alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: steamcp@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:48:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michael Paxton

Kent, WA 98042
Exhibit








                                                                                                                                                                             EXHIBIT 10.6




Execution Version


Amendment to Change in Control Agreement
WHEREAS, this Amendment (this “Amendment”) to that certain Change in Control Agreement, dated as of December 6, 2011 (the “Agreement”), by and among (the “Executive”) Gregory L. Ebel and Spectra Energy Corp (the “Company”), shall be effective as of March 15, 2016 (the “Effective Date”);
WHEREAS, Section 14 of the Agreement provides that (except as otherwise provided in Section 13 of the Agreement) the Agreement may not be modified unless such modification is agreed to in writing and signed by the Executive and the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company (or an officer designee); and
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive wish to amend the Agreement on the terms and subject to the conditions described herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Executive, intending to be legally bound, do hereby agree as follows.
		
	1.
	The first sentence of Section 4.1(B) of the Agreement shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows:


“In lieu of any severance benefit otherwise payable to the Executive, the        Company shall pay to the Executive, a lump sum severance payment, in cash, equal to three (or, if less, the number of years (including partial years) until the Executive reaches the Company’s mandatory retirement age, provided that the Company adopts a mandatory retirement age pursuant to 29 USC §631(c)), multiplied by the sum of (i) the Executive’s base salary as in effect immediately prior to the Date of Termination or, if higher, as in effect immediately prior to the first occurrence of an event or circumstance constituting Good Reason, and (ii) the Executive’s target short-term incentive bonus opportunity for the fiscal year in which the Date of Termination occurs or, if higher, the fiscal year in which the first event or circumstance occurs constituting Good Reason.”
		
	2.
	Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full         force and effect.


[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]














IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment, to be                  effective as of the Effective Date.




GREGORY L. EBEL








   /s/ Gregory L. Ebel                                      


Date:  


March 15, 2016                                      






SPECTRA ENERGY CORP








   /s/ Dorothy M. Ables                               
Name:  Dorothy M. Ables                
Title:  Chief Administrative Officer




                                                                                                        2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SIGNATURE EYEWEAR, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED APRIL 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1998
<CASH>                                       5,770,132
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,601,403
<ALLOWANCES>                                    75,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,672,384
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            22,428,443
<PP&E>                                       2,487,889
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,400,069
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,663,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,843,989
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,400
<OTHER-SE>                                  18,809,731
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,663,120
<SALES>                                     18,895,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,895,000
<CGS>                                        7,577,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,064,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,471,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   963,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,508,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,508,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .29
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-10443 Conference Calendar

LESTER WARNELL FREEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus TERRI MOORE, Lawyer, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:99-CV-546-D

-------------------- October 20, 1999 Before JONES, WIENER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Lester Freeman (Texas prisoner #751150) appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action as frivolous. In connection with his appeal, Freeman has filed a motion requesting the appointment of counsel and a motion requesting the production of a transcript of a hearing conducted before a grievance committee of the State Bar of Texas. Freeman’s motions are DENIED. As the basis for his § 1983 suit, Freeman states that he wasNo. 99-10443 -2-

denied the effective assistance of counsel when his courtappointed attorney, Terri Moore, failed to file an appellate brief on his behalf during his direct criminal appeal. Freeman’s § 1983 suit lacks an arguable basis in law because Moore was not acting under color of state law for purposes of § 1983 liability.
See Polk County v. Dodson , 454 U.S. 312, 325 (1981); Mills v. Criminal Dist. Court No. 3 , 837 F.2d 677, 679 (5th Cir. 1988). The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing his complaint as frivolous. See Siglar v. Hightower , 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997). Freeman’s appeal is likewise frivolous and is therefore DISMISSED. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The dismissal of Freeman’s complaint as frivolous and the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous each count as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). We caution Freeman that once he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g). MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; § 1915(g) WARNING ISSUED.
1 

### Ogulei, David

From: David Moore <DavidM@cooperenvironmental.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 2:13 PM To: Ogulei, David Subject: Cooper Environmental

Hello David,

I just wanted to follow up to see if you were able to communicate with Dr. Fine at South Coast AQMD re garding our Xact systems in stack applications. Do you require any additional information from us?

Best regards,

David Moore Director of Sales and Marketing Cooper Environmental Services LLC 10180 SW Nimbus Ave. Suite J6 Portland, OR 97223 Phone #: 503-608-4444 Mobile #: 503-970-8190 Fax #: 503-624-2120 Email: DavidM@cooperenvironmental.com Website: www.cooperenvironmental.com
From: kathy.edmonston@apsb.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:26:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

kathy edmonston

Gonzales, LA 70737
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE OPTEL,
INC. THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                          92,187
<SECURITIES>                                    63,797
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,683
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,078)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         324,897
<DEPRECIATION>                                (39,763)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 616,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        429,019
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          212,244
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                    (72,516)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   616,632
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,540
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,388
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,541
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,922
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,020)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (21,020)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (21,020)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (9.41)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (9.41)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information (in thousands
except per share data) extracted from Petroleum Heat and Power Co., Inc. and
Subsidiaries financial statements as of December 31, 1996 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               3,257
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       94,450
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1,088
<INVENTORY>                                         22,084
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   130,010
<PP&E>                                              72,253
<DEPRECIATION>                                      41,587
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     275,025
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              111,917
<BONDS>                                            291,337
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                8,333
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             2,552
<OTHER-SE>                                        (148,285)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       275,025
<SALES>                                            567,329
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   608,161
<CGS>                                              348,338
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      427,388
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   172,005
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     1,882
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  34,669
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (23,684)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (21,901)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     (6,414)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (28,315)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (1.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (1.20)
                                               


</TABLE>
(R.D. 11410)

#### Parsons & Whittemore, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided December 5, 1967)

*Sharp, Solter & SuioMson*for the plaintiff.

*Bdivin L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

5. _ That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

7. _ That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

*7818. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.86 MB)
 
 james mattis JIm Mattis Chaos James N. Mattis Kuwait
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil