alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 179 (Monday, September 18, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 63957]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20092]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health; Notice of Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of 
Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), within 
the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), announces the 
renewal of the charter of the Board of Scientific Counselors, National 
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BSC, NIOSH).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria Strickland, M.P.H., Designated 
Federal Officer, Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, 400 7th Street SW, 
Suite 5W, Constitution Center, Washington, District of Columbia 20024. 
Telephone: (202) 245-0649; Email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: CDC is providing notice under 5 U.S.C. 1001-
1014. This charter has been renewed for a two-year period through 
February 3, 2025.
    The Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of 
the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register 
notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee 
management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2023-20092 Filed 9-15-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```
From: nousername4me@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:55:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dave Marino

Mount Laurel, NJ 08054
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 179 (Monday, September 18, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 63967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20107]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Drug Abuse; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Drug Abuse Initial 
Review Group; Career Development Education and Training Study 
Section.
    Date: November 2-3, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Health, National Institute on Drug 
Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Sindhu Kizhakke Madathil, Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Officer, Division of Extramural Research, Scientific Review 
Branch, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH 301, North Stonestreet 
Avenue, MSC 6021, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-5702, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#681b01060c001d46030112000903030d05090c091c00010428060100460f071e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="66150f08020e13480d0f1c0e070d0d030b070207120e0f0a26080f0e48010910">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug 
Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist 
Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug 
Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 
93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 12, 2023.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-20107 Filed 9-15-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
From: dking@keyinsco.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:36:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David King

Olathe, KS 66061
From: hart5jc@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:16:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Larry Hart

Jefferson City, MO 65109
EX-99.CERT 11(b)

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, and 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, and accompanies the report on Form N-CSR for the
period ended January 31, 2008 of Pax World Money Market Fund, Inc. (the
"Company").

Each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certify that, to the best
of such officer's knowledge:

         (i) the Form N-CSR fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
         U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

         (ii) the information contained in the Form N-CSR fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
         of the Company.



Date:  April 9, 2008          /s/Joseph F. Keefe
                                 Joseph F. Keefe
                                 Principal Executive Officer





Date:  April 9, 2008          /s/Anthony Pace
                                 Anthony Pace
                                 Treasurer
From: eliz.brunt@mygait.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:03:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sally L. Brunt

Keystone Heights, FL 32656
Case No. 14,153.

#### TRAVERSE v. BEALL.

[2 Cranch. C. C. 113.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

June Term, 1815.

Arbitration — When Umpire to be Cabled in.

An umpire is not to be called in until the original arbitrators have differed, and is then only to decide the points on which they differ.

Exceptions to an award.

Mr. Jones, for defendant,

objected that the umpire (Collet) decided upon the whole case, and not merely upon the points on which the other two (E. Law and I. D. Barry) differed, and that he was appointed by them, and called in before they had disagreed.

J. Law, contra,

cited ICyd, Awards, 53, 138, 156, 159.

THE COURT

(nem. con.) was of opinion that the award was bad, because it did not appear that the original arbitrators had differed before they called in the umpire, but that he decided upon the whole case ab initio.
From: jauciello@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:02:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joe Auciello

Cincinnati, OH 45238
#### Emma Fifield, as Administratrix with the Will Annexed of the Estate of Roswell C. Muzzy, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*Hollis P. White, Respondent.

*Fifleld*v. *White,*139 App. Div. 390, affirmed.

(Argued January 15,1913;

decided February 4, 1913.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered March 24, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract.

*Patrick J. Tierney*for appellant.

*Robert E. Healy*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Collin and Hogan, JJ.
#### Mary S. Vischer, Respondent, v. James M. Andrews, Appellant, Impleaded, etc.

Judgment modified as per opinion, without costs. Order to be settled by Bockes, J. Opür'on by

Bockes, J.,

and by Learned, P. J., dissenting.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12188]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Hanne Darboven—Writing Time” at the Menil Drawing Institute, The Menil Collection, Houston, Texas, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-20429 Filed 9-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTAUDITORS 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-41406, 333-49882, 333-62097, 333-90552 and333-109210 on Form S-8 pertaining to the 1990 Stock Option Plan; Immucor, Inc. 1990 StockOption Plan; 1995 Stock Option Plan; Immucor, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan; and Immucor, Inc. 1995 StockOption Plan, respectively, of Immucor, Inc., of our report dated July 30, 2004 withrespect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Immucor, Inc. included inthe Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended May 31, 2004. 

/s/ Ernst &Young LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Registrant. |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                      | NW                Tech Capital, Inc.                                                                             |
|-------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                      |                                                                                                             |   |
| Date: August                12, 2008 | By:                                                                                                    | /s/  James                A. Wheeler |
|                                      | James                A. WheelerChief                Executive Officer and Chief Financial                Officer |

----