alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 19, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 64450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20247]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Lifestyle Intervention for Late-midlife Adults.
    Date: October 13, 2023.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Janetta Lun, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of Health, National 
Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
827-4588, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cba1aaa5aebfbfaae5a7bea58ba5a2a3e5aca4bd"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c5afa4aba0b1b1a4eba9b0ab85abacadeba2aab3">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 14, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-20247 Filed 9-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 65957.

#### Hercules Division, American Machine and Foundry Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/31376, etc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: bssuhy@peoplepc.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:33:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

susan suhy

Honor, MI 49640
#### The United States Life Insurance Company, Appellant, v. Mary A. Adams, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
No. 385.

#### Dull *v.*Indiana.

Supreme Court of Indiana. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1



           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First
Keystone Corporation (the "Corporation") for the period ended
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, J. Gerald Bazewicz, President and
CEO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

   1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
       in all material respects, the financial condition and
       results of operations of the Corporation as of and for the
       period covered by the Report.





                                /s/ J. Gerald Bazewicz
                                J. Gerald Bazewicz
                                President and CEO


March 12, 2004


                               28
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue


Registration No.  333-35460
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)
PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  061				                          Trade Date: 03/22/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated
  September 8, 2000)						                               Issue Date:  03/27/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement March 22, 2001

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION
OR REPAYMENT
Date and terms of redemption or repayment
(including any applicable regular or special record dates)

  CUSIP
    or	Stated				                                 Interest
Common	Interest		        Price to	   Discounts &  Payment	    Survivor's
  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	 Commissions  Frequency	  Option	Yes/No

14911QCN9 5.75%	03/15/08	100%	        1.25%       Monthly	      YES	    NO



Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:
____  Yes	  X   No						N/A



(1) The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not
affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the
effective date of the change.

(2) Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to
Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the
time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Signature Eyewear, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael Prince, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


/s/    Michael Prince
--------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
June  24, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION NOTICE OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT:

88 FR 62358.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING:

Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 10:30 a.m.

# CHANGE IN THE MEETING:

The September 14, 2023 Open Meeting has been canceled.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Vicktoria J. Allen,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2023-20230 Filed 9-14-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
| RATES      EFFECTIVE for Variable Denomination Floating Rate Demand      Notesas of March 09, 2009: |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7239

MICHAEL R. SOUTHALL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ROBERT KUPEC, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-00-1246-AW) Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 11, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael R. Southall, Appellant Pro Se. Celia Anderson Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Michael R. Southall seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001), and his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and findno reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Southall v. Kupec , No. CA-00-1246-AW (D. Md. filed Aug. 9, 2000; entered Aug. 10, 2000; Sept. 6, 2000); see also Crawley v. Catoe , 257 F.3d 395 (4th Cir. 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
## SERVE D JANUAR Y 11,201 0 U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C
IN TH EMATTE RO F RECURREN T TRAININ GCENTER , INC
. FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP009GL000 8 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S No
. FAA-2009-097 1 

### AMENDE D PROCEDURA L ORDE R Paragrap h# 2 o f

th e Procedura l Orde r

i s amende da s follows : WHEREFORE , th e partie s b e an dar e hereb y ORDERE D t o adher e t o th e followin g procedura l schedule :

.. . O n o r before Apri l 15 , 2010 , th epartie s shal l conclud e al l discovery including , but no t limite dto , depositions , documen t production , response s t o productio n request s and/o r

interrogatories
. I f

th epartie s canno t

resolv e adiscovery dispute the y shal l submi t

th e dispute t o th e undersigne dfo r resolutio n i n atimel y manner.. . 

### DEP IOF^iJAKSPpRIATlO N

iwi n U.S
. Administrativ e Law Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No
. CP09GL000 8 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 ^

ON ECOP Y Charle s R
. Bamett , III , Respondent' s Counse l 1664 Moorlan dLan e Crystal Lake , I L60014-298 5 TEL : 815-356-864 7 FAX : 815-356-704 2 Brian aMorgan , Complainant' s Counse l Grea t Lake s Region , AGL-7 M Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 230 0 Eas t Devo n Avenu e De s Plaines , I L60018-469 6 TEL : 847-294-731 3 FAX : 847-294-749 8 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groim dFloo r RoomE12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n Administration

, 60 0 Independenc

e Avenue, S.W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000, Washington

, D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsHardness and Microstructure of Binary and Ternary Nitinol CompoundsThe hardness and microstructure of twenty-six binary and ternary Nitinol (nickel titanium, nickel titanium hafnium, nickel titanium zirconium and nickel titanium tantalum) compounds were studied. A small (50g) ingot of each compound was produced by vacuum arc remelting. Each ingot was homogenized in vacuum for 48 hr followed by furnace cooling. Specimens from the ingots were then heat treated at 800, 900, 1000 or 1100 degree C for 2 hr followed by water quenching. The hardness and microstructure of each specimen was compared to the baseline material (55-Nitinol, 55 at.% nickel - 45 at.% titanium, after heat treatment at 900 degC). The results show that eleven of the studied compounds had higher hardness values than the baseline material. Moreover, twelve of the studied compounds had measured hardness values greater 600HV at heat treatments from 800 to 900 degree C.Document ID20160001689Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsStanford, Malcolm K.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredFebruary 9, 2016Publication DateJanuary 1, 2016Subject CategoryAstronautics (General)Metals And Metallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2016-218946GRC-E-DAA-TN27159E-19191Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 109492.02.03.02.01.02Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.KeywordsintermetallicsphotomicrographyVickers hardnessmetallographyAvailable DownloadsNameType20160001689.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitle20200000255SupersedesHardness and Microstructure of Binary and Ternary Nitinol Compoundsvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
From: redcllc@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:10:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jose Hernandez

Boca Raton, FL 33487
___________

No. 95-1155

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Missouri.

Carlos Jones, also known as *

Dion Tillman, * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: April 19, 1996

 Filed: April 26, 1996

___________

Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After a jury found Carlos Jones guilty of carjacking and firearm

charges, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2119 and 2 and 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1),

the district court granted Jones's motion to dismiss the firearm count on

double jeopardy grounds. The court also denied Jones's motion for a new

trial. On appeal, we affirmed the denial of the new-trial motion, but

reversed the dismissal of the firearm conviction and remanded "with

instructions to reinstate [Jones's] conviction on that count and to

sentence [Jones] thereunder." See United States v. Jones, 34 F.3d 596,

599-602 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 1701 (1995). On remand,

the district court resentenced Jones to a total of 97 months imprisonment

and two years supervised release for the two convictions, and Jones

appeals. Counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). We affirm.
-2-

On appeal, Jones raises two issues he presented at the resentencing

hearing on remand, namely, that the evidence was insufficient to show that

he aided and abetted in the carjacking, and that counsel was ineffective

at trial for failing to obtain the full criminal record of one of the

victims. Ineffective-assistance claims should be raised in a collateral

proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, United States v. Thomas, 992 F.2d 201,

204 (8th Cir. 1993), and Jones's sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenge was

beyond the scope of the matters before the district court pursuant to this

court's remand order, see Klein v. Arkoma Prod. Co., 73 F.3d 779, 784 (8th

Cir. 1996); cf. United States v. Prestemon, 953 F.2d 1089, 1090 (8th Cir.

1992) (trial court could not consider new bases for downward departure

where remand was limited to resentencing within applicable Guideline

range). After conducting the necessary review of the record, in accordance

with Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we conclude that no other nonfrivolous issues exist.

Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.86 MB)
 
 F-35 Aircraft Aviation F-35A F-35A Lightning II Take off Lightning Take-off
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil