alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDesign of Launch Vehicle Flight Control Augmentors and Resulting Flight Stability and Control (Center Director's Discretionary Fund Project 93-05, Part III)This publication presents the control requirements, the details of the designed Flight Control Augmentor's (FCA's), the static stability and dynamic stability wind tunnel test programs, the static stability and control analyses, the dynamic stability characteristics of the experimental Launch Vehicle (LV) with the designed FCA's, and a consideration of the elastic vehicle. Dramatic improvements in flight stability have been realized with all the FCA designs; these ranged from 41 percent to 72 percent achieved by the blunt TE design. The control analysis showed that control increased 110 percent with only 3 degrees of FCA deflection. The dynamic stability results showed improvements with all FCA designs tested at all Mach numbers tested. The blunt TE FCA's had the best overall dynamic stability results. Since the lowest elastic vehicle frequency must be well separated from that of the control system, the significant frequencies and modes of vibration have been identified, and the response spectra compared for the experimental LV in both the conventional and the aft cg configuration. Although the dynamic response was 150 percent greater in the aft cg configuration, the lowest bending mode frequency decreased by only 2.8 percent.Document ID19970037712Acquisition SourceMarshall Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Publication (TP)AuthorsBarret, C.*(NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Huntsville, AL United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1997Subject CategoryLaunch Vehicles And Space VehiclesReport/Patent NumberNASA-TP-3704M-839NAS 1.60:3704Accession Number97N31151Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970037712.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
<PAGE>

                        COMPANY: WORLD OF SCIENCE, INC.
                                 TICKER: WOSI
                                 EXCHANGE: NMS

                                FORM-TYPE: 10-Q
          Exhibit 11. Statement re Computation of Per Share Earnings


                          FILING-DATE: June 15, 1999

                                  Exhibit 11

                            WORLD OF SCIENCE, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE NET LOSS
                     (In thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                               Quarter Ended
                                                                               -------------
Basic Loss Per Share:                                                 May 1, 1999          May 2, 1998
                                                                      -----------          -----------
<S>                                                                   <C>                  <C>
Net loss                                                               $(1,573)             $(1,079)

Weighted average common shares outstanding                               4,761                5,080

Basic loss per share                                                   $( 0.33)             $( 0.21)
                                                                       =======              =======

Diluted Loss Per Share:

Net loss                                                               $(1,573)             $(1,079)

Weighted average common shares outstanding                               4,761                5,080

Diluted loss per share                                                 $( 0.33)             $( 0.21)
                                                                       =======              =======
</TABLE>

                                       14
No. 649.

#### Silvas *v.*Arizona.

*John P. Frank*for petitioner.

*Robert W. Pickrell,*Attorney General of Arizona, and *Stirley Newell,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Supreme Court of Arizona. Certiorari denied.
```

[House Report 107-625]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     107-625

======================================================================

 
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 
                        3009, TRADE ACT OF 2002

                                _______
                                

  July 27 (Legislative day of July 26), 2002.--Referred to the House 
                   Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. Reynolds, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 509]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 509, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany H.R. 3009 the Trade Act of 2002, 
and against its consideration. The resolution further provides 
that the conference report shall be considered as read.

                                

```
EXHIBIT 32.1



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert E. Matthiessen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date:	May 14, 2010

/s/ Robert E. Matthiessen
Robert E. Matthiessen
President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

 

          I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., certify that: 

          1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of inTEST Corporation; 

          2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

          3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

          4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

        (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

        (b)  [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

        (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

        (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

          5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors: 

        (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

        (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 14, 2007/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
From: deb.baucum@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:30:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Deborah Baucum

Long Beach, CA 90807
\



### SERVED: JUNE 17, 2013

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF AVIATION TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. FAA DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS No. FAA-2011-0682
ORDERDISMISSING MOTION The Initial Decision ("I.D.") inthis matter was issued and served onMay 17, 2013. Itis under seal and may be disseminated only on a limited basis. See Order Sealing Exhibits and Transcript ("Order") served October 18, 2012. On June 3, 2013, Respondent moved for modification ofthe undersigned's Orderto permit Southwest Airlines, which is not a partyto this proceeding, to obtain a copy ofthe Initial Decision. Complainant Federal Aviation Administration, onJune 12, 2013, responded, opposing ATS' motion. The undersigned does nothavejurisdictionto rule on Respondent's motion. It is wellsettled inthe agency that administrative lawjudges losejurisdiction overa proceeding once the Initial Decisionhas been issued. See, e.g., Gerald W Keller, FAA OrderNo. 2011-2 (January 11, 2011), p. 6; Florence Barnhill, FAA OderNo. 1992-32 (May 5, 1992).2
In view ofthe foregoing, Respondent's Motion is hereby DISMISSED.

Attachment

- Service List

### ..

SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY Dane B. Jacques, Respondent's Counsel DombroffGilmore Jacques & French, PC 1676 International Drive, PH · McLean, VA 22102 TEL: 703-336-8800 FAX: 703-336-8750 CELL: 703-966-6111. Karen D. Huber, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-2167 FPCX: 425-227-1007 FDMS No. FAA-2011-0682 (Civil Penalty Action)

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WJOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
3
EXHIBIT 31.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Peter Porath, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Marwich II, Ltd.

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

    a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
prepared;

    b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c)  presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

    a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

    b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
and

6.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 15, 2004


/s/ Peter Porath
Peter Porath
Vice-President, Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 11


                STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  Year Ending December 31 ,
                                ----------------------------
                                1996        1995        1994
                                ----        ----        ----
<S>                             <C>         <C>         <C>
Earnings per share:
  Primary
    Net Income                  1.51        1.88        1.70
  Fully diluted
    Net Income                  1.51        1.88        1.69
</TABLE>

Primary and fully diluted earnings per share are calculated using the
following number of adjusted weighted average shares outstanding:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  Year Ending December 31,
                             ---------------------------------
                               1995        1994         1993
                             ---------   ---------   ---------
     <S>                     <C>         <C>         <C>
     Primary                 5,714,054   5,703,071   5,687,145

     Fully diluted           5,713,713   5,710,535   5,696,328
</TABLE>

     The weighted average number of shares outstanding is adjusted to recognize
the dilutive effect, if any, of outstanding employee stock options on both a
primary and fully diluted basis.

     The calculations of earnings per share above are based on the weighted
average number of shares outstanding including all common stock and common
stock equivalents in conformity with the instructions for Item 601 of
Regulation S-K. The calculation of earnings per share for financial reporting
purposes is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding at
December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994, of 5,671,362, 5,656,368, and 5,640,591,
respectively, without giving effect to the common stock equivalents resulting
from the assumed exercise of stock options, which do not dilute earnings per
share by more than 3 percent, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
No. 95.

#### Tecon Corporation *v.*Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico.

*James R. Beverley*for petitioner.

*Arturo Estrella,*Acting Solicitor General of Puerto Rico, and *Rodolfo Cruz Contreras,*Assistant Solicitor General, for respondent.

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico. Certiorari denied.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Wniteb ~tate~ ~ourt of ~peaI~

for tbe jfeberaI ~irtuit

IN RE DENTAL IMAGING TECHNOLOGIES

CORPORATION,

Petitioner.

Miscellaneous Docket No. 138

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United

States District Court for the District of Delaware in case

no. IO-CV-0288, ChiefJudge Gregory M. Sleet.

ON MOTION

ORDER

Dental Imaging Technologies Corporation moves

without opposition to withdraw its petition for a writ of

mandamus.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT Is ORDERED THAT:

The motion is granted and the petition is dismissed.

Case: 12-138 Document: 12 Page: 1 Filed: 11/28/2012
IN RE DENTAL IMAGING TECHNOLOGIES

s26

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly

Clerk

2

Case: 12-138 Document: 12 Page: 2 Filed: 11/28/2012
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Marwich II, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      William J. Maender, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                William J. Maender
              William
                J. Maender
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              April
                4, 2007
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


     The following table lists the subsidiaries of the Registrant as of 
December 31, 1996, the state or other jurisdiction of incorporation and the 
names under which such subsidiaries do business.  The Registrant owns all of 
the outstanding voting securities of each subsidiary.

<TABLE>
                                                                     Name Under
                                        Jurisdiction of            Which Subsidiary
Name of Subsidiary                        Organization             Is Doing Business
------------------                      ---------------            -----------------
<S>                                     <C>                     <C>
Optical Data Systems, Inc.                  Nevada           Optical Data Systems, Inc.

ODS, Inc.                                   Nevada                      ODS, Inc.

Optical Data Systems-Texas, Inc              Texas        Optical Data Systems-Texas, Inc.

Optical Data Systems GmbH                   Germany           Optical Data Systems GmbH

Optical Data Systems Ltd.               United Kingdom        Optical Data Systems Ltd.

ODS Ltd.                                United Kingdom                  ODS Ltd.

Optical Data Systems SARL                    France           Optical Data Systems SARL

Optical Data Systems, Ltda.                  Brazil           Optical Data Systems, Ltda.

Optical Data Systems (Barbados) Ltd.       Barbados     Optical Data Systems (Barbados) Ltd. 
</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmNet Mortgage, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,John M. Robbins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| August 16, 2004 |                    |
|----------------------|-------------------------|
|                 | /s/ John M. Robbins     |   |
|                 | John M. Robbins         |
|                 | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----