alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 1ST
QUARTER 1999 FORM 10-Q/A UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND UNAUDITED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FORM 10-Q/A.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          13,123
<SECURITIES>                                    13,351
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,071
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,628
<PP&E>                                          24,757
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  73,308
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,915
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            78
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,427
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    73,308
<SALES>                                         10,316
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,316
<CGS>                                            7,590
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,590
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,440
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 193
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,493)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (366)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,127)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,127)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund VI, L.P., Series 5 (the "Partnership") for the quarters ended
December 31, 2005, September 30 2005 and June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and
pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr., President and Chief
Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership,
hereby certify that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except
                  to the extent that such provisions require the audit report of
                  Local Limited Partnership financial statements to refer to the
                  auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
                  Board for the Partnership's annual financial statements and
                  except that the Report is a cumulative report covering each of
                  the quarters ended December 31, September 30 and June 30, 2005
                  and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Partnership.



/s/Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
May 16, 2008
Dismissed and Opinion Filed November 12, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-14-00518-CR No. 05-14-00519-CR No. 05-14-00520-CR

MICHAEL WAYNE CAMPBELL JR, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F12-31211-Q, F12-31218-Q, F12-31219-Q



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Brown

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeals. Appellant’s counsel has approved

the motion. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that the appeals be DISMISSED

and this decision be certified below for observance. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47 140518F.U05

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL WAYNE CAMPBELL JR, Appellant

No. 05-14-00518-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12-31211-Q. Opinion delivered per curiam before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Brown.

Based on the Court’s opin ion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered November 12, 2014

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL WAYNE CAMPBELL JR, Appellant

No. 05-14-00519-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12-31218-Q. Opinion delivered per curiam before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Brown.

Based on the Court’s opin ion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered November 12, 2014

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL WAYNE CAMPBELL JR, Appellant

No. 05-14-00520-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12-31219-Q. Opinion delivered per curiam before Chief Justice Wright and Justices Myers and Brown.

Based on the Court’s opin ion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal.

Judgment entered November 12, 2014
From: steven.m.pokorny@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:27:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Steve Pokorny

San Antonio, TX 78247
Before the Second Division,

January 18, 1967

No. P67/22.

#### American Express Company, a/c International Communications Corporation et al. *v.*United States,

protests 63/10492, etc. (Los Angeles).

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of echo sounders *862similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kelvin & Hughes America Corp.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 21, C.D. 2468), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
|   | I, Toni M. Perazzo, certify that: |
|--------|-----------------------------------|

|   | 1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q/a of AeroCentury Corp.; |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |   |                           |
|-----------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|
|                              |   |                           |   |
| Date:  February 4, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Toni M. Perazzo       |   |
|                              |   | Name: Toni M. Perazzo          |   |
|                              |   | Title: Chief Financial Officer |   |
|                              |   |                           |   |
No. 700, Misc.

No. 741, Misc.

#### Kirsch *v.*Pate, Warden; and Contaldo *v.*Murphy, Warden, et al.

Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.
|   | (1) the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company atthe dates and for the periods indicated. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: June 22,2020 | /s/ Harold M.Lyons                                                    |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|               | Harold M.Lyons                                                        |
|               | Sr. VicePresident - Finance and ChiefFinancial Officer |
|               |                                                                  |
Exhibit
32.1
  Certification
of President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted
 pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, John W. Roblin, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:
 
 (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   Date:   March
      28, 2008/s/ John W.
      RoblinName:  John
      W. RoblinTitle:    President
      and Chief Executive Officer
From: paterc@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:13:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Howard T Clark

Essington, PA 19029
No. 68369.

protests 61/12070-12305 and 63/3385-13253 (Chicago).

#### Marshall Field & Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tbe merchandise consists of household (Hibachi) stoves similar in all material respects to those tbe subject of Abstract 67238, the claim of tbe plaintiff was sustained.
From: vco@cfaith.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:58:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

V Olsen

Dayton, MN 55327