alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1360 

Honoring and commemorating the selfless acts of heroism displayed by the 

late Detective John Michael Gibson and Private First Class Jacob Joseph 

Chestnut of the United States Capitol Police on July 24, 1998. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2008 

Ms. EDWARDS of Maryland submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring and commemorating the selfless acts of heroism 

displayed by the late Detective John Michael Gibson 

and Private First Class Jacob Joseph Chestnut of the 

United States Capitol Police on July 24, 1998. 

Whereas Detective Gibson, born March 29, 1956, was killed 

in the line of duty while protecting the office complex of 

the House Majority Whip; 

Whereas Private First Class Chestnut, born April 28, 1940, 

was killed in the line of duty while guarding the Document Room Door entrance of the Capitol; 

Whereas Detective Gibson and Private First Class Chestnut 

were the first police officers to lie in honor in the rotunda 

of the Capitol; 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1360 IH 

Whereas Private First Class Chestnut was the first AfricanAmerican to lie in honor in the rotunda of the Capitol; 

Whereas Detective Gibson was married to Evelyn and was 

the father of three children; 

Whereas Private First Class Chestnut was married to Wen 

Ling and was the father of five children; and 

Whereas 10 years have passed since Detective Gibson and 

Private First Class Chestnut sacrificed their lives to protect the lives of hundreds of tourists, staff, and Members 

of Congress on July 24, 1998: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors and commemorates the selfless 

3 acts of heroism displayed by the late Private 

4 First Class Jacob Joseph Chestnut and Detec5 tive John Michael Gibson of the United States 

6 Capitol Police on July 24, 1998; and 

7 (2) expresses its condolences to the wives, 

8 children, and other family members of Private 

9 First Class Chestnut and Detective Gibson on 

10 the 10 year anniversary of their passing. 

Æ 


erowe on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
No. 149.

#### Harlow et al. *v.*United States.

*Joel W. Westbrook*for petitioner Harlow.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Julia P. Cooper*for the United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

BudgetingDecentralizationEducational Equity (Finance)Educational FinanceElementary Secondary EducationFinance ReformSchool Based ManagementSchool Restructuring

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
#### Walter K. Yorston v. James W. Bouton.

Judgment modified, so far as to sustain the demurrer to the first, third, fourth and fifth causes of action contained in the complaint, and as modified the judgment should be affirmed, but without costs of the appeal to either party5 and with liberty to the plaintiff to amend his complaint within twenty days after notice of this decision. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
Case No. 14,758.

#### UNITED STATES v. CATON.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 150.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1803.

Contempt—Refusal to Testify before Grand Jury.

It is a contempt of court in a witness to refuse to answer proper questions before the grand jury, for which he may he fined, and required to give security for his good behavior.

[Cited in U. S. v. Anonymous, 21 Fed. 770.]

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

Attachment of contempt on complaint of the grand jury, signed by their foreman, that Catón had refused to answer questions, and behaved in an insolent manner, and had threatened some of the grand jurors. Upon examining on- oath two of the grand jurors, and the facts being proved, he was fined five dollars and ordered to give security for his good behavior for one year, himself and one surety in fifty dollars each—or himself in fifty dollars with two sureties in twenty-five dollars each.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              63
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,089
<ALLOWANCES>                                        98
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,153
<PP&E>                                           4,027
<DEPRECIATION>                                     877
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,652
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,608
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           36,487
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                    (29,779)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,652
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,409
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,654
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    55
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 503
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,809)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,809)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.32)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<CIK>               0001036262
<NAME>              INTEST CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

       

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                     8,780
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                              4,138
<ALLOWANCES>                                 168
<INVENTORY>                                2,570
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          15,922
<PP&E>                                     1,974
<DEPRECIATION>                             1,135
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            23,719
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      2,396
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                      65
<OTHER-SE>                                21,258
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              23,719
<SALES>                                    4,811
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           4,811
<CGS>                                      2,279
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              2,301
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              297
<INCOME-TAX>                                 125
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          172
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                 172
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .03
        


</TABLE>
MAURICE NOBLE

,
Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3980

Opinion filed January 7, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Maurice Noble

, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n , 807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA

2002) (holding that where the trial court has recently taken action on a pending

pleading, mandamus relief was not warranted)

.
BENTON, CLARK, and SWANSON

, JJ., CONCUR.
From: tupyjunk@q.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:36:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Penny Tupy

Minneapolis, MN 55428
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Material Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert M. Bernstein, Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:				1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and				2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company./s/ Robert M. Bernstein                            Robert M. Bernstein,   Chief Executive Officer and				Chief Financial Officer				December 5, 2007

----
EXHIBIT 10-W
------------
(Carlyle-XIV)

                          CONSENT OF DIRECTOR
                                  OF
                        CARLYLE MANAGERS, INC.


     The undersigned, being all the directors of Carlyle Manager, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), acting by written consent
pursuant to Section 141(f) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, hereby
consent to the adoption of, and do hereby adopt, the following resolutions:

     WHEREAS, this Corporation is the holder of certain demand notes made
by its shareholders in the aggregate original principal amount of
$3,000,000 (the "Notes"), as set forth in EXHIBIT A attached hereto; and,

     WHEREAS, this Corporation desires to make a distribution to its
shareholders aggregating $2,000,000, as a return of capital (the
"Distribution"); and,

     WHEREAS, in order to effect the Distribution, the outstanding
principal amount of the Notes will be reduced as set forth in such Exhibit
A.

     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Corporation make the
Distribution, as a return of capital, effective as of the date hereof, to
be paid by the reduction of the outstanding principal amount as set forth
EXHIBIT A attached hereto; and,

     FURTHER RESOLVED, that any officer of this Corporation is hereby
authorized and directed to effect the Distribution as of the date hereof,
to enter into, execute and deliver, or to ratify, any and all documents
incidental or related thereto, including without limitation, those
documents deemed necessary or appropriate to evidence the reduction in the
outstanding principal balances of each of the Notes as set forth herein,
and any said officer is hereby authorized and directed to take whatever
actions said officer deems reasonably necessary in order to consummate the
transaction described or contemplated.



Dated:           October 31, 1996



STUART C. NATHAN
--------------------
Stuart C. Nathan



Being the sole director or Carlyle Managers, Inc., a Delaware corporation.




                               EXHIBIT A
                               ---------



                                                Original 
                                                Principal    Principal
Payor                          Date of Note      Amount      Reduction
-----                         --------------   ----------    ---------

JMB Realty Corporation        March 25, 1993   $  600,000     $400,000

JMB/Manhattan
 Associates, Ltd.             March 25, 1993   $  600,000     $400,000

Carlyle Real Estate
 Limited Partnership-XIII     March 25, 1993   $  600,000     $400,000

Carlyle Real Estate
 Limited Partnership-XIV      March 25, 1993   $1,200,000     $800,000
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Century Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward F. Gotschall, Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    EDWARD F.
GOTSCHALLEdward F. Gotschall Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer May 7, 2004




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Companys Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
No. 69190.

#### Hairnet Corporation of America *v.*United States,

protests 59/27251 (B), 60/7241 (A), and 60/25557 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon hair nets similar in use to manufactures of silk and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 CCPA 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 659, Misc.

#### Allison *v.*Wiman, Warden.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*MacDonald Gallion,*Attorney General of Alabama, and *John C. Tyson III,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Supreme Court of Alabama. Certiorari denied.
From: groehrig@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:36:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gerald Roehrig

Carrollton, TX 75007
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





DATE OF REPORT (Date of earliest event reported): June 17, 2013





CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION


(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)





Delaware (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION)001-11241 (COMMISSION FILE NUMBER)37-1105865 (IRS EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)





2120 West End Avenue, Nashville, Tennessee    37203-0001 (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)    (ZIP CODE)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (615) 341-1000





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:


o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))














---



I tem 8.01 Other Events .





Exhibits are filed herewith in connection with the issuance on June 17, 2013 by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation (the “Company”) of $250,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its Medium-Term Notes, Series G, Floating Rate Notes due 2015 (the “Notes”) pursuant to the Company’s previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-173364) (the “Registration Statement”) and the related Prospectus dated April 7, 2011, Prospectus Supplement dated April 7, 2011 and Pricing Supplement dated June 12, 2013, relating to the Notes.





Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits .





(d) Exhibits . The following Exhibits are filed as part of this Report and as Exhibits to the Registration Statement:





ExhibitNumberDescription5.1Opinion of Sidley Austin LLP, as to the legality of the Notes.23.1Consent of Sidley Austin LLP (included as part of Exhibit 5.1).








2


---



SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





Caterpillar Financial Services CorporationBy:/s/ J. Wesley BlumenshineName: J. Wesley Blumenshine Title:   Secretary





Date: June 17, 2013








3


---



EXHIBIT INDEX








ExhibitNumberDescription5.1Opinion of Sidley Austin LLP, as to the legality of the Notes.23.1Consent of Sidley Austin LLP (included as part of Exhibit 5.1).





4
No. 68875.

#### Panation Trade Co. *v.*United States,

protests 61/2708, 61/21535, and 62/6116 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rosary bracelets the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 66761, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32




CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Matech Corp. (the Company”) on Form 10-Q
for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert M. Bernstein, Chief Executive Officer,
President, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1.      The
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.      The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Date: 
May 19, 2009






/s/
Robert M.
Bernstein


Robert M.
Bernstein,


Chief
Executive Officer, President, and


Chief
Financial Officer
No. 249, Misc.

#### Dolatowski *v.*Illinois.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*William G. Clark,*Attorney General of Illinois, for respondent.

Criminal Court of Cook County, Illinois. Certiorari denied.