alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.16



 Exhibit 4.16 
 The Progressive Corporation 
 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan

 Performance-Based Restricted Stock Deferral Agreement 
 THIS DEFERRAL AGREEMENT is entered into pursuant to the provisions of The Progressive Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (“Plan”). All capitalized terms in this Agreement shall
have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan. 
 1. Deferral Election. I hereby elect to defer receipt of all Performance-Based Restricted
Stock Awards granted to me in 2006 under The Progressive Corporation 2003 Incentive Plan. This election shall become effective as of the date the restrictions applicable to such Awards (or portion thereof) expire and shall not apply to any Award (or
portion thereof) that fails to vest free of all restrictions. 
 2. Method of Distribution. I hereby elect that any distribution of the
balance of the Deferral Account established pursuant to this Agreement made on account of Termination of Employment be paid as follows: (Select one) 
  

	 	•	Single Lump Sum Payment 

  

	 	•	Three Annual Installments 

  

	 	•	Five Annual Installments 

  

	 	•	Ten Annual Installments 

 I understand that Plan
distributions made for reasons other than Termination of Employment will be made in a single lump sum payment, unless the Plan provides otherwise. I understand that I may change the method of distribution elected above only if and to the extent
permitted by the Plan. 
 3. Investment of Deferral Account. I understand that each amount credited to the Deferral Account established pursuant
to this Agreement shall be deemed to be invested in The Company Stock Fund until the day it is distributed. I also understand that this deemed investment is merely a device used to determine the amount payable to me under the Plan and does not
provide me with any actual rights or interests in any particular funds, securities or property of the Company, any Affiliated Company or the Trust or in any stock of The Progressive Corporation. I also understand that my right to receive
distributions under the Plan makes me a general creditor of the Company with no greater right or priority than any other general creditor of the Company. 
 4. Miscellaneous. I understand that this Agreement is subject to the terms, conditions and limitations of the Plan, as in effect from time to time, in all respects and that, except as expressly permitted
by the Plan, all elections made in this Agreement are irrevocable. I acknowledge that I have received, read and understand the Plan Description dated December, 2005 relating to the Plan. I agree to accept as final and binding all decisions and
interpretations of the Committee relating to the Plan, the Trust and this Agreement. 
 ALSO, I UNDERSTAND THAT THE PLAN IS LIKELY TO BE AMENDED
IN SIGNIFICANT RESPECTS FOLLOWING MY EXECUTION OF THIS AGREEMENT. I AGREE TO BE BOUND BY ALL SUCH AMENDMENTS AND BY ANY CHANGES SUCH AMENDMENTS MAY REQUIRE IN THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT. 

NAME OF ELIGIBLE EXECUTIVE: 
 EMPLOYEE
ID: 
 DATE: 
 Your
electronic submission of this Election Form will create a date/time stamp and serve as your signature.
EVA ELECTRIS CANNIE aka AVA ELECTRIS CANNIE

, Appellant,

v.

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB DBA CHRISTIANA TRUST, NOT INDIVIDUALLY BUT AS TRUSTEE FOR PRETIUM MORTGAGE ACQUISITION TRUST

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 2598

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 20, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Adrian C. Soud , Judge

. Eva Electris Cannie aka Ava Electris Cannie, pro se

, Appellant.

David Rosenberg of Robertson, Anschutz & Schneid, P.L., Boca Raton , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellee’s motion, filed on October 6, 2017, is granted and the appeal is

dis missed for lack of jurisdiction.

LEWIS, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, J J

. , CONCUR.
Before the Third Division,

February 5, 1957

No. 60465.

#### Max Duraffourg, Ltd., and N. M. Albert Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 198852-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic rutile, an earthy or mineral substance, not decorated in any manner, the same in all material respects as that the subject of *International Lapidaries Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 230, C. D. 1780), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**Exhibit      99.1 **

**C**
**AT      FINANCIAL ANNOUNCES THIRD-QUARTER 2005 RESULTS **

**STATISTICAL      HIGHLIGHTS:**

**THIRD      QUARTER 2005 VS. THIRD QUARTER 2004 **

**(ENDING      SEPTEMBER 30)**

|                                |   |   | **2005** |   |   | **2004** |   |   | **CHANGE** |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------|--------|--------|----------|--------|--------|------------|--------|
| Revenues                            |   | $      | 596      |   | $      | 476      |   |   | 25         | %      |
| Net                Profit           |   | $      | 87       |   | $      | 82       |   |   | 6          | %      |
| New                Retail Financing |   | $      | 3,024    |   | $      | 2,393    |   |   | 26         | %      |
| Total                Assets         |   | $      | 25,144   |   | $      | 22,255   |   |   | 13         | %      |

**FIRST      NINE MONTHS 2005 VS. FIRST NINE MONTHS 2004 **

**(ENDING      SEPTEMBER 30)**

|                                |   |   | **2005** |   |   | **2004** |   |   | **CHANGE** |   |
|-------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------|--------|--------|----------|--------|--------|------------|--------|
| Revenues                            |   | $      | 1,726    |   | $      | 1,400    |   |   | 23         | %      |
| Net                Profit           |   | $      | 260      |   | $      | 217      |   |   | 20         | %      |
| New                Retail Financing |   | $      | 8,735    |   | $      | 6,949    |   |   | 26         | %      |
Exhibit 32.1

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, A. Cameron Richardson, President and Chief Financial Officer of Aurora Gold
Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.   The  Quarterly  Report  on  Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period ended
     September 30, 2004 which this certification accompanies fully complies with
     the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
     of  1934:  and

2.   The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  October  18,  2004             BY:  /s/  A.  Cameron  Richardson
       ------------------                  -------------------------------------
                                           A.  Cameron  Richardson
                                           President and Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

) Application of ) )

KaiserAir, Inc. ) Docket OST-2009-0208 ) for a certificate of public convenience ) and necessity pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 41102 ) (interstate charter air transportation) ) )

SUPPLEMENT NO. 1 TO APPLICATION OF KAISERAIR, INC.

Communications with respect to th is document should be addressed to:

Mark W. Atwood

Elizabeth J. Wadsworth

Sher & Blackwell LLP 1850 M Street, N.W., Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 463-2513

Attorneys for KaiserAir, Inc.

January 19, 2010
From: imjohncs@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:59:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Stokes

Warren, MI 48093
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                             7
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                MAR-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          1,504,785
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                         1,478,014
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                           1,504,785
<EQUITIES>                                            0
<MORTGAGE>                                            0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                         0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                1,504,785
<CASH>                                        1,057,666
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                            1,023,532
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                4,664,612
<POLICY-LOSSES>                               1,687,785
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             622,210
<POLICY-OTHER>                                        0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                 0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                   8,102
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                        503,384
<OTHER-SE>                                    1,392,506
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  4,664,612
<PREMIUMS>                                      305,537
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              25,407
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                    0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  301,859
<BENEFITS>                                      222,769
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                      24,123
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            406,881
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (20,970)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (8,179)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (12,791)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (12,791)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.03)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                        0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                   0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                     0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                      0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                       0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                               0
        


</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

July 3, 1957

No. 60987.

protest 292412-K (San Francisco).

#### The Emporium and The Emporium Capwell Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the rate of 25 percent should apply to the toys valued at $271 and that the rate of 35 percent should apply to the toys valued at $37, the protest was sustained to that extent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>


<S>                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>         12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>     DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>          DEC-31-1999

<CASH>                        9,715,669
<SECURITIES>                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                    73,526
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              9,789,195
<PP&E>                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               37,601,029
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            61,922
<BONDS>                      33,824,625
<COMMON>                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<OTHER-SE>                  (11,039,877)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 37,601,029
<SALES>                       5,016,736
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              5,569,474
<CGS>                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 2,737,629
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              1,285,659
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            4,961,947
<INCOME-PRETAX>              (3,415,761)
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             915,476
<DISCONTINUED>               25,689,423
<EXTRAORDINARY>              (2,105,391)
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                 24,499,508
<EPS-BASIC>                     60.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                     60.44




</TABLE>
From: jlc@wi.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:07:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joetta Jatczak

, 53005
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                 AEROCENTURY CORP.

                                  CERTIFICATION


In connection with this quarterly report of AeroCentury Corp. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Toni M. Perazzo, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of
Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best
of my knowledge:

              (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
              13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
              1934, and

              (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
              all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
              indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.



Date:  August 12, 2005              /s/ Toni M. Perazzo
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Toni M. Perazzo
                                    Chief Financial Officer
From: roane.michael@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:06:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michael Roane

Dunkirk, MD 20754
Exhibit 32.1
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 I, Lars Pearl, President, Chief Executive Officer and  Chief Financial Officer of Aurora Gold Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 1.
The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2010 which this certification accompanies fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:November 22, 2010

BY:
/s/ Lars PearlLars PearlPresident, CEO and CFO
  This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 314, Misc.

#### Streit *v.*Bennett, Warden.

Supreme Court of Iowa. Certiorari denied.
No. 210, Misc.

#### Nerwinski *v.*Yeager, Prison Keeper.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                      15,816,217
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,716,642
<ALLOWANCES>                                   502,372
<INVENTORY>                                  8,462,850
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,101,623
<PP&E>                                      10,505,766
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,486,974
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              57,544,276
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,153,185
<BONDS>                                      8,911,727
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       807,881
<OTHER-SE>                                  41,624,669
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                57,544,276
<SALES>                                     39,790,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            39,790,434
<CGS>                                       18,167,840
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               18,167,840
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,843,920
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             615,705
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,879,189
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,810,416
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,068,773
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,068,773
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>