alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of VTEX Energy,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB/A  Amendment  No. 1 for the period  ending  January  31,  2005 (the
"Report"),  I, Randal B. McDonald,  Jr., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the Company's  financial  position and results of operations for
     the periods presented.



/s/Randal B. McDonald, Jr.
--------------------------
Randal B. McDonald, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
May 1, 2006
From: donna@alandensmoreinc.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:16:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Donna Ariail

Bethlehem, GA 30620
### Petition for exemption **from compliance with 14 CFR 91.203(a) & (b) and 91.9(b) (2)**  **for Solara**

**series unmanned aircraft** 06/04/2012 **Contact:** Maximus Yaney Titan Aerospace P.O. Box 87035
- 1129 50 G eorge Applebay Way, Hangar 76 Mobile: 505
- 750
-0329 myaney@titanaerospace.us
or Robert Carlton 604 Newport Ct. SE Albuquerque, NM 87123 Mobile: 505
- 239
- 5967 bob@desertaerospace.com Petition for relief As outlined in FAA Order 8130.34B, Chapter 2, Section 1, paragraph 3, Titan Aerospace petitions FAA for relief from compliance with 14 CFR 91.203 (a) & (b) and 91.9(b)(2) for the Solara
- series of unmanned aircraft (UAS) . These regulations require the aircraft Airworthiness C ertificate, Pilot Operating Handbook (POH) and operational placards and markings to be located in the aircraft cabin or cockpit
. Our petition is to allow the documents to be maintained at the ground
- based pilot station for immediate access by the pilot and crew. The location of this station is specified in the aircraft Program Letter. Reason for seeking relief The Solara aircraft are lightweight solar/electric unmanned aircraft systems. The location requirement for these documents is for the purposes of the pilot, crew and passengers. As the Solara aircraft are unmanned, location of these documents in the aircraft is impractical and contrary to safe operation
. Extent of relief The documents specified will be maintained at the pilot flight station, the location of which is specified in the aircraft Program Letter or other FAA approved documents. Benefit to the public This petition will benefit the public as a whole by allowing the operation of the Solara aircraft, which will provide communication and surveillance services to public, private and government organizations. Equivalent level of safety This exemption will enhance the safety of the flight operations by allowing the pilot immediate access to the documents.Summary

Titan Aerospace petitions FAA for relief from compliance wi th 14 CFR 91.203 (a) & (b) and 91.9(b)(2) for the Solara series of unmanned aircraft (UAS). These regulations require the aircraft A irworthiness C ertificate, Pilot Operating Handbook (POH) and operational placards and markings to be located in the aircraft cabin or cockpit. Since the Solara aircraft are unmanned, placing these documents in the cockpit or cabin is impractical and contrary to safe operation. Titan Aerospace petitions FAA for relief of these regulations by allow ing the documents to be maint ained at the ground
- based pilot station for immediate access by the pilot and crew. This petition is submitted in accordance with the guidelines established in FAA Order 8130.34, Chapter 2, Section 1, paragraph 3
.
No. 637.

#### Lemons et al. *v.*United States.

*R. R. Ryder*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Robert G. Maysack*for the United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement with Robert A. Baffi



 Exhibit 10.4 
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) made as of December 17, 2012 (“Effective
Date”) by and between BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Robert A. Baffi, Ph.D (“Employee”). 

 

	1.	This Amendment No. 3 is intended to amend and modify that certain Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Employee dated January 1, 2009 and amended on May
8, 2012 and May 24, 2012 (the “Agreement”). The Agreement, together with this Amendment, shall constitute a single agreement. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in
the Agreement. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remaining full force and effect according to its terms. 

  

	2.	The defined term “Termination Compensation,” as provided in Section 7(c) of the Agreement, is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety by the
following definition: 

 Termination Compensation. For purposes of this Agreement, the term
“Termination Compensation” shall mean: (i) one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the Employee’s then current annual base salary which shall be payable in a lump sum within forty-five (45) days after separation of employment, conditioned
on Employee executing the Company’s standard form severance and release agreement within twenty (20) days of the Employee’s termination, and shall be subject to customary withholding and other applicable payroll processes. If Employee
fails to execute and deliver the Company’s standard form severance and release agreement within twenty (20) days after the Employee’s termination, Employee will have no right to any Termination Compensation under this Agreement.

  

	3.	This Amendment No. 3 may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the
same instrument. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Amendment have executed this Amendment as of the date
first written above. 
  

									
	BIOMARIN PHARMACEUTICAL INC.	  		  	EMPLOYEE
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Jean-Jacques Bienaimé
	  		  	By:	 	 /s/ Robert A. Baffi, Ph.D

	Name: Jean-Jacques Bienaimé	  		  		 	Robert A. Baffi, Ph.D
	Its:      Chief Executive Officer
[Civ. No. 11799.

Second Appellate District, Division Two.

April 13, 1938.]

#### WILLIAM E. McKENZIE, Appellant, v. SANTA FE TRAIL STAGES (a Corporation), Respondent.

No appearance for Appellant.

Shattuck, Davis & Story for Respondent.

THE COURT.

Upon submission of the motion to dismiss herein the presiding justice in open court made the following statement:

This case comes before us on motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that appellant has not filed a transcript or brief within the time prescribed by law. The motion is good and it is granted. *(In re Yahne,*193 Cal. 386 [224 Pac. 452] ; *In re Wignall,*193 Cal. 387 [224 Pac. 452].)

Appeal is dismissed.
From: djgreen@hargray.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:40:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. By and large, these are OPTIONAL products and procedures and should not

be mandated as part of private health insurance coverage.

If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations that

provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I strongly oppose the

government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices that I

oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Green

Bluffton, SC 29910
From: BPAINTER@NAECI.COM

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:59:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

BARBARA PAINTER

Viola, AR 72583
From: mr.berg@charter.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:27:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Morrie Tubergen

Grand Haven, MI 49417
H. Res. 1368 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 24, 2008. 

Resolved, That section 803 of the Medicare Prescription 

Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 shall not 

apply during the remainder of the 110th Congress. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #18183 and #18184; Illinois Disaster Number IL-00093]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Illinois (FEMA-4728-DR), dated 09/15/2023. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         06/29/2023 through 07/02/2023.
 DATES: Issued on 09/15/2023. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/14/2023. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         06/17/2024.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 09/15/2023, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Christian, Clark, Coles, Cumberland, De Witt, Douglas, Edgar, Hancock, Macon, McDonough, Monroe, Morgan, Moultrie, Pike, Sangamon, Scott, Vermilion, Warren, Washington. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 18183 6 and for economic injury is 18184 0. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Francisco Sánchez, Jr., Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.


[FR Doc. 2023-20501 Filed 9-20-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
From: debby.jenkins@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:43:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Debby Jenkins

Greenwood, IN 46142
file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090107.en4.txt[9/6/2012 9:10:04 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 09-0107

Post-Focus Draft Revision 2 7/13/2012

ENGINEER: Austin \ AG

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE:

MSDS: Yes Label: No

Gen Eqpt: safety glasses with side shields or goggles /

lab coat, apron, or coveralls / rubber or disposable

gloves / exhaust ventilation

Respirator: none required unless breathing mists, or

heated vapors, or acidified vapors

Health Effects: eyes: corrosive / skin: irritant /

ingestion: not established; however, ingestion should be

strongly avoided / inhalation: not established; breathing

mists or heated vapors should be avoided because they may

cause irritation of the respiratory system

TLV/PEL:

None established

CRSS :

/L @

VP: 1.0E-6 torr @
file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090107.en4.txt[9/6/2012 9:10:04 AM]

SAT (concerns) (12/19/2008):

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P1B1T1

Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 110 ppb)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 
file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090107.en4.txt[9/6/2012 9:10:04 AM]

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 09-0107

Manufacturing: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 
file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090107.en4.txt[9/6/2012 9:10:04 AM]

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY
file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090107.en4.txt[9/6/2012 9:10:04 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 09-0107

Use: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium

s
file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090107.en4.txt[9/6/2012 9:10:04 AM]

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY
file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090107.en4.txt[9/6/2012 9:10:04 AM]

MEMORANDUM of CBI TELEPHONE CONVERSATION

CALL BY: Sharon Austin

Organization: EPA

CALL TO: 

Organization: 

 Yes

MEMORANDUM of CBI TELEPHONE CONVERSATION

CALL BY: Sharon Austin

Organization: EPA

CALL TO: Fred Gouzoules

Organization: MeadWestvaco

Date: 07/06/2012

Time: 11:30

Phone: 843-740-2171
file:///J|/INITENG/P09%20cases/p090107.en4.txt[9/6/2012 9:10:04 AM]

Concerning what TSCA CBI?

PMN: 09-0107

Q1: use sites . . locations / papermills / operating

days| A1: | | | | Q2: || containers at three years . | |

| A2: | | Q3: | A3: | | Q4: | A4: | Left message