alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: rolou27@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:47:25 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Roma Davidson

Nampa, ID 83651
[No. 3480.]

#### Stephens-Wilmot Co. v. Howell.

1. Tax *Titles*— Void *Deed.*A treasurer’s deed which shows upon its face that it is based upon a sale of the land to the county made on the first day it was offered is void.

So, a deed based upon a sale to the county, and an assignment of the certificate by the county clerk more than three years after its date

*3972. *Limitations-*— Color *of Title. A*tax deed. Which has not been of record for seven years preceding an action by the original owner for the recovery of the lands does not support a plea of the seven years statute of limitations.

*Appeal from Yuma District Court.*Hon. H. P. Burke, Judge.

Mr. E. H. Gtlmohe, for appellant.

Mr. John F. Mail, for appellee.

*Per curiam.*

Action in ejectment; complaint in the ordinary form. The answer consists of a general denial, and a plea of the seven year statute of limitations pertaining to vácant and unoccupied lands. The replication consists of specific denials. Judgment went for appellee Howell, who was plaintiff below. The record in this case is similar to, if not precisely like, that in *Empire Ranch and Cattle Company v. Howell,*our number 3477. Plaintiff’s title rested upon trustee’s deeds emanating from the foreclosure, in some instances, of first, and in others, of second trust deeds, there being some five tracts of land involved in the action. Plaintiff’s title was sufficient to maintain the action. To support its title the defendant corporation introduced an original and a correction tax deed, both based on the same tax certificate. This tax certificate was originally issued to the county and by the county clerk assigned more than three years after the date thereof. This fact appears on the face of the original tax deed introduced by the defendant, and is not negatived by the correction tax deed. The tax deeds also show on their face that the land in question was bid in by the county on the first day it was offered for sale. For these reasons the tax deeds were void on their face. Neither of them had been of record for seven years, *398therefore, they were properly excluded by the trial court and the judgment must be affirmed. *Affirmed.*

Decided November 11, A. D. 1912.

Rehearing denied December 16, A. D. 1912.
BEFORE THE FIRST DIVISION,

January 30, 1961

No. 65102.

#### D. N. & E. Walter & Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 329771-K, etc. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of *D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), .the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64982-64983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20331]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-0829]


Agency Information Collection Activity: Income and Asset 
Statement in Support of Claim for Pension or Parents' DIC; Withdrawn

AGENCY:  Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On Friday, September 15, 2023, the Veterans Benefits 
Administration (VA), published a notice in the Federal Register 
announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection 
Income and Asset Statement in Support of Claim for Pension or Parents' 
(VA Form 21P-0969). This notice was published in error; therefore, this 
document corrects that error by withdrawing this FR notice, document 
number 2023-20001.

[[Page 64983]]


DATES: As of Friday, September 15, 2023, the FR notice published at 88 
FR 178, page 63677 on September 15, 2023, is withdrawn.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maribel Aponte, Office of Enterprise 
and Integration, Data Governance Analytics (008), 810 Vermont Ave. NW, 
Washington, DC 20006, (202) 266-4688 or email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f29f93809b90979edc93829d9c8697b28493dc959d84"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f39e92819a91969fdd92839c9d8796b38592dd949c85">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FR Doc. 2023-20001, published on Friday, 
September 15, 2023 (88 FR 178, page 63677), is withdrawn by this 
notice.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Maribel Aponte,
VA PRA Clearance Officer, Office of Enterprise and Integration/Data 
Governance Analytics, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2023-20331 Filed 9-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

August 1 5 , 2018 

# Order

Clerk August 1 5 , 2018

15 6406 ( 62 )

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appell ant

, SC: 15 6406

v COA: 332081

Wayne CC: 15

- 005481

- FH

JOEL EUSEVIO DAVIS

, Defendant

- Appell ee

. _____________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice , the motion defendant

- appell ee to extend the time for

filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted as

timely filed if submitted on or before September 14 , 2018

.
EXHIBIT 23
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos.333-217029 and 333-234103) of Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation of our report dated February 19, 2020 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.
 
 /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 Nashville, Tennessee
 February 19, 2020
---

---

Exhibit
  12

AMPAL-AMERICAN
  ISRAEL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
  SCHEDULE SETTING FORTH THE COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF CONSOLIDATED 
  EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
  (Amounts in thousands, except ratios)

|                                                        | Fiscal
      Year Ended December 31,
|------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|Earnings:                                               |                                     
|Income
      (loss) from continuing operations         
|(including
      dividends from less than 50%          
|owned
      affiliates) before income taxes, equity    
|in
      earnings of affiliates, and minority interests | $                                   
|Fixed charges                                           |                                     
|                                                        |                                     
|Earnings                                                | $                                   
|                                                        |                                     
|Fixed charges:                                          |                                     
|Interest                                                | $                                   
|Amortization
      of debentures expenses               |                                     
|                                                        |                                     
|Fixed
      charges                                     | $                                   
|                                                        |                                     
|Ratio of
      earnings to fixed charges                |                                     

85

---

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         1,040
<SECURITIES>                                   25,703
<RECEIVABLES>                                  170
<ALLOWANCES>                                   8
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               34,758
<PP&E>                                         5,250
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,642)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 46,798
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,127
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       18
<OTHER-SE>                                     43,653
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   46,798
<SALES>                                        215
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               231
<CGS>                                          209
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7,399
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,609)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,609)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,609)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.37)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.37)


</TABLE>
From: perrysplace2@verizon.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:00:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

LEONARD PERRY

Georgetown, MA 01833
From: jstetar@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:38:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joshua Stetar

Everett, WA 98201
From: galin1060@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:54:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Margaret Miller

Elgin, IL 60120
EXHIBIT 23.0


The Board of Directors
Petroleum Heat and Power Co., Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
33-54053 and No. 33-60741) on Form S-8 and Form S-3, respectively, of Petroleum
Heat and Power Co., Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated March 1, 1996,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Petroleum Heat and Power Co.,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1994 and 1995, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficiency) and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
1995, and the related schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 1995,
annual report on Form 10-K of Petroleum Heat and Power Co., Inc.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Stamford, CT
March 19, 1996


                                       30
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Peak International Limited (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Supan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 12, 2008



/s/ John SupanJohn SupanChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of VTEX Energy,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending October 31, 2003 (the  "Report"),  We, Stephen
F. Noser,  Chief Executive Officer and Randal B. McDonald,  Jr., Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/Stephen F. Noser
--------------------------
Stephen F. Noser
Chief Executive Officer
December 17, 2003

/s/Randal B. McDonald, Jr.
--------------------------
Randal B. McDonald, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
December 17, 2003