alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 355.

#### Lynd, Circuit Clerk and Registrar of Voters of Forrest County, Mississippi, et al. *v.*United States.

*Joe T. Patterson,*Attorney General of Mississippi, *Dugas Shands, Peter M. Stockett, Jr.*and *Will S. Wells,*Assistant Attorneys General, and *M. M. Roberts*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attor-*

*ney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene*and *Isabel L. Blair*for the United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
From: nate@abiglime.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:35:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nate Kassebaum

Gilbert, AZ 85234
No. 730, Misc.

#### Cisneros *v.*California.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of California. Petition dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.
No. 529.

#### United States *v.*Carlo Bianchi & Co., Inc.

*Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Guilfoyle*and *John G. Laughlin, Jr.*for the United States.

*William H. Matthews*and *Robert W. Knox*for respondent.

Court of Claims. Certiorari granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1489 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1489

To provide for the sharing of information between Federal departments, 
 agencies, and other entities with respect to aliens seeking admission 
             to the United States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 3, 2001

  Ms. Snowe (for herself and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the sharing of information between Federal departments, 
 agencies, and other entities with respect to aliens seeking admission 
             to the United States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHARING INFORMATION.

    All United States law enforcement agencies and the intelligence 
community (as defined in section 3(4) of the National Security Act of 
1947 (50 U.S.C. 401a(4)) shall share information on aliens with any 
United States department, agency, or other entity responsible for 
receiving, processing, issuing, and admitting any individual seeking 
entry to the United States by any visa or other official document that 
authorizes entry to the United States.
                                 <all>
```
From: jpcd40@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:40:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Paul Nielsen

Cartersville, GA 30120
800 Independence Ave., S.W.

Washington, DC 20591

January 22, 2013

Mr. Richard D. Blosser

3037 Lakeview Terrace

Fullerton, CA 92835

Dear Mr. Blosser:

This is in response to your November 3, 2008 letter sent to the public docket (No. 

FAA-2008-1212) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to initiate 

rulemaking to repeal certain requirements relating to the operation of light-sport aircraft

by persons exercising the privileges of a sport pilot. Specifically, the petition for 

rulemaking requested the FAA repeal the requirements of 14 CFR § 61.303(b)(2).

In accordance with 14 CFR § 11.73, the FAA must use the following criteria when 

making a decision as to whether or not to amend current regulations based on a petition 

for rulemaking:

1) The immediacy of the safety or security concerns you raise;

2) The priority of other issues the FAA must deal with; and 

3) The resources we have available to address these issues.

Medical certification standards have been established by the FAA in accordance with its 

statutory mandate to prescribe regulations and minimum standards the Administrator 

finds necessary for safety in air commerce. Section 61.303 has been promulgated in 

accordance with this authority and does not require an individual to make any selfincriminating statement for the purpose of operating a light-sport aircraft. The regulation 

establishes minimum medical certification requirements for the operation of light-sport 

aircraft by persons exercising the privileges of a sport pilot. 

The FAA has a priority list for rulemaking that addresses many issues that are crucial to 

the safety of the aviation community and the traveling public. The FAA must prioritize 

its limited rulemaking resources so as to deliver the most value to the aviation system as a 

whole. After reviewing your request, we have determined that the issue you raise is not 

an immediate safety concern and would not provide a level of safety equivalent to that 
2

provided by the regulation. We also find that granting the request would not be in the 

public interest.

For the reasons above, we deny your petition for rulemaking in accordance with 

14 CFR § 11.73.

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen

Director, Flight Standards Service
From: LFroggy24@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:19:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth Swope

Hollywood, FL 33026
---

EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT

I, David C. Ferguson, certify that:

|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F/A of
      TransGlobe Energy Corporation;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
      untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
      necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
      which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
      covered by this report.

Date: May 26, 2010

/s/ David
FergusonDavid C. Ferguson Chief Financial Officer

---
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue


Registration No.  333-35460
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)
PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  041				Trade Date: 01/25/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated
  September 8, 2000)						Issue Date:  01/30/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement January 25, 2001

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION
OR REPAYMENT
  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or
     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any
Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivor's		applicable
                                                             regular or special
  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No
                                                                  record dates)

14911QBS9  6.50%      01/15/11	  100%	      1.50%	 Semi-annually	  YES	 YES
                                               Callable at 100% on 01/15/03 and
									                                            semi-annually thereafter



Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:
____  Yes	  X   No						N/A



(1) The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not
affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the
effective date of the change.

(2) Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to
Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the
time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
EXHIBIT 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Century Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward F. Gotschall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/    Edward Gotschall








Edward F. Gotschall


Chief Financial Officer


August 14, 2002
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 129

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the payment of

a monthly stipend to the surviving parents (known as ‘‘Gold Star parents’’) of members of the Armed Forces who die during a period of

war.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 22, 2001

Mr. CLELAND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the

payment of a monthly stipend to the surviving parents

(known as ‘‘Gold Star parents’’) of members of the

Armed Forces who die during a period of war.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gold Star Parents An5 nuity Act’’.
2

•S 129 IS

1 SEC. 2. SPECIAL PENSION FOR GOLD STAR PARENTS.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—(1) Chapter 15 of title 38, United

3 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing new subchapter:

5 ‘‘SUBCHAPTER V—SPECIAL PENSION FOR GOLD

6 STAR PARENTS

7 ‘‘§ 1571. Gold Star parents

8 ‘‘(a) The Secretary shall pay monthly to each person

9 who has received a Gold Star lapel button under section

10 1126 of title 10 as a parent of a person who died in a

11 manner described in subsection (a) of that section a spe12 cial pension in an amount determined under subsection

13 (b).

14 ‘‘(b) The amount of special pension payable under

15 this section with respect to the death of any person shall

16 be $125 per month. In any case in which there is more

17 than one parent eligible for special pension under this sec18 tion with respect to the death of a person, the Secretary

19 shall divide the payment equally among those eligible par20 ents.

21 ‘‘(c) The receipt of special pension under this section

22 shall not deprive any person of any other pension or other

23 benefit, right, or privilege to which such person is or may

24 hereafter be entitled under any existing or subsequent law.

25 Special pension under this section shall be paid in addition

26 to all other payments under laws of the United States.
3

•S 129 IS

1 ‘‘(d) Special pension under this section shall not be

2 subject to any attachment, execution, levy, tax lien, or de3 tention under any process whatever.

4 ‘‘(e) For purposes of this section, the term ‘parent’

5 has the meaning provided in section 1126(d)(2) of title

6 10.’’.

7 (2) The table of sections at the beginning of such

8 chapter is amended by adding at the end the following:

‘‘SUBCHAPTER V—SPECIAL PENSION FOR GOLD STAR PARENTS

‘‘1571. Gold Star parents.’’.

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Section 1571 of title 38,

10 United States Code, as added by subsection (a), shall take

11 effect on October 1, 2001.

Æ
H. Res. 1367 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 24, 2008. 

Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the 

legislative day of Thursday, July 24, 2008, for the Speaker 

to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules relating to the bill (H.R. 6578) to provide for the sale of light 

grade petroleum from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve and 

its replacement with heavy grade petroleum. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
From: flgasva@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:03:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gerold Smith

Monterey, VA 24465
From: holeman790@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:37:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Paul Wilson

Crystal Lake, IL 60014