alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

 

          I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., certify that: 

          1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of inTEST Corporation; 

          2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

          3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

          4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

        (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

        (b)  [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

        (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

        (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

          5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors: 

        (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

        (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 15, 2004/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
#### Justine Perlstrom, Appellant, v. Edward Van Ness, Respondent.

— Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman. J.
No. 68391.

protest 63/12048 (El Paso).

#### Joseph H. Brown & Son *v.*United States,

*300Opinion by

Donlon, J.

An examination of the official papers showing that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
No. 60150.

protest 28428-K (Portland, Oreg.).

#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that 20 percent of the merchandise consists of rags used chiefly for papermaking, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained with respect to said 20 percent of the merchandise.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,850,293
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               56,256,674
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,898,960)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,511,168
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            86,260,779
<PP&E>                                     234,189,792
<DEPRECIATION>                            (52,032,755)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,668,013,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      109,285,659
<BONDS>                                  1,013,552,199
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      511,642,522
<PREFERRED>                                    314,286
<COMMON>                                           573
<OTHER-SE>                               (251,872,481)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,668,013,179
<SALES>                                      6,018,097
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           146,339,620
<CGS>                                       11,858,855
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              151,613,652
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (1,903,695)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          55,528,311
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (60,378,837)
<INCOME-TAX>                              (22,939,901)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (37,438,936)
<DISCONTINUED>                            (25,778,997)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (63,217,933)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (193.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (193.28)


</TABLE>
No. 60975.

protest 295832-K (New York)

#### C. A. Andres & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is properly dutiable under paragraph 1530 (b) (7), as modified, *supra,*the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Asher Zwebner, the Chief Financial Officer of Dynamic Applications,
Corp. (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for
the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report on Form
10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
January 26, 2009





By:
              /s/ Asher ZwebnerName:
      Asher ZwebnerTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting
    Officer)
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Cooper, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 71]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Felice Shea, J.), rendered January 29, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of two counts of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

Before commencement of jury selection, the court asked defendant if he would waive his right to be present at sidebar conferences where prospective jurors could discuss any personal matters with the court and the attorneys in private. When defendant declined, the court responded that it would not invite such conferences. *People v Antommarchi*(80 NY2d 247) established that a defendant is entitled to be present at sidebar conferences with prospective jurors concerning their backgrounds and ability to weigh the evidence objectively. Neither that case, nor any other case or statute, requires that the court invite prospective jurors to raise private matters at sidebar (*see, People v Mitchell,*80 NY2d 519, 527). In any event, defendant could have asked prospective jurors if they wanted to discuss anything in private, but did not do so, even after he was given permission when he objected at the end of the first round of questioning. Defendant’s claim that this permission came too late is without merit, since the court was willing to call back the jurors who had already been questioned. Defendant’s other claim that he was deprived of a fair trial by the prosecutor’s summation is without merit insofar as it is preserved. Insofar as it is unpreserved, we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Ross and Tom, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Signature Eyewear, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael Prince, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Michael Prince
----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
August 27, 2003
From: jpugh7799@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:56:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

jerry pugh

Louisville, MS 39339
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 200 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 200

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Rules in the One 
                        Hundred Tenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2007

  Ms. Slaughter (for herself and Mr. Dreier) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Rules in the One 
                        Hundred Tenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Rules (hereafter in this 
resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the expenses of 
all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 
of the House of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 
not more than $6,781,540 for the One Hundred Tenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $3,357,198 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2007, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2008; and
            (2) not more than $3,424,342 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2008, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2009.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
In The Matter Of: MOUNTAIN AIR CARGO, INC. Respondent 

## SERVED: SEPTEMBER3, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2014-0111 ) ) ) Case No. 2013EA680043 )
ORDER GRANTING JOINT REQUEST FOREXTENSION OF DEADLINE On July 28, 2014, an Order Suspending General Discovery and Directing Supplemental Filings on Good Cause Issue was filed. Among otherthings, this Order set September4, 2014 as the FAA's deadline for filing a Reply to the Respondent's supplemental materials on a Motion involving good cause. OnAugust 15, 2014, the Respondent filed Mountain Air Cargo Inc.'s Supplemental Memorandum in Support ofMotionto File Answer Out ofTime and Opposition to the FAA's Motion for Decision was filed. On September 2, 2014, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order, in which they agreed to extend the deadline for the FAA's Reply from September4, 2014, to September 30, 2014. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.213(a), the parties'joint stipulation and request for a deadline extension is granted. The FAA's Reply to the Respondent's August 15,2014 Supplemental Memorandum is extended from September 4, 2014, to September30, 

### 2014.

Attachment: Service ListSERVICE LIST- BYU.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 WilburWright Building-Suite2W1000 1

Mr. Zachery M. Berman 

### Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Administration 1 Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258 FPC(: 718-995-5699 Mr. MarkA. Dombroff 

### Respondent's Counsel McKenna Long & Alderidge 1676 International Drive PH McLean, VA 22102 TEL: 703-336-8700 FAX: 703-336-8750
. Judge J.E. Sullivan 

### US. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation ONE COPY

1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FPC(: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0111 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 IndependenceAvenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
From: yo1512@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:20:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Yuliana Wibowo

Arlington, TX 76017
From: John Massey

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 8:47:23 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

John Massey

397 Linden Street Apt. 1R

Brooklyn, NY 11237
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Catherine A.Cuisson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of AGY Holding Corp. (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrants other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|Date: March 31, 2010               
|                                   
|/s/ Catherine A. Cuisson           
|VP of Finance, Corporate Controller
|(Principal Financial Officer)
IMPROVE Home Page is available at: 

http://vista.cira.colostate.edu/improve/Default.htm