alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.01

Certification of Mindy Kline, Chief Executive Officer pursuant to

Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



I, Mindy Kline, certify that:



1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K/A-2 of Gold Star Tutoring Services, Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



October 5, 2009



___/s/Mindy Kline_____________

Mindy Kline

Chief Executive Officer

Principal Executive Officer
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.3


Regulus Therapeutics Inc.
Paul C. Grint, M.D. Yearly Discretionary Base Salary Increase
The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Regulus Therapeutics Inc., upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee of the Board, approved the increase of Dr. Grint’s annual base salary to $515,000, effective January 1, 2016.
From: perlapot@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:57:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

perla mapili

Elmont, NY 11003
From: boombah76@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:58:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Elaine Geiger

Lancaster, NY 14086
From: dbduffy@earthlink.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:15:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dorothy Duffy

Mc Lean, VA 22102
From: john.neighbors@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:56:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Neighbors

Arlington, TX 76001
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
   
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
of U S WEST, Inc. on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-50047, 33-50047-01, 33-63451 and
33-63087) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-01931, 33-63089, 33-63093, 33-63085,
33-63901, 33-24285 and 333-24283) and Form S-4 (File No. 333-45765) of our
reports dated February 12, 1996, on our audit of the consolidated financial
statements and consolidated financial statement schedule of U S WEST, Inc. for
the year ended December 31, 1995, which reports are included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A.
    
 
/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
 
   
Denver, Colorado
April 13, 1998
    
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
   
    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our reports dated February 12, 1998 (except with respect to the
matter discussed in Note 21 as to which the date is April 6, 1998) on the
consolidated financial statements, the consolidated financial statement schedule
and Supplementary Selected Proportionate Results of Operations of U S WEST,
Inc., as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for the years then ended included in
this amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, into U S WEST, Inc.'s previously
filed Registration Statements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 33-50047, 33-50047-01, 33-63451
and 33-63087), Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-01931, 33-63089, 33-63093, 33-63085,
33-63091, 333-24285 and 333-24283) and Form S-4 (No. 333-45765).
    
 
/s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
 
   
Denver, Colorado,
April 13, 1998.
#            

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (R)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-109182

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  462                                                                   Trade Date:  08/02/04

(To Prospectus Supplement dated November 6, 2003 &

  Prospectus dated October 15,2003)                                                              Issue Date:   08/05/04

The Date of this Pricing SupplementAugust 2, 2004

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                                   Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                   Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment     Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)   Maturity  Public (2) Commissions       Frequency       Option  Yes/No     record dates)

14911QVF5  4.0%             08/15/09           100%              1.0%                 Monthly                          YES         NO                                                                                                                                                                                       

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Principal                                                                                 1st Payment             Day         

Amount                  Proceeds                  Dealer                           Date                   Count

$1,282,000.00         $1,269,180.00         ABN AMRO Inc.        09/15/04                               30/360    

Original Issue Discount Note:                                                                         Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                  N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (R) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (R) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $126.518 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (R) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (R) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated October 15,2003.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
From: dawalker00@blomand.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:15:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dale Walker

Sparta, TN 38583
From: pastor@gracebythelake.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:39:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gregory Heidorn

Rochester, MN 55906
#### Anna Milewska, an Infant, by Mary Gonsiewska, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, *v.*The Yates Hotel Company, Appellant.

*Milewsha*v. *Yates Hotel Company,*140 App. Div. 938, affirmed.

(Argued February 27, 1912;

decided March 26, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 23, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant, her employer.

*W. P. Goodelle*for appellant.

*James E. Newell*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Werner Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ.
H. Res. 1464 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 22, 2008. 

Whereas AARP is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization with 

over 40 million members that is dedicated to improving 

the quality of life of people 50 and over as they age; 

Whereas AARP was founded in 1958 by Ethel Percy Andrus, 

a retired educator from California, around the principles 

of promoting independence, dignity and purpose for older 

Americans and encouraging current and future generations ‘‘To Serve, not to be served’’; 

Whereas AARP’s vision is ‘‘A society in which everyone ages 

with dignity and purpose and in which AARP helps people fulfill their goals and dreams’’; 

Whereas AARP’s mission is dedicated to enhancing the quality of life for all as we age, leading positive social change 

and delivering value to members through information, advocacy, and service; 

Whereas AARP’s nonpartisan advocacy activities help millions of individuals participate in the Nation’s legislative, 

judicial, and administrative processes; 

Whereas AARP is a trusted source of reliable information on 

health, financial security, and other important issues of 

the 50+ population; 
2 

•HRES 1464 EH 

Whereas AARP provides an opportunity for volunteerism and 

service for its millions of members to better their families, communities, and the Nation; 

Whereas AARP Services is a leader in the marketplace by 

being a force influencing companies to offer new and better services for AARP’s members; 

Whereas AARP Foundation, its philanthropic arm, delivers 

information, education, and direct service program to the 

most vulnerable age 50+ Americans; 

Whereas AARP Foundation’s Tax Aide, the Nation’s largest, 

free, volunteer-run tax preparation program has helped 

over 40 million low- and middle-income taxpayers; 

Whereas AARP Foundation’s job placement program has 

helped over 400,000 low-income older Americans find 

jobs, giving them purpose and dignity; 

Whereas AARP’s Driver Safety Program has helped over 10 

million old drivers sharpen their driving skills; and 

Whereas, in 2008, its 50th anniversary, AARP renews its 

commitment to improving the quality of life for all older 

Americans and helping people of all generations fulfill 

their goals and dreams: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes 

and commends AARP for 50 years of outstanding service, 

promoting the lives and retirement security of older persons 
3 

•HRES 1464 EH 

age 50 and older, and to future generations for aging Americans. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 567.

#### Gold Fuel Service, Inc., *v.*Esso Standard Oil Co.

*Sam Weiss*and *Michael J. Pappas*for petitioner.

*Burtis W. Horner*for respondent.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.