alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           6
<LEGEND>            The  schedule   contains   summary   financial   information
                    extracted  from  the  financial  statements  and  supporting
                    schedules  as of the end of the most  current  period and is
                    qualified in its  entirety by  reference  to such  financial
                    statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>               0000764901
<NAME>              Connecticut Daily Tax Free Income Fund
<SERIES>
<NUMBER>            2
<NAME>              CLASS B

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  JUL-31-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>         174777988
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>        174777988
<RECEIVABLES>                 1031835
<ASSETS-OTHER>                0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>          14557635
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                190367458
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>      0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>       0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>     319849
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>           319849
<SENIOR-EQUITY>               0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>      190053358
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>         190071668
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>         182641898
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>     0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>        0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>       (5749)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>      0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>      0
<NET-ASSETS>                  190047609
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>             0
<INTEREST-INCOME>             2759043
<OTHER-INCOME>                0
<EXPENSES-NET>                792015
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>       1967028
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>      1603
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>     0
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>         1968631
<EQUALIZATION>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>     1967028
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>      0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>         0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>       261260587
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>   255781420
<SHARES-REINVESTED>           1950603
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>        7431373
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>       0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>     (7352)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>       0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>    0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>         274082
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>               792015
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>          183223213
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>         1.00
<PER-SHARE-NII>               .01
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>       0
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>          .01
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>     0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>          0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>           1.00
<EXPENSE-RATIO>               .66



</TABLE>
From: goboyds@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:38:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Garrett Boyd

Atlanta, GA 30342
EXHIBIT 32.2



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date:	August 14, 2008

/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32(b)

ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-QSB of WWA Group, Inc. for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Digamber Naswa, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

|(1) | This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the small business issuer at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of the small business issuer for the period covered by this Report.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Digamber Naswa

Digamber Naswa

Chief Financial Officer

May 14, 2007

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the small business issuer for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the small business issuer and will be retained by the small business issuer and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
EXHIBIT 32-1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund VI, L.P., Series 5 (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.





Date: January 28, 2011








/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.


Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.


President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
#### In the Matter of the Application of John A. Bensel et al., Constituting the Board of Water Supply of the City of New York, to Acquire Real Estate in the Town of Greenburgh and City of Yonkers.

#### The City of New York, Appellant; Charles Ammann, Respondent.

*Matter of Bensel,*152 App. Div. 923, affirmed.

(Argued January 7, 1913;

decided January 28, 1913.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 18, 1912, which affirmed, an order of Special Term confirming an award in condemnation proceedings.

*Archibald B. Watson, Corporation Counsel (I. J. Beaudrias*of counsel), for appellant.

*Benjamin Trapnell*and *Leo A. Doran*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J.,Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Collin and Hogan, JJ.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-10-00115-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.C., C.B. AND M.B., CHILDREN

From the 77th District Court

Limestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. CPS-210-A

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, B.M. and C. B., each filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s order 

terminating their parental rights to their children. Now, both B.M. and C.B. have each 

signed and prepared separate notices stating they no longer wish to prosecute the 

appeal. 

Accordingly, this appeal as to both B.M. and C. B. is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a).

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed June 2, 2010

[CV06]
21.5.2018

To:

MB&B
Business Creation Ltd.



Re:
Amendment to Consulting Agreement



Dear
Sirs,



Reference
is made to the Consulting Agreement between you and One World Cannabis Ltd. (the “Company”), dated
August 1, 2017 as amended (the “Agreement”; capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the
meaning given to them in the Agreement). This letter hereby documents the agreement reached between us with respect to
certain amendments to the Agreement, effective as of May 1, 2018, as follows:



In
Exhibit Ato the Agreement, the paragraph set forth opposite to the words “Fee” shall be deleted in its entirety
and replaced by the following:



“Fee:
The Consultant shall be entitled to consideration, with respect to his Services to the Company within the above specified
scope, in the amount of NIS 40,000 per month, plus VAT, at the standard rate, if applicable.”



Please
countersign this letter to indicate your agreement to the terms set forth. Note that this letter will only come into effect upon
receipt of your signature by the Company.



The
provisions of Section 9 of the Agreement are incorporated herein by reference and shall apply to the terms herein. In the event
of any conflict between the provisions of this letter and the provisions of the Agreement, the provisions of this letter shall
prevail and govern. Except as specifically amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement remain and shall
continue in full force and effect.



| | 
| | 



|Agreed
    and accepted:        |                      
|------------------------------- | ---------------------
|                                |                      
|                                |                      
|MB&B
    Business Creation Ltd. |                      
|                                |                      
|By:                             | Mordechai
    Bignitz
|Date:                           | 21.5.18              



I
hereby acknowledge and agree to the Agreement as amended pursuant to this letter.





| | 
| |
Decisions Handed Down June 17, 1885.

#### In the Matter of the Application of the Broadway Underground *C*onnecting Railway for the appointment of Commissioners.

Motion for taxation of the cost** of the t-ewnil commissioners by whom the report was mide granted, and ordered that the same be taxed at the sum of $1,000 to each of said co missioners for their respective costs, charges and expenses.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 174 / Monday, September 11, 2023 / Presidential Documents 62439 

Notice of September 7, 2023 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to 

Persons Who Commit, Threaten To Commit, or Support 

Terrorism 

On September 23, 2001, by Executive Order 13224, the President declared 

a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the 

United States constituted by the grave acts of terrorism and threats of terrorism committed by foreign terrorists, including the terrorist attacks on 

September 11, 2001, in New York and Pennsylvania and against the Pentagon, 

and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks against United 

States nationals or the United States. 

On September 9, 2019, the President signed Executive Order 13886 to 

strengthen and consolidate sanctions to combat the continuing threat posed 

by international terrorism and to take additional steps to deal with the 

national emergency declared in Executive Order 13224, as amended. 

The actions of persons who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism 

continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, 

foreign policy, and economy of the United States. For this reason, the 

national emergency declared in Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 

2001, as amended, and the measures adopted to deal with that emergency, 

must continue in effect beyond September 23, 2023. Therefore, in accordance 

with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), 

I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to persons 

who commit, threaten to commit, or support terrorism declared in Executive 

Order 13224, as amended. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PRESDOC-O3
62440 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 174 / Monday, September 11, 2023 / Presidential Documents 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

September 7, 2023. [FR Doc. 2023–19744 

Filed 9–8–23; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3395–F3–P 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PRESDOC-O3BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Fairchild Semiconductor International, Inc. (the company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 29, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark S. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Mark S. Thompson   
|Mark S. Thompson       
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 8, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Signature Eyewear, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael Prince, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Michael Prince
-------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
Septmeber 11, 2006
No. 267.

#### Mid-America Telephone Co. *v.*Public Utilities Commission of Ohio et al.,

*ante,*p. 831.

Motion to dispense with printing the petition for rehearing granted. Petition for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and application.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

 

          I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., certify that: 

          1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of inTEST Corporation; 

          2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

          3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

          4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

        (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

        (b)  [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

        (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

        (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

          5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors: 

        (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

        (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 11, 2006/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
From: jhenao@bellsouth.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:06:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Juan Henao

Hollywood, FL 33027
Before the Second Division,

October 15, 1968

No. P68/435.

protest 60/1052-S (New York).

#### Bert Scheuer, Inc. *v.*United States,

*656No. P68/436.

protests 60/10538, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Herbert A. H. Behrens, Inc. *v.*United States,

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bicycles, with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard &*Co., *Mamgano Cycles Co.*(47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.