alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1304 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 26, 2008.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 6052) to promote increased public transportation use, to promote 
increased use of alternative fuels in providing public transportation, and for 
other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All 
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those 
arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to 
the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment 
under the five-minute rule. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of 
order against provisions in the bill are waived. Notwithstanding clause 11 of 
rule XVIII, no amendment to the bill shall be in order except those printed in 
the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such 
amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 
only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be 
debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by 
the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 
be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 
Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such amendments are waived 
except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration in the House of H.R. 6052 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair 
may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated 
by the Speaker.
    Sec. 3.  It shall be in order at any time on the legislative day of 
Thursday, June 26, 2008, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House 
suspend the rules relating to:
     (a) a measure concerning the Commodity Exchange Act and energy markets; and
    (b) a measure concerning the issuance of oil and gas leases on Federal lands 
or waters.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: don@gracem.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:46:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Don Ten Hoeve

Hudsonville, MI 49426
#### Hall v. Smith.

— Motion granted, with ten dollars costs in one case.
**EXHIBIT 15.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement on Form S-8 No. 333-156454 of Global Ship Lease, Inc. of our reports dated June 19, 2009 relating to the combined financial statements of Global Ship Lease, Inc., and its Predecessor, which appears in the AnnualReport to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 20-F. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

PricewaterhouseCoopers 

Neuilly-sur-Seine, France 

June 25, 2009 **

*PricewaterhouseCoopers is represented byPricewaterhouseCoopers Audit, 63 rue de**Villiers—92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, France*
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsImportance of the Natural Terrestrial Environment with Regard to Advanced Launch Vehicle Design and DevelopmentThe terrestrial environment is an important forcing function in the design and development of the launch vehicle. The scope of the terrestrial environment includes the following phenomena: Winds; Atmospheric Thermodynamic Models and Properties; Thermal Radiation; U.S. and World Surface Environment Extremes; Humidity; Precipitation, Fog, and Icing; Cloud Characteristics and Cloud Cover Models; Atmospheric Electricity; Atmospheric Constituents; Vehicle Engine Exhaust and Toxic Chemical Release; Occurrences of Tornadoes and Hurricanes; Geological Hazards, and Sea States. One must remember that the flight profile of any launch vehicle is in the terrestrial environment. Terrestrial environment definitions are usually limited to information below 90 km. Thus, a launch vehicle's operations will always be influenced to some degree by the terrestrial environment with which it interacts. As a result, the definition of the terrestrial environment and its interpretation is one of the key launch vehicle design and development inputs. This definition is a significant role, for example, in the areas of structures, control systems, trajectory shaping (performance), aerodynamic heating and take off/landing capabilities. The launch vehicle's capabilities which result from the design, in turn, determines the constraints and flight opportunities for tests and operations.Document ID19960047082Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsPearson, S. D.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Vaughan, W. W.*(Alabama Univ. Huntsville, AL United States)*Batts, G. W.*(Computer Sciences Corp. Huntsville, AL United States)*Jasper, G. L.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1996Subject CategoryEnvironment PollutionReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-108511NAS 1.15:108511Accession Number96N32864Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960047082.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

37 BULLETIN 1053, PLATE 3

EMINEM SEC. 5, 7.15 N.,R.3W.

23

NWASWK SEC. 12, T.14 N, R.2 W.

Fe |

28
6s-v
EMINEM SEC. 33, T. 14 N., R. 2 W.

39
6s-W
‘SENSEX SEC. 30, T.15 N.,R.3.M.

36
GS-CH-4

BASE OF LINCOLN FORMATION (OF WEAVER)

7

GS-£2
SWKSWM« SEC, 24, 7.15 N., RW.

‘SWASEY SEC. 22, T. 14 N, 3 W.

6
GS-E
NWAESW3 SEC. 24, T. 15 N.,.R.1W.

442728 0 -58 -(in pocket)

i ‘wu-4 8a
NEMNEM SEC, 14, T. 15 N., R.1 W. Te-1 9
_ = =e SENSE SEC. 1, 7.15 NR. We 1-2
anu 20 SEMNES SEC. 14, T.15 N, RIM.
— —— Qlden iow bed Gs-K
—— NESE SEC. 7, 14, RW. 2 1
GS-CH 8
—_seo oO — - GS-6
——— —— “4 hese S307 15 wn, MASH SECT. 19M, RE
Pree tn 13 wu-2 a ot
— [NveeNWE SEC. 21, T.15 NR. 1 W. 13
26
os =
WASH SEC. 23,T.14.N,R.2M.
Upper Thompson bed _. —_ —— —— |
=== ee as sai SWHENWA SEC. 20,715 W,R.1M.
oe eS 18 5
GS-1
SWARSWH SEC. 33, T.15 NR Me ie
| 17 FW
[sy CENTER SW SEC. 297.15 N.,R.1W.
22
[NESW SEC. 19, T.15 NR.
29
6-00 AE SS
[NESCSW2 SEC 29,7. 15 N, R.2 W. te ity bed SS ae
at es a an ___ smith bed __ —_ — —
a aa
40
GS-x
NEANEN SEC. 25, 1.14 N., RAW
30
Gs-P
4
4 15 NRW.
6S-cH-9 31 aoc
35 NENSE SEC. 14,1. 14 ., R.3 W. GS-BB
6S-CH2 [NWN SEC. 7,15 N., R.2M.
‘SWHeSWH SEC. 11,T.15 N,R.3 We 27
EXPLANATION 65-0 2 z
‘SWHeSEX SEC.34,T.15 N, R.2W. i
NENW SEC. 3, T.14 N, R1W. Frmse
431
3 028
GS--AA 147
‘SWEeSEN SEC 13, T.15 W.,R.3 W.
013
142
003
25 454
GS-N
NWSW SEC. 1,15 N, R.2 W. 0.05
830
‘Sandy limestone Intrusive igneous rock =
‘Contralia
Fe 2) 42
Siltstone 014 + +
336 24 a
Permeability of sandstone measured Ge GW-1 es Sa
in millidarcies shown on right ‘SEMSWH SEC. 36, 7. 16 N., R. 2 W. 19 a
aa 300-4 528 z 6S-A — 36 aa : .
Porosity of sandstone measured in “
Percent shown on left is ‘SWHSWH SEC. 32, 7.16 N.,R.1W. 4) + +
FW
269
A. H. Foote water well 200
cw
Great Western Coal Co.test hole pee
MC
Mendota Coal Co. diamond-drill hole 1004
t [seo ma
‘Thompson Creek Coal Co. diamond-<rill hole q Ged
Gs tT.
U.S. Geological Survey test hole im id
wu BASE OF SKOOKUMCHUCK Fi
Washington Union Coal Co.test hole SRMATION
INDEX MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF TEST HOLES

12 5 Miles

STRATIGRAPHIC SECTIONS IN SHALLOW TEST HOLES DRILLED IN THE SKOOKUMCHUCK FORMATION, CENTRALIA-CHEHALIS DISTRICT, SHOWING THEIR CORRELATION AND THE STRATIGRAPHIC POSITION OF THE COAL BEDS, WASHINGTON
#### Eli Tinklepaugh, Respondent, v. Chester Miller, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Landon, J.
EXHIBIT 10.41

                                  March 1, 1998


Tristar Corporation
12500 San Pedro Avenue, Suite 500
San Antonio, Texas 78216

      Re:   Promissory Note dated August 31, 1993, of Tristar Corporation,
            payable to Nevell Investment S. A.  in the original amount of
            $1,500,000

            Promissory Note dated April 25, 1994, of Tristar Corporation,
            payable to Nevell Investment S. A. in the original principal
            amount of $2,500,000

            Promissory Note dated December 18, 1994, of Tristar Corporation,
            payable to Nevell Investment S. A. in the original principal
            amount of $4,000,000

Gentlemen:

      This is to verify our agreement, in consideration for $10 and other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged and conferred, that the interest rates on the refinanced Promissory
Notes shall be and have been reduced to the extent that an aggregate of
$1,163,708 of interest shall be due upon payment in full of such Promissory
Notes.

      Please verify your agreement to the foregoing by executing this letter in
the space provided below.


                                            NEVELL INVESTMENT S.A.

                                            By: ____________________________

AGREED TO this _____ day
of July, 1998

TRISTAR CORPORATION

By: _____________________________
From: federatedchurchofmcdonald@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:42:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" be covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to patients. If

you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations that provide

individual and group insurance and for individual policy holders who have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. In addition, individuals who are not part of a group plan should not be

forced to violate their moral/religious views. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience

laws which prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on

moral or religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to

only include churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have

conscience objections will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being

able to offer employees health insurance. In addition, some pastors have their health care coverage

under their spouse's group policy which would not allow this conscience exclusion.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me (insurees) who object to

being forced by the federal government to offer, buy, or subsidize contraceptives, especially when some

of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. I again urge you in the strongest way possible

to reverse course and remove contraceptives from the list of mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mark Adams

Mc Donald, KS 67745
From: jhnnynicholas@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:35:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Johnny Nicholas

Richwood, WV 26261
(R.D. 11478)

#### Omega Import Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 5639, etc.

(Decided January 30, 1968)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*Mdwin L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Watson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

> 1. That the involved merchandise was entered after the effective date of Section 2 of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (Public Law 927, 84th Congress, T.D. 54165) and is not identified on the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant thereto (T.D. 54521).

> 2. That on or about the dates of exportation, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, *769offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States were the appraised unit values less 1%.

> 3. That the appeals may be submitted on this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and issue described hereinabove and abandoned in all other respects.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here in question, and that such values were the appraised unit values, less 1 percent.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
From: ethlynj@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:33:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am begging that you do everything you can to rescind the mandate that all "contraceptives" and

sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to patients. If you

cannot, I ask you to at least expand the conscience protections to ANY organizations that provide

individual and group insurance based on their moral or religious objections. I truly am opposed to the

government forcing Americans to fund (with our taxes) free insurance coverage, and I especially hate

the fact that you force me to subsidize drugs and devices that I personally oppose because some of

them can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

If we must have the insurance ( and I will continue to pray that we will not), at least reconsider your

definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience protection for any organization and

business that has moral or religious objection to providing such insurance to their employees. This legal

mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which prohibit government discrimination against

those who object to various health services on moral or religious grounds. The definition of "religious

employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include churches This will mean that a host of

businesses and organizations that have conscience objections will be required to choose between either

violating their consciences or not being able to offer employees health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize any and all contraceptives and sterilization

services, especially those that can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced

by the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the

strongest way possible to reverse the course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list

of mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ethlyn James

Cypress, TX 77429
From: jkstarbucks@charter.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:39:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Karin Gorton

Glendale, CA 91201