alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDevelopment of Stitched, Braided and Woven Composite Structures in the ACT Program and at Langley Research CenterSummary results are presented from the research conducted on woven, braided, knitted and stitched (textile) composites at the Langley Research Center and under the NASA Advanced Composites Technology (ACT) Program in the period from 1985 to 1997. The report also includes an annotated bibliography of 270 U.S. publications on textile composites (with their abstracts). Two major research areas are discussed: (1) the general research in textile composites performed throughout the period under the direction of the Langley Research Center and (2) the development of textile composite aircraft structures by industry under the NASA ACT Program. The annotated bibliography is organized in three subsections: (1) general textiles R&D under the auspices of Langley, (2) ACT Program development of textile structural components, and (3) textiles research by individuals and organizations not associated with the ACT Program. An author index is provided for the reports and documents.Document ID19980000063Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeOther - BibliographyAuthorsDow, Marvin B.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Dexter, H. Benson*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1997Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TP-97-206234NAS 1.60:206234L-17662Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 538-10-11-02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980000063.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SIGNATURE EYEWEAR, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                       3,685,408
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,083,272
<ALLOWANCES>                                    71,568
<INVENTORY>                                  9,848,060
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,644,129
<PP&E>                                       3,048,423
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,587,796
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,236,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,479,045
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,216
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,290,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,236,873
<SALES>                                      9,035,901
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,035,901
<CGS>                                        3,984,947
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,031,211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 61,859
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             38,859
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,859
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
#### Henry C. Higginson, Appellant, v. Alice T. Brown, Respondent.

— Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                         266,948
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  496,494
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               763,442
<PP&E>                                      16,320,357
<DEPRECIATION>                                 502,552
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,975,524
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,561,521
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<COMMON>                                     2,418,828
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,467,064
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,675,524
<SALES>                                        872,152
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               872,218
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,855,947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             379,750
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,363,480)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,363,480)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)


</TABLE>
From: Megan Sherwood

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 7:09:35 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.
From: epellerin@mccarter.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:21:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Eileen Pellerin

, 03038-4391
**Docket Number: FAA -**  **2012 -**  **0329**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY FOR THE
THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,602,000
<SECURITIES>                                84,790,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                314,223,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,344,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 900,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             409,480,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       141,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  56,959,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               408,480,000
<SALES>                                     24,394,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            32,500,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,870,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,492,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,138,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,098,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,040,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,040,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46
        

</TABLE>
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 13 

Encouraging increased public awareness of eating disorders and expanded 

research for treatment and cures. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2007 

Mrs. BIGGERT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Encouraging increased public awareness of eating disorders 

and expanded research for treatment and cures. 

Whereas an estimated 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 people in the 

United States suffer from eating disorders, including 

anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder; 

Whereas eating disorders are more common among women, 

but an increasing number of men also suffer from these 

disorders; 

Whereas an estimated 0.5 to 3.7 percent of women in the 

United States will suffer from anorexia nervosa in their 

lifetimes, an estimated 1.1 to 4.2 percent of women in 

the United States will suffer from bulimia nervosa, and 

an estimated 2 to 5 percent of people in the United 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 13 IH 

States experience binge eating disorder during any given 

6-month period; 

Whereas anorexia nervosa has the highest premature mortality rate of any mental illness; 

Whereas eating disorders are associated with serious physical 

health consequences, including irregular heartbeats, heart 

disease and heart failure, kidney failure, osteoporosis, 

gastric rupture, peptic ulcer, tooth decay, obesity, gall 

bladder disease, diabetes, and death; 

Whereas eating disorders are also associated with substantial 

psychological problems, including depression, substance 

abuse, and suicide; and 

Whereas shame, guilt, and misunderstanding often afflict a 

person who suffers from an eating disorder, and prevent 

the treatment of the disorder: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives encour2 ages— 

3 (1) increasing public awareness of eating dis4 orders; 

5 (2) expanding research for treatment and cures; 

6 (3) broadening access to treatment; and 

7 (4) promoting healthful eating habits and a 

8 healthy body image. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
From: jswhitaker@q.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:06:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

james whitaker

Parker, CO 80138
Norine Janzen, MA, MLS

N101W17383 Tanglewood Drive

Germantown, WI 53022

To Whom It May Concern:

I joint with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to 

accept the recommendation of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of 

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious 

employers.” I believe that preventive service is a critical element of the new law and 

would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

Further, “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive 

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are 

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Some groups are looking to 

apply the exemption to religiously-run health providers, which would make hospitals 

with religious affiliations exempt from the coverage requirement. Remember that not all 

of their employees are people that practice the same faiths or ideologies. If granted, this 

larger exemption denies access to thousands of women based on their place of work.

I urge you to ensure women have equal access to quality preventive care by accepting 

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption 

provisions.

Sincerely,

Norine Janzen

262-251-5745
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
  As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
reports (and to all references to our Firm) included in or made part of the
Form 10-K of Metromail Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1996. We
also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement No. 333-06265 on Form S-8 of our reports dated January 21, 1997,
covering the financial statements and financial statement schedule of
Metromail Corporation and Affiliates included in the Company's Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1996 (Commission file number 1-14348).
 
                                          Arthur Andersen LLP
 
Chicago, Illinois
March 5, 1997
From: smaxwell@diequip.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:53:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Scott Maxwell

Carnegie, PA 15106
Exhibit 11 -- Statement Re: Computation of Per-Share Earnings
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               Year ended August 31,
                                               1997            1996
                                               ---------------------
Primary

  <S>                                           <C>        <C>
  Average shares outstanding                    1,574,112  1,565,284
     Net effect of dilutive stock options-
       based on the treasury stock
       method using average
       market price                               149,428    160,724
                                               ---------- ----------
         

     Total                                      1,723,540  1,726,008
                                               ========== ==========

     Net income                                $  733,327 $  665,355
                                               ========== ==========

     Per-share amount                               $0.43      $0.39
                                                    =====      =====

Fully Diluted

  Average shares outstanding                    1,574,112  1,565,284
     Net effect of dilutive stock options-
       based on the treasury stock
       method using the year-end
       market price, if higher 
       than average market price                  153,370    164,343
                                                ---------  ---------

  Total                                         1,727,482  1,729,627
                                                =========  =========

  Net income                                    $ 733,327  $ 665,355
                                                =========  =========

  Per-share amount                                  $0.42      $0.39
                                                    =====      =====
</TABLE>