alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: stevewillm@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:49:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Steve Williams

Canyon Country, CA 91387
EX-10.6



 Exhibit 10.6 
 AMENDMENT #1 TO THE 
 JOY GLOBAL INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

 This amendment dated June 4, 2012, to the Joy Global Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“Plan”) is made
pursuant to Section 14 of the Plan. 
 WHEREAS, Joy Global Inc. (the “Company”) sponsors the Plan, effective as
of April 1, 2011; and 
 WHEREAS, the Human Resources and Nominating Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the
“Committee”) administers the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, the Section 14 of the Plan permits the Committee to amend the Plan;
and 
 WHEREAS, effective December 6, 2011, the Company listed its Common Stock for trading on the NYSE and, in connection with
such listing, terminated the listing of its Common Stock on NASDAQ; and 
 WHEREAS, the Committee believes it is in the best interest of the
Company to amend certain defined terms in the Plan.. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that effective immediately the
definition of “Fair Market Value” should be deleted in its entirety and replaced to read as follows: 

“‘Fair Market Value’ means, with respect to a share of Common Stock as of any Grant Date or Purchase Date, the closing
price of such Common Stock on the NYSE on such date, as reported in The Wall Street Journal. In the event that such a closing price is not available for a Grant Date or a Purchase Date, the Fair Market Value of a share of Common Stock on such
date shall be the closing price of a share of the Common Stock on the NYSE on the last market day prior to such date or such other amount as may be determined by the Administrator by any fair and reasonable means.” 

FURTHER RESOLVED, that effective immediately the definition of “Grant Date” should be deleted in its entirety and replaced to
read as follows: 
 “‘Grant Date’ means the first day of each Offering Period.” 

FURTHER RESOLVED, that effective immediately the definition of “Purchase Date” should be deleted in its entirety and replaced
to read as follows: 
 “‘Purchase Date’ means the last NYSE market day of each Offering Period at which time the
option to purchase Common Stock is exercised.” 
 FURTHER RESOLVED, that a new definition of “NYSE” should be
added to read as 
 follows: 
 “‘NYSE’ means the New York Stock Exchange.”
EXHIBIT 31(b) 

I, Digamber Naswa, chief financialofficer of WWA Group, Inc. (“Registrant”) certify that: 

1.              I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (“Report”) of          Registrant; 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a          material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements          made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not          misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information          included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial          condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and          for, the period presented in this Report; 

4.              I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and          procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the          Registrant and have: 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure          controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that          material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated          subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly          during the period in which this Report is being prepared; 

b)              Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and          procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness          of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered          by this Report based on such evaluation; and 

c)              Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrant’s internal control          over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent          fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual          report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially          affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.              I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrant’s          auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors (or          persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a)              All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation          of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to          adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and          report financial information; and 

b)              Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees          who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal controls over          financial reporting. 

Date: August 18, 2005 

_/s/ Digamber Naswa

Digamber Naswa
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund VI, L.P., Series 5 (the "Partnership") for the quarters ended
December 31, 2005, September 30, 2005 and June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Thomas J. Riha, Senior Vice-President and Chief
Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except
                  to the extent that such provisions require the audit report of
                  Local Limited Partnership financial statements to refer to the
                  auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
                  Board for the Partnership's annual financial statements and
                  except that the Report is a cumulative report covering each of
                  the quarters ended December 31, September 30 and June 30, 2005
                  and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Partnership.



/s/Thomas J. Riha
------------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
May 16, 2008
From: dsberg1@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:27:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dennis Berg

Corona, CA 92881
No. P68/453.

protests 66/6532, etc. (New York).

#### Abercrombie & Fitch Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of sheepskin coats or jackets similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Abercrombie & Fitch Co.*v. *United States*(59 Cust. Ct. 122, C.D. 3093), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

JACOB MATTHEW CHRISTINE, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 135 MAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 10th day of May, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
From: Diana4CH@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:22:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

Today I am writing to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

Also, I ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Diana Gray

Vincennes, IN 47591
Exhibit
          32.2
 
 AEROCENTURY
          CORP.
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 
 In
          connection with this quarterly report of AeroCentury
          Corp. (the
          “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
          Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Toni M. Perazzo, Chief
          Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
          solely
          for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
          Code,
          that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
          the
          Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),
          as
          applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 
 (2)
          the
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the
          dates
          and for the periods indicated.
 
 This
          Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
          and Exchange Commission.
  TONI
                  M.
                  PERAZZODate: 
August
                  14, 2006
                
                /s/ 
Toni
                  M.
                  PerazzoTitle:
                  Chief Financial
                  Officer
From: pmiller.adv@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:15:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Pierre V. Miller II

New Orleans, LA 70130
From: kk24fan@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:18:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Karen King

Crownsville, MD 21032
From: debbi.wilson53@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:26:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Debra Wilson

Morgan Hill, CA 95037
The Honorable Raner C. Collins, U.S. District Judge for the District of *

Arizona, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVEN FRANK JACKSON,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

T. FELKNER,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 09-15379

D.C. No. 2:07-cv-00555-RJB

Eastern District of California, 

Sacramento

ORDER

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Before: SCHROEDER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and COLLINS,

District Judge.* 

The judgment of this court, Jackson v. Felkner, 389 Fed.Appx. 640 (9th Cir.

2010), was reversed by the United States Supreme Court. See Felkner v. Jackson,

131 S.Ct. 1305 (2011). This case is remanded to the district court for further

proceedings consistent with the decision of the Supreme Court.

FILED

JAN 12 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
H. Res. 165

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

February 15, 2007.

Resolved, That the Senate be informed that Lorraine C. 

Miller, a citizen of the State of Texas, has been elected Clerk 

of the House of Representatives of the One Hundred Tenth 

Congress. 

Attest:

Clerk.