alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2


                           CERTIFICATION

I, David R. Saracino, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer,
certify, that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10K for the
period ended December 31, 2004, of First Keystone Corporation.

   2.   Based on my knowledge, the annual report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report.

   3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this quarterly report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this annual report.

   4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)
for the registrant and we have:

        a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
   or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
   designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
   information relating to the registrant, including its
   consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
   within those entities, particularly during the period in
   which this annual report is being prepared;

        b)   intentionally omitted;

        c)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
   disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
   annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
   disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
   period covered by this annual report based upon such
   evaluation; and

        d)   disclosed in this report any change in the
   registrant's internal control over financial reporting that
   occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter
   that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
   materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
   financial reporting; and

   5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

        a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or
   operation of the internal controls which could adversely
   affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
   and report financial data and have identified for the
   registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal
   controls; and

        b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
   management or other employees who have a significant role in
   the registrant's internal controls.




                       /s/ David R. Saracino
                       David R. Saracino
                       Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer



Date:  March 8, 2005


                               71
Exhibit 10.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The
Board of Directors
BakBone Software Incorporated:

We
consent to the inclusion of our report dated June 22, 2001, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of BakBone Software Incorporated as of March 31, 2001 and
April 30, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations and accumulated deficit and cash flows for the eleven months ended March 31, 2001 and the year ended
April 30, 2000, which report appears in the registration statement on Form 20-F of BakBone Software Incorporated.

| |  | /s/ KPMG LLP
| |  | ------------
| |  |             

|San Diego, California
January 31, 2002 |  | 
|-------------------------------------- |  | 

1

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 178 (Friday, September 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 63638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19981]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #18026 and #18027; Vermont Disaster Number VT-
00047]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Vermont

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 3.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Vermont 
(FEMA-4720-DR), dated 07/14/2023.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides.
    Incident Period: 07/07/2023 through 07/17/2023.

DATES: Issued on 09/06/2023.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 09/12/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/15/2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Vermont, dated 07/14/2023, is hereby amended to include the following 
areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

Primary Counties: Essex.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco S[aacute]nchez, Jr.,
Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2023-19981 Filed 9-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1464 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1464

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the definition of 
       rural airports for purposes of the air transportation tax.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2001

Mr. Kerry (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the definition of 
       rural airports for purposes of the air transportation tax.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
    (a) Modification of Rural Airport Definition.--Clauses (i) and (ii) 
of section 4261(e)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining 
rural airport) are amended to read as follows:
                            ``(i) there were fewer than 100,000 
                        commercial passengers departing by air during 
                        the second preceding calendar year from such 
                        airport and such airport--
                                    ``(I) is not located within 75 
                                miles of another airport which is not 
                                described in this clause, or
                                    ``(II) is receiving essential air 
                                service subsidies as of August 5, 1997, 
                                or
                            ``(ii) such airport is not connected by 
                        paved roads to another airport.
                For purposes of determining the number of passengers 
                under clause (i), passengers departing on a segment of 
                less than 100 miles shall not be taken into account.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--
            (1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), the 
        amendment made by subsection (a) shall apply to transportation 
        beginning on or after October 1, 2001.
            (2) Treatment of amounts paid for tickets purchased before 
        date of enactment.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
        not apply to the amounts paid for a ticket purchased before the 
        date of the enactment of this Act for a specified flight 
        beginning on or after October 1, 2001.
                                 <all>
```
From: cmthames@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:19:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Christina Thames

Reynolds, GA 31076
Sullivan,

June 27, 1913.

#### Ola M. Lamberton *& a. v.*Kate Dinsmore *& a.*

In an action to restrain interference with a way, the right to which was determined in a prior suit between the same parties, the defendant is not entitled to a trial by jury upon the question whether the way described in the petition is the same as that set out in the pleadings in the original action; and such issue can only be raised in a proceeding for violation of the injunction.

Bill in Equity, to restrain the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs’ right of way, extending from the Punkshire road to the plaintiffs’ land over land of the defendants. The court enjoined the defendants and they excepted. Transferred from the November term, 1912, of the superior court by *Plummer,*J.

*Hosea W. Parker*and *Ira 0. Colby*(by brief and orally), for the plaintiffs.

*Edward R. Buck*(of Vermont) and *Scott Sloane {Mr. Sloane*orally), for the defendants.

Young, J.

It was held when this case was here before that the judgment in *Dinsmore*v. *Lamberton*(Sullivan, May term, 1907) decided that the plaintiffs in this action had a right of way over the defendants’ land as described in their brief statement in the former suit. *Lamberton*v. *Dinsmore,*75 N. H. 574, 575. The defendants’ contention that it has never been decided that the plaintiffs have a right of way over their land is therefore not open to them.

The defendants contend that the court erred in enjoining them, because they were entitled to a jury trial of the issue as to whether the way described in the plaintiffs’ petition is the same way that was described in their brief statement in the former action. But that contention is not open to them in this proceeding. It can only be raised in a proceeding to punish them for a violation of the injunction.

*Exception orerruled.*

All concurred.
Exhibit
      32.1





Multiband
      Corporation.











Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As
      Adopted Pursuant to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with this Annual Report Form 10-K, Multiband Corporation (the
“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2006, I, James L. Mandel, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.  This
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and


2.  The
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
                April 20, 2007
              /s/James
                  MandelJames
                  MandelChief
                  Executive Officer
From: Gina Dennis

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Friday, August 05, 2011 7:19:22 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs, and helping women be free to make this

decision, without being hindered by poverty.

Sincerely,

Gina Dennis

262 E 15th St

Cookeville, TN 38501
From: blgti@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:53:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Todd Rehklau

Maryland Heights, MO 63043
No. 413, Misc.

#### Norvell *v.*Illinois.

*Thomas P. Sullivan*for petitioner.

Motion for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Illinois granted. Case transferred to the appellate docket.
#            

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (R)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-109182

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  456                                                                   Trade Date:  07/19/04

(To Prospectus Supplement dated November 6, 2003 &

  Prospectus dated October 15,2003)                                                              Issue Date:   07/22/04

The Date of this Pricing SupplementJuly 19, 2004

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                                   Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                   Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment     Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)   Maturity  Public (2) Commissions       Frequency       Option  Yes/No     record dates)

14911QUZ2   3.75%         01/15/09           100%              0.99%              Semi-Annually              YES         NO                                                                                                                                                                

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Principal                                                                                 1st Payment             Day         

Amount                  Proceeds                  Dealer                           Date                   Count

$344,000.00            $340,594.40            ABN AMROInc.        01/15/05                              30/360    

Original Issue Discount Note:                                                                         Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                  N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (R) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (R) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $113.452 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (R) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (R) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated October 15,2003.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.E


                              AMENDMENT THREE TO
                            COMPUCOM SYSTEMS, INC.
                          401(k) MATCHED SAVINGS PLAN


     WHEREAS, effective January 1, 1988, CompuCom Systems, Inc. (the "Company")
established the CompuCom Systems, Inc. 401(k) Matched Savings Plan (the "Plan")
for the benefit of employees of the Company and its affiliated entities; and

     WHEREAS, the Company amended and restated the Plan in its entirety,
effective as of May 1, 1996, adopted Amendment One to the Plan, effective as of
January 1, 1998, and adopted Amendment Two to the Plan, effective as of January
26, 1998; and

     WHEREAS, the Company recently acquired certain assets from ENTEX
Information Services, Inc. and its affiliates ("ENTEX") as of May 10, 1999 (the
"Acquisition"), and as a result of the Acquisition certain former ENTEX
employees have become employees of the Company or its affiliates;

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to grant past service credit
for Plan eligibility purposes to the ENTEX employees who become employees of the
Company or its affiliates in connection with the Acquisition;

     NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to its authority under Section 19.1 of the Plan,
the Company amends the Plan, effective as of May 28, 1999, as follows:

1.   The definition of "Eligibility Service" in Section 1.1 is amended by adding
     the following at the end thereof:

     In the case of any Employee who is a former employee of ENTEX Information
     Services, Inc. or any of its affiliates ("ENTEX") and who became or becomes
     an Employee in connection with the Employer's acquisition of certain ENTEX
     assets on May 10, 1999, for purposes of determining such Employee's
     Eligibility Service, such Employee's period of service shall include all
     eligibility service credited or required to be credited for purposes of
     determining eligibility under the ENTEX 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan.
<PAGE>

2.   The definition of "Enrollment Date" in Section 1.1 is amended by adding the
     following at the end thereof:

     In addition, May 10, 1999 shall be an Entry Date for former ENTEX employees
     who became Employees on May 10, 1999 in connection with the Company's
     acquisition of certain ENTEX assets on May 10, 1999.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, COMPUCOM SYSTEMS, INC. has caused this instrument to
be executed by its duly authorized officer on this 28 day of May, 1999.
                                                   --        ---


                                  COMPUCOM SYSTEM, INC.



                                  By:   /s/ Daniel Celoni
                                      -----------------------------------

                                  Its:  Treasurer
                                      -----------------------------------