alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No.  333-97047

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  226				Trade Date: 10/03/02
(To Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2002 & 

  Prospectus dated August 8,2002)					Issue Date:  10/08/02
The Date of this Pricing Supplement October 4, 2002
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QKK6   2.30%	10/15/04	     100%	        0.55%                Semi Annually	     YES	    NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		      Date		Count

$5,069,000.00	$5,041,120.50	ABN AMRO Inc.	   04/15/03		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes	  X   No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.   Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $0 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated August 8, 2002.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
No. 105, Misc.

#### Rideau *v.*Louisiana.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Jack P. F. Gremillion,*Attorney General of Louisiana,

and *Weldon A. Cousins, M. E. Culligan, Wm. P. Schuler*and *Dorothy D. Wolbrette,*Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

Motion for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Louisiana granted. Case transferred to the appellate docket.
#### Francesco Rammauro, Respondent, *v.*Illinois Surety Company, Appellant.

#### Guido Consenting, Respondent, *v.*Illinois Surety Company, Appellant.

Reported below, 152 App. Div. 933, 934.

(Argued January 6, 1913;

decided January 14, 1913.)

Motions to dismiss the appeal in each of the above-entitled actions from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 4,1912, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court in an action to recover upon a surety bond.

The motions were made upon the ground that the cases were not appealable to the Court of Appeals.

*Achille J. Oishei*for motion.

*Nelson L. Keach*opposed.

Motions denied in each case, with ten dollars costs in one case. The provisions of section 191 of the Code of Civil Procedure apply only to bonds or undertakings on appeal.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carlos Cruz, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 977]

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate a decision and order of this Court dated January 10, 1994 *(People v Cruz,*200 AD2d 581), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, *682Queens County, rendered April 1, 1991, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The defendant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see, Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Miller and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.
<page>		                 EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Cornerstone
Fund II (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin Perry,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.








By:     /s/ Kevin Perry

Name:       Kevin Perry
Title:      Chief Financial Officer

Date:       March 31, 2005
From: jbrown2@cablelynx.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:59:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jo brown

Pine Bluff, AR 71603
<PAGE>

                       COMPANY:  WORLD OF SCIENCE, INC.
                                 TICKER: WOSI
                                EXCHANGE:  NMS

                               FORM-TYPE:  10-Q
          Exhibit 11.  Statement re Computation of Per Share Earnings


                       FILING-DATE:  September 14, 1999

                                  Exhibit 11

                            WORLD OF SCIENCE, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE NET LOSS
                     (In thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 Quarter Ended
                                                                 -------------

Basic Loss Per Share:                                  July 31, 1999        August 1, 1998
                                                       -------------        --------------
<S>                                                    <C>                  <C>
Net loss                                                 $ (1,965)             $(1,177)

Weighted average common shares outstanding                  4,760                5,080

Basic loss per share                                     $  (0.41)             $ (0.23)
                                                         ========              =======

Diluted Loss Per Share:

Net loss                                                 $ (1,965)             $(1,177)

Weighted average common shares outstanding                  4,760                5,080

Diluted loss per share                                   $  (0.41)             $ (0.23)
                                                         ========              =======
</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Intrusion Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael L. Paxton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| March 29,   2011 | /s/ Michael L. Paxton   |   |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                  | Michael L. Paxton       |   |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-KSB for
the year ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Obal, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: December 26, 2006                 By: /s/ David A. Obal
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David A. Obal
                                            Chief Financial Officer


                                       21
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

 

          I, Robert E. Matthiessen, certify that: 

          1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of inTEST Corporation; 

          2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

          3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

          4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

        (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

        (b)  [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]; 

        (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

        (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

          5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors: 

        (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

        (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 15, 2004/s/ Robert E. Matthiessen
| Date:   March 1, 2010 |   | By:    | /s/ John C. Warren                   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |   |   | John C. Warren                       |
|                                      |   |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                      |   |   | (principal executive officer)        |

| Date:   March 1, 2010 |   | By:    | /s/ David V. Devault                                            |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                      |   |   | David V. Devault                                                |
|                                      |   |   | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
|                                      |   |   | (principal financial and accounting officer)                    |
From: coachlevert@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:53:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Samuel G LeVert

Kosciusko, MS 39090
From: dcmalott@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:03:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

D. C. Malott

Chesterfield, MO 63017
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:56:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private <a

href="http://lwken.com/click/?s=63452&c=149579" style="color:#006600;font-weight:bold;textdecoration:underline;background:none;padding:0;margin:0;">health insurance</a> with no co-pay to

patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations

that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I strongly oppose

the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices that I

oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

<a href="http://lwken.com/click/?s=63452&c=149579" style="color:#006600;font-weight:bold;textdecoration:underline;background:none;padding:0;margin:0;">health insurance</a>.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

J. Hendrickson
---

---

EXHIBIT 23.3



Date:  
  March 28, 2004 
  Our ref:  417145



**CONSENT
  OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

As independent public accountans of Bay Heart Ltd, we hereby consent to the
  incorporation of our report included in this Form 10-K, into Ampal - American
  Israel Corporations previously filed Registration Statements file No.
  333-61895 and NO. 333-55970.



**Brightman
  Almagor & Co
  Cretified Public Accountants
  Member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu**

---

---
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-92053, 33-2171, 33-17848 (Post-Effective Amendment No. 1),
33-33803, 33-33807, 33-39323, 33-36911, 33-45176, 33-45231, 33-45233, 33-56952, 33-58708,
33-72158, 033-55265 (Post-Effective Amendment No. 1), 033-60379, 033-63547, 333-11639, 333-15923,
333-29099, 333-70459, 333-74371, 333-34726, 333-44508, 333-50992, 333-59504, 333-64988, and
333-76764 of 3Com Corporation on Form S-8 of our report dated June 24, 2002 (July 16, 2002 as to Note 21), appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of 3Com Corporation for the year ended May 31, 2002.

DELOITTE &
TOUCHE LLP

San
Jose, California
August 2, 2002

---

QuickLinks