Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2023 / Notices 58245 

Republic of Korea: Notice of Amended Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 73 

FR 45403 (August 5, 2008) (Order). 

3See Order, 73 FR 45403; see also 

Implementation of Determinations Under Section 

129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act: Certain 

New Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires; Circular 

Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe; Laminated 

Woven Sacks; and Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe 

and Tube from the People’s Republic of China, 77 

FR 52683 (August 30, 2012). 

walled steel pipe and tube, of 

rectangular (including square) cross 

section, having a wall thickness of less 

than 4 mm. The term carbon-quality 

steel includes both carbon steel and 

alloy steel which contains only small 

amounts of alloying elements. 

Specifically, the term carbon-quality 

includes products in which none of the 

elements listed below exceeds the 

quantity by weight respectively 

indicated: 1.80 percent of manganese, or 

2.25 percent of silicon, or 1.00 percent 

of copper, or 0.50 percent of aluminum, 

or 1.25 percent of chromium, or 0.30 

percent of cobalt, or 0.40 percent of 

lead, or 1.25 percent of nickel, or 0.30 

percent of tungsten, or 0.10 percent of 

molybdenum, or 0.10 percent of 

niobium, or 0.15 percent vanadium, or 

0.15 percent of zirconium. The 

description of carbon-quality is 

intended to identify carbon-quality 

products within the scope. The welded 

carbon-quality rectangular pipe and 

tube subject to this Order is currently 

classified under the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) 

subheadings 7306.61.50.00 and 

7306.61.70.60. While HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and CBP’s customs 

purposes, our written description of the 

scope of the Order is dispositive. 

Final Results of Administrative Review 

As noted above, we received no 

comments on, and made no changes to, 

the Preliminary Results. We continue to 

find that the sole mandatory 

respondent, Ailong, is not eligible for a 

separate rate, and, thus, is part of the 

China-wide entity. In this 

administrative review, no party 

requested a review of the China-wide 

entity, and Commerce did not selfinitiate a review of the China-wide 

entity. Because no review of the Chinawide entity is being conducted, the 

China-wide entity rate is not subject to 

change as a result of this review. The 

rate previously established for the 

China-wide entity is 255.07 percent.3

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

has determined, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with the final results of this 

review. We intend to instruct CBP to 

apply an ad valorem assessment rate of 

255.07 percent (i.e., the China-wide 

entity rate), to all entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR which 

were exported by Ailong. Commerce 

intends to issue assessment instructions 

to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the 

date of publication of these final results 

of this review in the Federal Register. 

If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of subject merchandise from 

China entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the publication date of the final results 

of this administrative review, as 

provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act: (1) for Ailong, that has not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be that for the 

China-wide entity; (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed Chinese and 

non-Chinese exporters that received a 

separate rate in a prior segment of this 

proceeding, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the existing exporterspecific rate; (3) for all Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise that 

have not been found eligible for a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be that for the China-wide entity; and 

(4) for all non-Chinese exporters of 

subject merchandise which have not 

received their own rate, the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate applicable to the 

Chinese exporter that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification of Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during the POR. Failure 

to comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties, and/or an increase 

in the amount of antidumping duties by 

the amount of the countervailing duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely written notification of the return 

or destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

Commerce is issuing and publishing 

the final results of this review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: August 21, 2023. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2023–18385 Filed 8–24–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–583–856] 

Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products 

From Taiwan: Notice of Third Amended 

Final Determination of Sales at Less 

Than Fair Value Pursuant to Court 

Decision and Partial Exclusion From 

Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On June 23, 2023, the U.S. 

Court of International Trade (CIT) 

sustained the U.S. Department of 

Commerce’s (Commerce) second 

remand redetermination concerning the 

antidumping duty investigation of 

certain corrosion-resistant steel 

products (CORE) from Taiwan, which: 

(1) reinstated the use of an adverse 

inference in the calculation of 

respondent Prosperity Tieh Enterprise 

Co., Ltd.’s (Prosperity) reporting of yield 

strength for CORE production, and (2) 

reversed Commerce’s determination 

from the investigation to collapse 

mandatory respondent Prosperity with 

the other mandatory respondent, the 

Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh 

Phui) and Synn Industrial Co., Ltd. 

(Synn) single entity (collectively, Yieh 

Phui/Synn). Accordingly, Commerce is 

issuing a third amended final 

determination for the less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation of CORE 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
58246 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2023 / Notices 

1See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products 

from Taiwan: Negative Preliminary Determination 

of Sales at Less than Fair Value, 81 FR 72 (January 

4, 2016), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum (PDM) at 4; see also Certain 

Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from Taiwan: 

Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 

Value and Final Affirmative Determination of 

Critical Circumstances, in Part, 81 FR 35313, 35314 

(June 2, 2016) (Final Determination), and 

accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum 

(IDM); and Memorandum, ‘‘Less Than Fair Value 

Investigation of Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 

Products from Taiwan: Final Affiliation and 

Collapsing Memorandum,’’ dated May 24, 2016 

(Final Collapsing Memo). 

2See Certain Corrosion Resistant Steel Products 

(CORE) from India, Italy, China, Korea and Taiwan: 

Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping 

Determination for India and Taiwan, and 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR 48390 (July 26, 

2016) (Amended Final Determination and Order). 

Although the Amended Final Determination 

changed the weighted-average dumping margins, it 

did not change the analysis from the Final 

Determination. 

3See Final Affiliation and Collapsing 

Memorandum, at 9. 

4See Final Determination, 81 FR 35314, and 

accompanying IDM at Comment 1. 

5 Id. 

6See Prosperity Tieh Enter. Co. v. United States, 

284 F. Supp. 3d 1364, 1382 (CIT 2018) (Prosperity 

I). 

7See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant 

to Court Remand, Prosperity Tieh Enterprise Co., 

Ltd. et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 19– 

00138, Slip Op 18–5 (CIT 2018), dated May 23, 

2018 (First Redetermination Results). 

8See Prosperity Tieh Enter. Co. v. United States, 

358 F. Supp. 3d 1363, 1370 (CIT 2018) (Prosperity 

II). 

9See Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products from 

Taiwan: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony 

With Final Determination of Antidumping Duty 

Investigation and Notice of Amended Final 

Determination of Investigation, 84 FR 6129 

(February 26, 2019) (Second Amended Final 

Determination and Timken Notice). 

10See Prosperity Tieh Enter. Co. v. United States, 

965 F.3d 1320, 1326 (Fed. Cir. 2020) (Prosperity III); 

Federal Circuit Mandate in Appeal #19–1400 

(September 8, 2020), ECF. No. 132; see also 

Prosperity Tieh Enter. Co. v. United States, 532 F. 

Supp. 3d 1401 (CIT 2021) (Prosperity IV). 

11See Prosperity III, 965 F.3d at 1328. 

12See Prosperity IV, 532 F. Supp. 3d at 1401. 

from Taiwan. The determination to not 

collapse Prosperity with the Yieh Phui/ 

Synn entity results in a negative 

amended final determination of sales at 

LTFV for Yieh Phui/Synn and, thus, 

excludes Yieh Phui/Synn from the 

antidumping duty order. 

DATES: Applicable July 3, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brendan Quinn, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5848. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The litigation in this case relates to 

Commerce’s final determination in the 

LTFV investigation of CORE from 

Taiwan, which was later amended. In 

the Preliminary Determination, 

Commerce determined that Yieh Phui 

and Synn comprised a single entity, and 

no party challenged this determination 

in its case brief. Thus, Commerce 

continued to find Yieh Phui and Synn 

to be a single entity in the Final 

Determination.1 In the Final 

Determination, Commerce further 

determined that Prosperity was part of 

the Synn single entity.2 With regard to 

Prosperity and Synn, Commerce found 

that Prosperity was affiliated with Synn, 

and that it should be treated as a part 

of the Synn single entity. As a result, 

Commerce concluded that ‘‘{s}ince 

Prosperity Tieh is collapsed with 

{Synn}, and Yieh Phui is collapsed with 

{Synn}, {as a result of} the potential for 

manipulation of price and production 

among the three companies comprising 

the two collapsed entities, we find that 

Prosperity Tieh/{Synn} and Yieh Phui/ 

{Synn} should be collapsed as a single 

entity for purposes of the final 

determination in this investigation.’’ 3

Also, in the Final Determination, 

Commerce determined that Prosperity 

misreported the yield strength of certain 

of its sales of CORE, which resulted in 

Commerce’s determination that 

Prosperity failed to cooperate to the best 

of its ability.4 To determine the costs of 

the sales found to have been 

misclassified by Prosperity, Commerce 

resorted to partial adverse facts 

available pursuant to sections 

776(a)(2)(B) and (D) and 776(b) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act).5

Mandatory respondents, Prosperity 

and Yieh Phui, each a Taiwanese 

producer and exporter of CORE, 

challenged aspects of Commerce’s final 

affirmative LTFV determination before 

the CIT, including Commerce’s single 

entity determination with respect to 

Prosperity and the Yieh Phui/Synn 

entity and Commerce’s use of facts 

otherwise available with an adverse 

inference in response to Prosperity’s 

reporting of yield strength. In Prosperity 

I, the CIT ordered Commerce to: (1) 

reconsider its decision to collapse 

Prosperity with the Yieh Phui/Synn 

entity; and (2) ‘‘correct the errors 

resulting from {Commerce’s} unlawful 

decision to use the facts otherwise 

available and an adverse inference 

pertaining to the yield strength 

classification and coding of Prosperity’s 

home market and U.S. market sales.’’ 6

In its First Redetermination Results, 

Commerce: (1) reconsidered the 

collapsing determination in accordance 

with the CIT’s opinion, but continued to 

treat Prosperity, Yieh Phui, and Synn as 

a single-entity, consistent with 19 CFR 

351.401(f); and (2) under respectful 

protest, revised the Yieh Phui/ 

Prosperity/Synn entity’s weightedaverage dumping margin by using 

Prosperity’s reported yield strength data 

rather than facts otherwise available 

with an adverse inference.7 In 

Prosperity II, the CIT sustained 

Commerce’s First Redetermination 

Results.8 On February 26, 2019, 

Commerce published the second 

amended final determination and 

notification of final judgment that is not 

in harmony with Commerce’s amended 

final determination of the antidumping 

investigation.9

In Prosperity III, the U.S. Court of 

Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal 

Circuit) vacated the CIT’s judgment on 

the collapsing issue in Prosperity II by 

concluding that ‘‘Commerce acted 

contrary to law when it collapsed 

Prosperity, Yieh {Phui}, and Synn 

without considering the {19 CFR} 

351.401(f) factors as between the 

relationships of Prosperity and Yieh 

{Phui} or between Prosperity and Yieh 

{Phui}/Synn . . . Commerce must 

consider the ‘totality of circumstances’ 

between all entities when it evaluates 

whether, for purposes of collapsing 

entities, there is significant potential for 

manipulation of price or production to 

circumvent antidumping duties.’’ 10

Regarding Prosperity’s yield strength, 

the Federal Circuit held that the CIT 

‘‘erred when it reversed Commerce’s 

finding that Prosperity misreported 

yield strength,’’ and that ‘‘{s}ubstantial 

evidence also supports Commerce’s 

finding that Prosperity failed to provide 

yield strength information based on the 

ASTM industry standard.’’ 11

The Federal Circuit remanded to the 

CIT for further proceedings consistent 

with its opinion, and on September 1, 

2021, the CIT issued its remand order, 

ordering Commerce to reach a new 

determination on whether collapsing is 

appropriate, reinstate the use of facts 

available with an adverse inference with 

respect to Prosperity’s reporting of yield 

strength which Commerce used in its 

final and amended LTFV 

determinations, and redetermine 

margins, as appropriate, consistent with 

Prosperity III.12 On February 14, 2022, 

Commerce issued the second remand 

redetermination, in which it reversed its 

determination to collapse Prosperity 

with the Yieh Phui/Synn single-entity 

based on the lack of record evidence to 

support a collapsing determination as to 

Prosperity and Yieh Phui and reinstated 

its use of AFA as to Prosperity’s 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2023 / Notices 58247 

13See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant 

to Court Remand, Prosperity Tieh Enterprise Co., 

Ltd. et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 19– 

00138, Slip Op. 21–113 (CIT 2021), dated February 

14, 2022 (Second Redetermination Results). 

14See Prosperity Tieh Enterprise Co., Ltd. and 

Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd. v. United States, 

Consolidated Court No. 16–00138, Slip Op. 23–95 

(CIT 2023) (Prosperity V). 

15See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337, 

341 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken). 

16See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products 

from Taiwan: Amended Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2020– 

2021, 88 FR 13779 (March 6, 2023). 

reporting of yield strength for CORE 

production.13 On June 23, 2023, the CIT 

issued its final judgment to sustain the 

Second Redetermination Results 

concerning the underlying LTFV 

investigation of CORE from Taiwan.14

All-Others Rate 

Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act 

provides that the estimated weightedaverage dumping margin for all other 

producers and exporters not 

individually examined shall be equal to 

the weighted average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated excluding 

rates that are zero, de minimis, or 

determined entirely under section 776 

of the Act. Prosperity is the only 

respondent for which Commerce 

calculated an estimated weightedaverage dumping margin that is not 

zero, de minimis, or based entirely on 

facts otherwise available. Therefore, for 

purposes of determining the ‘‘all-others’’ 

rate, and pursuant to section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, we are using the 

estimated weighted-average dumping 

margin calculated for Prosperity, as 

referenced in the ‘‘Third Amended Final 

Determination’’ section below. 

Third Amended Final Determination 

Because there is now a final court 

decision, Commerce is amending the 

Final Determination, Amended Final 

Determination and Order, and Second 

Amended Final Determination and 

Timken Notice. The revised, amended 

weighted-average dumping margins for 

the period April 1, 2014, through March 

31, 2015, are as follows: 

Producer or exporter 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

Prosperity Tieh Enterprise Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................. 11.04 

Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd., and Synn Industrial Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................... * 1.20 

All Others ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 11.04 

* De minimis. 

Partial Exclusion From Antidumping 

Duty Order 

Pursuant to section 735(a)(4) of the 

Act, Commerce ‘‘shall disregard any 

weighted average dumping margin that 

is de minimis as defined in section 

733(b)(3) of the Act.’’ Furthermore, and 

pursuant to section 735(c)(2) of the Act, 

‘‘the investigation shall be terminated 

upon publication of that negative 

determination,’’ and Commerce shall 

‘‘terminate the suspension of 

liquidation’’ and ‘‘release any bond or 

other security, and refund any cash 

deposit.’’ As a result of this amended 

final determination, in which 

Commerce has calculated a de minimis 

estimated weighted-average dumping 

margin of 1.20 percent for Yieh Phui/ 

Synn, Commerce is hereby excluding 

merchandise produced and exported by 

Yieh Phui/Synn from the Order. 

Accordingly, if the CIT’s ruling is not 

appealed, or if appealed and upheld, 

Commerce will direct U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) to refund cash 

deposits pertaining to any suspended 

entries produced and exported by Yieh 

Phui/Synn. 

Commerce applies the exclusion from 

the Order to the producer/exporter 

combination that was examined in the 

investigation. Entries of subject 

merchandise in any other producer/ 

exporter combination, e.g., merchandise 

produced by a third party and exported 

by Yieh Phui or Synn, or produced by 

Yieh Phui or Synn and exported by a 

third party, are subject to the cash 

deposit requirements at the all-others 

rate. We note, however, pursuant to 

Timken, the suspension of liquidation 

must continue during the pendency of 

the appeals process.15 Accordingly, we 

will instruct CBP to continue to suspend 

liquidation of all unliquidated Yieh 

Phui/Synn entries referenced above 

until appropriate liquidation 

instructions are sent. As of the date of 

the publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register, a cash deposit rate of 

0.00 percent will be the applicable cash 

deposit rate for Yieh Phui/Synn entries 

referenced above. 

Lastly, as a result of the exclusion of 

Yieh Phui/Synn from the Order, 

Commerce is: (1) discontinuing the 

ongoing administrative review of the 

Order covering the 7/1/2021 through 6/ 

30/2022 period of review, in part, with 

respect to Yieh Phui and Synn; and (2) 

will not initiate any new administrative 

reviews of Yieh Phui’s or Synn’s entries 

pursuant to the Order. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Since the Final Determination, 

Commerce has established a new cash 

deposit rate for Prosperity.16 Therefore, 

this amended final determination has no 

effect on subsequent cash deposit rates 

determined for Prosperity. For all-other 

producers and/or exporters, except for 

companies that received their own rates 

in subsequent administrative reviews, 

Commerce will issue revised cash 

deposit instructions to CBP, adjusting 

the cash deposit rate for all-other 

producers and/or exporters to 11.04 

percent, effective as of the date of this 

publication of this notice. 

Liquidation of Suspended Entries 

At this time, Commerce remains 

enjoined by Court orders from 

liquidating entries that were produced 

and exported by: (1) Prosperity and 

imported by Prosperity Tieh USA; that 

were subject of the United States 

Department of Commerce’s final results 

in Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 

Products from Taiwan: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2017–2018, 85 FR 16613 (Dep’t 

Commerce March 24, 2020); and that 

were entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, during the period 07/01/ 

2017 through 6/30/2018 (see CBP 

message number 0101402, dated April 

10, 2020); (2) Prosperity Tieh Enterprise 

Co., Ltd and imported by Prosperity 

Tieh USA, that were the subject of the 

United States Department of 

Commerce’s final results in Certain 

Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products From 

Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2016–2017, 

83 FR 64527 (Dept Commerce Dec. 17, 

2018), and that were entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, on or after 

June 2, 2016 up to and including June 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
58248 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 164 / Friday, August 25, 2023 / Notices 

30, 2017 (see CBP message number 

9035305, dated February 24, 2023); (3) 

Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd; that were 

the subject of the United States 

Department of Commerce’s final 

determination in the Certain CorrosionResistant Steel Products from Taiwan: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Final 

Determination of No Shipments 2020– 

2021, 88 FR 7408 (February 3, 2023); 

and that were entered or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption, 

during the period July 1, 2020, through 

June 30, 2021 (see CBP message 

3055401, dated February 24, 2023); and 

(4) Yieh Phui Enterprise Co., Ltd and 

imported by Yieh Phui America, Inc.; 

that were subject of the United States 

Depart of Commerce’s final results in 

Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel 

Products from Taiwan: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Final Determination of No 

Shipments; 2019–2020, 87 FR 7106 

(Dep’t Commerce Feb. 8, 2022); and that 

were entered or withdrawn from 

warehouse, on or after July 1, 2019 up 

to and including June 30, 2020 (see CBP 

message number 2074409, dated March 

15, 2022). 

These entries will remain enjoined 

pursuant to the terms of the injunctions 

issued in CIT Court No. 16–00138 

during the pendency of any appeals 

process. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice of the amended final 

determination is issued and published 

in accordance with sections 735(d) and 

516A(c)(1) and (e) of the Act. 

Dated: August 21, 2023. 

Abdelali Elouaradia, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2023–18386 Filed 8–24–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

[RTID 0648–XD089] 

Schedules for Atlantic Shark 

Identification Workshops and 

Protected Species Safe Handling, 

Release, and Identification Workshops; 

Correction 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of public workshops; 

correction. 

SUMMARY: NMFS cancelled the Safe 

Handling, Release, and Identification 

Workshop originally scheduled for 

September 6, 2023, in Kenner, LA, and 

the Atlantic Shark Identification 

Workshop originally scheduled for 

September 14, 2023, in Virginia Beach, 

FL. The workshops were announced in 

the Federal Register on June 21, 2023. 

NMFS has rescheduled the Safe 

Handing, Release, and Identification 

Workshop for September 27, 2023 and 

the Atlantic Shark Identification 

Workshop for September 28, 2023. 

DATES: The Safe Handling, Release, and 

Identification Workshop originally 

scheduled for September 6, 2023 is 

rescheduled to September 27, 2023. The 

Atlantic Shark Identification Workshop 

originally scheduled for September 14, 

2023 is rescheduled to September 28, 

2023. 

ADDRESSES: The locations of the 

rescheduled workshops have not 

changed. The Safe Handling, Release, 

and Identification Workshop will be 

held in Kenner, LA. The Atlantic Shark 

Identification Workshop will be held in 

Virginia Beach, VA. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Peter Cooper by email at peter.cooper@

noaa.gov or by phone at 301–427–8503. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Atlantic 

highly migratory species (HMS) 

fisheries are managed under the 

authority of the Atlantic Tunas 

Convention Act (16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.) 

and the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 

Conservation and Management Act (16 

U.S.C. 1801 et seq.). The 2006 

Consolidated Atlantic HMS Fishery 

Management Plan and its amendments 

are implemented by regulations at 50 

CFR part 635. Section 635.8 describes 

the requirements for the Safe Handling, 

Release, and Identification Workshops 

and Atlantic Shark Identification 

Workshops. The workshop schedules, 

registration information, and a list of 

frequently asked questions regarding 

Safe Handling, Release, and 

Identification workshops and the 

Atlantic Shark Identification are 

available online at: https://

www.fisheries.noaa.gov/atlantic-highlymigratory-species/safe-handling-releaseand-identification-workshops and 

https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/atlantichighly-migratory-species/atlantic-sharkidentification-workshops. 

Correction 

In the Federal Register of June 21, 

2023 (88 FR 40221) in FR Doc. 2023– 

13186, on page 40222, in the first 

column, the date of the second Atlantic 

Shark Identification Workshop listed 

under the heading ‘‘Workshop Dates, 

Times, and Location’’ is corrected to 

read as follows: 

2. September 28, 2023, 12 p.m.–4 

p.m., Courtyard by Marriott-Virginia 

Beach Norfolk, 5700 Greenwich Road, 

Virginia Beach, VA 23462. 

Also, in the Federal Register of June 

21, 2023 (88 FR 40221) in FR Doc. 

2023–13186, on page 40222, in the 

second column, the date of the third 

Safe Handing, Release, and 

Identification Workshop listed under 

the heading ‘‘Workshop Dates, Times, 

and Location’’ is corrected to read as 

follows: 

3. September 27, 2023, 9 a.m.–5 p.m., 

Hilton New Orleans Airport, 901 Airline 

Drive, Kenner, LA 70062. 

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. 

Dated: August 22, 2023. 

Jennifer M. Wallace, 

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable 

Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. 

[FR Doc. 2023–18365 Filed 8–24–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Submission to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

Review and Approval; Comment 

Request; Assessing Public 

Preferences and Values To Support 

Coastal and Marine Management 

AGENCY: National Oceanic & 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of information collection, 

request for comment. 

SUMMARY: The Department of 

Commerce, in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

(PRA), invites the general public and 

other Federal agencies to comment on 

proposed, and continuing information 

collections, which helps us assess the 

impact of our information collection 

requirements and minimize the public’s 

reporting burden. The purpose of this 

notice is to allow for 60 days of public 

comment preceding submission of the 

collection to OMB. 

DATES: To ensure consideration, 

comments regarding this proposed 

information collection must be received 

on or before October 24, 2023. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit written comments to 

Adrienne Thomas, NOAA PRA Officer, 

at NOAA.PRA@noaa.gov. Please 

reference OMB Control Number 0648– 

XXXX in the subject line of your 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1