alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: japanlcna2003@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:06:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Wade Pritchard

Taylorsville, KY 40071
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>    1
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                        127,898
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              127,898
<PP&E>                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                128,351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         217,406
<BONDS>                       0
<COMMON>                      150
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                    (89,205)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 128,351
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              1,523
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              240,578
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (239,055)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (239,055)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (239,055)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (1.59)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (1.59)
        

</TABLE>
No. 297.

#### Dixilyn Drilling Corp. *v.*Crescent Towing & Salvage Co.

*E. D. Vickery*for petitioner. *Charles Kohlmeyer, Jr.*for respondent..

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted.
#### Lyons *v.*Winter.

Atkinson, J.

1. The service of a bill of exceptions must be personal,, except in those cases where another mode of service is expressly authorized by statute. *Anderson*v. *Albany & Northern Ry. Co.,*123 *Ga.*318.

2. In cases where the opposite party is the State, or the opposite party does not reside in the county and the attorney, for the defendant in error can not be' served personally, on account of his absence from the-county of his residence, the statute expressly authorizes service to be made by leaving a copy at the residence of such attorney; but in no case is authority given to make service by leaving a copy at the , residence of the defendant in error himself. Civil Code, §5547, par. 2.

*417Submitted June 6,

Decided November 12, 1907.

Motion to dismiss the writ of error.

*T. 8. Lyons,*for plaintiff. *J. 8. Reynolds,*for defendant.

3. “Service of a bill of exceptions by the plaintiff in error or his attorney, or by any other person, if properly shown by affidavit, is valid.” *Walter*v. *Kierstead,*74 *Ga.*18. The ruling made in *Henderson*v. *Henderson,*7 *Ga.*421, was founded upon the fourth section of the act organizing the Supreme Court, which required the service of a bill of exceptions by sheriff, constable, or attorney of the superior court. This section of the act was changed by the- law as now contained in the Civil Code, §5547.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices coneur, except Holden, J., who did not preside*
<XBRL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!--XBRL Document Created with the Workiva Platform-->
<!--Copyright 2024 Workiva-->
<!--r:749753d4-5066-4f69-b6b6-806d856000aa,g:2b60bfaa-22bd-40de-aa73-9b417fe7137d-->
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:link="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" xmlns:cfsc="http://finance.cat.com/20240425" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://finance.cat.com/20240425">
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xlink-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-instance-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-linkbase-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2022" schemaLocation="https://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2022/dei-2022.xsd"/>
  <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="cfsc-20240425_pre.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="cfsc-20240425_lab.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/labelLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:roleType id="CoverPage" roleURI="http://finance.cat.com/role/CoverPage">
        <link:definition>0000001 - Document - Cover Page</link:definition>
        <link:usedOn>link:presentationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:calculationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:definitionLink</link:usedOn>
      </link:roleType>
    </xs:appinfo>
  </xs:annotation>
</xs:schema>
</XBRL>
---

EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ENGINEERS

We consent to the use of our Report on Reserves Data dated
February 10, 2012 included as Schedule A of the Annual Information Form filed
as Exhibit 99.1 to the Annual Report on Form 40-F of TransGlobe Energy
Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

Sincerely,

DeGolyer and MacNaughton Canada Limited

|/s/ Colin Outtrim       
|------------------------
|Name                    
|Title:                  
|                        
|Calgary, Alberta, Canada
|March 15, 2012          

---
No. P66/139. —

#### Polks Model Craft Hobbies, Inc. *v.*United States, protest 64/4737 (New York).

Nao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of meters similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *G. L. Electronics, Inc., Arrow Sales, Ino.*(49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: wan50@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:32:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

William Neukum

Saint Louis, MO 63146
January 7, 1963.

No. 10, Original.

#### Virginia *v.*Maryland.

The report of the Special Master is received, approved and ordered filed. In view of the suggestion of the parties and the recommendation of the Special Master that the case has been settled and is now moot, the bill of complaint is dismissed. The costs in this case are to be equally divided between the parties. The Special Master, having completed all of his duties, is hereby discharged. [For previous decision and order of the Court, see 355 U. S. 269,946.]
No. 77, Misc.

#### Stevenson *v.*United States.

*Carl L. Shipley*and *Thomas A. Ziebarth*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Guilfoyle*and *Alan S. Rosenthal*for the United States.

Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.
From: K Omnimedia

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:32:42 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
LNB Bancorp, Inc.
 2008 Management Incentive Plan
For Key Executives
  Section I. PURPOSE
  Section II. DEFINITIONS
  A.
    
    Committee.The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of LNB Bancorp,
Inc., or such other committee as such Board may designate.B.
    
    Employer or Lorain National Bank.LNB Bancorp, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliates.C.
    
    Plan year.January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008.D.
    
    Employee/Key Executive.The participants selected to participate in this Plan as
described in Section III below.E.
    
    Plan.The LNB Bancorp, Inc. 2008 Management Incentive Plan for Key Executives.F.
    
    Incentive Payment.Cash payment earned by Employee on the Incentive Payment Date, as
determined in accordance with Section IV and the other terms of this Plan.G.
    
    Incentive Payment Date.The date on which an Incentive Payment to Employee is paid,
which shall be as soon as reasonably practicable after such payment is calculated
and authorized by the Committee but not later than two and one-half months following
the end of the Plan year.H.
    
    Profitability.Profitability is defined as net income after tax of LNB Bancorp, Inc.
and its consolidated subsidiaries for the Plan year, as determined by the Committee.
The Committee has the discretion to adjust for any unforeseen occurrences which may
affect the profitability number.I.
    
    Profitability Goal.An amount of Profitability established as a goal by the
Committee in its discretion and solely for purposes of this Plan, based on the
Employers annual budget as determined by its Audit and Finance Committee. This goal
will be communicated to each Key Executive when the Key Executive is selected to
participate in this Plan.




---



##### 



Section III. ELIGIBILITY
  Section IV. AMOUNT OF INCENTIVE PAYMENT
  Section V. OTHER INCENTIVE PAYMENT TERMS
 A. Payments and Deductions/Withholding Taxes .
   B. Incentive Payment Calculation .
   2




---



##### 



D. Special Circumstances .
 Conflicts with Law
 Voluntary or Involuntary Termination
 Transfer
 Leave of Absence
 Death
 Section VI. NON-SOLICITATION AND CONFIDENTIALITY
 A. Non-Solicitation .
  3




---



##### 



B. Confidentiality .
       B. Related Provisions
 Prior Agreements
 Equitable Relief
 Section VII. GENERAL PROVISIONS
 Administration
 4




---



##### 



No Implied Rights to Employment
 Other Compensation Plans
 Successors; Amendments
 Validity
 Governing Law; Interpretation
 Entire Agreement
 Section VIII. CLAWBACK OF PLAN PAYMENTS
  5




---



##### 



6
Before the Third Division,

October 7, 1968

No. P68/428.

protest 66/13966 (New York).

#### Frederick Lunning, a Division of Georg Jensen, Inc. *v.*United States,

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of vases in mineral colors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *F.*Lunning, *Inc.,*and *Traders Service Corp. et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 271, C.D. 1941), the claim of the plaintiff Was sustained.
EXHIBIT 23

                              ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Zygo Corporation:


We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No.
33-62087, No. 33-57060, No. 33-20880, and No. 33-34619 on Forms S-8 of Zygo
Corporation of our reports dated August 8, 1997, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of Zygo Corporation and subsidiaries as of June 30,
1997, and 1996 and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related schedule for each of the years
in the three-year period ended June 30, 1997, which reports appear in or are
incorporated by reference into the June 30, 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K405
of Zygo Corporation.


KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP





Hartford, Connecticut
September 16, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Company's unaudited financial statements for the quarter ended
March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                       MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                        216,212
<SECURITIES>                                                   20,055
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  73,950
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              291,831
<PP&E>                                                        123,447
<DEPRECIATION>                                               (119,738)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                331,935
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         459,044
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                       15,101
<OTHER-SE>                                                   (459,413)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  331,935
<SALES>                                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              180,847
<CGS>                                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 289,426
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             15,220
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               129,037
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     (800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           128,237
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  128,237
<EPS-BASIC>                                                     0.009
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0.00



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.01



Certifying Statement of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.





In connection with the Annual Report of Gold Star Tutoring Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mindy Kline, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Gold Star Tutoring Services, Inc. and will be retained by Gold Star Tutoring Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





March 25, 2009



___/s/Mindy Kline_____________

Mindy Kline

Chief Executive Officer

Principal Executive Officer
From: clmcgee@rnet.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:06:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Connie McGee

Saint Charles, MO 63303
| RATES EFFECTIVE for Variable Denomination Floating Rate Demand Notesas of  January 17, 2011: |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|