alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: bbaehr@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:04:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert Baehr

, 91765-2587
No. 68372.

protest 63/16075 (New York).

#### Pacific Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lord, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Hibachis similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67238, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 68868.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 63/13029 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise, designated on the invoice as “50 Object Carriers HDIIM,” are, in fact, specimen holders made of quartz, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#            

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (R)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-109182

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  469                                                              Trade Date:  08/16/04

(To Prospectus Supplement dated November 6, 2003 &

  Prospectus dated October 15,2003)                                                         Issue Date:   08/19/04

The Date of this Pricing SupplementAugust 16, 2004

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                             Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                 Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common   Interest                       Price to   Discounts&         Payment       Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)     Maturity    Public (2)  Commissions       Frequency        Option    Yes/No     record dates)

14911QVN8  4.5%          02/15/13          100%             1.28%             Semi-Annually             YES        NO                                                                                                                                                                                                                             

                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Principal                                                                               1st Payment               Day         

Amount                   Proceeds                   Dealer                           Date                   Count

$447,000.00              $441,278.40              ABN AMROInc.         02/15/05                               30/360     

Original Issue DiscountNote:                                                                     Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes               X   No                                                                              N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (R) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (R) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $137.342 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (R) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (R) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated October 15,2003.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
From: briandempski@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:27:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Brian Dempski

Gurnee, IL 60031
From: dsmith@egcc.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:35:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Smith

Steubenville, OH 43952
From: livehisstory@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:58:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mandy Kruchkow

Waterford, MI 48329
No. 68367.

protest 198948-K (New York).

#### Mayar Silk Mills, Inc., and W. J. Byrnes & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*292Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tbe merchandise consists of silk similar in all material respects to that tbe subject of Abstract 64266, tbe claim of tbe plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 33.3
 MANAGEMENTS ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE
  Platform i e
 Applicable Servicing Criteria
 Period
 Managements interpretation of Applicable Servicing Criteria
 Third parties classified as vendors




---



##### 



DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANYBy:
    /s/ Gary R. VaughanName:
    Gary R. VaughanIts:
    Managing DirectorBy:
    /s/ David CoName:
    David CoIts:
    DirectorBy:
    /s/ Matt BowenName:
    Matt BowenIts:
    DirectorBy:
    /s/ Kevin FischerName:
    Kevin FischerIts:
    DirectorBy:
    /s/ Robert FrierName:
    Robert FrierIts:
    DirectorDEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICASBy:
    /s/ Kevin C WeeksName:
    Kevin C WeeksIts:
    Managing DirectorBy:
    /s/ Jenna KaufmanName:
    Jenna KaufmanIts:
    Director
From: plsteers4@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:00:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Philip Steers

Yuma, AZ 85365
PROMISSORY NOTE


 


	$3,000	December 21, 2012








FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency
of which is hereby acknowledged, Thompson Designs, Inc., a Nevada corporation, (“Maker”) hereby promises to pay to
the order of Kade Thompson (“Holder”) the sum of THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($3,000). This Note shall bear interest at
the rate of five percent (5%) per annum. All principal and interest due hereunder shall be paid on or before December 21, 2014.


 


Maker hereby waives presentment, dishonor, notice of dishonor
and protest. All parties hereto consent to, and Holder is expressly authorized to make, without notice, any and all renewals, extensions,
modifications, or waivers of the time for or the terms of payment of any sum or sums due hereunder, or under any documents or instruments
relating to or securing this Note, or of the performance of any covenants, conditions or agreements hereof or thereof or the taking
or release of collateral securing this Note. Any such action by Holder shall not discharge the liability of any party to this Note.


 


This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of Nevada without regard to conflict of law principles. Maker shall also pay Holder any and all costs
of collection incurred in connection with this Note, including court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees.


 


Thompson Designs, Inc.


 


By: /s/ Kade Thompson


Kade Thompson, President
From: kkwhiggs@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:31:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kerry Higgs

Middle River, MD 21220
October 28, 1963

No. 68069.

#### S. M. Iida, Ltd., and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 61/15517, etc.

Protests abandoned July 9, 1963.

(Not published.) Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing denied.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Restoration handbook forsagebrush steppe ecosystems with emphasis on greater sage-grouse habitat /**
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.4/2:1416 | I 19.4/2:1418 | I19.4/2:1426 

Item Number:0620-A (online)
CGP systemNumber:000967178
 
Parts: 010203
 
April 13, 2020
### -82 -80 -78 -76 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/18 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
From: dr.hosley@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:22:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I agree wholly with the following paragraphs but would like to add an encouragement from a business

owners perspective. The current economic times are challenging the best of businesses to streamline

and stay profitable. Adding provisions like these that are PAID FOR BY EVERYONE-AMOUNTING

ESSENTIALLY TO ANOTHER TAX will hinder our economic recovery. Businesses and individuals need

the government to do everything in it's power to keep this country financially viable; not add burdens to

people and push payment for non-essential medical services onto us as individuals. Please stay focused

on what is truly best for this country.

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ryan Hosley

Portland, OR 97223
Case No. 12,873.

#### SIMON et al. v. PAINE.

[4 Cranch, C. C. 99.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1830.

Si.avert — Suit por Freedom — Where Action may be Maintained.

Slaves escaping from Maryland and sueing here for their freedom, will not be delivered up to the person claiming to be their owner, upon security to return them to Maryland: their claim for freedom having arisen here, and their witnesses residing here.

This was a suit for freedom [by negroes Simon and Lewis against Paine’s administrator], docketed this term by an order of tbe court made ex parte.

Mr. Taylor, for defendant,

moved the court to rescind the order, upon bond and security to take the negroes back to Maryland, from whence they escaped into this district, and gave themselves up to the magistrate, and prayed leave to sue in forma pauperis.

Mr. Mason, contra.

Their right to freedom arose under the laws here.

THE COURT

(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent,)

refused to rescind the order.

The cause was tried, and the jury found a verdict for the plaintiffs, upon the ground that they had been brought here by their master and kept here more than a year.