alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No.  333-59540

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  197				Trade Date: 07/03/02
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

  June 1, 2001)							Issue Date:  07/09/02
The Date of this Pricing Supplement July 08, 2002
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QJE2   4.25%	07/15/06	     100%	       0.875%             Semi-Annually	     YES	    NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		      Date		Count

$2,180,000.00	$2,160,925.00	ABN AMRO Inc.	    1/15/03		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes	  X   No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.   Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $641.886 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under a Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
Additionally, the total principal amount of PowerNotes(SM) offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001 has been increased from $500.0mm to $750.0mm.  $250.0mm principal amount of debt securities registered pursuant to Registration Statement No. 333-59540 originally offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement dated June 15, 2001 and related Prospectus dated May 25, 2001 are being offered as PowerNotes(SM) by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
From: rkiger25@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:05:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

RANDALL KIGER

Machesney Park, IL 61115
From: cinfsh6@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:11:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cindy Fisher

Visalia, CA 93277
|   | (1) | The      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June      30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Sections      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or      78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| August      11, 2008 |   | /s/      Phillip E. Becker                 |
|----------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
| Date                 |   | Phillip      E. Becker                     |
|                 |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer |
|                 |   |                                       |
|                 |   |                                       |
|                 |   |                                       |
| August      11, 2008 |   | /s/      H. Stewart Fitz Gibbon III        |
| Date                 |   | H.      Stewart Fitz Gibbon III            |
|                 |   | Executive      Vice President and          |
|                 |   | Chief      Financial Officer               |
From: nealniki@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:45:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Neal Reavely

Springfield, OR 97478
From: SusanMWR@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: No to "religious refusal" exemptions for womens preventive health care!!!!

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:44:06 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women

just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Thank you.
From: dianeq48@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:14:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Diane Quagliana

Naperville, IL 60563
From: amorbolin@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:28:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dan Bolin

Alto, NM 88312
SERVED AUGUST 3, 2011 

OFPARTMEMTOF 

•lOKETOFERAliOi^b 

vQll MIG - 3 P ?-^ \ 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON. DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

TRISHAN AIR, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. CP10WPOOI3 

(Civil Penally Action) 

DMS No. FAA~2010-12I8 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On December 17, 2010, the Federal Aviation Administration ("Complaitianl") 

filed a Complain;. Respondent Trishan Air, Inc. ("Respondent") had filed a Request for 

Hearing on December 9, 2010. 

On August 2, 2011, Respondent withdrew its Request for Hearing. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency 

attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing 

without the consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney 

withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a heafing-andthe 

answer, (lie administrative law judge shall dismiss the proceedings under this 

subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal of Request for Hearing having been 

read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Respondent's Withdrawal of Request for Hearing is hereby granted; and 
2 

2. This proceeding be and is licrcby dismissed with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED. 

. t/<2G*i^-c^ 

Richard C. Goodwin 

Administrative Law Judge 

"^-^--3& 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10WP0013 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, A(K:-430 

Wilbur. Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Louis S. Franecke, RespofidenCs Counsel 

Franecke Law Group 

1115 Irwin Street, Suite 100 

San Rafael, CA 94901 

TEL; 415-457-7040 

FAX: 415-457-7041 

Don Bobertz, ComplainotU 's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel 

Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O: Box 92007 

Los Angeies, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-3454 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Adminisirative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

-WashingtonrDC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Ser\'iccwasby U.S. Mail. For semce in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Adminisuation, 800 Independence Avenue, S.W.. Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Caballo

Reservoir

Radium

Springs

Doña Ana County

Doña Ana County

Dona Ana

Mountains

Luna County

0 5 10 miles

NORTH

Caballo Mounta ni s

Point of

Sierra County Rocks

New

Mexico

Sierra

County

Rio Grande

Rio Grande

Las

Cruces

El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro

National Historic Trail

Auto Tour Route

High-Potential Historic Site

Section 2 of 7

United States Department of the Interior

National Park Service

Bureau of Land Management

Auto Tour Route

High-Potential Historic Sites

El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro

National Historic Trail

Jorn da

a

del Muerto

Jornada

Experimental

Range

(USDA)

~

DSC/APRIL 2004/661/2012 2 OF 7

New Mexico

Mexico

Texas

Santa Fe

Albuquerque

El Paso Ciudad

Juarez

25 Paraje Perrillo

Fort Selden

Dona Ana

Las Penuelas

La Rancheria

Mesilla

Robledo

478

185

158

Map 3B

~

~
Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

BILL OF COSTS

No. 01-14-00391-CV

April Doranna Cross 

v.

The State of Texas

NO. 73573 IN THE 412TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BRAZORIA COUNTY

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

CLK RECORD

RPT RECORD

STATEWIDE EFILING

FILING

$82.00

$327.00

$20.00

$175.00

10/30/2014

08/18/2014

06/30/2014

06/30/2014

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

ANT

ANT

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the First Court of Appeals Houston, Texas are 

$604.00.

Court costs in this case have been taxed in this Court’s judgment

I, Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas, do hereby 

certify that this is a true statement of the costs of appeal in this case.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my 

hand and the seal of the Court of Appeals for the 

First District of Texas, this April 3, 2015.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 187 (Wednesday, September 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 59243]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23673]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending August 25, 2012

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2012-0145.
    Date Filed: August 20, 2012.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: September 10, 2012.
    Description: Application of VistaJet Limited (``Applicant'') 
requesting issuance of an exemption and a foreign air carrier permit 
authorizing the Applicant to engage in the following: (i) foreign 
charter air transportation of persons, property, and mail from any 
point or points behind any Member State of the European Union, via any 
point or points in any EU Member State and via intermediate points, to 
any point or points in the United States and beyond; (ii) foreign 
charter air transportation of persons, property, and mail between any 
point or points in the United States and any point or points in any 
member of the European Common Aviation Area; (iii) foreign charter air 
transportation of cargo between any point or points in the United 
States and any other point or points; (iv) other charters pursuant to 
the prior approval requirements set forth in the Department's 
regulations governing charters; and (v) charter transportation 
authorized by any additional route rights made available to European 
Union carriers in the future, to the extent permitted by the 
Applicant's homeland license on file with the Department.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2012-23673 Filed 9-25-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
From: Rebecca Godinez

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:13:41 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Rebecca Godinez

10110 Westview #2101

Houston, Tx 77043