alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE

98–488 WASHINGTON : 2016

114th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 114–98 

CITY OF MANHATTAN, KANSAS LOCAL PROTECTION 

PROJECT

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF THE ARMY, 

CIVIL WORKS, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

TRANSMITTING

THE CITY OF MANHATTAN, KANSAS LOCAL PROTECTION PROJECT: 

FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR APRIL 30, 

2016, PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW 91–611, SEC. 216; (84 STAT. 

1830)

FEBRUARY 4, 2016.—Referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure and ordered to be printed 

(iii)
iv
v

vii
viii
ix
x
xi
xii
xiii

(1)
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS
N O . A P - 76, 359

EX PA R TE JO SE L U I S A G U I LA R , A ppl i c ant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CAUS E N O. S - 0 7 - 3 2 4 1 - CR I N T HE 3 6 TH DI S TR I CT COURT

FROM S AN PATRI CI O CO UNTY

P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pur s u an t to th e p r o v is io n s o f A rti c le 1 1
. 0 7 o f th e T e xa s Co d e o f Cr im in a l Pr o c edure , the cler k of the trial c ourt transmitted to this C ourt this a pplication for a

writ of habe as cor

pus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag g ravated sexual assault and indec ency

with a child and se ntence d to two terms of twe nty y ear s’ imprisonment. Applicant conte nds that he was denied his rig ht to appea l. On October 7, 2009, we r emande d this application for finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law. On r emand, the trial cour t found that Ap pli c ant fi le d a

pr e tr ia l mo tio n to su

pp re ss t hat w a s d e nie d a

nd that he did

no t w a ive his ri g ht t o
a pp e a l th e de nia l of this mot ion . The tr ia l c ourt a lso fo un d th a t c ouns e l w a s g ive n th e op po rt un ity2

to r e s p o n d b u t p r o v id e d n o e v id e n c e th a t h e a d v is e d A p p li c an t o n th e “ me an in g an d e f f e c t of the judgme nt rende red by

the cour t, his rig ht to appeal f

rom that judg ment, the nec essity of g iving notice of appea l a

nd taking other steps to pur sue an appea l, a s well as expressing his pr ofessional judg ment as to possible g rounds for a ppeal a nd their merit, and de lineating advanta g es and disadva ntag es of appea l.” Ex parte Ax el , 757 S.W .2d 369, 374 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). The trial c ourt conc luded that Ap pli c ant w a s d e nie d h is r ig ht to ap pe a l and re c omm e nd e d th a t w e g ra nt h im a n o ut- of -t ime a pp e a l. We find, there fore , that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of

-time appe al of the judg ment of convic tion in C ause No. S-07-3241-CR from the 36th J udicial Dis trict Court of San Patricio County . His out-of-time appeal shall be li mited to any issues raised by

written pre trial motion. Applicant is ordere d returne d to that time at which he may g ive a wr itten notice of appe al so that he may

then, with the aid of c ounsel, obtain a mea ningf ul appeal
. Al l t i m e limits shall be
c a lc ulate d a s if

the se nte nc e ha d be e n im

po se d o n th e date on

wh ic h th e mand a te of

thi s Co ur t is su e s. We h old tha t, s ho uld Ap pli c ant d e sir e to p ro se c ute an a pp e a l, he mus t take a ff

ir ma tiv e ste ps to f

ile
a wr itt e n n oti c e of

a pp e a l in the tr ia l c ourt

wi thi n 3 0 d ay s a ft e r t

he mand a te of

thi s Co ur t is su e s.

Deliver ed: J une 9, 2010 Do No t Pu

bli sh
NO. 12-08-00480-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

§

IN RE: JODY FORD MCCREARY,

RELATOR § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

§

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jody Ford McCreary has filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which he states that he

pleaded guilty to the offense of robbery, a second degree felony, but that the district attorney failed

to invoke the jurisdiction of the trial court. Therefore, McCreary asserts, his conviction is void and

should be set aside by writ of mandamus.

We have previously held that we have no jurisdiction to consider this complaint because it

relates to postconviction relief in a felony case. See In re McCreary, No. 12-08-00343-CR, 2008

WL 4335168, at *1 (Tex. App.–Tyler 2008, orig. proceeding) (mem. op., not designated for

publication) (citing Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)).

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive authority to grant postconviction relief in a

felony case. See Ater, 802 S.W.2d at 243. Accordingly, McCreary’s petition for writ of mandamus

is dismissed.

 BRIAN HOYLE 

 Justice

Opinion delivered December 17, 2008.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
tbk-ex107_260.htm



 

Exhibit 10.7

 


				
	

	
12700 Park Central Drive

Suite 1700

Dallas, Texas 75251
	
Main: 214-365-6900

Fax:   214-237-3197
	
 




 

________

________________
________________
________________


Re:Award under 2014 Triumph Bancorp, Inc. Omnibus Incentive Plan


______________

Reference is hereby made to the 2014 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) of Triumph Bancorp, Inc., a Texas corporation (the “Company”).   Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Plan.

In connection with your service as a director of the Company, we are hereby pleased to present you with an Award of __________ Shares under the Plan, effective as of _________ (the “Grant Date”).  Such shares shall be fully vested and non-forfeitable as of the Grant Date.

This letter constitutes an Award Agreement under the terms of the Plan, and the Shares granted hereunder are governed by, and subject in all respects to the terms of, the Plan and this Award Agreement.  This letter shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the internal laws of the State of Texas without regard to principles of conflicts of law thereof.

We thank you for your continuing service to the Company.

 


	
 
	
Best Regards,

	
 
	
 

	
 
	
Aaron P. Graft

	
 
	
President and CEO




 

 

triumphbancorp.com
Before the Third Division,

January 22, 1957

No. 60457.

#### Park & Tilford Import Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 30812-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 130, C. A. D. 508) and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRandom Vibration and Torque Tests of Fasteners Secured With Locking Cable, Room Temperature Vulcanized (RTV) Rubber, and Closed Cell Foam to Support the Launch of STS-82During a walkdown of the Space Transportation System (STS) orbiter for the 82nd Space Shuttle flight (STS-82), technicians found several safety cables for bolts with missing or loose ferrules. Typically, two or three bolts are secured with a cable which passes through one of the holes in the head of each bolt and a ferrule is crimped on each end of the cable to prevent it from coming out of the holes. The purpose of the cable is to prevent bolts from rotating should they become untightened. Other bolts are secured with either a locking cable or wire which is covered with RTV and foam. The RTV and foam would have to be removed to inspect for missing or loose ferrules. To determine whether this was necessary, vibration and torque test fixtures and tests were made to determine whether or not bolts with missing or loose ferrules would unloosen. These tests showed they would not, and the RTV and foam was not removed.Document ID19970034682Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsYost, V. H.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1997Subject CategorySpace TransportationReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:108539NASA-TM-108539Accession Number97N29923Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 250-40-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970034682.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: C.M., A MINOR

PETITION OF: K.M., NATURAL MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 483 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of February, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 138 

Recognizing the importance of Hot Springs National Park on its 175th 

anniversary. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2007 

Mr. ROSS (for himself, Mr. SNYDER, Mr. BERRY, and Mr. BOOZMAN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the importance of Hot Springs National Park 

on its 175th anniversary. 

Whereas the concept in the United States of setting aside a 

nationally significant place for the future enjoyment of 

its citizens was first implemented 175 years ago in Hot 

Springs, Arkansas, with the creation of the Hot Springs 

Reservation, which protected 47 area hot springs; 

Whereas the Act that created the Hot Springs Reservation, 

entitled ‘‘An Act authorizing the governor of the territory 

of Arkansas to lease the salt springs, in said territory, 

and for other purposes’’, approved April 20, 1832 (4 

Stat. 505), required that ‘‘the hot springs in said territory, together with four sections of land, including said 

springs, as near the centre thereof as may be, shall be 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 138 IH 

reserved for the future disposal of the United States, and 

shall not be entered, located, or appropriated, for any 

other purpose whatever’’; 

Whereas the Hot Springs Reservation was the first protected 

area in the Nation; 

Whereas the Act creating the Hot Springs Reservation preceded both the establishment of the Department of the 

Interior in 1849 and the establishment of Yellowstone 

National Park as the first national park in 1872; 

Whereas the Hot Springs Reservation was renamed Hot 

Springs National Park in 1921 and became America’s 

18th national park; and 

Whereas the tradition of preservation and conservation that 

developed into the National Park System, which now includes 390 units, began with the Act that created the 

Hot Springs Reservation: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That on this 175th anniversary of the Act 

2 of Congress that created the Hot Springs Reservation, the 

3 House of Representatives recognizes the important con4 tribution of the Hot Springs Reservation and Hot Springs 

5 National Park to the history of conservation in the United 

6 States. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 182 (Thursday, September 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 65221]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20504]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #18118 and #18119; Florida Disaster Number FL-
00192]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of Florida

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-4734-DR), dated 08/31/
2023.
    Incident: Hurricane Idalia.
    Incident Period: 08/27/2023 through 09/04/2023.

DATES: Issued on 09/05/2023.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/30/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/31/2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Florida, dated 08/31/2023, is hereby 
amended to establish the incident period for this disaster as beginning 
08/27/2023 through 09/04/2023.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco S[aacute]nchez, Jr.,
Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2023-20504 Filed 9-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
No. 60983.

protest 294171-K (San Francisco).

#### G. & S. Mfg. Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of percussion caps similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Gold-Silver & Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 51, C. D. 1753), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Order filed October 4, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00330-CR

____________

SYLVIA MARIE COLLINS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1390220

ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of Defendant's Exhibit 1.
The clerk of the 178th District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this 

court the original of Defendant's Exhibit 1, on or before October 11, 2016. The 

Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this original 

exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon 

completion of inspection, to return the original of Defendant's Exhibit 1, to the 

clerk of the 178th District Court.

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001036500
<NAME>                        WNC HOUSING TAX CREDIT FUND VI, L.P., SERIES 5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US DOLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                           1,852,258
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,852,258
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,329,196
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,013,968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,329,196
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    69,900
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      271,530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   361,324
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (562,954)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (562,954)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (562,954)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0




</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Vie de France Corporation

The Board of Directors
Vie de France Corporation:

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements, (Nos. 33-60614 and 33-60616) on Form S-8 of Vie de France
Corporation of our report dated September 23, 1997, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Vie de France Corporation and subsidiaries as of
June 28, 1997 and June 29, 1996, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the fiscal
years then ended, and related schedule, which report appears in the June 28,
1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Vie de France Corporation.


                                        KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


                                        Washington, D.C.
                                        September 26, 1997
 
The Board of Directors
Vie de France Corporation:


         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statements on form S-8 (Nos. 33-60614 and 33-60616) of Vie de
France Corporation of our report dated August 25, 1995 appearing on page F-2 of
this Form 10-K


                                         Price Waterhouse LLP


            
                                         Washington, D.C.
                                         September 26, 1997





36     VIE DE FRANCE
#### Margaret Grady, v. Henry Prigge.

Judgment anu order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.;

Dykman, J., not sitting.
No. 463.

#### Fitzgerald, Public Administrator of the County of New York, *v.*United States Lines Co.

*Jacob Rassner*for petitioner.

*Matthew L. Danahar*and *Charles N. Fiddler*for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted limited to the following question:

“1. Does a seaman have a right to a jury trial on a claim for unpaid maintenance and cure when joined with a claim for Jones Act negligence?”
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8) of Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. (the "Company") of our report dated
September 27, 2007, on our audit of the consolidated financial statements of the
Company as of June 30, 2007, and for each of the years in the two-year period
then ended, which report is included in the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on September 28, 2007.

                          /S/ KMJ CORBIN & COMPANY LLP

KMJ Corbin & Company LLP
Irvine, California
September 27, 2007