alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:34:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Onufrey

Warminster, PA 18974
No. 536.

#### Keiningham *v.*United States.

*Kenneth D. Wood*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *'Felicia Dubrovsky*for the United States.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
#            

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES®

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-124310

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  659                                                                   Trade Date:  10/11/05

(To Prospectus Supplement dated July 7, 2005 &

  Prospectus dated May 13,2005)                                                                    Issue Date:   10/14/05

The Date of this Pricing SupplementOctober 11, 2005

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                                   Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                   Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment     Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)   Maturity  Public (2) Commissions       Frequency       Option  Yes/No     record dates)

14911QL41   4.35%         10/15/08        100%                0.625%                Monthly                      YES         NO                                                                                                                                                                                       

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Principal                                                                                 1st Payment             Day         

Amount                  Proceeds                  Dealer                           Date                   Count

$1,676,000.00         $1,665,525.00         ABN AMRO Inc.        11/15/05                               30/360    

Original Issue DiscountNote:                                                                          Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                  N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes® may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes® offered prior to the effective date of the change.  After the issuance of the PowerNotes® covered by this

Pricing Supplement, $906.152 mm principal amount of PowerNotes® remain available for sale

pursuant to the accompanying Prospectus Supplement.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1450 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require officers 

and employees of the House to read the Constitution of the United 

States each year. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2008 

Mr. CONAWAY (for himself, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. SULLIVAN, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. 

MCHENRY, Mr. MARCHANT, Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. GINGREY, Mr. 

KINGSTON, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, and Mr. BISHOP of Utah) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

require officers and employees of the House to read 

the Constitution of the United States each year. 

Whereas the United States Constitution articulates principles 

envisioned by the Founding Fathers; 

Whereas the United States Constitution is the written set of 

the fundamental principles by which the United States is 

governed; 

Whereas Article I of the United States Constitution establishes the legislative branch; 

Whereas the United States Constitution is the supreme law 

of the land; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1450 IH 

Whereas the United States Constitution is the world’s oldest 

written national constitution; 

Whereas the United States Constitution confers honor and 

responsibility upon Members of Congress; 

Whereas the United States Constitution should be known by 

those who legislate; and 

Whereas the United States Constitution is a dynamic governing document of and for the people of the United 

States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

3 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘A Modest Effort 

4 to Read and Instill the Constitution Again Resolution of 

5 2008’’ or the ‘‘AMERICA Resolution of 2008’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SENSE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. 

7 It is the sense of the House of Representatives that 

8 Members of Congress, who swear to uphold the Constitu9 tion of the United States and are responsible for writing 

10 laws regarding the powers granted to the Government and 

11 proposing constitutional amendments, should read this im12 portant document, including its amendments. 

13 SEC. 3. ANNUAL READING OF THE CONSTITUTION RE14 QUIRED FOR HOUSE OFFICERS AND EMPLOY15 EES. 

16 Clause 3(a) of rule XI of the Rules of the House of 

17 Representatives is amended by adding at the end the fol18 lowing new subparagraph: 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1450 IH 

1 ‘‘(7)(A) The committee shall provide a copy of 

2 the Constitution of the United States to each new 

3 Member, Delegate, Resident Commissioner, officer, 

4 and employee of the House. 

5 ‘‘(B) Not later than January 31 of each year, 

6 each officer and employee of the House shall file a 

7 certification with the committee attesting that the 

8 officer or employee has read the Constitution of the 

9 United States in its entirety in the previous year.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
No. 61467.

#### A. S. Leather Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 313922-K, etc. (New York).

*417Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of goatskins and sheepskins the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Nawi Noonoo & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 57, C. D. 1904), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Primate Aging Database.                    

*Date:*                         October 26, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Kaitlyn Noel Lewis-Hardell, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Aging, Scientific Review Branch, 7201 Wisconsin Ave., Rm. 2E405, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 555-1234,                         *kaitlyn.hardell@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 14, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-20249 Filed 9-18-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
No. 68876.

#### Catholic Manufacturing Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 63/13175 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rosary bracelets, with the beads strung on wire, similar in use to those the subject of *The J. Orlando Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 115, C.D. 2114), and the same in all material respects as the merchandise involved in Abstract 66761, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

TSO Armor and Training, Inc. 

Under Contract No. NOOl 78-14-D-7543 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 61303 

Michael J. Gardner, Esq. 

Erik C. Porcaro, Esq. 

Troutman Sanders LLP 

Virginia Beach, VA 

Ronald J. Borro, Esq. 

Navy Chief Trial Attorney 

Robert McCall, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

NA VSUP Fleet Logistics Center 

San Diego, CA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 14 November 2017 

Adminis ative Judge 

Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61303, Appeal of TSO Armor and 

Training, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
From: ajshea@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:28:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients.

If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations that

provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections.

I strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Alan Shea

Goshen, IN 46526
From: drsissy@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:25:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

elizabeth willliams

Oklahoma City, OK 73162
From: noel.vandeslunt@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:17:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Noel vande slunt

Durham, NC 27703
No. 59675.

#### S. S. Kresge Company *v.*United States,

protests 50451-K, etc. (New York).

*327Opinion by

Olives, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures or articles, composed wholly or in chief value of papier máché, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 56975, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

                                AEROCENTURY CORP.

                                  Certification


In connection with this quarterly report of AeroCentury Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Neal D. Crispin, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that
to the best of my knowledge:

              (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
              1934, and

              (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
              all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
              indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


Date: November 12, 2004             /s/ Neal D. Crispin
                                    --------------------------
                                    Neal D. Crispin
                                    Chief Executive Officer
No. 64494.

#### Import Export Industries, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 329305-K, etc. (Tampa).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

The official papers in these cases disclosing that each protest was filed prior to liquidation, the protests were dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
From: clark.clark427@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:33:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

howard clark

Woodville, VA 22749
No. 12, Original.

#### Hawaii *v.*Bell.

This case is set for argument on Monday, October 14, 1963, and a total of two hours is allowed for oral argument. [For earlier order herein, see *ante,*p. 804.]