alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: rdc1usa@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:36:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ralph Cairl

Myrtle Beach, SC 29579
From: buchankj@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:35:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joyce Buchanan

Kirkland, WA 98033
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PAMECO CORPORATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
NOVEMBER 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001036283
<NAME> PAMECO CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                             162
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,536
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,992
<INVENTORY>                                    142,375
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               170,685
<PP&E>                                          22,345
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,650
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 244,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          102,435
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            88
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   244,821
<SALES>                                        503,554
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               503,554
<CGS>                                          383,529
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  481,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,799
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,462
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,042
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,744
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,298
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,298
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.13
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
 32(b)



CERTIFICATION
 OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
 connection with the report on Form 10-Q of WWA Group, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed
 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Digamber
 Naswa, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
 pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in this report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the small business issuer at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of the small business issuer
 for the period covered by this report.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:
 August 13, 2008

/s/
 Digamber Naswa

Digamber
 Naswa

Chief
 Financial Officer



Thiscertification
 accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be
 deemed filed by the small business issuer for the purposes of §18 of
 the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into
 any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
 (whether made before or after the date of this report),
 irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of
 this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the small
 business issuer and will be retained
 by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
 Commission or its staff upon request.



26
#            

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (R)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-109182

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  490                                                                                   Trade Date:  10/04/04

(To Prospectus Supplement dated November 6, 2003 &

  Prospectus dated October 15,2003)                                                                              Issue Date:   10/07/04

The Date of this Pricing SupplementOctober 4, 2004

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                                   Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                   Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment     Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)   Maturity  Public (2) Commissions       Frequency       Option  Yes/No     record dates)

14911QWK3      4.25%    04/15/13        100%                1.29%             Semi-Annually                YES          No

                                                                                               

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Principal                                                                                 1st Payment             Day         

Amount                  Proceeds                  Dealer                           Date                   Count

$547,000.00            $539,943.70            ABN AMROInc.        04/15/05               30/360    

Original Issue DiscountNote:                                                                          Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                  N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (R) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (R) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $175.015 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (R) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (R) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated October 15,2003.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
***EXHIBIT32(a)***

** **

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

** **

In connection with the reporton Form 10-Q of WWA Group, Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, EricMontandon, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuantto §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledgeand belief:

 

(1)  This report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)  The information contained in thisreport fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition ofthe registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results ofoperations of the registrant for the period covered by this report.

 

 

Date: May 16, 2011

 

 

/s/ Eric Montandon

Eric Montandon

Chief Executive Officer 

 

 

This certification accompaniesthis report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemedfiled by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by referenceinto any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of thisreport), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in suchfiling.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant and willbe retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
(R.D. 11472)

#### Mohawk Brush Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 862766.

(Decided January 24, 1968)

*Busby <& Rimldn*for the plaintiff.

*Edwin L. Weisl, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Watson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties, subject to the approval of the Court, in the above entitled case, that:

> 1. The merchandise herein consists of aromatic substances (perfume compounds) exported from the United Kingdom during the year 1966, which merchandise is not on the Final Valuation List of the Secretary of the Treasury, T.D. 54521, and on which it is agreed that the proper basis for appraisement is constructed value under Sec. 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> 2. On or about the date of exportation of said merchandise the cost of materials and of fabrication or other processing of any kind employed in producing such or similar merchandise, together with the amount of general expenses and profit usually reflected in sales of merchandise of the same general class or kind, made by producers in the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for shipment to the United States, including the cost of all containers and packing and all other expenses incidental to placing said merchandise m condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States, are as follows:

> Compound U.S. 007 U.S. $39.23 per kilo, packed

> *7633. The appeal for reappraisement herein may be deemed submitted for a decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold constructed value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was as follows:

> Compound U.S. 007 U.S. $39.23 per kilo, packed

Judgment will issue accordingly.
|   | I, Toni M. Perazzo, certify that: |
|--------|-----------------------------------|

|   | 1.  I have reviewed this  report on Form 10-Q/A of AeroCentury Corp.; |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  February 4, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Toni M. Perazzo |   |
|                              |   | Name: Toni M. Perazzo |   |
|                              |   | Title: Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                              |   |   |   |
From: jfuhrma1@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:56:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Fuhrman

, 48168-9263
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

                    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at                     *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.*                     Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.                

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than October 3, 2023.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago*                     (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414. Comments can also be sent electronically to                     *Comments.applications@chi.frb.org:*

                    1.                     *Sandra Kay Fowler 2023 Irrevocable Trust, Kenneth Fowler, as trustee, both of Lansing, Michigan;*                     to acquire voting shares of Bank Michigan Financial Corporation, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Bank Michigan, Brooklyn, Michigan.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Michele Taylor Fennell,

Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2023-20070 Filed 9-15-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P