alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Douglas A. Lindgren, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Excelsior Private Equity Fund II, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|Date: September 20, 2004                    
|                                            
|/s/ Douglas A. Lindgren                     
|Douglas A. Lindgren, Chief Executive Officer



23
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 546 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 215
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 546

                          [Report No. 107-683]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4691) to prohibit certain 
      abortion-related discrimination in governmental activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 24, 2002

   Mrs. Myrick, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4691) to prohibit certain 
      abortion-related discrimination in governmental activities.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4691) to prohibit certain 
abortion-related discrimination in governmental activities. The bill 
shall be considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall 
be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Energy and Commerce; and (2) one motion to recommit.

                                                 House Calendar No. 215

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 546

                          [Report No. 107-683]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4691) to prohibit certain 
      abortion-related discrimination in governmental activities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 24, 2002

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
#### WILLIAM KING, Respondent, *v.*CLARA KING, Appellant, and GEORGE F. KING, Defendant.

*ISmdence*— *certificate of a surrogate as to the probate of a will*— when *sufficient*— . *Code of CM Procedure, sec.*2629.

Appeal from a judgment, entered upon tbe report of a referee.

This action was brought to compel the defendant Clara King to convey certain real estate, of which she holds the legal title, to the plaintiff and his minor son, the said George E. King, who are the alleged devisees of her deceased husband John King.

After considering other questions the General Term said: “ The objection that the will was erroneously received in evidence is not well founded. The will offered was the original, and attached to it ’was a certificate of the surrogate of the proper county, to the effect that the same ‘ was duly proved before ’ said surrogate, 1 according to law, as and for the last will and testament of the real and personal estate of the said deceased. Which said last. will and testament, and the proofs and examinations taken thereon, are recorded in this office.’ It is contended that the certificate is insufficient under section 2629 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which requires that the certificate shall state that the will has, *‘*upon due proof, been admitted to probate as a will valid to pass real or personal property, or both, as the case may be.’ The statute does not prescribe the form of the certificate; it is enough if the certificate states ih substance what the statute requires, and we think the certificate in the present case meets that requirement.”

* -» * * «

*Ira E.*Myers, for Clara King, appellant

*George E.*Loveridge, for the resyondent and defendant George F. King.

■Opinion by

Smith, P. J.;

Barker and Bradlet, JJ., concurred; Haight, J., not sitting.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs to be paid by appellant,
From: hmlvml62@ptd.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:45:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Harry Langan

Zionsville, PA 18092
From: J G

Subject: Recommendations of the Institute of Medicine, Women"s Health

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 1:03:19 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertains to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers”. These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions for even larger groups. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the

exemption to apply to religiously run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If

granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they

work.

I urge you to ensure that women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
No. 66461.

#### F. L. Kraemer & Co. and George A. Abood Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/12378, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sodium phosphate (brifisol 410) similar in all material respects to that the subject of *George A. Abood Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 1, C.D. 2270), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### L. L. Stanley v. The State.

No. 2404.

Decided October 30, 1901.

Local Option—Sale, What Is.

The exchange and delivery of a pint of peach brandy by a distiller to a customer for each bushel of peaches furnished by the latter, constituted a sale of the liquor in violation of local option in a prohibited district where the law is in force.

Appeal from the District Court of Shelby. Tried below before Hon. Tom C. Davis.

Appeal from a conviction for violating local option; penalty, a fine of $35.

No brief on file for appellant.

*RoVt A. John,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of violating the local option law, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $35.

The facts show that appellant, owner of a distillery, made a trade with prosecuting witness, by which he would exchange a pint of brandy for every bushel of peaches witness would furnish him at his distillery.

The trade was carried out. Prosecuting witness delivered the peaches, and subsequently obtained from appellant fifty-six pints of peach brandy in payment for fifty-six bushels of peaches furnished. The question presented is whether or not this is a.sale under the local option law. We deem it unnecessary to enter into a discussion of this matter, as the question was decided adversely to appellant’s contention in Keaton v. State (Texas Crim. App.), 36 S. W. Rep., 440. See also Commonwealth v. Clark, 14 Gray, 367. The facts show an evasion of the local option law, and it would be immaterial that money was not paid. The exchange of any other commodity or goods for liquor, or liquor for goods, would bring it within the operation of the law.

The judgment is affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
---

**CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND 
  CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
   PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Daniel Hunter, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
  Officer of Forge, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
  Report on Form 10-QSB of Forge, Inc., for the quarterly period ending June 30,
  2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report
  on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
  and results of operations of Forge, Inc.



By: /s/ Daniel Hunter

Name: Daniel Hunter

Title: Chief Executive Officer 
              Chief Financial Officer

Date: August 15, 2003

---
---

Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Lars Pearl, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Aurora Gold Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2011 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Lars Pearl
Dated: May 20, 2011By: Lars Pearl


Title: Chief Executive Officer and President, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer and Director





This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Balthasar Kreischer, Respondent and Appellant, v. Wilson D. Haven, Appellant and Respondent.

Order affirmed, on both appeals, without costs. Opinion fry Davis, P. J.
#### Silas Call, Respondent, v. George W. Slack, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.
Petition for exemption from compliance with 14 CFR 91.203(a) & (b) and 91.9(b) (2) for Solara 

series unmanned aircraft

06/04/2012

Contact:

Maximus Yaney

Titan Aerospace

P.O. Box 87035-1129

50 George Applebay Way, Hangar 76

Mobile: 505-750-0329

myaney@titanaerospace.us

or

Robert Carlton

604 Newport Ct. SE

Albuquerque, NM 87123

Mobile: 505-239-5967

bob@desertaerospace.com

Petition for relief

As outlined in FAA Order 8130.34B, Chapter 2, Section 1, paragraph 3, Titan Aerospace petitions FAA for 

relief from compliance with 14 CFR 91.203 (a) & (b) and 91.9(b)(2) for the Solara-series of unmanned 

aircraft (UAS). These regulations require the aircraft Airworthiness Certificate, Pilot Operating 

Handbook (POH) and operational placards and markings to be located in the aircraft cabin or cockpit. 

Our petition is to allow the documents to be maintained at the ground-based pilot station for immediate 

access by the pilot and crew. The location of this station is specified in the aircraft Program Letter.

Reason for seeking relief

The Solara aircraft are lightweight solar/electric unmanned aircraft systems. The location requirement 

for these documents is for the purposes of the pilot, crew and passengers. As the Solara aircraft are

unmanned, location of these documents in the aircraft is impractical and contrary to safe operation.

Extent of relief

The documents specified will be maintained at the pilot flight station, the location of which is specified 

in the aircraft Program Letter or other FAA approved documents.

Benefit to the public

This petition will benefit the public as a whole by allowing the operation of the Solara aircraft, which will 

provide communication and surveillance services to public, private and government organizations.

Equivalent level of safety

This exemption will enhance the safety of the flight operations by allowing the pilot immediate access to 

the documents.
Summary

Titan Aerospace petitions FAA for relief from compliance with 14 CFR 91.203 (a) & (b) and 91.9(b)(2) for 

the Solara series of unmanned aircraft (UAS). These regulations require the aircraft Airworthiness 

Certificate, Pilot Operating Handbook (POH) and operational placards and markings to be located in the 

aircraft cabin or cockpit. Since the Solara aircraft are unmanned, placing these documents in the cockpit 

or cabin is impractical and contrary to safe operation. Titan Aerospace petitions FAA for relief of these 

regulations by allowing the documents to be maintained at the ground-based pilot station for 

immediate access by the pilot and crew. This petition is submitted in accordance with the guidelines 

established in FAA Order 8130.34, Chapter 2, Section 1, paragraph 3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000737717
<NAME> ADVANCED TOBACCO PRODUCTS INCL
<CURRENCY> DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          84,918
<SECURITIES>                                 1,007,837
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               322,352
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,484,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,528
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,952,136
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,481,470
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,484,998
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (14,957)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,957)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.002)
        

</TABLE>
Wachovia Bank, National
Association


201 S College Street,
8th
Floor


Charlotte, NC
28244-1067




WACHOVIA
      BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION Logo
            Wachovia
      Securities






1123
SERVICER’S CERTIFICATE
 
 
 Reference
is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of April
11, 2007, by and among Structured Asset Securities Corporation, II, as
Depositor, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR
Partners, Inc., as Special Servicer, LaSalle Bank, National Association, as
Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2007-C2 (the "Agreement").  Capitalized terms used herein not
otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the
Agreement.
 
 Pursuant
to Section 3.13 of this Agreement, Marilyn Addison and David J Shay, Director of
Compliance and Third Party Oversight and Director of Strategic Initiatives do
hereby certify that:
 
 1.
              A
      review of the activities of  the  Master Servicer
      during the period from January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008 and
      of its performance under the Agreement during such period has been
      made under our supervision; and
 
 2.
              To
      the best of our knowledge, based on such review,  the Master
      Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all
      material respects throughout the period January 1, 2008 through December
      31, 2008.
 IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate as of the
10th
day of March 2009.
    /s/ Marilyn
      Addison
              
              /s/ David J
      ShayMarilyn
      Addison, Director
              
              David J Shay,
      DirectorWachovia Bank
      National Association
              
              Wachovia Bank
      National Association
    O:\shared\sp\INCOME\Compliance
and Third Party Oversight\2008 Compliance\Wachovia Compliance\Annual
Certifications\Certificate _ 0309\Certificate _0309\2007 Requirement\Signed Word
Docs\LBUBS2007-C2.doc