alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
****ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT TO THE****ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF****SGI INTERNATIONAL****

Pursuant to the provisions of the Utah Revised Business CorporationAct, the undersigned corporation adopts the following Articles of Amendmentsto its Articles of Incorporation:
***FIRST***. The name of the corporation is SGI INTERNATIONAL.
***SECOND*.** The following amendments of the Articles of Incorporationwere adopted by the Shareholders of the corporation on September 18, 2000,in the manner prescribed by the Utah Revised Business Corporation Act:
ARTICLE IV (a) of the Articles of Incorporation will be deleted andin its place and stead the following shall be substituted:
**ARTICLE IV**
(a) Capital Stock. The Corporation shall have the authority to issueOne Hundred Twenty-Five Million (125,000,000) shares of Common Stock, nopar value, and Twenty Million (20,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock parvalue $0.01 per share. Any stock of the Corporation, which is fully paid,shall not be subject to further call or assessment for any purpose.
***THIRD***. The number of shares of the Corporation outstandingat the time of such adoption was 68,960,056 and the number of shares entitledto vote thereon was 66,573,809.
***FOURTH***. The designation and number of outstanding sharesof each class entitled to vote thereon as a class were as follows:
Class _________________                                                      Number of SharesCapital Stock No Par Value                                                             66,573,809
***FIFTH.*** The number of shares voted for and against suchamendments was as follows:Numbers of Shares VotedAmendment _____________                                                             For                  AgainstAmendment of ARTICLE IV                                                        53,581,309          1,376,393
***SIXTH.*** The number of shares of each class entitled tovote thereon as a class, which voted for and against such amendment, respectively,was:
                                                                                                Common Capital Stock No Par Value                                                                                                          Number of Shares VotedAmendment ____________                                                            For                       AgainstAmendment of ARTICLE IV                                                       53,581,309             1,376,393
***SEVENTH.*** Manner, if not set forth in such amendment, inwhich any exchange, reclassification, or cancellation of issued sharesprovided for in the amendment shall be effected, is as follows:
No Change.
***EIGHTH***. Manner in which such amendment effects changein the amount of stated capital, and the amount of stated capital, andthe amount of stated capital as changed by such amendment are as follows:
No Change.
Dated this 18th day of September 2000.
/S/MICHAEL L. ROSEPresident
/S/JOHN R. TAYLORSecretary
No. 60133.

protest 272385-K (Detroit).

#### John V. Carr & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Exhibit32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John W. Roblin, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:
March 19, 2010
/s/ John W. Roblin
Name: John W. Roblin
Title: Chief Executive Officer
From: Eugenia Eden

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:39:47 PM

THE RIGHT OF ANY EMPLOYER TO DENY MEDICAL COVERAGE FOR CONTRACEPTION IS UNFAIR AND

UNJUST.

INASMUCH AS MALES ARE COVERED FOR MEDICINES THAT WILL ENHANCE THEIR LIBIDO, NO ONE

SHOULD DENY HELP FOR UNWANTED PREGNANCIES.

CONTRACEPTIVES FOR WOMEN ARE A NECESSARY MEDICAL BENEFIT...IF ONLY TO PROTECT

CHILDREN FROM PARENTS WHO DO NOT WANT THEM.
Case No. 12,859.

#### SILVERTHAIN’S ASSIGNEE v. MITCHELL.

[Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

STEPHEN J. BYERS
, Appellant,

v.

ANTIQUERS AERODROME, INC.
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3171

[ November 19, 2020 ]

Consolidated a ppeal from the State of Florida, Department of Economic Opportunity ; L.T. Case No. 18

- 37 and DOAH L.T. Case No. 18

- 1 732

.

Robert L. Shearin, Esq. of Law Office s of Robert L. Shearin, Boca Raton, for appellant.

Keith F. Backer, Esq. and Jonathan A. Yellin, Esq. of Backer Aboud Poliakoff & Foelster, LLP, Boca Ra ton, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY
, F ORST and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Century
Properties Fund XX and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                        5,246,000
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      0
<PP&E>                                       54,538,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (20,919,000)     <F1>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               40,715,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 0
<BONDS>                                      45,242,000     <F2>
<COMMON>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                  (5,499,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 40,715,000
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              6,949,000
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 5,296,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            2,511,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,589,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,589,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,589,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (25.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (25.19)
<FN>
<F1> Depreciation includes a $6,296,000 allowance for impairment of value.
<F2> Bonds include $13,856,000 of deferred interest payable.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
From: liturgy@speakeasy.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:01:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patrick Clark

San Jose, CA 95118
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1371 

Congratulating the Saratoga Race Course as it celebrates its 140th season. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2008 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the Saratoga Race Course as it celebrates 

its 140th season. 

Whereas, July 23, 2008, marks the start of the Saratoga 

Race Course’s 140th season; 

Whereas horseracing enjoys a history rich in tradition 

throughout the world; 

Whereas the Saratoga Race Course welcomes the best 

thoroughbreds from across the world; 

Whereas the Saratoga Race Course has the highest total attendance of any New York thoroughbred racetrack, despite having the shortest season; 

Whereas the Saratoga Race Course is the oldest organized 

sporting venue in the United States; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1371 IH 

Whereas many of the Nation’s top thoroughbreds have raced 

at the Saratoga Race Course, including Man o’ War, 

Cigar, Secretariat, and Affirmed; 

Whereas the Saratoga Race Course welcomes an average of 

nearly 30,000 visitors per day throughout its race season; 

Whereas 2008 marks the 139th running of the Travers 

Stakes, the oldest major thoroughbred race for 3-year-old 

horses in the United States; 

Whereas the Saratoga Race Course has a total economic impact of approximately $200,000,000 throughout Saratoga 

County and the surrounding communities; 

Whereas the Saratoga Race Course contributes more than 

2,500 jobs to Saratoga Springs and the surrounding 

area; 

Whereas Saratoga Springs during racing season is a top destination for tourists from around the world; 

Whereas the Saratoga Race Course has added modern technology while still maintaining its Victorian charm and 

original traditions; and 

Whereas the Saratoga Race Course is the oldest continuously-operating thoroughbred race track in the United 

States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates the Saratoga Race Course as 

3 it celebrates its 140th season; 

4 (2) encourages all people in the United States 

5 to spend an electrifying day at the races; and 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1371 IH 

1 (3) recognizes the Saratoga Race Course’s im2 portant place in horseracing history. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
From: B Lehmkuhle

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: We oppose the Definition of Religious Employer in Health Care Rules

Date: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 7:00:02 AM

To whom it may concern at HHS,

I was surprised and angry to see that the current definition of religious employer in proposed rules does

not provide true conscience protection for those committed to preserving life. Health care plans should

not be forced to violate the moral and religious convictions of providers or employees in order to

participate in the health care system. Requiring such an unacceptable demand threatens both universal

access to health care and religious freedom of conscience.

Request: Change the rules to explicitly protect conscience, and provide a reply to this e-mail on how

your plans to revise the rules accordingly.

I do appreciate the service of HHS staff and leaders in their good efforts to respect dignity and ensure

health care is provided for/to people in or nation. Just want more appropriate rule provision.

All the best,

Brian Lehmkuhle

working to
From: Cindy Thomas

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Access to Preventative Care and Contraception

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:54:12 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine

as it pertains to coverage of preventive care under the new health

care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.”

These preventive services are a critical element of the new law and

would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an

ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health

providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt

from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

Personally, I am a devout Christian and strongly believe in the

separation of church and state. Religion has no place in the

workforce, our government or the healthcare industry. It is a

personal issue and should be nobody's business, but there are those

who are making it EVERYONE'S business. Religion should not be used as

a pawn or excuse to refuse benefits to people in need. If you want to

profess your faith, go to church, but don't make laws around it. 

Employers are not supposed to discriminate and that's exactly what

will happen if you allow them to exempt themselves under "religious

refusal". This is absurd. They are employers. I feel the same way

about pharmacists filling prescriptions for women that they have a

moral and religious problem with (morning after pill or

contraceptives). If they can't fulfill the duties of their chosen

job, then they should find another job that doesn't challenge their

religious beliefs. SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE.

I urge you to ensure that women of ALL faiths and those with NO faith

at all, have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Thank you.
EXHIBIT 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. [] of Global Ship Lease, Inc. of our reports dated May 18, 2011 and June 19, 2009 relating to the combined financial statements of
Global Ship Lease, Inc. Successor, and Global Ship Lease, Inc. Predecessor, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
|PricewaterhouseCoopers    

Neuilly-sur-Seine, France

May 18, 2011

PricewaterhouseCoopers is
represented by PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit, 63 rue de Villiers92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
#### Robert F. Wilcox, Appellant, v. James Crowley Respondent.

Order denying motion for new trial affirmed, with, costs. Opinion by Board-ma^ J.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Acorn Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John G.
Jacob, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                  /s/  John G. Jacob
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  John G. Jacob, Chief Financial Officer
                                  August 9, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
registrant's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31,
1995.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          26,811
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                18,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    116,988
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          60,146
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            61,299
<LOANS>                                        484,694
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,164
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 739,854
<DEPOSITS>                                     621,057
<SHORT-TERM>                                    41,550
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,228
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,068
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,951
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 739,854
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 44,566
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,267
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   287
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                54,120
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              21,218
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,618
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           30,502
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (256)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 27,553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,132
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      11,132
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,199
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.86
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.45
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,163
<LOANS-PAST>                                       744
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 21,003
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 5,793
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,255
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,626
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,164
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,632
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,532
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm














The Board of Directors


Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc.:








We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-107141, 333-72277, 333-48315, 333-13167, 033-23048, 333-146388 and 333-107141) on Forms S-8 and in the registration statements (Nos. 333-13821, 033-28065, 333-42502 and 333-154521) on Forms S-3 of Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc.
and subsidiaries of our report dated March 1, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reports appear in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K
of Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc.





As discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, as of January 1, 2009, the Corporation changed its method of evaluating other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities to comply with new accounting requirements issued by the FASB.











/s/KPMG LLP








Providence, Rhode Island


March 1, 2010
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2010 

d0621 

Order 

 

June 28, 2010 

140921 & (63) 

(64)(65)(66) 

 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee/ 

Cross-Appellant, 

v SC: 140921 

 COA: 287859 

Branch CC: 06-108611-FH 

TIMOTHY ALLEN MILLER, 

Defendant-Appellant/ 

Cross-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration and the motion to 

withdraw the motion to withdraw the application are GRANTED. The application for 

leave to appeal the February 16, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals and the 

application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are considered. The application for 

leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. It appearing to this Court that the case of People v 

Smith (Docket No. 140371) is pending on appeal before this Court and that the decision 

in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal as 

cross-appellant, we ORDER that the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant be 

held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.