alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ayman S. Ashour, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SCM Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of SCM Microsystems, Inc.



|                    |  |     |  |                                                  
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 17, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/    AYMAN S. ASHOUR                           
|                    |  |     |  | Ayman S. Ashour                                  
|                    |  |     |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer and Director)       

I, Melvin Denton-Thompson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of SCM Microsystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of SCM Microsystems, Inc.



|                    |  |     |  |                                             
|------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 17, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/    MELVIN
DENTON-THOMPSON               
|                    |  |     |  | Melvin Denton-Thompson                      
|                    |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary       
|                    |  |     |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
exhibit_10-7.htm










Exhibit 10.7


 


26 February 2012







Amendment to Consultant Service Agreement Dated April 21, 2009







Between Oramed (Company) and ADRES (Contractor)







According to the original agreement dated April 21, 2009, the last milestone payment of 71,000 US$ was due on IND submission. Because of delays in the product development resulted in delay in IND submission, the following changes to the original agreement are introduced as agreed by the parties:








	
  

	
1.

	
20,000 US$ out of the 71,000 US$ were already paid to CBR and ADRES








	
  

	
2.

	
The last milestone payment of 51,000 US$ will be paid upon issuance this amendment (invoice to be issued 1 March 2012)








	
  

	
3.

	
As of 1 March 2012 until the IND submission, monthly retainer payment to ADRES equivalent to 15 hours per month at a rate of 400 NIS per hour (it is expected to submit the IND within 6-8 months)








	
  

	
4.

	
As of 1 March 2012 until the IND submission, fee for sercive payment to CBR. The total budget should not exceed 16,000 US$








	
  

	
5.

	
As stated in the service agreement, correspondence with the FDA after IND submission and prior to its approval, limited to 20 hours, will be free of charge.












In case IND is not submitted by 1 November 2012 the companies will negotiate in good faith extension of this amendment.


 



	  	
Company

	
Contractor

	  
	  	
Oramed Ltd

	
CBR International Corp.

	
ADRES Advanced Regulatory Services Ltd.


	
By

	
/s/ Nadav Kidron

	
/s/ Jeanne Novak

	
/s/ Rivka Zaibel


	
Print Name

	
Nadav Kidron

	
Jeanne M. Novak, Ph.D

	
Rivka Zaibel


	
Title:

	
CEO

	
CEO and Principal Consultant

	
CEO and Consultant


	
Date:

	
2/27/12

	
3/8/12

	
3/8/12
exhibit10.htm





 


 






EXHIBIT 10(L)







SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR AND EXECUTIVE OFFICER NON-PLAN COMPENSATION







Non-Employee Directors







The current fees paid to non-employee directors are as follows:







Non-employee directors of the Company are each paid $24,000 per year for their services.  The Chairmen of the Board of Directors and of the Audit Committee each receive an additional $5,000 for their duties as such while the Chairmen of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee each receive an additional $3,500 per year for their duties as such. Members of committees other than the Executive Committee, each receive an additional $1,000 for their duties as such.







Executive Officers







The current annual salaries of the executive officers are as follows:







Matthew Boyle, President and Chief Executive Officer


-- British Pounds 193,800







Paul N. Farquhar, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer


-- British Pounds 118,965







Annual cash bonuses will be determined at the end of the year.












* * * * *







Further information about compensation of directors and executive officers is found in the Company’s proxy statements on file with the Commission, as well as in periodic Form 8-K filings by the Company.
No. 30, Misc.

#### Schaber *v.*Ohio.

Petitioner *prose. Harry Friberg*for respondent.

Supreme Court of Ohio. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, J. Michael French., President and Chief Executive Officer of MDRNA, Inc. (“MDRNA”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of MDRNA on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of MDRNA. 

 

Date:April 30, 2010 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to MDRNA andwill be retained by MDRNA and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

Thiscertification accompanies each periodic report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by MDRNA for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.12 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: sttoni7@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:37:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Antonia St Germain

Naples, FL 34108
From: aglicha50@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:05:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Alicia Galvani

Tucson, AZ 85741
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES NEAL GREEN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CR-95-72, CA-96-1787-3-19)

Submitted: December 23, 1997 Decided: April 20, 1998

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Neal Green, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Green, Nos. CR-95-72; CA-96-1787-3-19 (D.S.C. May

27, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for transcripts at government

expense and his request for leave to file a supplemental informal

brief based on such transcripts. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

 

       Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement(Form S-8, No. 33-58570) pertaining to the 1983 Incentive StockOption Plan of Intrusion Inc. and the 1987 Incentive Stock Option Plan ofIntrusion Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8,No. 333-60928) and the Registration Statement (Form S-8,No. 333-57948) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan ofIntrusion Inc., as amended, the Registration Statement (Form S-8,No. 33-34484) and the Registration Statement (Form S-8,No. 333-90408) pertaining to the 1995 Non-employee Director Stock OptionPlan of Intrusion Inc., as amended, the Registration Statement(Form S-8, No. 33-42927) pertaining to the 1997 Employee StockPurchase Plan of Intrusion Inc., the Registration Statement(Form S-8, No. 33-80898) pertaining to the 401(k) Savings Plan ofIntrusion Inc. and the Registration Statement (Form S-8,No. 333-53813) pertaining to the Essential Communication Corporation 1996Stock Option Plan of our report dated January 30, 2004, except for Note 13for which the date is March 25, 2004, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements and schedule of Intrusion Inc. included in its AnnualReport (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

 

 

**KBA Group LLP**

Dallas,Texas

March 26,2004

 

----
From: donellamae@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:51:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

DonElla Nielsen

Coleman, MI 48618
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,497
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   83,640
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,340
<INVENTORY>                                     36,178
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          39,812
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,252
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 158,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        104,555
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,798
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   158,961
<SALES>                                         57,241
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,502
<CGS>                                           11,236
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,481
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    220
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (830)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,050
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,050
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30


</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

October 16, 1968

No. P68/439.

protest 68/10495 (Baltimore).

#### Oxford International Corp. *v.*United States,

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise identified on the invoice covered by the foregoing protest as “#50 Sheriff Sirens” is similar in all material respects to the mer*657chandise the subject of *Oxford International Corp.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 472, Abstract 69607), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### Achsah Gunn v. Edgar Kenyon and eight other cases.

Motion for reargument denied.
Before the Third Division,

February 15, 1966

No. 69793.

#### Corn Products Co. *v.*United States,

protest 64/8594 (New York).

*871Opinion by

DoNLON, J.

In accordance -with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of dehydrated leek flakes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Corn Products Co.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 152, C.D. 2567), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures)
of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person for any other purpose.



The undersigned, who are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Liberty National Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), hereby each certify as follows:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company (the Report)
which accompanies this Certificate fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



Dated this 12th day
of August 2004.



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ William L. Daniel                       
|William L. Daniel                           
|Chief Executive Officer                     
|(Principal Executive Officer)               
|                                            
|/s/ Jesse R. Cheatham, Jr.                  
|Jesse R. Cheatham, Jr.                      
|Chief Financial Officer                     
|(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to
Liberty National Bancshares, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-21-00032-CV

IN RE RHONDA LEE COUGOT

Original Proceeding

_____________

From the County Court at Law

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 9276PR

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator’s Petition for Writ of Mandamus is denied.

MATT JOHNSON

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Neill, and

Justice Johnson

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed March 10, 2021

[OT06]