alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 474 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 11, 2002.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2733) to authorize the National Institute of Standards and Technology 
to work with major manufacturing industries on an initiative of standards 
development and implementation for electronic enterprise integration. The first 
reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to 
the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Science. After general 
debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It 
shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment 
under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on Science now printed in the bill. Each section of 
the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as 
read. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the 
Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of 
whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the 
portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of 
rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the conclusion 
of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 
the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member 
may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the 
Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature 
of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except 
one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: bizxbizx@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:54:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

kelly hopper

Sarasota, FL 34236
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Robinson Financial
Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ending December 31, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this
Certification (the “Report”), we, Rick L. Catt, Chief Executive Officer and
Jamie E. McReynolds, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)  the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or another document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of the written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to First Robinson Financial Corporation and will
be retained by First Robinson Financial Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





By:  /s/ Rick L.
    Catt
                    
                    By: /s/ Jamie E. McReynoldsName:  Rick
      L. Catt
                    
                    Name:  Jamie
      E. McReynoldsChief
      Executive Officer
                    
                    Chief
      Financial OfficerFebruary
      14, 2011
                    
                    February
      14, 2011
No. 67472.

#### Sommers Fabrics Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 298109-K, etc. (New York).

*219Opinion by

Olive®, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic sheeting similar in use to patent leather and that the issues are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Prepac, Inc.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 97, C.D. 2111), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: Rmcclure28@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:18:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rochelle Mcclure

Tampa, FL 33626
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Acorn Holding Corp.  (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December  31, 2002 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Stephen A.
Ollendorff,  Chairman  and Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)  The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
           material respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations
           of the Company.


                                         /s/ Stephen A. Ollendorff
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Stephen A. Ollendorff
                                         Chairman and Chief Executive
                                           Officer

April 9, 2003

<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 31(a) 

I, Eric Montandon, chief executive officer of WWA Group, Inc. (“Registrant”) certify that: 

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (“Report”) of Registrant; 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this Report; 

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared; 

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and 

c)     Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: November 15, 2005 

/s/ Eric Montandon

Eric Montandon

Chief Executive Officer 

----
From: dianallove@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:36:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Diana Love

Powhatan, VA 23139
10.2 Independent Director Compensation Policy






Exhibit 10.2
 
Independent Director Compensation Policy
 
1.             Base Compensation.  Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. (the "Company") shall pay each director who meets the criteria for each of (i) a “non-employee director,” as such term is used in Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and (ii) “independent director,” as defined in the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange (each, an "Independent Director"), an amount of $25,000 for 2012 and $30,000 per annum thereafter until such amount is recommended for change by the Compensation Committee.  Such base compensation amounts are payable in four equal installments at the time of each quarterly meeting of the Board of Directors.
 
2.             Committees. The chairperson of the Audit Committee and the chairperson of the Compensation Committee shall receive additional annual compensation equal to 33% of their base quarterly cash fee.
 
3.             Reimbursement of Travel and Other Expenses. The Company shall promptly pay or reimburse each Independent Director for all ordinary and reasonable out-of-pocket expenses actually incurred (and, in the case of reimbursement, paid) by such Independent Director in connection with attending meetings of the Board and any committee thereof on which he serves; provided that such Independent Director submits proof of such expenses, with all properly completed forms as prescribed from time to time by the Company, no later than 60 days after such expenses have been so incurred.
 
4.             Restricted Stock Grants. Each Independent Director shall receive an award of 2,500 shares of Restricted Stock (as defined in the Natural Gas Services Group, Inc. 2009 Restricted Stock/Unit Plan (the "Plan") under the Plan on the first day of each calendar year.  An Independent Director who joins the Company's Board during the year shall receive upon joining the Board a prorated number of restricted shares equal to the number of full months remaining in the calendar year including the month in which he or she joined the Board (for example, an Independent Director who joined the Board on March 15th would be granted 2,084 restricted shares (2,500 x 10/12)).  Subject to such Independent Director’s continued service as an Independent Director, such Restricted Stock shall vest in quarterly installments beginning in the year following the year of grant, subject to acceleration under the Plan.  Effective upon such Independent Director’s resignation (except by retirement) or removal from the Board, all unvested shares of Restricted Stock held by such Independent Director shall be forfeited.


5.    Amendments.  This Policy may be amended upon recommendation by the Compensation Committee and approval by the majority of the members of the Board of Directors.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Highway Administration

          - [Docket No. FHWA-2023-0027]

# AGENCY:

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Department of Transportation (DOT).

# ACTION:

Notice; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

                        The FHWA is withdrawing the notice, “Agency Information Collection Activities: Request for Comments for a New Information Collection,” published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on September 15, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Paul Jodoin, 202-366-5465, Office of Operations, Federal Highway Administration, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FHWA is withdrawing the notice published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 15, 2023, at 88 FR 63644 (FR Number 2023-20021).                

Issued on: September 15, 2023.

Jazmyne Lewis,

Information Collection Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2023-20344 Filed 9-19-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
Exhibit
99.1  CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Bruce L. Claflin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of 3Com Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May
31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of 3Com Corporation.   By:
  /s/ Bruce L. ClaflinName:
  Bruce L. ClaflinTitle:
  Chief Executive Officer I, Mark Slaven, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of 3Com Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2002
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual
Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of 3Com Corporation.   By:
  /s/ Mark SlavenName:
  Mark SlavenTitle:
  Senior Vice President,
  Finance and Planning, and Chief Financial Officer
From: cheriepurpera@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:03:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cherie Purpera

Baton Rouge, LA 70809