alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: stormy@disciples.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:10:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kara Weathers

Yuma, CO 80759
Exhibit
23.1






CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We have
issued our reports dated July 23, 2010, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements, schedule, and internal control over financial reporting
included in the Annual Report of Immucor, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for
the year ended May 31, 2010. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference
of said reports in the Registration Statements of the Company on Forms S-8 (File
No. 333-131399, effective January 31, 2006 and File No. 33-41406, effective
August 24, 1995 and File No. 33-49882, effective July 22, 1992 and File No.
033-62097, effective September 12, 1995 and File No. 333-90552, effective June
14, 2002 and File No. 333-109210, effective September 29, 2003 and File No.
333-131902 effective February 16, 2006).
 
 
 /s/
Grant Thornton LLP
 Atlanta,
Georgia
 July 23,
2010
M A N D A T E

TO THE 120TH DISTRICT COURT OF EL PASO COUNTY, GREETINGS: 

Before our Court of Appeals for the Eighth District of Texas, on July 17, 2020, the cause upon 

appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

ALEX MONTELONGO, Appellant,

No. 08-18-00093-CR and

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee,

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no reversible 

error in the judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of 

Appeals for the Eighth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, 

obeyed and executed.

WITNESS, the Clerk of the Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

El Paso, this April 23, 2021.

Elizabeth G. Flores, Clerk

Trial Court No. 20150D02910

FILE COPY
February 25, 1997

United Gold & Government Fund, Inc.(Class A shares, Class Y shares)
6300 Lamar Avenue
P. O. Box 29217
Shawnee Mission, Kansas  66201-9217

Dear Sir or Madam:

In connection with the public offering of shares of Capital Stock, par value
$1.00 per share, of United Gold & Government Fund, Inc. (Class A shares, Class Y
shares) (the "Fund"), I have examined such corporate records and documents and
have made such further investigation and examination as I deemed necessary for
the purpose of this opinion.

It is my opinion that the 1,405,060 shares of Capital Stock of the Fund,
registration of which the notice makes definite in number, were legally issued,
fully paid and nonassessable.

I hereby consent to the filing of this opinion with the Rule 24f-2 Notice.

Very truly yours,


Sharon K. Pappas
Attorney at Law

SKP:ss
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

 

          I, Robert E. Matthiessen, certify that: 

          1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of inTEST Corporation; 

          2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

          3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

          4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

        (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

        (b)  [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]; 

        (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

        (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

          5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors: 

        (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

        (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 11, 2006/s/ Robert E. Matthiessen
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

 

          I, Robert E. Matthiessen, certify that: 

          1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of inTEST Corporation; 

          2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

          3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

          4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

        (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

        (b)  [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]; 

        (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

        (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

          5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors: 

        (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

        (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 14, 2007/s/ Robert E. Matthiessen
From: dropbocks2@netzero.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:01:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ann Bock

Lakeland, FL 33810
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATIONS FOR FORM 10-Q I, Everett R. Dobson,
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive
Officer, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Dobson
Communications Corporation (the registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and we have:  (a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
report is being prepared;(b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):  (a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Dobson Communications CorporationMay 10, 2004
    By:
    /S/ EVERETT R. DOBSONEverett R. DobsonChairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
**~-** ; 

### National Aviation January 6, 2015

U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building ground floor Room W12-140 1200 newJerseyAvenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 ACADEMY



### Subject: Extension ofExemption from 14 CFR Part 65.75(a) to allow theAviation Mechanic General (AMG), Aviation Mechanic Airframe (AMA), andAviation Mechanic Powerplant (AMP) written tests to be administered after completingthe corresponding portion ofthe curriculum. 

### Exemption Number: 10211 

### Docket Number: FAA-2010-1256

Dear Sir or Madam,
National Aviation Academy-New England operates an FAA Approved Aviation Maintenance Technician School (AMTS), in Bedford, MAunderAir Agency Certificate number EC6T068K.



### Petition: National Aviation Academy-New England is requesting an extension ofExemption Number 10211 relatingto 14 CFR Part 65.75(a) to allowthe Aviation Mechanic written tests (AMG, AMA, AMP) to be administered after completingthe corresponding portion ofthe approved curriculum.



### ReliefSought: National Aviation Academy-New England is seeking an extension from 14 CFR Part 65.75(a) to allow students enrolled in its FAA Approved 14 CFR Part 147 Aviation Maintenance Technician School (AMTS) to take theAviation Mechanic written tests (AMG, 1\MA, AMP) after completingthe corresponding portion ofthe curriculum, priorto meetiJlg the experience requirements of§65.77.

Tampa Bay: 6225 Ulmerton**R~**.• Clearwater Fl33760 Toll Free: 800.659.2080 : Main: 727.531.2080 • Fax: 727.535.8727 I New England: 150 Hanscom Dr., Bedford MA 01730 Toll Free: 800.292.3228 Main: 781.274.8448 • Fax: 781.274.8490 

## NAA EDU

### National Aviation ACADEMY



### Persons to be covered bythe exemption: National Aviation Academy-New England, Air Agency Certificate Number EC6T068K and students enrolled in its AMTS program in the Airframe, Powerplant orAirframe and Powerplant curricula.


### Information, views or arguments to supportthe action sought: There has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safetythatwere the basis for granting the original exemption. The requested extension ofthe exemption would not seta precedent and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to National Aviation Academy-New England and the students served byit.
Sincerely,

Alan Hay Director ofEducation National Aviation Academy-New England

CC: Thomas MacMurtry Flight Standards Eastern Region 12 New England Executive Park Burlington, MA 01803

I 

# I
Tampa Bay: 6225 Ulmerton

# J. Clearwater FL 33760 Toll Free: 800.659.2080 

# I
Main: 727.531.2080 ·Fax: 7 17.535.8727 New England: 150 Hanscom Dr., Bedford MA 01730 Toll Free: 800.292.3228 Main: 781.274.8448 ·Fax: 781.274.8490 

## NAA EDU
From: ricknruth@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:30:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rick Odess

Somersworth, NH 03878
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 11-10407

________________________

District Court Nos. 1:09-cv-00629-CG,

1:06-cr-00206-CG-B-1

QUANG VAN NGUYEN,

Movant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent.

___________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

____________________________

(August 16, 2012)

Before JORDAN and FAY, Circuit Judges, and HOOD, District Judge. *

PER CURIAM:

Honorable Joseph M. Hood, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of *

Kentucky, sitting by designation.

Case: 11-10407 Date Filed: 08/16/2012 Page: 1 of 3 
Following oral argument and a review of the record, we vacate the district

court’s order denying relief because we conclude that Mr. Nguyen is entitled to an

evidentiary hearing on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Given the

definition of “ice” in USSG § 2D1.1(c), Note (C) (defining “ice,” for purposes of §

2D1.1, as “a mixture or substance containing d-methamphetamine hydrochloride of

at least 80% purity”), this is not one of those cases where the “motion and the files

and records of the case show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief.” 28 U.S.C. §

2255. 

On remand, the district court shall hold an evidentiary hearing on Mr.

Nguyen’s claim that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance at sentencing by

failing to object to the methamphetamine being “ice” for purposes of § 2D1.1. At the

evidentiary hearing, Mr. Nguyen shall have the burden of showing (1) that his

counsel rendered deficient performance by failing to object, and (2) that there is a

reasonable probability that the deficient performance affected the outcome of the

sentencing hearing (i.e., that there is a reasonable probability that, had counsel

objected, the government would not have been able to establish that the

methamphetamine was “ice” under § 2D1.1(c), Note (C)). See Strickland v.

Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694 (1984) (defining a “reasonable probability as a

probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome”). At the conclusion

2

Case: 11-10407 Date Filed: 08/16/2012 Page: 2 of 3 
of the evidentiary hearing, the district court shall issue findings of fact and

conclusions of law and enter a new judgment granting or denying § 2255 relief.

The district court shall appoint counsel for Mr. Nguyen pursuant to Rule 8(C)

of the Rules Governing § 2255 Motions, which provides that “[i]f an evidentiary

hearing isrequired, the judge shall appoint counsel for a movant who qualifiesfor the

appointment of counsel under 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(g)[.]” See Sheperd v. United

States, 253 F.3d 585, 587 (11 Cir. 2001). The district court may wish to consider th

appointing, as Mr. Nguyen’s counsel for the evidentiary hearing, the attorney who

was court-appointed to represent Mr. Nguyen on appeal, as that attorney is now

familiar with the record. 

VACATED AND REMANDED FOR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING.

3

Case: 11-10407 Date Filed: 08/16/2012 Page: 3 of 3