alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11.1 - COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
                      Advanced Communication Systems, Inc.
                      (in thousands, except per share data)

                                              Three Months       Six Months
                                                 Ended             Ended
                                             March 31, 1998    March 31, 1998
 Basic:                                      --------------    --------------
   Total basic average shares outstanding...     6,524             6,438
                                             ==============    ==============

   Net income...............................      $843            $1,497
                                             ==============    ==============

   Net income per share - basic.............     $0.13             $0.23
                                             ==============    ==============
Diluted:
   Total basic average shares outstanding...     6,524             6,438
   Plus dilutive stock options..............       112               120
                                             --------------    --------------

   Total diluted average shares.............     6,636             6,558
                                             ==============    ==============

   Net income per share - diluted...........     $0.13             $0.23
                                             ==============    ==============
From: donmavisrich@usfamily.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:59:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mavis Richman

Minneapolis, MN 55420
Chromium Electroplating RTR

Summary of EPA Meeting with Atotech

March 1, 2012

Participants

• Erin Newman, EPA

• Chuck French, EPA

• Phil Mulrine, EPA

• Cindy Hancy, RTI International

• Gene Barlow, Atotech USA Inc. 

• Matthias Schmidt, Atotech USA Inc.

• Matthias Rost, Atotech USA Inc. 

• Neil Paton, Atotech USA Inc.

• Gokhan Kisaback, Atotech USA Inc.

Summary

A meeting between EPA and Atotech USA Inc. was set up to discuss chemical fume suppressant

products that do not contain perfluoro-octyl sulfonates (PFOS).

Key Points

• EPA proposed the phase out of PFOS chemical fume suppressants and lower surface 

tension limits for facilities subject to the Chromium Electroplating NESHAP. 

• Non-PFOS products account for 70% of Atotech’s worldwide fume suppressant sales.

• Atotech has a foaming and low-foaming version of their non-PFOS fume suppressant. 

Foaming issues sometimes occur with lower operating temperatures or at high 

concentrations, but this issue also occurs with PFOS-based fume suppressants. Excess 

foaming is not a large issue worldwide and has only been a problem with a few of 

Atotech’s clients. It is usually solved by increasing the bath temperature 1-2°F and 

should not be an issue at a surface tension range of 30-33 dynes/cm. 

• Atotech recommends operating at 30 dynes/cm and foaming is not generally an issue. 

• There are 1-2 anodizing facilities in the U.S. that the Atotech representatives are aware of 

that are using a non-PFOS fume suppressant. Some aerospace anodizing facilities are 

looking into using non-PFOS fume suppressants. 

• Japan, Australia, and Europe have phased out PFOS completely. 

• Japan phased out PFOS in one year. 

• Phase-out of PFOS in Europe was done quickly and was not problematic. 

• Some California plants use non-PFOS fume suppressants but have not had to go through 

approval because it is used in conjunction with a secondary control device. 

• Atotech did not have any additional studies that have not already been provided for tanks 

using non-PFOS fume suppressants. They are also not aware of any facilities that have 

emissions data. 

• Discussed differences between stalagmometers and tensiometers. 

• Using a non-PFOS fume suppressant generally results in lower consumption due to less 

drag out losses. The majority of Atotech’s customers report an overall cost savings when
using a non-PFOS fume suppressant. Overall there seems to be a cost savings using nonPFOS compared to PFOS, or “worst-case” the costs are about the same using non-PFOS 

as compared to PFOS products.
From: kjtathomas@cableone.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: Health insurance

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:52:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Janice Thomas

, 36265-3703
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1





                  CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-3 and S-8) of Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. of our report dated
July 24, 1997, except for Note 8, as to which the date is September 23, 1997,
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Alliance Pharmaceutical
Corp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
June 30, 1997.


                                            ERNST & YOUNG LLP



San Diego, California
September 23, 1997
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





DATE OF REPORT (Date of earliest event reported): March 26, 2015





CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION


(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)





Delaware (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION)001-11241 (COMMISSION FILE NUMBER)37-1105865 (IRS EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)





2120 West End Avenue, Nashville, Tennessee    37203-0001 (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)    (ZIP CODE)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (615) 341-1000





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))














---






Item 8.01 Other Events .





Exhibits are filed herewith in connection with the issuance on March 26, 2015 by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation (the “Company”) of $1,366,000 aggregate principal amount of its 2.700% PowerNotes® due March 15, 2025 (the “Notes”) pursuant to the Company’s previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-195039) (the “Registration Statement”) and the related Prospectus dated April 4, 2014, Prospectus Supplement dated April 4, 2014 and Pricing Supplement dated March 23, 2015 relating to the Notes.





Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits .





(d) Exhibits . The following Exhibits are filed as part of this Report and as Exhibits to the Registration Statement:





ExhibitNumberDescription5.1Opinion of Sidley Austin LLP, as to the legality of the Notes.23.1Consent of Sidley Austin LLP (included as part of Exhibit 5.1).


2


---






SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





Caterpillar Financial Services CorporationBy:/s/ Leslie S. ZmuggName: Leslie S. Zmugg Title:   Secretary





Date: March 26, 2015


3


---



EXHIBIT INDEX





ExhibitNumberDescription5.1Opinion of Sidley Austin LLP, as to the legality of the Notes.23.1Consent of Sidley Austin LLP (included as part of Exhibit 5.1).








4
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12172]

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 506(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (the “Act”) (22 U.S.C. 2318(a)(1)) and Presidential Delegation of Authority dated May 31, 2023, I hereby determine that:
    - an unforeseen emergency exists which requires immediate military assistance to Ukraine; and
    - the emergency requirement cannot be met under the authority of the Arms Export Control Act or any other provision of law.

I, therefore, pursuant to authority delegated to me by the President, direct the drawdown of up to $300 million in defense articles and services of the Department of Defense, and military education and training, under the authority of section 506(a)(1) of the Act, to provide assistance to Ukraine. The Department of State will coordinate implementation of this drawdown.

                    This determination shall be reported to the Congress and published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: May 31, 2023.

Antony Blinken,

Secretary of State.

# Note:

 This document was received for publication by the Office of the Federal Register on September 6, 2023.

[FR Doc. 2023-19580 Filed 9-11-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
From: joelmk@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:11:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joel Kennedy

Saline, MI 48176
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1173

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the work opportunity

credit to the employment of any adult food stamp recipient.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 12, 2001

Mr. BAYH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend

the work opportunity credit to the employment of any

adult food stamp recipient.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT

4 TO EMPLOYMENT OF ANY ADULT FOOD

5 STAMP RECIPIENT.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 51(d)(8)(A)(i) of the In7 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining qualified food

8 stamp recipient) is amended by striking ‘‘but not age 25’’.
2

•S 1173 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section shall apply to individuals who begin work for

3 the employer after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
No. 316.

#### Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks et al. *v.*Allen et al.

*Milton Kramer*and *Lester P. Schoene*for petitioners.

*Whitejord S. Blakeney*for respondents.

Supreme Court of North Carolina. Certiorari granted.
#            

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (R)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-109182

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  468                                                              Trade Date:  08/16/04

(To Prospectus Supplement dated November 6, 2003 &

  Prospectus dated October 15,2003)                                                         Issue Date:   08/19/04

The Date of this Pricing SupplementAugust 16, 2004

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                             Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                 Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common   Interest                       Price to   Discounts&         Payment       Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)     Maturity    Public (2)  Commissions       Frequency        Option    Yes/No     record dates)

14911QVM0  4.25%       08/15/11          100%             1.21%             Semi-Annually             YES        NO                                                                                                                                                                                                                             

                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Principal                                                                               1st Payment               Day         

Amount                   Proceeds                   Dealer                           Date                   Count

$1,571,000.00           $1,551,990.90           ABN AMROInc.         02/15/05                               30/360     

Original Issue DiscountNote:                                                                     Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes               X   No                                                                              N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (R) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (R) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $135.771 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (R) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (R) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated October 15,2003.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
EXHIBIT 32.1



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert E. Matthiessen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Date:	May 14, 2007

/s/ Robert E. Matthiessen
Robert E. Matthiessen
President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 619, Misc. No. 630, Misc. No. 658, Misc.

#### Ex parte Schlette; Perry *v.*Maxwell, Warden; and Verschoor *v.*California.

Motions for leave to file petitions for writs of habeas corpus denied.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
CUISINE SOLUTIONS, INC.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements,
(Nos. 33-60614 and 33-60616) on Form S-8 of Cuisine Solutions, Inc. of our
report dated September 15, 2000, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of
Cuisine Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 24, 2000, and the related
consolidated statement of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for the year then ended, and related schedule, which report appears in the
June 24, 2000 annual report on Form 10-K of Cuisine Solutions, Inc..




Vienna, Virginia                                   Grant Thornton LLP
September 15, 2000
No. 28, Misc.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Thomas F. Eagleton,*Attorney General of Missouri, and *Howard L. McFadden,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

#### Green *v.*Missouri.

Supreme Court of Missouri. Certiorari denied.