alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT.

#### Patrick H. Dougherty agt. Edward A. Gardner.

*Execution against the person—assignment of part of judgment for tort.*

When part of a judgment for a tort is assigned, execution against the person may still issue in the name of the assignor for the full amount of the judgment.

A judgment for damages resulting from personal injuries is assignable in whole or in part. The right to imprison is not lost.

*Special*Term, *January,*1880.

Motion by defendant to vacate and set aside execution against his person.

Patrick H. Dougherty sued Edward A. Gardner for damages resulting from an assault and battery, and after arresting and holding the defendant to bail on *mesne*process, recovered judgment by default for $5,130.20. While an execution against property was in the hands of the sheriff, the plaintiff assigned one-third of the judgment, a copy of which assignment was forthwith served on the defendant. After the return of the execution against the property, plaintiff’s attorney, without any reference to the assignment, issued an execution against the person in the usual form, in the name of the people, for the full amount of the judgment under which execution the defendant was arrested and imprisoned. On affidavits setting forth the above facts, and claiming that he owed the plaintiff only two-thirds of the judgment and his assignee the other third, defendant moved to set aside the execution and for his discharge from imprisonment thereunder.

*Robert*Johnstone, for defendant, insisted :

The execution should have been issued only for the two-thirds owned by the plaintiff, and that as to the other third the right to issue an *285execution against the person was lost, being destroyed by the assignment. That the judgment in the hands of an assignee was a mere debt for which the defendant could not be imprisoned, no wrong having been done the assignee. That if the plaintiff could assign a part to one, he could split the judgment into fifty parts and compel the defendant to travel all around in order to settle a compromise, and that if each could detain the defendant for his share, it was a logical conclusion that each might have a separate execution. That the policy of the law was in favor of compromises and condonements of such torts. That it would be unjust to compel an atonement after arrest to a person that had never been injured, and let a person that was injured assign away a right of forgiveness. Personal injuries cannot be assigned before judgment. Can they be afterwards, except as mere debts ? If not, the arrest is illegal.

*Peekharn &*Tyler, for plaintiff.

The plaintiff was a mere trustee for the assignee as to the part assigned, and the judgment being a writ, the process must conform to it and issue for the full amount due. If the assignment of a part of the judgment was valid, it carried with it the right to imprison, and if invalid, then the defendant was not prejudiced by it. The assignment vitiates no remedy.

Lawrence, J.

Motion denied.
From: mczujak@snet.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:53:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Margaret Czujak

Seymour, CT 06483
DATE JULY 20, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: OVERRIDE FOR EXTREME AMBIENT TEMPERATURES

FROM: Victor McMahan, OTAQ/Transportation and Regional Programs Division

 

TO: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for HeavyDuty Engines and Vehicles; Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

PURPOSE / BACKGROUND:

March 9, 2011 email communication with staff of the Texas Transportation Institute 

(TTI) on preliminary environmental chamber test results on the performance of idle reduction 

technologies in extreme ambient temperature conditions (see below)

DISCUSSION:

From: "Zietsman, Joe" <Zietsman@tamu.edu>

To: Victor McMahan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Johnson, Jeremy" <j-johnson@TTIMAIL.TAMU.EDU>, "Lee, Doh-Won" <leedw@tamu.edu>

Date: 03/09/2011 03:39 PM

Subject: Temperatures

Victor,

Here is what we found for chamber temperatures at 100 and 0 degrees. 

In-Cabin Target Temperature (73 °F)

Average Temperature Maintained 

during the Hot Test (at 100 °F)

Average Temperature Maintained 

during the Cold Test (at 0 °F)

Diesel Powered APU #1 73 64*

Diesel Powered APU #2 71 73

Battery Powered APU #1 80

Battery Powered APU #2 83

Diesel Operated Heater #1 62

Diesel Operated Heater #2 50

*APU was set at 73° F. It probably would have reached higher temperatures if it was set at a higher 

temperature. 

Also, please note that the Battery Powered APUs did not have heaters connected to them so we could 

not run the cold tests on them. 

If you need anything else or more, please, let me know

 

Let me know if you need anything else.

Joe
2

CONCLUSION:

The information from the email communication with TTI was used to inform the 

discussion on the performance of idle reduction technologies in extreme ambient temperature 

conditions and decision to adopt the Automatic Engine Shutdown override for extreme ambient 

temperatures.
From: guineamamma79@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:52:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Linda Mullen

Fairfield, TX 75840
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

 

          I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., certify that: 

          1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of inTEST Corporation; 

          2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

          3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

          4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

        (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

        (b)  [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

        (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

        (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

          5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors: 

        (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

        (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 14, 2005/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

BOARD OF DIRECTORS ANDSTOCKHOLDERS OF FIRST KEYSTONE CORPORATION:

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-145093)on Form S-3 of First Keystone Corporation and to the use of our reportsdated March 11, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets ofFirst Keystone Corporation and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2007, and2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes instockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-yearperiod ended December 31, 2007, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2007, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2007, which reports are included herein.

 

 
|                   | /s/ J. H. Williams & Co., LLP |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                   | J. H. Williams & Co., LLP     |
|                   |                                   |
| March 11, 2008    |                                   |
| Kingston, Pennsylvania |                                   |

 

1

----
Registration No. 333-59540 424 (b)(3)

Pricing Supplement No:354 Cusip:14912LV99
Dated: September 13, 2002 
*	Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation

	Medium-Term Notes, Series F

	(Fixed Rate)

	With Maturities of 9 Months or More from Date of Issue
	Interest payable each March 19 and September 19 and at Maturity
Principal Amount: Interest Rate: Proceed Amount:

$30,000,000 3.10% $29,925,000

Original Issue Date: Commission Fee: Maturity Date:

09/18/2002 $75,000 09/19/2005

	 

Dealer:

Merrill Lynch

 

Specified Currency: Option to Elect Payment Authorized Denominations

x U.S. dollars in U.S. dollars (only applicable if

_ Other:___________ (only applicable if Specified Currency is

Specified Currency is other than U.S.

other than U.S. dollars): N/A 

N/A 

The Note is a: Exchange Rate Agent X Global Note (if other than First 

Certificated Note Trust New York): N/A (only applicable if

Specified Currency 

is other than U.S. dollars) 

Original Issue Total Amount of OID: N/A Terms of Amortizing Discount Note: Notes: N/A

Yes x No Issue Price (expressed 

as a percentage of 

aggregate principal 

amount): variable price reoffer

Redemption Date(s) (including Redemption Price(s): N/A any applicable regular or 

special record dates): N/A

	 

Repayment Date(s) (including Repayment Price(s): N/A any applicable regular or

special record dates): 

N/A

Interest Rate Reset Option: _ Yes X No

Optional Reset Dates (only applicable if option to reset interest rate): N/A

Basis for Interest Rate Reset (only applicable if option to reset interest rate): N/A

Stated Maturity Extension Option: _ Yes x No

Extension Period(s) and Final Maturity Date (only applicable if option to extend stated maturity): N/A

Basis for Interest Rate During Extension Period (only applicable if option to extend stated maturity): N/A

 

 

Historical Exchange Rate (only applicable if Specified Currency other than U.S. dollars): N/A

The interest rates on the Notes may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any Note offered prior to the effective date of the change. Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $3007.465 mm principal amount of the Notes had been sold at interest rates then in effect. 

	_________________________________
**	Pricing Supplement to Prospectus Supplement dated June 15, 2001

	and Prospectus dated May 23, 2001***
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Home
  MEDIA
  NEWS ARTICLES
  News Article View
 Download
 Details
 Share
 Download
 Details
 Share
 Download
 Details
 Share
 News
 USMC F-35B conducts first combat strike in CENTCOM AOR By NAVCENT Public Affairs
                U.S. Naval Forces Central Command / U.S. 5th Fleet
 During this mission, the F-35B conducted an air strike in support of ground clearance operations, and the strike was deemed successful by the ground force commander. “The F-35B is a significant enhancement in theater amphibious and air warfighting capability, operational flexibility, and tactical supremacy,” said Vice Adm. Scott Stearney, commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command. “As part of the Essex Amphibious Ready Group, this platform supports operations on the ground from international waters, all while enabling maritime superiority that enhances stability and security.” The 13th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) is the first combat-deployed MEU to replace the AV-8B Harrier with the F-35B Lightning II. The F-35Bs from Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 211 are currently embarked on the Wasp-class amphibious assault ship USS Essex (LHD 2) as part of Essex Amphibious Ready Group.
 SHARE
 PRINT
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: garygmart@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:32:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gary Miller

Littleton, CO 80122
No. 428, Misc.

#### Wynn *v.*New York.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Benj. J. Jacobson*for respondent.

Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.32 MB)
 
 SME 1TSC RAO USCENTCOM USARCENT 184th SC Omani HET
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil