alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: John Walker Wood 

Sent: Monday, December 11, 2017 4:33 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Cc: john@woodfirm.com

Subject: 1210-AB39

Office of Regulations and Interpretations,

Employee Benefits Security Administration

Room M-5655

U.S. Dept. of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue NW

Washington D.C. 20210

Re: Re-Examination of Claims Procedure Regulations for Plans Providing Disability 

Benefits

RIN No.: 1210-AB39

Regulation: 29 C.F.R. §2560.503

Dear Deputy Assistant Secretary Hauser:

I request that the Department of Labor refuse to modify or further delay the final disability 

claims regulations that are scheduled to go into effect on April 1, 2018.

I am an attorney for disabled persons who assert claims under ERISA. I know that the final 

disability claims regulations will result in a simpler and fairer system for deciding benefit claims.

The self-serving concerns raised by the insurance industry are meritless. Where those rules are 

based on policy choices that have been made by Congress, by this Department, and by the 

federal courts interpreting ERISA, another argument about the merits is unnecessary. 

Currently, the insurance industry handles claims in a one-sided fashion that prevents the fair 

resolution of claims. For example, insurance companies routinely add new evidence from paid 

“consultants” without providing claimant a chance to respond to the new evidence. This is a 

hideous practice that prevents many claims from receiving a full-and-fair review of their claims 

or from recovering their disability benefits. Among other things, the new regulations end this 

practice by allowing claimants the opportunity to rebut the biased reports from the paid 

consultants (who have almost never seen or spoken with the claimant).

I therefore request that the new regulation go into effect as scheduled.

Thank you.

John Walker Wood

The Wood Law Firm, PLLC

Seattle, WA 98199
# Update on withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan June 28, 2021

/ Published June 29, 2021
TAMPA, Fla., 
June 29, 2021Release Number 20210629-05FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEUpdate on withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan June 28, 2021TAMPA, Fla. - U.S. Central Command provides the following update on the orderly and responsible withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan, as of 10 a.m. on June 28, 2021.Since the President's decision, the DoD has retrograded the equivalent of approximately 896 C-17 loads of material out of Afghanistan and have turned nearly 15,943 pieces of equipment to the Defense Logistics Agency for disposition. The 15,943 pieces of equipment comprise almost entirely federal excess personal property. Most of this equipment is not defensive articles or considered to be major equipment.Also, the U.S. has officially handed over six facilities to the Afghan Ministry of Defense. We anticipate additional transfers of bases and military assets in the future which will support the ANDSF/GIRoA as they work to stabilize and defend their nation.U.S. Central Command estimates that we have completed more than 50% of the entire retrograde process.NOTE: For operational security and to preserve force protection, we will not be updating the specific percentage of the exit process going forward.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Audio EquipmentBroadcast Reception EquipmentCurrent EventsEducational EquipmentEducational TechnologyElementary Secondary EducationInstructional MaterialsLearning ActivitiesNews MediaProgramming (Broadcast)RadioTelecommunicationsWorld Affairs

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
From: James.Wilcoski@usace.army.mil

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:31:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James Wilcoski

Mahomet, IL 61853
To: Reid Rosnick

From: Neal S. Nelson

Subject: Comparison of CAP88 calculations from SC&A and the EPA web version of CAP88

As a cross check to assure that the version of CAP88 being used by SC&A is the same as the one 

which is downloaded from the EPA radiation website, a couple of the input data sets were obtained 

from SC&A.

Initially I was unable to duplicate SC&A results. Investigation of the problem revealed I had a 

copy of ‘CAP88 ver3’ which had an executable dated 02/24/07. I had downloaded it from the EPA 

website at some time in the past. The out put had scrambled the dose conversion files somehow.

After discussing the question with SC&A, I discovered that the current version of ‘CAP88 ver3’ 

has an executable dated 12/09/07. After I downloaded and installed a new copy of the current ‘CAP88 

ver3’, I was able to run and duplicate the SC&A calculations.

Since the EPA website lists only ‘CAP88 ver3’ for downloading, and does not indicate that 

different builds of the program have different executables, the only way to identify different builds is to 

compare the executables for size and date.

Also, I was unable to run the program on a computer that had been off line for a couple of years. 

The error report showed that Active X was unable to do something. It would appear that the Windows 

program must be up to date, so the computer must be on line to get the automatic updates to 

Windows.

Anyway, it seems that we are running the same version of ‘CAP88 ver3’ as SC&A and can 

duplicate or extend any reports we get from them.
#### James McNaughton, v. Ralph R. Osgood.

Motion to resettle order granted.

Learned, P. J., not acting.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
EMAILTHATPAYS.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES FORM 10-QSB FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             587
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  121,433
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (58,500)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               569,598
<PP&E>                                       1,305,650
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,762,798
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 851,898
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,990
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,888,630
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,762,798
<SALES>                                        879,891
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               879,891
<CGS>                                           67,773
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,773
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,417,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             (605,568)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              91,491
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (696,955)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (261,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (435,995)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (425,840)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,155)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
----

| Delaware                                       | 37-1105865                           |
|------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification Number) |

|   |   |   | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)                  |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |                                                                                                   |
|   |   |   | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)                 |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                   |
|   |   |   | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                   |
|   |   |   | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                   |

----

| c)     | Exhibits: |   |
|--------|-----------|--------|
|   |      | 99.1   | 2010 Third Quarter Results Press Release dated October 21, 2010 |
|   |      |   |   |
|   |      |   |   |

| Date:  October 21, 2010 |           By: /s/ Michael G. Sposato                                                                 |
|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |                       Michael G. Sposato |
|                              |                       Secretary          |

----
EX-(4).(a).(6)



 CONTRACT DATA PAGE 

 

			
	Contract Number:  [P9999999999]
 f1	  	Contract Date:  [May 2, 2016] f1

  

					
	Owner:  [JOHN DOE] 
f1      	 	Date of Birth:  [March 1, 1976] 
f1     	 	Age at
Issue:  [35]f1

  

													
	2®
	 	[Owner:  [JANE DOE] 
f1        	 		 	Date of Birth: 	 	[June 10, 1976] 
f1	 	Age at Issue: 	 	[34] 
f1]
						
	Annuitant:  [JOHN
DOE] f1  	 		 	Date of Birth:	 	[March 1, 1976] f1 
 	 	Age at Issue:	 	[35] f1
							
	2®
	 	[Annuitant:  [JANE DOE]	 		 	Date of Birth:	 	[June 10, 1976] f1	 	Age at Issue:	 	[34] 
f1]

 Beneficiary:  As named by You 

Initial Purchase Payment:  [$10,000.00] f1  

Maximum Purchase Payment Without Our
Approval:  [$1,000,000]f3 
 Purchase
Payment Age Limit:  [Prior to the 86th birthday]f4  
 Minimum Subsequent Purchase Payment:  [$500] f5 
 Purchase Payments are subject to the limitations defined in this Contract. 

Fixed Account Options – Minimum Guarantee Rate:  [1.0%] f6 

With 30 days advance notice, we may cease offering the Fixed Account Options, Fixed Account Guarantee Period Options and/or Dollar Cost Averaging Fixed Account
Options if market conditions are such that we are not able to credit the Minimum Guarantee Rate Shown on this page. 
 Fixed Account
Options:  [1 Year Fixed, 6 Month DCA Fixed, 1 Year DCA Fixed] f7 
 Minimum
Partial Withdrawal Amount:  [$1,000] f8  

Maximum Penalty-Free Withdrawal Percentage:  [10%]f9  

Minimum Systematic Withdrawal Amount:  [$100] f10 

Minimum Amount Remaining After a Partial Withdrawal:  [$2,500] f11 


 Withdrawal Charge Schedule: 

 
 



 
 See Page [13] for Withdrawal Provisions. f13 

Number of Full Years Elapsed Between Purchase Payment Contribution And Date of Withdrawal 
Withdrawal Charge as a Percentage of Withdrawn Purchase Payment 
12 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7+

8% 7% 6% 5% 4% 3% 2% 0% 

  

					
	US-803-PPS7 (12/15) 	  	3	  	










 CONTRACT DATA PAGE (Cont’d.) 

 

  Minimum Transfer Amount:  [$100] f14 

 Separate Account Charge (including guaranteed death benefit risk charge of [0.10%]): [1.15%]f15 
  Annual Contract Maintenance Fee:  [$50]f16 
  Transfer Fee:  [$25] f17 

  Earliest Annuity Date After the Contract Date:  13 months 

 Latest Annuity Date:  [1st day of the month following Your 95th
Birthday]
f18
 

 Separate Account:  [FS VARIABLE SEPARATE
ACCOUNT]
f19
 

 
  
 



 

  

					
	US-803-PPS7 (12/15)	  	4
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.1



                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


Principal Amount                                               December 31, 2002
$15,699.72                                               Las Vegas, Nevada 89101



         This Promissory Note will replace all previous Promissory Notes to
Cellcom Corp. Its purpose is to extend the due date through June 30, 2003.

         For value received, I promise to pay, in lawful money of the United
States of America, to the order of CELLCOM CORP. at 520 S. Fourth Street, Las
Vegas, Nevada 89101 the sum of FIFTEEN THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED NINTY-NINE AND 72/00
($15,699.72) with interest thereon at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum.
Interest will be paid monthly and principal is payable in full on or before June
30, 2003.

         I hereby waive presentment, demand, protest, notice of protest, notice
of dishonor, and notice of non-payment.

         In the case of default of, or if suit is commenced for, collection of
any amount due hereunder, the undersigned agrees to pay interest thereon at the
rate of ten percent (10%) per annum, together with reasonable attorney's fees
incurred and costs.




                                           /s/ Jay H. Brown
                                           JAY H. BROWN
p130183.eng
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0183 Focus Ready Draft 1/14/2013

ENGINEER: Choudhary \ EV PV (kg/yr):

Page 1p130183.eng

SAT (concerns) (11/06/2012): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Ecotox Related Cases:

Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P2B3T1 Linear: P1B2T1 // Branched: P2B3T1. Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 2 ppb.)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

Page 2p130183.eng

Page 3p130183.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0183

Page 4p130183.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0183

Page 5p130183.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0183

Page 6p130183.eng

Page 7p130183.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0183

Page 8p130183.eng

Page 9
From: mphillipswka@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:41:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mark Phillips

Dunedin, FL 34698
EXHIBIT 10-W
------------
(Carlyle-XIV)

                          CONSENT OF DIRECTOR
                                  OF
                        CARLYLE MANAGERS, INC.


     The undersigned, being all the directors of Carlyle Manager, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), acting by written consent
pursuant to Section 141(f) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, hereby
consent to the adoption of, and do hereby adopt, the following resolutions:

     WHEREAS, this Corporation is the holder of certain demand notes made
by its shareholders in the aggregate original principal amount of
$3,000,000 (the "Notes"), as set forth in EXHIBIT A attached hereto; and,

     WHEREAS, this Corporation desires to make a distribution to its
shareholders aggregating $2,000,000, as a return of capital (the
"Distribution"); and,

     WHEREAS, in order to effect the Distribution, the outstanding
principal amount of the Notes will be reduced as set forth in such Exhibit
A.

     NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Corporation make the
Distribution, as a return of capital, effective as of the date hereof, to
be paid by the reduction of the outstanding principal amount as set forth
EXHIBIT A attached hereto; and,

     FURTHER RESOLVED, that any officer of this Corporation is hereby
authorized and directed to effect the Distribution as of the date hereof,
to enter into, execute and deliver, or to ratify, any and all documents
incidental or related thereto, including without limitation, those
documents deemed necessary or appropriate to evidence the reduction in the
outstanding principal balances of each of the Notes as set forth herein,
and any said officer is hereby authorized and directed to take whatever
actions said officer deems reasonably necessary in order to consummate the
transaction described or contemplated.



Dated:           October 31, 1996



STUART C. NATHAN
--------------------
Stuart C. Nathan



Being the sole director or Carlyle Managers, Inc., a Delaware corporation.




                               EXHIBIT A
                               ---------



                                                Original
                                                Principal    Principal
Payor                          Date of Note      Amount      Reduction
-----                         --------------   ----------    ---------

JMB Realty Corporation        March 25, 1993   $  600,000     $400,000

JMB/Manhattan
 Associates, Ltd.             March 25, 1993   $  600,000     $400,000

Carlyle Real Estate
 Limited Partnership-XIII     March 25, 1993   $  600,000     $400,000

Carlyle Real Estate
 Limited Partnership-XIV      March 25, 1993   $1,200,000     $800,000
From: nancys_56@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:28:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nancy Belzile

Willsboro, NY 12996
No. 349.

#### United Mine Workers of America *v.*Flame Coal Co. et al.

*Harrison Combs*and *M. E. Boiarsky*for petitioner.

*Howard H. Baker, Jr.*for respondents.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.