alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<CIK>               0001036262
<NAME>              INTEST CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

       

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                     8,551
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                              3,293
<ALLOWANCES>                                 197
<INVENTORY>                                2,631
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          15,456
<PP&E>                                     2,549
<DEPRECIATION>                             1,745
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            23,415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1,939
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                      65
<OTHER-SE>                                21,411
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              23,415
<SALES>                                   15,238
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          15,238
<CGS>                                      6,453
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              5,521
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            3,640
<INCOME-TAX>                               1,351
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        2,289
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                               2,289
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .38
        


</TABLE>
No. 104.

#### New Jersey et al. *v.*New York, Susquehanna & Western Railroad Co.

*Austin L. Roberts, Jr.*on the motion.

*Vincent P. Biunno*for appellee, in opposition.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 370 U. S. 933.) The motion of the National Association of Railroad and Utilities Commissioners for leave to file brief, as *amicus curiae,*is granted.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sienna Resources, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Julie Carter, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
3rd day of June, 2009.


/s/ Julie Carter
----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
From: tvalnt9@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:17:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Teresa Valentine

Patterson, CA 95363
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIHAI75N93023R00003: Pre-clinical Models of Infectious Diseases—Task Area B.                    

*Date:*                         October 20-23, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E70A, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Annie Walker-Abbey, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E70A, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-627-3390,                         *aabbey@niaid.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 18, 2023.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-20493 Filed 9-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS 

# oFFfcW!»^TOLrT1°&SiSSU STATE OF TEXAS PENALTY FOR 

## PRIVATE USE f' PITNEYBOWES

6/3/2015 

### ELLER, NATHAN RAY 

### Tr. Ct. No. W13-44914-Y (A) 

## WRs63,051-01 t) 

## On this day, the application forwgtof.habeas corpus is dismissed as moot Abel Acosta, Clerk NATHAN RAY ELLER HUTCHINS UNIT - TDC # 1970806 1500 E. LANGDON
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPeriodic Time-Domain Nonlocal Nonreflecting Boundary Conditions for Duct AcousticsPeriodic time-domain boundary conditions are formulated for direct numerical simulation of acoustic waves in ducts without flow. Well-developed frequency-domain boundary conditions are transformed into the time domain. The formulation is presented here in one space dimension and time; however, this formulation has an advantage in that its extension to variable-area, higher dimensional, and acoustically treated ducts is rigorous and straightforward. The boundary condition simulates a nonreflecting wave field in an infinite uniform duct and is implemented by impulse-response operators that are applied at the boundary of the computational domain. These operators are generated by convolution integrals of the corresponding frequency-domain operators. The acoustic solution is obtained by advancing the Euler equations to a periodic state with the MacCormack scheme. The MacCormack scheme utilizes the boundary condition to limit the computational space and preserve the radiation boundary condition. The success of the boundary condition is attributed to the fact that it is nonreflecting to periodic acoustic waves. In addition, transient waves can pass rapidly out of the solution domain. The boundary condition is tested for a pure tone and a multitone source in a linear setting. The effects of various initial conditions are assessed. Computational solutions with the boundary condition are consistent with the known solutions for nonreflecting wave fields in an infinite uniform duct.Document ID19970001879Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsWatson, Willie R.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton,VA United States)*Zorumski, William E.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton,VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1996Subject CategoryAcousticsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-110230NAS 1.15:110230Accession Number97N11629Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-59-52Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970001879.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
From: marciae@fcoc.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:07:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marcia Ernst

Mount Pleasant, IA 52641
From: shdoan1@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:08:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Shirley Doan

Washington, IL 61571
Exhibit 10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE CONTRACT 
 THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE
CONTRACT (“Second Amendment”) is made effective as of August 9, 2012, by and between TWIN CITY CROSSING, LLC (“Seller”) and WHEELER INTERESTS, INC. (“Purchaser”). 

RECITALS: 

WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser previously entered into that certain Purchase Contract, dated June 11, 2012, as amended by First
Amendment to Purchase Contract, dated July 26, 2012 (as amended, the “Agreement”) for the sale of the Property as defined in the Agreement, including, without limitation, certain real property and improvements located in the Town of
Batesburg-Leesville, County of Lexington, South Carolina; 
 WHEREAS, Purchaser and Seller desire to further amend the Agreement
as set forth herein; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
of which is hereby acknowledged, Purchaser and Seller hereby undertake and agree as follows: 
 1. Defined Terms. Terms
defined in the Agreement shall have the same meanings in this Second Amendment unless specifically modified herein. 
 2.
Inspection Period Agreements. Purchaser and Seller agree that the Review Period, as defined in Section 3(A) of the Agreement, is extended to and including August 16, 2012. 

3. Execution by Facsimile/Counterparts. Execution of this instrument may be evidenced by facsimile signature which shall be deemed
an original for all purposes. To facilitate execution, this Second Amendment may be executed in as many counterparts as may be required; and it shall not be necessary that the signature of, or on behalf of, each party, or that the signatures of the
persons required to bind any party, appear on one or more such counterparts. All counterparts shall collectively constitute a single agreement 
 4. Agreement Remains in Effect. Subject to the specific amendments and agreements set forth in this Second Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect without modification.

 [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller and Purchaser have caused this Second Amendment to be signed as
of the date first above written. 
  

									
	SELLER:	 		 	TWIN CITY CROSSING, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company
				
		 		 	By:	 	Du Rhone Group, Ltd., its Manager
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Neil R. Smith

		 		 		 		 	Neil R. Smith
		 		 		 		 	Executive Vice President
			
	PURCHASER:	 		 	WHEELER INTERESTS, INC.
				
		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Jon S. Wheeler

		 		 	Name:	 	 JON S. WHEELER

		 		 	Its:	 	 PRESIDENT/CEO



  
 2
From: dirtundermanails2@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:25:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Roberta Thoren

Odenton, MD 21113
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1489

To provide for the sharing of information between Federal departments,

agencies, and other entities with respect to aliens seeking admission

to the United States, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 3, 2001

Ms. SNOWE (for herself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide for the sharing of information between Federal

departments, agencies, and other entities with respect

to aliens seeking admission to the United States, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHARING INFORMATION.

4 All United States law enforcement agencies and the

5 intelligence community (as defined in section 3(4) of the

6 National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 401a(4)) shall

7 share information on aliens with any United States de8 partment, agency, or other entity responsible for receiving,
2

•S 1489 IS

1 processing, issuing, and admitting any individual seeking

2 entry to the United States by any visa or other official

3 document that authorizes entry to the United States.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 177 (Thursday, September 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 63148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19830]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 14, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 5, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 48 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2023-258, CP2023-261.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-19830 Filed 9-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P