alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of VTEX Energy,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending October 31, 2005 (the "Report"),  I,
Grant G. Emms, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/S/ Randal B. McDonald, Jr.
---------------------------
Randal B. McDonald, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
December 20, 2005
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 14, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40387

Summary Calendar

CHARLES FRANKLIN IRELAND,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DOUG DRETKE; SANDRA BALDWIN, Correctional Officer; JOHN DOE,

Correctional Officer, Beto 1; Jane Doe, Correctional Officer,

Beto 1; UNIDENTIFIED UNIDENTIFIED, Officer of Gang Intelligence,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:05-CV-171

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Charles Franklin Ireland, Texas prisoner # 506419, appeals

the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit for failure to exhaust

administrative remedies. Ireland filed an untimely Step 1

grievance and did not attempt to file a Step 2 grievance. 

Ireland’s untimely Step 1 grievance does not excuse his failure

to exhaust the prison grievance system. See Days v. Johnson, 322

F.3d 863, 866-67 (5th Cir. 2003).
No. 06-40387

-2-

Ireland argues that he sufficiently exhausted his

administrative remedies because he filed his Step 1 grievance

while in the prison infirmary, which did not have a grievance

box, by giving it to a nurse. Because Ireland did not raise this

argument in the district court, we do not consider it. See

Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co., 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th Cir.

1999); see also Stewart Glass & Mirror, Inc. v. U.S. Auto Glass

Discount Ctrs., Inc., 200 F.3d 307, 316-17 (5th Cir. 2000). We

also do not consider Ireland’s argument, raised for the first

time in his reply brief, that the district court erroneously

denied his request for the appointment of counsel. See Wallace

v. County of Comal, 400 F.3d 284, 292 (5th Cir. 2005).

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
#### Harry S. Martin, Respondent, v. Reuben T. Pettengill, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
***EXHIBIT 32(a)***

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of WWA Group, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (“Report”), I, Eric Montandon, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of the registrant for the period covered by this Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: May 14, 2008

/s/ Eric Montandon 

Eric Montandon, Chief Executive Officer

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

**** ****
-  Home 
-  Regulations & Policies 

# In This Section

                      -  Advisory Circulars (ACs) 
                      -  Airworthiness Directives (ADs) 
                      -  FAA Regulations                          -  Overview 
                        -  Regulatory Consistency Communication Board (RCCB) 
                      -  Forms 
                      -  Handbooks & Manuals                          -  Overview 
                        -  Aircraft 
                        -  Aviation 
                        -  Examiners & Inspectors 
                      -  Orders & Notices 
                      -  Pilot Records Database 
                      -  Policy & Guidance                          -  Overview 
                        -  Environmental Policy & Guidance 
                      -  Rulemaking                          -  Overview 
                        -  Committees and Documents 
                        -  Notice of Public Meetings 
                        -  Recently Published Rulemaking Documents 

# Airworthiness Directives

Airworthiness Directives (ADs) are legally enforceable regulations issued by the FAA in accordance with 14 CFR part 39 to correct an unsafe condition in a product. Part 39 defines a product as an aircraft, engine, propeller, or appliance.

### Get notified of new ADs

Sign up for email delivery of new ADs and Special Airworthiness Information Bulletins (SAIBs), based on your aircraft type and make.

## Types of ADs

                  - Emergency Airworthiness Directives (EAD)                      - View PDF Guide 
                  - Airworthiness Directives (AD Rules)                      - View PDF Guide 
                  - AD Notices of Proposed Rulemaking (AD NPRMs)                      - View PDF Guide 
                  - AD Biweekly                      - View PDF Guide
From: catherineann.meyer@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:09:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cathy Meyer

Sincerely,

Cathy Meyer

Huntingburg, IN 47542
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


       CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Cover-All Technologies Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, John W. Roblin, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

        (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:   March 31, 2006

/s/ John W. Roblin
------------------------------------------
Name:   John W. Roblin
Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 317.

#### Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. *v.*McIntyre; United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. *v.*Hart; and Standard Accident Insurance Co. *v.*Aguirre.

No. 318.

No. 319.

*John H. Benckenstein*for petitioner, and *Joe H. Tonahill*for respondent in No. 317.

*Reo Knowles*for petitioner, and *William*

*Vandercreek*and *Marvin Jones*for respondent in No. 318. *Josh Groce*for petitioner, and *Rudy Rice*and *William Vandercreek*for respondent in No. 319.

Motion for leave to file amended brief in opposition to petition for writ of certiorari in No. 317 granted. Petitions for writs of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
EX 10.1






Exhibit 10.1




Amendment to the Amended & Restated Key Employee Savings and Investment Plan




The Amended and Restated Key Employee Savings and Investment Plan is amended as of January 1, 2014   as follows:


1.    Section 3.1 is restated to read:


3.1    Employer Matching Contributions Amount.
(a)    For each pay period during which the full offset under Section 2.1 or 2.2 applies, the Employer shall credit to each Participant's Employer Matching Contribution Account an amount equal to the lesser of 50% of the Participant's Deferral Contributions under Section 2.1 and 2.2 above for such pay period or (ii) 4.0% of the Regular Compensation and Total Bonus Payout for such pay period in excess of the prorated Compensation Limit.  
(b)    For each pay period during which the offset under Section 2.1 or 2.2 does not apply, the Employer shall credit to each Participant's Employer Matching Contribution Account an amount equal to the lesser of (a) 100% of the Participant's deferral contributions under Sections 2.1 and 2.2. above up to 2% of Regular Compensation and Total Bonus Payout and (b) 50% of the Participant's Deferral Contributions under Sections 2.1 and 2.2 above for such pay period in excess of 1% of Regular Compensation and Total Bonus Payout but not in excess of 6% of Regular Compensation and Total Bonus Payout or (ii) 4.0% of the Regular Compensation and Total Bonus Payout for such pay period.  
(c)    For the pay period during a Plan Year in which the offset under Section 2.1 or 2.2 is discontinued, the Employer Matching Contribution formula set forth in (b) above shall apply except that the Participant's actual deferrals under the Qualified Savings Plan shall be aggregated with the Participant's deferral contributions under Sections 2.1 and 2.2 for purposes of determining the extent to which deferral contributions under this Plan are matched at the 100% rate.    
2.    Section 3.2 is restated to read:


3.2  Employer Three Percent Contributions.


Employer shall make a Three Percent Contribution for each Plan Year commencing on and after January 1, 2014 for a Participant who is eligible to receive a 3% Company Nonelective Contribution under the Qualified Savings Plan for such Plan Year (generally, a Participant who was never eligible to participate in the Briggs & Stratton Corporation Retirement Plan or whose benefits under the Qualified Savings Plan were frozen and who is employed by the Employer on the last day of the Plan Year).  The amount of such contribution shall be equal to three percent of excess of the Participant's Regular Compensation and Total Bonus Payout over the Compensation Limit.  The Employer may make such contribution annually or more frequently.  For Plan Years commencing prior to January 1, 2014, the Company Nonelective Contribution under this Section was 2%.
FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 09/4/2015 12:03:16 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Impac
Commercial Holdings, Inc. Quarterly Report on form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,333
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 454,781
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,514
<BONDS>                                        270,510
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          5
<COMMON>                                            63
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,689
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   454,781
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,476
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,670
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   337
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,202
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,267
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,267
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,267
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.34


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
              Petroleum Heat and Power Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries

         This schedule contains summary financial information (in thousands
except per share data) extracted from Petroleum Heat and Power Co., Inc. and
Subsidiaries financial statements as of December 31, 1995 and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           $  78,285
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       96,330
<ALLOWANCES>                                           969
<INVENTORY>                                         20,413
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   207,791
<PP&E>                                              68,433
<DEPRECIATION>                                      38,170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     357,241
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              142,383
<BONDS>                                            294,429
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               16,667
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             2,523
<OTHER-SE>                                       (103,426)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       357,241
<SALES>                                            570,538
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   609,507
<CGS>                                              314,199
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      387,825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   204,292
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     1,087
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  41,084
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (22,271)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (22,043)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (1,436)
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (23,479)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (1.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (1.06)
                                                         

</TABLE>
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:00:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

S. Foran
No. 642.

#### Kansas City Transit, Inc., *v.*Kansas City Terminal Railway Co.

*Albert Thomson*for petitioner.

*Richard S. Righter*for respondent.

Supreme Court of Missouri. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE
MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,036,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,500
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      15,143,200
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,094,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,417,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,315,700
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,417,400
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,221,100
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,932,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               245,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               132,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             103,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                939,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            939,600
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   939,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    31.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>