alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.2

AMENDMENT TO CHANGE OF CONTROL AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT (the "Amendment") is made as of the 31st day of December, 2008, by and between inTEST Corporation, a Delaware corporation ("inTEST") and Hugh T. Regan, Jr. ("Executive").

WHEREAS, inTEST and Executive entered into an agreement, dated April 21, 2001, as amended August 27, 2007, (the "Agreement") which may be subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code");

WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of Executive and inTEST to amend the Agreement to comply with final regulations issued by the Internal Revenue Service under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the "Code") in order for Executive to avoid the adverse tax consequences that would arise from a failure to comply with Code Section 409A, including the imposition of an additional 20% excise tax on payments provided thereunder;

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree to amend the Agreement as of January 1, 2009 by adding the following new Section 20 thereto:

"20.	COMPLIANCE WITH CODE SECTION 409A.For purposes of this Agreement, Executive's termination of employment shall mean Executive's "separation from service" as defined under Code Section 409A. Each payment under this Agreement that is determined to be subject to Section 409A shall be treated as a separate payment. In no event may Executive, directly or indirectly, designate the calendar year of any payment to be made under this Agreement. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, if Executive is a "specified employee" (as defined in Section 409A of the Code) as of his "separation from service" (as defined in Section 409A of the Code), then the payment of any amounts payable hereunder that are subject to Section 409A of the Code shall be postponed in compliance with Section 409A (without any reduction in such payments ultimately paid or provided to Executive) until the first payroll date that occurs after the date that is six (6) months following Executive's "separation from service." Any such postponed payments shall be paid in a lump sum to Executive on the first payroll date that occurs after the date that is six (6) months following Executive's "separation from service." If Executive dies during the postponement period prior to the payment of the postponed amount, the amounts withheld on account of Section 409A shall be paid to Executive's estate within sixty (60) days after the date of his death."

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written above.

inTEST CORPORATION

By:   /s/ Alyn R. Holt
      Alyn R. Holt, Chairman of the Board

EXECUTIVE

/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
AND 1997 AND FROM THE BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND DECEMBER 31, 1998
OF PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          14,641
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,664,833
<ALLOWANCES>                                    44,800
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          40,970
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,894
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,679,820
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        956,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     31,000
<COMMON>                                        14,500
<OTHER-SE>                                     322,729
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,679,820
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               213,038
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126,108
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                11,485
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 40,378
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,744
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,634
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,634
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Acorn Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A No. 1 for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John G. Jacob, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                  /s/  John G. Jacob
                                  --------------------------------------------
                                  John G. Jacob, Chief Financial Officer
                                  October 17, 2002
EXHIBIT 99.2



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Date:	May 15, 2003

/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0450 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-CE-013-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
From: penny.sheridan@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:23:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Penny Sheridan

Lemon Grove, CA 91945
From: kathyhogya@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:02:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Katherine Hogya

Old Bridge, NJ 08857
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SIGNATURE EYEWEAR, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED JULY 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,486,573
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,871,431
<ALLOWANCES>                                    67,755
<INVENTORY>                                 11,172,421
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,813,432
<PP&E>                                       2,392,383
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,325,129
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,018,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,502,130
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,400
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,506,593
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,018,123
<SALES>                                     29,599,689
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            29,892,868
<CGS>                                       11,832,037
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               26,329,817
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,430
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,557,621
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,353,222
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,204,399
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,204,399
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
        

</TABLE>
| For      the Period: 3/24/2009 to 3/30/2008 |
|---------------------------------------------|

| Coupon | Interest                           | Maturity | Callable | Survivor'sOption | Price1 | Yield2 | Moody's | S&P | CUSIP     |
|--------|------------------------------------|----------|----------|------------------|--------|--------|---------|---------|-----------|
| 4.800% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 4/15/11  | NO       | YES§        | 100.00 | 4.800% | A2      | A       | 14912HNZ9 |
| 5.650% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 4/15/13  | NO       | YES§        | 100.00 | 5.650% | A2      | A       | 14912HPA2 |
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First Keystone Corporation
(the “Corporation”) for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Diane C.A. Rosler, Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





17.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





18.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Corporation as of and for the period covered by the
  Report.





Date:  March 10, 2009
                /s/
      Diane C.A. RoslerDiane
      C.A. RoslerChief
      Financial Officer








[THIS
PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]








[THIS
PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Before the First Division,

January 27, 1959

No. 62706.

#### Castelazo & Associates and David Chow & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 287248-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of iron pictures the same as those the subject of *Marshall Field & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C.C.P.A. 72, C.A.D. 676), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 10-Z
------------
(C-XIV)


                        ALLONGE TO DEMAND NOTE

     Reference is made to that certain Demand Note, dated as of March 25,
1993 (the "Note"), made by Carlyle Real Estate Limited Partnership-XIV, an
Illinois limited partnership ("Carlyle XIV"), in favor of Carlyle
Investors, Inc., a Delaware corportion ("Investors"), in the original
principal amount of $1,200,000.

     In consideration for the return of capital made by Investors to
Carlyle XIV as of the date hereof in the amount of $800,000, the
undersigned hereby reduces the outstanding principal balance of the Note to
$400,000.  Such reduction shall not serve to reduce or cancel any accrued
and unpaid interest which may be outstanding on the Note.

     This Allonge shall be attached to and become a part of the Note.



Dated as of October 31, 1996.                   CARLYLE INVESTORS, INC.,
                                                A Delaware corporation


                                                By:____________________
                                                Its:___________________

Acknowledged and Agreed:

CARLYLE REAL ESTATE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP-XIV,
an Illinois limited partnership

By:  JMB REALTY CORPORATION,
     a Delaware corporation,
     Corporate General Partner

     By:______________________
     Its:_____________________
From: kimstumpf@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:53:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kim Stumpf

Parkville, MD 21234
#### Hiron W. Allen, Executor, etc., Respondent, v. James W. Shephard and others, Appellants.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements, and motion to change place of trial granted, with ten dollars costs.
From: timdameron@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:07:28 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tim Dameron

Battleboro, NC 27809