alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
November 17 , 2011



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CITY OF HOUSTON , Appellant

NO. 14

- 11

- 00220

- CV V.

KELVIN JOHNSON , Appellee

____________________ This court today heard a motion for rehearing filed by appellant, City of Houston. We order that the motion be overruled, and that this court’s former judgment of July 28, 2011, be vacated, set aside, and annulled. We further order this court’s opinion of July 28, 2011, withdrawn.

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in f avor of appellee, Kelvin Johnson, signed March 7, 2011, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below
AFFIRMED

.
We order appellant, City of Houston, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal. We
further order this decision certified below for observance.
No. 60129.

protests 184591-K, etc. (New York).

#### Glensder Textile Corp. and S. Stern, Henry & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Hefferman, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1,064
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 153,447
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,807
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       45
<OTHER-SE>                                     150,595
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   153,447
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,379)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,379)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,379)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.03)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Signature Eyewear, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2001, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael Prince, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Michael Prince
--------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
June 20, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit  Fund VI,  L.P.,  Series 5 (the  "Partnership")  for the  quarters  ended
September  30 2007 and June 30, 2007 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I,
Wilfred  N.  Cooper,  Jr.,  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  WNC &
Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  except to the extent  that such
     provisions require the audit report of Local Limited Partnership  financial
     statements  to  refer  to the  auditing  standards  of the  Public  Company
     Accounting   Oversight  Board  for  the   Partnership's   annual  financial
     statements and except that the Report is a cumulative  report covering each
     of the quarters ended September 30 and June 30, 2007 and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.




/s/Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
May 16, 2008
MICROMUSE INC.



Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each
of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, in his capacity as an officer of Micromuse Inc. (the Company), that, to his knowledge:



(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: February 8, 2005



By:

/s/ LLOYD A. CARNEYLloyd A. Carney Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ IAN HALIFAXIan Halifax Chief Financial Officer




This certification is not deemed
to be filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
EXHIBIT 21


                         LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

     The Partnership is a partner of the following joint ventures:
JMB/Piper Jaffray Tower Associates, an Illinois a general partnership,
which is a partner in (i) OB Joint Venture II, an Illinois general
partnership, which is a partner of 222 South Ninth Street Limited
Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, which holds title to the
Piper Jaffray Tower office building in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and (ii) OB
Joint Venture, a South Dakota general partnership, which holds title to the
land underlying the Piper Jaffray Tower office building; JMB/Piper Jaffray
Tower Associates II, an Illinois general partnership, which also is a
partner in OB Joint Venture, a general partnership, which holds title to
the land underlying the Piper Jaffray Tower office building; 900 3rd Avenue
Associates, an Illinois general partnership, which is a partner of Progress
Partners, a general partnership, which holds title, prior to the sale in
November 1999, to 900 Third Avenue Building located in New York, New York;
and Maguire Thomas Partners-South Tower, a limited liability company, which
holds title to Wells Fargo Center-IBM Tower located in Los Angeles,
California.  Reference is made to the Notes for a description of the terms
of such joint venture partnerships.  The Partnership is a 50% shareholder
in Carlyle Managers, Inc., the general Partner of JMB/NYC Office Building
Associates, L.P. ("JMB/NYC") and 50% shareholder in Carlyle Investors,
Inc., which is the general partner of Carlyle-XIV Associates, L.P.  The
Partnership is a 99% limited partner in Carlyle-XIV Associates, L.P., which
holds an approximate 25% limited partnership interest in JMB/NYC.  JMB/NYC
is a 99% limited partner in Upper Tier Associates, L.P.  Reference is made
to the Notes for a description of the terms of such joint venture
partnerships.
|  |   |
|--|--------|

| For                the Period: 2/19/2008 to                2/22/2008 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Coupon | Interest                           | Maturity | Callable   | Survivor'sOption | Price1 | Yield2 | Moody's | S&P | CUSIP     |
|--------|------------------------------------|----------|------------|------------------|--------|--------|---------|---------|-----------|
| 4.000% | Monthly(†)                   | 2/15/13  | NO         | YES§        | 100.00 | 4.034% | A2      | A       | 14912HJL5 |
| 5.150% | Monthly(†)                   | 2/15/18  | 2/15/10*   | YES§        | 100.00 | 5.206% | A2      | A       | 14912HJM3 |
| 5.750% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 2/15/23  | 2/15/11*** | YES§        | 100.00 | 5.750% | A2      | A       | 14912HJN1 |
| 5.850% | Monthly(†)                   | 2/15/28  | 2/15/12*   | YES§        | 100.00 | 5.922% | A2      | A       | 14912HJP6 |
Form of Section 906 Certification

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

	In connection with the Quarterly Report of Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 31, 2002 (the "Report"), I, James S. Beard, President of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)	the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

 

 

						/s/  J.S. Beard
Date:  August 5, 2002			James S. Beard

						President
Merrimack,

Nov 4, 1914.

#### Samuel F. Chesbrough *v. K. &*C. Manufacturing Co.

An objection to argument of counsel is not effectual until it is made known to the presiding justice and an exception claimed.

Case, for negligence. Trial by jury and verdict for the plaintiff. Transferred from the October term, 1913, of the superior court by *Pike,*J., on the defendant’s exceptions to the denial of motions for a nonsuit and the direction of a verdict and to remarks of counsel in argument. The facts are stated in the opinion.

*Doyle & Lueier*and *Martin & Howe (Mr. Lucier*orally), for the plaintiff.

*David F. Dudley*(by brief and orally), for the defendant.

Peaslee, J.

The plaintiff was injured by the falling of an elevator which he was operating as the defendant’s servant. He complains, among other things, that the elevator was so constructed that it was to be expected that the cable would break and allow the elevator to fall. There was evidence that the sheaves over which the wire cable ran were so small as to subject the cable to a strain beyond its elastic limit, and that the break was at a point where the cable ran over the sheaves. It is sought to prevent the drawing of the inference that this was the cause for the accident by the introduction of evidence to the effect that the cable was carefully inspected, that no signs of weakening were discovered, and that from a dent in the under side of a timber making a part of the frame to the elevator well, it appeared as though the wheel of the wheelbarrow which the plaintiff had on the elevator had struck the timber, thereby stopping the elevator and causing the cable to break.

This evidence merely raised issues to be passed upon by the jury. There was testimony to the effect that when the cable was bent beyond its elastic limit it might begin to give way at points not discernible upon inspection; and as to the wheelbarrow, the plaintiff testified that it was properly placed upon the elevator platform.

In argument for the plaintiff, counsel said: “They have brought in here the defence of contributory negligence. That is a defence which always bobs up and is of no consequence here.” Objection. *388being made, counsel added: “I am arguing that the defence is an old shadow which has no substance in this case, and I am going to try to demonstrate it.” So far as appears from the record, no exception was asked for. Objection was made, counsel explained what he meant by the language used, and the matter was dropped there. The statement in the case, that “the defendant excepted as appears,” does not warrant the inference that it excepted as does not appear. “It is not necessary to give reasons for the proposition that an objection is not taken until it is made known to the presiding justice and an exception claimed of him.” *Story*v. *Railroad,*70 N. H. 364, 380.

*Exceptions overruled.*

All concurred.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 JUL-3-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                      SEP-26-1998
<CASH>                                            23,927
<SECURITIES>                                      6,602
<RECEIVABLES>                                     22,954
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       175,801
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  231,328
<PP&E>                                            79,573
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    329,937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             103,158
<BONDS>                                           128,425
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          122
<OTHER-SE>                                        78,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      329,937
<SALES>                                           269,412
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  269,412
<CGS>                                             218,597
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     218,597
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3,991
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (1,512)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (1,512)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (1,512)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
From: cshelton6028@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:21:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carol Shelton

Knoxville, TN 37912
This appendix is only available from MassDEP as an electronic 

file entitled “CMAQ Ozone Predictions versus 2002 Ozone 

Observations for the OTR States”
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Cantu Services, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 62841

)

Under Contract No. W91QF5-17-D-0003 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: John C. Dulske, Esq. 

Bonnie Kirkland, Esq. 

Carrie Gorner, Esq.

 Dykema Gossett PLLC

 San Antonio, TX

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Scott N. Flesch, Esq.

 Army Chief Trial Attorney

CPT Philip L. Aubart, JA

 Trial Attorney

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: May 13, 2022

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62841, Appeal of Cantu Services, 

Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: May 13, 2022

CHRISTOPHER M. MCNULTY

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
From: heidicasey@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:12:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Heidi Casey

Matthews, NC 28105
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 19, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 64448]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20246]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Bioinformatics Drug Repositioning and Combination Therapy for 
AD.
    Date: October 23, 2023.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Mariel Jais, Ph.D., M.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of Health, 
National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, RM: 2E400, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#167b77647f737a387c777f6556787f7e38717960"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="315c504358545d1f5b505842715f58591f565e47">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 14, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-20246 Filed 9-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>