alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No.  333-59540

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  199				Trade Date: 07/11/02
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

  June 1, 2001)							Issue Date:  07/16/02
The Date of this Pricing Supplement July 14, 2002
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QJG7   4.50%	07/15/07	     100%	       1.00%             Semi-Annually	     YES	    NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		      Date		Count

$1,737,000.00	$1,719,630.00	ABN AMRO Inc.	    1/15/03		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes	  X   No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.   Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $644.066 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under a Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
Additionally, the total principal amount of PowerNotes(SM) offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001 has been increased from $500.0mm to $750.0mm.  $250.0mm principal amount of debt securities registered pursuant to Registration Statement No. 333-59540 originally offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement dated June 15, 2001 and related Prospectus dated May 25, 2001 are being offered as PowerNotes(SM) by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of AE Biofuels, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the year ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report ), I, Scott A. Janssen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |                        
|------------------ | -----------------------
|By:                | /s/ Scott A. Janssen   
|                   | Scott A. Janssen       
|                   | Chief Financial Officer
|                   |                        
|Date: May 19, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1284 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 19, 2008.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to take 
from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 2642) making appropriations for military 
construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 2008, and for other purposes, with the Senate 
amendments to the House amendments to the Senate amendment thereto, and to 
consider in the House, without intervention of any point of order except those 
arising under clause 10 of rule XXI, a single motion offered by the chairman of 
the Committee on Appropriations or his designee that the House (1) concur in the 
Senate amendment to the House amendment numbered 1 and (2) concur in the Senate 
amendment to the House amendment numbered 2 with the amendment printed in the 
report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. The Senate 
amendments and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be 
debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to final adoption without 
intervening motion or demand for division of the question except that the Chair 
shall divide the question between the dispositions of the two Senate amendments.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of the motion to concur pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair 
may postpone further consideration of the motion to such time as may be 
designated by the Speaker.
    Sec. 3.  The chairman of the Committee on Appropriations may insert in the 
daily issue of the Congressional Record dated June 19, 2008, such material as he 
may deem explanatory of the motion.
    Sec. 4.  It shall be in order, any rule of the House to the contrary 
notwithstanding, to consider concurrent resolutions providing for the 
adjournment of the House and Senate during the month of July.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 526, Misc.

#### Snead *v.*Warden, Maryland Penitentiary.

Court of Appeals of Maryland. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 10.3








ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND CLARIFICATION








QAD Inc., a Delaware corporation, with its principal offices located at 100 Innovation Place, Santa Barbara, California 93108 ("QAD"), and Daniel Lender, residing at XXXX ("Employee"), hereby acknowledge and agree that all severance benefits, as described in Employee's offer letter of October 10, 2008, are provided under and are subject to the terms and conditions of the Executive Termination Policy as approved by QAD Inc.'s Board of Directors and in effect as of December 18, 2008 (the "Policy"), but that any benefits provided to Employee pursuant to such Policy shall be for a period of twelve (12) months instead of six (6) months.






/s/ Daniel Lender

/s/ Murray RayDaniel Lender

Murray RayCPO & EVP, Human ResourcesQAD Inc.Dated:  December 18, 2008

Dated:  December 18, 2008
#            

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (R)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-109182

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  481                                                                   Trade Date:  09/10/04

(To Prospectus Supplement dated November 6, 2003 &

  Prospectus dated October 15,2003)                                                              Issue Date:   09/16/04

The Date of this Pricing SupplementSeptember 10, 2004

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                                   Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                  Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment     Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)   Maturity  Public (2) Commissions       Frequency       Option  Yes/No     record dates)

14911QWA5  4.5%          03/15/13        100%                1.48%             Semi-Annually               YES         NO                                                                

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Principal                                                                                 1st Payment             Day         

Amount                  Proceeds                  Dealer                           Date                   Count

$649,000.00            $639,394.80            ABN AMROInc.        03/15/05               30/360    

Original Issue DiscountNote:                                                                          Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                  N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (R) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (R) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $155.911 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (R) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (R) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated October 15,2003.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                                 CERTIFICATION

           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
CODE)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b)  of  Section  1350,  Chapter  63 of  Title  18,  United  States  Code),  the
undersigned officer of VTEX Energy, Inc. (the "Company"), in his Form 10-QSB for
the period  ended  January 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission (the "10-QSB Report") that to his knowledge:

     (1) the 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
         (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date:  March 31, 2003

/s/  Stephen F. Noser
----------------------------
Stephen F. Noser
President



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to VTEX  Energy,  Inc.  and will be retained by VTEX  Energy,  Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Greg lwinski-Eagle Eye Drone Service 2008 south shore drive moline,illinois 61265 309-269-7871 tigermax1@msn.com Wednesday, March 25, 2015**-----~--** _----:;....:.**--~-- --~~-**  

# ------**~-----** _....;...**~-** Petition for exemption 14 cfr 11.81 section 7. UAS certificate ofwaiver or authorization for commercial use-Aerial video and photography. Extent of relief-to operate for commercial use. Offering !he public consu.mer a.l<?wer cost option for aerial photography and property**inspectio~** and appraisal. I would not be operating a drone over the general public or over private property without permission ofthe property owner.Drones would only be used under400ft and within visual line ofsight and would also be using avisual observer to help identify possible hazards in the air as well as on the ground and would not be operated within 5 miles ofthe local airport.drone is also equipped with high visibility lights to identify its location.drone would also be flown during daylight hours ONLY! I have read the current proposed rules and regulations pertaining to commercial drone usage and agree**~ith** them all in the**int~rest** ofpublic**saf~~y ~n_d** **i~tend_ ~o_fo~l~w** **t~e_m** as a strict policy ofsafe operation.drones would be inspected and tested for air worthyness prior to each flight to insure safe flight to reduce chance ofdamage to property on the ground_. Ialso have basic aeronauticle knowledge due to the fact that i took helicopter pilots lessons as a teenager and have 15 hours flight time. i would also like information pertaining to receiving an unmanned airvehicle pilots certificate to further insure a level of expertise pertaining to FAA rule 333. ' . - I have been contacted by TPC Deere run which hosts the PGA golftour and they would like to use my service for this**y~ars** Deere classic tour but i am not able to do so unless i get the above mentio.ne9 _exemption and i will only operate under the current proposed rules of regulation. 

### 1I am hoping you except my exemption so i can continue to operate gainfully and legally 

### !



# '·



# .,

_.· 

# . .•**.~** ...**~**



# ... ••

2**.--~** ._-- 

## .-

Sincerely, Greg Iwinski ., J
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion on Remand filed June 3 , 2014
.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 12

- 01069

- CR

DALEON DEMOND POTTS , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
On Appeal from the 184th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1340949

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON REMAND

Appellant Daleon Demond Potts appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon . On original submission, appellant argued that there

wa s insufficient evidence in the record to support the court’s costs of $ 234 reflected in the judgment . We agreed and modified the trial court’s judgment to delete the specific amount of costs assessed

. Potts v. State , No. 14

- 1 2

- 0 1069

- CR; 2013 WL 6045898 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dist.] Nov. 14 , 2013) vacated and2

remanded , No. PD

- 1625

- 13 ; 2014 WL 1512962 (Tex. Crim. App. Apr. 16, 2014). The Court of Criminal Appeals vacated our judgment and remanded in light of its opinion in Joh nson v. State , 423 S.W.3d 385 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). The judgment includes an assessment of $ 234 in court costs. A supplemental clerk’s record was filed, which contains a certified, signed bill of costs listing $ 234 in court costs. We review the assessment of court costs on appeal to determine if there is a basis for the costs, not to determine whether there was sufficient evidence offered at tria l to prove each cost

. Johnson v. State , 423 S.W.3d at 390 . Traditional sufficiency

- of

- th e
- evidence standards of review do not apply. Id

. Generally, a bill of costs must (1) contain the items of cost, (2) be signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive payment for the cost, and (3) be certified. Id . at 3 92

– 93 ; see Tex. Crim. Proc. Code Ann. arts. 103.001, 103.006 . T he record supports the assessment of costs in this case because the record contains a bill of costs that contains each item of cost, is signed by a representative of the district clerk , who is entitled to receive payment of the costs, and is certified

. See Johnson , 423 S.W.3d at 393

. The trial court assessed $ 234 in costs against appellant. The sum of the itemized costs in the cost bill is $ 234

. There being no challenge to any specific cost

or the basis for the assessment of such cost, the bill of costs supports the costs assessed in the judgment. Id . at 396

. The fact that the bill of costs was not prepared until after the court signed the judgment does not defeat the lawfulness of the bill of c osts. Id. at 394. (“[M]atters pertaining to the imposition of court costs need not be brought to the attention of the trial court, including a bill of costs prepared after a criminal trial.”).3

On remand, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Jamison. Do Not Publish

— T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2( b).
|                          |
|--------------------------|
|                          |  |  |
|                     |   | (Signed)  "Nahla Boury" |
|                     |   | Name:  Nahla Boury, P.Eng |
|                     |   | Title:    Vice President Engineering and Director |
|                     |   | DeGolyer and MacNaughton Canada Limited |
|                     |   |   |
| Calgary, Alberta, Canada |   |   |
| March 13, 2014           |   |   |
|                     |   |   |
|                     |   |   |
**Exhibit      32 **

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the                      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all                      material                      respects, the financial condition and result of operations                      of the                      Company. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                       |                                            |   |                                                                                                           |   |                                                   |
|------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
| By:                                                        | /s/ Rick              L.              Catt |   |                                                                                                           | By:    | /s/ Jamie              E.              McReynolds |
| Name: Rick L. CattChief Executive OfficerFebruary 14, 2007 |                                            |   | Name:                Jamie E. McReynoldsChief                Financial OfficerFebruary                14, 2007 |

----
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 62619]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19580]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12172]


Determination Under Section 506(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance 
Act of 1961 To Provide Military Assistance to Ukraine

    Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 506(a)(1) of the 
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (the ``Act'') (22 U.S.C. 2318(a)(1)) and 
Presidential Delegation of Authority dated May 31, 2023, I hereby 
determine that:
    <bullet> an unforeseen emergency exists which requires immediate 
military assistance to Ukraine; and
    <bullet> the emergency requirement cannot be met under the 
authority of the Arms Export Control Act or any other provision of law.
    I, therefore, pursuant to authority delegated to me by the 
President, direct the drawdown of up to $300 million in defense 
articles and services of the Department of Defense, and military 
education and training, under the authority of section 506(a)(1) of the 
Act, to provide assistance to Ukraine. The Department of State will 
coordinate implementation of this drawdown.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress and published 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: May 31, 2023.
Antony Blinken,
Secretary of State.

    Note:  This document was received for publication by the Office 
of the Federal Register on September 6, 2023.

[FR Doc. 2023-19580 Filed 9-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
| 3.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Corporation as of and for the period covered by the  Report. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                  |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|   | /s/      Diane C.A. Rosler                            |
|   | Diane      C.A. Rosler                                |
|   | Senior      Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer |

----
James Kaleigh

Antitrust Attorney

Phone: 817.967.3478

Facsimile: 817.967.2937

Email: james.kaleigh@aa.com

MD	5675, PO	Box	619616	

Dallas/Fort	Worth	Airport,	TX	75261-9616

August 19, 2013

Mr. Todd Homan

Director, Office of Aviation Analysis

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: DOT-OST-2013-0082

Dear Mr. Homan:

Enclosed please find letters executed by the existing carriers with whom American 

Airlines currently holds antitrust immunity or a joint business approval. In these letters, 

each carrier consents to the transfer of the antitrust immunity or joint business approval 

with American to include US Airways. Please let me know should you have any 

questions about this submission. 

Very truly yours,

 

James Kaleigh

Antitrust Attorney 








CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that, on August 20, 2013, I caused to be served a copy of the foregoing 

correspondence letters by email upon those addressees listed below:

urskr@state.gov (Department of State)

esta.rosenberg@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

brian.hedberg@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

brett.kruger@dot.gov (Department of Transportation)

john.allen@faa.gov (Federal Aviation Administration)

dan.weiss@united.com (United)

steve.morrissey@united.com (United)

karine.faden@united.com (United)

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com (Delta)

chris.walker@delta.com (Delta)

jhill@dowlohnes.com (Counsel for JetBlue and Hawaiian)

perkmann@dowlohnes.com (Counsel for JetBlue and Hawaiian)

robert.land@jetblue.com (JetBlue)

msinick@ssd.com (Counsel for Alaska)

jyoung@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit)

dkirstein@yklaw.com (Counsel for Spirit)

bob.kneisley@wnco.com (Southwest)

leslie.abbott@wnco.com (Southwest)

ethan.blank@rjet.com (Republic)

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com (Counsel for Republic)

patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com (Counsel for Republic)

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com (Sun Country)

rpommer@atlasair.com (Atlas)

anita.mosner@hklaw.com (Counsel for UPS)

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com (Counsel for UPS)

cfelts@fedex.com (FedEx)

nssparks@fedex.com (FedEx)

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com (Polar)

matwood@cozen.com (Counsel for Kalitta)

_________________________

Francis C. Heil