alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: k_mac@charter.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:15:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Margaret McCarty

Wausau, WI 54403
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MISTER IVORY,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-13-00213-CR

Appeal from the

396th District Court

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC# 1234891D)

O P I N I O N

Appellant Mister Ivory waived a trial by jury and pleaded guilty to the offense of burglary 

of a habitation. The trial court deferred adjudication of guilt, placed Appellant on community 

supervision for five years, and ordered Appellant to pay $1,600 in restitution, $500 in attorney’s 

fees, and $274 in court costs.

The State later filed a petition to proceed to adjudication. After being admonished on the 

State’s petition, Appellant entered an open plea of true to the acts alleged in paragraphs 1 and 2 of 

the petition. The trial court revoked Appellant’s community supervision, found Appellant guilty 

of burglary of a habitation, and sentenced him to imprisonment for six years. Appellant appealed. 

We affirm.
2

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has moved to withdraw as counsel and has filed a 

brief in which he has concluded that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief 

meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh. 

denied, 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 1377 (1967), by presenting a professional 

evaluation of the record demonstrating why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be 

advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 

684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v. 

State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). A copy of counsel’s brief has been delivered to 

Appellant, and Appellant has been advised of his right to examine the appellate record and file a 

pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is 

wholly frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support 

the appeal and a discussion of the contentions advanced in counsel’s brief would add nothing to the 

jurisprudence of the state.

The judgment is affirmed.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

July 11, 2014

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0001287 18-MAR-2016 08:14 AM
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Acorn Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A No. 1 for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, A. Corydon Meyer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                /s/  A. Corydon Meyer
                                --------------------------------------------
                                A. Corydon Meyer, Chief Executive Officer
                                October 17, 2002
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY

In connection with the annual report of TransGlobe Energy Corp.
(the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Ross G. Clarkson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

/s/ Ross ClarksonName: Ross G. Clarkson
Title: Chief Executive Officer March 27, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule
13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has
been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification accompanies the Form 40-F to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 40-F), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
No. 552.

#### Ragland et al. *v.*United States.

*R. R. Ryder*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Felicia Dubrovsky*for the United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No.  333-59540

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  219				Trade Date: 09/12/02
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

  June 1, 2001)							Issue Date:  09/17/02
The Date of this Pricing Supplement September 13, 2002
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QKC4   2.50%	09/15/04	     100%	        .45%                Semi-Annually	     YES	    NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		      Date		Count

$3,537,000.00	$3,521,083.50	ABN AMRO Inc.	   03/15/03		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes	  X   No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.   Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $706.656 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under a Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
Additionally, the total principal amount of PowerNotes(SM) offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001 has been increased from $500.0mm to $750.0mm.  $250.0mm principal amount of debt securities registered pursuant to Registration Statement No. 333-59540 originally offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement dated June 15, 2001 and related Prospectus dated May 25, 2001 are being offered as PowerNotes(SM) by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
From: rjlabrune@atcjet.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:58:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ron LaBrune

Lexington, NE 68850
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                   [Salomon Brothers Realty Corp. Letterhead]


                                August 12, 1998



New Century Mortgage Corporation
18400 Von Karman, Suite 1000
Irvine, California 92612

Attention:  Brad Morrice
            Chief Executive Officer

            Re:  Refinance Line between Salomon Brothers Realty Corp. and New
                 Century Mortgage Corporation

Ladies and Gentlemen:

    Reference is hereby made to that certain Letter Agreement (the "Letter
Agreement"), dated November 18, 1997, between Salomon Brothers Realty Corp.
("Salomon Brothers") and New Century Mortgage Corporation ("New Century") and
that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement", collectively
with the Letter Agreement, the "Agreements"), dated as of November 1, 1997,
between Salomon Brothers and New Century.

    Pursuant to Section 3(d) of the Letter Agreement and Section 18 of the
Purchase Agreement, Salomon Brothers and New Century hereby mutually agree that
the Agreements are hereby amended as of the date hereof to provide that Salomon
Brothers and New Century may terminate the Agreements upon mutual consent.

    Pursuant to the foregoing Salomon Brothers and New Century hereby terminate
the Agreements effective as of the date hereof.
<PAGE>
 
                                                   Page 2.


    Kindly acknowledge your agreement and acceptance of the foregoing by signing
and returning this letter to the undersigned.  This letter shall become
effective upon receipt by Salomon Brothers of your signed acknowledgment of the
terms of this letter.

                              Very truly yours,

                              SALOMON BROTHERS REALTY CORP.


                              By:    /s/ Vincent J. Varca
                                     --------------------
                              Name:  Vincent J. Varca
                                     --------------------
                              Title: Authorized Agent
                                     --------------------


Accepted and Agreed:

NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATION


By:    /s/ Brad A. Morrice
       -------------------
Name:  Brad A. Morrice
       -------------------
Title: CEO
       -------------------
From: gbaucum@apd.lacounty.gov

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:12:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gary Baucum

Long Beach, CA 90807
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit  Fund VI,  L.P.,  Series 5 (the  "Partnership")  for the  quarters  ended
September  30 2007 and June 30, 2007 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, I,
Wilfred  N.  Cooper,  Jr.,  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  WNC &
Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934,  except to the extent  that such
     provisions require the audit report of Local Limited Partnership  financial
     statements  to  refer  to the  auditing  standards  of the  Public  Company
     Accounting   Oversight  Board  for  the   Partnership's   annual  financial
     statements and except that the Report is a cumulative  report covering each
     of the quarters ended September 30 and June 30, 2007 and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,   the  financial  condition  and  result  of  operations  of  the
     Partnership.




/s/Thomas J. Riha
-----------------
Thomas J. Riha
Senior Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.
May 16, 2008
Exhibit 4.5


 


 





 


 


 





 


HÖEGH LNG PARTNERS LP 

AMENDED AND RESTATED NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN 

(Effective as of February 28, 2016)


 


 


The non-employee members of the Board of
Directors (the “Board”) of Höegh LNG Partners LP (the “Partnership”) will be entitled
to receive the following compensation:


 


	1.	Retainer Fees 


 


	 	•	 	Each non-employee director will receive an annual cash retainer fee of USD 37,500 (subject to adjustment from time to time, as determined by the Board) for each year of service as a director. 


 


	 	•	 	The Chairs of the Audit and Conflict Committees will each receive an annual cash retainer fee of USD 20,000 (subject to adjustment from time to time, as determined by the Board) for each year of service in such capacity. 


 


	 	•	 	Other committee members will receive an annual cash retainer fee of USD 10,000 (subject to adjustment from time to time, as determined by the Board)  for each year of service in such capacity. 


 


	2.	Equity Awards 


 


	 	•	 	
        Each non-employee director will receive
        an annual equity-based award (with award type, vesting and all other terms and conditions to be determined by the Board for any
        given year), valued at USD 37,500 (subject to adjustment from time to time, as determined by the Board) on the applicable date
        of grant, for each year of service as a director, which such award will be granted under the Höegh LNG Partners LP Long Term
        Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time (the “Plan”), or a successor plan, program or arrangement.

         

	 3.	Expense Reimbursement 


 


	 	•	 	Each non-employee director will be reimbursed for travel and miscellaneous expenses to attend meetings and activities of the Board or its committees and related to the director’s participation in the Partnership’s general education and orientation programs for directors.
From: jflynn82@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:28:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Flynn

Bloomsburg, PA 17815