alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Interorgan signal.                    

*Date:*                         October 19-20, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Nijaguna Prasad, Ph.D.,  Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Gateway Building, Suite 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-9667,                         *prasadnb@nia.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 14, 2023.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-20239 Filed 9-18-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert E. Matthiessen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Date:	August 13, 2004

/s/ Robert E. Matthiessen
Robert E. Matthiessen
President and Chief Executive Officer
From: gekauffman@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:58:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gordon E Kauffman

Easton, PA 18042
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1490 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1490

    To establish terrorist lookout committees in each United States 
                                Embassy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 3, 2001

   Ms. Snowe introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To establish terrorist lookout committees in each United States 
                                Embassy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TERRORIST LOOKOUT COMMITTEES.

    (a) Establishment.--(1) Not later than 30 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall establish within 
each United States Embassy a Terrorist Lookout Committee, which shall 
include the head of the political section and senior representatives of 
all United States law enforcement agencies, and the intelligence 
community, under the authority of the chief of mission.
    (2) Each Committee shall be chaired by the respective deputy chief 
of mission, with the head of the consular section as vice chair.
    (b) Meetings.--Each Terrorist Lookout Committee established under 
subsection (a) shall meet at least monthly and shall maintain records 
of its meetings. Upon the completion of each meeting, each Committee 
shall report to the Department of State all names submitted for 
inclusion in the visa lookout system.
    (c) Certification.--If no names are submitted upon completion of a 
meeting under subsection (b), the deputy chief of mission shall certify 
to the Secretary of State, subject to potential application the 
Accountability Review Board provisions of title III of the Omnibus 
Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986, that none of the 
relevant sections of the United States Embassy had knowledge of the 
identity of any individual eligible for inclusion in the visa lookout 
system for possible terrorist activity.
    (d) Report.--The Secretary of State shall submit a report on a 
quarterly basis to the Committee on Foreign Relations of the Senate and 
the Committee on International Relations of the House of 
Representatives on the status of the Terrorist Lookout Committees.
                                 <all>
```
FORM 10-Q

UNITED STATES 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

										 

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended SeptemberJune 30, 2003
Commission File No.    0-13295
 

 

 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION         

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 
**Delaware**37-1105865**(State of incorporation) **(IRS Employer I.D. No.)****2120 West End Ave.

Nashville, Tennessee**37203-0001**(Address of principal executive offices)**(Zip Code)**Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (615) 341-1000            
   The Registrant is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Caterpillar Inc. and meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction (H)(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q, and is therefore filing this form with the reduced disclosure format.

    Indicate by a check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  

Yes  X   No       
    Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). 

Yes No  X  ********************
From: dalesisam@eplife.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:23:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dale Sisam

Eden Prairie, MN 55344
exhibit_10-1.htm










Exhibit 10.1


 



 






 


November 29, 2012


 


David M. Slager


Regals Capital LP ("Regals")


152 West 57th Street - Ninth Floor


New York, NY 10019


 


Dear David:


 


Reference is made to (i) the Warrant dated March 11, 2012, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto dated as of August 28, 2012, and Amendment No. 2 thereto dated as of November 13, 2012, to purchase up to 3,485,500 shares of common stock of Oramed Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the "Company"), (ii) the Warrant dated August 28, 2012, to purchase up to 1,351,352 shares of common stock of the Company and (iii) the Warrant dated November 5, 2012, to purchase up to 202,703 shares of common stock of the Company (together, the "Warrants") issued by the Company to Regals. In connection therewith, I am writing to confirm that Regals and the Company have agreed to amend each of the Warrants (and to prepare and execute amendments to each of the Warrants (the "Amendments") setting forth such terms as soon as reasonably practicable) as follows:








	
  

	
1.

	
Section 3(e) ("Anti-dilution Adjustments") of each of the Warrants shall be deleted in its entirety; and







 



	
  

	
2.

	
The Exercise Price (as such term is defined in Section 2(b) of each of the Warrants) shall be $0.31, subject to adjustment as provided under each of the respective Warrants.







 


As  a condition to and simultaneous with the execution and delivery of the Amendments, the Company shall issue to Regals a Common Stock Purchase Warrant in the form attached as Exhibit A hereto. In connection with such issuance, please confirm by your signature below that the representations and warranties of Regals set forth in Section 3.2 of the Share Purchase Agreement, date November 5, 2012, between Regals and Company are true as of the date hereof.


 


Please indicate your acknowledgement and agreement to the terms of this letter agreement in the space provided below and return an executed copy to me.


 




	
 


 


Acknowledged and agreed: 


 



Regals Capital LP



/s/ David M. Slager


Title:____________________





	
Sincerely,


 




/s/ Nadav Kidron




Nadav Kidron, CEO


 







 





Oramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc.   |    2 Elza Street, Jerusalem, Israel 93706.   |    www.oramedpharma.com


Phone: 011 972-54-790 9058   |    Fax: 011 972-2-679 2336   |    Email: info@oramedpharma.com


 




  





  











  












 



Exhibit A


 


The Common Stock Purchase Warrant is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 to this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A filed December 27, 2012.
Exhibit 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement [Form
S-8 No. 333-44119] pertaining to the 1995 Employee Stock Option Plan, and in the
related Prospectus of Cover-All Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries of our
report dated February 26, 2003, with respect to the 2002, 2001 and 2000
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Cover-All Technologies, Inc.
and subsidiaries included in its Annual Report [Form 10-K] for the year ended
December 31, 2002.

                                                   MOORE STEPHENS, P. C.
                                                   Certified Public Accountants.

New York, New York
March 28, 2003
From: suzsander@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:18:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Suzanne Sander

Ames, IA 50010
#### Isabella T. Myers, Appellant, v. The Bank of Portsmouth, Respondent.

— Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinions by

Daniels, J., and Davis, P. J.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JOE WILLIE HOOKS,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-10188

D.C. No. 2:96-cr-00246-ROS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Roslyn O. Silver, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2012** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Joe Willie Hooks appeals from the district court’s order denying his 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of sentence. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

DEC 31 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-10188

Hooks contends that he is eligible for a sentence reduction under

Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines, which changed the drug quantity

table in U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1 for offenses involving crack cocaine. This contention

fails. Amendment 750 did not alter the Guidelines range applicable to the drug

quantity used to determine Hooks’s sentence. See U.S.S.G. app. C, amend. 750. 

Because Amendment 750 did not lower Hooks’s advisory Sentencing Guidelines

range, the district court lacked jurisdiction to reduce his sentence. See 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2); United States v. Leniear, 574 F.3d 668, 674 (9th Cir. 2009).

In light of this conclusion, we do not reach Hooks’s contention that the

district court abused its discretion by failing to state reasons for denying his

motion.

AFFIRMED.
From: Eugene Johnson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 1:45:50 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I am outraged that we, the people, have once again been steamrolled by the Obama

administration and Planned Parenthood. Our right to give input on rules promulgated

by the government has been set aside and our religious freedoms have been thrown

under the bus.

We will be required to pay for other people's contraception through our insurance

premiums, and Catholic institutions and employers will be required to provide and

participate in insurance programs that include abortifacient birth control.

As Planned Parenthood "applauds the U.S. Department of Health and Human

Services (HHS) decision requiring new insurance plans to fully cover FDA-approved

contraceptive methods without co-pays or other out-of-pocket costs," those who

oppose paying for abortifacient birth control are left without even a forum to object.

That is why I turn to you today.

The Obama administration, through its various departments, unilaterally set aside

the required period for public comments and implemented the requirements as of

the date of publication in the Federal RegisterAugust 3, 2011.

The reason given for setting aside statutory provision for public comment? "The

Departments have determined that such a delay in implementation of the statutory

requirement that women receive vital preventive services without cost-sharing would

be contrary to the public interest because it could result in adverse health

consequences that may not otherwise have occurred."

This reasoning is ridiculous and the regulations are an affront to my religious

liberties.

As a member of your constituency, I ask you to please take any and all steps

available to rectify this situation, and notify me of the steps that are being taken to

right this horrible wrong.

Sincerely,

Eugene Johnson

Stafford, Virginia
From: BonfireUSA@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:45:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bonnie Berry

Oceanside, CA 92058
ACCEPTED 03-14-00416-CV 7344195 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/13/2015 9:59:14 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK
No. 508, Misc.

#### Shorey *v.*Warden, Maryland Penitentiary.

Court of Appeals of Maryland. Certiorari denied.