U. S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-KSB
(Mark One)

[X]   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
      ACT OF 1934

                  For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005

[_]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
      EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

           For the transition period from ___________ to _____________

                        Commission File Number: 000-13846

                          CRUISECAM INTERNATIONAL INC.
                     (f/k/a Strategic Alliance Group, Inc.)
           (Name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

                Florida                                       75 14 33 000
    (State or other jurisdiction of                         (I.R.S. Employer
     incorporation or organization)                       Identification No.)

                              23070 Commerce Drive
                           Farmington Hills, MI 48335
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
          (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

<TABLE>
<S>                                                              <C>
   Registrant's telephone number, including area code:           (248) 471-9520
   Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:   None
   Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:   $.10 par value common stock
</TABLE>

                               -------------------

      Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [_] No [X]

      Check if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB
or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [_]

      The issuer's revenues for the most recent fiscal year were $259,794.

      The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held
by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $1,913,651 as of September
30, 2005. Shares of common stock held by each officer and director and by each
person or group who owns 10% or more of the outstanding common stock amounting
to 26,092,000 shares have been excluded in that such persons or groups may be
deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not
necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

      As of September 30, 2005, 40,812,392 shares of our common stock were
issued and outstanding.

      Documents Incorporated by Reference: None.

      Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format: No.


<PAGE>

                                     PART I

Item 1.   Description of Business

Our Company

      We manufacture and sell a complete line of mobile integrated video
technology for law enforcement, original equipment manufacturers (OEM), motor
sports and aftermarket applications. Our patent portfolio encompasses cameras on
or about the automotive seat that we developed by Lear Corp. and our founder D.
Scott Watkins in conjunction with Ford Motor Company.

      Our executive offices are located at 23070 Commerce Drive, Farmington
Hills, MI 48335, and telephone number (248) 471-9520. We maintain a website at
www.cruisecam.com.

Our Business

Corporate History

      CruiseCam International, Inc. was originally incorporated in Florida as
Eutro Group Holding, Inc. in September 1991. In October 1999, we filed an
Articles of Amendment to our Articles of Incorporation thereby changing our name
to Strategic Alliance Group, Inc. In September 1991, we completed a reverse
acquisition of Bio-Analytic Laboratories, Inc., which then became our wholly
owned operating subsidiary. In May 1998, we sold our Bio-Analytic Laboratories,
Inc. subsidiary. In July 2004, we completed a reverse acquisition of GRP, Inc.
and subsidiaries, which then became our wholly owned operating subsidiary. We
changed our name to CruiseCam International, Inc. in conjunction with this
reverse acquisition.

      CruiseCam International, Inc. is a holding corporation. Its principal
business is to own operating subsidiaries and assist these companies as well as
other small and medium size companies with research, development, marketing and
sales.

      GRP, Inc. (legal subsidiary company) was originally started to create and
produce an "in-car" camera mount and trade named "CruiseCam" for street and
competition racing cars and was incorporated in 1997. This company filed for its
first patent in 1997 and it was received in 1998.

      In 1999, we, in conjunction with Lear Corporation, started a partnership
through a licensing agreement of a GRP concept of an integrated seat camera
system now patented by GRP for Ford police cars. The agreement with Lear was
terminated in late 2001 and the licensing rights reverted back to GRP and its
subsidiary, CruiseCam, LLC. CruiseCam, LLC purchased assets from Rosen, the key
supplier in late 2002 and proceeded with development and distribution. GRP
continued with the management of the patented mount.

Introduction to Business

      In 1995, D. Scott Watkins ("Watkins") was recruited to drive a factory
supported GTS-1 Oldsmobile Cutlass on the Chrysler Mosport 500K, at the Toronto,
Canada racetrack. Watkins started the race from the tenth position and moved up
to fifth place by the 45-minute mark. At turn two, the 140mph downhill sweeper,
under maximum acceleration, the car drifted off the outside apron and onto the
grass. Watkins tried to correct; the car came back onto the track and was
heavily contacted with John Paul, Jr. The car received severe damage but no one
was seriously injured.

      Watkins' recollection of the event was dramatically different from the
ESPN replay. Watkins scoured magazines, camera stores, race shops and the
Internet for a video camera mount for use in racing. He found nothing suitable
in the marketplace. Watkins analyzed what would be a key position for recording
and display in a vehicle, designed the ideal mount and built a prototype.

      As a result, one year later, Watkins was back on the track at Road
Atlanta, testing the InCar mount then called the CruiseCam. He was encouraged by
fellow racers and law enforcement agencies to pursue its development.


                                       2
<PAGE>

      The Office of Law Enforcement Technologies & Commercialization (OLETC)
picked up Watkins' product as a supported project for development. Watkins
earned Ford Motor Company's interest with head to head crash testing that showed
the dangers of windshield cameras during standard testing for front and rear
accidents. Alternate designs by Watkins that integrated the entire camera system
into the seat were quickly accepted. Centerline video cameras performed
extremely well because they were in the location that moves the least. Ford then
requested that Lear deliver the Lear CruiseCam for the Panther Crown Victoria
police car for 2002 and 2003. Lear obtained the license on nearly a worldwide
basis and demonstrated a production intent design that was supported directly by
Watkins as their lead consultant.

      CruiseCam(TM) is a trademark that has become known to describe an
invention created by Watkins in 1996. The official name for the device is a
"Seat Video Imaging Apparatus" whereby the minimum content of a "Seat" consists
of a Video Camera that is centrally located within a vehicle. The device further
integrates audio, controls and display(s) without regard to the type and styles
of component.

Industry Overview

      CruiseCam International, Inc.'s patented integrated mobile video, display
and associated electronics applicable to law enforcement, United States Postal
Service, private and commercial sectors, foreign and domestic, present ideal
growth opportunities, if it obtains adequate funding.

      These industries that exceed $25 billion annually in product and service
purchases can be further segmented into the field of vehicles by use, primarily
the automobile. These fields provide the opportunity to commit CruiseCam's
intellectual property (IP) and trade secrets through controlled manufacturing
and distribution. Operations will remain in the heart of the "Motor City" with
the "Big Three" automobile manufacturers providing solutions in route to
creating a sizeable tier 2 supplier.

      CruiseCam expanded its scope of operations vertically by acquiring the
manufacturing rights to its products, thereby providing the necessary control
over technology development, application and allocation of resources. This
anticipated achievement of a vertically integrated group of companies that can
create intellectual properties, manufacture and then distribute those products,
ensures the success of maintaining an uninterrupted flow into various
predetermined markets.

      Along this pursuit, the Company has the opportunity to convert its
technology to much broader commercial and consumer markets. We will achieve this
by applying the same proven integrated technologies from law enforcement, for
example, but in alternative packaging. This created "Technology Crossover"
significantly reduces development costs and decreases the time to market.

The In-Car Video Industry

      The law enforcement industry has long recognized the value of documenting
critical incidents by means of recorded videotape. Videotape provides accurate
portrayal of traffic violations, citizen behavior and other events as they
occur, documents police contacts with the public, offers persuasive evidence in
court, allows for officer performance monitoring and protects law enforcement
agents against false claims of police misconduct. The result is increased
likelihood of criminal prosecutions, less officer overtime spent in court,
improved training, fewer citizen complaints and reduced exposure to civil
liability and enhanced officer safety, as well as the potential to improve
accountability and trust between the police and the public.

      The advent of the videotape camera in the early 1980s and improvements
made in the field since then have given rise to many new applications of video
technology in law enforcement. Agencies in the United States and around the
world are applying video technology to many facets of police operations by
equipping vehicles with video recorders, monitoring public areas and recording
booking and other police procedures.

      In-car video was originally used, beginning in the 1980s, to record field
sobriety tests to support driving under the influence of alcohol allegations. In
the 1990s, in-car video cameras proved valuable to document drug interdiction
stops. By the late 1990s, the police were also using in-car video to document
traffic stops in response to allegations of racial profiling and to address the
increase in assaults on officers. Since the terrorists' attacks of September 11,
2001, video recordings from police vehicles have been recognized as a means by
which information needed to locate terrorists can be collected, thereby
improving homeland security.


                                       3
<PAGE>

      Although there have been recent technological advances making the use of
the mobile video recorder more practical and affordable, nearly all video
applications in law enforcement today still rely on analog VHS technology.
Problems with current in-car analog technologies include:

      o     poor video and audio quality that makes identification difficult;

      o     high failure rates under normal circumstances and especially when
            used in extreme temperatures, resulting in lost data and high
            maintenance costs;

      o     danger to the officer in the event of an accident as the in-car unit
            and in some cases the cameras may become projectiles because of
            their installation constraints;

      o     occupation of valuable space in the trunk and cab; o excessive time
            required to evaluate and catalog recorded material;

      o     significant physical space for storage of the in-car unit and the
            data itself;

      o     lack of effective zoom capabilities; and

      o     limited area coverage when camera positioning is fixed.

      Digital in-car video systems were first offered to the law enforcement
industry only recently and have been quickly recognized to be superior to analog
systems in many important respects. Digital video, for example, allows for
pre-event recording while analog video does not. Most digital systems are
continually in the passive recording mode when the power is on. When the record
mode is activated, a period of time, from ten seconds to five minutes depending
on the manufacturer, is added to the recording, possibly capturing the incident
that prompted the officer to begin recording.

      Access to specific digitally recorded information is much quicker. Rather
than having to review a VHS cassette by fast-forwarding and reversing, a scene
can be selected from a menu and viewed instantly. Also, digital video produces
higher quality images and stores substantially more information than analog
video, including, on every frame, the date and officer name, traffic radar
output, GPS coordinates, incident identification and status of emergency lights
and other factors.

      DVD disks can be stored in a fraction of the space of VHS cassettes.
Digital video can also be archived to a server, reducing storage space even
further. Video archived to a server can be viewed from computers networked to
the server instead of having to retrieve a video from a physical storage
facility, with the ability to control access and functions. Also, "back end"
management software, available from a few manufacturers, catalogs video
information allowing for easy retrieval through a computer.

      Digital video systems also offer the advantage of being able to record
simultaneously more than one channel of video, allowing two or more cameras to
record different views at once. In addition, copies of video clips can be made
more quickly than analog and do not degrade over time like VHS.

Our Products

Headrest and Seat Video Imaging Apparatus (Patent #'s 6,198,502, 6,201,568,
6,215,518, 6,445,408)

      This is our initial product which integrates three video cameras, a
recording device, a wireless microphone and a stealth microphone into the
vehicle's existing passenger seat.. The CruiseCam approach is completely
integrated, off the windshield and with the recorder in the seat. The trunk
recorder has been documented to potentially cause fuel system fires in rear
accidents. Due to CruiseCam systems being within the vehicle, system fires are
not probable. The system has the best environment and is air condition
controlled with minimal amount of cabling and vibration. The CruiseCam system
has been tested for, and exceeds the Ford Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
(FMVSS). Due to satisfaction of these strict safety standards, CruiseCam is
eligible on original equipment for a new vehicle.


                                       4
<PAGE>

      Crown Victoria Program

      The first contract issued for the creation of the device was a result of
Ford Motor Company's request to produce a prototype in January of 1999. The
interest at that time was primarily driven by Ford's concern to investigate the
functionality of a police use video camera system that was placed out of the
windshield area of the vehicle. Ford directed Lear Corp, the appointed Crown
Victoria seat supplier, to work in conjunction with CruiseCam (then GRP).

      The CruiseCam Pull Ahead Project for the EN114 Law Enforcement Crown
Victoria created a new front passenger seat that is specifically designed to
integrate the CruiseCam VHS video recording equipment and camera. The CruiseCam
seat is available on all 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 Crown Victoria police cars
and is the world's first OEM supported video recording project. There are
approximately 100,000 Crown Victoria in service today and we expect that number
to increase to nearly 180,000 by the end of vehicle year 2006. CruiseCam has
test-marketed nearly 900 systems to date. The police vehicle market is
approximately 400,000 with approximately 80,000 new vehicles each year.

      Law Enforcement

      Primary consideration has been given to the law enforcement market. The
Department of Justice has provided a confidentiality agreement through the
Office of Law Enforcement Technology & Commercialization ("OLETC") for working
with InCar & CruiseCam products for law enforcement. OLETC is a part of the
Department of Justice and the National Institute of Justice (NIJ).

      Officers have recently been injured due to forward objects on their
vehicle dash. The position of the CruiseCam InCar mount and CruiseCam allows
cockpit capturing and external view with little opportunity for occupant injury
in the event of an accident.

      OLETC recommended the development of a low cost system for a market of
300,000 plus vehicles without cameras. As previously mentioned, this market has
only a small percentage of cameras due to cost, distribution and maintenance
considerations. CruiseCam is targeting a 10% penetration or 30,000 systems over
the next 4 years from this market alone. CruiseCam's first year target sales
from OEM are 10% or 10,000 units and aftermarket sales of 5,000 units. The
Company looks forward to developing relationships that will enable broadcasting
from the vehicle to become commonplace and evolve as a resource to NIJ's
Interoperability program of standardized emergency vehicle communications
nationwide.

      The largest potential volume for systems is from the smaller law
enforcement agencies which, until now, have been nearly impossible to cater to.
Most do not have cameras because of the high cost, low volume, inadequate
support and difficult installations. The InCar and CruiseCam systems are
targeted to be most successful with these markets as they can be shipped
directly to the customer and do not require complicated installation.

      However, the largest distribution channel for vehicular equipment is the
OEM dealer with vehicle sales at nearly 90,000 units annually. CruiseCam's
feature set has the advantage for uniting this distribution with cameras.
CruiseCam is the only system on the market that will meet the specifications and
requirements that the new vehicle manufacturer must meet. Crash testing and
occupant injury are the highest concerns followed by integration difficulties.
CruiseCam has been certified for safety and integrates with the least degree of
difficulty.

      For 2005 CruiseCam launched the new law enforcement digital vehicle
recording system. The CCDVR system is a state of the art system utilizing a
proprietary encryption based on reference framing and differing, allowing the
user to store greater capacity and not be concerned about predictive frames. By
using data compression originally created for military use, the CCDVR has the
ability to store up to two (2) months of VCR quality video on an internal
mounted hard drive. The CCDVR comes with many options including wireless
transfer, removable hard drives and multiple camera inputs.

Other Products

      CruiseCam has integrated-developed the new Sony IX10a Zoom Camera for
retrofit and new sales launching in May 2004. This camera exceeds all state bid
requirements and is beginning review by NY, MI, WI and CT State Troopers.


                                       5
<PAGE>

      CruiseCam InCar Camera Mount and its accessories - a 19" or 48" horizontal
anodized bar with adjustable custom clamps that attach to vehicle headrest;
basic unit includes an adjustable "head" which the camera or camcorder is
mounted onto and is the shortest in the business. The stabilizer was invented to
eliminate camera movement developed by large cameras and/or from performance
driving. In addition, the solid seat back accessory kit adapts the InCar mount
to high-back seats without headrests. A security strap designed to tether the
camera wraps around the entire camera. Passenger guards are provided with all
models. The major factors that differentiate the InCar mount is that they're
crash tested and install quickly without the use of tools.

      CruiseCam Rear Vision - Developed specifically for the USPS, CruiseCam
utilizes up to 4 cameras and a quad monitor in order to reduce or eliminate
blind spots around postal delivery vehicles.

      CruiseCam Prisoner Transport Video - A continuation of the quad viewing
products while utilizing recording devices and security housings to protect the
media. GE supplies some of these components.

      CruiseCam LEV - Crossover to all police vehicles has been achieved by
creating alternate mounting hardware to the Crown Vic system. All CruiseCam
equipment can now be placed directly into the existing seat of any law
enforcement vehicle.

      CruiseCam Digital Racing and Transit Systems - Recaro of North America
signed a Letter of Intent to commercially produce a racing and transportation
recording system product by CruiseCam International. These digital recorders
will be used to capture video on motorsports vehicles, transit buses, and
commercial vehicles. These systems are currently be tested in several different
environments both on and off road. The launching of these systems is slated to
be 3rd quarter 2006.

Intellectual Property Rights

We currently have the following patents for our product portfolio:

<TABLE>
<S>         <C>                             <C>
Patent No.  5,833,101                       Camera Mount

Patent No.  6,116,485                       Camera Mount Stabilizer

Patent No.  6,198,502                       Headrest and Seat Video Imaging Apparatus

Patent No.  6,201,568                       Headrest Camera Mount

Patent No.  6,215,518                       Headrest and Seat Video Imaging Apparatus

Patent No.  6,231,017                       Mount bar for Video Recording and Display

Patent No.  6,315,180                       Cantilever Camera Mount

Patent No.  6,445,408                       Headrest and Seat Video Imaging Apparatus

Patent No.  6,558,028                       Projection and Illumination Device (HUD)

Chinese Pat. No. ZL 98 8 10534.9            Camera Mount (Foreign Version of US Patent)

Chinese Pat. No. ZL 00 9 14954.2            Seat Video Imaging Apparatus (Foreign Version of US Patent)
</TABLE>

      All or most of the above patent list is extended with foreign patent
filings, which include: Canada, China, Japan, Australia and Europe. We also use
confidentiality agreements with employees and key suppliers to ensure the
confidentiality of our trade secrets.


                                       6
<PAGE>

      We may not be able to obtain full intellectual property right protection
and, even if we do, it is possible that the registration might not provide any
ability to prevent our competitors or others from infringing upon any
intellectual property rights that we may have. In addition, we will be required
to disclose any trade secrets and proprietary intellectual property not only to
our employees and consultants, but also to potential corporate partners,
collaborators, and contract manufacturers. In those circumstances, we use our
best efforts to obtain adequate assurance of the confidential treatment of the
disclosed information. However, any confidentiality agreements that we may enter
into with such persons may be breached, any we may not have adequate remedies
for any such breach. It is also possible that any trade secrets and proprietary
intellectual property may otherwise become known or be independently discovered
by competitors. We believe that our competitors, many of whom are more
established, and have greater financial and personnel resources than we, may be
able to replicate our products in a manner that could circumvent any protective
safeguards. Therefore, it is possible that none of our products will be or
remain proprietary.

Supply and Distribution

      The key to the success of InCar and CruiseCam has always been having the
right feature set that can be readily distributed to key markets. All the
CruiseCam products have excelled in these areas with the InCar products already
having 13 editorials written. In addition, we have seen requests by numerous
associations and endorsements from the Sports Car Club of America (SCCA).
Furthermore, manufacturers' representatives are positioning themselves to handle
the release and the distribution to law enforcement for these products
respectively.

      Lear selected CruiseCam for use by Ford Motor Company in the 2003, 2004,
2005 and 2006 Panther Police Crown Victoria launch. Vehicle video systems
integrators will struggle to rival the anticipated volumes. Plans are in the
works for new projects with other distributors outside of the initial OEM field
of use. Auto dealers, Motorola franchise stores and local police equipment
dealers are now in place for 42 states.

      CruiseCam has been tasked by Canfield Equipment a second stage
manufacturer for DaimlerChrysler (DCX) to develop the camera system for all new
police fleet vehicles and has received seats for the Durango and Magnum, Charger
and Sprinter vans.

      CruiseCam has brought on numerous new dealers through out the United
States to distribute our law enforcement systems and racing products.

Manufacturing and Warehousing

      CruiseCam will continue their expansion of facilities and physical plant
incorporating new resources of metal working, plastics and electrical design
that influence the time to market and product innovations. With additional
funding, the Company will create advanced design and conceptual engineering
departments to lead automotive technologies and capture new levels of OEM
programs.

      Warehousing and distribution strategies will follow in the wake of product
demands and logistical concerns. The supply chain will further evolve
domestically and internationally in 2005. All of the product components are
manufactured with standard machining which could be moved from a manufacturer if
the supplier is unable to perform or the volume becomes too great.

      In many cases, components and products will be outsourced to China for
reducing the ultimate cost of goods sold and the final price to market.

Sales and Marketing

      We are currently marketing our products primarily to law enforcement
agencies. In-car video, however, has applications in many other special use
vehicles such as fire trucks, emergency medical technician (EMT) vehicles,
school and public buses, trains, planes, military, border patrol vehicles and
taxi cabs.

      There are more than 440,000 police vehicles currently in service in the
U.S., and approximately 70,000 new vehicles are leased or purchased by law
enforcement agencies each year. At an average selling price of at least $2,400
for the VHS version of CruiseCam Headrest and Video Imaging Apparatus and
related equipment [and $5,900 for the Digital version], there is an estimated
potential market of over $2 billion for law enforcement vehicles in the U.S.
alone. In 2004, approximately 38% of local law enforcement and 72% of state
highway patrol vehicles had VHS (analog) in-car video systems.


                                       7
<PAGE>

      We market products directly to all levels of city, county, state and
federal law enforcement agencies. Our marketing efforts include advertising in
police magazines, direct mailings to law enforcement agencies and participation
in industry trade shows, conferences and seminars. In addition to our full-time
inside sales and regional sales staff, we plan to include our products in direct
mail industry catalogs and to secure endorsements from respected law enforcement
agencies.

      Our sales cycle typically begins by initiating contact with a law
enforcement agency or the receipt of a request for information from a
prospective customer, usually through our website. After making the contact or
receiving the request for information, we assess the potential customer's needs,
make presentations and product demonstrations at the customer's place of
business, present a formal proposal and negotiate a contract. The decision to
purchase is typically made by a group of people including the chief of police or
sheriff but may also include political decision-makers such as city council
members.

      We will initially focus on development in the U.S. market and in Canada
via distributors. We intend to address other English-speaking markets in the
future.

Competition

      The law enforcement market and specifically the in-car video market are
highly competitive. Digital in-car video is a quickly evolving technology, and
the market is growing rapidly as the new technology is gaining widespread
acceptance, new patrol cars are being purchased or leased and outdated analog
video systems are being replaced by digital systems.

      Most major in-car video manufacturers are in the process of developing, or
have developed, digital video technology, and many have already introduced and
sold digital units to law enforcement agencies. We have three major competitors
- Mobile-Vision, Inc., Decatur Electronics and Kustom Signals - and many other
competitors who sell or may in the future sell in-car video systems to police
departments.

      In addition to their existing relationships with law enforcement agencies,
many of these competitors have significant advantages over us, including greater
financial, technical, marketing and manufacturing resources, preferred vendor
status with our existing and potential customer base, more extensive
distribution channels, larger customer bases and faster response times to new or
emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements. As a result, our
competitors may develop superior products or beat us to market with products
similar to ours.

We believe we compete principally on the basis of:

      o     product performance and functionality;

      o     price;

      o     product quality and reliability; and

      o     customer service and technical support.

      The market for in-car video systems for police and other first responder
vehicles is expected to grow rapidly over the next five years, as more cars are
equipped with video surveillance and as upgrades to digital are made. We feel we
are positioned to become a leader in this market based on what we believe to be
the superiority of our innovative product and its attractive price.

Inventory Systems

      Inventory warehousing and shipping are managed from our Farmington Hills,
Michigan facility. We use standard warehousing systems to store, retrieve,
monitor and manage our inventory.


                                       8
<PAGE>

Employees

      As of September 30, 2005, we had 9 full-time employees including 5 in
management and administration, 3 in sales and marketing and 1 in engineering.
None of our employees are represented by a labor union and we have not entered
into a collective bargaining agreement with any union. We have not experienced
any work stoppages and consider our relations with our employees to be good


Item 1A. Risk Factors and Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Information

      An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You
should carefully consider the following risk factors and the other information
in this annual report before investing in our common stock. Our business and
results of operations could be seriously harmed by any of the following risks.
The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks.

                          Risks Related to Our Business

We have a history of losses, and we expect to continue to operate at a loss at
least for the near term and may never be profitable.

      Since inception, we have incurred net losses in every year, including net
losses of $1,330,395 for the year ended September 30, 2005 and negative cash
flows from operations for the year ended September 30, 2005. We have had limited
revenues to date. We expect to incur losses in the coming year and may never
become profitable. We expect that our expenses will increase substantially for
the foreseeable future as we seek to expand our product line and sales and
distribution network, implement internal systems and infrastructure and comply
with the legal, accounting and corporate governance requirements imposed upon
public companies. These ongoing financial losses may adversely affect our stock
price.

Our limited operating history makes evaluation of our business difficult.

      We have a limited operating history and have encountered, and expect to
continue to encounter, many of the difficulties and uncertainties often faced by
early stage companies. Accordingly, we have only a limited operating history by
which you can evaluate our business and prospects. An investor must consider our
business and prospects in light of the risks, uncertainties and difficulties
frequently encountered by early stage companies, including limited capital,
delays in product development, possible marketing and sales obstacles and
delays, inability to gain customer acceptance or to achieve significant
distribution of our products to customers, and significant competition. We may
not be able to successfully address these risks. If we are unable to address
these risks, our business may not grow, our stock price may suffer, and we may
be unable to stay in business.

The CruiseCam portfolio is technologically complex, and our inability to improve
the product and develop new products in the video surveillance market would
adversely impact our ability to compete in our market.

      To be competitive in our market, we must continually improve and expand
our product line. Our success depends on our ability to anticipate advances in
digital video technologies, enhance our existing product, and develop and
introduce new products and product line extensions to meet customer requirements
and achieve market acceptance. This involves highly complex processes and will
include components for which we have not yet demonstrated technical feasibility.
Difficulty in development of new products or improvements to our existing
product could delay or prevent the creation and release of such products, which
would materially harm our business, operating results, financial condition and
future growth. In addition, the introduction by others of new, protected
technology could materially affect our ability to compete.

If we are unable to compete in our market, you may lose all or part of your
investment.

      Our market is highly competitive and highly fragmented. Many of these
competitors have significant advantages over us, including greater financial,
technical, marketing and manufacturing resources, more extensive distribution
channels, larger customer bases and faster response times to adapt new or
emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements. As a result, our
competitors may develop superior products or beat us to market with products
similar to ours. If we are not successful in competing against our current and
future competitors, you could lose your entire investment.


                                       9
<PAGE>

We may need to raise additional capital.

      We are currently operating at a loss and expect our expenses to continue
to increase as we embark on full scale production of our product and expand our
geographic presence throughout the United States. To date, we have relied almost
exclusively on financing transactions to fund operations. In the future, new
sources of capital may not be available to us when we need it or may be
available only on terms we would find unacceptable. If such capital is not
available on satisfactory terms or is not available at all, we may be unable to
continue to fully develop our business, and our operations and financial
condition may be materially and adversely affected. Debt financing, if obtained,
could increase our expenses and would be required to be repaid regardless of
operating results. Equity financing, if obtained, could result in dilution to
our existing stockholders.

We depend on third parties to manufacture our product, and those third parties
may not perform satisfactorily.

      We do not have the resources, facilities or experience to manufacture our
product, and therefore depend on third parties for its manufacture. We rely on a
third parties company for the development and manufacture of our products. Our
manufacturing strategy presents the following risks:

      o     we have limited control over the manufacturing processes;

      o     the manufacturing processes have not been tested in quantities
            needed for commercial sales;

      o     delays in scale-up to commercial quantities could delay the
            commercialization of our products;

      o     if we have to change to new manufacturers, they would have to be
            educated in the processes necessary for the production of our
            products, which could be time consuming;

      o     we may not have intellectual property rights, or may have to share
            intellectual property rights, to any improvements in the
            manufacturing processes or new manufacturing processes for our
            products.

We may lose potential sales because of our inability to fulfill orders on a
timely basis.

      We use a third-party manufacturer to produce our products, and they make
their production and purchasing decisions based on the information regarding our
projected needs that we provide to them. However, many customers will not
provide us with forecasts of their requirements for our products. If those
customers place significant orders, we may not be able to increase our
production quickly enough to fulfill their orders. The inability to fulfill
orders could damage our relationships with customers and reduce our sales which
could have a material adverse effect on the value of your investment.

Government agency budgetary and political constraints may delay or limit our
sales.

      Initially, our principal customers for our products will be state and
local police forces that are funded principally by limited local budgets and
federal or state grants. These agencies may also experience political pressure
that dictates the manner in which they spend money. As a result, even if an
agency wants to acquire our products, it may be unable to purchase them due to
budgetary or political constraints. Some orders may also be canceled or
substantially delayed due to budgetary, political or other scheduling delays
that frequently occur in connection with the acquisition of products by such
agencies. Any such cancellations or delays would likely adversely affect our
financial results which, in turn, could cause our stock price to decline.

We expend significant resources in anticipation of a sale due to our lengthy
sales cycle and may receive no revenue in return.

      Generally, law enforcement and other agencies that may consider using our
product consider a wide range of issues before committing to purchase products
such as an in-car video system, including product benefits, training costs,
product reliability and budgetary constraints. The length of our sales cycle may
range from 60 days to a year or more. We may incur substantial selling costs and
expend significant effort in connection with the evaluation of our product by
potential customers before they place an order. Initial orders by agencies
typically are for a small number of units which are used to evaluate the
product. If these potential customers do not purchase our product, we will have
expended significant resources and received no revenue in return.


                                       10
<PAGE>

Customer order estimates may not be indicative of actual future sales.

      We expect that some of our customers will provide us with forecasts of
their requirements for our products over a period of time. We will make many
management decisions based on these customer estimates, including purchasing
materials, hiring personnel and other matters that may increase our production
capacity and costs. If a customer reduces its orders from prior estimates after
we have increased our costs and production capabilities or committed to
third-party manufacturers, this reduction may decrease our sales, and we may not
be able to reduce our costs to account for this reduction in customer orders.
Such increases in costs without increases in sales will likely reduce our
profitability and have a material adverse effect on the value of your
investment.

If we are unable to protect our proprietary rights, the value of your investment
may be materially and adversely affected.

      Our failure to protect our proprietary rights could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation. We
cannot assure you that any patents, trademarks or copyrights or our other
proprietary rights issued to, licensed or otherwise used by us, will not be
challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or that the rights granted thereunder
will provide competitive advantages to us. Furthermore, others may be able
independently to develop substantially equivalent or superseding proprietary
technology and an equivalent product or system may be marketed in competition
with our products, thereby substantially reducing the value of our proprietary
rights. We also may not be able to protect our proprietary technology from
duplication. Many successful technology companies have had their systems and
methods of operation duplicated, almost entirely, by competitors. We cannot
assure you that a competitor will not attempt to duplicate and improve upon the
products that we may develop. Additionally, the prevention or unauthorized use
and disclosure of our intellectual property will likely become more difficult as
our business grows. We could incur substantial legal costs in defending any
patent, trademark, copyright or other infringement claims or in asserting any
patent rights, copyrights or other proprietary rights, including those granted
by third parties, in a suit with another party. If we are unsuccessful in our
efforts to protect our intellectual property and proprietary technology, you
could lose all or part of your investment.

Successful infringement claims by third parties could result in substantial
damages, lost product sales and the loss of important proprietary rights.

      There has been substantial litigation regarding patent and other
intellectual property in various high technology industries. In the future, we
may be notified of allegations that we may be infringing on intellectual
property rights possessed by others. Should litigation be brought against us,
such litigation could be extremely expensive and time consuming and could
materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations, regardless of the outcome of the litigation. Such litigation could
also result in loss of certain proprietary rights, significant monetary
liability and barriers to product manufacturing. Any of these outcomes could
materially harm our business and have a material negative impact on the value of
your investment.

Pressure by our customers to reduce prices and agree to long-term supply
arrangements may adversely affect our net sales or profit margins.

      Our potential customers, especially in the law enforcement industry, are
often under budgetary pressure and are price sensitive. Our customers may
negotiate supply arrangements with us well in advance of delivery dates, thereby
requiring us to commit to product prices before we can accurately determine our
costs. If this happens, we may have to reduce our third-party manufacturing
costs and obtain higher volume orders to offset lower average sales prices. If
we are unable to offset lower sales prices by reducing our costs, our gross
profit margins will decline. This could have a material negative effect on the
value of your investment.

If we are unable to manage rapid growth effectively, our operating results could
be adversely affected.

      Our business strategy anticipates rapid growth for the foreseeable future.
This growth will place significant strain on our administrative, operational and
financial resources and increase demands on our systems and controls. To manage
our future growth, we will need to attract, hire and retain highly skilled and
motivated officers and employees and improve existing systems and/or implement
new systems for information processing, operational and financial management and
training, integrating and managing our growing employee base. If we are unable
to manage growth effectively, our operating results could be adversely affected.


                                       11
<PAGE>

Defects in our products could impair our ability to sell our products or could
result in litigation and other significant costs.

      Detection of any significant defects in our products may result in, among
other things, delay in time-to-market, loss of market acceptance and sales of
our products, diversion of development resources, injury to our reputation, or
increased warranty costs. Because our products are complex, they may contain
defects that cannot be detected prior to shipment. These defects could harm our
reputation and impair our ability to sell our products. The costs we may incur
in correcting any product defects may be substantial and could decrease our
profit margins. Additionally, errors, defects or other performance problems
could result in financial or other damages to our customers, which could result
in litigation. Product liability litigation, even if we prevail, would be time
consuming and costly to defend. Our product liability insurance may not be
adequate to cover claims.

Our operating results may fluctuate, which makes our results difficult to
predict and could cause our results to fall short of expectations.

      Our operating results may fluctuate as a result of a number of factors,
many of which are outside of our control. For these reasons, comparing our
operating results on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful, and you
should not rely on our past results as an indication of our future performance.
Our quarterly and annual expenses as a percentage of our revenues may be
significantly different from our historical or projected rates. Our operating
results in future quarters may fall below expectations. Any of these events
could cause our stock price to fall. Each of the risk factors listed in this
"Risk Factors" section, as well as others including general economic conditions,
political events such as war, threat of war and terrorist actions, and natural
disasters, may adversely affect our operating results.

We may not have sufficient funds to operate our business and may not be able to
obtain additional financing.

      We currently have insufficient funds to operate our business according to
our proposed business plan. In addition, if unanticipated expenses, problems,
and difficulties occur which result in material delays in the development of our
products, we will not be able to operate within our budget. If we do not operate
within our budget, we will require additional funds to continue our business. We
may not be able to obtain additional financing as needed, on acceptable terms,
or at all, which would force us to delay our plans for growth and implementation
of our strategy which could seriously harm our business, financial condition,
and results of operations. If we need additional funds, we may seek to obtain
them primarily through stock or debt financings. Those additional financings
could result in dilution to our stockholders.

We will need to raise additional money before we achieve profitability; if we
fail to raise additional money, it could be difficult to continue our business.

      Based on our current plans, we believe that we do not have sufficient
financial resources to meet our operating expenses and capital requirements.
Accordingly, we will need to obtain additional funds. In addition, changes in
our research and development plans or other events affecting our operating
expenses may result in unanticipated expenditures. We may also require
substantial additional funds in order to finance our development programs, fund
operating expenses, pursue regulatory clearances, develop manufacturing,
marketing and sales capabilities, and prosecute and defend our intellectual
property rights. We may seek additional funding through public or private
financing or through collaborative arrangements with strategic partners.

      You should be aware that in the future:

      o     we may not obtain additional financial resources when necessary or
            on terms favorable to us, if at all; and


                                       12
<PAGE>

      o     any available additional financing may not be adequate.

      If we cannot raise additional funds when needed, or on acceptable terms,
we will not be able to continue to develop and market our products.

Litigation or other disputes regarding patents and other proprietary rights may
be expensive, cause delays in bringing products to market and harm our ability
to operate.

      The manufacture, use or sale of our products may infringe on the patent
rights of others. If we are unable to avoid infringement of the patent rights of
others, we may be required to seek a license, defend an infringement action or
challenge the validity of the patents in court. Patent litigation is costly and
time consuming. We may not have sufficient resources to bring these actions to a
successful conclusion. In addition, if we do not obtain a license, develop or
obtain non-infringing technology, or fail to successfully defend an infringement
action or have the patents we are alleged to infringe declared invalid, we may:

      o     incur substantial money damages;

      o     encounter significant delays in bringing our drug candidates to
            market;

      o     be precluded from participating in the manufacture, use or sale of
            our products or without first obtaining licenses to do so; and/or

      o     not be able to obtain any required license on favorable terms, if at
            all.

      In addition, if another party claims the same subject matter or subject
matter overlapping with the subject matter that we have claimed in a United
States patent application or patent, we may decide or be required to participate
in interference proceedings in the United States Patent and Trademark Office in
order to determine the priority of invention. Loss of such an interference
proceeding would deprive us of patent protection sought or previously obtained
and could prevent us from commercializing our products. Participation in such
proceedings could result in substantial costs, whether or not the eventual
outcome is favorable. These additional costs could adversely affect our
financial results.

We may need to develop manufacturing capacity for our existing and future
products, which will increase our expenses.

      We have evaluated in the past, and continue to evaluate, the feasibility
of acquiring manufacturing capabilities to support the production of our
products. These facilities may be required to meet the production capacities
required to support clinical trials and to produce such products for commercial
sale at an acceptable cost. We have not manufactured these products in the past.
Developing these technological capabilities and building or purchasing a
facility will increase our expenses with no guarantee that we will be able to
recover our investment in our manufacturing capabilities.

We depend heavily on key personnel, and loss of the services of one or more of
our key executives or a significant portion of any prospective local management
personnel could weaken our management team adversely affecting our operations.

      Our success largely depends on the skills, experience and efforts of our
senior management, particularly our President, D. Scott Watkins, our Chief
Financial Officer, David Wisnieski, and our Chief Operating Officer, Robert
Buono. Our operations will also be dependent on the efforts, ability and
experience of key members of our prospective local management staff. The loss of
services of one or more members of our senior management or of a significant
portion of any of our local management staff could weaken significantly our
management expertise and our ability to deliver health care services
efficiently. We do not maintain key man life insurance policies on any of our
officers, although we intend to obtain such insurance policies in the future.


                                       13
<PAGE>

The marketability and profitability of our products is subject to unknown
economic conditions.

      The marketability and profitability of our products may be adversely
affected by local, regional, national and international economic conditions
beyond our control and/or the control of our management. Favorable changes may
not necessarily enhance the marketability or profitability of the products. Even
under the most favorable marketing conditions, there is no guarantee that our
products can be sold or, if sold, that such sale will be made upon favorable
prices and terms.

                         Risks Related to our Securities

There is a limited trading market for our common stock.

      Our common stock is traded on the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board "pink
sheets" under the symbol "CCMJ.PK" There has been virtually no trading activity
in our stock recently, and when it has traded, the price has fluctuated widely.
We consider our common stock to be "thinly traded" and any last reported sale
prices may not be a true market-based valuation of the common stock. A
consistently active trading market for our stock may not develop at any time in
the future. Stockholders may experience difficulty selling their shares if they
choose to do so because of the illiquid market and limited public float for our
stock. It is possible that even a limited public market for our common stock
will not be sustained after the date of this annual report or at a time at which
you may desire to sell your shares.

      Announcements by us or our competitors of innovations or new and
period-to-period fluctuations in revenues and financial results will have a
significant impact on our business and the market price of the common stock. In
addition, stock markets in general, have experienced extreme price and volume
fluctuations in recent years that have frequently been unrelated to the
operating performance of the affected companies. These broad market fluctuations
may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Our common stock is considered to be a "penny stock" and, as such, the market
for our common stock may be further limited by certain SEC rules applicable to
penny stocks.

      As long as the price of our common stock remains below $5.00 per share or
we have net tangible assets of $2,000,000 or less, our shares of common stock
are likely to be subject to certain "penny stock" rules promulgated by the SEC.
Those rules impose certain sales practice requirements on brokers who sell penny
stock to persons other than established customers and accredited investors
(generally institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with
net worth in excess of $1,000,000). For transactions covered by the penny stock
rules, the broker must make a special suitability determination for the
purchaser and receive the purchaser's written consent to the transaction prior
to the sale. Furthermore, the penny stock rules generally require, among other
things, that brokers engaged in secondary trading of penny stocks provide
customers with written disclosure documents, monthly statements of the market
value of penny stocks, disclosure of the bid and asked prices and disclosure of
the compensation to the brokerage firm and disclosure of the sales person
working for the brokerage firm. These rules and regulations make it more
difficult for brokers to sell our shares of our common stock and limit the
liquidity of our securities.

We do not expect to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.

      For the foreseeable future, it is anticipated that earnings, if any, that
may be generated from our operations will be used to finance our operations and
that cash dividends will not be paid to holders of our common stock.

Any projections used in this prospectus may not be accurate.

      Any and all projections and estimates contained in this annual report or
otherwise prepared by us are based on information and assumptions which
management believes to be accurate; however, they are mere projections and no
assurance can be given that actual performance will match or approximate the
projections.

Because stock ownership is concentrated, you and other investors will have
minimal influence on stockholders' decisions.

      Four (4) of our significant shareholders (three of whom are officers and
directors owning 63%) own approximately 70% of our outstanding common stock as
of September 30, 2005. As a result our executive officers may be able to
significantly influence the management of the company and all matters requiring
stockholder approval, including the election of directors. Such concentration of
ownership may also have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control
of our company.


                                       14
<PAGE>

Our significant shareholders control the company.

      Four of our significant shareholders directly or beneficially own
approximately 28,433,144 shares or approximately 70% of our outstanding common
stock. Accordingly, these persons, as a group, may be able to exert significant
influence over the direction of our affairs and business, including any
determination with respect to our acquisition or disposition of assets, future
issuances of common stock or other securities, and the election of directors.
Such a concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying,
deferring, or preventing a change in control of the company.

Substantial sales of our stock may impact the market price of our common stock.

      Future sales of substantial amounts of our common stock, including shares
that we may issue upon exercise of options and warrants, could adversely affect
the market price of our common stock. Further, if we raise additional funds
through the issuance of common stock or securities convertible into or
exercisable for common stock, the percentage ownership of our stockholders will
be reduced and the price of our common stock may fall.

Issuing preferred stock with rights senior to those of our common stock could
adversely affect holders of common stock.

      Our charter documents give our board of directors the authority to issue
series of preferred stock without a vote or action by our stockholders. The
board also has the authority to determine the terms of preferred stock,
including price, preferences and voting rights. The rights granted to holders of
preferred stock may adversely affect the rights of holders of our common stock.
For example, a series of preferred stock may be granted the right to receive a
liquidation preference - a pre-set distribution in the event of a liquidation -
that would reduce the amount available for distribution to holders of common
stock. In addition, the issuance of preferred stock could make it more difficult
for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock. As a
result, common stockholders could be prevented from participating in
transactions that would offer an optimal price for their shares.

                         Cautionary Statement Concerning
                           Forward-Looking Statements

      Some of the statements in this annual report are forward looking
statements, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. These risks and
uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those
expressed in forward-looking statements. We base these forward-looking
statements on our expectations and projections about future events, which we
derive from the information currently available to us. Such forward-looking
statements relate to future events or our future performance. Forward-looking
statements are only predictions. The forward-looking events discussed in this
annual report, the documents to which we refer you and other statements made
from time to time by us or our representatives, may not occur, and actual events
and results may differ materially and are subject to risks, uncertainties and
assumptions about us. For these statements, we claim the protection of the
"bespeaks caution" doctrine. The forward-looking statements speak only as of the
date hereof, and we expressly disclaim any obligation to publicly release the
results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events
or circumstances after the date of this filing.

Item 2. Description of Property

      Our executive offices are located at 23070 Commerce Drive, Farmington
Hills, MI 48335, and telephone number (248) 471-9520. This location consists of
18,000 square feet, which includes dedicated labs, media training, anti-static
assembly rooms, training conference center and warehousing. We lease this
facility at a rate of $8,600/month. We believe there is an adequate supply of
suitable office space for lease on terms acceptable to us.


                                       15
<PAGE>

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

      From time to time, we are involved in litigation arising in the ordinary
course of business. Although there can be no assurance, we do not believe that
any such litigation will, individually or in the aggregate, have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

      None.


                                       16
<PAGE>

                                     PART II

Item 5. Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

      Our common stock trades on the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board "pink sheets"
under the symbol "CCMJ." The following table shows the high and low bid prices
for our common stock for each quarter since October 1, 2003 as reported by the
Pink Sheets. All share prices have been adjusted to provide for the 1-for-250
reverse split in effected in November 2003. We consider our stock to be "thinly
traded" and any reported sale prices may not be a true market-based valuation of
the stock. Some of the bid quotations from the OTC Bulletin Board set forth
below may reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or
commission and may not represent actual transactions.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
October 1, 2003 to September 30, 2004                      High Bid                     Low Bid
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                           <C>                         <C>
First quarter                                                 $0.875                      $0.209
Second quarter                                                 0.459                       0.159
Third quarter                                                  1.009                       0.229
Fourth quarter                                                 0.759                       0.309

October 1, 2004 to September 30, 2005                      High Bid                     Low Bid
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First quarter                                                  $0.70                       $0.32
Second quarter                                                  0.45                        0.20
Third quarter                                                   0.35                        0.13
Fourth quarter                                                  0.25                        0.13
</TABLE>

      As of September 30, 2005, there were approximately 787 record holders of
our common stock.

      We have not paid any cash dividends since our inception and do not
contemplate paying dividends in the foreseeable future. It is anticipated that
earnings, if any, will be retained to retire debt and for the operation of the
business.

      Shares eligible for future sale could depress the price of our common
stock, thus lowering the value of a buyer's investment. Sales of substantial
amounts of common stock, or the perception that such sales could occur, could
adversely affect prevailing market prices for shares of our common stock.

      Our revenues and operating results may fluctuate significantly from
quarter to quarter, which can lead to significant volatility in the price and
volume of our stock. In addition, stock markets have experienced extreme price
and volume volatility in recent years. This volatility has had a substantial
effect on the market prices of securities of many smaller public companies for
reasons unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the
specific companies. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the
market price of our common stock.

      Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans. We
currently do not have any securities authorized for issuance under any equity
compensation plans.

      Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

      On January 26, 2005, we issued 100,000 shares of our common stock for an
aggregate purchase price $10,000 to two individuals. The issuance was exempt
under Section 4(2) of the Securities Ac of 1933, as amended (the "Act").

      On February 11, 2005, we issued 100,000 shares of our common stock to a
single accredited investor for a purchase price of $5,000. The issuance was
exempt under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On February 17, 2005, we issued 1,450,000 shares of our common stock to
two accredited investors for an aggregate purchase price of $116,000. The
issuance was exempt under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On February 17, 2005, we issued 370,000 shares of stock to two consultants
as compensatory stock grants. Our board valued the common stock at $0.08 per
share for a total of $29,600. The issuance was exempt under Section 4(2) of the
Act.


                                       17
<PAGE>

      On February 17, 2005, we issued 100,000 shares of stock to 2 investors for
an aggregate purchase price of $10,000. This issuance was exempt under Section
4(2) of the Act.

      On February 17, 2005 we issued 100,000 of stock to a single investor for
an aggregate purchase price of $4,100. The issuance was exempt under Section
4(2) of the Act.

      In March 2005, we issued 1,214,000 shares of common stock as compensatory
stock grants. Our board valued the common stock at $0.117 per share for a total
of $143,000. The issuance was exempt under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On April 4, 2005, we issued 101,000 shares of common stock to a single
accredited investor for an aggregate purchase price of $5,000. The issuance was
exempt under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On April 22, 2005, we issued 21,500 shares of common stock for an
aggregate purchase price of $1,050. The issuance was exempt under Section 4(2)
of the Act.

      On April 22, 2005, we issued 300,000 shares of our common stock to a
single accredited investor for an aggregate purchase price of $14,100. The
issuance was exempt under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On April 22, 2005, we issued 150,000 shares of common stock to a single
investor for an aggregate purchase price of $10,500. The issuance was exempt
under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On April 22, 2005 we issued 100,000 shares of common stock to a single
investor for an aggregate purchase price of $1,750. The issuance was exempt
under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On May 13, 2005, we issued 82,000 shares of common stock to a single
individual as a compensatory stock grant. Our board valued the common stock at
$0.15 for a total of $12,300.

      On May 18, 2005, we issued 300,000 shares of common stock to a single
investor for an aggregate purchase price of $20,000. The issuance was exempt
under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On May 18, 2005, we issued 300,000 shares of common stock to a single
investor for an aggregate purchase price of $40,000. The issuance was exempt
under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On July 8, 2005, we issued 1,500,000 shares of common stock as a
compensatory stock grant. Our board valued the common stock at $0.071 for a
total of $107,300 The issuance was exempt under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On July 29, 2005, we issued 2,500 shares of common stock as a compensatory
stock grant. Our board valued the common stock at $0.10 for a total of $250. The
issuance was exempt under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On July 29, 2005, we issued 15,000 shares of common stock as a
compensatory stock grant. Our board valued the common stock at $0.10 for a total
of $1,500. The issuance was exempt under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On July 29, 2000, we issued30,000 shares of common stock to a single
investor for an aggregate purchase price of $3,000. The issuance was exempt
under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On August 24, 2005, we issued 32,500 shares of common stock to a single
accredited investor for an aggregate purchase price of $2,500. The issuance was
exempt under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On August 24, 2005, we issued 40,000 shares of common stock to a single
investor for an aggregate purchase price of $4,000. The issuance was exempt
under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On August 24, 2005, we issued 27,500 shares of common stock to a single
investor for an aggregate purchase price of $1,500. The issuance was exempt
under Section 4(2) of the Act.


                                       18
<PAGE>

      On August 24, 2005, we issued 50,000 shares of common stock to a single
accredited investor for an aggregate purchase price of $5,000. The issuance was
exempt under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On August 24, 2005, we issued 50,000 shares of common stock to a single
investor for an aggregate purchase price of $5,000. The issuance was exempt
under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On August 24, 2005, we issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock as a
compensatory stock grant. The board valued the common stock at $0.10 for a total
of $100,000. The issuance was exempt under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On August 24, 2005, we issued 100,000 shares of common stock as a
compensatory stock grant. The board valued the common stock at $0.10 for a total
of $100,000. The issuance was exempt under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On August 24, 2005, we issued 1,750,000 shares of common stock as a
compensatory stock grant. The board valued the common stock at $0.10 for a total
of $175,000. The issuance was exempt under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On August 24, 2005, we issued 250,000 shares of common stock as a
compensatory stock grant. The board valued the common stock at $0.10 for a total
of $25,000. The issuance was exempt under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On August 24, 2005, we issued 500,000 shares of common stock to a single
investor for an aggregate purchase price of $20,000. The issuance was exempt
under Section 4(2) of the Act.

      On August 24, 2005, we issued 20,000 shares of common stock for an
aggregate purchase price of $1,000. The issuance was exempt under Section 4(2)
of the Act.

Item 6. Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation

General

      We manufacture and sell a complete line of mobile integrated video
technology for law enforcement, OEM, motor sports and aftermarket applications.
Our patent portfolio encompasses cameras on or about the automotive seat that we
developed by Lear Corp. and our founder D. Scott Watkins in conjunction with
Ford Motor Company.

      Our executive offices are located at 23070 Commerce Drive, Farmington
Hills, MI 48335, and telephone number (248) 471-9520. We maintain a website at
www.cruisecam.com.


                                       19
<PAGE>

Our Corporate History

      CruiseCam International, Inc. was originally incorporated in Florida as
Eutro Group Holding, Inc. in September 1991. In October 1999, we filed an
Articles of Amendment to our Articles of Incorporation thereby changing our name
to Strategic Alliance Group, Inc. In September 1991, we completed a reverse
acquisition of Bio-Analytic Laboratories, Inc., which then became our wholly
owned operating subsidiary. In May 1998, we sold our Bio-Analytic Laboratories,
Inc. subsidiary. In July 2004, we completed a reverse acquisition of GRP, Inc.
and subsidiaries, which then became our wholly owned operating subsidiary. We
changed our name to CruiseCam International, Inc. in conjunction with this
reverse acquisition.

      CruiseCam International, Inc. is a holding corporation. Its principal
business is to own operating subsidiaries and assist these companies as well as
other small and medium size companies with research, development, marketing and
sales.

      GRP, Inc. (legal subsidiary company) was originally started to create and
produce an "in-car" camera mount and trade named "CruiseCam" for street and
competition racing cars and was incorporated in 1997. This company filed for its
first patent in 1997 and it was received in 1998.

      In 1999, we, in conjunction with Lear Corporation, started a partnership
through a licensing agreement of a GRP concept of an integrated seat camera
system now patented by GRP for Ford police cars. The agreement with Lear was
terminated in late 2001 and the licensing rights reverted back to GRP and its
subsidiary, CruiseCam, LLC. CruiseCam, LLC purchased assets from Rosen, the key
supplier in late 2002 and proceeded with development and distribution. GRP
continued with the management of the patented mount.

      Our primary operation is located in suburban Detroit, Michigan and is
incorporated in the state of Florida.

Significant Accounting Policies

      Accounts Receivable:

      There are no significant concentrations of credit risk. Accounts
      Receivable are written off when deemed uncollectible. In the current year,
      no write offs occurred.

      Inventories:

      Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, using
      the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.

      Patent Costs:

      The Company has accumulated costs related to its patent applications such
      as filing, legal fees, etc. These costs are amortized over the life of the
      patents.

      Fixed Assets:

      These assets are carried at acquisition cost. Depreciation is provided
      using the straight-line method over the estimated useful economic lives of
      the assets, which is over 5-7 years.

      Revenue Recognition:

      Revenue is recognized for sales of goods when product is shipped FOB
      plant.

Results of Continuing Operations

Basis of Presentation

      The results of operations set forth below for the years ended September
30, 2005 and 2004 are those of the continuing operations of CruiseCam
International, Inc., which include GRP, Inc. on a consolidated basis


                                       20
<PAGE>

      The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain
selected financial data expressed as a percentage of net sales from continuing
operations:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Year Ended                  Year Ended
                                                    September 30,               September 30,
                                                        2005                        2004
                                              --------------------------  --------------------------
<S>                                                     <C>                         <C>
Net sales                                               $259,794                    $241,015
Cost of sales                                             79,515                     166,902
                                              --------------------------  --------------------------

Gross Margin                                             180,279                      74,113

Operating Expenses                                     1,644,269                     493,277
                                              --------------------------  --------------------------

Net Operating Income (Loss)                         $(1,463,990)                  $(419,164)
                                              ==========================  ==========================
</TABLE>


                                       21
<PAGE>

Comparison of the Years ended September 30, 2005 and 2004

      Net sales. Net sales for operations of CruiseCam International, Inc.
increased to $259,794, or an increase of approximately 7.8%, for the year ended
September 30, 2005, from $241,015 for the year ended September 30, 2004. This
increase was attributable to sales of our new digital recording system.

      Cost of Sales. Cost of sales for continued operations decreased to
$79,515, or approximately 52%, for the year ended September 30, 2005, from
$166,902 for the year ended September 30, 2004. As a percentage of net sales,
cost of sales decreased to approximately 31% of net sales for the year ended
September 30, 2005 versus approximately 69% of sales for the year ended
September 30, 2004. The decrease in cost of sales as a percentage of net sales
resulted primarily from a significant reduction in engineering costs and also
from the savings of utilizing a salesforce from our distributors in lieu of in
house sales personnel As a result, we generated a gross profit of $180,279 with
a gross profit margin of approximately 69% for the year ended September 30,
2005.

      Operating Expenses. Operating expenses increased to $1,644,269, or an
increase of over 300%, for the year ended September 30, 2005, from $493,277 for
the year ended September, 2004. The increase in operating expenses primarily
results from amortization of our patent costs.

      Operating loss. We incurred an operating loss of $1,463,990 for the year
ended September 30, 2005, compared to an operating loss of $491,164 for the year
ended September 30, 2004. We had increased operating losses in the year 2005 as
compared to 2004 primarily due to amortization of our patent costs.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      We have financed our operations, acquisitions, debt service, and capital
requirements through cash flows generated from [operations and loans from
officers and issuances of capital stock]. Our working capital deficit at
September 30, 2005 was $2,183,309 and at September 30, 2004 it was $2,028,546.
We had cash of $1,506 as of December 31, 2005, while we had cash of $25,152 as
of December 31, 2004. This difference results primarily from increased costs of
legal and accounting fees.

      We used $886,778 of net cash used in operating activities for the year
ended September 30, 2005 compared to using $968,083 in the year ended September
30, 2004. This cash used in operating activities was offset by a non-cash
depreciation expense of $42,442, and an amortization expense of $890,240.

      Net cash flows used by investing activities was $47,955 for the year ended
September 30, 2005, compared to $15,353,465 in the year ended September 30,
2004. The cash used by investing activities for the years ended September 30,
2005 and 2004 was for 47,955 and 15,353,465 respectively.

      Net cash flows provided by financing activities were $911,087 for the year
ended September 30, 2005, compared to net cash provided by financing activities
of $16,346,700 in the year ended September 30, 2004. The difference results
primarily from the issuance of common stock.

      We anticipate that we will need at least $2,000,000 in additional working
capital in order to satisfy our contemplated cash requirements for our current
proposed plans and assumptions relating to our operations for a period of
approximately 12 months. However, our expectations are based on certain
assumptions concerning the costs involved in the clinical trials. These
assumptions concern future events and circumstances that our officers believe to
be significant to our operations and upon which our working capital requirements
will depend. Some assumptions will invariably not materialize and some
unanticipated events and circumstances occurring subsequent to the date of this
annual report. We will continue to seek to fund our capital requirements over
the next 12 months from the additional sale of our securities, however, it is
possible that we will be unable to obtain sufficient additional capital through
the sale of our securities as needed.

      The amount and timing of our future capital requirements will depend upon
many factors, including the level of funding received by us anticipated private
placements of our common stock and the level of funding obtained through other
financing sources, and the timing of such funding.

      We intend to retain any future earnings to retire any existing debt,
finance the expansion of our business and any necessary capital expenditures,
and for general corporate purposes.


                                       22
<PAGE>

Item 7.  Financial Statements

                                Table of Contents

         Independent Auditor's Report                                        F-1

         Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2005                 F-2

         Consolidated Statements of Income
         For the Years Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004                     F-3

         Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
         For the Years Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004                     F-4

         Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
         For the Years Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004                     F-5

         Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements                      F-6


<PAGE>

             REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and Management of
CruiseCam International, Inc.
Farmington Hills, Michigan

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of CruiseCam
International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2005 and the related
consolidated statements of income, cash flows and stockholders' equity for the
year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.

Except as discussed in the following paragraph, we conducted our audit of these
financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

We did not observe the taking of the physical inventory at the balance sheet
date; nor were we able to satisfy ourselves as to the carrying value of the
inventory by other audit procedures. Additionally, we were not able to obtain
attorney representations from one Firm who represented the Company.

In our opinion, except for the effects of such adjustments, if any, as might
have been determined to be necessary had we been able to examine evidence
regarding the inventory value and attorney representations, the consolidated
financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of CruiseCam International, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
September 30, 2005, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the
year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the
Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 10 to the
financial statements, the Company has a working capital deficiency and has
incurred losses since inception.

The Company's lack of financial resources and liquidity as of September 30, 2005
raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
Management's plans in regard to these matters are described in Note 10. The
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the
outcome of this uncertainty.


David S. Hall, P.C.

Dallas, Texas
April 7, 2006


                                      F-1
<PAGE>

                          CRUISECAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                           Consolidated Balance Sheet
                               September 30, 2005

<TABLE>
<S>                                                                            <C>
ASSETS
       Current Assets
                 Cash and Cash Equivalents                                     $      1,506
                 Accounts Receivable                                                 86,918
                 Inventory                                                          633,335
                                                                               ------------
                       Total Current Assets                                         721,759

       Fixed Assets-Net of Depreciation                                             139,022
       Other Assets
                 Due From Related Parties                                           432,907
                 Patents and Related Costs-Net of Amortization                   14,243,839
                 Deferred Tax Asset                                                 293,437
                                                                               ------------
                       Total Other Assets                                        14,970,183
                                                                               ------------

                             TOTAL ASSETS                                      $ 15,830,964
                                                                               ============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
       Current Liabilities
                 Cash Overdrafts                                               $     14,117
                 Accounts Payable                                                   734,535
                 Accrued Expenses                                                   610,086
                 Notes Payable-Current Portion                                    1,546,330
                                                                               ------------
                       Total Current Liabilities                                  2,905,068
       Long Term Liabilities
                 Deferred Tax Liabilities                                         5,287,770
                 Notes Payable                                                       10,500
                                                                               ------------
                       Total Long Term Liabilities                                5,298,270

       Stockholders' Equity
                 Common Stock, $.1 Par Value, 500,000,000 Shares Authorized,
                       40,812,392 Shares Issued and Outstanding                   4,081,239
                 Additional Paid-In Capital                                      13,350,064
                 Deficit Accumulated                                             (9,803,677)
                                                                               ------------
                       Total Stockholders' Equity                                 7,627,626
                                                                               ------------

                             TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        $ 15,830,964
                                                                               ============
</TABLE>


                                      F-2
<PAGE>

                          CRUISECAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                        Consolidated Statements of Income
                 For the Years Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              2005            2004
                                                          ------------    ------------
<S>                                                       <C>             <C>
REVENUES
        Sales (Net of Discounts of $5,935 and $1,966)     $    259,794    $    241,015
        Less:  Cost of Sales                                    79,515         166,902
                                                          ------------    ------------

             GROSS MARGIN                                      180,279          74,113

OPERATING EXPENSES                                           1,644,269         493,277
                                                          ------------    ------------

             NET OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)                    (1,463,990)       (419,164)

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
        Interest Income                                             42              14
        Interest Expense                                      (104,270)        (55,185)
        Gain (Loss) on Disposition of Assets                   (55,614)              0
                                                          ------------    ------------

             TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)                     (159,842)        (55,171)
                                                          ------------    ------------

                  NET INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES     (1,623,832)       (474,335)

        Provision for Income Taxes (Expense) Benefit           293,437      (5,287,770)
                                                          ------------    ------------

                  NET INCOME (LOSS)                         (1,330,395)     (5,762,105)

        Beginning Retained Earnings (Deficit)               (8,473,282)     (2,711,177)
                                                          ------------    ------------

ENDING RETAINED EARNINGS (DEFICIT)                        $ (9,803,677)   $ (8,473,282)
                                                          ============    ============
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:

        Weighted Average of Outstanding Shares              39,201,931      46,830,264
                                                          ============    ============

        Income (Loss) for Common Stockholders             $      (0.03)   $      (0.12)
                                                          ============    ============
</TABLE>


                                      F-3
<PAGE>

                          CRUISECAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                      Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
                 For the Years Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                         2005            2004
                                                                                     ------------    ------------
<S>                                                                                  <C>             <C>
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
             Net Income (Loss)                                                       $ (1,330,395)   $ (5,762,105)
             Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
              provided by operating activities:
                        Depreciation                                                       42,442          30,263
                        Amortization                                                      890,240               0
                        Loss on Disposition of Assets                                      55,614               0
                        (Increase) in Accounts Receivable                                 (16,102)        (70,816)
                        (Increase) in Inventory                                           (63,147)       (570,188)
                        (Increase) in Due to Related Parties                              (90,417)       (342,490)
                        (Increase) in Deferred Tax Asset                                 (293,437)              0
                        Decrease in Other Assets                                           26,103         (26,103)
                        Adjustment for Retained Earnings Carryforward-GRP, Inc.                 0        (980,831)
                        Increase (Decrease) in Cash Overdrafts                             (1,750)         15,867
                        Increase in Accounts Payable                                       63,948         670,587
                        Increase in Deferred Tax Liabilities                                    0       5,287,770
                        (Decrease) in Accrued Expenses                                   (169,877)        779,963
                                                                                     ------------    ------------
                                           Net Cash (Used) by Operating Activities       (886,778)       (968,083)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
             Purchase of Fixed Assets                                                     (21,791)       (245,550)
             Purchase of Patents                                                          (26,164)    (15,107,915)
                                                                                     ------------    ------------
                                           Net Cash (Used) by Investing Activities        (47,955)    (15,353,465)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
             Note Payable Additions                                                       318,045       1,238,785
             Issuance of Common Stock                                                     593,042      15,107,915
                                                                                     ------------    ------------
                                           Net Cash Provided by Financing                 911,087      16,346,700
                                           Activities
                                                                                     ------------    ------------

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS                                      (23,646)         25,152

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR                                             25,152               0
                                                                                     ------------    ------------

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR                                             $      1,506          25,152
                                                                                     ============    ============

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:

             Cash Paid During the Year for Interest Expense                          $        817          10,700
                                                                                     ============    ============
</TABLE>


                                      F-4
<PAGE>

                          CRUISECAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
            Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
                 For the Years Ended September 30, 2005 and 2004

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            Common Stock                   Paid-In
                                                      Shares             Amount            Capital            Totals
                                                   --------------     -------------     ---------------    --------------
<S>                                                  <C>          <C>               <C>                 <C>
2004

Beginning Stockholders' Equity                       475,000,000  $     47,500,000  $     (44,788,823)  $      2,711,177

          Reverse Split--250/1                     (473,099,849)      (47,309,985)          47,309,985                 0

          Reverse Acquisition of GRP, Inc.            30,215,828         3,021,583          12,086,332        15,107,915

          Other Stock Issued Prior to Acquisition      3,509,021           350,902           (350,902)                 0

          Adjustment for Carryforward Retained
              Earnings (Deficit)--GRP, Inc.                                     --           (980,831)         (980,831)
                                                   --------------     -------------     ---------------    --------------

Ending Stockholders' Equity                           35,625,000  $      3,562,500  $       13,275,761  $     16,838,261
                                                   ==============     =============     ===============    ==============

2005
                          Stock Issued
                          During Year                 10,166,000         1,016,600           3,850,551         4,867,151

                          Stock Cancelled            (4,978,608)         (497,861)         (3,776,248)       (4,274,109)
                                                   --------------     -------------     ---------------    --------------

Ending Stockholders' Equity                           40,812,392  $      4,081,239  $       13,350,064  $     17,431,303
                                                   ==============     =============     ===============    ==============
</TABLE>


                                      F-5
<PAGE>

                          CRUISECAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
                               September 30, 2005


NOTE 1 - NATURE OF ACTIVITIES AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

      Nature of Activities, History and Organization:

      CruiseCam International, Inc. (The Company) was originally incorporated in
      Florida as Eutro Group Holding, Inc. in September 1991. In October 1999,
      the Company filed an Articles of Amendment to its Articles of
      Incorporation thereby changing its name to Strategic Alliance Group, Inc.
      In September 1991, the Company completed a reverse acquisition of
      Bio-Analytic Laboratories, Inc., which then became a wholly owned
      operating subsidiary of the Company. In May 1998, the Company sold its
      Bio-Analytic Laboratories, Inc. subsidiary. In July 2004, the Company
      completed a reverse acquisition of GRP, Inc. and subsidiaries, which then
      became a wholly owned operating subsidiary of the Company. The Company
      changed its name to CruiseCam International, Inc. in conjunction with this
      reverse acquisition.

      CruiseCam International, Inc. is a holding corporation. Its principal
      business is to own operating subsidiaries and assist these companies as
      well as other small and medium size companies with research, development,
      marketing and sales.

      GRP, Inc. (legal subsidiary company) was originally started to create and
      produce an "in-car" camera mount and trade named "CruiseCam" for street
      and competition racing cars and was incorporated in 1997. The Company
      filed for its first patent in 1997 and it was received in 1998.

      In 1999, the Company, in conjunction with Lear Corporation, started a
      partnership through a licensing agreement of a GRP concept of an
      integrated seat camera system now patented by GRP for Ford police cars.
      The agreement with Lear was terminated in late 2001 and the licensing
      rights reverted back to GRP and its subsidiary, CruiseCam, LLC. CruiseCam,
      LLC purchased assets from Rosen, the key supplier in late 2002 and
      proceeded with development and distribution. GRP continued with the
      management of the patented mount.

      The Company's primary operation is located in suburban Detroit, Michigan
      and is incorporated in the state of Florida.

      Significant Accounting Policies:

      The Company's management selects accounting principles generally accepted
      in the United States of America and adopts methods for their application.
      Below is a summary of certain significant accounting policies selected by
      management.

            Basis of Presentation:

            The Company prepares its financial statements on the accrual basis
            of accounting.

            Principals of Consolidation:

            The financial statements consolidate the activities of the parent
            along with:

                           GRP, Inc. and Subsidiaries:

                                    CruiseCam, LLC
                                    Commandeer, LLC

            All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been
            eliminated.


                                      F-6
<PAGE>

                          CRUISECAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
                               September 30, 2005


NOTE 1 - NATURE OF ACTIVITIES AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

      Cash and Cash Equivalents:

      All highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or
      less are stated at cost which approximates market value. Cash as of
      September 30, 2005 was $1,506.

      Accounts Receivable:

      There are no significant concentrations of credit risk. Accounts
      Receivable are written off when deemed uncollectible. In the current year,
      no write offs occurred.

      Inventories:

      Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, using
      the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.

      Patent Costs:

      The Company has accumulated costs related to its patent applications such
      as filing, legal fees, etc. These costs are amortized over the life of the
      patents.

      Earnings (Loss) per Share:

      Earnings (loss) per share (basic) is calculated by dividing the net income
      (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the
      period covered. As the Company has no potentially dilutive securities,
      fully diluted earnings (loss) per share is identical to earnings (loss)
      per share (basic).

      Fixed Assets:

      These assets are carried at acquisition cost. Depreciation is provided
      using the straight-line method over the estimated useful economic lives of
      the assets, which is over 5-7 years.

      Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

      The Company's financial instruments consist of cash, accounts receivable,
      accounts payable, accrued expenses and notes payable. The fair value of
      these financial instruments approximates their carrying values as of
      September 30, 2005.

      Revenue Recognition:

      Revenue is recognized for sales of goods when product is shipped FOB
      plant.

      Income Taxes:

      Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income
      Taxes (SFAS No. 109), which requires the use of the liability method in
      the computation of income tax expense and the current and deferred income
      taxes payable is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
      years beginning on or after December 15, 1992. Under SFAS No. 109, income
      tax expense consists of taxes payable for the year and the changes during
      the year in deferred assets and liabilities. Deferred income taxes are
      recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between
      the tax bases and financial reporting bases of assets and liabilities.
      Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax
      assets to the amount expected to be realized.


                                      F-7
<PAGE>

                          CRUISECAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
                               September 30, 2005


NOTE 1 - NATURE OF ACTIVITIES AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

      Use of Estimates:

      The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
      accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
      assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures.
      Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

NOTE 2 - ACQUISITIONS

      On July 7, 2004, the Company (Acquirer) entered into an exchange agreement
      with GRP, Inc. and subsidiaries (Aquiree). The agreement called for the
      Company to issue 30,215,818 shares of its common stock in exchange for
      100% of the common stock of GRP, Inc. This transaction has been recorded
      as a "Reverse Acquisition", meaning that the financial statements are
      prepared using the accounts of the Aquiree Company.

      In addition, the assets and liabilities of the purchase are to be
      reflected at their fair values (as opposed to book values). As the fair
      value of the Acquirer's stock is more readily ascertainable, it was used
      to record the fair values of the assets and liabilities purchased.

NOTE 3 - FIXED ASSETS

      Fixed assets at September 30, 2005 are as follows:

             Furniture & Equipment                       $     4,642
             Transportation Equipment                          5,132
             Tooling                                         140,800
             Other Equipment                                  61,638
             Less: Accumulated Depreciation                  (73,190)
                                                         ------------

                      Total Fixed Assets                 $   139,022
                                                         ===========

      Depreciation expense was $42,442 for the year ended September 30, 2005.

NOTE 4 - COMMON STOCK

      The Company is authorized to issue 500,000,000 common shares at a par
      value of $.10 per share. These shares have full voting rights. There are
      no preferred shares as of September 30, 2005.

      On November 4, 2003, the Company entered into a "Reverse Split" of 250 to
      1. Therefore, each share after the split would be worth 1/250 of its value
      before the split. This reverse split reduced the number of shares
      outstanding from 475,000,000 to 1,900,151. On July 7, 2004, the Company
      issued 30,215,818 shares in conjunction with the acquisition of GRP, Inc.
      and subsidiaries (See Note 2 above).

      At September 30, 2005, there were 40,812,392 common shares outstanding.

NOTE 5 - INCOME TAXES

      Effective July 7, 2004, the Company adopted Statement of Financial
      Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (SFAS No. 109),
      which requires the use of the liability method in the computation of
      income tax expense and the current and deferred income taxes payable.
      Under SFAS No. 109, income tax expense consists of taxes payable for the
      year and the changes during the year in deferred assets and liabilities.
      Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future
      years of differences between the tax bases and financial reporting bases
      of assets and liabilities. Valuation


                                      F-8
<PAGE>

                          CRUISECAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
                               September 30, 2005


NOTE 5 - INCOME TAXES (Continued)

      allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to
      the amount expected to be realized.

      The Company has calculated a deferred tax asset of $293,437, which
      represents the current year's net operating loss adjusted for tax
      differences multiplied by an effective corporate tax rate of 40%.

      The Company has also recorded a deferred tax liability for the acquisition
      of a subsidiary, accounted for by the purchase method. This liability
      represents the difference between book bases and tax bases as follows:

                  GRP, Inc. and Subsidiaries                  $5,287,770

NOTE 6 - INTANGIBLE ASSETS

      The Company has acquired patents through the acquisition of GRP, Inc. and
      subsidiaries, which was accounted for using the purchase method in a
      "reverse acquisition". The patents relate to its production of "in-car"
      camera mounts.

      Total patent costs are $15,134,079 as of September 30, 2005. The patent
      costs are being amortized over 17 years and the current year amortization
      was $890,240.

NOTE 7 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

      The Company leases retail space under a three-year lease which expires in
      April, 2008. Future minimum rental obligations at September 30, 2005 are
      as follows:

                     Fiscal
                   Year Ended

                      2006                             $    103,200
                      2007                                  103,200
                      2008                                   34,400
                                                       -------------

                               Totals                  $    240,800
                                                       ============

      Rent expense was $95,802 for the year ended September 30, 2005.

      As of September 30, 2005, the Company was involved in several lawsuits and
      disputes. The potential liability of these suits and disputes has been
      accrued in these financial statements and, in the opinion of management,
      no additional liabilities will be incurred.

NOTE 8 - NOTES PAYABLE

      The Company had financed the purchase of its transportation equipment. The
      original note principal was $31,976. The note calls for interest of 16.08%
      with the principal and interest amortized over three and one half years.
      This note was paid off in the current year.

      The Company entered into a purchase agreement for the bulk of its initial
      inventory and equipment in exchange for a note payable of $1,000,000. The
      note calls for interest of 6.75% payable monthly. In 2002, the lender
      charged $80,000 for nonpayment and this amount is accrued in these
      financial statements. In the current year, the Company has paid no
      interest on this note and therefore, it has been accrued.

      The Company had some other small notes payable totaling $476,830 as of
      September 30, 2005.


                                      F-9
<PAGE>

                          CRUISECAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
                               September 30, 2005


NOTE 9 - DUE TO/FROM RELATED PARTIES

      The Company has conducted transactions with its Subsidiary Company Founder
      and its wholly owned subsidiary companies which include draws to the
      Founder. The balance as of September 30, 2005 is made up of the following:

                  Draws to Founder                            $  432,907
                                                              ----------

                           Total                              $  432,907
                                                              ==========

NOTE 10 - GOING CONCERN AND SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

      The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the
      Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred losses
      and has been dependent on outside financing in order to meet its current
      operational needs. The Company's viability will continue to hinge on its
      ability to obtain outside financing for the near term. The financial
      statements do no include any adjustments that might result from the
      outcome of this uncertainty.

      In July, 2004, the Company, entered in a share exchange agreement with
      GRP, Inc. and subsidiaries. The Company is in the process of filing an 8K
      report with the SEC regarding these matters.


                                      F-10
<PAGE>

Item 8. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.

      None.

Item 8A. Controls and Procedures.

      We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our President and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness
of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as
defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(c) as of the end of the period covered by
this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB. Based on that evaluation, they concluded that
our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and
Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated
and communicated to them to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.

      There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.

Item 8B. Other Information.

      None.


                                       23
<PAGE>

                                    PART III

Item 9. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters And Control Persons; Compliance
        With Section 16(A) Of The Exchange Act

Executive Officer and Directors

      Our executive officers and directors, the positions held by them, and
their ages are as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
         Name                               Age               Position
         ----                               ---               --------
<S>                                         <C>               <C>
         D. Scott Watkins                   45                President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
                                                              Officer and Director

         James F. Bender                    45                Secretary, Director

         Robert A. Buono                    61                Chief Operating Officer, Director
</TABLE>

      D. Scott Watkins. serves as our President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer and Director. Mr. Watkins founded CruiseCam in 1997. Prior to
CruiseCam, Mr. Watkins was the President and founder of NTI, Inc., an insurance
agency. Mr. Watkins holds a B.S. in Business and Marketing from the University
of Florida.

      James F. Bender. has served as a director since July 2004. Mr. Bender is
currently employed as a director of a 911 dispatch center, a position he has
held since 2001. From 1984-2001, Mr. Bender served as a deputy sheriff in the
Clark County Sheriff's Department. Mr. Bender graduated from the police training
institute from the University of Illinois.

      Robert A. Buono has served as our Chief Operating Officer and Director
since July 2004. Prior to joining CruiseCam, Mr. Buono served as Engineering
Manager at Lear Corporation from 1998.

Audit Committee

      We do not have an audit committee at this time.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

      Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires
our directors, executive officers, and stockholders holding more than 10% of our
outstanding common stock, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission
initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in beneficial ownership of
our common stock. Executive officers, directors and greater-than-10%
stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all
Section 16(a) reports they file. To our knowledge, based solely on review of the
copies of such reports furnished to us for the period ended September 30, 2005,
no Section 16(a) reports required to be filed by our executive officers,
directors and greater-than-10% stockholders were filed on a timely basis.

Item 10. Executive Compensation

      The following table sets forth the cash compensation paid to the Chief
Executive Officer and to all other executive officers for services rendered
during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2005 and 2004.



                                       24
<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Annual Compensation                           Long-Term Compensation
                                                                                                     Common Shares
                                                                                                       Underlying         All
                                                                                      Restricted        Options          Other
                                                                     Other Annual        Stock          Granted         Compen
    Name and Position         Year        Salary          Bonus      Compensation     Awards ($)       (# Shares)       -sation
<S>                           <C>     <C>                     <C>            <C>            <C>         <C>                  <C>
D. Scott Watkins              2005    $125,000(1)            -0-            -0-            -0-          ------              -0-
President, Chief              2004     106,560(2)            -0-            -0-            -0-          ------              -0-
Executive Officer, Chief
Financial Officer
and Director
As of July 2004

Robert A. Buono               2005            -0-            -0-            -0-            -0-          ------              -0-
Chief Operating Officer       2004            -0-            -0-            -0-            -0-          ------              -0-
and Director
As of July 2004

James F. Bender               2005         36,000            -0-            -0-            -0-          ------              -0-
Secretary                     2004      12,000(3)            -0-            -0-            -0-          ------              -0-
and Director
As of July 2004

Floyd D. Wilkenson            2005            -0-            -0-            -0-            -0-          ------              -0-
Former Sole Officer and       2004            -0-            -0-            -0-            -0-          ------              -0-
Director (until July
2004)
</TABLE>

(1)      $47,573.90 of this amount was accrued as salary, but not paid.
(2)      $38,936 of this amount was accrued as salary, but not paid.
(3)      Accrued as salary but not paid.

Option Grants and Exercises

      There were no option grants or exercises by any of the executive officers
named in the Summary Compensation Table above.

Employment Agreements

      As of the year ended September 30, 2005, we had no employment contracts
with any of our employees.

Compensation of Directors

      All directors receive reimbursement for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
in attending board of directors meetings and for promoting our business. From
time to time we may engage certain members of the board of directors to perform
services on our behalf. In such cases, we compensate the members for their
services at rates no more favorable than could be obtained from unaffiliated
parties.

Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.

      The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
beneficial ownership of our common stock as of September 30, 2005 by the
following persons:

      o     each person who is known to be the beneficial owner of more than
            five percent (5%) of our issued and outstanding shares of common
            stock;


                                       25
<PAGE>

      o     each of our directors and executive officers; and

      o     all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

The following table assumes that there are 40,812,392 common shares issued and
outstanding immediately before this offering. Except as set forth in the
footnotes to the table, the persons names in the table have sole voting and
investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as
beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable.
A person is considered the beneficial owner of any securities as of a given date
that can be acquired within 60 days of such date through the exercise of any
option, warrant or right. Shares of common stock subject to options, warrants or
rights which are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days are
considered outstanding for computing the ownership percentage of the person
holding such options, warrants or rights, but are not considered outstanding for
computing the ownership percentage of any other person.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Number Of Shares
           Name And Address (1)                 Beneficially Owned         Percentage Owned
           --------------------                 ------------------         ----------------
<S>                                                     <C>                          <C>
D. Scott Watkins                                        23,000,000                   56.36%
James F. Bender                                          2,092,000                    5.13
Robert A. Buono                                          1,000,000                    2.45
Mezzanine Fund LLC                                       2,341,144
All  directors  and officers as a group (3              26,092,000                   63.93
persons)
</TABLE>

----------------------------------------------
*     Less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock.

(1)   Unless otherwise noted, the address for each person is 23070 Commerce
      Drive, Farmington Hills, MI 48335.


Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

None.

Item 13. Exhibits.

Exhibit No.       Description

2.1               Share Exchange Agreement dated as of July 7, 2004 by and
                  between CruiseCam International, Inc. and GRP, Inc.*

3.1               Articles of Incorporation.*

3.2               Bylaws.  *

31.1              Certification of D. Scott Watkins pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).

31.2              Certification of D. Scott Watkins pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).


                                       26
<PAGE>

32.1              Certification of D. Scott Watkins pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section
                  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
                  Act of 2002.

32.2              Certification of D. Scott Watkins pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section
                  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
                  Act of 2002

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*previously filed

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

Appointment of Auditors

      Our Board of Directors selected David S. Hall, P.C., certified public
accountant, as our auditor for the year ended September 30, 2005 and 2004.

Audit Fees

      David S. Hall, P.C., billed us $15,000 and $20,400 in fees for our annual
audit for the years ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and no fees
for the review of our quarterly financial statements for that year.

Audit-Related Fees

      David S. Hall, P.C., did not bill us any fees for assurance and related
services in 2005 or 2004 and are not reported under Audit Fees above.

Tax and All Other Fees

      We did not pay any fees to David S. Hall, P.C. for tax compliance, tax
advice, tax planning or other work during our fiscal years ending September 30,
2005 and 2004.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

      We have implemented pre-approval policies and procedures related to the
provision of audit and non-audit services. Under these procedures, our board of
directors pre-approves all services to be provided by David S. Hall, P.C. and
the estimated fees related to these services.

      With respect to the audit of our financial statements as of September 30,
2005 2004 and for the years then ended, none of the hours expended on David S.
Hall, P.C.'s engagement to audit those financial statements were attributed to
work by persons other than David S. Hall, P.C.'s full-time, permanent employees.


                                       27
<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES

      In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

                                          CRUISECAM INTERNATIONAL INC.


                                          By: /s/ D. Scott Watkins
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                  D. Scott Watkins
                                                  President

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of
the registrant and in the capacities indicated.


Signatures                  Title                                   Date
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


/s/ D. Scott Watkins        President, Chief Executive Officer,     June 5, 2006
------------------------    Chief Financial Officer, Director
D. Scott Watkins


/s/ James F. Bender         Secretary, Director                     June 5, 2006
------------------------
James F. Bender


/s/ Robert A. Buono         Chief Operating Officer and Director    June 5, 2006
------------------------
Robert A. Buono


                                       28