alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: patriciabryant09@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:40:25 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patricia Bryant

Shreveport, LA 71105
# 

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-97047

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  335                                                               Trade Date: 9/08/03

(To Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2002 &

  Prospectus dated August  8, 2002)                                                                     Issue Date:  9/11/03

The Date of this Pricing SupplementSeptember  8, 2003

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP                                                                                                                                Date and terms of redemption or

     or        Stated                                                                  Interest                                    repayment (including any

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment  Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)               Maturity                Public (2)                Commissions      Frequency      Option     Yes/No                record dates)

14911QPY1   6.0%                        09/15/18          100%                     1.15%             Semi-Annually                        YES                YES                        Callable at 100% beginning 09/15/05     

                                                                                                                                                                                                                    and quarterly thereafter.                                                         

                          

Principal                                                                                1st Payment Day         

Amount                   Proceeds                 Dealer                            Date                  Count

$6,147,000.00                $6,076,309.50         ABN AMROInc.                 03/15/04                 30/360    

Original Issue Discount Note:                                                                   Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                   N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $262.342 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated August 8,2002.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
From: rpanzer@hospicepatients.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 3:09:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ron Panzer

Rockford, MI 49341
**Exhibit 35**

ITEM 1123 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE 

WITH RESPECT TO THE INDENTURE (“THE INDENTURE”) FOR THE

GENWORTH LIFE GLOBAL FUNDING TRUSTS 

I, MaryCallahan, Vice President of The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (the “Trustee”), state: 

(a) a review of the Trustee’sactivities for the period January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2008 and of the Trustee’s performance under the lndenture has been made under my supervision, and 

(b) to the best of my knowledge, except as disclosed in the Trustee’s platform-level assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria specified in Item 1122 (d) of Regulation AB datedFebruary 27, 2009 and attached hereto as Schedule A, the Trustee has fulfilled, in all material respects, its obligations under the Indenture for the period described above. 

Date: March 2, 2009 

 

SCHEDULE A 

MATERIAL INSTANCES OF NON-COMPLIANCE 

*1122(d)(2)(i): Payments on pool assets are deposited into the appropriatecustodial bank accounts and related bank clearing accounts no more than two business days of receipt, or such other number of days specified in the transaction agreements.*

With respect to collections received on assets relating to certain series of securities, such collections were not deposited into a segregated account for each specified series but rather were deposited into a generalaccount held by the Company as lndenture Trustee (hereinafter referred to as the “lndenture Trustee”) and remitted directly to the investors. All collections were properly allocated by the lndenture Trustee to the related series ofsecurities and timely remitted to the investors in such series. The segregated account for each specified series was in existence prior to the time deposits were to be made into such account but such account was not utilized in all instances by theIndenture Trustee as stated above. Procedures have been in place and are currently being reinforced so that collections are deposited into the segregated account for each specified series within the applicable time frames and then remitted to theinvestors in such series all in accordance with the related transaction documents.
From: cheripaisson@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:56:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cheri Paisson

La Mirada, CA 90638
#### In the Matter of John F. Caruso, Respondent, v County of Westchester, Sued Herein as Westchester County Medical Center, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 75]

—In a proceeding for leave to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5), the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Silverman, J.), entered March 18, 1994, which granted the application.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the application for leave to file a late notice of claim is denied.

The Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting the petitioner’s application for leave to file a late notice of claim. While the petitioner’s claim sounds in medical malpractice, and he asserts that his physical condition contributed to his delay in seeking leave to file a late notice, his application was supported solely by his own conclusory and self-serving allegations and those of his counsel *(see, Ribeiro v Town of N. Hempstead,*200 AD2d 730; *Matter of Dominguez v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*178 AD2d 186; *Carroll v City of New York,*130 AD2d 702). Further, and contrary to the petitioner’s contentions, there is no evidence in the record establishing that the appellant acquired actual notice of the essential facts constituting the petitioner’s claim within the prescribed 90-day period or a reasonable time thereafter *(see, Munnerlyn v City of New York,*203 AD2d 437; *Carroll v City of New York, supra).*The appellant’s possession of the petitioner’s hospital records is insufficient to provide notice of the facts constituting his claim *(Matter of Fallon v County of Westchester,*184 AD2d 510, 511; *Matter of Aviles v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*172 AD2d 237; *Perkins v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*167 AD2d 150; *Bailey v City of New York,*159 AD2d 280). Under the circumstances, the petitioner’s application should have been denied. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.
From: hames@stscoinc.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:32:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bob Hames

Lubbock, TX 79453
From: michaelmcc@q.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:23:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michael McClymont

Peoria, AZ 85383
No. P68/451.

protests 63/7602, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Banton Corporation and Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni et al. *v.*United States,

Bao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of steel strips similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Geo. S. Bush &*Co., *Inc., and Heidner & Co.*v. *United States*(52 Cust. Ct. 344, Abstract 68544), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 10.5



 Exhibit 10.5 
 THIRD AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE CONTRACT 
 THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE
CONTRACT (“Amendment”) is made effective as of August 16, 2012, by and between TWIN CITY CROSSING, LLC (“Seller”) and WHEELER INTERESTS, INC. (“Purchaser”). 

RECITALS: 

WHEREAS, Seller and Purchaser previously entered into that certain Purchase Contract, dated June 11, 2012, as amended by First
Amendment to Purchase Contract, dated July 26, 2012, as further amended by Second Amendment to Purchase Contract, dated August 9, 2012 (as amended, the “Agreement”) for the sale of the Property as defined in the Agreement,
including, without limitation, certain real property and improvements located in the Town of Batesburg- Leesville, County of Lexington, South Carolina; 
 WHEREAS, Purchaser and Seller desire to further amend the Agreement as set forth herein; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Purchaser and Seller hereby undertake and agree as follows:

 1. Defined Terms. Terms defined in the Agreement shall have the same meanings in this Amendment unless specifically
modified herein. 
 2. Inspection Period Agreements. Purchaser and Seller agree that the Review Period, as defined in
Section 3(A) of the Agreement, is extended to and including August 30, 2012. 
 3. Execution by
Facsimile/Counterparts. Execution of this instrument may be evidenced by facsimile signature which shall be deemed an original for all purposes. To facilitate execution, this Amendment may be executed in as many counterparts as may be required;
and it shall not be necessary that the signature of, or on behalf of, each party, or that the signatures of the persons required to bind any party, appear on one or more such counterparts. All counterparts shall collectively constitute a single
agreement 
 4. Agreement Remains in Effect. Subject to the specific amendments and agreements set forth in this
Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect without modification. 
 [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Seller and Purchaser have caused this Amendment to be signed as of the
date first above written. 
  

									
	SELLER:	 		 	TWIN CITY CROSSING, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company
				
		 		 	By:	 	Du Rhone Group, Ltd., its Manager
					
		 		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Neil R. Smith

		 		 		 		 	Neil R. Smith
		 		 		 		 	Executive Vice President
			
	PURCHASER:	 		 	WHEELER INTERESTS, INC.
				
		 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Jon S. Wheeler

		 		 	Name:	 	 JON S. WHEELER

		 		 	Its:	 	 PRESIDENT/CEO



  
 2
From: jshearer@usfamily.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:32:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Terese Shearer

Burnsville, MN 55337