alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Gary.Kelly@EarsToHear.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:02:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gary Kelly

Fitchburg, MA 01420
No. 497.

#### Malat et al. *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

*George T. Altman*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, I. Henry Kutz*and *Morton K. Rothschild*for respondent.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
From: weixelc2@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:12:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Creighton Weixel

Goshen, IN 46528
EXHIBIT 23
 
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on FormS-3 (Nos. 333-150218 and 333-170652) of Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation of our report dated February 22, 2011 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.
   
  Peoria, Illinois
 February 22, 2011
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02

- 19

- 00458

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 415th District Court

Parker County, Texas

Tria l Court No. CV19

- 0516

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Gabriel and Kerr, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### C APSTONE 

### C LASSIC 

### C ONSTRUCTION



### , LLC

, Appellant

V



### .

E RIC 

### A DDISON 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered “Appellant ’ s Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” We grant the

motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex . R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Each party must bear its own costs of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered : February 13, 20 20
No. P67/9.

#### World Wide Automobiles Corp. and Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States, protests 60/11285, etc. (New York).

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of heaters for Volkswagen vehicles, dedicated to use as parts of said vehicles, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Gallagher & Ascher Company*v. *United States*(52 CCPA11, C.A.D. 849), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Central Command

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  ABOUT US    -  COMMAND PRIORITIES             
  -  LEADERSHIP             
  -  COMPONENT COMMANDS             
  -  HISTORY             
  -  POSTURE STATEMENT 
-  CENTCOM AOR    -  CENTCOM COALITION 
-  OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES    -  USMTM 
-  CONTACT    -  OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT             
  -  COMMUNITY RELATIONS             
  -  THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE             
  -  INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL             
  -  MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL 
-  MEDIA    -  SOCIAL MEDIA             
  -  NEWS ARTICLES             
  -  PRESS RELEASES             
  -  STATEMENTS             
  -  IMAGERY             
  -  VIDEOS             
  -  TRANSCRIPTS 
-  VISITORS AND PERSONNEL    -  FAMILY CENTER             
  -  FAMILY READINESS             
  -  CENTCOM WEBMAIL             
  -  SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY             
  -  ACCOUNTABILITY             
  -  EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS             
  -  USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS             
  -  FOIA LIBRARY             
  -  INNOVATION OASIS             
  -  WELCOME GUIDE 

HomeMEDIANEWS ARTICLESNews Article View

# Jordan, U.S. celebrate training cycle completion

By Sgt. 1st Class Shaiyla HakeemArea Support Group - Jordan

                JORDAN  –              

                New Jersey National Guard Soldiers, with 1st Squadron, 102nd Calvary Regiment, 44th Infantry Brigade Combat Team of the 42nd Infantry Division, watch as Jordan Border Guard Force Soldiers, with the 7th Mechanized Battalion, 48th Mechanized Brigade, fire live ammunition at a range during a Jordan Operational Engagement Program (JOEP) training cycle at Joint Training Center-Jordan in September 2019. Jordan and the United States have a strong and enduring partnership in regard to joint training and the JOEP further cements that partnership through persistent training with the Border Guard Forces, Quick Reaction Forces and the 77th Marine Battalion. (U.S. Army photo by Maj. David Zuzak)            

                Jordan, U.S. celebrate training cycle completion            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Maj. David Zuzak

VIRIN: 191003-A-PA428-776

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
No. 486.

#### Vulcan Materials Co. *v.*Sauber, District Director of Internal Revenue, et al.

*Forest D. Siefkin*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer*and *Melva M. Graney*for respondents.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 140 

Requesting the Secretary of Defense to remove members of the United States 

Armed Forces from street patrol duty in Iraq. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2007 

Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting the Secretary of Defense to remove members 

of the United States Armed Forces from street patrol 

duty in Iraq. 

Whereas the conflict in Iraq has become a civil war for which 

there is no military solution; 

Whereas members of the United States Armed Forces are 

targets for attacks by insurgents in Iraq, and approximately 60 percent of Iraqis support such attacks; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces are conducting street 

patrols in Iraq, which has led to an increasingly high rate 

of casualties of members of the Armed Forces; 

Whereas the conduct of street patrols in Iraq should be the 

sole duty of trained Iraqi troops; 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 140 IH 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces would be more effective if they were used to fortify sensitive areas in Iraq, 

protect Iraqi Government officials, entities, and functions, and respond to destabilizing emergencies throughout Iraq; and 

Whereas Iraqi politics and United States diplomacy, including 

dialogue with Iran, Syria, and other countries in the region, are the only strategies that can end the civil war 

in Iraq: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) requests the Secretary of Defense to remove 

3 members of the United States Armed Forces from 

4 street patrol duty in Iraq by not later than the end 

5 of the six-month period beginning on the date of the 

6 adoption of this resolution, with the exception of 

7 those members of the Armed Forces who are train8 ing Iraqi troops to conduct street patrols in Iraq; 

9 and 

10 (2) requests the Secretary of Defense to ensure 

11 that members of the Armed Forces who are taken 

12 off of street patrol duty in Iraq are used to fortify 

13 sensitive areas in Iraq, protect Iraqi Government of14 ficials, entities, and functions, and respond to desta15 bilizing emergencies throughout Iraq. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
From: robison@afo.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:20:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Brett Whitaker

Fernandina Beach, FL 32034
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SIGNATURE EYEWEAR, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED JANUARY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                         238,668
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,095,496
<ALLOWANCES>                                   288,867
<INVENTORY>                                 16,682,998
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,738,027
<PP&E>                                       3,919,164
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,356,990
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              37,407,695
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,677,556
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,188
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,663,751
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                37,407,695
<SALES>                                     12,003,409
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,003,409
<CGS>                                        4,807,448
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,431,958
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,066
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             195,498
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (420,429)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (168,171)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (252,258)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (252,258)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
From: ahauck1@rochester.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:19:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Albert Hauck

Spencerport, NY 14559
From: brrotha@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:11:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Betty Rotha

Spokane, WA 99208
From: aaampennisi@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:55:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Angelo & Angela Pennisi

Morristown, NJ 07960