alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-111504) of PACCARFinancial Corp. and in the related Prospectus of our report dated February 23,2005 with respect to the financial statements of PACCAR Financial Corp.included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,2004.

 
|                | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |   |
|---------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                |                      |
|                |                      |
| Seattle, Washington |                      |
| March 2, 2005       |                      |

 

1

----
#### Kirkland Augustus COKE, Petitioner—Appellant, v. Gene M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent—Appellee.

No. 05-6411.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 18, 2005.

Decided Aug. 24, 2005.

William P. Robinson, Jr., for Appellant. Kathleen Beatty Martin, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

*214PER CURIAM:

Kirkland Augustus Coke seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation to deny his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The report and recommendation of th§ magistrate judge is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

*DISMISSED*
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-0910

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM151AD

A84-57-19, RC --- 8/20/08

A84-57-19, RB --- 3/6/08

A84-57-19, RA --- 2/6/08

A84-57-19 --- 2/1/08

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          18,205
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,050
<ALLOWANCES>                                       203
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,868
<PP&E>                                           5,115
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,252
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,439
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,077
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           168
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,811
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,439
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,049
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,831
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    94
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 374
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,527)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,527)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.52)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-KSB for
the year ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Obal, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: December 26, 2006                 By: /s/ David A. Obal
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David A. Obal
                                            Chief Financial Officer


                                       22
|   | I, Neal D. Crispin, certify that: |
|--------|-----------------------------------|

|   | 1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/A of AeroCentury Corp.; |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |   |                                           |
|-----------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|                              |   |                                           |   |
| Date:  February 4, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Neal D. Crispin                       |   |
|                              |   | Name: Neal D. Crispin                          |   |
|                              |   | Title: President & Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                              |   |                                           |   |
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. (the company) on Form 10-Q, as amended, for the period
ended March 27, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(1) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|/S/ MARK S. THOMPSON                            
|Mark S. Thompson                                
|Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
|August 17, 2016
From: Rhonda K Boyett

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: "religious employer"

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 3:03:09 PM

Please rethink what’s going on. To take part in the healthcare system, one should not be forced to

violate the moral or religious beliefs on the protection and dignity of every human life.

Thanks for your time

Rhonda boyett

512-346-0884

512-346-0972 

1-866-346-0884

rhonda@billasf.com
From: johnhutcheson213@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:47:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Hutcheson

Marysville, OH 43040
**Exhibit
      32**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of First Robinson Financial
      Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2007
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this
      Certification (the “Report”), we, Rick L. Catt, Chief Executive Officer and
      Jamie E. McReynolds, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or another document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of the written statement required
      by
      Section 906, has been provided to First Robinson Financial Corporation and
      will
      be retained by First Robinson Financial Corporation and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







By:
                /s/ Rick L. Catt
            By:
                /s/ Jamie E. McReynoldsName:
                Rick L. Catt
            Name:
                Jamie E. McReynoldsChief
                Executive Officer
            Chief
                Financial OfficerNovember
                14, 2007
            November
                14, 2007
EXHIBIT 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. 333-156454 of Global Ship Lease, Inc. of our
reports dated September 14, 2010 relating to the combined financial statements of Global Ship Lease, Inc., and its Predecessor, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F/A.



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
|PricewaterhouseCoopers    

Neuilly-sur-Seine, France

September 16, 2010

PricewaterhouseCoopers is represented by PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit, 63 rue de Villiers92200 Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit  Fund VI,  L.P.,  Series 5 (the  "Partnership")  for the  quarters  ended
December  31,  2006,  September 30, 2006  and June  30,  2006 as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I, Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,  President  and Chief
Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  except to the extent
          that  such  provisions  require  the  audit  report  of Local  Limited
          Partnership financial statements to refer to the auditing standards of
          the Public Company  Accounting  Oversight Board for the  Partnership's
          annual financial statements and except that the Report is a cumulative
          report  covering each of the quarters ended December 31,  September 30
          and June 30, 2006 and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Partnership.



/s/Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
May 16, 2008
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of AE Biofuels, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the year ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report “), I, Eric A. McAfee,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By: /s/ Eric A.
McAfee


Eric A.
McAfee


Chief
Executive Officer





Date:
March 15, 2010
LOUISIANA

HAYNESVILLE SHALE

OVERVIEW

1

SUSTAINING LOUISIANA’S FRESHWATER AQUIFERS

A CASE STUDY

IN

BRINGING COMMUNITY AND INDUSTRY TOGETHER

James H. “Jim” Welsh

Commissioner of Conservation

Louisiana Office of Conservation
1

Shale Gas Plays, Lower 48 States

Source: Energy Information Administration based on data from various published studies

Updated: May 28, 2009
2

Current Haynesville Shale Activity
3

GENERALIZED LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC COLUMN WITH

REPRESENTATIVE HAYNESVILLE SHALE WELLBORE 
Generalized Cross-Section of Marcellus Shale With 

Representative Wellbore

5
5

Current Haynesville Shale Activity in LA
6

Estimated Ultimate Recovery in Tcf

(Tcf = Trillion cubic feet)

Data compiled from various sources by Office of Conservation Engineering Division

2008
7

Northwest Louisiana Aquifers
8

Ground Water Use Advisory
9

Directive Issued to Industry for Frac Water Reporting

Due to revisions of the WH-1 form, water source and associated volumes are now reported on page 3.
Drilling and Stimulation Operations 

Haynesville Shale Natural Gas Well Development

Reported Usage from 10/1/2009 to 2/1/2011

Water Stats

Source Volume (Gallons)

Frac Groundwater 810,384,455

Frac Surface Water 3,340,652,866

Drilling Rig 

Groundwater Supply 395,802,431

Drilling Rig Surface 

Water Supply 59,403,197

Other Groundwater 24,403,351

Other Surface Water 13,917,380

Frac Stages 8982

Total Frac Water 

Used (gallons) 4,151,037,321

Volume per Frac 

Stage(gallons) 462,150

Average Frac 

Stages per Well

10.1

Average Water Use 

per Well 4,928,734

Average Frac Water 

Use per Well 4,351,251 10

Frac Ground Water

17%

Rig Supply Ground 

Water

9%

Other Ground 

Water

1%

Frac Surface 

Water

72%

Rig Supply Surface 

Water

1%

Other Surface 

Water

<0.5%
11

E&P Waste Fluids Use for Frac Water Supply

LAC 43:XIX.Subpart 1.Chapter 3 Amendment 

Allows Operators to Use E&P Waste Fluids 

for Frac Supply Purposes

1) Promulgated November 20, 2009

2) Amended June 20, 2010

3) Limitations:

i. Used as Frac Supply Only

ii. By the Same Operator

iii. With Operator Affidavit Confirming 

Landowner Consent
12

Red River & Toledo Bend Yield Capacity

Red River & Toledo Bend Yield Capacity vs. Projected Surface Water Usage @ 70% Level

Sources: Jim Pratt, Executive Director – Sabine River Authority Jamie Triplett, Hydraulic Eng. – US Army Corps of Eng.
13

DNR / Conservation

Haynesville Shale Water Resource Management Summary

Agency Action:

1. Timely Response

2. Sufficient Oversight

i. Policy and Regulation Adjustments

ii. Resource Use Reporting and Monitoring

iii. Increased Waste Minimization / Recycling Opportunities

iv. Industry and Public Education / Outreach
EXHIBIT NO. 3.3
                    AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS
                                       OF
                          UCI MEDICAL AFFILIATES, INC.

                                 August 21, 1996



         RESOLVED, that the first sentence of Article III, Section 5 of the
Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Corporation is hereby amended to read as
follows:

                  At all meetings of the Board of Directors, a majority of the
                  total number of directors shall constitute a quorum for the
                  transaction of business.

     I, Jerry F. Wells,  Jr., as Secretary of UCI Medical  Affiliates,  Inc., do
hereby  certify  that the above  amendment  was duly  approved  and adopted at a
special  meeting of the Board of  Directors of UCI Medical  Affiliates,  Inc. on
August 21, 1996.




                                              /s/ Jerry F. Wells, Jr.
                                              Jerry F. Wells, Jr.
                                              Secretary
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-2034

JAMES M. BOWLING,

Appellant,

LAWRENCE E. BOWLING,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JEANETTE MCVAY, individually and officially as

Sheriff, Jackson County; D. J. MARTIN, individually and officially as Chief Deputy, Jackson County; DAVID MOORE, individually and

officially as Prosecuting Attorney, Jackson

County; LEAH R. TAYLOR, individually and officially as Assistant Prosecuting Attorney,

Jackson County; CAROLYN MONK; WILLIAM MONK;

CHARLES E. MCCARTY, individually and officially as Judge, Fifth Judicial Circuit,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Parkersburg. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CA-97-463-6)

Submitted: June 30, 1998 Decided: July 16, 1998

Before NEIMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James M. Bowling, Lawrence E. Bowling, Appellants Pro Se. Carolyn

Monk, William Monk, Appellees; Steven Paul McGowan, Ancil Glenn

Ramey, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

In an attempt to determine whether his son, James Bowling, is

the father of two minor children, Lawrence Bowling filed two

actions in West Virginia state court. His lawsuits were unsuccessful, and Lawrence then filed the subject action raising various

state law claims related to the original state actions. The magistrate judge issued a report determining that the state court judge

named as a Defendant was absolutely immune from suit, that the

claims against the remaining Defendants were barred by principles

of res judicata and collateral estoppel, and that the motion to

amend the Complaint should be denied in the court’s discretion. The

district court adopted the report and dismissed the action. This

appeal followed.

We have reviewed the record and the order of the district

court adopting the report of the magistrate judge and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Bowling v. McVay, No. CA-97-463-6 (S.D.W. Va. July

3, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED