alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: JPBRACKENJR@GMAIL.COM

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:15:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

JOHN P. BRACKEN, JR

Rockledge, FL 32955
From: charletteluna@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:16:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Charlette Luna

, 08902-2515
NO. CAAP-22-0000160

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

AS TRUSTEE SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BANK OF AMERICA,

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO

LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR

CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF BEAR STERNS ASSET BACKED SECURITIES 1 LLC,

ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2007-HE7, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. JAMES C. ACOB, Defendant-Appellant, and

JOHN AND MARY DOES 1-20; DOE PARTNERSHIPS,

CORPORATIONS OR OTHER ENTITIES 1-20, Defendants.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 1CC151000671)

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

(By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Wadsworth and Nakasone, JJ.)

Upon consideration of self-represented DefendantAppellant James C. Acob's (Acob) August 1, 2022 Motion for Appeal

Reply Order Dismissing Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction, for Good

Cause (Motion for Reconsideration), which we construe as a motion

for reconsideration of our June 9, 2022 Order Dismissing Appeal

for Lack of Appellate Jurisdiction (Dismissal Order), the papers

in support, and the record, it appears that Acob asks the court

to reconsider its Dismissal Order and reinstate this appeal, as

an accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act and

under Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 26(e).

HRAP Rule 40(a) provides that a motion for

reconsideration "may be filed by a party only within 10 days

after the filing of the . . . dispositional order, . . . unless

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-22-0000160

22-AUG-2022

07:55 AM

Dkt. 18 ORD
by special leave additional time is granted during such period by

a judge . . . of the appellate court involved." Acob did not

file the Motion for Reconsideration or a request for an extension

of time within ten days after entry of the Dismissal Order, as

required by HRAP Rule 40(a), and the Motion for Reconsideration

is untimely. Further, Acob fails to demonstrate that the court

overlooked or misapprehended any point of law or fact when it

entered its Dismissal Order.1 HRAP Rule 40(b). 

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion for

Reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, August 22, 2022.

/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka

Presiding Judge

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Associate Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone

Associate Judge 

1 We also note that we dismissed the appeal as untimely, under HRAP

Rule 4(a)(1), and HRAP Rule 26(b) provides that "no court or judge or justice

is authorized to change the jurisdictional requirements contained in Rule 4 of

these rules."

2
From: wmewes@brothersofholycross.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Stop persecution

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:27:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

William Mewes

Notre Dame, IN 46556
EXHIBIT 32.1



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert E. Matthiessen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Date:	August 14, 2007

/s/ Robert E. Matthiessen
Robert E. Matthiessen
President and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

EGAN PAYNE, SR.,

Petitioner

v.

AMERICOLD LOGISTICS LLC (WORKERS' 

COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD),

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 271 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
#            

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (R)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-109182

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  522                                                                   Trade Date:  01/03/05

(To Prospectus Supplement dated November 6, 2003 &

  Prospectus dated October 15,2003)                                                              Issue Date:   01/06/05

The Date of this Pricing SupplementJanuary 03, 2005

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                                   Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                   Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment     Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)   Maturity  Public (2) Commissions       Frequency       Option  Yes/No     record dates)

14911QXT3  4.05%          07/15/11        100%                1.17%                 Monthly                       YES         NO                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Principal                                                                                 1st Payment             Day         

Amount                  Proceeds                  Dealer                           Date                   Count

$2,921,000.00         $2,886,824.30         ABN AMRO Inc.        02/15/05               30/360    

Original Issue DiscountNote:                                                                          Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                  N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (R) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (R) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $275.369 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (R) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (R) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated October 15,2003.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
From: arussell17@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:37:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Anne Russell

The Villages, FL 32162
No. 68871.

#### A. N. Deringer, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 62/9215, etc. (Ogdensburg).

*305Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tbe merchandise consists of granular or sponge iron similar in all material respects to that tbe subject of *John V. Carr & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 29, C.D. 2384), tbe claim of tbe plaintiff was sustained.
[Civ. No. 11556.

Second Appellate District, Division Two.

April 13, 1938.]

#### FEED LINDENBERG, Respondent, v. ADOLPH BRODEK, as Administrator, etc., Appellant.

No appearance for Appellant.

No appearance for Respondent.

THE COURT.

Upon the hearing on order to show cause why the appeal herein should not be dismissed for want of prosecution, the presiding justice in open court made the following statement:

In this case the court itself has served upon the appellant an order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. The clerk’s and reporter’s transcripts were filed July 28, 1937. Thereafter the parties entered into a stipulation taking the ease off calendar, in the hope of making settlement. This court has waited sufficiently. There is no opposition, and the appeal is dismissed. *(In re Yahne,*193 Cal. 386 [224 Pac. 452] ; *In re Wignall,*193 Cal. 387 [224 Pac. 452].)
(R.D. 11424)

#### English Electric Export & Trading Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

(Decided on remand December 12, 1967)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiffs.

*E&win L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Ford, Judge:

The cases listed in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, are before the court pursuant to a judgment in the case of *English Electric Export & Trading Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States,*53 CCPA 84, C.A.D. 881, wherein the matter was remanded to this court.

The parties hereto have entered into a stipulation of facts wherein it has been agreed as follows:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, subject to the approval of the court, that the merchandise covered by the reappraisement appeals in the attached Schedule A, *805which. Schedule A is made a part of this stipulation, consists of electric generators of the vertical water wheel type, or parts thereof, exported from England during the period from November 1954 through November 1956, which were the subject of decision in *English Electric Export*& *Trading Co., Inc., et al.,*53 C.C.P.A. (Customs) 84, C.A.D. 881.

That on the dates of exportation the “cost of production” values as defined in Section 402(f) Tariff Act of 1930 (as it existed prior to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956) for the items of merchandise covered by the appeals in the attached Schedule A, were the appraised values less 5.621% net packed.

The appeals in the attached Schedule A are submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402(f), Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis of value for the involved electric generators and parts thereof and that said values are the appraised values less 5.621 percent, net packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Unassociated Document






Exhibit 10.20


SUMMARY OF THE REGISTRANT’S NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION


The Company pays each of its
non-employee directors $30,000 annually or $60,000 annually to its Chairman. In addition, non-employee directors receive the following
committee-related fees annually: (1) $7,500 for participating on the Audit Committee or $15,000 for chairing the committee; (2) $5,000 for
participating on the Compensation Committee or $15,000 for chairing the committee; and (3) $2,500 for participating on the Nominating and Governance
Committee or $5,000 for chairing the committee.


Upon appointment, non-employee
directors receive a one-time grant of an option to purchase 6,250 shares of common stock. These options vest pro rata over one year. Annually,
non-employee directors receive an option to purchase 5,000 shares of common stock, which also vest pro rata over one year. The exercise price of these
options is the fair market value on the date of grant. Each such option expires seven years after the date of grant under the Company’s 2010 Stock
Incentive Plan.


The Company reimburses its non-employee
directors for reasonable expenses incurred in connection with attending board and committee meetings.
#### European American Bank, Formerly Known as European American Bank & Trust Company, Respondent, v Perspective Development Corporation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

[633 NYS2d 341]

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Perspective Development Corporation, Carlo Sanchez, and Biagio Buccieri appeal from (1) an or*718der of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered July 29, 1994, which denied their motion, *inter alia,*to vacate so much of a prior order of the same court, entered March 21, 1994, as granted the plaintiffs cross motion to, in effect, convert the judgment of foreclosure and sale entered February 24, 1993, into a money judgment; and (2) an amended judgment of the same court entered March 8, 1995, upon the order entered July 29, 1994, and the order entered March 21, 1994.

Ordered that the appeal from the order entered July 29, 1994, is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the amended judgment is reversed, on the law, the order entered July 29, 1994, is vacated; the motion is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for re-entry of the original judgment of foreclosure and sale as of its original date of entry; and it is further,

Ordered that the appellants are awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order entered July 29, 1994, must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the amended judgment in the action *(see, Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). The issues raised on the appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the amended judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

When the foreclosure action was rendered moot and the security of the mortgage was destroyed by reason of the New Rochelle in rem tax foreclosure judgment and deed, the only recourse available to the plaintiff was to bring an action in law to recover on the note. Thus, it was error to have granted the plaintiffs cross motion and to have permitted entry of an amended judgment "converting” the original judgment of foreclosure and sale into a judgment against the appellants (see *generally, Boyd v Jarvis, 1A*AD2d 937; *Irving Trust Co. v Seltzer,*265 App Div 696; *see also, Lehman v Roseanne Investors Corp.,*106 AD2d 617). Therefore, the Supreme Court should have granted the appellants’ motion. Balletta, J. P., Thompson, Ritter and Florio, JJ., concur.