alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the
purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as an officer of UCI Medical Affiliates, Inc. (UCI), that, to his
knowledge, the Annual Report of UCI on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of UCI. This written statement is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to such Form 10-K. A signed original of this statement has
been provided to UCI and will be retained by UCI and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|              |  |                                                     
|------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|April 8, 2010 |  | /s/ D. Michael Stout, M.D.                          
|              |  | D. Michael Stout, M.D.                              
|              |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|              | 
|              |  | /s/ Joseph A. Boyle, CPA                            
|              |  | Joseph A. Boyle, CPA                                
|              |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                              MARWICH II, LTD.
                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.D. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Annual Report of Marwich II, Ltd. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Peter Porath, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Peter Porath
Peter Porath
Vice-President, Chief Executive Officer
November 15, 2004
From: nl09994@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:58:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ned La Celle

Lansing, NY 14882
#### Oliver J. Teeft, Respondent, *v.*Buffalo Dry Dock Company, Appellant.

*Teeft*v. *Buffalo Dry Bock Co.,*147 App. Div. 918, affirmed.

(Argued February 5, 1913;

decided February 25, 1913.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 27, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant.

*Alfred L. Becker*and *Daniel E. Meegan*for appellant.

*W. J. Wetherbee*and *Hamilton Ward*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Cuddeback, Hogan and Miller, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                               MARWICH II, LTD.
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.D. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Annual Report of Marwich II, Ltd. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2000, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael Schumacher, President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Michael Schumacher
Michael Schumacher
President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer
November 15, 2004
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 55 (Wednesday, March 21, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16548-16549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6794]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL 9649-5; CERCLA-04-2012-3768; CERCLA-04-2012-3767; CERCLA-04-2012-
3766; CERCLA-04-2012-3765]

Florida Petroleum Reprocessors Superfund Site; Davie, Broward 
County, FL; Notice of Settlements

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice of Settlements.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation 
and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States Environmental Protection 
Agency has entered into four (4) settlements for past response costs 
concerning the Florida Petroleum Reprocessors Superfund Site located in 
Davie, Broward County, Florida.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlements 
until April 20, 2012. The Agency will consider all comments received 
and may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlements if comments 
received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the 
settlements are inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

[[Page 16549]]

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from Ms. Paula V. 
Painter. Submit your comments by Site name Florida Petroleum 
Reprocessors by one of the following methods:
    www.epa.gov/region4/superfund/programs/enforcement/enforcement.html.
     Email. Painter.Paula@epa.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

    Dated: February 29, 2012.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management, Branch Superfund 
Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-6794 Filed 3-20-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 17

- 00468

- CV

In th e Matter of J.R. §

§

§

§ From the 323rd District Court

of Tarrant County (323

- 106076

- 17)

April 12, 2018

Per Curiam



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the juvenile court’s judgment. It is ordered that the

judgment of the juvenile court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
From: mark.boyer@imail.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:59:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mark Boyer

Saint George, UT 84770
From: BARBARA DAUGHTRY

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Monday, August 08, 2011 9:11:56 AM

I WISH TO VOICE MY OPPOSITION TO THE DEFINITION OF "RELIGIOUS

EMPLOYER" WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF A LACK OF TRUE CONSCIOUS

PROTECTION!
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-KSB for
the year ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David A. Obal, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: December 26, 2006                 By: /s/ David A. Obal
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David A. Obal
                                            Chief Financial Officer


                                       22
H. Res. 1356 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 18, 2008. 

Whereas the Constitution of the United States of America 

was formally signed on September 17, 1787, by 39 delegates from 12 States; 

Whereas the Constitution of the United States was subsequently ratified by each of the original 13 States; 

Whereas the Constitution of the United States was drafted 

in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, 

ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty for citizens of our Nation; 

Whereas the liberties enjoyed by the citizens of the United 

States today are rooted in this cherished document that 

gave birth to our Nation; 

Whereas the Constitution of the United States serves as the 

foundation for citizens of the United States to accomplish 

a level of prosperity, security, justice, and freedom unsurpassed by any other country; 

Whereas the Constitution of the United States is a model for 

establishing freedom in other countries; 

Whereas the Members of the House of Representatives take 

an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the 

United States; and 
2 

•HRES 1356 EH 

Whereas September 17, 2008, is the 221st anniversary of the 

signing of the Constitution of the United States: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) celebrates the 221st anniversary of the signing 

of the Constitution of the United States of America; 

(2) honors the efforts of the 42 delegates who attended the majority of the Constitutional Convention 

meetings and the 39 signers of the Constitution of the 

United States; 

(3) acknowledges the significance of the ideals established by the Constitution of the United States, including the principle of a limited Federal Government 

with a system of checks and balances between the 3 

branches; 

(4) recognizes the Constitution of the United States 

as the source responsible for our Nation’s ability to withstand calamity and preserve national stability, or as 

Thomas Jefferson wrote, ‘‘Our peculiar security is in the 

possession of a written Constitution’’; and 

(5) encourages the citizens of the United States of 

America, who have the privilege to share in the freedoms 

recognized in the Constitution of the United States, to 
3 

•HRES 1356 EH 

join with the House of Representatives in this historic 

celebration. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
From: alvinapmech@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:39:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

alvin gonzales

Mount Prospect, IL 60056
From: jvolzer@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:30:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing to express my concern that insurance plans will be mandated to provide contraceptives and

sterilization. I oppose this move. I would ask, as the very least, that the requirement be amended to

allow not just churches to opt out as a conscience objector, but ANY individual or company with a moral

objection to do so. Why should any American (individual or company) be forced to subsidize (through

the higher premiums that everyone will have to pay to cover these services) services that they have a

moral objection to? Not only should ALL religious organizations be able to opt out (rather than just

churches), but there should not even be a requirement that the individual or company be "religious" in

order to have a moral objection that is honored.

Jarrett Volzer

Sincerely,

Jarrett Volzer

Calhoun, GA 30701
No. 327, Misc.

#### Chavez et al. *v.*Dickson, Warden.

*Richard Gladstein, Norman Leonard*and *Ruth Jacobs*for petitioners.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. (the company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended October 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Frey, Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Mark S. Frey       
|Mark S. Frey           
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 9, 2006
No. 68370.

protest, 63/9418 (San Diego).

#### Western Pacific Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cocktail Hibachis similar in all material respects to the Mini Bachis the subject of Abstract 67238, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
|    |   |
|--------------|--------|

| Performance vs. Plan | Payout as a % of Target |
|----------------------|-------------------------|
| < 70%             | 0%                      |
| 70% to 77.4%         | 25%                     |
| 77.5% to 82.4%       | 50.0%                   |
| 82.5% to 87.4%       | 62.5%                   |
| 87.5% to 92.4%       | 75.0%                   |
| 92.5% to 97.4%       | 87.5%                   |
| 97.5% to 102.4%      | 100.0%                  |
| 102.5% to 107.4%     | 112.5%                  |
| 107.5% to 112.4%     | 125.0%                  |
| 112.5% to 117.4%     | 137.5%                  |
| 117.5% +             | 150%                    |

----

|    |   |
|--------------|--------|

|    |   |
|--------------|--------|

|    |   |
|--------------|--------|

|    |   |
|--------------|--------|

|    |   |
|--------------|--------|

|    |   |
|--------------|--------|
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF TREASURER**

 

I, Robert F. Aufenanger, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Excelsior Private Equity Fund II, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: June 14, 2005