alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: rmzwahlen@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:09:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rene Zwahlen

Huntsville, AL 35811
(4910-13-PI

.'<C1JRll£"CES

,;o:;.SV,",lKlL

AtY!f,lltfti

"I"11Als.SIG

V~~t/

Federal Aviation Administration

RIN 2120-AA64

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus ModeJ A330-200 and -300, and Model A340-200,

-300, -500 and -600 Series Airplanes I

14 CFR Part 39

'"51/lfllo

IDocket No. FAA-2009-1215 Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-126-AD; Amendmen ovmOOS"MIIOL

\ Ct:>3&>4 14-1'1 Jft/{-116 16

39-*****; AD 2010-**-**]

DEPARTMENT OF TRAc"lSPORTATION

(DOT). ANM-1-

~mAJ.S,'SIG

ACTION: Final rule. C .(~

'"T£

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products lisRO~~~~LF

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness infonnation (MeAl) tl<m •••~ -(\"

O. db" b' f I I °d'f d ,1Yl4~ ongmate y an aV131lOn aut only 0 allot ler country to lent! y an correct an unsaJe ~MH

I z.'/{)

condition on an aviation product. The MCAllescribes the unsafe condition as: "(,)l;~M:\Ol

* * * [PJartiai blockage of the water aJlsorbing filter element PIN (part 0-"" I~

number) QA06l23 was observed severLaltimes. The blockage was created &~'.JlJ/~

by carbon debris from the cartridge and from the burst disc of the Halon :<G$""OO~

bottle. ANM- (<X)

This water absorbing filter element is part of Halon Dual-Filter Assembly .~'~

installed also in the Flow Metering System (FMS) of the cargo

compartment Fire Extinguishing System used in the A330 and A340

aeroplanes.

Blockage of the water absorbing filter element could lead to reduction of

Halon outflow, leading to incapacity to maintain fire extinguishing agent

concentration. Combined with fire, this could result in an uncontrolled fire

in the affected compartment, which wduld constitute an unsafe condition.
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Robert A. Zummo, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Acorn Holding Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including it’s consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual reportis being prepared;b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofa date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “EvaluationDate”); andc. presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses ininternal controls; andb. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whetheror not therewere significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internalcontrols subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regardto significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.Date:December 14, 2005     /s/ Robert A. Zummo     Robert A. Zummo, Chairman  President and Chief Executive Officer
From: teetersclu@earthlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:47:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Teeters

Tomball, TX 77377
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1471 Agreed to House (ATH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1471

 Honoring the 50th anniversary of the successful demonstration of the 
  first integrated circuit and its impact on the electronics industry.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 22, 2008

    Mr. Hall of Texas submitted the following resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on Science and Technology

                           September 22, 2008

  The Committee on Science and Technology discharged; considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Honoring the 50th anniversary of the successful demonstration of the 
  first integrated circuit and its impact on the electronics industry.

Whereas in May 1958 Jack St. Clair Kilby joined Texas Instruments because it was 
        the only company that would permit him to work full-time on 
        miniaturization of electronics;
Whereas just four months later on September 12, 1958, Jack Kilby demonstrated 
        the first integrated circuit by combining a transistor, several 
        resistors, and a capacitor on a half inch piece of germanium in an 
        attempt to reduce transistor costs;
Whereas Jack Kilby spent his career at Texas Instruments, a productive 
        engineering career that resulted in over 60 patents and seminal 
        inventions, including the electronic calculator;
Whereas Jack Kilby received the National Medal of Science in 1969 and the 
        National Medal of Technology in 1990, and shared the Nobel Prize in 
        Physics in 2000, for his invention of and contributions to the 
        development of the integrated circuit;
Whereas during Kilby's lifetime integrated circuits provided a million fold 
        decrease in the costs of electronics;
Whereas Kilby's achievement revolutionized electronics and permitted it to grow 
        to over $1,500,000,000,000 in annual sales world wide;
Whereas the integrated circuit revolutionized computing and made possible 
        getting a man to the moon and modern space exploration;
Whereas the integrated circuit led to a revolution in communications, 
        transportation, and medical industries; and
Whereas the future will inevitably bring equally far-reaching integrated 
        circuit-based advances in many fields: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes and honors the research and development 
        efforts of Jack Kilby and his contemporaries, who by inventing 
        and perfecting the integrated circuit brought us modern 
        electronics and changed the world; and
            (2) recognizes the importance of continued advancements in 
        electronics to the well-being of America.
                                 <all>
```
'S DEPARTMENT OF THE I
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Pl

ITCHER ISLAND

ZAREM BO

s

1S LAND

HRUBBY ISLAND

adapted from U. S.

[Navy vertical aerial photographs |

‘Geology from U. S. Geological Survey Bulletin 800, pate 1

GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE SALMON BAY AREA, PETERSBURG QUADRANGLE, SOUTHEASTERN ALASKA

1
eo.

3 Miles
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 11, 2009 

s0831 

Order 

 

September 11, 2009 

138325 & (9) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138325 

 COA: 287814 

Wayne CC: 2004-003608 

GREGORY LEE BERRY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 5, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion to remand is DENIED.
No. 457, Misc.

#### Wesley *v.*Illinois.

Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.
From: corderc@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:11:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Curtis L Corder

Lubbock, TX 79424
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

________________________ No. ACM S32709

________________________ UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Ryan J. Davis Airman First Class (E

- 3 ), U.S. Air Force, Appellant

________________________ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary

Decided 2 9 June 2022

________________________ Military Judge: Brett A. Landry

. S entence: Sentence adjudged on 10 June 2021 by SpCM convened at Luke A ir Force Base, Arizona . Sentence entered by military judge on 15 July 2021 : Bad

cond uct discharge , confinement for 6 months , forfeiture of $1,190 pay per month for 6 months, reduction to E

- 1, and a reprimand

. For Appellant: Major Stuart J. Anderson, USAF; Major Spencer R. Nelson , USAF

. For Appellee : Major John P. Patera, USAF ; Mary Ellen Payne, Esquire

. Before KEY , ANNEXSTAD , and MEGINLEY , Appellate Military Judges.

________________________This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 30.4.

_____________

___________ PER CURIAM: The findings and sentence as entered are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(d) , Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C . §§ 859(a), 866( d ) ,United States v. Davis , No. ACM S3270 9

2 Manual for Courts

- Martial, United States (2019 ed.). Accordingly, the findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE Clerk of the Court
From: p-dubs@fuse.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:40:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Paul Washnock

Independence, KY 41051
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsProject ORION: Orbital Debris Removal Using Ground-Based Sensors and LasersAbout 100,000 pieces of 1 to 10-cm debris in low-Earth orbit are too small to track reliably but large enough to cripple or destroy spacecraft. The ORION team studied the feasibility of removing the debris with ground-based laser impulses. Photoablation experiments were surveyed and applied to likely debris materials. Laser intensities needed for debris orbit modification call for pulses on the order of lOkJ or continuous wave lasers on the order of 1 MW. Adaptive optics are necessary to correct for atmospheric turbulence. Wavelength and pulse duration windows were found that limit beam degradation due to nonlinear atmospheric processes. Debris can be detected and located to within about 10 microrads with existing radar and passive optical technology. Fine targeting would be accomplished with laser illumination, which might also be used for detection. Bistatic detection with communications satellites may also be possible. We recommend that existing technology be used to demonstrate the concept at a loss of about $20 million. We calculate that an installation to clear altitudes up to 800 km of 1 to 10-cm debris over 2 years of operation would cost about $80 million. Clearing altitudes up to 1,500 km would take about 3 years and cost about $160 million.Document ID19960054373Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCampbell, J. W.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1996Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:108522NASA-TM-108522Accession Number96N36541Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19960054373.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

ChildrenEconomically DisadvantagedElementary Secondary EducationHigh Risk StudentsHomeless PeopleHousing DeficienciesPovertyRural AreasRural FamilyRural SchoolsRural Urban DifferencesSchool PolicySchool Role

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
From: ilahmik@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:30:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kim Barger

Tulsa, OK 74135