alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Donal dR . Jos t I J^JL^TIC ; 391 0 Willo w Ridg e E>rive , Holt , M I 4884 2 ;,';^T\j!Q|,P .

- 1 Docke t Managemen t

Facility U.S . Dep t o f Transportatio n Docke t No . FAA-2102-008 9 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Wes t Bldg . Gran dFloor , Roo mW-12014 0 Washington , D . C . 2059 0 Thi s i s t o len dm

y support t o Su nCountr y Airline' s slo t exemptio nDocke t No . FAA-2012-0089 . Th e dail y direc t

flight s betwee nReaga nNationa l an dLansing , Michigan' s airport ar e especiall y efficien t

an dhelpfu l t o m

y extende dfamil y wh o trave l multipl e time s annuall y betwee nLansin g an dWashington . W e mus t otherwis e mak e arrangement s that consum e fuel an dtim e an dmone y t o us e airport s i nDetroi t

o r othe r Michiga ncities . Sincerely , Donal dR . Jos t

/-.i-^*^^- ^ /^^

^ ;^ '
No. 628.

#### Liner et al. *v.*Jafco, Inc., et al.

*H. G. B. King*for petitioners.

*John A. Chambliss, Jr.*for respondents.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee. Certiorari granted.
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00383-CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,

Appellant/Cross-Appellee

v.

Julian TORRES, III,

Appellee/Cross-Appellant

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-05-98

Honorable Alex W. Gabert, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 17, 2008

REVERSED and REMANDED

The parties have filed a “Joint Motion to Set Aside and Remand” stating they have reached

a settlement, and requesting that we set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits

and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with the parties’s

settlement agreement. The motion is granted. The judgment of the trial court signed on March 12,

2008 is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. See TEX. R.

APP.P.42.1(a)(2)(B), 43.2(d). Costs of appeal are taxed against the parties who have incurred them.

PER CURIAM
December 28,2015

US Dept. ofTransportation Docket Operations West Bldg Ground Floor, Rm w12-140 1200 NewJersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 ATTN: Request to Cancel333 Exemption Submission Dear Sir or Ma'am: I made several errors onmy recent 333 Exemption submission viathe Regulations.gov website. My commenttracking number is 1jz-8mzu-9mls. Please cancel this submission. I amplanning on resubmitting the 333 Exemption submission inthe near future once I have corrected the errors. Much thanks,

Charles Borchini Jr. 1643 Suburban Ave. Fl. #1 Pittsburgh, PA 15216 Tel: 410-317-7434 E-mail: charles@borchini.com
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Academically GiftedCheck ListsConcept FormationCurriculum DevelopmentEducational ChangeEducational PrinciplesElementary Secondary EducationLearning ProcessesQuestionnairesScience CurriculumScience EducationStudent CharacteristicsTeaching MethodsTheory Practice Relationship

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
From: candsgregory@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:17:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lt Col Charles Gregory

, 13856-1446
|   |  (1)       | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |            |                                                                                                                                                 |
|   |  (2)  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|  Date:  November 4, 2010  |  /s/ Kent M. Adams                          |
|-----------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                          |  Kent M. Adams                                   |
|                                          |  President, Director and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                          |                                                  |
|                                          |                                                  |
|  Date:  November 4, 2010       |  /s/ James A. Duensing                      |
|                                          |  James A. Duensing                               |
|                                          |  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial    |
|                                          |  Officer                                         |
REV HOLDINGS LLC AND
SUBSIDIARIES

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of REV Holdings LLC
(the "Company") for the period ended
September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Todd J. Slotkin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/ Todd J.
Slotkin

Todd J.
SlotkinChief Financial OfficerNovember 13,
2003

38

---
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.96 MB)
 
 Travels Dunford Iraq Chairman
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Richard L. Parsons

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:36:05 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as

pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care law,

and to reject any exemptions for "religious employers." These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide

countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that "religious refusal" exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological

distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to

make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the

exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals

with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage

requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and

ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM's recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.

Richard L. Parsons

Jefferson City, MO
No. 624.

#### Sears, Roebuck & Co. *v.*Gugel.

*Burton Y. Weitzenfeld*for petitioner.

*Nuel N. Donley*for respondent.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Academic AchievementElementary Secondary EducationLabeling (of Persons)Self Fulfilling PropheciesSocial ReinforcementStereotypesStudent BehaviorStudent MotivationStudentsTeacher AttitudesTeacher Expectations of StudentsTeachers

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12 -00637- CR

Israel Meza

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 432nd District Cou rt

o f Tarrant County (1259657D )

November 6, 2014

Opinion by Justice Gardner

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the tria l court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Anne Gardner

Justice Anne Gardner
No. 402.

#### Solo Products Corp. *v.*Feathercombs, Inc.

*Floyd H. Crews*for petitioner.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
Pursuant to





18
U.S.C. Section 1350





As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Rogers Communications Inc., a
corporation organized under the laws of British Columbia (the “Company”) for the
period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers
of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








Dated:
      March 4, 2008
            /s/
      Edward S. RogersEdward
      S. RogersPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer








Dated:
      March 4, 2008
            /s/
      William W. LintonWilliam
      W. LintonSenior
      Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
  Officer
From: lehcaruwi@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:05:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rachel Lewis

Jonesboro, IN 46938
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2016 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                      
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company.




Date:May 2, 2016/s/Kent M. AdamsKent M. AdamsPresident, Director and Chief Executive OfficerDate:May 2, 2016/s/James A. DuensingJames A. DuensingExecutive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: Tankcar3901@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:00:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mark Simmons

Sulphur, LA 70665
#### Jacob Morris, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Bockes, J.
No. 138, Misc.

#### Crews *v.*New York.

Supreme Court of New York, Clinton County. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1470 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1470

  To establish a demonstration program for school dropout prevention.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 26, 2001

Mr. Smith of Oregon introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To establish a demonstration program for school dropout prevention.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Dropout Reduction Outreach Program 
Act of 2001'' or the ``DROP Act''.

SEC. 2. SCHOOL DROPOUT PREVENTION.

    (a) Grants Authorized.--The Secretary of Education is authorized to 
carry out a demonstration program under which the Secretary awards 
grants to not less than 2 States to enable the States--
            (1) to provide targeted assistance to secondary school and 
        middle school students who are at risk of high school dropout 
        through specialized professional development opportunities for 
        guidance counselors, teachers or administrators who work with 
        such students at schools that have among the highest school 
        dropout rates in the State based on data for the 3 academic 
        years preceding the academic year for which the grant is 
        awarded, to determine if the school dropout rates decrease as a 
        result of the assistance;
            (2) to implement the hiring of additional guidance 
        counselors who have been trained to work with students at high 
        risk for dropping out to work with such students; and
            (3) to implement school and State program evaluation 
        strategies for the purpose of disseminating best practices on 
        effective school-based dropout prevention strategies.
    (b) Criteria for Selection.--To be eligible to receive a grant 
under this section, a State shall have provided the National Center for 
Education Statistics with not less than 3 contiguous years of State and 
school dropout data that are in compliance with the common core data 
standards of the National Center for Education Statistics, in order to 
ensure data-based decisionmaking in the awarding of such grants.
    (c) Evaluation and Report.--The Secretary of Education shall 
evaluate the activities assisted under this section and transmit to 
Congress a report regarding the results of the evaluation.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $3,333,333 for each of the 
fiscal years 2002, 2003, and 2004.
                                 <all>
```