alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Dec . 20 . 201 1 2:53F M Supanc e & Howar dNo . 765 4 P . 2 U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA LAVIATIO NADMINISTRATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D,C , I nth e Matte r

o f Tiffi nAire , Inc . Cas e No . 2010.GL-70-026 6 FDM S NO . FAA-2011-100 7 Judg e J,E , Sulliva n MOTIO NFO REXTENSIO NO FTIM E Respondent , Tiffi nAire , Inc. , represente db y th e undersigne dattorne3 ^ respectfull y request s a nextensio nof tim e t o respon dt o Complainant' s Complaint , Motio nt o Dee mAllegation s Admitte dan dfor Judgmen t

o nth e Pleading s o r

for Hearin g o nSanctio nOnly , an dReques t fo r Discover y for

th e followin g reasons . Responden t

ha s jus t

recentl y retaine dth e undersigne dattornej ^ t o represen t i t i n thi s matter . Additiona l tim e i s necessar y fo r Respondent' s attorne y t o full y investigat e th e allegation s an dprepar e th e appropriat e responses . Further , Complainant' s attorne y wa s advise do f thi s motio nan dha s n o objectio na s th e partie s ar e attemptin g t o resolv e thi s matte r throug hsettlemen t

discussions . Responden t

request s a nextensio nunti l Januar y 20 , 2012 . Respectfull y submitted ,

Bren t T . Howar d^003902 3 Supanc G& Howar d 8 4 S . Washingto nStree t Tifrm;Ohi o 4488 3 Telephone : 419-447-252 1 Fax : 419-447-231 0 Attorne y fo r

Respondent , Tiffi nAire , Inc .O.e.: . 20 . 201 1 2:53P M Supanc e ^ . Ho^var ^ No . U' A P . 3

CERTIFICAT EO FSERVIC E I hereb y certif

y tha t I have , thi s date , serve dth e foregoin g Motio nt o th e followin g addresses :

ON ECOP Y VI A REGULA RMAI LAN D FA X Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S,W , Washington , D C 2050 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AG C - 43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W100 0 Kat e Barber , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counsel , AGL- 7 Grea t Lake s Regio n Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n 230 0 Eas t

Devo nAvenu e DesPlainesJ L6001 8 FAX : 847-294-749 8 Th e Honorabl e J.E . Sullivan , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.lil . Washington , D C 2059 0 FAX : 202-366-753 6 Date dthi s 20^'

^ da y o f December , 201 1

Breli t T . Howar (

cap^rent/tif^mfllr6/l*.1:otia nfoi

- ejtteiisioj i - FA A
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-92053, 33-2171,33-17848 (Post-Effective Amendment No. 1), 33-33803, 33-33807, 33-39323, 33-36911, 33-45176,33-45231, 33-45233, 33-56952, 33-58708, 33-72158, 033-55265 (Post-Effective Amendment No. 1),033-60379, 033-63547, 333-11639, 333-15923, 333-29099, 333-70459, 333-74371, 333-34726, 333-44508,333-50992, 333-59504, 333-64988, 333-76764, 333-109983, 333-122441, 333-129785 and 333-144322 of3Com Corporation on Form S-8 of our report dated July 31, 2007, relating to the financialstatements and financial statement schedule of 3Com Corporation (which report expresses anunqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement ofFinancial Accounting Standards No. 123(Revised), *Share-Based Payment*) and of our reportdated July 31, 2007, relating to management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of 3Com Corporation for the yearended June 1, 2007./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPBoston, Massachusetts
<page>
									 EXHIBIT 31.01

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Jeffrey A. Rothman, President of Demeter Management Corporation
("Demeter"), the general partner of the registrant, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the
registrant;

 2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-
15(e)) for the registrant and have:

  a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

 b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

 c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and


<page>
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of Demeter's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

   a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
      design or operation of internal controls over financial
      reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
      the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and

   b)	 Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
      management or other employees who have a significant role
      in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.




 Date:  March 30, 2004    BY: /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman
                                 	Jeffrey A. Rothman
                                 	President,
                               	Demeter Management Corporation,
							general partner of the registrant
-83 -82 -81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76

 37

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

06/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
From: Jennifer M Weishaar

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: No religious exemptions

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 9:21:42 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine

as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care

law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would

provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an

ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health

providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt

from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.

Jennifer M Weishaar

255 N Michigan St #58

Lawrence, KS 66044
#### William Gadlowski, Respondent, *v.*West Virginia Pulp and Paper Company, Appellant.

(Submitted April 8, 1912;

decided April 12, 1912.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 204 N. Y. 645.)
<page>
			            EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley Cornerstone
Fund III L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Lee Horwitz, Chief
Financial Officer of Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.








By:	  /s/	Lee Horwitz

Name:		Lee Horwitz
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 23, 2007
From: mgwbd@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:04:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Johnathan Bollwerk

, 80111-5119
From: mbjelinek@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:07:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Beth Jelinek

Memphis, MI 48041
From: ccrhomestead@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:23:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rhonda Carter

Spring Hill, KS 66083
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****FMS customer financialmanagement handbook (billing)**
 
SuDoc Number:D 1.6/2:F 49/2/

CGP systemNumber:000468204
 
Printings: June2002 | August 2007
 
August 18, 2020
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No. 333-35460

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO. 076				Trade Date: 05/10/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

September 8, 2000)						Issue Date: 05/15/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement May 10, 2001
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

or	Stated				 Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		 Price to	 Discounts & Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions Frequency	 Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QDD0 5.25%	05/15/05	100%	 1.0% Quarterly	 YES	 NO	

 

 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____ Yes	 X No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount. Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
CUISINE SOLUTIONS, INC.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements,
(Nos. 33-60614 and 33-60616) on Form S-8 of Cuisine Solutions, Inc. of our
report dated September 4, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Cuisine Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 27, 1998, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for the years ended June 27, 1998 and June 28, 1997, and related schedule,
which report appears in the June 26, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of Cuisine
Solutions, Inc..



                                        KPMG LLP



Washington, D.C.
September 29, 1999

38
#### I. Townsend Burden, Respondent, v. The Burden Iron Company and others, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements. Opinion by

Landon, J.
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23a

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 4,
2005 relating to the financial statements, management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting of BellSouth Corporation, which
appears in this Form 10-K, in the following Registration Statements of BellSouth
Corporation:

-     Form S-3 (File No. 333-117772)

-     Form S-3 (File No. 333-120170)

-     Form S-8 (File No. 333-115034)

-     Form S-8 (File No. 333-115035)

-     Form S-8 (File No. 333-115036)

-     Form S-8 (File No. 333-105710)

-     Form S-8 (File No. 333-75660)

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
March 4, 2005
#### Mark H. Eisner, Appellant, *v.*Pringle Memorial Home, Respondent.

*Kisner*v. *Pringle Memorial Home,*144 App. Div. 896, affirmed.

(Argued January 33, 1913;

decided February 11, 1913.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered *718April 28, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at a Trial Term in an action under the terms of a lease to recover the value of buildings erected upon the leased premises.

*Jerome Eisner*for appellant.

*Nelson Zabriskie*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Hiscock, Collin and Cuddeback, JJ. Absent: Werner, J. Not sitting: Miller, J.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 178 (Friday, September 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 63550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20036]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-34-2023]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 72; Authorization of Production 
Activity; Dorel Juvenile Group Inc.; (Child Strollers, Walkers, and Car 
Seats); Columbus, Indiana

    On May 15, 2023, Dorel Juvenile Group Inc. submitted a notification 
of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility 
within Subzone 72W, in Columbus, Indiana.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (88 FR 34484, May 30, 2023). On 
September 12, 2023, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's 
decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this 
time. The production activity described in the notification was 
authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, 
including section 400.14.

    Dated: September 12, 2023.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-20036 Filed 9-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P