alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 3RD
QUARTER 1999 FORM 10-Q/A UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FORM 10-Q/A.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          14,419
<SECURITIES>                                     7,928
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,416
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,469
<PP&E>                                          33,714
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,162
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,151
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            79
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,542
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,162
<SALES>                                         34,556
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,556
<CGS>                                           22,880
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,335
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 611
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,556)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (308)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,248)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,248)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)


</TABLE>
From: Afpups3@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:18:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Allan & Marlene Fleming

New Berlin, WI 53151
#### In the Matter of the Petition of E. H. & D. M. Cavin, Respondents, v. J. B. Gleason, as General Assignee, etc., Appellant.

— Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Hardin, P. J.
From: ruthsclark@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:41:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ruth Clark

Syracuse, NY 13219
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

Mr. David K. Paylor, Director Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality P.O. Box 1105 Richmond, Virginia 23218 Dear Mr. Paylor: 

### MAR 

### 1 5Z014

On February 18, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality pertaining electronic SIP transmittals. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete. Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct them to Sharon McCauley, Air Protection Division, at (215) 814-3376, or at mccauley.sharon@epa.gov. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking. Sincerely,

.. [) i(\.l<(:L

# 0 WI Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division

ft**~.1** Printed on 100% recycled/recyclablepaper with 100%post-consumer fiber andprocess chlorine free. Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
From: rayalmendarez@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:11:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ramon Almendarez Jr

, 48060-4509
Before the Third Division,

October 27, 1965

No. 69605.

#### Dan Brechner & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 59/30353 (New York).

*469Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *W. Kay Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Official Journal C 193/16 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 193 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6016 June 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 193

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6016 June 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2017/C 193/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2017/C 193/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  ) | 4 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2017/C 193/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  1
  )

1

1

2017/C 193/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – Cases where the Commission raises no objections (
  2
  )

2

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |
| | (2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

(2)   Text with EEA relevance, except for products falling under Annex I of the Treaty.

2

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
From: Linda Yazvac MD

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:56:52 AM

I strongly urge you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

“Religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive services.. Religiously-run health

providers should not be exempted since they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger

exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

In a country where recent studies reveal that 17% of women are the victims of rape or attempted rape, it is

imperative that women have access to safe, reliable birth control as a critical component of preventive care.

This is particularly true since statistics show that the rate of maternal death has increased dramatically during

the past decade. No woman should be subjected to an unwanted pregnancy. It is fundamentally unfair that to

date women have been expected to bear the total cost of birth control, which can be substantial, alone.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s recommendations and

rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Thank you.

Linda Yazvac MD
IV 

House Calendar No. 271 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1489 

[Report No. 110–876] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 23), 2008 

Mr. ARCURI, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of September 24, 2008, pro6 viding for consideration or disposition of a measure to pro7 vide incentives for energy production and conservation, to 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1489 RH 

1 extend certain expiring provisions, to provide individual in2 come tax relief, and for other purposes. 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS

jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 271 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1489 

[Report No. 110–876] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

tions reported from the Committee on Rules. with respect to consideration of certain resoluSEPTEMBER 24 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 23), 2008 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
From: ckdaug@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:05:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

clarence and kay daugherty

Plano, TX 75074
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:09:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dale Carpenter

Mc Henry, MD 21541
Page 1 of 1 Section 333 Exemption Request – Maintenance & Inspection Manual – Phantom 2 Vision+ | Tom Kilpatrick | May 19, 2016

Maintenance & Inspection Manual

DJI Phantom 2 Vision+

Amendment to Section 333 Exemption 12152 | Tom Kilpatrick | May 19, 2016

DATE EVENT DISCREPANCY ACTION RESOLUTION

00/00/0000 Aircraft tipped over on landing 2 propellers damaged Propellers replaced by TK Returned to service

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________

_________ ___________________________ _______________________ ________________________ ____________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>


<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>          DEC-31-1996

<CASH>                       18,069,904
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                   438,763
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             18,508,667
<PP&E>                       33,602,388
<DEPRECIATION>                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               60,002,966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         4,376,799
<BONDS>                      47,736,328
<COMMON>                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                  (13,813,018)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 60,002,966
<SALES>                      10,544,285
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             11,830,330
<CGS>                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 7,119,863
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              7,517,045
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            5,971,389
<INCOME-PRETAX>              (8,777,967)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>         152,923,409
<DISCONTINUED>                2,928,068
<EXTRAORDINARY>              23,622,011
<CHANGES>                   (16,000,000)
<NET-INCOME>                163,473,488
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    393.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                    393.43





</TABLE>
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. §1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Webdigs, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert A. Buntz,
Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Edward Wicker, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Act of 1934; and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Robert A. Buntz, Jr.Robert
      A. Buntz, Jr.President
      and Chief Executive OfficerFebruary
      13, 2009/s/
      Edward WickerEdward
      WickerChief Financial OfficerFebruary
      13, 2009