alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No.  333-59540

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  210				Trade Date: 08/15/02
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

  June 1, 2001)							Issue Date:  08/20/02
The Date of this Pricing Supplement August 16, 2002
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QJT9   4.405%	08/15/08	     100%	       1.00%                Semi-Annually	     YES	    NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		      Date		Count

$4,616,000.00	$4,569,840.00	ABN AMRO Inc.	   02/15/03		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes	  X   No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.   Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $676.877 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under a Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
Additionally, the total principal amount of PowerNotes(SM) offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001 has been increased from $500.0mm to $750.0mm.  $250.0mm principal amount of debt securities registered pursuant to Registration Statement No. 333-59540 originally offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement dated June 15, 2001 and related Prospectus dated May 25, 2001 are being offered as PowerNotes(SM) by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 20, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-1630 Lower Tribunal No. 20-0202-K

________________ 

### Laura Gayle, etc. , Appellant, vs. 

### First Protective Insurance Company, etc. ,

Appellee. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Timothy J. Koenig, Judge. Janssen, Siracusa & Keegan PLLC, and John M. Siracusa, for appellant. Briscoe Ortiz Zuluaga PLLC, and Bianca R. Zuluaga; Russo Appellate Firm, P.A., and Elizabeth K. Russo and Paulo R. Lima, for appellee. Before EMAS, LOGUE, and LINDSEY, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSpace Tethers: Design CriteriaThis document is prepared to provide a systematic process for the selection of tethers for space applications. Criteria arc provided for determining the strength requirement for tether missions and for mission success from tether severing due to micrometeoroids and orbital debris particle impacts. Background information of materials for use in space tethers is provided, including electricity-conducting tethers. Dynamic considerations for tether selection is also provided. Safety, quality, and reliability considerations are provided for a tether project.Document ID19970027081Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsTomlin, D. D.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Faile, G. C.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Hayashida, K. B.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Frost, C. L.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Wagner, C. Y.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Mitchell, M. L.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Vaughn, J. A.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Galuska, M. J.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1997Subject CategorySpacecraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:108537NASA-TM-108537Accession Number97N26173Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970027081.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PAMECO CORPORATION FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED NOVEMBER
30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001036283
<NAME> PAMECO CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-02-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                             115
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,190
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,661
<INVENTORY>                                     99,590
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               134,523
<PP&E>                                          11,583
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,453
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 170,944
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,585
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   170,944
<SALES>                                        117,197
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               117,197
<CGS>                                           89,623
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  114,385
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   896
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 173
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,743
<INCOME-TAX>                                       544
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,199
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,199
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Cornerstone Fund II and is qualified in its entirety by references
to such financial instruments.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      28,509,266
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   97,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,046,842<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,046,842<F2>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,449,790<F3>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,402,328
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,047,462
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,047,462
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,047,462
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net unrealized
gain on open contracts of $1,316,434 and due from DWR of $123,327.
<F2>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $442,706, accrued incentive
fees of $316,750, accrued management fees of $99,352, accrued brokerage
commissions of $83,967, common administrative expenses payable of
$52,339 and accrued transaction fees and costs of $5,558.
<F3>Total revenues includes realized trading revenue of $7,321,679, net
change in unrealized of ($2,051,673) and interest income of $1,179,784.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KWAME LAMAR BARNES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 59 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of July, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-19-00458-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 415th District Court

Parker County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV19-0516

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Gabriel and Kerr, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

CAPSTONE CLASSIC CONSTRUCTION, LLC, Appellant

V.

ERIC ADDISON, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered “Appellant’s Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” We grant the 

motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Each party must bear its own costs of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: February 13, 2020
No. P66/142. —

#### W. T. Grant Co. et al. *v.*United States, protests 64/4407, etc. (New York).

Nao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of hose nozzles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Lipman's*(52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: renwanz@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:24:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Vernon Renwanz

Sacramento, CA 95835
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of diaDexus, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David J. Foster, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                                                
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 15, 2010 |  | /s/ David J. Foster                                            
|                        |  | David J. Foster                                                
|                        |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
No. 488.

#### Gunderson Bros. Engineering Corp. *v.*Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp.

*William F. White*for petitioner.

*Benjamin H. Kizer*for respondent.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Black believe that certiorari should be granted to consider whether the petitioner Gunderson Bros. Engineering Corp. has been denied its right to jury trial guaranteed by the Seventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.
|   | (1)  the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,  and |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)  the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      at the dates and for the periodsindicated. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             |   |                                                |
|----------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|
|                             |   |                                                |   |
| Date:       August 13, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Neal      D. Crispin                       |   |
|                             |   | Name:      Neal D. Crispin                          |   |
|                             |   | Title:      President & Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                             |   |                                                |   |
Case No. 9,475.

#### The MERRIMAC.

[Blatchf. Pr. Cas. 563.] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

Oct., 1863.

Prize — Violation of Blockade — Enemy Property.

Vessel and cargo condemned as enemy property, and for a violation of the blockade.

In admiralty.

1

 [Reported by Samuel Blatchford, Esq.]

BETTS, District Judge.

This vessel and cargo were captured, July 24, 1863, at sea, on the Atlantic Ocean, in latitude 33° 59' 30" north, and longtitude 76° 55' west off Wilmington North Carolina, by the United States gunboat Iroquois, and were sent into this port for adjudication. They were libelled in this court, as prize, under such arrest, July 28th, thereafter, and the warrant and monition on the process were duly served on the vessel and cargo on the same day. No person appearing thereupon, due' proclamation was made in open court, and a decree of default was rendered against the prize property, and all persons interested therein. The papers of the vessel and the proof taken in preparatorio were submitted to the court, and judgment and condemnation against the prize was prayed by the United States attorney. A register of the vessel was recorded, in the name of the Confederate States, at the Wilmington custom-house, in North Carolina, to Richard Bradley, of that place, as owner, July 21, 1863. A shipping agreement with the master and crew, signed, without date, a manifest, a clearance of the vessel and cargo from Wilmington, North Carolina, to St. George’s, Bermuda, and several bills of lading of the same direction, signed in July, 1863, were produced with the papers from the vessel. The cargo was cotton, spirits of turpentine, and tobacco.

This, upon the vouchers in writing, is palpably a case of the seizure of enemy property, in flagrante delicto of traffic, in an enemy vessel, at sea. No citation of legal authority is requisite to show its eonfiscability. The deposition in preparatorio taken from the master of the vessel is in full harmony with the paper documents. He swears that he is a resident of North Carolina, and owes allegiance to that state, and not to the United States; that the vessel was captured sailing under the Confederate flag; that she was built in England, and was owned and sailed by a stock company in Wilmington; that hi knew that the port of Wilmington was under blockade before he sailed from it, and saw the blockade squadron lying outside; that the cargo, he supposes, was the growth and manufacture of the Southern states; and that there was a consignee in Bermuda for the vessel and cargo. No comments need be added to this fullness of inculpatory evidence.

A decree is rendered condemning the vessel and cargo to forfeiture.

[The merchant steamer Eagle rendered valuable assistance in delaying and capturing the Merrimac. The master of the Eagle interposed a claim on her behalf that she should be entitled to share as one of the captors. It was decided that no such right existed. Case No. 9,476. The case was again heard upon the commissions and allowances claimed by the prize commissioners. Id. 9,477.]
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO **

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, **

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In      connection with the quarterly report of Cybertel Capital Corp. (the "Company")      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James      A. Wheeler, CEO, President and director of the Registrant, certify, pursuant      to      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley      Act of 2002, that: 

|                                     |                                     |                                       |
|------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                |                                |                                  |
| Date: May                  14, 2007 | By:                            | /s/ James                  A. Wheeler |
|                                     | James                  A. Wheeler        |
|                                     | Chief                  Executive Officer |
No. 515, Misc.

#### Goodwin *v.*Missouri et al.

Supreme Court of Missouri. Certiorari denied.
From: bdstine1@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:12:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bruce Stine

Plainfield, NJ 07063