alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: k@familink.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:00:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Katherine Lamberton

Tucson, AZ 85704
https://fdms.erulemaking.net/.../component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480b1a698&Comment=true[8/23/2010 9:19:12 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: August 23, 2010

Received: July 15, 2010

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 80b1a698

Comments Due: August 27, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: HHS-OS-2010-0014

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Preexisting Condition Exclusions, Lifetime and Annual Limits,

Rescissions, and PatientProtections

Comment On: HHS-OS-2010-0014-0001

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Preexisting Condition Exclusions, Lifetime and Annual Limits,

Rescissions, and PatientProtections

Document: HHS-OS-2010-0014-DRAFT-0013

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-15278

Submitter Information

General Comment

Section 2711 applies to grandfathered group plans. This means that the highest annual limit that the

grandfathered group plan could have is $750,000. Section 1251 gives various scenarios as to ensure retention of

grandfather status. If a grandfathered grup health plan had a $1 million lifetime limit and no annual limit, does

that plan need to set its new annual limit at no less than $1 million to keep its grandfather status even though

Section 2711 applies to it?
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit  Fund VI,  L.P.,  Series 5 (the  "Partnership")  for the  quarters  ended
September 30, 2007 and June 30, 2007 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I,
Wilfred  N.  Cooper,  Jr.,  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  WNC &
Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  except to the extent  that such
     provisions require the audit report of Local Limited Partnership  financial
     statements  to  refer  to the  auditing  standards  of the  Public  Company
     Accounting   Oversight  Board  for  the   Partnership's   annual  financial
     statements and except that the Report is a cumulative  report covering each
     of the quarters ended September 30 and June 30, 2007 and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.




/s/Thomas J. Riha
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
May 16, 2008
Exhibit 23.1


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-2 (No. 333-44789), the Registration Statement on Form S-2 (No. 333-68811)
and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 which were previously filed by SGI
International (the "Company") of our report on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999
and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1999, dated
March 15, 2000, which report appears elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.



                                        /s/ J. H. COHN LLP

San Diego, California
March 15, 2000
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of VTEX Energy,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending October 31, 2003 (the "Report"), We, Stephen
F. Noser,  Chief Executive Officer and Randal B. McDonald,  Jr., Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/Stephen F. Noser
--------------------------
Stephen F. Noser
Chief Executive Officer
October 25, 2003

/s/Randal B. McDonald, Jr.
--------------------------
Randal B. McDonald, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
October 25, 2003
No. 235, Misc.

#### Wade *v.*Thomas, Warden.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky. Certiorari denied.
No. 342, Misc.

#### Duncan *v.*Maine.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Certiorari denied.
Opinion issued February 21, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-12-01045-CR

———————————

WILLIE CLARKE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 179th District Court 

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1364752

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Willie Clark, pleaded guilty to the felony offense of obtaining a 

controlled substance by misrepresentation or fraud with intent to obtain a 
2

controlled substance that was not medically necessary for the appellant.

1

 The trial 

court found appellant guilty, and, in accordance with the terms of appellant’s plea 

agreement with the State, sentenced appellant to confinement for three years. 

Appellant has filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.

In a plea-bargained case, a defendant may only appeal those matters that 

were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial or after obtaining the 

trial court’s permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.02 (West 

2006); TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). An appeal must be dismissed if a certification 

showing that the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the 

record. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Here, the trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See id. 

The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea-bargained case and the 

defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record 

supports the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Because appellant has no right of appeal, we must 

dismiss this appeal. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 

2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an 

appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must 

 1 See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.129(a-1), (d-1)(2) (West Supp. 

2012).
3

dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the 

appeal.”). 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. We dismiss all 

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Sharp, and Huddle.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
BULLETIN 1059 PLATE 3

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Boki a
Lodgepote 1g my ken Fm i) die <= ae

k
Pon ~*~ 434 + | go Bakken fm (m)
0 sh ( sh ( {
Dn K) e my xs Heath sh (m)
dog 43 oS
24 dog 293

43
(mas alfeath sh(m)

ul
Piérre sh (K)
e 43

Snole ae ime
feo) be 45!

! SHARON SPRINGS MEMB!

| ae SHALE a |
kK).

n

Hartville fm-(y-tp)
Pierre
24, ast] 24 teeg KK)

G in H
Ags amtilttess | oF
inneluso ss (py
4
+93 Pierre sh (K)
69

EXPLANATION

a
Outcrop, black shale containing 0.005
percent or more uranium

Aa

Outcrop, black shale containing more
than 0.001 and less than 0.005

percent uranium

+

Drill hole, black shale containing 0.005
Percent or more uranium

ee

Drill hole, black shale containing more

than 0.001 and less than 0.005
percent uranium

7

Pilog
es Manning co’ aire fn (op P)
eo von sh (M-B)

Sho 24
sage

ys

Woods), 2 Marcos Sh ()
2q4 cnt Sreen sree 29 <P) au
© $eraner doy (yy) if, Tre) 24 “24

|
|
|

SHALES | By
37, 48,50, 5

pecy i.
_Jbreatnitt fe fm Bhs

a

i A Belden sh (p)

toe)? 4
pss permosa fm (p)

Wonakoh fm, hoy
Uncompahgre it”)
17,24]

pa 9
2 Shole wi ‘ ) Drill hole, black shale, radioactivity data
ASI 7 ~ given in terms other than uranium
age 3 or equivalent uranium
*64,65,68 A Shale (€)
: / © 2, 24
Numbers correspond with numbers
ant annotated articles;
dicates that uranium content
is given in terms of equivalent
uranium. Age of rock given in
parentheses

0 Mermejo fm kin

ie ewes

Har TayoogA SHALE (DP) |

15, 6, II, 57, 7
Woodfor

6 { rd cl brit 1)

ae Shales (Tm) \
W » 18, 53, ra}, 80, 8 \
Sylvan sh (0)
5,6,79 j
wf WOODFORD ae (DP)
wat

S 1
Un RR

Me Lish f }

e
®S

Tm, Tertiary, Miocene M, Mississippian
Te, Tertiary, Eocene D, Devonian
K, Cretaceous S, Silurian

J, Jurassic O, Ordovician
‘R, Triassic €, Cambrian
P, Permian P€, Precambrian

P, Pennsylvanian

CF SHALE

Generalized outcrop area of black
shale, samples of which contain
0.005 percent or more uranium

QD

Shale absent

M |

|

: H

Woodford ch ea |
> ORRTID EY re es a a

Woodbi d (K. ! H

53, 78, ag onan son ia cachet) \ |

© | Eagle Ford shale(k) Ww
Woodbine sond (kK) f = énatk(K)

Eutaw fm (K) 5
Tuscalonsa fw), Ne ef

12. 18,79

12,18, 79, 80, 81

acer (o) NS iia

iN ake Gale aed 1 sh chk @
ee. jLisburne 1s(M) ree .
73 a \Shales(spM) %& Escondido fm (K)

- he 226
‘ Shales(0 or} Osan Calico Bluff fm (M)
< 73,74°%e S727
Kenmicott fm tk)
S aSholes(k) 4e44.

The geologic names and their age
designations are those used by
the authors of the cited publications
and may not necessarily follow
the usage of the U. S. Geological Survey|

GENERAL REFERENCES
Numbered as in annotated bibliography

Summaries of uranium deposits:
3 3,7, 10, 19, 20, 28, 33, 38, 40,
, 41, 47,59,
Reports presenting data on a number

of occurrences: 6, 27, 57, 58

\ Woodbin:
sand (K
\ 8

me: 3

0 200 Miles

a

st i ALASKA
2 400 MILES

MAP OF OCCURRENCES OF URANIUM-BEARING MARINE BLACK SHALES IN THE UNITED STATES; URANIUM CONTENT AND KEY TO REFERENCES

466353 © -58 (In pocket)
Exhibit








Assignment and Extension of Agreement No: 910024  “Yo Gabba Gabba!”


We refer to the Agreement between SmartKids, LLC of 150 Pico Boulevard, Santa Monica, California, 90405, USA (“Licensee”) and GabbaCaDabra LLC, of 15000 Ventura Blvd, 3rd Floor, Sherman Oaks, California, 91403, the USA (the “Licensor”) dated May 9, 2012. 


The Licensor and Licensee hereby agree to assign the Agreement to Athena Brands Inc, of 7620 Miramar Road, Suite 4200, San Diego, California 92126, USA (“Assignee”), and to amend the terms of the Agreement with effect from April 1, 2016 as follows:


1. License Period: The Term of the License Period set forth in the Standard Terms and Conditions shall be extended through to and including January 31, 2020 unless sooner terminated pursuant to the terms of the Agreement.


2. The parties hereby agree to assign the benefits and burdens from the Licensee hereunder to the Assignee and the Assignee hereby accepts such assignment.  


Notwithstanding the foregoing the Licensee undertakes to fully indemnify Licensor in the event that Assignee is in breach of the Agreement and fails to remedy such breach in accordance with the terms of the Agreement.


Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and all provisions of said Agreement modified, replaced, or deleted by this Amendment shall remain fully enforceable in their original forms with respect to the period prior to the date of this Amendment.




Kindly indicate your acceptance of the above by signing and returning a copy of this Assignment.


	
		
	Signed by: /s/ authorized signor GabbaCaDabra LLC
	Signed by: /s/ Thomas Ardnt

	An authorised signatory for and on 
behalf of GabbaCaDabra LLC
(Licensor)
	An authorised signatory for and on behalf of SmartKids, LLC
(Licensee)










	
	
	Signed by:  /s/ Sam J Messina III

	Sam J Messina III, CFO
Athena Brands, Inc (Assignee)
EXHIBIT 99.2
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**** **

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vail Banks, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Peter G. Williston, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
- T he Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

  /s/ Peter G. Williston                             Peter G. WillistonSenior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 12, 2002
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1297 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 241
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1297

                          [Report No. 110-731]

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6275) to amend the 
 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide individuals temporary relief 
       from the alternative minimum tax, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2008

    Mr. Welch of Vermont, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6275) to amend the 
 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide individuals temporary relief 
       from the alternative minimum tax, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 6275) to amend the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide individuals temporary relief 
from the alternative minimum tax, and for other purposes. All points of 
order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising 
under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment in the nature of a 
substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed 
in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall 
be considered as read. All points of order against provisions of the 
bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of H.R. 6275 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the 
Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as 
may be designated by the Speaker.
                                                 House Calendar No. 241

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1297

                          [Report No. 110-731]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6275) to amend the 
 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide individuals temporary relief 
       from the alternative minimum tax, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 24, 2008

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 134 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 134

 Recognizing and honoring the employees of the Department of Homeland 
Security for their efforts and contributions to protect and secure the 
                                Nation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2007

 Mr. Carney (for himself, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Thompson of Mississippi, 
Mr. Rogers of Alabama, Mr. Markey, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Dicks, Mr. 
McCaul of Texas, Ms. Harman, Mr. David Davis of Tennessee, Mrs. Lowey, 
Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mrs. Christensen, Mr. Langevin, Mr. Cuellar, 
 and Mr. Al Green of Texas) submitted the following resolution; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing and honoring the employees of the Department of Homeland 
Security for their efforts and contributions to protect and secure the 
                                Nation.

Whereas the United States must remain vigilant against all threats to the 
        homeland, including acts of terrorism, natural disasters, and other 
        emergencies;
Whereas the Department of Homeland Security marked its 4th anniversary on 
        January 24, 2007;
Whereas the more than 208,000 employees of the Department work tirelessly to 
        prepare the Nation to counter acts of terrorism, natural disasters, and 
        other emergencies;
Whereas the Department's employees work diligently to deter, detect, and prevent 
        acts of terrorism;
Whereas the Department's employees stand willing, ready, and able to respond if 
        catastrophe strikes;
Whereas the Department's employees support the Department's mission to protect 
        continuously the Nation's borders, airports, seaports, rail lines, and 
        other transit systems;
Whereas the Department's employees, together with employees of other agencies 
        and departments of the Federal Government, work with State, local, and 
        tribal partners to enhance disaster preparedness at all levels of 
        government;
Whereas the Department's employees are called upon to sacrifice time with their 
        families to work long hours to fulfill the Department's vital mission; 
        and
Whereas the Nation is indebted to the Department's employees for their efforts 
        and contributions: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives recognizes and honors 
the employees of the Department of Homeland Security for their 
exceptional efforts and contributions to protect and secure the Nation.
                                 <all>
```
#### EASTER *v.*DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS OF BALTIMORE CITY.

No. 584.

Decided January 7, 1963.

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
From: louanncrownover@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:15:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lou Ann Crownover

Oklahoma City, OK 73107