alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 250

Urging the Secretary of Energy to fill the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 2, 2001

Mr. BARTON of Texas (for himself and Mr. BOUCHER) submitted the following

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

RESOLUTION

Urging the Secretary of Energy to fill the Strategic

Petroleum Reserve.

Whereas the United States may soon be engaged in military

activity as a result of the terrorist attacks of September

11, 2001;

Whereas such acts continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy

of the United States, including the security of important

energy supplies;

Whereas our Nation imports more than half of the crude oil

it consumes from other nations;

Whereas Congress found in the Energy Policy and Conservation Act that the storage of substantial quantities of petroleum products will diminish the vulnerability of the

United States to the effects of a severe energy supply
2

•HRES 250 IH

interruption, and provide limited protection from the

short-term consequences of interruptions in supplies of

petroleum products;

Whereas a severe energy supply interruption would have an

adverse impact upon American consumers and the economy;

Whereas the Strategic Petroleum Reserve has an authorized

capacity of 1,000,000,000 barrels of crude oil, a current

storage capacity of 700,000,000 barrels of crude oil, and

approximately 545,000,000 barrels of crude oil currently

in storage; and

Whereas marginal wells in the United States provide an important base of domestic crude oil production, make an

important contribution to our workforce and economy,

are particularly sensitive to price fluctuations, and are

difficult and costly to reopen: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives urges

2 the Secretary of Energy to increase the capacity of the

3 Strategic Petroleum Reserve to 1,000,000,000 of crude

4 oil, to fill the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to its capacity

5 as soon as practicable, and to consider purchasing from

6 marginal wells that would otherwise cease production, con7 sistent with current law.

Æ
H. Res. 1325 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 10, 2008. 

Whereas Jesse Alexander Helms, Jr., born in Monroe, North 

Carolina on October 18, 1921, spent a 52-year public career dedicating himself to his country, his family, and his 

home State, representing North Carolina in the United 

States Senate for 30 years; 

Whereas Jesse Alexander Helms, Jr., served in the United 

States Navy from 1942 until 1945; 

Whereas Jesse Alexander Helms, Jr., was educated in the 

public schools of Monroe, North Carolina, and at 

Wingate Junior College and Wake Forest College, and 

served as a city editor of the Raleigh Times, an administrative assistant to United States Senators Willis Smith 

and Alton Lennon, an executive director of the North 

Carolina Bankers Association, a member of the Raleigh 

City Council, and a television and radio executive; 

Whereas Jesse Alexander Helms, Jr., was elected to the 

United States Senate in 1972, and served as Chairman 

of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and the Senate Agriculture Committee, ultimately serving five terms, 

equal to the longest service of any Senator from North 

Carolina; 
2 

•HRES 1325 EH 

Whereas Jesse Alexander Helms, Jr., was a leader against 

Communism and became the first legislator of any nation 

to address the United Nations Security Council; 

Whereas Jesse Alexander Helms, Jr., was married for 65 

years to Dorothy ‘‘Dot’’ Coble Helms, whom he termed 

his ‘‘best friend’’, and Jesse Alexander Helms, Jr., is the 

father of three children; and 

Whereas Jesse Alexander Helms, Jr., made valuable contributions to his community, State, Nation, and the World: 

Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) honors the life, achievements, and distinguished 

career of Jesse Alexander Helms, Jr., public servant and 

former Member of the United States Senate; and 

(2) expresses its condolences to his wife, ‘‘Dot’’, and 

his three children on his passing. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
H. Res. 1362 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 24, 2008. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R. 

5501) to authorize appropriations for fiscal years 2009 

through 2013 to provide assistance to foreign countries to 

combat HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria, and for other 

purposes, with the Senate amendment thereto, and to consider in the House, without intervention of any point of order 

except those arising under clause 10 of rule XXI, a motion 

offered by the chairman of the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

or his designee that the House concur in the Senate amendment. The Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour 

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 

minority member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs. The 

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to its adoption without intervening motion. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of the motion to concur 

pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of 
2 

•HRES 1362 EH 

the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the motion to such time as may be designated by 

the Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Journal  Register  Company (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 27,  2004,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Robert
M. Jelenic, Chairman,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
Jean B. Clifton,  Executive  Vice President and Chief  Financial  Officer of the
Company,  each certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


/S/ ROBERT M. JELENIC
---------------------
Robert M. Jelenic
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
August 2, 2004

/S/ JEAN B. CLIFTON
-------------------
Jean B. Clifton
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
August 2, 2004


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  as amended (the  "Exchange
Act"),  or  incorporated  by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended,  or the Exchange Act,  except as may be expressly set forth by
specific  reference  in any such  filing.  A  signed  original  of this  written
statement   required  by  Section   906,  or  other   document   authenticating,
acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature  that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been  provided to Journal  Register  Company and will be retained by Journal
Register Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of BakBone Software Incorporated (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2003 (the Report), I, John Fitzgerald, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: June 26, 2003



BakBone Software Incorporated



|    | 
|--- | 
|By: | 
|    | 



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[House Report 107-695]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     107-695

======================================================================

 
 WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT TO THE 
  SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES 
                               COMMITTEE

                                _______
                                

 September 25, 2002.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 551]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 551, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a 
two-thirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is 
reported from the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions 
reported from the Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver 
to any special rule reported on the legislative day of 
Thursday, September 26, 2002, providing for the consideration 
or disposition of a joint resolution making continuing 
appropriations for the fiscal year 2003.

                                  

```
From: jpzipes@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:34:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jeannette Zipes

Rio Rancho, NM 87144
|     |                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|     |                                                                                                                                                       |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
| Date:  | November 2, 2016 | /s/Kent M. Adams |
|   |   | Kent M. Adams |
|   |   | President, Director and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |   |
| Date:  | November 2, 2016 | /s/James A. Duensing |
|   |   | James A. Duensing |
|   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer |
#### AHOYIAN et al. *v.*MASSACHUSETTS TURNPIKE AUTHORITY et al.

No. 473.

Decided December 3, 1962.

*J. Fleet Cowden*for appellants.

*Edward 0. Proctor, Arthur E. Sutherland*and *Kevin Hern*for appellees.

Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
From: rodtucker03@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:47:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rod Tucker

Locust, NC 28097
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:04:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Candonn Granger

Reynolds, ND 58275
No. 638.

#### Jew Ten, alias George K. Jue, alias Jue Gar King, alias Chow Ka King, *v.*Immigration and Naturalization Service.

*Joseph S. Hertogs*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Richard W. Schmude*for respondent.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
From: HEINKE CLARK

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Contraceptive Services and Preventive Care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:10:55 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Heinke K. Clark

631 Market Street

Apt. 201

Kirkland, WA 98033

 email: heinkeclark@msn.com
From: susan.mibeck@veryhelpful.info

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:14:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Susan Mibeck

Grand Forks, ND 58201