alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                   1,712
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                            3,297
<ALLOWANCES>                             982
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         1,762
<PP&E>                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           11,394
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    23
<BONDS>                                  3,355
<COMMON>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<OTHER-SE>                               7,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             11,394
<SALES>                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         1,105
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       476
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          (2,514)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      (2,514)
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                             (2,514)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            (64.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            (64.91)


</TABLE>
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1408

To amend title 38, United States Code, to standardize the income threshold

for copayment for outpatient medications with the income threshold for

inability to defray necessary expenses of care, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 6, 2001

Mr. ROCKEFELLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to standardize the

income threshold for copayment for outpatient medications with the income threshold for inability to defray

necessary expenses of care, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans’ Copayment

5 Adjustment Act’’.
2

•S 1408 IS

1 SEC. 2. STANDARDIZATION OF INCOME THRESHOLDS FOR

2 COPAYMENT FOR OUTPATIENT MEDICATIONS

3 AND FOR INABILITY TO DEFRAY NECESSARY

4 EXPENSES OF CARE.

5 (a) STANDARDIZATION.—Section 1722A(a)(3)(B) of

6 title 38, United States Code, is amended to read as fol7 lows:

8 ‘‘(B) to a veteran whose attributable income is

9 not greater than the amount provided for in sub10 section (b) of section 1722 of this title, as adjusted

11 from time to time under subsection (c) of that sec12 tion.’’.

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

14 subsection (a) shall take effect on January 1, 2002, and

15 shall apply with respect to calendar years beginning on

16 or after that date.

17 SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF INCREASE IN

18 COPAYMENTS FOR OUTPATIENT MEDICA19 TIONS PENDING COLLECTION OF COPAY20 MENTS FOR OUTPATIENT CARE.

21 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec22 retary of Veterans Affairs may not implement under sec23 tion 1722A(b)(1) of title 38, United States Code, an in24 crease in the copayment amount for medications furnished

25 on an outpatient basis under section 1722A(a) of that title

26 until the Secretary commences collection of amounts for
3

•S 1408 IS

1 outpatient visits for medical services under section

2 1710(g) of that title.

Æ
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

July 20, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133462 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. ________________________________________ Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

IN RE EGBERT R. SMITH TRUST. 

________________________________________ 

GLEN PHILLIPS and DALE PHILLIPS, 

Petitioners-Appellees, 

v SC: 133462 

 COA: 269549 

Sanilac PC: 81-021856-TT 

BETTY HOMER, Successor Trustee,

Respondent-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 15, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall 

include among the issues to be briefed whether a right of first refusal is revocable once 

the holder of the right receives notice of a third party’s offer and whether the petitioners 

are entitled to summary disposition and specific performance of the right of first refusal, 

as the Court of Appeals held. 

The Real Property Section of the State Bar of Michigan is invited to file a brief 

amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues 

presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae. 

s0717 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 20, 2007 

Clerk
Did you know...

Class of 2018!

For more information:

Texas Education Agency:

http://www.tea.state.tx.us/brochures/

Institute for Public School Initiatives

http://ipsi.utexas.edu/hb5-resources-2/

Education Service Center Region 13

http://www4.esc13.net/cc/house-bill-5

the high school 

graduation 

requirements are 

changing?

Beginning with the graduating class of 2018, 

Texas high school students will have the 

option to complete one of three new 

graduation plans: the Foundation Plan, the 

Foundation plus Endorsement Plan, or the 

Distinguished Plan.

With the move to these new graduation 

plans comes new course requirements, 

particularly with regard to mathematics. 

Only students who choose to complete the 

Distinguished Plan or the STEM endorsement 

within the Foundation plus Endorsement 

Plan will be required to complete Algebra II.

Yet, Algebra II is still an admissions 

requirement for most public colleges and 

universities in Texas.
Will you have the math to get you to college?

Foundation Plan (22 credits)

English (4 credits)

Science (3 credits)

Mathematics (3 credits)

Social Studies (3 credits)

Physical Education (1 credit)

World Language (2 credits)

Fine Arts (1 credit)

Electives (5 credits)

Foundation plus Endorsement 

(26 credits)

English (4 credits)

Science (4 credits)

Mathematics (4 credits)

Social Studies (3 credits)

Physical Education (1 credit)

World Language or Computer Science (2 credits)

Fine Arts (1 credit)

Electives (2 credits)

Endorsement Requirements 

Distinguished (26 credits)

English (4 credits)

Science (4 credits)

Mathematics (4 credits) 

MUST INCLUDE ALGEBRA II

Social Studies (3 credits)

Physical Education (1 credit)

World Language or Computer Science (2 credits)

Fine Arts (1 credit)

Electives (2 credits)

Endorsement Requirements for 1 Endorsement

Not all new graduation plans require Algebra II, but most Texas public universities do!

If you intend to select either the Foundation or the Foundation plus Endorsement Plan,

talk to your guidance counselor TODAY about adding Algebra II!

Does NOT require 

Algebra II

Will NOT qualify

for admission to Texas

public universities

Will qualify

for admission to Texas

public universities, 

if you complete Algebra II

Will qualify for 

automatic admission

to Texas public universities

Only STEM endorsement Requires Algebra II

requires Algebra II

Your Choice of High School Graduation Plans:

Aects Your College Options:
Dates: April 21- May 1, 2010 

Subject: EPA Invitation to Provide Fluorinated-GHG Measurement Data 

Kirsten Cappel sought to confirm that SIA and its member companies were unable to provide 

emissions measurement data, other than information that may have been shared with SEMI, to support 

the consideration of expanded default emission factors for semiconductor manufacturing process types. 

Tom Diamond confirmed the unavailability of data on behalf of SIA during phone calls placed on April 

21, 2010 and again on May 1, 2010. Written confirmation via e-mail was sought on April 23, 2010 but 

no written response was provided (see attached). 
p

p

y 

p

g

p

p

Please correct me if I misunderstood. 

Thank you, 

Kirsten Kirsten Cappel 

Climate Change Division 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Telephone: (202) 343-9556 

Mobile: (202) 351-9573 

Fax: (202) 343-2202 

cappel.kirsten@epa.gov 

Mailing Address: 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. (6207J) 

Washington, D.C. 20460 

Office Address: 

1310 L Street, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

Any communication on the mandatory GHG reporting rule is intended to provide general and 

administrative information about the Rule. This communication does not provide legal advice, and 

responses to questions received do not have legally binding effect or expressly or implicitly create, 

expand, or limit any legal rights, obligations, responsibilities, expectations, or benefits in regard to any 

person. Facility owners or operators and suppliers are responsible for determining how they would be 

affected by the requirements of the rule.
EXHIBIT 32.1



           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10K of First
Keystone Corporation (the "Corporation") for the period ended
December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, J. Gerald Bazewicz, President and
CEO, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:

   1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
       in all material respects, the financial condition and
       results of operations of the Corporation as of and for the
       period covered by the Report.






                                /s/ J. Gerald Bazewicz
                                _________________________
                                J. Gerald Bazewicz
                                President and CEO


March 9, 2006


                               73
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ATHELUALDO ORTEGA-LOPEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-73944

Agency No. A035-554-123

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Athelualdo Ortega-Lopez, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions

pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing

his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under

8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, and review for substantial

FILED

NOV 02 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-73944

evidence the factual findings underlying the agency’s decision. Melkonian v.

Ashcroft, 320 F.3d 1061, 1065 (9th Cir. 2003). We deny the petition for review.

The agency properly found Ortega-Lopez removable based on his

admissions that he had been previously deported in December 1999 and that he

sought re-entry within twenty years of his deportation. See 8 U.S.C.

§ 1182(a)(9)(A)(i). Ortega-Lopez has not submitted any evidence indicating that

he applied for or received a waiver under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(9)(A)(iii) prior to

seeking reentry. See 8 C.F.R. § 1240.8(b) (an arriving alien must prove that he or

she is clearly and beyond a doubt entitled to be admitted to the United States and is

not inadmissible as charged). 

To the extent Ortega-Lopez seeks to collaterally attack his 1999 removal

order, he has not demonstrated a gross miscarriage of justice in his prior

proceedings. See Ramirez-Juarez v. INS, 633 F.2d 174, 175-76 (9th Cir. 1980)

(per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





Form 8-K





Current Report





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report  (Date of earliest event reported): April 25, 2017





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation


(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)





001-11241


(Commission File Number)


Delaware37-1105865(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(IRS Employer Identification Number)





2120 West End Avenue


Nashville, Tennessee 37203-0001


(Address of principal executive offices, with zip code)





(615) 341-1000


(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:


oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).





Emerging growth company o





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o








---







Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.





On April 25, 2017, Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation issued a press release reporting financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2017.  A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated into this Item 2.02 by reference.





The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, is being furnished in accordance with the provisions of General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K.








Item 9.01.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.





d)Exhibits:99.1Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated April 25, 2017








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation








Date:  April 25, 2017By:/s/ Leslie S. ZmuggLeslie S. ZmuggSecretary








2


---







EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit No.Description99.1Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated April 25, 2017

















3
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0001125

23-MAR-2016

07:46 AM
#### In the Matter of the Application of John A. Bensel et al., Constituting the Board of Water Supply of the City of New York, to Acquire Real Estate in the Towns of Mount Pleasant and Greenburgh. The City of New York, Appellant; Alexander S. Cochran, Respondent.

*Matter of*Bensel, 152 App. Div. 499, affirmed.

(Argued January 8, 1913;

decided January 21, 1913.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered September 10, 1912, which modified, and affirmed as modified, an order of Special Term confirming an award made in condemnation proceedings.

*Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel (I. J. Beaudrias*of counsel), for appellant.

*Woodson R. Oglesby*and *A. S. Oglesby*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Collin and Hogan, JJ.
# 

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-97047

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  319                                                               Trade Date: 8/04/03

(To Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2002 &

  Prospectus dated August  8, 2002)                                                                     Issue Date:  8/07/03

The Date of this Pricing SupplementAugust  4, 2003

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP                                                                                                                                Date and terms of redemption or

     or        Stated                                                                  Interest                                    repayment (including any

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment  Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)               Maturity                Public (2)                Commissions      Frequency      Option     Yes/No                record dates)

14911QPG0     4.1%                       08/15/10           100%                    1.2%                  Quarterly           YES           NO                                        

                          

Principal                                                                                1st Payment Day         

Amount                   Proceeds                 Dealer                            Date                  Count

$2,140,000.00                $2,114,320.00         ABN AMROInc.                 11/15/03                 30/360    

Original Issue Discount Note:                                                                   Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                   N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $209.019 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated August 8,2002.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

((((((((((((((((

No. 10-0991

((((((((((((((((

In Re  Estrella Resources, LLC, Relator

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

**ORDER**

1. This case is **ABATED** pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.2.

2.This case is removed from this Court’s active docket until further order of this Court.  The parties shall timely notify this Court of all events affecting the status of this case, including when the successor judge has ruled in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.2(b).  The parties shall file either a status report or a motion to dismiss by March 29, 2011.

Done at the City of Austin, this 28th day of January, 2011.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

OCTOBER 2, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-10132

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 08-60165-CR-WPD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY DEHANEY,

a.k.a. Ewart Dehaney,

a.k.a. Ewart Anthony Dehaney,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(October 2, 2009)

Before TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
Alvin E. Entin, appointed counsel for Anthony Dehaney in this direct

criminal appeal, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief

prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d

493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s

assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent

examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dehaney’s convictions and sentences are

AFFIRMED.

2
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1467

To amend the Hmong Veterans’ Naturalization Act of 2000 to extend the

deadlines for application and payment of fees.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 26, 2001

Mr. WELLSTONE (for himself, Mr. HELMS, Mr. KOHL, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. INOUYE, and Mr. REED) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Hmong Veterans’ Naturalization Act of 2000

to extend the deadlines for application and payment of fees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bruce Vento Hmong

5 Veterans’ Naturalization Extension Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF DEADLINES.

7 Section 6 of the Hmong Veterans’ Naturalization Act

8 of 2000 (Public Law 106–207; 8 U.S.C. 1423 note) (as

9 amended by Public Law 106–415) is amended by striking
2

•S 1467 IS

1 ‘‘18 months’’ each place such term appears and inserting

2 ‘‘36 months’’.

Æ