alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10-4.htm


	





 

 




 


 

W81XWH-15-C-0046

(tduvall161837)

Page 2 of 2

 

 

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

 

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

 

 

SECTION C - DESCRIPTIONS AND SPECIFICATIONS

 

 

 

The following have been modified:

 

KEY PERSONNEL (MAR 1999) (USAMRAA)

 

a.  The Contractor agrees to utilize the following Key Personnel on this contract:

 

Pamela Palmer: [*] - Chief Medical Officer (and Principal Investigator) 

[ * ], Clinical Operations

[*], Clinical Operations 

[*], Medical Affairs 

[*], Regulatory

[*], Regulatory Affairs 

[ * ], Engineering 

[ * ], Quality Evangeline 

[*], Pharmaceutical Development 

[ * ], Manufacturing Engineering 

[*], Program Management

 

b.  The above Key Personnel shall be utilized as necessary to fulfill the requirements of this contract.

c.  The offerer must provide thorough and detailed documentation of the experience, abilities, and background for Key Personnel under this contract in the form of resumes or equivalent statements of qualifications. Such documentation should include but not be limited to: name, curriculum vitae, type and description of experience.

d.  The contractor agrees that during the contract performance period substitution for Key Personnel shall not be permitted unless such substitution is necessitated by sudden illness, death, or termination of employment. In any of these events, the contractor shall promptly notify the Contracting Officer and provide the information required by paragraph (e) below.

e.  All requests for substitutions must provide a detailed explanation of the circumstances necessitating the proposed

substitution(s), a complete resume for the proposed substitute(s), and any other information requested by the Contracting Officer needed to approve or disapprove the proposed substitution(s). All proposed substitutes shall have qualifications that are equal to or higher than the qualifications of the person to be replaced. The Contracting Officer or his authorized representative will evaluate such requests and promptly notify the contractor of his approval or disapproval thereof.

f.  If any of the listed Key Personnel are subcontractor

personnel, the contractor shall include the substance of this clause in any subcontract which he awards under this contract.

 

 

(End of Summary of Changes)

 

 

 

 

[*] = Certain confidential information contained in this document, marked by brackets, has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Rule 24b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### Byron Alfred, and another, Respondents, v. Eugene M. Cobb, Appellant.

Order affirmed, without costs. Opinion by Bradley, J.
No. 273.

#### United New York & New Jersey Sandy Hook Pilots Association et al. *v.*Halecki, Administratrix.

*Lawrence J. Mahoney*for petitioners.

*Nathan Baker, Bernard Chazen*and *Milton Garber*for respondent.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
From: Niemi, Nancy

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: AAUW reject exemptions re: birth control

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:01:36 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the

exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would

be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and

ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Nancy Niemi
From: bam17@psu.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:12:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bradley Maben

Milroy, PA 17063
ex10_1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


Fuel Systems Solutions, Inc.


780 Third Avenue, 25th Floor


New York, New York 10017


April 30, 2016


 


Re:           Second Amendment to Retirement Agreement


 


Dear Mr. Costamagna:


 


Reference is made to the Retirement Agreement entered into among Fuel Systems Solutions, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), MTM S.r.L. (“MTM”, a subsidiary of the Company), and Mariano Costamagna, a resident of the Republic of Italy (“Mr. Costamagna”), as of April 24, 2015, as amended by the Amendment to Retirement Agreement, dated December 16, 2015 (as amended, the “Retirement Agreement”).


 


In accordance with the terms of the Retirement Agreement, and in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 1, 2015, by and among Westport Innovations Inc., Whitehorse Merger Sub Inc. and the Company, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated March 6, 2016 (as amended, the “Merger Agreement”), the Retirement Date is hereby amended to be the earlier of (i) the Closing Date (as defined in the Merger Agreement), and (ii) June 30, 2016.  Except as amended hereby, all other terms of the Retirement Agreement and the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement entered into as of April 24, 2015 between the Company and Mr. Costamagna remain unchanged and are in full force and effect.


 


This Amendment to the Retirement Agreement has been duly executed by authorized representatives of the Company and MTM, and by Mr. Costamagna.


 



	
ACKNOWLEDGED:


 


By: /s/ Andrea Alghisi____________________


Name: Andrea Alghisi


Title: Chief Operating Officer, Fuel Systems Solutions, Inc.

	
FUEL SYSTEMS SOLUTIONS, INC.


 


By: /s/ Colin S. Johnston___________________


Name:  Colin S. Johnston


Title: Director, Fuel Systems Solutions, Inc.


	 	 
	
ACKNOWLEDGED:


 


By: /s/ Andrea Alghisi____________________


Name: Andrea Alghisi


Title: Chief Operating Officer, Fuel Systems Solutions, Inc.

	
MTM S.R.L.


 


By: /s/ Colin S. Johnston___________________


Name:  Colin S. Johnston


Title: Director, MTM S.R.L.


	 	 
	
ACKNOWLEDGED:


 


By: /s/ Colin S. Johnston___________________


Name:  Colin S. Johnston


Title: Director, Fuel Systems Solutions, Inc.

	
 


MARIANO COSTAMAGNA


/s/ Mariano Costamagna_____________________


Mariano Costamagna (Signature)













 


1
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

I, Michael L. Paxton, Chief Financial Officerof Intrusion Inc., certify that:

 

(1)                          I have reviewed this annual report on Form10-KSB of Intrusion Inc.:

 

(2)                          Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

(3)                          Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

(4)                          The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)              Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

(5)                          The registrant’s other certifying officer(s)and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)              All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(c)              Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: March 29,  2005 | /s/ Michael L. Paxton   |   |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                  | Michael L. Paxton       |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 178 (Friday, September 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 63686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19969]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-0161]

Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review: Medical 
Expense Report

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, 
this notice announces that the Veterans Benefits Administration, 
Department of Veterans Affairs, will submit the collection of 
information abstracted below to the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) for review and comment. The PRA submission describes the nature 
of the information collection and its expected cost and burden and it 
includes the actual data collection instrument.

DATES: Written comments and recommendations on the proposed collection 
of information should be received on or before September 5, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maribel Aponte, Office of Enterprise 
and Integration, Data Governance Analytics (008), 810 Vermont Ave. NW, 
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 266-4688 or email [email protected]. 
Please refer to ``OMB Control No. 2900-0161'' in any correspondence.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Authority: U.S. Code: 38 U.S.C. 1503; U.S. Code: 38 U.S.C. 1541; 
U.S. Code: 38 U.S.C. 1543; U.S. Code: 38 U.S.C. 1315.
    Title: VA Form 21P-8416, Medical Expense Report.
    OMB Control Number: 2900-0161.
    Type of Review: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    Abstract: VBA would be unable to properly administer needs-based 
benefits without this collection of information. The information is 
collected on an ad hoc basis, and, therefore, cannot be collected less 
frequently. The form is designed to collect the minimum amount of 
information which will allow VBA to properly administer the program.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The Federal Register Notice with a 
60-day comment period soliciting comments on this collection of 
information was published at 88 FR 43013 on July 5, 2023, page 43013.
    Affected Public: Individuals and households.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 50,000.
    Estimated Average Burden per Respondent: 30 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: One time, or as needed.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 100,000.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Dorothy Glasgow,
VA PRA Clearance Officer, (Alt) Office of Enterprise and Integration, 
Data Governance Analytics, Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2023-19969 Filed 9-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

            LETTER TO THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T



                      ENSTAR INCOME PROGRAM 1984-1, L.P.
                           12405 Powerscourt Drive
                          St. Louis, Missouri 63131







                                March 29, 2002




Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

        Pursuant to temporary note 3T, Enstar Income Program 1984-1, L.P. has
obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen stating that the
December 31, 2001 audit was subject to their quality control system for the
U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance that the
engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there
was appropriate continuity of Arthur Andersen personnel working on the audit,
and availability of national office consultation.  Availability of personnel at
foreign affiliates of Arthur Andersen was not relevant to the audit.


                                Very truly yours,

                                ENSTAR COMMUNICATIONS
                                  CORPORATION, General Partner of
                                  Enstar Income Program 1984-1, L.P.



                                By: /s/  Paul E. Martin
                                    ---------------------------------
                                  Name:  Paul E. Martin
                                  Title: Vice President and Corporate
                                         Controller (Principal Financial
                                         Officer and Principal Accounting
                                         Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      11,809,000
<SECURITIES>                                38,046,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            57,396,000
<PP&E>                                      37,085,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,998,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              93,677,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,666,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,000
<COMMON>                                       320,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  75,765,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                93,677,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,209,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            57,970,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (33,003,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (33,003,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (33,003,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.04)
        

</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: SteamboatLake quadrangle, Oregon : 7.5-minute series (topographic)**
 
2014 | 2015
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.28/6:45117-B 4/
Item Number:0080-G-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000978824
 
July 23, 2018
From: david.holbrook@gemalto.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:52:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to demand that you rescind the unjust and coercive mandate that all "contraceptives"

and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to patients. If you do

not reverse course, I ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations that provide

individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I strongly oppose the

government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices that I

oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your hyper-narrow definition of religious employer and offer an authentic

conscience protection for any organization and business that has a moral or religious objection to

providing such insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience

laws which prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on

moral or religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow that only

churches are included; this means that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience

objections will be required to either violate their conscience or quit offering health insurance to their

employees.

You need to protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers, and people like me who object to

being forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services,

especially when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be

forced by the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the

strongest way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of

mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Holbrook

Ambler, PA 19002
From: Stevensonsp07@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:19:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sue Stevenson

Minneapolis, MN 55433
#### Catharine Van Alstyne, Respondent, v. William Van Alstyne, Appellant.

— Judgment reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide the event. Opinion by

Landon, J.