alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: remaxwel@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:46:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Richard Maxwell

Palatine, IL 60074
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
     333-78893,  33-35863 and  33-42261 on Form S-3 of Immucor,  Inc. and in the
     related  Prospectuses and Registration  Statement Nos.  33-4636,  33-24199,
     33-36554, 33-41406, 33-49882 and 33-62097 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Key
     Employee Stock Incentive Plan,  Salary Reduction Plan, 1983 Stock Incentive
     Plan and 1986 Incentive Stock Option Plan; 1987 Non-Incentive  Stock Option
     Plan; 1989 Non-Incentive Stock Option Plan; 1990 Stock Option Plan and 1995
     Stock  Option Plan,  respectively,  of Immucor,  Inc.,  of our report dated
     August 29, 2001 (except for paragraph 6 of Note 17, as to which the date is
     September 11, 2001) with respect to the consolidated  financial  statements
     and schedule of Immucor, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
     the year ended May 31, 2001.

                                           Ernst & Young LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
September 13, 2001
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-20800 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ISMAEL ROMAN-FIGUEROA, Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CR-94-1

--------------------- April 19, 1999 Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Ismael Roman-Figueroa (“Roman”) has filed a motion to withdraw and a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Roman has not filed a response. Our review of the brief filed by counsel and of the record discloses no nonfrivolous point for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements for year ended June 30, 1996 which statement is dated May
24, 1997 by Michael B. Johnson & Co.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                             100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   100
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,055
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,825
<OTHER-SE>                                      65,707
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (26,955)
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Samuel A. Foster, Plaintiff, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Defendant.

Motion for new trial denied, with costs. Opinion by Learned, P. J.
From: lomaleem@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:52:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Loma McKinnon

Saratoga Springs, UT 84045
From: Lindsay Bacher

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women!!

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:31:34 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

This is huge! Thank you so, so much for this much needed change.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Lindsay Bacher

1801 3rd Ave S

Minneapolis, MN 55404
From: cheiss@ccrc.uga.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:16:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Christian Heiss

Athens, GA 30607
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1435 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 23, 2008.
Whereas November 9, 2008, through November 10, 2008, marks the 70th anniversary 
        of Kristallnacht, The Night of Broken Glass;
Whereas during Kristallnacht, hundreds of synagogues in Germany and Austria were 
        burned and destroyed, businesses and homes were ransacked, scores of 
        innocent people were killed because they were Jews, and thousands of 
        others were arrested and sent to concentration camps;
Whereas Kristallnacht was sanctioned by the Nazi state to foment anti-Semitism 
        and terrorize Jewish citizens;
Whereas the shattered panes of glass that littered sidewalks, most of it coming 
        from the shop windows of Jewish stores, gave the pogrom its name, 
        Kristallnacht or ``Night of Broken Glass'';
Whereas Kristallnacht marked the Nazis' first centrally organized operation of 
        large-scale, anti-Jewish violence;
Whereas the lack of any serious diplomatic consequences from civilized nations 
        led the Governments of Germany and Austria to believe that further 
        atrocities would go unpunished;
Whereas Kristallnacht served as a prelude to the Second World War, to the death 
        of millions of innocent people, and to the mass murders and carnage on a 
        scale never before seen in human history;
Whereas the reign of the Nazi government marks one of the darkest periods in 
        civilized history; and
Whereas Kristallnacht should remind us all that evil must be confronted 
        forcefully and the civilized world cannot watch idly while barbarism and 
        mass murder are committed against innocent peoples: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the 70th anniversary of Kristallnacht, The Night of 
        Broken Glass;
            (2) pays tribute to the over 6,000,000 Jewish people who were killed 
        during the Holocaust; and
            (3) recommits the United States to continued vigilance against these 
        kind of atrocities and urges the international community to fight 
        against organized aggression directed at religious, ethnic, and other 
        minority groups wherever it may occur.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-34-2023]

On May 15, 2023, Dorel Juvenile Group Inc. submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within Subzone 72W, in Columbus, Indiana.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (88 FR 34484, May 30, 2023). On September 12, 2023, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including section 400.14.                

Dated: September 12, 2023.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-20036 Filed 9-14-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
##### 



CERTIFICATE OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF
DOBSON COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
  a.
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andb.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the
Company at September 30, 2006, and the results of the
Companys operations for the period ended September 30, 2006.
 November 9, 2006
    /s/ STEVEN P. DUSSEKSteven P. DussekChief Executive Officer
and principal executive officer
Exhibit 21

Subsidiaries of Registrant



|                                     |  |                             
|------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------
|Subsidiary                           |  | Jurisdiction of Organization
|Immucor Medizinische Diagnostik GmbH |  | Germany                     
|                                     | 
|Immucor Italia S.r.l.                |  | Italy                       
|                                     | 
|Immucor Diagnosticos Medicos Lda.    |  | Portugal                    
|                                     | 
|Dominion Biologicals Limited         |  | Canada                      
|                                     | 
|Immucor, S.L.                        |  | Spain                       
|                                     | 
|Immucor Gamma Benelux SPRL.          |  | Belgium                     
|                                     | 
|Immucor K. K.                        |  | Japan                       
|                                     | 
|Immucor France S.A.S.                |  | France                      
|                                     | 
|IBG Immucor Limited                  |  | United Kingdom              
|                                     | 
|BCA Acquisition Corporation          |  | United States (Georgia)     
|                                     | 
|Immucor Sales, Inc.                  |  | United States (Georgia)     

The Company owns, directly or indirectly, 100% of each of the above entities.
From: kathy.mckee@ingramentertainment.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:37:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kathy McKee

Nashville, TN 37220
EXHIBIT 32.2



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Date:	August 15, 2005

/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2(1)



Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer



I, William Snyder, the chief financial officer of Peak
International Limited (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|Date: November 12, 2003 |  | 
|                        |  | 
|                        |  | 

---

|(1) | In accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K and SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986, Final Rule: Managements Reports on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the certification furnished in this Exhibit 32.2 is deemed to accompany this Form 10-Q and will not be deemed filed for purpose of Section 18 of the Exchange
Act. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------