alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.76 MB)
 
 1CTCS AFCENT F-16 Fighting Falcon B-52 Stratofortress Bomber Task Force
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Top of page

Skip to main content

Library of Congress

              - Discover
              - Services
              - Visit
              - Education
              - Connect
              - Shop *external link*
              - Donate
              - About
              - Ask a Librarian
              - Help
              - Contact
              - Search Online Catalog
              - Copyright.gov
              - Congress.gov

Library of Congress
Research Centers
Law Library of Congress
Collections
Digital Collections
From: Jeanne Betsock Stillman

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Institute of Medicine recommendations on coverage of preventive care for women.

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:59:12 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care

under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services,

are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Jeanne Betsock Stillman

Hastings-on-Hudson, New York
#### Hugh Smith and others, Respondents, v. Solomon Jacobs, Appellant.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements; amount paid to be reimbursed, together with expenses of searching title; order denying motion requiring purchaser to complete, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disburse-' mente. Opinion by

Daniels, J.

Order to be settled by Daniels, J.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DANIEL SCOTT MUZZY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 400 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of February, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
---- -Maria Race <MRace@MWGen.com> wrote: -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: Maria Race <MRace@MWGen.com> Date: 07/08/2010 11:29AM cc: Bill Constantelos <BConstantelo@MWGen. com>, Julia Wozniak <JWozniak@MWGen.com> 

### Pa g e 1 of 2

2/23/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C37166EDO

...Subject: Fw: ICR extension request letter

Please find attached a request for extension to su bmit information required by the Steam Electric Power Generating Industry Information Collection Request. Plea se contact me with any questions.

Maria Race Midwest Generation Edison Mission Energy

630 771 7862 (office) 312 925 3608 (cell) 312 788 5526 (fax)
----- Forwarded by Maria Race/Chicago/EMG/EIX on 07/08/2010 10:25 AM -----

Basil G. Constantelos Environmental Services Midwest Generation Edison Mission Energy 630-771-7829
----- Forwarded by Bill Constantelos/Chicago/EMG/EIX on 07/08/2010 10:24 AM ----- From: Bill Constantelos/Chicago/EMG/EIX

To: Julia Wozniak/Chicago/MWGEN@EME, Maria Race/Chicago/EMG/EIX@EME

Date: 07/08/2010 10:25 AM

Subject: ICR extension request letter

From: "Midwest Generation Ops" <c hiprn518072@missionenergy.com>

To: "Bill Constantelos" <bconstantelos@mwgen.com>

Date: 07/08/2010 10:23 AM

Subject: Attached Image 

### Pa g e 2 of 2

2/23/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C37166EDO

...
**Exhibit 12.3**

 

**PACCAR and Subsidiaries**

 

**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGSTO FIXED CHARGES**

 

**PURSUANT TO SEC REPORTINGREQUIREMENTS**

(Millions of Dollars)

 
| ** **                                             | ** ** | **Year ended December 31** | ** **  |
|--------------------------------------------------------|------------|----------------------------|-------------|
| ** **                                             | ** ** | **2004**                   | ** **  | **2003** | ** ** | **2002** | ** ** | **2001** | ** ** | **2000** | ** ** |
|                                                   |       |                       |        |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                                          |       |                       |        |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense- PACCAR and subsidiaries  (1)         | ** ** | **$**                      | **134.3**   |   | $ | 137.1 |   | $ | 162.8 |   | $ | 216.9 |   | $ | 249.2 |   |
| Portion of rentals deemed interest                     | ** ** | **14.4**                   |        | 12.9 |   | 12.7 |   | 13.5 |   | 13.2 |   |
|                                                   |       |                       |        |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                                    | ** ** | **$**                      | **148.7**   |   | $ | 150.0 |   | $ | 175.5 |   | $ | 230.4 |   | $ | 262.4 |   |
|                                                   |       |                       |        |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| EARNINGS                                               |       |                       |        |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Income before taxes– PACCAR and  Subsidiaries (2) | ** ** | **$**                      | **1,368.2** |   | $ | 805.5 |   | $ | 574.1 |   | $ | 255.3 |   | $ | 665.1 |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                                          | ** ** | **148.7**                  |        | 150.0 |   | 175.5 |   | 230.4 |   | 262.4 |   |
|                                                   |       |                       |        |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS DEFINED                                    | ** ** | **$**                      | **1,516.9** |   | $ | 955.5 |   | $ | 749.6 |   | $ | 485.7 |   | $ | 927.5 |   |
|                                                   |       |                       |        |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                     | ** ** | **10.20**                  | **x**       | 6.37 | x | 4.27 | x | 2.11 | x | 3.53 | x |

 

----

(1)           Exclusive ofinterest paid to PACCAR.

 

(2)           Includesbefore-tax earnings of wholly-owned subsidiaries.

 

1

----
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                             IDENTIX INCORPORATED
                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                           As of September 1, 1999

Wholly-owned Subsidiary:                        Place of Incorporation

ANADAC, Inc.                                    Virginia, USA
Legislative Demographic Services, Inc.   (1)    Delaware, USA
Identicator Technology, Inc.                    Delaware, USA
Identix International, Inc.                     California, USA
Biometric Applications & Technology, Inc.       Missouri, USA
Identix Australia Pty Ltd.                      New South Wales, Australia

50%-owned Subsidiary:
Sylvan/Identix Fingerprinting Centers L.L.C.    Delaware, USA

(1) 100% owned by ANADAC, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1296 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 24, 2008.
Whereas millions of American children and youth represent the hopes and future 
        of our Nation;
Whereas numerous individuals, children's organizations, and youth-serving 
        organizations that work with children and youth collaborate to provide 
        invaluable services to enrich and better the lives of the young;
Whereas heightening awareness of and increasing support for organizations that 
        provide access to healthcare, social services, education, the arts, 
        sports, and other services will assist in the development of character 
        and the future success of our Nation's youth;
Whereas the President issued a proclamation on May 30, 2008, proclaiming June 1, 
        2008 as National Child's Day to demonstrate a commitment to our youth;
Whereas September is a time when parents, families, teachers, school 
        administrators, and communities in general increase their focus on 
        children and youth nationwide as the school year begins;
Whereas September is a time for the people of the United States as a whole to 
        highlight and be mindful of the needs of children and youth;
Whereas private corporations and businesses have joined with hundreds of 
        national and local charitable organizations throughout the Nation in 
        support of a month-long focus on children and youth; and
Whereas designating September as National Child Awareness Month would recognize 
        that a long-term commitment to children and youth is in the public 
        interest, and will encourage widespread support for the charities and 
        organizations that seek to provide a better future for the children and 
        youth of the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the designation of a 
National Child Awareness Month to promote awareness of children's charities and 
youth-serving organizations across the United States and recognizes their 
efforts on behalf of children and youth as a critical contribution to the future 
of our Nation.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: A. Barre

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comments Regarding Preventative Care and Contraception

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:10:58 PM

I ask that you accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as they

pertain to the coverage of preventive care under the new health care law and to

reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better

access to necessary health care.

I (and numerous others) personally believe that “religious refusal” exemptions

unjustly deny women access to contraceptive services. Others people, driven by

an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government

to make exemptions even larger. Some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption

would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

This is absurd.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions. Thank you for your time and consideration.
From: Cori Fleser

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 8:11:23 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Cori Fleser

204 W. 31st St

Austin, TX 78705
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
                                                                     PAGE 1 OF 1


                         GLOBAL NATURAL RESOURCES INC.
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                      JURISDICTION OF
NAME                                                                                  INCORPORATION
----                                                                                  -------------
<S>                                                                                   <C>
Global Natural Resources Corporation of Nevada ("GNRC")                               Nevada, U.S.A.
GNR Investment Corporation                                                            Nevada, U.S.A.
GNR Eastern                                                                           Russia
Global Noteholder Inc. (wholly - owned subsidiary of GNRC)                            Texas, U.S.A.
GNR International (Argentina), Inc. (wholly - owned subsidiary of GNRC)               Texas, U.S.A.
GNR International (Turkey), Inc. (wholly - owned subsidiary of GNRC)                  Nevada, U.S.A.
Texneft Inc. (90% owned by GNRC)                                                      Texas, U.S.A.
Tatex (50% owned by Texneft Inc.)                                                     Russia
USAgas Pipeline Inc. (wholly - owned subsidiary of GNRC)                              Texas, U.S.A.
GNR (Cote d'Ivoire) Ltd. (wholly - owned subsidiary of GNRC)                          Grand Cayman,
                                                                                          Cayman Islands
GNR (Malaysia) Ltd. (wholly - owned subsidiary of GNRC)                               Grand Cayman,
                                                                                          Cayman Islands
GNR (Egypt) Ltd. (wholly - owned subsidiary of GNRC)                                  Grand Cayman,
                                                                                          Cayman Islands
GNR (Cote d'Ivoire) CI-12 Ltd. (wholly - owned subsidiary of GNRC)                    Grand Cayman,
                                                                                          Cayman Islands
GNR (Egypt) East Beni Suef Ltd. (wholly - owned subsidiary of GNRC)                   Grand Cayman,
                                                                                          Cayman Islands
Unless otherwise stated, all subsidiaries are wholly - owned by the Company.
</TABLE>
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the annual report of TransGlobe Energy
Corporation (the Registrant) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, David C. Ferguson, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                      
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                    
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Registrant.



/s/ David
FergusonName:
David C. Ferguson Title: Chief Financial Officer March 24, 2008





A signed original of this written statement required by Rule
13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has
been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 40-F to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 40-F), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
From: janice.miller@indwes.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:44:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jan Miller

Marion, IN 46952
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER AGREEMENT

                        Recitals

This Second Amendment to the Technology Transfer Agreement (the "Second 
Amendment") is made effective as of the 25th day of August 1996, (the 
"Effective Date") by and between SGI International ("SGI") and OCET 
Corporation ("OCET") with reference to the following facts:

A.   SGI and OCET entered into a Technology Transfer Agreement (the
"Agreement") effective as of March 17, 1995; and,

B.   On May 15, 1995, SGI and OCET entered into an Amendment (the "First 
Amendment") to that Agreement in order to change the compensation payable 
to SGI by OCET for the transfer; and,

C.   OCET again desires to modify the compensation payable to SGI and is 
willing to compensate SGI for that modification by issuing additional stock 
to SGI.

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, covenants and conditions 
set forth herein, SGI and OCET agree as follows:

1.   To the extent that the Second Amendment is inconsistent with the 
Agreement or the First Amendment, the Agreement and the First Amendment are 
hereby amended.

2.   OCET hereby agrees to issue an additional 500,000 shares of OCET common 
stock to SGI in return for SGI's canceling and waiving any and all other 
consideration, which OCET has agreed to pay SGI under either the Agreement 
or the First Amendment.

3.   SGI hereby agrees that, effective on the date it receives an additional
500,000 shares of OCET common stock, it shall no longer have any right to, or 
claim to, any compensation of any kind from OCET under the Agreement or the 
First Amendment and OCET's only obligation to SGI shall be for money loaned 
to it pursuant to the inter-company account.

4.   Except as is hereby amended the Agreement and the First Amendment are 
still in full force and effect.

SGI international                 OCET Corporation

          /s/                                /s/
By:========================      By:=============================
   Joseph A. Savoca, President     Ernest P. Esztergar, President