alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   | Title of Each Class of |   | Maximum Aggregate |   | Amount of |   |
|   | Securities Offered |   | Offering Price(1) |   | Registration Fee(2) |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 3.050% PowerNotes®  Due August 15, 2024 |   | $4,116,000 |   | $530.14 |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | TOTAL |   |   |   | $530.14 |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |

|     |                                    |
|-----|------------------------------------|
| (1) | Excludes accrued interest, if any. |

|     |                                                                             |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | Calculated in accordance with Rule 457(r) under the Securities Act of 1933. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | CUSIP | Aggregate |   | Selling | Gross | Net |   | Coupon | Coupon |   | Coupon | Maturity | 1st Coupon | 1st | Survivor's | Product |   |   |
|   | Number | Principal |   | Price | Concession | Proceeds |   | Type | Rate |   | Frequency | Date | Date | Coupon | Option | Ranking |   |   |
|   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 14912HRJ1 | $4,116,000.00 |   | 100% | 1.800% | $4,041,912.00 |   | Fixed | 3.050% |   | Semi- | 08/15/2024 | 02/15/2015 | $15.33 | Yes | Senior Unsecured |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Annual |   |   |   |   | Notes |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
From: mjboyer2@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:12:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

M. J. Boyer

Worden, IL 62097
Exhibit 10.8









    	 	 	 



     


    








    	 	 	 



     


    








    	 	 	 



     


    








    	 	 	 



     


    




CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT WERE OMITTED AND REPLACED
WITH “[****]”. A COMPLETE VERSION OF THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO AN APPLICATION REQUESTING CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 406 PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES
ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED.


 


EXECUTION VERSION


CONFIDENTIAL


 


Exhibit A


 


[****]


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 






    	 	 	 



     


    

 







CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT WERE OMITTED AND REPLACED
WITH “[****]”. A COMPLETE VERSION OF THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO AN APPLICATION REQUESTING CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT PURSUANT TO RULE 406 PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES
ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED.


 


 


 


Exhibit “C”


Additional Terms and Conditions


 


Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used herein shall have
the meaning ascribed to them in the body of this Agreement.


 


1.[****]


 


2.Private Label Network.During such period as GN ReSound
maintains private label programs for its large resellers, GN ReSound will permit Network Members (defined below) to purchase private
label products made available to Company hereunder in accordance with the term of this Agreement and extend payment terms to and
collect payment from said network members in accordance with GN ReSound’s regular business practices. [****]. [****]. For
each product purchased by a Network Member, GN Resound will pay Company a rebate equal to the amount by which the applicable Member
Price actually collected by GN ReSound for such product sale exceeds the price payable by Company for such product hereunder. [****].


 


3.Notwithstanding the restrictions set forth in Section 1.3 of the Agreement,
and during such period as GN ReSound maintains private label programs for its large resellers, Company may resell private label
products, manufactured by GN ReSound specifically for Company and purchased by Company from GN ReSound, to other hearing aid dispensing
retail or independent distribution entities listed on Exhibit D from time to time (“Network Members”) which contract
with Company to supply its private label products (purchased from GN ReSound). The Company may modify Exhibit D by providing thirty
days written notice to GN ReSound to remove entities from the list of Network Member (in Company’s sole discretion) or to
add new Network Members, subject to the approval of GN ReSound; and said approval will not be unreasonably withheld or delayed;
provided that said approval shall not violate any federal anti-trust laws. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Company may not add MFHC
as a Network Member and shall not resell its products to MFHC.


 


4. GN ReSound warrants that it is not currently considering termination
of its private label program.
From: jenniert@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:33:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

jennifer praytor

Springville, AL 35146
From: tocarranco2@q.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:17:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Toni Carranco

Denver, CO 80234
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      14,590,000
<SECURITIES>                                57,041,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            80,028,000
<PP&E>                                      27,030,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,456,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             112,013,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,811,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       311,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  91,020,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               112,013,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            44,580,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            67,660,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (19,016,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (19,016,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (19,016,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 183, Misc.

#### Gwynn *v.*New York.

*Frances Kahn*for petitioner.

*Frank S. Hogan*and *H. Richard Uviller*for respondent.

Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.
No. 528, Misc.

#### Frierson *v.*United States.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller*and *Beatrice Rosenberg*for the United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
From: stafford.winters@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:38:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Stafford Winters

Troutdale, OR 97060
EXHIBIT 32.2



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date:	May 15, 2012

/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 23.1
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
  
    
    our Report of Independent Registered Accounting Firm dated March 9,
2007, on the consolidated balance sheets of Rogers Communications Inc.
and subsidiaries (the Company) as at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and
the related consolidated statements of income, deficit and cash flows
for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2006
    
    our Report of Independent Registered Accounting Firm dated March 9,
2007 with respect to managements assessment of the effectiveness of
internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006
**Form      8-K**

**Current      Report**

**Pursuant      to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934**

** **
**      January 26, 2007**

| Delaware                                | 37-1105865                                          |
|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|
| (State                of incorporation) | (IRS                Employer Identification Number) |

|   |   |   | Written                communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17                CFR                230.425)                  |
|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                |
|   |   |   | Soliciting                material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR                230.425)                                   |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                |
|   |   |   | Pre-commencement                communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17                CFR                240.14d-2(b)) |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                |
|   |   |   | Pre-commencement                communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17                CFR                240.13e-4(c)) |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                                                                |

----

**Item      2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition and Item 7.01. Regulation      FD      Disclosure.**

**Item      9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.**

| c)     | Exhibits: |
|--------|-----------|
|   |      | 99.1 | 4th                Quarter and Year-end 2006 Results Press Release dated January 26,                2007 |
|   |      |   |   |
|   |      |   |   |

**SIGNATURES**

**Caterpillar      Financial Services Corporation**

| Date:                January 26, 2007 | By:                /s/ Michael G. Sposato |
|---------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                  | Michael                G. Sposato         |
|                                  | Secretary                                 |
No. 490, Misc.

#### Turpin *v.*Ohio.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0645

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v. 

JUNE LEE WOLVERINE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including May 27, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 20 2022

04/20/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0645
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, James R. Johnson, principal
executive officer and principal financial officer of BakBone Software Incorporated (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
(Section 906) that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) | the annual report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: August 1, 2008



/s/ James R. JohnsonJames R. JohnsonPrincipal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer