alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      This schedule contains summary financial information (in thousands except
per share data) extracted from Petroleum Heat and Power Co., Inc. and
Subsidiaries financial statements as of December 31, 1998 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           $2,004   
<SECURITIES>                                          0   
<RECEIVABLES>                                    56,845   
<ALLOWANCES>                                        944   
<INVENTORY>                                      17,534   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 88,306   
<PP&E>                                           76,979   
<DEPRECIATION>                                   48,855   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  199,531   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            97,283   
<BONDS>                                         278,731   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            28,578   
<PREFERRED>                                           0   
<COMMON>                                          2,647   
<OTHER-SE>                                     (218,472)  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    199,531   
<SALES>                                         372,552   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                408,019   
<CGS>                                           199,113   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   265,526   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                142,867   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  1,419   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               33,037   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (33,817)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                        400   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (34,217)  
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0   
<CHANGES>                                             0   
<NET-INCOME>                                    (35,337)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (1.52)  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (1.52)  
                                               


</TABLE>
November 10, 2010 

U.S Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor, 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Subject: Exemption 6612F from 14 CFR (FAR Section) – 121.135(a)(3) 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2000-8525 - Request for 

extension 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

In accordance with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 

Part 11, Section 11.25, United Air Lines, Inc. (United) petitions for renewal 

of Exemption No. 6612F as amended, from April 30, 2011, to April 30, 

2013. 

Exemption 6612F, as amended, exempts United from the provisions of 14 

CFR § 121.135(a)(3), which requires all certificate holders to “have the date 

of last revision on each page” of each manual required by § 121.133. Section 

121.133 requires “a manual for the use and guidance of... ground operations 

and management personnel in conducting its operations.” 

United petitions the Administrator for an extension of the termination date of 

Exemption 6612F, as amended, which permits United to use electronic 

digital technology to satisfy the requirements of 14 CFR § 121.135(a)(3) 

instead of printing the date of the last revision on each page. 

All the reasons and substantiation contained in the original petition dated 

April 4, 1996, remain the same. Additionally, there has been no change in 

the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the 

basis for granting the original petition. 
Thank you for your consideration of this petition. Please advise if any 

further information is required for your review. 

Sincerely, 

Juan de Mesa 

United Airlines 

Staff Rep. Flight Operations Regulatory Compliance
Order filed October 4, 2016

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 15

- 00330

- CR

____________ SYLVIA MARIE COLLINS , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court C ause No. 1390220



### ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to T exas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of Defendant's Exhibit 1

.The clerk of the 178th Dis trict Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this

court the original of Defendant's Exhibit 1, on or before October 11, 2016. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of Defendant's Exhibit 1, to the
clerk of the 178th District Cou rt.

PER CURIAM
From: darlclemons@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Obamacare

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:23:35 PM

Please stop obamacare, it will break us as a nation and will cause us to go down the road to socialism.

Sincerely,

Darl Clemons

Monticello, IN 47960
#### CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF CALIFORNIA *v.*SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SACRAMENTO COUNTY et al.

No. 330.

Decided November 5, 1962.

*Alvin H. Pelavin*for appellant.

*Martin McDonough*for City of North Sacramento, appellee.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Drp a Page | of |
KEC-]2039)-/0
VISION
GAL PROCESSING DI
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS As of: August 31, 2011
BRANCH Received: August 15, 2011
Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: August 31, 2011

Tracking No. 80ce180c
‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: [RS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0065
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Tari Parker
Address:
643 Leonard Road
Onalaska, 98570
Email: knowel@lewiscounty.com

General Comment

Females carry the heaviest weight in every sense of the word, in childbearing.

Females ofthen have little to say about the role they play, -

even their own death.

Surely to move forward as a civilization worthy of preservation, women (and girls) must have
greater control over when they use their bodies to carry and bear children.

Free, or the lleast costly contraception available is a must.

Make this happen!

http://fdms.erulemaking .net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=0900... 8/31/2011
# U.S. Navy Interdicts Stateless Vessel Previously Caught Smuggling Weapons 

/ Published Jan. 23, 2022
Manama Bahrain, 
MANAMA, Bahrain – On Jan. 18, U.S. 5th Fleet ships interdicted a stateless fishing vessel in the Gulf of Oman that was caught smuggling illicit weapons off the coast of Somalia last year.

Guided-missile destroyer USS Cole (DDG 67) and patrol coastal ship USS Chinook (PC 9) interdicted the stateless vessel transiting from Iran in waters outside of any state’s territorial sea along a route historically used to traffic weapons to the Houthis in Yemen.

During a flag verification boarding and subsequent search, U.S. forces discovered 40 tons of urea fertilizer, a chemical compound with agricultural applications that is also known to be used as an explosive precursor.

The vessel was the same stateless dhow interdicted in February 2021 off the coast of Somalia by guided-missile destroyer USS Winston S. Churchill (DDG 81) and discovered to be carrying weapons. Among the cache of weapons seized during the February 2021 interdiction were thousands of AK-47 assault rifles, light machine guns, heavy sniper rifles, rocket-propelled grenade launchers and crew served weapons. The inventory also included barrels, stocks, optical scopes and weapon systems.

Following the Jan. 18 interdiction, the U.S. Navy transferred the vessel, cargo and five Yemeni crewmembers to Yemen Coast Guard officials Jan. 21.

U.S. naval forces regularly perform maritime security operations in the Middle East to ensure the free flow of legitimate trade and to disrupt the transport of illicit cargo that often funds terrorism and other unlawful activity.

The U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations encompasses approximately 2.5 million square miles of water area and includes the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea, parts of the Indian Ocean and three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, Suez Canal and Strait of Bab al Mandeb.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BMJ MEDICAL MANAGEMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           3,606,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,823,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (25,381,000)
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,206,000
<PP&E>                                          13,886,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,346,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 113,996,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,995,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,744,000
<COMMON>                                            18,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,846,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   113,996,000
<SALES>                                         34,395,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,395,000
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,768,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,103,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,744,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                294,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (3,038,000)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,744,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.14)
        


</TABLE>
No. 66455.

#### Dessy Atco, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 315308-K(D), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Eord, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 30 percent under paragraph 1208, as modified, *supra,*as knit nylon gloves similar in use to silk gloves, and the items marked “B” at 30 percent under paragraph 915, as modified, *supra,*as knit nylon gloves similar in use to cotton gloves.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

STEVEN SAEPHARN,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-30011

D.C. No. 3:11-cr-00073-RRB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Alaska

Ralph R. Beistline, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 14, 2013** 

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Steven Saepharn appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

his jury-trial conviction for distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21

U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

FILED

MAY 17 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-30011

(1967), Saepharn’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for

relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided

Saepharn the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se

supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Nos. 96-50042 & 96-50073 USDC Nos. W-95-CV-173, 174

__________________ BARRY LYNN GILMORE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus WILLIAM J. HARDIN, Dr., Defendant-Appellee,
* * * * * * * * * BARRY LYNN GILMORE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus DAN SMITH, Sheriff; JOHNSON, Lt.; SHELLY HOWELL, Dr.; W.J. BRYAN, Jail Administrator; HARDIN, Dr., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - - July 11, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *No. 96-50042 & 96-50073 - 2 - Barry Lynn Gilmore (Texas prisoner # 621324) seeks in forma pauperis (IFP) status to appeal the district court's dismissal, as frivolous, of his civil rights suits alleging deliberate indifference to his medical needs. We have reviewed Gilmore's contentions and the records and determined that his appeals are frivolous. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Therefore leave to appeal IFP is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED. Gilmore's motion for the appointment of counsel on appeal is DENIED as moot. IFP DENIED; APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
#### Daniel F. Keefe, Appellant, v. Hiram Holley, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Bockes, J.
From: cdwhitman2@bellsouth.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:35:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dawn Whitman

Ruston, LA 71270
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 64906]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20360]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 3442-000]


The City of Nashua; Notice of Authorization for Continued Project 
Operation

    The license for the Mine Falls Hydroelectric Project No. 3442 was 
issued for a period ending July 31, 2023.
    Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), requires the 
Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue from year-to-
year an annual license to the then licensee(s) under the terms and 
conditions of the prior license until a new license is issued, or the 
project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 15 or any other 
applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior license waived 
the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based on section 9(b) 
of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), and as set forth 
at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project has filed an 
application for a subsequent license, the licensee may continue to 
operate the project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the 
license after the minor or minor part license expires, until the 
Commission acts on its application. If the licensee of such a project 
has not filed an application for a subsequent license, then it may be 
required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to continue project operations 
until the Commission issues someone else a license for the project or 
otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 3442 is issued to 
The City of Nashua for a period effective August 1, 2023, through July 
31, 2024, or until the issuance of a new license for the project or 
other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. If issuance of 
a new license (or other disposition) does not take place on or before 
July 31, 2024, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 CFR 
16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is 
renewed automatically without further order or notice by the 
Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that The City of Nashua is authorized to continue 
operation of Mine Falls Hydroelectric Project under the terms and 
conditions of the prior license until the issuance of a new license for 
the project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first.

    Dated: September 14, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-20360 Filed 9-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
From: pamelapearljames@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:09:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Pamela James

Baton Rouge, LA 70817
No. 185.

#### Gibas et al. *v.*United States.

*Richard E. Gorman*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Robert G. Maysack*for the United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.