alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: jeanwebb@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:29:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jean Webb

Baton Rouge, LA 70817
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

 

          I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., certify that: 

          1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of inTEST Corporation; 

          2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

          3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

          4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

        (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

        (b)  [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

        (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

        (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

          5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors: 

        (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

        (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 16, 2005/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
From: jasongq@ccfindiana.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:15:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jason Quellhorst

Shelbyville, IN 46176
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Lockheed Martin Corporation, Missiles and ) ASBCA No. 61237

 Fire Control )

)

Under Contract Nos. W31P4Q-08-C-0021

W31P4Q-05-C-0018

DAAH01-03-C-1054

DAAH01-03-C-0171

W31P4Q-11-C-0166

W31P4Q-15-C-0103

W31P4Q-12-C-0151

)

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Brian T. McLaughlin, Esq.

John E. McCarthy, Jr., Esq.

Jonathan M. Baker, Esq.

Christopher D. Garcia, Esq.

 Crowell & Moring LLP

 Washington, DC

Thomas A. Lemmer, Esq.

 Dentons US LLP

 Denver, CO

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Scott N. Flesch, Esq.

 Army Chief Trial Attorney

Zachary Jacobson, Esq.

Harry M. Parent, III, Esq.

 Trial Attorneys

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The government and appellant Lockheed Martin Corporation, Missiles and Fire 

Control, acting on behalf of Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc., are commended for resolving the 

underlying dispute. Appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal as settled is 

granted. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: October 6, 2020

REBA PAGE

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals
2

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61237, Appeal of Lockheed Martin 

Corporation, Missiles and Fire Control, rendered in conformance with the Board’s 

Charter.

Dated: October 6, 2020

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
BLD

- 078 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 12

- 3849

___________ IN RE: HECTOR HUERTAS ,

Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States D istrict Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania

(Related to W.D. Pa. Civ. No. 10

- cv - 00010 )

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

December 28, 2012 Before: SCIRICA, HARDIMAN and GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed : January 10, 2013 )

_________ OPINION

_________ PER CURIAM Pro se petitioner Hector Huertas seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the United States District Court for th e Western District of Pennsylvania to rule upon cross - motions for summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the former Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Jeffrey Beard, and various officials employed
at SCI

- Albion and SC I

- Forest. We will deny the mandamus petition.2

Huertas filed a complaint in District Court against the Defendants alleging violations of his procedural due process and Eighth Amendment rights arising from his continued confinement in segregation or restri cted housing units in various st ate correctional institutions. The D efendants moved for summary judgment ; i n response, Huertas filed a motion for partial summary judgment. T he Magistrate Judge recommended that the D efendants’ motion be granted and that H uertas ’s motion be denied. Huertas filed objection s to the Report and Recommendation. He then filed this petition for a writ of mandamus , seeking an order to compel the Distric t Court to decide the motions. On December 6, 2012 , the District Court granted the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and denied Huertas’s motion for partial summary judgment. In light of the District Court’s order, Huertas’s petition for a writ of mandamus is now moot. Accordingly, we will deny the petition for a writ of m an damus.
IMMUCOR, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 11.1
STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                                         Year Ended May 31,
 
                                     1997            1996            1995

Primary income per common and common
  equivalent share:
  Net income                      $1,839,914      $2,772,635      $2,889,787


Weighted average number of common shares and common 
share equivalents are as follows:
  Weighted average common shares
    outstanding                    8,066,137       7,867,354       7,695,252
  Shares issued from assumed exercise 
    of options and warrants          468,947         786,011         113,413
  Weighted average number of shares
    outstanding, as adjusted       8,535,084       8,653,365       7,808,665

Primary income per common and common equivalent share:

Net income                        $      .22      $    	 .32      $	     .37

 Note:	Shares issued from assumed exercise of options and warrants include the
 number of incremental shares which result from applying the "treasury stock
 method" for dilutive options and warrants in 1997, 1996 and 1995, per APB 
 15, paragraph 38.
                                        Year Ended May 31,

                                 1997            1996            1995

Fully diluted income per common and common 
    equivalent share:
    Net income                $1,839,914      $2,772,635      $2,889,787

The weighted average number of common
 shares are as  follows:
  Weighted average common shares
    outstanding                8,066,137       7,867,354       7,695,252
Shares issued from assumed exercise 
  of options and warrants        482,462         929,304         160,588
Weighted average number of shares
  outstanding, as adjusted     8,548,599       8,796,658       7,855,840

Fully diluted income per common
  and common equivalent share: 
Net income                    $      .22      $      .32      $      .37

 Note:	Shares issued from assumed exercise of options and warrants include the
 number of incremental shares which result from applying the "treasury stock
 method" for dilutive options and warrants in 1997, 1996 and 1995, per APB
 15, paragraph 38.
EXHIBIT
23
 
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 BOARD OF
DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS OF FIRST KEYSTONE CORPORATION:
 
 We
consent to the use of our reports dated March 9, 2009, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of First Keystone Corporation and Subsidiary as of
December 31, 2008, and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2008, management’s report on internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which
reports are included herein.
 
 /s/ J. H. Williams & Co.,
      LLPJ.
      H. Williams & Co., LLP
 
 March 9,
2009
 Kingston,
Pennsylvania
EXHIBIT 32.2



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Date:	August 14, 2007

/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
From: mmartin@harrisshelton.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:38:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Martha MARTIN

Millington, TN 38053
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001036180
<NAME>                        GFSI HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         5,437
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  30,371
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    36,956
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               75,949
<PP&E>                                         40,067
<DEPRECIATION>                                 20,657
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,094
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          25,406
<BONDS>                                        237,242
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          4,802
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (160,123)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   102,094
<SALES>                                        153,642
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               153,642
<CGS>                                          92,947
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,326
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (97)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             18,565
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,848
<INCOME-TAX>                                   2,285
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3,563
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,563
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
No. 293, Misc.

#### Biggs *v.*Acme Furnace Fitting Co. et al.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and for other relief denied.
From: mbenton@sunbeltgroupinc.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:29:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michael Benton

Houston, TX 77040
Order issued October 19, 2012



### In The 

## Court of Appeal Bi trict of at Balla No. 05-11-00600-CV BALDEV SINGH, HARMISH KAUR, WAHE GURU ONE, LLC,

AND SUBZI MANDI TEXAS, LLC, Appellants HARVINDER SINGH AND RASPAL SINGH NIJJAR, Appellee 

### ORDER The Court has before it the October 18, 2012 motion of appellants Baldev Singh, Harmish Kaur, and Subzi Mandi Texas, LLC to substitute counsel. We GRANT the motion. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to remove John Reeder as counsel of record for the previously named appellants and to substitute the following as lead counsel in his place: Eric J. Chartan Mohomad Said Law Firm of Modjarrad & Abusaad 100 N. Central Expwy., Suite 1000 Richardson, TX 75080 John Reeder shall remain attorney of record for appellant Wahe Guru One, LLC, until a motion to substitute counsel is filed on its behalf. Submission of this case will not be delayed by appellants’ substitution of new counsel, and the case will be submitted on the briefs currently on file.

MOLLY 

### PRESIDING JUSTICE
From: rdeh471@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:58:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Christina Stickel

Northumberland, PA 17857