alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Barbara Mann

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Freedom of choice is necessary for women

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:28:09 PM

Attachments: image001.png

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the

exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would

be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and

ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Thank you,

Barbara C. Mann, President

SpeechSolutions, Inc.

Nuance Dragon Medical Healthcare Partner

Dragon Medical Authorized Instructor

Virginia Certified Woman Business Enterprise (WBE)

Phone: 703-360-3880 Toll Free: 1-866-517-9899

E-Mail: speech.solutions@verizon.net

Websites: www.speechsolutions.net

 www.dragonfordoctors.com
EX-10.6



 Exhibit 10.6 

AMENDMENT NO. 3 
 CAPE BANK 

EMPLOYEES’ SAVINGS & PROFIT SHARING PLAN 

The Plan named above gives the Employer the right to amend it at any time. According to that right, the Plan is amended effective July 14, 2015 as follows:

 By striking the definition of Predecessor Employer from the DEFINITIONS SECTION of Article I, as previously amended in Amendment No. 1, and
substituting the following: 
 Predecessor Employer means, except for purposes of the CONTRIBUTION LIMITATION SECTION of
Article III, a firm of which the Employer was once a part (e.g., due to a spinoff or change of corporate status) or a firm absorbed by the Employer because of a merger or acquisition (stock or asset, including a division or an operation of such
company) that maintained this Plan or that is named below: 
 Boardwalk Bank 

Colonial Bank 
 Sun National Bank

 By striking the second paragraph from the ROLLOVER CONTRIBUTIONS SECTION of Article III and substituting the following: 

A Rollover Contribution shall be allowed in cash or in kind and must be made according to procedures set up by the Plan
Administrator. The in kind distribution must be of Qualified Employer Securities held under the Plan. 
 By striking the third paragraph in the ROLLOVER
CONTRIBUTIONS SECTION of Article III, as previously amended in Amendment No. 1, and substituting the following: 
 A Rollover
Contribution may include a direct rollover from Colonial Bank or Sun National Bank of an outstanding loan balance that is not in default for a Participant impacted by a business event in accordance with nondiscriminatory procedures set up by the
Loan Administrator. For this purpose, a business event means an acquisition, merger, or similar transaction involving a change in the employer of the employees of a trade or business. 

This amendment is made an integral part of the aforesaid Plan and is controlling over the terms of said Plan with respect to the particular items addressed
expressly herein. All other provisions of the Plan remain unchanged and controlling. 
 Unless otherwise stated on any page of this amendment, eligibility
for benefits and the amount of any benefits payable to or on behalf of an individual who is an Inactive Participant on the effective date(s) stated above, shall be determined according to the provisions of the aforesaid Plan as in effect on the day
before he became an Inactive Participant. 
 Signing this amendment, the Employer, as plan sponsor, has made the decision to adopt this plan amendment. The
Employer is acting in reliance on its own discretion and on the legal and tax advice of its own advisors, and not that of any member of the Principal Financial Group or any representative of a member company of the Principal Financial Group. 

Signed this 16th day of July, 2015. 
  

			
	CAPE BANK
		
	By	 	 /s/ Angie Hickman

	
	 VP, Compensation & Benefits

	Title



  

					
	Amendment No. 3	 	1	  	(4-60403)
		 		  	Subtype 110217
From: kay@dallavalleco.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:08:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kay Dallavalle

Frederick, MD 21703
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3




            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-116076), Form S-8 (No. 333-114512) and Form S-4
(No. 333-112309) of Laidlaw International, Inc. of our report dated November 18,
2003 relating to the financial statements of Laidlaw Inc. for the period from
September 1, 2002 to May 31, 2003, which appears in this Form 10-K.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants
Mississauga, Ontario
November 14, 2005
ROBERT B. KARNS

105 Main Street (701) 278-3747 COMMUNITY AIRLINE DEVELOPMENT

E-Mail: bOb@sovereignairi nc. com 

# ~obereign ~ir 3Jnt. VPGM BELCOURT, ND 58316

Dennis J. DeVany, Chief EAS & Domestic Analysis Division, X-53 Office of Aviation Analysis Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE Washington, DC 20590 Aug. 15,2012
Re: Proposal to Provide Essential Air Service at : ATHENS, GEORGIA DOCKET DOT-OST-2002-11348 Dear Mr. DeVany: This proposal is to provide basic air service required by order 2012-7- 15 (July 13, 2012). Sovereign Air's DOT new Fitness should be in by end of next week ..

OBERT B. KARNS VPGM Sovereign Air Inc. 763-535-4198

MINNEAPOLIS 5701 KENTUCKY AVE. N Suite 153 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55428-3302

(763) 535-4198 PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER

## SOVEREIGN AIR INC. Compensation Annual Rrquirements for Essential Air Service at

Departures: Mileage st: Block Hours: Aircraft Passenger Seats: Revenue Passenger Miles: Available Seat Miles:
Revenue: Passengers

Other Revenue Total Revenues: Expenses: ATHENS,GEORGA Two Round Trips - 

### 19 seat Atrcraft (Jetstream 

### 31 or 

### 32)

97% completion rate Atlanta Hub Proposal #1



### 7,000 at 

### 2% Passenger revenue



### $1,600 Direct Per Block Hour Indirect Aircraft Lease Purchase Total Expenses:

Loss Compensation Annual Required: Passengers Per departure L/F 

### $600,000 5.0% Total Expenses



### 5.780347 0.304229 $50 $350,000 $7,000

$646,400 $443,286 $300,000

Loss 

### 1211 67 404

$357,000

$1,389,686 $69,484.30 $1,459,170.30 ($1,102,170)From: Devany, Dennis (OST) To: Jon Payne ; Muldoon, Albert (OST) Subject: RE: Sovereign Air Correction Date: Thursday, August 16, 2012 5:11:17 AM 

### Ok, thx From: Jon Payne [mailto:dpayne25@tx.rr.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2012 11:50 PM To: Devany, Dennis (OST) Subject: Sovereign Air Correction 

### Hi, Dennis, Bob sent you the bid for Athens and forgot to list the total subsidy request, which is $1,102,170 per year. It is the same total that shows adjacent to "Loss" on the spreadsheet. Jon Payne
From: Sharon DiPiazza

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Thursday, August 04, 2011 10:24:09 AM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Sharon DiPiazza
Seffner, Florida
No. 363.

#### Ginsburg *v.*Ling, U. S. District Judge.

*Paul Ginsburg,*petitioner, *pro se.*

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                          284261
<SECURITIES>                                     64402
<RECEIVABLES>                                   894224
<ALLOWANCES>                                     12000
<INVENTORY>                                    1177452
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2476722
<PP&E>                                          496994
<DEPRECIATION>                                  395830
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6009100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1064212
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         16051
<OTHER-SE>                                     4928837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6009100
<SALES>                                        4918935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4918935
<CGS>                                          1702373
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1702373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2405380
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1095327
<INCOME-TAX>                                    362000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             733327
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    733327
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of ALCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report"), I, Andrew Liu, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.      By: /s/ Andrew Liu, CEO and Chairman  Date:March 25, 2010
#### George E. White *v.*Lizzie A. White.

May Term, 1916.

Present: Munson, C. J., Watson, Haselton, Powers, and Taylor, JJ.

Opinion filed December 9, 1916.

. Appeal by the administrator of the estate of Edwin C. White from the report of commissioners in the estate of Edwin G. White, allowing the claim of Lizzie A. White. Heard on appellant’s motion to dismiss the proceedings at the December Term, 1915; Lamoille County, *Fish,*J., presiding. Motion to dismiss sustained. Exception by claimant.

*V. A. Bullard, Ruftis F. Brown*and *W. B. G. Sticlmey*for the appellant.

*F. G. Fleetwood, M. P. Maurice*and *J. W. Redmond*for the appellee.

Watson, J.

The disposition of this case is governed by the holding in *White’s Admr.*v. *White,*ante p. 75, 99 Atl. 305.

*Judgment affirmed. To be certified to the probate court.*
Exhibit 21    Subsidiaries of Registrant

The following list sets forth the name of the Registrant and each of its subsidiaries, the state or other jurisdictions under which they are organized, and the
percentage ownership of the voting securities of each corporation by its immediate parent.

|Name of Corporation and State
Under Which Organized(1)                                                                                                                                                                                |  | Percentage of Voting Securities
Owned by Immediate Parent(2)
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|F&M BancorpFarmers & Mechanics Bank
        Key Holdings, Inc.
        Key Management, Inc. (Delaware)
        Keller Stonebraker Insurance, Inc.
        Potomac Basin Group Associates, Inc.
                (District of Columbia) |  |                                                             

---

---
Exhibit 4.3







 


FORM OF AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. LOCAL DIRECTORS COMPENSATION AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT PLAN


 


 


 


 




  





  











  











AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO


TO THE COMPASS BANCSHARES, INC. LOCAL DIRECTORS


COMPENSATION AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT PLAN

















The Compass Bancshares, Inc. Local Directors Compensation and Business Development Plan, effective as of October 22, 2007, as amended by that certain Amendment Number One to the Compass Bancshares, Inc. Local Directors Compensation and Business Development Plan dated November 23, 2009 (the “Plan”), is hereby further amended as follows:







(1)  The Plan shall be re-named “BBVA Compass Bancshares, Inc. Local Directors Compensation and Business Development Plan”.







(2) The second sentence of Section 4 is removed in its entirety, and in lieu thereof, the following sentence is substituted in its place:







“The number of BBVA ADSs that may be acquired by Participants pursuant to the Plan shall not exceed an aggregate of 835,093, subject to the adjustments provided for in section 11.”







(3) All other provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
#### William Miller, Respondent, v. Volney J. Hoke and others, Appellants.

Judgment of tho County Court of Tioga county affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Boardman, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         580
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               580
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 12,780
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,921,147
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       15,030
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,922,347)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   12,780
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               602,833
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             92,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (602,833)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (602,833)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (856,896)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.06)



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Select Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Martin F. Jackson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2005


                                        /s/ Martin F. Jackson
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Martin F. Jackson
                                        Senior Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
From: laura.crowder@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:43:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Steven Crowder

Rutherfordton, NC 28139