alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,****As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe period ended May 31, 2007 (the “Report”) of Immucor, Inc. (the “Registrant”),as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Icertify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

(2)       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.
| July 27, 2007 | /s/ Patrick D. Waddy            |
|---------------|---------------------------------|
|          | Patrick D. Waddy                |
|          | Interim Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
... .... 

.. 
• • 

Mare-h .31.2.ot0 Mu-h~ betweu\ U.S EfA- ~~~ 4 ~ Qean E"ne~ 1 Grro-tAf' fY\. ~mvd Hate. BAftl PU'..r 

I NAME I ORGANIZATION I PHONE I E-MAIL I 

, UJ e. 'l!r 17l/J;JJ 

Cevll::e..;:;;LSlOe..o(j.tCA-£. Dtv~ ,.,-y {j28) 3IO.(b7t3 

q2-~ -- 'i 8' , :l8 D2 I kfse>@·-frorYlier, c.a 

To V\,"Jwn \ /sJ I ttl~ l~SZ- I · t'1 ~Lrt;;:~~~ 

~\Aek '«\.a:A \j\j ~ Co.J-ctl tJvl. 

.\~c. w'\e:!.:l vJ:l-~ 6 --t. f-. ~' it if-3/ D · forJj 

5ttt- ~""- Cl f>ut..J A-!fr,.ke 6of 3bo f3'11 4 

~o;t /r;4 6~~~ () 

AA;JooA 

B.e ss ter-
#### Henry B. Laidlaw, Respondent, v. Edward F. Slayback, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Daniels, J.
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January

12, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00804-CV

EX PARTE W.K.B.

On Appeal from the 295th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2022-45089

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a final order signed September 30, 2022. On 

December 30, 2022, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted. 

We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Wilson.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                           5

<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                   May-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                        May-31-2000
<CASH>                                                         3505926
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 22890644
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   1164582
<INVENTORY>                                                   16813239
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              45021469
<PP&E>                                                        17475882
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 7720980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               102774879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         23153508
<BONDS>                                                       40380390
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                        746212
<OTHER-SE>                                                    40172586
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 102774879
<SALES>                                                       76540476
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              76540476
<CGS>                                                         36407764
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 36407764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              32773487
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             2911029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                4709655
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   1897635
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            2812020
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   2812020
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       0.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     0.33




</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
condensed consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 1999 and for the
three months then ended and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,137,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,295,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   337,000
<INVENTORY>                                 13,800,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,137,800
<PP&E>                                          19,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,979,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,201,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,777,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,979,200
<SALES>                                      3,502,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,502,000
<CGS>                                        2,561,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,946,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             183,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                435,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                    87,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            348,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   348,900
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08


</TABLE>
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Gary Wayne Sutton , Appellant

No. 06

- 23

- 00083

- CR v.

The State of Texas , Appellee Appeal from the 12th District Court of

Walker County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 30308 ). Memorandum Opinio n delivered by Chief

Justice Stevens

, Justice van Cleef and

Justice Rambin participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note tha t the appellant, Gary Wayne Sutton , has adequately indicated his inability to

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUN E 9, 2023
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
SCOTT E. STEVENS
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T OCTOB ER 2, 2009 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o

. 0 9

- 1 0 1 3 2 N o n - A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 0 8

- 6 0 1 6 5

- C R

- W P D

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s
A N T H O N Y D E H A N E Y , a

. k

. a

. E w a r t D e h a n e y , a

. k

. a

. E w a r t A n t h o n y D e h a n e y ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f F l o r i d a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( O c t o b e r 2 , 2 0 0 9 )

B e f o r e T J O F L A T , E D M O N D S O N a n d A N D E R S O N , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.
P E R C U R I A M :A l v i n E

. E n t i n , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f o r A n t h o n y D e h a n e y i n t h i s d i r e c t

c r i m i n a l a p p e a l , h a s f

i l e d a m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w o n a p p e a l , s u p p o r t e d b y a b r i e f

p r e p a r e d p u r s u a n t t o A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L

. E d

. 2 d

4 9 3 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s t h a t c o u n s e l ’ s

a s s e s s m e n t o f t h e r e l a t i v e m e r i t o f t h e a p p e a l i s c o r r e c t

. B e c a u s e i n d e p e n d e n t

e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s n o a r g u a b l e i s s u e s o f m e r i t , c o u n s e l ’ s

m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , a n d D e h a n e y ’ s c o n v i c t i o n s a n d s e n t e n c e s a r e
A F F I R M E D

.

2
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1468 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1468

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 21, 2002

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 For the relief of Ilko Vasilev Ivanov, Anelia Marinova Peneva, Marina 
               Ilkova Ivanova, and Julia Ilkova Ivanova.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    In the administration of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Ilko Vasilev Ivanov, Anelia Marinova Peneva, 
Marina Ilkova Ivanova, and Julia Ilkova Ivanova shall be held and 
considered to have been lawfully admitted to the United States for 
permanent residence as of the date of the enactment of this Act upon 
payment of the required visa fees.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Ilko Vasilev Ivanov, 
Anelia Marinova Peneva, Marina Ilkova Ivanova, and Julia Ilkova Ivanova 
as provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the 
proper officer to reduce by the appropriate number during the current 
fiscal year the total number of immigrant visas available to natives of 
the country of the aliens' birth under subsection (a) of section 203 of 
the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153).

            Passed the Senate October 17, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                  JERI THOMSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
From: pipedog55@embarqmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:09:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rebecca Belden

Cologne, MN 55322
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONOF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of First KeystoneCorporation (the “Corporation”) for the period ended December 31, 2007, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Diane C.A.Rosler, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

17.       The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

18.       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Corporation as of and for the periodcovered by the Report.

 

 
| Date:  | March 11, 2008     |   | /s/ Diane C.A. Rosler |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------|
|   |                    |
|   | Diane C.A. Rosler       |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

I, John M. Robbins, ChiefExecutive Officer of American Residential Investment Trust, Inc. (the“Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

 

(1) theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification isattached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Dated:  August 14, 2002 | /s/  John M. Robbins |   |
|-------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                    | John M.  Robbins          |
|                    | Chief  Executive Officer  |

 

----
From: stdtune@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:51:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

George Vallas

Burlington, MA 01803
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue


Registration No.  333-35460
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)
PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  050				Trade Date: 02/22/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated
  September 8, 2000)						Issue Date:  02/27/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement February 22, 2001

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION
OR REPAYMENT
  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or
     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any
Common	Interest Price to	 Discounts & Payment	Survivor's		applicable regular or
                                                                        special
Code	Rate(1)	Maturity	Public(2)	Commissions Frequency	 Option	Yes/No	record
                                                                        dates)

14911QCB5	   5.85%	02/15/06	100%	         1.0%	  Monthly	      YES	    NO



Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:
____  Yes	  X   No						N/A



(1) The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not
affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the
effective date of the change.

(2) Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to
Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the
time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
From: joshua.d.bishop@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:06:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Josh Bishop

Holland, MI 49423
From: Cindy Johnson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 12:12:14 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Cindy Johnson

2150 Wilshire Dr. SE

Grand Rapids, MI 49506