alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1)  the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)  the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |   |                                                |
|------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                               |   |                                                |   |
| Date:       November 13, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Neal      D. Crispin                       |   |
|                               |   | Name:      Neal D. Crispin                          |   |
|                               |   | Title:      President & Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                               |   |                                                |   |
#### Babetta Lehman, Appellant, v. District No. 1, Independent Order of B’nai B’rith, Respondent.

— Judgment affirmed. Opinion hy

Daniels, J.
From: ccvellenga@hot.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:03:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

cornelia vellenga

Woodway, TX 76712
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**SECTION 302**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Judith A. Berry, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of AmNet Mortgage, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for theregistrant and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on suchevaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: May 17, 2004      |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
|                    |
| /s/ Judith A. Berry     |   |
| Judith A. Berry         |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32

     CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION  1350 AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 of
chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of UCI
Medical Affiliates, Inc. ("UCI"), that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of
UCI on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2007, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of UCI. This written
statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an
exhibit to such Form 10-K. A signed original of this statement has been provided
to UCI and will be retained by UCI and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


December 26, 2007                             /s/ D. Michael Stout, M.D.
                                            ----------------------------
                                             D. Michael Stout, M.D.
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer


                                           /s/ Jerry F. Wells, Jr., CPA
                                           Jerry F. Wells, Jr., CPA
                                           Executive Vice President and
                                           Chief Financial Officer
H. Res. 1281 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 19, 2008. 

Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to the House 

is waived with respect to any resolution reported on the legislative day of June 19, 2008, providing for consideration or 

disposition of a measure making supplemental appropriations 

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2008. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
From: HisLmt@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:16:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Molly Smith

Saint Paris, OH 43072
From: Allison VanKanegan

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: I support access to contraception

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 10:09:08 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger.

Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run

health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the

coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies.

If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #18026 and #18027; Vermont Disaster Number VT-00047]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 3.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Vermont (FEMA-4720-DR), dated 07/14/2023.

*Incident:*                         Severe Storms, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides.                    

*Incident Period:*                         07/07/2023 through 07/17/2023.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 09/06/2023.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         09/12/2023.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         04/15/2024.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Vermont, dated 07/14/2023, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Essex.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco Sánchez, Jr.,

Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2023-19981 Filed 9-14-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 05/13/2010 08:49PM -----

To: Gary McAlister/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

From: Thomas McGrath <tmcgrath.mea@gmail.com>

Date: 05/13/2010 05:10PM

cc: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Lisa Beal

<lbeal@ingaa.org>, Matt Todd <ToddM@api.org>, "Jeffrey A. Panek"

<japanek@ameritech.net>, Jim McCarthy <jamesmccarthy@comcast.net>

Subject: EPA Method 323 and EPA Method 320 Formadehyde Measurements 

Comparison: 1

of 3

Gary – per your request, the attached report provides the results of 

side-by-side formaldehyde

measurements by Proposed EPA Method 323 and EPA Method 320 (extractive FTIR). 

The report was

prepared by Innovative Environmental Solutions and the project was sponsored 

by the American

Petroleum Institute (API) and the Interstate Natural Gas Association of 

America (INGAA).

In summary, a total of five test series (3 or 4 test runs per series) were 

conducted on rich-burn and leanburn gas-fired reciprocating engines. The Method 323 measurements were 

higher than the Method 320

measurements for all of the test series with the average difference ranging 

from 12 to 47 percent. For

these tests, all of the Method 320 QA spike recoveries were less than 100% 

suggesting a low bias to the

measurements. When the Method 320 measurements are adjusted for the QA spike 

recoveries, there is

very good agreement with the Method 323 measurements with the average 

difference ranging from -4 to

8 percent, well within the uncertainties of these test methods. These data 

suggest that a low bias in the

Method 320 measurements, indicated by the low spike recoveries, contributed 

to the difference between

the Method 323 and Method 320 measurements for this test program.

Based on accepted statistical evaluations to validate method performance, the 

results demonstrate

acceptable performance for Method 323 and support the conclusion that Method 

323 should be included

in the RICE NESHAP (40 CFR 63, Subpart ZZZZ) as an approved test method for 

formaldehyde

measurement. In addition, anomalous Method 323 results reported by EPA in 

the March 2009 proposed

RICE NESHAP amendments have been investigated and determined to be a result 

of testing errors (i.e.,

human error). Therefore, Method 323 should be accepted for formaldehyde 

measurement from gas-fired

reciprocating engines and promulgated as an accepted EPA test method when the 

final rule that amends

40 CFR 63 Subpart ZZZZ is published, which is planned for late summer or fall 

2010.

Please note that, because of the size of the files, some report attachments 

will be sent separately.

Please call me if you have any questions or would like additional information.

Thank you –

Tom

--

Thomas McGrath

Innovative Environmental Solutions

610 California Street

Huntington Beach, CA 92648

tmcgrath.mea@gmail.com

714.315.4040
From: rrwilson18@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:47:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

robert wilson

Wever, IA 52658
IV 

House Calendar No. 253 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1367 

[Report No. 110–768] 

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2008 

Mr. WELCH of Vermont, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 

resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

1 Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on 

2 the legislative day of Thursday, July 24, 2008, for the 

3 Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the 

4 rules relating to the bill (H.R. 6578) to provide for the 

5 sale of light grade petroleum from the Strategic Petroleum 

6 Reserve and its replacement with heavy grade petroleum. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 253 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1367 

[Report No. 110

–768] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend 

the rules. 

JULY 23, 2008 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue


Registration No.  333-35460
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)
PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  048				Trade Date: 2/12/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated
  September 8, 2000)						Issue Date:  02/13/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement February 12, 2001

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION
OR REPAYMENT
  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or
     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any
Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivor's		applicable
                                                            regular or special
  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No
                                                                  	record dates)

14911QBZ3   6.4%        02/15/08	  100%	     -1.0276%    Monthly	  YES	   NO



Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:
____  Yes	  X   No						N/A



(1) The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not
affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the
effective date of the change.

(2) Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to
Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the
time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 17, 2014

h0910 

# Order

Clerk September 17, 2014

149461

____________________________________

SC: 149461

In re CURRAN, Minors. COA: 317470

Grand Traverse CC Family

Division: 11

- 003293

- NA

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 15, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.