alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    2,383,925
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    230,820
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         637,906
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       212,522
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,465,173
<COMMON>                                        48,462
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      694,040
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            334,331
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,076,833
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           74,407
<PREFERRED>                                     83,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           955,681
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    1,467
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                        2,000
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,271,785
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                3,465,173
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      780,542
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            38,990
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     628,685
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     667,675
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        112,867
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              (4,498)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 108,369
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        51,188
<NET-INCOME>                                    57,181
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      5,790
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   51,391
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        45,604
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         226,877
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
        

</TABLE>
#### Walter S. Church, Respondent, v. Newton Ketcham, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Learned, P. J.
No. 453, Misc.

#### Moore, alias Phillips, *v.*Wiman, Warden, et al.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*MacDonald Gallion,*Attorney General of Alabama, and *John C. Tyson III,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondents.

Supreme Court of Alabama. Certiorari denied.
From: GZFieldman@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: (no subject)

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:39:25 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women

just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-11383

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

REGINALD D. FINLEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeals from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(3:00-CR-4-1-X)

 

December 19, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Reginald Finley pled guilty pursuant to a written agreement to

being a felon in possession of a firearm and to failing to appear,

in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§922(g)(1) and 3146(a)(1). He argues

that he was denied effective assistance of counsel where his

attorney advised him to enter into a plea agreement from which he

received no benefit and in which he waived his right to appeal. We

find that Finley has failed to demonstrate that counsel was
1 United States v. Rawls, 85 F.3d 240, 242-43 (5th Cir. 1996).

2 United States v. Williams, 264 F.3d 561, 574 (5th Cir.

2001).

3 Id.

ineffective.

Finley argues that counsel was ineffective for failing to file

a pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that §

992 (g)(1) is unconstitutional. This argument is foreclosed by our

precedent.1

Finley also claims that the government failed to present

sufficient facts to prove that he had been convicted previously of

an offense punishable by a term exceeding one year, which is an

element of the offense. Because Finley did not raise this issue

below, we review only for plain error.2 We hold that there was no

clear error that affected Finley’s substantial rights.3

AFFIRMED.
H. Res. 1315 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 10, 2008. 

Whereas the National Aeronautics and Space Administration 

was established on July 29, 1958; 

Whereas on May 5, 1961, NASA successfully launched America’s first manned spacecraft, Freedom 7, piloted by Alan 

B. Shepard, Jr.; 

Whereas in July of 1969 President John Kennedy’s vision of 

landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to 

Earth was realized with the Apollo 11 mission, commanded by Neil A. Armstrong, Lunar Module Pilot 

Edwin ‘‘Buzz’’ Aldrin, Jr., and Command Module pilot 

Michael Collins; 

Whereas on April 12, 1981, NASA began a new era of 

human space flight and exploration with the launch of 

the first Space Shuttle Columbia, commanded by John 

W. Young and piloted by Robert L. ‘‘Bob’’ Crippen; 

Whereas NASA has greatly expanded our knowledge and understanding of our planet and solar system through various unmanned vehicles utilized on numerous missions; 

Whereas, during the Cold War, NASA’s achievements served 

as a source of national pride and captured the imagination of the world by demonstrating a peaceful use of our 

technological capabilities; 
2 

•HRES 1315 EH 

Whereas NASA now serves as a model for international cooperation and American leadership through the International Space Station and other scientific endeavors; 

Whereas thanks to NASA and the far-reaching gaze of the 

Hubble Space Telescope, we have seen further into our 

universe than ever before; 

Whereas NASA space probes have landed on or flown by 

eight of the planets in our solar system; 

Whereas the aeronautics research by NASA has led to great 

discoveries and advances in aircraft design and aviation; 

Whereas the work done by NASA has expanded the scope of 

human knowledge, created new technologies, and inspired 

young men and women to enter scientific and engineering 

careers; 

Whereas in the last fifty years, NASA has positively impacted 

almost every facet of our lives; and 

Whereas, thanks to the heroism, courage, and supreme sacrifice of our astronaut corps over the last five decades, 

we are now able to live and work in space for the benefit 

of all men: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

(1) honors the men and women of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration on the occasion of its 

50th Anniversary; 

(2) acknowledges the value of NASA’s discoveries 

and accomplishments; and 
3 

•HRES 1315 EH 

(3) pledges to maintain America’s position as the 

world leader in aeronautics and space exploration and 

technology. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   | Title of Each Class of |   | Maximum Aggregate |   | Amount of |   |   |
|   | Securities Offered |   | Offering Price(1) |   | Registration Fee (2) |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 2.700% PowerNotes®  Due March 15, 2025 |   | $1,366,000 |   | $158.73 |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | TOTAL |   |   |   | $158.73 |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |

|     |                                    |
|-----|------------------------------------|
| (1) | Excludes accrued interest, if any. |

|     |                                                                             |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | Calculated in accordance with Rule 457(r) under the Securities Act of 1933. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | CUSIP | Aggregate |   | Selling | Gross |   | Net | Coupon | Coupon |   | Coupon |   | Maturity |   | 1st Coupon | 1st | Survivor's | Product |   |   |
|   | Number | Principal |   | Price | Concession |   | Proceeds | Type | Rate |   | Frequency |   | Date |   | Date | Coupon | Option | Ranking |   |   |
|   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 14912HRQ5 | $1,366,000.00 |   | 100% | 1.800% |   | $1,341,412.00 | Fixed | 2.700% |   | Semi- |   | 03/15/2025 |   | 09/15/2015 | $12.68 | Yes | Senior Unsecured |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Annual |   |   |   |   |   |   | Notes |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-19-00019-CR

JUAN GABRIEL CERVANTES,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 361st District Court

Brazos County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-04555-CRF-361

ORDER

Appellant’s Motion to Extend Time to File Notice of Appeal was filed on January 

14, 2019. In the motion, appellant asserts that he was convicted on December 5, 2018, but 

due to a mistake, did not timely file a notice of appeal. He also asserts that a notice of 

appeal was filed with the trial court on January 14, 2019, and attached a copy of the notice. 

Appellant requests an extension of time to file the notice of appeal until the date it was 

filed in the trial court.

Because the notice of appeal and the motion for extension of time were filed in the 
Cervantes v. State Page 2

proper locations within 15 days after the date of the deadline for filing the notice of 

appeal, appellant’s motion is granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3.

Accordingly, appellant’s notice of appeal was timely filed with the trial court on 

January 14, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray, and

Justice Davis

Motion granted

Order issued and filed January 23, 2019
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

March 31, 2016

Mr. David K. Paylor, Director

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

629 East Main Street

P.O. Box 1105

Richmond, Virginia 23218

Dear Mr. Paylor:

 On October 26, 2015, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision

to the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department of Environmental 

Quality (VADEQ). The SIP revision converts a consent order for reasonably available control 

technology (RACT) into a state operating permit; as well as, administratively corrects two 

typographical errors in calculating the daily reduction in volatile organic compound (VOC) 

emissions. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete 

and is reviewing it to prepare a Direct Final Rulemaking. 

 If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Mr. Gregory Becoat, 

at (215) 814-2036, the principal contact for this rulemaking. 

Sincerely,

 /s/

 Nikos Singelis, Acting Director

 Air Protection Division 

cc: Mr. Michael G. Dowd, Air Quality Division Director

 Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
From: bcarier@roadrunner.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive Care for Women

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:00:26 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Thank you.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATIN EXTRACTED FORM THE JUNE 30,
1998 10-Q OF ON STAGE ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,088
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,354
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        227
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,033
<PP&E>                                          23,434
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,853
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,073
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,145
<BONDS>                                         14,671
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            74
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,073
<SALES>                                         14,450
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,533
<CGS>                                           10,922
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,340
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (541)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (542)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (542)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
No. 305, Misc.

#### Mann *v.*United States.

*Gerry Levenberg*and *W. L.*

*Craig*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant*

*Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Kirby W. Patterson*for the United States.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of IntrusionInc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending December 31,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Michael L. Paxton, Chief Financial Officer of the Companycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| March 28,  2008 | /s/ Michael L. Paxton   |
|----------------------|-------------------------|
|                 | Michael L. Paxton       |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1318 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          July 9, 2008.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5811) to amend title 44, United States 
Code, to require preservation of certain electronic records by Federal agencies, 
to require a certification and reports relating to Presidential records, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived 
except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment in the 
nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Oversight and Government 
Reform now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as 
amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions of 
the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform; 
and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  During consideration of H.R. 5811 pursuant to this resolution, 
notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone 
further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 
Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                                  Certification
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
                                      Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Excelsior Private Equity Fund II, Inc. (the "Company"),
does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2003 (the
"Form 10-Q") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  September 15, 2003                            /s/ David I. Fann
                                                     ---------------------------
                                              Name:  David I. Fann
                                              Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer

Date:  September 15, 2003                            /s/ Douglas A. Lindgren
                                                     ---------------------------
                                              Name:  Douglas A. Lindgren
                                              Title: Co-Chief Executive Officer

Date:  September 15, 2003                            /s/ Robert F. Aufenanger
                                                     ---------------------------
                                              Name:  Robert F. Aufenanger
                                              Title: Treasurer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 177 (Thursday, September 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 63108]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19912]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as 
other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for 
immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and 
at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be 
obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the 
appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of 
Information Office at https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/request.htm. 
Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards 
enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)).
    Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at 
the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, 
Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution 
Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20551-0001, not later than October 16, 2023.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Stephanie Weber, Assistant 
Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55480-0291. 
Comments can also be sent electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d09d9190bda0bca3feb6a2b2febfa2b7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f5b8b4b598859986db938797db9a8792">[email protected]</span></a>:
    1. Bank Forward Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust, Fargo, 
North Dakota; to acquire up to 41.02 percent of the voting shares of 
Security State Bank Holding Company, and thereby indirectly acquire 
voting shares of Bank Forward, both of Fargo, North Dakota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2023-19912 Filed 9-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>