alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           47900
<SECURITIES>                                    108800
<RECEIVABLES>                                   494800
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (11700)
<INVENTORY>                                     364700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1152200
<PP&E>                                         1755000
<DEPRECIATION>                                (874400)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2568500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           496500
<BONDS>                                         225000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        140100
<OTHER-SE>                                     1388800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2568500
<SALES>                                        1926700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1953800
<CGS>                                          1312200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1657200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  9000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               17400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 270200
<INCOME-TAX>                                     97300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             172900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    172900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.29
        

</TABLE>
From: a.tipton@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:12:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

A. Dudley Tipton

Bloomingdale, IL 60108
[Crim. No. 1609.

Third Appellate District.

April 4, 1938.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. R. G. PETREWYMER, Appellant.

*590No appearance for Appellant.

U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and Wilmer W. Morse, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

THE COURT.

The appellant was convicted in the Superior Court of Stanislaus County of the crime of issuing bank check with intent to defraud, a felony.

The transcript on appeal was filed in this court January 20, 1938. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on April 4, 1938. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing.

Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed.
From: Ashley Ernest

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Saturday, August 13, 2011 3:06:30 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

www.ashleyernest.com

http://differentkindoffine.blogspot.com

Ashley Ernest
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,101,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    286,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,672,000
<PP&E>                                       3,679,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,604,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,078,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,874,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,170,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,078,000
<SALES>                                     15,164,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,164,000
<CGS>                                       12,438,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               14,126,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               688,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                348,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            327,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   327,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
        

</TABLE>
No. 168, Misc.

#### Flett *v.*W. A. Alexander & Co. et al.

*Benjamin Wham*for petitioner. *William A. McSwain, Leo F. Tierney, Bryson P. Burnham, John B. Robinson, Jr.*and *W. Donald Me-Sweeney*for respondents.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 99.2



                    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection  with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended May
31, 2002 (the "Report") of Immucor,  Inc. (the "Registrant"),  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the best of
my knowledge, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Registrant.



August 29, 2002                                /s/ Steven C. Ramsey
                                               --------------------
                                               Steven C. Ramsey
                                               Chief Financial Officer
From: mcrealty@iowatelecom.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:11:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ronald Davis

Knoxville, IA 50138
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1500 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 275
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1500

                          [Report No. 110-883]

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 2008

    Mr. Welch of Vermont, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

    Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time through the 
calendar day of September 28, 2008, for the Speaker to entertain 
motions that the House suspend the rules. The Speaker or her designee 
shall consult with the Minority Leader or his designee on the 
designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this 
resolution.
                                                 House Calendar No. 275

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1500

                          [Report No. 110-883]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 25, 2008

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
No. 60970.

protests 98931-K, etc. (New York).

#### Moise Ash, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) or *Prime Fur Corp.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lambskin plates similar to those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, *supra,*the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in C. D. 1480 and C. D. 1643, *supra.*
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit  Fund VI,  L.P.,  Series 5 (the  "Partnership")  for the  quarters  ended
December  31,  2003 and  September  30 2003 as filed  with  the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  and  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.,  section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002,  I,  Thomas J.  Riha,  Senior  Vice-President  and Chief  Financial
Officer of WNC & Associates,  Inc.,  general partner of the Partnership,  hereby
certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  except to the extent  that such
     provisions require the audit report of Local Limited Partnership  financial
     statements  to  refer  to the  auditing  standards  of the  Public  Company
     Accounting   Oversight  Board  for  the   Partnership's   annual  financial
     statements and except that the Report is a cumulative  report covering each
     of the quarters ended December 31 and September 30, 2003 and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.



/s/Thomas J. Riha
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
May 16, 2008
## OPP Introduction Benefit Benefit2Benefit Benefit Summarv 3
No. 343, Misc.

#### Russell *v.*United States.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Theodore George Gilinsky*for the United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
From: hjsilhavy@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:47:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Heather Silhavy

Highwood, IL 60040
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No. 333-35460

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO. 084				Trade Date: 05/31/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

September 8, 2000)						Issue Date: 06/05/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement May 31, 2001
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

or	Stated				 Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		 Price to	 Discounts & Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions Frequency	 Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QDM0 6.125%	06/15/07	100%	 1.2% Semi-Annually YES	 NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		 Date		Count

$10,291,000.00	$10,167,508.00	ABN AMRO Inc.	12/15/01		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____ Yes	 X No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $[235.895]mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect. The PowerNotes (SM) described in this Pricing Supplement will be the last offering of PowerNotes (SM) made underthe Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated September 8, 2000. Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under a Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount. Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
### Pi oneer Hi - Bred International, Inc. Page 84 of 169 73496 Canola 

### Table 26 . List of Species with Reports of Hand - Pollinated or Spontaneous Hybridization with **B. napus** Species Name a Crop Weed Classification b Hand Pollination (successes:failures) c Spontaneous and Natural Hybridization c Presence in Winter Canola Growing Areas d Presence in Spring Canola Growing Areas d **B.napus** as Male **B.napus** as Female **B.napus** as Male **B.napus** as Female Brassica carinata  X 4:1 7:0 Brassica elongata    Brassica fruticulosa  0:1 1:1  X

Brassica juncea   25:1 13:4     Brassica nigra   2:2 4:2 X X   Brassica oleracea  X 3:11 9:17  X  

Brassica rapa   55:8 84:0     Brassica tournefo rtii  0:1 1:1  X

Camelina sativa  X 0:1 0:1   Capsella bursa pastoris  0:1 0:1   Coincya monensis    Conringia orientalis  0:1 0:1   Diplotaxis erucoides X 1:1  

Diplotaxis muralis  3:0 1:1   Diplotaxis siif olia X 0:3 0:1 X X Diplotaxis tenuifolia  0:3 1:1  

Eruca vesicaria (E.sativa)  2:0   Erucastrum gallicum  0:1 1:0 X   Hirschfeldia incana  1:2 1:2    X Moricandia arvensis X 0:2 0:2 X X Myagrum perfoliatum X 0:1 0:1  X Raphanus raphanistrum  0:4 3:2     Raphanus sativus   1:5 1:2   Rapistrum rugosum  1:0  

Rorippa islandica  1:0 X X

Sinapis alba   0:6 1:2 X   Sinapis arvensis  1:10 5:8 X    Sisymbrium irio  0:1 0:1  X Sis ymbrium orientale    

###  = Yes, to some degree X = No a 

### Species highlighted in purple have at least one report of successful hybridization with B. napus b 

### Weed Science Society of America or USDA NRCS list of noxious weeds c 

### Andersson and de Vicente, 2010; FitzJohn et al ., 2007 d 

### USDA PLANTS Database; Criteria to distinguish growing areas for winter and spring canola were obtained from Brown et al. (2008) and are summarized in the following section. Blank cells = no data available
No. 68376.

protests 59/31722, etc. (Honolulu).

#### Best Trading, Ltd., and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Mini Bachi stoves similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67238, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.