alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## UAV/UAS Aircraft Specifications DJI PHANTOM 3 PROFESSIONALAircraft Weight (including battery and propellers) 1280 g Diagonal size (including propellers) 590 mm Max Ascent Speed 5 m/s Max Descent Speed 3 m/s Hover Accuracy

 Vertical: +/- 0.1 m (when Vision Positioning is active) or +/- 0.5 m  Horizontal: +/- 1.5 m Max Speed 16 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind) Max Altitude Above Sea Level 6000 m Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C GPS Mode GPS/GLONASS Camera Sensor

Sony EXMOR 1/2.3” Effective pixels: 12.4 M (total pixels: 12.76 M) Lens FOV 94° 20 mm (35 mm format equivalent) f/2.8, focus at ∞ ISO Range 100-3200 (video) 100-1600 (photo) Shutter Speed 8s -1/8000s Image Max Size 4000 x 3000 Still Photography Modes

 Single Shot Burst Shooting: 3/5/7 shots  Auto Exposure Bracketing (AEB): 3/5  Bracketed Frames at 0.7EV Bias  Time-lapse Video Recording Modes

UHD: 4096x2160p 24/25, 3840x2160p 24/25/30  FHD: 1920x1080p 24/25/30/48/50/60  HD: 1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60 Supported SD Card Types Micro SD Max capacity: 64 GB. Class 10 or UHS-1 rating required Max Bitrate of Video Storage 60 Mbps Supported File Formats

 FAT32/exFAT  Photo: JPEG, DNG  Video: MP4, MOV (MPEG-4 AVC/H.264) Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°CGimbal Controllable Range Pitch -90° to +30° Stabilization 3-axis (pitch, roll, yaw)

Vision Positio ning Max Velocity Less than 8 m/s (when 2 m above ground) Altitude Range 30 cm-300 cm Operating Range 30 cm-300 cm Operating Environment Surface with clear pattern and adequate lighting (Lux > 15)

RemoteContr oller Operating Frequency 2.400 GHz-2.483 GHz Max Distance 2000m (outdoors and unobstructed) Video Output Port USB Operating Temperature 0°C- 40°C Battery 6000 mAh LiPo 2S Mobile Device Holder For tablet or phone Receiver Sensitivity (1%PER) -101 dBm ±2 dBm Transmitter Power (EIRP)

 FCC: 20 dBm  CE: 16 dBm Working Voltage 1.2 A @7.4 VBatteryCharg

er Voltage 17.4 V Rated Power

 100 W

Intelligent Flight Batter y Capacity 4480 mAh Voltage 15.2 V Battery Type LiPo 4S Energy 68 Wh Net Weight 365 g Max Flight Time Approximately 23 minutes Operating Temperature -10°C to 40°C Max Charging Power 100 W App / Live View Mobile App DJI Pilot EIRP 100mW Live View Working Frequency 2.4GHz ISM Live View Quality 720P @ 30fps (depending on conditions and mobile device) Latency 220ms (depending on conditions and mobile device)Required Operating Systems

 iOS 8.0 or later  Android 4.1.2 or later Recommended Devices

 iOS: iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPad Air, iPad Air Wi-Fi + Cellular, iPad mini 2, iPad mini 2 Wi-Fi + Cellular, iPad Air 2, iPad Air 2 Wi-Fi + Cellular, iPad mini 3, and iPad mini 3 Wi-Fi + Cellular. This app is optimized for iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, and iPhone 6 Plus  Android: Samsung S5, Note 3, Sony Xperia Z3, Google Nexus 7 II, Google Nexus 9, Mi 3, Nubia Z7 mini  *Support for additional Android devices available as testing and development continues
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OFTHE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Intrusion Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael L.Paxton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| March 26, 2004 | /s/ Michael L. Paxton   |   |
|----------------|-------------------------|--------|
|           | Michael L. Paxton       |
|           | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-10152

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RAUL CAMARGO FLORES,

also known as Woody,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:02-CR-87-8-C

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Raul Camargo Flores appeals from his sentence for possession

with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of methamphetamine

and aiding and abetting in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1)

and (b)(1)(A) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. He argues that the district

court erred in determining that his prior escape offense in

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751 was a crime of violence under

U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, the career offender sentencing guideline. He
No. 03-10152

-2-

concedes that this issue is foreclosed and raises it to preserve

for further review. 

Flores’s knowing escape from federal custody constitutes a

crime of violence within the meaning of U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. See

United States v. Ruiz, 180 F.3d 675, 677 (5th Cir. 1999). The

district court did not err in making an adjustment to Flores’s

offense level under the career offender sentencing guideline. 

See id.

AFFIRMED.
No. 179.

#### Orgel et al. *v.*Clark Boardman Co., Ltd., et al.

*James E. Bird-sail*for petitioners.

*Philip Wittenberg*and *Edward W. Stitt, Jr.*for respondents.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Euroopan unionin C 64A/28.

| | ISSN 1977-1053 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopan unionin
  virallinen lehti | C 64A |
| | |
| Suomenkielinen laitos | Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia | 60. vuosikerta28. helmikuu 2017 |

ISSN 1977-1053

Euroopan unionin

virallinen lehti

C 64A

Suomenkielinen laitos

Tiedonantoja ja ilmoituksia

60. vuosikerta28. helmikuu 2017

---

| Ilmoitusnumero | Sisältö | Sivu |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Ilmoitukset |
| | HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT |
| | Euroopan parlamentti |
| 2017/C 64 A/01 | Valintamenettely PE/195/S – Väliaikainen toimihenkilö – Yksikönpäällikkö (AD 14) – Soveltuvien hakijoiden luettelo | 1 |

Ilmoitusnumero

Sisältö

Sivu

V   Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Euroopan parlamentti

2017/C 64 A/01

Valintamenettely PE/195/S – Väliaikainen toimihenkilö – Yksikönpäällikkö (AD 14) – Soveltuvien hakijoiden luettelo

1

---

| FI | |
| --- | --- |

FI

---

V Ilmoitukset

HALLINNOLLISET MENETTELYT

Euroopan parlamentti

| 28.2.2017 | FI | Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti | CA 64/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2017

FI

Euroopan unionin virallinen lehti

CA 64/1

---

VALINTAMENETTELY PE/195/S

Väliaikainen toimihenkilö – Yksikönpäällikkö (AD 14)

SOVELTUVIEN HAKIJOIDEN LUETTELO

(2017/C 064 A/01)

| 1. | BORDEZ, Emmanuel |
| --- | --- |

1.

BORDEZ, Emmanuel

Soveltuvien hakijoiden luettelo vahvistettiin 14. helmikuuta 2017.

---
Manufacturins Process Description [ X ] - CBI- 

### entire pqe
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5


<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,200
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,006,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                   405,200
<INVENTORY>                                  6,220,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,011,700
<PP&E>                                       6,019,900
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,044,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,377,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,574,300
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                     8,615,300
<OTHER-SE>                                    (385,900)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,377,200
<SALES>                                     23,565,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,565,800
<CGS>                                       16,249,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,249,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (11,500)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             700,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (574,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (574,600)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (574,600)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)


</TABLE>
From: Jim.Edwardson@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:20:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James Edwardson

Glenside, PA 19038
From: socks@futurehealthtrends.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:26:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Socks Henderson

Arcadia, CA 91066
EXHIBIT 32.2



           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First
Keystone Corporation (the "Corporation") for the period ended
December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, David R. Saracino, Treasurer and CFO,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

   1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
       in all material respects, the financial condition and
       results of operations of the Corporation as of and for the
       period covered by the Report.






                                /s/ David R. Saracino
                                David R. Saracino
                                Treasurer and CFO


March 12, 2004


                               29
EXHIBIT 32.2



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Date:	May 14, 2007

/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
From: Marcia Okun

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Contraception

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:10:45 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care. It should not be up to an employer to decide what an

employee would believe or practice.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work. In addition, this goes

against our national practice of separating state government and personal

religion.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Thank you.
No. 290.

#### Rice Lake Creamery Co. *v.*General Drivers & Helpers Union, Local No. 662, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America, et al.

*Clark M. Robertson*for petitioner. *Solicitor General Cox, Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come*and *Nancy M. Sherman*for the National Labor Relations Board, respondent.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
From: emily.boge@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:08:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Emily Boge

Janesville, WI 53548
Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 11/27/12 ---

Regional Airline Association 11/27/12 ---

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 11/27/12 ---

Airlines for America Joe White 11/27/12 ---

 Docket Number FAA-2013-0688

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

·
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Federal Reserve-Treasury Draw Authority

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs. Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy, 1977-1995					 and 	Ninety-Fifth Congress, 1977-1979. 						*Federal Reserve-Treasury Draw Authority : Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy of the Committee on Banking, Finance, and Urban Affairs, House of Representatives, Ninety-Fifth Congress, Second Session, June 27 and 28, 1978*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										June 27 and 28, 1978,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/733,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
EXHIBIT 32.1



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert E. Matthiessen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Date:	August 14, 2003

/s/ Robert E. Matthiessen
Robert E. Matthiessen
President and Chief Executive Officer
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Coupon | Interest | Maturity | Callable | Survivor's Option | Price | CUSIP |   |
| 2.250% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 12/15/2022 | No | Yes § | 100.00 | 14912HQB9 |   |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |  |
| (†††) | First Payment date 6/15/2013 |   |
|                    |   |