alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: lynnette@northland.cc

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:32:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lynnette Larrison

Topeka, KS 66617
From: cgroomer@geobound.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:19:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Celeste Groomer

Red Oak, TX 75154
No. 344, Misc.

#### McGann *v.*United States.

*Edward Q. Carr, Jr.*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Theodore George Gilinsky*for the United States.

C. A.

2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
(4910-13-PI

.'<C1JRll£"CES ,;o:;.SV,",lKlL 

## AtY!f,lltfti "I"11Als.SIG 

# V~ ~t/ Federal Aviation Administration

RIN 2120-AA64

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation Airworthiness Directives; Airbus ModeJ A330-200 and -300, and Model A340-200, -300, -500 and -600 Series Airplanes I 14CFR Part 39 

## '" 51/lfllo IDocket No. FAA-2009-1215 Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-126-AD; Amendmen ovmOOS"MIIOL 

## \Ct:>3&> 

# 4 14-1'1 Jft/{-116 

## 16 39-*****; AD 2010-**-**] DEPARTMENT OF TRAc"lSPORTATION

(DOT). 

## ANM-1- ~mAJ.S,'SIG ACTION: Final rule. 

### C.(~ '"T£ SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe products lis

# RO~~~~LF
above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness infonnation (MeAl) tl<m••• ~ -(\" O. db" b' f I I °d'f d ,1Yl4~ ongmate y an aV131lOn aut only 0 allot ler country to lent! y an correct an unsaJe ~MH I 

### z.'/{) condition on anaviation product. The MCAllescribes the unsafe condition as: 

# "(,)l;~M:\ Ol



### * * * [PJartiai blockage ofthe water aJlsorbing filter element PIN (part 0-"" I~ number) QA06l23 was observed severLal times. The blockage was created 

## &~ '.JlJ/~ by carbon debris fromthe cartridge and fromthe burst disc ofthe Halon :<G$""OO~ bottle. 

## ANM- (<X) This water absorbing filter element ispart ofHalon Dual-Filter Assembly .~'~ installed also inthe Flow Metering System (FMS) ofthe cargo compartment Fire Extinguishing System used inthe A330 and A340 aeroplanes. Blockage ofthe water absorbing filter element could lead to reduction of Halon outflow, leading to incapacity to maintain fire extinguishing agent concentration. Combined with fire, this could result in an uncontrolled fire inthe affected compartment, which wduld constitute an unsafe condition.
Case No. 10,165.

#### NEW JERSEY MUT. INS. CO. v. BAKER.

[See 94 U. S. 610.]
From: algberglund@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:07:25 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Laurie Berlgund

Mohnton, PA 19540
From: unkj@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:12:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections.

<b>I strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs

and devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

</b>

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Darlene Maddox

Portland, OR 97202
Case No. 14,775.

#### UNITED STATES v. CHAFLIN.

[See Case No. l-±.798.]
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 39 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 39

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Ways and Means 
                  in the One Hundred Seventh Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 13, 2001

 Mr. Thomas submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Ways and Means 
                  in the One Hundred Seventh Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Ways and Means (hereafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $16,077,758 for the One Hundred 
Seventh Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $8,014,668 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2001, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2002; and
            (2) not more than $8,063,090 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2002, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2003.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
Before the First Division,

July 22, 1958

No. 62190.

#### Kurt S. Adler *v.*United States,

protest 314380-K (New York).

*328Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise described as “Hanging Elf-figurines w. thread W-2043” is properly dutiable, by similitude, as cellulose acetate articles, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit
10.15





AMENDMENT TOAGREEMENT





The
following provisions are hereby incorporated into, and are hereby made a part
of, that certain Settlement Agreement dated August 19, 2008 by and among Matech
Corp., a Delaware corporation (f/k/a Material Technologies, Inc.) (“MaTech”),
RBC Dexia Investor Services Bank Luxembourg (“Julius Baer”), Anima S.G.R.P.A.
Rubrica Anima America (“Anima”), and Kreuzfeld Ltd., (“Kreuzfeld”) and such
provisions are effective retroactively to the date of the Agreement (the
“Effective Date”).  All capitalized terms in this Amendment to
Agreement, to the extent not otherwise defined herein, shall have the meanings
assigned to such terms in the Agreement.





1.
            With
      respect to Julius Baer only, Section 1.2 of the Agreement is hereby
      amended, as follows:





1.2     
Julius Baer hereby agrees to return to MaTech, any and all shares of common
stock held by them, including the Common Stock, in exchange for a number of
newly issued shares of MaTech common stock equal to 50% of those shares returned
by them (the “Shares”);





2.
            Section
      1.5 is hereby deleted in its
entirety.





3.
            All
      other provisions of the Agreement shall remain
  unchanged.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
Parties have caused this Amendment to Agreement to be duly executed and
delivered as of November 4, 2008.







MATECH
      CORP.,
                a
      Delaware corporation
              
              
              RBC
      DEXIA INVESTOR SERVICES
                BANK
      LUXEMBOURG,By:
      Robert M. Bernstein
              
              
              By:Its:
      Chief Executive Officer
              
              
              Its:
From: alumpkins@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:41:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Alida Lumpkins

Owasso, OK 74055
From: goldstone2@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:18:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ruth Harms

Reedley, CA 93654
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           6
<LEGEND>            The  schedule   contains   summary   financial   information
                    extracted  from  the  financial  statements  and  supporting
                    schedules  as of the end of the most  current  period and is
                    qualified in its  entirety by  reference  to such  financial
                    statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>               0000764901
<NAME>              Connecticut Daily Tax Free Income Fund
<SERIES>
<NUMBER>            1
<NAME>              CLASS A
       
<S>                               <C>    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                  JUL-31-1998
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>         175365810
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>        175365810
<RECEIVABLES>                 1001074
<ASSETS-OTHER>                1910061
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                178276945
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>      0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>       0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>     388957
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>           388957
<SENIOR-EQUITY>               0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>      177895886
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>         177914196
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>         167810297
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>     0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>        0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>       (7898)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>      0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>      0
<NET-ASSETS>                  177887988
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>             0
<INTEREST-INCOME>             2901529
<OTHER-INCOME>                0
<EXPENSES-NET>                731979
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>       2169550
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>      0
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>     0
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>         2169550
<EQUALIZATION>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>     2169550
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>      0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>         0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>       170160873
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>   162200345
<SHARES-REINVESTED>           2143371
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>        10103899
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>       0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>     (7898)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>       0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>    0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>         249034
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>               732100
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>          166478526
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>         1.00
<PER-SHARE-NII>               .01
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>       0
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>          .01
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>     0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>          0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>           1.00
<EXPENSE-RATIO>               .88
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>        0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>          0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Material  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert
Bernstein, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  May 10, 2004                   By:  /s/ Robert Bernstein
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                            Robert Bernstein
                                      Its:  President, Chief Executive Officer &
                                            Chief Financial Officer