alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #18118 and #18119; FLORIDA Disaster Number FL-00192]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 3.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-4734-DR), dated 08/31/2023.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Idalia.                    

*Incident Period:*                         08/27/2023 through 09/04/2023.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 09/09/2023.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         10/30/2023.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date*: 05/31/2024.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Florida, dated 08/31/2023, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

*Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*                     Manatee, Sarasota.                

*Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):*

Florida: Charlotte, DeSoto, Hardee.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco Sánchez, Jr.,

Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2023-19974 Filed 9-14-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
From: cvsunsets@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:00:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Terri Brown

Troy, MI 48083
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT JAMES R. BROWN, Petitioner-Appellant,

v. No. 95-2174 COMMISSIONER OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 92-20023) Argued: May 6, 1996 Decided: September 5, 1996 Before ERVIN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and NORTON, United States District Judge for the District of South Carolina, sitting by designation.

_________________________________________________________________ Reversed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL ARGUED: Paula Marie Junghans, MARTIN, JUNGHANS, SNYDER & BERNSTEIN, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. William J. Patton, Tax Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Loretta C. Argrett, Assistant Attorney General, Gary R. Allen, Richard Farber, Tax Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: James R. Brown appeals a decision of the United States Tax Court upholding a determination by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue that a distribution Brown received in 1989 from the Maryland T eachers' Retirement System was taxable income to him in that year. We note that the material facts presented here are indistinguishable from those we addressed in Adler v. Commissioner , 86 F.3d 378 (4th Cir. 1996), in which we held that a distribution from the Maryland Employees' Retirement System was entitled to rollover treatment under 26 U.S.C.A. § 402(a)(5) (West 1988). The parties agree that the distribution Brown received was a partial distribution from a qualified plan, that he transferred the entire previously-untaxed portion of the distribution ($149,283.76) to an eligible individual retirement accountwithin 60 days of receiving the payment, and that his retirement qualifies as a "separation from the service." See26 U.S.C.A. § 402(a)(5), (e)(4)(A)(iii). Therefore, Brown's distribution was entitled to rollover treatment if he received it "on acc ount of" his retirement. Id. § 402(e)(4)(A)(iii). As did the taxpayer in Adler , Brown elected, inconnection with his retirement, to transfer to a pension system, resulting in his receipt of the distribution; accordingly, he received the distribution "on account of" his retirement within the meaning of 26 U.S.C.A. § 402(e)(4)(A)(iii). See Adler , 86 F.3d at 381. For the reasons set forth in Adler , we reverse. REVERSED
2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISS POWELL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 493 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 11th day of April, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
***EXHIBIT32(a)***

** **

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

** **

In connection with the reporton Form 10-Q of WWA Group, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30,2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,I, Eric Montandon, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge and belief:

 

(1)  This report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)  The information contained in thisreport fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition ofthe registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results ofoperations of the registrant for the period covered by this report.

 

 

Date: November 15, 2010

                       

 

/s/ Eric Montandon

Eric Montandon

Chief Executive Officer 

 

 

This certificationaccompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, bedeemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, orthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or afterthe date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant and willbe retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
From: fdifonzo@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:34:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Francis DiFonzo

Exton, PA 19341
|   |   |
|--------|--------|

**Filed      Pursuant To Rule 433, Registration No. 333-124310**
** **

**$1,000,000,000**

**CATERPILLAR      FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION**

| **For                the Period: 3/26/2007 to 4/2/2007** |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
| **Coupon**                                               | **Interest** | **Maturity** | **Callable** | **Survivor's****Option** | **Price****1** | **Yield****2** | **Moody's** | **S&P** | **CUSIP** |
| 4.650%                                                   | Quarterly(††) | 4/15/09 | NO | YES§  | 100.00 | 4.677% | A2 | A | 14912HCC2 |
| 5.000%                                                   | Monthly(†) | 4/15/14 | 4/15/09*  | YES§  | 100.00 | 5.052% | A2 | A | 14912HCD0 |
| 5.250%                                                   | Monthly(†) | 4/15/17 | 4/15/09*  | YES§  | 100.00 | 5.308% | A2 | A | 14912HCE8 |
| 5.550%                                                   | Monthly(†) | 4/15/27 | 4/15/11*  | YES§  | 100.00 | 5.614% | A2 | A | 14912HCF5 |

*All      offerings are subject to prior sale.*
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7268

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CALVIN JOHNSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-93-7, CA-96-210-3)

Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 31, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Calvin Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Crawford Vick, Jr., OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Johnson, Nos. CR-93-7; CA-96-210-3 (E.D.

Va. Aug. 21, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of

counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                               MARWICH II, LTD.
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.D. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Annual Report of Marwich II, Ltd. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael Schumacher, President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Michael Schumacher
Michael Schumacher
President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer
November 15, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 182 (Thursday, September 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 65208]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20410]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service 
Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 21, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 13, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 3 to Competitive 
Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. 
MC2023-268, CP2023-271.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-20410 Filed 9-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
From: craigscapes@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:36:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Craig Hobson

Woodstock, GA 30188
From: leroy@testsystems.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:15:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Leroy Earhart

Phoenix, AZ 85021
EXHIBIT 32.2



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Date:	August 13, 2004

/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23
                                                                    ----------

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated February 22,
1996  on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and the financial
statement  schedule   of  Pacific  Telesis   Group  and  Subsidiaries   as  of
December 31, 1995 and 1994 and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 1995, which  reports are included, or incorporated  by reference,
in  the  Pacific  Telesis  Group  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  and  in  the
Corporation's registration statements as follows:

   Form S-3:  PacTel  Capital  Resources   $500,000,000  debt  securities  and
              guarantee thereof by Pacific Telesis Group

   Form S-3:  Secondary Offering  of 137,504  shares of Pacific  Telesis Group
              Common Stock

   Form S-3:  Shareowner Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

   Form S-3:  Pacific Telesis Group and  Pacific Telesis Financing I,  II, and
              III  filed to  sell  up  to  $1  billion  of  Trusts'  preferred
              securities

   Form S-4:  ABI American Businessphones, Inc. Merger

   Form S-8   Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan

   Form S-8:  Supplemental Retirement and Savings Plan for Salaried Employees

   Form S-8:  Supplemental  Retirement   and  Savings  Plan   for  Nonsalaried
              Employees

   Form S-8:   Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan

   Form S-8:  Stock Incentive Plan




/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
San Francisco, California
March 22, 1996