alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.9 - TAIC JS Consulting Agreement

  
 EXHIBIT 10.09
 BUSINESS CONSULTING AGREEMENT
 

 This agreement dated January 1, 2011, is made By and Between Raj Ventures, Inc., referred to as “Company,” and John Stickler, referred to as “Consultant,” whose addresses are 1001 Brickell Bay Drive, Suite 1716, Miami FL 33131 and 1060 Brickell Ave, Apt 2603, Miami, FL 33131, respectively. 
 1.
 Consultation Services. The Company hereby employs the Consultant to perform the following services in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this agreement: The Consultant will provide marketing and sale services. 
 

 2.
 Terms of Agreement. This agreement will begin January 1, 2011 and will end T.B.D. Either party may cancel this agreement on thirty (30) days notice to the other party in writing, by certified mail or personal delivery. 
 

 3.
 Time Devoted by Consultant. The particular amount of time may vary from day to day or week to week. 
 

 4.
 Place Where Services Will Be Rendered.  The Consultant will perform most services in accordance with this contract at the Company. In addition, the Consultant will perform services on the telephone and at such other places as designated by the Company to perform these services in accordance with this agreement.
 

 5.
 Payment to Consultant. The Consultant will be paid on an invoice basis. The Consultant will submit an itemized statement setting forth the services provided, and the Company will pay the Consultant the amounts due (subject to approval by Company) as indicated by statements submitted by the Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt. 
 

 6.
 Independent Contractor. Both the Company and the Consultant agree that the Consultant will act as an independent contractor in the performance of its duties under this contract. Accordingly, the Consultant shall be responsible for payment of all taxes including Federal, State, and local taxes arising out of the consultant’s activities in accordance with this contract, including by way of illustration but not limitation, Federal and State income tax, Social Security tax, Unemployment Insurance taxes, and any other taxes or business license fee as required. 
 

 7.
 Confidential Information. The Consultant agrees that any information received by the Consultant during any furtherance of the consultant’s obligations in accordance with this contract, which concerns the personal, financial or other affairs of the Company will be treated by the Consultant in full confidence and will not be revealed to any other persons, firms or organizations.

 
 8.
 Employment of Others. The Company may from time to time request that the Consultant arrange for the services of others. All costs to the Consultant for those services will be paid for by the Company, but in no event shall the Consultant employ others without the prior authorization of the Company.
 

 9.
 Signatures. Both the Company and the Consultant agree to the above contract. 
 

 ANY DISPUTE RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT WILL BE GOVERNED BY MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA LAW.
 

 BY:
 

 /s/ Charles J. Scimeca__
 Charles J. Scimeca
 COMPANY
 

 /s/ John Stickler______
 John Stickler
 CONSULTANT
From: aredfern@kmtel.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:55:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Anna Redfern

Kasson, MN 55944
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 176 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 176

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary in 
                    the One Hundred Tenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2007

    Mr. Conyers (for himself and Mr. Smith of Texas) submitted the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary in 
                    the One Hundred Tenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on the Judiciary (hereafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $16,657,587 for the One Hundred 
Tenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $8,165,484 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2007, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2008; and
            (2) not more than $8,492,103 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2008, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2009.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
*** This information is subject to confidential treatment and has been omitted and filed separately with
the Commission


 






    	 



    	 	



    

 





 


*** This information is subject to confidential treatment and has been omitted and filed separately with
the Commission


 






    	 



    	 	



    
 






 


*** This information is subject to confidential treatment and has been omitted and filed separately with
the Commission


 






    	 



    	 	



    

 





 


*** This information is subject to confidential treatment and has been omitted and filed separately with
the Commission


 






    	 



    	 	



    




 


Table
1 To


Purchase
Agreeemnt No. PA-03600


Aircraft
Delivery, Description, Price and Advance Payments





 





	Airframe Model/MTOW:	777-Freighter	766800 pounds	 	Detail Specification:	  D019W007-D
    (2/19/2010)	  4Q10 External
    Fcst
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Engine Model/Thrust:	GE90-110B1L	  110100 pounds	 	Airframe Price Base Year/Escalation Formula:	Jul-10	ECI-W Afm
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Airframe Price:	 	$263,995,000	 	Engine Price Base Year/Escalation Formula:	N/A	N/A
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Optional Features:	 	***	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Sub-Total of Airframe and Features:	***	 	Airframe Escalation Data:	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Engine Price (Per Aircraft):	 	$0	 	Base Year Index (ECI):	111.3	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Aircraft Basic Price (Excluding BFE/SPE):	***	 	Base Year Index (ICI):	175.9	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Buyer Furnished Equipment (BFE) Estimate:	***	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Seller Purchased Equipment (SPE) Estimate:	$0	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Deposit per Aircraft:	 	$265,000	 	 	 	 










 





	 	 	Escalation	 	 	Escalation
    Estimate	Advance
    Payment Per Aircraft (Amts. Due/Mos. Prior to Delivery):
	Delivery	Number
    of	Factor	 	 	Adv
    Payment Base	At
    Signing	24
    Mos.	21/18/15/12/9/6
    Mos.	Total
	Date	Aircraft	(Airframe)	 	 	Price
    Per A/P	1%	4%	5%	35%
	Jul-2013	1	1.1195	 	 	***	 	 	 	 
	Aug-2013	1	1.1228	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Jan-2015	1	1.1697	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Jun-2015	2	1.1838	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Jul-2015	1	1.186	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Total:	6	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 










 


	GUN-PA-03600 56603-1F.TXT	Boeing Proprietary	SA 1 Page 1


 


*** This information is subject to confidential treatment
and has been omitted and filed separately with the Commission
United States
Securities and Exhange Commission
Washington, D.C.   20549

Form 12b-25

Notification of Late Filing

(Check one):
___ Form 10-K    __ Form 20-F   __ Form 11-K    ___ Form 10-Q    X  Form N-SAR

For the Period Ended:

12/31/96          

Part I - Registrant Information

Full Name of Registrant

Scudder Tax Free Money Fund
        

Former Name if Applicable


Address of Principal Executive Office (Street & Number)

Two International Place
Boston, MA 02110
        

Part II - Rules 12b-25(b) and (c)

If the subject report could not be filed without  unreasonable effort or expense
and the registrant seeks relief pursuant to Rule 12b-25(b), the following should
be completed.

(a)  the resons  described in  reasonable  detail in Part III of this form could
     not be eliminated without unreasonable effort or expense.
                                           
(b)  The subject annual report,  semi-annual  report,  transition report on Form
     10-K, Form 20-F, 11-K, Form N-SAR, or portion thereof,  will be filed on or
     before the fifteenth calendar day following the prescribed due date; or the
     subject quarterly report transition report on form 10-Q, or portion thereof
     will be filed on or before the fifth  calendar day following the prescribed
     due date (XX)

(c)  The accountant's  statement or other exhibit required by Rule 12b-25(c) has
     been attached if applicable

Part III - Narrative

State below in  reasonable  detail the reasons  why the Form 10-K,  11-K,  10-Q,
N-SAR, or the transition  report or portion  thereof,  could not be filed within
the prescribed time period.

The registrant requests additional time to file form NSAR so that it can compile
the necessary information to file a complete and accurate document. (XX)

Part IV - Other Information

(1)  Name  and  telephone  number  of  person  to  contact  in  regard  to  this
     notification

     Thomas F. McDonough, Assistant Secretary
     (617) 295-2567

       
(2)  Have all other periodic  reports  required under Section 13 or 15(d) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Section 30 of the Investment Company Act
     of 1940 during the preceeding 12 months been filed?

     Yes   


(3)  Is it anticipated that any significant change in results of operations from
     the corresponding  period for the last fiscal year will be reflected by the
     earnings  statements  to be  included  in the  subject  report  or  portion
     thereof?

     No 



(Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter) Scudder Tax Free Money Fund

has caused this notification to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned 
hereunto duly authorized.

Date:   2/5/97                                  By: John Lumbard
                                                /s/:John Lumbard
No. 60977.

protest 280900-K (New York).

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protest was dismissed, and the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
EPA responses to the second set of OMB detailed comments Bill Maxwell to: Cortney_Higgins 03/12/2011 01:09 PM

Cortney --

Attached are our responses to this set of comments.

Thank you.

Summary of Interagency Working Comments on draft EGU MACT under EO 12866 Interagency Review - 3- 9-11 - Response_031211.doc

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt

Bill Maxwell Energy Strategies Group Sector Policies and Programs Division U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 109 T.W. Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Phone: 919-541-5430 FAX: 919-541-5450
EX-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 
 CHART INDUSTRIES, INC. 
 AMENDMENT NO. 4 

TO 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 4 (the “Amendment”) to the Employment Agreement, dated February 26, 2008 and subsequently amended effective January 1, 2009, June 1, 2010 and
January 1, 2012 (the “Agreement”), by and between Chart Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) and Kenneth J. Webster (“Executive”), is effective January 1, 2013. 

WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement; and 

WHEREAS, the parties reserved the right to amend the Agreement pursuant to Section 13.c thereof. 

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 13.c of the Agreement, and effective as of January 1, 2013, the parties hereby amend the
Agreement as follows: 
 1. In Section 3 of the Agreement, delete the dollar amount “$210,000” and
replace with “$245,000”. 
 2. In Section 4 of the Agreement delete the phrase “of sixty
percent (60%) of the Executive’s Base Salary (with it being understood that sixty percent (60%) of the Executive’s Base Salary is the “Target”)” in its entirety and replace it with “of fifty percent
(50%) of the Executive’s Base Salary (with it being understood that fifty percent (50%) of the Executive’s Base Salary is the “Target”)”. 

3. Except as set forth herein, the Agreement is not modified or amended hereby. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment. 

 

							
	 CHART INDUSTRIES, INC.
 (“Company”)
	  		  	 KENNETH J. WEBSTER

(“Executive”)

				
	 By:
	  	/s/ Samuel F. Thomas	  		  	/s/ Kenneth J. Webster
		  	  
	  		  	  

	 Name:
	  	Samuel F. Thomas	  		  	
	 Title:
	  	Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
From: dhjwheeler@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:51:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Deb Wheeler

Coeur D Alene, ID 83815
From: blextraeffort@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:47:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bill & Lois Charron

Harrison, MI 48625
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Century
Properties Fund XX 1998 Year-end 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000736909
<NAME> CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XX
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,197
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          50,408
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,652
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (8,363)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,549
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,482
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,511
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (184)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.91)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert E. Matthiessen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Date:	August 15, 2005

/s/ Robert E. Matthiessen
Robert E. Matthiessen
President and Chief Executive Officer