alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
                  OFFICER REGARDING PERIODIC REPORT CONTAINING

                              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

         I, Steven A. Schumm, the Chief Administrative Officer of Enstar Income
Program 1984-1, L.P. (the "Partnership") in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
hereby certify that, the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period
ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission:

            -     fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            -     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                                    /s/  Steven A. Schumm
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Steven A. Schumm
                                                    Chief Administrative Officer
                                                    April 10, 2003
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Francisco ALONZO-MELENDEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 05-50017.

Conference Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Decided Aug. 17, 2005.

Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Judy Fulmer Madewell, Federal Public Defender’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before BENAVIDES, CLEMENT, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Francisco Alonzo-Melendez raises arguments that are foreclosed by *Almendarez-Torres v. United*States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Exhibit
      32.1





AEROCENTURY
      CORP.





CERTIFICATION








In
      connection with this quarterly report of AeroCentury
      Corp. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Neal D. Crispin, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
      for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
      that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.




Date: November
              13, 2006
            By:
            /s/ Neal
              D.
              CrispinTitle:
              Chief Executive Officer
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.73 MB)
 
 55th Signal Company Runway repair Kurdistan Kurdish Maj. Stevens Q-west combined joint task force airfield Operation Inherent Resolve U.S. Air Force Iraq
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1010 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 469
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1010

                          [Report No. 107-192]

     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
         hydroelectric project in the State of North Carolina.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 11, 2001

Mr. Helms (for himself and Mr. Thurmond) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                             June 28, 2002

              Reported by Mr. Bingaman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
         hydroelectric project in the State of North Carolina.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
              PROJECT.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project 
number 11437, the Commission may, at the request of the licensee for 
the project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with the 
requirements of that section and the Commission's procedures under that 
section, extend the time period during which the licensee is required 
to commence the construction of the project for 3 consecutive 2-year 
periods.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) takes effect on the date of the 
expiration of the extension issued by the Commission before the date of 
the enactment of this Act under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 
U.S.C. 806).

                                                       Calendar No. 469

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1010

                          [Report No. 107-192]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
         hydroelectric project in the State of North Carolina.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 28, 2002

                       Reported without amendment
```
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Global Ship Lease, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 20-F), I Ian J. Webber, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Form 20-F fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: June 25, 2009



|    |  |                              
|--- |  | -----------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Ian J. Webber            
|    |  | Ian J. Webber                
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|    |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, Robert M. Bernstein, the Chief Executive Officer of Material Technologies, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Material Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

(c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based upon my evaluation as of the evaluation date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 11, 2005                                     /s/ ROBERT M. BERNSTEIN                  			                                                                       Material Technologies, Inc.			                                                                       Chief Executive Officer            

----
January 19, 1956

No. 59673.—Suit 4844.

#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States.

A. R. D. 53 affirmed December 8, 1955. C. A. D. 604.
From: s_sbill@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:52:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rachelle Bill

Moorhead, MN 56560
No. 33.

#### Inches Steamship Co., Ltd., *v.*International Maritime Workers Union et al.

*Herbert Brownell*and *Jack P. Jefferies*on the motion for the Republic of Panama.

*Lawrence Hunt*on the motion for the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

*Paul Barker*and *Neal Rutledge*on the motion for the Seafarers’ International Union of North America, Atlantic & Gulf District, AFL-CIO.

Certiorari, 368 U. S. 924, to the Court of Appeals of New York. The motions of the Republic of Panama; Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; and Seafarers’ International Union of North America, Atlantic & Gulf District, AFL-CIO, for leave to file briefs, as *amici curiae,*are granted.
From: olgpeg@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:51:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ann Keller

Camillus, NY 13031
From: psalater@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:52:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Penelope Salater

Kimberling City, MO 65686
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                         233,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               11,040,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   850,000
<INVENTORY>                                 12,691,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,222,000
<PP&E>                                       8,532,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,391,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              33,767,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,932,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       167,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,060,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                33,767,000
<SALES>                                     51,720,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            51,720,000
<CGS>                                       40,801,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               57,086,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,955,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,359,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,321,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,732,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,053,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,053,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.72)
        

</TABLE>
No. 131, Misc.

#### Green *v.*New York.

Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.