alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   | Title of Each Class of |   | Maximum Aggregate |   | Amount of |   |
|   | Securities Offered |   | Offering Price(1) |   | Registration Fee(2) |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 2.300% PowerNotes®  Due April 15, 2022 |   | $3,774,000 |   | $438.54 |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | TOTAL |   |   |   | $438.54 |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |

|     |                                    |
|-----|------------------------------------|
| (1) | Excludes accrued interest, if any. |

|     |                                                                             |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | Calculated in accordance with Rule 457(r) under the Securities Act of 1933. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | CUSIP | Aggregate | Selling | Gross | Net |   | Coupon | Coupon | Coupon | Maturity | 1st Coupon | 1st |   | Survivor's |   | Product |   |   |
|   | Number | Principal | Price | Concession | Proceeds |   | Type | Rate | Frequency | Date | Date | Coupon |   | Option |   | Ranking |   |   |
|   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 14912HRR3 | $3,774,000.00 | 100% | 1.450% | $3,719,277.00 |   | Fixed | 2.300% | Semi- | 04/15/2022 | 10/15/2015 | $12.33 |   | Yes |   | Senior Unsecured |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Annual |   |   |   |   |   |   | Notes |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
From: suestauffer@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:29:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

sue stauffer

Montgomery Village, MD 20886
H. Res. 127 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 9, 2008. 

Whereas July 7, 2008, marks the 50th anniversary of the enactment of the Alaska Statehood Act as approved by the 

United States Congress and signed by President Dwight 

D. Eisenhower; 

Whereas the Alaska Statehood Act authorized the entry of 

Alaska into the Union on January 3, 1959; 

Whereas the land once known as ‘‘Seward’s Folly’’ is now regarded as critical to the strategic defense of the United 

States and important to our national and economic security; 

Whereas the people of Alaska remain committed to the preservation and protection of the Union, with among the 

highest rates of veterans and residents in active military 

service of any State in the Nation; 

Whereas Alaska is the northernmost, westernmost, and easternmost State of the Union, encompassing an area onefifth the size of the United States; 

Whereas the State of Alaska has an abundance of natural resources vital to the Nation; 

Whereas Alaska currently provides over 16 percent of the 

daily crude oil production in the United States and has 

44 percent of the undiscovered oil resources and 36 per-
2 

•HRES 127 EH 

cent of undiscovered conventional gas in the United 

States; 

Whereas Alaska’s 34,000 miles of shoreline form a gateway 

to one of the world’s greatest fisheries, providing over 60 

percent of the country’s commercial seafood harvest; 

Whereas over 230 million acres of Alaska are set aside in national parks, wildlife refuges, national forests, and other 

conservation units for the benefit of the entire country; 

Whereas over 58 million acres are designated wilderness in 

Alaska, representing 55 percent of the wilderness areas 

in the United States; 

Whereas Alaska Natives, the State’s first people, are an integral part of Alaska’s history, and preserving the culture 

and heritage of Alaska’s Native people is of primary importance; 

Whereas the passage of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement 

Act in 1971 signaled a new era of economic opportunity 

for Alaska Natives; 

Whereas Alaska’s Native people have made major contributions to the vitality and success of Alaska as a State; 

Whereas the people of Alaska represent the pioneering spirit 

that built this great Nation and contribute to our cultural and ethnic diversity; and 

Whereas the golden anniversary, on January 3, 2009, provides an occasion to honor Alaska’s entry into the Union: 

Now, therefore, be it 
3 

•HRES 127 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes 

and celebrates the 50th anniversary of the entry of Alaska 

into the Union as the 49th State. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

VANDANA BHANDARI, *

* No. 11-632V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. * Filed: June 26, 2013

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; trivalent influenza (flu) vaccine;

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * acute disseminated encephalomyelitis

* (ADEM)

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

UNPUBLISHED DECISION1

Clifford J. Shoemaker, Shoemaker and Associates, Vienna, VA, for Petitioner;

Althea W. Davis, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

On June 24, 2013, respondent filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for 

compensation filed by Vandana Bhandari on October 3, 2011. In her petition, Ms. Bhandari 

alleged that the trivalent influenza vaccine, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the 

“Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), and which she received on October 25, 2010, caused her to 

sustain the first symptom or manifestation of the onset of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis 

(“ADEM”). Ms. Bhandari further alleges that she suffered the residual effects of these injuries 

for more than six months. Ms. Bhandari represents that there has been no prior award or 

settlement of a civil action for damages on her behalf as a result of her condition.

Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged injuries or any other 

injury or her current disabilities. 

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A. 

The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in 

awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

 

1

The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002), 

requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the 

parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other 

information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special 

master will appear in the document posted on the website.
2

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum payment of $125,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, 

Vandana Bhandari. This amount represents compensation for all damages that 

would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is 

directed to enter judgment in case 11-632V according to this decision and the attached 

stipulation.2

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Tucker McCarthy, at (202) 357-6392.

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master

 

2

Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing 

a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.
From: agiltner@smmsisters.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:13:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

andrea giltner

Rock Island, IL 61201
From: amy.mancuso@me.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:22:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Amy Mancuso

Chesapeake Beach, MD 20732
#### Robert H. Moore and others, Appellants, v. The North River Construction Company and others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
KEVIN CRAMER 

NORTH DAKOTA

WASHINGTON D.C. OFFICE:


1032 LONGWORTH BUILDING


WA5HINGTON, DC 20515


202-225-261 1 

sISMARCKOFFICE:

220 EAST ROSSER AVENUE	 CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES 

RooM32a	

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES BISMARCK, NORTH DAKOTA 5$501 

701-224-0355	 WASHINGTON, DC 20515 

October 18, 2013

FARpO OFFICE:


3217 FIECHTNER DRIVE SOUTH, Jt11TE r D


FARGO, NORTH DAKOTA 58103


701-356-2216 

MINOT OFFICE:


315 MAIN STREt-T SOUTH, SUITE 203


MINOT, NORTH DAKOTA 56701


701-839-0255 

ORAND FORKS OFFICE:


CENTEH FOR INNOVATION FOUNDATION BUILDING


4200 JAMES RAV DRIVE, OFFICE 600


CiRAND FORKS, NORTH DAKOTA 58202


701-73$-4880 

The Honorable Gina McCarthy 

Administrator 

U.S, Environmental Protection Agency 

Ariel Rios Building 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20460 

Dear Administrator McCarthy, 

The people of North Dakota breathe some of the cleanest air in the world and enjoy the lowest prices of electricity 

in the United States. As their Congressman, I am greatly concerned by your agency's plan to impose drastic new carbon 

emissions standards on coal-fired power plants. 

You should know this decision puts at risk 17,000 jobs, $3.5 billion in economic impact, and $100 million in tax 

revenue provided by the lignite coal industry in North Dakota, These figures are significant not only to North Dakota, but 

to the national interest. 

Additionally, your planned EPA listening sessions bypass our state entirely in favor of cities like San Francisco, 

Boston, and Seattle. Excluding North Dakota and every other top ten coal state prevents our citizens from speaking out on 

new regulations which could destroy their economic welfare. Fewer places on earth have greater interest or expertise in 

the coal industry than our communities. 

I request the EPA hold an additional listening session in Bismarck, North Dakota. Centrally located near six coalfired power plants, the Bismarck-Mandan community is home to farmers, engineers, accountants, machinery operators, 

environmental scientists, rangeland biologists, and truck drivers who power our industry. 

At the current burn rate, there is an 835 year supply of lignite coal under our prairies, with 120,000 of our acres 

under permit for mining. Yet we are one of very few states meeting all ambient air quality standards as prescribed by the 

EPA. Our mines take great pride and invest vast resources in protecting our environment. Coal miners and utility 

company employees not only enjoy high paying jobs, but they live here, they breathe the air, they drink the water, and 

they farm the land. 

My staff will be ready to work with yours on a Bismarck hearing. I hope you will consider giving our citizens a 

chance to be heard.

Sincerely, 

Kevin Cramer 

Mernber of Congress 

CRAMER. HOUSE.GOV
From: annamaria.hoffman@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:03:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Anna Maria Hoffman

Trabuco Canyon, CA 92679
Exhibit
35




THE BANK
OF NEW YORK MELLON (FORMERLY THE BANK OF NEW YORK)




OFFICERS’
CERTIFICATE


ANNUAL
STATEMENT OF THE TRUSTEE




CWALT,
INC.


ALTERNATIVE
LOAN TRUST RESECURITIZATION 2008-2R,


RESECURITIZATION
PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2008-2R




The
undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer of The Bank
of New York Mellon (formerly The Bank of New York) (the “Trustee”), and does
hereby further certify pursuant to Section 3.11 of the Trust Agreement for the
above-captioned Series (the “Agreement”) that:




(i)           A
review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year and
of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
supervision; and




(ii)           To
the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
calendar year.




/s/ Paul Catania
                
                Dated:
      March 9, 2009




Paul
Catania


Assistant
Vice President
H. Res. 1507 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 26, 2008. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

7110) making supplemental appropriations for job creation 

and preservation, infrastructure investment, and economic 

and energy assistance for the fiscal year ending September 

30, 2009, and for other purposes. All points of order against 

consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under 

clause 10 of rule XXI. The bill shall be considered as read. 

All points of order against the bill are waived. The previous 

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final 

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 

debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 7110 pursuant to 

this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 
2 

•HRES 1507 EH 

question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the 

bill to such time as may be designated by the Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
From: rickystp@dcci.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:28:24 PM

Come on get real did you think this would pass without being vetoed?:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Richard St. Pierre

Bulverde, TX 78163