alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: terrikone@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:12:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Terri Konermann

Middletown, OH 45044
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 179 (Monday, September 18, 2023)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 64347]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20302]



[[Page 64345]]

Vol. 88

Monday,

No. 179

September 18, 2023

Part III





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Presidential Determination No. 2023-10 of September 13, 2023--
Continuation of the Exercise of Certain Authorities Under the Trading 
With the Enemy Act


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 88 , No. 179 / Monday, September 18, 2023 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 64347]]

                Presidential Determination No. 2023-10 of September 13, 
                2023

                
Continuation of the Exercise of Certain 
                Authorities Under the Trading With the Enemy Act

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the 
                Secretary of the Treasury

                Under section 101(b) of Public Law 95-223 (91 Stat. 
                1625; 50 U.S.C. 4305 note), and a previous 
                determination on September 2, 2022 (87 FR 54859, 
                September 8, 2022), the exercise of certain authorities 
                under the Trading With the Enemy Act is scheduled to 
                expire on September 14, 2023.

                I hereby determine that the continuation of the 
                exercise of those authorities with respect to Cuba for 
                1 year is in the national interest of the United 
                States.

                Therefore, consistent with the authority vested in me 
                by section 101(b) of Public Law 95-223, I continue for 
                1 year, until September 14, 2024, the exercise of those 
                authorities with respect to Cuba, as implemented by the 
                Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 515.

                The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and 
                directed to publish this determination in the Federal 
                Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, September 13, 2023

[FR Doc. 2023-20302
Filed 9-15-23; 11:15 am]
Billing code 4811-33-P
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1375 

Recognizing and supporting the goals and ideals of National Runaway 

Prevention Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 24, 2008 

Mrs. BIGGERT (for herself and Mr. ISRAEL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 

Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and supporting the goals and ideals of National 

Runaway Prevention Month. 

Whereas the prevalence of runaway and homelessness among 

youth is staggering, with studies suggesting that every 

year, between 1,600,000 and 2,800,000 youth live on the 

streets of the United States; 

Whereas running away from home is widespread, and youth 

aged 12 to 17 are at a higher risk of homelessness than 

adults; 

Whereas runaway youth most often are youth who have been 

expelled from their homes by their families; physically, 

sexually, and emotionally abused at home; discharged by 

State custodial systems without adequate transition 

plans; separated from their parents by death and divorce; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1375 IH 

too poor to secure their own basic needs; and ineligible 

or unable to access adequate medical or mental health resources; 

Whereas effective programs supporting runaway youth and 

assisting youth and their families in remaining at home 

succeed because of partnerships created among families, 

community-based human service agencies, law enforcement agencies, schools, faith-based organizations, and 

businesses; 

Whereas preventing youth from running away from home and 

supporting youth in high-risk situations is a family, community, and national priority; 

Whereas the future well-being of the Nation is dependent on 

the opportunities provided for youth and families to acquire the knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary for 

youth to develop into safe, healthy, and productive adults; 

Whereas the National Network for Youth and its members 

advocate on behalf of runaway and homeless youth, and 

provide an array of community-based support to address 

their critical needs; 

Whereas the National Runaway Switchboard provides crisis 

intervention and referrals to reconnect runaway youth to 

their families and link youth to local resources that provide positive alternatives to running away from home; 

and 

Whereas the National Network for Youth and National Runaway Switchboard are cosponsoring National Runaway 

Prevention Month in November to increase public awareness of the life circumstances of youth in high-risk situations, and the need for safe, healthy, and productive alVerDate Aug 31 2005 03:31 Jul 25, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR1375.IH HR1375

wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1375 IH 

ternatives, resources, and support for youth, families, and 

communities: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes and supports the goals and ideals of National Run3 away Prevention Month. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
No. 386, Misc.

#### Short *v.*New Jersey.

Supreme Court of New Jersey. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 179 (Monday, September 18, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 64007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20224]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 1:00 p.m. on Thursday, September 21, 2023.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: September 14, 2023.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-20224 Filed 9-14-23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
From: letscarve@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:42:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Elton Turner

Shreveport, LA 71129
From: Kevin.Alff@Daimler.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:13:28 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kevin Alff

, 97220-5511
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Joel San Antonio, hereby certify that, to
the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report of Warrantech Corporation on Form
10-K for the year ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934, and that the information contained in that Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Warrantech Corporation.


Date: June 23, 2003                /s/ Richard Gavino
                                   ---------------------------------------
                                   Richard Gavino
                                   Executive Vice President,
                                   Chief Financial Officer,
                                   Chief Accounting Officer, and Treasurer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Warrantech Corporation and will be retained by Warrantech
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.



<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 168 (Thursday, August 31, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60240-60241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18855]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-1185 (Second Review)]


Steel Nails From the United Arab Emirates

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission 
(``Commission'') determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (``the 
Act''), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on steel nails 
from the United Arab Emirates would be likely to lead to continuation 
or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in Sec.  207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on September 1, 2022 (87 FR 
53777) and determined on December 5, 2022 that it would conduct a full 
review (87 FR 79907, December 28, 2022). Notice of the scheduling of 
the Commission's review and of a public hearing to be held in 
connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the 
Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the Federal Register on 
February 9, 2023 (88 FR 8457). The Commission conducted its hearing on 
June 29, 2023. All persons who requested the opportunity were permitted 
to participate.
    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) 
of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its 
determination in this review on August 28, 2023. The

[[Page 60241]]

views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5454 (August 
2023), entitled Steel Nails from the United Arab Emirates: 
Investigation No. 731-TA-1185 (Second Review).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: August 28, 2023.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-18855 Filed 8-30-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cellcom I Corp. on Form 10-KSB for
the year ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay H. Brown, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: December 26, 2006                 By: /s/ Jay H. Brown
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Jay H. Brown
                                            Chief Executive Officer


                                       21
Exhibit 32.1








Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2010 (the “Report”) of Immucor, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.











July 23, 2010                                                                                                    /s/ Gioacchino De Chirico


Gioacchino De Chirico


Chief Executive Officer
#### The Town of Mentz, Respondent, v. Roswell Cook, Appellant.

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. Opinion by Barker, J.
From: drthydmt@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:00:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dorothy M. Thompson

, 70601-7972
From: bealhome@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Yes to women"s health care - No to religious exemptions

Date: Monday, August 29, 2011 12:23:10 PM

These words are written by AAUW. But I support them.

 I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for "religious employers." These preventive services

are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary

health care.

While AAUW believes that "religious refusal" exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so Catholic hospitals would be exempt

from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If

granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where

they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM's

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.