alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 16, 2011 | /s/ Toni M. Perazzo        |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|               | Toni M. Perazzo                                               |
|               | Chief Financial Officer                                       |
|               |                                                          |
From: Danaalbers@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:21:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dana Albers

Arlington Heights, IL 60005
| RATES EFFECTIVE for Variable Denomination Floating Rate Demand Notesas of  November 22, 2010: |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6710

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TYRONE STROTHERS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-92-365)

Submitted: November 21, 1996 Decided: December 3, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Strothers, Appellant Pro Se. David Calhoun Stephens, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-

132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. United States v. Strothers, No.

CR-92-365 (D.S.C. Apr. 3, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 66467.

#### United Mineral & Chemical Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 61/1454.

Protest abandoned January 18, 1962. (Not published.) (Initial No. 283338-K.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,766,317
<SECURITIES>                                   364,359
<RECEIVABLES>                               24,981,061
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,252,892
<INVENTORY>                                  4,881,902
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,734,246
<PP&E>                                      36,511,952
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,714,961)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             147,777,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       28,833,037
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,651,867
<COMMON>                                    88,888,863
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,560,004
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               147,777,940
<SALES>                                     31,923,061
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            31,923,061
<CGS>                                     (20,473,040)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (9,180,905)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (367,022)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,975,812
<INCOME-TAX>                                   918,311
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,057,501
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        


</TABLE>
From: lpcarhart@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:32:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Pam Carhart

Vincentown, NJ 08088
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: AneroidMountain quadrangle, Oregon: 7.5 minute series (topographic)**
 
2014 | 2015
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28/6:45117-B 2/
Item Number:0080-G-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000978804
 
July 23, 2018
From: rippere@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:20:27 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I ask that you rescind the mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by

private health insurance with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course, I ask you to expand

conscience protections for any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral

or religious objections. I strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans,

especially for drugs and devices that I oppose, because some of these can cause an abortion (such as

ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate violates the spirit of conscience laws which prohibit

government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or religious

grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to.

Sincerely,

Larry Rippere

Mountain View, CA 94043
No. 464.

#### United States *v.*Muniz et al.

*Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Guilfoyle*and *Morton Hollander*for the United States. *Charles Andrews Ellis*for respondent Muniz.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 100 (Friday, May 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 29836]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11982]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice before Waiver With Respect to Land at Richmond 
International Airport, Richmond, Virginia

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent of waiver with respect to land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is publishing notice of proposed release of 1.318 
acres of land at the Richmond International Airport, Richmond, Virginia 
to the Henrico County for construction of the widening of Charles City 
Road. An additional 0.622 Acres will be permanently utilized by Henrico 
County within utility, and drainage easements. There are no adverse 
impacts to the Airport and the land is not needed for airport 
development as shown on the Airport Layout Plan. Fair Market Value of 
the land has been established. The Airport will benefit from the 
improvements to Charles City Road with the more efficient intersection 
at Airport Drive. The east and west bound through lanes and dedicated 
right and left turn lanes will provide a more efficient entry to the 
Airport. These intangible benefits will offset the value of the 
released property.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 23, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to 
the FAA at the following address: Terry J. Page, Manager, FAA 
Washington Airports District Office, 23723 Air Freight Lane, Suite 210, 
Dulles, VA 20166.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be 
mailed or delivered to Jon E. Mathiasen, President & CEO, Capital 
Region Airport Commission, at the following address: Jon E. Mathiasen, 
President & CEO, Capital Region Airport Commission, 1 Richard E. Byrd 
Terminal Drive, Richmond International Airport, VA 23250.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Terry Page, Manager, Washington 
Airports District Office, 23723 Air Freight Lane, Suite 210, Dulles, VA 
20166; telephone (703) 661-1354, fax (703) 661-1370, email 
Terry.Page@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Wendell H. Ford Aviation investment and 
Reform Act for the 21st Century, public Law 10-181 (Apr. 5, 2000; 114 
Stat. 61) (AIR 21), as amended, requires that a 30 day public notice 
must be provided before the Secretary may waive any condition imposed 
on an interest in surplus property.

    Issued in Dulles, Virginia on May 16, 2014.
Terry J. Page,
Manager, Washington Airports District Office, Eastern Region.
[FR Doc. 2014-11982 Filed 5-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Educational ObjectivesHeritage EducationHigher EducationHispanic AmericansLanguage MaintenanceLanguage ProficiencyLiteracyLiteracy EducationNative Language InstructionNative SpeakersSecond Language LearningSecondary EducationSpanishSpanish SpeakingTransfer of Training

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
Exhibit 23.1


Consent of Sidley Austin LLP (included as part of Exhibit 5.1).
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 174 / Monday, September 11, 2023 / Presidential Documents 62435 

Notice of September 7, 2023 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to 

Ethiopia 

On September 17, 2021, by Executive Order 14046, I declared a national 

emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act 

(50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat 

to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted 

by the situation in and in relation to northern Ethiopia. 

The situation in and in relation to northern Ethiopia, which has been marked 

by activities that threaten the peace, security, and stability of Ethiopia and 

the greater Horn of Africa region, continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United 

States. For this reason, the national emergency declared in Executive Order 

14046 of September 17, 2021, must continue in effect beyond September 

17, 2023. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national 

emergency declared in Executive Order 14046 with respect to Ethiopia. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

September 7, 2023. [FR Doc. 2023–19742 

Filed 9–8–23; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3395–F3–P 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PRESDOC-O1BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
Exhibit
3.1


STATE
OF DELAWARE


CERTIFICATE
OF AMENDMENT


OF
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION


OF


MATERIAL
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.





MATERIAL TECHNOLOGIES,
INC., (the
“Corporation”) a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the
General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY:





FIRST:The Board of Directors of the Corporation has duly adopted a resolution,
dated September 22, 2008, setting forth a proposed amendment to the Certificate
of Incorporation of this Corporation in accordance with the provisions of
Section 141 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. The resolution setting
forth the proposed amendment is as follows:





RESOLVED, thatArticle One is hereby
amended in its entirety to read:





The name
of the Corporation shall be “Matech Corp.”





RESOLVED FURTHER,that Article
Four is hereby amended to add the following to the end of subsection
(a):  Upon the Effective Date (as defined below) of the Certificate of
Amendment, each 1,000 shares of the Corporation’s Class A Common Stock then
issued and outstanding shall, without any further action on the part of the
holders thereof, be consolidated and automatically converted into one single
share of the Corporation’s Class A Common Stock; provided that, if any
shareholder would otherwise be entitled to a fractional share on such reverse
stock split, such fraction shall be rounded up or down to the nearest whole
share.  The Corporation’s transfer agent shall provide certificates
representing the post-reverse split shares of Class A Common Stock of the
Corporation in exchange for and upon receipt and surrender of certificates
representing shares of the Class A Common Stock of the Corporation issued and
outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Date.  From and after
the Effective Date, certificates representing shares of Class A Common Stock of
the Corporation issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Date
shall, until they are surrendered, represent only the right of the shareholders
thereof to receive post-reverse split shares of the Corporation’s Class A Common
Stock resulting from the reverse stock split.





SECOND:   That
thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, a special meeting
of the stockholders of said corporation was duly called and held upon notice in
accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware at which meeting the necessary number of shares as required by statute
were voted in favor of the amendment.





THIRD:       
That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of
Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.





FOURTH:    The
remainder of the Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation shall remain in full force and effect.







FIFTH:         The
Effective Date of this Certificate of Amendment shall be October 3,
2008.








IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
Corporation has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed by it’s duly
authorized officer as of this 30th day
September 2008.








/s/ Robert M.
Bernstein


By:     
Robert M. Bernstein, President and Chief


Executive
Officer
Before the Second Division,

January 29, 1959

No. 62717.

#### Aluminium, Ltd., Sales, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 320866-K (St. Albans).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of aluminum alloys similar in all material respects to those the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(45 C.C.P.A. 43, C.A.D. 670), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                      0001036848
<NAME>                     AeroCentury Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>               1
<CURRENCY>                 u.s. dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>               JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>            1
<CASH>                                         4,464,290
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    598,120
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,470,150
<PP&E>                                        46,124,220
<DEPRECIATION>                                16,359,470
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                35,234,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         20,325,890
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           1,610
<OTHER-SE>                                    15,325,620
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  35,234,900
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,983,590
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,380,780
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               457,050
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,145,760
<INCOME-TAX>                                     408,530
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              737,230
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     737,230
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.47



</TABLE>