This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER

contains regulatory documents having general

applicability and legal effect, most of which

are keyed to and codified in the Code of

Federal Regulations, which is published under

50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by

the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of

new books are listed in the first FEDERAL

REGISTER issue of each week.

Rules and Regulations Federal Register

6649 

Vol. 80, No. 25 

Friday, February 6, 2015 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2009–1088; Directorate 

Identifier 2008–SW–76–AD; Amendment 39– 

18091; AD 2014–12–11 R1] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky 

Aircraft Corporation Helicopters 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are revising Airworthiness 

Directive (AD) 2014–12–11 for Sikorsky 

Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky) Model 

S–92A helicopters. AD 2014–12–11 

required revising the Rotorcraft Flight 

Manual (RFM) to include the 

appropriate operating limitations for 

performing Class D external loadcombination operations. As published, 

AD 2014–12–11 referenced an incorrect 

date for Revision No. 12 of Sikorsky 

RFM SA S92A–RFM–003, Part 1. This 

AD corrects the error while retaining the 

requirements of AD 2014–12–11. These 

actions are intended to require 

appropriate operating limitations to 

allow operators to perform Class D 

external load-combination operations, 

including human external cargo, in this 

model helicopter that now meets the 

Category A performance standard. 

DATES: This AD is effective March 13, 

2015. 

ADDRESSES: For service information 

identified in this AD, contact Sikorsky 

Aircraft Corporation, Attn: Manager, 

Commercial Technical Support, 

mailstop S581A, 6900 Main Street, 

Stratford, CT, telephone (203) 383–4866, 

email address tsslibrary@sikorsky.com, 

or at http://www.sikorsky.com. You may 

view this referenced service information 

at the FAA, of the Regional Counsel, 

Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham 

Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas 

76137. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http:// 

www.regulations.gov in Docket No. 

FAA–2009–1088; or in person at the 

Docket Management Facility between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 

docket contains this AD, any 

incorporated-by-reference information, 

the economic evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

address for the Docket Office (phone: 

800–647–5527) is Document 

Management Facility, U.S. Department 

of Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Coffey, Flight Test Engineer, Boston 

Aircraft Certification Office, 12 New 

England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 

01803; telephone (781) 238–7173; email: 

john.coffey@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 to revise AD 2014–12–11, 

Amendment 39–17872 (79 FR 45085, 

August 4, 2014), which applied to 

Sikorsky Model S–92A helicopters. The 

NPRM, published in the Federal 

Register on October 27, 2014 (79 FR 

63855), proposed to retain the 

requirements of AD 2014–12–11 and 

correct the date of the RFM revision that 

appeared in the text of the rule. 

Specifically, AD 2014–12–11 

included the following under paragraph 

(f), Credit for Actions Previously 

Completed: ‘‘Incorporation of the 

changes contained in Sikorsky RFM SA 

S92A–RFM–003, Part 1, Revision No. 

12, approved March 21, 2005, before the 

effective date of this AD is considered 

acceptable for compliance with the 

corresponding actions specified in 

paragraph (e) of this AD.’’ As published, 

the reference to March 21, 2005, was 

incorrect. The correct approval date for 

Revision 12 is December 9, 2010. 

The FAA has determined that it is 

appropriate to revise AD 2014–12–11 to 

correct the RFM approval date. This 

revision clarifies which RFM revision is 

acceptable to obtain credit for previous 

actions. 

No other part of the preamble or 

regulatory information has been 

changed. The final rule is reprinted in 

its entirety for the convenience of 

affected operators. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD, but 

we received no comments on the NPRM 

(79 FR 63855, October 27, 2014). 

FAA’s Determination 

We have reviewed the relevant 

information and determined that an 

unsafe condition exists and is likely to 

exist or develop on other helicopters of 

these same type designs and that air 

safety and the public interest require 

adopting the AD requirements as 

proposed. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

Section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We have determined that this AD will 

not have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. This AD will 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
6650 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 25 / Friday, February 6, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska to the extent that a regulatory 

distinction is required, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by 

removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 

2014–12–11, Amendment 39–17872 (79 

FR 45085, August 4, 2014), and adding 

the following new AD: 

2014–12–11 R1 Sikorsky Aircraft 

Corporation: Amendment 39–18091; 

Docket No. FAA–2009–1088; Directorate 

Identifier 2008–SW–76–AD. 

(a) Applicability 

This AD applies to Sikorsky Aircraft 

Corporation Model S–92A helicopters, 

certificated in any category. 

(b) Unsafe Condition 

This AD defines the unsafe condition as an 

inaccurate Rotorcraft Flight Manual (RFM) 

provision, which was approved without 

appropriate limitations for this model 

helicopter for carrying Class D external 

rotorcraft-load combinations, including 

Human External Cargo (HEC), when this 

model helicopter was not certificated to 

Category A one-engine inoperative (OEI) 

performance standards, including fly away 

capabilities after an engine failure, which is 

required for carrying HEC. 

(c) Affected ADs 

This AD revises AD 2014–12–11, 

Amendment 39–17872 (79 FR 45085, August 

4, 2014). 

(d) Effective Date 

This AD becomes effective March 13, 2015. 

(e) Compliance 

You are responsible for performing each 

action required by this AD within the 

specified compliance time unless it has 

already been accomplished prior to that time. 

(f) Required Actions 

Within 90 days, revise the Operating 

Limitations section of Sikorsky Rotorcraft 

Flight Manual (RFM) SA S92A–RFM–003, 

Part 1, Section I, by inserting a copy of this 

AD into the RFM or by making pen and ink 

changes, as follows: 

(1) In the ‘‘Types of Operation’’ section, 

beneath Hoist, add the following: ‘‘The hoist 

equipment certification installation approval 

does not constitute approval to conduct hoist 

operations. Operational approval for hoist 

operations must be granted by the Federal 

Aviation Administration. No cabin seats may 

be installed in front of station 317 when 

conducting Human External Cargo hoist 

operations, which requires Category A 

performance capabilities.’’ 

(2) In the ‘‘Flight Limits’’ section, add the 

following: ‘‘ ‘‘HOIST’’ When conducting 

Human External Cargo operations, which 

require category ‘A’ performance capabilities, 

the minimum hover height is 20 feet AGL 

and the maximum hover height is 80 feet 

AGL. ‘‘HOIST’’ The collective axis must 

remain uncoupled when conducting Human 

External Cargo, which requires category ‘A’ 

performance capabilities, for the period of 

time that the person is off the ground or 

water and not in the aircraft. This can be 

accomplished by either uncoupling the 

collective axis or by the pilot depressing the 

collective trim switch during the pertinent 

portion of the maneuver.’’ 

(3) In the ‘‘Weight Limits’’ section: 

(i) Remove the following: ‘‘NOTE: The 150 

pound hoist decrement does not preclude Cat 

A operations at a gross weight of 26,500 

pounds with a hoist installed. If conditions 

permit, the pilot may go to the right of the 

26,500 line on Figure 1–2 to determine a 

maximum gross weight up to 26,650 and then 

subtract 150 pounds.’’ 

(ii) Add the following: ‘‘NOTE: If 

conditions permit, the pilot may go to the 

right of the 26,500 pound line on Figure 1– 

2 to determine the maximum gross weight 

and then subtract a 150 pound hoist 

decrement. The maximum gross weight for 

category ‘A’ operations cannot exceed 26,500 

pounds (12,020 kilograms).’’ 

(iii) Add the following and insert Figure 1 

to Paragraph (f)(3)(iii) of this AD: 

‘‘ ‘‘HOIST’’ Maximum gross weight for 

Human External Cargo, which requires 

category ‘A’ performance capabilities, is 

limited to the gross weight determined in 

accordance with the following Figure 1 to 

Paragraph (f)(3)(iii) of this AD for your 

altitude and temperature with the airconditioner, anti-ice, and bleed air turned 

off.’’ 

Note 1 to paragraph (f)(3)(iii) of this AD: 

Figure 1 to Paragraph (f)(3)(iii) of this AD 

becomes Figure 1–2A when inserted in the 

‘‘Weight Limits’’ section of your RFM. 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 25 / Friday, February 6, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 6651 

(g) Credit for Actions Previously Completed 

Incorporation of the changes contained in 

Sikorsky RFM SA S92A–RFM–003, Part 1, 

Revision No. 12, approved December 9, 2010, 

before the effective date of this AD is 

considered acceptable for compliance with 

the corresponding actions specified in 

paragraph (f) of this AD. 

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Boston Aircraft 

Certification Office, FAA, may approve 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULESER06FE15.000</GPH>

Part1. Section I 

OPiRATING UMITATIONS 

S-I2A MAXIMUM GROSS WEIGHT 

FOR HOisnNG HUMAN EXTERNAL CARGO 

REQUIRING CATEGORY A 

ONE ENGINE INOPERATIVE OB 310 8ECOM) POWER 

AIR-COIIlmiONER OFF ANTI-ICE OFF BLEED AIR OFF 

• 

4 

I 

0&-30 

2 -101J4) 

t 

0 

-1 

tl 11 

GROSS WEIGHT ... 1000 LB 

IIOTE 1 :THIS CHART DEPICTS liiEGROSS WBGHT, ~SSUR:. Al TilUDE, TEMPERAlURECOMBIIIAliOIII WHEiE 

OEl HOGECAPABIIUTY EJIISTSUSIIIJG30 SECOIIID OB POW1ER WllHAGO SHP MARGitil 

IIOTE 2:15 FTOFGROUIIDCI..EARAIICEIS ASSURED IN THE EVEIITOFAN EJIGINEFAILURE AT20 mao FT AGL 

Figure 1-2A- Maximum Gross weight for HEC Requiring cat "A' 

Figure 1 to Paragraph (f)(3)(iii) 
6652 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 25 / Friday, February 6, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

AMOCs for this AD. Send your proposal to: 

John Coffey, Flight Test Engineer, Boston 

Aircraft Certification Office, 12 New England 

Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; 

telephone (781) 238–7173; email: 

john.coffey@faa.gov. 

(2) For operations conducted under a 14 

CFR part 119 operating certificate or under 

14 CFR part 91, subpart K, we suggest that 

you notify your principal inspector, or 

lacking a principal inspector, the manager of 

the local flight standards district office or 

certificate holding district office, before 

operating any aircraft complying with this 

AD through an AMOC. 

(i) Additional Information 

For service information identified in this 

AD, contact Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, 

Attn: Manager, Commercial Technical 

Support, mailstop S581A, 6900 Main Street, 

Stratford, CT, telephone (203) 383–4866, 

email address tsslibrary@sikorsky.com, or at 

http://www.sikorsky.com. You may review a 

copy of the service information at the FAA, 

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest 

Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort 

Worth, Texas 76137. 

(j) Subject 

Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) 

Code: 2510 Flight Compartment Equipment. 

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on January 16, 

2015. 

Lance T. Gant, 

Acting Directorate Manager, Rotorcraft 

Directorate Manager, Aircraft Certification 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02283 Filed 2–5–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–C 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

17 CFR Parts 229, 230, and 232 

[Release Nos. 33–9720; 34–74194; File No. 

S7–08–10] 

Asset-Backed Securities Disclosure 

and Registration 

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange 

Commission. 

ACTION: Technical amendment. 

SUMMARY: This release makes technical 

corrections to rules that were published 

in the Federal Register on September 

24, 2014. The Commission adopted 

revisions to Regulation AB and other 

rules governing the offering process, 

disclosure, and reporting for assetbacked securities. These technical 

amendments are being published to 

reinstate language that was 

inadvertently removed and make other 

technical corrections. 

DATES: Effective February 6, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kayla M. Florio, Attorney-Advisor, at 

(202) 551–3850; Division of Corporation 

Finance, Securities and Exchange 

Commission, 100 F Street NE., 

Washington, DC 20549–3628. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

release technical amendments to 

§ 229.1100, § 230.190, and § 232.201 

that were published in the Federal 

Register on September 24, 2014 (79 FR 

57184). 

List of Subjects 

17 CFR Part 230 

Advertising, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Securities. 

17 CFR Parts 229 and 232 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Securities. 

Text of Amendments 

For the reasons set out in the 

preamble, Title 17, Chapter II, of the 

Code of Federal Regulations is amended 

as follows: 

PART 229—STANDARD 

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING FORMS 

UNDER SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

AND ENERGY POLICY AND 

CONSERVATION ACT OF 1975— 

REGULATION S–K 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 229 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77e, 77f, 77g, 77h, 

77j, 77k, 77s, 77z–2, 77z–3, 77aa(25), 

77aa(26), 77ddd, 77eee, 77ggg, 77hhh, 777iii, 

77jjj, 77nnn, 77sss, 78c, 78i, 78j, 78j–3,78l, 

78m, 78n, 78n–1, 78o, 78u–5, 78w, 78ll, 

78mm, 80a–8, 80a–9, 80a–20, 80a–29, 80a– 

30, 80a–31(c), 80a–37, 80a–38(a), 80a–39, 

80b–11, and 7201 et seq.; and 18 U.S.C. 1350, 

unless otherwise noted. 

* * * * * 

§ 229.1100 [Amended] 

■ 2. Amend § 229.1100 in paragraph (f) 

by removing the reference ‘‘(§§ 229.1100 

through 229.1124)’’ and adding in its 

place ‘‘(§§ 229.1100 through 229.1125)’’. 

PART 230—GENERAL RULES AND 

REGULATIONS, SECURITIES ACT OF 

1933 

■ 3. The authority citation for part 230 

continues to read, in part, as follows: 

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77b, 77b note, 77c, 

77d, 77d note, 77f, 77g, 77h, 77j, 77r, 77s, 

77z–3, 77sss, 78c, 78d, 78j, 78l, 78m, 78n, 

78o, 78o–7 note, 78t, 78w, 78ll(d), 78mm, 

80a–8, 80a–24, 80a–28, 80a–29, 80a–30, and 

80a–37, and Pub. L. 112–106, sec. 201(a), 126 

Stat. 313 (2012), unless otherwise noted. 

* * * * * 

§ 230.190 [Amended] 

■ 4. Amend § 230.190 in paragraph 

(b)(5) by adding ‘‘and’’ after 

‘‘securities;’’. 

PART 232—REGULATION S–T— 

GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS 

FOR ELECTRONIC FILINGS 

■ 5. The authority citation for part 232 

continues to read, in part, as follows: 

Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77f, 77g, 77h, 77j, 

77s(a), 77z–3, 77sss(a), 78c(b), 78l, 78m, 78n, 

78o(d), 78w(a), 78ll, 80a–6(c), 80a–8, 80a–29, 

80a–30, 80a–37, and 7201 et seq.; and 18 

U.S.C. 1350. 

* * * * * 

§ 232.201 [Amended] 

■ 6. Amend § 232.201 in paragraph (a) 

introductory text by adding ‘‘an 

application for an order under any 

section of the Investment Company Act 

(15 U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.),’’ after ‘‘a Form 

D (239.500 of this chapter),’’. 

Dated: February 3, 2015. 

Brent J. Fields, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–02425 Filed 2–5–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration 

29 CFR Part 1952 

[Docket ID. OSHA 2014–0019] 

RIN 1218–AC92 

Arizona State Plan for Occupational 

Safety and Health 

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration, Department of Labor. 

ACTION: Rejection of State initiated plan 

change. 

SUMMARY: This document announces the 

Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration’s (OSHA’s) decision to 

reject Arizona’s standard for fall 

protection in residential construction. 

OSHA is deferring decision on the 

simultaneously proposed action of 

reconsidering the Arizona State Plan’s 

final approval status, pending Arizona’s 

expected repeal of the rejected standard, 

by operation of law, and subsequent 

enforcement of a standard that is at least 

as effective as OSHA’s standard on fall 

protection in residential construction. 

DATES: Effective February 6, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

For press inquiries: Francis Meilinger, 

OSHA Office of Communications, Room 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES