TITLE: Biotechnology: Legislation and RegulationPUBLICATION DATE: January 1994ENTRY DATE: March 1994EXPIRATION DATE: NoneUPDATE: As neededCONTACT: Biotechnology Information Center(biotech@nalusda.gov)         National Agricultural LibraryDOCUMENT TYPE: TextDOCUMENT SIZE: 167k approx 90 pp.
Biotechnology: Legislation and RegulationJanuary 1989 - January 1994
297 citations in English from AGRICOLA
Kim Guenther and Ray Dobert                                    
                             SEARCH STRATEGY
     SET       ITEMS     DESCRIPTION           S1   11275     GENETIC?( )ENGINEERING OR BIOTECHNOLOG? OR           TRANSGEN? OR MICROMANIPULAT? OR RECOMBINANT           ( )DNA       S29569(GENE? OR GENETIC? OR CHROMOSOM? OR DNA OR           RNA)(4N)(TRANSFER? OR TRANSFORM? OR MANIPULAT? OR           ALTER?  OR INSERT? OR MODIF? OR RECOMBIN?)     S317811   S1 OR S2        S420043   SH=D500     S518156   (LEGISLAT? OR LAW? OR LEGAL OR LITIGAT?)/TI,DE     S63096(REGULAT? AND (LAW? OR LEGAL OR SAFE? OR POLIC? OR                         FEDERAL? OR FDA OR EPA OR USDA OR ISSUE? OR                    GUIDELINE?))/TI,DE     S7 630S3 AND (S4 OR S5 OR S6)      S8 617S7 AND LA=ENGLISH     S9 387S8 AND PY=1989:19941                                   NAL Call. No.: KF1893.B56K6
The 1990-91 biotechnology regulations handbook..  Biotechnologyregulationshandbook Federal regulation of biotechnologyKorwek, Edward L.Fairfax Station, Va. : Center for Energy and EnvironmentalManagement,; 1990.xiv, 197 p. : 28 cm.  Title from cover.  On title page: Federalregulation ofbiotechnology.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biotechnology; Law and legislation; United States;Biotechnology;Government policy; United States; Biotechnology; Safetyregulations; UnitedStates
2                                     NAL Call. No.: 286.8 N48820 chefs call for a boycott of genetically altered foods.New York, N.Y. : H.J. Raymond & Co. :.; 1992 Jun03.The New York times. p. B8; 1992 Jun03.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Food safety; Genetic engineering; Public opinion;Labeling
3                                        NAL Call. No.: Q320.A423 Field test permits for genetically engineered plants.Cedar Falls, Iowa : Freiberg Pub; 1991 Nov.AgBiotechnology news v. 8 (6): p. 5; 1991 Nov.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Field tests; Usda; Crops; Genetic engineering
4                                      NAL Call. No.: LB2300.C5Academy panel recommends a new review process for outdoor tests ofgeneticallyaltered organisms.Wheeler, D.L.Washington, D.C. : Chronicle of higher education :.; 1989 Sep27.The chronicle of higher education. p. A4, A10; 1989 Sep27.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Field tests; Genetic engineering; Usda; Safety
5                                         NAL Call. No.: A00109Action alert! The Omnibus Biotechnology Act of 1990.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1990 Nov.The gene exchange v. 1 (3/4): p. 4; 1990 Nov.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Regulations; Genetic engineering; Usda; Fieldtests
6                                         NAL Call. No.: A00109Action alerts!.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1991 Jun.The gene exchange v. 2 (2): p. 6; 1991 Jun.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Biotechnology; Regulations; Public opinion
7                                     NAL Call. No.: QH442.G452Activist groups plan to concentrate on state, local levels.Washington, D.C. : Gershon W. Fishbein; 1990 Nov24.Genetic engineering letter v. 10 (22): p. 1; 1990 Nov24.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Biotechnology; Decision making; Publicopinion; Publicagencies; Legislation; Regulations
8                                     NAL Call. No.: 280.8 J822Adding an economic dimension to risk assessment: discussion.Mauskopf, J.Ames, Iowa : American Agricultural Economics Association; 1989 May.American journal of agricultural economics v. 71 (2): p. 485-486;1989 May.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Health hazards; Economic analysis; Costbenefit analysis;Risks; Agricultural economics; Genetic engineering; Environmentallegislation;Foodborne diseases
9                                     NAL Call. No.: SB123.3.D5African center hosts expert workshop on property rights,biotechnology andgenetics resources.Reid, W.Fort Collins, Colo. : Laboratory for Information Science inAgriculture; 1991.Diversity v. 7 (3): p. 10-11; 1991.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Genetic resources; Biotechnology; Compensation;Indigenousknowledge; Legislation
10                                   NAL Call. No.: SB113.2.S45As agbiotech faces the real world, a tough, uncertain road liesahead.Freiberg, B.Cedar Falls, IA : Freiberg Pub. Co; 1991 May.Seed industry v. 42 (5): p. 6-7, 29; 1991 May.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Product development; Research support; Seed industry;Biotechnology; Usda; Regulations; Public opinion; Patents
11                                     NAL Call. No.: R856.A4B5AGnews.San Francisco, Calif. : Deborah J. Mysiewicz; 1991 Apr03.BioEngineering news v. 12 (14): p. 7; 1991 Apr03.
Language:  English
Descriptors: California; Biocides; Marketing; Regulations; Usda;Bacillusthuringiensis; Genetic engineering
12                                        NAL Call. No.: A00033AGnews: corn transformed; grace biocontrol consolidates; memberstold...; Bstsafety told; carrington.San Francisco, Calif. : Deborah J. Mysiewicz; 1990 Aug31.BioEngineering news v. 11 (36): p. 6-8; 1990 Aug31.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Zea mays; Genetic transformation; Field tests;Biologicalcontrol; Usda; Somatotropin; Food safety; Licenses;Immunostimulants
13                                       NAL Call. No.: 1 AG84YAgricultural biotechnology and APHIS regulations: a pathway to thefuture.Kastner, C.Washington, D.C. : U.S. Department of Agriculture; 1992.The ... Yearbook of agriculture. p. 80-84; 1992.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Biotechnology; Regulations; Federalgovernment; Animalhealth; Plants
14                         NAL Call. No.: ArUKF1682.A75A37 1990Agricultural biotechnology from the test tube to the farm.Hamline University, Advanced Legal EducationSt. Paul, MN : Advanced Legal Education, [c1990]; 1990.106 p. : ill. ; 30 cm.  April 20, 1990.
Language:  English; English
Descriptors: Agricultural biotechnology; Law and legislation;United States;Agricultural biotechnology; Law and legislation; Minnesota; Plantbiotechnology; Research; Law and legislation; United States; Plantbiotechnology; Research; Law and legislation; Minnesota;Agricultural laws andlegislation; United States; Agricultural laws and legislation;Minnesota;Biotechnology industries; Government policy; United States;Biotechnologyindustries; Government policy; Minnesota; Biotechnology; UnitedStates;Patents
15                                NAL Call. No.: S494.5.B563A37Agricultural biotechnology introduction to field testing.Purchase, Graham H.; MacKenzie, David R.United States, Office of Agricultural BiotechnologyMississippi State : Dept. of Information Services, Division ofAgriculture,Forestry, and Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University,;1990.xiii, 58 p. ; 28 cm.  On cover: Office of AgriculturalBiotechnology, U.S.Dept. of Agriculture.  "March 1990"--Cover.  Includesbibliographicalreferences (p. 43-44) and index.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Agricultural biotechnology; Agriculturalbiotechnology; Research;Law and legislation; United States; Field experiments
16                             NAL Call. No.: KF27.A33277 1988fAgricultural Research Act of 1988; and the BiotechnologyCompetitiveness Actof 1988 hearing before the Subcommittee on Department Operations,Research,and Foreign Agriculture of the Committee on Agriculture, House ofRepresentatives, One Hundredth Congress, second session, on H.R.5056 and S.1966, August 10, 1988.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Agriculture.Subcommittee onDepartment Operations, Research, and Foreign AgricultureWashington [D.C.] : U.S. G.P.O. : For sale by the Supt. of Docs.,Congressional Sales Office, U.S. G.P.O.,; 1989; Y 4.Ag 8/1:100-108.iii, 220 p. : form ; 24 cm.  Distributed to some depositorylibraries inmicrofiche.  Serial no. 100-108.
Language:  English; English
Descriptors: Agriculture; Research; Law and legislation; UnitedStates;Agricultural innovations; United States; Biotechnology; Research;Law andlegislation; United States; Agriculture; Economic aspects; UnitedStates
17                                   NAL Call. No.: TP248.2.A77Agriculture agency proposes to ease biotechnology regulation.Stamford, Conn. : Business Communications Co., Inc; 1992 Nov.Applied genetics news v. 13 (4): p. 12; 1992 Nov.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Zea mays; Cotton; Potatoes; Tomatoes;Soybeans; Tobacco;Genetic engineering; Regulations; Usda
18                                    NAL Call. No.: 284.28 W15Agriculture agency seeks to ease rules on genetically alteredcrops.Davis, B.New York, N.Y. : Dow Jones; 1992 Sep18.The Wall Street journal. p. B5; 1992 Sep18.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Crops; Genetic engineering; Regulations; Usda
19                                   NAL Call. No.: QH442.G4522All parties find fault with proposed field test rule.Conroy, D.Washington, D.C. : King Pub. Group; 1993 Jan21.Biotech daily v. 2 (105): p. 1-2; 1993 Jan21.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Field tests; Usda; Genetic engineering; Plants
20                                        NAL Call. No.: Q1.D57Altered vegetable states.Svitil, K.Los Angeles, Calif. : Time, Inc. :.; 1992 Jan.Discover v. 14 (1): p. 44-46; 1992 Jan.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Food crops; Biotechnology; Food safety; Freshproducts;Regulations; Food supply
21                                       NAL Call. No.: QL1.D48Animal health industry's views on the EEC initiatives inbiotechnology foragriculture.Vanhemelrijck, J.; Verschueren, C.Amsterdam : Elsevier North-Holland; 1991.Developments in animal and veterinary sciences (25): p. 191-193;1991.  In theseries analytic: Animal biotechnology and the quality of meatproduction /edited by L.O. Fiems, B.G. Cottyn, and D.I. Demeyer. Paperpresented at anOECD workshop, Nov. 7-9, 1990, Melle, Belgium.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Animal health; Biotechnology; European communities
22                                      NAL Call. No.: QH442.A5Animal patents the legal, economic and social issues.Lesser, WilliamNew York, N.Y. : Stockton Press ; [S.l. : Macmillan : distributedby GlobeBook Services,; 1989.xiv, 369 p. ; 24 cm.  "Papers ... prepared for a symposium of thesame nameheld at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York on December 5-6,1988"--P. xi.Includes bibliographical references and indexes.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Genetic engineering; Law and legislation; Animalgeneticengineering; Patents
23                                NAL Call. No.: S494.5.B563N33Animal pharmaceuticals.Terry, M.Ithaca, N.Y. : National Agricultural Biotechnology Council; 1992.NABC report / (4): p. 157-163; 1992.  In the series analytic:Animalbiotechnology: opportunities and challenges.  Proceedings of thefourth annualNABC meeting, May 1992, College Station, Texas.  Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Drugs; Regulations; Biotechnology; Animal experiments
24                                        NAL Call. No.: A00031Antidote for ice-9.Palo Alto, Calif. : BioVenture View; 1991 May.BioVenture view v. 6 (5): p. 20; 1991 May.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Transgenics; Frost resistance; Usda; Fieldtests
25                                        NAL Call. No.: A00109Applications to EPA under federal insecticide, fungicide, androdenticide act.et al.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1991 Jun.The gene exchange v. 2 (2): p. 11-15; 1991 Jun.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Field tests; Plants; Transgenics
26                                        NAL Call. No.: A00109Applications to field test genetically engineered organisms.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1993 Jan.The gene exchange v. 3 (4): p. 9-11; 1993 Jan.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Field tests; Genetic engineering; Crops; Usda
27                                        NAL Call. No.: A00109Applications to USDA to field test genetically engineered organismsunder thefederal plant pest act.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1992 Jul.The gene exchange v. 3 (2): p. 14-15; 1992 Jul.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Field tests; Usda; Genetic engineering; Crops
28                                        NAL Call. No.: A00109Applications to USDA under Federal Plant Pest Act to field testgeneticallyengineered plants.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1990 Nov.The gene exchange v. 1 (3/4): p. 9-15; 1990 Nov.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Field tests; Usda; Plants; Transgenics
29                                        NAL Call. No.: A00109Applications to USDA under Federal Plant Pest Act to field testgeneticallyengineered plants.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1991 Oct.The gene exchange v. 2 (3): p. 11-14; 1991 Oct.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Plants; Genetic engineering; Field tests; Usda
30                                        NAL Call. No.: A00109Applications to USDA under Federal Plant Pest Act to field testgeneticallyengineered plants (1987.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1991 Mar.The gene exchange v. 2 (1): p. 9-23; 1991 Mar.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Field tests; Transgenics; Crops; Usda
31                                        NAL Call. No.: A00109Assessing USDA's environmental assessments.Wrubel, R.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1991 Dec.The gene exchange v. 2 (4): p. 4-5; 1991 Dec.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Transgenics; Field tests; Usda; Environmentalassessment
32                                        NAL Call. No.: A00050Assuring the safety of foods produced by genetic modification.Winnipeg : Winter House Scientific Publications :.; 1990 Sep.New biotech v. 4 (9): p. 9-11; 1990 Sep.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Canada; Europe; Japan; U.S.A.; Food safety; Geneticengineering;New products; Biotechnology; Testing; Regulations; Nutritive value
33                                     NAL Call. No.: 61.8 SE52ASTA develops revised intellectual property rights position.Des Plains, Ill. : Scranton Gillette Communications, Inc. :.; 1990Oct.Seed world v. 128 (11): p. 10-11, 13-14; 1990 Oct.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Patents; Genetic engineering; Seeds;Germplasm; Diversity
34                                     NAL Call. No.: R856.A4B5At last:rDNA food safety in spotlight.San Francisco, Calif. : Deborah J. Mysiewicz; 1990 Dec01.BioEngineering news v. 11 (49): p. 1; 1990 Dec01.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Food products; Genetic engineering; Foodsafety;Regulations
35                                        NAL Call. No.: A00109At the federal level.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1990 Nov.The gene exchange v. 1 (3/4): p. 6; 1990 Nov.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Regulations; Research policy; Usda;Biotechnology
36                                     NAL Call. No.: 61.8 SE52Belgian biotech firm expands field trials.Whitmore, L.Des Plains, Ill. : Scranton Gillette Communications, Inc; 1989 May.Seed world v. 127 (6): p. 33-35; 1989 May.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Belgium; Field tests; Crops; Genetic engineering
37                                    NAL Call. No.: 500 AM322ABenefits and risks of genetic engineering in agriculture.Pimentel, D.; Hunter, M.S.; LaGro, J.A.; Efroymson, R.A.; Landers,J.C.;Mervis, F.T.; McCarthy, C.A.; Boyd, A.E.Washington, D.C. : The Institute; 1989 Oct.BioScience - American Institute of Biological Sciences v. 39 (9):p. 606-614;1989 Oct.  Literature review.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Genetic engineering; Agriculture; Crops;Livestock;Problem analysis; Regulations; Risks
38                                     NAL Call. No.: 470 SCI24Better than the real thing.Pendick, D.Washington, D.C. : Science Service :.; 1992 Nov28.Science news v. 142 (22): p. 376-377; 1992 Nov28.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering; Usda;Field tests;Regulations
39                                     NAL Call. No.: R856.A4B5Biohelp: needed by Third World?.San Francisco, Calif. : Deborah J. Mysiewicz; 1991 Mar07.BioEngineering news v. 12 (9): p. 3; 1991 Mar07.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Developing countries; Developed countries; Fieldtests; Geneticengineering; Risk
40                                    NAL Call. No.: TP360.B562Biopigments: biotech pigments poised to challenge synthetic colors;biopigments market could reach $350 million by 2000.Englewood, N.J. : Technical Insights, Inc; 1992 May.Industrial bioprocessing v. 14 (5): p. 4-5; 1992 May.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Food colorants; Carotenes; Xanthophylls; Melanins;Biotechnology;Regulations; Market research
41                                    NAL Call. No.: SB123.3.D5Biotech industry played key role in U.S. refusal to signBioConvention.Usdin, S.Fort Collins, Colo. : Laboratory for Information Science inAgriculture; 1992.Diversity v. 8 (2): p. 8-9; 1992.
Language:  English
Descriptors: International agreements; Diversity; Seed industry;Biotechnology; Gatt; Technology transfer
42                                        NAL Call. No.: Q1.S37Biotech panel wrestles with oversight role.Morgan, D.Philadelphia, Pa. : Institute for Scientific Information :.; 1990Feb19.The scientist v. 4 (4): p. 1, 14; 1990 Feb19.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Regulations; Genetic engineering; Release
43                                        NAL Call. No.: A00051Biotechnica applies for extensive field testing of geneticallyengineeredcorn.Nepean, Ont. : Winter House Scientific Publications; 1991 Apr22.New biotech business Canada v. 3 (7): p. 5; 1991 Apr22.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Iowa; Illinois; Minnesota; Nebraska; Zea mays; Fieldtests;Genetic engineering; Usda
44                                    NAL Call. No.: RA1190.R42Biotechnologies and food: assuring the safety of foods produced bygeneticmodification.Orlando, Fla. : Academic Press; 1990 Dec.Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP v. 12 (3,pt.2): 220p.; 1990 Dec. Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Food safety; Food biotechnology; Foodmicrobiology;Genetic engineering; Generally recognized as safe list; Toxicity;Evaluation;Regulations; Federal government
45                                     NAL Call. No.: QH442.A47Biotechnology and food safety: villain or hero?.New York, N.Y. : Mary Ann Liebert; 1990 Jun.Agricultural genetics report v. 9 (3): p. 5; 1990 Jun.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Food safety; Biotechnology; Public opinion;Regulations
46                            NAL Call. No.: KF3133.B56C66 1991Biotechnology and the law., 1991 revision..Cooper, Iver P.New York, N.Y. : Clark Boardman Co., 1991-; 1991-9999.2 v. (loose-leaf) ; 26 cm.  "Release.  Loose-leaf for updating. Includesbibliographical references and index.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Microorganisms; Biotechnology
47                                      NAL Call. No.: 41.8 AM3Biotechnology and the veterinarian--some legal considerations.Hannah, H.W.Schaumburg, Ill. : The Association; 1989 Apr01.Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association v. 194 (7):p. 890-891;1989 Apr01.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Veterinarians; Biotechnology; Law
48                                NAL Call. No.: S494.5.B563N33Biotechnology at the crossroads: is regulation the gatekeeper?.Nicholas, R.B.Ithaca, N.Y. : National Agricultural Biotechnology Council; 1991.NABC report / (3): p. 111-119; 1991.  In the series analytic:Agriculturalbiotechnology at the crossroads: biological, social andinstitutionalconcerns.  Proceedings of the National Agricultural BiotechnologyCouncil'sthird annual meeting, May 1991.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Cabt; Biotechnology; Regulations; Usda;Governmentorganizations; History; Federal government
49                                  NAL Call. No.: TP248.13.B54Biotechnology financing for 1991 already tops $1 billion.New York : McGraw-Hill :.; 1991 Apr08.Biotechnology newswatch v. 11 (7): p. 1, 3; 1991 Apr08.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Europe; U.S.A.; Somatotropin; Milk production; Foodsafety;European communities; Usda; Regulations
50                            NAL Call. No.: TP248.185.U55 1992Biotechnology in a global economy hearing before the SubcommitteeonEnvironment of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology,U.S. House ofRepresentatives, One Hundred Second Congress, first session,December 16,1991.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science, Space, andTechnology.Subcommittee on EnvironmentWashington : U.S. G.P.O. : For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. ofDocs.,Congressional Sales Office,; 1992; Y 4.Sci 2:102/90.iii, 105 p. : ill. ; 23 cm.  Shipping list no.: 92-260-P.  No. 90.
Language:  English; English
Descriptors: Biotechnology industries; Food; Pharmaceuticalbiotechnology;Competition, International; Biotechnology
51                                        NAL Call. No.: A00067Biotechnology in the food industry--a consumer perspective.Paris, France : Biofutur S.A.; 1990 Dec02.European biotechnology newsletter (102): p. 1-2; 1990 Dec02.
Language:  English
Descriptors: England; Food biotechnology; Regulations; Gibberellazeae;Consumer attitudes; Marketing
52                                   NAL Call. No.: aS21.D27S64Biotechnology: international affairs.Airozo, D.; Warmbrodt, R.D.Beltsville, Md. : The Library; 1991 Sep.Special reference briefs - National Agricultural Library (U.S.).(91-12): 32p.; 1991 Sep.  Bibliography.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biotechnology; International comparisons; Policy;Regulations;Economics; Technology transfer; Utilization; Risk; Informationservices;Bibliographies
53                                      NAL Call. No.: 100 IL64Biotechnology: issues, ethics, and regulations.Prow, T.M.Urbana, Ill. : The Station; 1991.Illinois research - Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station v. 33(1/2): p.3-4; 1991.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Illinois; Plants; Biotechnology
54                                  NAL Call. No.: KF3827.G4B44Biotechnology law for the 1990s analysis and perspective.Bureau of National Affairs (Washington, D.C.)Washington, D.C. : Special Project Unit of the Bureau of NationalAffairs,;1989.1 v. (various pagings) ; 28 cm. (The BNA special report series onbiotechnology ; special rept.).  Cover title.  December 1989. Includesbibliographical references.
Language:  English; English
Descriptors: Genetic engineering; Biotechnology; Biotechnologyindustries
55                                     NAL Call. No.: aZ5071.N3Biotechnology: legislation and regulation: January 1988-May 1992.Warmbrodt, R.; Wiggert, L.Beltsville, Md. : The Library; 1992 Jul.Quick bibliography series - U.S. Department of Agriculture,NationalAgricultural Library (U.S.). (92-53): 39 p.; 1992 Jul.  Updates QB91-80.Bibliography.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Biotechnology; Genetic engineering; Dna; Rna;Legislation; Regulations; Bibliographies
56                                     NAL Call. No.: aZ5071.N3Biotechnology: legislation and regulation--January 1979-February1991.Warmbrodt, R.D.Beltsville, Md. : The Library; 1991 Apr.Quick bibliography series - U.S. Department of Agriculture,NationalAgricultural Library (U.S.). (91-80): 30 P.; 1991 Apr. Bibliography.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Biotechnology; Genetic engineering; Dna; Rna;Legislation; Bibliographies
57                                        NAL Call. No.: A00035Biotechnology patent bill will expand process patent protection.Summit, N.J. : CTB International Pub. Co; 1991 Mar21.Biotechnology news v. 11 (7): p. 3-4; 1991 Mar21.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Patents; Legislation
58                            NAL Call. No.: KF3133.B56U54 1991Biotechnology Patent Protection Act of 1991 report (to accompany S.654).United States. Congress. Senate Committee on the JudiciaryWashington : D.C.? : U.S. G.P.O.,; 1992; Y 1.1/5:102-260.17 p. ; 23 cm. (Report / 102d Congress, 2d session, Senate ;102-260).Caption title.  Distributed to some depository libraries inmicrofiche.Shipping list no.: 92-270-P.  March 11 ... 1992.  Includesbibliographicalreferences.
Language:  English; English
Descriptors: Biotechnology; Biotechnology industries
59                                 NAL Call. No.: KF3133.B56B56Biotechnology patents a business manager's legal guide.Bureau of National Affairs (Washington, D.C.)Washington, D.C. : Special Project Unit of the Bureau of NationalAffairs,;1989.1 v. (various pagings) ; 28 cm. (The BNA special report series onbiotechnology ; special rept.).  Cover title.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biotechnology
60                                  NAL Call. No.: TP248.14.B57Biotechnology patents, regulations and public issues : June 14 and15, 1989.Maryland Biotechnology Institute, University of Maryland, CollegePark,Instructional Television SystemCollege Park : Md.? : University of Maryland, InstructionalTelevisionSystem?,; 1989.356 p. : ill. ; 28 cm.  Cover title.  Publication containsabstracts ofspeeches presented at the symposium.  Includes bibliographicalreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biotechnology; Congresses; Biotechnology; Patents;Congresses
61                                   NAL Call. No.: QD415.A1J63Biotechnology: research in animal agriculture and regulatorypolicy.DeLoach, J.R.Duluth, Minn. : Academic Press; 1989 Aug.Biotechnology and applied biochemistry v. 11 (4): p. 349-361; 1989Aug.Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biotechnology; Animal husbandry; Genetic engineering;Recombination; Dna; Vaccines; Livestock; Poultry
62                                        NAL Call. No.: A00040Biotech's regulatory bog.Randel, S.New York, N.Y. : Schnell Pub. Co. :.; 1989 Nov11.Chemical business v. 11 (10): p. 12-13; 1989 Nov11.
Language:  English
Descriptors: North Carolina; Regulations; Field tests; Geneticengineering;Release
63                                   NAL Call. No.: 389.8 F7398Bovine somatotropin safety and effectiveness: an industryperspective.Hecht, D.W.Chicago, Ill. : Institute of Food Technologists; 1991 Apr.Food technology v. 45 (4): p. 118, 123-124, 126; 1991 Apr. Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Milk; Food technology; Somatotropin; Food safety; Foodquality;Regulations; Biotechnology; Food processing
Abstract:  The end goal of technology, when applied to agriculture,is toimprove the efficiency of food production or to enhance the qualityof ourfood. That is the goal of bovine somatotropin (BST), one of thefirst majorproducts of biotechnology being developed for the food industry.This articlewill discuss (1) how BST came into being and the impact it willhave on thefood industry; (2) whether it is safe; (3) reasons some peopleoppose it; (4)regulatory and consumer perception implications; and (5) publicbenefits.
64                                    NAL Call. No.: QH442.G452BSCC publishes revised version of regulations for industry.Washington, D.C. : Gershon W. Fishbein; 1990 Aug10.Genetic engineering letter v. 10 (15): p. 1; 1990 Aug10.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Regulations; Field tests; Genetic engineering;Transgenics; Weeds
65                                      NAL Call. No.: QH442.B5bST & the EEC: politics vs. science.Vandaele, W.New York, N.Y. : Nature Publishing Company; 1992 Feb.Bio/technology v. 10 (2): p. 148-149; 1992 Feb.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Dairy cows; Somatotropin; Recombinant  DNA; Geneticengineering;Milk production; Milk; Food safety; Food and nutritioncontroversies; Europeancommunities; Ec regulations
66                                       NAL Call. No.: Q320.A4The BST controversy: trying to define "good".Breiberg, B.Cedar Falls, Iowa : Freiberg Pub; 1990 Nov.AgBiotechnology news v. 7 (6): p. 2, 19; 1990 Nov.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Somatotropin; Milk production; Geneticengineering; Usda;Food safety
67                                        NAL Call. No.: A00069Building a better tomato.Washington, D.C. : The Washington Post Co; 1992 May28.The Washington post. p. A20; 1992 May28.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Food safety; New products; Geneticengineering; Fruits;Vegetables; Regulations
68                                        NAL Call. No.: A00060Building a better tomato.Dailey, P.Raleigh, N.C. : News & Observer Pub. Co; 1992 Aug12.The news & observer. p. E1, E7; 1992 Aug12.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering;Regulations; Publicopinion
69                                        NAL Call. No.: A00063Bush looses control over biotechnology industry.Durham, N.C. : Durham Herald Co., Inc; 1992 Feb25.The Herald-sun. p. A3; 1992 Feb25.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Biotechnology; Regulations
70                                    NAL Call. No.: 284.28 W15Bush to propose rules to spur biotechnology.Davis, B.; Gutfield, R.New York, N.Y. : Dow Jones; 1992 Feb19.The Wall Street journal. p. B6; 1992 Feb19.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Biotechnology; Regulations; Usda
71                                    NAL Call. No.: QH442.G452Calgene asks FDA for its opinion on kanamycin safety.Washington, D.C. : Gershon W. Fishbein; 1991 Apr24.Genetic engineering letter v. 11 (9): p. 2; 1991 Apr24.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Food safety; Genetic engineering; Kanamycin; Foodadditives
72                                   NAL Call. No.: TP248.2.A77Calgene files petition with USDA.Stamford, Conn. : Business Communications Co., Inc; 1992 Aug.Applied genetics news v. 13 (1): p. 7; 1992 Aug.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering;Regulation;Usda
73                                    NAL Call. No.: 284.28 W15Calgene is seeking 'food' designation for altered tomato.New York, N.Y. : Dow Jones; 1991 Aug13.The Wall Street journal. p. B5; 1991 Aug13.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering;Regulations; Approval schemes
74                                        NAL Call. No.: A00109Calgene seeks approval of genetically engineered tomato.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1991 Mar.The gene exchange v. 2 (1): p. 1, 5; 1991 Mar.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering; Foodsafety;Regulations; Tomatoes
75                                    NAL Call. No.: QH442.G452Calgene seeks consultation with FDA on its tomato.Washington, D.C. : Gershon W. Fishbein; 1992 Jun24.Genetic engineering letter v. 12 (12): p. 2; 1992 Jun24.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering;Polygalacturonase;Food safety
76                                   NAL Call. No.: QH442.G4522Calgene seeks FDA review of gene to answer critics.Washington, D.C. : King Pub. Group; 1993 Jan06.Biotech daily v. 2 (95): p. 1, 3; 1993 Jan06.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Lycopersicon esculentum; Food additives;Biotechnology;Regulations
77                                    NAL Call. No.: QH442.G445Calgene seeks USDA OK to begin commercial production of geneticallyengineeredtomato.Fort Lee, N.J. : Technical Insights, Inc; 1992 Aug.Genetic technology news v. 12 (8): p. 14; 1992 Aug.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering;Usda;Regulations
78                                        NAL Call. No.: A00035Calgene submits bioengineered plants for FDA approval.Summit, N.J. : CTB International Pub. Co; 1990 Dec07.Biotechnology news v. 10 (29): p. 1; 1990 Dec07.  This publicationis notowned by NAL.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Regulations; Usda; Genetic engineering; Crops
79                                  NAL Call. No.: TP248.13.B54Calgene submits data to answer FDA's final tomato questions.Lehrman, S.New York : McGraw-Hill :.; 1993 Mar15.Biotechnology newswatch. p. 10-11; 1993 Mar15.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering; Foodsafety
80                                     NAL Call. No.: TA166.T72Canadian survey highlights plant biotechnology requirements for the1990s.Katz, J.S.; Steck, W.Cambridge : Elsevier Publications; 1989 Jun.Trends in biotechnology v. 7 (6): p. 135-137; 1989 Jun.  Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Canada; Plants; Biotechnology; Surveys; Geneticengineering;Research support; Breeders' rights; Legislation
81                                   NAL Call. No.: QH442.G4522Case against tighter controls and labels for bio-foods.Washington, D.C. : King Pub. Group; 1992 Nov25.Biotech daily v. 1 (73): p. 4; 1992 Nov25.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; New York; Food safety; Biotechnology;Regulations; Crops;Genetic engineering
82                                       NAL Call. No.: QD1.A45Challenges of pest control with enhanced toxicological andenvironmentalsafety. An overview.Duke, S.O.; Menn, J.J.; Plimmer, J.R.Washington, D.C. : The Society; 1993.ACS Symposium series - American Chemical Society (524): p. 1-13;1993.  In theseries analytic: Pest control with enhanced environmental safety /edited byS.O. Duke, J.J. Menn, and J.R. Plimmer.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Pest control; Plant protection; Legislation; Microbialpesticides; Pesticides; Genetic engineering; Environmentalprotection
Abstract:  Much of the increase in agricultural productivity overthe pasthalf century has been due to more efficacious and economical pestcontrolthrough the use of synthetic chemical pesticides (SCPs). However,there iscontinued and growing social and legislative pressure to reduce thetoxicological and environmental risks associated with control ofagriculturalpests with SCPs. Public and private sector research is beingconducted todevelop biorational pesticides and to replace or reduce the use ofSCPs withnatural product-based pesticides, biocontrol (including classicalbiocontrol),genetically-engineered pest resistance, and combinations of thesereplacementstrategies. Nevertheless, these emerging pest control technologieswill likelyrepresent only a small percentage of the pest control market by theyear 2000.Therefore, methods to reduce use rates of synthetic pesticides andto developmore environmentally and toxicologically benign pesticides are alsoimportantin risk abatement. Such strategies as biorational design,development ofpesticide synergists, and development of crops resistant to moreenvironmentally safe herbicides, insects, and plant pathogens canimprove theenvironmental quality, food safety, and allay societal fearsconcerning cropprotection technology.
83                                  NAL Call. No.: TP248.13.B54Clinton's ag-biotech rules seen as good news for industry,environment.Lehrman, S.New York : McGraw-Hill :.; 1993 Apr05.Biotechnology newswatch. p. 1, 5; 1993 Apr05.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Field tests; Crops; Genetic engineering; Usda;Publicopinion
84                                     NAL Call. No.: 61.8 SE52Comments on the revised ASTA position statement on IPR.Des Plains, Ill. : Scranton Gillette Communications, Inc. :.; 1990Oct.Seed world v. 128 (11): p. 15-18, 20-21, 23-24; 1990 Oct.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Legal rights; New products; Seed industry;Biotechnology;Research support; Molecular biology; Germplasm; Licenses
85                                NAL Call. No.: KF27.S399 1992Commercialization of biotechnology hearing before the SubcommitteeonTechnology and Competitiveness of the Committee on Science, Space,andTechnology, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred SecondCongress, firstsession, December 6, 1991.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science, Space, andTechnology.Subcommittee on Technology and CompetitivenessWashington : U.S. G.P.O. : For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. ofDocs.,Congressional Sales Office,; 1992; Y 4.Sci 2:102/86.iii, 166 p. : ill. ; 23 cm.  Distributed to some depositorylibraries inmicrofiche.  Shipping list no.: 92-178-P.  No. 86.  Includesbibliographicalreferences.
Language:  English; English
Descriptors: Biotechnology; Technology transfer; Competition,International
86                             NAL Call. No.: SB123.57.I55 1992Commercialization review process for plant varieties developedthroughbiotechnology.McCammon, S.L.; Medley, T.L.Braunschweig, Germany : Biologische Bundesanstalt fur Land- undForstwirtschaft; 1992.Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on the BiosafetyResults ofField Tests of Genetically Modified Plants and Microorganisms : May11-14,1992, Goslar, Germany : edited by R. Casper and J. Landsmann. p.192-196;1992.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Plants; Transgenics; Environmental impact;Biotechnology;Product development; Legislation
87                                     NAL Call. No.: R856.A4B5Competition looms in tomato field.San Francisco, Calif. : Deborah J. Mysiewicz; 1992 Jul18.BioEngineering news v. 13 (28): p. 1; 1992 Jul18.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering;Ripening;Transgenics; Usda; Food safety; Regulations
88                                      NAL Call. No.: TX341.C6Consumer advocates fear FDA bowing to industry.Washington, D.C. : Community Nutrition Institute; 1992 Sep11.Nutrition week v. 22 (35): p. 4-5; 1992 Sep11.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Food industry; Government organizations;Regulations;Consumer protection; Labeling; Biotechnology
89                                   NAL Call. No.: QH442.G4522Consumer coalition wants new controls for genetically engineeredfoods.Washington, D.C. : King Pub. Group; 1993 Jan14.Biotech daily v. 2 (101): p. 3; 1993 Jan14.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Regulations; Food safety; Genetic engineering;Usda
90                                        NAL Call. No.: T1.T44Controlling risk in biotech.Krimsky, S.; Bergman, K.; Connell, N.Cambridge, Mass. : Alumni Association, Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology:.; 1989 Jul.Technology review v. 92 (5): p. 62-68, 70; 1989 Jul.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Field tests; Safety; Regulations; Usda; Geneticengineering
91                                 NAL Call. No.: S494.5.B563R5Coordination of regulatory and research guidelines affectingbiotechnology: anoverview.Young, A.L.Oakland : Division of Agricultural and Natural Resources,University ofCalifornia; 1990.Risk assessment in agricultural biotechnology : proceedings of theInternational Conference, August 1988 / [technical authors, JamesJ. Marois,and George Bruening]. p. 210-215; 1990.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Agricultural research; Biotechnology;Products; Release;Environmental impact; Risk; Assessment
92                                   NAL Call. No.: QH442.G4522Council urges pre-market tests, labels for gene-altered foods.Washington, D.C. : King Pub. Group; 1992 Dec03.Biotech daily v. 1 (77): p. 4; 1992 Dec03.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Food biotechnology; Regulations; Labeling; Risk
93                             NAL Call. No.: TP248.14.N35 1990Current USDA policy for licensing and field testing liverecombinant-derivedveterinary biological products.Shibley, G.P.; Espeseth, D.A.Nairobi : Initiatives Publishers; 1991.Biotechnology in Kenya : proceedings of the National Conference onPlant andAnimal Biotechnology, held February 25-March 3, 1990 at KenyattaInternationalConference Centre, Nairobi, Kenya / A.M. Mailu, J.O. Mugah. p.195-212; 1991.Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Veterinary products; Recombinant  DNA;Biotechnology;Usda; Regulations; Licenses
94                                       NAL Call. No.: 472 N42Cutting out a hazard of genetic engineering.Coghlan, A.London, Eng. : New Science Publications; 1992 Feb01.New scientist v. 133 (1806): p. 28; 1992 Feb01.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Nicotiana tabacum; Marker genes; Field tests;Geneticengineering; Usda
95                                     NAL Call. No.: 280.8 SY8Cutting the heart out of european biotech?.Levine, J.B.; Carey, J.New York, N.Y. : McGraw-Hill :.; 1990 Jun18.Business week (3165): p. 177-178; 1990 Jun18.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Europe; U.S.A.; Wisconsin; Minnesota; North Carolina;Ecregulations; Genetic engineering; Food safety; Field tests
96                                    NAL Call. No.: 286.8 N488Delays are reported in federal decision on a milk hormone.New York, N.Y. : H.J. Raymond & Co. :.; 1990 Nov23.The New York times. p. C8; 1990 Nov23.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Somatotropin; Genetic engineering; Milkproduction; Foodsafety; Regulations
97                                  NAL Call. No.: TP248.13.B54Denmark eases ban on field release of gene-altered plants.Witte, L.New York : McGraw-Hill :.; 1990 Aug06.Biotechnology newswatch v. 10 (15): p. 5-6; 1990 Aug06.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Denmark; Transgenics; Legislation; Field tests
98                               NAL Call. No.: S494.5.B563B554The development of genetically modified varieties of agriculturalcrops by theseeds industry.Connett, R.J.A.; Barfoot, P.D.Wallingford, Oxford, UK : CAB International; 1992.Biotechnology in agriculture v. 7: p. 45-73; 1992.  In the seriesanalytic:Plant genetic manipulation for crop protection / edited by A.M.R.Gatehouse,V.A. Hilder and Boulter, D.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Europe; U.S.A.; Crops; Varieties; Plant breeding;Geneticimprovement; Agronomic characteristics; Seed industry; Artificialselection;Tissue culture; Genetic resources; Genetic engineering; Genetictransformation; Protoplast fusion; Intergeneric hybridization; Cropquality;Crop yield; Innovations; Patents; Regulations; Fieldexperimentation; Release;Food biotechnology; Marketing; Environmental impact; Europeancommunities
99                             NAL Call. No.: SB123.57.I55 1992Development of legal requirements in France for commercializationofgenetically modified plants.Dattee, Y.; Roger, P.Braunschweig, Germany : Biologische Bundesanstalt fur Land- undForstwirtschaft; 1992.Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on the BiosafetyResults ofField Tests of Genetically Modified Plants and Microorganisms : May11-14,1992, Goslar, Germany : edited by R. Casper and J. Landsmann. p.185-191;1992.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: France; Plants; Genetic engineering; Regulations; Law
100                                 NAL Call. No.: TP248.13.B54DNAP's gene-spliced foods on back burner until controversy cools.Bovsum, M.New York : McGraw-Hill :.; 1993 Apr05.Biotechnology newswatch. p. 14; 1993 Apr05.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering;Publicopinion; Product development; Usda; Licenses; Conferences
101                                    NAL Call. No.: TD172.E48Does genetic engineering need genetic engineers?: Should theregulation ofgenetic engineering include a new professional discipline?.Auchincloss, S.Newton Centre, Mass. : Boston College Law School; 1993.Boston College environmental affairs law review v. 20 (1): p.37-63; 1993.Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Genetic engineering; Regulations; Materials;Biotechnology;Release; Environment
102                                      NAL Call. No.: Q320.A4Doing business in China.Ying-Shan, H.Cedar Falls, Iowa : Freiberg Pub; 1991 Mar.AgBiotechnology news v. 8 (2): p. 3; 1991 Mar.
Language:  English
Descriptors: China; Biotechnology; Crop production; Biocides;Resistance;Licenses; International trade
103                                   NAL Call. No.: 286.8 N488Eating well: uncompromising interpretations on both sides of theF.D.A.'sgenetic-engineering policy.Burros, M.New York, N.Y. : H.J. Raymond & Co. :.; 1992 Jun17.The New York times. p. B5; 1992 Jun17.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Food biotechnology; Regulations; Genetic engineering;Nutritionlabeling
104                                     NAL Call. No.: Q320.B56Ecological considerations in EPA's review for field tests ofgeneticallyengineered organisms.Akcakaya, H.R.; Ginzburg, L.R.Stoneham, Mass. : Butterworth Publishers; 1991.Biotechnology (15): p. 267-287; 1991.  In the Series Analytic:AssessingEcological Risks of Biotechnology / edited by Lev R. Ginzburg. Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Microorganisms; Genetic engineering; Ecology;Risk;Environmental protection; Government organizations; Regulation
105                                     NAL Call. No.: Q320.B56Ecological risk assessment and European community biotechnologyregulation.Holla, R.A.H.G.Stoneham, Mass. : Butterworth Publishers; 1991.Biotechnology (15): p. 313-324; 1991.  In the Series Analytic:AssessingEcological Risks of Biotechnology / edited by Lev R. Ginzburg. Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Europe; Biotechnology; Genetic engineering; Ecology;Risk;Environmental protection; Assessment; Regulations; Europeancommunities
106                                   NAL Call. No.: 280.8 J822The economic risks of deliberately released genetically engineeredmicroorganisms.Fleisher, B.Ames, Iowa : American Agricultural Economics Association; 1989 May.American journal of agricultural economics v. 71 (2): p. 480-484;1989 May.Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biotechnology; Genetic transformation; Geneticengineering;Microorganisms; Risks; Uncertainties; Economic analysis;Regulations;Innovation adoption; Legal liability; Welfare economics
107                                  NAL Call. No.: QH442.G4522EC's novel foods regulation poses barrier to U.S. biotech.McLaughlin, P.Washington, D.C. : King Pub. Group; 1992 Nov24.Biotech daily v. 1 (72): p. 3-4; 1992 Nov24.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Europe; U.S.A.; European communities; Regulations;Foodbiotechnology; Novel foods
108                                       NAL Call. No.: A00109EDF calls on FDA to regulate genetically engineered foods.Hopkins, D.; Goldburg, R.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1991 Dec.The gene exchange v. 2 (4): p. 1, 8; 1991 Dec.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Food biotechnology; Regulations
109                                 NAL Call. No.: TP248.13.B54Eight states pass biotechnology laws in first half of 1990.New York : McGraw-Hill :.; 1990 Jul02.Biotechnology newswatch v. 10 (13): p. 5; 1990 Jul02.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Oklahoma; Field tests; Genetic engineering;Microorganisms
110                                 NAL Call. No.: TP248.13.B54Environmentalists seethe, industry worries over new USDA testrules.Lehrman, S.New York : McGraw-Hill :.; 1992 Nov16.Biotechnology newswatch v. 12 (22): p. 10; 1992 Nov16.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Field tests; Regulations; Usda; Geneticengineering;Crops
111                                   NAL Call. No.: QH442.G452EPA approves 2 mycogen biopesticides; hearing set July 22.Washington, D.C. : Gershon W. Fishbein; 1991 Jul10.Genetic engineering letter v. 11 (13): p. 3; 1991 Jul10.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biocides; Genetic engineering; Bacillus thuringiensis;Fieldtests; Regulations
112                                  NAL Call. No.: QH442.G4522EPA eases reporting requirements on small-scale field testing.Conroy, D.Washington, D.C. : King Pub. Group; 1993 Jan19.Biotech daily v. 2 (103): p. 1; 1993 Jan19.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Microbial pesticides; Field tests;Regulations; Usda;Biotechnology
113                                    NAL Call. No.: QR351.B56EPA regulations governing release of genetically engineeredmicroorganisms.Milewski, E.A.New York : McGraw-Hill; 1989.Biotechnology of plant-microbe interactions / [edited by] James P.Nakas andCharles Hagedorn. p. 319-340; 1989.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biotechnology; Insecticides; Microbial genetics;Antifungalagents; Rodenticides; Toxic substances
114                                    NAL Call. No.: SB610.W39EPA's response to resistance management and herbicide--tolerantcrop issues.Horne, D.M.Champaign, Ill. : The Society; 1992 Jul.Weed technology : a journal of the Weed Science Society of Americav. 6 (3):p. 657-661; 1992 Jul.  Paper presented at the Symposium,"Development ofHerbicide-Resistant Crop Cultivars", Weed Science Society ofAmerica, February6, 1991, Louisville, Kentucky.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Transgenic plants; Herbicide resistance;Public agencies;Biotechnology; Regulation; Legislation
115                                    NAL Call. No.: HD1407.C6Equitable patent legislation for developing countries.Lesser, W.Ithaca, N.Y. : The Station; 1991 Jan.Cornell agricultural economics staff paper - Department ofAgriculturalEconomics, Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station(91-2): 23 p.;1991 Jan.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Developing countries; Biotechnology; Plant breeding;Drugs;Patents; Legislation
116                                      NAL Call. No.: 472 N42Europe battles over biotechnology.MacKenzie, D.London, Eng. : New Science Publications; 1991 May04.New scientist v. 130 (1767): p. 13; 1991 May04.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Europe; Regulations; Biotechnology; Europeancommunities;Environmental impact
117                                      NAL Call. No.: 472 N42Europe wrangles over Herman's sex life.Cremers, H.C.; MacKenzie, D.London, Eng. : New Science Publications; 1992 Nov28.New scientist v. 136 (1849): p. 8; 1992 Nov28.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Netherlands; Transgenics; Cattle; Mastitis; Diseaseresistance
118                        NAL Call. No.: KJE6242.A31992A2 1992European Community environment legislation.Commission of the European Communities, Directorate-General forEnvironment,Consumer Protection and Nuclear SafetyLuxembourg : Office for Official Publications of the EuropeanCommunities,;1992.7 v. : ill. ; 23 cm.  Includes bibliographical references andindexes.
Language:  English; English
Descriptors: Environmental law
119                               NAL Call. No.: QH442.E97 1989European Workshop on Law and Genetic Engineering proceedings.Leskien, Dan; Spangenberg, JoachimEuropean Workshop on Law and Genetic Engineering 1989 : Hamburg,Germany.Bonn : BBU,; 1990.95 p. ; 29 cm.  Summaries in English and German.  Includesbibliographicalreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Genetic engineering
120                                    NAL Call. No.: 61.8 SE52Europeans probe biotech issues.Des Plains, Ill. : Scranton Gillette Communications, Inc. :.; 1990Nov.Seed world v. 128 (12): p. 27; 1990 Nov.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Europe; German federal republic; Biotechnology;Productdevelopment; Legislation; Genetic engineering; Release; Risk;Public opinion
121                                  NAL Call. No.: 330.9 N21NEEvaluating the safety of biotechnology field tests.Washington, D.C. : National Academy of Sciences, National ResearchCouncil;1989 Oct.News report v. 39 (9): p. 16-17; 1989 Oct.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Field tests; Usda; Genetic engineering
122                                   NAL Call. No.: SB123.5.E9An Evaluation of the issues, challenges, and opportunities relatedto plantpatenting a workshop report : 31 January-3 February 1989, AnaheimHilton andTowers Hotel, Anaheim, California.Tallard, Annette J.Crop Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, SoilScienceSociety of AmericaMadison, Wis. : Crop Science Society of America, American Societyof Agronomy,Soil Science Society of America,; 1989.31 p. ; 28 cm.
Language:  English; English
Descriptors: Plants, Cultivated; United States; Varieties; Patents;Congresses; Intellectual property; United States; Congresses; Plantbiotechnology; United States; Congresses; Germplasm resources,Plant; UnitedStates; Congresses
123                                   NAL Call. No.: QH442.G452Experience validates NC's law on agriculture biotechnology.Washington, D.C. : Gershon W. Fishbein; 1991 Jul24.Genetic engineering letter v. 11 (14): p. 3; 1991 Jul24.
Language:  English
Descriptors: North Carolina; Regulations; Field tests; Bacillusthuringiensis;Nicotiana tabacum
124                                   NAL Call. No.: 280.8 J822Externalities and research priorities in agricultural pest control.Carlson, G.A.Ames, Iowa : American Agricultural Economics Association; 1989 May.American journal of agricultural economics v. 71 (2): p. 453-457;1989 May.Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Pest control; Uncertainties; Agriculturalresearch;Pesticide application; Biotechnology; Integrated pest management;Safety;Regulations
125                                   NAL Call. No.: 286.8 N488FDA approves gene-altered item.Tolchin, M.New York, N.Y. : H.J. Raymond & Co. :.; 1990 Mar25.The New York times. p. 21; 1990 Mar25.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Chymosin; Genetic engineering; Food products
126                                  NAL Call. No.: TP248.2.A77FDA concludes that BGH is safe in cattle.Stamford, Conn. : Business Communications Co., Inc; 1990 Oct.Applied genetics news v. 11 (3): p. 11-12; 1990 Oct.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Somatotropin; Milk production; Food safety; Geneticengineering
127                                       NAL Call. No.: A00109FDA fails to regulate genetically engineered food.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1992 Jul.The gene exchange v. 3 (2): p. 1, 3; 1992 Jul.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Genetic engineering; Food safety; Fresh products
128                                   NAL Call. No.: SB123.3.D5FDA issues new guidelines for regulation genetically engineeredfoods.Fort Collins, Colo. : Laboratory for Information Science inAgriculture; 1992.Diversity v. 8 (2): p. 26; 1992.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Food safety; Genetic engineering; Guidelines
129                                       NAL Call. No.: A00060FDA oks altered enzyme.Raleigh, N.C. : Raleigh News and Observer :.; 1990 Mar24.Raleigh news and observer. p. A5; 1990 Mar24.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Food; Genetic engineering; Enzymes; Cheesestarters;Chymosin
130                                       NAL Call. No.: A00109FDA requests public comment on genetically engineered food.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1991 Jun.The gene exchange v. 2 (2): p. 1-2; 1991 Jun.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Food safety; Genetic engineering; Regulations
131                                   NAL Call. No.: 286.8 N488F.D.A. ruling sought for engineered crops.Schneider, K.New York, N.Y. : H.J. Raymond & Co. :.; 1990 Nov27.The New York times. p. B9; 1990 Nov27.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Food safety; Crops; Genetic engineering;Resistance;Regulations
132                                      NAL Call. No.: Q320.A4FDA to regulate engineered foods under existing "food additive"regs.Cutler-Wrage, K.Cedar Falls, Iowa : Freiberg Pub; 1992 May.AgBiotechnology news v. 9 (3): p. 1, 8; 1992 May.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Bacillus thuringiensis; Food additives;Regulations;Genetic engineering
133                                     NAL Call. No.: 381 C426FDA user fees proposal in finding wide support.Begley, R.New York, N.Y. : McGraw-Hill :.; 1992 Aug19.Chemical week v. 151 (7): p. 12; 1992 Aug19.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Milk production; Somatotropin; Genetic engineering;Mastitis;Antibiotic residues; Regulations
134                                   NAL Call. No.: QH442.G456FDA will not give special attention to genetically engineeredfoods.Metheny, B.; Haley, S.New York, N.Y. : Mary Ann Liebert; 1992 Jun01.Genetic engineering news v. 12 (9): p. 3; 1992 Jun01.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Food biotechnology; Genetic engineering; Foodlegislation; Food quality; Food safety; Public agencies
135                                    NAL Call. No.: LB2300.C5Field test of genetically altered organisms increase as publicopposition tothe experiments fades.Wheeler, D.Washington, D.C. : Chronicle of higher education :.; 1989 Jul26.The chronicle of higher education v. 35 (46): p. 4-6; 1989 Jul26.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Field tests; Genetic engineering; Usda; Biocides;Recombinantvaccines; Regulations; Public opinion
136                                       NAL Call. No.: A00035Field test regulations for rDNA crops made tighter by ClintonAdministration.Summit, N.J. : CTB International Pub. Co; 1993 Apr16.Biotechnology news v. 13 (10): p. 8; 1993 Apr16.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Field tests; Regulations; Genetic engineering;Crops
137                                   NAL Call. No.: 500 AM322AField testing transgenic plants: an analysis of the US DepartmentofAgriculture's environmental assessments.Wrubel, R.P.; Krimsky, S.; Wetzler, R.E.Washington, D.C. : The Institute; 1992 Apr.BioScience - American Institute of Biological Sciences v. 42 (4):p. 280-289;1992 Apr.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Plants; Transgenics; Field tests; Geneticengineering;Law; Risk; Usda
138                                       NAL Call. No.: Q1.S37Firms foresee high stakes in emerging biopesticide market.Twombly, R.Philadelphia, Pa. : Institute for Scientific Information :.; 1990Jul09.The scientist v. 4 (14): p. 1, 8-9, 28; 1990 Jul09.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biological control; Genetic engineering; Bacillusthuringiensis;Regulations; Field tests
139                                       NAL Call. No.: A00109First proposed U.S. test of transgenic crucifers.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1991 Jun.The gene exchange v. 2 (2): p. 2; 1991 Jun.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Wisconsin; Brassica napus; Genetic engineering;Bacillusthuringiensis; Usda; Field tests; Weeds
140                                       NAL Call. No.: A00035Flavr Savr tomatoes cleared for approval; will be commerciallyavailable in1993.Summit, N.J. : CTB International Pub. Co; 1992 Oct23.Biotechnology news v. 12 (26): p. 3; 1992 Oct23.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering;Usda;Regulations
141                                    NAL Call. No.: R856.A4B5Food biotech approvals streamlined.San Francisco, Calif. : Deborah J. Mysiewicz; 1992 Jun01.BioEngineering news v. 13 (22): p. 1-2; 1992 Jun01.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Vegetables; Genetic engineering; Food safety;Regulations
142                                  NAL Call. No.: 389.8 F7398Food biotechnology regulation: Overview and selected issues.Korwek, E.L.Chicago, Ill. : Institute of Food Technologists; 1990 Mar.Food technology v. 44 (3): p. 76-78, 80. charts; 1990 Mar. Includes 15references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Food biotechnology; Food industry; Food legislation;Federalgovernment; Food safety; Toxicity
Abstract:  Government agencies, laws and regulations that apply tofoodsdeveloped by biotechnology are discussed.
143                               NAL Call. No.: S494.5.B563N33Food safety perspectives on animal biotechnology.Cross, H.R.Ithaca, N.Y. : National Agricultural Biotechnology Council; 1992.NABC report / (4): p. 121-126; 1992.  In the series analytic:Animalbiotechnology: opportunities and challenges.  Proceedings of thefourth annualNABC meeting, May 1992, College Station, Texas.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Food safety; Biotechnology; Transgenic animals;Regulations
144                                       NAL Call. No.: A00069For the next course, 'engineered' entree?.Sugawara, S.Washington, D.C. : The Washington Post Co; 1992 Jun10.The Washington post. p. F1, F3; 1992 Jun10.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering;Foodbiotechnology; Somatotropin; Milk production; Usda; Regulations
145                                  NAL Call. No.: aHD1401.J68A framework for examining technical change.Knudson, M.K.; Larson, B.A.Washington, D.C. : U.S. Department of Agriculture, EconomicResearch Service;1989.Journal of agricultural economics research v. 41 (4): p. 21-28;1989.Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Lycopersicon esculentum; Glyphosate; Tolerances;Biotechnology;Diffusion of research; Economic impact; Innovation adoption;Regulations; Costanalysis; Consumers; Decision making; Public agencies
Abstract:  Technical change is dynamic, recursive, and endogenousto theeconomic system. However, empirical studies usually treattechnology asexogenous, defining technical change in terms of its end result:changes insome production possibilities set. An endogenous view of technicalchange isnecessary to understand, anticipate, and perhaps alter thedevelopment and useof new technologies and their associated problems. This articleoutlines aconceptual framework in which technical change is endogenous. Theframeworkaccounts for the dynamic and recursive interactions betweenresearch anddevelopment activities, the adoption and diffusion of newinnovations, and theregulatory and institutional environment. As an example, thedevelopment ofglyphosate-tolerant crops is discussed to show how the frameworkcan be usedto identify, organize, and understand the important variables andrelationships for a specific case of technical change.
146                                       NAL Call. No.: A00109From the states: Minnesota moves to adopt rules on geneticengineering.Stark, M.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1991 Dec.The gene exchange v. 2 (4): p. 7; 1991 Dec.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Minnesota; North Carolina; Legislation; Field tests
147                                  NAL Call. No.: QH442.G4522FSIS moving toward regulating slaughtered transgenic animals.Washington, D.C. : King Pub. Group; 1993 May03.Biotech daily v. 2 (176): p. 3; 1993 May03.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Meat inspection; Food safety; Transgenics;Usda
148                                       NAL Call. No.: A00047Gene tech approved for feed.Tokyo : Shimbunsha; 1989-1990.The Japan economic journal. p. 21; 1989-1990.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Japan; Feed formulation; Genetic engineering;Regulations; Foodsafety; Cattle feeding
149                                   NAL Call. No.: 286.8 N488Gene-altered rabies vaccine halted.King, W.New York, N.Y. : H.J. Raymond & Co. :.; 1990 Jun11.The New York times v. 139 (48,263): p. A16; 1990 Jun11.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Virginia; South Carolina; Recombinant vaccines;Rabies; Fieldtests
150                                    NAL Call. No.: 381 J825NGene-engineered bovine product banned.Hileman, B.Washington, D.C. : American Chemical Society; 1990 May07.Chemical and engineering news v. 68 (19): p. 6; 1990 May07.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Somatotropin; Milk production; Genetic engineering;Regulations
151                                       NAL Call. No.: A00069Genetically altered tomato at center of ripening debate.Gladwell, M.Washington, D.C. : The Washington Post Co; 1989 Aug30.The Washington post. p. A1, A16, A17; 1989 Aug30.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering; Foodsafety;Regulations
152                                    NAL Call. No.: R856.A4B5Genetically engineered canola trials planned.San Francisco, Calif. : Deborah J. Mysiewicz; 1991 Sep.BioEngineering news v. 12 (38): p. 5; 1991 Sep.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Brassica napus; Genetic engineering; Field tests; Usda
153                                       NAL Call. No.: A00060Genetically engineered pesticide to be tried in N.C.Kanigel, R.Raleigh, N.C. : Raleigh News and Observer :.; 1990 Apr19.Raleigh news and observer. p. A1, A19; 1990 Apr19.
Language:  English
Descriptors: North Carolina; Field tests; Pesticides; Geneticengineering;Lepidoptera; Nicotiana tabacum
154                                       NAL Call. No.: A00109Genetically engineered plant virus tests North Carolina system.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1991 Jun.The gene exchange v. 2 (2): p. 1, 3, 6-7; 1991 Jun.
Language:  English
Descriptors: North Carolina; Tobacco mosaic tobamovirus; Fieldtests; Geneticengineering; Usda
155                                  NAL Call. No.: QH442.G4522Genetically engineered tomato clears USDA hurdle.Rood, M.Washington, D.C. : King Pub. Group; 1992 Oct20.Biotech daily v. 1 (48): p. 1-2; 1992 Oct20.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering;Regulations; Usda;Food safety
156                                 NAL Call. No.: TP248.13.B54Greenpeace plans protest of r-DNA plants patents.New York : McGraw-Hill :.; 1991 Jul01.Biotechnology newswatch v. 11 (13): p. 1, 3; 1991 Jul01.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Transgenics; Field tests; Pressure groups
157                                   NAL Call. No.: 464.8 AN72Guidelines and regulations for research with genetically modifiedorganisms: aview from academe.Tolin, S.A.; Vidaver, A.K.Palo Alto, Calif. : Annual Reviews, Inc; 1989.Annual review of phytopathology v. 27: p. 551-581; 1989. Literature review.Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Animals; Plants; Microorganisms; Genetictransformation;Genetic engineering; Biotechnology; Molecular genetics; Recombinant DNA;Guidelines; Regulation; History; Safety; Literature reviews
158                                       NAL Call. No.: A00110Hard times for crop biotechnology.Schacht, H.San Francisco, Calif. : The Chronical Publishing Co; 1991 Jun13.San Francisco chronicle. p. C9; 1991 Jun13.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Biotechnology; Crops; Usda; Research support;Productdevelopment; Regulations
159                                   NAL Call. No.: 284.28 W15Hardy crops yield herbicide controversy.Nazario, S.L.New York, N.Y. : Dow Jones; 1991 Aug01.The Wall Street journal. p. B1, B4; 1991 Aug01.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Herbicide resistance; Genetic engineering;Bromoxynil;Environmental impact
160                                    NAL Call. No.: 381 J825NHerbicide-resistant crops focus of biotechnology debate.Baum, R.M.Washington, D.C. : American Chemical Society; 1993 Mar08.Chemical and engineering news v. 71 (10): p. 38-41; 1993 Mar08.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Herbicide resistance; Crops; Geneticengineering; Usda;Public opinion
161                                  NAL Call. No.: 389.8 F7398Highlights of "The Nutraceutical Initiative: A Proposal forEconomic andRegulatory Reform".Pszczola, D.E. (ed.)Chicago, Ill. : Institute of Food Technologists; 1992 Apr.Food technology v. 46 (4): p. 77-79; 1992 Apr.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Food quality; Nutritive value; Regulations; Foodbiotechnology;Food legislation; Medical research
162                                       NAL Call. No.: A00110High-tech carp go outdoors.San Francisco, Calif. : The Chronical Publishing Co; 1991 Jul13.San Francisco chronicle. p. A17; 1991 Jul13.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Alabama; Carp; Field tests; Usda; Genetic engineering;Transgenics
163                                     NAL Call. No.: QH442.B5How FDA approved chymosin: a case history.Flamm, E.L.New York, N.Y. : Nature Publishing Company; 1991 Apr.Bio/technology v. 9 (4): p. 349-351; 1991 Apr.  Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Microbial rennet; Genetic engineering; Foodbiotechnology;Government organizations; Food safety; Generally recognized as safelist;Recombinant  DNA
164                                       NAL Call. No.: A00043IBA endorses FDA's new policy statement on foods derived fromgenetically-modified plants.Washington, D.C. : Industrial Biotechnology Association; 1992 Sep.IBA reports. p. 3; 1992 Sep.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Food biotechnology; Food safety; Regulations
165                                       NAL Call. No.: A00043IBA urges U.S. government action on EEC trade barriers.Godown, R.; Holt, F.Washington, D.C. : Industrial Biotechnology Association; 1989Jun07.IBA reports. p. 1; 1989 Jun07.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Europe; U.S.A.; Somatotropin; Milk production; Geneticengineering; Regulations
166                                    NAL Call. No.: TX341.B75The impact of 1992 on food law.Cockbill, C.A.London : The Foundation; 1990 Jan.BNF Nutrition bulletin - British Nutrition Foundation v. 15: p.33-39; 1990Jan.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Europe; Food policy; Consumer protection; Foodlegislation;Nutrition labeling; Food additives; Packaging materials; Foodquality; Foodsafety; Food biotechnology; Food irradiation; Trade barriers; Foodhygiene
Abstract:  The essential purpose of food law is consumer protectionwhilequality judgement is a matter for the individual, based oninformativelabeling. Although the Council has agreed major frameworksdirectives, muchdetailed work is still required including; an agreed common list offoodadditives; the problems of the constitutents of packaging materialsand theirpossible migration into food; the assessment of quality of dietaryproductsfor their declared aims; limits for environmental contaminants; theapproachto be adopted for biotechnology products and the labeling of foodscontainingingredients which have been irradiated.
167                                  NAL Call. No.: SB950.A2B74Impact of EC legislation on the development of biotechnology inagriculture.Ager, B.P.; Poole, N.J.Surrey : British Crop Protection Council; 1990.Brighton Crop Protection Conference-Pests and Diseases v. 3: p.1097-1106;1990.  Meeting held November 19-22, 1990, Brighton, England. Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: European communities; Environmental legislation;Agriculture;Biotechnology; Genetic engineering; Transgenics
168                                       NAL Call. No.: A00033'Implement Guidelines' word from ABRAC meeting.San Francisco, Calif. : Deborah J. Mysiewicz; 1991 Feb28.BioEngineering news v. 12 (8): p. 1-2; 1991 Feb28.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Louisiana; Genetic engineering; Field tests;Regulations; Usda;Inoculation methods; Crops
169                              NAL Call. No.: KF26.A351 1992gImplementation of the Alternative Agricultural Research andCommercialization(AARC) Act of 1990 hearing before the Subcommittee on AgriculturalResearchand General Legislation of the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition,andForestry, United States Senate, One Hundred Second Congress, secondsession... focusing on the current activities of the AARC Board and futureactivities, September 29, 1992.United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Agriculture,Nutrition, andForestry. Subcommittee on Agricultural Research and GeneralLegislationWashington : U.S. G.P.O. : For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. ofDocs.,Congressional Sales Office,; 1993; Y 4.AG 8/3:S.HRG.102-946.iii, 74 p. ; 24 cm. (S. hrg. ; 102-946).  Distributed to somedepositorylibraries in microfiche.  Shipping list no.: 93-0173-P.  Includesbibliographical references (p. 50).
Language:  English
Descriptors: Agricultural biotechnology; Agricultural innovations;Plantproducts; Agriculture; New products
170                                 NAL Call. No.: KF1893.B56S8The Industrial Biotechnology Association survey of state governmentlegislation on biotechnology.Industrial Biotechnology Association (U.S.)Washington, D.C. : IBA,; 1989.19 leaves ; 28 cm.
Language:  English; English
Descriptors: Biotechnology; Law and legislation; United States;States;Biotechnology; Government policy; United States; States
171                                  NAL Call. No.: 389.8 F7398An industrial perspective on biotechnology issues.Welser, J.R.Chicago, Ill. : Institute of Food Technologists; 1991 Apr.Food technology v. 45 (4): p. 102-109; 1991 Apr.  Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biotechnology; Regulations; Consumer attitudes;Productdevelopment; Medical research; Health care; Food biotechnology;Agriculturalresearch
172                                  NAL Call. No.: QH442.G4522Institute: politically correct labeling isn't necessary.Washington, D.C. : King Pub. Group; 1992 Dec02.Biotech daily v. 1 (76): p. 4; 1992 Dec02.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Food biotechnology; Regulations; Labeling
173                                   NAL Call. No.: 1.90 C2OU8Intellectual property rights for biotechnology.Ihnen, J.L.Washington, D.C. : The Department; 1990 Apr.Outlook - Proceedings, Agricultural Outlook Conference, U.S.Department ofAgriculture. p. 394-408; 1990 Apr.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Biotechnology; Property protection; Legalrights
174                           NAL Call. No.: HD1751.S6 no.89-13Intellectual property rights in plants a summary of effects onproducers andconsumers.Stallmann, Judith I.Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Dept. ofAgriculturalEconomicsBlacksburg, Va. : Dept. of Agricultural Economics, VirginiaPolytechnicInstitute and State University,; 1989.5 leaves ; 30 cm. (SP (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and StateUniversity.Dept. of Agricultural Economics) ; 89-13.).  May, 1989.  Presentedat thePublic Symposium and Forum, Plant Breeding and Biotechnology:Issues andOptions for Intellectual Property Rights, Arlington, Virginia: May4, 1989.
Language:  English
175                            NAL Call. No.: SB123.57.I55 1992International harmonization of safety priniciples forbiotechnology.Teso, B.Braunschweig, Germany : Biologische Bundesanstalt fur Land- undForstwirtschaft; 1992.Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on the BiosafetyResults ofField Tests of Genetically Modified Plants and Microorganisms : May11-14,1992, Goslar, Germany : edited by R. Casper and J. Landsmann. p.7-15; 1992.Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biotechnology; Safety; Regulations; Internationalagreements
176                                    NAL Call. No.: HT401.A36The international stakes of biotechnology and the patent war:considerationsafter the Uruguay Round.Bifani, P.Gainesville, Fla. : Agriculture and Human Values , Inc; 1993.Agriculture and human values v. 10 (2): p. 47-50; 1993.  Paperpresented atthe conference on "Biotechnologies and Agriculture: TechnicalEvolution orRevolution?" held March 28-29, 1992, Rome, Italy.  Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biotechnology; Gatt; Patents; Property; Legal rights
177                                       NAL Call. No.: A00109The latest on transgenic herbicide-tolerant crops.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1991 Jun.The gene exchange v. 2 (2): p. 10; 1991 Jun.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Herbicide resistance; Transgenics; Crops;Usda; Fieldtests
178                                    NAL Call. No.: S16.F5J68Legal protection of plant biotechnology inventions.Vanhala, P.T.; Pehu, T.; Gyllenberg, H.G.Helsinki : The Scientific Agricultural Society of Finland; 1989.Journal of agricultural science in Finland : Maataloustieteellinenaikakauskirja v. 61 (5): p. 405-414; 1989.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Europe; U.S.A.; Developing countries; Plant breeding;Varieties;Biotechnology; Breeders' rights; Breeding methods; Legislation;Patents;Protection
179                                    NAL Call. No.: TA166.T72Legal trends and agricultural biotechnology: effects on developingcountries.Barton, J.H.Cambridge : Elsevier Publications; 1989 Oct.Trends in biotechnology v. 7 (10): p. 264-268; 1989 Oct.  Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Developing countries; Agriculture; Biotechnology;Application;Legal rights; Property protection; Environmental protection;Research;Constraints
Abstract:  The application of agricultural biotechnology indeveloping nationsis influenced by certain current legal trends. In addition to thetraditionalissues of intellectual property and environmental safety, thepracticalregulatory issues that restrict biotechnology research andapplication areconsidered in this review.
180                                  NAL Call. No.: TP248.2.A77Majors shift in FDA regulation.Stamford, Conn. : Business Communications Co., Inc; 1992 Jun.Applied genetics news v. 12 (11): p. 5-6; 1992 Jun.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Fruit; Vegetables; Genetic engineering; Foodsafety;Regulations
181                                   NAL Call. No.: 284.28 W15Make mine bacon, lettuce and (bioengineered) tomato.Whelan, E.New York, N.Y. : Dow Jones; 1992 May29.The Wall Street journal. p. A10; 1992 May29.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Food safety; Regulations; Genetic engineering;Newproducts; Fruits; Vegetables
182                                  NAL Call. No.: TP248.3.B46Microbiological inventions and the patent law--internationaldevelopments.Crespi, R.S.Wimborne : Intercept; 1989.Biotechnology & genetic engineering reviews v. 7: p. 221-258; 1989. Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Crops; Cultivars; Registration; Patents; Breeders'rights;Literature reviews; Microorganisms; Genetic engineering
183                                   NAL Call. No.: 286.8 N488Monsanto told to halt promotion of its gene-engineered milk drug.New York, N.Y. : H.J. Raymond & Co. :.; 1991 Feb13.The New York times. p. A14; 1991 Feb13.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Somatotropin; Milk production; Genetic engineering
184                                     NAL Call. No.: TX341.C6A mutable feast: genetic engineering and food.Washington, D.C. : Community Nutrition Institute; 1991 Nov15.Nutrition week v. 21 (45): p. 4-5; 1991 Nov15.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Food engineering; Genetic engineering;Regulations; Foodproducts; Government organizations; Federal government
185                                   NAL Call. No.: 286.8 N488Mutant foods create risks we can't yet guess.Keppel, D.New York, N.Y. : H.J. Raymond & Co. :.; 1992 Jun16.The New York times. p. A14; 1992 Jun16.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Genetic engineering; Food safety; Regulations
186                                    NAL Call. No.: HD1407.C6Needed reforms in the harmonization of U.S. patent law.Lesser, W.Ithaca, N.Y. : The Station; 1991 Jun.Cornell agricultural economics staff paper - Department ofAgriculturalEconomics, Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station(91-14): 13 p.;1991 Jun.  Paper presented at the third annual NABC Meeting,"AgriculturalBiotechnology at the Crossroads," May 30-June 1, 1991, Sacramento,California. Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Patents; Property; Law
187                               NAL Call. No.: S494.5.B563N33Needed reforms in the harmonization of U.S. patent law.Lesser, W.Ithaca, N.Y. : National Agricultural Biotechnology Council; 1991.NABC report / (3): p. 120-131; 1991.  In the series analytic:Agriculturalbiotechnology at the crossroads: biological, social andinstitutionalconcerns.  Proceedings of the National Agricultural BiotechnologyCouncil'sthird annual meeting, May 1991.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Cabt; Patents; Law; Property; Biotechnology
188                                  NAL Call. No.: TP248.2.S54The new biology law, ethics and biotechnology..  Law, ethics andbiotechnologySmith, George Patrick,New York, N.Y. : Plenum Press,; 1989.xix, 303 p. ; 22 cm.  Includes bibliographical references andindex.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biotechnology; Moral and ethical aspects; Geneticengineering;Moral and ethical aspects; Medical ethics
189                                       NAL Call. No.: A00060New N.C. biotechnology law praised as model for nation.Babington, C.Raleigh, N.C. : News & Observer Pub. Co; 1989 Aug11.The news & observer. p. C3; 1989 Aug11.
Language:  English
Descriptors: North Carolina; Field tests; Legislation;Biotechnology
190                                   NAL Call. No.: 284.28 W15New policy eases market path for bioengineered foods.Ingersoll, B.New York, N.Y. : Dow Jones; 1992 May26.The Wall Street journal. p. B1, B6; 1992 May26.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Food safety; Regulations; Genetic engineering;Newproducts; Fruits; Vegetables
191                                       NAL Call. No.: A00043New USDA/APHIS plant will act as catalyst for speedier delivery ofbioagproducts.Washington, D.C. : Industrial Biotechnology Association; 1992 Nov.IBA reports. p. 3; 1992 Nov.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Crops; Genetic engineering; Usda; Regulations
192                                   NAL Call. No.: 286.8 N488No evidence of danger.Nettleton, J.; Harlander, S.; Dibner, M.New York, N.Y. : H.J. Raymond & Co. :.; 1992 Jun16.The New York times. p. A14; 1992 Jun16.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering;Foodsafety; Regulations
193                                       NAL Call. No.: A00067No news, good news, but what about food news?.Paris, France : Biofutur S.A.; 1992 Aug26.European biotechnology newsletter (140): p. 5-6; 1992 Aug26.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Novel foods; Genetic engineering; Regulations;Europeancommunities
194                                 NAL Call. No.: TP248.13.B54North Carolina enacts law on recombinant field-releases.New York : McGraw-Hill :.; 1989 Aug21.Biotechnology newswatch v. 9 (16): p. 6; 1989 Aug21.
Language:  English
Descriptors: North Carolina; Field tests; Legislation
195                                       NAL Call. No.: T1.T44North Carolina regulates biotech.Manuel, J.Cambridge, Mass. : Alumni Association, Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology:.; 1990 Jul.Technology review v. 93 (5): p. 20-21; 1990 Jul.
Language:  English
Descriptors: North Carolina; Regulations; Genetic engineering; Usda
196                                   NAL Call. No.: QH442.G456The Nutraceutical Initiative: a recommendation for U.S. economicandregulatory reforms.DeFelice, S.L.New York, N.Y. : Mary Ann Liebert; 1992 Apr01.Genetic engineering news v. 12 (5): p. 4, 15; 1992 Apr01.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Food legislation; Food policy; Artificial foods;Nutrients;Nutrient availability; Regulations; Food biotechnology; Medicinalproperties
197                                       NAL Call. No.: K1.G74Of plants, patents, and breeders' rights: some proposals forinternationalunification of proprietary protection of plant biotechnology.Jurgensen, T.E.Boston, Mass. : Warren, Gorham & Lamont; 1991.Journal of agricultural taxation and law v. 12 (4): p. 291-333;1991.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Developed countries; Developing countries; Breeders'rights;Patents; Plants; Biotechnology; Property protection; Internationalagreements;Genetic engineering; Germplasm; Release; Marketing
198                                       NAL Call. No.: A00109Outrage over FDA food policy.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1992 Oct.The gene exchange v. 3 (3): p. 1-2; 1992 Oct.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Food safety; Genetic engineering; Regulations;Publicopinion
199                           NAL Call. No.: KF3133.B56W43 1992Patent law in biotechnology, chemicals & pharmaceuticals.Wegner, Harold C.Basingstoke : Stockton,; 1992.xviii, 514 p. ; 25 cm.  Errata slip inserted.  Includes index.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biotechnology; Patent laws and legislation; Chemicals;Drugs
200                                      NAL Call. No.: S530.J6Patent laws and plant science.Chapman, S.R.; Bahls, S.Madison, Wis. : American Society of Agronomy; 1992.Journal of natural resources and life sciences education v. 21 (2):p.149-152; 1992.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Zea mays; Patents; Genetic engineering;Courts;Cultivars; Law
201                          NAL Call. No.: S494.5.B563B44 1991A patent on life ownership of plant and animal research.Belcher, Brian; Hawtin, G.International Developement Research Center (Canada)Ottawa, Ontario, Canada : International Development ResearchCentre,; 1991.40 p. ; 25 cm. (Searching series ; 2).  Cover title.  Includesbibliographicalreferences (p. 39-40).
Language:  English
Descriptors: Agricultural biotechnology; Genetic engineering;Deregulation
202                      NAL Call. No.: NBUS494.5 B563 B44 1991A patent on life ownership of plant and animal research.Belcher, Brian; Hawtin, G.International Development Research Center (Canada)Ottawa, Ontario, Canada : International Development ResearchCentre,; 1991.40 p. ; 25 cm. (Searching series ; 2).  Caption title.  Includesbibliographical references (p. 39-40).
Language:  English
Descriptors: Agricultural biotechnology; Genetic engineering;Deregulation
203                                     NAL Call. No.: Q320.B56Patent protection for Aspergillus-related inventions.Jong, S.C.; Birmingham, J.M.Stoneham, Mass. : Butterworth Publishers; 1992.Biotechnology (23): p. 297-311; 1992.  In the series analytic:Aspergillus:Biology and industrial applications / edited by J.W. Bennett andM.A. Klich.Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Federal government; Patents; Regulations;Aspergillus;Species; Industrial microbiology; Industrial products;Biotechnology
204                                    NAL Call. No.: 470 SCI25Patenting life.Barton, J.H.New York, N.Y. : Scientific American, Inc; 1991 Mar.Scientific American v. 264 (3): p. 40-46. ill; 1991 Mar.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Animals; Plants; Genetic engineering; Biotechnology;Patents;Legislation; Standards; Law; Legal rights
205                                   NAL Call. No.: HV4701.A35Patenting life: legislative myths and realities.Douglass, A.Denver, Colo. : American Humane Association, Animal ProtectionDivision; 1989.Advocate v. 7 (2): p. 14-17. ill; 1989.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Domestic animals; Patents; Legislation; Geneticengineering
206                              NAL Call. No.: TP248.65.F66F66The patenting of inventions in the field of food and biotechnology.Vossius, V.New York, N.Y. : Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1990.Food biotechnology v. 4 (1): p. 635-643; 1990.  Paper presented attheInternational Conference on Biotechnology and Food, February 20-24,1989,Stuttgart.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Food technology; Biotechnology; Patents
207                                    NAL Call. No.: TA166.T72Patents as non-tariff trade barriers.Cook, A.G.Cambridge : Elsevier Publications; 1989 Oct.Trends in biotechnology v. 7 (10): p. 258-263; 1989 Oct.  Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biotechnology; Industry; Market competition;Industrial products;Patents; Government; Policy; Nationalism
Abstract:  Patents influence economic development and internationalcompetition in the biotechnology industry. They have been, andcurrently are,used in many countries as a form of non-tariff trade barrier, wherelegislative, judicial or simply policy mechanics dissuadenon-residents fromentering into business. Patent policies towards biotechnology areeven morecomplicated than in other areas. Different definitions ofpatentable materialand the lack of global standards have resulted in a diversity ofnationalbiotechnology patent policies. In order for biotechnology to matureas aglobal industry, these issues of patent nationalism and patentpolicy must beaddressed by governments and the business and legal communities.
208                              NAL Call. No.: S494.5.B563A382Patents in biotechnology and chemistry--a comparison.Crespi, R.S.Milan, Italy : Teknoscienze; 1991 Jan.Agrofoodindustry hi-tech v. 2 (1): p. 36-40; 1991 Jan.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Patents; Biotechnology; Chemistry; Comparisons; Law
209                                    NAL Call. No.: R856.A4B5Permits for rDNA tests issued.San Francisco, Calif. : Deborah J. Mysiewicz; 1992 May08.BioEngineering news v. 13 (18): p. 2; 1992 May08.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Field tests; Transgenics; Usda
210                                      NAL Call. No.: Q320.A4Permits issued for field tests.Cedar Falls, Iowa : Freiberg Pub; 1992 May.AgBiotechnology news v. 9 (3): p. 5-6; 1992 May.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Field tests; Usda; Genetic engineering
211                                NAL Call. No.: HD9000.9.U5A1Perspective on food biotechnology.Miller, H.I.; Ackerman, S.J.Rockville, Md. : Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health& HumanServices; 1990 Mar.F.D.A. consumer v. 24 (2): p. 8-13; 1990 Mar.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biotechnology; New products; Food and nutritioncontroversies;Consumer protection; Food safety
Abstract:  The new biotechnology, less than 20 years old, isalready changingthe foods we eat. This article discusses what is new in thebiotechnologyfield. The benefits and controversies concerning the new techniquesare alsodiscussed.
212                                   NAL Call. No.: SB379.A9A9Plant breeding of the 21st century.Buck, B.Carpinteria, Calif. : Rincon Information Management Corporation;1992 Dec.California grower v. 16 (12): p. 32; 1992 Dec.
Language:  English
Descriptors: California; Arizona; Plant breeding; Geneticengineering;Consumer preferences; Federal government; Regulations; Consumerattitudes
213                               NAL Call. No.: HD9999.B442P53Plants, power, and profit social, economic, and ethicalconsequences of thenew biotechnologies.Busch, Lawrence; Burkhardt, JeffreyCambridge, Mass., USA : B. Blackwell,; 1990.xii, 275 p. : ill. ; 24 cm.  Includes bibliographical references(p.[239]-264) and index.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biotechnology industries; Biotechnology industries
214                                    NAL Call. No.: 470 SCI24Please pass the genes.Wickelgren, I.Washington, D.C. : Science Service :.; 1989 Aug19.Science news v. 136 (8): p. 120-122, 124; 1989 Aug19.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering; Plantbreeding;Food crops; Regulations; Field tests; Usda
215                                       NAL Call. No.: A00008[Policy directions] regulating biotech: a case study.Glass, D.J.Knoxville, Tenn. : Tenneessee Valley Authority; 1989.Forum for applied and public policy v. 4 (3): p. 92-95; 1989.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Field tests; Regulation; Genetic engineering; Usda;Field crops
216                                       NAL Call. No.: A00008[Policy directions] regulating biotech: an industrial viewpoint.Cox, G.V.Knoxville, Tenn. : Tenneessee Valley Authority; 1989.Forum for applied and public policy v. 4 (3): p. 96-98; 1989.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Regulations; Genetic engineering; Plants
217                                    NAL Call. No.: 59.8 C333The present U.S. biotechnology regulatory structure and futureneeds.Serdy, F.S.St. Paul, Minn. : American Association of Cereal Chemists; 1990Nov.Cereal foods world v. 35 (11): p. 1111-1113; 1990 Nov.  Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Agricultural sector; Biotechnology; Geneticengineering; Federalgovernment; Regulations
218                                    NAL Call. No.: SB951.P47Prospects for the development of a genetically engineeredbaculovirusinsecticide.Hawtin, R.E.; King, L.A.; Possee, R.D.Essex : Elsevier Applied Science Publishers; 1992.Pesticide science v. 34 (1): p. 9-15; 1992.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Uk; Baculovirus; Biological control agents; Microbialpesticides;Genetic engineering; Safety; Legislation
Abstract:  Baculoviruses are insect-specific pathogens which havebeenemployed for the natural control of insect pests for many years.They presentan alternative to the use of chemical agents for crop protection.Theirrestricted host range enables particular pest species to betargeted, and thisprevents any loss of beneficial insects from a treated area.However, theirlarge-scale development as insect control agents has been limitedbecause theytake longer to kill the host following infection thanrapidly-acting chemicalinsecticides. The aim of genetic modification of baculoviruses isto increasetheir speed of action, while preserving their beneficialcharacteristics, socreating a fast-acting, environmentally friendly insecticide. Theprospectsfor achieving this are discussed in this paper, with considerationofscientific progress and the influence of economic and legislativefactors.
219                                  NAL Call. No.: 389.8 F7398PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS: Genetically improved food crops.Ingenthron, G.D.Chicago, Ill. : Institute of Food Technologists; 1991 Apr.Food technology v. 45 (4): p. 110, 112, 114, 117; 1991 Apr. Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biotechnology; Genetic engineering; Foodbiotechnology; Consumereducation; Food safety; Regulations; Communication; Attitudes
Abstract:  This article will address subjects related to publiccommunicationson genetically engineered food crops. It will discuss variousfindings ofrelated public opinion polls on food and give some critics'positions onbiotechnology. Concluding the article are recommendations for abroad approachfor communicating on biotechnology-related issues.
220                                   NAL Call. No.: QP251.A1T5Public policy aspects of patenting transgenic animals.Raines, L.J.Stoneham, Mass. : Butterworth Publishers; 1990 Jan.Theriogenology v. 33 (1): p. 129-140; 1990 Jan.  Paper presented atthe"Annual Conference of the International Embryo Transfer Society,"Jan 14-16,1990, Denver, Colorado.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Animals; Genetic engineering; Patents; Biotechnology
221                                   NAL Call. No.: 280.8 J822Public regulation of agricultural biotechnology field tests:economicimplications of alternative approaches.Larson, B.A.; Knudson, M.K.Ames, Iowa : American Agricultural Economics Association; 1991 Nov.American journal of agricultural economics v. 73 (4): p. 1074-1082;1991 Nov.Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biotechnology; Agricultural research; Research policy;Fieldtests; Regulations; Behavior; Risk; Fixed costs; Property;Liabilities;Research support; Safety
Abstract:  Federal oversight of agricultural biotechnology fieldtesting isbased on public concerns that unknown consequences could arise fromsuchtests, and that firms may not adequately consider the publicconsequences oftheir research and development activities. In this paper, fourgeneral typesof ex ante and ex post approaches to manage public risks from fieldtestingare explored. The analysis shows that the approaches are leasteffective atfacilitating the research process yet controlling public risks whentheresearch firm is small in size and potential damages exceed thevalue of thefirm.
222                                   NAL Call. No.: QH442.G452Quayle committe resolves 'scope' regulatory impasse.Washington, D.C. : Gershon W. Fishbein; 1990 Jul10.Genetic engineering letter v. 10 (13): p. 1; 1990 Jul10.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Regulations; Field tests; Genetic engineering; Usda
223                                 NAL Call. No.: TP248.13.B54Quayle's council promulgates four biotechnology 'basic risk'principles.New York : McGraw-Hill :.; 1990 Sep03.Biotechnology newswatch v. 10 (17): p. 5-6; 1990 Sep03.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Regulations; Biotechnology; New products;Probabilityanalysis; Federal government
224                                       NAL Call. No.: A00043A question of taste and feelings as biotech foods hit the market.Washington, D.C. : Industrial Biotechnology Association; 1992 Sep.IBA reports. p. 3, 5; 1992 Sep.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Food biotechnology; Food safety; Regulations; Newproducts;Public opinion
225                                 NAL Call. No.: TP248.13.B54r-DNA crop experimenters doubled field-trial permit request infiscal '91.New York : McGraw-Hill :.; 1991 Oct21.Biotechnology newswatch v. 11 (20): p. 12; 1991 Oct21.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Field tests; Plant breeding; Geneticengineering; Usda
226                                   NAL Call. No.: QH442.G393Recent developments in animal patenting.Matthews, K.I.Cambridge, Mass. : Council for Responsible Genetics; 1993 Mar.Genewatch v. 8 (5/6): p. 5; 1993 Mar.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Livestock; Genetic engineering; Recombinant DNA;Laboratory animals; Mice; Transgenic animals; Patents; Legislation
227                                     NAL Call. No.: Q320.B56Regulation and oversight of biotechnological applications foragriculture andforestry.Cordle, M.K.; Payne, J.H.; Young, A.L.Stoneham, Mass. : Butterworth Publishers; 1991.Biotechnology (15): p. 289-311; 1991.  In the Series Analytic:AssessingEcological Risks of Biotechnology / edited by Lev R. Ginzburg. Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Biotechnology; Research; Applications;Agriculture;Forestry; Regulations; Usda
228                                       NAL Call. No.: T1.T44Regulation in biotech.Griffith, K.Cambridge, Mass. : Alumni Association, Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology:.; 1991 Nov.Technology review v. 94 (8): p. 6, 8; 1991 Nov.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Plant breeding; Genetic engineering; Breeders' rights;Regulations; Field tests
229                                    NAL Call. No.: TP669.I57Regulation of biotechnology.Dotson, K.Champaign, Ill. : American Oil Chemist's Society; 1992 Mar.International news on fats, oils and related materials v. 3 (3): p.242-265(18 p. not consecutive); 1992 Mar.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Uk; Biotechnology; Regulation; Stategovernment; Oils andfats industry; Food safety; Transgenics; Legal rights
230                                     NAL Call. No.: Q320.B56Regulation of biotechnology by the Environmental Protection Agency.Rogul, M.; Levin, M.Stoneham, Mass. : Butterworth Publishers; 1991.Biotechnology (15): p. 233-265; 1991.  In the series analytic:AssessingEcological Risks of Biotechnology / edited by Lev R. Ginzberg. Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Biotechnology; Genetic engineering;Microorganisms;Recombinant  DNA; Ecology; Risk; Assessment; Environmentalprotection;Government organizations; Regulations
231                               NAL Call. No.: S494.5.B563N33The regulation of genetically engineered animals: going from bad toworse.Mellon, M.Ithaca, N.Y. : National Agricultural Biotechnology Council; 1992.NABC report / (4): p. 165-169; 1992.  In the series analytic:Animalbiotechnology: opportunities and challenges.  Proceedings of thefourth annualNABC meeting, May 1992, College Station, Texas.  Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Cabt; Genetic engineering; Regulations; Animalexperiments
232                              NAL Call. No.: S494.5.B563A382Regulations and the future of agricultural biotechnology.Greef, W. deMilan, Italy : Teknoscienze; 1991 Jul.Agrofoodindustry hi-tech v. 2 (4): p. 3-7; 1991 Jul.  Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Agriculture; Biotechnology; Regulations; Safety
233                                  NAL Call. No.: QH442.G4522Regulators request for comments on Calgene's 'FLAVR SAVR' tomatodraws littleresponse, negative or positive.Crouse, G.Washington, D.C. : King Pub. Group; 1992 Aug31.Biotech daily v. 1 (15): p. 1-2; 1992 Aug31.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering;Regulations; Usda;Food safety
234                                   NAL Call. No.: SB123.3.D5Regulatory activity in Latin America and the Caribbean for plantbiotechnologyresearch.Kubicek, Q.B.Fort Collins, Colo. : Laboratory for Information Science inAgriculture; 1991.Diversity v. 7 (1/2): p. 85-86; 1991.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Developing countries; Developed countries; LatinAmerica;Caribbean; Biotechnology; Improved varieties; Regulations; Usda;Field tests
235                                    NAL Call. No.: SB599.C35Regulatory issues and approaches for plant disease biocontrol.Forsyth, S.F.Guelph, Ont. : Canadian Phytopathological Society; 1990 Sep.Canadian journal of plant pathology; Revue Canadienne dephytopathologie v. 12(3): p. 318-321; 1990 Sep.  Paper presented at the "Symposium onBiologicalControl of Plant Diseases," July 9-13, 1989, Montreal, Canada. Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Canada; Plant diseases; Plant disease control;Biologicalcontrol; Biological control agents; Microbial pesticides; Productdevelopment;Guidelines; Regulations; Registration; Requirements; Field tests;Transgenics
236                                    NAL Call. No.: QK725.I43Regulatory issues for commercialization of tomatoes with anantisensepolygalacturonase gene.Redenbaugh, K.; Berner, T.; Emlay, D.; Frankos, B.; Hiatt, W.;Houck, C.;Kramer, M.; Malyj, L.; Martineau, B.; Rachman, N.Columbia, MD : Tissue Culture Association; 1993 Jan.In vitro cellular & developmental biology : plant v. 29P (1): p.17-26; 1993Jan.  Paper presented at the Session-in-Depth "Field TestRequirements andPerformance of Transgenic Plants," 1991 World Congress on Cell andTissueCulture, June 16-20, 1991, Anaheim, California.  Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Lycopersicon esculentum; Transgenic plants;Genetictransformation; Polygalacturonase; Antisense  DNA; Fruits;Postharvest decay;Field experimentation; Safety; Regulations; Food safety; Usda;Tomatoes
237                                NAL Call. No.: S494.5.B563R5Regulatory oversight at the state level: A CDFA perspective.Jones, T.Oakland : Division of Agricultural and Natural Resources,University ofCalifornia; 1990.Risk assessment in agricultural biotechnology : proceedings of theInternational Conference, August 1988 / [technical authors, JamesJ. Marois,and George Bruening]. p. 216-220; 1990.
Language:  English
Descriptors: California; Genetic engineering; Products; Release;Environmentalimpact; State government; Legislation; Risk; Assessment
238                                       NAL Call. No.: A00035Regulatory road for bioengineered foods cleared; foes vow to fight.Summit, N.J. : CTB International Pub. Co; 1992 Jun04.Biotechnology news v. 12 (14): p. 5-6; 1992 Jun04.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Fruits; Vegetables; Oilseeds; Grain crops;Transgenics;Regulations; Food safety
239                                     NAL Call. No.: S900.R39Release of genetically engineered microorganisms to theenvironment.Fleckenstein, L.J.London : Harwood Academic Publishers; 1989.Resource management and optimization v. 6 (4): p. 347-367; 1989. Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Microorganisms; Genetic engineering;Recombination;Environment; Hazards; Biotechnology; Guidelines; Authority; Federalgovernment
240                                      NAL Call. No.: 10 J822The release of transgenic plants into agriculture.Dale, P.J.Cambridge : Cambridge University Press; 1993 Feb.The Journal of agricultural science v. 120 (pt.1): p. 1-5; 1993Feb.  Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Uk; Plants; Transgenics; Varieties; Legislation;Regulations;Risk; Reviews
241                                   NAL Call. No.: 284.28 W15Report aims to whet palate for superfood.Ingersoll, B.New York, N.Y. : Dow Jones; 1992 Aug14.The Wall Street journal. p. B1, B2; 1992 Aug14.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Food safety; Public opinion; Genetic engineering; Usda
242                            NAL Call. No.: KF27.A33277 1990gReview of current and proposed agricultural biotechnologyregulatory authorityand the Omnibus Biotechnology Act of 1990 hearing before theSubcommittee onDepartment Operations, Research, and Foreign Agriculture of theCommittee onAgriculture, House of Representatives, One Hundred First Congress,secondsession, on H.R. 5312, October 12, 1990.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Agriculture.Subcommittee onDepartment Operations, Research, and Foreign AgricultureWashington [D.C.] : U.S. G.P.O. : For sale by the Supt. of Docs.,Congressional Sales Office, U.S. G.P.O.,; 1991; Y 4.Ag 8/1:101-75.iii, 202 p. ; 24 cm.  Distributed to some depository libraries inmicrofiche.Serial no. 101-75.  Includes bibliographical references (p.138-139).
Language:  English
Descriptors: Agricultural innovations; Agricultural biotechnology;Agricultural laws and legislation
243                                      NAL Call. No.: 472 N42Revised gene law 'panders to industry' while Germans fleepaperwork.Coghlan, A.London, Eng. : New Science Publications; 1992 Aug08.New scientist v. 135 (1833): p. 6; 1992 Aug08.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Europe; Field tests; Biotechnology
244                                     NAL Call. No.: QH442.B5Revising oversight of genetically modified plants.Huttner, S.L.; Arntzen, C.; Beachy, R.; Breuning, G.; Nester, E.;Qualset, C.;Vidaver, A.New York, N.Y. : Nature Publishing Company; 1992 Sep.Bio/technology v. 10 (9): p. 967-971; 1992 Sep.  Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Crops; Genetic engineering; Recombinant  DNA;Transgenics; Regulations; Environmental impact; Fieldexperimentation; Usda
245                                    NAL Call. No.: QH301.N32Risks of releasing wild-type and genetically engineered biocontrolorganismsinto the ecosystem.Schroth, M.N.New York, N.Y. : Plenum Press; 1992.NATO ASI series : Series A : Life sciences v. 230: p. 371-379;1992.  In theseries analytic: Biological control of plant diseases: progress andchallengesfor the future / edited by E.C. Tjamos, G.C. Papavizas and R.J.Cook.Proceedings of a NATO Advanced Research Workshop, May 19-24, 1991,CapeSounion, Athens, Greece.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Biological control agents; Microbialpesticides;Transgenics; Wild strains; Environmental impact; Release; Risk;Regulations
246                                   NAL Call. No.: QH442.G393A rose is a rose; or is it?.Krimsky, S.Boston, Mass. : Council for Responsible Genetics; 1992 Jul.Genewatch v. 8 (2): p. 2; 1992 Jul.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Food biotechnology; Food safety; Public agencies; Foodlegislation
247                              NAL Call. No.: TP248.65.F66F66Safety aspects in biotechnology.Frommer, W.New York, N.Y. : Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 1990.Food biotechnology v. 4 (1): p. 613-624; 1990.  Paper presented attheInternational Conference on Biotechnology and Food, February 20-24,1989,Stuttgart.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: German federal republic; Food safety; Biotechnology;Regulations
248                                     NAL Call. No.: 470 SCI2The safety of foods developed by biotechnology.Kessler, D.A.; Taylor, M.R.; Maryanski, J.H.; Flamm, E.L.; Kahl,L.S.Washington, D.C. : American Association for the Advancement ofScience; 1992Jun26.Science v. 256 (5065): p. 1747-1749, 1832; 1992 Jun26.  Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Food crops; Genetic engineering; Biotechnology; Foodsafety;Regulations
249                                    NAL Call. No.: 381 J825NSandoz crop protection prepares for changing agrochemicalsindustry.Thayer, A.M.Washington, D.C. : American Chemical Society; 1990 Aug06.Chemical and engineering news v. 68 (32): p. 15-17; 1990 Aug06.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biocides; Public opinion; Agricultural chemicals;Public health;Research support; Genetic engineering; Legislation
250                                   NAL Call. No.: 500 AM322AScaling-up field testing of modified microorganisms.Cavalieri, L.F.Washington, D.C. : The Institute; 1991 Sep.BioScience - American Institute of Biological Sciences v. 41 (8):p. 568-574;1991 Sep.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Microbial pesticides; Microorganisms; Geneticengineering; Biological control agents; Insect pests; Problemanalysis; Weedcontrol; Environmental protection; Regulations
251                                       NAL Call. No.: A00031Scientists up the biopesticide load in transgenic plants.Palo Alto, Calif. : BioVenture View; 1991 May.BioVenture view v. 6 (5): p. 21; 1991 May.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Bacillus thuringiensis; Biocides; Transgenics;Usda;Field tests
252                                    NAL Call. No.: 381 J825NSession probes biotechnology and environment.Krieger, J.Washington, D.C. : American Chemical Society; 1989 Apr24.Chemical and engineering news. p. 28-30; 1989 Apr24.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Environmental impact; Genetic engineering;Microorganisms; Risk;Regulations; New products
253                               NAL Call. No.: QH332.M32 1990Shaping genes ethics, law and science of using new genetictechnology inmedicine and agriculture.Macer, Darryl R. J.Eubios Ethics InstituteChristchurch, N.Z. : Eubios Ethics Institute,; 1990.x, 421 p. : ill. ; 21 cm.  Includes index.  Bibliography: p.348-392.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Genetic engineering; Biotechnology; Bioethics
254                                    NAL Call. No.: 389.8 B77The Single European Market and the quality of dairy products.Glaeser, H.Bradford : MCB University Press; 1992.British food journal v. 94 (4): p. 3-6; 1992.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Uk; Milk products; Milk quality; Food legislation;Europeancommunities; Dairy industry; Quality standards; Food composition;Heattreatment; Genetic engineering
Abstract:  In 1993, the Single European Market will become reality.Forconsumers and producers, economic advantages can be expected.However, concernhas been expressed as to the possible negative effects on foodquality. Aftera brief review of EC food legislation, outlines activities in thedairy fieldwhich may contribute to a high quality standard of dairy products.These areamong other things related to drinking milk (protein content, heatload),fermented milk (characteristic micro-organisms), cheese (raw milkcheeses,cheeses with specific characteristics) and butter (butterdefinition, criteriafor first quality butter, control of butterfat purity). In a finalchapterdiscusses the future role of products obtained from geneticallymanipulatedmicro-organisms in the dairy sector.
255                                       NAL Call. No.: A00111Smart Plants Int'l--it's ripe for fed's step to go easy onbio-foods.Fikes, B.San Diego, Calif. : San Diego Business Journal; 1992 Jun01.San Diego business journal v. 13 (21): p. 4; 1992 Jun01.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Genetic engineering; Plants; Regulations
256                                     NAL Call. No.: 41.8 AM3Some legal implications in biotechnology.Hannah, H.W.Schaumburg, Ill. : The Association; 1992 Jun01.Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association v. 20 (11):p.1634-1635; 1992 Jun01.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Biotechnology; Law
257                                       NAL Call. No.: A00069Splice and dice: genetic engineers on the cutting edge.Sugarman, C.Washington, D.C. : The Washington Post Co; 1992 Jun03.The Washington post. p. E1, E4; 1992 Jun03.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Genetic engineering; Plants; Regulations; Usda
258                                  NAL Call. No.: TP248.2.A77State legislate on environmental release.Stamford, Conn. : Business Communications Co., Inc; 1989 Sep.Applied genetics news v. 10 (2): p. 6-7; 1989 Sep.
Language:  English
Descriptors: North Carolina; Field tests; Legislation; Geneticengineering
259                                       NAL Call. No.: Q1.S37State legislators seek to broaden regulation of biotech products.Eisner, R.Philadelphia, Pa. : Institute for Scientific Information :.; 1991Feb18.The scientist v. 5 (4): p. 1, 6, 19; 1991 Feb18.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Biotechnology; Regulations; Geneticengineering
260                                    NAL Call. No.: HD1407.C6Statement for the Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties and theAdministration of Justice for Hearings on H.R. 1556 the TransgenicAnimalPatent Reform Act Washingtion, DC, September, 13-14, 1989.Lesser, W.Ithaca, N.Y. : The Station; 1989 Sep.Cornell agricultural economics staff paper - Department ofAgriculturalEconomics, Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station(89-31): 7 p.;1989 Sep.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Animal breeding; Genetic engineering; Patents;Breeders'rights; Law; Government
261                                     NAL Call. No.: 381 C426States fight inertia in biotech regs.Rotman, D.New York, N.Y. : McGraw-Hill :.; 1990 Jan17.Chemical week v. 146 (2): p. 24-25; 1990 Jan17.
Language:  English
Descriptors: North Carolina; Regulations; Biotechnology; Fieldtests; Geneticengineering
262                                   NAL Call. No.: 1.90 C2OU8Status of agricultural biotechnology.Young, A.L.Washington, D.C. : The Department; 1990 Apr.Outlook - Proceedings, Agricultural Outlook Conference, U.S.Department ofAgriculture. p. 385-393; 1990 Apr.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Biotechnology; Agricultural research;Regulation; Safety;Public opinion; Risks; Property protection; Legal rights
263                                     NAL Call. No.: TP368.C7Status of regulatory approval of biotechnology-derived plants andanimals.Medley, T.L.Boca Raton, Fla. : CRC Press; 1992.Critical reviews in food science and nutrition v. 32 (2): p.151-155; 1992.Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biotechnology; Regulations; Technology transfer; Usda;Environmental protection
Abstract:  Development of new technology brings with it decisionsregardingregulation to ensure safety in technology transfer. Properlyformulated andadministrated, such regulations can act as a catalyst for thetransfer of newtechnology, not a barrier. Such regulations must be based on soundscientificprinciples, and are intended to provide protection for the public,engenderpublic acceptance, and foster communication with the varioussegments ofsociety. To develop this new technology in a safe and orderlymanner fieldtesting of the products/organisms of biotechnology, especiallygeneticengineering, has been permitted by the U.S. Department ofAgriculture (USDA).USDA permits certify the environmental safety of field testing ofplants andmicroorganisms developed through the use of material derived fromplant pests.Permits are issued based upon analyses of the biology of theorganism, theaffected environment. and the precautions taken to ensureenvironmentalprotection. Licenses for the use of veterinary biologics, includingrecombinant vaccines, are also issued.
264                                 NAL Call. No.: TP248.13.B54'There outta be law,' about r-DNA food, says NCY consumer chief.New York : McGraw-Hill :.; 1993 Mar15.Biotechnology newswatch. p. 1, 10; 1993 Mar15.
Language:  English
Descriptors: New York; Regulations; Genetic engineering; Foodproduction
265                                   NAL Call. No.: 286.8 N488Tomato gene is submitted for approval.Fisher, L.M.New York, N.Y. : H.J. Raymond & Co. :.; 1993 Jan06.The New York times. p. C4; 1993 Jan06.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering;Markergenes; Food additives
266                                    NAL Call. No.: QK725.I43ToMV-resistant transgenic tomato as a material for the first fieldexperimentof genetically engineered plants in Japan.Motoyoshi, F.Columbia, MD : Tissue Culture Association; 1993 Jan.In vitro cellular & developmental biology : plant v. 29P (1): p.13-16; 1993Jan.  Paper presented at the Session-in-Depth "Field TestRequirements andPerformance of Transgenic Plants," 1991 World Congress on Cell andTissueCulture, June 16-20, 1991, Anaheim, California.  Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Japan; Lycopersicon esculentum; Lycopersiconperuvianum;Transgenic plants; Genetic transformation; Genetic resistance;Tomato mosaictobamovirus; Interspecific hybridization; Field experimentation;Regulations;Safety
267                                       NAL Call. No.: A00109Transgenic crops rushed to commercialization.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1992 Oct.The gene exchange v. 3 (3): p. 1; 1992 Oct.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Field tests; Crops; Genetic engineering; Diseaseresistance;Usda; Regulations
268                            NAL Call. No.: SB123.57.I55 1992The UK approach to the evaluation and control of novel foodsproduced bygenetic modification.Jonas, D.A.Braunschweig, Germany : Biologische Bundesanstalt fur Land- undForstwirtschaft; 1992.Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on the BiosafetyResults ofField Tests of Genetically Modified Plants and Microorganisms : May11-14,1992, Goslar, Germany : edited by R. Casper and J. Landsmann. p.221-228;1992.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Uk; Food products; Biotechnology; Genetic engineering;Regulation; Food safety
269                                     NAL Call. No.: Q320.B56United States government regulations affecting aspergilli and theirproducts.Schechtman, M.G.Stoneham, Mass. : Butterworth Publishers; 1992.Biotechnology (23): p. 271-296; 1992.  In the series analytic:Aspergillus:Biology and industrial applications / edited by J.W. Bennett andM.A. Klich.Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Federal government; Regulations; Patents;Aspergillus;Species; Industrial microbiology; Industrial products;Biotechnology
270                                      NAL Call. No.: Q320.A4An update on the battle to regulate AgBiotechnology.Cutler, K.Cedar Falls, Iowa : Freiberg Pub; 1992 Jan.AgBiotechnology news v. 9 (1): p. 1, 4-6, 16; 1992 Jan.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Biotechnology; Regulations; Usda
271                                       NAL Call. No.: A00109Updates on products/field tests.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1992 Apr.The gene exchange v. 3 (1): p. 10; 1992 Apr.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Field tests; European communities; Usda; Somatotropin;Transgenics; Recombinant vaccines
272                            NAL Call. No.: SB123.57.I55 1992The US approach to the safety evaluation and oversight of wholefoods derviedfrom new plant varieties, including those developed with rDNAtechniques.Flamm, E.Braunschweig, Germany : Biologische Bundesanstalt fur Land- undForstwirtschaft; 1992.Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on the BiosafetyResults ofField Tests of Genetically Modified Plants and Microorganisms : May11-14,1992, Goslar, Germany : edited by R. Casper and J. Landsmann. p.218-220;1992.  Includes references.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Plants; Genetic engineering; Biotechnology;RibosomalDNA; Food safety; Regulations
273                                 NAL Call. No.: KF1893.B56U2U.S. biotechnology a legislative and regulatory roadmap..  USbiotechnologyBureau of National Affairs (Washington, D.C.)Washington, D.C. : Special Projects Unit of the Bureau of NationalAffairs,;1989.1 v. (various pagings) : ill. ; 28 cm. (The BNA special reportseries onbiotechnology ; special report).  Cover title.
Language:  English; English
Descriptors: Biotechnology industries; Law and legislation; UnitedStates;Biotechnology; Research; Law and legislation; United States
274                                       NAL Call. No.: A00035U.S. Government to change rules on release of geneticallyengineeredorganisms.Summit, N.J. : CTB International Pub. Co; 1990 Aug10.Biotechnology news v. 10 (20): p. 8; 1990 Aug10.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Regulations; Federal government; Field tests;Risk
275                                      NAL Call. No.: 472 N42US tackles the legal labyrinth of biotechnology.Coghlan, A.London, Eng. : New Science Publications; 1992 Jul11.New scientist v. 135 (1829): p. 7; 1992 Jul11.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Biotechnology; Regulations; Usda; Crops
276                                  NAL Call. No.: TP248.2.A77USDA deregulates FLAVR SAVR tomato.Stamford, Conn. : Business Communications Co., Inc; 1992 Nov.Applied genetics news v. 13 (4): p. 12; 1992 Nov.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering;Regulations; Usda
277                                   NAL Call. No.: QH442.G445USDA gives Calgene ok to market genetically engineered tomato.Fort Lee, N.J. : Technical Insights, Inc; 1992 Nov.Genetic technology news v. 12 (11): p. 2; 1992 Nov.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering;Usda;Regulations
278                                       NAL Call. No.: A00109USDA has no data on half the completed tests of transgenic crops.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1992 Oct.The gene exchange v. 3 (3): p. 2; 1992 Oct.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Field tests; Crops; Transgenics; Usda
279                                    NAL Call. No.: R856.A4B5USDA issues new guide.San Francisco, Calif. : Deborah J. Mysiewicz; 1991 Oct16.BioEngineering news v. 12 (41): p. 8; 1991 Oct16.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Regulations; Guidelines; Usda; Geneticengineering; Fieldtests
280                                  NAL Call. No.: QH442.G4522USDA moves to speed Bio-Ag commercialization.Conroy, D.Washington, D.C. : King Pub. Group; 1992 Nov02.Biotech daily v. 1 (57): p. 1; 1992 Nov02.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Field tests; Genetic engineering; Crops; Usda
281                                       NAL Call. No.: A00109USDA notice indicates government's inability to regulate Agbiotech.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1991 Jun.The gene exchange v. 2 (2): p. 9; 1991 Jun.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Regulations; Biotechnology; Usda
282                                      NAL Call. No.: Q320.A4USDA official says biotech vital to ag future.Cedar Falls, Iowa : Freiberg Pub; 1990 Jan.AgBiotechnology news v. 7 (1): p. 4; 1990 Jan.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Biotechnology; Food costs; Regulations; Scienceeducation; Usda
283                                       NAL Call. No.: A00109USDA opens door for commercializing Flavr Savr tomato.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1993 Jan.The gene exchange v. 3 (4): p. 1; 1993 Jan.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Lycopersicon esculentum; Cucurbita; Geneticengineering;Regulations; Usda
284                                    NAL Call. No.: 381 J825NUSDA opens way to marketing biotech tomato.Thayer, A.Washington, D.C. : American Chemical Society; 1992 Oct26.Chemical and engineering news v. 70 (43): p. 6; 1992 Oct26.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering;Usda;Regulations; Food safety; Testing
285                               NAL Call. No.: S494.5.B563N33USDA regulation of animal biotechnology.Frydenlund, J.E.Ithaca, N.Y. : National Agricultural Biotechnology Council; 1992.NABC report / (4): p. 149-155; 1992.  In the series analytic:Animalbiotechnology: opportunities and challenges.  Proceedings of thefourth annualNABC meeting, May 1992, College Station, Texas.  Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Cabt; Animal experiments; Biotechnology; Usda;Regulations
286                             NAL Call. No.: HD9049.C8U6 1990USDA regulations for transgenic organisms.Kubicek, Q.B.s.l. : s.n.; 1990.Corn Utilization Conference III proceedings / National Corn GrowersAssociation : sponsored by CIBA-GEIGY Seed Division. 11 p.; 1990. Includesreferences.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Genetic engineering; Biotechnology; Usda;Regulation
287                                       NAL Call. No.: A00109USDA relaxes transgenic plant rules: Clinton administration playsa role.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1993 May.The gene exchange v. 4 (1): p. 1, 5; 1993 May.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Field tests; Crops; Genetic engineering; Usda
288                                 NAL Call. No.: TP248.13.B54USDA says Calgene tomatoes ready for market, FET mobilizes 1,000'pure' chefs.Eldredge, M.New York : McGraw-Hill :.; 1992 Jul20.Biotechnology newswatch v. 12 (14): p. 1, 3; 1992 Jul20.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Lycopersicon esculentum; Genetic engineering;Foodsafety; Usda; Regulations
289                                   NAL Call. No.: QH442.G456USDA seeks easing of field test requirements.Sterling, J.New York, N.Y. : Mary Ann Liebert; 1992 Nov15.Genetic engineering news v. 12 (18): p. 1, 16; 1992 Nov15.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Crops; Transgenics; Field tests; Regulations;Safety;Usda
290                                 NAL Call. No.: TP248.13.B54USDA to lighten regulations for planting genetically altered crops.Lehrman, S.New York : McGraw-Hill :.; 1992 Nov02.Biotechnology newswatch v. 12 (21): p. 1, 3-4; 1992 Nov02.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Crops; Genetic engineering; Usda; Regulations;Fieldtests; Tomatoes; Maize; Cotton; Soybeans; Potatoes; Tobacco;Resistance;Environmental impact
291                                       NAL Call. No.: A00109USDA tries to relax oversight of transgenic crops.Washington, DC : National Biotechnology Policy Center of theNational WildlifeFederation; 1993 Jan.The gene exchange v. 3 (4): p. 6; 1993 Jan.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Regulations; Field tests; Usda; Transgenics;Crops
292                                   NAL Call. No.: 286.8 N488West Germany and its biotechnology anxiety.Schmemann, S.New York, N.Y. : H.J. Raymond & Co. :.; 1989 Mar12.The New York times. p. 6; 1989 Mar12.
Language:  English
Descriptors: German federal republic; Field tests; Regulations
293                                      NAL Call. No.: 472 N42White House changes rules for genetic engineering.Charles, D.London, Eng. : New Science Publications; 1991 May25.New scientist v. 130 (1770): p. 14; 1991 May25.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Genetic engineering; Legislation; Transgenics;Environmentalimpact
294                                 NAL Call. No.: TP248.13.B54White House clears 'major cloud' over food biotechnology.New York : McGraw-Hill :.; 1992 Jun01.Biotechnology newswatch v. 12 (11): p. 1, 3; 1992 Jun01.
Language:  English
Descriptors: U.S.A.; Vegetables; Food safety; Genetic engineering;Regulations
295                                      NAL Call. No.: 472 N42Who's afraid of biotechnology?.Tait, J.London, Eng. : New Science Publications; 1992 Jun27.New scientist v. 134 (1827): p. 49; 1992 Jun27.
Language:  English
Descriptors: England; U.S.A.; Europe; Biotechnology; Regulations
296                                   NAL Call. No.: 286.8 N488Wisconsin temporarily banning gene-engineered drug for cows.Schneider, K.New York, N.Y. : H.J. Raymond & Co. :.; 1990 Apr28.The New York times. p. 1, 8; 1990 Apr28.
Language:  English
Descriptors: Wisconsin; Somatotropin; Milk production; Geneticengineering
297                                   NAL Call. No.: SB123.5.W6Work group reports of the workshop an evaluation of the issues,challenges,and opportunities related to plant patenting : 31 January-3February 1989,Anaheim Hilton and Towers Hotel, Anaheim, California..  Evaluationof theissues, challenges, and opportunities related to plant patentingCrop Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, SoilScienceSociety of AmericaMadison, Wis., USA : Crop Science Society of America : AmericanSociety ofAgronomy : Soil Science Society of America, [1989?]; 1989.49 p. : ill. ; 28 cm.  Cover title.  Includes bibliographicalreferences (p.46).
Language:  English
Descriptors: Plants, Cultivated; United States; Patents;Congresses; Plantbiotechnology; United States; Congresses; Germplasm resources,Plant; UnitedStates; Congresses
Ackerman, S.J.  211  Ager, B.P.  167  Airozo, D.  52  Akcakaya, H.R.  104  Arntzen, C.  244  Auchincloss, S.  101  Babington, C.  189  Bahls, S.  200  Barfoot, P.D.  98  Barton, J.H.  179, 204  Baum, R.M.  160  Beachy, R.  244  Begley, R.  133  Belcher, Brian  201, 202  Bergman, K.  90  Berner, T.  236  Bifani, P.  176  Birmingham, J.M.  203  Bovsum, M.  100  Boyd, A.E.  37  Breiberg, B.  66  Breuning, G.  244  Buck, B.  212  Bureau of National Affairs (Washington, D.C.)  54, 59, 273  Burkhardt, Jeffrey  213  Burros, M.  103  Busch, Lawrence  213  Carey, J.  95  Carlson, G.A.  124  Cavalieri, L.F.  250  Chapman, S.R.  200� Charles, D.  293  Cockbill, C.A.  166  Coghlan, A.  94, 243, 275  Commission of the European Communities, Directorate-General forEnvironment,Consumer Protection and Nuclear Safety  118  Connell, N.  90  Connett, R.J.A.  98  Conroy, D.  19, 112, 280  Cook, A.G.  207  Cooper, Iver P.  46  Cordle, M.K.  227  Cox, G.V.  216  Cremers, H.C.  117  Crespi, R.S.  182, 208  Crop Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, SoilScienceSociety of America  122, 297  Cross, H.R.  143  Crouse, G.  233  Cutler, K.  270  Cutler-Wrage, K.  132  Dailey, P.  68  Dale, P.J.  240  Dattee, Y.  99  Davis, B.  18, 70  DeFelice, S.L.  196  DeLoach, J.R.  61  Dibner, M.  192  Dotson, K.  229  Douglass, A.  205  Duke, S.O.  82  Efroymson, R.A.  37  Eisner, R.  259  Eldredge, M.  288  Emlay, D.  236  Espeseth, D.A.  93  Eubios Ethics Institute  253  Fikes, B.  255  Fisher, L.M.  265  Flamm, E.  272  Flamm, E.L.  163, 248  Fleckenstein, L.J.  239  Fleisher, B.  106  Forsyth, S.F.  235  Frankos, B.  236  Freiberg, B.  10  Frommer, W.  247  Frydenlund, J.E.  285  Ginzburg, L.R.  104  Gladwell, M.  151  Glaeser, H.  254  Glass, D.J.  215  Godown, R.  165  Goldburg, R.  108  Greef, W. de  232  Griffith, K.  228  Gutfield, R.  70  Gyllenberg, H.G.  178  Haley, S.  134  Hamline University, Advanced Legal Education  14  Hannah, H.W.  47, 256  Harlander, S.  192  Hawtin, G.  201, 202  Hawtin, R.E.  218  Hecht, D.W.  63  Hiatt, W.  236  Hileman, B.  150  Holla, R.A.H.G.  105  Holt, F.  165  Hopkins, D.  108  Horne, D.M.  114  Houck, C.  236  Hunter, M.S.  37  Huttner, S.L.  244  Ihnen, J.L.  173  Industrial Biotechnology Association (U.S.)  170  Ingenthron, G.D.  219  Ingersoll, B.  190, 241  International Developement Research Center (Canada)  201  International Development Research Center (Canada)  202  Jonas, D.A.  268  Jones, T.  237  Jong, S.C.  203  Jurgensen, T.E.  197  Kahl, L.S.  248  Kanigel, R.  153  Kastner, C.  13  Katz, J.S.  80  Keppel, D.  185  Kessler, D.A.  248  King, L.A.  218  King, W.  149  Knudson, M.K.  145, 221  Korwek, E.L.  142  Korwek, Edward L.  1  Kramer, M.  236  Krieger, J.  252  Krimsky, S.  90, 137, 246  Kubicek, Q.B.  234, 286  LaGro, J.A.  37  Landers, J.C.  37  Larson, B.A.  145, 221  Lehrman, S.  79, 83, 110, 290  Leskien, Dan  119  Lesser, W.  115, 186, 187, 260  Lesser, William  22  Levin, M.  230  Levine, J.B.  95  Macer, Darryl R. J.  253  MacKenzie, D.  116, 117  MacKenzie, David R.  15  Malyj, L.  236  Manuel, J.  195  Martineau, B.  236  Maryanski, J.H.  248  Maryland Biotechnology Institute, University of Maryland, CollegePark,Instructional Television System  60  Matthews, K.I.  226  Mauskopf, J.  8  McCammon, S.L.  86  McCarthy, C.A.  37  McLaughlin, P.  107  Medley, T.L.  86, 263  Mellon, M.  231  Menn, J.J.  82  Mervis, F.T.  37  Metheny, B.  134  Milewski, E.A.  113  Miller, H.I.  211  Morgan, D.  42  Motoyoshi, F.  266  Nazario, S.L.  159  Nester, E.  244  Nettleton, J.  192  Nicholas, R.B.  48  Payne, J.H.  227  Pehu, T.  178  Pendick, D.  38  Pimentel, D.  37  Plimmer, J.R.  82  Poole, N.J.  167  Possee, R.D.  218  Prow, T.M.  53  Pszczola, D.E. (ed.)  161  Purchase, Graham H.  15  Qualset, C.  244  Rachman, N.  236  Raines, L.J.  220  Randel, S.  62  Redenbaugh, K.  236  Reid, W.  9  Roger, P.  99  Rogul, M.  230  Rood, M.  155  Rotman, D.  261  Schacht, H.  158  Schechtman, M.G.  269  Schmemann, S.  292  Schneider, K.  131, 296  Schroth, M.N.  245  Serdy, F.S.  217  Shibley, G.P.  93  Smith, George Patrick,  188  Spangenberg, Joachim  119  Stallmann, Judith I.  174  Stark, M.  146  Steck, W.  80  Sterling, J.  289  Sugarman, C.  257  Sugawara, S.  144  Svitil, K.  20  Tait, J.  295  Tallard, Annette J.  122  Taylor, M.R.  248  Terry, M.  23  Teso, B.  175  Thayer, A.  284  Thayer, A.M.  249  Tolchin, M.  125  Tolin, S.A.  157  Twombly, R.  138  United States, Office of Agricultural Biotechnology  15  United States. Congress. House. Committee on Agriculture.Subcommittee onDepartment Operations, Research, and Foreign Agriculture  16, 242 
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science, Space, andTechnology.Subcommittee on Environment  50  United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science, Space, andTechnology.Subcommittee on Technology and Competitiveness  85  United States. Congress. Senate Committee on the Judiciary  58  United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Agriculture,Nutrition, andForestry. Subcommittee on Agricultural Research and GeneralLegislation  169  Usdin, S.  41  Vandaele, W.  65  Vanhala, P.T.  178  Vanhemelrijck, J.  21  Verschueren, C.  21  Vidaver, A.  244  Vidaver, A.K.  157  Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Dept. ofAgriculturalEconomics  174  Vossius, V.  206  Warmbrodt, R.  55  Warmbrodt, R.D.  52, 56  Wegner, Harold C.  199  Welser, J.R.  171  Wetzler, R.E.  137  Wheeler, D.  135  Wheeler, D.L.  4  Whelan, E.  181  Whitmore, L.  36  Wickelgren, I.  214  Wiggert, L.  55  Witte, L.  97  Wrubel, R.  31  Wrubel, R.P.  137  Ying-Shan, H.  102  Young, A.L.  91, 227, 262  Agricultural biotechnology  14, 15, 169, 201, 202, 242 Agricultural chemicals 249 Agricultural economics  8 Agricultural innovations  16, 169, 242 Agricultural laws and legislation  14, 242 Agricultural research  91, 124, 171, 221, 262 Agricultural sector  217 Agriculture  16, 37, 167, 169, 179, 227, 232 Agronomic characteristics  98 Alabama  162 Animal breeding  260 Animal experiments  23, 231, 285 Animal genetic engineering  22 Animal health  13, 21 Animal husbandry  61 Animals  157, 204, 220 Antibiotic residues  133 Antifungal agents  113 Antisense  DNA  236 Application  179 Applications  227 Approval schemes  73 Arizona  212 Artificial foods  196 Artificial selection  98 Aspergillus  203, 269 Assessment  91, 105, 230, 237 Attitudes  219 Authority  239 Bacillus thuringiensis  11, 111, 123, 132, 138, 139, 251 Baculovirus� 218 Behavior  221 Belgium  36 Bibliographies  52, 55, 56 Biocides  11, 102, 111, 135, 249, 251 Bioethics  253 Biological control  12, 138, 235 Biological control agents  218, 235, 245, 250 Biotechnology  1, 6, 7, 9, 10, 13, 14, 16, 20, 21, 23, 32, 35, 40,41,45, 46, 47, 48, 50, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 58, 59, 60, 60, 61, 63, 69,70, 76,80,81, 84, 85, 86, 88, 91, 93, 101, 102, 105, 106, 112, 113, 114, 115,116, 120,124, 143, 145, 157, 158, 167, 170, 170, 171, 173, 175, 176, 178,179, 187,188,189, 197, 199, 203, 204, 206, 207, 208, 211, 217, 219, 220, 221,223, 227,229,230, 232, 234, 239, 243, 247, 248, 253, 256, 259, 261, 262, 263,268, 269,270,272, 273, 275, 281, 282, 285, 286, 295 Biotechnology industries  14, 50, 54, 58, 213, 273 Brassica napus  139, 152 Breeders' rights  80, 178, 182, 197, 228, 260 Breeding methods  178 Bromoxynil  159 Cabt  48, 187, 231, 285 California  11, 212, 237 Canada  32, 80, 235 Caribbean  234 Carotenes  40 Carp  162 Cattle  117 Cattle feeding  148 Cheese starters  129 Chemicals  199 Chemistry  208 China  102 Chymosin  125, 129 Communication  219 Comparisons  208 Compensation  9 Competition, International  50, 85 Conferences  100 Congresses  60, 122, 297 Constraints  179 Consumer attitudes  51, 171, 212 Consumer education  219 Consumer preferences  212 Consumer protection  88, 166, 211 Consumers  145 Cost analysis  145 Cost benefit analysis  8 Cotton  17, 290 Courts  200 Crop production  102 Crop quality  98 Crop yield  98 Crops  3, 18, 26, 27, 30, 36, 37, 78, 81, 83, 98, 110, 131, 136,158, 160,168, 177, 182, 191, 244, 267, 275, 278, 280, 287, 289, 290, 291
Cucurbita  283 Cultivars  182, 200 Dairy cows  65 Dairy industry  254 Decision making  7, 145 Denmark  97 Deregulation  201, 202 Developed countries  39, 197, 234 Developing countries  39, 115, 178, 179, 197, 234 Diffusion of research  145 Disease resistance  117, 267 Diversity  33, 41 Dna  55, 56, 61 Domestic animals  205 Drugs  23, 115, 199 Ec regulations  65, 95 Ecology  104, 105, 230 Economic analysis  8, 106 Economic aspects  16 Economic impact  145 Economics  52 England  51, 295 Environment  101, 239 Environmental assessment  31 Environmental impact  86, 91, 98, 116, 159, 237, 244, 245, 252,290,293 Environmental law  118 Environmental legislation  8, 167 Environmental protection  82, 104, 105, 179, 230, 250, 263 Enzymes  129 Europe  32, 49, 95, 98, 105, 107, 116, 120, 165, 166, 178, 243, 295
European communities  21, 49, 65, 98, 105, 107, 116, 167, 193, 254,271 Evaluation  44 Federal government  13, 44, 48, 142, 184, 203, 212, 217, 223, 239,269,274 Feed formulation  148 Field crops  215 Field experimentation  98, 236, 244, 266 Field experiments  15 Field tests  3, 4, 5, 12, 19, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 36,38, 39,43,62, 64, 83, 90, 94, 95, 97, 109, 110, 111, 112, 121, 123, 135, 136,137, 138,139, 146, 149, 152, 153, 154, 156, 162, 168, 177, 189, 194, 209,210, 214,215,221, 222, 225, 228, 234, 235, 243, 251, 258, 261, 267, 271, 274,278, 279,280,287, 289, 290, 291, 292 Fixed costs  221 Food  50, 129 Food additives  71, 76, 132, 166, 265 Food and nutrition controversies  65, 211 Food biotechnology  44, 51, 92, 98, 103, 107, 108, 134, 142, 144,161, 163,164, 166, 171, 172, 196, 219, 224, 246 Food colorants  40 Food composition  254 Food costs  282 Food crops  20, 214, 248 Food engineering  184 Food hygiene  166 Food industry  88, 142 Food irradiation  166 Food legislation  134, 142, 161, 166, 196, 246, 254 Food microbiology  44 Food policy  166, 196 Food processing  63 Food production  264 Food products  34, 125, 184, 268 Food quality  63, 134, 161, 166 Food safety  2, 12, 20, 32, 34, 44, 45, 49, 63, 65, 66, 67, 71, 74,75, 79,81, 87, 89, 95, 96, 126, 127, 128, 130, 131, 134, 141, 142, 143,147, 148,151,155, 163, 164, 166, 180, 181, 185, 190, 192, 198, 211, 219, 224,229, 233,236,238, 241, 246, 247, 248, 268, 272, 284, 288, 294 Food supply  20 Food technology  63, 206 Foodborne diseases  8 Forestry  227 France  99 Fresh products  20, 127 Frost resistance  24 Fruit  180 Fruits  67, 181, 190, 236, 238 Gatt  41, 176 Generally recognized as safe list  44, 163 Genetic engineering  2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 11, 17, 18, 19, 22, 26, 27, 29,32, 33,34, 36, 37, 38, 39, 42, 43, 44, 54, 55, 56, 61, 62, 64, 65, 66, 67,68, 71,72,73, 74, 75, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 87, 89, 90, 94, 95, 96, 98,99, 100,101, 103, 104, 105, 106, 109, 110, 111, 119, 120, 121, 125, 126,127, 128,129,130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 144,148, 150,151,152, 153, 154, 155, 157, 159, 160, 162, 163, 165, 167, 168, 180,181, 182,183,184, 185, 188, 190, 191, 192, 193, 195, 197, 198, 200, 201, 202,204, 205,210,212, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 219, 220, 222, 225, 226, 228, 230,231, 233,237,239, 241, 244, 248, 249, 250, 252, 253, 254, 255, 257, 258, 259,260, 261,264,265, 267, 268, 272, 276, 277, 279, 280, 283, 284, 286, 287, 288,290, 293,294,296 Genetic improvement  98 Genetic resistance  266 Genetic resources  9, 98 Genetic transformation  12, 98, 106, 157, 236, 266 German federal republic  120, 247, 292 Germplasm  33, 84, 197 Germplasm resources, Plant  122, 297 Gibberella zeae  51 Glyphosate  145 Government  207, 260 Government organizations  48, 88, 104, 163, 184, 230 Government policy  1, 14, 14, 170 Grain crops  238 Guidelines  128, 157, 235, 239, 279 Hazards  239 Health care  171 Health hazards  8 Heat treatment  254 Herbicide resistance  114, 159, 160, 177 History  48, 157 Illinois  43, 53 Immunostimulants  12 Improved varieties  234 Indigenous knowledge  9 Industrial microbiology  203, 269 Industrial products  203, 207, 269 Industry  207 Information services  52 Innovation adoption  106, 145 Innovations  98 Inoculation methods  168 Insect pests  250 Insecticides  113 Integrated pest management  124 Intellectual property  122 Intergeneric hybridization  98 International agreements  41, 175, 197 International comparisons  52 International trade  102 Interspecific hybridization  266 Iowa  43 Japan  32, 148, 266 Kanamycin  71 Labeling  2, 88, 92, 172 Laboratory animals  226 Latin America  234 Law  47, 99, 137, 186, 187, 200, 204, 208, 256, 260 Law and legislation  1, 14, 15, 16, 22, 170, 273 Legal liability  106 Legal rights  84, 173, 176, 179, 204, 229, 262 Legislation  7, 9, 55, 56, 57, 80, 82, 86, 97, 114, 115, 120, 146,178, 189,194, 204, 205, 218, 226, 237, 240, 249, 258, 293 Lepidoptera  153 Liabilities  221 Licenses  12, 84, 93, 100, 102 Literature reviews  157, 182 Livestock  37, 61, 226 Louisiana  168 Lycopersicon esculentum  38, 68, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 79, 87,100, 140,144, 145, 151, 155, 192, 214, 233, 236, 265, 266, 276, 277, 283,284, 288 Lycopersicon peruvianum  266 Maize  290 Marker genes  94, 265 Market competition  207 Market research  40 Marketing  11, 51, 98, 197 Mastitis  117, 133 Materials  101 Meat inspection  147 Medical ethics  188 Medical research  161, 171 Medicinal properties  196 Melanins  40 Mice  226 Microbial genetics  113 Microbial pesticides  82, 112, 218, 235, 245, 250 Microbial rennet  163 Microorganisms  46, 104, 106, 109, 157, 182, 230, 239, 250, 252
Milk  63, 65 Milk production  49, 65, 66, 96, 126, 133, 144, 150, 165, 183, 296
Milk products  254 Milk quality  254 Minnesota  14, 43, 95, 146 Molecular biology  84 Molecular genetics  157 Moral and ethical aspects  188, 188 Nationalism  207 Nebraska  43 Netherlands  117 New products  32, 67, 84, 169, 181, 190, 211, 223, 224, 252 New York  81, 264 Nicotiana tabacum  94, 123, 153 North Carolina  62, 95, 123, 146, 153, 154, 189, 194, 195, 258, 261
Novel foods  107, 193 Nutrient availability  196 Nutrients  196 Nutrition labeling  103, 166 Nutritive value  32, 161 Oils and fats industry  229 Oilseeds  238 Oklahoma  109 Packaging materials  166 Patent laws and legislation  199 Patents  10, 14, 22, 33, 57, 60, 98, 115, 122, 176, 178, 182, 186,187, 197,200, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 220, 226, 260, 269, 297 Pest control  82, 124 Pesticide application  124 Pesticides  82, 153 Pharmaceutical biotechnology  50 Plant biotechnology  14, 122, 297 Plant breeding  98, 115, 178, 212, 214, 225, 228 Plant disease control  235 Plant diseases  235 Plant products  169 Plant protection  82 Plants  13, 19, 25, 28, 29, 53, 80, 86, 99, 137, 157, 197, 204,216, 240,255, 257, 272 Plants, Cultivated  122, 297 Policy  52, 207 Polygalacturonase  75, 236 Postharvest decay  236 Potatoes  17, 290 Poultry  61 Pressure groups  156 Probability analysis  223 Problem analysis  37, 250 Product development  10, 86, 100, 120, 158, 171, 235 Products  91, 237 Property  176, 186, 187, 221 Property protection  173, 179, 197, 262 Protection  178 Protoplast fusion  98 Public agenciesp 7, 114, 134, 145, 246 Public health  249 Public opinion  2, 6, 7, 10, 45, 68, 83, 100, 120, 135, 160, 198,224, 241,249, 262 Quality standards  254 Rabies  149 Recombinant  DNA  65, 93, 157, 163, 226, 230, 244 Recombinant vaccines  135, 149, 271 Recombination  61, 239 Registration  182, 235 Regulation  72, 104, 114, 157, 215, 229, 262, 268, 286 Regulations  5, 6, 7, 10, 11, 13, 17, 18, 20, 23, 32, 34, 35, 37,38, 40,42,44, 45, 48, 49, 51, 52, 55, 62, 63, 64, 67, 68, 69, 70, 73, 74, 76,77, 78,81,87, 88, 89, 90, 92, 93, 96, 98, 99, 101, 103, 105, 106, 107, 108,110, 111,112, 116, 123, 124, 130, 131, 132, 133, 135, 136, 138, 140, 141,143, 144,145,148, 150, 151, 155, 158, 161, 164, 165, 168, 171, 172, 175, 180,181, 184,185,190, 191, 192, 193, 195, 196, 198, 203, 212, 214, 216, 217, 219,221, 222,223,224, 227, 228, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 238, 240, 244,245, 247,248,250, 252, 255, 257, 259, 261, 263, 264, 266, 267, 269, 270, 272,274, 275,276,277, 279, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285, 288, 289, 290, 291, 292, 294,295 Release  42, 62, 91, 98, 101, 120, 197, 237, 245 Requirements  235 Research  14, 15, 16, 16, 179, 227, 273 Research policy  35, 221 Research support  10, 80, 84, 158, 221, 249 Resistance  102, 131, 290 Reviews  240 Ribosomal  DNA  272 Ripening  87 Risk  39, 52, 91, 92, 104, 105, 120, 137, 221, 230, 237, 240, 245,252,274 Risks  8, 37, 106, 262 Rna  55, 56 Rodenticides  113 Safety  4, 90, 124, 157, 175, 218, 221, 232, 236, 262, 266, 289
Safety regulations  1 Science education  282 Seed industry  10, 41, 84, 98 Seeds  33 Somatotropin  12, 49, 63, 65, 66, 96, 126, 133, 144, 150, 165, 183,271,296 South Carolina  149 Soybeans  17, 290 Species  203, 269 Standards  204 State government  229, 237 States  170, 170 Surveys  80 Technology transfer  41, 52, 85, 263 Testing  32, 284 Tissue culture  98 Tobacco  17, 290 Tobacco mosaic tobamovirus  154 Tolerances  145 Tomato mosaic tobamovirus  266 Tomatoes  17, 74, 236, 290 Toxic substances  113 Toxicity  44, 142 Trade barriers  166 Transgenic animals  143, 226 Transgenic plants  114, 236, 266 Transgenics  24, 25, 28, 30, 31, 64, 86, 87, 97, 117, 137, 147,156, 162,167, 177, 209, 229, 235, 238, 240, 244, 245, 251, 271, 278, 289,291, 293 U.S.A.  3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 13, 17, 18, 19, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30,31, 32,33, 34, 35, 37, 44, 48, 49, 55, 56, 57, 64, 66, 67, 69, 70, 72, 73,77, 78,81,83, 84, 86, 88, 89, 91, 93, 94, 95, 96, 98, 100, 104, 107, 108,110, 112, 114,124, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 134, 136, 137, 140, 141, 144, 147,157, 158,159,160, 165, 173, 177, 178, 180, 181, 184, 186, 187, 190, 191, 192,198, 200,203,210, 223, 225, 226, 227, 229, 230, 231, 236, 238, 239, 244, 245,250, 251,255,256, 257, 259, 260, 262, 265, 269, 270, 272, 274, 275, 276, 277,278, 279,280,281, 283, 284, 285, 286, 287, 288, 289, 290, 291, 294, 295 Uk  218, 229, 240, 254, 268 Uncertainties  106, 124 United States  1, 14, 15, 16, 122, 170, 273, 297, 297 Usda  3, 4, 5, 10, 11, 12, 17, 18, 19, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31,35, 38,43, 48, 49, 66, 70, 72, 77, 78, 83, 87, 89, 90, 93, 94, 100, 110,112, 121,135, 137, 139, 140, 144, 147, 152, 154, 155, 158, 160, 162, 168,177, 191,195,209, 210, 214, 215, 222, 225, 227, 233, 234, 236, 241, 244, 251,257, 263,267,270, 271, 275, 276, 277, 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 283, 284, 285,286, 287,288,289, 290, 291 Utilization  52 Vaccines  61 Varieties  98, 122, 178, 240 Vegetables  67, 141, 180, 181, 190, 238, 294 Veterinarians  47 Veterinary products  93 Virginia  149 Weed control  250 Weeds  64, 139 Welfare economics  106 Wild strains  245 Wisconsin  95, 139, 296 Xanthophylls  40 Zea mays  12, 17, 43, 200                                   BULLET 15
       ELECTRONIC MAIL ACCESS FOR INTERLIBRARY LOAN (ILL) REQUESTS
                                                                  June 1993
The National Agricultural Library (NAL), Document Delivery Services Branchaccepts ILL requests from libraries via several electronic services.  Allrequests must comply with established routing and referral policies andprocedures.  The transmitting library will pay all fees incurred duringthe creation of requests and communication with NAL.  A sample format forILL requests is printed below along with a list of the required data/formatelements.
ELECTRONIC MAIL  -  (Sample form below)     SYSTEM            ADDRESS CODE     ====================================================     INTERNET. . . . . LENDING@NALUSDA.GOV     EASYLINK. . . . . 62031265     ONTYME. . . . . . NAL/LB     TWX/TELEX . . . . Number is 710-828-0506 NAL LEND.                       This number may only be used for                       ILL requests.     FTS2000 . . . . . A12NALLEND      OCLC  . . . . . . NAL's symbol AGL need only be entered                       once, but it must be the last entry in                       the Lender string.  Requests from USDA                       and Federal libraries may contain AGL                       anywhere in the Lender String.
SAMPLE ELECTRONIC MAIL REQUEST| AG University/NAL    ILLRQ 231     4/1/93     NEED BY:  6/1/93 ||                                                                || Interlibrary Loan Department                                   || Agriculture University                                         || Heartland, IA  56789                                           ||                                                                || Dr. Smith   Faculty   Ag School                                ||                                                                || Canadian Journal of Soil Science 1988 v 68(1):  17-27          || DeJong, R.  Comparison of two soil-water models under          || semi-arid growing conditions                                   || Ver:  AGRICOLA                                                 || Remarks:  Not available at IU or in region.                    || NAL CA:  56.8 C162                                             ||                                                                || Auth:  C. Johnson      CCL     Maxcost: $15.00                 ||                                                                || MORE                                                           ||                                                                |
TELEFACSIMILE - Telephone number is 301-504-5675.  NAL accepts ILL requestsvia telefacsimile.  Requests should be created on standard ILL forms andthen faxed to NAL.  NAL does not fill requests via Fax at this time.
REQUIRED DATA ELEMENTS/FORMAT-  Borrower's address must be in block format with at least two blank      lines above and below so form may be used in window envelopes.   Provide complete citation including verification, etc.  
-  Provide authorizing official's name (request will be rejected if      not included).   Include statement of copyright compliance if applicable.  
-  Indicate willingness to pay applicable charges.    Include NAL call number if available.Contact the Document Delivery
     Services Branch at (301) 504-6503 if additional information is     required.

                      NAL DOCUMENT DELIVERY SERVICES 
                                                                  June 1993
United States Department of AgricultureNational Agricultural LibraryPublic Services DivisionDocument Delivery Services BranchBeltsville, Maryland  20705-2351
The National Agricultural Library has established document delivery servicepolicies for three user categories.  They are 1) individuals; 2) libraries, other information centers, and commercial organizations; and 3) foreign libraries, information centers, and commercial organizations.  Availableservices for each user category are given below.  For informationon electronic access for interlibrary loan requests, read Bullet 15.-  DOCUMENT DELIVERY SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS  The National Agricultural Library (NAL) supplies agriculturalmaterials not found elsewhere to other libraries.
Filling requests for materials readily available from other sourcesdiverts NAL's resources and diminishes its ability to serve as anational source for agricultural and agriculturally relatedmaterials.  Therefore, NAL is viewed as a library of last resort. Submit requests first to local or state library sources prior tosending to NAL.  In the United States, possible sources are publiclibraries, land-grant university or other large research librarieswithin a state.  In other countries submit requests through majoruniversity, national, or provincial institutions.
If the needed publications are not available from these sources,submit requests to NAL with a statement indicating theirnon-availability.  Submit one request per page following theinstructions for libraries below.
NAL'S DOCUMENT DELIVERY SERVICE INFORMATION FOR THE LIBRARY
The following information is provided to assist your librarian inobtaining the required materials.
LOAN SERVICE -- Materials in NAL's collection are loaned only toother U.S. libraries.  Requests for loans are made through localpublic, academic, or special libraries.
The following materials are not available for loan: serials (exceptUSDA serials); rare, reference, and reserve books; microforms; andproceedings of conferences or symposia.  Photocopy or microform ofnon-circulating publications may be purchased as described below.
DOCUMENT DELIVERY SERVICE -- Photocopies of articles are availablefor a fee.  Make requests through local public, academic, orspecial libraries.  The library will submit a separate interlibraryloan form for each article or item requested.  If the citation isfrom an NAL database (CAIN/AGRICOLA, "Bibliography of Agriculture,"or the NAL Catalog) and the call number is given, put that callnumber in the proper block on the request form.  Willingness to paycharges must be indicated on the form.  Include compliance withcopyright law or a statement that the article is for "researchpurposes only" on the interlibrary loan form or letter.  Requestscannot be processed without these statements.
CHARGES:-  Photocopy, hard copy of microfilm and microfiche - $5.00 for      the first 10 pages or fraction copied from a single article or     publication.  $3.00 for each additional 10 pages or fraction.   Duplication of NAL-owned microfilm - $10.00 per reel.  
-  Duplication of NAL-owned microfiche - $ 5.00 for the first      fiche and $ .50 for each additional fiche per title.
BILLING -- Charges include postage and handling, and are subject tochange.  Invoices are issued quarterly by the National TechnicalInformation Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA22161.   Establishing a deposit account with NTIS is encouraged.  DO NOT SEND PREPAYMENT.
SEND REQUESTS TO:           USDA, National Agricultural Library          Document Delivery Services Branch, PhotoLab          10301 Baltimore Blvd., NAL Bldg.          Beltsville, Maryland  20705-2351
Contact the Head, Document Delivery Services Branch in writing orby calling (301) 504-5755 with questions or comments about thispolicy.
2)   DOCUMENT DELIVERY SERVICES AVAILABLE TO LIBRARIES, OTHER
     INFORMATION CENTERS AND COMMERCIAL ORGANIZATIONS.
The National Agricultural Library (NAL) accepts requests fromlibraries and other organizations in accordance with the nationaland international interlibrary loan code and guidelines.  In itsnational role, NAL supplies copies of agricultural materials notfound elsewhere.  Filling requests for materials readily availablefrom other sources diverts NAL's resources and diminishes itsability to serve as a national source for agricultural andagriculturally related materials.  Therefore, NAL is viewed as alibrary of last resort.
Submit requests to state/region/network sources prior to sending toNAL.  Within the United States, possible sources are publiclibraries, land-grant university libraries or other large researchlibraries within a state.  In other countries submit requests tomajor university, national or provincial institutions.  If theneeded publications are not available from these sources, submitrequests to NAL with a statement indicating their non-availability.
REQUESTS -- Submit on the American Library Association (ALA) or theInternational Federation of Library Associations and Institutions(IFLA) interlibrary loan form or via electronic mail ortelefacsimile (see over for more details).  Include the completename of the person authorizing the request on each form; thestandard bibliographic source which lists the title as owned byNAL; and the call number if the citation is from an NAL database(CAIN/AGRICOLA, "Bibliography of Agriculture," or the NAL catalog).
LOAN SERVICE -- Materials in the NAL collection are loaned only toU.S. libraries.  The loan period is one month.
The following materials are not available for loan:  serials(except for USDA serials); rare, reference, and reserve books;microforms; and proceedings of conferences or symposia.  Photocopyor microform of the non-circulating publications is suppliedautomatically (as described below) when the requesting organizationindicates that photocopy is acceptable on the loan form.
AUDIOVISUALS (AVs) -- Order at least 3-4 weeks before the intendedshow date.  Give show date and alternate show date when requestingspecific titles.  Request specific format needed if more than oneformat is given in the citation.
DOCUMENT DELIVERY SERVICE -- Submit a separate completedinterlibrary loan form for each article required.  Indicatewillingness to pay charges on the form and compliance withcopyright law or include a statement that the article is for"research purposes only."  Requests are not processed without thesestatements.
CHARGES:-  Photocopy, hard copy of microfilm and microfiche - $5.00 for      the first 10 pages or fraction copied from a single article or     publication.  $3.00 for each additional 10 pages or fraction.   Duplication of NAL-owned microfilm - $10.00 per reel.  
-  Duplication of NAL-owned microfiche - $5.00 for the first      fiche and $ .50 for each additional fiche per title.
BILLING - Charges include postage and handling, and are subject tochange.  Invoices are issued quarterly by the National TechnicalInformation Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA22161.  Establishing a deposit account with NTIS is encouraged.  DONOT SEND PREPAYMENT.
Send Requests to:     USDA, National Agricultural Library     Document Delivery Services Branch, ILL, PhotoLab     10301 Baltimore Blvd.,  NAL Bldg.     Beltsville, Maryland  20705-2351
Contact the Head, Document Delivery Services Branch in writing orby calling (301) 504-5755 with questions or comments about thispolicy.
3)   DOCUMENT DELIVERY SERVICES AVAILABLE TO FOREIGN LIBRARIES,
     INFORMATION CENTERS AND COMMERCIAL ORGANIZATIONS.
The National Agricultural Library (NAL) accepts requests fromlibraries and other organizations in accordance with the nationaland international interlibrary loan code and guidelines.
In its national role, NAL supplies copies of agricultural materialsnot found elsewhere.  Filling requests for materials readilyavailable from other sources diverts NAL's resources and diminishesits ability to serve as a national source for agricultural andagriculturally related materials.  Therefore, NAL is viewed as alibrary of last resort.
Submit requests to major university libraries, national orprovincial institutions or network sources prior to sendingrequests to NAL.  If the needed publications are not available fromthese sources, submit requests to NAL with a statement indicatingtheir non-availability.
AGLINET -- Requesters in countries with an AGLINET library areencouraged to make full use of that library and its networkingcapabilities.  As an AGLINET participant, NAL provides freedocument delivery service for materials published in the UnitedStates to other AGLINET participants.
REQUESTS -- Submit requests on the American Library Association(ALA) or the International Federation of Library Associations andInstitutions (IFLA) interlibrary loan form or via electronic mailor telefacsimile (see over for more details).  Include the completename of the person authorizing the request on each form; thestandard bibliographic source which lists the title as owned byNAL; and the call number if the  citation is from an NAL database(CAIN/AGRICOLA, "Bibliography of Agriculture", or the NAL catalog).
DOCUMENT DELIVERY SERVICE -- Submit a separate completedinterlibrary loan form for each article requested.  Indicatewillingness to pay charges on the form, and compliance withcopyright law or include a statement that the article is for"research purposes only".  Requests cannot be processed withoutthese statements.
CHARGES:-  Photocopy, hard copy of microfilm and microfiche - $5.00 for      the first 10 pages or fraction copied from a single article or     publication.  $3.00 for each additional 10 pages or fraction.   Duplication of NAL-owned microfilm - $10.00 per reel.  
-  Duplication of NAL-owned microfiche - $5.00 for the first      fiche and $ .50 for each additional fiche per title.
BILLING - Charges include postage and handling, and are subject tochange.  Invoices are issued quarterly by the National TechnicalInformation Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, VA22161.  Establishing deposit account with NTIS is encouraged. Annual billing is available to foreign institutions on request bycontacting NAL at the address below.  DO NOT SEND PREPAYMENT.
Send Requests to:      USDA, National Agricultural Library     Document Delivery Services Branch, ILL, PhotoLab     10301 Baltimore Blvd., NAL Bldg.     Beltsville, Maryland  20705-2351
Contact the Head, Document Delivery Services Branch at (301)504-5755 with questions or comments about this policy.