alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Green Star Mining Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending February 28, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nan
Weaver, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
20th day of April, 2009.


/s/ Nan Weaver
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TATYANA EVGENIEVNA DREVALEVA, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

NARAYAN TRAVELSTEAD 

PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION; 

TIMOTHY TRAVELSTEAD, in his 

capabilities as a President of the Narayan 

Travelstead Professional Law Corporation; 

JULIE L. CHO, in her official and individual 

capacities as an Associate Attorney of the 

Narayan Travelstead Professional Law 

Corporation; ALAMEDA HEALTH 

SYSTEM, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 23-15654 

D.C. No. 3:22-cv-02068-EMC 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 26, 2024**

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and KOH, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 29 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 23-15654 

Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva appeals pro se from the district court’s 

judgment dismissing her action alleging federal and state law claims. We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s 

judgment on the pleadings. Fleming v. Pickard, 581 F.3d 922, 925 (9th Cir. 2009). 

We affirm.

In her opening brief, Drevaleva failed to address the grounds for dismissal of 

her action and has therefore waived any such challenge. See Indep. Towers of 

Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (explaining that “we will 

not consider any claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening 

brief”). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Drevaleva’s 

requests for leave to file post-judgment pleadings because the proposed filings 

were within the scope of the pre-filing order. See Moy v. United States, 906 F.2d 

467, 469 (9th Cir. 1990) (standard of review); West v. Procunier, 452 F.2d 645, 

646 (9th Cir. 1971) (concluding that an order refusing to authorize filing of 

complaint was a “proper exercise of the district court’s authority to effectuate 

compliance with its earlier order”).

We reject as meritless Drevaleva’s contentions regarding personal 

jurisdiction and that Judge Chen’s judgment was the result of fraud or criminal 

conduct. 
3 23-15654 

All pending motions and requests are denied. 

AFFIRMED.
From: brianb0904@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:06:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Brian Beridon

Portage, MI 49002
E

C

/R Incorporated Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989

501 Eastowne Drive, Suite 250  Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514

Telephone: (919)484-0222  Fax: (919) 484-0122

MEMORANDUM

Date: August 12, 2010

To: Bruce Moore, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/CCG

From: Robert Vogt, EC/R Incorporated

Heather Brown, EC/R Incorporated

Subject: Documentation of the May 12, 2010 EPA site visit to the ExxonMobil Paluxy oil 

well and field gathering and separation site

I. INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the EPA visit to ExxonMobile’s 

Paluxy field site, which consists of approximately 250 active oil wells and a field separation and 

gathering system in the East Texas basin. 

II. LOCATION & DATE

The Paluxy field site is located near the town of Hawkins, in Wood County, Texas. The 

site visit took place on May 12, 2010.

III. ATTENDEES

API

Matt Todd

Cathe Kalisz

BP

Jeffrey A. Adams, Manager, Regulatory Affairs

ExxonMobil

Tom Monahan, Senior Regulatory Specialist
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA/OAQPS)

Alex MacPherson, Health and Environmental Impacts Division, Air Benefit and Cost Group

Bruce Moore, Sector Policies and Programs Division, Coatings and Chemicals Group

Jodi Howard, Sector Policies and Programs Division, Coatings and Chemicals Group

Nick Parsons, Sector Policies and Programs Division, Coatings and Chemicals Group

Rachel Agnew, Sector Policies and Programs Division, Measurement Policy Group

EC/R Incorporated

Heather Brown

Phil Norwood

Robert Vogt

The site visit report for this facility contains confidential business information (CBI), and 

pending approval by the facility, a non-confidential report has not been issued.
From: ronboldham@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:59:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ron Oldham

Long Beach, CA 90808
No. 362, Misc.

#### McIntyre *v.*Texas.

*John Saleh*for petitioner.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. Certiorari denied.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Prisoners in state and federalinstitutions on...**
 
SuDoc Number:J 1.42/3:SD-NPS-PSF- | J26.10:SD-NPS-PSF- | J 29.9:SD-NPS-PSF- | J 29.9/7:

Item Number:0968-H-22 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000977580
 
1978 | 1979 | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 | 1984
 
March 16, 2020
Te presentamos MiPlato

El icono MiPlato nos recuerda que necesitamos comer y beber alimentos de los cinco grupos 

alimenticios. Las Frutas, los Vegetales, los Lácteos, los Granos, y los Alimentos Ricos en Proteínas 

son importantes para una buena salud. MiPlato muestra los grupos alimenticios en distintas secciones 

del plato. ¿Significa esto que los alimentos necesitan estar separados en tu plato? ¡De ninguna manera! 

Algunos de nuestros alimentos saludables favoritos son una mezcla de grupos alimenticios. ¿Qué 

grupos alimenticios hay en un emparedado o en un taco?

Juego de combinación MiPlato

Dibuja una línea desde cada sección de MiPlato hasta los alimentos correspondientes debajo. 

¿Sabías que...?

Las habichuelas pertenecen 

a dos grupos alimenticios: las 

proteínas y los vegetales. Entre 

las muchas maneras de comer 

habichuelas, a los niños les 

encanta comerlas en burritos, 

tacos, chile, salsas 

y quesadillas.

Padres

Llene la mitad de su plato con frutas y vegetales. 

Es una manera fácil de asegurarse que usted 

(y su familia) ingieran la cantidad requerida. Para 

obtener más información sobre MiPlato visite:

http://www.choosemyplate.gov/en-espanol.html

: naranja. VEGETALES: ensalada FRUTAS Respuestas: 

: ALIMENTOS RICOS EN PROTEÍNAS n. Í de jard

: leche. LÁCTEOS frijoles. GRANOS: arroz. 

Mayo 2014 • FNS-471-B-S • USDA es un proveedor y empleador que 

ofrece oportunidad igual para todos. http://teamnutrition.usda.gov
Ayuda a tu familia a preparar un menú de cenas para la semana.

Visita http://www.choosemyplate.gov/en-espanol.html para aprender qué 

alimentos pertenecen a cada grupo alimenticio. Visita nuestro Cajón de Recetas 

en internet: http://www.fns.usda.gov/fncs-recipe-box

Planificador de menús familiares

Ejemplo: 

Los cinco grupos alimenticios (Inclúyalos todos)

lunes

domingo

martes

miércoles

jueves

viernes

sábado

Frutas Vegetales Granos Proteínas Lácteos

Cena Espaguetis Melocotones Brócoli

Salsa de tomate

Pasta de trigo 

integral

Carne molida magra 

(92% magra, 

8% grasa) 

Leche descremada

Queso parmesano

Padres

La leche es importante. Los niños y adultos de todas las edades necesitan el calcio, las proteínas y la vitamina D que contiene la leche 

para tener huesos, dientes y músculos fuertes. Recuerde servir leche descremada o baja en grasa (1%) con las comidas. Si sirve una 

bebida de soja, verifique en la etiqueta de Información Nutricional que contenga unos 300 mg de calcio (30% del Valor Diario).
From: tom.geffre@smphs.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:06:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

sincerely and earnestly,

Chaplain Tom

Sincerely,

Tom Geffre

Jamestown, ND 58401
No. 562, Misc.

#### Anderson et al. *v.*California.

Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied.
file:///C|/..._List_29-08-2011_12-55-54-352/Document%20List%2029-08-2011%2012-55-54-352_docs/EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0050.html[8/29/2011 2:06:37 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: August 29, 2011

Received: August 24, 2011

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 80eeaec3

Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0018

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of

Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0018-0002

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services under

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0050

Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Gennifer Edwards

Address:

1717 W Maple St

Wichita, KS, 67213

Email: bgwgss@yahoo.com

Phone: 316-267-9341

General Comment

I disagree with the narrow religious exemption in the Interim Final Rule. Those business owners who

do not feel comfortable funding certain birth control methods required to be supported by the plan

should have the ability to be exempt from doing so. Many religions frown on the use of birth control

that causes spontaneous abortion and these citizens will be illegally forced to do something their

consciences are against. Please change this rule so that it is easier to opt out of that part of the

insurance arrangement.
-------------- ------- ------------------------------------------ - 

## ---

# -----'lit~&>~-~- 

# --------------

# ----~=~----**----------------------~--~er~ ~**  --- -----·---------------
----------------- -------·- ---------- ----------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------<

------------- ·------- ----·--------------------------------------------- ---- ---------------------------------·--··---- --------- -------------------------------
-- -------------------------- ·--- ---------------

---------------------------- ------ - ---------------------- --------- ---- ----------------------- ------- ---- ----------------·----------- ---------------· -- 

# SCANNED -------------- FEB Z 7 2015 - 

## '
From: mbeecham@bresnan.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:35:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mike Beecham

La Junta, CO 81050
From: ColleeninDexter@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:34:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Colleen Ross

Dexter, IA 50070
EXHIBIT 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm














The Board of Directors


Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc.:






We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-107141, 333-72277, 333-48315, 333-13167, 033-23048, 333-146388 and 333-160298) on Forms S-8 and in the registration statements (Nos. 333-13821, 033-28065, 333-42502 and 333-154521) on Forms S-3 of Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 7, 2011, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which reports appear in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc.




As discussed in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, as of January 1, 2009, the Corporation changed its method of evaluating other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities to comply with new accounting requirements issued by the FASB.








/s/KPMG LLP






Providence, Rhode Island


March 7, 2011
IV 

House Calendar No. 254 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1368 

[Report No. 110–769] 

Relating to the House procedures contained in section 803 of the Medicare 

Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2008 

Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Relating to the House procedures contained in section 803 

of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and 

Modernization Act of 2003. 

1 Resolved, That section 803 of the Medicare Prescrip2 tion Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 

3 shall not apply during the remainder of the 110th Con4 gress. 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 254 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1368 

[Report No. 110

–769] 

RESOLUTION 

Relating to the House procedures contained in secprovement, and Modernization Act of 2003. tion 803 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, ImJULY 23, 2008 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS