alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 15

June 19, 2000


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Signature Eyewear, Inc.

We are aware of the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Signature Eyewear, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 33-48109) of our report dated June
8, 2000 relating to the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of
Signature Eyewear, Inc. which are included in its Form 10-Q for the six-month
period ended April 30, 2000.

Pursuant to Rule 436(c) of the Securities Act of 1933, our report is not a part
of the registration statement prepared or certified by accountants within the
meaning of Section 7 or 11 of the Securities Act of 1933.


         /S/ ALTSCHULER, MELVOIN & GLASSER LLP

Los Angeles, California
From: hdwhight@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:19:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Harold Hight

Quarryville, PA 17566
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Coupon | Interest | Maturity | Callable | Survivor's Option | Price | CUSIP |   |
| 2.000% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 3/15/2020 | 3/15/2018 * | Yes § | 100.00 | 14912HTA8 |   |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |  |
| (†††) | First Payment date 9/15/2017 |   |
|                    |   |
EXHIBIT 10.6




 








 


AMENDMENT TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


WHEREAS, Derma Sciences, Inc. (“Employer”)
and Robert C. Cole (“Employee”) are parties to that certain Employment Agreement dated as of March 7, 2012 (the
“Agreement”).


 


WHEREAS, Employer and Employee desire to
amend the Agreement to remove Employee’s ability to receive severance benefits upon Employee’s voluntary termination
of employment within six months of the occurrence of a change in control of Employer.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
recitals set forth above, and for other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
Employer and Employee agree that the Agreement be amended as follows:


 


1.Section 7 of the Agreement is hereby
deleted in its entirety.


 


2.Sections 8, 9, 10 and 11 of the Agreement
are hereby re-numbered as Sections 7, 8, 9 and 10, respectively.


 


3.The second sentence of Section 7 of the Agreement is
hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:


 


This Agreement is intended to comply with the requirements
of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder (“Section 409A”).


 


4.Section 8 of the
Agreement (Option Exercise Extension) is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:


 


In the event that Employer, without cause, either terminates
Employee’s employment or fails to renew this Agreement upon expiration hereof, then the period to exercise any option to
purchase the securities of Employer of which Employee may be possessed shall be extended to the earlier to occur of (i) the expiration
thereof as set forth in the option instrument or (ii) the 10th anniversary of the original date of grant.


 


Except as set forth herein, all of the other provisions of the
Agreement shall remain in effect.


 


This amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which together shall be considered one and the same agreement.


 


[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]


 



    	 



    	 



    

 


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed
this amendment on the 20th day of December, 2012.


 










	 	 	DERMA SCIENCES, INC.
	 	 	 
	 		/s/   Edward J. Quilty
	 	 	By: Edward J. Quilty
Title: President and Chief Executive
Officer









	 	 	EMPLOYEE.
	 	 	 
	 		/s/    Robert C. Cole
	 	 	Name:  Robert C. Cole



 








    	2
From: pleach@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:01:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patricia Leach

Saint Paul, MN 55118
|  |  15.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  |        16.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Corporation as of and for the period covered by the  Report. |
|--|-----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  March      10, 2009 | /s/      J. Gerald Bazewicz               |
|--------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                 | J.      Gerald Bazewicz                   |
|                                 | President      and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |

----
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSolar Proton Transport Within an ICRU Sphere Surrounded by a Complex Shield: Ray-trace GeometryA computationally efficient 3DHZETRN code with enhanced neutron and light ion (Z is less than or equal to 2) propagation was recently developed for complex, inhomogeneous shield geometry described by combinatorial objects. Comparisons were made between 3DHZETRN results and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations at locations within the combinatorial geometry, and it was shown that 3DHZETRN agrees with the MC codes to the extent they agree with each other. In the present report, the 3DHZETRN code is extended to enable analysis in ray-trace geometry. This latest extension enables the code to be used within current engineering design practices utilizing fully detailed vehicle and habitat geometries. Through convergence testing, it is shown that fidelity in an actual shield geometry can be maintained in the discrete ray-trace description by systematically increasing the number of discrete rays used. It is also shown that this fidelity is carried into transport procedures and resulting exposure quantities without sacrificing computational efficiency.Document ID20160002213Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsSlaba, Tony C.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Wilson, John W.*(Old Dominion Univ. Norfolk, VA, United States)*Badavi, Francis F.*(Old Dominion Univ. Norfolk, VA, United States)*Reddell, Brandon D.*(NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX, United States)*Bahadori, Amir A.*(NASA Johnson Space Center Houston, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredFebruary 23, 2016Publication DateDecember 1, 2015Subject CategorySpace RadiationSpace Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberL-20652NASA/TP-2015-218994NF1676L-23300Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 651549.02.07.10Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20160002213.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
From: karinmorin@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:53:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing to request that you rescind the mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization

procedures be covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to patients.

I do not understand why these medications and procedures must be covered by all plans. Many people,

including myself and my husband (a physician) object to paying for these medications and procedures

on moral grounds. Many others will want to pay for them, and should be able to find insurance plans

which will cover them. Why not leave the choice up to the individual, if the individual is buying

insurance? Why not leave the choice up to the employer, whether for cost or moral reasons, if the

employer is buying insurance? Surely allowing a choice is not only the best way to respect the diversity

of opinion in our free society, but the best way to insure that we take responsibility for our moral

decisions. We should not be required to pay for others' moral choices when they differ from our own.

If you don't see the sense of rescinding this regulation, then I ask that you expand conscience

protections for any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or

religious objections. I strongly oppose the government forcing this "free" insurance coverage on

Americans in violation of their consciences, especially for drugs and devices that I and many others

oppose because some can cause an abortion.

I also ask that you reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. The legal mandate as it now stands clearly violates the spirit of

conscience laws. Such laws intend to prohibit government discrimination against anyone who objects

to various health services on moral or religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the

regulation is so narrow as to only include churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and

organizations that have conscience objections will be required to choose between either violating their

conscience or not being able to offer employees health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to subsidize morally objectionable health services. I again urge you in the

strongest way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of

mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

Karin Morin

Needham Heights, MA 02494
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<CIK>                                      0001036506
<NAME>                   Stoneville Insurance Company

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           922,718
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          922,825
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            922,825
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               1,274,517
<CASH>                                       1,090,801
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             484,413
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,938,133
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              1,414,533
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          1,245,917
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  4,115
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       503,384
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,365,670
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,938,133
<PREMIUMS>                                   1,505,644
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             95,423
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                               1,623,557
<BENEFITS>                                   1,183,749
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         1,908,192
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                132,683
<INCOME-TAX>                                    51,745
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             80,938
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    80,938
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
<RESERVE-OPEN>                               1,258,463
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                          1,183,749
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                             (206,311)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             289,609
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               531,755
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                              1,414,533
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        206,311



</TABLE>
From: midog@openrange.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:25:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mr. & Mrs. Michael Garrett

Decatur, IN 46733
# New Coast Guard Cutters Visit Lebanon for 1st Middle East Stop

/ Published July 25, 2022
MANAMA, BAHRAIN, 
Two U.S. Coast Guard fast response cutters arrived in Beirut, Lebanon for a scheduled port visit July 25, marking their arrival to the Middle East after departing the United States and transiting the Mediterranean Sea.Fast response cutters USCGC John Scheuerman (WPC 1146) and USCGC Clarence Sutphin Jr. (WPC 1147) are the newest additions to a slate of Coast Guard ships supporting U.S. 5th Fleet from Bahrain.“The John Scheuerman crew is excited to begin operations in U.S. 5th Fleet where we will have the opportunity to collaborate with our partners in the region,” said Lt. Trent Moon, commanding officer of John Scheuerman. “I am extremely proud of this crew and they have proved that we are ready for the opportunities ahead.”The visit comes on the heels of the Lebanese Armed Forces completing an annual maritime exercise with U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, July 23. Approximately 60 U.S. personnel from the Navy, Marine Corps, Army and Coast Guard participated in bilateral exchanges focused on maritime security operations, mine countermeasures and explosive ordnance disposal.“The crew and I are thrilled to arrive in Lebanon en route to our new operating station,” said Lt. David Anderson, commanding officer of Clarence Sutphin Jr.While in Beirut, crewmembers will meet with Lebanese Navy counterparts on subjects related to shipboard operations, safety and damage control. Coast Guardsmen will also participate in cultural exchange opportunities planned ashore.The Sentinel-class cutters are the final two of six that are overseen by Patrol Forces Southwest Asia, the Coast Guard's largest unit outside of the United States. The new cutters feature advanced communications systems and improved surveillance and reconnaissance equipment.The ships are forward-deployed to U.S. 5th Fleet to help ensure maritime security and stability across the Middle East.The U.S. 5th Fleet operating area includes 21 countries, the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea, parts of the Indian Ocean and three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, Bab al-Mandeb and Suez Canal.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

J & B ENTERPRISES, INC., ;=; 

d/b/a RHYTHM SHINE, Z] 

Complainant 

• '-•'? 

V. Docket No. 16-08-07 ^^g 

METROPOLITAN NASHVILLE o 

AIRPORT AUTHORITY, ^ ^ ^ 

Respondent. 

ORDER OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

Although 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 16, Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted 

Airport Enforcement Proceedings is intended to expedite substantially the handling and 

disposition of airport-related complaints. Section 16.11(a) provides that an extension of time 

may be grzmted where necessziry or appropriate for a fair and complete hearing of the matters 

before the agency. 

In the foregoing matter, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requires additional time 

for a fair and complete hearing of the matter. Accordingly, the FAA's Final Agency Decision 

is extended and now due to be rendered on or before March S, 2010. 

Date: 

Fanny Rivej; 

Assistant Administrator for Civil Rights 

and FAA Diversity Advocate 

2//^//0 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on February 16,2010,1 caused to be placed in the United States mail 

(first class, postage paid), or personally delivered a true copy of tiie ORDER OF EXTENSION 

addressed to: 

Arthur?. Berg 

Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP 

641 Lexington Ave., Suite 1409 

New York, New York 10022 

Aberg@Kaplan.kirsch.com 

(212)328-9515 

(646) 514-5440 fax 

Thomas J. Henderson 

Henderson Law Firm, PLLC 

1425 K. Street, NW, Suite 350 

Washington, DC 20005 

(202) 587-5687 

(202) 587-5601 fax "i'' 

Wilbur S. Barham, Director 

National Airport Civil Rights Policy and 

Compliance 

Office of Civil Rights
**EXHIBIT 32.1****WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Cuisine Solutions, Inc.(the “Company”), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof: (a) the Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 of the Company for the period ended June 24, 2006 filed on the date hereof with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (b) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.         /s/ Stanislas Vilgrain Chief Executive Officer September 22, 2006         Stanislas Vilgrain             /s/ Yuyun Tristan Kuo Chief Financial Officer, September 22, 2006         Yuyun Tristan Kuo Treasurer and Corporate Secretary  
55