alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-7248

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

GEORGE CHAMBERS, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief 

District Judge. (3:94-cr-00089-JRS-1) 

Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: August 12, 2009 

Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

George Chambers, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Joan 

Elizabeth Evans, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

George Chambers appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. See United States v. Chambers, No. 3:94-

cr-00089-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. June 19, 2008). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
### Related ca s e s : H ealth related ca s e s : 

### SAT Report P MN N umber : P-11-0543 SAT Date: 8 / 5 / 2011 Pr int D ate: 7 / 8 / 2015

. Ye s Ecotox related ca s e s : Anal ogs: C on c e1 ·n l evel s: 

### T y pe of C oncern: Le v el of C oncern: Health 1

- 2 2


### Pers i s tence 3

E xpo s ure Bas ed Review: Health: Ecotox: No Route s of expo s ure:
Keyword s : E co C omments 2 

### 3
Bioaccum 3 Toxicity 1 2



### Health: De1mal Inh alatio n- D W I Ecotox: A ll r eleases to water Fate: ;
Ke y word s : P MN: SENS-S ; L UNG ; I RR -E ,S , MM ; AQUATOX

- LIVE R ; BLOO D ; MAL E RE PRO ; I MMUNO T OX; ONCO ; AQUATOX S ummary of A ss e ss ment: Fate:

Fate**~UIIllmla** 

### FATE: E stimat i o n s for

- wit h M P < 25 C l og K ow = 

### 1.64 (E) 

### S = 

### Di s p / 1.50 giL 

### at 25 C (I C B /E ) VP < l. OE

- 6 to n at 25 C (E) 

### BP > 

### 400 C (E) 

### H < 1.00E-8 (E )l og Koc 

### = 5
. 26 (E ) l og Fi s h B C F = 0. 5 0 (E) l og Fi s h BAF 

### = 0
.73 (E ) POTW removal (%) = 5 0

- 9 0 v i a sor p t i o n and s trippin g Time f or co mp l e t e ulti m at e ae r o bi c b i o d eg > m o S 01pt i o n to so il s / se dime n t s = m o d e r at e PB T P o tent i a l: P 3 B 3 *C EB F A TE : Mi gr at i o n t o gr o und water 

### = m o d e 1t e H e alth: H e alth S umm a r y: A b s 01p t i o n i s t r a c t , and goo d fr o m th e h m g ( an a l og)
. Co n cem f or e ye, s kin (c hro n i c), mu co u s m e m b r an es a n d lun g A l so co n c e m f or d e nn a l sen s it i z a ti o n F o r th e

Ec oto x : fr o m t h e s kin , m o d e r at e fr o m th e GI o n th e h m g ; ini tati o n t o of t h e

T es t T es t T es t E nd Pr e dicte d Me a s ure d C omm e nt s Or g ani s m T ype Point fi s h 96 -h L C5 0 35 daphnid 4 8-h L C5 0 5. 1 g re e n a l g al 96 -h EC5 0 5. 1 fi s h c hroni c 1. 9 A CR 1 8



## - v alue daphnid chro nic 0 .36 A CR1 4



## - v alu e a l g al chronic 1. 3 AC R 4



## - v alu e**~** 3- h EC5 0



## -**lud ~** **~** 

## - C hronic



## -**lud ~**  Va lu e ; S AR c h e m i ca l cl ass 

### = l og K ow o f th e h yd r o p h obe 

### = W l mp 

### = m w ate r at 2 5 C (P ) ; p H 7 ; eff ec ti v e co n c ent r ati o n s b ase d o n 1 00 % act i ve ing r edi e n t s and m e an m eas ur ed

### concentrations ; h a rdn ess < 150
. 0 m g/L as CaC03; and TOC < 2
. 0 m g/L ; hi gh concem for t oxicity to t enestrial or gani s m s

Ecotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: Fate 

### assessor: llealth 

### assessor:
From: davedawncade@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:50:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dawn Damron

Fontana, CA 92336
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

EX PARTE: LUIS NAJERA. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 17

- 00216

- CR

Appeal from the

384th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20010D05849)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 15TH DAY OF MAY, 2019.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
EXHIBIT 4.51




                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


$4,719.23                    Milpitas, California             September 21, 2000



For value received,  ADATOM.com, Inc., promises to pay Richard Barton the sum of
Four  Thousand  Seven  Hundred  and  Nineteen  dollars  and  Twenty-Three  Cents
($4,719.23) with interest at the rate of Ten Percent per annum (10%) until paid.
Any  unpaid  interest  will  become  part  of the  principal.  Interest  payable
quarterly commencing on September 30, 2000. The Principal of Four Thousand Seven
Hundred Thirty dollars and Eighty Seven cents  ($4,730.87) is due in one payment
on September  30, 2000.  Principal  may be paid in whole or in part prior to the
due date without penalty or premium.

Should  default be made in payment of principal  and/or  interest  when due, the
whole sum of principal and interest shall become  immediately due, at the option
of the  holder of the note.  If action be  instituted  on this  note,  The maker
promises to pay such sum as a Court may fix as attorney's fees.






Adatom.com, Inc.

By: /s/ MICHAEL M. WHEELER
    -----------------------
        Michael M. Wheeler
        Controller





                                      E-49
No. 432, Misc.

#### Brinson *v.*California.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California and for other relief denied.
61668 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2023 / Notices 

[FR Doc. 2023–19321 Filed 9–6–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4915–01–C 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Office of Foreign Assets Control 

Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions 

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets 

Control, Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the 

Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets 

Control (OFAC) is publishing the names 

of one or more persons that have been 

placed on OFAC’s Specially Designated 

Nationals and Blocked Persons List 

(SDN List) based on OFAC’s 

determination that one or more 

applicable legal criteria were satisfied. 

All property and interests in property 

subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these 

persons are blocked, and U.S. persons 

are generally prohibited from engaging 

in transactions with them. 

DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

section for applicable date(s). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

OFAC: Andrea Gacki, Director, tel.: 

202–622–2490; Associate Director for 

Global Targeting, tel.: 202–622–2420; 

Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 

202–622–2480; Assistant Director for 

Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202–622–4855; 

or Assistant Director for Compliance, 

tel.: 202–622–2490. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Electronic Availability 

The SDN List and additional 

information concerning OFAC sanctions 

programs are available on OFAC’s 

website (www.treasury.gov/ofac). 

Notice of OFAC Actions 

On August 31, 2023, OFAC 

determined that the property and 

interests in property subject to U.S. 

jurisdiction of the following persons are 

blocked under the relevant sanctions 

authority listed below. 

BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2023 / Notices 61669 

Authorities: E.O. 13687, 80 FR 819, 3 

CFR, 2015 Comp., p. 259. 

Dated: August 31, 2023. 

Andrea M. Gacki, 

Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, 

U.S. Department of the Treasury. 

[FR Doc. 2023–19230 Filed 9–6–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–AL–C 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

Proposed Collection; Requesting 

Comments on Form 8838 

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), 

Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Internal Revenue Service, 

as part of its continuing effort to reduce 

paperwork and respondent burden, 

invites the general public and other 

federal agencies to take this opportunity 

to comment on proposed and/or 

continuing information collections, as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995. The IRS is soliciting 

comments concerning Form 8838, 

Consent To Extend the Time To Assess 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1EN07SE23.011</GPH>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20464 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LAZARO MORENO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-95-CR-142-22

-------------------- April 11, 2002 Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Lazaro Moreno appeals from his sentence for conspiring to possess with intent to distribute 1,000 kilograms or more of marijuana. Moreno contends that his sentence violated Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), because his indictment did not allege a specific amount of marijuana or a range of amounts of marijuana. The Government contends that Moreno waived his Apprendi contention by waiving his right to appeal his sentence and that Moreno’s Apprendi contention is unavailing on its merits.No. 01-20464 -2- Even without the waiver, Moreno’s appeal has no merit. There was no Apprendi violation in the case. Moreno’s indictment alleged that he had conspired to possess with intent to distribute 1,000 or more kilograms of marijuana; Moreno’s offense carried a statutory penalty range of ten years’ to life imprisonment. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1)(A), 846. Moreno’s sentence of life imprisonment was within that statutory range. See United States v. Keith , 230 F.3d 784, 787 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1182 (2001). AFFIRMED.
From: jrcjach@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:39:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Charles Jachim

Lakeland, MN 55043
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1296 

Supporting the designation of a National Child Awareness Month to promote 

awareness of children’s charities and youth-serving organizations across 

the United States and recognizing their efforts on behalf of children 

and youth as a positive investment for the future of our Nation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2008 

Mr. CALVERT (for himself and Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Education and Labor 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the designation of a National Child Awareness 

Month to promote awareness of children’s charities and 

youth-serving organizations across the United States and 

recognizing their efforts on behalf of children and youth 

as a positive investment for the future of our Nation. 

Whereas millions of American children and youth represent 

the hopes and future of our Nation; 

Whereas numerous individuals, children’s organizations, and 

youth-serving organizations that work with children and 

youth collaborate to provide invaluable services to enrich 

and better the lives of the young; 

Whereas heightening awareness of and increasing support for 

organizations that provide access to healthcare, social 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1296 IH 

services, education, the arts, sports, and other services 

will result in the development of character and the future 

success of youngsters; 

Whereas the President issued a proclamation on May 30, 

2008, proclaiming June 1, 2008 as National Child’s Day 

to demonstrate a commitment to our youth; 

Whereas September is a time when parents, families, teachers, school administrators, and communities in general 

increase their focus on children and youth nationwide as 

the school year begins; 

Whereas September is a time for the people of the United 

States as a whole to highlight and be mindful of the 

needs of children and youth; 

Whereas private corporations and businesses have joined with 

hundreds of national and local charitable organizations 

throughout the Nation in support of a month-long focus 

on children and youth; and 

Whereas designating September as National Child Awareness 

Month would recognize that a long-term commitment to 

children and youth is in the public interest, and will encourage widespread support for the charities and organizations that seek to provide a better future for the children and youth of the United States: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of a National Child Awareness Month to 

3 promote awareness of children’s charities and youth-serv4 ing organizations across the United States and recognizes 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1296 IH 

1 their efforts on behalf of children and youth as a critical 

2 contribution to the future of our Nation. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1389 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 31, 2008.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4137) to amend and 
extend the Higher Education Act of 1965, and for other purposes. All points of 
order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. 
The conference report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 409, Misc.

#### King *v.*Illinois.

Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Eric Borrmann, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Plumtree Software, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a.
    
    Designed such
disclosure controls
and procedures, or
caused such disclosure
controls and
procedures to be
designed under our
supervision, to ensure
that material
information relating
to the registrant,
including its
consolidated
subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others
within those entities,
particularly during
the period in which
this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the
effectiveness of the
registrants
disclosure controls
and procedures and
presented in this
report our conclusions
about the
effectiveness of the
disclosure controls
and procedures, as of
the end of the period
covered by this report
based on such
evaluation;c.
    
    Disclosed in this
report any change in
the registrants
internal control over
financial reporting
that occurred during
the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter
in the case of an
annual report) that
has materially
affected, or is
reasonably likely to
materially affect, the
registrants internal
control over financial
reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing due equivalent functions):  a.
    
    All significant
deficiencies in the
design or operation of
internal controls over
financial reporting
which are reasonably
likely to adversely
affect the
registrants ability
to record, process,
summarize and report
financial information;
andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or
not material, that
involves management or
other employees who
have a significant
role in the
registrants internal
control over financial
reporting. Date: November 4, 2004 By:
    /s/ Eric BorrmannName:
    Eric BorrmannTitle:

    Chief Financial Officer
From: nahallac247@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:45:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Edward Callahan

Marshfield, MA 02050