alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: mk.brandon@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:35:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask that you rescind the mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization

procedures be covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse

course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations that provide individual and

group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I strongly oppose the government forcing free

insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices that I oppose because some of these

can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Brandon

Tenino, WA 98589
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §  1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Signature Eyewear, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael Prince, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.












/s/ Michael Prince
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
September 9, 2009
#### William T. Merrill, Respondent, v. Edmund F. Clark and another, Appellants.

Judgment modified by deducting therefrom the sum of $400, as of the date of the decision, which was allowed for a deficiency, and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party.

Corlett, J., dissents and reads an opinion.
---

---

EXHIBIT 23.8



**Independent
  Auditors Consent**

The Board of Directors
  Granite Hacarmel Investments Limited:

We consent to the incorporation
  by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-61895 and No. 333-55970)
  on Form S-8 of Ampal American Israel Corporation of our report dated March 12,
  2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Granite Hacarmel Investments
  Limited as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of
  income, shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
  two-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the Form 10-K
  of Ampal American Israel Corporation.

Our report dated March
  12, 2003 contains an explanatory paragraph that bring attention to Note 28 in
  the financial statements regarding four claims against consolidated companies
  which the court has been asked to recognize as class actions and other claims
  against a consolidated company claiming that its agreements with its customers
  are restrictive trade arrangements.



Somekh Chaikin
  Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)

Haifa, March
  23, 2004

---

---
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Central Command

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  ABOUT US    -  COMMAND PRIORITIES             
  -  LEADERSHIP             
  -  COMPONENT COMMANDS             
  -  HISTORY             
  -  POSTURE STATEMENT 
-  CENTCOM AOR    -  CENTCOM COALITION 
-  OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES    -  USMTM 
-  CONTACT    -  OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT             
  -  COMMUNITY RELATIONS             
  -  THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE             
  -  INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL             
  -  MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL 
-  MEDIA    -  SOCIAL MEDIA             
  -  NEWS ARTICLES             
  -  PRESS RELEASES             
  -  STATEMENTS             
  -  IMAGERY             
  -  VIDEOS             
  -  TRANSCRIPTS 
-  VISITORS AND PERSONNEL    -  FAMILY CENTER             
  -  FAMILY READINESS             
  -  CENTCOM WEBMAIL             
  -  SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY             
  -  ACCOUNTABILITY             
  -  EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS             
  -  USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS             
  -  FOIA LIBRARY             
  -  INNOVATION OASIS             
  -  WELCOME GUIDE 

HomeMEDIANEWS ARTICLESNews Article View

# CENTCOM command team visits PSAB, reaffirms commitment to the region

By Tech. Sgt. Michael Charles378th Air Expeditionary Wing

                PRINCE SULTAN AIR BASE, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia  –              

                U.S. Air Force Brig. Gen. John C. Walker, left, 378th Air Expeditionary Wing commander, greets U.S. Marine Corps Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr., right, commander, United States Central Command, at Prince Sultan Air Base, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Jan. 29, 2020. The CENTCOM command team’s tour of installations in the command’s area of responsibility underscores the U.S.’s commitment to regional security, the flexibility of American military power, and the importance of military-to-military relationships with coalition partners. (U.S. Air Force photo by Senior Airman Giovanni Sims)            

                CENTCOM command team visits PSAB            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Senior Airman Giovanni Sims

VIRIN: 200129-F-KK391-101

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.3 




Second Amendment to Expatriate Agreement


Original Agreement Signed: September 6, 2013
Date of First Amendment:  April 24, 2015
Date of Second Amendment:  January 19, 2016


This Second Amendment to Expatriate Agreement is made as of this 19th day of January, 2016 by and between William H. Reitman (“Mr. Reitman”) and Briggs & Stratton International, Inc. (“B&S”) and amends that certain Expatriate Agreement dated as of September 6, 2013, as previously amended.


Mr. Reitman and B&S each hereby agree to amend the Expatriate Agreement as follows:


		
	1.
	The Expatriate Agreement is amended to provide that Mr. Reitman’s assignment end date will be May 31, 2016 and paragraphs 8(a) and (d) are hereby modified accordingly.


		
	2.
	Mr. Reitman’s current base monthly salary is $32,187.50, notwithstanding the reference to $30,250 in Section 1(a) of the Expatriate Agreement.


		
	3.
	The following Sections of the Expatriate Agreement are hereby modified, effective as of January 1, 2016, to reflect the May 31, 2016 termination date of Mr. Reitman’s assignment and the scope of his international obligations between January 1, 2016 and such termination date:


		
	a.
	Section 1(f):  Mr. Reitman’s “Goods and Services Allowance” will equal $4,513 per month for each month from January 2016 through May 2016.


		
	b.
	Section 1(g):  The reference to $62,000 is replaced with a reference to $67,500.


		
	c.
	Section 1(h):  The reference to 5% is changed to 3.5% for fiscal 2016.


		
	d.
	Section 1(i):  Mr. Reitman will receive 1,620 shares of restricted stock following completion of his assignment on May 31, 2016.




Except as specifically set forth in this Amendment, the Expatriate Agreement remains unchanged and in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.


This Amendment, once signed, is binding upon both Briggs & Stratton International, Inc. and Mr. Reitman.






Briggs & Stratton Corporation        Briggs & Stratton International, Inc.
        


	
					
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	/s/ Todd J. Teske
	 
	  /s/ Andrea Golvach  
	 
	 /s/ William H. Reitman

	Todd J. Teske - Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
	 
	Andrea Golvach    VP Treasurer
	 
	William H. Reitman
From: l.baxter@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:10:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lori Baxter

Carmel, IN 46032
From: doterra4u@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:00:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

LYNDA GREEN

Washington, UT 84780
H. Res. 1271 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 26, 2008. 

Whereas the President of the United States has issued a 

proclamation designating the month of June 2008 as National Homeownership Month; 

Whereas the people of the United States are one of the besthoused populations in the world; 

Whereas owning a home is a fundamental part of the American dream and is the largest personal investment many 

families will ever make; 

Whereas homeownership provides economic security for homeowners by aiding them in building wealth over time and 

strengthens communities through a greater stake among 

homeowners in local schools, civic organizations, and 

churches; 

Whereas creating affordable homeownership opportunities requires the commitment and cooperation of the private, 

public, and nonprofit sectors, including the Federal Government and State and local governments; 

Whereas homeownership can be sustained through appropriate homeownership education and informed borrowers; 

and 
2 

•HRES 1271 EH 

Whereas affordable homeownership will play a vital role in resolving the crisis in the United States housing market: 

Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) fully supports the goals and ideals of National 

Homeownership Month; and 

(2) recognizes the importance of homeownership in 

building strong communities and families. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1432

To authorize the issuance of United States Defense of Freedom Bonds to

aid in funding of the war against terrorism, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 14, 2001

Mr. SMITH of Oregon introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To authorize the issuance of United States Defense of Freedom Bonds to aid in funding of the war against terrorism, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘United States Defense

5 of Freedom Bond Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSE.

7 The purpose of this Act is to authorize the issuance

8 of United States Defense of Freedom Bonds to aid in the

9 funding of the war against terrorism, as defined by the

10 President.
2

•S 1432 IS

1 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF DEFENSE

2 OF FREEDOM BONDS.

3 Section 3102 of title 31, United States Code, is

4 amended by adding at the end the following:

5 ‘‘(f) ISSUANCE OF BONDS.—

6 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary is authorized

7 to issue bonds under this section, to be known as

8 ‘United States Defense of Freedom Bonds’, in re9 sponse to the acts of terrorism perpetrated against

10 the United States on September 11, 2001.

11 ‘‘(2) FORM.—The bonds authorized by para12 graph (1) shall be in such form and denominations,

13 and shall be subject to such terms and conditions of

14 issue, conversion, redemption, maturation, payment,

15 and rate of interest as the Secretary may pre16 scribe.’’.

Æ
From: abbotgeorgeburke@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:06:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

George Burke

Cedar Crest, NM 87008
#### The City of Oswego v. Martin D. Collins.

Motion for leave to.appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsUtilizing GPUs to Accelerate Turbomachinery CFD CodesGPU computing has established itself as a way to accelerate parallel codes in the high performance computing world. This work focuses on speeding up APNASA, a legacy CFD code used at NASA Glenn Research Center, while also drawing conclusions about the nature of GPU computing and the requirements to make GPGPU worthwhile on legacy codes. Rewriting and restructuring of the source code was avoided to limit the introduction of new bugs. The code was profiled and investigated for parallelization potential, then OpenACC directives were used to indicate parallel parts of the code. The use of OpenACC directives was not able to reduce the runtime of APNASA on either the NVIDIA Tesla discrete graphics card, or the AMD accelerated processing unit. Additionally, it was found that in order to justify the use of GPGPU, the amount of parallel work being done within a kernel would have to greatly exceed the work being done by any one portion of the APNASA code. It was determined that in order for an application like APNASA to be accelerated on the GPU, it should not be modular in nature, and the parallel portions of the code must contain a large portion of the code's computation time.Document ID20160001359Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMacCalla, Weylin*(Embry-Riddle Aeronautical Univ. Daytona Beach, FL, United States)*Kulkarni, Sameer*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredFebruary 2, 2016Publication DateJanuary 1, 2016Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberE-19192GRC-E-DAA-TN28305NASA/TM-2016-218947Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 338881.02.25.03.01.01.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Keywordscomputer programmingparallel processingcomputational fluid dynamicsAvailable DownloadsNameType20160001359.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
From: buhrclan@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:10:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as Ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mark W. Buhr

Sincerely,

Mark Buhr

Rockwood, MI 48173
No. 176, Misc.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney Gen-*

*eral Miller*and *Philip R. Monahan*for the United States.

#### Jones *v.*United States.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.