alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: LeeKoerber@USAChristian.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:14:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lee Koerber

Ivanhoe, MN 56142
From: charlesmolnar@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:47:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Charles Molnar

, 15108-2126
# EXHIBIT 21

Subsidiaries of
Registrant

|Subsidiary                            | Jurisdiction of Organization
|------------------------------------- | ----------------------------
|                                      |                             
|Immucor Medizinische Diagnostik GmbH  |                             
|                                      |                             
|Immucor Italia S.r.l                  |                             
|                                      |                             
|Immucor Diagnosticos Medicos Lda      |                             
|                                      |                             
|Gamma Biologicals, Inc.               |                             
|                                      |                             
|Dominion Biologicals Limited          |                             
|                                      |                             
|Immucor, S.L                          |                             
|                                      |                             
|Immucor Gamma Benelux SPRL            |                             
|                                      |                             
|Immucor France EURL                   |                             
|                                      |                             
|BCA Acquisition Corporation           |                             
|                                      |                             
|Immucor Sales, Inc.                   |                             
|                                      |                             
|Immucor Intellectual Properties, Inc. |                             
|                                      |                             
|Immucor/Gamma, L.P.                   |                             
|                                      |                             
|Immucor Investments, Inc.             |                             
|                                      |                             
|Immucor Investments, LLC              |                             
|                                      |                             
|Gamma Operations, LLC                 |                             

The Company owns, directly or
indirectly, 100% of each of the above entities.
99–008

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ! 2d Session 107–695

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII 

WITH RESPECT TO THE SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF 

CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES COMMITTEE

SEPTEMBER 25, 2002.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 551] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 551, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver to any special rule 

reported on the legislative day of Thursday, September 26, 2002, 

providing for the consideration or disposition of a joint resolution 

making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003.

Æ
#### WILLIAMSON et al. *v.*HOPEWELL REDEVELOPMENT & HOUSING AUTHORITY.

No. 582.

Decided January 7, 1963.

*Lewis S. Pendleton, Jr.*for appellants.

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
No. 324, Misc.

#### Butler *v.*Rundle, Correctional Superintendent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied.
No. 217.

#### Goss et al. *v.*Board of Education of Knoxville, Tennessee, et al.

*Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Carl A. Cowan*and *Z. Alexander Looby*for petitioners.

*S. Frank Fowler*and *K. Harlan Dodson, Jr.*for respondents.

The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition, which reads as follows:

“Whether petitioners, Negro school children seeking desegregation of the public school systems of Knoxville, Tennessee (Goss case), and Davidson County, Tennessee (Maxwell case), are deprived of rights under the Fourteenth Amendment by judicial approval of a provision in desegregation plans adopted by their local school boards, which expressly recognizes race as a ground for transfer between schools in circumstances where such transfers operate to preserve the pre-existing racially segregated system, and which operate to restrict Negroes living in the zones of all-Negro schools to such schools while permitting white children in such areas to transfer to other schools solely on the basis of race.”
From: stacyhoop@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:37:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

stacy hoop

Grenada, MS 38901
From: mbnorton59@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:27:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Beth Norton

Kingsville, OH 44048
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of Rogers Communications Inc.

We
consent to the use of:



| |  |  | our Independent Auditors Report, dated February 13, 2015 on the consolidated financial statements of Rogers Communications Inc. (the Company) which comprise the consolidated statements of
financial position of the Company as at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year
period ended December 31, 2014, and notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated February 13, 2015 on the consolidated statements of financial position of the Company as at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and
the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2014; and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm dated February 13, 2015 on the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014,
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

each of which is included in this annual report on Form 40-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such reports in Registration Statement No. 333-193960, and 333-178511 on Form F-10 and Registration
Statement No. 333-170234 on Form F-3D of the Company.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants

February 13, 2015

Toronto, Canada
From: collette.lavallee@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:21:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Collette Lavallee

Swampscott, MA 01907
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Coupon | Interest | Maturity | Callable | Survivor's Option | Price | CUSIP |   |
| 2.100% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 9/15/2020 | 3/15/2018 * | Yes § | 100.00 | 14912HTB6 |   |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |  |
| (†††) | First Payment date 9/15/2017 |   |
|                    |   |
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |
|   | Title of Each Class of | Maximum Aggregate | Amount of |   |
|   | Securities Offered | Offering Price(1) | Registration Fee(2) |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 2.550% PowerNotes® | Due September 15, 2021 | $1,346,000 | $173.36 |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 3.100% PowerNotes® | Due September 15, 2026 | $1,246,000 | $160.48 |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | TOTAL |   |   | $333.85 |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |

|     |                                    |
|-----|------------------------------------|
| (1) | Excludes accrued interest, if any. |

|     |                                                                             |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | Calculated in accordance with Rule 457(r) under the Securities Act of 1933. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | CUSIP | Aggregate |   | Selling | Gross |   | Net | Coupon | Coupon |   | Coupon |   | Maturity |   | 1st Coupon | 1st | Survivor's | Product |   |   |
|   | Number | Principal |   | Price | Concession |   | Proceeds | Type | Rate |   | Frequency |   | Date |   | Date | Coupon | Option | Ranking |   |   |
|   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 14912HRK8 | $1,346,000.00 |   | 100% | 1.450% |   | $1,326,483.00 | Fixed | 2.550% |   | Semi- |   | 09/15/2021 |   | 03/15/2015 | $12.54 | Yes | Senior Unsecured |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Annual |   |   |   |   |   |   | Notes |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | CUSIP | Aggregate | Selling | Gross | Net |   | Coupon | Coupon | Coupon | Maturity | 1st Coupon | 1st |   | Survivor's |   | Product |   |   |
|   | Number | Principal | Price | Concession | Proceeds |   | Type | Rate | Frequency | Date | Date | Coupon |   | Option |   | Ranking |   |   |
|   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 14912HRL6 | $1,246,000.00 | 100% | 2.000% | $1,221,080.00 |   | Fixed | 3.100% | Semi- | 09/15/2026 | 03/15/2015 | $15.24 |   | Yes |   | Senior Unsecured |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Annual |   |   |   |   |   |   | Notes |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of First Robinson
Financial Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ending December
31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), we, Rick L. Catt, Chief Executive Officer and Jamie E.
McReynolds, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of the written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to First Robinson Financial
Corporation and will be retained by First Robinson Financial Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



By:  /s/ Rick L. Catt                         By: /s/ Jamie E. McReynolds
---------------------                         ---------------------------
Name:  Rick L. Catt                           Name: Jamie E. McReynolds
Chief Executive Officer                       Chief Financial Officer
February 17, 2004                             February 17, 2004



                                       4