alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23c

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of BellSouth Corporation listed below

     -    Form S-3 (File No. 333-120170)

     -    Form S-3 (File No. 333-117772)

     -    Form S-8 (File No. 333-115035)

     -    Form S-8 (File No. 333-115036)

     -    Form S-8 (File No. 333-115034)

     -    Form S-8 (File No. 333-129985)

of our report dated March 3, 2005, relating to the financial statements of
Omnipoint Facilities Network II, LLC, which appears in the Form 10-K of Cingular
Wireless LLC for the year ended December 31, 2005.  Our report is referenced in
the report on the consolidated financial statements of Cingular Wireless LLC
which is included in this Form 10-K of BellSouth Corporation.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Seattle, Washington
February 24, 2006
#### ERRINGTON *v.*MISSOURI.

No. 157.

Decided October 8, 1962.

*Walter A. Raymond*and *Kenneth C. West*for appellant.

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1430 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1430

 Expressing support for the goals of the National Step Up For Kids Day 
 by promoting national awareness of the needs of the children, youth, 
and families of the United States, celebrating children, and expressing 
   the need to make their future and well-being a national priority.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 11, 2008

   Mr. Loebsack (for himself and Mr. Platts) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and Labor

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for the goals of the National Step Up For Kids Day 
 by promoting national awareness of the needs of the children, youth, 
and families of the United States, celebrating children, and expressing 
   the need to make their future and well-being a national priority.

Whereas there are approximately 73 million children in the United States;
Whereas nine million children are without health insurance and do not receive 
        timely or comprehensive medical attention;
Whereas three million children are reported abused or neglected each year, 
        thousands of whom are killed or severely injured;
Whereas more than 13 million children and youth live below the poverty level;
Whereas millions of children and youth are unsupervised at the end of the school 
        day and would benefit from participation in quality after school 
        programs;
Whereas millions of infants, toddlers, and preschoolers lack access to 
        affordable, high-quality early care, and education;
Whereas safe, nurturing, and stimulating experiences in the first years of life 
        promote school-readiness, future academic success, and other positive 
        social outcomes; and
Whereas the future success, health, prosperity, and security of our Nation 
        depend on an educated, healthy, and secure citizenry, all of which is 
        founded in childhood: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes that wise investments in children will lead 
        to a better-educated citizenry and a more competitive workforce 
        in the United States;
            (2) supports the goals and ideals of the National Step Up 
        For Kids Day;
            (3) recognizes that every child matters; and
            (4) encourages the citizens of the United States to make 
        children, youth, and families a priority throughout the year.
                                 <all>
```
#### Josephine Rodriguez, Appellant, v City of New York, Defendant, and Anthony Carillo et al., Respondents.

[633 NYS2d 974]

—Appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.), dated September 27, 1994.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Lerner at the Supreme Court. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Ritter, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
From: Trust.Jesus@mchsi.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: *** Comment: RIN 1210-AB44 ***

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:24:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Alan Henderson

Springfield, MO 65803
#### George W. Wildrick, v. Martin O’Donnell.

Motion for reargument denied, without costs.

Bradley, J., not sitting.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

 

We consent tothe incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No.33-58570) pertaining to the 1983 Incentive Stock Option Plan of Intrusion Inc.and the 1987 Incentive Stock Option Plan of Intrusion Inc., the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8, No. 333-60928) and the Registration Statement (Form S-8,No. 333-57948) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan of Intrusion Inc., asamended, the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-34484) and theRegistration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-90408) pertaining to the 1995Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan of Intrusion Inc., as amended, theRegistration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-42927) pertaining to the 1997 EmployeeStock Purchase Plan of Intrusion Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8,No. 33-80898) pertaining to the 401(k) Savings Plan of Intrusion Inc. and theRegistration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-53813) pertaining to the EssentialCommunication Corporation 1996 Stock Option Plan of our report dated January28, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofIntrusion Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2003.

 

 

 

**Ernst & Young LLP**

Dallas, Texas

March 26, 2004

 

 

----
CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Material Technologies, Inc. (the
Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert M. Bernstein,
Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
August 18, 2008




/s/ Robert M.
Bernstein


Robert M.
Bernstein,


Chief
Executive Officer, President, and


Chief
Financial Officer
# 

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-97047

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  331                                                               Trade Date: 9/02/03

(To Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2002 &

  Prospectus dated August  8, 2002)                                                                     Issue Date:  9/05/03

The Date of this Pricing SupplementSeptember  2, 2003

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP                                                                                                                                Date and terms of redemption or

     or        Stated                                                                  Interest                                    repayment (including any

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment  Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)               Maturity                Public (2)                Commissions      Frequency      Option     Yes/No                record dates)

14911QPU9     5.05%                       09/15/12           100%                    1.6%                  Quarterly           YES           YES               Callable at 100% beginning 09/15/05

                                                                                                                                                                                                                    and quarterly thereafter.                                                         

                          

Principal                                                                                1st Payment Day         

Amount                   Proceeds                 Dealer                            Date                  Count

$3,963,000.00                $3,899,592.00         ABN AMROInc.                 12/15/03                 30/360    

Original Issue Discount Note:                                                                   Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                   N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $251.867 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated August 8,2002.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6306

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOHN WESLEY INGRAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., 

Chief District Judge. (1:03-cr-00372-JAB-1)

Submitted: May 26, 2011 Decided: June 1, 2011

Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Wesley Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Michael Hamilton, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

John Wesley Ingram appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. United States v. Ingram, No. 1:03-cr-00372-JAB1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 11, 2011). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
From: panamaana@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:26:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ana Collins

El Paso, TX 79912
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1330 

Commending the recent decision of the Supreme Court of the United States 

in District of Columbia v. Heller for upholding the right of the individual 

to keep and bear arms under the second amendment of the Constitution. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2008 

Mr. SALI (for himself, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mrs. DRAKE, Mr. CHABOT, 

Mrs. MILLER of Michigan, Mrs. MUSGRAVE, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. DAVID DAVIS of Tennessee, Mr. WILSON of South 

Carolina, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. HALL of Texas, Mr. 

GINGREY, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. 

PEARCE, Mr. SCALISE, Mr. SHULER, Mr. BUYER, and Mr. CALVERT) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the recent decision of the Supreme Court of 

the United States in District of Columbia v. Heller for 

upholding the right of the individual to keep and bear 

arms under the second amendment of the Constitution. 

Whereas the second amendment of the Constitution states, 

‘‘A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security 

of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear 

Arms, shall not be infringed.’’; 

Whereas James Madison stated, ‘‘The right of the people to 

keep and bear . . . arms shall not be infringed. A well 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1330 IH 

regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, 

trained to arms, is the best and most natural defense of 

a free country. . . .’’; 

Whereas Samuel Adams once stated, ‘‘[T]he said Constitution [shall] be never construed to authorize Congress to 

infringe the just liberty of the press, or the rights of Conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, 

who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own 

arms. . . .’’; 

Whereas the right to keep and bear arms is now an indisputable individual right; 

Whereas Congress must be vigilant to safeguard the second 

amendment, which is as valuable today as it was at the 

birth of the Nation; 

Whereas the Supreme Court opinion in District of Columbia 

v. Heller reflects the view of our Founding Fathers that 

law-abiding citizens have the right as individuals to defend their lives, families, and property; and 

Whereas no laws shall infringe on the right of law-abiding 

citizens to keep and bear arms: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives com2 mends the recent decision of the Supreme Court of the 

3 United States in District of Columbia v. Heller for uphold4 ing the right of the individual to keep and bear arms under 

5 the second amendment of the Constitution. 

Æ 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 2ND
QUARTER 1999 FORM 10-Q/A UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q/A
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           4,498
<SECURITIES>                                    26,497
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,177
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,455
<PP&E>                                          19,810
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,294
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            78
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,371
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,760
<SALES>                                         24,820
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,820
<CGS>                                           13,757
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,437
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,043
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,613
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,430
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,430
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29


</TABLE>
From: Byron L Davis

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Fair and important access

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:28:20 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

--
****FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED****NOTE EXTENSION AGREEMENT****

This First Amended and Restated Extension Agreement (the "Agreement")is made effective as of November 23, 2000 (the "Effective Date") by andbetween SGI International, a Utah Corporation ("SGI" or the "Company")and the A. H. Kerr Foundation ("hereinafter Kerr").
**RECITALS**
**A.**SGI has issued a promissory note to Kerr on April 14, 1999(the "Note") and the due date has passed, although the parties orally agreedto extend the due date; and, 
B. Company and Kerr formally extended the due date on such Note to andincluding November 23, 2000, all on the same terms and conditions, exceptthat payment of all principal and interest was due on November 23, 2000.
C. Company and Kerr desire to extend the due date on such Note on allof the same terms, except that payment of all principal and interest willnow be due and payable on a date thirty (30) days after Companys receiptof written notice of demand by Kerr.
**AGREEMENT**
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and conditions of thisAgreement the parties do hereby agree as follows:
    1. **Extension**. SGI and Kerr hereby agreethat as of the Effective Date in consideration of the premises containedherein and for other good and valuable consideration the Note is herebyamended with the due date on such Note being hereby extended to be a datethirty (30) days after Company receives written notice of demand for paymentby Kerr with all other terms including interest at the rate set forth inthe Note continuing to accrue through the due date.
    2. **Term and Amendment**. This Agreementshall amend only the due date of the Note and all other terms and conditionscontained in the Note shall continue in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement by theirduly authorized signatories as of the day and year first written above.
SGI International, Inc.                            A. H. Kerr Foundation 
By: /S/ MICHAEL L. ROSE                 By: /S/WILLIAM A. KERR                                                             William A. Kerr