alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: mnward@suddenlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:39:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nina Ward

Hurricane, WV 25526
From: bupm@groeneveldmr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:11:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Paul Minardi

Park City, UT 84098
United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C.   20549

Form 12b-25

Notification of Late Filing

(Check one):
___ Form 10-K __ Form 20-F __ Form 11-K  ___ Form 10-Q    X  Form N-SAR

For the Period Ended:            12/31/03

Part I - Registrant Information

Full Name of Registrant

Scudder Advisor Fund II

Former Name if Applicable



Address of Principal Executive Office (Street & Number)

One South Street
Baltimore, MD 21202

Part II - Rules 12b-25(b) and (c)

If the subject report could not be filed without unreasonable effort or
expense and the registrant seeks relief pursuant to Rule 12b-25(b), the
following should be completed.

(a) the reasons  described in  reasonable  detail in Part III of this
form could not be eliminated without unreasonable effort or expense.

(b) The subject annual report, semi-annual report, transition
report on Form 10-K,  Form 20-F,  11-K,  Form N-SAR, or portion
thereof, will be filed on or before the  fifteenth calendar day
following the  prescribed  due date; or the subject quarterly report
transition report on form 10-Q, or portion thereof will be filed on or
before the fifth calendar day following the prescribed due date

(c)     The accountant's statement or other exhibit required by Rule
12b-25(c)has been attached if applicable

Part III - Narrative

State below in reasonable detail the reasons why the Form 10-K, 11-
K, 10-Q, N-SAR, or the transition report or portion thereof, could
not be filed within the prescribed time period.

The registrant requests additional time to file form NSAR so that it
can compile the necessary information to file a complete and accurate
document.

Part IV - Other Information

(1)     Name and telephone number of person to contact in regard to
this notification

        Charles Rizzo, Vice President
        (410) 295-3488

(2)     Have all other periodic reports required under Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Section 30 of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 during the preceding 12 months been
filed?

                Yes

(3) Is it anticipated that any significant change in results of
operations from the  corresponding  period for the last  fiscal  year
will be reflected  by the earnings statements to be included in the
subject report or portion thereof?

        No

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)    Scudder Advisor Fund II

has caused this notification to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Date:   3/1/04	                            By:     Brendan Concannon
                                              /s/:    Brendan Concannon
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         6,635,207
<SECURITIES>                                  37,878,850
<RECEIVABLES>                                    139,018
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              46,648,471
<PP&E>                                         4,598,652
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (851,350)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                55,570,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,385,253
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          17,648
<OTHER-SE>                                    54,167,989
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  55,570,890
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 118,540
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  9,918,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               216,182
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (9,332,249)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,824,069
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (6,508,180)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (6,508,180)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (0.44)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert E. Matthiessen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date:	August 14, 2008

/s/ Robert E. Matthiessen
Robert E. Matthiessen
President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 171, Misc.

#### Hansen *v.*United States.

*Morris Lavine*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Theodore George Gilinsky*for the United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 178 (Friday, September 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 63616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19953]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-895 (Fourth Review)]


Pure Granular Magnesium From China

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on pure granular 
magnesium from China would be likely to lead to continuation or 
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioner Amy A. Karpel not participating.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on February 1, 2023 (88 FR 
6784) and determined on May 8, 2023 that it would conduct an expedited 
review (88 FR 37275, June 7, 2023).
    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determination in this review on September 11, 2023. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5458 (September 2023), 
entitled Pure Granular Magnesium from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-
895 (Fourth Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: September 11, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-19953 Filed 9-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
From: palumbo@logantele.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:10:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Peter Palumbo

Auburn, KY 42206
From: RUSSDOGGER1@COX.NET

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:09:27 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

russell antol

Trabuco Canyon, CA 92679
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       51
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    52
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      52
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               59
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                        (23)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        52
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    83
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       46
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     37
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 37
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        37
<EPS-BASIC>                                      0.002
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.002


</TABLE>
From: chase_welch@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:53:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Chase Welch

Lubbock, TX 79416
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 22 (Friday, February 1, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7412-7413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02180]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List; Proposed Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed Additions to the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to add products to the Procurement 
List that will be furnished by the nonprofit agency employing persons 
who are blind or have other severe disabilities.

DATES: Comments Must Be Received On or Before: 3/4/2013.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800, 1421 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3259.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION OR TO SUBMIT COMMENTS CONTACT: Patricia 
Briscoe, Telephone: (703) 603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email 
CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 8503(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed 
actions.

Additions

    If the Committee approves the proposed additions, the entities of 
the Federal Government identified in this notice will be required to 
procure the

[[Page 7413]]

products listed below from the nonprofit agency employing persons who 
are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    The following products are proposed for addition to the Procurement 
List for production by the nonprofit agency listed:

Products

NSN: MR 1153--Basket, Cooking, Steel, Multipurpose.
NSN: MR 1159--Set, Bakeware, Cake Pop.
NPA: Industries for the Blind, Inc., West Allis, WI.
Contracting Activity: Military Resale-Defense Commissary Agency 
(DeCA), Fort Lee, VA.
Coverage: C-List for the requirements of military commissaries and 
exchanges as aggregated by the Defense Commissary Agency.

Patricia Briscoe,
Deputy Director, Business Operations, (Pricing and Information 
Management).
[FR Doc. 2013-02180 Filed 1-31-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```