alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: FrJosiah@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:31:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Josiah Trenham

Riverside, CA 92501
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>     6

<CIK>     0000764860

<NAME> FLAGSHIP ALL-AMERICAN TAX EXEMPT FUND

<SERIES>

<NUMBER>    011

<NAME>   CLASS A

<MULTIPLIER>  1

       

<S>    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>  6-MOS

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>  MAY-31-1997

<PERIOD-START> JUN-01-1996

<PERIOD-END>  NOV-30-1996

<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST> 253,271,063

<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE> 269,894,264

<RECEIVABLES> 5,136,817

<ASSETS-OTHER>   3,647,371

<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS> 0

<TOTAL-ASSETS> 278,678,452

<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES> 2,841,790

<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT> 0
 
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES> 1,657,698
 
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>  4,499,488

<SENIOR-EQUITY> 0

<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON> 255,603,772

<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK> 19,887,465

<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR> 19,497,708

<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT> 16,606

<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII> 0

<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS> 1,935,385
                       
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS> 0
                         
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC> 16,623,201
                         
<NET-ASSETS>             274,178,964
                         
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>        0
                         
<INTEREST-INCOME>        8,498,533
                         
<OTHER-INCOME>           0
                         
<EXPENSES-NET>           (1,307,560)
                                          
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>   7,190,973
                          
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>  1,780,365
                          
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT> 9,057,912
                          
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>     18,029,250
                          
<EQUALIZATION>            0
                          
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME> (5,931,385)
                          
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>  0
                          
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>     0
                          
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>   1,418,588
                          
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>(1,310,745)
                           
<SHARES-REINVESTED>        281,914
                           
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>     12,966,978
                           
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>    0
                           
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>  155,020
                                                      
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>    0
                           
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR> 0
                           
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>      662,665
                           
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>         0
                           
<GROSS-EXPENSE>            1,512,613
                            
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>        264,341,773
                            
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>       10.67
                            
<PER-SHARE-NII>             0.30
                            
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>     0.44
                            
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>        (0.30)
                            
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>   0.00
                            
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>        0.00
                            
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>         11.11
                            
<EXPENSE-RATIO>             0.90
                            
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>      211,889
                            
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>        0.01
                            
        







</TABLE>
#### Bobby J. OLDHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Theodis BECK; Boyd Bennett; Michael W. York; Joseph G. Pickelsimer; North Carolina Department of Correction; Dennis M. Rowland, Special Assistant to the Director of Prisons; Jennifer H. Langley, Assistant Superintendent for Custody and Operations at Albemarle Correctional Institution; John Davis, Unit Manager at Albemarle; Mr. Cook, Programmer at Albemarle; Captain Strickland; Todd W. Pinion, Assistant Superintendent, Defendants—Appellees.

No. 05-6384.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 29, 2005.

Decided: Aug. 17, 2005.

*172Bobby J. Oldham, Appellant pro se. John Payne Scherer, II, Assistant Attorney General; James Philip Allen, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Bobby J. Oldham appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation. *See Wells v. Shriners Hosp.,*109 F.3d 198, 201 (4th Cir.1997); *Wright v.*Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir.1985); *see also Thomas v. Arn,*474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985).

Oldham has waived appellate review of the magistrate judge’s conclusion regarding the objective component of the test to establish an Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claim based upon exposure to environmental tobacco smoke by failing to specifically object. *See Helling v. McKinney,*509 U.S. 25, 35-36, 113 S.Ct. 2475, 125 L.Ed.2d 22 (1993) (discussing Eighth Amendment standard); *Odom v. S.C. Dep’t of Corr.,*349 F.3d 765, 770 (4th Cir.2003) (same). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 1337

JEAN CLAUDE NANA

,

Petitioner

,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III

Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : September 21, 2017 Decided: October 12, 2017

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Godwill C. Tachi, THE TACHI LAW FIRM, LLC, Greenbelt, Maryland , for Petitioner. Chad A. Readler, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jessica E. Burns, Senior Litigation Counsel, Juria L. Jones , Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not bindin g precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Jean Claude Nana, a native and citizen of Cameroon, petitions for review of an order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals ( “ Board ” ) dismissing his appeal from the

immigration judge’s denial of his requests for asy lum , withholding of removal, and

protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the

record, including the transcript of Nana’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We

conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the

administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial

evidenc e supports the Board’s decision, s ee INS v. Elias

– Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 481

(1992). Accordingly, we deny the petition for r eview for the reasons stated by the Board.

In re Nana , (B.I.A. Feb. 17, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional pro cess.

PETITION DENIED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# AGENCY:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice of charter renewal.

# SUMMARY:

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), announces the renewal of the charter of the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BSC, NIOSH).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Maria Strickland, M.P.H., Designated Federal Officer, Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, 400 7th Street SW, Suite 5W, Constitution Center, Washington, District of Columbia 20024. Telephone: (202) 245-0649; Email:                         *MStrickland2@cdc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

CDC is providing notice under 5 U.S.C. 1001-1014. This charter has been renewed for a two-year period through February 3, 2025.

                    The Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                

Kalwant Smagh,

Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2023-20092 Filed 9-15-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
No. 141, Misc.

#### Odom *v.*Heard, Acting Corrections Director.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Will Wilson,*Attorney General of Texas, and *Sam R. Wilson, Linward Shivers*and *Alio B. Crow, Jr.,*Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,256,388
<SECURITIES>                                   282,310
<RECEIVABLES>                                  539,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,048,498
<PP&E>                                      18,988,101
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,200,841
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,268,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,727,120
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,823
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,988,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,268,638
<SALES>                                      8,221,694
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,221,694
<CGS>                                       10,160,811
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,160,811
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             196,351
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,234,636)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,961
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,249,597)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,249,597)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.26)




</TABLE>
From: all4him66@q.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:40:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mike Snell

Lexington, NE 68850
#### William Burke, Plaintiff, v. Augustus W. Spinning, Defendant.

Motion for new trial denied and judgment ordered for the defendant upon the verdict. Opinion by

Haight, J.
No. 571.

#### Harley *v.*Tehan, U. S. District Judge.

*Sidney M. Eisenberg*for petitioner.

*Gerald J. Kahn*for Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co., as *amicus curiae,*in opposition.

Motion of Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. for leave to file brief, as *amicus curiae,*granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
From: lmaners@iendeavor.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:20:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Letchard Maners

Cloverdale, IN 46120
EX-4.65



 Exhibit 4.65 

Contract No.: CTC-ZBZB-2016-000011 
 Shares
Subscription Agreement 
 (This Agreement is signed by the following parties on January 29, 2016 in Beijing) 

Issuer: China Tower Corporation Limited (“China Tower”) 

Subscriber: China United Network Communications Corporation Limited 

In view of that the issuer and the subscriber have signed the Agreement on Purchase of Stock Tower-related Assets by Issue of Shares and Payment of Cash.
Based on the preceding agreement and the specific circumstances of delivery of tower-related assets, the issuer has determined to issue a total of 119,344,615,024 shares with the price at RMB 1 yuan/share. 

1. Subscription Price 
 RMB 1 yuan/share. 

2. Subscription Amount and Quantity 
 The subscriber has
confirmed to pay RMB 33,335,836,822 yuan to subscriber for 33,335,836,822 shares. 
 3. Subscription Method 

The subscriber has agreed to subscribe for the shares issued by investing with assets. 

4. Payment Method 
 The subscriber has completed the actual
payment of contribution before December 31, 2015. 
 5. Shareholders’ Rights and Obligations 

Both parties have confirmed that the subscriber shall become the owner of shares it subscribed for in this transaction from the effective date of this
Agreement, and it shall enjoy shareholder rights and bear the corresponding obligations for such shares. And both parties agree that the issuer shall complete change to register of shareholders, revision of Articles of Association and change to
industrial and commercial registration within 30 days after signing the Shares Subscription Agreement. 
 6. Entry into Force and Counterparts 

This Agreement shall enter into force upon signature and stamp being affixed by both parties, dating back to December 31, 2015. This agreement is executed in
sextuplicate, each party holding two copies, and the rest shall be submitted for examination and approval/record filing. 
 (Reminder of this page
intentionally left blank) 








	
	 China Tower Corporation Limited

	
	 (seal)

	
	 Legal representative or authorized representative:

	
	 _______________________________________________    


  

	
	 China United Network Communications Corporation Limited

	
	 (seal)

	
	 Legal representative or authorized representative:

	
	 _______________________________________________