alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: charityintruth@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:49:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patty Palmquist

Lilburn, GA 30047
From: DonaldNagel@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:22:36 PM

Dear representative of the People,

To take another's life is without question a crime in any culture, an offense against nature, and deeply

painful to those who commit such an act, no matter the circumstances and regardless of whether they

are fully conscious of it. How can we say then that to prevent one from existing in the first place is

acceptable? To force the People of this nation to fund contraceptives such as Plan B as well as

sterilization blurs the line between what is truly health care and what is, if we were all honest about it,

simply convenient. You are endorsing the funds to a cause with which reasonable people deeply

disagree. Please broaden the exceptions for employers who object to these procedures. There is no

challenge or dignity in taking the course of least resistance. Is this an honorable way to fulfill the great

privilege of your office?

Peace,

Sara Nagel

Sincerely,

Sara Nagel

Bellefonte, PA 16823
Before the Second Division,

October 8, 1968

No. P68/429.

protest 65/1583 (New York).

#### Check Writer Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of calculating machines similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Air-Sea*Forwarders, *Wholesale Business Machines et al.*(54 CCPA 67, C.A.D. 907), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. P66/162. —

#### Burst Industries, Inc. *v.*United States, protests 65/18615 and 65/18047 (New York).

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of rotary lawn sprinklers or metal parts thereof, dedicated for use therewith, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 CCPA 56, C.A.D. 820), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: Paulaiampr@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:47:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Paula Romines

Bakersfield, CA 93309
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                         APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                        1640
<SECURITIES>                                163200
<RECEIVABLES>                                 9594
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            135810
<PP&E>                                       93831
<DEPRECIATION>                              166885
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              340165
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       395552
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      9572
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          350
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                  723709
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                340165
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             48849
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               273339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             41548
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            9625
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (182942)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (182942)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (182942)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.01)

</TABLE>
From: Bsvebigrac@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:20:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bonnie Pharr

Shreveport, LA 71138
# Bahrain Leads Unmanned Exercise for Multinational Task Force

/ Published Oct. 27, 2022
MANAMA, Bahrain, 
A multinational naval task force led by Bahrain conducted a one-day training drill in the Arabian Gulf, Oct. 26, featuring the use of unmanned systems and artificial intelligence alongside seven crewed ships.

Naval Forces from Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom and the United States participated in support of Bahrain-led Combined Task Force (CTF) 152, one of four task forces organized under the Combined Maritime Forces. The naval drill enhanced interoperability in integrating new unmanned technologies to monitor regional waters.

“It is so valuable to get these opportunities to really test how our forces from across different nations can work together with the uncrewed systems,” said Royal Bahrain Naval Force Capt. Rashed Al-Ameen, commander of CTF 152. “It helps us better understand how to work with each other to boost regional security.”

Three U.S. Navy Saildrone Explorer unmanned surface vessels operated with USS Hurricane (PC 3) and USS Chinook (PC 9) from the United States, UK Royal Navy ships RFA Cardigan Bay (L3009) and HMS Bangor (M109), Royal Bahrain Naval Force ships RBNS Al-Manama and RBNS Al-Fateh, and HMS Khalid from the Royal Saudi Navy.

CTF 152 led the exercise while embarked aboard Cardigan Bay, as the ship sailed in international waters off the coast of Saudi Arabia. This is the latest drill involving unmanned systems in the Arabian Gulf since the United Kingdom and United States completed a similar bilateral naval exercise Oct. 7.

During both maneuvers, unmanned and artificial intelligence systems operated in conjunction with crewed ships and naval command centers ashore in Bahrain. Sensors from the unmanned vessels were able to locate and identify training aides in the water and relay visual depictions to the command centers.

Established in 2004, CTF 152 oversees maritime security operations in the Arabian Gulf for Combined Maritime Forces. Bahrain assumed command of CTF 152 from Kuwait in August.

Combined Maritime Forces is the world’s largest multinational naval partnership and includes 34 member-nations whose forces operate in the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden, Northern Arabian Sea, Gulf of Oman, Arabian Gulf and Indian Ocean. CMF is headquartered in Bahrain with U.S. Naval Forces Central Command and U.S. 5th Fleet.
July 17, 1958

No. 62188.

#### Plumrose, Inc., and Gehrig Hoban & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 296411-K, etc.

Protests abandoned June 17, 1958. (Not published.) Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,060
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  223,617
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,095
<INVENTORY>                                    129,076
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               370,896
<PP&E>                                          65,704
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,986
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 498,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          274,240
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     15,000
<COMMON>                                           480
<OTHER-SE>                                     207,492
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   498,052
<SALES>                                      2,607,967
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,911,889
<CGS>                                        2,396,720
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,597,739
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               271,978
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,195
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,977
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,403
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,574
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,574
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Laidlaw International, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended August 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to such officer's knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
          Report.


Date:  November 14, 2005

                                   /s/ Kevin E. Benson
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Name:  Kevin E. Benson
                                   Title: President and Chief Executive Officer



                                   /s/ Douglas A. Carty
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Name:  Douglas A. Carty
                                   Title: Senior Vice President and
                                          Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as a part of this report or on a separate
disclosure document
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 23.1



                 CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-3 and S-8) of Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. of our report dated July
23, 1999 (except for paragraph 2 of Note 5, as to which the date is September
14, 1999), with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Alliance
Pharmaceutical Corp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended June 30, 1999.


                                           ERNST & YOUNG LLP






San Diego, California
September 22, 1999
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 2ND QUARTER
2000 FORM 10-Q UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FORM 10Q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          11,424
<SECURITIES>                                     6,458
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,980
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,009
<PP&E>                                          39,650
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,392
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,395
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            81
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,392
<SALES>                                         27,252
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,252
<CGS>                                           17,796
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,796
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 412
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    787
<INCOME-TAX>                                       331
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                456
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       456
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06


</TABLE>
From: faithful137@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:47:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Alexis Hewes

Longview, TX 75607