alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case No. 8,749.

#### McDERMOTT v. YEATMAN.

[5 Pittsb. Leg. J. (O. S.) 29.]

Circuit Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

1857.

Chattel Deed or Trust — Substitution of Property.

The case here referred to was McDermott v. Yeatman. This case first came up at the last term of the court. It appeared that Mc-Dermott was a trustee in a deed given on two horses, which deed had a clause providing that other horses might be substituted. Some time after the deed was made the horses mentioned therein were, by the consent of the parties interested in the deed, traded off for other horses, in accordance with the clause of substitution. The defendant, Yeatman, levied, under a magistrate’s judgment, on the horses thus substituted, and McDermott replevied.

Mr. Morgan, for defendant,

asked the court to instruct the jury that if the jury, from the evidence, were satisfied that the horses levied on by defendant were not the identical horses described in the deed of trust, they must find for defendant, except they should further find that there was a formal act of delivery of the horses, for the purpose of the trust, by the grantor in the deed to the trustee before the levy by Yeatman.

THE COURT

gave the instruction, and the jury found for the defendant. A motion was then made for a new trial, on the ground of misdirection of the court, but the court, at the present term, has overruled the motion, and affirmed their previous decision. This decision also applies to deeds on stock in trade.
No. 60458.

#### Keepnews Importers Co. and Intra-Mar Transport Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 290152-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
25

20

395

21

31

2

20

21

Usk

Addy

Ione

Boyds

Arden

Orient

Curlew

Marcus

Cusick

Laurier

Newport

Danville

Metaline

Chewelah

Colville

Republic

Bluecreek

Northport

Kettle Falls

DRAFT Colville National Forest-Forest Plan Revision P Alternative

1

1:400,000

Wild Scenic River

Pacific Northwest Trail Corridor-Subject to Change

National RecreationTrails

Kettle Crest Special Intrest Area

Research Natural Area

Wilderness-Congressionally Designated

Wilderness-Recommended

Scenic Byways

Backcountry

Backcountry Motorized

Focused Restoration

General Restoration September 24, 2015

***************DRAFT*****************

This product is reproduced from information prepared by

the USDA, Forest Service or from other suppliers. The Forest

Service cannot assure the reliability or suitability of this

information for a particular purpose. The data and product accuracy

may vary due to compilation from various sources, including modeling

and interpretation, and may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards.

This information may be updated, corrected or otherwise modified

without notification. For more information contact:

Colville National Forest Supervisors Office at 509-684-7000.

The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

*******For Internal Use Only--Working Document*******

2016 Preferred Alternative
From: psinrud@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:11:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Pete Sinrud

Bothell, WA 98011
From: Galatte2@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:56:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

A Cowart

Carnation, WA 98014
EXHIBIT 32(a)

ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-QSB of WWA Group, Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Eric Montandon, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|(1) |  | This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the small business issuer at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of the small business issuer for the period covered by this Report.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Eric Montandon

Eric Montandon

Chief Executive Officer

May 14, 2007

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the small business issuer for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                             81,992
<SECURITIES>                      135,525
<RECEIVABLES>                      47,963
<ALLOWANCES>                        3,951
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   12,341
<PP&E>                             48,228
<DEPRECIATION>                     69,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    436,519
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              98,394
<BONDS>                           300,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                        93,000
<COMMON>                           55,000
<OTHER-SE>                         13,211
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      436,519
<SALES>                           109,361
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  109,361
<CGS>                              96,797
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      96,797
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   40,476
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    2,468
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 19,553
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    40,360
<INCOME-TAX>                      357,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                40,717
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                      (8.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                      (8.14)
        

</TABLE>
1 

~. I 

,. 

I ~ 

' 

fl-4' J 

3. En~yclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety. Volume 1. 

Gen~va 1 International Labor Office, 1971-72. PP• 220-221, 

'"' 

c 

.... 

I 

0 

01 

0)
From: tpmayer@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:07:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tom Mayer

Scottsdale, AZ 85254
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE: LUIS NAJERA.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-17-00216-CR

Appeal from the

384th District Court 

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20010D05849) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 15TH DAY OF MAY, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
#### Thomas C. Parkhurst v. Lena Mitchell.

Motion for reargument granted
|   | (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                        |   |                                           |
|-----------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   |                                           |   |
| Date:  August 13, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Neal D. Crispin                       |   |
|                        |   | Name: Neal D. Crispin                          |   |
|                        |   | Title: President & Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                        |   |                                           |   |
#### In the Matter of the Application of the City of New York, Respondent, Relative to Acquiring Title to Lands Required for the Opening of Eleventh Avenue, in the Borough of Brooklyn. John H. Hanley, Appellant.

(Submitted March 3, 1913;

decided March 11, 1913.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 206 N. Y. 687.)
From: sabennick@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:39:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sallie Bennick

Littleton, CO 80122
II

Calendar No. 174

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1097

[Report No. 107–72]

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to issue right-of-way permits

for natural gas pipelines within the boundary of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 25, 2001

Mr. THOMPSON (for himself and Mr. FRIST) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

OCTOBER 1, 2001

Reported by Mr. BINGAMAN, without amendment

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to issue rightof-way permits for natural gas pipelines within the

boundary of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1097 RS

1 SECTION 1. NATURAL GAS PIPELINES WITHIN THE BOUND2 ARY OF THE GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NA3 TIONAL PARK.

4 (a) PERMIT FOR NATURAL GAS PIPELINES.—

5 (1) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of the In6 terior may issue right-of-way permits for natural gas

7 pipelines that are—

8 (A) within the boundary of the Great

9 Smoky Mountains National Park (as of the

10 date of enactment of this Act);

11 (B) not otherwise authorized by Federal

12 law; and

13 (C) not subject to valid rights of property

14 ownership.

15 (2) CONDITIONS.—A permit issued under para16 graph (1) shall be subject to any terms and condi17 tions that the Secretary determines necessary.

18 (b) PERMIT FOR PROPOSED NATURAL GAS PIPE19 LINES.—

20 (1) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary may issue

21 right-of-way permits for natural gas pipelines within

22 the boundary of the Great Smoky Mountains Na23 tional Park that are proposed for construction in—

24 (A) the Foothills Parkway;

25 (B) the Foothills Parkway Spur between

26 Pigeon Forge and Gatlinburg; and
3

S 1097 RS

1 (C) the Gatlinburg Bypass.

2 (2) CONDITIONS.—A permit issued under para3 graph (1) shall be subject to any terms and condi4 tions that the Secretary determines necessary,

5 including—

6 (A) provisions for the protection and res7 toration of resources that are disturbed by pipe8 line construction; and

9 (B) assurances that construction and oper10 ation of the pipeline will be compatible with the

11 purposes of the Park.
Calendar No. 174

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1097

[Report No. 107–72]

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to issue

right-of-way permits for natural gas pipelineswithin the boundary of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park.

OCTOBER 1, 2001

Reported without amendment
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Errol Williams, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 490]

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Juviler, J.), rendered February 22, 1994, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the People improperly introduced evidence concerning his alleged motive for the crime is unpreserved for appellate review *(see,*CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt, any error was harmless *(see, People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 241-242). Balletta, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.
Ms. Elizabeth A. Dieck 

Director 

Environmental Affairs 

South Carolina Department of 

Health and Environmental Control 

2600 Bull Street 

Columbus, South Carolina 29201 

Dear Ms. Dieck: 

On May 7, 2014, we received a revision to the South Carolina State Implementation Plan submitted by 

your agency on April30, 2014. That revision pertains to Clean Air Act (CAA) requirements for section 

IIO(a)(2) (A-C), D(i)(II), D(ii), (E-H), and (J-M) for the 2010 nitrogen dioxide standards. We have 

completed our review of this submission and have determined that all of the required administrative and 

technical components for these aforementioned elements are present. Consistent with CAA timeframes, 

we will review the submission for approvability prior to preparing a rulemaking notice to take action on 

the revision. 

If you have questions about this letter, contact me or Lynorae Benjamin, Chief of the Regulatory 

Development Section, at (404) 562-9040. 

cc: Myra Reece, SCDHEC 

Maeve Mason, SCDHEC 

Sincerely, r] 

-<rfl 

Director 0 

Air, Pesticides and Taxies 

Management Division 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa gov 

Recycledll'lecyclable • Printed wHh Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Pos1consumer)