alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: michael_f_brady@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:12:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michael & Patricia Brady

, 10509-1612
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Peak International Limited (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dean Personne, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 12, 2008



/s/ Dean PersonneDean PersonneChief Executive Officer
No. 193, Misc.

#### Sawyer *v.*United States.

*Aloysius B. McCabe*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney*

*General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Richard W. Schmude*for the United States.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 138 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 138

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 19, 2007.
Whereas the concept in the United States of setting aside a nationally 
        significant place for the future enjoyment of its citizens was first 
        implemented 175 years ago in Hot Springs, Arkansas, with the creation of 
        the Hot Springs Reservation, which protected 47 area hot springs;
Whereas the Act that created the Hot Springs Reservation, entitled ``An Act 
        authorizing the governor of the territory of Arkansas to lease the salt 
        springs, in said territory, and for other purposes'', approved April 20, 
        1832 (4 Stat. 505), required that ``the hot springs in said territory, 
        together with four sections of land, including said springs, as near the 
        centre thereof as may be, shall be reserved for the future disposal of 
        the United States, and shall not be entered, located, or appropriated, 
        for any other purpose whatever'';
Whereas the Hot Springs Reservation was the first protected area in the Nation;
Whereas the Act creating the Hot Springs Reservation preceded both the 
        establishment of the Department of the Interior in 1849 and the 
        establishment of Yellowstone National Park as the first national park in 
        1872;
Whereas the Hot Springs Reservation was renamed Hot Springs National Park in 
        1921 and became America's 18th national park; and
Whereas the tradition of preservation and conservation that developed into the 
        National Park System, which now includes 390 units, began with the Act 
        that created the Hot Springs Reservation: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That on this 175th anniversary of the Act of Congress that 
created the Hot Springs Reservation, the House of Representatives recognizes the 
important contribution of the Hot Springs Reservation and Hot Springs National 
Park to the history of conservation in the United States.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
## LOUISIANA HAYNESVILLE SHALE OVERVIEW

1 

# SUSTAINING LOUISIANA’S FRESHWATER AQUIFERS A CASE STUDY IN BRINGING COMMUNITY AND INDUSTRY TOGETHER

James H. “Jim” Welsh Commissioner of Conservation Louisiana Office of Conservation1



# Shale Gas Plays, Lower 48 States

Source: Energy Information Administration based on data from various published studies Updated: May 28, 20092 

# Current Haynesville Shale Activity3



### GENERALIZED LITHOSTRATIGRAPHIC COLUMN WITH REPRESENTATIVE HAYNESVILLE SHALE WELLBORE

## Generalized Cross-Section of Marcellus Shale With Representative Wellbore

55 

# Current Haynesville Shale Activity in LA6



# Estimated Ultimate Recovery in Tcf (Tcf = Trillion cubic feet)

Data compiled from various sources by Office of Conservation Engineering Division 20087



# Northwest Louisiana Aquifers8



# Ground Water Use Advisory9



# Directive Issued to Industry for Frac Water Reporting

Due to revisions of the WH-1 form, water source and associated volumes are now reported on page 3.

### Drilling and Stimulation Operations Haynesville Shale Natural Gas Well Development Reported Usage from 10/1/2009 to 2/1/2011

Water Stats Source Volume (Gallons) Frac Groundwater 810,384,455 Frac Surface Water 3,340,652,866 Drilling Rig Groundwater Supply 395,802,431 Drilling Rig Surface Water Supply 59,403,197 Other Groundwater 24,403,351 Other Surface Water 13,917,380
Frac Stages 8982 Total Frac Water Used (gallons) 4,151,037,321 Volume per Frac Stage(gallons) 462,150 Average Frac Stages per Well 10.1 Average Water Use per Well 4,928,734 Average Frac Water Use per Well 4,351,251 10 Frac Ground Water 17%

Rig Supply Ground Water 9%

Other Ground

Water 1%

Frac Surface Water 72% Rig Supply Surface Water 1% Other Surface Water <0.5%11



# E&P Waste Fluids Use for Frac Water Supply LAC 43:XIX.Subpart 1.Chapter 3 Amendment Allows Operators to Use E&P Waste Fluids

forFrac Supply Purposes 

# 1) Promulgated November 20, 2009 

# 2) Amended June 20, 2010 

# 3) Limitations: 

# i. Used as Frac Supply Only 

# ii. By the Same Operator 

# iii. With Operator Affidavit Confirming Landowner Consent12



# Red River & Toledo Bend Yield Capacity Red River & Toledo Bend Yield Capacity vs. Projected Surface Water Usage @ 70% Level

Sources: Jim Pratt, Executive Director – Sabine River Authority Jamie Triplett, Hydraulic Eng. – US Army Corps of Eng.13 

# DNR / Conservation Haynesville Shale Water Resource Management Summary Agency Action: 

# 1. Timely Response 

# 2. Sufficient Oversight i. Policy and Regulation Adjustments ii. Resource Use Reporting and Monitoring iii. Increased Waste Minimization / Recycling Opportunities iv. Industry and Public Education / Outreach
From: vicftgf@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:57:50 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert De Gennaro

Monroe Township, NJ 08831
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SIGNATURE EYEWEAR, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED APRIL 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                       5,842,647
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,472,629
<ALLOWANCES>                                    71,568
<INVENTORY>                                  9,669,177
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,903,052
<PP&E>                                       3,144,983
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,657,121
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,523,776
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,082,108
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,216
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,036,619
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,523,776
<SALES>                                     21,461,640
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,461,640
<CGS>                                        9,004,305
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,254,280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,280,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                   495,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            785,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   785,200
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                         353,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,098,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,357,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,999,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,867,000
<PP&E>                                       9,963,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,694,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,712,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,819,000
<BONDS>                                      1,768,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       141,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,984,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,712,000
<SALES>                                     13,987,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,987,000
<CGS>                                       12,015,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,015,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,338,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             993,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,373,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   439,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (934,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 468,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (466,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the annual report of TransGlobe Energy Corporation
  (the Registrant) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December
  31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the Report), I, David C. Ferguson, Chief Financial Officer of the
  Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                              
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                        
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Registrant.





/s/ David FergusonName: David C. Ferguson 
  Title: Chief Financial Officer 
  March 13, 2009





A signed original of this written statement required by Rule
  13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C.
  Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the
  Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
  upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 40-F to which it relates,
  is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to
  be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities
  Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
  (whether made before or after the date of the Form 40-F), irrespective of any
  general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 15 - 00237 - CR IN RE R . WAYNE JOHNSON, RELAT OR ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

### August 25 , 2015 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Relator R. Wayne Johnson, a prison inmate appearing pro se, filed a petition asking the court to issue a writ of mandamus against respondent the Honorable Ana Estevez, judge of the 251st District Court of Potter County. Overall, the petition does not meet the requirements of appellate rule 52.3, lacks a proper re cord, and contains no indication of service on Judge Estevez and the apparently - intended real party in interest, the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.3 (form and contents of petition), 52.7 (record), 9.5 (service requirement an d procedure).2

Johnson’s complaint seems to be that Judge Estevez will not appoint counsel to represent him in “future TDCJ tribunal cases,” 1 which, he asserts, constitutes “a criminal law matter.” Elsewhere he requests appointment of counsel for represe ntation in this original proceeding. Otherwise, the substance of Johnson’s mandamus issue is unclear. This court and other Texas courts have reminded Johnson of the formal requirements for a petition in an original proceeding. See In re Johnson, No. 07 - 14 - 00426 - CV , 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 729, at *1 - 2 (Tex. App.
— Amarillo Jan. 27, 2015, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (citing In re Johnson, No. 07 - 13 - 00424 - CV, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 3511 (Tex. App.
— Amarillo Mar. 31, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.); In re Johnson, No. 06 - 13 - 00137 - CV, 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 52 (Tex. App.
— Texarkana Jan. 7, 201 4, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.)). In particular, he has often been reminded it is the relator’s burden to provide with the mandamus petition a record sufficient to establ ish his right to mandamus relief. In re Johnson , 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 52 at *1; see Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 883, 839 - 40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Johnson’s failure to comply even in the slightest degree with the record requirement, alone, req uires denial of his petition.

1 Johnson ’s objective may be to challenge by habeas corpus, at some future time, his asserted loss of prisoner good conduct time. See In re Johnson, No. 07 - 15 - 00195 - CR, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 5569 (Tex. App.
— Amaril lo June 2, 2015, orig. proceeding) (per curiam, mem. op., not designated for publication); In re Johnson, No. 07 - 15 - 00183 - CR, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 4525 (Tex. App.
— Amarillo Apr. 30, 2015, orig. proceeding) (per curiam, mem. op., not designated for publicati on); cf. In re Johnson, No. 10 - 15 - 00156 - CV, 2015 Tex. App. LEXIS 6243 (Tex. App.
— Waco June 18, 2015, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.) (concerning authorization of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to forfeit Johnson’s accrued good - time behavior, accordi ng to Texas Government Code section 498.0045(b), for filing a frivolous appeal and frivolous mandamus petition in the court of appeals )
.3

Johnson’s request for appointed counsel in this original proceeding is denied. His petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam
Do not publish.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 64919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20328]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated 
Program Project Applications (P01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: October 19, 2023.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G76, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Marci Scidmore, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Natl. Institute of Allergy & 
Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers 
Lane, Room 3G76, Bethesda, MD 20892, (240) 627-3255, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4b262a392822653828222f2624392e0b252223652c243d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="94f9f5e6f7fdbae7f7fdf0f9fbe6f1d4fafdfcbaf3fbe2">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 14, 2023.
Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-20328 Filed 9-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 211, Misc.

#### White *v.*Maryland.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Thomas B. Finan,*Attorney General of Maryland, and *Robert F. Sweeney,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Motion for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland granted limited to the point of law raised in *Hamilton*v. *Alabama,*368 U. S. 52. Case transferred to the appellate docket.
Memorandum To: Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505 for Oil and Natural Gas 

Sector: Emission Standards for New and Modified Sources

Re: EPA meeting with API

Message: EPA staff met with representatives from API on October 22, 2015, to discuss API’s 

comments on the September 18, 2015, four proposed oil and gas actions. 

Agenda: 

9-12 pm - Source Determination/NSPS/draft CTG

1-2:30 pm - Tribal Lands

Attendees: Attached.