alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32(b)

| | CERTIFICATION |  | OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
| | ------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of WWA Group, Inc. (Registrant) for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (Report), I, Digamber Naswa, chief financial officer, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) | This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Registrant.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Digamber Naswa

Digamber Naswa Chief Financial
Officer

August 18, 2005

This certification accompanies this
Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to
the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for
the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This
certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written
statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained
by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

---
From: render.now@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:07:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Meza

Santa Ana, CA 92701
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 [Nos. 333-02567, 333-44119, 333-86616, 333-141470 and 333-146393] and in the related prospectuses of Cover-All Technologies Inc. and
subsidiary of our report dated March 24, 2011, with respect to the 2010, 2009 and 2008 consolidated financial statements and schedule of Cover-All Technologies
Inc. and subsidiary, included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

/s/MSPC

Certified Public Accountants and Advisors,

A Professional Corporation



New York, New York

March 24, 2011

















---
No. 159, Misc.

#### Perkins *v.*New York.

Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.
H. Res. 1426 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 11, 2008. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

(1) COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT.—Mr. Scott of Virginia. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF PLANTE & MORAN,
PLLCINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of DirectorsLNB Bancorp,
Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statements No. 33-65034, No. 333-125288, No.
333-115385, No. 333-133621, and No. 333-53210 on Form S-8 and No. 333-43441 and
No. 333-58414 on Form S-3 and 333-141580 on Form S-4 of LNB Bancorp, Inc. of our
report dated March 11, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of
LNB Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2007, and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders equity and cash flows for the year then
ended and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report
on Form 10-K of LNB Bancorp, Inc.

Auburn Hills, MichiganMarch 11,
2008

---
From: la_sasuga@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:31:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Leslie Sasuga

Bishop, CA 93514
From: Godschild168@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:20:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

RoseMary Arendt

Colorado Springs, CO 80922
No. 536, Misc.

#### Hudgens *v.*Gladden, Warden.

Supreme Court of Oregon. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 23.01


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





The Board of Directors


CommunityOne Bancorp and Subsidiaries


Charlotte, North Carolina








We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-3 of CommunityOne Bancorp and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) of our reports dated March 6, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of CommunityOne Bancorp and Subsidiaries and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reports are included in the Company’s 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.





We also consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” in the Registration Statement.





/s/ Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP





Charlotte, North Carolina


March 9, 2015
file:///C|/..._List_29-08-2011_12-55-54-352/Document%20List%2029-08-2011%2012-55-54-352_docs/EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0058.html[8/29/2011 2:37:41 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: August 29, 2011

Received: August 24, 2011

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 80eebaad

Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0018

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of

Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0018-0002

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services under

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0058

Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Address: Georgia

General Comment

I oppose the general principle of government over-regulation of the health insurance industry and

fear that the consequences for citizens and consumers will be loss of freedom of choice in the

marketplace and higher insurance costs for less effective health care.

But specifically what concerns me terribly about this Preventive Services rule is that the religious

exemption is too narrow to adequately protect the rights of those with a conscientious objection to

providing certain medicines, especially those that induce abortion.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Direct Purchases of United States Obligations by Federal Reserve Banks

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking and Currency, 1865-1974					 and 	Eighty-Fourth Congress, 1955-1957. 						*Direct Purchases of United States Obligations by Federal Reserve Banks : Hearings Before the Committee on Banking and Currency, House of Representatives, Eighty-Fourth Congress, Second Session, on H. R. 9285, February 27 and 29, 1956*,												Washington: 								Government Printing Office, 										February 27 and 29, 1956,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/724,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

May 13, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00019

- CR

Sandra Jo SMALL, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court

, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR

- 20

- 0000066 Honorable M . Rex Emerson , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

After we granted Appellant’s first and second motions for extension of time to file the brief, A ppellant’s brief was due on May 11, 2022. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6( d ). After t he twice

extended due date, Appellant filed a third motion , which sought a one

- day extension of time to file the brief , and the brief.
Appellant’s motion is granted; the brief is deemed timely filed.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 13th day of May, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000737210
<NAME> LNB BANCORP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          27,428
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         293,292
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     15,161
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          89,405
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            90,915
<LOANS>                                        276,493
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,002
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 421,603
<DEPOSITS>                                     353,455
<SHORT-TERM>                                    24,148
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,209
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,039
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,752
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 421,603
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 24,827
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,984
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   300
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                31,111
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,528
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,636
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           19,475
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      400
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 16,023
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,339
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,003
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,003
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.24
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.14
<LOANS-NON>                                        732
<LOANS-PAST>                                       725
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    942
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,832
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      449
<RECOVERIES>                                       219
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,002
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,861
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,141
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Signature Eyewear, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael Prince, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Michael Prince
----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
June 12, 2007
From: mark.outson@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment on HHS: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:11:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mark Outson

, 68832-2101
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Signature Eyewear, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael Prince, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Michael Prince
-----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
March 17, 2008