alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Second Division,

August 6, 1959

No. 63282.

protests 58/64 and 58/65 (Norfolk).

#### Race Chemical Equipment Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal dialysers and parts thereof the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Keer, Maurer Co.*v. *United, States*(40 Cust. Ct. 247, C.D. 1990), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: crwells2001@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:37:25 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

In the strongest way possible, I urge that you rescind the unjust and coercive mandate that all

"contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to

patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations

that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections to these procedures.

With many other persons of faith and moreal conviction, I strongly oppose the government's forcing

free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices that can cause an abortion such

as ella and Plan B).

In addition, I urge you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic

conscience protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to

providing such insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience

laws which prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on

moral or religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to

only include churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have

conscience objections will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being

able to offer employees health insurance. James Madison, the father of the U.S. Constitution,

summarized our concerns more than 200 years ago: "The civil rights of none, shall be abridged on

account of religious belief or worship, nor shall any national religion be established, nor shall the full and

equal rights of conscience be in any manner, or on any pretext infringed."

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize sterilization services and contraceptives, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of unborn children. No Americans should be forced by the

federal government to subsidize services they find morally reprehensible. Again I urge you in the

strongest way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of

mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

Richard Wells

Humboldt, TN 38343
233 South Wacker Drive 23rd Floor WHQFO, Chicago, IL 60606

February 1, 2017

Docket Management Facility 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590

Subject: Renew Exemption 10776A

Regulatory Docket No.: FAA-2000-8525

Regulatory Reference: 14 CFR Part 121 Section 121.135(a)(3)

Dear Sir or Madam:

In accordance with the provisions of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 11, Section 11.25, 

United Airlines, Inc. (United) petitions for renewal of Exemption No. 10776A as amended, from May 31, 

2017 to May 31, 2019.

Exemption 10776A, as amended, exempts United from the provisions of 14 CFR § 121.135(a)(3), which 

requires all certificate holders to “have the date of last revision on each page” of each manual required by 

§ 121.133. Section 121.133 requires “a manual for the use and guidance of...ground operations and 

management personnel in conducting its operations.”

All reasons and substantiation contained in the original petition remain the same. Additionally, there has 

been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for 

granting the original petition.

Your consideration of this request and granting of the extension prior to its termination date of May 31, 

2017 is appreciated. This extension does not set a precedent and any delay beyond the termination date 

of May 31, 2017 would be detrimental to United. If you have any questions regarding this 

correspondence, please feel free to contact this office.

Sincerely,

Ellen Birmingham

Director Flight Operations Regulatory Compliance & Quality Control

United Airlines, Inc.

Certificate CALA014A

Address: United Airlines, Inc.

233 South Wacker Drive

23rd Floor, WHQFO

Chicago, Illinois 60606

Phone: 872-825-5193

Email: ellen.birmingham@united.com
#### Plattsburgh Light, Heat and Power Company, Appellant, *v.*Plattsburgh Traction Company, Respondent.

*Plattsburgh L., H.& P. Co.*v. *Plattsburgh Traction Co.,*145 App. Div. 900, affirmed.

(Argued February 11, 1913;

decided February 25, 1913.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 6, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action to recover money alleged to be due for electric power furnished to defendant.

*Frank E. Smith*and *Thomas B. Cotter*for appellant.

*Lewis E. Carr*and *W. L. Pattisson*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett, Chase, Cuddeback, Hogan and Miller, JJ.
MEMORANDUM UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 4 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960

February 5, 2014

SUBJECT: MOVES Modeling Files for Federal Register Document EPA-R04-0AR-2012- 0851; Approval and Promulgation ofImplementation Plans and Designation of Areas for Air QualityPlanning Purposes; Georgia; Redesignation ofthe Macon, Georgia 1997 Annual FineParticulateMatterNonattainment Areato Attainment FROM: Joydeb Majumder 

# :Jf"".. Regulatory Development Section TO: File and Docket EPA-R04-0AR-2012-0851
Due to the MOVES modeling file type, the Region was unableto upload the MOVES files from Georgia's submittal to the Federal Docket Management System. An electronic copycan be viewed at the RegulatoryDevelopment Section, AirPlanningBranch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that, ifat all possible, you schedule your inspection. Please contactJoydeb Majumder, listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section oftheFebruary 5, 2014, Federal Registernotice for an appointment. The Regional Office's official hours ofbusiness are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal holidays.

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printec with Vegetable Oil Basec Inks on Recyclec Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)
From: jesusjunkie@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:23:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nick Davis

Mormon Lake, AZ 86038
[Crim. No. 2008.

First Appellate District, Division Two.

March 17, 1938.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. HENRY RODRIGUES, Appellant.

Alfred J. Hennessy for Appellant.

U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and William F. Cleary, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

NOURSE, P. J.

The defendant, with two others, was jointly charged in an information with a violation of the State Narcotic Act—having “in their possession a preparation of cocaine.” All waived trials by jury and went to trial to the court. One was acquitted, another changed his plea to guilty, and this appellant was found guilty after trial. His motion for a new trial was denied.

His sole point on appeal is that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment. There is no conflict. The three defendants were apprehended in a room rented by the one who pleaded guilty. As the officers entered, the appellant approached the window and threw some of the *394narcotics outside. They were found in the light well and were shown to have been in the same type of container as others found in the room.

The appellant’s argument is that he could not have had exclusive possession because his codefendant rented the room and must be deemed in possession of everything found there. But exclusive possession need not be shown where two or more parties are jointly charged. Here the facts fully justify the inference that appellant was in possession of so much of the drug as he threw out of the window, and that is sufficient to sustain the judgment. The judgment is fully supported by *People*v. *Sinclair,*129 Cal. App. 320 [19 Pac. (2d) 23].

The judgment and the order denying a new trial are affirmed.

Sturtevanf, J., and Spence, J., concurred.

A petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on April 14, 1938. Houser, J., voted for a hearing.
From: johnathon.m.jones@eu.navy.mil

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:08:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing insurers to cover procedures, drugs and devices that are not

medically necessary to sustain an individual's health, and I also oppose some of these because they can

cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Johnathon Jones

Fpo, AE 09626
No. 282.

#### Columbus Production Credit Association *v.*Bowers, Tax Commissioner of Ohio.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, J. William Doolittle, Joseph Kovner*and *Paul O. Ritter*for petitioner.

*Mark McElroy,*Attorney General of Ohio, *Theodore R. Saker,*First Assistant Attorney General, and *John Dilenschneider,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Supreme Court of Ohio. Certiorari denied.
#### Richard Heller, Appellant, v. Peter Fritcher *et*al., Respondents. Jane C. Moody, Appellant, v. Same, Respondents.

Order vacating injunction reversed, with ten dollars costs in each case and printing disbursements, and motion to vacate injunction denied, with ten dollars costs in each case.
From: american_fitness@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:57:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Vito Viviano

Maryville, IL 62062
No. 474, Misc.

#### Carr *v.*New York.

Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATION





I, Yaru Hang, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Flurida Group, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;





c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Dated: March 31, 2011
By:
/s/ Yaru HangYaru HangChief Financial Officer
H. Res. 1369 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 23, 2008. 

Whereas the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has cost many innocent lives and continues to bring terrible suffering to 

both peoples; 

Whereas despite the ongoing conflict, Israeli and Palestinian 

individuals and nongovernmental organizations have been 

working for decades to build bridges between the two 

peoples, to address humanitarian concerns, and to further the cause of peace; 

Whereas such individuals and nongovernmental organizations 

that are committed to nonviolence, recognize Israel’s 

right to exist, and are dedicated to achieving a two-state 

solution deserve recognition and encouragement to continue their important work; 

Whereas the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is currently at a critical juncture, and sustained progress towards peace depends on the commitment of individuals and organizations that choose dialogue, friendship, and openness; 

Whereas the Palestinian Anti-Terrorism Act of 2006 (Public 

Law 109–446) permits the provision of United States assistance to nongovernmental organizations to provide for 

basic human needs, the protection of basic human freedoms, and the promotion of human rights, nonviolence, 
2 

•HRES 1369 EH 

and for a just and peaceful reconciliation, provided that 

such assistance does not knowingly and directly benefit 

any terrorist organization; 

Whereas the initiatives of these individuals and nongovernmental organizations reflect the tenacity of those with a 

true commitment to peace, mutual respect, and coexistence, and demonstrate the real impact that such people 

can make on the lives of individuals and communities; 

and 

Whereas such initiatives build hope and trust among both 

peoples and can help pave a path to peace: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) recognizes the vital role of nongovernmental organizations in peace-building efforts between Israel and 

Palestinians, and encourages them to remain steadfast 

in their commitment to nonviolence, recognition of 

Israel’s right to exist, dedication to achieving a two-state 

solution, and work toward building trust and cooperation 

between the two peoples; 

(2) applauds the tireless work of these individuals 

and nongovernmental organizations, and urges them to 

continue their efforts; 

(3) acknowledges and encourages the important efforts and support that these nongovernmental organizations, religious organizations, and individuals committed 

to peace and nonviolence contribute to these initiatives; 
3 

•HRES 1369 EH 

(4) affirms the importance of United States support 

to nongovernmental organizations that provide humanitarian aid and work for democracy, human rights, and 

peace and reconciliation between Israelis and Palestinians; and 

(5) urges Israeli and Palestinian leaders to embrace 

the spirit of nongovernmental peace builders toward 

achieving a just and lasting peace. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Capers W. McDonald, President and Chief Executive Officer of
BioReliance Corporation (the Corporation), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:

(1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Corporation for the period
ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.

/s/ Capers W. McDonald

Capers W. McDonald
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002