Exhibit 13.01

Prudential-Bache/

Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-2

(In Process Of Liquidation)

2005



Annual

Report



---

PRUDENTIAL-BACHE/WATSON & TAYLOR, LTD.-2

2005 Annual Report



March 2006



Enclosed are the financial statements and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-2 (the Partnership) for the year ended December 31, 2005.



In accordance with a consent statement dated September 17, 1996, the limited partners
approved, during October 1996, the proposed sale to Public Storage, Inc. (Public) of all eight mini-warehouse facilities owned by the Partnership and the liquidation and dissolution of the Partnership.



Seven of the eight properties were sold to Public during December 1996. The
Partnership continues to own the Hampton Park property located in Capitol Heights, Maryland as it was not sold to Public after Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments performed during 1996 by MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc.
(MACTEC) identified detectable levels of tetrachloroethene (PCE) in the soil and ground water samples collected at the site. MACTEC, at the Partnerships request, reported the PCE release to the Maryland Department of
the Environment (MDE).



On November 21, 2000, MDE reached a
determination that it was appropriate to undertake an active remedial measure at the site. MACTEC, at the request of the Partnership, submitted an application to enter the site into MDEs Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) during March
2001. During a meeting on May 16, 2001 between the Partnership, MACTEC and MDE, to discuss MDEs comments on the Partnerships application, it was determined that the Partnership would perform a non-invasive Phase I Environmental Site
Assessment Update (Phase I Activities) and would subsequently, upon review and agreement with MDE, move to perform certain Phase II invasive sampling and analytical procedures (Phase II Activities) with the anticipation of
entering the site into the VCP. During the first quarter of 2002, MDE notified the Partnership that Phase I Activities were satisfactorily completed. Additionally, MACTEC completed the fieldwork for Phase II activities (under a work plan that MDE
reviewed) during 2002. The procedures and findings were documented in a Phase II Site Characterization and Risk Assessment Report (the Report) that was sent to MDE on February 13, 2003. During April 2003, MDE requested supplemental
soil-gas sampling procedures be performed. These procedures were performed and reported to MDE during September 2003. MDE issued a response letter, dated October 24, 2003, in which it formally accepted the site into the VCP and informed the
Partnership that some form of remedial action is required to address elevated levels of PCE in soil and ground water. The MDE approved the plan for remedial action (the Plan) on November 24, 2004. In December 2004, an agreement was
entered into with ATC Associates Inc. (ATC), pursuant to which ATC will provide certain environmental services to perform the environmental cleanup effort as described in the Plan. As of December 31, 2005, the Statement of Net Assets in
process of liquidation reflects an accrued liability of $314,000, which represents the Partnerships best estimate of the obligation regarding the environmental issues mentioned above; however, it is reasonably possible that the loss exposure
will be in excess of the amount accrued and may be material to the Partnership.



On January 18, 2005 the Partnership had an irrevocable standby letter of credit established in the amount of $60,000 that expired on January 7, 2006, in favor of the MDE in connection with the plan. The letter of credit has been extended
through January 7, 2007.



The General Partners engaged an unrelated
third party real estate broker CB Richard Ellis, Inc. on April 7, 2005, to market the property on an exclusive basis for a six month period. The Partnership will seek to obtain from any potential buyer as complete an indemnification as possible for
any liability in connection with remediation of the contamination of the property.



On August 5, 2005, the Partnership reported that it had concluded its bid process for its sole remaining property, Hampton Park, located in Capitol Heights, Maryland, and accepted a bid to sell the property. On November 4, 2005
the Partnership entered into a Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement (the Sale Agreement) with Recycland, LLC (the Recycland).



The Sale Agreement provided that Recycland would pay approximately $3,200,000 to the Partnership, taking into account anticipated offsets under the Sale Agreement
for the cost of a pollution legal liability insurance policy covering certain environmental liabilities and the cost of a fixed price to closure contract



1



---

with Gannett Fleming Project Development Corporation and EMG Corporation to complete the environmental remediation work through and including the issuance of a
Certificate of Completion by the MDE. The Sale Agreement provided that Recycland would continue the remediation work and indemnify the Partnership for certain environmental liabilities and performance obligations. Pursuant to the Sale Agreement,
Recycland had an opportunity to conduct due diligence and to terminate the agreement for any reason until one business day before closing.



On November 15, 2005, Recycland terminated the Sale Agreement in accordance with sections 4.5 and 13.4 of the Sale Agreement.



In light of the termination of the Sale Agreement and other information, the managing
general partner has changed its estimated liquidation date of the Partnership from December 31, 2005 to December 31, 2006. As a result, at this time the managing general partner has estimated an increase in future liquidating costs of approximately
$475,000 or approximately $9.00 per limited and equivalent participating unit of the Partnership.



The General Partners intend to remarket the property in 2006 once additional environmental testing and remediation work is undertaken. The Partnerships
liquidation and dissolution will proceed upon the sale of the Hampton Park property and will distribute any remaining funds after payment of and reserves for all expenses and liabilities.



We encourage you to read the attached report. Should you have any questions concerning
your investment or your account status, please contact the Client Services Department at (973) 802-3705.



2



---

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



To the Partners of Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-2:



In our opinion, the accompanying statements of net assets in process of liquidation and the related
statement of changes in net assets in process of liquidation present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-2 at December 31, 2005, and the changes in its net assets in process of
liquidation for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the General Partners. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the General Partners, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



As discussed in Note B to the financial statements, the Partnership adopted the liquidation basis of
accounting effective October 1, 1996.



/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



New York, New York

March 28, 2006



3



---

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Partners

Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-2



We have audited the accompanying
statement of changes in net assets in process of liquidation for Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-2 for the year ended December 31, 2003. This financial statement is the responsibility of the Partnerships management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement based on our audit.



We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit on the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.



In our opinion, the financial statement referred to above presents fairly, in all material respects, the changes in net assets in process of liquidation for the year ended December 31, 2003 of Prudential
Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd. -2, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.



As discussed in Note B to the financial statements, the Partnership adopted the liquidation basis of accounting effective October 1, 1996.



/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

New York, New York

January 23, 2004



4



---

PRUDENTIAL-BACHE/WATSON & TAYLOR, LTD.-2

(limited partnership)

STATEMENTS OF NET ASSETS

(in process of liquidation)



|                                                                |  |              |           |      |   |          
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ | --------- | ---- | - | ---------
|                                                                |  | December 31,
|                                                                |  | 2005         |           | 2004
|ASSETS                                                          |  |              |           |      |   |          
|Property held for sale                                          |  | $            | 2,018,521 |      | $ | 2,018,521
|Cash and cash equivalents                                       |  |              | 1,608,754 |      |   | 1,946,498
|Other assets                                                    |  |              | 314,338   |      |   | 271,852  
|                                                                |  |              |           |      |   |          
|Total assets                                                    |  |              | 3,941,613 |      |   | 4,236,871
|                                                                |  |              |           |      |   |          
|LIABILITIES                                                     |  |              |           |      |   |          
|Estimated liquidation costs                                     |  |              | 731,649   |      |   | 465,308  
|Estimated remediation costs                                     |  |              | 313,865   |      |   | 500,000  
|                                                                |  |              |           |      |   |          
|Total liabilities                                               |  |              | 1,045,514 |      |   | 965,308  
|                                                                |  |              |           |      |   |          
|Net assets available to limited and general partners            |  | $            | 2,896,099 |      | $ | 3,271,563
|                                                                |  |              |           |      |   |          
|Limited and equivalent partnership units issued and outstanding |  |              | 51,818    |      |   | 51,818   
|                                                                |  |              |           |      |   |          
|Net asset value per limited and equivalent units                |  | $            | 56.17     |      | $ | 63.45    
|                                                                |  |              |           |      |   |          

---



STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS

(in process of liquidation)



|                                       |  |                 |           |   |                 |   |       |  |   |           |  
|-------------------------------------- |  | --------------- | --------- | - | --------------- | - | ----- |  | - | --------- | -
|                                       |  | LIMITEDPARTNERS |           |   | GENERALPARTNERS |   | TOTAL | 
|Net assetsDecember 31, 2002           |  | $               | 3,107,817 |   |                 | $ |      |  | $ | 3,107,817 |  
|Net income from liquidating activities |  |                 | 30,502    |   |                 |   |      |  |   | 30,502    |  
|                                       |  |                 |           |   |                 |   |       |  |   |           |  
|Net assetsDecember 31, 2003           |  |                 | 3,138,319 |   |                 |   |      |  |   | 3,138,319 |  
|Net income from liquidating activities |  |                 | 133,244   |   |                 |   |      |  |   | 133,244   |  
|                                       |  |                 |           |   |                 |   |       |  |   |           |  
|Net assetsDecember 31, 2004           |  |                 | 3,271,563 |   |                 |   |      |  |   | 3,271,563 |  
|Net loss from liquidating activities   |  |                 | (375,464  | ) |                 |   |      |  |   | (375,464  | )
|                                       |  |                 |           |   |                 |   |       |  |   |           |  
|Net assetsDecember 31, 2005           |  | $               | 2,896,099 |   |                 | $ |      |  | $ | 2,896,099 |  
|                                       |  |                 |           |   |                 |   |       |  |   |           |  

---

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
statements.



5



---

PRUDENTIAL-BACHE/WATSON & TAYLOR, LTD.-2

(a limited partnership)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003



A.  General



Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-2 (the Partnership) is a Texas limited partnership formed on November 14, 1983 which will terminate in
accordance with a vote of the limited partners as described below. The Partnership was formed for the purpose of acquiring, developing, owning and operating mini-storage and office/warehouse facilities. The general partners of the Partnership are
Prudential-Bache Properties, Inc. (PBP), a wholly owned subsidiary of Prudential Securities Group Inc., George S. Watson, and A. Starke Taylor, III (collectively, the General Partners). PBP is the managing general partner of
the Partnership (the Managing General Partner).



In
accordance with a consent statement dated September 17, 1996, the limited partners approved, during October 1996, the proposed sale to Public Storage, Inc. (Public) of all eight mini-warehouse facilities owned by the Partnership and the
liquidation and dissolution of the Partnership.



Seven of the eight
properties were sold to Public during December 1996. The Partnership continues to own the Hampton Park property located in Capitol Heights, Maryland as it was not sold to Public after Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments performed
during 1996 by MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. (MACTEC) identified detectable levels of tetrachloroethene (PCE) in the soil and ground water samples collected at the site. MACTEC, at the Partnerships request,
reported the PCE release to the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE).



On November 21, 2000, MDE reached a determination that it was appropriate to undertake an active remedial measure at the site. MACTEC, at the request of the Partnership, submitted an application to enter the site into
MDEs Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) during March 2001. During a meeting on May 16, 2001 between the Partnership, MACTEC and MDE, to discuss MDEs comments on the Partnerships application, it was determined that the
Partnership would perform a non-invasive Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Update (Phase I Activities) and would subsequently, upon review and agreement with MDE, move to perform certain Phase II invasive sampling and analytical
procedures (Phase II Activities) with the anticipation of entering the site into the VCP. During the first quarter of 2002, MDE notified the Partnership that Phase I Activities were satisfactorily completed. Additionally, MACTEC
completed the fieldwork for Phase II activities (under a work plan that MDE reviewed) during 2002. The procedures and findings were documented in a Phase II Site Characterization and Risk Assessment Report (the Report) that was sent to
MDE on February 13, 2003. During April 2003, MDE requested supplemental soil-gas sampling procedures be performed. These procedures were performed and reported to MDE during September 2003. MDE issued a response letter, dated October 24, 2003, in
which it formally accepted the site into the VCP and informed the Partnership that some form of remedial action is required to address elevated levels of PCE in soil and ground water. The MDE approved the plan for remedial action (the
Plan) on November 24, 2004. In December 2004, an agreement was entered into with ATC Associates Inc. (ATC), pursuant to which ATC will provide certain environmental services to perform the environmental cleanup as described
in the Plan. As of December 31, 2005, the Statement of Net Assets in process of liquidation reflects an accrued liability of $314,000, which represents the Partnerships best estimate of the obligation regarding the environmental issues
mentioned above; however, it is reasonably possible that the loss exposure will be in excess of the amount accrued and may be material to the Partnership.



On January 18, 2005, the Partnership had an irrevocable standby letter of credit established in the amount of $60,000 that expired on January 7, 2006, in favor of
the MDE in connection with the Plan. The letter of credit has been extended through January 7, 2007.



The General Partners engaged an unrelated third party real estate broker CB Richard Ellis, Inc. on April 7, 2005, to market the property on an exclusive basis for a
six month period. The Partnership will seek to obtain from any potential buyer as complete an indemnification as possible for any liability in connection with remediation of the contamination of the property.



6



---

On August 5, 2005, the Partnership reported that it had concluded its bid process for its sole remaining property,
Hampton Park, located in Capitol Heights, Maryland, and accepted a bid to sell the property. On November 4, 2005, the Partnership entered into a Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement (the Sale Agreement) with Recycland, LLC (the
Recycland).



The Sale Agreement provided that Recycland
would pay approximately $3,200,000 to the Partnership, taking into account anticipated offsets under the Sale Agreement for the cost of a pollution legal liability insurance policy covering certain environmental liabilities and the cost of a
fixed price to closure contract with Gannett Fleming Project Development Corporation and EMG Corporation to complete the environmental remediation work through and including the issuance of a Certificate of Completion by the MDE. The
Sale Agreement provided that Recycland would continue the remediation work and indemnify the Partnership for certain environmental liabilities and performance obligations. Pursuant to the Sale Agreement, Recycland had an opportunity to conduct due
diligence and to terminate the agreement for any reason until one business day before closing.



On November 15, 2005, Recycland terminated the Sale Agreement in accordance with sections 4.5 and 13.4 of the Sale Agreement.



In light of the termination of the Sale Agreement and other information, the Managing
General Partner has changed its estimated liquidation date of the Partnership from December 31, 2005 to December 31, 2006. As a result, at this time the Managing General Partner has estimated an increase in future liquidating costs of approximately
$475,000 or approximately $9.00 per limited and equivalent participating unit of the Partnership.



The General Partners intend to remarket the property in 2006 once additional environmental testing and remediation work is undertaken. The Partnerships
liquidation and dissolution will proceed upon the sale of the Hampton Park property.



Net assets in liquidation decreased approximately $375,000 during the year ended December 31, 2005. The decrease was mainly due to the increase in liquidation accruals due to the fact that the Partnership has changed its
estimated liquidation date from December 31, 2005 to December 31, 2006. As a result, at this time the Managing General Partner has estimated an increase in future liquidation costs of approximately $475,000 or approximately $9.00 per limited and
equivalent participating unit of the Partnership.



Watson & Taylor
Management, Inc. (WTMI), an affiliate of the individual general partners is responsible for the day-to-day operation of the property, including the supervision of the on-site managers and the establishment of rental policies and rates
for new rentals and renewals and directs the marketing activity for the property under a management agreement (Management Agreement) entered into with the Partnership. The Management Agreement may be terminated by either party with 60
days written notice, with or without cause, and can be terminated upon a sale of the property. WTMI receives 4.5% of the propertys gross revenues (as defined in the Management Agreement) as a management fee.



B.  Summary of Significant Accounting Policies



Basis of accounting



The Partnership adopted the liquidation basis of accounting effective October 1, 1996. Accordingly, the net assets of the Partnership
at December 31, 2005 and 2004 are stated at liquidation value, i.e., the assets have been valued at their estimated fair values, net of selling expenses, and the liabilities include estimated amounts to be incurred through the date of liquidation of
the Partnership, which is in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Due to the nature of the Hampton Park environmental issue, the date of liquidation is uncertain; however, the Partnership has utilized a
December 31, 2006 date for purposes of estimating costs through the conclusion of liquidation reflecting the Managing General Partners best estimate. The actual remaining net proceeds from liquidation will depend upon a variety of factors and
are likely to differ from the estimated amounts reflected in the accompanying financial statements. The Partnerships fiscal year for both book and tax purposes ends on December 31.



The financial statements of the Partnership have been prepared on the liquidation basis of accounting in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Such principles require the General Partners to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results



7



---

could differ from those estimates. The Partnerships application of these polices involves judgment regarding the estimated date of liquidation and the property
held for sale. A change to the assumption date or the property value could materially impact the financial statements.



Certain balances from the prior period have been reclassified to conform with the current financial statement presentation.



Income taxes



The Partnership is not required to provide for, or pay, any Federal or state income taxes. Income tax attributes that arise from its
operations are passed directly to the individual partners. The Partnership may be subject to other state and local taxes in jurisdictions in which it operates.



Profit and loss allocations and distributions



Income from a Terminating Sale, as defined in the Amended and Restated Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership (the Partnership Agreement), is
allocated first to all partners having negative capital account balances, to the extent of such balances, and then to the limited partners until their capital accounts equal their Adjusted Capital Contribution plus a Cumulative Preference as those
terms are defined in the Partnership Agreement. Sales proceeds from a Terminating Sale are first used for the payment of any debts or obligations of the Partnership, then any balance remaining is distributed to the partners having positive capital
account balances.



PBP has waived its right to share in any limited
partner cash distributions and allocations of the Partnerships profits and losses with respect to the 258 equivalent units it holds (see Note E).



C.  Property Held for Sale



The Partnerships property as of December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 consisted solely of Hampton Park, a mini-warehouse facility located in Capitol Heights,
Maryland. It is uncertain at this time what the Partnership will ultimately realize from the sale of the property due to the propertys environmental issue (see Note A). However, the carrying amount of the property appears to be recoverable
based on the most recent appraised valuation of the property reduced by estimated costs to sell and a discount associated with the uncertainty of costs to resolve the outstanding environmental issue.



D.  Net Income (Loss) From Liquidating Activities



Net income (loss) from liquidating activities consisted of the following:



|                                              |  |                              |          |   |                              |   |                            |  |   |        
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------- | -------- | - | ---------------------------- | - | -------------------------- |  | - | -------
|                                              |  | Year Ended December 31, 2005 |          |   | Year Ended December 31, 2004 |   | Year EndedDecember 31,2003
|Rental and other income                       |  | $                            | 603,880  |   |                              | $ | 579,699                    |  | $ | 589,713
|                                              |  |                              |          |   |                              |   |                            |  |   |        
|Property operating expenses                   |  |                              | 343,557  |   |                              |   | 319,580                    |  |   | 282,576
|General and administrative expenses           |  |                              | 6,842    |   |                              |   | 2,933                      |  |   | 1,593  
|Estimated liquidation expenses                |  |                              | 628,945  |   |                              |   | 123,942                    |  |   | 275,042
|                                              |  |                              |          |   |                              |   |                            |  |   |        
|                                              |  |                              | 979,344  |   |                              |   | 446,455                    |  |   | 559,211
|                                              |  |                              |          |   |                              |   |                            |  |   |        
|Net income (loss) from liquidating activities |  | $                            | (375,464 | ) |                              | $ | 133,244                    |  | $ | 30,502 
|                                              |  |                              |          |   |                              |   |                            |  |   |        



E.  Related Parties



PBP and its affiliates perform services for the Partnership which
include, but are not limited to: accounting and financial management, transfer and assignment functions, asset management, investor communications, printing and other administrative services. PBP and its affiliates receive reimbursements for costs
incurred in connection with these services, the type of which is limited by the provisions of the Partnership Agreement. PBP is a wholly owned subsidiary of Prudential Securities Group, Inc. (PSG).



Affiliates of Messrs. Watson and Taylor, the individual General Partners, also perform
certain administrative and monitoring functions on behalf of the Partnership for which they receive cost reimbursement.



8



---

Additionally, WTMI receives 4.5% of the propertys gross revenues (as defined in the Management Agreement) as
a management fee. Such management fees totaled approximately $24,000, $25,000 and $26,000 for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.



In conjunction with the liquidation basis of accounting, the Partnership has recorded an accrual as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 for the estimated costs
expected to be incurred to liquidate the Partnership. Included in these estimated liquidation costs is $112,000 and $139,000 as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, expected to be payable to the General Partners and their affiliates during
the anticipated remaining liquidation period. The actual charges to be incurred by the Partnership will depend primarily upon the length of time required to liquidate the Partnerships remaining net assets, and may differ from the amounts
accrued as of December 31, 2005.



PBP and the individual General
Partners of the Partnership own 258, 130 and 130 equivalent limited partnership units, respectively. PBP receives funds from the Partnership, such as General Partner distributions and reimbursement of expenses, but has waived all of its rights
resulting from its ownership of equivalent limited partnership units. Accordingly, the 258 units owned by PBP are not part of the 51,560 limited and equivalent units which receive distributions and allocations of the Partnerships profits and
losses.



PSG, an affiliate of PBP, owns 180 limited partnership units at
December 31, 2005 for which no such waivers on profit participation are in effect.



F.  Income Taxes



The following is a
reconciliation of net income (loss) for financial reporting purposes to net income for tax reporting purposes:



|                                                            |  |                                |          |   |      |   |          |      |  |   |          |  
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | -------- | - | ---- | - | -------- | ---- |  | - | -------- | -
|                                                            |  | For the year ended December 31 |         
|                                                            |  | 2005                           |          |   | 2004 |   |          | 2003 | 
|Net income (loss) for financial reporting purposes (a)      |  | $                              | (375,464 | ) |      | $ | 133,244  |      |  | $ | 30,502   |  
|Estimated liquidation costs, deducted for books not tax     |  |                                | 628,945  |   |      |   | 123,942  |      |  |   | 275,042  |  
|Liquidation costs incurred, deducted for tax not book       |  |                                | (609,485 | ) |      |   | (175,732 | )    |  |   | (211,206 | )
|Tax depreciation and amortization in excess of book amounts |  |                                | (102,608 | ) |      |   | (102,581 | )    |  |   | (139,218 | )
|                                                            |  |                                |          |   |      |   |          |      |  |   |          |  
|Tax basis net loss                                          |  | $                              | (458,612 | ) |      | $ | (21,127  | )    |  | $ | (44,880  | )
|                                                            |  |                                |          |   |      |   |          |      |  |   |          |  



---

|(a) | Represents net income (loss) from liquidating activities which is reflected in the Statement of Changes in Net Assets as well as Note D.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The differences between the tax basis and book basis of partners capital are
primarily attributable to the cumulative effect of the book to tax income adjustments and the initial charge to partners capital of syndication costs, for book purposes, when the Partnership was formed.



9



---

PRUDENTIAL-BACHE/WATSON & TAYLOR, LTD.-2

(a limited partnership)

MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS



Critical Accounting Policies



Preparation of the financial statements and related disclosures in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles requires the application of appropriate
technical accounting rules and guidance, as well as the use of estimates. The Partnerships application of these policies involves judgments which, in and of themselves, could materially impact the financial statements and disclosures. A future
change in the assumptions or judgments applied in determining the following matters, among others, could have a material impact on future financial results. As such, actual results may differ from the estimates used by management.



Date of Liquidation



In light of the termination of the Sale Agreement and other information, the managing general partner has changed its estimated
liquidation date of the Partnership from December 31, 2005 to December 31, 2006. Due to the nature of the environmental issue, the date of liquidation is uncertain and a change to that assumption date could materially impact the financial statements
and disclosures.



Assumption Regarding the Property Held for Sale



It is uncertain at this time what the Partnership will ultimately realize from the
sale of the Hampton Park property due to the propertys environmental issue (see discussion below). Additionally, there is uncertainty regarding the ultimate costs of environmental remediation at the Hampton Park property and significant
changes to PBPs assumptions could materially impact the financial statements and disclosures.



Liquidity and Capital Resources



In
accordance with a consent statement dated September 17, 1996, the limited partners approved, during October 1996, the proposed sale to Public Storage, Inc. (Public) of all eight mini-warehouse facilities owned by the Partnership and the
liquidation and dissolution of the Partnership.



Seven of the eight
properties were sold to Public during December 1996. The Partnership continues to own the Hampton Park property located in Capitol Heights, Maryland as it was not sold to Public after Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments performed
during 1996 by MACTEC Engineering and Consulting, Inc. (MACTEC) identified detectable levels of tetrachloroethene (PCE) in the soil and ground water samples collected at the site. MACTEC, at the Partnerships request,
reported the PCE release to the Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE).



On November 21, 2000, MDE reached a determination that it was appropriate to undertake an active remedial measure at the site. MACTEC, at the request of the Partnership, submitted an application to enter the site into
MDEs Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) during March 2001. During a meeting on May 16, 2001 between the Partnership, MACTEC and MDE, to discuss MDEs comments on the Partnerships application, it was determined that the
Partnership would perform a non-invasive Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Update (Phase I Activities) and would subsequently, upon review and agreement with MDE, move to perform certain Phase II invasive sampling and analytical
procedures (Phase II Activities) with the anticipation of entering the site into the VCP. During the first quarter of 2002, MDE notified the Partnership that Phase I Activities were satisfactorily completed. Additionally, MACTEC
completed the fieldwork for Phase II activities (under a work plan that MDE reviewed) during 2002. The procedures and findings were documented in a Phase II Site Characterization and Risk Assessment Report (the Report) that was sent to
MDE on February 13, 2003. During April 2003, MDE requested supplemental soil-gas sampling procedures be performed. These procedures were performed and reported to MDE during September 2003. MDE issued a response letter, dated October 24, 2003, in
which it formally accepted the site into the VCP and informed the Partnership that some form of remedial action is required to address elevated levels of PCE in soil and ground water. The MDE approved the plan for remedial action (the
Plan) on November 24, 2004. In December 2004, an agreement was entered into with ATC Associates Inc.



10



---

(ATC), pursuant to which ATC will provide certain environmental services to perform the environmental cleanup effort as described in the Plan. As of
December 31, 2005, the Statement of Net Assets in process of liquidation reflects an accrued liability of approximately $314,000, which represents the Partnerships best estimate of the obligation regarding the environmental issues mentioned
above; however, it is reasonably possible that the loss exposure will be in excess of the amount accrued and may be material to the Partnership.



On January 18, 2005 the Partnership had an irrevocable standby letter of credit established in the amount of $60,000 that expired on January 7, 2006, in favor of
the MDE in connection with the Plan. The letter of credit has been extended through January 7, 2007.



The General Partners engaged an unrelated third party real estate broker CB Richard Ellis, Inc. on April 7, 2005, to market the property on an exclusive basis for a
six month period. The Partnership will seek to obtain from any potential buyer as complete an indemnification as possible for any liability in connection with remediation of the contamination of the property.



On August 5, 2005, the Partnership reported that it had concluded its bid process for
its sole remaining property, Hampton Park, located in Capitol Heights, Maryland, and accepted a bid to sell the property. On November 4, 2005, the Partnership entered into a Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement (the Sale Agreement)
with Recycland, LLC (the Recycland).



The Sale Agreement
provided that Recycland would pay approximately $3,200,000 to the Partnership, taking into account anticipated offsets under the Sale Agreement for the cost of a pollution legal liability insurance policy covering certain environmental liabilities
and the cost of a fixed price to closure contract with Gannett Fleming Project Development Corporation and EMG Corporation to complete the environmental remediation work through and including the issuance of a Certificate of Completion
by the MDE. The Sale Agreement provided that Recycland would continue the remediation work and indemnify the Partnership for certain environmental liabilities and performance obligations. Pursuant to the Sale Agreement, Recycland had an opportunity
to conduct due diligence and to terminate the agreement for any reason until one business day before closing.



On November 15, 2005, Recycland terminated the Sale Agreement in accordance with sections 4.5 and 13.4 of the Sale Agreement.



In light of the termination of the Sale Agreement and other information, the managing
general partner has changed its estimated liquidation date of the Partnership from December 31, 2005 to December 31, 2006. As a result, at this time the managing general partner has estimated an increase in future liquidating costs of approximately
$475,000 or approximately $9.00 per limited and equivalent participating unit of the Partnership.



The General Partners intend to remarket the property in 2006 once additional environmental testing and remediation work is undertaken. The General Partners intend
to liquidate the Partnership subject to the Hampton Park property first being sold, and will distribute any remaining funds after payment of and reserves for all expenses and liabilities.



In conjunction with the liquidation basis of accounting, the Partnership has recorded
an accrual as of December 31, 2005 for the estimated costs expected to be incurred to liquidate the Partnership. Due to the nature of the Hampton Park environmental issue, the date of liquidation is uncertain. However, as mentioned above, the
Partnership has utilized a December 31, 2006 date for purposes of estimating costs through the conclusion of liquidation reflecting the Managing General Partners best estimate. The actual charges to be incurred by the Partnership will depend
primarily upon the length of time required to liquidate the Partnerships remaining net assets, and may differ from the amounts accrued as of December 31, 2005.



Net assets in liquidation decreased approximately $375,000 during the year ended December 31, 2005. The decrease was mainly due to the
increase in liquidation accruals due to the fact that the Partnership has changed its estimated liquidation date from December 31, 2005 to December 31, 2006. As a result, at this time the managing general partner has estimated an increase in future
liquidation costs of approximately $475,000 or approximately $9.00 per limited and equivalent participating unit of the Partnership.



As of December 31, 2005, the Partnership has cash and cash equivalents of approximately $1,609,000, which is sufficient to meet the working capital requirements of
the Partnership for the foreseeable future. The future liquidation and dissolution of the Partnership will result in the sale of the Hampton Park property and any other Partnership assets and the distribution to the Limited Partners, after payment
of and reserves for all expenses and liabilities, of the net sales proceeds and remaining cash.



11



---

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations



As of December 31, 2005, the Partnership had not utilized special purpose entities to facilitate off-balance sheet financing
arrangements and has no loan guarantee arrangements or off-balance sheet arrangements of any kind other than those that are not likely to have a material current or future effect on the Partnerships financial position.



The Partnerships contractual obligations are primarily with service providers
such as PBP, WTMI, ATC, registered public accounting firms, etc. A summary of the Partnerships significant contractual obligations as of December 31, 2005, follows:



|                        |         |                  |   |           |  |           |        |                  |   |        |  |   |  
|----------------------- | ------- | ---------------- | - | --------- |  | --------- | ------ | ---------------- | - | ------ |  | - | -
|Contractual Obligations
|Payments due by period 
|Total                   |         | Less than 1 year |   | 1-3 years |  | 3-5 years |        | More than5 years
|$                       | 570,000 |                  | $ | 467,000   |  | $         | 90,000 |                  | $ | 13,000 |  | $ | 
|                        |         |                  |   |           |  |           |        |                  |   |        |  |   |  



Results of Operations



As a result of the Partnership adopting the liquidation basis of accounting in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as of October 1, 1996, and thus not reporting results of operations thereafter, there is no management discussion comparing the corresponding 2005, 2004 and 2003 periods.



12



---

OTHER INFORMATION



The Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is available to limited partners without charge upon written
request to:



Prudential-Bache/Watson & Taylor, Ltd.-2

Enterprise Discontinued Business Solutions

751 Broad Street, 2nd
Floor

Newark, NJ 07102-3714



13