alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: margmcc@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:13:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marg McCausland

Ashburn, VA 20147
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Amendment No. 1 to the
Registration Statement [Form S-3 No. 333-6131] and related Prospectus of
Cover-All Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries for the registration of 6,591,528
shares of its common stock of our report dated March 15, 2002, with respect to
the 2001, 2000 and 1999 consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Cover-All Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries included in its Annual Report
[Form 10-K] for the year ended December 31, 2001.

     We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement [Form S-8 No. 333-44119] pertaining to the 1995 Employee Stock Option
Plan, and in the related Prospectus of Cover-All Technologies, Inc. and
subsidiaries of our report dated March 15, 2002, with respect to the 2001, 2000
and 1999 consolidated financial statements and schedule of Cover-All
Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries included in its Annual Report [Form 10-K]
for the year ended December 31, 2001.



                                        MOORE STEPHENS, P.C.
                                        Certified Public Accountants

New York, New York
March 29, 2002
From: scoutertale@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:13:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

First of all, it might be good to remember that God is your Judge and you WILL stand before Him one

day to explain why you devised this mandate.

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jules Dubuisson

Fort Walton Beach, FL 32548
EX 10.2



		

			

		




		
			Exhibit 10.2
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			May 4, 2016
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Mr. Eugene M. Bullis
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Dear Gene,
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			I am glad that you have agreed to continue your employment in your current capacity through at least September 16, 2016 (the “Initial Term”), with the Company retaining the option to extend your employment for up to two additional months, through no later than November 11, 2016.  The base salary and benefits will remain as outlined in the October 26, 2015 letter (the “Offer Letter”), except that we have agreed that in the event you remain willing and able to serve, but your services are no longer needed at any time prior to September 16, 2016, either in your current capacity or as a senior advisor through a transition period, then we will continue to pay your base salary through the Initial Term.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Assuming you complete the Initial Term and any extended term as provided above, then as soon as practicable after such service is completed, we will pay you a cash bonus of $100,000.  This bonus is not payable if you fail to complete service for the Initial Term and any extended term for any reason, unless such failure is a result of your termination by the Company without Cause (as defined in the Offer Letter).
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Gene, thank you for helping us through the very difficult period that followed David’s passing and through this transition period.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Sincerely,
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			/s/ Christine Bilotti-Peterson
		

		
			Christine Bilotti-Peterson 
		

		
			Senior Vice President and CHRO
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Signed:
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			/s/ Eugene M. Bullis
		

		
			_________________________________May 5, 2016
		

		
			Eugene M. BullisDate
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
From: vgd33@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:54:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

GREG DIETRICH

Metairie, LA 70005
Before the Second Division,

November 9, 1965

No. 69612.

#### Cotra Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 58/23664 (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waterproof velveteen cloth identical to exhibit 1 in protest 60/17099, decided in Abstract 66801, wherein the merchandise was held to be similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. D. *H. Grant & Co., Inc.*(47 CCPA 20, C.A.D. 723), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Order entered November 4 , 2014

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 14

- 01195

- CV

IN RE KINGMAN HOLDINGS, L. L.C., Relator

Original Proceeding from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416

- 02434

- 2014



### O RDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus. We ORDER each party to bear its own costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SIGNATURE EYEWEAR, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED JULY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY>  U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                     NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUL-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                              1
<CASH>                                                  27,764
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       13,875,121
<ALLOWANCES>                                           351,244
<INVENTORY>                                         19,611,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    37,749,115
<PP&E>                                               4,669,181
<DEPRECIATION>                                       2,592,932
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      47,261,565
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               28,069,727
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                 9,188
<OTHER-SE>                                          14,177,202
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        47,261,565
<SALES>                                             41,835,119
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    41,835,119
<CGS>                                               16,941,816
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       30,077,974
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         (543)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     769,991
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (5,954,119)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (2,215,316)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (3,738,803)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (3,738,803)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             (0.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (0.74)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. (the company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Mark S. Thompson   
|Mark S. Thompson       
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 7, 2008
##### 





| |             
| | ------------
| | EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Capers W. McDonald, President and Chief Executive Officer of
BioReliance Corporation (the Corporation), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

(1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the period ended
September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

/s/ Capers W. McDonald
Capers W. McDonald
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2003

36
From: earniedeeds@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:38:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Moses Deeds

, 73160-7416
iqnt-ex101_233.htm



 

Exhibit 10.1

 

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED
BY INTELIQUENT, INC.

 

From: Ian Neale 
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2016 9:26 AM
To: 'Taylor, Mike (Operations)'; Dave Lopez; Kumar, Manoj; Williams, Dan (Legal)
Subject: RE: Amendment Language

 

Mike,

 

Thanks for your email confirming the change of terms relating to your [***] and [***]service traffic, we agree that your email reflects recent discussion on these matters.

 

We appreciate you working with us on these issues and look forward to our on-going partnership with T-Mobile.

 

Cheers, Ian.

 

From: Taylor, Mike (Operations) 
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2016 3:06 AM
To: Ian Neale; Dave Lopez 
Cc: Kumar, Manoj ; Williams, Dan (Legal)  
Subject: Amendment Language

 

Ian/Dave,

 

T-Mobile has agreed to provide following to Inteliquent:

 

·         PRC Free [***] minutes from [***] to [***].

·         Additional [***] minutes by [***]

·         [***] additional [***]by [***]

·         During any month between [***] through [***], if high cost destination traffic falls below under [***] % of ( total [***]traffic) then Inteliquent will pay PRC for [***] minutes for that month

 

·         T-Mobile agrees to following definition for Excess Outbound 8YY Service MOUs: 

 

o   Excess Outbound 8YY Service MOUs: If PRC Free [***] is applicable

§  The total Outbound 8YY Service MOUs in a given month minus [***] MOUs minus the total Outbound IntraMTA Service MOUs in that month divided by [***].

 

o   Excess Outbound 8YY Service MOUs: If PRC Free [***] is not applicable

§  The total Outbound 8YY Service MOUs in a given month minus the total Outbound IntraMTA Service MOUs in that month divided by [***]

 

 

Please let me know if you have any question.

 

Thanks,

-Mike 

 

 

 

[* * *] The confidential content of this Exhibit 10.1 has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.
From: empresstra@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:57:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tiara Auxier

Salt Lake City, UT 84109