alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: kitcat_79@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:10:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Catherine Brites

Austin, TX 78705
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in previously filed registration
statements of Dental/Medical Diagnostic Systems, Inc., including, without
limitation, registration statements on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-42865) and
Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-42867), together with any and all amendments
thereto, filed as of the date hereof, of our report dated February 16, 1998 on
our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Dental/Medical
Diagnostic Systems, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for the twelve
month period ended December 31, 1997, the ten month period ended December 31,
1996, and for the period from inception (October 23, 1995) to March 2, 1996,
which report is included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for 
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997.



/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


Los Angeles, California
April 24, 1998
2

OBI EINEMEM IEEE therefore conclude that the district court did not err in denying appellant's motion. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2 

# a tA-de-coc Hardesty

cc: Hon. Doug Smith, District Judge Nyutu K. Woods Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

2 We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 02-910

________________________________________________________________________

DEFENSE

Memorandum of Understanding between the

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

and CANADA

Memorandum signed at Las Vegas September 10, 2002
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent

evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof

or authentication thereof.”
CANADA

Defense

Memorandum signed at Las Vegas September 10, 2002;

 Entered into force September 10, 2002.
From: sonoristmiller@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:49:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Stephen Miller

Bellevue, WA 98005
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Material Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert M. Bernstein, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:				1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and				2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company./s/ Robert M. Bernstein                         Robert M. Bernstein,   				Chief Executive Officer, President, and				Chief Financial Officer				May 19, 2008

----
<PAGE>

                        MODIFICATION OF PROMISSORY NOTE


This Modification of Promissory Note ("Modification") is made effective the
31st day of July, 2000 with respect to that certain Promissory Note ("Note")
dated July 31, 1999 in the original principal amount of $7,000,000.00
executed by HORIZON PHARMACIES, INC. ("Borrower") payable to the order of
BANK ONE, TEXAS, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ("Bank") for the purpose of extending
the maturity date of the Note.

        Effective this date, the Maturity Date (as defined in the Note) is
        extended to September 1, 2000 and interest shall be due and payable
        prior to the Maturity Date, as extended, only on the effective date
        of this Modification.

Except as herein expressly provided, all other terms and provisions of the
Note shall continue in full force and effect.

THE MODIFICATION REPRESENTS THE FINAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND MAY
NOT BE CONTRADICTED BY EVIDENCE OF PRIOR, CONTEMPORANEOUS, OR SUBSEQUENT ORAL
AGREEMENTS OF THE PARTIES.

THERE ARE NO UNWRITTEN ORAL AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE PARTIES.

BANK:
-----

BANK ONE, TEXAS NATIONAL
  ASSOCIATION


By: /s/ Bradley C. Peters
   ----------------------------------
NAME:  Bradley C. Peters
TITLE:  Vice President


BORROWER:
---------

BY: /s/ John N. Stogner
   ----------------------------------
NAME:  John N. Stogner
TITLE:  Chief Financial Officer
From: Janet Berres

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:45:05 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs. It's about time!!

Sincerely,

Janet Berres

9106 Belleforte Ave

Morton Grove, IL 60053
# HIV in the United States by Age

Español (Spanish)

Minus

Data for 2020 should be interpreted with caution due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on access to HIV testing, care-related services, and case surveillance activities in state and local jurisdictions. While 2020 data on HIV diagnoses and prevention and care outcomes are available, we are not updating this web content with data from these reports.

While HIV affects all people in the United States and dependent areas,a some age groups are especially affected. Get the latest data on HIV by age.

HIV Risk Behaviors

PrEP Coverage

HIV Incidence

HIV Diagnoses

Knowledge of Status

Viral Suppression

Prevention Challenges

What CDC Is Doing

a American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, the Republic of Palau, and the US Virgin Islands.

                          - CDC.  Diagnoses of HIV infection in the United States and dependent areas, 2019 .  HIV Surveillance Report 2021;32.
                          - CDC.  Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States 2015–2019 .  HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report  2021;26(1).
                          - CDC.  Monitoring selected national HIV prevention and care objectives by using HIV surveillance data—United States and 6 dependent areas, 2019.  HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report  2021;26(2).
                          - CDC.  HIV infection risk, prevention, and testing behaviors among persons who inject drugs—National HIV Behavioral Surveillance: injection drug use, 23 U.S. Cities, 2018 .  HIV Surveillance Special Report  2020;24.
                          - CDC.  Sexually transmitted disease surveillance, 2019 . Accessed February 14, 2022.
                          - National Institute on Aging.  HIV, AIDS, and older people . Accessed February 14, 2022

Top of Page

June 28, 2022
Division of HIV PreventionNational Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB PreventionCenters for Disease Control and Prevention
No. 550, Misc.

#### Cruz *v.*Beto, Corrections Director, et al.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Certiorari denied.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-4333

___________

Craig Campbell, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Arkansas.

Spero Electric Corporation, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Defendant - Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: May 14, 1998

Filed: June 11, 1998 

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

This is a diversity action by terminated sales representative Craig Campbell to

recover unpaid commissions from Spero Electric Corporation. The parties’ prior tenyear relationship is reflected in a September 6, 1985, letter from Spero’s president

addressed to Campbell in Maumelle, Arkansas, and stating, “This letter will officially

appoint you as our representative for the state of Oklahoma.” (Emphasis added.)

Spero moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, arguing that it did not have

the constitutionally requisite minimum contacts with the State of Arkansas. Campbell

responded, arguing that the contract with an Arkansas resident was enough, and further
The HONORABLE JIMM LARRY HENDREN, United States District Judge 1

for the Western District of Arkansas.

-2-

asserting without supporting evidence that the contract as performed had included sales

in Arkansas and other Arkansas contacts. The district court granted the motion to

1

dismiss because Campbell “offers no evidence to support his contentions that [Spero]

has transacted business in Arkansas.” Campbell appeals, without first asking the

district court to reconsider its decision or otherwise showing that he has, or could

obtain through discovery, concrete evidence to support his contention that the contract

was partially performed in Arkansas. After careful review of the record, we agree with

the district court that this failure of proof is fatal to Campbell’s assertion of personal

jurisdiction over Spero in Arkansas. Accordingly, we affirm, except that we modify

the dismissal to be without prejudice. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32(a)

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the report on Form 10-QSB of WWA Group, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, Eric Montandon, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the small business issuer at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of the small business issuer for the period covered by this Report. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ Eric Montandon

Eric Montandon

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

August 13, 2007

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the small business issuer for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 21

Ortep of New Jersey, Inc. - New Jersey

Ortep of Staten Island - New York

Ortep of Pennsylvania, Inc. - Pennsylvania

Ortep of Connecticut, Inc. - Connecticut

Petro/Crystal Corp. - New York

Maxwhale Corp. - Minnesota

Petro, Inc. - Delaware

Reliance Utilities Corp. - New York

Public Fuel Services Co., Inc. - New York

CBW Realty Corp. of New York - New York

CBW Realty Corp. of Connecticut - Connecticut

CBW Realty Corp. of Pennsylvania - Pennsylvania

CBW Realty Corp. of Massachusetts

Miller Fuel Oil Co. - Pennsylvania

D.J.W. Gasoline Co. - Pennsylvania

Marex Corporation - Maryland

Ocennet Fuel Oil Corp. - Connecticut

A.P. Woodson Co., Inc. - District of Columbia

Ortep of Rhode Island - Rhode Island

Star Gas Corporation - Delaware

Silgas, Inc. - Indiana

Silgas of Illinois Corporation - Illinois

Star Gas Holdings - Delaware


                                       29
From: nat_z@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:18:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Natalie Zorovic

Rocklin, CA 95765
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATIONS





I, Todd Waltz, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No.
1) of Aemetis, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





Date: April 20, 2018








/s/ Todd Waltz


Todd Waltz


Chief Financial Officer
From: brianpals@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:03:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the mandate that all

"contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to

patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations

that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I strongly oppose

the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices that I

oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Brian Pals

Aurora, CO 80017