alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AIR RESOURCES BOARD

VENTURA COUNTY APCD RULE EVALUATION FORM

- Page 1

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Ventura County APCD Rule No.: 37 Date / Amended /Repealed : J une 1 2 , 20 1 2

Rule Title: Project XL

Date Submitted to ARB: October 18

, 20 1 2 If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended: Not Applicable

Is the Rule Intended to b e Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? (X) Yes ( ) No If NO, do not complete remainder of form.

District Contact: Stan Cowen Phone No.: 805 /645

- 1408

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: ( ) New Rule ( ) Amended (X) Repealed

Polluta nt(s) Regulated by the Rule (Circle): ROG NOx SO2 PM10 CO TAC

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emission. Attach referen ce(s) for emission factor(s) and other

information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emissions information provided below was determined. See staff report Appendix A for emission calculations.

Net Effect on Emissions: ( ) Increase ( ) Decrease ( X ) N/A No impact on emissions.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: ( ) Attainment (X) Nonattainment ( ) Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule: None

Percent in Nonattainment Area: Not Applicable

Number of Large (>100 TPY) Sources Cont rolled: None Percent in Nonattainment Area: Not Applicable

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Not Applicable

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

Not Applicable

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

(X) No Impact ( ) Impacts RFP ( ) Impacts attainment

Discussion: The repeal of Rule 37 will have no impact on emissions because it does not apply to any sources.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.97 MB)
 
 USCENTCOM Tampa food CENTCOM Coalition International holiday cuisine
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Annie Craig

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: No more contraceptive copays

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:11:25 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as

pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to

reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services

are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological

distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make

exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption

to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though

they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger

exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where

they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.

Sincerely, Julianne C.
From: llfsalley@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:50:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Linda Salley

Riverside, CA 92507
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1366 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1366

  Recognizing Honor Flight Michigan, Inc., for its important work in 
  recognizing World War II veterans and expressing condolences to the 
        family and friends of David Cameron following his death.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2008

Mr. Knollenberg submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing Honor Flight Michigan, Inc., for its important work in 
  recognizing World War II veterans and expressing condolences to the 
        family and friends of David Cameron following his death.

Whereas there are an estimated 3,000,000 World War II veterans alive today;
Whereas Honor Flight Michigan, Inc., is a nonprofit organization founded by 
        David and Carole Cameron;
Whereas Honor Flight Michigan raises funds to send World War II veterans from 
        Michigan to see the World War II Memorial in Washington, District of 
        Columbia, at no cost to the veteran;
Whereas Honor Flight Michigan works with local veterans organizations to ensure 
        every Michigan veteran who wants to see the World War II Memorial can do 
        so;
Whereas Honor Flight Michigan is funded by donations from people across the 
        United States;
Whereas Honor Flight Michigan makes 2 trips per month to our Nation's Capital 
        between April and November;
Whereas Honor Flight Michigan has made 13 trips to Washington, District of 
        Columbia, since April 2007 to give World War II veterans a chance to see 
        the Memorial erected in recognition of their service to our Nation;
Whereas Honor Flight Michigan helped pave the way for over 30 States to provide 
        a similar opportunity for their World War II veterans;
Whereas David Cameron was a founding member of the nationwide Honor Flight 
        Network, which works to bring veterans from across the country to the 
        World War II Memorial;
Whereas David Cameron, a businessman from Royal Oak, Michigan, who dedicated the 
        last 2 years of his life to veterans, passed away on Sunday, June 8, 
        2008; and
Whereas David Cameron is survived by his wife, Carole, and 3 sons: Michael, Don, 
        and David: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the mission of Honor Flight Michigan and the 
        World War II veterans who so honorably served our Nation;
            (2) recognizes the patriotism of David and Carole Cameron; 
        and
            (3) mourns the loss of David Cameron.
                                 <all>
```
### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 14

- 00495

- CV

M.M.V. , Appellant

V.

DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND PROTECTIVE SERVI CES , Appellee

Appeal from the 313th District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 2013

- 02934J ).

TO THE 313TH DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court , on the 11th day of December 2014 , the case upon appeal to revise

or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by

the trial court on June 4, 2014. After submitting the case on

the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the

parties, the Court holds that the tr ial court’s judgment contains

no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial

court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below

for observance.

Judgment rendered December 11 , 2014.Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Brown. Opinion

delivered by Justice Brown.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

February 20, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000732814
<NAME> APPALACHIAN OIL & GAS COMPANY, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         104,123
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               134,560
<PP&E>                                         466,758
<DEPRECIATION>                                 313,727
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 287,591
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,345
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,358
<OTHER-SE>                                     241,888
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   287,591
<SALES>                                        355,225
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               357,273
<CGS>                                          244,232
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               186,535
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,340
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,340
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,340
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### Julius B. de Mesquita, Respondent, *v.*The Herbert Kaufmann and Handy Company, Appellant.

*de Mesquita*v. *Kaufmann and Handy Co.,*154 App. Div. 886, appeal dismissed.

(Argued February 24, 1913;

decided March 4, 1913.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 9, 1912, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee in an action for services.

The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal was unauthorized, the affirmance by the Appellate Division having been unanimous and permission to appeal not having been obtained.

*Milton Dammann*for motion.

*Thorndike Saunders*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
No. 101.

#### Seiberling Rubber Co. *v.*United States.

August 10, 1962.

*Edward C. Park*for petitioner. *Solicitor General Cox*for the United States.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Claims.

Dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.
From: us5r4ku@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:00:28 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Barbara Meiss

Shawnee, KS 66216
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.63 MB)
 
 CENTCOM NAVCENT USCG 5th Fleet
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
-----Forwarded by Jezebe le Alicea/DC/USEPA/US on 07/02/2010 09:03PM -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: "Gwyther, Mike" <Mik e.Gwyther@gdfsuezna.com> Date: 07/02/2010 11:47AM cc: "Harris, Milton" <Milton.Harris@gdfsuezna.com>, "Vodopivec, Cynthia" <Cynthia.Vodopivec@gdfsuezna.com>, "Merchant, Richard" <Richard.Merchant@gdfsuezna.com>, "Merchant, James" <James.Merchant@gdfsuezna.com> Subject: Request for extension: Mt Tom CWA ICR - Draft for comment

Dear Ms. Alicea:

On June 18, 2010, Mount Tom Generating Company (Mt. Tom) received the information collection request (ICR) authorized by the Clean Water Act to develop e ffluent limitations and stan dards for Steam Electric Power Generating industry. We have reviewed the content of the 6 parts of the ICR (A,B,C,D, H, and I) to which we are required to respond. Our review indicates that the amount and the detailed nature of the information requested will require Mt. Tom to locate and hire outside technical help to assist in compiling a complete response. The proposed de adline for the 90-day re sponse also comes at a time where Mt. Tom's resources have already been dedicated to other regulatory obligations.

For these reasons, Mount Tom respectfully requests th at the EPA extend our 90-day response deadline to 120 days. This extra time will allow for a more a ccurate and thorough response to the ICR which will ultimately benefit the EPA in this data collection effort.

Best Regards,

Mike Gwyther

Plant Manager

Mt. Tom Generating Co., LLC

200 Northampton Street

Holyoke, MA 01040

Ph: (413) 536-9562

Fx: (413) 536-9554

mike.gwyther@gdfsuezna.com 

## Pa g e 1 of 1

4/25/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C2E4647DO

...
From: nancyd@s-gcpa.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:17:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nancy Dobney

Walker, IA 52352
From: Clpierce8@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: (no subject)

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:31:54 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women

just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

sincerely

Cheri Pierce