








By: _____________________________
	SHUTTERFLY, INC.








By: _____________________________

	Name:
	Name:

	Title:
	Title:
From: tk_bohr@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:22:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tom Bohr

Wichita, KS 67235
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134543 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134543 

 COA: 277565 

Ingham CC: 06-000473-FH 

JOHN WARRAN WALLACE, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 15, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1022 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 29, 2007 

 Clerk
From: lloydletta@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:35:10 PM

I am writing today to encourage you to require insurance to cover contraceptives as proposed.

Please don't listen to the bleatings from the so-called "Family Research Council." They oppose

contraception because they view it as taking away consequences for sex.

Eva Young

Sincerely,

Eva Young

Minneapolis, MN 55411
From: david.ross.7@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:14:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Ross

Fredericksburg, VA 22407
From: jandsperrin@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:26:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Shirley Perrin

Canton, GA 30115
<PAGE>


                            LNB Bancorp, Inc.

                         Exhibit to Form 10 - K/A

             (For the twelve months ended December 31, 2002)

                        Exhibit Number (99.3)

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of LNB Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary
C. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Gary C. Smith


Gary C. Smith
President and
Chief Executive Officer
June 30, 2003
From: scotthamaker@bex.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:12:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Scott Hamaker

Maumee, OH 43537
H. Res. 1503 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 26, 2008. 

Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to the House 

is waived with respect to any resolution reported on the legislative day of September 26, 2008, providing for consideration 

or disposition of a measure making supplemental appropriations for job creation and preservation, infrastructure investment, and economic and energy assistance for the fiscal year 

ending September 30, 2009, and for other purposes. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.71




CIH INTERNATIONAL S.À R.L.
December 11, 2015


VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
Grupo Modelo, S.A.B. de C.V.
Av. Javier Barnos Sierra
555-3 Piso
Col. Santa Fe
01210, Mexico, D.F.
Attention: General Counsel




RE:  That certain Interim Supply Agreement between Grupo Modelo, S.A.B. de C.V. (“Supplier”) and CIH International S.à r.l., as successor by assignment to Crown Imports LLC (“CIHI”), dated June 7, 2013, as amended (the “ISA”).


Dear Sir or Madam,


Despite the reasonable efforts of CIHI and its affiliates to complete the “Brewery Expansion Plan” (as that term is defined in the ISA), continuing supply of “Product” (as that term is defined in the ISA) is required.  Therefore, pursuant to Section 8.1(b) of the ISA, commencing on June 8, 2016, the terms and conditions of the ISA shall continue for an additional twelve month period.


As you are aware, the aforementioned continuation requires the approval of the United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division pursuant to the Final Judgment (as that term is defined in the ISA). Pending such approval, pursuant to the terms of the ISA Supplier will conduct itself as if the aforementioned continuation will be approved.


Very truly yours,
CIH International S.à r.l.


	
		
	/s/ Nicolas Susgin

	By:
	Nicolas Susgin

	Title:
	Category A manager








Our vision:  to elevate life with every glass raised
CIH International S.à r.l.  •  Société à responsabilité limitée
5, rue Guillaume Kroll  •  L-1882 Luxembourg  •  Grand Duchy of Luxembourg 
R.C.S. Luxembourg: B176850  •  Share capital: USD 1,000,000.-

























cc:
Anheuser-Busch InBev
Brouwerijplein 1
Leuven 3000
Belgium
Attention:     Chief Legal Officer and Company Secretary


Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
125 Broad Street
New York, New York 10004
Attention:     Frank J. Aquila, George J. Sampas, Krishna Veeraraghavan


Our vision:  to elevate life with every glass raised
CIH International S.à r.l.  •  Société à responsabilité limitée
5, rue Guillaume Kroll  •  L-1882 Luxembourg  •  Grand Duchy of Luxembourg 
R.C.S. Luxembourg: B176850  •  Share capital: USD 1,000,000.-
From: scaddensharp@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:19:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kevin Scadden

Plattsmouth, NE 68048
Exhibit 32.1
------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Material  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company"),  on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert
Bernstein, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  August 4, 2004                 By:  /s/ Robert Bernstein
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                            Robert Bernstein
                                      Its:  President, Chief Executive Officer &
                                            Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                AEROCENTURY CORP.

                                  CERTIFICATION


In connection with this quarterly report of AeroCentury Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Neal D. Crispin,  Chief Executive
Officer  of the  Company,  hereby  certify  as of the date  hereof,  solely  for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,  Section 1350 of the United States Code,  that
to the best of my knowledge:

              (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
              1934, and

              (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
              all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
              indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


Date:  November 14, 2005              /s/ Neal D. Crispin
                                    --------------------------
                                    Neal D. Crispin
                                    Chief Executive Officer