alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: briangpowell@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:35:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course, I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government's forcing free insurance coverage on Americans, especially for drugs

and devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to (a principle established by

Thomas Jefferson). I again urge you in the strongest way possible to reverse course and remove

contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

Brian Powell

Lynchburg, VA 24502
#### John Fallon v. Rosanna Lawlor.

— Motion granted, without costs, upon condition that the appellant may discontinue his appeal in the Court of Appeals, without costs, if he so elects.
No. 236.

#### Lopez *v.*United States.

*Edward J. Davis*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Kirby W. Patterson*for the United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari granted.
(V.D. 150)

#### Silvine Importers, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 12766.

(Decided February 6, 1969)

*Green & Blum*for the plaintiff.

*William D. Ruehelshaus,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Newman, Judge:

This matter is before me on remand from classification proceedings decided by this court in *Silvine*Importers, *Inc*v. *United*States, 60 Cust. Ct. 1041, Abstract P68/237, wherein the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement. It has been submitted on a written stipulation reading as follows:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General, attorney for the United States, as follows:

*10531. That all of the merchandise listed on the invoices consists of electric pots called brewmasters and detachable electric cords with plugs. These items are the same as the merchandise passed upon in the case of *Silvine Importers, Inc.*v. *United States,*60 Cust. Ct. 1041, P68/237, wherein the Court ruled that the brewmasters and the electric cords were separate items of commerce and subj ect to appraisement and classification separately, and accordingly remanded the matter to a single judge to determine the proper dutiable values.

2. That the aforesaid merchandise does not appear on the final list published by the Secretary of the Treasury, under the Customs Simplifications Act of 1956, T.D. 54521.

3. That the proper basis for determining the value of the merchandise herein is the export value, as defined in Section 402(b) of the Tariff Aot of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplifications Act of 1956 (19 U.S.C.A. § 1401-a).

4. That such or similar merchandise at the time of exportation to the United States, was freely sold in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and' in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the costs of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, at the values stated in Appendix A, attached hereto.

It is further agreed that the matter be submitted on this Stipulation.

Upon the agreed facts, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the involved Brewmasters and electric cords with plugs, and that said values are the below listed prices net, packed:

> Item Unit price

> No. 9600A, Brewmaster, white color $0. 6545

> No. 9940, Brewmaster, with yellow color $0. 6102

> Electrical cord and plug $0.088

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
From: rhelms510@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:44:52 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robin Helms

Winter Park, FL 32789
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000737210
<NAME> LNB BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          18,890
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             102
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     16,102
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          88,858
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            89,537
<LOANS>                                        302,073
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,116
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 438,243
<DEPOSITS>                                     366,380
<SHORT-TERM>                                    23,386
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,184
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,095
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,138
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 438,243
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 25,910
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,377
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   183
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                32,470
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,505
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,478
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           20,992
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      600
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  (1)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 16,565
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,752
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,852
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,852
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.41 
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.33
<LOANS-NON>                                        765
<LOANS-PAST>                                       357
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,066
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 4,002
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      672
<RECOVERIES>                                       186 
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,116
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,867
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,253


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE  TO SUCH 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998.
       
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                            2397
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  2397
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    2652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              273
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                       8000
<COMMON>                                          1935
<OTHER-SE>                                       (7556)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      2652
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   817
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (817)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (817)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE OPTEL,
INC. NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MAY 31, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                         113,497
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,613
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (914)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         137,198
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 417,203
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        353,148
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,587
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   417,203
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,117
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,016
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,993
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (31,668)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (31,668)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (31,668)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (13.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (13.23)
        

</TABLE>
From: veitchl@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:30:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Laynie Veitch

Leonard, MI 48367
ACXIO N 

## Pettiford , Mari e (OST) 

# J - SlO-f10124-00 4 COIJTROLU O 

## From : Sent : To : Subject :
Januar y21 , 201 1 TO : Th e Honorabl e Ra

yLaHoo d 

## Jerr

yBlackle r[docblack@ak.net ] Friday , Januar

y21 , 201 1 8:2 4 P M LaHood
. Ra

y(OST ) Cordova Ai rServic e

" 0 —'—Z , o o o As busines s owner s i n Cordov a Alask a w e ar e writin g thi s lette rt o expres s ou rsuppor t fo rth e selectio n o f Alaska Airline s t o continu e t o provid e essentia l ai rservic e t o th e communit y o f Cordova
. V^ e rel yo n Alaska Airline s t o brin g i n everythin g fro m a packag e o f nut s & bolt s t o transmission s an d engine s fo rth e customer s w e servic e throug h ou rbusiness
. Alaska' s twic e dail y je t servic e i s vita l t o th e economi c wel l bein g o f ou r compan yan d tha t o f th e community
. W e reques t tha t DOT selec t Alask a Airline s t o continu e t o provid e ai rservic e t o Cordov a an d th e othe rSoutheas t communttre s tha t the yserve . Sincerely , Jerry& Vick i Blackle r Alpin e Diese l & Shipyar d Renta l LL C
EXHIBIT 10-X
------------
(C-XIV)


                          CONSENT OF DIRECTOR
                                  OF
                        CARLYLE INVESTORS, INC.


     The undersigned, being all the directors of Carlyle Investors, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), acting by written consent
pursuant to Section 141(f) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, hereby
consent to the adoption of, and do hereby adopt, the following resolutions:

     WHEREAS, this Corporation is the holder of certain demand notes made
by its shareholders in the aggregate original principal amount of
$3,000,000 (the "Notes"), as set forth in EXHIBIT A attached hereto; and,

     WHEREAS, this Corporation desires to make a distribution to its
shareholders aggregating $2,000,000, as a return of capital (the
"Distribution"); and,

     WHEREAS, in order to effect the Distribution, the outstanding
principal amount of the Notes will be reduced as set forth in such Exhibit
A.

     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Corporation make the
Distribution, as a return of capital, effective as of the date hereof, to
be paid by the reduction of the outstanding principal amount as set forth
EXHIBIT A attached hereto; and,

     FURTHER RESOLVED, that any officer of this Corporation is hereby
authorized and directed to effect the Distribution as of the date hereof,
to enter into, execute and deliver, or to ratify, any and all documents
incidental or related thereto, including without limitation, those
documents deemed necessary or appropriate to evidence the reduction in the
outstanding principal balances of each of the Notes as set forth herein,
and any said officer is hereby authorized and directed to take whatever
actions said officer deems reasonably necessary in order to consummate the
transaction described or contemplated.


Dated:           October 31, 1996




STUART C. NATHAN
--------------------
Stuart C. Nathan



Being the sole director or Carlyle Investors, Inc., a Delaware corporation.





                               EXHIBIT A
                               ---------



                                                Original
                                                Principal    Principal
Payor                          Date of Note      Amount      Reduction
-----                         --------------   ----------    ---------

JMB Realty Corporation        March 25, 1993   $  450,000     $300,000

JMB/Manhattan
 Associates, Ltd.             March 25, 1993   $  600,000     $400,000

Carlyle Real Estate
 Limited Partnership-XIII     March 25, 1993   $  600,000     $400,000

Carlyle Real Estate
 Limited Partnership-XIV      March 25, 1993   $1,200,000     $800,000

JMB Service Bureau
 company (a division of
 Northbrook Corporation),
 as successor-in-interest
 to JMB Holdings Corporation  March 25, 1993   $  150,000     $100,000
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-30490 Summary Calendar

ROBERT KEVIN MCCARTNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus CLYDE TERRAL; MIKE VILLARD; CLIFFORD STRIDDER; JAMES BUCK; CHARLES WAGNER, Defendants-Appellees. * * * * * * * * * *

__________________ c/w No. 98-30491

__________________ ROBERT KEVIN MCCARTNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus KEITH PERKINS; JEFF CLARK; DALE PARKER; RAY DELCOMYN; TOM RIBAUDO; CLIFFORD STRIDDER, III, Defendants-Appellees. * * * * * * * * * *

___________________ c/w No. 98-30492

____________________ ROBERT KEVIN MCCARTNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus CLIFFORD STRIDDER, III; THOMAS RIBAUDO, Defendants-Appellees.Nos. 98-30490, 98-30491, 98-30492, 98-30493, 98-30494 -2-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. * * * * * * * * * *

__________________ c/w No. 98-30493

__________________ ROBERT KEVIN MCCARTNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus CLYDE TERRAL; MIKE VILLARD; CHARLES WAGNER; JAMES BUCK; CLIFFORD STRIDDER, Defendants-Appellees. * * * * * * * * * *

__________________ c/w No. 98-30494

___________________ ROBERT KEVIN MCCARTNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JAMES BUCK; CHARLES WAGNER; VERNON CREECY; WILLIAM HILTON; MIKE VILLARD; MONIQUE METOYER; JOHN DOE, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC Nos. 98-CV-38 c/w 98-CV-39, 98-CV-40,

98-CV-41, 98-CV-42
- - - - - - - - - - August 26, 1998 Before SMITH, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *Nos. 98-30490, 98-30491, 98-30492, 98-30493, 98-30494 -3- Robert Kevin McCartney, Louisiana state prisoner #358987, appeals from the district court’s dismissals of his five civil rights complaints as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. These cases have been consolidated for purposes of this appeal. McCartney argues that the district court erred by dismissing his complaints as repetitious and duplicative of earlier litigation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Because McCartney’s appeals are frivolous, they are DISMISSED. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We previously warned McCartney that additional frivolous appeals would result in the imposition of sanctions against him. Accordingly, McCartney is BARRED from filing any pro se civil appeal in this court without the prior written approval of an active judge of this court. Further, he is BARRED from filing any pro se initial civil pleading in any court which is subject to this court’s jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a judge of the forum court. The clerk of this court and the clerks of all federal district courts subject to the jurisdiction of this court are directed to return to McCartney, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this bar. APPEALS DISMISSED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED.