alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: pattysis@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:03:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patty Bertrand

Wood Dale, IL 60191
From: Tammy Brislin

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:58:03 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Tammy Brislin

9749 e 34th palce

Denver, CO 80238
Filed Pursuant To Rule 433, Registration No. 333-195039








Dated Monday, September 08, 2014





POWERNOTES Issued by CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION.





For the Period: 9/8/2014 to 9/15/2014


CouponInterestMaturityCallableSurvivor's OptionPriceCUSIP2.550%Semi-Annual(†††)9/15/2021NoYes§100.0014912HRK83.100%Semi-Annual(†††)9/15/2026NoYes§100.0014912HRL6





Expected Trade Date - Monday, September 15, 2014





Expected Settlement Date - Thursday, September 18, 2014





(†††)First Payment date 3/15/2015





§ The limit for any individual deceased owner or beneficial interest is $200,000 per calendar year. Limit in aggregate per calendar year is 1% of outstanding principal amount of PowerNotes as of the end of the most recent fiscal year. For complete details, see the prospectus .





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation has filed a registration statement (including prospectus) with the SEC for the offering to which this communication relates. Before you invest, you should read the prospectus in that registration statement and the other documents Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation has filed with the SEC for more complete information about Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation and this offering. You may get these documents for free by visiting EDGAR on the SEC web site at www.sec.gov. Alternatively, Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation, any underwriter or any dealer participating in the offering will arrange to send you the prospectus if you request it by calling (800) 289-6689.





Supplemental United States Federal Income Tax Considerations: Final regulations released by the U.S. Department of the Treasury state that Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA) withholding (as described in “Certain United States Federal Income Tax Consequences— Non-United States Holders— Foreign Account Tax Compliance” in the prospectus supplement) may apply to certain debt obligations that are issued on or after July 1, 2014; therefore, the Notes may be subject to FATCA withholding.





All offerings are subject to prior sale.





Under no circumstances shall this information constitute an offer to sell, nor shall there be any sale of the securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of such jurisdiction.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 01017**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  

### 01017\01017_ Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 01017\01017_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 01017\01017_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted 

### x 01017\01017_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook 

### x 01017\01017_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 01017\01017_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 01017\01017_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 01017\01017_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 01017\01017_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file 

### x 01017\Correspondence\01017 Response_032411 Email communications regarding questions on the survey response 

### x 01017\Correspondence\01017 Response_032411\01017_Email Correspondence_032411.pdf Email communications regarding questions on the survey response 

### x 01017\Correspondence\01017 Response_032411\Copy of COF_Part_A.xls Email communications regarding questions on the survey response 

### x 01017\Supporting Documents\COF ICR Flow Schematic Source Diagram August 2010.pptx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 01017\Supporting Documents\COF Part D Block Diagrams.xlsx Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 01017\Supporting Documents\COF.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey



### 01017\Supporting Documents\DEA_Colbert Fossil Plant_Installation of Flue Gas Desulfuriz.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 01017\Supporting Documents\FEA_Allen Fossil Plant Biogas Fuel Supplement Project.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 01017\Supporting Documents\FEA_Colbert Fossil Plant_Construction of Skimmer Wall.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 01017\Supporting Documents\FEA_Colbert Fossil Plant_Dry Fly Ash Facility and Dry Storag.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 01017\Supporting Documents\FEA_Colbert Fossil Plant_Property Sale and Permanent Easemen.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### 01017\Supporting Documents\FEA_Colbert Fossil Plant_Units 1 through 5 Reduction Systems.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
<PAGE>


                             LNB Bancorp, Inc.

                           Exhibit to Form 10 - K

               (for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002)

                        S - K Reference Number (23)




                     Consent of Independent Accountants.



































<PAGE>

                             Exhibit 23


Consent of Independent Accountants

The Board of Directors
LNB Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
No. 33-64034 and No. 33-53210 on Form S-8 and No. 333-43441 and No. 333-58414
on Form S-3 of LNB Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated January 28, 2003, except
as to note 22, which is as of February 25, 2003, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of LNB Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002
and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, cash flows and
shareholders' equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual
report on Form 10-K of LNB Bancorp, Inc.



/s/KPMG LLP
Cleveland, Ohio
March 6, 2003
From: handofgrace@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:39:25 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Pam Jacobsen

Omaha, NE 68154
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SUMMER M. STILES,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1908

[January 6, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Indian River County; Dan L. Vaughn,

Judge; L.T. Case No. 312013CF000883A.

Antony P. Ryan, Director, and Paul O’Neil, Assistant Regional Counsel 

of the Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, West Palm 

Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kimberly T. Acuña,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, FORST and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free.

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

The Honorable E. Christopher Abruzzo, Secretary September 23, 2014

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

Rachel Carson Building

P.O. Box 2063

Harrisburg, PA 17105

Dear Secretary Abruzzo:

On April 30, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision 

to the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Pennsylvania Department of 

Environmental Protection (PADEP). This SIP revision consists of a redesignation request and 

maintenance plan for the Lancaster, PA 1997 annual fine particulate matter (PM2.5) 

Nonattainment Area and the Lancaster, PA 2006 24-hour PM2.5 Nonattainment Area. EPA has 

determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to 

prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR). 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Leslie Jones 

Doherty, Office of Air Program Planning, at (215) 814-3409. She is the principal contact for this

rulemaking. 

 Sincerely, 

/s/

Diana Esher, Director

 Air Protection Division 

cc: Joyce Epps, Director, PADEP Bureau of Air Quality
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determine d that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30246 Summary Calendar

NEIL BUNTYN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

POLICE JURY OF QUACHITA PARISH; LAYMON GODWIN, Sheriff; CLARENCE BRITTON,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Louisiana

(95-CV-1339)

September 3, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. *

PER CURIAM:

Neil Buntyn, a Louisiana pretrial detainee incarcerated at

Quachita Parish Correctional Center, appeals the district court’s

denial of his motion for a temporary restraining order and/or

preliminary injunction. This Court has jurisdiction to review the2

district court’s denial of Buntyn’s mot ion for a preliminary

injunction. L akedreams v. Taylor , 932 F.2d 1013, 1107 (5th Cir.

1991).

Buntyn requested a temporary injunction requiring the

authorities to “immediately install [free] non-collect phone lines

to attorneys, bail bond smen and government agencies in the local

area and making lines accessible to 800 numbers, and . . .

requiring the defendants [to] maintain the non-collect lines.” We

have reviewed the rec ord, the magistrate judge’s report, and the

di strict court’s order and find no abuse of discretion. S ee id

. Accordingly, we affirm for essentially the reas ons stated by the

magistrate judge and adopted by the district court. B untyn v.
Police Jury of Quachita Parish , No. 95-CV-1339 (W.D. La. March 6,

1996).

AFFIRMED
#### Harriet M. Wilson and another, Plaintiffs, v. Lora Cummings and others, Defendants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Kennedy, J.
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit VI, L.P., Series 5 (the "Partnership") for the period ended June 30, 2003
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  and  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.,  section  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  I,  Wilfred N.  Cooper,  Jr.,
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner
of the Partnership, hereby certify that to my knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Partnership.


/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
October 14, 2003
Merrimack,

Feb. 3, 1914.

#### Isaac Mushlin *v.*John W. K. Rowell *& a.*

Under chapter 76, Laws 1906, the selectmen of a town have no authority to limit the number of jurikdealers’ licenses to be issued therein.

Petition for mandamus, to compel the issuance of a junkdealer’s license to the plaintiff. The defendants are the selectmen of Hooksett. Having licensed one Isenberg as a junkdealer in that town, they declined to license the plaintiff, on the sole ground that the number of licenses to be issued was a matter for them to decide and that it was for the interest of the town that only one junk-dealer should do business therein. Transferred without a ruling from the October term, 1913, of the superior court by *Chamberlin,*J., on an agreed statement of facts.

*Remick & Jackson (Mr. Jackson*orally), for the plaintiff.

*Martin & Howe,*for the defendants.

Young, J.

The only question considered is whether section 1, chapter 124, Public Statutes, as amended by chapter 76, Laws 1905, authorizes the defendants to determine the number of licenses they will issue, as well as the suitability of applicants. *Silverman*v. *Gagnon,*74 N. H. 502. The amended section provides that the selectmen of a town “may license persons, deemed by them to be suitable, to be dealers in . . . old junk.” As the act is silent as to the number of licenses that may be issued in any town, it is probable the legislature intended that one should be issued to any suitable person who applied for it. *State*v. *Cohen,*73 N. H. 543. To hold that the legislature intended the selectmen to limit the number of licenses is not only to read such a provision into the statute, but also to hold that it intended to permit them to create a monopoly of the business in so far as their town is concerned.

*Case discharged.*

All concurred.
From: ravenvt@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:16:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Critchfield

Fairbanks, AK 99712
#### Richard V. Harnett and another. Appellants, v. William P. Barker and others, Respondent.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs-to abide event.
No. 596.

#### Sears, Roebuck *&*Co. et al. *v.*Jones et al.

*Cedric W. Porter*and *Philip H. Sheridan*for petitioners.

*Herbert J. Jacobi, Samuel L. Davidson*and *Robert B. Jacobi*for respondents.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1528 

Honoring the life and recognizing the accomplishments of civil rights leader 

J.L. Chestnut, Jr. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 3, 2008 

Mr. DAVIS of Alabama submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life and recognizing the accomplishments of 

civil rights leader J.L. Chestnut, Jr. 

Whereas J.L. Chestnut Jr., was born on December 16, 1930, 

in Selma, Alabama, and attended Talladega College and 

Howard University School of Law; 

Whereas in 1958, J.L. Chestnut Jr., returned to his hometown and began practice as the first African-American 

lawyer in Selma; 

Whereas during the 1960s, J.L., Chestnut Jr., served as an 

advisor, strategist and participant in efforts led by civil 

rights leaders, including the late Reverend Dr. Martin 

Luther King, Jr., to seek racial justice in Alabama; 

Whereas J.L. Chestnut, Jr., was present at the Edmund 

Pettus Bridge on ‘‘Bloody Sunday,’’ March 7, 1965, 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1528 IH 

when the police attempted to prevent demonstrators from 

beginning the historic march from Selma to Montgomery; 

Whereas J.L. Chestnut, Jr., successfully argued critical civil 

rights cases, leading to the rights of African-Americans 

to serve on juries in Dallas County, to desegregate Selma 

public schools, and, in 1999, to provide relief to farmers 

who were discriminated against by the United States Department of Agriculture; 

Whereas the life story of J.L. Chestnut Jr., is outlined in his 

memoir, ‘‘Black in Selma: The Uncommon Life and 

Times of J.L. Chestnut, Jr.; and 

Whereas the community of Selma has lost a beloved son with 

passing of J.L. Chestnut, Jr., on September 30, 2008, at 

the age of 77: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses its condolences to the surviving 

3 family of J.L. Chestnut, Jr., his wife Vivian, three 

4 daughters, three sons, sister, six grandchildren and 

5 two great-grandchildren; and 

6 (2) honors the life of J.L. Chestnut Jr., a rec7 ognized leader and powerful advocate for justice and 

8 equality. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
No. 64478.

#### Close & Stewart et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/8941, etc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.