alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA
Present: Judges Kelsey, Petty and Seni or Judge Bumgardner

JOHN EDWARD KIRK, SR. MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 0652-06-3 PER CURIAM AUGUST 8, 2006 SOUTHERN AIR, INC. AND PENNSYLVANIA MANUFAC TURING ASSOCIATION INSURANCE COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Charles R. Allen, Jr., on brief), for appellant. (Rachel L. Arnold; Midkiff, Mu ncie & Ross, P.C., on brief), for appellees.
John Edward Kirk (claimant) appeals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that he failed to prove (1) his right foot probl ems were causally related to his compensable July 6, 2004 injury by accident; and (2) he was entitled to a change in treating physicians. We have reviewed the record and th e commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. 1 Accordingly, we affirm for the reas ons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Kirk v. Southern Air, Inc. , VWC File No. 219-89-42 (Feb. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal cont entions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid th e decisional process.
See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. Affirmed.

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.

1 In light of our summary affirmance with re spect to the first two questions presented by claimant on appeal, we need not ad dress the third question presented.
From: arainvill@emich.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:19:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as Ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again strongly urge you to

reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory preventive

services.

Sincerely,

Alice Jo Rainville

Livonia, MI 48150
Exhibit 10.3





AMENDMENT TO


STOCK OPTION AGREEMENTS


[A. McBryde]





This Amendment to Stock Option Agreements (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of October 3, 2016, by and between CommunityOne Bancorp, a North Carolina corporation (the “Company) and Angus M. McBryde, III (the “Participant”).





WHEREAS,  the Company and the Participant are parties to a Stock Option Agreement dated October 1, 2014 and a Stock Option Agreement dated July 31, 2015 (the “October 11, 2014 Option Agreement” and the “July 31, 2015 Option Agreement”, respectively);





WHEREAS, the Company is party to an Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between Capital Bank Financial Corp. and the Company, dated as of November 22, 2015 (the “Merger Agreement”);


WHEREAS, the Company and the Participant desire to amend the October 1, 2014 Option Agreement and the July 31, 2015 Option Agreement to provide that to the extent that the Options (as defined under such agreements) covered by such agreements are unvested as of immediately prior to the Effective Time, the term of such unvested Options shall expire and terminate immediately prior to the Effective Time (to the extent not previously forfeited);


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration the receipt of which the parties acknowledge, the Company and the Participant agree as follows:


1.  Each of the October 1, 2014 Option Agreement and the July 31, 2015 Option Agreement is hereby amended to add the following at the end of Section 1(d):


Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, to the extent that any of the Options are unvested as of immediately prior to the Effective Time (as defined in the Merger Agreement), the term of such Options shall expire and terminate immediately prior to the Effective Time (to the extent such Options are not  previously forfeited).  “Merger Agreement” means the Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between Capital Bank Financial Corp. and the Company, dated as of November 22, 2015.


2.  This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year written below.








COMMUNITYONE BANCORP    PARTICIPANT:





By:  __ /s/ Robert L. Reid ______    ___ /s/ Angus M. McBryde, III __





Title: _ President & CEO ______    Date: __ 10/3/2016 ___________





Date: _ 10/3/2016 ___________











1
No. 340, Misc.

#### Schultz *v.*New York.

Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





Form 8-K





Current Report





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report  (Date of earliest event reported): January 28, 2016





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation


(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)





001-11241


(Commission File Number)





Delaware37-1105865(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(IRS Employer Identification Number)





2120 West End Avenue


Nashville, Tennessee 37203-0001


(Address of principal executive offices, with zip code)





(615) 341-1000


(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---




Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.





On January 28, 2016, Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation issued a press release reporting financial results for the year and fourth quarter ended December 31, 2015.  A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated into this Item 2.02 by reference.





The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, is being furnished in accordance with the provisions of General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K.








Item 9.01.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.





d)Exhibits:99.1Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated January 28, 2016








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation








Date:  January 28, 2016By:/s/ Leslie S. ZmuggLeslie S. ZmuggSecretary





2


---




EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit No.Description99.1Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated January 28, 2016














3
From: dnpolin@frontiernet.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:38:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Richard Olin

, 38558-6985
<PAGE>
 

                                                                      Exhibit 21


                     SUBSIDIARIES OF METROMAIL CORPORATION
                            AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996


<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
Subsidiary                                         Jurisdiction of Incorporation
----------                                         -----------------------------
<S>                                                <C> 
Customer Insight Company                           Delaware
International Communication & Data plc             United Kingdom
ICD Marketing Services Group Limited               United Kingdom
ICD Marketing Services Limited                     United Kingdom
Lombard Information Resources Incorporated         Delaware
</TABLE> 

As of December 31, 1996, Metromail Corporation's other subsidiaries, considered
in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant
subsidiary as defined in Rule 1-02(w) of Regulation S-X.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondents, v. Alonzo E. Carr, Appellant.

Judgment and conviction affirmed, and proceedings remitted to the Court of Sessions of Erie County. Opinion by Barker, J.
#### Huldah M. Crouse, Respondent, v. George Clarke, Appellant

— Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costó of motion.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 42 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 07/21 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 21 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
Exhibit 99.2

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Charles F.  Finn,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Michael  C.  Anderson,  Chief
Financial Officer of Wayne Savings Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company") each certify
in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the  quarterly
report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended  December 31, 2001 and that to the
best of his knowledge:

(1)  based on his knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material  fact or omit to state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements
     were made, not misleading;

(2)  based on his  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
     information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects
     the financial  condition and results of operations of the issuer as of, and
     for, the periods presented in the report.



   October 1, 2002                            /s/Charles F. Finn
----------------------------                  --------------------------------
Date                                          Charles F. Finn,
                                              Chief Executive Officer


   October 1, 2002                            /s/Michael C. Anderson
----------------------------                  --------------------------------
Date                                          Michael C. Anderson,
                                              Chief Financial Officer
From: akaneecee6@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:33:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Denise Robertson

Waterford, CA 95386
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 August 15, 2018

Order 

Clerk

August 15, 2018

156406(62)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, SC: 156406

v COA: 332081

Wayne CC: 15-005481-FH

JOEL EUSEVIO DAVIS,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion defendant-appellee to extend the time for 

filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted as 

timely filed if submitted on or before September 14, 2018.
***EXHIBIT 31(b)***

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Digamber Naswa, certify that:  

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q (“Report”) of WWA Group, Inc.;  

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;   

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this Report;   

 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:  

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;   

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  

 

c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and  

 

5. I have disclosed based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 14, 2008

 

/s/ Digamber Naswa

Digamber Naswa, Chief Financial Officer 

 

35

 

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                      14,184,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                470,858,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       8,275,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,710,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             945,901,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,044,000
<BONDS>                                    704,136,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       147,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 179,801,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               945,901,000
<SALES>                                     22,810,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            60,384,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               29,581,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          18,086,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             12,717,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,444,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,273,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,273,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.38


</TABLE>
From: skheaton@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:58:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kelly Heaton

Atglen, PA 19310