alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: donstuckey@frontiernet.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:01:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Donald Stuckey

Medora, IL 62063
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Peak International Limited (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Supan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 9, 2007



/s/ John SupanJohn SupanChief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 10.26**

 
|   |                        |
|--------|------------------------|
|   | 1101   E. Arapaho Road |
|   | Richardson,   TX 75081 |
|   | 972-234-6400   tel     |
|   | 972-234-1467   fax     |

 

 

 

 

 

February 4, 2011

 

***Confidential***

 

The Board of Directors

Intrusion Inc.

 

Re: Intrusion Inc.

 

Gentlemen:

 

As you are aware, over the past few years, I have provided financial assistance to Intrusion through various private placements.  This letter confirms my intention to make available funds in the amount of up to $1,500,000 to cover cash flow shortfalls, if any, which may be experienced by Intrusion during the period, ended March 2012.  I also confirm that I have access to sufficient financial assets to make these funds available.  In the event of my death, my heirs will be bound by this commitment.

 

This letter is in replacement of, and not in addition to, the original commitment letter dated March 20, 2008 for $1,500,000.  In essence, I am only extending my original commitment one year.

 

If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me.

 
| Sincerely,         |   |
|--------------------|--------|
|               |   |
| /s/ G. Ward Paxton |   |
|               |   |
| G. Ward Paxton     |   |
| President and CEO  |   |
| Intrusion Inc.     |   |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert E. Matthiessen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Date:	November 14, 2003

/s/ Robert E. Matthiessen
Robert E. Matthiessen
President and Chief Executive Officer
#### WASSERMANN *v.*BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

No. 312.

Decided October 15, 1962.

*Jacob Rassner*for appellant.

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
From: sberg8735@everestkc.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:02:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

susan berg

Shawnee, KS 66216
From: tonyluna@alum.mit.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:15:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Antonio Luna

Marion, CT 06444
99–008

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ! 2d Session 107–660

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF HOUSE RESOLUTION 524, EXPRESSING THE SENSE OF THE HOUSE THAT CONGRESS SHOULD COMPLETE 

ACTION ON THE PERMANENT DEATH TAX REPEAL ACT OF 2002 AND 

HOUSE RESOLUTION 525, EXPRESSING THE SENSE OF THE HOUSE OF 

REPRESENTATIVES THAT THE 107TH CONGRESS SHOULD COMPLETE 

ACTION ON AND PRESENT TO THE PRESIDENT, BEFORE SEPTEMBER 30, 

2002, LEGISLATION EXTENDING AND STRENGTHENING THE SUCCESSFUL 1996 WELFARE REFORMS

SEPTEMBER 17, 2002.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 527]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 527, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of House Resolution 

524, expressing the sense of the House that Congress should complete action on the Permanent Death Tax Repeal Act of 2002 and 

House Resolution 525, expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the 107th Congress should complete action on 

and present to the President, before September 30, 2002, legislation extending and strengthening the successful 1996 welfare reforms, under a closed rule. 

The rule provides that the resolution (H. Res. 524) shall be debatable in the House for one hour equally divided and controlled 

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 

on Ways and Means. The rule provides that the resolution (H. Res. 

524) shall be considered as read for amendment. 

The rule provides that the resolution (H. Res. 525) shall be debatable in the House for one hour equally divided among and controlled by the chairmen and ranking minority members of the Committees on Ways and Means and Education and the Workforce. FiVerDate Sep 04 2002 01:07 Sep 18, 2002 Jkt 099008 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6659 Sfmt 6602 E:\HR\OC\HR660.XXX HR660
2

nally, the rule provides that the resolution (H. Res. 525) shall be 

considered as read for amendment.

Æ
From: shark2@cableone.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:18:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Greg Sharkey

Joplin, MO 64804
No. 205.

#### Ozark Dairy Co. et al. *v.*Adams Dairy Co. et al.

*J. L. London*for petitioners.

*R. H. McRoberts, John H. Lashly, Paul B. Rava*and *J. Leonard Schermer*for respondents.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer of Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the
Company for the year ended June 30, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:  September 28, 2007





BY: /s/ DUANE J. ROTH
    ---------------------------
        Duane J. Roth
        Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. and
will be retained by Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No.  333-59540

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  207				Trade Date: 08/08/02
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

  June 1, 2001)							Issue Date:  08/13/02
The Date of this Pricing Supplement August 12, 2002
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QJQ5   3.25%	08/15/05	     100%	       0.625%                Semi-Annually	     YES	    NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		      Date		Count

$3,231,000.00	$3,210,806.25	ABN AMRO Inc.	    2/15/03		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes	  X   No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.   Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $665.694 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under a Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
Additionally, the total principal amount of PowerNotes(SM) offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001 has been increased from $500.0mm to $750.0mm.  $250.0mm principal amount of debt securities registered pursuant to Registration Statement No. 333-59540 originally offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement dated June 15, 2001 and related Prospectus dated May 25, 2001 are being offered as PowerNotes(SM) by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
From: ekjohnsen@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:56:42 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Eric Johnsen

Salinas, CA 93908
TY  - RPRT
A3  - U. S. Govt. Print. Off.,
CY  - 
C6  - 
ET  - -
LA  - ENGLISH
M3  - Report
SN  - 1052E
SP  - 
T2  - Bulletin
VL  - 
AU  - Rogers, Allen Stuart
TI  - Physical behavior and geologic control of radon in mountain streams
PY  - 1958
DO  - 
DB  - USGS Publications Warehouse
UR  - http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/b1052E
ER  -
H. Res. 1272 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

October 2, 2008. 

Whereas Alice Mary Robertson was born on January 2, 1854, 

in the Tullahassee Mission, Creek Nation, Indian Territory, now known as Tullahassee, Oklahoma; 

Whereas Alice Mary Robertson was an American educator, 

social worker, government official, and politician; 

Whereas Alice Mary Robertson was the 2nd woman to serve 

in Congress and the 1st from the State of Oklahoma; 

Whereas Alice Mary Robertson was a clerk in the Bureau of 

Indian Affairs from 1873 to 1879, later returning to Indian Territory and teaching in Tullahassee and the Carlisle Indian Industrial School; 

Whereas Alice Mary Robertson established the Nuyaka Mission, taught in Okmulgee, Oklahoma, and was in charge 

of a Presbyterian boarding school for Native American 

girls, now the University of Tulsa; 

Whereas Alice Mary Robertson was appointed by President 

Theodore Roosevelt as the 1st government supervisor of 

Creek Indian schools from 1900 to 1905, and later the 

postmaster of Muskogee, Oklahoma, from 1905 to 1913; 

Whereas Alice Mary Robertson’s canteen service to the troops 

during World War I later led to the formation of the 

Muskogee Chapter of the American Red Cross; 
2 

•HRES 1272 EH 

Whereas Alice Mary Robertson was elected by the 2nd District of Oklahoma as a Republican Representative to the 

67th Congress, from 1921 to 1923, serving on the Committee on Indian Affairs, the Committee on Expenditures 

in the Interior Department, and the Committee on 

Woman Suffrage; 

Whereas Alice Mary Robertson helped secure the building of 

a veteran’s hospital in Muskogee, following the creation 

of the Veterans Bureau in 1921; 

Whereas Alice Mary Robertson became the 1st woman to preside over the House of Representatives on July 20, 1921, 

when she presided over a roll call vote on S.J. Res. 34; 

and 

Whereas Alice Mary Robertson was a devoted teacher for the 

Creek Nation and helped the community through her 

translation of portions of the Scriptures and texts: Now, 

therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes 

Alice Mary Robertson for her spirit of service and dedication 

to her country, and honors her as a great American in recognition of her contributions to the State of Oklahoma and 

nationwide in the House of Representatives. 

Attest: 

Clerk.