T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T MAR I A Q UE S AD A, P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. M I C H A E L J . A S T R U E , C om m i s s i one rof S o ci al S ecu ri ty, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 11- 57059 D. C . No . 3 : 1 0 - c v - 0 1 1 3 9 - J M- P OR ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J e f f r e yT . M i l l e r , S e ni orD i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J a nua ry22, 2013 ** B efo re: H U G , F A R R IS , an d L E A V Y , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M a r i aQ ue s a daappe a l s the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nta f f i rm i ng the C o m m is s io n e ro f

S o c ia l S e c u r ity ’s d e n ia l o f h e rap p lic a tio n f

o rd is ab ility i ns ur a nc e be ne f

i t s unde rT i t l e I I of

the S oc i a l S e c ur i tyA c t . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on



# FI LED MA R 05 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 57059 2 u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o , B e rr yv . A s tr ue , 622 F . 3d 1228, 1231 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 1 0 ) , a n d w e a f f i rm. S ub st ant i al evi dence s up po rt s the A dm i ni stra t i ve L aw Judg e’ s ( “ A L J” ) rej ect i o n o f th e treat i n g p h ysi ci an s’ o p i n i o n s b ecau se th e ex am i n i n g p h ysi ci an s’ i nde pe nde ntc l i ni c a l f

i ndi ngs di f

f e r e d f r om the tr e a t i ng phy s i c i a ns ’ f i ndi ngs a nd th e m e d ic a l e x p e rt’s te s tim o n yu n d e rm in e d th e tr e a tin g p h y s ic ia n s ’ c o n c lu s io n s . Se e O rn v . A s tr ue , 495 F . 3d 625, 632 ( 9th C i r . 2007) ( “ [ W ] he n a n e xa m i ni ng phy s i c i a n pr ovi de s i nde pe nde ntc l i ni c a l f i ndi ng tha tdi f

f e rf r om the f i ndi ngs of

the tre at i ng ph ys i ci an, such fi nd i ng s are subst ant i al evi dence. ” ( ci t at i on and i nt ernal q u o ta tio n m a rk s o m itte d ) ) ; R eddi ck v. Cha ter , 157 F . 3d 715, 726 ( 9th C i r . 1998) (co n si st en cy o f treat i n g p h ysi ci an ’ s rep o rtw i th o th er m ed i cal fi n d i n g s i s a le g itim a te b a s is f

o re v a lu a tin g r e p o rt’s r e liab ility ) . T he A L J provi ded cl ear and conv i nci ng re as on s, supp ort ed by subst ant i al e v id e n c e , f

o rd e te rm in in g th a t Q u e s a d aw a s n o t c r e d ib le . See T on ap et yan v. H al ter , 2 4 2 F .3 d1 1 4 4 , 1 1 4 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 1 ) ( th e c la im a n t’s te n d e n c yto e x a g g e r a te i s al e gi t i m a t e c ons i de r a t i on i n de t e rm i ni ng c r e di bi l i ty ) . T he A L J ’ s r e l i a nc e on the i nc orr e c t l yda t e d di s c ogr a m w a s ha rm l e s s e rr or , be c aus e the A L J ’ s r e m a i ni ng r e a s ons f orf i ndi ng Q ue s a danotc r e di bl e c ons t i tut e s ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e s upport i ng11- 57059 3 th e f in d in g . Se e Carm i c kle v . C om m ’ r, Soc . Se c . A dm i n. , 533 F . 3d 1155, 1162- 63 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). T h e A L Jd id n o t e rrin r e ly in g o n th e te s tim o n yo f th e v o c a tio n a l e x p e rt to c onc l ude tha tQ ue s a dac oul d pe r f orm j obs tha te xi s ti n s i gni f i c a ntnum be r s i n the na t i ona l e c onom ybe c aus e the A L Ja s ke d the voc a t i ona l e xpe rtt o i de nt i f ya ny confl i ct s w i th the D i ct i on ary of O cc up at i on al T i t l es (“ D O T ”) and the vo ca t i on al e x p e rt’s s ta te m e n t th a t h e rte s tim o n yw a s in c o n f o rm a n c e w ith th e D O T is s u p p o rte d b yth e r e c o r d . Se e M as s ac hiv . A s tr ue , 48 6 F . 3d 11 49 , 11 53 (9th C i r. 20 07 ). AF F I RME D.