alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



DOBSON COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
 COMPENSATION COMMITTEE CHARTER
(Effective as of March 1, 2007)
 Purpose
   Committee Membership
    Meetings
  Committee Responsibilities and Authority
 1.
    
    The Compensation Committee shall, at least annually, review and approve the annual
base salaries, bonus payments and other annual incentive opportunities of the Officers.2.
    
    The Compensation Committee shall, periodically and as and when appropriate, review and
approve the following as they affect the Officers: (a) all stock option grants and other
incentive awards and opportunities. including both cash-based and equity-based awards and
opportunities; (b) any employment agreements and severance arrangements; (c) any
change-in-control agreements and change-in-control provisions affecting any elements of
compensation and benefits; and (d) any special or supplemental compensation and benefits for
the Officers and persons who formerly served as Officers, including supplemental retirement
benefits and the perquisites provided to them during and after employment.3.
    
    The Compensation Committee shall have authority to allocate and award grants of stock
options and/or restrictive stock grants in the aggregate amounts of stock as designated from
time to time by the Board of Directors.




---



##### 



4.
    
    The Compensation Committee shall produce the annual report of the Compensation
Committee on executive compensation for inclusion in the Companys proxy statement in
compliance with the rules and regulations promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission.5.
    
    The Compensation Committee shall monitor the Companys compliance with the
requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 relating to 401(k) plans and loans to
directors and officers and with all other applicable laws affecting employee compensation and
benefits.6.
    
    The Committee shall oversee the Companys compliance with the requirement under the
NASDAQ Marketplace Rules that, with limited exceptions, shareholders approve equity
compensation plans.7.
    
    The Compensation Committee shall receive periodic reports on the Companys
compensation programs as they affect all employees.8.
    
    The Compensation Committee shall make regular reports to the Board.9.
    
    The Compensation Committee shall have the sole authority to retain and terminate any
compensation consultant to be used by the committee to assist it in the evaluation of the
compensation programs of the Company and shall have sole authority to approve the consultants
fees and the other terms and conditions of the consultants retention.10.
    
    The Compensation Committee may form and delegate authority to subcommittees as it
deems appropriate.11.
    
    This Charter may be amended, revised or revoked by a majority vote of the Companys
Directors.
No. 564.

#### Washington ex rel. Sherman *v.*Board of Governors of the Washington State Bar Assn. et al.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*T. M. Royce*for respondents.

Supreme Court of Washington. Certiorari denied.
#### Evelina Banker, Plaintiff, v. George A. Fisher, Defendant.

Motion denied, without costs. Opinion hy Barnard,!?. J.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 23
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
  As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
reports (and to all references to our Firm) included in or made part of the
Form 10-K of Metromail Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1997. We
also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement No. 333-06265 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-28143 on
Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-28137 on Form S-8 of our reports
dated January 31, 1998, covering the financial statements and financial
statement schedule of Metromail Corporation and Affiliates included in the
Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 (Commission file
number 1-14348).
 
                                              /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP
 
                                              Arthur Andersen LLP
 
Chicago, Illinois
March 23, 1997
#### Mina Adler, Respondent, v. Alexander Goldsmith, Appellant.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion Dy

Dykman, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
extr-ex103_430.htm



145 Rio Robles  /  San Jose, CA 95134  /  +1-408-579-2800  /  www.extremenetworks.com

                                                                                                                                                        Exhibit 10.3

 

 

August 4, 2015

 

Dear Bob,

Thank you for your commitment to Extreme and your dedication over the past year in particular. You are a critical part of the team we are building to take this company forward.  I am pleased to confirm the following compensation information for you:

FY16 Stock Grant: 80,000 Time Based RSUs and 80,000 Performance Stock Units (PSUs)

 


	
 
	
•
	
80,000 RSUs will vest annually in three (3) equal annual increments over three (3) years.





	
 
	
•
	
You are also eligible for an additional 80,000 PSUs subject to Extreme’s achievement of a stock price of $3.50 and meeting or exceeding that price for 30 consecutive trading days at any point during period of 8/15/2015 to 2/15/2017.





	
 
	
•
	
If/when the price hurdle is achieved (prior to 2/15/17), 1/3 of the awards will vest immediately; 1/3 will vest on 8/15/17; the final 1/3 will vest on 8/15/18.





	
 
	
•
	
All vesting and rights to exercise any Restricted Stock offered hereunder will also be subject to your continued employment with the Company at the time of vesting.  Your Restricted Stock grant is further conditioned on your execution of the Company’s standard form of employee restricted stock agreement, and will be governed by and subject to the terms of that agreement.




 

FY16 Extreme Bonus Plan:

Effective July 1, 2015, you will be eligible to participate in the Extreme Bonus Plan with an annual target of 100% of your base salary compensation (currently, $345,000).  With your participation in the Extreme Bonus Plan and also Effective July 1 2015, you will no longer participate in and/or be eligible for the Company’s sales compensation plan.

 

All other terms and conditions of your employment will remain in full force and effect.

 

I look forward to your on-going contributions and leadership. Together, I believe we can MAKE IT HAPPEN. 

Sincerely,

/S/   Ed Meyercord

 

Ed Meyercord

CEO

 

EM/lh

 

Cc:  Human Resources
From: cduty@ptd.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:44:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Colleen Duty

Talmage, PA 17580
From: garamirez3@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:22:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gloria Ramirez

Santa Maria, CA 93458
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-2292

EILEEN CHU HING, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

GLENN F. HING, 

 Defendant - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:08-cv-00210-BO) 

Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 21, 2009 

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Eileen Chu Hing, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

Plaintiff-appellant Eileen Chu Hing filed a complaint 

for divorce in Pennsylvania state court. Hing subsequently 

removed the case to the Eastern District of North Carolina. 

Concluding that subject matter jurisdiction was lacking, the 

district court dismissed and remanded the action back to the 

state court. Hing moved for reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. 

Civ. P. 59(e), and the district court denied the motion. Hing 

filed a timely appeal. For the reasons that follow, we dismiss 

the appeal. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2006), “[a]n order 

remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is 

not reviewable on appeal or otherwise, except that an order 

remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed 

pursuant to section 1443 . . . shall be reviewable . . . .” The 

Supreme Court has limited § 1447(d) to insulate from appellate 

review those remand orders based on the grounds specified in 

§ 1447(c): a defect in the removal procedure and a lack of 

subject matter jurisdiction. Quackenbush v. Allstate Ins. Co., 

517 U.S. 706, 711-12 (1996). Because the district court 

concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction under 

§ 1441, its remand order is not subject to appellate review. 

See Severonickel v. Gaston Reymenants, 115 F.3d 265, 266-69 (4th 

Cir. 1997); Mangold v. Analytic Servs., Inc., 77 F.3d 1442, 1450 

2 
3 

(4th Cir. 1996); Noel v. McCain, 538 F.2d 633, 635 (4th Cir. 

1976). Moreover, having determined that subject matter 

jurisdiction over Hing’s case was lacking, the district court 

was without jurisdiction to consider Hing’s motion to 

reconsider. See In re Lowe, 102 F.3d 731, 734-35 (4th Cir. 

1996). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We also deny Hing’s 

motion for a transcript at government expense. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
No. 175.

#### Zucker *v.*New York.

*Emanuel Redfield*for petitioner. *Frank S. Hogan*and *H. Richard Uviller*for respondent.

Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
No. 612, Misc.

#### Sees *v.*New York.

Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0001036500
<NAME>                        WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund VI, L.P., Series 5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                           1,646,298
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,646,298
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,936,649
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,710,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,936,649
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    92,240
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      336,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   620,999
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (865,560)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (865,560)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (865,560)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0




</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of First Robinson
Financial Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ending December
31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), we, Rick L. Catt, Chief Executive Officer and Jamie E.
McReynolds, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and result of
                operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of the written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to First Robinson Financial
Corporation and will be retained by First Robinson Financial Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


BY: /s/ Rick L. Catt                    BY: /s/ Jamie E. McReynolds
--------------------                    ---------------------------
Name:  Rick L. Catt                     Name:  Jamie E. McReynolds
Chief Executive Officer                 Chief Financial Officer
February 14, 2006                       February 14, 2006


                                       31
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information (in thousands except per
share data) extracted from Petroleum Heat and Power Co., Inc. and Subsidiaries
financial statements as of December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,390
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,967
<ALLOWANCES>                                       980
<INVENTORY>                                     16,285
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               105,124
<PP&E>                                          73,397
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,782
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 247,846
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,688
<BONDS>                                        288,957
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           32,489
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,620
<OTHER-SE>                                   (179,653)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   247,846
<SALES>                                        509,751
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               548,141
<CGS>                                          305,536
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  379,748
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               168,481
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,853
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,813
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (22,164)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,899)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,899)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.06)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          15,269
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          16,143
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     75,323
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          71,364
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            70,326
<LOANS>                                        278,523
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,280
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 469,807
<DEPOSITS>                                     404,746
<SHORT-TERM>                                    16,815
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,773
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,986
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,487
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 469,807
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 17,386
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,482
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   297
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                23,165
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               9,843
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,249
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,916
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      698
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  66
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,399
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,536
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,536
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,616
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.35
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,199
<LOANS-PAST>                                       614
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,212
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      692
<RECOVERIES>                                        62
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,280
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,857
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            423


</TABLE>
No. 541.

#### Local 100, United Association of Journeymen & Apprentices, *v.*Borden.

*L. N. D. Wells, Jr.*for petitioner.

*Ewell Lee Smith, Jr.*for respondent.

Motion of respondent for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Fifth Supreme Judicial District, granted.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.