alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Two U.S. Navy Sailors missing off the coast of Somalia

/ Published Jan. 12, 2024

On the evening of January 11, two U.S. Navy Sailors were reported missing at sea while conducting operations off the coast of Somalia. Search and rescue operations are currently ongoing to locate the two sailors. For operational security purposes, we will not release additional information until the personnel recovery operation is complete.Out of respect for the families affected, we will not release further information on the missing personnel at this time.The sailors were forward-deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet (C5F) area of operations supporting a wide variety of missions.
Department Energy

Washington, DC 20585

March 3, 1997

DATE CHANGE: PUBLIC HEARING- APRIL 1, 1997

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING AND PUBLIC HEARING ON

TEST PROCEDURES AND CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS

FOR PLUMBING PRODUCTS; AND CERTIFICATION

REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL APPLIANCES

On February 20, 1997, the Department of Energy (DOE or Department) published a Notice of

Proposed Rulemaking and Public Hearing Regarding Test Procedures and Certification

Requirements

- --^ for Plumbing Products; and Certification iRequiro+Y ent or Des:den +; al n

a1141l i.J for 1\\..]111e ,L.1 APPI1U11VeJ.

(62 FR 7834, February 20, 1997). The comment period closes May 6, 1997.

You recently received an invitation to this public hearing which was originally scheduled for

March 31, 1997. Since a number of people have raised a concern about traveling on March 30,

1997, the Department has decided to change the date of the public hearing to April 1, 1997. The

location of the hearing and the time remains the same.

If you plan to attend the public hearing or have questions regarding the Notice of Proposed

Rulemaking, please contact Ms. Sandy Beall at (202) 586-7574 or Mr. Bill Hui at (202) 586-

9145, respectively.

TIME: April 1 , 1997 (9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.)

PLACE: Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Room 1E-245

Washington, DC 20585

'CONTACT: Mr. Bill Hui

U.S. Department of Energy

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, EE-43

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20585

(202) 586-9145 (202) 586-4617 (Fax)

MiL ae11. Mc a e, Director

Office of Codes and Standards

Building Technology, State and

Community Programs

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Printed with soy ink on recycled paper

 EE-RM-TP-97-600 COMMENT 0C
Exhibit 32.1
------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Material  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Robert Bernstein, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  November 12, 2004              By:  /s/ Robert Bernstein
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                            Robert Bernstein
                                      Its:  President, Chief Executive Officer &
                                            Chief Financial Officer
From: jshapazian@bak.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:35:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James Shapazian

Bakersfield, CA 93308
# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-97047

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  350                                                               Trade Date:  10/20/03

(To Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2002 &

  Prospectus dated August  8, 2002)                                                                     Issue Date:   10/23/03

The Date of this Pricing SupplementOctober 20, 2003

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP                                                                                                                                Date and terms of redemption or

     or        Stated                                                                  Interest                                    repayment (including any

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment  Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)               Maturity                Public (2)                Commissions      Frequency      Option     Yes/No                record dates)

14911QQP9   4.00%                        04/15/10          100%                    1.0%                  Quarterly           YES                       NO                

                       

                          

Principal                                                                                1st Payment Day         

Amount                   Proceeds                 Dealer                            Date                  Count

$2,071,000.00                $2,050,290.00         ABN AMROInc.                 01/15/04                 30/360    

Original Issue Discount Note:                                                                   Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                   N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $307.533 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated August 8,2002.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
From: ddaniel@providenthomeloans.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:14:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the very strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dan Daniel

Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
April 14, 2015

U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington D.C. 20590

Re: Essential Mail Service via Island Air

To whom it may concern**:~...:'**..... ' ") ."1**;~.** -., r· 

### .-..**·-~** :;**~.**

This letter is to express strong support forthe selection of Island Airto continueto, provide essential air service to ourcommunity. Island Air has been

### providin~ servfces to ' Port Bailey and Dry Spruce Bay community for many years and we depend on the service to operate our business as well as allowing for our basic survival.

Island Air's service connects us and allows us·to operate a business from

### ou~rural location on Kodiak Island. They provide freight, cargo and mail year round to our location and without the service we simply would not be able to continue to operate our business or sustain life at Port Bailey. Island Air's dispatchers and pilots are.reliable and always in communication assuring we have what we need. · Simply put, Island Airs' service is critical to the economic well being of Port Bailey and the Dry Spruce Bay community and we supporttheir application to provide Essential Air Service to Kodiak Isla d. /

## Sim;~=-----... · .". 

# (/'**--~**

# (f,~~ RobertS. Shane

# n{J\r Anita A. Shane



### Port Bailey 

### (KPY)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>


<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>          DEC-31-1997

<CASH>                       21,051,953
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                   571,039
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             21,622,992
<PP&E>                       33,994,623
<DEPRECIATION>                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               63,829,469
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         3,863,302
<BONDS>                      51,768,623
<COMMON>                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                   (5,732,983)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 63,829,469
<SALES>                       8,559,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             11,393,348
<CGS>                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 4,363,238
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              1,321,086
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            5,893,740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                (184,716)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           8,080,035
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                  8,080,035
<EPS-PRIMARY>                     19.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                     19.35




</TABLE>
#### Oliver Cooper, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements on opinion of Kennedy, J., delivered at Special Term in *Kane*v. *New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company.*
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906****OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Material Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert M. Bernstein, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:				          (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and				          (2)        Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| Dated:  November 13, 2006 | /s/ Robert M. Bernstein                               |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                | By:  Robert M. Bernstein                                                                                                                                                                               |
|                                | Its:  Chief Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                          |

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 5017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01887]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8613]

Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Goya and the Altamira Family''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the object to be 
included in the exhibition ``Goya and the Altamira Family,'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of 
cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at The Metropolitan 
Museum of Art, New York, NY, from on or about April 22, 2014, until on 
or about August 3, 2014, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit object, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: January 23, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-01887 Filed 1-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
No. 392.

#### Head, doing business as Lea County Publishing Co., et al. *v.*New Mexico Board of Examiners in Optometry.

*Carol J. Head*for appellants.

Appeal from the Supreme Court of New Mexico. Probable jurisdiction noted. In addition to the questions listed in the jurisdictional statement, the parties are requested to address themselves to the issue of possible federal preemption by reason of the Federal Communications Act. The Solicitor General is also invited to express the views of the Federal • Communications Commission on this issue.
Before the Second Division,

September 9, 1960

No. 64485.

#### Vanetta Fabrics Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 301338-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waterproof cotton cloth similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *D. H. Grant & Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 20, C.A.D. 723), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Clanton, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 188]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), rendered March 26, 1991, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree and unlawful possession of marihuana, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the Supreme Court correctly denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence. Initially we note that the defendant’s present contentions were not raised before the suppression court and are thus unpreserved for appellate review. In any event, the record establishes that the defendant abandoned the bag containing, *inter alia,*20 vials of crack cocaine, upon the police officer’s mere approach, unaccompanied by any show of force *(see, People v Toodles,*184 AD2d 674). As a result of this calculated act, which was not in response to any unlawful police activity, the defendant forfeited any expectation of privacy he might have otherwise had in the bag *(People v Toodles, supra; People v McCants,*175 AD2d 847; *People v Carrington,*174 AD2d 572).

The defendant has failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the People failed to adduce legally sufficient evidence that he was in knowing possession of an amount of cocaine in excess of 500 milligrams (Penal Law § 220.06 [5]; *see, People v Gray,*86 NY2d 10; *People v Ryan,*82 NY2d 497). In any event, his claim is meritless *(see, People v Sanchez,*86 NY2d 27; *People v Miller,*209 AD2d 187, *affd*85 NY2d 962).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.
----

|  TRUSTEE                                  |   |  DEPOSITOR:                                           |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|  LaSalle Bank,      National Association  |   |  Structured      Asset Securities Corporation II, 745 |
|  135 S. LaSalle      St., Suite 1625      |   |  Seventh      Avenue                                  |
|  Mailcode:      IL4-135-16-25             |   |  New York, New      York 10019                        |
|  Chicago, IL 60603                        |   |  Attention:      David Nass - LB-UBS 2008-C1          |
|  Attn: Edgar Team                         |   |                                                       |
|                                           |   |                                                       |
|  MASTER      SERVICER:                    |   |                                                       |
|  Wachovia Bank,      National Association |   |                                                       |
|  8739 Research      Drive, URP4           |   |                                                       |
|  Charlotte,      NC  28262-1075      |   |                                                       |
|  Attention:      LBUBS 2008-C1            |   |                                                       |
|                                           |   |                                                       |
|  RATING      AGENCIES:                    |   |                                                       |
|                                           |   |                                                       |
|  Moody's      Investors Service, Inc.     |   |  Standard &      Poor's Rating Services           |
|  99 Church      Street                    |   |  55 Water      Street, 10th      Floor                |
|  New York, New      York 10007            |   |  New York, New      York 10004                        |
|  Attention:      Tracey Ferguson          |   |  Attention:      CMBS Surveillance Department         |

|   | (i)    | a      review of CWCAM's activities during the period 4/11/2008 - 12/31/2008 and      of CWCAM's performance under this Agreement has been made under my      supervision; and                       |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | (ii)   | to      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all      its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout      the reporting period noted above. |

----