alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          35,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  418,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,000
<INVENTORY>                                    274,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               776,000
<PP&E>                                         590,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 229,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,685,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          481,100
<BONDS>                                      2,239,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,330,100)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,685,100
<SALES>                                        441,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               441,100
<CGS>                                          155,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  155,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (49,300)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (51,200)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (51,200)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001035507
<NAME>                        800-JR CIGAR, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                        12,063
<SECURITIES>                  3,919
<RECEIVABLES>                 3,561
<ALLOWANCES>                  (93)
<INVENTORY>                   44,178
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              69,536
<PP&E>                        36,080
<DEPRECIATION>                (6,870)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                99,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         22,420
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      128
<OTHER-SE>                    75,578
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  99,126
<SALES>                       151,619
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              152,091
<CGS>                         125,513
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 17,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              139
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            462
<INCOME-PRETAX>               8,440
<INCOME-TAX>                  3,385
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           5,055
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  5,055
<EPS-BASIC>                 .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                 .40



</TABLE>
Record of Communication 

02-04-15 

This afternoon (02-04-15) EPA Region 6 met with representatives from Xcel Energy (see 

Attachment 1) concerning our proposal on the Texas and Oklahoma regional haze SIPs. The 

following summarizes the main discussion points Xcel communicated to us regarding our 

analysis of the Tolk facility: 

 Xcel believes we did not appropriately consider the cost of acquiring additional water in 

costing dry scrubbers and the impact that would have on non- air environmental impacts. 

 Xcel believes we did not appropriately consider the cost of additional waste disposal in 

costing dry scrubbers and non- air environmental impacts. 

 Xcel questioned our use of CAMx modeling and how we weighed Xcel’s contribution 

against the influence of Mexico and natural conditions. 

 Xcel questioned our use of metrics such as thresholds for control, and percent 

contribution over deciview impacts. 

We asked that Xcel provide official written comments to these discussions points so that we can 

respond to those comments on the record.
##### 



EXHIBIT 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
The Board of Directors
CUISINE SOLUTIONS, INC.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements,
(Nos. 33-60614 and 33-60616) on Form S-8 of Cuisine Solutions, Inc. of our
report dated August 27, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of
Cuisine Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 29, 2002, and the related
consolidated statement of operations, changes in stockholders equity, and cash
flows for the year then ended, and related schedule, which report appears in
the June 29, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Cuisine Solutions, Inc.

GRANT THORNTON LLP

Vienna, Virginia
September 20, 2002
From: Jan Marquart

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 7:04:27 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs. Now along with the birth control please give

them advice on sex and the consequences of it or this preventive measure will have little effect on

other social issues.

Sincerely,

Jan Marquart

Sincerely,

Jan Marquart

PO 10322

Austin, Tx 78766
From: james007gibbs@me.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:48:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James Gibbs

Duncan, OK 73533
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2024 KW 0139

VERSUS

DONOVAN TYRELLE WRIGHT APRIL 19, 2024

In Re: Donovan Tyrelle Wright, applying for supervisory

writs, 32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of

Terrebonne, No. 742992. 

BEFORE: THERIOT, PENZATO, AND GREENE, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

MRT

AHP

HG

OURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

PUTY CLERK OF COU

FOR THE COURT
Exhibit






AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED 
EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




This Amendment to the Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement dated June 9, 2015 (“Employment Agreement”) is entered into by and between ARC Document Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“ARC”) and Rahul K. Roy (“Executive”) as of May 9, 2016 (“Effective Date”).




WHEREAS, ARC and Executive entered into the Employment Agreement dated June 9, 2015; and


WHEREAS, ARC and Executive now wish to enter into this Amendment to the Employment Agreement.


NOW THEREFORE, ARC and Executive agree as follows:


Section 1 of Appendix B of the Employment Agreement is amended in full to read as follows:


		
	1.
	Base Salary.  During the Employment Term, ARC shall pay Executive a base salary at the annual rate of $675,000 per year or such higher rate as may be determined from time to time by ARC in accordance with ARC’s compensation policies and practices (“Base Salary”).  Such Base Salary shall be paid in accordance with ARC’s standard payroll practice for senior executives.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the date first hereinabove set forth.




	
		
	ARC DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. 
 
 
By:  ______________________   Kumarakulasingam Suriyakumar
   President and Chief Executive Officer
	EXECUTIVE 
 
 
_________________________________Rahul K. Roy
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ayman S. Ashour, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that (1) the Quarterly Report of Identive Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Identive Group, Inc.



|                       |  |                                                  
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 16, 2010 |  | /S/ AYMAN S. ASHOUR                              
|                       |  | Ayman S. Ashour                                  
|                       |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|                       |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                    

I, Melvin
Denton-Thompson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Quarterly Report of Identive Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Identive Group, Inc.



|                       |  |                                             
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 16, 2010 |  | /S/ MELVIN
DENTON-THOMPSON                  
|                       |  | Melvin Denton-Thompson                      
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary       
|                       |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
From: luu_susan@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:09:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients.

Please recognize what you are doing -The federal government is mandating that all private health

insurance plans cover contraceptives and sterilization services (including those with abortifacient

mechanisms of action) free of charge. This will only increase health insurance premiums. And, as with

anything that 'free' to the user it will be taken advantage of in abusice and wasteful way. Please think of

the waste and abuse of medicaid (free medicine), foodstamp, welfare. Do you realize how many people

receive foodstamp and welfare while working under the table for CASH. Thereby, avoiding paying taxes

and taking advantage of the the government benefits at the same time. I urge to please stop wasting

money where not necessary starting with this unneccesary mandate.

Sincerely,

Thu-Van Luu

Sincerely,

THu-Van LUu

Lumberton, NJ 08048
No. 136.

#### Pierce Ford Sales, Inc., et al. *v.*Ford Motor Co.

*John S. Burgess*for petitioners.

*Whitney North Seymour, Osmer C. Fitts*and *Richard Hawkins*for respondent.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black would grant certiorari in this case because he believes that petitioner Pierce Ford Sales, Inc., was denied its right to a trial by jury in violation of the guarantee of the Seventh Amendment.
___________ No. 95-1155

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Carlos Jones, also known as * Dion Tillman, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 19, 1996 Filed: April 26, 1996

___________ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.

Af ter a jury found Carlos Jones guilty of carjacking and firear m charges, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2119 and 2 and 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) , the district court gr anted Jones's motion to dismiss the firearm count on double jeopardy grounds. The court also denied Jones's motion for a new trial. On appeal, we affirmed the denial of the new-trial motion, bu t
revers ed the dismissal of the firearm conviction and remanded "wit h instru ctions to reinstate [Jones's] conviction on that count and t o sentence [Jones] thereunder." See United States v. Jones , 34 F.3d 596 , 599-602 (8th Cir. 1994), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct . 1701 (1995). On remand, the district court re sentenced Jones to a total of 97 months imprisonment and two years supervised release for the two convictions, and Jone s appeals. Counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). We affirm.

### -2- On appeal , Jones raises two issues he presented at the resentencing hearing on remand, namely, that the evidence was insufficient to show that he aided and abetted in the carjacking, and that counsel was ineffective at trial for failing to obtain the full criminal record of one of th e victims. Ineffective-assistance claims should be raised in a collateral proceeding under 28 U .S.C. § 2255, United States v. Thomas , 992 F.2d 201, 204 (8th Cir. 1993), and Jones's sufficiency-of- the-evidence challenge was beyond the scope of the matters before the distr ict court pursuant to this court's remand order, see Klein v. Arkoma Prod. Co. , 73 F.3d 779, 784 (8th Cir. 1996); cf. Unite d States v. Prestemon , 953 F.2d 1089, 1090 (8th Cir. 1992) (trial court could not consider new bases for downward departur e wh ere remand was limited to resentencing within applicable Guidelin e range). After conducting the necessary review of the record, in accordanc e with Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), we conclude that no other non

frivolous issues exist.
Accordingly, we affirm.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





DATE OF REPORT (Date of earliest event reported): March 23, 2017





CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION


(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)





Delaware (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION)001-11241 (COMMISSION FILE NUMBER)37-1105865 (IRS EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)





2120 West End Avenue, Nashville, Tennessee    37203-0001 (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)    (ZIP CODE)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (615) 341-1000





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:


o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

















---







I tem 8.01 Other Events .


Exhibits are filed herewith in connection with the issuance on March 23, 2017 by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation (the “Company”) of (i) $250,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its Medium-Term Notes, Series H, Floating Rate Notes due 2019 (the “Floating Rate Notes”) and (ii) $650,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its Medium-Term Notes, Series H, 1.900% Notes due 2019 (the “2019 Notes” and, together with the Floating Rate Notes, the “Notes”) pursuant to the Company’s previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-195039) (the “Registration Statement”) and the related Prospectus dated April 4, 2014, Prospectus Supplement dated April 4, 2014 and Pricing Supplements, each dated March 20, 2017, relating to the Floating Rate Notes and the 2019 Notes, respectively.





Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits .





(d) Exhibits . The following Exhibits are filed as part of this Report and as Exhibits to the Registration Statement:





ExhibitNumberDescription5.1Opinion of Sidley Austin LLP, as to the legality of the Notes.23.1Consent of Sidley Austin LLP (included as part of Exhibit 5.1).











2


---







SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





Caterpillar Financial Services CorporationBy:/s/ Leslie S. ZmuggName: Leslie S. Zmugg Title:   Secretary





Date: March 23, 2017











3


---







EXHIBIT INDEX








ExhibitNumberDescription5.1Opinion of Sidley Austin LLP, as to the legality of the Notes.23.1Consent of Sidley Austin LLP (included as part of Exhibit 5.1).











4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 25, 1998, ITS CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATION FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 25, 1998 AND
SCHEDULE II AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-25-1998
<CASH>                                          21,265
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  357,547
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,958
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               393,081
<PP&E>                                          99,001
<DEPRECIATION>                                  51,331
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 948,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          272,821
<BONDS>                                        405,059
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,665
<COMMON>                                           227
<OTHER-SE>                                     231,276
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   948,606
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               757,435
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  666,474
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                24,971
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,203
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              24,895
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (733)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,694
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,427)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,427)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.63)
        

</TABLE>
From: Luise Eichenbaum

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:19:58 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Luise Eichenbaum

515 West End Avenue

New York, NY 10024
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 14, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 14, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21A0421. NATIONAL COLLEGIATE STUDENT LOAN TRUST 2005-2 v. RYAN 

SWERTFAGER.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion the hereby GRANTED, and 

jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.