alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DuPont Performance Elastomers LaPlace, Louisiana Back End Process Emission Souces

Source Description Number

1700-25 East Wash Belt Dryer 1700-26 West Wash Belt Dryer 1700-27 East Hot Dryer Exhaust 1700-28 West Hot Dryer Exhaust 1700-45 No. 1 East Drye r Cooling Compartment 1700-46 No. 1 West Dryer Cooling Compartment 1700-47 No. 2 East Drye r Cooling Compartment 1700-48 No. 2 West Dryer Cooling Compartment 1700-53 Stripped Emulsion Storage Tank No. 1 1700-54 Stripped Emulsion Storage Tank No. 2 1700-55 Stripped Emulsion Storage Tank No. 3 1700-67 Stripped Emulsion Storage Tank No. 4 1700-68 Stripped Emulsion Storage Tank No. 5 1700-69 Stripped Emulsion Storage Tank No. 9 1700-70 Stripped Emulsion Storage Tank No. 11 1700-71 Stripped Emulsion Storage Tank No. 12 1700-72 Stripped Emulsion Storage Tank No. 15 1700-73 Stripped Emulsion Storage Tank No. 16BACKEND SOURCES TITLE V PERMIT CONDITIONS
No. 154, Misc.

#### Harris *v.*McGarraghy et al.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Guilfoyle*and *Morton Hollander*for respondents.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
From: gma5@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:55:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Anita Liverman

Huntsville, AL 35803
Before the Third Division,

February 6, 1959

No. 62732.

#### Moscahlades Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 163405-K (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of olives in brine similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Moscahlades Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 127, C.D. 1917), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
CONSENT OF COUNSEL

     We consent to the reference to our Firm under the heading "Counsel and
Independent Accountants" in Post-Effective Amendment No. 18 to the Registration
Statement on Form N-1A of Delafield Fund, Inc. as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on or about April 29, 2008.

/S/ PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP
PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP


New York, New York
April 29, 2008
H. Res. 198

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 12, 2007.

Whereas the first African Americans were brought forcibly to 

the shores of America as early as the 17th century; 

Whereas African Americans were enslaved in the United 

States and subsequently faced the injustices of lynch 

mobs, segregation, and denial of basic, fundamental 

rights; 

Whereas despite this enslavement, early Black Americans 

made significant contributions to the economic, educational, political, artistic, literary, religious, scientific, 

and technological advancement of the United States; 

Whereas in the face of these injustices, United States citizens 

of all races distinguished themselves in their commitment 

to ideals of which the United States was founded and 

fought for the rights and freedom of African Americans; 

Whereas the United States was conceived, as stated in the 

Declaration of Independence, as a new country dedicated 

to the proposition that ‘‘all Men are created equal, that 

they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the 

Pursuit of Happiness’’; 
2

•HRES 198 EH 

Whereas since its founding, the United States has been an 

imperfect work in making progress towards those noble 

goals; 

Whereas the history of the United States is the story of a 

people regularly affirming high ideals, striving to reach 

them but often failing, and then struggling to come to 

terms with the disappointment of that failure before committing themselves to trying again; and 

Whereas the month of February is officially celebrated as 

Black History Month, which dates back to 1926, when 

Dr. Carter G. Woodson set aside a special period of time 

in February to recognize the heritage and achievement of 

Black Americans: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) recognizes the significance of Black History 

Month as an important time to recognize the contributions of Black Americans in the Nation’s history, and 

encourages the continued celebration of this month to 

provide an opportunity for all people of the United 

States to learn more about the past and to better understand the experiences that have shaped the Nation; and 

(2) affirms that—

(A) the contributions of Black Americans are 

a significant part of the history, progress, and heritage of the United States; and 
3

•HRES 198 EH 

(B) the ethnic and racial diversity of the 

United States enriches and strengthens the Nation. 

Attest:

Clerk.
From: hoffmanjb2@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:44:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James Hoffman

Austin, TX 78753
From: rankin566@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:34:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Thomas Rankin

Libertyville, IL 60048
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 20 (Wednesday, January 30, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 6400]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02046]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Results of FAA Nitrous Oxide BLEVE Characterization Testing

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of public teleconference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a public teleconference to share with 
the public results of recent FAA sponsored testing of nitrous oxide 
(N2O) characteristics. Nitrous oxide is an important 
oxidizer to developers of some commercial reusable launch vehicles. A 
potential hazard in nitrous oxide storage and handling is a Boiling 
Liquid Expanding Vapor Explosion (BLEVE), which results from a sudden 
loss of pressure in a tank containing nitrous oxide stored under 
pressure above its normal boiling point. The FAA's Office of Commercial 
Space Transportation sponsored tests of liquid-phase nitrous oxide at 
NASA's White Sands Test Facility to empirically determine the superheat 
limit temperature for nitrous oxide, and to demonstrate that a BLEVE 
would not occur if the liquid is maintained at temperatures below this 
superheat limit temperature.
    Meeting Information: The teleconference is scheduled for Thursday, 
February 28, 2013, from 1:00-2:30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. The 
presentation and call-in number will be posted one week in advance at 
http://www.ast.faa.gov/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stewart Jackson, Division Manager, 
Regulations and Analysis Division, AST-300, Office of Commercial Space 
Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence 
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, Telephone (202) 267-7903, or email at 
stewart.jackson@faa.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 22, 2013.
George C. Nield,
Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2013-02046 Filed 1-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
From: djbucheck@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: comments

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:50:40 PM

I join with the American Association of University

Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as

pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are

a critical element of the new law and would provide

countless women better access to necessary health

care. Women need to choose their care, their

employer should not be choosing specific care for

their employee.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal”

exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an

ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the

exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers,

so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though

they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If

granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they

work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality
preventive care by accepting IOM’s recommendations

and rejecting the proposed religious refusal

exemption provisions. If you accept these exemptions

then they could also ask that you exempt

appendectomy or any other medical need. Please let

us have a "clean" recommendation of health.

Ann

Minnesota
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
  ACT

In connection with the annual report of TransGlobe Energy
  Corporation (the Registrant) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December
  31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the Report), I, David C. Ferguson, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
      and                                  
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                    
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Registrant.

/s/ David
  FergusonName:
  David C. Ferguson 
  Title: Chief Financial Officer 
  February 10, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule
  13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has
  been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
  furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
  request.

This certification accompanies the Form 40-F to which it
  relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
  not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
  Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
  before or after the date of the Form 40-F), irrespective of any general
  incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
No. 68879.

#### Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 62/8643, 62/14548, and 63/1242 (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of miniature motors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66961, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 60476.

#### John A. Steer Co. *v.*United States,

protests 274810-K and 261944-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hoods the same in all .material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 63276.

protest 58/22325 (New York).

#### Gehrig, Hoban & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

Tbe protest was dismissed.
#### In the Matter of the Petition of William W. Farley, as State Commissioner of Excise, Appellant, for an Order Revoking and Canceling Liquor Tax Certificate No. 24,492, Issued to Eugene O. Mosher, Respondent.

*Matter of Farley (Masher),*153 App. Div. 939, affirmed.

(Argued January 7, 1913;

decided January 21, 1913.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 12, 1912, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a petition for the revocation of a liquor tax certificate.

*Louis M. King*and *A. M. Sperry*for appellant.

*A. F. Mills*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Collin and Hogan, JJ.
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

38 39 40



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/16 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 16 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL
_________________

_________________ 1 Cite as: 596 U. S. ____ (2022)

Statement of B REYER , J. 

## SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

No. 21A632

CARL WAYNE BUNTION v. BOBBY LUMPKIN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, ET AL

. ON APPLICATION FOR STAY [April 21, 2022] The application for stay of ex ecution of sentence of death presented to J USTICE A LITO and by him referred to the Court is denied. Statement of J USTICE B REYER respecting the denial of ap

plication for stay. This case illustrates a seri ous legal and practical problem with the death penalty as it is currently administered. As I have previously noted, Carl Wayne Buntion has been on death row under threat of execution for 30 years. Buntion

v. Lumpkin , 595 U. S. ___ (2021) (statement respecting de

nial of certiorari). Twenty of those years, he tells us, were spent in solitary confinement. Id., at ___ (slip op., at 1). We have described even four weeks of waiting in prison under the threat of execution as “one of the most horrible feelings to which [a person] can be subjected.” In re Medley , 134 U. S. 160, 172 (1890). Buntion has suffered under such con

ditions for decades. When efforts to administer the death penalty produce results such as this, it raises serious ques

tions about whether that practice complies with the Consti

tution’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. I have expressed concerns about the constitutionality of the death penalty in the past, and I am compelled to do so again in light of the facts and hist ory of Buntion’s case. See, e.g.,2 BUNTION v. LUMPKIN

Statement of B REYER , J.
Hamm v. Dunn , 583 U. S. ___ (2018) (statement respecting denial of application for stay and denial of certiorari); Smith

v. Ryan , 581 U. S. ___ (2017) (statement respecting denial of certiorari); Glossip v. Gross , 576 U. S. 863, 908 (2015) (dissenting opinion).
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Office of Environmental Management, Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting: cancellation.

# SUMMARY:

On August 9, 2023, the Department of Energy published a notice of open meeting announcing a meeting on September 7, 2023, of the Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Portsmouth. This notice announces the cancellation of this meeting.

# DATES:

                        The meeting scheduled for September 7, 2023, announced in the August 9, 2023, issue of the                         **Federal Register**                         (FR Doc. 2023-17039, 85 FR 53872), is cancelled.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Eric Roberts, Board Support Manager, by Phone: (270) 554-3004 or Email:                         *eric@pgdpcab.org.*

Signed in Washington, DC, on August 24, 2023.

LaTanya Butler,

Deputy Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-18722 Filed 8-29-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P