alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.36



 Exhibit 10.36 
  

			
	



	  	
		  	 1060 Windward Ridge Parkway,

Suite 170 Alpharetta, GA 30005


 HIRING BONUS REPAYMENT AGREEMENT 

John Deere Landscapes (Company) has extended an offer of employment to Briley Brisendine (Employee) as Executive Vice President and General Counsel, effective
September 8, 2015. This offer includes a one-time hiring bonus in the amount of $70,000. The hiring bonus will be paid to the Employee in one lump-sum amount, less all applicable local, state and federal withholding taxes for which the Company
will not reimburse the Employee. 
 Employee Promise to Repay 

In consideration of Company’s payment/advance of the items listed above, the Employee hereby unconditionally agrees to repay to the Company the full
amounts stated above if the Employee quits, resigns, terminates or is terminated from employment with the Company within the first anniversary of the date of full-time hire for any reason other than the following: (a) death, (b) permanent
and total disability, or (c) termination of employment for the Company’s sole convenience and not because of misconduct or other cause. 
 In such
event, the Employee agrees to make repayment to the Company before receiving any final payment of salary or other compensation upon such termination of employment. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the Employee hereby authorizes the Company to
offset and deduct such full repayment amount from any final salary and other compensation or reimbursement due and payable by the Company to the Employee upon termination. In the event the Employee’s final salary, other compensation and
reimbursements are insufficient to make repayment in full, any amount remaining unpaid shall be an obligation owing by the Employee to the Company until paid in full. The Employee also agrees to pay all costs, expenses, interest, and legal fees
incurred by the Company to enforce this Agreement. 
 I acknowledge I have read, understood, and agree to the above terms. 

 

					
	 /s/ Briley Brisendine
	 		 	 8/17/2015

	Employee Signature	 		 	Date
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000313

17-OCT-2017

08:03 AM
H. Res. 1350 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 17, 2008. 

Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the 

legislative day of Thursday, July 17, 2008, for the Speaker 

to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules relating to a measure concerning the domestic production of oil 

and natural gas. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
From: Jennifer St.Hilaire

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Friday, August 05, 2011 2:16:53 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Jennifer St.Hilaire

1074 45th Street

Emeryville, CA 94608
1 The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-1819

___________ City of Lake Ozark, Missouri; * Wally Schrock; Robert Ashford; * Michael Luby, * * Appeal from the United States Appellees, * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. v. * * [UNPUBLISHED] Robert Singleton; Justin Olsen, * * Appellants. *

___________ Submitted: January 18, 2008 Filed: September 15, 2008

___________ Before WOLLMAN, BRIGHT, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Robert Singleton and Justin Olsen appeal from the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment on their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against the City of Lake Ozark, Missouri, Wally Schrock, Robert Ashford, and Michael Luby. Having reviewed the record de novo and considered the arguments rais ed by the appellants, we conclude-2- that the district court’s order contains no error of fact or law and thus should be affirmed.
Singleton and Olsen also appeal from the dismissal without prejudice of Rudy Rodriguez, whom they failed to serve within 120 days after filing the complaint. The district court put Singleton and Olsen on notice that the complaint was subject to dismissal and properly exerci sed its discretion when it sua sponte dismissed the complaint without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). See Norsyn, Inc. v. Desai , 351 F.3d 825, 830-31 (8th Cir. 2003)(holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it dismissed the case without prejudice because the plaintiff failed to properly serve the de fendant within 120 days after filing the complaint).
Finally, we note that “[d]istrict courts have broad discretion to set filing deadlines and enforce local rules.” Reasonover v. St. Louis County, Mo. , 447 F.3d 569, 579 (8th Cir. 2006). Singleton and Olsen moved for leave to amend their summary judgment response well after the completion of summary judgment briefing. The district court granted their motion, but as a sanction for the delay in seeking leave, it ordered Singleton and Olsen to pay any attorney’s fees incurred by the defendants in preparing an amended reply. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(f)(2) authorizes the district court to impose such a sanc tion, and Singleton and Olsen will not now be heard to complain that the district court’s order somehow prejudiced them when they were granted leave to amend but chose not to do so.
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, ex rel. Jerome B. Hadsell, Respondent, *v.*Maurice Tompkins, as Sheriff of Broome County, Appellant.

(Submitted January 13, 1913;

decided January 21, 1913.)

Motion for recall of remittitur for the purpose of striking out the award of costs by the Appellate Division denied. No point was made against the power of the Appellate Division to award costs upon the argument of the appeal in this court and the question cannot now be raised by such a motion as this. (See 206 N. Y. 658.)
From: bvbc@cox-internet.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:55:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert Powell

Morgan City, LA 70380
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

July 7, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00240

- CV

INTEREST OF C.H., J.H., E.H., I.B.H., AND I.A.H.,

F rom the 112th Judicial District Court

, Sutton County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV06287 Honorable Pedro (Pete) Gomez Jr. , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights, which must be disposed of by this Court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. Appellant S.H.’s brief is due July 13, 2021. Appellant S.H. has filed a motion for extension of time to file his brief. Appellant S.H.’s motion for extension of time is GRANTED, and appellant’s brief is due on August 2, 2021.

Given the time constraints governing the disposition of this appeal, fur ther requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 7th day of July, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. James C. Young, Appellant, *v.*Rhinelander Waldo, as Fire Commissioner of the City *of*New York, Respondent.

*People ex rel. Young*v. *Waldo,*147 App. Div. 937, affirmed.

(Argued January 9, 1913;

decided January 28, 1913.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 28, 1911, which affirmed the proceedings of the defendant in dismissing the relator from the fire department of the city of New York.

*Jacob Rouss*and *Louis J. Grant*for appellant.

*Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel (James D. Bell*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Collin and Hogan, JJ.
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.67
JOINDER AGREEMENT
January 5, 2016
Sovereign Co-Invest II, LLC (“Co-Invest II”) is executing and delivering this Joinder Agreement pursuant to Section 3.06 of the Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 23, 2014, by and among Sabre and the stockholders of Sabre who are party thereto (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) in connection with the distribution by Sovereign Co-Invest, LLC (“Co-Invest”) of 7,984,086 shares of Sabre common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), to Co-Invest II pursuant to the terms of the amended and restated limited liability company operating agreement of Co-Invest.      
By executing and delivering this Joinder Agreement to the Registration Rights Agreement, Co-Invest II hereby adopts and approves the Registration Rights Agreement and acknowledges, agrees and confirms, effective commencing on the date hereof, to be bound by and to comply with all of the terms, provisions and conditions of the Registration Rights Agreement, and that its shares of Common Stock be subject thereto, in the same manner as if Co-Invest II was an original signatory to the Registration Rights Agreement.
This Joinder Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to the conflicts of law principles thereof. This Joinder Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts (including counterparts submitted via facsimile or email), each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but each of which together shall constitute one and the same document.
[Signature Page Follows]


	
			
	 
	 
	 












Accordingly, as of the date first written above, the undersigned has executed and delivered this Joinder Agreement.
SOVEREIGN CO-INVEST II, LLC
By:  Sovereign Manager Co‐Invest, LLC, 
      its managing member
		
	By: /s/ Clive Bode
	 
 Name:     Clive Bode 
 Title:  Vice President    








	
	
	[Signature Page to Joinder Agreement – Registration Rights Agreement]












Acknowledged and Accepted:


SABRE CORPORATION




By: /s/ Chris Nester    
Name:  Chris Nester
Title:  Senior Vice President               
     and Treasurer




	
	
	[Signature Page to Joinder Agreement – Registration Rights Agreement]
From: kylemeythaler@ihop.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:39:25 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kyle Meythaler

Kansas City, MO 64137
EXHIBIT 32.1



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert E. Matthiessen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date:	May 13, 2011

/s/ Robert E. Matthiessen
Robert E. Matthiessen
President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM HORIZON
PHARMACIES, INC. -  10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,836
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,002
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (696)
<INVENTORY>                                     20,488
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,107
<PP&E>                                          10,277
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,496)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,663
<BONDS>                                          8,229
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            60
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,436
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,388
<SALES>                                        104,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104,036
<CGS>                                           77,593
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  108,656
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,030
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,650)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,650)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,650)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.12)


</TABLE>
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1404 

Recognizing the 50th Anniversary of the Country Music Association and 

its contributions to music, culture, history, and patriotism. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 31, 2008 

Mr. POE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 50th Anniversary of the Country Music Association and its contributions to music, culture, history, 

and patriotism. 

Whereas the Country Music Association was founded in 

1958; 

Whereas the Country Music Association was the first trade 

organization formed to promote a music genre; 

Whereas the objectives of the Country Music Association are 

to guide and enhance the development of country music 

throughout the world; 

Whereas the Country Music Association has more than 6,000 

organizational and individual members in 41 countries; 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1404 IH 

Whereas the Country Music Association Board of Directors 

established the Country Music Hall of Fame in 1961 to 

honor the greatest contributors to country music; 

Whereas the Country Music Association created the Country 

Music Awards in 1967; 

Whereas the 1968 Country Music Awards was the first music 

award show to be nationally televised; 

Whereas the Country Music Awards recognize 12 categories 

of country music; 

Whereas the Country Music Association has annually hosted 

the Country Music Festival since 1972; 

Whereas the Country Music Association supports numerous 

charities; 

Whereas country music and its numerous patriotic songs play 

an integral part in encouraging citizens of the United 

States to support the Armed Forces and its role in protecting the ideals of the United States; 

Whereas the Country Music Association promotes pride and 

patriotism to members of the Armed Forces stationed 

abroad through United Service Organizations programs; 

and 

Whereas October 2008 marks the 44th annual observance of 

Country Music Month: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the 50th Anniversary of the Country Music Associa3 tion and its contributions to music, culture, history, and 

4 patriotism. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
From: trents20@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:25:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patricia Trent

Centralia, WA 98531