alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Registration No. 333-35460 424 (b)(2)

Pricing Supplement No:326 Cusip:14912LR94
Dated: June 26, 2001 
*	Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation

	Medium-Term Notes, Series F

	(Fixed Rate)

	With Maturities of 9 Months or More from Date of Issue
	Interest payable each April 1 and October 1 and at Maturity
Principal Amount: Interest Rate: Proceed Amount:

$50,000,000 4.80% $49,912,500

Original Issue Date: Commission Fee: Maturity Date:

06/29/2001 $87,500 08/01/2003

	 

Dealer:

Merrill Lynch	

 

Specified Currency: Option to Elect Payment Authorized Denominations

x U.S. dollars in U.S. dollars (only applicable if

_ Other:___________ (only applicable if Specified Currency is

Specified Currency is other than U.S.

other than U.S. dollars): N/A 

N/A 

The Note is a: Exchange Rate Agent X Global Note (if other than First 

Certificated Note Trust New York): N/A (only applicable if

Specified Currency 

is other than U.S. dollars) 

Original Issue Total Amount of OID: N/A Terms of Amortizing Discount Note: Notes: N/A

Yes x No Issue Price (expressed 

as a percentage of 

aggregate principal 

amount): 100%

Redemption Date(s) (including Redemption Price(s): N/A any applicable regular or 

special record dates): N/A

	 

Repayment Date(s) (including Repayment Price(s): N/A any applicable regular or

special record dates): 

N/A

Interest Rate Reset Option: _ Yes X No

Optional Reset Dates (only applicable if option to reset interest rate): N/A

Basis for Interest Rate Reset (only applicable if option to reset interest rate): N/A

Stated Maturity Extension Option: _ Yes x No

Extension Period(s) and Final Maturity Date (only applicable if option to extend stated maturity): N/A

Basis for Interest Rate During Extension Period (only applicable if option to extend stated maturity): N/A

 

 

Historical Exchange Rate (only applicable if Specified Currency other than U.S. dollars): N/A

The interest rates on the Notes may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any Note offered prior to the effective date of the change. Prior to the date ofthis Pricing Supplement, $2,855.95 mm principal amount of the Notes had been sold at interest rates then in effect. Additionally, the total principal amount of the Notes offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement dated June1, 2000 and Prospectus dated May 11, 2000 has been reduced from $4,000.0 mm to $3,253.814 mm. $746.186 mm principal amount of debt securities registered pursuant to Registration Statement No. 333-35460 were offered by Caterpillar Financial ServicesCorporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and related Prospectus each dated September 8, 2000 and its Prospectus Supplement dated May 8, 2001 and related Prospectus dated May 11, 2000.

	_________________________________
**	Pricing Supplement to Prospectus Supplement dated June 1, 2000

	and Prospectus dated May 11, 2000***
From: Barb Pedersen

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive care & contraception

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 4:24:53 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the recommendations 

of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject 

any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new law and 

would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive services, 

others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make 

exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health 

providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though 

they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands 

of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s recommendations and 

rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                             7

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          1,209,881
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                         1,206,108
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                           1,209,881
<EQUITIES>                                            0
<MORTGAGE>                                            0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                         0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                1,209,881
<CASH>                                          930,829
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                            1,023,532
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                4,989,033
<POLICY-LOSSES>                               1,773,892
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                           1,050,251
<POLICY-OTHER>                                        0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                 0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                   7,479
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                        503,384
<OTHER-SE>                                    1,186,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  4,989,033
<PREMIUMS>                                    1,250,277
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              73,392
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                6,387
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  933,441
<BENEFITS>                                    1,038,415
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     119,021
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                          1,441,447
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (335,386)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (131,347)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (204,039)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (204,039)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.41)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                        0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                   0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                     0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                      0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                       0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                               0



</TABLE>
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No. 333-59540

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO. 085				Trade Date: 06/07/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

June 1, 2001)						Issue Date: 06/12/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement June 07, 2001
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

or	Stated				 Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		 Price to	 Discounts & Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions Frequency	 Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QDN8 5.15%	06/15/04	100%	 0.8% Semi-Annually YES	 NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		 Date		Count

$7,180,000.00	$7,122,560.00	ABN AMRO Inc.	12/15/01		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____ Yes	 X No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $[0.00]mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect. Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under a Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount. Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**STEVEN MAPP,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 415 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 8th day of February, 2016, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**

**Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this** 

**matter.**
No. 12, Original.

#### Hawaii *v.*Bell.

*Shiro Kashiwa,*Attorney General of Hawaii,

*Wilbur K. Watkins, Jr.,*Deputy Attorney General,

*Thurman Arnold, Abe Fortas, Paul A. Porter*and *Dennis G. Lyons*for plaintiff.

*Solicitor General Cox, Wayne G. Barnett, David R. Warner*and *Thos. L. McKevitt*for defendant.

The motion for leave to file bill of complaint is granted and the United States is allowed sixty days to answer. Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
============= MDL No. 15-0256

=============

IN RE NATIONAL LLOYDS INSURANC E COMPANY HAIL STORM LITIGATION

================== ================== ========== ON REVIEW BY THE MULTIDI STRICT LITIGATION PANEL

================== ================== ==========

This order is issued in response to Na tional Lloyd’s motion to transfer. National Lloyds is ordered to file a supp lement to its motion to address In re Farmers Insurance Company Wind/Hail Storm Litigation , No. 14-0882 (Tex. M.D.L. Panel April 7, 2015) by April 24. Real Parties in Inte rest are ordered to file a resp onse to the motio n to transfer and supplement to the motion to transfer by Ma y 11. Any reply must be filed by May 20. National Lloyds is further ordered to file , along with its supplement to motion to transfer, two supplements to Appendix A, lis ting (1) the cases grouped by county and, within each county, grouped by the court and (2) the cases grouped by the date of the storm along with the location and type of storm.
From: dchertel@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:41:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Richard Hertel

Minneapolis, MN 55437
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1348

To designate the Federal building located at 10th Street and Constitution

Avenue, NW, in Washington, District of Columbia, as the ‘‘Robert F.

Kennedy Department of Justice Building’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 3, 2001

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. HATCH, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. SPECTER, Mrs.

CLINTON, Mr. MCCAIN, and Mr. FEINGOLD) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 10th Street

and Constitution Avenue, NW, in Washington, District

of Columbia, as the ‘‘Robert F. Kennedy Department

of Justice Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ROBERT F. KENNEDY DE4 PARTMENT OF JUSTICE BUILDING.

5 The Federal building located at 10th Street and Con6 stitution Avenue, NW, in Washington, District of Colum7 bia, and known as the ‘‘Department of Justice Building’’,
2

•S 1348 IS

1 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Robert F. Kennedy

2 Department of Justice Building’’.

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

6 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

7 a reference to the Robert F. Kennedy Department of Jus8 tice Building.

Æ
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.66 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: dolliebird@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:32:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lizabeth Farrell

Spokane, WA 99206
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               2
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         60,375
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,208
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                 10
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,250
<COMMON>                                        30,250
<OTHER-SE>                                         698
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  61,208
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,061
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    10
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,071
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,071
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                     48
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,023
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,023
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,023
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    10.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    10.77
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.53
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
No. 240, Misc.

#### Sires *v.*Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent.

Supreme Court of Washington. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
32.1




Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In
connection with the Annual Report of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, John W. Roblin, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive
officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
knowledge:




(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March
30, 2009
  /s/ John W.
Roblin
 Name: John
W. Roblin
 Title: Chief
Executive Officer
#### William H. Harris, Plaintiff, v. Henry S. Mackie, Defendant.

Motion for new trial denied and judgment ordered for the defendant on the nonspit.

Bradley, J., not sitting.
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________ NO. 09-17-00478-CV



### ____________________
IN THE ESTATE OF ALMA S. MARTIN

___________________ __________________ __________________ _________________ On Appeal from the County Court at Law Polk County, Texas Trial Cause No. 09783

___________________ __________________ __________________ _________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION The appellants, Neal Eichelman, as I ndependent Administrator of the Estate of Alma S. Martin, Jessie Eichelman, and Phillip Joseph Martin, filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is voluntar ily made by the appellants prior to any decision of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). No other party filed a notice of appeal. We grant the moti on and dismiss the appeal. APPEAL DISMISSED.

_________________________________ CHARLES KREGER Justice2 Submitted on June 13, 2018 Opinion Delivered June 14, 2018 Before McKeithen, C.J., Kr eger and Johnson, JJ.