alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#            

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (R)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-109182

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  496                                                                   Trade Date:  10/18/04

(To Prospectus Supplement dated November 6, 2003 &

  Prospectus dated October 15,2003)                                                              Issue Date:   10/21/04

The Date of this Pricing SupplementOctober 18, 2004

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                                   Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                   Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment     Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)   Maturity  Public (2) Commissions       Frequency       Option  Yes/No     record dates)

14911QWR8  4.375%      10/15/13        100%                1.30%                 Monthly                       YES         NO                                                                                                                                        

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Principal                                                                                 1st Payment             Day         

Amount                  Proceeds                  Dealer                           Date                   Count

$608,000.00            $600,096.00            ABN AMROInc.        11/15/04               30/360    

Original Issue DiscountNote:                                                                          Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                  N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (R) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (R) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $200.961 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (R) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (R) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated October 15,2003.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
From: behanhj@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive health care

Date: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 7:13:15 PM

As one of the health care providers in this nation. and a member of AAUW, I believe

that all women and girls deserve quality preventive health care. I urge you to accept

IOM's recommendations and reject the proposed religious refusal exemptions

provisions. Thank you for your attention to this important subject.

Helen Behan
#### Mary S. Bradley, Respondent, v. Mary L. Van Ba en, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 11, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 132193 & (58) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 132193 COA: 261724 Kent CC: 03-007771-FC ERNEST GORDON, III, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion fo r immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to a ppeal the July 13, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not p ersuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d1010 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 11, 2006

Clerk
**Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONI, Robert A. Zummo, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Acorn Holding Corp.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including it’s consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual reportis being prepared;b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofa date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “EvaluationDate”); andc. presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses ininternal controls; andb. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and6. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whetheror not therewere significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internalcontrols subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regardto significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.Date:November 17, 2005     /s/ Robert A. Zummo     Robert A. Zummo, Chairman  President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-50139

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RICARDO RAMIREZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:08-CR-126-1

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Ricardo Ramirez has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967). Ramirez has not filed a response. Our independent review of

the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 20, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Herminio Jaimes Salazar and * From the 132 nd District Court

Salvador Jaimes Salazar

, of Scurry County,

Trial Court No. 25832

.

No. 11

- 2 3

- 00 032

- C V * April 20 , 20 2 3

Jose M. Jaimes, * Per Curiam Memorand um Opinion

(P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and Williams , J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal

should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion, the appeal

is dismissed

. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal are taxed against

Herminio Jaimes Salazar and Salvador Jaimes Salazar.
From: janieewanco@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:20:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Janie Ewanco

Fort Worth, TX 76179
From: teresamuller7@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:03:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Teresa Muller

Seaside, CA 93955
| RATES      EFFECTIVE for Variable Denomination Floating Rate Demand      Notesas      of  August 30, 2010: |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1277 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 19, 2008.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5781) to provide that 8 of the 12 weeks of 
parental leave made available to a Federal employee shall be paid leave, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived 
except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment in the 
nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Oversight and Government 
Reform now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as 
amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions of 
the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any amendment thereto, to final passage 
without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Oversight and Government Reform; (2) the amendment printed in the report of the 
Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered by Representative 
Davis of Illinois or his designee, which shall be in order without intervention 
of any point of order except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI, 
shall be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for 10 minutes 
equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of H.R. 5781 pursuant to this resolution, 
notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone 
further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 
Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. GABRIEL PERAZZO, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 344 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 29th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Exhibit 99               AdditionalExhibit:**Requirements for Arthur Andersen LLP Auditing Clients.**

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                March27, 2002

 

To the Commissioner

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

 

                Pursuantto the Temporary Final Rule and Final Rule: Requirements for Arthur AndersenLLP Auditing Clients effective March 18, 2002 we have obtained representationsfrom Arthur Andersen LLP. As of March 15, 2002, Arthur Andersen represented tous that their audit was subject to their quality control system for the U.S.accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that theengagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, that therewas appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the auditand availability of national office consultation. Availability of personnel atforeign affiliates of Arthur Andersen was not relevant to the audit.

 

 

 
| Respectfully submitted, |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
|                    |
| Kaye A. Simmons         |
| Treasurer               |

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

110Thomas Johnson Drive

P.O.Box 518

Frederick,MD  21705

(301)694-4000

 

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12179]

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 506(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (the “Act”) (22 U.S.C. 2318(a)(1)) and Presidential Delegation of Authority dated October 4, 2022, I hereby determine that:
    - an unforeseen emergency exists which requires immediate military assistance to Ukraine; and
    - the emergency requirement cannot be met under the authority of the Arms Export Control Act or any other provision of law.

I, therefore, pursuant to authority delegated to me by the President, direct the drawdown of up to $625 million in defense articles and services of the Department of Defense, and military education and training, under the authority of section 506(a)(1) of the Act to provide assistance to Ukraine. The Department of State will coordinate implementation of this drawdown.

                    This determination shall be reported to the Congress and published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: October 4, 2022.

Antony Blinken,

Secretary of State.

# Note:

 This document was received for publication by the Office of the Federal Register on September 7, 2023.

[FR Doc. 2023-19711 Filed 9-11-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF
DOBSON COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

I, Everett R. Dobson, Chief Executive Officer of Dobson Communications
Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2003, (the Report):



| | a. |  | complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that                                                                                                                                
| | -- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | b. |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at
June 30, 2003, and the results of the Companys operations for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2003.

|                |  |                                                       
|--------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|August 14, 2003 |  | /s/ Everett R. Dobson                                 
|                |  |                                                       
|                |  | Everett R. Dobson
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
From: dlittrell@tampabay.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:25:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Littrell

Valrico, FL 33594
##### 








---



##### 








---



##### 



(i)
    
    The retirement of the Executive on or after January 1, 2000.(ii)
    
    The death of the Executive.(iii)
    
    Discharge of the Executive without cause.(iv)
    
    Resignation due to change in control of the Bank.




---



##### 








---



##### 



IN THE PRESENCE OF:
    
    
    
    BANKLORAIN NATIONAL BANK:/s/Daniel Batista
    
    
    
    /s/Stanley G. PijorBY:Chairman/s/Suzanne M. LudwigEXECUTIVE/s/Daniel Batista
    
    /s/James F. KiddJames F. Kidd/s/Suzanne M. Ludwig




---



##### 



þ
 o
 o




---



##### 



Share ofPayment %JoLyn Kidd
    
    ###-##-####Primary
    
    Name
    
    SSN1027 E. Erie Ave., Lorain, OhAddressPrimary
    
    Name
    
    SSNAddressJames Kidd Trust UTD 7694Secondary
    
    Name
    
    SSNL.N.B. Trust Dept., 457
Broadway, Lorain OHAddressPrimary
    
    Name
    
    SSNAddressSecondary
    
    Name
    
    SSNAddress
 
  /s/James F. Kidd
    
    ###-##-####James F. Kidd
    
    Social Security Number6-15-99




---



##### 



DateSpouses signature (if
community property state and
Primary Beneficiary other than
Spouse is to receive more than
a 50% share).