alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: danielmillette@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:41:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Daniel Millette

Fairhope, AL 36532
From: curtine@fuse.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:30:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ellen Curtin

Fort Thomas, KY 41075
#            

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (R)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-109182

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  459                                                                   Trade Date:  07/26/04

(To Prospectus Supplement dated November 6, 2003 &

  Prospectus dated October 15,2003)                                                              Issue Date:   07/29/04

The Date of this Pricing SupplementJuly 26, 2004

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                                   Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                   Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment     Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)   Maturity  Public (2) Commissions       Frequency       Option  Yes/No     record dates)

14911QVC2  3.5%            07/15/08           100%              1.0%                Semi-Annually               YES         NO                                                                                                                                                                

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Principal                                                                                 1st Payment             Day         

Amount                  Proceeds                  Dealer                           Date                   Count

$3,424,000.00         $3,389,760.00         ABN AMRO Inc.        01/15/05                               30/360    

Original Issue DiscountNote:                                                                          Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                  N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (R) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (R) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $119.933 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (R) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (R) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated October 15,2003.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- TSO Armor and Training, Inc. Under Contract No. NOOl78-14-D-7543 APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: ) ) ) ) )

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 61303

Michael J. Gardner, Esq. Erik C. Porcaro, Esq.

Troutman Sanders LLP Virginia Beach, VA Ronald J. Borro, Esq.

Navy ChiefTrial Attorney Robert McCall, Esq.

Trial Attorney NA VSUP Fleet Logistics Center San Diego, CA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 14 November 2017

Adminis ative Judge Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCANo. 61303, Appeal ofTSO Armor and Training, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated: JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
H. Res. 1288 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 31, 2008. 

Whereas college and university campuses are not immune 

from the crime problems that face the rest of society in 

the United States; 

Whereas a total of 37 homicides, 8,112 forcible-sex offenses, 

8,923 aggravated assaults, and 3,071 cases of arson were 

reported on college and university campuses from 2004 

to 2006, in accordance with the reporting requirements 

under the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security 

Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act (20 U.S.C. 

1092(f); Public Law 89–329); 

Whereas criminal experts estimate that between 1⁄5 and 1⁄4 of 

female students become the victim of a completed or attempted rape, usually by someone they know, during 

their college careers, but fewer than 5 percent report the 

assault to law enforcement; 

Whereas each year, 13 percent of female students enrolled in 

an undergraduate program at a college or university will 

be victims of stalking; 

Whereas 1,700 college and university students between the 

ages of 18 and 24 die each year from unintentional alcohol-related injuries, including motor vehicle accidents; 
2 

•HRES 1288 EH 

Whereas Security On Campus, Inc. (hereinafter referred to 

as ‘‘SOC’’), a national nonprofit group dedicated to promoting safety and security on college and university campuses, has designated September as National Campus 

Safety Awareness Month; 

Whereas each September since 2005, SOC has partnered 

with colleges and universities across the United States to 

offer National Campus Safety Awareness Month educational programming on sexual assault, alcohol and 

other drug abuse, hazing, stalking, and other critical 

campus safety issues; and 

Whereas National Campus Safety Awareness Month provides 

an opportunity for entire campus communities to become 

engaged in efforts to improve campus safety: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) supports the goals and ideals of National Campus Safety Awareness Month; and 

(2) encourages colleges and universities throughout 

the United States to provide campus safety and other 

crime awareness and prevention programs to all students 

throughout the year. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
From: susan.mibeck@veryhelpful.info

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:15:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Susan Mibeck

Grand Forks, ND 58201
From: ron.routh@emerson.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:06:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ron Routh

Antioch, IL 60002
EXHIBIT 32.2



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Date:	November 14, 2003

/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
No. 78.

#### Pearlman, Trustee in Bankruptcy, *v.*Reliance Insurance Co.

*David Morgulas*for the Association of Casualty and Surety Companies, and *Edward M. Murphy, pro se,*on the motions.

Certiorari, 369 U. S. 847, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The motions of the Association of Casualty and Surety Companies and Edward M. Murphy for leave to file briefs, as *amici curiae,*are granted.
----

| Japan      Local Currency Bank Name         | Japan      Local Currency Commitment |
|---------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| The Bank of      Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. | US      $75,000,000                  |

| Total      Japan Local Currency Commitment: | US      $75,000,000 |
|---------------------------------------------|---------------------|

| Japan Local Currency      Bank Name         | Applicable Japan Local      Currency Lending Office                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|---------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| The Bank of      Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. | The Bank of      Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd.,Corporate      Banking Division No. 3, Corporate Banking Group7-1,      Marunouchi 2-chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, JapanAttention:  Mr.      Shu Ohsuga(Telephone      No.:  03-3240-2512 / 81-3-3240-2512)(Facsimile      No.:  03-3240-8885 /81-3-3240-8885) |

----

----
[Crim. No. 359.

Fourth Appellate District.

February 10, 1938.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. ALFRED HENRY, Appellant.

*50A. L. Wissburg for Appellant.

U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and John 0. Palstine, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

MARKS, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment and from an order denying defendant’s motion for new trial after conviction of the crime of assault with a deadly weapon. Defendant was sentenced to confinement in the county jail of Riverside County for a period of sixty days.

Defendant urges that the evidence does not support the verdict and judgment and complains of instructions given at the request of the district attorney.

The information charges that the assault was committed with a knife. No one saw any knife used and defendant denied having had one, or any other weapon during his altercation with S. L. McCoy, the complaining witness. He had a ring on a finger of the hand with which he struck McCoy and argues that the wounds were either caused by this ring or by his finger-nails.

McCoy had three wounds on his person which had been inflicted by defendant. One was a cut on his chest. The sweater worn by McCoy was cut over the place of this wound. There was another cut on McCoy’s chin and a third on his neck. This last cut went rather deep into the neck muscles and was quite long. The physician who dressed the wounds testified that the cuts were clean and had been made by some sharp-edged instrument such as a knife or a razor.

McCoy exhibited the scars of his wounds to the jury. The appearance of these sears was evidence of considerable importance. If the edges appeared smooth this fact would justify the inference that the wounds had been made with a sharp instrument. such as a knife. The scars are not described in the record. We must, therefore, assume, in support of the judgment, that their nature supported the conclusion of the jury that they had been made with a knife.

We have studied the instructions and find nothing so prejudicially erroneous in any of them as to justify a reversal of the judgment.

The judgment, and the order denying the motion for new trial, are affirmed.

Barnard, P. J., concurred.
(Click to Proceed)

Note

without PRIOR approval

HomeDANTESDEDCDISCNADLPFAQProspective SchoolsInstitution LoginPrintContactBack

DANTES 2014
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1





            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Forms S-3 and S-8) of Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. (the "Company") of our
report dated September 6, 2006, on our audit of the consolidated financial
statements of the Company as of June 30, 2006, and for the year then ended,
which report is included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended June 30, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 27, 2006.

                                                     /S/ CORBIN & COMPANY LLP

Corbin & Company LLP
Irvine, California
September 26, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE  TO SUCH 10QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JULY 31, 1997.
       
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,460
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,460
<PP&E>                                             300
<DEPRECIATION>                                      15
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              273
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      8,000
<COMMON>                                         1,935
<OTHER-SE>                                      (5,463)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,745
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,182
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,182)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,182)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

        

</TABLE>