alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Theresa Mayer

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 1:49:50 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Theresa Mayer
Ontonagon, Michigan
J-A01033-15

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant

v. NATHANIEL LEE BROWN, Appellee No. 623 WDA 2014

Appeal from the Order entered March 21, 2014, in the Court of Common Pleas of Butler County, Criminal Division, at No(s): CP-10-CR-0001974-2013

BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., DONOHUE, and ALLEN, J J. JUDGMENT ORDER BY ALLEN, J.: FILED JANUARY 16, 2015 In this appeal, the Commonwealth contends that the trial court erred in granting Appellee’s suppression motion because t he Slippery Rock University campus police officer who stopped Appell ee’s vehicle on Kiester Road had authority to do so under 24 P.S. § 20-2019 -A of the Public School Code of 1949, and 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 8953(a)(2) of the Judicial Code. Kiester Road runs through Slippery Rock University but is n ot owned by the University; it is maintained by Slippery Rock Borou gh. Trial Court Memorandum and Opinion, 3/21/14, at 1. We recently rejected this same argument in a case i nvolving a stop by Slippery Rock University campus police on Kiester R oad. See generally , Commonwealth v. Boyles , 2014 PA Super 244, ___ A.3d ___ (Pa. Super. 2014). Because the Boyles decision controls the disposition of the instantJ-A01033-15

- 2 -

appeal, we affirm the trial court’s order granting Appellee’s suppression

motion.

Order affirmed.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 1/16/2015
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1324 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1324

  To provide relief from the alternative minimum tax with respect to 
             incentive stock options exercised during 2000.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 2001

 Mr. Lieberman introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide relief from the alternative minimum tax with respect to 
             incentive stock options exercised during 2000.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX RELIEF WITH RESPECT TO INCENTIVE 
              STOCK OPTIONS EXERCISED DURING 2000.

    In the case of an incentive stock option (as defined in section 422 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986) exercised during calendar year 
2000, the amount taken into account under section 56(b)(3) of such Code 
by reason of such exercise shall not exceed the amount that would have 
been taken into account if, on the date of such exercise, the fair 
market value of the stock acquired pursuant to such option had been its 
fair market value as of April 15, 2001 (or, if such stock is sold or 
exchanged on or before such date, the amount realized on such sale or 
exchange).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                          PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
(the "Report") of Cimnet, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31,
2004, I, John D. Richardson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ JOHN D. RICHARDSON
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       John D. Richardson
                                       Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                       Accounting Officer

May 14, 2004

                                       13
No. 120, Misc.

#### Mitchell *v.*United States.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller*and *Beatrice Rosenberg*for the United States.

United

States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
From: mcarmack@schange.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:44:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Matthew Carmack

Ashby, MA 01431
# 

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-97047

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  347                                                               Trade Date:  10/14/03

(To Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2002 &

  Prospectus dated August  8, 2002)                                                                     Issue Date:   10/17/03

The Date of this Pricing SupplementOctober 14, 2003

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP                                                                                                                                Date and terms of redemption or

     or        Stated                                                                  Interest                                    repayment (including any

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment  Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)               Maturity                Public (2)                Commissions      Frequency      Option     Yes/No                record dates)

14911QQL8   3.3%                        10/15/08          100%                    1.0%                   Monthly            YES                       NO                

                       

                          

Principal                                                                                1st Payment Day         

Amount                   Proceeds                 Dealer                            Date                  Count

$1,262,000.00                $1,249,380.00         ABN AMROInc.                 11/15/03                 30/360    

Original Issue Discount Note:                                                                   Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                   N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $297.282 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated August 8,2002.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Stanislas Vilgrain, Chief Executive Officer of Cuisine Solutions, Inc. certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-K of Cuisine Solutions, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in thisannual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of,and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have a) designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.     Dated: September 22, 2005     /s/ STANISLAS VILGRAIN     Stanislas Vilgrain  Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 62835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19792]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-156, OMB Control No. 3235-0288]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Extension: Form 20-F

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549-2736

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved 
collection of information discussed below.
    Form 20-F (17 CFR 249.220f) is used to register securities of 
foreign private issuers pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'') (15 U.S.C. 78l) or as annual 
and transitional reports pursuant to Sections 13 and 15(d) of the 
Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) and 78o(d)). The information required in 
the Form 20-F is used by investors in making investment decisions with 
respect to the securities of such foreign private issuers. We estimate 
that Form 20-F takes approximately 2,629.92 hours per response and is 
filed by approximately 729 respondents. We estimate that 25% of the 
2,629.92 hours per response (657.48 hours) is prepared by the issuer 
for a total reporting burden of 479,303 (657.48 hours per response x 
729 responses).
    An agency may conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to 
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently 
valid control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information 
collection at the following website: www.reginfo.gov. Find this 
particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day 
Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function. 
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
by October 13, 2023 to (i) www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain and (ii) 
David Bottom, Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and 
Exchange Commission, c/o John Pezzullo, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, 
DC 20549, or by sending an email to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#beeeecffe1f3dfd7d2dcd1c6fecddbdd90d9d1c8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b4e4e6f5ebf9d5ddd8d6dbccf4c7d1d79ad3dbc2">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 8, 2023.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-19792 Filed 9-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
---

---

Exhibit 12

# AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

# SCHEDULE SETTING FORTH
THE COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF CONSOLIDATED 
EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES 
(Amounts in thousands,
except ratios)

|                                                  | Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
|------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|Earnings:                                         |                               
|Income (loss) from continuing operations          |                               
|(including dividends from less than 50%           |                               
|owned affiliates) before income taxes, equity     |                               
|in earnings of affiliates, and minority interests |                               
|Fixed charges                                     |                               
|                                                  |                               
|Earnings (insufficient earning to cover fixed     |                               
|charges)                                          |                               
|                                                  |                               
|Fixed charges:                                    |                               
|Interest                                          |                               
|Amortization of debentures expenses               |                               
|                                                  |                               
|Fixed charges                                     |                               
|                                                  |                               
|Ratio of earnings (deficit) to fixed charges      |                               



---

---
From: donr158@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:15:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Don Robertson

Nutley, NJ 07110