alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: lyons80016@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:09:28 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Karen Lyons

Aurora, CO 80016
#### Simons v. Louisville Trust Company, Extr.

(Decided November 23, 1920.)

•Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas, Third Division).

Appeal and Error—See Case of Same Style, Page 644.—This action being between the same parties, upon a similar cause of action and tbe same defense, as in L. Simons v. J. J. Douglas, Extr., *652etc., decided on November 23, 1920, is affirmed for tbe reasons given in that opinion.

GIFFORD & STEINFIELD for appellant.

PETER, TABB *&*LEVI for appellee.

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Hurt

Affirming.

This cause is an action between the same parties, as is the action of L. Simons v. J. J. Douglas, Extr., and which was decided at the same time. The only difference •between this action and that is, that in this, the appellee, Louisville Trust Company, as executor of the will of J. J. Douglas, deceased, sued the appellant, L. Simons, to recover the amount of a negotiable promissory note, which the decedent had jointly, with the appellant, executed and delivered, but, as his surety, only and which upon its becoming due, he was compelled to pay, while in the other action the suit was upon notes which appellant had executed to the decedent.

The defense offered to the recovery, in this action was the same, as in the other, and for the reasons assigned in the opinion in the other, the judgment appealed from herein is, also, affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Industrial  Minerals,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report") I, Larry
Van Tol, Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 15, 2006


/s/Larry Van Tol
------------------------------------------------------------------
Larry Van Tol, Chief Executive Officer and President


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF PIERCY BOWLER TAYLOR & KERN

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated January 30,
2006, on our audit of the financial statements of Cellcom I Corp. as of
September 30, 2004 and 2003, and for the years then ended included in this
annual report on Form10-KSB, in the Company's registration statement on Form S-8
(File No. 33-30985).


/s/ PIERCY BOWLER TAYLOR & KERN
-------------------------------------
Piercy Bowler Taylor & Kern
Certified Public Accountants and
Business Advisors
Las Vegas, Nevada

December 26, 2006


                                       23
From: jaydiannemoyers@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:00:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dianne Moyers

Littleton, CO 80122
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001036327
<NAME>                        GFSI, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-01-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         839
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  38876
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    34,824
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               77,051
<PP&E>                                         40,453
<DEPRECIATION>                                 20023
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,545
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          26,901
<BONDS>                                        179,241
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (96,424)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,545
<SALES>                                        54,839
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               54,839
<CGS>                                          33,612
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  46,214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (96)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4456
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4265
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1674
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,591
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,591
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
From: natalieshenigo@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:14:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Natalie Shenigo

Akron, OH 44333
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40227

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

OSCAR GARCIA-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:14-CR-72-1

Before DAVIS, ELROD, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Oscar GarciaHernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 

632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia-Hernandez has not filed a response. We 

have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 24, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-40227 Document: 00512946130 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/24/2015
No. 14-40227

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 14-40227 Document: 00512946130 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/24/2015
No. 153.

#### Memphis Transit Co. *v.*United States.

*E. Roy Gilpin, Leslie J. Flower*and *Norton Kern*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer*and *Meyer Rothwacks*for the United States.

Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
registrant's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31,
1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          33,762
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           4,943
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    146,308
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          99,503
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           100,201
<LOANS>                                        670,269
<ALLOWANCE>                                      9,639
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,005,851
<DEPOSITS>                                     794,750
<SHORT-TERM>                                    99,287
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             11,668
<LONG-TERM>                                      6,686
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        28,393
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,067
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,005,851
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 56,357
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               13,830
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   679
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                70,866
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              27,952
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,218
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           38,648
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,522
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                (330)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 36,512
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,384
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      11,384
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,611
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.52
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.18
<LOANS-NON>                                      7,281
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,220
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 20,579
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 9,796
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    3,922
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,243
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                9,639
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             7,683
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,956


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of John H. Fraser.

Order reversed, without costs. Opinion by Brady, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
June 30, 2000 financial statements of CFI Mortgage Inc. and Subsidiaries as at
and for the six months ended June 30, 2000 is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         223,351
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  108,740
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               489,917
<PP&E>                                         2,798,818
<DEPRECIATION>                                 121,471
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4,710,259
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,165,468
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1,721,596
<COMMON>                                       217,727
<OTHER-SE>                                     (914,604)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4,710,259
<SALES>                                        255,854
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               436,005
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,483,304
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               510,460
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             16,389
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,474,148)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,474,148)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                4,371,979
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,897,831
<EPS-BASIC>                                    $.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  $.18



</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1

MARINA
BIOTECH, INC.

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Marina Biotech, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December
31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned,
in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



|1. | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                  
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                            
|2. | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
    of the Company.



|Date:  | April
    30, 2018                               | 
|------ | ------------------------------------------------ | 
|       |                                                  | 
|By:    | /s/
    Vuong Trieu, Ph.D.                       | 
|Name:  | Vuong
    Trieu, Ph.D.                           | 
|Title: | Executive Chairman (Principal Executive Officer) |
From: blextraeffort@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:46:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bill & Lois Charron

Harrison, MI 48625
Exhibit
      32.1





Multiband
      Corporation.











Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As
      Adopted Pursuant to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with this Annual Report Form 10-K, Multiband Corporation (the
“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2006, I, James L. Mandel, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.  This
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and


2.  The
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
                April 2, 2007
              /s/James
                  MandelJames
                  MandelChief
                  Executive Officer