alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM EXCELSIOR PRIVATE
EQUITY FUND II, INC.'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JULY 31, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.




CIK                                     1036052
NAME                                    EXCELSIOR PRIVATE EQUITY FUND II, INC.
MULTIPLIER                              1000
<TABLE>
<S>                                     <C>    
PERIOD-TYPE                             3 - MOS
FISCAL YEAR-END                         OCT-31-1997
PERIOD-START                            JUNE-2-1997
PERIOD-END                              JULY-31-1997
INVESTMENTS-AT-COST                     0
INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE                    0
RECEIVABLES                             0
ASSETS-OTHER                            223
OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS                      0
TOTAL-ASSETS                            223
PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES                  0
SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT                   0
OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES                 222
TOTAL LIABILITIES                       222
SENIOR-EQUITY                           0
PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON                  1
SHARES-COMMON-STOCK                     0.001
SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR                     0
ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT                 0
OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII                    0
ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS                   0
OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS                  0
ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC                  0
NET ASSETS                              1
DIVIDEND-INCOME                         0
INTEREST-INCOME                         0
OTHER INCOME                            0
EXPENSES-NET                            0
NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME                   0
REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT                  0
APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT                 0
NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS                     0
EQUALIZATION                            0
DISTRIBUTION-OF-INCOME                  0
DISTRIBUTION-OF-GAINS                   0
DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER                     0
</TABLE>


619994.1

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<S>                                     <C>
NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD                   0
NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED               0
SHARES-REINVESTED                       0
NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS                    0
ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR                   0
ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR                 0
OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR                   0
GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES                     0
INTEREST-EXPENSE                        0
GROSS-EXPENSE                           0
AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS                      1
PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN                     1000
PER-SHARE-NII                           0
PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC                   0
PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND                      0
PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTION                  0
RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL                      0
PER-SHARE-NAV-END                       1000
EXPENSE-RATIO                           0
AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING                    0
AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE                      0
</TABLE>


619994.1
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1356 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 18, 2008.
Whereas the Constitution of the United States of America was formally signed on 
        September 17, 1787, by 39 delegates from 12 States;
Whereas the Constitution of the United States was subsequently ratified by each 
        of the original 13 States;
Whereas the Constitution of the United States was drafted in order to form a 
        more perfect union, establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility, 
        provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure 
        the blessings of liberty for citizens of our Nation;
Whereas the liberties enjoyed by the citizens of the United States today are 
        rooted in this cherished document that gave birth to our Nation;
Whereas the Constitution of the United States serves as the foundation for 
        citizens of the United States to accomplish a level of prosperity, 
        security, justice, and freedom unsurpassed by any other country;
Whereas the Constitution of the United States is a model for establishing 
        freedom in other countries;
Whereas the Members of the House of Representatives take an oath to support and 
        defend the Constitution of the United States; and
Whereas September 17, 2008, is the 221st anniversary of the signing of the 
        Constitution of the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) celebrates the 221st anniversary of the signing of the 
        Constitution of the United States of America;
            (2) honors the efforts of the 42 delegates who attended the majority 
        of the Constitutional Convention meetings and the 39 signers of the 
        Constitution of the United States;
            (3) acknowledges the significance of the ideals established by the 
        Constitution of the United States, including the principle of a limited 
        Federal Government with a system of checks and balances between the 3 
        branches;
            (4) recognizes the Constitution of the United States as the source 
        responsible for our Nation's ability to withstand calamity and preserve 
        national stability, or as Thomas Jefferson wrote, ``Our peculiar 
        security is in the possession of a written Constitution''; and
            (5) encourages the citizens of the United States of America, who 
        have the privilege to share in the freedoms recognized in the 
        Constitution of the United States, to join with the House of 
        Representatives in this historic celebration.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 199.

#### Bell *v.*Washington.

*Benjamin H. Kiser*for petitioner.

Supreme Court of Washington. Certiorari denied.
October 22, 1962.

No. 13, Original.

#### Texas *v.*New Jersey et al.

*Will Wilson,*Attorney General of Texas, and *Henry G.*
      *874
      *Braswell,*Assistant Attorney General, for plaintiff.

*873The motion for leave to file bill of complaint is granted and the State of New Jersey is allowed sixty days to answer.

*874
      *Arthur J. Sills,*Attorney General of New Jersey, *Theodore I. Botter,*Assistant Attorney General, and *Charles J. Kehoe,*Deputy Attorney General, for the State of New Jersey; *David Stahl,*Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and *Jack M. Cohen,*Deputy Attorney General, for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; and *Henry A. Frye*for Sun Oil Co., defendants.

[For earlier orders herein, see 369 U. S. 869 and 370 U. S. 929.]
Exhibit 32


Pursuant to §Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Sec. 1350)
 
 The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of StellarOne Corporation, respectively, certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of StellarOne Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated.  The foregoing certification is made pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350), and no purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose.  The undersigned
expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.
 
 Date:August 7, 2009
 /s/ O. R. Barham, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Jeffrey W. FarrarExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit









Exhibit 10.2(o)



Amendment to 
Performance Share Award Agreement
This Amendment, effective March 9, 2016 to the Performance Share Award Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of March 3, 2014 is made between Anthem, Inc. (the “Company”) and the Participant set forth in the accompanying Grant Notice to the Agreement.  This Amendment is included in and made part of the Agreement.  
1.A new Section 3(e) is added to read as follows, existing Section 3(e) is renumbered as Section 3(f) and all cross-references are updated accordingly:
(e)    Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason - Cigna Corporation Acquisition.  Unless section 3(d) is applicable, and notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement to the contrary, this Section shall apply for the period beginning on the date that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger among Anthem, Anthem Merger Sub Corp., and Cigna Corporation dated as of July 23, 2015 (the “Merger Agreement”) is approved under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 in accordance with Section 3.1(c)(iii)(A) of the Merger Agreement (the “HSR Approval Date”) and ending on the earlier of (1) the third anniversary of the “Closing Date” as defined in the Merger Agreement or (2) the date the acquisition of Cigna Corporation is terminated (the “Cigna Integration Period”).  The Performance Period shall immediately lapse, causing any restrictions which would otherwise remain on the Performance Shares to immediately lapse, and the Shares covered by the award shall be immediately delivered if the Participant does not otherwise meet the requirements of Retirement as set forth in Section 3(a) above at Termination and, during the Cigna Integration Period, the Participation’s Termination is either (A) by the Company or an Affiliate without Cause or (B) by the Participant for Good Reason (as defined in the Executive Agreement Plan), provided that for clause (B), the Participant participates in the Executive Agreement Plan as of the HSR Approval Date.  
2.    Effect on Agreement.  This Amendment has no effect on the other terms of the Agreement and the Agreement shall otherwise continue in effect.  
	
				
	 
	ANTHEM, INC.

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Printed:
	 
	Jose Thomas

	 
	Its:
	 
	EVP & Chief Human Resources Officer

	 
	 
	 
	Anthem, Inc.










Amendment - Performance Share Award Agreement - 2014
EL CAMINO REAL DE TIERRA ADENTRO
COMPREHENSIVE MANAGEMENT PLAN
AND
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

Draft( ) Final (X)

The United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and National
Park Service (NPS)

Type of Action: Administrative

Jurisdiction: Rio Arriba, Santa Fe, Sandoval, Bernalillo, Valencia, Socorro, Sierra, and
Dojia Ana Counties in New Mexico and El Paso County in Texas

Abstract: The Proposed Comprehensive Management Plan and Final Environment Impact
Statement (CMP/FEIS) describes alternative visions for managing the National Historic Trail
between El Paso, Texas, and San Juan Pueblo, New Mexico. Three alternatives have been
analyzed in detail: Alternative A (no action); Alternative B, with a focus on protection and off-site
interpretation; and Alternative C (Preferred Alternative), emphasizing resource protection and
coordinated programming and activities to enhance the visitor experience. Alternative C, the
Preferred Alternative in the Draft CMP/EIS, was selected, with minor modification, as the
Proposed CMP.

The impacts of the three alternatives are presented in Chapter 4. Comments received on the Draft
CMP/EIS resulted in the inclusion of additional information and clarifications. Public comments

are summarized in Appendix J.

For further information, please contact :

Harry Myers, Sarah Schlanger,

Long Distance Trails Group Office New Mexico State Office
National Park Service Bureau of Land Management
P.O. Box 728 P.O. Box 27115

Santa Fe, NM 87504-0728 Santa Fe, NM 87504-0115
505-988-6717 505-438-7454

Protests on the proposed plan must be filed within 30 days following the date that the Notice of
Availability is published in the Federal Register.

Recommended: Approved:

GZ bt Sent Gow
Ron Dunton, Ifnda S.C. Rundell

BLM Deputy State Director, Resources BLM State Director

Santa Fe, New Mexico New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas

be Krakow Stephen , wah

National Park Service Regional Director

National Trails Office - IMR. NPS Intermountain Region

Santa Fe, New Mexico
Attachment 0 11 – TS1201UC – Certificate of Analysis

1 of 2 page s 

# SanitizedAttachment 0 11 – TS1201UC – Certificate of Analysis

2 of 2 page s 

# sanitized
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 1 3 , 2019

NO. 03

- 17

- 00271

- CR

Thomas Ritchie McBride, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE RO SE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND KELLY AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART

— OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court

. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in a portion

of the district court’s judgment of conviction . Therefore, the Court affirms the portion of the

district court’s ju dgment adjudicati ng McBride’s guilt, reverses the portion of the judgment

imposing punishment

, and remands th is ca u se for a new punishment hearing. Because appell ant

is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
****Consumer Product Safety Commission**BACK TO SCHOOL SAFETY ALERT: CPSC Urges Bicyclists to Wear Helmets CPSC Document #5002Each year about 800 bicyclists are killed and more than half a million are treated in hospital emergency rooms. In recent years, almost two-thirds of the deaths and one-third of the injuries involved head and face injury. About one-half the injuries to children under the age of 10 involved the head or face. Helmets may reduce the risk of head injury to bicyclists by as much as 85 percent. Yet, only about 50 percent of bicyclists wear helmets. The purpose of a helmet is to absorb the energy of an impact to minimize or prevent a head injury. Crushable, expanded polystyrene foam generally is used for this purpose.A bicycle helmet should have a snug but comfortable fit on the rider's head. Some helmets are available with several different thicknesses of internal padding to custom fit the helmet to the user. If a parent is buying a helmet for a child, the CPSC recommends that the child accompany the parent so that the helmet can be tested for a good fit.For a helmet to provide protection during impact, it must have a chin strap and buckle that will stay securely fastened.  No combination of twisting or pulling should remove the helmet from the head or loosen the buckle on the strap. Children should be instructed to always wear the helmetlevel on the forehead, not tilted back. The chin strap should be adjusted correctly and firmly buckled. Helmets manufactured after March 1999, are required by federal law to meet the CPSC standard. When purchasing a helmet, consumers are urged to examine the helmet and accompanying instructions and safety literature carefully. Consumers should also look for a label stating conformance with the CPSC standard. Bicyclists should avoid riding at night. If you must ride at night, install and use front and rear lights on the bicycle and wear clothing with reflective tape or markings. These precautionsare in addition to the reflectors that the CPSC requires to be on the front, rear, pedals, and wheels of bicycles.Many bicycle-car crashes can be avoided by applying the rules of the road and by increasing attentiveness of cyclists and motorists. Bicyclists have a legal right to share the road,but they are often not noticed in traffic. Drivers should always keep an eye out for bicyclists, especially when turning, merging, changing lanes, or entering intersections.009608**
No. 608.

#### Hermetic Seal Products Co. *v.*United States.

*Louis A. Tepper*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Acting*Assistant *Attorney General Guilfoyle, Morton Hollander*and *David L. Rose*for the United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 46, Misc.

#### Frankfurter *v.*California.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Stanley Mosk,*Attorney General of California, and *Robert R. Granucci*and *John S. Mclnerny,*Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.

Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied.
From: darren.strash@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:26:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Darren Strash

Hillsboro, OR 97124
**Boarding & Alighting –**  **Issues List**

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ **Boarding/A lighting**  **(Spatial, applies to all modes)** 1. Use of devices on - vehicle versus platform - based boarding devices a. Wh en is permanent versus temporary installation appropriate b. Back- up methods for mechanical lifts c. Impact on dwell time / service levels 2. Platforms a. How best to address the use of bus and light rail boarding devices on shared platforms b. Definition of level boarding (+/- 5/8”) for light/heavy & intercity lon g trains at level platforms c. Evaluate different car types and implications for level boarding d. Commuter railroad shares ROW with freight 3. Wh eelchair lifts a. Possibly increase lifting capacity

– 800 lbs. minimum b. How best to address extreme super- elevations c. Lif t platform barrier height d. Self- operable lifts 4. Ramps a. Rethink the ramp slope and railing requirements b. On - board storage of ramps 5. Bridgeplates a. Barriers and crowding conditions i. Is space requirement similar to bus ramps/lifts? b. Examine how bridgeplates interact with detectable warnings on the platform c. Consider alternatives for near level boarding , e.g., low floor vehicles and bridge plates 6. Light rail a. Examine implications of 60 - 70% low floor vs 100% low floor vehicles 7. Gaps a. Exa mine the potential for gap filler devices on vehicles or platforms b. Examine European pop - out steps 8. Doors and doorways a. Minimum width of doorway and each leaf b. Handrails to assist with boarding and alighting c. How to provide accessible entry to each boarding an d alighting area i. Examine the potential for bi - level access from the station 9. Othera. Full high - platform level boarding should be the highest priority and most preferred method of boarding on all rail modes, whether light rail, rapid rail, intercity rail, and/or commuter rail. W hen level boarding is not required or possible, boarding should be, as often as possible, by ramp or bridge - plate as the primary 100% reliable and quick means for boarding, and clearly making mechanical lifts a back - up alternative when possible. W here mechanical lifts are needed, they should be carborne, not station - based. b. Full level boarding, all doors and all cars should be provided. W hen full level boarding is not required, add ramps, bridgeplates, etc.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.47 MB)
 
 F-35 Aircraft Aviation Pilot F-35A F-35A Lightning II Take off Lightning Take-off
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### William S. Swift, Appellant, v New York, West Shore and Buffalo Railway Company, Respondent.

Judgment of County Court affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.