alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Excelsior Private Equity Fund II, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2007 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  |                            
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------ |  | ---------------------------
|                         |  |  | 
|Date: September 14, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ David R. Bailin     
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | David R. Bailin            
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer 
|                         |  |  | 
|Date: September 14, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Raghav V. Nandagopal
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Raghav V. Nandagopal       
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer 
|                         |  |  | 
|Date: September 14, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Steven L. Suss      
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Steven L. Suss             
|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                          |  | Principal Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



25
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Mary R. Brust, Respondent, v. John R. Brown, Appellant.

— Order and proceedings subsequent under it affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Pratt, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
From: jswartz2@bellsouth.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:48:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Swartz

Easley, SC 29642
#### In the Matter of Henry M., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[632 NYS2d 575]

—In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from an order of disposition of the Family Court, Queens County (Gage, J.), dated January 20, 1994, which, upon a fact-finding order of the same court dated December 2, 1993, made after a hearing, finding that the appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of robbery in the third degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent and placed him with the Division for Youth for a period of 18 months. The appeal brings up for review the fact-finding order dated December 2, 1993.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

*668The Family Court considered, all of the dispositional alternatives and decided that the appropriate disposition was to place the appellant in the custody of the Division for Youth for placement in a structured environment that would best provide for his needs. Based on the psychological evaluation of the appellant and all of the other relevant evidence, including his prior felony petition, his home environment, and his poor academic motivation, this was a proper exercise of the court’s discretion and its determination should not be disturbed *(see, Matter of Katherine W.,*62 NY2d 947).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review, and, in any event, without merit. Altman, J. P., Hart, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.
##### 



CERTIFICATE OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF
DOBSON COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
  a.
    
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and thatb.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of the Company at June 30, 2005, and the results of the Companys
operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005.
 August 12, 2005/S/ BRUCE R. KNOOIHUIZENBruce R. Knooihuizen
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and principal financial officer
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION FOR E N B ANC R ECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: In the Interest of M.A.J. Jr., H.A.J., and B.D.J., Children

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 9

- 0 0 6 85

- C V

Trial court case number: 2018

- 04197J

Trial court: 314t h District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed : July 10 , 2020

Party filing motion : Appell ee

A majority of t he en banc court has voted to deny app ell ee ’s motion for en banc

reconsideration. It is ordered that the motion is denied

.

Judge’s signature:

___

/s / Julie Countiss

_________ Acting for the En Banc Court*

Date: ___ December 10, 2020

___________________

* En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Keyes, Lloyd

, Kelly, Goodman,

Landau, Hightower, Countiss, and Adams

.

Keyes , J., dissenting from the denial of en banc reconsideration for reasons stated in h er dissenting

opinion on rehearing.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.2



                                  PROMISSORY NOTE

Principal Amount - $31,972.19
December 31, 2002
Las Vegas, NV  89101

This Promissory Note will replace all previous Promissory Notes to Cellcom Corp.
Its purpose is to extend the due date through June 30, 2002.

For value received, I promise to pay, in lawful money of the United States of
America, to the order of CELLCOM CORP. at 520 S. Fourth Street, Las Vegas,
Nevada 89101 the sum of THIRTY-ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED SEVENTY-TWO AND 19/100
($31,972.19) with interest thereon at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum.
Interest will be paid monthly and principal is payable in full on or before June
30, 2002.

I hereby waive presentment, demand, protest, notice of protest, notice of
dishonor, and notice of non-payment.

In the case of default of, or if suit is commenced for, collection of any amount
due hereunder, the undersigned agrees to pay interest thereon at the rate of ten
percent (10%) per annum, together with reasonable attorney's fees incurred and
costs.

                                          /s/ JAY H. BROWN
                                          ----------------------------

                                       16
From: davecranstonsr@mac.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:02:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Cranston

Sewickley, PA 15143
-  Home 
-  File Repository 
-  Events 
-                   Depository Library Council (DLC) Meetings              

# Depository Library Council (DLC) Meetings

The Depository Library Council to the GPO Director meets twice a year, in the spring and fall. These meetings, attended by Federal depository library staff and other information professionals, are the largest gatherings devoted to U.S. Government information in the country. Prior to 2001, proceedings were distributed in paper format. As of 2001, proceedings are available online only.

## Categories

2022 Meeting Proceedings

2023 Meeting Proceedings

2024 Meeting Proceedings

2021 Meeting Proceedings

2020 Meeting Proceedings

2019 Meeting Proceedings

2018 Meeting Proceedings

2017 Meeting Proceedings

2016 Meeting Proceedings

2015 Meeting Proceedings

2014 Meeting Proceedings

2013 Meeting Proceedings

2012 Meeting Proceedings

2011 Meeting Proceedings

2010 Meeting Proceedings

2009 Meeting Proceedings

2008 Meeting Proceedings

2007 Meeting Proceedings

2006 Meeting Proceedings

2005 Meeting Proceedings

2004 Meeting Proceedings

2003 Meeting Proceedings

2002 Meeting Proceedings

2001 Meeting Proceedings

2000 Meeting Proceedings

1999 Meeting Proceedings

1998 Meeting Proceedings

1997 Meeting Proceedings

1996 Meeting Proceedings

1995 Meeting Proceedings

1994 Meeting Proceedings

1993 Meeting Proceedings

1992 Meeting Proceedings

Meeting Minutes and Transcripts

Contains compilations of minutes from Depository Library Council Meetings. Transcripts are provided beginning in 2006.
No. 189, Misc.

#### McGee *v.*Arizona.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Robert W. Pickrell,*Attorney General of Arizona, and *Kenneth G. Flickinger, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Supreme Court of Arizona. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
EMAILTHATPAYS.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FORM 10-QSB FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         259,189
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  259,707
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,582)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               567,435
<PP&E>                                         240,026
<DEPRECIATION>                                (57,899)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 749,562
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          349,257
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        44,615
<OTHER-SE>                                     212,865
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   749,562
<SALES>                                        544,207
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               544,207
<CGS>                                          435,215
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  435,215
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,016,977
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (907,985)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,917
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (918,902)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (918,902)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (918,902)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-58570) pertaining to the 1983
Incentive Stock Option Plan of Intrusion Inc. and the 1987 Incentive Stock Option Plan of Intrusion Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8,
No. 333-60928) and the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-57948) pertaining to the 1995 Stock Option Plan of Intrusion Inc., as
amended, the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-34484) and the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-90408)
pertaining to the 1995 Non-employee Director Stock Option Plan of Intrusion Inc., as amended, the Registration Statement (Form S-8,
No. 33-42927) pertaining to the 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Intrusion Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-80898)
pertaining to the 401(k) Savings Plan of Intrusion Inc. and the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-53813) pertaining to the Essential Communication
Corporation 1996 Stock Option Plan of our report dated January 28, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Intrusion Inc. included in its Annual
Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/
Ernst & Young LLP Ernst & Young LLPDallas, Texas
August 5, 2004

---



QuickLinks
1

The Honorable Lyle E. Strom, United States District Judge for the District of

Nebraska. 

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-2994

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the District

* of Nebraska.

Tyree L. Lampkin, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: February 4, 2004

Filed: February 10, 2004

___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Tyree L. Lampkin appeals the sentence the district court1

 imposed after he

pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute

50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing cocaine base, in violation of

21 U.S.C. § 846. Mr. Lampkin contests the amount of cocaine base the court

attributed to him at sentencing. See U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c)(1). The government bears

the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence both the type and
-2-

quantity of drugs attributable to a defendant, and we “will reverse only if firmly

convinced a mistake has been made.” See United States v. Thompson, 335 F.3d 782,

784 (8th Cir. 2003) (type), cert. denied, 2004 WL 47344 (U.S. Jan. 12, 2004) (No. 03-

7643); United States v. Sarabia-Martinez, 276 F.3d 447, 450 (8th Cir. 2002)

(quantity). After carefully reviewing the record, including the sentencing testimony

of various witnesses who described drug transactions involving Mr. Lampkin, we

conclude the district court’s findings of drug type and quantity are not clearly

erroneous. See Sarabia-Martinez, 276 F.3d at 450; United States v. Maxwell, 25 F.3d

1389, 1397 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1031 (1994). Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

 

          I, Robert E. Matthiessen, certify that: 

          1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of inTEST Corporation; 

          2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

          3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

          4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

        (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

        (b)  [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]; 

        (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

        (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

          5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors: 

        (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

        (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 14, 2003/s/ Robert E. Matthiessen
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           18351
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   132161
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     120084
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                282886
<PP&E>                                          212176
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  634853
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           169283
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          4386
<OTHER-SE>                                      200804
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    634853
<SALES>                                         520882
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                520882
<CGS>                                           302127
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   302127
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                166274
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               21993
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  30228
<INCOME-TAX>                                     11411
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              18817
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     18817
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .84
        

</TABLE>
#### New Jersey Steamboat Company, Appellant, v. The Mayor, etc., of the City of New York, Respondent.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Daniels, J,