alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: ptzebley@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:34:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patricia Zebley

Lewiston, ME 04240
No. P68/448.

protest 65/1158 (New York).

No. P68/449.

protest 65/7936 (New York).

#### Novelty Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States, Levin Bros. *v.*United States,

Bao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of miniature pocketknives similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Paul E. Sernau, Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 514, Abstract 65737), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) 3RD
QUARTER 1999 FORM 10-Q UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH (B) FORM 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          14,419
<SECURITIES>                                     7,928
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,037
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,090
<PP&E>                                          33,714
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  77,783
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,021
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            79
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,293
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    77,783
<SALES>                                         34,556
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                34,556
<CGS>                                           22,880
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,880
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,335
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 611
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,556)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (308)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,248)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,248)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)


</TABLE>
EX-4.9



 Exhibit 4.9 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION 
 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED
COMPENSATION PLAN 
 (2008 Amendment and Restatement) 

WHEREAS, The Progressive Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan is currently maintained pursuant to a 2008 Amendment and
Restatement (“Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, it is deemed desirable to amend the Plan further; 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended in the respects hereinafter set forth: 

1. Effective as of January 1, 2008, but only with respect to Awards that were earned or become vested on or after January 1,
2005, the last sentence of the first paragraph of Section 3.1 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to provide as follows: 
 “If distribution is to be made in installments, payment of installments following the first installment shall be made within thirty (30) days following each anniversary of (1) the date
referred to in clause (i) or (ii) of the first sentence of this Section 3.1 or (2) the date of a Participant’s Termination of Employment, as applicable, until all installments have been paid.” 

2. Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, the terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain entirely unchanged and continue in
full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto caused this Amendment to be executed by its
duly authorized representative on this 19 day of May, 2008. 
  

			
	THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Charles E. Jarrett

		
	Title:	 	Chief Legal Officer
Exhibit 32.1 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted),
James P. Panek, Chief Executive Officer of VaxGen, Inc. (the Company), and
Matthew J. Pfeffer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify
that, to the best of their knowledge: 1. The
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. In Witness
Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 6th day of
February, 2007. /s/ James P.
  Panek

/s/ Matthew
  J. PfefferChief Executive Officer

Chief Financial Officer This
certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated
by reference into any filing of VaxGen, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing. End of Filing - 1 -
From: tmerritt@walbridge.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:49:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Terry Merritt

Novi, MI 48375
# ANSF and ISAF Forces conclude response to attack in Kabul

/ Published Sept. 14, 2011

KABUL, Afghanistan (September 14, 2011) — Afghan National Security Forces, supported by Coalition forces, successfully concluded an operation this morning against a small group of insurgents who attacked several locations in Kabul city.

Insurgents attacked the International Security Assistance Force Afghanistan headquarters and the U.S. Embassy in Kabul on Tuesday with small arms fire from outside the secure zone surrounding these compounds.

Afghan National Security Forces, who have the lead for security in Kabul, responded immediately, to include Afghan National Army helicopters providing air support. Afghan and Coalition forces trapped the insurgents in the partially-constructed, multi-story building they were using as a firing position, and conducted a methodical, floor-by-floor clearing operation.  The Ministry of the Interior is reporting six insurgents killed in the operation.

“The people of Afghanistan have chosen a path to the future withTransition,” said Gen. John R. Allen, ISAF commander. “In this attack, the insurgency succeeded in killing Afghan civilians, once again demonstrating their bankrupt ideology, which has been rejected by the Afghan people.  Afghan security forces responded bravely, contained the insurgents, and systematically eliminated the threat. Once again, I was impressed by the courage, skill and fighting spirit of Afghan forces.

The insurgency has again failed.

Current reports indicate that 6 ISAF personnel were wounded.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO 
 CONOCOPHILLIPS 

KEY EMPLOYEE SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN 
 On April 19, 2012, effective as of the “Effective Time” defined in the Employee Matters Agreement by and between ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66 (the “Effective Time”),
ConocoPhillips Company (the “Company”) amended and restated the Key Employee Supplemental Retirement Plan (“KESRP”) for the benefit of certain employees of the Company and its affiliates. On July 20, 2015, effective
September 1, 2015, the Company adopted the First Amendment to ConocoPhillips Key Employee Supplemental Retirement Plan. 

The Company desires to amend the KESRP by amending Schedule B, effective April 1, 2016. 

Pursuant to the foregoing, the KESRP is hereby amended as follows, effective April 1, 2016: 

 

	1.	Schedule B is hereby amended by adding the following employee to the end thereof: 

 Executed March 14, 2016 
 For ConocoPhillips Company 

 

	
	 /s/ James D. McMorran

	 James D. McMorran

	 Vice President, Human Resources and Real Estate & Facilities Services



  
 1
Silberstein Ungar, PLLC CPAs and Business Advisors

Phone (248) 203-0080

Fax (248) 281-0940

30600 Telegraph Road, Suite 2175

Bingham Farms, MI 48025-4586

www.sucpas.com

** **

June 3, 2011

** **

** **

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

Board of Directors

Tupper, Inc.

New York, NY

 

To Whom It May Concern:

 

Silberstein Ungar, PLLC hereby consents tothe use in the Form 10-K, Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, filed by Tupper, Inc. ofour report dated May 31, 2011, relating to the financial statements of Tupper, Inc., a Nevada Corporation, as of and for the periodsending February 28, 2011 and 2010 and for the period from January 31, 2008 (inception) to February 28, 2011.

 

Sincerely,

 

/s/ Silberstein Ungar, PLLC

 

Silberstein Ungar, PLLC

 

Bingham Farms, Michigan
Before the Second Division,

September 19, 1962

No. 67055.

protests 319294-K, etc. (New York).

#### Geo-Joannou Cycle Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bicycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of G. *Joannou Cycle Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

November 12, 1964

No. 68880.

#### Crown Curtis Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 64/6798 (New York).

*309Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of steel bandsaws similar in all material respects to those the subject of *J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 41, C.D. 2386), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case No. 10,174.

#### Ex parte NEWMAN.

[2 Gall. 11.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Massachusetts.

Oct. Term, 1813.

Naturalization — Declaration op Intention by Alien Enemy.

An alien enemy cannot be permitted to make the declaration required by law preparatory to the naturalization of aliens.

J. T. Austin, in behalf of Newman, who is an alien enemy, moved the court to permit him to file his declaration preparatory to naturalization, according to the act of 14th of April, 1802, c. 28 [2 Stat.. 153].

Before STORY, Circuit Justice, and DAYXS, District Judge.

1

 [Reported by John Gallison, Esq.]

STORY, Circuit Justice.

The petitioner is an alien enemy, and therefore has no legal standing in court to acquire even inchoate rights. We have so held on a former application. The act of congress of 30th of July, 1813 [4 Bior. & D. 585] c. 35 [2 Stat 53, c. 30], on which this motion is founded, does not apply. That act enables persons, who before the war had made the preparatory declaration, to become citizens in the same manner as if war had not intervened. But it confers no privileges on other persons. The petitioner, therefore, cannot exempt himself from the general disability. Motion denied.
From: bndaly60@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:21:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bernadette Daly

Minneapolis, MN 55435
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER**

				I, Robert M. Bernstein, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Material Technologies, Inc., certify that:		

				1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Material Technologies, Inc.;		

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 27, 2005                               /s/ ROBERT M. BERNSTEIN                  			                                                                       Material Technologies, Inc.                                                                       Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer            

----
From: Coffman5@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:22:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lori Coffman

Overland Park, KS 66213