P. 1



# OAR Box 1784 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 54) ll-D-6 Docket Number: 

# A-84-4 4

Printed 10/31/2008 8:05:40 AM Sheet 54 of 143P. 2 

# A--84-'44 Shell Oi l Compan y One Shel l Plaz a P.O
. Bo x 432 0 Houston , Texa s 7721 0 

### Apri l 9 , 198 5

Mr . Jac k R . Fanner , Directo r Emissio n Standard s an d Engineerin g Divisio n Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlanning an d Standard s Unite d State s Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 2771 1 Dea r Mr . Farmer : A s requeste d i n you r lette r o f Januar y25 , 1985 , th e attache d informatio n o n proces s equipmen t an d associate d emissio n contro l equipmen t subjec t t o th e petroleu

mrefiner

yfue l ga s provision s o f 4 0 CFR 6 0 Subpar t J i s forwarde d fo r Shel l Oil' s Norco , LA , Wilmington , C Aan d Martinez , CA refineries
. Pleas e not e tha t onl ycos t an d supplementaryproces s infor

matio n ar e provide d fo r Norc o refinerysinc e th e balanc e o f the dat a wer e obtaine d during an EP Afiel d tri p t o tha t facility
. Ou r Wilmingto n refineryha s identifie d thre e problemarea s encountere d i n complying wit h the NSPS . Thes e ar e the dua l reporting o f informatio n t o EPAan d t o th e stat e agency , the shor t pr e start-u p notificatio n o f 3 0 t o 6 0 days , an

d possibl e difficultie s i n meetin g the "performanc e tes t dead

lin e o f start-u

p plu s 18 0 days . (Se e Sectio n i-I, pag e 1 4 o f Wilming

ton' s response ) W e believ e th e attache d dat a respond s t o al l o f th e informatio n requeste d i n EPA' s questionnaire
. However , i f clarificatio n i s require d pleas e fee l fre e t o contac t me a t (713 ) 241-1889 . Verytrul yyours ,

J//A . Mullins , Manage r Mvironmenta l Program s Environmenta l Affair s JAE/bl v Attachmen t

t,. . O ^

yv*S

<J 1P. 3



### SHEL L OI L COMPANY

MARTINE Z MANUFACTURIN G COMPLE X

RESPONS E T O EP AQUESTIONNAIR E

NSP S - PETROLEU M REFINERIE S -

FUE L GA S COMBUSTIO NDEVICE S

CR850990 6P. 4

II . FACILIT

YDESCRIPTIO

N Th e Martine z Manufacturin g Comple

x(MMC ) refiner

y fue l ga s syste

m utilize s variou s proces s stream s includin

g natura l gas , dr

y gas , proces s uni t vents , volatile s vaporize

dfro m storage , an

dvent s fro

m vapor recover

y systems . Typica l flow

s ar e Illustratedi nFigur e 1 . The stream s ar e blende

dtogethe r an droute dt o thre e separat e processin g areas : Operation s Centra l (OPCEN) , Light Oi l Processin g (LOP) , an

dHeav y Oi l Processin

g (HOP) . Figure s 2 an d 3 depic t th

e combustio

ndevice s i nLO P an dOPCEN , respectively . HOP , whic hi s not shown , contain s nine proces s heaters . I nadditio nt o blende

d refiner y fue l gas , severa l proces s heater s an dboiler s ar e equippe dto bur nlo w sulfu r fue l oi l an

dlo w BTUga s fro

m ou r Flexlcokln

g Unit . MM C ha s fou

r amine treater s whic hremov e H2 S fro

m refiner

y fue l ga s (refer t o Figur e 4) . Al l o f th e ne t dr

y ga s produceda t th e Catalyti c Crackin g Uni t i s route

dt o refiner

y fue l afte r amine treatment i ntw o paralle l Treate r Columns , Colum n10 3 an

dColum

n176 . Dr

y ga s produce

da t th

e Sat s Ga s Plan t i s treate dfor H2 S remova l i nColum n9 7 afte r whic h80 % i s used a s HydrogenPlan t No . 1 fee dga s an

dthe remainin

g 20 Z goe s t o refiner y fuel . Dr

y ga s fro

m th e Flexlcokln

g Uni t i s treate

di nColum

n21 5 and , again , 80 Z i s useda s Hydroge nPlan t No . 2 fee dan d20 Z i s sent t o refiner y fue l blending . A t MMC , Diethanolamine (DEA ) i s th e amine usedfo

r fue l ga s treating ; thre e amine regenerator s ar e usedi nparalle l t o servic e th e amine system . H2S-ric haci dga s fro m th e regenerator s i s charge dt o thre e Clau s Units . Sulfu r Plan t Nos . 1 an

d2 are adjacent unit s locate di nLigh t Oi l Process in g an dtai l ga s fro

m eac hi s combine

dan droute dto a singl e SCOT tal l ga s uni t (SCO T No . 1) . Sulfur Plan t No . 3 i s locate da t Operation s Centra l an dha s a dedicatedSCO T uni t (SCO T No . 3) . Th e quantity

o f sulfur removeda t th e fue l ga s treater s i s 3 3 LT/ D fro m Sat s Ga s Plan t Colum n97 , 1 1 LT/ D fro

m OPCE N Colum n215 , an

d2 6 LT/ D fro

m the Cat Cracke r ga s treater s Colum n10 3 an

dColum

n176 . Therefore , th e tota l i s approximatel y 7 0 LT/ D sulfur remova l fro m dr y ga s stream

s bein g processedfor refiner y fue l or hydrogenplan t feed . Becaus e th

e lea nDE A an drichDE

A header s ar e commo

nt o al l amine treaters , ther e i s n

o segregationo f sulfur-richamine 6trea m to an y particular regenerator . Sulfur Plan t No . 3 i s bas e loade dfo r 3 0 LT/ D sulfur recovery ; thi s fixe s th

e fee drat e o f richamine t o DE A No . 3 Regenerator . The remainin

g richamin e circulationi s spli t betweenDE A Nos . 1 an

d2 Regen erators , s o tha t Sulfur Plan t Nos . 1 arid - 2 proces s about 2 0 LT/ D each.o f th e remainin

g sulfur remove

dfro m ga s treating . I nadditio nt o amine aci d gas , Sulfur Plan t Nos . 1 an d2 als o proces s aci dga s fro m sou r wate r strippers ; Sulfu

r Plan t No . 3 canno t proces s sou r wate r aci dgas .

- 1III . COST S P. 5

The followin

g cos t informatio nha s beeninclude dfo r ou r fou

r amin e treaters :

b . c . Ite

m Purchas e Cost 1 / Yea r Purchased Installatio

nCost£ ' Annua l Operatin

g Cost s Labo r Cost s Hours/Da

y 

## $/Hour£ / Material s Replacemen t Part s Chemical s Gallon s $/Gallo n Sulfur Credit^ /

Stea m 

### Lb/H r Pressure , psi g Temperatur e Electricity^ ^ Wate r Col . 9 7 Sat 6 Ga s Treate r $14,53 5 196 5 $29,00 0 $23,60 0 

### 3. 0 $21.5 5 $1,50 0 $25,21 5 6,15 0 $4.1 0 $915,40 0

Col . 10 9 Strippe r No . 1
6,30 0 

### 5 0 32 5 $150,00 0 

### N A Col . 10 3

CC UGa s Treate r $11,99 4 196 5 $24,00 0 $9,45 0 

### 1. 2 $21.5 5 $1,00 0 $20,50 0 5,00 0 $4.1 0 $360,60 0

Col . 17 5 Strippe r No . 2
6,70 0 

### 5 0 32 5 $150,00 0 

### N A Col . 17 6

CC UGa s Treate r 

### N A 197 3 

### N A $9,45 0 

### 1. 2 $21.5 5 $1,00 0 $20,50 0 5,00 0 $4.1 0 $360,60 0

Col . 24 0 Strippe r No . 3
6,70 0 

### 5 0 32 5 $150,00 0 

### N A Col . 21 5

OPCE N Treate r $62,70 0 198 1 $125,00 0 $23,60 0 

### 3. 0 $21.5 5 $1,50 0 $14,78 5 3,85 0 $4.1 0 $305,14 0

d . Ke y Accountin

g Factor s Lifetim e o f equipmen t - 2 0 year s Equipmen t amortizationan ddepreciationrat e - 5 2 Tota l 198 4 labor/managemen t charge s - $4 2 M M Overhea drat e - 11.54 % of ne t manufacturing expens e an dvariabl e cost ) (tota l fixe d

1/ Purchas e cos t include s vesse l an dinternals . Cos t o f initia l chemica l inventor

y no t available . ?J Installatio

ncos t i s estimatedan dinclude s foundation , instrumenta tion , an

dlabor . 3/ Hourl y

rat e include s burden . 4 / Credi t base

do nsulfu

r balanc e an

d$76/L T o f recoveredsulfur . ][ / Electricity

co6t s base

do n30 0 HP .

- 2 -P. 6

IV . REFINER

YCOMBUSTIO

N DEVICE S 1 . Ou r refiner

y ha s 4 4 proces s heater s an d4 boiler s whic hbur nrefiner

y fue l gas . 2 . Typica l example s an drange s fo

r proces s heater s an dboiler s ar e liste d below : Proces s Heater s Boiler s



### 3 . a . BT

URating , M

M BTU/H R(Released ) Refiner y Fue l Gas , MMSCFD b . Capita l & Operatin g Cost s Hour s o f Operation , Day s pe r Yea r Typ e o f Operation HR/ D Typica l Rang e 9 3 6-59 9 2. 5 0.2-16. 0 No t Availabl e 2 4 2 4 36 5 36 5 Continuou s

—- 8 0 0-9 0 0 0-49 0 Typica l Rang e 23 2 232-26 9 2. 3 0.5-7. 2 No t Availabl e 2 4 2 4 36 5 36 5 Continuou s 5 2 50-5 4 5 0 0-9 0 22 8 0-39 0 d . CC ULow BTUGas 1 / % o f Dut y FX ULo w BTUGas^ / % o f Dut y Low Sulfur Fue l Oil , B/ D 1/ C O e xCC

URegenerato r burnedi n3 C O Boiler s only . 21 Lo w BT UGa s exFX

Uburne donl y i nheater s liste

di nSectionIV-3 . Listedbelo

w ar e ne w an dmodifiedcombustio ndevice s whic har e subjec t t o th e NSPS. No step s wer e takent o compl y wit hth

e NSP S becaus e the existin g H2 S leve l (usin

g existin

g amine treaters ) wa s acceptable . Equipmen t 

### No . F-4 0 F-41 A F- 4 I B F-4 9 F-5 0 F-5 1 F-5 9 F-7 0 F-7 1 F-10 2 F-10 4 F-12 6 F-12 8 BT U Rating ,

M M BTU/Hr . Rel . 

### 23 8 11 3 11 3 12 0 15 6 7 7 

### 10 4 26 9 10 0 8 4 

### 34 7 14 7 9 0 Servic e

Crud e Heate r Vacuu mFlashe r Heate r Vacuu mFlashe r Heate r Ca t Reforme r Preheate r Ca t Reforme r Interheate r Ca t Reforme r Interheate r Hydrocracke r Reboile r Heate r Statio n Boile r Hydrocracke r Reboile r Heate r Stea mSuperheate r Stea mMethan e Reforme r Crud e Heate r Ca t Reforme r Interheate r Yea r Installe d 196 6 '196 6 196 6 196 6 196 6 196 6 196 6 197 0 197 1 198 1 198 1 198 1 198 1 Yea r

Modifie d 198 1 198 1 198 1 198 1 198 1 198 1 198 1 198 1 198 1

-

-

-

-

- 3 -P. 7

IV . REFINER

YCOMBUSTIO

N DEVICE S -2 -

4 . Withou t th

e NSPS , a

nacceptabl e maximu m limi t for H2 S i nfue l ga s woul db e 71 0 pp m t o preven t significan t advers e corrosio no f combustio

nequipment . Thi s premis e i s base do naci dde

w point an

dcontain s n

o safet y margi nfor th e estimatio

no f de

w point temperature an dheate r tubewal l temperature . Othe r constraints , suc ha s plum

e opacity

o r fue l ga s distributionsyste m corrosion , wer e no t considered . 5 . Ba y Are a Ai r Quality

Managemen t Distric t Regulatio n9 , Rul e 3 , applie s to N0 Xfro m hea t transfe r operations . Regulatio n10 , Rul e 2 , applie s t o emission s o f SO2 , N0 X , an dparticulate s fro

m new , modifiedo r reconstructed stea m generators . Regulatio n10 , Rul e 8 , applie s t o the H2 S content o f fue l ga s burne

di nnew , modified , or reconstructe dcombustio

ndevices . Thes e regulation s di dno t affec t th e designo r modificationo f the combus tio ndevice s liste

di nIV-3 .

- 4 -V . PRIMAR YCONTROL (AMIN

E TREATERS ) P. 8

Characteristic s o f th e inle t ga s to th e fou r amin e treater s are no

t available . Include dbelo w ar e typica l characteristic s an dcomposition s o f treate

dgas : Sam e Ga s Co l 9 7 Co l 1 ( Component , %

V (Typical ) H 2 C l C 2 C 3 C 4 C 5 C 6 N 2 C O CO 2 H2S , pp m Sp . Gr . LHV , Btu/SC F Refe r to Figur e 4 for a genera l schemati c o f th e amine treaters . A furthe r descriptioni s includedbelow : . v Co l 9 7 Sat s Ga s Treate r 56. 7 21. 0 

### 7. 0 3. 1 2. 2 0. 2 0 9. 8 0 0 <5 0 0.42 0 605. 3 

### Co

l 10 3 Co l 

### 17 6 CC UGa s CC

UGa s Treate r Treate r 22. 5 32. 5 22. 8 

### 5. 9 1. 1 0. 5 0 11. 9 

### 0. 7 2. 1 <5 0 0.70 5 897. 7 Co l 21 5

OPCE N Treate r 25. 2 44. 3 19. 9 

### 4. 6 0. 8 0 0 4. 4 0. 8 0 <5 0 0.59 2 910. 4

Ite m Engineerin

g Contracto r Startu pYea r Operations , Hrs/Yr Design/Actua l Ga s Rate , MMSCFD Temperature , * F Pressure , PSI G Amin e Circulation , MB/ D Lea nAmin e Temp. , ° F Co l 9 7 Sat s Ga s Treate r Fluo r 196 6 876 0
12.5/16. 0 111/9 0 160/16 0 9.6/8. 0 100/12 0 Co l 10 3

Fue l Ga s Treate r Brau n 196 6 876 0
14.4/13. 0 115/10 0 100/13 5 3.5/4. 5 100/12 0 Co l 17 6

Fue l Ga s Treate r Shel l 197 5 876 0
30.0/13. 0 115/10 0 160/13 5 10.0/8.4 - 100/12 0 Co l 21 5

OPCE N Treate r Fluo r 198 3 876 0
12.3/10. 0 70/9 0 * 163/16 0 1.9/3. 8 120/11 0 Percen t o f TreatedGa s Sen t t o Fue l Syste

m 

### 20 % 100 % 100 % 

### 20 %

- 5 -P. 9

V . PRIMAR

YCONTROL (AMIN

E TREATERS )

Design/Actua l Fee dRate , MB/ D FeedTemperature , C F Stea m t o Reboiler , MLB/H r Col . 10 9 Stripper No . 1 17.0/9. 5 105/10 0 25.0/14. 1 Col . 17 5

Stripper No . 2 21.2/10. 5 105/10 0 33.3/16. 5 Col . 24 0

Stripper No . 3 16.5/9. 0 120/11 5 24.8/15. 4 Tota l amin e inventor y for four treatin

g columns , thre e strippers , an dasso ciate dpiping , exchangers , filters , an dflas hdrum

s i s 150 0 barrel s o f 25 % w DEA . 3 . Ou r only

amine treate r installedsinc e th e NSP S wa s i neffec t i s th e OPCE N Treater , Col . 215 . Thi s type o f syste m woul dhav

e bee ninstalledregardles s o f th e NSP S becaus e a portiono f th e treate

dga s i s useda s hydrogenplan t fee dan dmus t b

e lo w i nsulfu

r content . 4 . A complet e maintenanc e histor y 6inc e startu

po f eachamine treate r i s no t available . However , th e mos t frequent maintenanc e performeddurin g main tenanc e turnaround s i s washin g an dinspectiono f th e columns . Maintenanc e turnaround s ar e alway s performe di nconjunctio

nwit hth

e shutdow

no f up strea m units . Therefore , n o exces s emission s occur . A typica l annua l make-u prat e fo r MMC i s 20,00 0 gallon s o f 85%w DEA . Amin e losse s d o no t resul t i nexces s emission s o f SO 2 fro m proces s heaters , bu t onl y affec t the rat e o f replenishment . . v The greates t proble m wit hamine system s i s continua l foaming . Foamin g i n treater s canresul t i nincreasedamine losse s b y entrainmen t wit hthe proces s ga s flow . Foamin g i nstripper s reduce s regenerationefficiency . Foaming i s controlledb y continuou s on-line filtrationo f particulat e matte r an dperiodi c injectiono f anti-foa m chemicals . 5 . Maintenanc e i s typicall y very low . Amine make-u prate s quote

db y vendor ar e no t available . Make-u prate s var

y wit hga s throughput s an dfrequenc

y o f majo r upset s an dmechanica l breakdowns . Th e typica l annua l make-u prat e i s 20,00 0 gallon s o f 85%w DEA . 6 . Record s ar e no t availabl e for th e amine treater s t o compar e scheduledversu s unscheduleddowntime . However , i t ca ngenerall y

be state

dtha t th

e amine treater s ar e ver

y reliabl e units . Shutdown s onl y occur i nconjunctionwit h maintenanc e turnaround s o f upstrea m units . Upset 6 o f th e treater s ar e rar e an do f shor t duration . 7 . I nth

e pas t we hav

e inspectedthes e amine treatin g vessel s ever

y thre e t o fiv e years . Our norma l methodo f inspectio ninclude s visua l an dU T measure ment s for thickness . Norma l inspection s ar e performedb y refiner

y inspect or s whos e qualification s excee dthos e requiredi nAP I 51 0 - Pressur e Vesse l InspectionCode .

- 6 -P.1 0

V . PRIMAR

YCONTROL (AMIN

E TREATERS )

Becaus e o f problem s experience

db y other s i nth

e industry , w

e wil l inspec t eachvesse l a t th

e next schedule

dshutdow

nfor amine cracking . Selecte d weld s wil l b

e inspectedusin

g th e we t fluorescen t magneti c particl e testin g metho d(WFMPT) . Thi s metho dwil l b

e performedb

y outside inspectio n personne l wh

o ar e qualifiedi nthi s procedur e t o ASN T Leve l I I certification . 8 . Fo r eac

hamine treate r th e concentratio

no f sulfide s i nth e richamine an

d th e concentratio

no f H2 S i nth

e treate

dga s ar e monitoreddail y t o indicat e prope r performance . Fo r eachstripper th e lea namine i s monitoreddail y fo r % w DE A an dconcentratio

no f sulfides . 9 . T o contro l H2 S i nth e treate

dga s o r sulfide s i nth e richamine , operationa l adjustment s ar e mad e t o th e circulatio

nrate s for th

e treater s an

dth e stea m rate s t o th

e strippe r reboilers .

- 7 -P.1 1

VI . SECONDAR

YCONTROL (SULFU

RPLANTS ) 1 . Th e concentrate

dH2 S stream

s fro m th e amin e treater s ar e route dto Clau s sulfu

r plant s wit hSCOT tai l ga s units . Clau s Plan t No . 1 wa s Installe

dwit hconstructio no f th

e Light Oi l Processin g facilitie s (Includin

g Sat s Ga s Treate r Colum n9 7 an dFue l Ga s Treate r Colum n103 ) i n1966 . Claus e Plan t No . 2 wa s adde di n197 4 to provid e .spar e capacity for sulfu

r recover

y operations . Clau s Plan t No . 3 wa s installe dwit h constructio

no f th

e Flexlcoke r facilitie s (includin g OPCE N Treate r Colum n215 ) i n1981 . SCOT No . 1 serve s bothClau s Plan t No . 1 an d Clau s Plan t No . 2 . SCOT No . 3 serve s Clau s Plan t No . 3 . Belo w i s a brie f descriptiono f th e plants : Clau s Clau s Clau s SCOT SCOT No . 1 No . 2 No . 3 No . 1 No . 3 Engineerin

g Contracto r Parson s Parson s Fluo r Parson s Fluor Startu pYea r 196 6 197 4 198 3 198 1 198 3 RatedCapacity , LT/ D 10 0 10 0 5 5 17 5 5 5 2 . Bot hSCO T unit s us e MDE A a s a namine solutiont o provid e mor e selectiv

e H2 S absorptionthancanb e provide

dwit hDEA . Therefore , th e tw o amine system

s ar e segregated . MDE A i s considerabl y

mor e expensiv

e thanDEA . It s highe r cos t i s justifiedfo r tai l ga s treatin g i nwhich amine inventor

y i s smal l an

dth e recovere

dga s i s recycle

dt o th e Clau s plant . . Fo r large volum e amine Inventories , sucha s i nthe refiner y fue l ga s treatin g system , MDE

A woul db

e too expensive .

- 8 -P.1 2

VII . EMISSIO

N TESTIN G 1 . N o emissio

ntest s hav

e bee nperforme

donou r amine treaters , other tha n manua l samplin

g for H2 S whichi s performedb y uni t operators . However , tota l blende

dfue l ga s I s routinel y teste dthre e time s pe r wee k b y G C analysis . Th

e test s ar e conductedb y refiner

y Quality

Assuranc e per sonne l an

dcos t approximatel y $2 0 each . Report s fo r th e firs t sampl e i neac hmontho f 198 4 hav e beenarbitraril y selecte

dan dInclude

di n th e appendix . Correspondin g flow s fo r al l fue l ga s blendin g component s o nth e appropriat e date s hav e als o beenincluded . 2 . Sourc e test s performedb y th e Ba y Are a Ai r Qualit y

Managemen t Distric t an dth e Californi a Ai r Resource s Boar do nou r C O Boiler s Nos . 1 , 2 , an d 3 an dour Boile r No . 4 hav e bee nInclude

di nthe appendix . Pollutant s include di nth

e test s ar e SO2 , N0 X , CO , an dparticulates . I naddition , MM

C personne l conducte dtest s o nth

e proces s heater s liste d belo w for NO xdurin

g June throug

hAugust , 1983 . Th e heater s are describedi nSectionIV-3 . Estimatedcost s fo r th e serie s o f test s i s $5,000 .
Equipmen t 

### No . F-4 0 F-41A F- 4 IB F-49/50/5 1 F-5 9 F-7 0 F-7 1 F-10 2 F-10 4 F-12 6 F-12 8

Equipmen t 

### No . F-4 0 F-41A F- 4 IB F-49/50/5 1 F-5 9 F-7 0 F-7 1 F-10 2 F-10 4 F-12 6 F-12 8 

### NO

x pp m 3 2 

### 2 0 2 2 2 3 4 2 9 9 2 5 3 8 3 3 1 2 2 0

N0 X 

## PP ° 4 2 

### 15 13 3 5 5 2 9 9 1 2 6 0 25 1 9 2 7 Tes t

Refiner y Fue l Gas , MMSCF D 1. 0 

### 0. 5 0. 9 1. 3 0 0 0. 4 0. 5 4. 4 1. 6 0. 5 Tes t Refiner y Fue l Gas , MMSCF D 2. 1 

### 0. 5 0. 4 2. 3 0 0 0. 4 0. 7 3. 2 0. 7 0. 4 Ru

nNo . 1 Flexlcoke r Lo w BT UGa s MMSCF D 24. 8 13. 4 10. 8 30. 1 

### 6. 1 20. 7 

### 6. 4 6. 6 27. 7 

### 7. 4 6. 5 Ru nNo . 2 Flexlcoke r Lo w BTUGa s MMSCF D 14. 8 10. 2 10. 6 16. 9 

### 6. 0 21. 7 

### 5. 8 4. 6 41. 7 15. 0 

### 5. 6 Lo

w Sulfu r Fue l Oil , 

### B/D 0 0 0 0 5 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 0

Lo w Sulfu r Fue l Oil , 

### B/D

- . 0 

### 0 0 0 6 2 37 0 0 0 0 0 0

- 9 -P.1 3

VII . EMISSIO

N TESTIN G

3 . N o stat e or loca l regulation s requir e emissiontestin g fo r existin

g source s or testin

g beyon dth e requirement s o f th e NSPS .

- 1 0 -P. M

VIII . MONITORIN

GO F EMISSION S AN

D PROCES S OPERATIO

N 2 . Ba y Are a Ai r Quality

Managemen t Distric t Regulatio n10 , Rul e 8 , require s tha t th e H2 S conten t o f fue l ga s burne dinan

y refiner

y combustio

n devic e no t excee

d0.1 0 grains/dsc f a s determinedb y continuou s monitor ing . 3 . a . Tota l blende dfue l ga s i s monitoreda t one locatio nwit ha continu ou s emissionmonito r immediately afte r blending . Continuou s monit orin g i s performedprimaril y t o demonstrat e complianc e wit hth e NSPS . b . Manua l samplin g i s performe

donce/shif t (thre e time s daily ) u8in g colorimetri c tube s suc ha s Drage r o r Gastec . Th e samplin

g i s don e t o verif y

prope r operationo f th e amine treate r an dth e continuou s emissionmonitor . Cos t o f th e indicatin

g tube s i s negligible . Accuracy appear s t o be + 10% .
c . 1 . The continuou s emissio nmonito r usedi s manufacturedb y HoustonAtlas , Mode l 722R/102 , pape r tape type , wit ha range o f 0-30 0 ppm . Th e monito r wa s placedi noperatio ni nth

e fourt hquarte r o f 1983 . Th e cos t wa s $31,69 5 includin g shelte r an dsamplin

g system , plu s $5,00 0 fo r installation . 2 . Th e standar

ddeviatio

nfor dall y

drif t compare

dt o 15 0 pp

m calibrationga s i s + 5 ppm . Averag e breakdow nfrequenc

y i s onc e ever

y 2-1/ 2 month s an

daverag e outag e i s 6.7 5 hours . The samplin g syste m i s generall y

th e caus e o f the breakdown . Cos t o f maintenanc e i s $9 6 pe r wee k for labor , whic hInclude s repai r an dpreventativ

e maintenance , an d$8 1 pe r wee k for parts , whic hinclude s calibratio nga s cylinders . Norma l preventativ e maintenanc e progra

m i s dall y

calibratio

nan doperationcheck , whic hrequire s 6 hour s pe r wee k o f mechanic' s time . 3 . N o routine quality assuranc e test s ar e performedfo r H2S . However , estimate

dcost s fo r suc

htest s ar e $7 0 each , assumin g n o interferences . Th e onl y manua l samplin

g performedi s done wit hDrage r o r Gaste c tube s b y the uni t operator . 4 . Dat a i s continuousl y recordedb

y instrumen t ona one inc hpe r hou r stri pchart . The dat a i 6 als o transmittedt o a proces s compute r whic hi s usedfo r compilin

g an daveraging . Record s ar e retaine

dfo r tw

o year s I nshort-ter m storage , thentrans ferre dt o long-ter

m storage . 5 . Availabl e summarie s for H2 S hav e beenprovidedi nth e appendi x for December , 1984 , an dJanuar

y an dFebruary , 1985 . Typica l operatin

g condition s are includedi nFigur e 1 . Margina l excesse s o f the 3-hou r standar

doccurredo nDecembe r 8 an d9 , 1984 , a s a resul t o f a nupse t a t th

e Sat s Ga s Plan t Dr y Ga s Treater . Th e uni t wa s upse t b y anupstrea

m processin

g uni t

- 1 1 -P.1 5

VIII . MONITORIN

GOF EMISSION S AN

D PROCES S OPERATIO

N -2 -

whlc hwa s startin

g u pafter a maintenanc e turnaround . Afte r operationa t th

e upstrea

m uni t stabilized , th e Dr y Ga s Treate r returne dt o norma l operation . 4 . a . Tota l blendedfue l ga s i s monitoredfo r pressur e an

dspecifi c gravity . Al l monitorin g i s done b

y continuou s instruments . Cos t o f monitorin

g i s approximatel y $4 0 per week . b . Neithe r o f the proces s parameter s monitoredar e goo dIndicator s o f prope r amine treate r performanc e or H2 S concentration . Th e specifi c gravity

o f th e blendedfue l ga s ca nbe correlate

dwit h variation s i nfue l ga s composition . 5 . Ther e ar e currentl y n o plan s t o replac e th e existin

g continuou s emissio n monitor . 6 . Th e continuou s emissionmonito r i s no t integrate dint o the proces s a s a contro l system .

- 1 2 -P.1 6

IX . GENERA

L REFINER

YINFORMATIO

N 1 . Nomina l siz e o f ou r refiner y i s 11 0 thousan

dbarrel s pe r day . Fo r 198 4 average operatin

g leve l wa s 10 0 ..thousan dbarrel s o f crude per day . The refiner

y operate s 36 5 days pe r year . The gravity , sulfur content , an dIntak e of crude ca

nal l affec t sizin g an doperatio

no f th

e amine treaters . 2 . Typica l crud

e oi l sulfu

r content i s 1.2%w , wit ha rang e o f 0.7% w t o 1.2%w . Fee

drat e to th

e amine treater s wil l var y directl y

wit hcrud

e oi l sulfu

r content . Operationo f th e treater s i s adjustedt o maintai n a lo w leve l o f H2 S i nth e treate

dga s an

doperatio

no f th

e stripper s i s adjuste

dt o maintai na prope r leve l o f sulfide s i nthe DEA . Th e leve l o f H2 S an

dothe r sulfur compound s i s rarel y affectedb

y change s i ncrude oi l sulfur conten t becaus e o f exces s treatin g an dstrippin

g capacity . 3 . Operationo f th e amine treatin

g system

s i s not affectedb y othe r refiner y operatin

g factor s becaus e o f exces s capacity available . 4 . Typically , our tota l blende drefiner

y fue l ga s i s 5 0 MMSCFD , o f which 35 % i s natura l gas . Natura l ga s makeu pca nvar y fro m 10 % t o 60% . Th

e blending i s don

e t o provide a constant flo w o f fue l ga s t o proces s units .

- 1 3 -P.1 7

X . GENERA

L REGULATOR

YINFORMATIO

N 1 . N o problem

s hav e beenexperience di ninterpreting , achieving , or complyin

g wit hth

e NSPS . , . , 2 . N o problem

s have bee

nexperiencedi nperformin g testing , monitoring , or recordkeepin

g for th

e NSPS . 3 . Cost s for recordkeepin g an dreportin

g ar e negligible . Refe r t o Section XIII-3-C- 5 fo r a cop y o f th e repor t for

m used .

XI . CONTACT S FORFURTHERINFORMATIO N J . C . Moora

d Manage r Environmenta l ConservationDepartmen t (415 ) 228-616 1 D . F . Obenaue r Environmenta l Enginee r Environmenta l Conservatio nDepartmen t (415 ) 228-616 1

- 1 4 -

## Fit,uae . I

3 FUE L GA S BLENDIN G SA C PG E CC U SG P CG P SG P SG P RX V

GA S = NA T GA S = DR YGA S = DR YGA S = PROPAN E = PROPAN E = BUTAN E = ALK YPROPANE = DIM RPROPANE; = TO T SM . LG . H 2 VENTS =

> 

### VPRZ RC 3 VPR2 RC3 = MIS C VENT S .,

= VAPO RRECO V

= FX U DR YGA S = 5 . 8 7 . 1 24. 3 3 . 8 

## e . e
e . i 

## e . e e . e
e . i 3. 7 

# e. e
* s ) 3 . 8 

## e . e 

# U H FUE L GA S BLEN D DRU H

PRESSUR E 75. 1 PSI G SP. GRAVIT Y F M LIMITE R0.5 9 F H 9ARH1 3 NITROGE N MINIMU M

SR G T O BL N DRU M H2 S HEA T VALU E BALANC E (IN/OUT ) e.5 9

7.4 5 'A > 

## 3 . e e > 

### 2 2 PP M 858. 4 BTU/SC F 1 . 6 3 1 1 MA R8 5 15:28:4 8 DI S 515 1 NOTE : AL L FLOW S AR E I N MMSCF D NA T GA S INF O O N DISPLA Y 515 6

TREND S 41 0 > 41 2 >
FLO W F H DRU H 

# r

FUE L GA S BLEN D DRU H 4 8 . 4 

### • e y. OPE N

AuALYses . 

# A FLAR E 

### • 4 . 8 T O O P CENTRA L 

### • 4e. s T O LO P



### •



## 3 . 6 T O HO P



### •F 

## i6ua. e 2 .

E
40 . 5 MB/ D LO P REFINER YFUE L GA S DISRIBUTIO N

i . O F-4 0 O . 8 F-41 A O . 7 

## 4 - F-41 B 

## e . e F-4 2
e . 9 F*-4 3
e . 3 F-4 4 

## i . e F-4 S O . 7 F-4 6 O . 8

F-4 7 O . 5 F-4 9 O . 7 F-5 e
e . 2 F-5 1
e . 4 F-5 2


## e . i F-5 3


## e . 6 F-12 6 O . 5 f - F-12 8 

# QUfi D f\ 3 . 3 F-5 5 2 . 0 F-5 7 O . 9 

# + F-5 8 O . 3 

# + E 5 9 

### 4 . 9 F-60 N 5 . e F-66 S 1 . 4 F-7 1 

# QUA D B 1 1 MA R8 5 15:29:2 6 DI S 515 2 3 . 8 F-6 6 O . 5 F-6 7 

# QUfi D

C

e . o F-6 1


## e . l 

# QUfi D

D F-6 3 3 . 4 CO B 1 3 . 1 

# -i CO B 2 

# U TI L 3 . 7 CO B 3 

## e . e BL R 4 TOTA L T O LO P

FURNACE S 4 1 . i 

### BALANC E ( SUPPLY/DEMAND ) O . 9 8Flfcl A 

## a e

®

4 . 6 6 7 6 « RF GF H LO P

O . O O OPERATION S CENTRA L FUE L GA S CONSUMERS/PRODUCER S 1 1 MA R8 5 15:30:0 9 DI S 515 3 SP 220 0 220 1

F-16 1 1 . 2 5 F-16 2

H F OH D

KD G 0.0 3 CLEA N I DR YFUE L GA S

E 1 . 4 7 H 1 . 5 5 F-16 4



## e.e e 

# r l

e.ee 

# "—| H 

# * PRP 

# 1 SPL T C 3



## e . i s 

# — 1 PPR P C 

# ^

HIX D GA S T O LO P RF GBLN D 

# F X U H P 2 DM S 

# -H E ie s 

# -M E 1 6 6

F-16 7

F-16 8

k f 

## e . 6 2 

## F-16 9



# SRU 3 +FLAR E INST . -fPURG E 6.3 4

### •EPORT * 30 ? CHANNEL: , 8

" . . ( • 

### SAMPLE < LOP FUE L GAS INJECTED A T P.2 1



### QUfl L ASSURE HEP' T 9:35:2 7 O

N JA N 2 , 198 4 IORM-METHOD' : CARL5 T SEQ : *SEQ6 S SUBSQ/SAMP : 1 / 1 ;L-MDT H MV/HI N .56 6 .16 6 :UP-UN KDV

T N O 6.6 6 ACTUA L RU N TIME :

. r -

• $ 

### t " W 

# ( S

et 

# 1 5 

# ^ 7 1 6 

## * 

## \-A 

# 16 

# 4 > H 1 7 3 r \7

] 

### 1 9 1 9 22.t-r <c£.z4t

t 23.8 8 23.8 8 25.9 5 25.9 5 26.4 9 26.5 1 27.6 5 27.6 6 28.9 5 23.9 6 32.2 2 32.22 # DELA Y 1.6 6 ID-LV L 56 6 MIH-A

R 56 6 REF-RT W .36 6 41.61 7 MINUTE S

.
V 

### 578 7 468 6 168 4 139 4 215 2 191 1 368 3 BB BB B B BB B B BB BB i 

### MOL E '4 5.65 3 .11 4 3.42 4 7.96 7 3E - 6 •.22 6 3.19 6 ,.84 6 .45 5 

### ;E - 

# 6 .19 2 E - 5 E - 4 E - 4 .34 2 ..43 6 .35 1 .27 5 .65 3 .67 1 .11 6 .69 3 .26 8 BUNC H

N O MRT W *DIL- F I 3.66 6 106.6 6 YE S

NAM E ttHYDROGEN C0 2 ETHYLENE ttETHANE ARTIFAC T 0 2 + ARGO

N ftNITROGEN METHANE CARB MONO

X C6 + BACKFLUS H MIXTUR E MIXTUR E PROPANE PROPYLENE #ISOBUTANE N-BUTANE BUTENE- 1 ISOBUTYLE

N TRAN S BUT CI S BUT-2 - ttlSOPENTAN TOTA L ARE A = 175286 9 PROCESSED DAT

A FILE : PCB2 5 TOTA L MOL E 'A = 160.66 6 RA W DAT A FILE : RCB2 5

MOLOCULA

RWEIGHT * GA S GRAVITY(BASI S AI R GROS S BT

UPERSCF * NE T BT UPE RSCF * H2/ C WEIGH T RATIO * 18.682 9 1.666) * .62544 6 985.48 6 896.95 5 .31259 9 40T E COMPOSITIO

N RESULT S ACCURAT E T O 0.1 * ^CALCULATE D VALUE S GOOD T O 3 SIGNIFICANT FIGURE S LOP TEC H MANAGE

R LOP : PROCES S MANAGERQUA D A B C H UTI L CA : SPEC' S FOREMA N FIL E P-l- RP.2 2 

### REPORT : v

43 3 . CHANNEL : 8 SflHPCE : LOP ' FUE L GA S INJEtTE DA T W R M METHOD : CARL5 T SEQ : *SEQ6 S QUAL H.-r 

### Uft E DEP'T v 9:13:3 5 ON

FE B 3 » 198 4 SUBSQ/SAMP : \/

1 5L-WDT H

. 56 6 3UP-UNK N O MV/MI N

.16 0 DV T 0.0 0 DELAY

1.0 0 ID-LVL 50 0 MIN-flR

50 0 REF-RT W .30 0 ACTUA L RU

N TIME : 41.00 8 MINUTE S BUNC H N O 

### JiRT W 6.00 0 

### 2DIL- F I

160.6 0 YE S

R T ITM ARE A MOL E V. NAM E 1.4 4 2.5 2 3.2 7 3.9 3 5.7 7 5.9 2 6.9 6 8.4 0 9.7 7 15.6 7 16.2 0 16.3 5 17.2 3 19.1 2 26.0 0 22.2 9 23.9 6 32.3 3 1.44 #

2.5 2 3.2 7 3.93 # 5.7 7 5.9 2 6.96 « 8.4 7 9.7 9 15.7 1 16.2 8 16.3 6 17.2 3 19.1 2 19.9 9 22.29 # 23.9 5 32.33 # 3569 6

184 6 5389 3 12241 2 64 6 496 5 7450 4 57810 2 630 3 13735 8 6799 7 48251 3 14599 6 2925 5 1596 2 516 0 357 3 412 2 B V BB B V V B B H H S BB H S T T B V V V V B BB BB BB BB BB BB 15.39 2 .13 2 3.73 7 7.90 2 4.IE

- 7 3.2E

- 6

. 6.40 1 ^b.93 ^ .58 5 6.28 7 4.4E

- 5 3.IE

- 4 9.4E

- 5 1.88 6 1.89 9 .28 7 .22 1 .21 4 ^HYDROGEN C0 2 ETHYLEN E #ETHAN E ARTIFACT ARTIFAC T <#NllkULLH > " ' METHAN

E CAR B MONO X C6 + BACKFLUS H MIXTURE MIXTURE PROPAN E PROPYLEN

E #ISOBUTAN

E N-BUTAN

E ttlSOPENTAN TOTA L ARE A

= 177638 1 PROCESSE DDAT A

FILE : P68A1 6 TOTA L MOL E J J= 166.66 0 RA W DAT A FILE : R08A1 6

MOLECULA RWEIGHT * GA S GRAVIT Y(BASI S AI R GROS S BT UPE RSCF * NE T BT UPE RSCF * H2/ C WEIGH T RATIO * 21.861 4 " . 1.000) * .75377 1 1204.2 4 1102.3 9 .28154 7 NOT E COMPOSITIO N

RESULT S ACCURAT E T O 0.1 * CALCULATE DVALUE S GOO DT O 3 SIGNIFICAN T FIGURE S LO P TEC H MANAGE R LOP : PROCES S MANAGE RQUADA B C D UTI L QA : SPEC' S FOREMAN FIL E P-l- R i

### REPORT : 77 9 CHANNEL : 2 QUAL ASSUR E DEP' T SAMPLE, : LO P FUE L GA S INJECiE D AT 9:36:6 4 O NMA R 2 > 198 4 NOR M METHOD : CAR L I T SEQ : *SEQ6 2 SUBSQ/SAMP : 1 / 1 SL-WDT H

. 50 0 SUP-UN K NO MV/MI H

.10 6 DV T 0.0 0 DELA

Y 2.4 0 ID-LV L 50 0 MIN-A

R 75 0 REF-RTW .30 0 RCTUAL RU

NTIME : 44.66 8 MINUTE S EXCES S NE G INPU

T BUNC H NO 5SRTI T 5.66 0 5JDIL- F I

166.6 6 YE S

RT IT

M ARE A MOL E '4 NAM E 

## 2.8 2 4.1 4 4.7 6 6.6 9 7.8 4 9.3 7 18.8 7 12.1 4 13.8 9 22.7 9 23.3 2 23.4 9 24.3 5 25.6 9 25.8 1 28.6 3 28.5 1 28.7 6 29.4 1 30.7 8 32.6 8 2.7 6

4.1 2 4.7 1 6.69 # 7.9 1 9.3 1 11.1 3 12.2 4 14.2 7 22.79 # 23.3 6 23.4 6 24.3 9 25.1 3 25.81 * 27.8 7 28.6 6 29.41f t 36.8 6 32.9 3 36288 1

14622 6 8651 6 2166 2 643 4 438 7 338 1 298 7 1255 8 16721 5 345 7

. 16668 3 299 3 16738 8 19947 1 165 3 1437 1 78 2 19317 8 114764 7 884 6 B B B V V B B B B B B B B B B B B B V B B S TT B B B V V B B B B S V T BV r V V V B 1.6E

- 4 3.99 3 2.28 2 .49 3 .14 8 .16 5 .67 9 .67 6 .25 2 17.35 1 1.2E

- 6 3.4E

- 5 .11 2 3.85 0 6.68 4 5.5E

- 7 .65 5 .62 6 

# ^J^S 4 55.72 8 .41 8 MIXTUR

E PROPAN E PROPYLEN

E ttlSOBUTANE N-BUTAN E BUTENE S TRANS- 2 BUTADIEN

E #ISOPENTA

N ^HYDROGEN ARTIFACT ARTIFACT C0 2 ETHYLEN E #ETHAN E ARTIFACT 02+ARGO N #NITROGEh

D METHAN E C O TOTA L ARE A= 246744 8 »ROCESSE D DAT

AFILE : P6A21 9 TOTA L MOL E X = 160.OO O RA W DAT AFILE : R0A21 9

MOLECULA

R WEIGHT * GA S GRAVIT Y (BASI S AI R GROS S BTU PE R SCF * NE T BTU PE R SCF * H2/ C WEIGH T RATIO * 18.12 3 1.000) * .62611 3 1000.4 1 965.11 1 .36784 4 IOT E COMPOSITIO NRESULT S ACCURAT E T O 6.1 * CALCULATE D VALUE S GOO D T O 3 SIGNIFICANT FIGURE S
.O P TEC H MANAGE R :.OP : PROCES S MANAGE R QUA D AB C D UTI L «fl : SPEC' S FOREMA NFIL E P-l- R

### REPORT : 671.1 1 CHANNEL : S INJE C o SAMPLE * LO P FUE L G A KiR M METHOD : CARL5 T 

### TE D AT QUfl L ASSUR E DEP' T 7:43:4 9 O H AP R4» 198 4

5L-WDT H

. 56 0 5UP-UN K N O MV/MI N

.15 6 DV T 0.0 0 SEQ : *SEQ0 3 SUBSQ/SAMP : 1 / 1

DELA Y 1.0 0 ID-LV L 50 0 MIN-AR

50 0 REF-RT W .30 0 ACTUA L RU N TIME : 41.66 8 MINUTE S BUNC H N O *RT W * 6.00 0 *DIL- F I

100.0 0 YE S



## R T IT M ARE

A MOL E * NAM E 1.8 7 2.5 9 3.4 5 4.2 2 5.7 7 5.9 6 6.2 1 7.1 4 8.7 4 16.6 8 15.7 4 16.2 7 16.4 3 17.3 2 19.2 3 28.1 2 22.4 4 24.1 1 32.5 7 1.8 7

2.5 7 3.4 4 4.22 # 5.7 7 5.9 6 6.1 9 7.14 # 8.7 6 16.6 8 15.7 5 16.2 8 16.4 4 17.3 3 19.2 4 26.1 2 22.44 * 24.1 1 32.57 * 613 1

133 6 4878 5 9989 5 97 3 167 4 532 4 11263 8 49346 6 468 8 668 6 8576 6 49168 1 14273 4 1791 8 2621 2 678 8 338 5 443 1 B B 5.5E - 6 B B .13 3 B B 4.76 3 B B 8.96 5 B B 8.7E - 7 B S 1.5E - 6 B B .66 5 BBC.13.45 4 B S tt.y^ y B B .66 5 B V .42 6 V V 7.7E - 5 V B 4.4E - 4 BB1.3E - 4 B B 1.66 6 B B 1.93 5 B B .52 5 B B .29 1 B B .32 6 ARTIFAC T

C0 2 ETHYLEN

E ttETHANE ARTIFAC T ARTIFAC T n ? + ARHO N #NITROGEFP ) 

# " METHAN E CAR B MONO X C6 + MIXTURE MIXTURE MIXTURE PROPAN E PROPYLENE ttlSOBUTANE N-BUTAN

E #ISOPENTA

N TOTA L AREA = 155378 1 >ROCESSE D DAT A

FILE : P08A1 9 TOTA L MOL E * = 18,6.66 6 RA W DATA FILE : R68A1 9

MOLECULA

RWEIGHT * 21.455 7 GA S GRAVIT Y(BASI S AI R= 1.666) * .74186 8 GROS S BT UPE RSCF * 1657.1 9 NE T BT UPER~SCF * 966.14 8 H2/ C WEIGH T RATIO * - .28419 4 IOT E COMPOSITIO N

RESULT S ACCURAT E T O 0.1 * CALCULATE D VALUE S GOO D T O 3 SIGNIFICAN T FIGURE S \ 

### LO P TEC H MANAGE R LOP : PROCES S MANAGE RQUA D A B C D UTI L QA : SPEC' S FOREMA N FIL E P-l- R

## .'REPORT : 76 3 CHANNEL : 8 SAMPLE- : LO P FUE L GAS IHJEoTE D A T 6 : NOR M METHOD : CARL5 T SEQ : *SEQ6 8 SU E SL-WDTH MV/MI NDELA Y MIN-A

R .50 0 .15 0 l.O O 56 0 SUP-UN K DV

T ID-LV

L REF-RT

W N O 0.0 0 50 0 .30 6 26:1 2 U N ;SQ/SAMP : BUNC H N O *RT W 6.00 0 QUA

L ASSUR E DEP'T ' MA Y T 

## «fc*98 4 1 / 1

*DIL- F I 100.0 0 YE S P.2 5



### ACTUAL RU

NTIME : 41.01 7 MINUTE S
R T IT

M ARE A MOL E * NAM E 

## 1.4 0 1.8 8 2.5 9 3.4 5 4.2 0 5.9 9 7.6 1 8.5 7 18.1 2 15.7 5 16.2 8 16.4 4 17.3 2 19.2 2 26.6 9 22.4 1 24.6 8 26.1 6 26.6 2 27.8 6 29.1 6 32.4 9 1.46 *

1.8 8 2.5 7 3.4 3 4.26 * 5.9 8 7.61 * 8.6 4 16.2 1 15.7 3 16.2 8 16.4 5 17.3 3 19.2 3 26.6 9 22.41 * 24.6 9 26.1 6 26.6 3 27.8 1 29.1 2 32.49 * 5278 5

531 1 123 5 5941 9 13821 4 152 6 5506 6 46555 3 698 1 988 2 6435 9 41521 6 19388 2 2943 8 2922 9 864 2 451 6 164 8 153 1 219 8 145 7 556 6 BB BB BB B B B B BB B B B S B B B V V V V B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B 26.83 7 4.6E

- 6 .16 2 4.75 1 16.28 9 1.1E

- 6 <^.45 5 4b":25 3 .74 7 .51 5 4.8E

- 5 3.IE

- 4 1.4E

- 4 2.18 9 2.32 1 .55 4 .32 2 .65 8 .68 3 .11 8 .67 5 .33 6 *HYDROGEN ARTIFACT C0 2 ETHYLEN E *ETHAN E ARTIFACT *NITROCEi£ > 

## METHAN E CAR B MONO X C6 + MIXTURE MIXTUR E MIXTURE PROPAN E PROPYLEN

E #ISOBUTAN

E N-BUTAN E BUTENE- 1 ISOBUTYLEN TRANS BUT
CI S BUT-2

- *ISOPENTA

N TOTA L ARE A= 149217 6 PROCESSE D DAT

AFILE : P68A1 2 TOTAL MOL E * = 166.66 0 RA W DAT AFILE : R03A1 2

MOLECULA

R WEIGHT * GA S GRAVIT Y <BASI S AI R = GROS S BT U PE R SCF * NE T BTU PE R SCF * H2/ C WEIGH T RATIO * 17.253 4 1.000) * .59663 5 992.94 9 899.88 6 .31327 3 NOT E COMPOSITIO NRESULT S ACCURAT E T O 6.1 * CALCULATE D VALUE S GOO D T O 3 SIGNIFICANT FIGURE S
LO P TEC H MANAGE R LOP : PROCES S MANAGE R QUA D AB C D UTI L QA : SPEC' S FOREMA NFIL E P-l- Rr-truki : tic. * thMNUhL : a f 

### SAMPLE : LO P FUE L GA S NOR M METHOD : CARL5 T SL-WDT H MV/MI N .58 6 .15 8 SUP-UN K DV

T NO 0.6 6 ^ INJEuTE D A

T 9 : SEQ : *SEQ6 8 SU

E DELA Y MIN-A

R 1.0 6 56 0 ID-LV L REF-RTW 50 0 .3O 0 52:4 0 O N SQ/SAMP : BUNC H N O *RT W 6.06 0 QUAL ASSUR E DEP' T

( 

### JU NIJ
- 19*8 4 1 / 1

*DIL- F I 100.0 0 YE S P,2 6



### ACTUA L RU N TIME : 41.01 7 MINUTE S
R T IT M ARE

A MOL E * NAM E 1.3 8 2.5 5 3.3 9 4.1 3 5.7 9 6.8 2 6.1 4 6.8 6 8.3 8 9.5 9 15.7 5 16.2 9 16.4 5 17.3 2 19.2 2 26.6 7 22.3 9 24.6 5 26.5 9 32.4 1 1.38 *

2.5 5 3.3 9 4.13 * 5.7 6 5.9 9 6.1 3 6.86 * 8.4 4 9.6 6 15.7 6 16.2 7 16.4 4 17.3 1 19.2 1 26.6 6 22.39 * 24.6 5 26.5 9 32.41 * 3796 7

138 2 5477 7 12859 2 283 7 112 3 81 7 6817 9 42859 2 584 4 695 5 7862 6 43614 6 18255 2 3442 3 4567 8 742 3 373 8 165 8 415 3 

## BB B B B B BB B S BB B B B B 

## B S BB B V V V V B BB BB BB BB BB B B BB 26.65 4 .11 9 4.55 6 9.94 5 2.2E

- 6 8.7E

- 7 .R8 A (17.01 8 

## 45.68 4 .65 0 .37 6 6.IE

- 5 3.4E

- 4 1.4E

- 4 2.65 9 3.76 7 .49 5 .27 7 .05 9 .25 8 *HYDROGE N 

## C0 2 ETHYLENE *ETHANE ARTIFAC T ARTIFAC T

_fl ? + ARHON *NITROGEN ) METHANE CARB MONO X 

## C6 + MIXTUR E MIXTUR E MIXTUR E PROPANE PROPYLEN E *ISOBUTAN E N-BUTANE ISOBUTYLE N *ISOPENTA

N TOTA L ARE A = 153084 2 PROCESSED DAT

A FILE : P08A1 2 TOTA L MOLE * = 108.00 0 RA W DAT A FILE : R08A1 2

MOLECULA

RWEIGHT * GAS GRAVITY(BASI S AI R= GROS S BT

UPE RSCF * NET BT UPE RSCF * H2/ C WEIGH T RATIO * 18.609 6 1.666) * .64368 9 1634.4 3 938.46 9 .36663 8 NOT E COMPOSITIO

N RESULT S ACCURAT E T O 6.1 * CALCULATE D VALUE S GOOD T O 3 SIGNIFICAN

T FIGURE S
LOP TECH MANAGE

R LOP : PROCES S MANAGE RQUA D A B C D UTI L QA : SPEC' S FOREMA N FIL E P-l- R iP.2 7

• . • —• v*»• • ' . 111111111

_i . •;.". M 11

_i ••C'Ur.i : i«L. i I ( 

### SAMPLE : LO P FUE L GA S INJECTE D A T 9:24:6 7 O

NJU L 2 . '198 4 NOR M METHO I SL-WDT H

. 56 0 SUP-UN K N O : CARL5 T

MV/MI N
• IS O DV T 6.6 0 SEQ :

DELA Y 1.0 0 ID-LV L 50 0 *SEQ6 8 SUB S

MIN-A R 50 0 REF-RT W

. 30 0 •Q/SAMP :

BUNC H N O *RT W 6~ . 00 6 1 / 1

*DIL- F 100.0 0 I

YE S 

### ACTUAL RU

NTIME : 41.61 7 MINUTE S
R T IT

M ARE A MOL E * NAM E 1.3 8 1.8 2 1.8 7 2.5 4 3.3 9 4.1 3 5.7 9 6.6 2 6.8 1 8.2 9 9.3 7 13.2 9 15.7 3 16.2 8 16.4 4 17.3 2 19.2 1 28.6 8 22.3 8 24.6 3 26.6 5 26.5 9 27.7 4 29.6 4 32.3 6 1.38 *

1.8 4 1.8 9 2.5 5 3.3 9 4.13 * 5.7 7 6.6 1 6.81 * 8.3 6 9.4 6 13.9 6 15.7 1 16.2 8 16.4 5 17.3 2 19.2 1 26.6 8 22.38 * 24.0 4 26.8 9 26.6 2 27.7 9 29.6 8 32.36 * 2663 2

54 7 1424 8 88 9 4243 9 16629 6 136 6 126 9 7565 2 49188 8 437 6 4256 8 524 6 8151 6 56908 3 14962 9 3646 0 2484 9 555 5 386 3 56 3 78 9 171 9 158 1 428 1 B B B B B B B B BB B B B S B B B B B S B B BB B V V V V B B B BB B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B B 14.49 6 4.4E

- 7 1.IE

- 5 .67 9 3.63 3 8.47 1 1.6E

- " 6 1.6E

- 6 

# le.ez s 58.76 3 .56 1 3.4E

- 5 .29 3 6.5E

- 5 4.IE

- 4 1.2E

- 4 2.42 8 2.11 2 .38 1 .29 6 .03 4 .04 1 .09 9 .08 7 .27 4 #HYDROGEN ARTIFACT ARTIFACT C0 2 ETHYLEN E *ETHAN E ARTIFACT ARTIFAC L ttN!IRQGEK> METHAN E CAR B MONO X ARTIFAC T 

### C6 + MIXTUR E MIXTUR E MIXTUR E PROPAN E PROPYLEN E #ISOBUTAN E N-BUTAN E BUTENE- 1 ISOBUTYLE N TRAN S 6UT

CI S BUT-2

- *ISOPENTA N 

### TOTAL ARE A= 162696 9 PROCESSE D DAT

AFILE : P68A6 1 TOTAL MOL E * - 166.66 6 RA W DAT AFILE : R68A6 1

MOLECULA

R WEIGHT * GA S GRAVIT Y (BASI S AI R = GROS S BT

U PE R SCF * NE T BTU PE R SCF * H2/ C WEIGH T RATIO * 18.58 4 1.600) * .64278 8 1018.4 8 922.15 1 .38553 7 NOT E COMPOSITIONRESULT S ACCURAT E T O 0.1 * CALCULATE D VALUE S GOO D T O 3 SIGNIFICANT FIGURE S
LO P TEC H MANAGE R LOP : PROCES S MANAGE R QUA D AB C D UTI L QA : SPEC' S FOREMA NFIL E P-l- R

### SAMPLE : 4 0 R M 1 1 E l ••L-WDT H

. 56 6 5UP-UN K N O •

* • 

### LO P rHO D /FUEL/GAS
: CARL5 T MV/MI N .15 0 DV T 0.0 0 INJECTE D A T 8 : SEQ : *SEQ0 8 SU

E DELA Y 1.0 0 ID-LV L 50 0 MIN-A

R 50 0 REF-RTW .30 0 32:4 7 O

N SQ/SAHP : BUNC H NO *RT W 6.0O 6 AU

G I J 

### 198 4 1 / 1

*DIL- F I 100.0 0 YE S P.2 8



### ACTUA L RU NTIME : 41.00 8 MINUTE S
R T IT M ARE A MOL E * NAM E 1.3 7 1.8 7 2.5 6 3.4 8 4.1 3 6.0 2 6.8 0 8.3 2 9.3 0 15.7 4 16.2 8 16.4 4 17.3 1 19.2 1 20.0 8 22.3 9 24.0 3 26.0 9 26.6 2 27.8 0 29.1 0 32.4 5 1.37 *

1.8 7 2.5 2 3.4 0 4.13 * 6.0 1 6.86 * 8.3 6 9.3 8 15.7 2 16.2 9 16.4 5 17.3 2 19.2 2 26.6 9 22.39 * 24.8 5 26.1 6 26.7 6 27.8 2 29.1 1 32.45 * 4137 8

521 3 

## 61 1 6361 6 14844 6 142 2 7755 4 34146 4 956 9 887 3 9144 2 36781 7 21239 6 3143 0 3166 8 841 2 6879 4 108 4 148 1 255 9 158 3 1030 9 

## B B B B BB BB B B B S B B B S 

## B B B V V V V B BB BB BB B B BB BB BB BB BB B B 22.18 0 4.IE

- 6 .05 3 5.34 4 11.60 8 1.IE

- 6 lft.ft7 ? 48.02 6 1.66 9 .48 6 7.2E

- 5 2.9E

- 4 1.7E

- 4 2.45 5 2.64 2 .56 7 4.55 3 .66 3 .68 4 .14 5 .68 5 .64 8 *HYDROGE N ARTIFAC T 

## C0 2 ETHYLEN E *ETHANE ARTIFAC T -«! * 

### CAR B MONO X 

## C6 + MIXTUR E MIXTUR E MIXTUR E PROPAN E PROPYLEN E *ISOBUTAN E N-BUTAN E BUTENE- 1 ISOBUTYLE N TRAN S BUT
CI S BUT-2

- *ISOPENTA N 

### TOTA L ARE A= 151966 4 TOTAL MOL E * = 166.66 6 •ROCESSE D DAT

AFILE : P68A1 3 RA W DAT AFILE : R68A1 3

MOLECULA

R WEIGHT * GA S GRAVIT Y (BASI S AI R GROS S BTU PE R SCF * NE T BTU PE R SCF * H2/ C WEIGH T RATIO * 26.614 4 1.666) * .71282 9 1128.1 9 1026.5 7 " * .28388 6 IOT E COMPOSITIONRESULT S ACCURAT E TO 0.1 * CALCULATE D VALUE S GOO D T O 3 SIGNIFICANT FIGURE S
LO P TEC H MANAGE R LOP : PROCES S MANAGE R QUA D AB C D UTI L QA : SPEC' S FOREMA NFIL E P-l-R

-( 

## SAMPLE : LO P FUE L GAS INJECTE D A T 9:44:2 2 O

NSE P 3 J 198 4 NOR M METHOD : CARL5 T SEQ : *SEQ8 8 SUBSQ/SAMP : 1 / 1 P.2 9



## SL-WDT H .50 0 SUP-UN K N O MV/MI N

.15 0 DV T 0.0 0 DELA

Y 1.6 6 ID-LV L 56 6 MIN-A

R 56 6 REF-RT W .36 6 BUNCH

N O *RT W 6.66 0 *DIL- F I

100.6 0 YE S ACTUA L RU NTIME : 41.01 7 MINUTE S
R T 1.3 8 2.5 7 3.4 1 4.1 5 6.6 2 6.7 8 8.2 7 9.2 2 15.6 3 15.7 4 16.2 8 16.4 3 17.3 1 19.2 6 28.0 7 22.3 8 24.8 5 26.6 0 27.7 8 29.8 7 32.4 1 IT

M 1.38 * 2.5 6 3.4 8 4.15 * 6.0 2 6.78 * 8.3 2 9.2 4 14.9 6 15.7 1 16.2 8 16.4 5 17.3 1 19.2 1 26.0 7 22.38 * 24.6 5 26.6 2 27.7 9 29.6 8 32.41 * ARE

A 3571 6 BB 91 0 BB 5868 7 BB 14758 1 BB 846 9 BB 7521 6 BB 39959 9 B S 637 5 B B 2313 9 B B 566 6 B V 8823 5 V V 44328 8 V

B 20791 5 BB 5235 6 BB 3940 2 B B 681 6 B B 388 4 B B 105 7 B B 197 2 B B 128 8 B B 521 3 B B MOL E *

19.07 3 .07 9 4.92 9 11.53 9 6.6E

- 6 7.82 7 46.83 3 .71 7 1.8E

- 5 .31 0 6.9E

- 5 3.5E

- 4 1.6E

- 4 4.08 9 3.28 6 .45 9 .29 1 .66 6 .11 2 .66 9 .32 8 NAME *HYDROGE N C0 2 ETHYLEN E *ETHAN E ARTIFAC T *NITROGE N METHAN E CAR B MONO X ARTIFAC T C6 + MIXTURE MIXTURE MIXTURE PROPAN E PROPYLEN

E *ISOBUTAN

E N-BUTAN E ISOBUTYLEN TRANS BUT
CI S BUT-2

- *ISOPENTA

N TOTA L AREA= 161277 7 PROCESSE D DAT

AFILE : P68A3 6 TOTA L MOL E * = 160.06 6 RA W DAT AFILE : R68A3 6

MOLECULA

R WEIGHT * GA S GRAVIT

Y (BASI S AI R GROS S BT

U PER SCF * NE T BT U PER SCF * H2/ C WEIGH

T RATIO * 19.36 4

1.666) * .67617 6 1664.2 9 965.87 3 .29378 4 NOT E COMPOSITIO

NRESULT S ACCURAT E TO 6.1 * CALCULATE D VALUE S GOO D TO 3 SIGNIFICAN

T FIGURE S LO P TECH MANAGE R LOP : PROCES S MANAGE R QUA D AB C D UTI L QA : SPEC' S FOREMA NFIL E P-l- RP.3 0 

## SAMPLE : LOP/FUEL/GA

S INJECTE D 

## A

T 8:69:3 4 O

NOC T I J 

## 198 4 NORI 1 METHOD : CARL5 T SEQ : *SEQ6 8 SUBSQ/SAHP : 1/ 1 SL-WDT H .56 6 SUP-UN K N O MV/MI N

.15 6 DV T 6.6 0 DELA

Y 1.0 0 ID-LV L 50 0 MIN-A

R 50 0 REF-RT W .30 0 BUNCH

N O *RT W 6.00 0 *DIL- F I

100.6 6 YE S ACTUA L RU NTIME : 41.62 5 MINUTE S
R T IT M ARE

A MOL E * NAM E 1.3 9 1.8 9 2.5 8 3.4 3 4.1 9 6.7 5 8.2 4 9.1 4 15.7 6 16.2 8 16.4 4 17.3 1 19.2 1 26.6 7 22.3 9 24.6 5 26.0 7 26.6 0 27.7 9 29.0 9 32.4 5 1.39 *

1.8 9 2.5 8 3.4 3 4.19 * 6.75 * 8.2 8 9.1 6 15.7 1 16.2 7 16.4 4 17.3 1 19.2 1 26.6 7 22.39 * 24.0 6 26.6 8 26.6 2 27.8 6 29.0 9 32.45 * 3785 1

1384 2 92 4 5863 2 12336 9 10082 0 41331 3 587 9 415 3 11226 6 44173 0 18161 6 2483 9 3468 3 514 1 348 4 163 9 148 7 190 3 127 7 456 8 BB BB B B BB BB B B B S BB BB B V V B B B BB B B B B B B BB BB BB BB BB 28.67 8 1.1E

- 5 .68 6 4.84 2 9.57 7 *HYDROGEN

ARTIFACT C0 2 ETHYLEN E *ETHAN E . 

## TU.li yMETHAN

E .65 7 .22 6 8.7E

- 5 3.4E

- 4 1.4E

- 4 1.92 7 2.87 3 .34 4 .25 3 .66 0 .08 4 .16 7 .66 6 .28 2 CAR

B MONO X C6 + MIXTURE MIXTURE MIXTURE PROPAN E PROPYLEN

E *ISOBUTAN

E N-BUTAN E BUTENE- 1 ISOBUTYLEN TRANS BUT
CI S BUT-2

- *ISOPENTA

N TOTA L AREA= 157142 1 TOTA L MOL E * = 166.60 0 PROCESSE D DAT

AFILE : P68A6 1 RA W DAT AFILE : R68A6 1

MOLECULA

R WEIGHT * GAS GRAVIT

Y (BASI S AI R GROS S BT

U PE R SCF * NE T BT U PE R SCF * H2/ C WEIGH

T RATIO * 18.413 2 .:•- . 1.666) * .63669 1 969.92 3 879.06 3 .30514 6 NOTE COMPOSITIO

NRESULT S ACCURAT E TO 0.1 * CALCULATE D VALUE S GOOD TO 3 SIGNIFICAN T FIGURE S LO P TECH MANAGE R LOP : PROCES S MANAGE R QUA D AB C D UTI L QA : SPEC' S FOREMA NFIL E P-l- RP.3 1 

### SHMPLfc : LOP/FUEL/GA S INJECTE DMl 7:43:5 0 ON NO V o » 198 4 NORM METHOD : CARL5 T SEQ : *SEQ6 8 SUBSQ/SAMP : 1 / 1 SL-WDT H

. 56 0 SUP-UN K 

## N O MV/MI N

.15 0 DV T 6.6 0 DELA Y

1.6 6 ID-LV L 56 0 MIN-AR

50 0 REF-RT W .36 6 • ACTUA L RU

N TIME : 41.66 8 MINUTE S BUNC H NO *RT W 6.66 6 *DIL- F I

166.6 6 YE S

R T ITM ARE A MOL E * NAM E 1.3 6 1.8 7 2.5 5 3.4 6 4.1 2 5.7 8 6.1 0 6.7 4 8.2 5 9.0 8 15.7 3 16.2 8 16.4 5 17.3 1 19.2 2 20.0 8 22.4 1 24.0 8 26.6 4 27.8 3 32.4 8 35.5 2 1.36 *

1.8 8 2.5 6 3.4 8 4.12 * 5.8 1 6.1 2 6.74 * 8.2 3 9.8 6 15.7 5 16.2 8 16.4 6 17.3 2 19.2 3 20.0 9 22.41 * 24.0 7 26.6 3 27.8 1 32.48 * 35.4 9 4746 8 B B

1681 4 B B 217 3 B B 6011 7 B B 16682 5 B B 124 6 B B 443 9 B S 7726 8 B B 34041 1 B S 671 3 B B 804 7 BV 8961 6 V V 34501 6 VB 22559 5 B B 6565 3 B B 3618 3 B B 2425 2 B B 3429 4 B B 101 8 B B 158 2 B B 3108 6 B B 1864 1 B B 21.15 4

1.2E - 5 .17 9 4.79 7 12.39 3 9.3E - 7 3.3E - 6 _7.64 0 37.90 8 .71 7 .41 8 6.7E - 5 2.6E - 4 1.7E - 4 4.82 8 2.86 7 1.55 2 2.44 6 .65 5 .68 1 1.85 2 1.11 7 *HYDROGE N

ARTIFAC T C0 2 ETHYLEN E *ETHAN E ARTIFAC T ARTIFAC T ftNTTRfinFM^ 

### METHAN E CAR B MONO X C6 + BACKFLUS H MIXTUR E MIXTUR E PROPAN E PROPYLEN E *ISOBUTAN E N-BUTAN E ISOBUTYLE N TRAN S BUT - #ISOPENTA N N-PENTAN E TOTA L ARE A

= 166369 1 PROCESSE DDAT A

FILE : P68A8 1 TOTA L MOL E * = 166.66 6 RA W DAT A FILE : R68A6 1

MOLECULA RWEIGHT * GA S GRAVIT Y(BASI S AI R GROS S BT UPE RSCF * NE T BT UPE RSCF * H2/ C WEIGH T RATIO * 22.175 6 1.666) * .76748 2 1226.9 1 1116.7 6 .2751 3 .NOT E COMPOSITIO N

RESULT S ACCURAT E T O 6.1 * CALCULATE DVALUE S GOO DT O 3 SIGNIFICAN T FIGURE S LO P TEC H MANAGE R LOP : PROCES S MANAGE RQUA DA B C DUTI L QA : SPEC' S FOREMAN FIL E P-l- R iP.3 2



### REPORT : 28 8 CHANNEL : 8 QUA L ASSUR E DEP' T SAMPLE : I H

P ru nCQQ

INJECTE

D A T 9:67:4 4 O

N DEC 5 , 198 4 NOR M METHOD : CARL5 T SEQ : SEQ8 A SUBSQ/SAMP : 1 / 1 BTL : 1 SL-WDTH .56 6 SUP-UN K N O MV/MIN

.15 6 DV T 6.6 6 DELA

Y 1.6 6 ID-LV L 56 6 MIN-A

R 56 6 REF-RT W .36 6 BUNCH

N O *RT W 6.66 6 *DIL- F I

166.6 6 N

O ACTUA L RU N TIME : 41.61 7 MINUTE S


## R T IT M ARE

A MOL E * NAM E 1.3 6 1.8 8 2.5 4 3.3 8 4.1 2 6.1 1 6.7 2 8.2 1 9.6 6 15.7 3 16.3 6 16.4 7 17.3 4 19.2 3 20.1 O 22.4 1 24.0 7 26.0 8 26.6 1 27.8 0 29.1 0 32.4 3 35.4 5 1.36 *

1.8 8 2.5 4 3.3 8 4.12 * 6.1 8 6.72 * 8.2 3 9.0 2 15.7 2 16.2 9 16.4 5 17.3 2 19.2 2 20.0 8 22.41 * 24.0 7 26.0 8 26.6 1 27.7 9 29.8 8 32.43 * 35.4 9 TOTA L ARE A = 4826 9

503 8 212 8 5275 5 12121 5 498 7 8026 8 36862 5 245 1 1386 1 8864 3 37249 1 17367 7 6287 5 2691 2 2836 8 3387 1 283 5 428 7 351 6 243 5 2864 9 1972 5 154692 G BB

B B BB B B B B BB B B B S BB B V V V V B BB BB BB BB BB B V V B BB B B B B BB \ 

### 21.62 6 3.8E - 6 .17 6 4.23 2 9.65 1 3.7E - 6 7.97 8 4^^5 w .26 3 .68 3 6.6E - 5 2.8E - 4 1.3E - 4 4.69 6 2.14 4 1.82 5 2.42 2 .15 9 .22 9 .19 0 .12 5 1.72 0 1.22 8 ftHYDROGEN

ARTIFAC T C0 2 ETHYLENE #ETHAN E ARTIFAC T #MTTPnGFN , " METHAN

E CAR B MONO X C6 + MIXTURE MIXTURE MIXTURE PROPAN E PROPYLENE *ISOBUTANE N-BUTANE BUTENE- 1 ISOBUTYLE

N TRAN S BUT CI S BUT-2 - *ISOPEHTA

N N-PENTANE TOTA L MOL E * = v



### 180.00 0 PROCESSED DAT

A FILE : P08A 1 RA W DAT A FILE : R08A1

MOLECULA

RWEIGHT * GA S GRAVITY(BASI S AI R GROS S BT

UPE RSCF * NE T BT UPE RSCF * H2/ C WEIGH T RATIO * NOT E COMPOSITIO

N RESULT S ACCURAT E T O 6.1 * CALCULATE D VALUE S GOO D T O 3 SIGNIFICAN

T 21.777 7 1.800) * .75376 9 1199.4 4 1090.8 8 .27953 8
FIGURE S
LOP TEC H MANAGE

R LOP : PROCES S MANAGE RQUA D A B C D UTI L

« - » i i —

i- . < _r..FUE L GA S BLEND DRU M COMPONENT STREAMS . MMSCF D /&/ ^ ^ & e / "' liil"/

198 4 Jan . 2 Feb . 3 Mar . 2 Apr . 4 May 2 Jun e 1 Jul y 2 Aug . 1 Sept . 3 Oct . 1 Nov . 6 Dec . 5 - Sacrament o

Rive r Ga s 20.6 4 22.6 9 19.7 0 22.9 8 9.2 3 12.5 5 18.8 6 6.7 7 8.5 7 10.5 7 5.1 9 7.7 2 PG& E Nat .

Ga s 

### 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

' 0 

### 0 0 0 0 CG P Dry

Ga a 17.3 1 20. 6 21.4 2 23.7 8 25.2 5 22.6 9 18.4 7 23.1 9 20.8 9 21.6 1 20.7 3 19.4 1 SG P Dry

Ga s 5.5 0 6.0 2 5.0 5 7.7 4 7.3 9 7.6 2 7.1 6 7.2 0 7.0 0 6.7 9 

### 0 0 Coke r

Dry Ga s 7.9 4 5.8 9 

### 0 0 9.4 9 7.5 1 8.6 7 9.0 1 10.4 0 7.5 9 4.6 4 2.3 5 Dlmerso l

Propan e 0.61 3 0.97 4 0.71 0 

### 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.17 5 Vaporize d

Propan e 0.56 9 0.19 6 

### 0 0 0.18 3 0.19 4 0.23 1 0.12 8 0.72 9 0.18 0 

### 0 0.27 5 Vaporize d

Butan e 0 

### 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 . 0 0 0 . / 

### 64 1 22 3 Misc .

Ven t 8 

### 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.5 3 11.5 2



### DFOil p (3.50 ) 3/27/8 5.JTRI8UT.0N :

Fir m ' Permi t Services Enforcemen t Technica l Services Source Inventor

y Requeste r D.A.P.C.O . P.3 4 

### BA YARE A ) 

### AI R QUALIT

YMANAGEMEN TDISTRIC T 93 9 ELLI S STREE

T SA N FRANCISCO . CALIFORNI A 9410 9

(415 ) 771-6000 

# SUMMARYO F SOURC E TESTRE?' " T S R.POINO . 85 ° 2 6 , 

### I.. . o.t K 

### ..9/5/8 4 Tes t Times : Ru n A-...1.255-1.3.45 . Ru n BL.1.40.7-145. 7


### SOURC E INFORMATIO N Fir m Nam e an d Addres s Shel l Oi l P.O . Bo x71 1 Martinez . C

A 9455 3 Permi tCondition

s Fir m Representativ

e an d Titl e Dal e Obenhauer , En g Phon e No. 228-616 1 Source : C O Boile r# 3 ; Plan t#1 1 

# ^M^k^ljL-^

Non e Operatin g Parameter

s Norma l Operate s 2 4 hr/day&36 5

Applicabl e Regulations : Reg . 6 Sec . 310,31 1 V N Recommended : 

### N O Tes t Result s and Comments : METHO D TES T 

### ST-1 7 Stac k Volum e Flowrate , SDCF M Stac k Ga s Temperature , ° F
ST-2 3 Wate r content , Volum e % ST-1 4 Oxygen , Volum e % ST- 5 Carbo n Dioxide , Volum e % ST- 6 Carbo n Monoxide , pp m Carbo n Monoxide , lb/h r ST-1 5 Particulate , gr/SDC F Particulate , lb/h r RU N A

15. 6 2 . 9 15. 6 4 0 1 2 0.04 6 2 6 RU

N B AVG . 66,10 0 47 0
16. 5 16. 1 0 . 9 1. 9 14. 6 ,15. 1 4 0 4 0 1 2 1 2 0.05 3 0.05 0 3 0 28 " REG .

LIMI T

0.1 5 4 0 -

N O COMMERCIA L US E O F THES E RESULT S I S AUTHORIZE D Sourc e Tes t Tea m Leade

r

W . Hamme l 

# ,.^->L . Dat e

9/IT/B'T ' Approved—Chie fo fSourc e Tes t » Dat e 

# f/lfa/P.3 5

'Fir m '* Permi t Service

s Enforcemen t Technica l Service

s Source Inventor

y Requeste r D.A.P.C.O . 

# J BA YARE A ) A. H QUALIT

YMANAGEMEN TDISTRIC T 93 9 ELLI S STREET SA N FRANCISCO . CALIFORNI A 94109

(41S ) 771400 0 

### REPORTO F CONTINUOU S EMISSIO N MONITO R FIEL D ACCURACYTEST S i*f«^/t,/ f i »•*#

. Test Date Test Times Ru n A: Ru n B : 

### 7/18/8 4 !1034-110 5 1115-114 6
Ru n C i 

### 1151-122 0 SOURC E INFORMATIO N Fir m Nam

e an d Addres

s Shel l Oi l 

### P.O . Bo

x 71 1 Martinez , C

A 955 3 Condition s Durin

g Test s Norma l Fir m Representative an d Titl e 

### Dal e Obenhauer , Enginee r Phon e No . 228-616 1 Monitors ) Tested : ~ ~ 

### ED C Monito r§ CO

B 1 1

Parameter s Tested : 

### S02/02/C02/NOx/flo w 

### PROCEDURA L DAT A Ye s No Dally zer o & span check

made ? ^ 0 D Record s maintaine

d for2 yrs

? ^9 9 D Calibratio n gase

s acceptable? 30

9 D V/ N Recommended ? •(x % BAAQM D Representative s 

### B . Bartle y Ale x Ezersk y E d Wyat t Tes t Result s an d Comments :


### METHO D TES T ST-19 A SO2 ; pp

m (dry ) ST-19 A S02 ? lbs/hr ST-1 7 Volum

e Flowrate ; SDCF M ST- 5 C02 ; % Volume (dry ) ST-1 4 02 ? % Volume (dry ) ST-13 A NO x r 

### pp

m (dry ) ST-2 3 H20 % Volum e ST-13 A NOx ; lbs/hr •Althoug

hthe SO 2 pp

m & lbs/h

r ar e greate r than± 20 % relative accuracy ; they

d o mee t th

e ± 10 % o f emissionlimitationcri teri a . --... _ BAAQM D RESULT S 11 6 99. 2 86,00 0 14. 4 2. 1 9 1 16. 6 56. 0 SHEL L OI L

RESULT S 6 7 58. 7 88,00 0

—

— 

### PERCE

N DIFFERE -42. 2 -48. 8 +2. 4

— . -

_ _ _

N O COMMERCIA L US E O F THES E RESULT S I S AUTHORIZE D Sourc e Tes t Team Leader


### B . Bartle y Dat e Approved—Chie

fo fSourc e Tes t 

### JU L 2 6 193 ; , 

### ^ J . Karel s Date 

# 7/&I11P.3 6

/ .jTRIBUTION : >#Flr m Permi t Service

s Enforcemen t Technica l Services Sourc e Inventor

y Requeste r D.A.P.C.O . 

## A l

# 4 BA YARE A ) QUALIT YMANAGEMEN TDISTRIC T 93 9 ELLI S STREET SA N FRANCISCO . CALIFORNI A 9410 9

(415) 771-6000 

### REPORTO F CONTINUOU S EMISSIO N MONITO R FIEL D ACCURAC YTEST S Repor t No . Test Dale - V.18/8 4 

### Tes tTimes: Ru n A : 13.08-1338 . Ru nB: . 13 4 5-1416 . Ruf t

## & 1421-145 2 SOURC E INFORMATIO N PROCEDURA L DAT A Fir m Nam e an d Address Shel l Oi l P.O . Bo x71 1 Martinez , C

A 9453 3 Condition s Durin g Tests COB1 2 - Norma l Fir m Representativ

e an d Titl e Dal e Obenhauer , Engineetoall y Yes N c zer o & spa n chec kmade? 3Q

3 D Phon e No. 228-616 1 Monitors ) Tested : ~ ED C Monito r§ CO

B # 2 Record s maintaine d fo r2 yrs ? -X2 9 O 

### Calibratio n gase s acceptable ? ) S C 

## V/ N Recommended ? D]x > Parameter s Tested : S 0 2 

### /02/C02/NO x 

### /Flo w BAAQM D Representative

s Bo b Bartle y Ale xEzersk y E d Wyat t Tes tResult s an d Comments : METHO D TES T 

### ST^IS A S02 # pp

m (dry ) ST-19 A SO2 , lbs/hr ST-1 7 Volum

e Flowrat e SDCFM ST- 5 C0 2 

### % Volum e (dry ) ST-1 4 O 2 % Volum e (dry ) ST-2 3 H2O , % Volum e ST-13 A N0 X 

### ; pp

m (dry ) ST-13 A N0 X 

### ; lbs/hr •Althoug

hthe S0 2 pp

m & lbs/h

r do no t mee t th

e ± 20 % relative accurac y

requirement ; the

y do meet : the ±10 % o f emission limitationcriteria . BAAQM D RESULT S 11 5 11 5 101,00 0 15. 0 1. 5 17. 7 

## 8 8 63. 5 SHEL L OI L

RESULT S 

## 7 7 83. 5 . 109,00 0

_— _ 

### PERCEN

T DIFFERE 1 -33.0 * -27.4 ' -7. 9

• —

—. —

N O COMMERCIA L US E O F THES E RESULT S I S AUTHORIZE D 

### Sourc e Tes tTea m Leade r Dat e

l^s Jw L «

. [. ::j'r 

## B . Bartle y f Approved—Chie f o f Sourc e Tes t
G . Karel s Da t 

# •>/zol& WP.3 7

/ rlSTRIBUTION :

Flrm

_ Permi t Services Enforcemen t Technica l Services Source Inventor

y Requeste r D.A.P.C.O . 

### > 1 BAYARE A AI R QUALIT YMANAGEMEN TDISTRIC T

93 9 ELLI S STREE

T SA N FRANCISCO . CALIFORNI A 9410 9

(415 ) 771-600 0 

### REPOR TO F Ru n B:

. CONTINUOU S EMISSIO N MONITO R FIEL D ACCURAC YTEST S THflRMOXR u Repor t No . Tes t Date:. . Test Times : Ru n A IED C 

# t 97-8 4 5/3/8 4 1045-111 5 1126-115 7

n C:^ 1

. V I 

### 207-123 7 1245-131 6 SOURC E INFORMATIO N PROCEDURA L DAT A Fir m Nam e an d Addres s 

### Shel l Oi l P.O . Bo x 71 1 Martinez , C A9455 3 Condition s Durin g Test s 

### Fue l Usage : Flexigas-12 8 mmBTU/h r Refiner yGas-2 6 mmBTU/h r LSFO-6 7 mmBTU/h r TOTAL : 22 1 BTU/h r Firm Representativ e and Titl e Dal e Obenauer , Enginee r Phon e No.228-616 1 ' Monitors ) Tested : 

### Thermo x Monitor s a t Boile r # 4 Yes N o Dail yzero & spa n chec k

made ? E

D D Record s maintaine d (o r2 yrs ? 0 D Calibration gase s acceptable ? { D D V/ N Recommended ? O (R ) 

### Parameter s Tested : NOx/C0 2 

### / 0 2 

### /lbs-h r BAAQM D Representative s 

### B

. Bartle y Tes t Result s an d Comments : 

### METHO D TES T ST-13 ANOx , pp m(dry ) ST-13 ANOx , lb/h r ST-1 4 0 2 

### % , Volum e (dry ) ST- 5 C0 2 

### , % Volum e (dry )

Volum e Flowrate , SDCF M ST-19 AS0 2 

### , pp m(dry ) ST-19 AS0 2 

### , lbs/h r

•Calculate d usin g combustio n data . **Shel l dat a obtaine d fro mThermo x Analyze r location , no t ED C analyze r location
. Dat a obtaine d fromth e ED C analyze r lo

catio n o n thi s tes t dat e indicat e a lea k i n th e system . ***Meet s ± 5 % o f ful l scal e criteria
. BAAQM D RESULT S 

## 10 1 27.9 * 

## 3. 2 14. 4 38,600 * 

## 8 4 32. 3 SHEL L OIL* *

RESULT S 

## 11 2 35. 2 

## 3. 5

44,00 0

_ _ _ 

### PERCE )

DIFFEP J +10. 9 +26. 2 +9. 4

+14. 0



# CORRECTE D COP Y

N O COMMERCIA L US E O F THES E RESULT S I S AUTHORIZE D 

### Source Tes t Tea m Leade r Date



### B . Bartle y jr Approved—ChiefofSource Tes t D a 

# £&&& G . Karel s 

# ?//*/ */ STRIBUTlON :

'Fir m Permit'Service s Enforcemen t Technica l Service s Sourc e Inventor

y Requeste r D.A.P.C.O

. 

### - BA Y ARE A \ AI R QUALIT

YMANAGEMENTDISTRIC T 93 9 ELLI S STREE T SA N FRANCISCO

. CALIFORNI A9410 9

(415)771*00 0 

### REPOR TO F CONTINUOU S EMISSIO N MONITO R FIEL D ACCURAC

YTEST S Repor t No . _/~9. 4

.. . Tes tDate : $/..}./.$.$.... Test Times : Ru n A.1P.45-.111 5 EDC 

### R5B:1126-1.15 7 Ru nC : 

### SOURC E INFORMATIO N Fir m Nam e an d Addres s Shel l Oi l P.O . Bo x 71 1 Martinez , C

A 9455 3 Condition s Durin g Tests FUEL USAGE : Flexigas-12 8 mmBTU/h r Refiner y Gas-2 6 mmBTU/h r LSFO-6 7 mmBTU/h r TOTAL=22 1 mmBTU/h r Fir m Representativ

e an d Titl e Dal e Obenauer , Enginee r Phon e No ? 2ft-iS I 6 1 Monitors ) Tested: ' 

### ED C a tBoile r# 4 PROCEDURA L DAT A

Parameter s Tested : NOx/C02/0 2 

### /lbs-h r Yes N o Dail y zer o & spa n chec kmade ? £ tD Record s maintaine d fo r2 yrs ? j Q O 

### Calibratio n gase s acceptable ? 9 0 D V/ N Recommended ? J$k* 0 / BAAQM D Representative

s B . Bartle y
Tes t Result s an d Comments :
METHO D TES T 

### ST-13 ANOx , pp

m(dry ) ST-13 ANOx , lb/h r ST-1 4 0 2 

### % , Volume (dry ) ST- 5 C0 2 

### , % Volume (dry ) ST-2 3 H 2 

### 0 , % Volume ST-19 AS0 2 

### , pp

m(dry ) Volume Flowrate , SDCFM ST-19 AS0 2 

### , lbs/h r BAAQM D RESULT S 8 4 26. 0 5.1 V 12. 8 10. 7 7 2 43,30 0 31. 0 SHEL L OIL *

RESULT S 11 2 35. 2 3. 5

- — 

### -44,00 0

__ _ 

### PERCEN T

DIFFERE D +33.3 * +35.4* * -31. 4

-1. 6

__ _



### *Th e dat a a t the ED C sit e compare d t o th e dat a a t th e Thermox sit e indicat e a lea k a t th e ED C site
. **Meet s the ± 5 % o f ful l scal e critera
.



# CORRECTE D COP Y

N O COMMERCIA L US E O F THES E RESULTS I S AUTHORIZE D Sourc e Test Tea m Leade r Dat e Approved—Chie fo fSource Test



### B . Bartle y St f \ \ 

### ®fi Dat 

# */i*k

'P.3 9

DISTRIBUTION : Fir m Permi tService s Enforcemen

t Technical Service s Source Inventor

y Requeste r D.A.P.C.O . 

### BA YARE A . r 

### ...\ QUALIT

YMANAGEMEN TDIS.JG T 93 9 ELLI S STREET SA N FRANCISCO . CALIFORNI A 94109

(415 ) 771«)0 0 

### REPORTO F CONTINUOU S EMISSIO N MONITO R FIEL D ACCURACYTEST S Hepor i NO . 

### 2/28/8 4 Tes tDate: . Tes tTimes : 

### Ru nA:. . 1034-1102

_ Ru n 6:1112-1143 . Ru nC,ll. 5 

### .9.-1221 . 

### SOURC E INFORMATIO N PROCEDURA L DAT A Fir m Nam e an d Addres s Shel i Oi l P.O . Bo x71 1 Martinez , C

A 9455 3 Condition s Durin g Test s Mixe d Fuela ; Nat . Gas : 7 7 m

m btr/hr Fue l Oil s 219m

m btu/hr Fir

m Representativ

e an d Titl e Dal e Obenhauer , Enginee r Phon e No . 228-616 1 Monltor(s ) Tested : 

### ED C Monito r§ Boile r#4 Ye s N o Dall y zer o & spa n chec kmade ? B D Record s maintaine d fo r2 yrs ? B D 

### Calibratio n gases acceptable? D D V/N recommended ? g tD Parameter s Tested : N O x 

### /C0 2 

### /02/flo w BAAQM D Representative

s 

### B . Bartle y

Tes t Result s an d Comments : 

# CORRECTE D COP Y

METHO D TES T ST-13 A NO x 

### , pp

m (dry ) ST-13 A NO x 

### , lb/hr ST-1 4 02% , Volum e (dry ) ST- 5 CO2 , % Volum e (dry ) Volum e Flowrate , SDCFM ST-19 A SO2 , pp

m (dry ) ST-19 A S0 2 

### , lbs/hr ST-2 3 H 2 

### 0 , % Volum e *The CO 2 monito r i s n o longe r required .BAAQM D RESULT S 

## 16 2 52. 0 6.6 , 10. 6 44,90 0 

## 16 0 71. 5 12. 6 SHEL L OI L

RESULT S 18 3 53. 7 

## 4. 8 7. 6 41,00 0

-

— . _ 

### PERCENT

DIFFEREN ( +13. 0 +3. 3 -27. 3 -28.3 * -8. 7

—



# ;.;> C:A

N O COMMERCIA L US E O F THES E RESULT S I S AUTHORIZE D 

### Sourc e Tes tTea m Leade r Dat e



### P . Bartle y £

_ Approved—Chie f o f Sourc e Tes t

G . Karel s Dat e



# ^ b.IBUTION :

iSrmi t Services */Cn(orcemen t Technica l Services Sourc e Inventor

y Requeste r D.A.P.CO . P.4 0 

### ) BA YARE A) Ai R QUALIT YMANAGEMEN TDISThiC T

93 9 ELLI S STREE

T SA N FRANCISCO . CALIFORNI A 9410 9

(415 ) 771-600 0 

### REPOR TO F CONTINUOU S EMISSIO N MONITO R FIEL D ACCURAC YTEST S Itfl^W I •*%%*.. Tes t Dale: . Test Times : Ru n A i Ru n 8* . Ru n C : 

### 10/13/8 3 1124-115 4 1234-130 5 1307-133 7
SOURC E INFORMATIO N PROCEDURA L DAT A Fir m Nam e an d Addres s 

### Shel l Oil.Compan

y P.O . Bo x71 1 Martinez , C

A 9453 3 Fir m Representative an d Titl e



### Dal e Obenauer , Environ jnenta l Engineer^, . PhoneTfo . * 2 2 ft- ft1 fi 1 Condition s Durin g Test s Norma l Monltor(s ) Tested : 

### ED C 8 COBoile r# 1 Yes N o Dall yzer o & spa n check

made ? E l D Record s maintaine d fo r2 yrs ? Q D 

### Calibratio n gase s acceptable ? \~) D / N recommended ? Q C D Parameter s Tested : 

# so 2 

# /o 2 

# /co 2 BAAQM D Representative s 

### B . Bartle

y A . Ezersk

y Test Results an d Comments : 

### METHO D TES T 

### ST-19 A ST-19 A ST- 5 ST-1 4 ST- 2 3 S0 2 

### ; pp

m (dry ) S0 2 

### ; lb/h

r C0 2 

### ; * volum

e (dry ) 0 2 

### ; % volum

e (dry ) H 2 

### 0 ; % volum

e Volum e flowrate ; SDCF

M BAAQM

D RESULT S 13 1 11 1 14. 0 2. 6 15. 4 85,10 0 SHEL L

OIL * RESULT S 7 1 71. 3

- « , — — «



### 101,00 0 PERCENT

DIFFERENC E -45.8 *

. -35.8 *

+18. 7 •Althoug

hth e SO 2 pp

m (dry ) an

dS0 2 

### lbs/hr do no t mee t the±20 1 relativ

e accurac

y requirement ; the

y d o mee t th

e 10 * o f emissionlimitatio ncriteria .

N O COMMERCIA L US E O F THES E RESULT S I S AUTHORIZE D Sourc e Tes t Tea m Leade r Dat e Approved—Chie fo fSourc e Tes t

# fe*gB . Bartle y 'OC Tf6 198

3 

### G . Karel s Date 

# '°/u/?l. / P.4 1 BUTION : srmlt Services 'Enforcemen t Technica l Services Sourc e Inventor

y Requeste r O.A.P.C.O . 

### ) BA YARE A ' AI R QUALIT

YMANAGEMEN TDISTRIC T 93 9 ELLI S STREET SA N FRANCISCO . CALIFORNI A 94109

(415 ) 771-6000 

### REPORTO F CONTINUOU S EMISSIO N MONITO R FIEL D ACCURACYTEST S Repor t No . ~

> j - •> • 

### 10/11/8 3 1338-1408

_ Ru nB:..l. 4


### .. 2


### .6

### .:15p. O RunC,15?6 : 

### lS41

_ Tes t Date- . Test Times : Ru n A :



### SOURC E INFORMATIO N PROCEDURA L DAT A Fir m Nam e an d Addres s 

### Shel l Oi l Compan

y P.O . Bo x71 1 Martinez , C

A 9453 3 Condition s Durin g Test s 

### Norma l Fir m Representativ e an d Titl e 

### Dal e Obenaue r Environmenta l Enginee r Phon e No . >>>>o_ 6161 6



### _ Monitor(s) TesWb

T C O Boile r»2 Ye s N o Dall y zero & spa n chec k made ? S Q Record s maintaine d fo r2 yrs ? 0 Q Calibratio n gases acceptable ? jj p D
Parameters Tested : 

## so 2 

## /o 2 

## /co 2 BAAQM D Representatives 

### Bo bBartle

y Ale xEzersk

y
Tes t Result s an d Comments : 

### METHOD TES T ST-19 A S0 2 

### ; pp

m (dry ) ST-19 A S0 2 

### ; lb/hr ST- S C

O ; % volum

e (dry )

me 

### ST-1 4 0 2 

### ; t volum e (dry ) ST-2 3 H 2 

### 0 ; % volum e Flowrate ; SCDF

M BAAQM D RESULT S 12 0 12 3 13. 4 3. 1 18. 7 SHEL L OI L RESULT S 8 0 82. 0

_- _ 

### PERCENT

DIFFERENC E -33.3 * -33.3 *

em mmem

. . .

• - - 

### 103,00 0 *A1thoug

hth e SO ? pp

m (dry ) an

dS0 2 

### lb/hr ar e .greater than—20*; . the

y d o mee t th

e 10 * o f emissionstandar d criteria .



# CORRECTED COP Y

N O COMMERCIA L US E O F THES E RESULT S I S AUTHORIZE D Sourc e Test Tea m Leade r


### B . Bartle y 10/18/8 3 Dat e | Approved—Chie fo fSource Test


### G. Karel s Dat eP.4 2 

### • SHELL OI L COMPAN Y MARTINE Z MANUFACTURIN GCOMPLEX BOILERA

CONTINUOU S EMISSIO N MONITOR FIELD ACCURAC

YTES T JUL Y31 , 198 3

Tes t Time : 101 0 Hour s - 114 0 Hour s
Shel l Quality Boile r 1 4 Continuou s Tes t Assuranc e Dept . Va nEmissio nMonitor NOX , PP° » dr y NOx , lb./hr . Volum e Flowrate , SCF

M H 2 0 , X Vol . 15. 2 10 0 46. 3

— 11 8 54. 6 75,00 0

DEC:l p (2.73 ) 8/21/8 3« •i Services

•orcemen t Technica l Service

s Source Inventor

y Requeste r D.A.P.C.O . 

### BA YARE A AI R QUALIT

YMANAGEMEN TDISTRIC T 93 9 ELLI S STREET SA N FRANCISCO . CALIFORNI A 9410 9

(415) 771-6000 

### REPOR TO F CONTINUOU S EMISSIO N MONITO R FIEL D ACCURAC YTEST S P.4 3 Repor t No . wt i

_ / Test Dele : 5/19/83 . Test Times : RunA:....l.!\.4.-110 4 

### Ru n B: 

### .. . 11. 1 .P-.11.42 . RunC:....1149 : 

### l220 . 

### SOURC E INFORMATIO N Fir m Nam e an

d Addres s 

### Shel l Oi l Compan

y P.O . Box 71 1 Martinez , C

A 94SS 3 Condition s Durin g Test s


### NORMA L Fir m Representativ e an d Titl e Da n Glaze-Env . Enginee r Phon e No . 228-616 1 Monitor(s ) Tested : 

### Thermo-Electronaon

BOILE R1 4 Parameter s Tested : 

### N O /C0 2 

### /0 2 

### /H 2 

### 0 Tes t Result s and Comments : METHO D TES T ST-13 A N0 X , pp m (dry ) /—ST-13 A N0 X , lb/hr . 

### ST- 5 C0 2 P

### X

Volum e (dry ) ST-19 A S0 2 

### „ pp

m (dry ) ST-19 A S0 2 

### , lb/hr , ST-1 4 02 , X

Volum e (dry ) Volume Flowrate , SDCF M ST-2 3 Wate rVapor , X Volum e PROCEDURA L DAT A Ye s N o Dall y zero & spa n chec k made ? G J D Record s maintaine d fo r2 yrs ? QJ D Calibratio n oase s acceptable ? D 8 D V N Recommended ? X BAAQM D Representatives 

### Bo b Bartle y BAAQM D RESULT S 22 0 11 5 9. 0 3 2 -23. 2 5. 7

' - • _• - ** 

### 16. 7 SHEL L OI L

RESULT S 1S 6 81. 4 6. 5

-• * v

em> mm em -

em em em 

### 73,000 *

r 

### PERCEN

T DIFFERENC E -29. 1 -29. 2 -27. 8

em «• > em

* * em mm em



### * Dat asupplie d b y Shel l Oil .



# C N O COMMERCIA L US E O F THES E RESULT S I S AUTHORIZE D ,ourc e Tes t Tea m Leade r Dat e



# Q>et-&z*}»* Bob Bartley K JU N 1 0 1983 Dat eP.4 4

DISTRIBUTION : fir m Permi t Service

s Enforcement Technica l Services Sourc e inventor

y Requeste r D.A.P.C.O . • BA YARE A l Alr i QUALIT YMANAGEMEN TDISTRIC T

93 9 ELLI S STREET SA N FRANCISCO . CALIFORNI A 94109

(415) 771-6000 REPOR TO F CONTINUOU S EMISSIO N MONITO R FIEL D ACCURAC YTEST S SOURC E INFORMATIO N Fir m Name and Addres

s Shel l Oi l Compan y P.O . Bo x 71 1 Martinez , C

A 9453 3 Conditions During Test

s Norma l Fir m Representativ e an d Titl e Da n Glaze , Enginee r Phon e No . 228-616 1 Monitors) Tested : ED C Monito ro n C O Boile r92 Parameter

s Tested : S 0 2 / 0 2 /C0 2 /NO x Repor t N o ->'-o. > T.,,0.,. : .3/11/8 3 TestTlmes : u . 5 1

_ 1 2 . 2 2 Ru n A-......!.„ * l *"

.. RunB,.. 1

. 2 ::. 3

. 0 : . 1300 , R-C..?:?.:.??:.".:* ? PROCEDURA L DAT A Ye s No Daily zer o & spa n check

made ? D 9 D Record s malnta i ne

d fo r2 yrs

? Q I D Calibratio n gase

s acceptable? 1 3 D V N Recommended ? X BAAQM D Representative

s Bo b Bartle y
Tes t Results an d Comments :
METHOD TES T ST-19 A S0 2 , pp

m (dry ) ST-19 A S0 2 , lb/hr . ST-1 4 02 , X

Volum e (dry ) ST- 5 C0 2 , X Volum e (dry ) ST-13 A N0 X , pp

m (dry ) H 2 0 , X

Volum e Flowrate , SDCFM BAAQM D RESULT S 10 7 11 9 2. 9 13. 4 17 4 16.3 * SHELL RESULT S 10 8 12 0

- - -

. . . PERCEN T DIFFERENCE 0. 9 0. 8

112,000* *

* Thi s H 2 0 * valu e wa s obtaine d b y averagin

g th e las t fou

r sourc e tests ' wate r data .
* * Thi s flo

w wa s obtaine d usin g Shel l Oi l data .

N O COMMERCIA L US E O F THES E RESULT S I S AUTHORIZE D Source Test Tea m Leade r Dat e



## Bo b Bartl/ y I

W H • " Appro v Chie fo fSource Test

Gal e Karel s Dat e 

# 3^/?P.4 5 DISTRIBUTION : Fir m Permi t Services Enforcemen t Technica l Services Source Inventor

y Requeste r O.A.P.C.O . 

### > BA YAREA > AI R QUALIT

YMANAGEMEN TDISTRIC T 93 9 ELLI S STREE T SA N FRANCISCO . CALIFORNI A 94109

(415 ) 771-6000 

### REPORTO F CONTINUOU S EMISSIO N MONITO R FIEL D ACCURACYTEST S Repor t No . 30-83 . Test Date : 3/1/8 3 Test Times : Ru n A : 1333.-14.1 0 Ru n B_....16.05-16.36 . RunC : 16.46.-r.17.07 . 

### SOURC E INFORMATIO N PROCEDURA L DAT A Fir m Nam e an d Addres s Shel l Oi l Compan y P.O . Bo x71 1 Martinez , C

A 9453 3 Condition s Durin g Test s 

### C0B # 1 - Norma l COB * 2 - No t inoperatioA 1 

### Fir m Representativ

e an d Titl e Da n Glaz e Phon e No . 228-6 1 6 1 Monitor(s) Tested : C O BOILE R# 1 Parameter s Tested : 

### S 0 2 

### / 0 2 

### /C0 2 

### /flo w Ye s N o Dail y zer o & spa n chec k made ? j p D Record s maintained (o

r2 yrs ? J p D Calibration gase s acceptable ? j p D V N RecomnmnrlftH ? BAAQM D Representative s 

### Bob Bartle y

Tes t Result s an d Comments :


### METHO D ST-19 A ST-19 A ST- S ST-1 4 TES T

S0 2 

### , pp m (dry } S0 2 

### , lb/hr . C0 2 

### , * Volum

e (dry ) 0 2 

### , X Volum e (dry ) H 2 

### 0 , X Volum e Vdlum e Flowrate , SDCF

M BAAQM

D RESULT S 

## 17 0 21 9 14. 4 

## 3. 2 1 2 SHEL L

RESULT S 

## 10 2 13 1

129,400* * PERCEN

T DIFFERENCF . -40.0 * -40.2 *

* Althoughth

e S0 2 

### pp

m an dlb/h r do no t mee t th

e ±20 t accuracy tolerance , the

y do mee t th

e IO * o f emissionstandar dcriteria , For th e S0 2 

### pp

m the value s ar e 17 0 ±100ppm , an dfor th

e S0 2 

### lb/h r the value s ar e 21 9 ±12 9 lb/hr .

- ~. . -~ . 

### * * Calculatedvalu e usin g Shel l Oi l equationan dvelocit y

data .

N O COMMERCIA L US E O F THES E RESULT S I S AUTHORIZE D Sourc e Tes t Tea m Leade r



### [Tea m Leade r^ Dat e Approved—Chie

f o f So u Bo b Bartle y /T

^tfal cKarel s 

# f Approved—Chie fo fSourc e Tes t Da h 

# *hlr.P.4 6

^ainiuunwn , F^r m Permi t Services
' Enforcemen t Technica l Services Sourc e Inventory Requeste r O.A.P.C.O . 

### , BA YARE A Airt QUALIT

YMANAGEMEN TDISTRIC T 93 9 ELLI S STREE T SA N FRANCISCO

. CALIFORNI A9410 9

(415 ) 771-6000 

### REPORTO F CONTINUOU S EMISSIO N MONITO R FIEL D ACCURAC

YTEST S SOURC E INFORMATIO N Firm Nam e and Addres

s Shel l Oi l Compan y P.O . Bo x71 1 Martinez , C

A 9455 3 Condition s Durin g Test

s 

### Refiner y HasSri72 5 SCF M Fue l Oil —41 6 lb/ h r . Fir m Representativ e and Titl e Da n Glaze , Env . Enpr . Phon e No . 228-616 3 Monitors) Tested : BOILE R # 4
Parameter

s Tested : N O x / 0 2 /C0 2 /S0 2 Tes t Data....1.1./1.0/A2..'... . Tes t Times: Ru n A-.1/1:4.5*11:2 4 Rune-. 1 1 . / 3 0 " 1 2 ' 0 7

RU N D:12:S1-13:3 0 

### PROCEDURA L DAT

A Ye s N o Dall y zer o & spa n chec k made ? B l D Record s maintaine d (o r2 yrs ? 5 3 D Calibratio n gase s acceptable ? Ix l D BAAQM D Representative s Bo b Bartle y


### Tes t Result s an dComments : METHO DTES T ST-13 A MO x 

### , pp m

(dry ) ST-13 A N0 X 

### , lb/hr . ST-19 A S0 2 

### e pp m

(dry ) ST-19 A S0 2 

### , lb/hr . ST- 5 CO» , X

Volum e (dry ) ST-1 4 0 2 

### „ X

Volum e (dry ) Volum e Flowrate , SDCF M ST-2 3 Wate r Vapor , * Volum e BAAQM D RESULTS 

### 16 6 57. 2 

### 8 4 39. 8 9. 6 5. 8 47,600 * 10.2* * SPEL L RESULT S 

### 11 7 39. 8

—

k 

### 8. 0 6. 2

•

•• » • » 

### PERCEN T DIFFERENCE 

### -29. 5 ** * -30. 4 ** *

m m

em m 

### -16. 7 •6. 9

—

. -



### * Supplie db y

Shel l Oil . * * Supplie db v

CAR B - ** * Emissio nstandard s ar e als o 5 % o f ful l scal e o r i nthi s cas e 16 8 pp m

* 5 0 PPM , ranp. e 116-21 6 PP M an d39.5-73. 5 lb/hr . NOTE : CAR B tes t sit e wa s downstrea m o f BAAQM Dtes t site .

N O COMMERCIA L US E O F THES E RESULTS I S AUTHORIZE D Sourc e Test Tea m Leade r



### BO RBARTLEY ^ /Z. 

# •A/fca

. Dat e I Approved—Chie fo t Sourc e Test Dat e



# */n/fiP.4 7 

### TAL . 

# 1

. , Californi aAi rResource s Boar d

Enforcemen tDivisio n SUMMAR

Y O F SOURC E TES T RESULT S TEL.'IIMES : 

### 11/10/8 2 Ru n # 1 103 0 Ru n # 2 111 5 Ru n # 3 120 0 110 0 hrs .

114 5 hrs . 123 0 hr s

SOURC E INFORMATIO N AR B REPRESENTATIVE S SOURC E NAM E AN D ADDRES S 

### Shel l Oi l Gcmpan

y P . O . Bo x 71 1 Martinez , C A9455 3 SOURC E REPRESENTATIV E 

### Judit h C . Mcora

d PHON E NO . (415 ) 228-616 1 ENGINEER S 

### G. Zimrerma

n M . de l Castill o TECHNICIAN S 

### J . Katyrynui

X R. Simune

k DEVIC E TESTED : 

### Boile r#

4

OPERATIN G PARAMETERS : 

### See . attached .

PARAMETERMEASURE D TES T RESUL T Run»l Run#

2 Run# 3 Ave . 'REGULATOR YLIMI T



### Stac k Ga s Flowrate , SDCFM 37,85 0 Moistur e Content , % b yVo l — Oxygen , % byVo l (dry ) 8. 1 Carbo n Dioxide , % byVo l (dry ) 8. 0 Oxide s o f Nitrogen , ppm v(dry ) 14 5 Oxide s o f Nitrogen , (lb/hr ) 39. 2 Sulfur Dioxide , ppm

v(dry ) 7 6 Sulfur Dioxide , (lb/hr ) 28. 6

CE M Relative * Accuracy , % (ppm ) NC " Channe l 37,57 0 38,033 . 37,82 0

——10. 2 8. 5 8. 0 8. 5 8. 0 14 3 15 3 38. 3 41. 5 7 6 7 9 28. 4 29. 8 8. 2

8: 0 14 7 39. 7 7 7 28. 9

-20(-31 ) 

## 30 0

+ 20 % o f referenc e o r + 5 % o f ful l scal e ( + 5 0 ppm) , whicheve r is " greate r 

# //ftr/f r

M S ^ DAT E SECTIO N MANAGE R 

## -yy ENGINEE R I N CHARG E ENGINEE RP.4 8

/ /IHIbUllON :

Jr m ''Permi t Service s Enforcemen t Technica l Service s Sourc e Inventor y Requeste r D.A.P.C.O . 

### BA YARE A> AI M QUALITYMANAGEMEN TDISTRIOT 93 9 ELLI S STREE T SA N FRANCISCO . CALIFORNI A 9410 9

(415 ) 771-600 0 

### REPORTO F CONTINUOU S EMISSIO N MONITO R FIEL D ACCURACYTEST S Repor t N o A.9.~.!*

_ Tes t Date : I.P./?/8 1 Tes t Times : Ru n Ai. 12:00-12 : 3 Q Ru n B : 

### 13:00-13:3 0 Ru n c - «:.50-14:2 0 

### SOURC E INFORMATIO N Fir m Nam e an d Addres s Shel l Oi l Compan y P.O . Bo x71 1 Martinez , C

A 9455 3 Condition s Durin g Test s Norma l fo rCOB# l CO B # 3 no toperatin g Firm Representativ e and Titl e Da n Glaze-Env . Enqr . Phon e No . 228-6161 , x34 8 Monitor(s ) Tested : CO BOILE R# 1 Parameter

s Tested : S 0 2 /Opacit y 

### PROCEDURA L DAT A Ye s N o Dall y zero & spa n chec k made ? L

B D Record s maintaine d fo r2 yrs ? 0 D Calibratio n gases acceptable ? Q D BAAQM D Representatives 

### B . Bartle y J . Bucha n E . Dardo n Test Result s an d Comments : 

### METHO D ST-19 A ST-19 A ST- 5 ST-2 3 ST-1 7 TES T

S0 2 

### Dpm(dry ) S0 2 

### , lb/h r C0 2 

### # % Volum e (dry ) Water , % Volum e Volum e Flowrate , * 

### SDCFM * BAAOM D RESULT S 

## 11 9 13 2 15. 8 11. 6 111,70 0 SHEL L

RESULT S 

## 4 0 44. 4 16.1* *

V 

### PERCENT

DIFFERENC E -66. 4 -66. 4 +1. 9

* Dat a provide d b

yS.T. # 8206 2

* * Dat a provide d b

yShell' s C O Boile r # 2 CO j monitor
. Althoug h th e percen t differenc e betwee n result s i s greate r tha n ±20% ; Shel l Oi l i s stil l i n complianc e usin g th e 10 % o f emissio n standar d rule , (M.O.P . Volum e V , Se&tio n 6.2 ) Thi s rul e allow s COBf l t o b e withi n 10 0 pp mo f BAAOM D concentrations
.

N O COMMERCIA L US E O F THES E RESULT S I S AUTHORIZE D Sourc e Tes t Tea m Leade r



### Bo b Bartley/ ' Dat e Approved—Chie fo fSource Test Dat e /*-/-* /P.4 9

.•tIBUTION : j ; ir m .Permi t Service

s • Enforcement ' Technica l Services ' Sourc e Invento r Requeste rI D.A.P.C0 . ' 

### > BA YARE A» AI R QUALITYMANAGEMEN TDISTRIC T

93 9 ELLI S STREE

T SA N FRANCISCO . CALIFORNI A 94109

(415 ) 771-6000 

# SUMMARYO F SOURC E TESTRESULT S Repor t No. .

Tes t Date: . Tes t Times : Ru n A : Ru n B : Ru n C : 0206 2 10/8/8 1 11 - 1 2 1 3 30 - •10 - 45 - -1 2 -1 3 -1 4 :2 0 :3 0 :4 5 

### SOURC E INFORMATIO N BAAQM D REPRESENTATIVE S Fir m Nam e an d Addres s Shel l Oi l Compan y P.O . Bo x71 1 Martinez , C

A 9455 3
Permi t Condition s

NON E Fir m Representative an

d Title Jud y Moorad-Env . Engr . Phone No . 228-616 1 Sourc e TestEngineers 

### B . Bartle y J . Bucha n E . Dardo n Source : BOILE R# 1 Permi t Services Divisio n
Permi tNo . P.N . 6 4 Operates 2 4 hr/day&36 5 days/y r Enforcemen t Divisio n 

### Operatin g Parameter

s SE E SOURC

E TES T FIL E Tes tRequeste

d by: G . Karel s (CDS ) Applicabl e Regulations : 6-310,31 1 11-1-30 1 V N Recommended : N

O Tes tResult s an d Comments : METHO D TES T 

### RU NA RU

NB RU

NC AVG . ST-1 7 Stac k volum e flowrate , SDCF M H2,32 3

Stac k Ga s temperature , °F . ST-2 3 Wate r content , volun e % ST-1 4 Oxygen , volum e % ST- 5 Carbo n Dioxide , Volum e % ST-1 9 Sulfu r Dioxide , ppm ST-1 5 Particulate , Gr/SDC F

Particulate , lbs/h r Lea d Particulate , lbs/h r Lea d particulate , lbs/da y
* 2 0 lb/h r re g limi t i s base d o n dividin q4 0 lbs/h r b y2 operatin g stacks . N o velocit ytravers e wa s take n o n #2 . Becaus e fue l an d C O qa s feed s t o th e tw o unit s wer e equal , exhaus t ga s flowrate s woul d hav e bee n equa l also . N O COMMERCIA L US E O F THES E RESULT S I S AUTHORIZE D 

### 112,32 3 55 0 11. 8

.00 9 8.3 0 .01 2 .2 9 111,9 3

54 6 11. 7

.00 7 6.4 2 .01 2 . 2 9 8 » 110,75 8 55 0 11. 3

.01 1 10.5 5 .01 2 .2 9 111 ,

54 9 11. 6 1. 3 15. 8 11 9 .00 9 8.4 3 .01 2 .2 9 1 '

Sourc e Tes t Tea m Leade r Dat e 

# JrtC facfa. &*'* Joh n ?>ucha n Approved—Chie l o fSource Test Dat e 

# "/'/llP.5 0

TES TRESULT S AN D COMMENT S 

### Oxide s o f Nitroge npp m a t 3 % O2 * = 28 4 Sulfu r Dioxid e ppm * = 19 0 Oxygen * % b y

Volume * = 5. 7 Carbo nDioxid e % b y

Volume * * 9.2 % Carbo nMonoxid e ppm * = Negligibl e Moistur e Conten t % b y volum e - 1 3 CE M Accurac y

% =- 4 

## of<r

0 TABL E 1

1

. * • J CALIFORNI A AI R RESOURCE S BOAR D ENFORCEMEN TDIVISIO N SUMMAR YO F SOURC E TES TRESULT S

SOURC E INFORMATIO N SOURC E NAM E AN O ADDRES S Shel l Oi l Compan

y P.O . Bo x71 1 Martinez , CA. 9455 3



## 1 SOURC E REPRESENTATIV E Judit h C . Moora d PHON E NO . (415)228-616 1 DEVIC E TESTED : Boile r#4

OPERATIN G PARAMETERS : Stea m Flowrat e 126,50 0 lb/h ra t 745° F an d 65 0 ps i

• T£S TTIMES : 7/22/8 1 103 0 - 143 0 hour s

AR O REPRESENTATIVE S ENGINEERIN G TECHNICA L R . Tyle rD . Wilso n

H . Weishah n

REGULATIO N LIMIT S



### 30 0

+2 0

*A1 1 valjjes average dove r tes t a s the y wer e nearl y

constan tP.5 1

/ , DISTRIBUTION : / , ,Fir m

- Permit Service

s Enlorcement Technica l Service

s Sourc e Inventor

y Requeste r D.A.P.C.O . 

### \ BA

YARE A' l Ai R QUALITYMANAGEMEN TDISlrtlC T

939 ELLI S STREE

T SA N FRANCISCO , CALIFORNI A 94109

(415) 771-600

0 

# SUMMAR YO F SOURC E TES TRESULT S

* * 

### SOURC E INFORMATIO N Firm Nam

e and Addres

s Shel l Oi l Co . P.O . Bo x71 1 Martinez , C A 9455 3
Permi t Condition s

Non e Fir m Representativ e an d Titl e Jud y Moorad-Env . Engr . Phon e No . 228-616 1 Source : ^

BU1LK R # 3
Permi t No . Plan t #6 4 Operate s 2 4 nr/day & 365(j ays /y r Operatin g Parameters CONFIDENTIA L Applicable Regulations : b-JlU , b-J. 1 Repor t NO . . . 8115 4 Tes t Date:.

. 

### 3/10/8 1 Tes t Times : Ru n A : 1:14-2:0 4 RunB : 2..: . .3.0 . - 3 . J

. 2 Q . Ru n C : 3..:..4.0.-.4..:.3.0. . 

### BAAQM D REPRESENTATIVE S Sourc e Tes t Engineer

s E . Dardo n J . Bucha n B . Bartle y Permi t Service s Division

Enforcemen t Divisio n

Tes t Requested by : G . Karel s (CDS ) V N Recommended : Test Results an d Comments :

METHO D TES T 

### ST-1 7 Stac k Volum e Flowrate , SDCF M

Stac k Ga s Temperature , F.,Avg . ST-2 3 Water , Volum e % ST-1 4 Oxygen , Volum e % ST-1 5 Particulate , Gr/SDC F

Particulate , lbs/h r Ringelman n No. , Rang e Ringelman n No. , Avg .

* Thi s limi t i s base d o n dividin g 4 0 lbs/h r b y3 C O Boiler s

N O COMMERCIA L US E O F THES E RESULT S I S AUTHORIZE D 

### RU N A

n i l n i l RU

N B 78,00 0 51 0 9 . 5 3 . 6 .000 8 .56 7 0 0 RU

N C 76,60 0 51 0 11. 5 3 . 6

• .003 2 2.0 9 0 0 AVG .

77,30 0 51 0 10. 5 3 . 6 .002 0 1.3 2 0 0 LIMI' .

• . 

### 1 .

•

Source Tes

t Tea m Leade r Date 

# J ^&.M'^2OM**&I Joh n Bucha n Approved—Chie fo fSource Tes

t Dal ' 

# 3-23- *.DISTRIBUTION : Fir m > PermitService s Enlorcemen t Technica l Service s Sourc e Inventor

y Requeste r D.A.P.C.O . 

### ' BA YARE A AI R QUALIT

YMANAGEMEN TDISTRIC T 93 9 ELLI S STREE

T SA N FRANCISCO . CALIFORNI A 94109

(41S ) 771-600 0 

### REPOR TO F CONTINUOU S EMISSIO N MONITO R FIEL D ACCURAC YTEST S Repor t N o Test Date:.. . Test Times : Ru n A:. . Ru n B:. . Ru n C:. . PS ? 

### 3/10/8 1 1600-173 0



### SOURC E INFORMATIO N PROCEDURA L DAT A Fir m Nam e an d Addres s Shel l Oi l Co . P.O . Bo x71 1 Martinez , C

A 9455 3 Condition s Durin g Tests

NORMA L Fir m Representative an

d Title 

## Jud y Moora

d- Env
. Engr , Phone No . 228-616 1 Monitor(s ) Tested : C O BOILE R# 2 C O BOILE R§ 3 Ye s No Dail y zero & span chec kmade ? s Q D Record s maintained fo

r2 yrs ? Q O Calibration gase s acceptable ? Lj J D
Parameter

s Tested : 

### S 0 2 

### , Flowrat e BAAQM D Representative s 

### B . Bartle y J . Bucha n E . Dardo n Test Results an d Comments :


### METHO D TES T BAAQJI ) RESULT S ST-2 3 Wate r Content , % Volume * 14. 1 ST-1 7 Stac k Flowrate ; SDCFM * 85,40 0 ST-19 ASO 2 Avg . Cone , ppm(dry)* * 8 0

S0 2 

### avg . emissio n rate , lb/hr* * 67. 8 ST-1 4 Oxyge n content , % Volum e 3. 4 SHEL L OI L RESULT S
82,90 0

29. 7 PERCEN T DIFFERE T



### -2. 9 -5 6 -5 6

* * 

### Dat a wa s obtaine d fro mparticulat e sourc e tes t #81154 , whic h wa s performe d simultaneously
. + Althoug h th e % differenc e betwee n result s i s greate r tha n -20% ; Shel l oi l stil l come s withi n complianc e usin g th e 10 % o f emissio n standar d rul e (MO P Volum e V , Sectio n 6.2) . Thi s allow s CO R * 2 t o b e withi n 10 0 pp mo f BAAQM D concentrations
. CO E 1 3 opacit ytransnissonete r i s found t o b e i n compliance
.

N O COMMERCIA L US E O F THES E RESULT S I S AUTHORIZE D Sourc e Tes tTea m Leade r 

### H>Cr(?- &tt<7ti&4p UoL > Bartle y Date 

### >/^w« . %l Approved—Chie f o l Sourc e Tes t Ga) o G . Karel s 

### D ; 

## 3-3/-. ''/. " " r >

jiSh^l l Oil Compan y Martinez Manufacturin g Comple x P.5 3

Sourc e Monitored : *ufL Pollutant : H* ^

Month , Year

'. . DA

Y 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 2 0 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 •2 V 13 0 ,3 1 AVG . 2 4 HR .

CON C (ppm ) 

### 3 W H O <*< * 

### HZ
z f z. * ?>*> 5*2 - 

### 8-1 7 7 

### 3 1 H 9 V 3 Hi IC Z5 Z T - 

### 2M Z 7 Z- 7 Z5 * 

### Z 3 *-Z 

### 3H 7~\ 

# n £ $ • 

### 3 1 5 3 H O 3 3 MAX . 1 HR . CON C (ppm ) (0( 7 

### 6 7 / H H 15 9 Z 7 iW 3 

### fez. Ik O / ^ 3 /?> 5 3« 7 

### / W /oz

. lo2 - 3 0 

### 3 3 3fe 

# \vz 31 7 2 . 

### .fz

. 3 1 4 7 7 9 z c •3 o 

### 3 7 Hz

. H3 9 ( /o< y TOTA L MAS S EMISSION S (TONS )

- REG . EXCESSES

' • 

### 5r e exc« s a&otr ce e occfj fftpft>itT

.

- • . INSTRUMEN TDOW > TIM E (HRS. )

*

•

. Tota l Mas s Emissio n Fo rMonth Comments : Ton s



# id, ^
. .D^KU^- L

# , (fao/&r' Signal ure . DoteP.5 4 MONIHL YIN-STACK . MUNMOKlNv , KI:IVM < i
"Shel l Oi l Compan

y Martine z Manufacturin

g Comple

x

.3*N - {**? Sourc e Monitored : fu6 i fr** SrV r Pollutant : ^i *

DA Y 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 I I 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 20 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 | » \M .3 0 

# i » Month

. Yea r AVG
. 24 HR
. CONC (ppm) 

### 3 0 3 1 3 1 3 H 3 H 33 " ? H Z | 

### in. T-9 

## 3 3 3 Z 1*1 T>S Z( , 

# z c -2.f r Z( * 

### -z-i 

## zc* 2 U TU 7 

### Z 7 •Z 7 

### i * 3 o 

### t? IS 2 3 Z 3 

# z. MAX 1 HR
.

CON C (ppm ) 

### S C W 9 M l 5 7 L>o <*\ 1*1 

### ?<\ ?>* H 7 H<\ W< * 3 U 35 ? 

### Hi H I HS

3 / S O 3 o 3 1 

## 3 9 w o 3 H H O W O 

### 3 ^ W l 

# ^sH o H7

_ •v . TOTA LMASS EMISSION

S (TONS )

V

" " REG
. EXCESSE S

_

..-• ' •

. INSTRUMEN T DO S TIM E(HRS. )

- - Tota l Mas s Emissio n Fo rMont

h Comments : Tons

Siprunirr. Dat

eP.5 5 iWU.xiIIL tIN-blAL KMUMlOKlML i KfcfUK T

« . * » %)SVel

l Oi l Compan y
' Martinez Manufacturin g Comple x Sourc e Monitored : t~<-U- L t'A y '-'VVf

. Pollutant : M •

& S

Month . 'Yea r DA Y I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 I I 1 2 13 1 4 1 5 16 17 18 1 9 2 0 21 2 2 2 3 24 2 5 26 2 7 28 ! » .3 0 

## i 3 

## ' AVG . 2 4 HR .

CON C (ppm ) 

# 2 9 

# zs Z C 7 9 

### Z z . \p Z\ Z Z , 

### ZH "LH 

### 11 19 ^ f Z S

# \s1 \ 

# ' 9 IS Z 9 

# ie ii* 

### i s 2 0 Z C Z J Z 3 £ 3 Z- | • MAX . 1 HR. CON C (ppm ) 

### 3 7 3 1 

## 1 3 3 H f l i Trie 

### 3 3 3 4 H 3 

### SS 9 3 

### 1 H 7 3 / 

# s r Hz . W 3 ? l H G 

# v y H C 

### </ 3 3 0 V 3 W 3 

### 3F 3 i 

### 3g 3- 7 TOTA L MASS EMISSION S (TONS )

"

- REG . EXCESSE S

:

> %

_

-." * '

. INSTRUMEN T DOW f TIM E (HRS. )

*

- - Tota l Mass Emissio nFo rMonth Comments : Ton s

Signature
. Dot eP.5 6

* ' 

## Shel l Oi l Compan y On e Shel l Plaz a P.O

. Bo x432 0 Houston , Texa s 7721 0 d^-tW^ - 

### Apri l 9 , 198 5

Mr . Jac k R . Fanner , Directo r Emissio n Standard s an d Engineerin g Divisio n Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlannin g an d Standard s Unite d State s Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 2771 1 Dea r Mr . Farmer : A s requeste d i n you r lette r o f January25 , 1985 , th e attache d informatio n o n proces s equipmen t an d associate d emissio n contro l equipmen t subjec t t o the petroleu

mrefiner

yfue l ga s provision s o f 4 0 CF R 6 0 Subpar t J i s forwarde d fo r Shel l Oil' s Norco , LA , Wilmington , CAan d Martinez , C

A refineries
. Pleas e not e tha t onl ycos t an d supplementaryproces s infor

matio n ar e provide d fo r Norc o refinerysinc e th e balanc e o f the dat a wer e obtaine d during an EP Afiel d tri p t o tha t facility
. Ou r Wilmingto n refineryha s identifie d thre e proble marea s encountere d i n complying wit h th e NSPS . Thes e ar e the dua l reporting o f informatio n t o EP Aan d t o th e stat e agency ; the shor t pr e start-u p notificatio n o f 3 0 t o 6 0 days , an

d possibl e difficultie s i n meetin g the performanc e tes t dead

lin e o f start-u

p plu s 18 0 days . (Se e Sectio n X-I , pag e 1 4 o f Wilming

ton' s response ) W e believ e th e attache d dat a respond s t o al l o f th e informatio n requeste d i n EPA' s questionnaire
. However , i f clarificatio n i s require d pleas e fee l fre e t o contac t me a t (713 ) 241-1889 . Verytrul yyours , r
.

J//A . Mullins , Manage r ivironmenta l Program s Environmenta l Affair s JAE/bl v Attachmen t

CAS50990 ]

# V P.5 7 <;. . «

SHEL L OI L COMPAN

Y

WILMINGTO

N MANUFACTURIN

G COMPLE

X

RESPONSE T

O EP A QUESTIONNAIR

E

- i KSP S - PETROLEU

M REFINERIE S -

r FUELGA

S COMBUSTIO

NDEVICE S

CRC50990 6P.5 8 &

WILMINGTONMANUFACTURING COMPLE X RESPONS E T O EP AQUESTIONNAIR E NSPS V -PETROI£UM^REFINERIES , FUE L GA S COMBUSTIONDEVICE S

FACILIT Y DESCRIPTION Pleas e provid e a genera l descriptio n an d schemati c o f th e refineryfue l ga s system , combustio n devices , an d sulfu r treatmen t processes , (such a s amin e treaters , sulfu r plants , tai l ga s units)
. Includ e ga s flo wrate s (untreate d fue l gas , treate d fue l gas , an d natura l gas) , H^ S concentrations , an d sulfu r mas s balances . Not e o n th e diagra mwher e ga s blendin g i s don e an d wher e proces s monitorin g an d emissio n monitorin g sample s ar e taken-'. ~ Th e Wilmingto n Manufacturin g Comple x ha s bot h a lowan d high pressur e fue l systema t th e Domingue z portio n o f th e Comple x an d a hig h pressur e fue l systema t th e Wilmingto n Section
. Th e fue l ga s systemtypicall yha s <16 0 ppmH 2 S an

d i s use d a s fue l a t 3 0 differen t combustio n source s (furnaces , boiler s an

d flares. ) Adiethano l amin e (DEA ) treating systemi s use d t o remov e th e H 2 S -fro m th e fue l gas . Th e strippe d H 2 S i s converte d t o elementa l sulfu r wit h a Clau s Unit
. Of f gase s fro mthe Clau s Uni t ar e treate d b

ya SCO T Tai l Ga s Uni t tha t recover s ove r 99 % o f th e remaining H 2 S whic h i s recycle d bac k t o the Clau s Unit.
. Scrubbe d gase s fro m the SCO T Uni t ar e incinerate d t o conver t an yresidua l H. 2S t o S0 2 . Schematic s ar e enclose d tha t giv e a genera l descriptio n o f thes e system s (se e Attachment s 1 an

d 2. ) Fue l usag e fo r tht e combustio n unit s i s give n i n JI I (2 ) an d a typica l mas s balanc e fo r ou r sulfu r recoverysyste mi s give n i n V (1) . II . COST S

W e woul d lik e separat e capita l an d operatin g cost s o f you r primary emissio n contro l system s (amin e treater , FGD , o r othe r processin g unit)
. Th e cost s requeste d ar e fo r th e entir e contro l system , bu t w e ar e als o intereste d i n th e cost s associate d wit h the additiona l absorptio n capacit yrequire d fo r treatin g th e fue l ga s .tha t i s route d t o ne wcombustio n sources . Pleas e provid e a breakdow n (o r factor ) fo r jus t th e fue l ga s treatment , i f possible
. Ou r primar ycontro l devic e i s a n amin e treatin g systemtha t remove s th e H 2 S fro

mth e fue l ga s prio r t o it s combustio n i n furnace s o r boilers
. Capita l an d annua l operatin g cost s ar e maintaine d fo r eac h majo r processin g uni t whic h mayinclud e a n amin e strippe r o r absorber . However , the cost s ar e no t broke n dow n b yindividua l vesse l (suc h a s the amin e stripper ) withi n the majo r processin g unit
. Therefore , accurat e capita l an d operatin g cost s ar e no t availabl e fo r ou r amin e treating systemno r ar e cost s availabl e fo r ou r fue l ga s
BFG850603- 1P.5 9

treatmen t system . Additiona l adsorptio n capacit ywa s no t neede d t o mee t th e NSP S limi t o f 16 0 pp m H 2 S i nou

r fue l ga s system . Pleas e provide th

e followin

g cos t information . Inde xcost s t o yea r an dmonth .
a . Purchas e cos t (explai nwha t i s included ) b . Installatio n cos t (explai n wha t i s included )

c . Annua l operatin g cost s A s explaine d i n (1 ) above , cost s ar e maintaine d fo r eac h majo r proces s uni t bu t theyar e no t broke n dow n fo r eac h vesse l withi n th e uni t suc

ha s a n amin e absorbe r o r treater . d . Ke yaccounting factor s v

_• i
. I'>M
1 . Lifetim e o f equipmen t Twent yyear s is"th e generall yth e boo k lif e valu e fo r oi l refineryequipment
. 2 . Equipmen t amortizatio n an d depreciatio n rat e Amortizatio n refer s t o nontangibl e propertie s an d thu s i s no t applicabl e t o equipment
. W e us e bot h the boo k (2 0 years ) an

d tax live s ( 5 years ) t o depreciat e ou r assets . 3 . Labo r an

d managemen t charge s , ' Direc t operating overhea d charge s ar e include d i n annua l operating costs . 4 . Overhea d rat e " - - • Thes e overhea d rate s varydepending o n th e type.o f servic e an d period
. Thus , specifi c rate s canno t b e furnished
. III . REFINERY COMBUSTIONDEVICE S 1 . Ho wman

ycombustio n source s tha t bur n refineryfue l ga s ar e ther e a t you r refinery(flares , boilers , proces s heaters , incinerators , others) ? Ther e ar e 3 0 combustio n source s a t th e Wilmingto n Manufacturin g Complex . 2 . Fo r eac h genera l typ e o f combustio n devic e tha t burn s refineryfue l gas , pleas e provid e th e followin g informatio n (fo r a typica l exampl e an d ranges) : a ) Siz e - capacity , BT U rating , fue l consumption , >
BFGc-50603- 1P.6 0

b ) Cost s - capita l an d operating , c ) Hour s o f operatio n an d d ) Othe r fuel s used . ..--• • \-««i¥S
. Liste d belo wi s th e dat a yo u requeste d excep t fo r capita l an d . operatin g costs . Ou r accountin g syste mdoe s no t brea k th e cost s dow n b yheater , boiler , o r flare . Shel l Equip
. 

### No . EA-1 0 BA-1 1 BL-1 2 BI/-1 3 CC-1 4 CC-1 5 CF-1 4 CF-20 A AB-1 7 GH-1 8 GH-1 9 PT-2 4 PT-3 5 PT-2 5 PT-2 6 PT-2 9 PT-3 0 CK-3 1 CK-3 2 FR-3 3 FR-3 4 HP-3 e DH-4 0 DU-25 5 CL-4 8 CU-5 3 SA- 4 SA- 6 Doming
. Doming
. Typ e

Boile r Boile r Boile r Boile r Wast e Ht . Boile r Wast e Bt . Boile r Furnac e Furnac e Furnac e Furnac e Furnac e Furnac e Furnac e Furnac e Furnac e Furnac e Furnac e Furnac e Furnac e Furnac e Furnac e

. Furnac e Furnac e Furnac e Therma l Xncin
. Cat . Incin
. Flar e - Wilm
. Eas t Flar e - Wilm
. Wes t Flar e Flar e Desig n Hea t Releas e 1 0 BTU/h r 350- t 350- » 

### 29 1 29 1 157. 5 157. 5 

### 6 0 B 8 

### 19 0 5 4 4 0 39" l 28 J 11 7 n 12 8 J 66" t 25- J 126 n 12 6 J 122- 1 122-J 340 ' 

### 5 0 

### 23 1 27.5- 1 

## 1 5 

## J 

# :: 3 

# : n 198 4 Fue l

Consumptio n 1 0 SC F 

### 2 6 100 2 106 0 

### 43 5 37 0 

### 2 12 6 32 7 8 2 5 1 

### 12 0 47 0

• < 324 ' ;184 0 , 159 2 

### 99 0 12 2 155 1 

### 18 0 29 2 "65 0 Hour s

o f "Operatio n Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Continuous-.
. Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Continuou s Spar e Continuou s Spar e Fuel s

Use d 

### Ga s Ga s Ga s Ga s Gas ,
, - jGa s " ^Gas^

- 

### Ga s Ga s Ga s Ga s Ga s Ga s Ga s Ga s Ga s Ga s Ga s Gas



### Ga s Ga s Ga s

, Ga s " * Ga s 

### Ga s Ga s Ga s Ga s Ga s Ga s Pleas e lis t an

d describ e an

ynew , modified , o r reconstructe d combustio n device s yo u hav e tha t ar e subjec t t o th e NSPS , an d th e date s o f installation
. Fo r thes e affecte d combustio n devices , describ e ho wyo u complie d wit h th e NSP S an d th e resulting decreas e i n H, S concentration
. Estimate , i f possible , th e incrementa l cos t o f complianc e an d th e resultin g SO , emissio n reduction
.

EFGe50603- lP.6 1

Th e followin g i s th e informatio n yo u requested : DESCRIPTION"""" " SHELL- . EQUIP . 

### NO . BL-1 2

BL-1 3 HP-3 8 DH-4 0 DU-25 5 CL-4 8 CU-5 3 

### 4 . ,'.

- --Mr : :^^a ; TYP E Boile r

Boile r Furnac e Furnac e Furnac e Therma l Incin
. Cat . Inci n Withou t fue l ga s advers e 

### th

e DESIGN.DATE S O F HT , RELEASE ' INSTALLATION ' 10 ° BTU/HR (STARTUP ) 29 1 05-7 6

29 1 05-7 6 34 0 04-8 3 5 0 04-8 3 23 1 02-8 4 27. 5 04-8 3 1 5 04-8 3 METHO D 

### O F COMPLIANC E Existin g H 2 S leve l wa s acceptabl e

NSPS , wha t leve l o f H ? S an d othe r sulfu r c o woul d b e acceptabl e befor e ther e corrosio n o f combustio n equipment ? woul d b e sign

- V COS T T O

COMPL Y S0 2 REDUCTION Non e

i t

n

I I

H I
_ . _ .

I t

II mpound s i n ifican t
Excursion s u

p t o abou t 80 0 pp mtota l sulfu r conten t can b e tolerate d fo r period s u

p t o approximatel yeigh t hour s provide d th e temperatur e stay s abov e th e sulfuri c aci d de wpoin t temperature . I n norma l operation , w e tr

yt o keep th e sulfu r leve l belo w16 0 pp mt o avoi d corrosion
. Wha t othe r Federal , State , and loca l environmenta l regulation s appl y t o thes e combustio n devices , an d ho wdi d tha t affec t you r desig n consideration s an

d decision s t o replac e o r upgrad e existing devices ? Liste d belo war e th e environmenta l (sulfur ) regulation s tha t impac t ou r combustio n devices
. Ou r SCO T Tai l Ga s Uni t wa s installe d to
trea t th e of f gase s fro mth e Clau s Sulfu r RecoveryUnit-and ou r Fluidize d Catalyti c Cracking Uni t (FCCU ) wa s upgraded , i n part , t o allo wfo r th e us e o f S O captur e catalyst s t o mee t Sout h Coas t Ai r Qualit yManagemen t Distric t (SC-AQMD ) Rul e 1105 .

BFG850603- 1P.6 2

AGENC Y RUL E NO . AND NAM E SC-AQMD 40 7 "Liqui d an d Gaseou s Ai r Contaminants "

SC-AQMD 431. 1 "Sulfu r Conten t o f Gaseou s Fuels "

SC-AQMD 431. 2 "Sulfu r Conten t o f Liqui d Fuels "
SC-AQMD 46 8 "Sulfu r Recover yUnit "
SC-AQMD 90 3 "Standard s o f Performanc e fo r Fossi l

Fuel-Fire d Stea

mGenerators "
SC-AQMD 90 9 "Standard s o f Performanc e

fo r Petroleu

mRefineries "
SC-AQMD 110 5 "Flui d Catalyti c Cracking

Units-Oxide s o f Sulfu r

EP A• . 4 0 CF R 60.4 3 "Subpar t D - Standard s

o f Performanc e fo r Fossi l - Fue l Fire d Stea

mGenerator s fo r whic h constructio n i s commence d afte r Augus t 17 , 1971. " IV . PRIMARY CONTRO L (AMIN E TREATERS ) REMARK S Max . 50 0 ppmfroman y discharg e poin t t o th e atmosphere . 80 0 ppmmax . tota l sulfu r compound s i n gaseou s fuels . Max . 0.25% wsulfu r i n liqui d fuels . Max . 50 0 ppmS0 2 an d Max . 1 0 ppmH 2 S . Max . 0.80 ' l b S0 2 710. 6

- BT U fo r liquids-fuel ^ burning
. Max . 16 0 pp

m H 2 S (0.1 0 grains/SCF ) i n th e gaseou s fuel . Max . 13 0 kg . S0 2 / M bbls . o f fee d whic h reduce s t o 6 0 kg/ M bbl s o f fee d o n 1/1/87 . Max . 0.8 0 l b S0 2 /10 6 BT U fo r liqui d fue l burning
.

1 . Wha t ar e th e characteristic s an d compositio n o f th e fue l ga s tha t i s expecte d a t the inle t t o th e amin e treate r an d tha t i s desire d a t th e outle t prio r to . combustio n (typical , an d range) ? Ther e ar e tw o kind s o f fee d gase s treate d b you r amin e system . On e result s from

cracking operations , whil e th e othe r i s a ven t ga s from hydrotreatin g operations
. Th e cracke d gase s ar e primaril ymethane , ethane , an

d hydroge n contaminate d wit h H 2 S an d C0 2 . Th e hydrotreate r vent s ar e primaril yhydroge n wit h some methan e an d ethan e plu s mino r amount s o f heavie r hydrocarbons . Th e H 2 S concentratio n i n th e inle t stream s varyu

p t o approximatel y20 % H 2 S an d th e treate d (outlet ) ga s contain s les s tha n 16 0 ppmH 2 S .

BFG650603- 1P.6 3

2 . Amin e treate r descriptio n (i f th e refineryha s mor e tha n on e amin e treate r system , describ e onl yth e system s tha t provid e 'fue l ga s t o combustio n source s subjec t t o th e NSPS . Th e ga s amin e treatin g systemcontain s eleve n absorbers , two * strippers , an

dfiv e flash/ski mvessels . I t i s operate da s on e system . Seve n o f th e absorber s trea t ga s tha t goe s t o th e fue l system . Th e enclose d flo wdiagra m(Attachmen t 1 ) an d tabl e describ e th e system . 3 . Wha t typ e o f systemwoul d hav e bee n installe d i f th e NSP S had no t bee n i n effect ? Lis t th e difference s fro mth e presen t system . Th e sam e typ e o f systemwoul d hav e bee n installed
. 4 . Acomplet e maintenanc e historyo f th e amin e treatin g systemi s requested , o r a t a minimum , a narrativ e o f th e majo r outage s and mos t frequen t - maintenanc e item s tha t hav e occurre d sinc e start-up . I n discussing. , thes e problem s o r outages , pleas e indicat e th e exces s emission s tha t occurre d an

d th e correctiv e actio n taken . Th e treatin g systemi s maintaine d durin g routin e maintenanc e shutdowns . I t i s quit e reliabl e an d ther e i s n o historyo f excessiv e emission s tha t require d correctiv e actio n resulting fro mmaintenanc e problems . Ther e hav e bee n occasiona l foaming problem s i n th e pas t tha t resulte d i n significan t losse s o f th e amine
. Sinc e startu p o f the ne wsulfu r recoveryuni t i n 198 3 an d integratio n o f th e system ther e ha s no t bee n an yseriou s foaming
. Th e amin e ca n becom e contaminate d wit h hydrocarbon , whic h i s remove d i n flash/ski m vessels . Particulat e contaminant s ar e remove d byfiltering
. Corrosio n i s belo w5 mil s pe r year . 5 . Ar e th e maintenanc e requirement s an d amin e replacemen t rate s mor e excessiv e tha n tha t indicate d b yth e vendor ? Th e maintenanc e requirement s ar e normal . Th e amine'replacemen t i s abov e th e expecte d amoun t whic h i s bein g reviewed
. 6 . Wha t wa s th e reliabilit yo f th e amin e treate r systemo n a n annua l basi s fo r eac h yea r sinc e startup , (amoun t o f scheduled-and unschedule d downtime) ? Th e systemha s bee n quit e reliabl e sinc e startup . Ther e hav e bee n n o unschedule d shutdowns . Schedule d shutdown s ar e take n i n conjunctio n wit h boile r inspection s an d the inspectio n o r maintenanc e o f associate d units
. 7 . Wha t ar e th e inspectio n practice s an d schedule s fo r the amin e treate r system , an

d wha t type s o f personne l performthes e inspections ?

BFG850603- 1P.6 4

Ou r Inspectio n Departmen t i s staffe d wit h professiona l an d parapro fessiona l personne l wh o inspec t equipmen t internall yduring shutdown s an d wit h appropriat e externa l method s during operation
. Inspectio n method s include , we t magneti c fluorescen t particle , ultrasonic , an d

""•"- :

- - ? X - r a y.--••••'•-•••'
- " ' .-:.—;'C ~ . . -.•• - -/'•'•• . ". ' ; 8 . Wha t ar e th e proces s operatin g parameter s tha t ar e monitore d o r teste d t o determin e i f th e amin e treate r i s performin g properly , (fo r example : amin e samples , outle t concentration) ? Th e ga s i s teste d fo r H 2 S content . Th e amin e i s teste d fo r aci d ga s loading , bea t stabl e salts , foaming tendency , an d strength . 9 . Wha t amin e treate r operatin g parameter s ar e se t b yoperator s t o adjus t fo r varyin g condition s an d inle t loading s s o tha t a lowH 9 S concentratio n ca n b e maintaine d a t th e outlet ? Flo wrat e o f DE Ai s adjuste d fo r variation s i n flowrat e an d HgS-^ ^ conten t o f th e treate d streams . H 2 S conten t and strengt h o f th e lea n solutio n ar e monitore d t o maintai n 0.0 5 mole s H 2 S/mol e DE Aan d 35 % DE Aconcentration
. V . SECONDARY CONTRO L (SULFU R PLANTS , ETC. ) 1 . Ho wi s th e mor e concentrate d H ? S strea mexitin g th e amin e treate r handle d (sulfuri c aci d plant , Clau s sulfu r plan t wit h tai l ga s treater , thiosulfat e plant , sol d t o another'•firm) ? Briefl ydescrib e thi s secondarycontro l system , includin g desig n size , vendor , yea r installed , an

d sulfu r mas s balances . Wa s thi s secondarycontro l systeminstalle d separatel yo r a s par t o f a packag e wit h th e amin e treater ? The'concentrate d H 2 S strea mi s sen t t o on e o f two Clau s sulfu r unit s tha t operat e a t approximatel y95 % efficienc yi n converting th e H 2 S t o sulfur . Th e off-gase s fromth e Clau s unit s ar e the n fe d t o a J SC0 T tai l ga s uni t tha t recover s ove r 99 % o f th e H 2 S . Th e scrubbe d gase s fromth e SCO T uni t the n g o t o a catalyti c incinerato r wher e an y residua l H 2 S i s converte d t o S0 2 . Atypica l mas s balanc e fo r thi s systemis : (1 ) 280 M pounds/dayo f H 2 S ar e fe d t o th e Clau s unit , (2 ) 95 % o r 266 M pound s o f th e H 2 S ar e initiall yconverte d t o sulfu r b y th e Clau s unit , an

d (3 ) al l o f th e remainin g 12 M pound s o f H 2 S excep t fo r aroun

d 10-2 0 pound s ar e recovere d i n th e SCO T uni t an d ar e diverte d bac k t o th e Clau s plant . Th e remainin g 10-2 0 pound s leaving th e SCO T uni t ar e fe d t o a catalyti c oxidize r wher e th e H 2 S i s converte d t o S0 2 Tw o amin e stripper s wer e installe d th e sam e tim e a s th e Claus , SCO T an d incinerato r units
. Thei r desig n size , vendo r an d yea r o f installatio n are :

BFG850603- 1P.6 5

I. Clau s Uni t ^ 2 . SCO T Uni t 3 . Incinerato r Desig n Siz e Lon g Tons / Sulfur/DayMMSCF D -,iiV^ . . . -* ^ .... . 20 0 eac h— 2 0 —



### 3 0 4 . Amin e Stripper s FOOTNOTE : (a ) C . F . Braun wa s th e Genera l 2 . I f th e tai l ga s uni t use s amin e s < Capacit y M bbl s Vendo r


# , -_

_V--,-•, . • - (a 

# y; . .

(a ) (a ) 2 5 (a ) Contractor . rrubbing , i s i t no w(o r ar e Yea r o f Install . 198 3 198 3 198 3 198 3



### yo u considering ) combinin g the tai l ga s an d fue l ga s amin e stripping ? Wha t ar e th e advantage s an d disadvantage s o f thi s approach ?

—ZL-.ZZT -"*" * Ou r SCO T uni t doe s us e amin e scrubbing bu t w e d o no t combin e th e tai l ga s an d fue l ga s fo r amin e stripping
. W e hav e no t considere d thi s approac h an

d thu s canno t offe r an ycommen t o n it s advantage s an d disadvantages
. VI . EMISSIONTESTIN G 1 . Pleas e provid e a ful l cop yo f al l emissio n test s performe d o n fue l ga s fro myou r amin e treaters . Includ e th e dat e o f the tes t an d a descriptio n o f th e proces s condition s a t tim e o f tes t an d tes t method s used . I n addition , pleas e provid e the following information :
a . Wha t wa s th e cos t o f th e emissio n performanc e tests ? b . ' Wa s the testing performe d b yyou r compan

yo r b ya consultant ?

c . Beside s H ? S , wha t othe r compound s wer e teste d for , (suc h -a s COS , CS ? , mercaptans , tota l sulfur , etc.) ? Provid e a summary o f thos e results . d . Wher e wa s th e tes t sampling site ? Wa s i t befor e o r afte r blendin g wit h natura l ga s o r othe r refinerygas ? I- f afte r blending , wha t volum e o f othe r gase s wer e blende d wit h th e treate d fue l gas ? Eac h eight-hou r shift , th e H 2 S conten t i n th e fue l ga s i s normall ychec k wit h Draege r tube s a t the location s identifie d i n VI I (2)(a ) o f thi s questionnaire
. Thes e ar e screening check s t o ensur e th e amin e treatin g systemand/o r operation s ar e normal . Th e H 2 S level s ar e typicall y<16 0 ppm . Th e cos t o f eac h Draege r tes t i s approximatel y$20
. Record s ar e availabl e fo r review
. I n additio n t o th e Draege r tests , the following tota l sulfu r tes t wa s mad e b yShel l i n 1984 .
BFG850603- 1TES T PROCES S

DAT E CONDITION 08-01-84 * Norma l ' ^

Operation 08-23-8 4 Norma l

Operatio n LOCATION

Wilmington Boile r Hous e CC U - afte r Blend Dru

m TES T

METHO D EP AMetho d
Microcoulomete r EST . COS T $20 0 $20 0 TOTA L

SULFUR , PP M

—


### 10 4 H 2 S

PP M 18. 1 11. 5

FOOTNOTE : Dat e o f ou r repor t t o EPA ; th e 18. 1 pp mvalu e wa s th e averag e o f tw o test s conducte d o n 07/02/8 3 an d th e 11. 5 ppmvalu e wa s the averag e o f si x test s determine d o n 08/24/83 . 2 . Pleas e provid e a brie f summaryo f an yemissio n test s tha t hav e bee n performe d a t th e outle t o f combustio n device s whic h buri-ufue l gas . Describ e th e combustio n device s tested . I n additio n oiEffiii J ~ ~ type s o f informatio n liste d above , w e ar e intereste d i n a sumnarys^ . o f th e emissio n dat a fo r an yothe r pollutants/compound s (S0 ? , tota l sulfur , N O , CO , hydrocarbons , etc. ) Durin g 1984 , ou r heater s an d boiler s wer e teste d fo r N O .emission '

. unde r varyin g loads . Thi s testin g wa s performe d t o establis h N O profile s require d b ySC-AQMD Rul e 110 9 (N O limit s fo r refineryX heater s an

d boilers. ) N O testin g wa s als o performe d o n ou r stea m methan e reforme r heate r stac k pursuan t t o a SC-AQMD permi t Condition
. Als o Ke wSourc e Performanc e Emissio n Tests " wer e conducte d a t the Distillin g Uni t No . 5 heate r an d CCU C O Boile r Stacks . Lastly , w e checke d the emissio n a t our sulfu r unit' s therma l incinerato r an d th e SC-AQMD complianc e teste d ou r C O Boile r Stac k emissions
. Record s ,o f thes e test s ar e availabl e fo r review
. 3 . Are ' ther e an

ystat e o r loca l regulation s tha f requir e testin g o f fue l ga s fo r existin g sources , o r tha t requir e additiona l testin g fo r ne wsources ' beyond tha t require d b yth e NSPS ? r Ther e ar e n o testing requirement s fo r ai r monitorin g purposes . VII . MONITORING O F EMISSION S AND PROCES S OPERATION 1 . Pleas e describ e an ystat e o r loca l regulation s tha t requir e yo u to ' monitor
. Sout h Coas t Ai r Qualit yManagemen t District' s Regulatio n 90 9 wil l requir e u s t o monito r H 2 S level s i n the fue l ga s onc e a n approve d instrumen t i s identified
. 2. . 

### Emi
a . ssio n 

### Ho w monitorin g o f H 2 S d o yo u (continuou smonito r the concentratio n i n th e fue l H? S concentratio n o f th e instruments , periodi c grab samples) ' gas : fue l > D o 8 as » 

### you
EFG85GS03- 1

### 1 0

monito r mor e tha n on e locatio n (immediatel yafte r treatin g afte r blending , o r befor e combustion) ? D o yo u monito r primaril yt o demonstrat e complianc e wit h th e NSPS , o r fo r you r own purpose s t o ensur e tha t th e amin e treate r i s operating properly ? W e hav e thre e continuou s H 2 S monitor s a t th e followin g locations : LOCATION (1 ) Domingue z Boile r Hous e
(2 ) FCC U

(3 ) Wilmingto n Boile r Hous e REMARK S Monitor s th e H 2 S i n th e lo wpressur e fue l system . Th e monito r i s locate d downstreamo f th e ga s blend dru

mbu t befor e combus

tio n i n th e furnaces . '.'-- _._- :--^- x ' Th e monito r i s locate d downstream o f th e ga s blend dru

mbu t befor e combus

tio n i n th e furnace s an d boilers
. b . I f manua l sampling i s done , describ e th e procedur e an d costs . Wha t i s th e schedule d frequenc yo f sampling ? Describ e problem s tha t yo u hav e had wit h thi s procedur e an d th e accurac yo f the measurements . V I n additio n t o th e continuou s H 2 S monitorin g describe d i n 3 a above , Draege r tes t sample s ar e normall ytake n onc e pe r 8-hour '• * shift
. Th e cos t pe r tes t i s approximatel y$20
. Dail ycost s , woul d b e $180
. c . ' I f instrumen t emissio n monitor s ar e used , provid e th e following : 1 . Describ e th e monitors , includin g vendor, " mode l number , dat e installed , an

d cost s t o purchas e an d install
.

LOCATION DOMINGUE Z BOILE R HOUS E WILMINGTON BOILE R HOUS E FCC U 

### Th e following i s th e informatio n o n

DESCRIPTIOh VENDO R HOUSTON ATLA S HOUSTON ATLA S HOUSTON ATLA S MODE L i

72 2


### 72 2
72 2 ! ( TYP E CONTINUOU S

CONTINUOU S

CONTINUOU S APPROX .

YEA R O F INSTALLATION 197 7

198 3

197 7 ou r monitor s

EST . - PURCHAS E PRIC E $39 M $50 M $30 M :

COS T TO " INSTAL L $15 M $25 M $15 M

BFG850603- 1P.6 8



### 1 1

Wha t i s th e maintenanc e histor yo f th e instrumen t monitors , includin g predominan t problem s (suc h a s drift , bias , breakdowns) , lengt h o f outages , reli

abilit yhistory , and cos t o f maintenanc e (capital , operating , an

d labor) ? Wha t i s you r norma l preventa
tiv e maintenanc e programfo r th e monitors , an d ho w man ylabo r hours/wee k ar e expended ? Pleas e brea k dow n thes e hour s b

ytyp e o f personnel . W e hav e encountere d a wid e variet yo f problem s wit h thes e instruments
. Fo r illustrativ e purposes , w e hav e enclose d (Attachmen t 3 ) a maintenanc e lo g fo r on e on e o f our analyzer s covering par t o f 1984 . Note , th e lead acetat e tap e ha d t o b e replace d abov e ever ytw o week s an

d wa s th e mos t predominat e problem . Also , th e photocel l eithe r neede d replacin g o r recalibratio n severa l times
. Ou r preventativ e maintenanc e programi s t o chec k th e - M>"•'•.. ~ instrument s weekl yan d recalibrat e a s necessary . '"Ab'e'nt^ ^ fou r hours/wee k ar e spen t b ya n analyze r technicia n • checking an

d recalibratin g th e instruments
. Pleas e includ e an

ydat a comparing th e instrumen t emissio n monitorin g systemt o manua l sampling emissio n tests , includin g a descriptio n o f method s used , qualit yassurance , an d relativ e accurac yevaluations
. A s pointe d our earlier , Draege r sample s ar e draw n onc e eac h shif t an

d th e H 2 S result s ar e compare d t o thos e obtaine d b y th e Housto n Atla s monitor. ' Our;Instrumentatio n Departmen t i s notifie d o f an

ydiscrepancie s an d correctiv e action s ar e take n a s appropriate
. Draege r tes t dat a i s no t retained
. Ko wi s th e data.recorde d (manuall yo r b yinstrument ; periodicall yo r continuously) ? Ho wi s th e ra wdat a reduce d an

d analyzed ? Ho wlong ar e dat a record s retained ? Th e dat a i s recorde d continuousl yb ythe instrument s describe d earlie r i n C (1) . Th e fou r inc h stri p chart s giv e H 2 S reading s directl yi n "ppm " an d th e record s ar e kep t tw o years .
5 . Pleas e provid e a summaryo f monitorin g dat a fo r th e H ? S conten t o f fue l ga s wit h correspondin g proces s condition s fo r th e las t thre e months , (dail yaverage s an d ranges , notin g an ythree-hou r period s o f exces s emissions)
. Fo r period s o f exces s emissions , explai n th e cause s an

d correctiv e actio n taken . Durin g th e las t thre e months , th e H 2 S level s typicall ywer e <16 0 ppm . Ther e wer e n o three-hou r period s o f H 2 S level s ,
BFG85G603- 1P.6 9



### 1 2

exceedin g 16 0 pp

m andth e amin e treatin g syste m wa s operatin g normally . .3 . - ^Monitorin g o f proces s parameters:. . ,M;,

_-^ r --..„,,.. . . a . Wha t proces s parameter s ar e monitored ? How i s the monitorin g don e (instrument s o r manua l sampling) ? Wha t i s th e schedule d samplin g frequency ? How muc hdoe s i t cos t t o conduc t thi s monitoring ? Th e followin g proces s parameter s ar e monitored : (1 ) proces s and DE Aflo wrates , (2 ) H 2 

### S concentratio ni n th e products , and (3 ) aci dga s loadin g rate s i n th e lea n an d fa t DEA . Manua l samplin g an dinstrument s ar e use dt o monito r thes e parameters . Th e proces s an

dDE A flo w rate s ar e monitore dcontinuousl y an dth e lea nDE Astream s ar e sample deac hshift . Th e fa t DE Astream.i s sample dperiodicall y

(weekl y

o r longer ) dependin g o nth e ^••y < 

### ~ variabilit y

o f the feedcomposition . j ' -.-**— b . Whic hproces s parameter s ar e goo d indicator s o f th e prope r performanc e o f th e amin e treate r an d o f lo wH 2 

### S concentratio n a t th e outlet ? Ho wwel l d o th e proces s parameter s correlat e wit hH? S concentrations ? W e believ e th e followin g proces s parameter s ar e goo d indicator s o f prope r amin e treate r performanc e an d ..correlat e wel l wit hH 2 

### S concentration : 1 . H 2 

### S conten t i n th e fue l ga s , 2 . DE At o produc t flo wrat e 3 . DE Aconcentratio n i n the circulatin g DE A 4 . Aci d ga s loadin g i n th e lea n and fa t DEA . ;". . . Al l thes e parameter s provid e usefu l dat a t o ensur e lo wlevel s o f H 2 

### S ar e maintaine d i n th e fue l system . 4 . Ar e ther e plan s t o replac e o r purchas e ne wmonitors , and'i f so , whyand wit hwha t type ? Ther e ar e n o plan s t o replac e ou r presen t monitors
. 5 . Ar e anyo f th e instrumen t monitor s integrate d int o th e proces s a s a contro l system ? Non e o f th e H 2 

### S monitor s ar e integrate d int o th e proces s a s a contro l system .

BFG850603- 1P.7 0



### 1 3

1

- " Wha t i s th e norma l siz e o f you r refine'r yand curren t operatin g leve l (barrel s o f crude/day) ? Wha t i s th e operatin g schedule ? Wha t refiner yoperatin g parameter s affec t th e sizin g an d ••-•^••. operatio n o f you r amin e treaters ? ... . ^k-.'-.:- Ou r rate d crud e capacit yi s 108 M bbls/da yand w e ar e no wprocessin g aroun d 113 M bbl s o f crude/strea mday . W e ar e currentl ya t capacit y an d operat e 2 4 hour s a day , 36 5 day s pe r year . Th e ga s flo wrat e fro mou r Coker , CCU , and hydrotreater s affec t th e sizin g an d operatio n ou r amin e treaters . 2 . Wha t i s th e sulfu r conten t o f th e crud e oi l (typica l an d range) ? Ho wdoe s th e crud e oi l sulfu r conten t affec t th e operatio n o f amin e treater s an d th e leve l o f H ? 

### S an d othe r sulfu r compound s i n th e fue l gas ?
**** * *"-,.. . 

### Th e sulfu r conten t o f ou r crud e i n 198 4 average d approximatel y;f l r5<% w sulfur . Typica l range s wer e betwee n 0. 7 an d 4.5 % wsulfur . As^'iaie sulfu r conten t varied , th e DE Acirculatio n rat e wa s adjuste d t o ensur e sufficien t remova l o f H 2 

### S fro mth e gas . 3 . Ho wd o othe r refiner yoperatin g factor s (suc ha s desulfurizatio n o f products ) affec t th e sizing , operation , and cos t o f you r amin e treatin g system ? Th e degre e o f desulfurizatio n i n th e hydrotreater s affect s th e siz e an d operatio n o f th e amin e treates . Th e typ e o f sulfu r compound s i n th e crud e als o affec t th e siz e /an d operatio n o f th e treaters . Ou r curren t amin e treatin g syste mdescribe d earlie r i s adequat e t o handl e th e sulfu r variatio n i n th e crude . 4 . Ko wmuc hnatura l ga s (i f any ) i s blende d wi~. hth e refiner yfue l ga s prio r t o combustio n (typica l and range) ? I s thi s blendin g don e primaril yt o keep- a constan t flo wo f ga s t o proces s unit s o r t o dilut e th e H ? 

### S concentratio n t o a n acceptabl e level ? - I n 1984 , abou t 1 0 M M SC F pe r da ywa s blende d wit hou r refiner yfue l t o mee t ga s demand s and no t fo r H 2 

### S dilution
. X . GENERA L REGULATOR Y INFORMATIO N 1 . Wha t problem s hav e yo u experience d i n interpretin g th e NSPS , achievin g th e NSPS , and operatin g th e contro l system s t o compl y wit hth e NSPS ? W e hav e no t ha d anyspecifi c problem s i n interpretin g th e NSP S o r operatin g th e contro l system s t o compl ywit hth e NSPS . However , w e hav e th e followin g comment s concernin g th e achievemen t o f th e NSP S requirements :

£FG£50603- iP.7 1



### 1 4

a . Genera l comment s o n 4 0 CF R 60. 7 - Notificatio n and Recordkeepin g W e ar e require dt o notif y bot hth e EP A

andth e SC-AQMD . I t woul deas e th e administrativ e burde nb y eliminatin g th e EP A notificatio nan

drecordkeepin g requirement s wher e th e loca l ai r distric t (sucha s th e SC-AQM i nou r case ) ha s equivalen t o r mor e restrictive rules . b . 4 0 CF R 60.7(a)(2 ) - Prestartu p notificatio n betwee n 30-6 0 day s Th e 30-6 0 da yperio d i s extremel yshor t an d w e sugges t extendin g i t t o 12 0 days . Problem s ar e ofte n encountere d durin g th e commissionin g o f a uni t whic hcoul d easil ydela ystartu p a mont h o r so . c . 4 0 CFR60.8(a ) - Performanc e test s n o late r tha n 18 0 day s afte r startup.'_.. . >-i-•"• — We sugges t tha t a n extensio n b e allowe d t o cove r unforesee n problem s tha t dela yth e performanc e test s beyon d th e 180-da y period
. i n 2 . Wha t problem s o r difficulties , i f any , hav e yo u experience d ^ ~ performing'testing , monitoring, and recordkeepin g fo r th e NSPS ; D o yo u hav e an

ysuggestion s (pleas e provid e rationale ) fo r alleviatin g thes e problems , includin g alternativ e approache s o f achievin g th e sam e objective ? W e d o no t hav e anyparticula r problem s excep t a s note d above . 3 . Ho wmuc hdoe s i t cos t yo u t o compl ywit hth e NSP S regulatio n fo r recordkeepin g fo r th e NSPS ? D o yo u hav e an ysuggestions
. Pleas e provid e a cop yo f th e form s yo u routinel yhav e t o fil l ou t an d a sampl e o f a report . W e d o no t maintai n separat e financia l record s o n th e cos t o f NSP S recordkeeping
. Copie s o f ou r report s ar e availabl e fo r review
. XI . CONTACT S FO R FURTHE R INFORMATIO N Pleas e includ e th e name s and telephon e number s o f appropriat e contact s shoul d clarificatio n o f th e abov e informatio n b e needed .

NAM E C . U . Graha m J . D . Joyc e TELEPHON E NO . (213 ) 513-202 6 (213 ) 513-207 0

BFG850603- 1

## ATTACHMEN T1 - GENERAL SCHEMATI C DE A FUE L GA

S AN D SULFU R TREATMEN TSYSTE M WILMINGTO N MANUFACTURIN G COMPLE X • .-.••. .



# [-0 CAM OU T
CATCRACKIN G UNI T t-DE A ABSORBE

R 

## «*"l J
HYDROPROCESS1N G 3-DE A ABSORBER

S QA«m J IEA N DC A
COKE R t-DE A ABSOt-SQM

## lH
HYDROTREATE R (DH T3 ) t-DE A ABSORBER <m~l - TA T KAjmtiL TO DOMtNQUE Z WC H PRESSUR E FUE L CA S *fY5TE M ( <10 0 PP M H3 S )

BSORBE R "- n

J 1 fDEA " XESS1N G W i«nfmrn> * **>

"ER " X 

# jy-^-^j^ REATE R j J j FA TDE A FRO M SOURCE

S NO TASSOCIATE D WT H FUE L OA S SYSTE M

TW O DE A STRIPPER S H2 8

SULFU R PLAN T

SULFU R

SCRUBBE D CA

S ( <tO O PP M H2 S ) TO WUtrNCTrOH FU a •*rt*STE M SCO T

TA L OA S UNI T ATTACHMEN T2

•3 V

..*«• A • SO S

tNaNERATO R

SE E ATTACHMEN

T2

0% .BASSTBEAMS

. *0 H2 S CONCENTRATION

S CHECKE

D WT H DRAEGE

R TUBE S 

# O i£AHJDEAJIIJEAM-t__

__ ! ' ' MONITO R m TEsTraatxitCAU.Y t TEMPERATURE

. ACI D OA

S (LOAOMO

, FOAMtN O TENDENCY

. DC A .STRENGT

H AN D HEA

TSTABL E SAL TCONCENTRATIO

N ! •

* f;?i S 3STVEE TVEN TSTREAM S FRO M AIXYUTIO N UNI T

NATURA L OA S A S NEEDE D

. FRO M ATTACHMEN T1 HIG H PRESSUR E FUE L CA S <tO O PP M H2 S

NATURA L OA S A S NEEDE D

FRO M AnACHMEN T1 WLMINOTO N CA S <tO O PP M H2 S

•EXCES S CA S FRO M DOMINCUE Z •WATSO N LANDFII L OAS •OIST . UNI TVEN TOAS •TAN KFAR M VEN TOAS •MISC . SWEE

TVEN TCASE S 

## ATTACHMEN T2 - GENERA L SCHEMATI C FUE L GA

S AN D COMBUSTIO N SYSTE M WILMINGTO N MANUFACTURIN G COMPLE X
TAN KFAR M VEN TGASE S

H2 S ; MONITOR ;

PRESSUR E REDUCE R

PRESSUR E REDUCE R - * - TO BOTLER S 1 2 AN D 1 3

- * •T O CC U HEATE R .

T O OTHE R HEATER S ATDOMMOUE Z

-+~EXCES S T O -t-LMtNCTC N

- » •T O B0t£R 8 1 0 AN D 1 1

T O HEATER S A T-MLMtNOTO N

vi' V

### V , J :

ATTACHMENT II I MAINTENANC E RECOR D FO R ANALYZE R

'•SC. . AR 18 5 - SERVIC E H ? S FUE L GA S BLEND DRUM WILMINGTONBOILS E HOUS E

OPERATION DAT E TIM E Sat . Unsat . O/ S CALIBRATION O K Require d AUT O

"ZER O COMMENT S 02-07-8 4 140 0 X Repl . tap e an d chec k zer o - Ric h & Willi e 02-17-8 4 080 0 X Replace d tape , drainout ^ wate r from fue l line,...caii.b

~ 02-28-8 4 081 5 Replace d tape , zer o chec k - Willi e 03-09-8 4 075 0 X Replace d tape , zer o & ca l - Richar d 03-19-8 4 090 0 X 

### X Replace d tap e an d tw o cylinder s - RC G 03-30-8 4 04-10-8 4 04-19-8 4 05-11-8 4 081 0

" N 081 5 081 9 

### X X X X

05-23-8 4 090 0 X

05-29-8 4 123 0 X 

# x , X ' 

### X X
X

X X

X C K

O K

O K Replace d tap e - R.G . Replace d tap e - R.G . Replace d Tap e - R.G . Cal . photocell s - replace d tap e - R.G . Aligne d photocel l tap e replace d - Willi e Calib
. replace d nitroge n bottl e - Willi e 06-01-8 4 101 0 X Aligne d photocel l and cali b - Willi e 06-04-8 4 093 0 X X Routin e calibratio n Willi e

EFGS50790 2ATTACHMENT II I (Cont'd )

DAT E 06-13-8 4

06-28-8 4

07-09-8 4

08-01-8 4
08-15-8 4

08-24-8 4 TIM E

084 0

124 5

081 5

151 5
093 0

080 0 Sat . 

### X
X

X
X
X OPERATION Unsat . O/ S

•"• ^-.'^•'
. " v " - " r-v'/T---

- CALIBRATION

O K Require d

••;•--.-'*;-•-X•••**•

-


### X

X AUT O

ZER O
••"•Tr"" '


### X

X
X
X COMMENT S

• • ••.,.. . • • ..or^j;'
. , Replac e tape - Willi e Replace d tape , replace d H 2 cylinde r & cal . - Willi e Replace d tap e - Willi e Chec k and replac e tap e - Willie

_.."i1 "" — Replace d tape * - chec k zer o - Willi e Analyze r d o no t respond t o cali b

* . • 08-27-8 4 104 0 X

08-27-8 4

08-31-8 4
09-27/8 4 100 0 Ou t o f Servic e fo r Repai r 1000-110 0

104 0 Analyze r Bac k o n Servic e _ * 083 0 Analyze r Bac k o n Servic e X

10/01/8 4 093 0 Routin e Calibratio n
10/08/8 4 081 0 Routin e Calibratio n
10/19/8 4 073 5 Routin e Calibratio n
10/24/8 4 080 0 Routin e Calibratio n Photocel l replace d ligh t aligne d Electroni c Chec k Willi e X Electroni c Check

Willi e X Replaced , Balanc e photocel l - calibra

tio n '
- Willi e X Willi e Bac k o n Servic e 094 5 X Replace d tap e - * Willi e X Replace d tap e - Willi e

EFGE50790 2

### MAINTENANC E RECOR D FO R ANALYZE R AR-18 5 - SERVIC E H, S FUE L GA S BLEN D
OPERATIO NCALIBRATIO NPHOT O DAT E TIM E Sat . Unsat . O/ S ' O K Require d CEL L COMMENT S 10-3 1 075 5 -.' • M * • X-••*" • Replace dTap e - '..,-.• - «.. . Willi e 11-1 2 XXReplace d Tap e -• JW L 11-2 1 X X Meas . Replac e Tap e an d 3/36 K Balance d Photocel l - R C 12- 3 103 0 X X Opene d up Nitroge n - Replac e Tap e and Balance d Photocel l R C ' ^ ;

_M>--
- 

### X X Replac e SJ0

- 7l25~ ~ Opene d 

### XX Replac e Tap e - Balance d Photocel l XX H 2 

### S SJ O - Unsatis

factor y- Lo wpp m "* . Readin g - 7 0 pp m

a
• ' •:, « replacemen t 

### 2-1 6 X X Replac e Tap e Picku p n o t turnin g - Replace d St d 5 2 pp m 12

- 12

- 12

--1 3
-1 7
-23

- 8 4 120 0

140 0



### BFGE50790 2^ SYSTE M DDE A SYSTE M DESCRIPTIO

N PLANT

VESSE L ERV1C E A : RAT E TEHP . ODUCT : NAM E RAT E PRESSUR E TEHP . PLAN

T

VESSE L SERVIC E DEA : RAT E TEHP . PRODUCT : NAHE RAT E SULFU

R RECOVER Y UNI T V-257 0 SULFU

R SULFUR RECOVER YRECOVERY UNI T DA-2B 2 UNI T

V-257 2 SULFU

R RECOVERY UNI T DA-2BJ DE A FLAS HSTRIPPERDEA

FLAS HSTRIPPER 25gp a U O F DE A 375gp« PRESSURE fcOpsicj TEHP . 11 0 F Ogp i

11 0 F DE A •lOOgp a 25psi g 19 0 F 25gp i

11 0 F DE A 375gp i tOpsi g U O F Ogp i

U O F DE A 400gp i 25psi g 19 0 F STEA

H- METHANE REFORMER 252 2 ABSORBER 70gp i 11 0 F TABL E 1

WI1WINGTC N

h*IM*lFACIlJRIN GCOMPLE X

DHT- 3

HP-27 5 COKERCOKERCOKE R

22J 4 CK : 8 225 7 CCUCC U

1223/122 5 HS- 2 CC

U

241 5 HYDRO

SHU- 4 ABSORBERABSORBERABSORBERDE A FLAS HABSORBERABSORBE RDE A FLAS HABSORBER 150gp i 11 0 F SM RFEE DRECYC L H 2 20H HSCFD 9 0 psi g 7 0 F 60gp i 160gpa 15gp a

- C3/C 4 DR

Y6A S DE

A 100M N SCFD2500B/ D18M

HSCFD220gp« 900psi g 13 5 F 240psi g 14 0 PS1 6 5 PS1 6

BO F 7 0 F 11 0 F 40gp i 130gp i
C3/C 4 DRYGA S 5HB/ D11M

HSCF D 200psit ) 14 0 PSI 6 B O F 8 0 F 15gp i

DE A 170gp i 6 0 PSI G U O F 35gp i . i

HYDRO

6H U ABSORBER 35gp i HYDRO HYDRO

PT- 3 PT- 4 ABSORBERABSORBER 80gp i 30gp i

GASOLINE RECYC L H 2 RECYC L H 2 RECYC L H 2 IOMB/ D 10 0 PSI 6 15 0 F srnSCF D 60 0 PSI G 9 0 F BH HSCF DlOri

HSCFD 70 0 PS1 6 60 0 PSI G 10 0 F 10 0 F HYDf) 0

PT- 6 FLASHER ISgp r

DE A 180gp a 9 0 PS1 B 9 0 F

• i t '•'i- -

### P.7 8


# 8s. » sr.. 

# rv . 9 —' 

## *? 

## h 

# n

.• •• ? 3 3 * ** «

— ! »— i

v- J 

# 1O

1

i - ! -*r

# s t r f *

• n •* •

X * 

# c -1 

# 5 * JC H



# i

- o r

- o 3 

# 0 m
J O m > 

# r 0 ) 

# H m 

## 2

# V Shell Oi l Compan y On e Shel l Plaz a P.O

. Bo x432 0 Houston , Texa s 7721 0



### DoJcJr I Apri l 9 , 198 5

Mr . Jac k R . Farmer , Directo r Emissio n Standard s an d Engineerin g Divisio n Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlannin g an d Standard s Unite d State s Environmenta l Protectio n Agenc y Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a 2771 1 Dea r Mr . Farmer : A s requeste d i n you r lette r o f January25 , 1985 , th e attache d informatio n o n proces s equipmen t an d associate d emissio n contro l equipmen t subjec t t o th e petroleu

mrefineryfue l ga s provision s o f 4 0 CF R 6 0 Subpar t J i s forwarde d fo r Shel l Oil' s Norco , LA , Wilmington , C Aan d Martinez , C

A refineries
. Pleas e not e tha t onl ycos t an d supplementaryproces s infor

matio n ar e provide d fo r Norc o refinerysinc e the balanc e o f the dat a wer e obtaine d durin g a n EP Afiel d tri p t o tha t facility
. Ou r Wilmingto n refineryha s identifie d thre e proble marea s encountere d i n complying wit h th e NSPS . Thes e ar e the dua l reporting o f informatio n t o EP Aan d t o th e stat e agency ; th e shor t pr e start-u p notificatio n o f 3 0 t o 6 0 days , an

d possibl e difficultie s i n meetin g th e performanc e tes t dead

lin e o f start-u

p plu s 18 0 days . (Se e Sectio n X-I , pa^ e 1 4 o f Wilming

ton' s response ) W e believ e th e attache d dat a respond s t o al l o f th e informatio n requeste d i n EPA' s questionnaire
. However , i f clarificatio n i s require d pleas e fee l fre e t o contac t m e a t (713 ) 241-1889 . Verytrul yyours , r

J//A . Mullins , Manage r Environmenta l Program s Environmenta l Affair s JAE/bl v Attachmen t

CAS50990 1

# D

SHEL L OI L COMPANY

NORC O MANUFACTURIN G COMPLE X

RESPONS E T O EP AQUESTIONNAIR E

NSP S - PETROLEU M REFINERIE S -

FUE L GA S COMBUSTIO NDEVICE S

CR850990 6P.8 1



### TABL E 1
RESPONS E T O REFINERYFUE L GA S NSP S QUESTIONNAIR E

(SectionV,.Question s 1-9 )
V . PRIMARYCONTRO L (Amine Treaters ) 1 . Characteristics/Compositio no f Fue l Ga s

2 .

3 . 

## a . b . c . d .

Am i a . b . c . d . e . f . gFlo w rat e Heating valu e Temperatur e an

dpressur e Compositio n (1 ) H2 S (2 ) Sulfu r compound s (3 ) C0 2 

### ne Treate r Descriptio n Genera l schemati c Manufacturer/vendo r Start-u pdat e Desig ncapacit y

an drang e Hour s o f operation , Hr/Y r Numbe r o f vessel s Amin e inventory 13-27M M SCF D 900-140 0 BTU/SC F 60-100°F , 70-10 0 PSI G 

## 7% w l% w Unknow n

Se e attachmen t 1 Standar dtoo l 198 0 20M M SCFD , 10-2 8 SCF D 876 0 1 absorber , 1 strippe r 

### (1 ) Tota l inventory ( f 

### 2 ) Amin e circulatio nrat e h . Absorbe r design/operatin g conditio n i . Strippe r design/operatin g conditio n j . Typ e o f Amin e k . Othe r importan t design / operatin g criteri a Typ e o f system , i f NSP S hadno t bee nineffec t 4 . Maintenanc e History 120 0 gallon s 300 , gp m (1983) , 20 0 gp

m (1984 ) Se e attachmen t 2 Se e attachmen t 3 DEA (Diethanolamine ) Non e
Non e



## a . b . c . d . e . Degradation/Los s Foaming Amin e contaminatio n Vessel/Pipin g Corrosio n Excessiv e emissio n (1 ) 3 Q 198 3 (2 ) 4 Q 198 3 (3 ) 1 Q 198 4 (4 ) 2 Q 198 4 1 0 inventorie s (1983) , 4. 5 inventorie s (1984 ) Non e Hydrocarbon * Non e 97.3 % Complianc e rat e 90.2 % Complianc e rat e 94.8 % Complianc e rat e 93.8 % Complianc e rat e 

### *Knock-ou t Po t wa s installe dt o minimiz e entraine dhydrocarbon . i s route dt o slo poi l system . BLAS850810 2 Liqui dP.8 2



### 5 . 6 . 7 .

8 .

.9 . Amin e replacement/maintenanc e abov e vendo r specificatio n Annua l Amin e treatmen t reliabilit y Inspectio nschedules/practice s a . b . Schedul e Personne l Monitorin g require dt o asses s performanc e o f Amin e treatmen t system Amin e treate r operatin g paramete r use db y operator s t o maintai n specifie dH ? 

### S concentratio ni n amin e treate r outle t ga s Non e
99+ % strea

m facto r

2-2 $ year s T/ A

cycl e Shel l inspector s H^ S concentratio ninamin e treate r outle t ga s
DEA flo w

BLAS850810 2

### ATTACHMEN T II I V \

Dat e 7-15-8 3 Se e not e 1 . 7-19-8 3 Se e not e 2 . 7-20-8 3 7-20-f8 3 9-20-8 3 Sourc e

Ho . 42 2 42 0 42 1 41 7 41 8 42 3 41 9 Boiler

Ho . 2- 4 2- 5 2- 6 2- 2 2- 3 2- 1 2- 8 TABL E I

PHILLIP S PETROLEU

M COMPAN Y BORCS RREFINER

Y NO g TES T O H SEVE

N STEA M BOILER S
Sis e »/h r 390,00 0 100,00 0 100,00 0 100,00 0 100,00 0 150,00 0 100,00 0 LoadH O NO2 . 0 2

f/h r ppa

v ppa

v X 244,25 3 139. 2 4. 8 3. 4
69,63 7 103. 6 2. 6 3. 8
107,86 0 64. 5 15. 6 4. 5 123,06 2 160. 7 7. 3 2. 6 84,70 0 12 8 6. 6 3. 0

*Averag e o f eight , fiftee nminut e staples .
Not e 1 . Result * froa Boile r 2- 6 wer e les s then70 Z o f Perai t Liait .
Not e 2 . Result s fro a Boile r 2- 3 wer e lee s then70 Z o f Perai t Liait . EaissionRate * #N0 z /MMBT 0 0.11 9
0.08 9
0.07 7 0.13 3 0.11 0 Perai t Liai t

#HO x /MMBT 0 0.1 4 0.1 4 0.1 4 0.1 4 0.1 4 0.1 4 0.1 4 ' V •A

. > 

## 8.

• V'; " «


## •H
r-tfr 

# 1

HOPidsg/02 2

- 7 -P.8 4

•wuecMtAnatifWa a I . *•»•••!•• • mt

» iifrnur t •Mrinmun g vo n H J i n laf ) mt m MM* * I Zu rHondbobua g imGmwiWm mt

tm I 4 . OlOM TC4OrQV0tW'**lV~RjWfH J M M \fOOJTOWti*MO H

bi t n rvella * Onmminulio n o t H 4 l a ai rmt t n Nitiiiui l M m far urn or ) ta p O n Barnau l mar ) ta a MA<& » Tubal , Oparalin g laalnmioat ) aa d tnitractia m to rUr » 04 1 a . 3 . S M iflullialian . Opinin g tim a {duratio n o fo m pum a tin l : II I ttroa a anfi l mt limi t drai n I t caaplaMn )

1 un d iommmottmt

Spinof

f 3 JduaJMlMi a 4 Anzaigaidlidi t (wars ) rai l Skolrja ; ZoMWmrt a . ppa V Hi 5 Hai l (tai l bo l da rMla a «» r Pump a waiun ) «>M d tip . writin g turfac a r tria l mm

valva l a arra w(mat t poin t loward t i PPmH £

a . MiM i r eika i »° C nn••*> , •a i I Hub : 1 0 bi t m pp m Hfi. •a i 1 0 HObaat 1 bi t 2 0 ppa i »£» . J jffaJJlVJ'ty'S- ) -*° C """*
-
4.1 . Pumpa vo rjada rMatVaJh a tai l ungaoffnatt m Uhnha n Qu i Die»rti.i l prijlu . IX Spina s O M OUGEt-Uhrduja t abbradiaa . 4J . OKAGEK-tthrdKH i didi i i n da n Pumpantop ftimatta n (Hai l aatt t a » 4.4 . PrWga t noddu l n t 1 Ho b dun k d m DIXGEt-Mkniia a tauoor vliag t HS vor , t o varfdrb t tid l di a aarS a Antaiaairtiidr t hallbraua . Ung a da r Varforban g •Mo t li rdi a M**>onnm>tion . Air l da rIHvb-Skol o Kon taatrolia n i n pp m ablatio . Uao t da rWar t Soa r2 0 ppm . t a tt t di a Fruhm g baaadat . Waraa n aaniga ral t 2 0 pp m apgalwan , t o i n di a Prolon g mi l v araiMra n (oli o inigatom l 1 0 HGba n lorawatua . H^-KonnMrati M i n pp m iat d ou t da r10-Hub-Skol a oblawri . Nod i nagotiva m Prfltbotun d ken a do t DMGEI-tMrdia n HA Mt a m talba n Ta g bi t z u zahnma l banutzt wordon : nod i poiitivo m Bafun d nroH t mab rvar wandbor . Varfdrbungo n tin d tong a Zai t hullbor , arjn n Spilxa n mi t Gummikap .

tab . a * . •!•••• ' DiaOtAGEt-Mlvdia n Unar m i n aina m Timpmlutbaraid . ¥Oa 0 bi t 40 ° C » , aa fc wanoa t tifjatfoan . 12 . Ftaditigkai l I m laraid i vo n 3 bi t 3 0 m g H, 0 pr a Uta rha t di a Nadltigkat t kaina n Ein . ftu* ou t di a Aiuaiga . •J . Umuruc * Zu rKonMRu roa t OmckaMlima i ti t dta Anaig a (n n dm a Uganda n Pikto rn t mulltplt101 3 

## i j T S Korraklurfakto r-

Konakturttfcto r-

i O . tatUcnucM rI idtdrw t (i n naar ) (inTorr )
a p I TITliiill ) Anxaig a baru M ou t Forbraafclio n mi t ataivarbindung i a t anlttth t hallbrouna t •labutlid . I n Qtgtiwr i arMnra rSO,Konxantnitiaa M MU i di a H,S-Aiuaig a bad ! ou t (s . I . Gamut * vo a 3 pp m M J m d 4 0 pp m SO , argib t A i atw o I pp m Hfi), SO , allai n varMtb t di a Aiuaigaamidi t nil' - Andar a Got a un d Ddrnpl a baainflusta n di a H^Amaia a ni c dil . nidtt . Angoba n ou t da rlondaroto . Varbrouditdotu m un d luuwlampaiulu rvgl . J a kSMa rdit i

DUGaSmim*

galagt ' nutoia n Eignstoioftti a ariwItM . Ilalad l ArtaitipamtonMiviniluntMAIC) : lOppm(Biii<dlapiiolt>Ow>l»elili d taW .


## f lla n Tabatt a 4»a » aMM M ilplnHillia i guraai t di a mi l DUOtt-tUkrdia n maftbara n Oaa t aa d Dtrnpta , widtfig a ,li|iHaaiS i aa d n Itlligli d i DaN a {aa rOat a aa d Oampt a totm a lila»alui*iaaain . litta , lordar a tt a diat a Toball a ba i ua t aa . I VmaiaaU m OUCU-iahrdm a aa* l aaVU t brtamttaa , domrt ti a aidt t i n Kla idtrt l VaratdiMa j vo a DMO H i OWJ«3t*»Vgar*. . " e la rVaratdiMa j vo a PtWOf l Mrndia a •* . aad t a Mg a da r.Mimilunga n 3 . laag a a t (20"C , 101 3 n*ar . cortatpoadin g t o 20« t It M maart Wit h 1 ttroka i 1 0 l o M 0 pp m H J Will i 1 0 iliuati . 1 to » pp m H, f

4 . Tat t aaej batMllca i mi ffka aowl i 4.1 . lafor a aod i %tm o fmaowraiwantt , tat t Mia pwn p fo rtiQhtfia- a «-w-» « o a 4.2 . Iraafc«f fth * tip s o fth a OIAOE R Tuba . 40 . lAMr t th e 0RACE I twfa a HaMt y i a H * pun* * aao d (orro wpoint * kremrxh 4.4 . Firs t tu d th a oi rsorepl a throog h tt wlut e wit h 1 pum p firoka . I C HS i% prosaat p lh a whit a indkatiii g kiya rtum t pat * brawn . Th a laaat h o fth a o^BcotoroHo n i t o mmo$w o l lh a Hfi

comwiiTotioo . Raad-o H th a cancafi trotio n i a pp m o n th a 1-strok a wot* . I fth a volu a i t abow a 2 0 ppm . lh a tac t i t cempMad . I fi t i s lat a tha n 2 0 ppm . th a las t -uhotti d b o continua d wit h 9 furtha rf o tota l o f10 ) ttrokai . No wraod-of flh a H, S coneantrotio n < n pp m o n th a 10-strek a scola . 1 Atta ro napotiv a last rasult , th a H, S 1/ e Tub a ou t b a utmd u p t o ta n >\mm

o a th a torn * day . Th e tub a canno t b a wa d opoi n afte ra positiv a r+tvtt. OtKOlo rotion s co n b a kap t fo ra lon g tim a i fth a tip s ar e saola a wit h rubba rcops . 4 . trnMrnrnmu

*4 Awali n -taodliiaa i m *m Uwmtt mt •wi i 6.I.Tamp8iuitf i ThaOiw C 4.2 . Humidit y 6J.Tampliulur » Th a DRAGEft Tobas co n b o usad i n o tamparotur a roito o o ffro m 0 t o 40 ° C
dkotion . 3 an d Xm g H, 0 pa rlitra , homidit y ha s n o itiffoanc a o n th a i 6 J . Atmosphari c prasiur a *o rp*aaaur

a corractton , muRlpt

y th a tub a faadtn g b

y th a IWlowin g facto r Convora*ton (acto r• Comoraio n tscto r• {I n moa n prassur a (i n Torr) 7 . lasiin-Jt y (Cr»JB«->aaiiilt>.ry ) Indicatio n i t bosa d o n a cofou rrtoctio n wit h a lao d compoun d —pol a brow n fao d swlphid a i t producad . I n th a prasanc a offoirl y hig h SO , concontroriont , lh a indicatio n i t tomawho t to o hig h (a . g . o miatur a o f5 pp m H, S an d 4 0 pp m SO , giva s o n indicotto n of abou t I pp m H,S) ; SO , OIW M doa s no t chong a m a colou roflh a indicatin g leyar . Ofha rfloitt on d vopou n d a no * bffac t m a H, S indication . So » axpirotto n dot a on d storog o tamparotur a o a tota l o fth a box . Th a lowa r lh a tantparetur a a t whic h th a OKXCE R Tubas or a itorad , th a imalla rth a chong a i n lhai rchamico l propartias . f . Tamictt rOa« s nmhom unto volua : 1 0 pp m (US A 1940) .

Ou rtaa* t tM a contain s i n •l»habiMeo l orda rth a f^aa a mmd ta p sir s maoj-pfoW a wit h OIAOE KTutea , iopnilas t phpslia faa d loKltilaglaiTda-a j o flh a goaa s an d vopotrrs a s wal l m Mo y raftvonoM t o litorohjra . Thi s tobl a wil l b a son t t o yo u o n ragwast . O o ao t allo wOtAO M Tuba s t o M l int o lh a hand s o fAikkan . Co n ia n t i or a toffiiuva l Pa rdMtrovin , OWOf t Tufeaa , rata rl a Inajrmatim , tbaa l No . a OIXOItWfl K•A O •1USIC K•OltMAN YPrinm a , . m. Ndn i t^Aii . <

d o—o- yP.8 5



### .. A..:*-'. - 

### rfroiTi^iivnMm--^ ^ 1-OftlrtAJOftUPOT^

*-** " *--—>»•'»>

> thpa i (HailwleTSlwtt»oety V
Tmm .»—

%h1111a s Patrolau a Coapan y ^ - BoVgerRefiner y e H6 L Procas s Cente r -tra^e--, , P-0 > Bo x27 1 ^ Borgt r^ Taxas „ 79008-027 1 Owear , Opanto ro a TaatelWaJt t NUADS f 9mfeuM,Mumtmwt f i e •W"4»—ff f•«•• ) **>•»• —•w (806 ) 273-2831 . extensio n 8-287-120 1 fetm o f*Jei t o rfocsa Attac h Sulfu rRecover

y Uni t 43 an d A-lna/Sou rWate rUni t 4 4

iDtlnifforShauioaratseStsn-a p Octobe r2 , 1984 (2:00P M - 4:15PM ) TawaedEayctrtDwifltjee fF>LWI I Emiatog B Octobe r2 (2:05P M - 4:20PM ) Q MaerUpat fT ] The Sulfu rRecover

y Uni t 43 shutdow

n a t 2:00P M du

e t o lo wad d ga

s flow . The shutdow n occurre d whe

n th e AiMne/Sou rWate rUni t 4 4 becam e upset . The Clau s Sectio n o f Uni t 43 wa

s starte d up a t 3:00P M an d th e SCO TTal l Ga

s Sectio n wa

s starte d up a t 4:15PM .

leva ! o fEmtaton * (pv * bu s fo raatimaia) : Phyaea

l in d Chamka

l CompotritJoo

, Rats. Conctntfilion , an

d Duratio n

an H fm m th * Tal l Ga « Incinerato rfo r2 hour s 1 5 minute s a t 1000 ppm .

- •WMMift s (t o tx ) Tikt n t

o ItlKtnt o Ojtnut

y an d Du n Steos wer

e immediatel y take n t o stabiliz e uni t operations . auickl va

s safet y woul d permit .

Malaw i (l o ba

) Taka e t o ftenat tUcurraoc a (I fno t oatannfat

d yat , gfr c dat a wha n a Plan t personne l reviewe d operationa l procedures . a concentratio n 1 n exces s o f

The uni t wa

s starte d up a

s

eatuia s wi Q b a nibmittad

)

IVa.iVw.aadMcamoftiotiflcatk M E«acou»gObacto

rMr . Davi d HenHchs , Austin , Texas —b y cop y o fthi s repor t tetjosdOflks Mr . Ke n Bowers , Lubbock, Texas b y telephon e Octobe r4 , 1934 •dua l fti.|HMi n^. Octobe

r10 , 198 4 *•*• » •Stoned . . « j S . > . Fin k

(RC) S6-5(9 ) " J JU136M U . Lewi 4 , Hinadei 1 

## _J_IL___

_P.8 6 

### ATTACHMEN T V I 

### • 1 UFS : S6-5(9 )

PHILLIP S PETROLEU M COMPAN Y BQRGE RREFINE Y& NG L PROCES S CENTE R POS T OFFIC E BO

X27 1 BORGER , TEXA S 79008-027 1 Januar y 11 , 198 5

Mr . Bil l Stewart , P.E . Executiv e Directo r Texa s Ai r Contro l Boar d 633 0 Highwa y

29 0 Eas t Austin , Texa s 7872 3 PSD-TX-102M 3 an dTAC B Permi t C-755 3 Sulfu r Recover y

Uni t 4 3 Excessiv e Emission s Repor t Fourt hQuarte r 198 4

Dea r Sir : Specia l Provisio n2 . o f th e above-mentione dpermit s state s tha t th e permitte dfacilitie s mus t compl y wit hal l th e requirement s o f 4 0 CF R60 , Subpart s A

an dJ (Standard s o f Performanc e fo r New Stationar y

Sources) . I naccordanc e wit hSubpar t A , Sectio n60.7(c) , attache di s th e Fourt h Quarte r 198 4 Excessiv e Emission s Repor t fo r th e Sulfu r Recover y Uni t 43 . Th e value s state dhav e no t bee ncorrecte dt o zer o percen t oxyge ndu e t o operationa l problem s wit hth e oxyge ncontinuou s emissio nmonitor . Th e instrumen t i s being repaire dan dwil l b e place dinservic e a t th e earlies t opportunity . I f ther e ar e any question s o r additiona l informatio ni s needed , pleas e contac t H . J . Stric k(extensio n1568 ) collec t a t 806/273-2831 . Ver y trul y yours .

i J John0 . Lewi s J0L:GEF:g j Attachmen t
cc : Geral dHudson , TACB , Lubboc k R . W . Johnso n B . F . Ballar d 6 . E . Fink(RC ) $6-5(9 ) Readin g Fil eF # : •freyg Borge rRe-f i

u rD i nsr y

Sulfu rRett* liv t Emission * Repor t 'frour l a * ' _i « 

### *- £ !'t# # t*#> r
Excessiv e Sulfu rDioxid e Emission s (Correcte d t o ' %t dr y conditions ) 

### Magnitud e Date/Time (Hourl y Avg.> , Explanatio n



## a w Majo r Upse t Schedule dMaintenanc e

Oct . 2 <2I03PM-4I20PM > 

### 1000+pp m (2hr s ISmins ) MUt Uni t 4 3 shutdow ndu e t o lo

w aci dga s -flow , whic hresulte d 1 

### whe nUni t 4 4 became upset . Operationa l procedure s wer e re viewed . Refe r t o TAC B repor t submitte dOctobe r IO , 1984 .
Oct . I S <7i30AM> - Oct . 1 9 (4.00PM ) Oct . 3 1 QOiSOPM) - Nov . 2 <1:30PM ) Nov . 3 <10i00AM-12:30PM ) 72 S pp m (41hr s SSmins ) 1000+pp m (103hr s 45mins ) SMt Uni t 4 2 wa s shutdow nt o replac e catalys t ir v guar d reactors . Consequently , Uni t 4 3 als o shutdow

nfo r mainten ance . Bot hunit s starte du p howeve r Uni t 4 3 shutdow nagai n whe nshutdow

nsystem

wa s inad vertentl y

tripped . Preventativ e maintenanc e wor k wa s performe d during th e shutdown . Re-fe r t o TAC B repor t submitte dNov . 12 , 1984 .
Nov . 2 HUB compute r failure , n o dat a printe dout . Emission s occurre d a s indicate dabove .
Nov . 3 (12:30PM) - Nov . 5 (11:10AM ) CE M dat a incorrsct j S0 2 CE M shutdow

nt o replac e stac k prob e cerami c filter . N o excessiv e emission s occurre d(150ppm) .
Nov . 9 HU B compute r failure , n o dat a printe dout . N o excessiv e emission s occurred .
Nov . 1 8 HU B compute r failure , n o dat a printe dout . N o excessiv e emission s occurred .P.8 8

: .&3j^g3a«jr*5 ^


### Borga rRefiner y an d NGfc . Proces s (Utotrnt*'';; ;;•: Sul-fu rRacovar y Uni t 4 3 Excassiv a Emission s Rapor t Fourt h Quarta r196 4


# - I Excessiv e Sul-fu rDioxid e Emission s (Correcte dt o *8 < dry conditions ) Magnitud e Date/Tia a v



### (Hourl y Avg. ) Explanation

M U- Majo r Upse t S M » Schedule dMaintenanc i
Nov . 2 1 - Nov . 2 4 HU B compute r failure , n o dat a printe dout . Workin g wit hcom pute r personne l t o attemp t t o locat e caus e o f problem . No ex cessiv e emission s occurred .
Nov . 2 9 (9:35AM-11.50PM ) 60 2 pp m (40mins ) 1000+pp m (13hr s 35mins ) MU i Uni t 4 3 SCO T Sectio nshut dow ndu e t o hightemperatur e i n th e tai l ga s reactor , cause db y excessiv e combustio nai r i nth e in-lin e burne r mixer . Opera tiona l procedure s wer e review ed . Refe r t o TAC B repor t sub mitte dDec . 4 , 1984 .
Nov . 3 0 - Dec . 1 HU B compute r failure , n o dat a printe dout . Continue dat tempt s to , locat e problem . N o excessiv e emission s occurred , excep t a s indicate dbelow .
Dec . 1 (9:00AM) - Dec . 9 <1.00AM ) 57 2 pp m (104hr s 40mins ) 1000+pp m (SOhr s 35mins ) SM : Uni t 4 2 wa s shutdow nt o perform

maintenanc e wor k onth e mai nfractionator . Consequentl y Uni t 4 3 als o shutdown . Durin g Uni t 4 3 startu pprocedure s a hotspo t develope don.th e com bustio ns o th e uni t wa s shut dow nfo r repairs . Monitorin g Uni t 4 2 mai nfractionato r ope. — atio nt o determin e sourc e o f problem . Refe r t o TAC B repor t submitte dDec . 12 , 1984 .
Dec . 10.(7:45AM-1:40PM ) 35 9 pp m (5hr s lOmins ) 1000+pp m (45mins ) SM : Uni t 4 3 wa s shutdow nt o repai r a broke nsigh t glas s onth e combustio nfurnace . Refe r t o TAC B repor t submitte d Dec . 13 , 19S4 .P.8 9

m; :-i^"- *5? 

### Borge r Refiner y

andN6 L Proces s Cante r Sulfu r Recover y

Uni t 4 3 Excessiv e Emission s Repor t Fourt hQuarte r 198 4 ! 

### Excessiv e Sulfu r Dioxid e Emission s (Correcte dt o * It dry conditions ) Magnitud e Date/Time (Hourl y Avg. ) Explanatio n

M U- Majo r Upse t S M • Schedule dMaintenanc i

Dec . 1 1 Determine dan dcorrecte dprob le m wit hHU B compute r whic hwa s causin g CEM

dat a t o b e lost . No furthe r problem s expected .
Dec . 1 3 (8:00PM) - Dec . 1 4 (12:30AM ) 1000+pp m (4hr s 30mins ) MU : Uni t 4 3 shutdow ndu e t o lo

w ai r flow

to th e combustio n furnace . Th e lo

w ai r flow

re sulte dwhe nth e instrumen t ai r lin e brok e of f th e combustio n ai r controller . Th e instrumen t ai r lin e wa s repaired . Refe r to TAC B repor t submitte dDec . 18 , 1984 .
Dec . 1 4 (12:35PM-2:00PM > 29 4 pp m (35mins ) 1000 + (50mins ) MU : Uni t 4 3 shutdow ndu e t o lo

w aci dga s flow . Howeve r th e con ditio ndi*

dno t exis t an

ds o th e caus e wa s determine dto b e a n instrumen t malfunction . Th e in strumen t wa s repaired . Refe r t o TAC B repor t submitte dDec . 18 , 1984 .
Dec . 1 4 (7:35PM> - Dec . 1 5 (4:00AM ) 55 7 pp m (4hr s 40mins ) 1000+pp m (3hr s 45mins ) Excessiv e sulfu r dioxid e emis sion s du e to instrumen t prob lems . Uni t remaine donline ; th e instrumen t wa s repaired .
Dec . 1 8 (7:00AM-7:00PM ) 26 8 pp m (12hrs ) Sulfu r dioxid e emission s inex ces s o f 250pp

m average dove r a 1 2 hou r perio d(NSP S Subpar t J , Sectio n60.105(e)(3)(ii) .P.9 0 ~| > ^**~" ( ,< i ' ajH|H[jS)ia y(•• -• J*--^' - ""•*»?-%»' •am * a*.'. , •-

"', ^?B|SiJBMS**ij"'-'" ~ '"^'^flsHfcoiJaaaSaaaa'^^. j ' -* " - r " * •* * '>r^MSHMEtf a aV4'f^j' ' HC-4 3



### Borger Refiner

y an dN8 L Proces s Cantar. . " '" ''^^M-^^^'' V A ^ Sulfu r Recover

y Uni t 4 3 . * * • Excessiv

e Emission s Repor t FourthQuarte r 198 4 

# t JT l Excessiv

e Sulfu r Dioxide Emission s Explanatio n"* ' (Correcte

dt o " & dr

y conditions ) Magnitude M U• Major Upse t Date/Tim

e (Hourl y Avg.) , SM

" Schedule

dMaintenanc e
Dec . 1 9 (8:S0AM-11:45AM ) 1000+pp m (2hr s 55mins ) SM : Th e Uni t 4 3 SCO T Sectio n wa s shutdow

nt o allo

w a start u pcirculatio

nlin e t o be in stalled . Th

e ne w lin e wil l allo w th e Clau s Sectio

nt o b e starte du pmor e quickl y

afte r a shutdown . Th

a ne w lin e wil l therefor e reduc e the amount o f sulfu r emissio

ndurin

g futur e shutdowns . Refer t o TACB repor t submitte

dDec . 19 , 1984 .
Dec . 2 0 (9:00AM-9:00PM ) 32 4 pp m (12hrs ) Sulfu r dioxide emission s i nex ces s o f 250pp m averagedover a 1 2 hou r perio d(NSP S Subpar t J , Sectio n60.105(e>(3)<ii> .ATTACHMEN T2 P.9 1

' I-S33 0 SHUTDOW

N SrSH H I S WClECTROMI C SYSTEM A.V 3 LOOTE D " O N TH E COMPRESSO

R FRAHE . TH E SHUTDOW N STSTE H I S ACTIMTE O I T0E-ENERSIZ1N S TH E SHUTDOW N CIRCUIT . TH E SHWt . SIGNIFIE S TH E INTERFAC E SETVEE KT * SHUTDOW N 1 STSTE H M D TH E SHUTDOW N INSTRUMENTATIO N I N TH E

I/MIS H LEVEL ! 

### .CeVSkr-Q

-0 - I MK5 M Lfv a LO

W PV-199 . Fl . (LAM-2081 ) P*t - ! /T V J PV-199 . . »*£iJC S *—\* 0 ' (LAM-20 8 - " MitwTEv a ,PV-I9S3 , (LAH-»S4 ) 

### y-—< ?
i t- ?,„,>,,/, , »>>!>>> J»>/»//»»/r7T7T77r . Tne iijl /

< ^ 7

I-&U O


### ssr* ^ *icu* c H O 1 5 DU-rw S FEE

O HYDROTREATE

R avg<a#y«»£:xi E W»r**OC€» l CO»»fttHOB t

# £.-.z . pF A V^'PP ^ J-teS ^ P.9 2

VS." : 1 . IMEMA : c-ir:ct P.C . :S:::STM . 2 . :;•. < ELM-E

Tcr.!E«-."ir . .:\' . :"i: , --:c< . FU'S.- E E;.:Er/v*:.'.'" . Eiiiii R •:=•.-.. T J i-»;'.;-.J i A TI V-I O SV ; *2 0 vK.'i;. . (5 2 -:>-.::-" : LI'-E S DEMT E FLO WRJT - 'C R FLUSH: S :« t L£ = F:; - --• : TSA'.iFt - .:*.r:.is : £-222: . n%>

p-«3« « A< B

_' U» N DE . CIRCULATIO N PUMP SP.9 3 ATTACHMEN T3*

z z z

tfMft <A o o o mo o

—t* • *
r » p « r « « M M 

# 6 1

# 

# ?

* i 

## m l r ** n 

## 0 

# r • 

### CA

** 5



### r .1 * £ * » H > r • >

- a
<T »
V A


### t

* J 3

I N

jft >

r . i . 

# fe fcP.9 5 

# 3 * »_&*) £CAarrWl-* ! I C A M [lCi*TO>M:| * t.Itri . ...a . NOTES : 1 . 1-532 9 AND I-S33 0 RECYCLE MYCROM N CUINDCR S C O I E ICAX ; I N STEPS O F ot . a>v AN

D ::« . 2 . 1-532 9 AN

O 1-133 0 MFC'. . HYDROGE N CTLISOER S CA

N E E LOADE D -.1 STEPS l ' oi . 2St . sos . is : AN D IMI . 3 . REFE R T

O FI&JPE S 3 0 AND 4 4 FO R OETAIL S O F Tf fCCW-RESSO S PACKIN G VEN TAND OISTA.SCE..PJEC E VtN TPIPING .

« . OPERATIN G CO>:IT;OR S SHM I FO R 1-532 9 AN D J-S35 0 AR E MARIN E CAPACIT

YNUftERS , NO

TPLAN TDESIGN . £**«.--#- , £0T*_^T£a._ONUR

_ 432 . SHUT0O. 1 I S A N ELECTRONI C SYSTEli I AN D LOUIE O » S COtWESSO R FRAK . TH E SHUTOCV t SYSTE M I S ACTIVATE O I T 0£.£NE.S:iZI* G T« £SHUTDOW N CIRCUIT . TH E STieO L SIGNIFIE S TH E IkTEOFAC E DETWIE N TH E SMUTOOU N STSTE H AN

O TH E SrrjTDOtf N INSTPUMENTATlOl fI N TH E S/S///SS /)>>>>>>>,>,>,, Illli If T ' I I I " T

I t
_ 

## I r-0-^

•I uC U ICuf l ifta.ii M

_ ^ I HI6 H LEVE L LO WCUB E OI L
MrGMlEVB . PVH9SJ - (LAH-rOSr 3 >>»»}»»///>/;//////»»/»;;/>>>y,V

«EFI"**» ToOOPSfSH-j , HIG H PRESSUR E VEM T fc TO^PUir- '^LSMMSCfO'LlMLBrlT M lifW rlAAAfl A *

IOJ«Lft/Mf i