alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: deb@pickeringcreative.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:59:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Deb Pickering

Lincoln, NE 68523
No. 364, Misc.

#### Jenkot *v.*Pate, Warden.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          31,488                  47,180
<SECURITIES>                                    16,682                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,419                  18,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                       377                     385
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                68,442                  68,884
<PP&E>                                          11,474                   8,845
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,343                   1,580
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,803                  79,734
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,414                  18,556
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        62,839                  62,711
<OTHER-SE>                                        (730)                 (2,271)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,803                  79,374
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,543                   4,236
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,476                     835
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,106                   4,164
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 370                     143
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,331                    (620)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       816                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,515                    (620)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Obadiah W. F. Randolph, as Substituted Trustee under the Wills of Charles F. Randolph, Deceased, and George F. Randolph, Deceased, and as Trustee under the Will of Edward F. Randolph, Deceased, Appellant. George F. R. Albertson et al., Respondents.

*Matter of Randolph,*150 App. Div. 902, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted January 6, 1913;

decided January 31, 1913.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 19, 1912, which affirmed a decree of the New York County Surrogate’s Court settling the account of appellant as substituted trustee under the wills of Charles F. Randolph and George F. Randolph, deceased, and as trustee under the will of Edward F. Randolph, deceased.

*L. E. Warren*for appellant.

*Frank M. Avery, Edgar J. Phillips*and *William Thorn Simpson*for respondents.

Appeal dismissed, with costs against appellant personally, on the ground that the order appealed from is not a final order; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Collin and Hogan, JJ.
#### Lewis C. Wagner, Respondent, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.;

Bradley, J., not sitting.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS23247 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Cuisine Solutions, Inc. (the Company), each hereby certifies that, to his
knowledge on the date hereof:  (a)
    
    the Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 of the Company for the period ended June 26, 2004
filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. /s/ Stanislas Vilgrain
Stanislas Vilgrain
    
    Chief Executive Officer
    
    September 24, 2004/s/ Yuyun Tristan KuoYuyun Tristan Kuo
    
    Vice President of Finance,
Treasurer and Corporate
Secretary (Principal Financial
And Accounting Official)
    
    September 24, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Intrusion Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, G. Ward Paxton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|August 6, 2004 | /s/G. WARD PAXTONG. Ward Paxton
Chief Executive Officer
|-------------- | -------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
From: rufromengland@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:23:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kristel England

Santa Rosa, CA 95409
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         I,  Phillip E. Becker,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer and H.
Stewart  Fitz Gibbon III,  SVP and Chief  Financial  Officer,  of Wayne  Savings
Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:.

         (1)      The  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-Q of the  Company  for the
                  quarter ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report")  fully complies
                  with  the  requirements  of  Sections  13(a)  or  15(d) of the
                  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));
                  and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


February 10, 2006              /s/ Phillip E. Becker
-----------------              -----------------------------------
Date                           Phillip E. Becker
                               President and Chief  Executive Officer



February 10, 2006              /s/ H. Stewart Fitz Gibbon III
-----------------              -----------------------------------
Date                           H. Stewart Fitz Gibbon III,
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Comfort Systems USA, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William F. Murdy, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date: May 4, 2010

/s/ WILLIAM F. MURDY William F. Murdy Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


*A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


---



QuickLinks
From: fwalker@perryhallbaptist.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:38:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

William Walker

Towson, MD 21286
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PAMECO CORPORATION FOR THE QUARTER ENDED NOVEMBER 30,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                             128
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,967
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,006
<INVENTORY>                                    117,205
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               152,198
<PP&E>                                          29,528
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 227,935
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,193
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   227,935
<SALES>                                        135,991
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               135,991
<CGS>                                          103,163
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  141,439
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   962
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,861
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,271)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,129)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,142)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.56)


</TABLE>
From: estelled99@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:34:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Estelle Freeman

Colorado Springs, CO 80923
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 10433 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

− Appellee

,

v ersus

WILLIE MARION ROBERTS

,

Defendant

− Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas No. 3:18

- CR

- 491

- 1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Willie Roberts has

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 18, 2019
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-10433 Document: 00515203376 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/18/2019No. 19

- 10433

2 moved to withdraw and has filed a brief per Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738
(1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Roberts h a s not filed a response.

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the recor d.
We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-10433 Document: 00515203376 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/18/2019
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7617

MARIO JESUS OBREGON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

STEPHANIE HOLLENBACK, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (5:15-hc-02098-FL)

Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mario Jesus Obregon, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Mario Jesus Obregon, a federal prisoner, appeals the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012)

petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Obregon v. Hollenback, No. 5:15-hc-02098-FL (E.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 

2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED