alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

House Calendar No. 269 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1476 

[Report No. 110–867] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5244) to amend the Truth 

in Lending Act to establish fair and transparent practices relating to 

the extension of credit under an open end consumer credit plan, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 

Mr. WELCH of Vermont, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 

resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5244) to amend 

the Truth in Lending Act to establish fair and transparent practices relating to the extension of credit under 

an open end consumer credit plan, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 5244) to amend the Truth in Lending Act to establish 

4 fair and transparent practices relating to the extension of 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 1476 RH 

1 credit under an open end consumer credit plan, and for 

2 other purposes. All points of order against consideration 

3 of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 

4 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment in the nature of 

5 a substitute recommended by the Committee on Financial 

6 Services now printed in the bill shall be considered as 

7 adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. 

8 All points of order against provisions of the bill, as amend9 ed, are waived. The previous question shall be considered 

10 as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage with11 out intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate 

12 equally divided and controlled by the chairman and rank13 ing minority member of the Committee on Financial Serv14 ices; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without in15 structions. 

16 SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 5244 pursuant 

17 to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the 

18 previous question, the Chair may postpone further consid19 eration of the bill to such time as may be designated by 

20 the Speaker. 

21 SEC. 3. The chairman of the Committee on Armed 

22 Services may insert in the Congressional Record at any 

23 time during the remainder of the second session of the 

24 110th Congress such material as he may deem explanatory 

25 of defense authorization measures for the fiscal year 2009. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

House Calendar No. 269 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1476 

[Report No. 110–867] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5244) 

credit plan, and for other purposes. tension of credit under an open end consumer fair and transparent practices relating to the exto amend the Truth in Lending Act to establish 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2008 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

October 14, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00332

- CV

Lee B. WHEELER, Trustee of th e L& P Children's Trust and Nancy Wheeler Plumlee

, Appellant s

v.

SAN MIGUEL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.,

Appellee

From the 36th Judicial District Court, McMullen County, Texas

Trial Court No. M

- 17

- 0027

- CV

- A Honorable Starr Boldrick Bauer, Judge Presid ing



### O R D E R

Appellant’s third amended motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due Oc tober 18, 2019. No further extensions of time will be granted absent extenuating circumstances.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal o f the said court on this 14th day of October, 2019

.

___________________________________ LUZ ESTRADA

, Chief Deputy Clerk
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:43:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all contraceptives and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance with

no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any

organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of religious employer in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

eileen smith

, 9682
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 02-1219

________________________________________________________________________

CUSTOMS

Assistance

Agreement between the

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

and PARAGUAY

Agreement signed at Asuncion December 19, 2002
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent

evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof

or authentication thereof.”
PARAGUAY

Customs: Assistance

Agreement signed at Asuncion December 19, 2002;

 Entered into force December 19, 2002.
PQ B OX 2 5 7 Sto r ev i l le . MISS I SS ip p i 3 8 7 7 6 · 0 2 57

Phon e r 662 i 686-3350 Fax (6 6 2i 6 86 · 3378 May 8, 2012 Mr. Dennis DeVany ChieL Essential Air Service Division Ofticc of Aviation Analysis Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington. D.C. 20590 ' r · '
- - - I'"•
.**~** : ;-. .\ ; '**~** :

· : .·

' \. '

Reference: DOT-OST-2008-0209, 200 

### 1-l 0685. 2009-0305, 2000-7856 Greenville, MS, Laurel/Hattiesburg, MS, Tupelo, MS and Muscle Shoals. AL EAS Dear Mr. DeVany, Delta Council, a regional economic development organization in Northwest Mississippi, wishes to lend iis support to the proposal of Silver Airways to provide essential air service at Mid-Delta Greenville (GLH) as replacement for current Delta Air Lines service . Local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international air tf<d11sportation system is critical to the economic well being of the Delta region. The public and the business community of the region rely on our local air service for both business and leisure travel. The Silver Ainvays proposals offer us a modem 34-seat turboprop aircraft and flights to Atlanta, which is not only the largest hub airport in the world but also a popular business and leisure travel destination. We believe the Silver air service proposals represent the best option for retaini. ng our local air service long term and building up enplanements. We urge the Department ofTransportation to award Silver Airways the designation to provide Greenville's essential air service. Best regards,

Tom Gresham, Chairman Delta Council Development Department
Bowen Flowers. Clarl<sda le President Vice Presidents Bil1 Kennedy , Chairma Transportation Committee

Witho SoUoy, Oro-vnv i lle Oiedre Barret , Belzoni Rob Coker, Yazoo City Pnul**Dei!:~ ,**  Ui!l a no Russell Stewart, Anguilfa
. Troasurar Mark KimmeL l!1a Bena Chip Morgan , eJCec utive VICe President Michael Sanders
. Cleveland
#### Michael Gorey, by His Father and Natural Guardian, Thomas Gorey, et al., Respondents, v P. Chimento Company, Inc., et al., Respondents, and C & L Auto Service, Inc. Appellant.

[631 NYS2d 942]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant C & L Auto Service, Inc., appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), dated June 21, 1994, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed insofar as they are asserted against the defendant C & L Auto Service, Inc., and the action against the remaining defendants is severed.

The plaintiff was riding his bicycle eastbound on Hempstead Turnpike next to a truck traveling in the same direction and sustained injuries when he was hit by the truck as it made a right turn onto Meacham Avenue. The appellant, an automotive shop located at the corner where the accident occurred, had placed a sign on the sidewalk in the proximity of the shop advertising the prices for various services. The plaintiff alleged that the sign obstructed the view of motor vehicles traveling on Hempstead Turnpike and seeking to make a right turn onto Meacham Avenue.

The plaintiff was unable to present any evidence to chai*483lenge the truck driver’s testimony at an examination before trial that his view was unobstructed and that he did not even notice the sign. Although determinations as to causation are generally left for the trier of fact, it is the function of the court to determine if a prima facie case of causation has been established in the first instance *(see, Campbell v State of New York,*158 AD2d 499, 500). Since the plaintiff failed to demonstrate the existence of material issues of fact capable of being established at trial, and it cannot be inferred that the sign was a proximate cause of the accident on the unchallenged facts of this motion *(see, Pahler v Daggett,*170 AD2d 750, 751-752; *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 559), the Supreme Court erred in denying the appellant’s motion for summary judgment. Miller, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR HOOVER'S INC. FOR THE THREE
AND SIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          62,440
<SECURITIES>                                       227
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,345
<ALLOWANCES>                                        95
<INVENTORY>                                         47
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,644
<PP&E>                                           3,041
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,377
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,650
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           123
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
DENY and Opinion filed August 18, 2022 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00800-CV 

IN RE WILLIAM LISLE AND SMITH LISLE HOLDINGS, LTD., Relators 

Original Proceeding from the 416th Judicial District Court 

Collin County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 416-00639-2015 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Myers, Nowell, and Goldstein 

Opinion by Justice Goldstein 

Before the Court are relators’ August 12, 2022 petition for writ of 

mandamus and motion for emergency relief. Relators challenge the trial court’s 

July 26, 2022 Order Denying Defendants’ Emergency Motions for Approval of 

Remediation Solution as Compliance with Injunction and Order Enforcing 

Permanent Injunction. Also before the Court is real party in interest DO-MO 

JOINT VENTURE’s August 16, 2022 Opposition to Motion for Temporary Relief 

and Motion to Strike Portions of Relators’ Appendix Not Admitted Before the 

Trial Court. 
Entitlement to mandamus relief requires relators to show that the trial court 

has clearly abused its discretion and that relators have no adequate appellate 

remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. 

proceeding). 

Relators have failed to comply with requirements set out in Texas Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 52 for filing a petition for writ of mandamus. Relators failed 

to provide in the appendix or record in support of the petition a sworn or certified 

copy of the challenged order and of every document that is material to the relators’ 

claim for relief that was filed in any underlying proceeding and a properly 

authenticated transcript of any relevant testimony. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

52.3(k)(1)(A), 52.7(a). We conclude that relators, as the parties seeking relief, 

have not met the burden of providing the Court an adequate record to establish a 

right to mandamus relief. 

Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus. Having 

denied mandamus relief, we also deny the pending motions as moot. 

 

220800F.P05 

/Bonnie Lee Goldstein/

BONNIE LEE GOLDSTEIN 

JUSTICE
#### Stevens v. Hughes.

Motion for reargument granted.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1740

DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TOWN OF TRENTON, NC, et al.,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 10-1741

DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

TOWN OF TRENTON, NC, et al.,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 10-1742

DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.
2

TOWN OF TRENTON, NC, et al.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, 

Senior District Judge. (4:10-mc-00001; 4:10-mc-00004; 4:10-mc00002)

Submitted: November 9, 2010 Decided: December 9, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Johnson Willis, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Johnson Willis appeals the district court’s 

order denying leave to file three new civil actions against the 

Town of Trenton. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. Willis v. Town of Trenton, NC, Nos. 

4:10-mc-00001; 4:10-mc-00004; 4:10-mc-00002 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 28, 

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Coupon | Interest | Maturity | Callable | Survivor's Option | Price | CUSIP |   |
| 1.400% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 6/15/2020 | 12/15/2016 * | Yes § | 100.00 | 14912HSC5 |   |
| 1.700% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 6/15/2022 | 12/15/2016 * | Yes § | 100.00 | 14912HSD3 |   |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |  |
| (†††) | First Payment date 12/15/2016 |   |
|                    |   |
Before the Second Division,

August 2, 1956

No. 60141.

protests 245795-K, 261942-K, and 261946-K (Philadelphia).

#### Trans Atlantic Co. *v.*United States,

*304Opinion by

Laweence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of butt hinges, imported with wood screws of steel, the hinges measuring 3 inches by 3 inches or 3)4 inches by 3)4 inches, being packed 2 hinges and 12 screws to a box (12 screws for each pair of hinges), and the hinges, size 4 inches by 4 inches, being packed 2 hinges and 16 screws to a box (16 screws for each pair of hinges), of the same kind in all material respects as the merchandise the subject of *Trans Atlantic Company*v. *United States*(35 Cust. Ct. 1, C. D. 1712). Upon the agreed statement of facts and following the cited authority, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained, the value of the screws being held as follows, as stipulated by counsel:

> Screw size Unit value U. S. dollars per 1,000 screws

> *%*#8 or *% #8*81.21

> 1 #9 81.48

> 1 #10 $1.64

which values were included in the value of the screws and hinges, as invoiced and appraised.
EXHIBIT
32.1











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
§  1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Signature Eyewear, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael Prince, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.










/s/ Michael Prince





Chief
Executive Officer


Chief
Financial Officer


March 5,
2010
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Form 10-Q of VaxGen, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the Financial Statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on my most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
Audit Committee of registrants Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ James P. PanekPrincipal Executive and Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-QSB  of First  Robinson
Financial  Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ending September
30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  we,  Rick L.  Catt,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  Jamie  E.
McReynolds, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.

A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906, or another
document authenticating,  acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of the  written  statement
required  by  Section  906,  has  been  provided  to  First  Robinson  Financial
Corporation  and will be retained by First Robinson  Financial  Corporation  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 By:  /s/ Rick L. Catt                          By: /s/ Jamie E. McReynolds
 ---------------------                          ---------------------------
 Name:  Rick L. Catt                            Name:  Jamie E. McReynolds
 Chief Executive Officer                        Chief Financial Officer
 November 13, 2006                              November 13, 2006