alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 27 AND
28 OF THE FORM 10-K AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON
DECEMBER 28, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                              82,083
<SECURITIES>                                        18,466
<RECEIVABLES>                                       16,049
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (1,089)
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   120,827
<PP&E>                                              14,921
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (6,337)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     158,958
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               41,218
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           127,046
<OTHER-SE>                                          (9,306)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       158,958
<SALES>                                             24,167
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    32,932
<CGS>                                                1,362
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       29,747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       201
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      4,813
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2,371
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  3,185
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         2,442
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.06



</TABLE>
**SUMMARY OF EMISSIONS TEST DATA**

Table : 1 Plant :Hanson Brick, Mineral Wells, TX Location :Kiln #2 Exhaust Operator :T. Armstrong, L. Whicher Test Date :17-Aug-10 Repetition : 1 2 3

**STACK GAS** Temperature, F 241.4 237.3 238.6 Velocity, fps 42.73 42.10 42.29 Volume Flow, acfm 17129.1 16876.6 16953.3 scfm 11695.1 11595.5 11681.2 scfh 701705 695731 700872 Moisture, % 6.99% 6.95% 6.52% CO2, % 1.50 2.00 2.00 O2, % 17.73 17.59 17.90

**SAMPLE** Start Time, hrs:min 7:55 AM 9:26 AM 10:57 AM Finish Time, hrs:min 9:00 AM 10:30 AM 12:01 PM Sample Volume, scf 37.656 35.661 35.858 Isokinetic Ratio, % 102.7637 98.15525 97.97357

**HYDROGEN FLUORIDE** Sample Weight, mg (<0.143) (<0.158) (<0.147) Concentration, ppm (<0.162) (<0.188) (<0.174) Concentration, ppm @ 7% O2 (<0.712) (<0.790) (<0.807) Emissions, lbs/hr (<0.0059) (<0.0065) (<0.006) Emissions, gr/hr (<2.68) (<3.08) (<2.87)

**CHLORINE** Sample Weight, mg (<0.12) (<0.11) (<0.10) Concentration, ppm (<0.074) (<0.075) (<0.065) Concentration, ppm @ 7% O2 (<0.326) (<0.316) (<0.300) Emissions, lbs/hr (<0.0048) (<0.0048) (<0.0042) Emissions, gr/hr (<2.18) (<2.19) (<0.190)

**HYDROGEN CHLORIDE** Sample Weight, mg 0.84 2.06 0.82 Concentration, ppm 0.517244 1.346851 0.530199 Concentration, ppm @ 7% O2 2.268043 5.655962 2.456587 Emissions, lbs/hr 0.034392 0.088791 0.035211 Emissions, gr/hr 15.59727 40.2679 15.96892
From: scott.moffett@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:21:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Scott Moffett

Anchorage, AK 99507
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit  Fund VI,  L.P.,  Series 5 (the  "Partnership")  for the  quarters  ended
December  31,  2004,  September  30 2004  and June  30,  2004 as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I, Thomas J. Riha, Senior  Vice-President and Chief
Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  except to the extent  that such
     provisions require the audit report of Local Limited Partnership  financial
     statements  to  refer  to the  auditing  standards  of the  Public  Company
     Accounting   Oversight  Board  for  the   Partnership's   annual  financial
     statements and except that the Report is a cumulative  report covering each
     of the quarters ended December 31, September 30 and June 30, 2004 and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.



/s/Thomas J. Riha
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
May 16, 2008
**Exhibit 31.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER				PURSUANT TO THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,				RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14				AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO				SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Material Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert M. Bernstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rules 13a-14 and 15-d14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:				1.       I have reviewed this Report;				2.       Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;				3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report;				4.       I and the other certifying officers of the Company:

are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures for the Company;
- have designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information is made known to us, particularly during the period in which the Report is being prepared;     have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of the date of the Report; andhave presented in the Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on the required evaluation.			
5.       I and the other certifying officers have disclosed to the Company’s auditors and to the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent function):
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls (a pre-existing term relating to internal controls regarding financial reporting) which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report		
financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
- any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls.		  6.       I and the other certifying officers have indicated in the Report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  
Dated: December 5, 2007

/s/ Robert M. Bernstein                         

By:

Robert M. Bernstein

Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1433 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 16, 2008.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 6899) to advance the national security 
interests of the United States by reducing its dependency on oil through 
renewable and clean, alternative fuel technologies while building a bridge to 
the future through expanded access to Federal oil and natural gas resources, 
revising the relationship between the oil and gas industry and the consumers who 
own those resources and deserve a fair return from the development of publicly 
owned oil and gas, ending tax subsidies for large oil and gas companies, and 
facilitating energy efficiencies in the building, housing, and transportation 
sectors, and for other purposes. All points of order against consideration of 
the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The 
bill shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions of the 
bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) three hours of 
debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Natural Resources; and (2) one motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of H.R. 6899 pursuant to this resolution, 
notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone 
further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 
Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 246 (Thursday, December 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 79656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-32707]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS

Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 19 January 2012, at 9 a.m. in the Commission offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street 
NW., Washington DC, 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include 
buildings, parks and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding the 
agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address; by emailing staff@cfa.gov; or by calling (202) 504-
2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the 
hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before 
the meeting date.

    Dated December 15, 2011 in Washington, DC.
Thomas Luebke,
AIA Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-32707 Filed 12-21-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
```
From: tpmullins@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:36:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Terry Mulins

Fairborn, OH 45324
Exhibit 32.1

           Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


Solely for the purpose of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
solely to the extent this certification is applicable to the Annual Report of
Warrantech Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify that this Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: June 29, 2005                    /s/ JOEL SAN ANTONIO
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Joel San Antonio
                                       Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
                                       and Director


Date: June 29, 2005                    /s/ RICHARD GAVINO
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Richard Gavino
                                       Executive Vice President,
                                       Chief Financial Officer,
                                       Chief Accounting Officer, and Treasurer

                                       63
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

B.L.F.,

Petitioner

v.

D.J.F.,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 489 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5th day of December, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
[No. 3577.]

#### Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Leib.

1. *Parties*— Substitution. Where an action is instituted by a father for personal injuries to an infant daughtei', the child, upon arriving at majority, may be substituted, and permitted to prosecute the action in her own name.

2. Contributory *Negligence*— Of *Driver Not Imputed to Passenger.*The doctrine of Denver Co. v. Armstrong, 21 Col. Ap. 640, followed.

*Appeal from Otero District Court.*Hon. C. S. Essex, Judge.

Mr. T. H. Devine, Mr. Henry A. Dubbs, Mr. H. C. . Vidal, Mr. J. W. Preston, for appellant.

Mr. Fred A. Sabin, for appellee.

Morgan, J.

Appellee was one of the automobile party in *Missouri Pacific Railway Company v. Atkinson,*just decided, and as that case is reversed and remanded on account of *365errors concerning the issues, the proof and the instructions, involving the public highway, all of which appear in this case, the judgment herein, for such errors, is reversed and the cause remanded, with the same directions. There are two questions discussed on this appeal, however, which “are not involved in the other case, that should be disposed of in view of another trial.

1. The lower court permitted the name of Corinne Leib to be substituted for that of her father, in whose name the action was pending until she became old enough to maintain the action in her own name. This was not error, as it appears in the complaint that the action was for such damages, only, as could be recovered by the daughter, and, while the complaint should have contained apt language that the father sued as next friend or natural guardian, the court was, nevertheless, justified in permitting the substitution.

2. Concerning the contention that the jury should have been instructed that, “if they believed from the evidence that the driver’s negligence was the proximate cause of the injury the plaintiff could not recover,” the opinion in the case of *Denver City Tramway Co. v. Armstrong,*21 Colo. App., 640, recently decided by this court, will serve as a sufficient guide on another trial, to both court and counsel.

*Reversed and Remanded.*
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDevelopment and Flight Test of an Emergency Flight Control System Using Only Engine Thrust on an MD-11 Transport AirplaneAn emergency flight control system that uses only engine thrust, called the propulsion-controlled aircraft (PCA) system, was developed and flight tested on an MD-11 airplane. The PCA system is a thrust-only control system, which augments pilot flightpath and track commands with aircraft feedback parameters to control engine thrust. The PCA system was implemented on the MD-11 airplane using only software modifications to existing computers. Results of a 25-hr flight test show that the PCA system can be used to fly to an airport and safely land a transport airplane with an inoperative flight control system. In up-and-away operation, the PCA system served as an acceptable autopilot capable of extended flight over a range of speeds, altitudes, and configurations. PCA approaches, go-arounds, and three landings without the use of any normal flight controls were demonstrated, including ILS-coupled hands-off landings. PCA operation was used to recover from an upset condition. The PCA system was also tested at altitude with all three hydraulic systems turned off. This paper reviews the principles of throttles-only flight control, a history of accidents or incidents in which some or all flight controls were lost, the MD-11 airplane and its systems, PCA system development, operation, flight testing, and pilot comments.Document ID19980210483Acquisition SourceArmstrong Flight Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsBurcham, Frank W., Jr.*(NASA Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA United States)*Burken, John J.*(NASA Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA United States)*Maine, Trindel A.*(NASA Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA United States)*Fullerton, C. Gordon*(NASA Dryden Flight Research Center Edwards, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 1997Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategoryAircraft Stability And ControlReport/Patent NumberNASA/TP-1997-206217NAS 1.60:206217H-2170Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 522-15-34Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980210483.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
No. 181.

#### Lakeland Grocery Corp. *v.*Food Fair Stores, Inc.

*William L. Parker*and *Norris E. Halpern*for petitioner.

*Archibald G. Robertson*and *Lewis T. Booker*for respondent.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
CMAS Facility Information

Nick Parsons to: Cortney_Higgins 10/01/2012 12:37 PM

Cc: Paul Versace, JohnB Chamberlin, Penny Lassiter

Hi Cortney,

Attached is a spreadsheet containing information on the CMAS facilities that have uncontrolled HAP emissions 

greater than 100 tpy.

Thanks,

Nick

CMAS 100tpy Synthetic Area Sources.xlsx
No. 57.

#### Cleary *v.*Bolger.

Certiorari, 368 U. S. 984, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The motion of respondent for the appointment of counsel is granted, and it is ordered that *Joseph Aron-stein, Esquire,*of New York, New York, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for the respondent in this case.