alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Civ. No. 11615.

Second Appellate District, Division One.

February 16, 1938.]

#### W. P. NICHOLS (CATHERINE A. McKENNA Substituted as Plaintiff), Appellant, v. H. B. BUSING, as Administrator, etc., et al., Respondents.

*98Catherine A. McKenna, *in pro. per.,*and J. Irving Mc-Kenna for Appellant.

Edwin J. Miller, for Respondents.

WHITE, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment entered on or about June 2, 1937. Defendants moved to dismiss said appeal on the ground that appellant has taken no proceedings to perfect the same. Appellant opposes the motion on the ground that the trial court has refused to settle her proposed bill of exceptions, and that she now has pending in this court an alternative writ of mandate to compel the superior court to settle said proposed bill of exceptions, which the trial court struck from the files on the ground that the proposed bill as presented did not recite the truth and for numerous other reasons set forth in the trial court’s order.

We have this day filed an opinion and order in the aforesaid mandate proceeding *(Nichols*v. *Smith, ante,*p. 94 [76 Pac. (2d) 525]) discharging the alternative writ issued therein and denying a peremptory writ; and the certificate of the county clerk shows that there are now no proceedings pending in the court below either for a transcript or a bill of exceptions, and the record shows that the time for initiating such proceedings has long since expired.

It therefore follows that the appeal herein should be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

York, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on April 14, 1938.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information
extracted from the
company's third quarter 1996 10-Q and is qualified in its
entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>
<C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           27,900
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 5,847,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                     68,400
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          724,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  244,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                6,444,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 0<F1>
<BONDS>                                       2,748,200<F2>
<COMMON>                                        345,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                      333,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  6,444,900
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                495,600
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   145,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 25,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              232,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  91,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                     33,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              58,500
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     58,500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
<FN>
<F1>The Company is a captive finance subsidiary which does
not have a classified
balance sheet.
<F2>Inclused current and noncurrent maturities of long-term
debt.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
From: pastor@exeterag.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:39:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ernie Karjala

Exeter, NH 03833
From: mattreichert@centurytel.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:06:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Christina Reichert

Brunswick, MO 65236
From: jahazlewood@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:29:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Janice Hazlewood

Oxford, MS 38655
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,363
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100
<INVENTORY>                                      6,907
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,506
<PP&E>                                           6,066
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,165
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  35,544
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,635
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            65
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    35,544
<SALES>                                          6,928
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,928
<CGS>                                            3,839
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,839
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,768
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (99)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,580)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       616
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (964)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (964)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.150)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.150)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.02

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. (the company) on Form 10-Q, as amended, for the period
ended March 27, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Frey, Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the company.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ MARK S. FREY                                               
|Mark S. Frey                                                   
|Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|August 17, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1413 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 26, 2008.
Whereas many at-risk young men in the Nation's inner cities face a challenging 
        and uncertain future;
Whereas the future success of at-risk young men can be greatly enhanced through 
        sustained mentorship;
Whereas effective working partnerships between and within the public and private 
        sectors can have a lasting and positive impact on the future of these 
        young men;
Whereas participation in organized sports has provided a creative and 
        disciplined outlet and a path to a better life for many at-risk males;
Whereas the Youth Impact Program combines the disciplines of football, 
        mentoring, and academics in partnership between local National Football 
        League (NFL) franchises and universities to promote discipline, 
        learning, and positive values;
Whereas the Youth Impact Program is a community-based program that has proven 
        its value over the past 2 years in raising the outlook and aspirations 
        of at-risk young men and has provided them greater exposure to 
        academics, core values, and life skills;
Whereas the Youth Impact Program provides year-round mentoring to its 
        participants that is a proven formula for building success;
Whereas the NFL, the National Football League Players Association, the 
        University of Southern California, and Tulane University have provided 
        critical support to the Youth Impact Program;
Whereas the Youth Impact Program will be expanded to three additional cities in 
        partnership with local NFL franchises and universities;
Whereas the Youth Impact Program seeks to establish a presence in every city 
        with a local NFL franchise; and
Whereas under the vision and leadership of Mr. Riki Ellison, founder of the 
        Youth Impact Program, 10-year veteran of the NFL, three-time Super Bowl 
        champion, and a University of Southern California alumnus, the Youth 
        Impact Program has expanded from a regional program to one with a 
        growing national presence: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates Mr. Riki Ellison for his leadership and vision in 
        founding the Youth Impact Program;
            (2) recognizes the ongoing and significant contributions of the 
        National Football League, the University of Southern California, and 
        Tulane University to the Youth Impact program; and
            (3) encourages the expansion of the Youth Impact Program to inner 
        cities across the Nation.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: piais1@tampabay.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:11:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nancy Disonell

Spring Hill, FL 34609
From: drm4cubs@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:37:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

D Myers

Cleveland, TN 37323
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
                   
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,817,840
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  122,620
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,974,020
<PP&E>                                         32,368,750
<DEPRECIATION>                                 15,269,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 19,276,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,814,260
<BONDS>                                        866,670
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       1,610
<OTHER-SE>                                     13,593,760
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   19,276,300
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               821,920
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               385,350
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8,090
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                428,480
<INCOME-TAX>                                   170,440
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            258,040
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   258,040
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.16
        


</TABLE>