alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Richard F. Welch,
Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of the managing general partner, Prudential-Bache Properties, Inc. (the Managing General Partner), of Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-2 (the
Partnership), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Richard F. Welch                                                                                                                                         
|Richard F. Welch Chairman of the Board of Directors, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner of the Partnership April 20, 2007
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 30, 

2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-12-00577-CV

SAMAH ABU-MAHMEED, Appellant

V.

ABDULNASSIR TAMIMI, Appellee

On Appeal from the 246th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-40720

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a final decree of divorce signed March 19, 2012. On

October 16, 2012, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1. The motion is granted.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Brown and Busby.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6164

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Petitioner

- Appellee ,

v. DUANE MONTGOMERY , Respondent

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. ( 5:16

- hc

- 02218

- BR )

Submitted : October 17, 2017 Decided: November 3, 2017

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Louis C. Allen, Acting Federal Public Defender, Eric J. Brignac, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. John Stuart Bruce, United States Attorney, G. Norm an Acker, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Robert J. Dodson, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Duane Montgomery appeals the district court's order finding by a preponderance of the evidence that he is presently suffering from a mental disease or defect for the treatment of which he is in need of custody for care and treatment in a suitable facility and committing him to the cus tody of the Attorney General for hospitalization and

treatment. See 18 U.S.C. § 4245 (2012). Montgomery contends that the district court clearly erred in reaching this conclusion. We affirm. In finding that Montgomery satisfied the criteria for commitmen t, the district court relied on two written forensic evaluations prepared by staff at FMC

– Butner as well as the testimony of a third forensic psychologist. The unanimous conclusion of the medical personnel was that Montgomery suffered from a mental diseas e or defect for which he required tr eatment at a suitable facility. Montgomery presented no evidence to contradict these opinions . Based on Montgomery's medical history, the written evaluations, and the sworn testimony, we conclude that the district cour t did not clearly err when it found that
he met the criteria for commitment under § 4245. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00001-CV

Braums, Inc.

v.

Angelita Sifuentes

§

§

§

§

From the 17th District Court

of Tarrant County (017-270194-14)

February 25, 2016

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and the 

parties’ “Joint Motion to Vacate and Render Judgment Pursuant to Settlement” 

and holds that the motion should be granted and the cause should be dismissed. 

Without regard to the merits and effectuating the parties’ settlement agreement, 

we vacate the trial court’s judgment and dismiss the cause with prejudice.

Also relying on the settlement agreement, we order that each party shall 

bear its own costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot______________

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-06-00121- CV In r e Ro que Te r c e r o- Ar anda ORI GINAL PRO CEEDING FRO M TRAVIS CO UNTY M E MO R

A N D UM O P I N I O N The pe tition for writ of mandamus is denied. SeeTex. R. App. P . 52.8(a) .

__________________________________________ David Puryear , J ustice Be fore J ustices B . A. Smith, P uryear and Waldrop Filed: Mar ch 28, 2006
No. 410.

No. 475, Misc.

No. 478, Misc.

No. 563, Misc.

#### Jackson Brewing Co. *v.*Clarke, Jackson Brewing Co. *v.*Connally, U. S. District Judge, Levine *v.*Radio Corporation of America et al., Gluckstern *v.*New York,

*ante,*p. 891;

*ante,*p. 885;

*ante,*p. 897; and

*ante,*p. 899.

Petitions for rehearing denied.
From: royces2@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:37:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jerrie Royce

Bothell, WA 98012
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





Form 8-K





Current Report





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report  (Date of earliest event reported): January 28, 2019





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation


(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)





001-11241


(Commission File Number)





Delaware37-1105865(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(IRS Employer Identification Number)





2120 West End Avenue


Nashville, Tennessee 37203-0001


(Address of principal executive offices, with zip code)





(615) 341-1000


(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:


oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).





Emerging growth company o





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o





---










Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.





On January 28, 2019, Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation issued a press release reporting financial results for the year and fourth quarter ended December 31, 2018.  A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated into this Item 2.02 by reference.





The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, is being furnished in accordance with the provisions of General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K.








Item 9.01.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.





d)Exhibits:The following is furnished as an exhibit to this report:Exhibit No.Description99.1Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated January 28, 2019








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation








Date:  January 28, 2019By:/s/ Leslie S. ZmuggLeslie S. ZmuggSecretary











2
PUBLIC LAW 114–134—MAR. 9, 2016 130 STAT. 299 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1596: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD: 

Vol. 161 (2015): Aug. 5, considered and passed Senate. 

Vol. 162 (2016): Mar. 1, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 114–134 

114th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2082 

Stringtown Road in Grove City, Ohio, as the ‘‘Specialist Joseph W. Riley Post 

Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SPECIALIST JOSEPH W. RILEY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 2082 Stringtown Road in Grove City, Ohio, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Specialist Joseph W. Riley Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Specialist Joseph W. Riley Post Office Building’’. 

Approved March 9, 2016. 

Mar. 9, 2016 

[S. 1596] 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1 with PUBLAWLAW
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

American IndiansBlacksCultural InfluencesElementary Secondary EducationFamily School RelationshipFutures (of Society)Higher EducationHispanic AmericansMathematics EducationMinority GroupsScience EducationTeaching Methods

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
From: dowjones@prodigy.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:49:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

W. Dow Jones

, 93003-4838
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Roxalana Druse, Appellant.

Conviction, order and judgment affirmed. Opinion hy

Hardin. P. J.
From: tdmo321@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:39:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as Ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Debbie Morse

Bedford, IN 47421
From: dilda@everestkc.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:09:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dilda Curtis

Overland Park, KS 66212
**EXHIBIT 99.3**

**CATERPILLAR FINANCE CORPORATION**

**JAPAN LOCAL CURRENCY ADDENDUM**

**ARTICLE I**

**Definitions**

**SECTION 1.01**

**SECTION 1.02**

**ARTICLE II**

**The Credits**

****

**SECTION 2.01**

**SECTION 2.02**

**ARTICLE III**

**Representations and Warranties**

**ARTICLE IV**

**Miscellaneous Provisions**

**SECTION 4.01**

**SECTION 4.02**

**SECTION 4.03**

**SECTION 4.04**

**SECTION 4.05**

**SECTION 4.06**

**SECTION 4.07**

**ARTICLE V**

**The Japan Local Currency Agent**

**SECTION 5.01**

**SECTION 5.02**

**SECTION 5.03**

**SECTION 5.04**

**SECTION 5.05**

**SECTION 5.06**

**SECTION 5.07**

**SECTION 5.08**

**SECTION 5.09**

**SECTION 5.10**
No. 535, Misc.

#### Elliott *v.*Warden, Maryland Penitentiary.

Baltimore City Court, Maryland. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
32.1








Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form
10-K for the period ended May 31, 2010 (the “Report”) of Immucor, Inc. (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)         The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)         The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.











July 26,
2010                                                                                                   
/s/ Gioacchino De
Chirico


Gioacchino De Chirico


Chief Executive
Officer