alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: donaldandsuelleng@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:17:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Suellen growe

Coupeville, WA 98239
From: sjb@astound.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:02:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Steve Balog

Concord, CA 94518
No. 378, Misc.

#### Dufrene *v.*Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Peter Porath, certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Marwich II, Ltd.

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and we have:

          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such valuation; and

          c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Dated:  May 5, 2006


 /s/ Peter Porath
Peter Porath
Vice President, Chief Executive Officer


                                       11
<page>			            EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Morgan Stanley  Cornerstone
Fund II L.P. (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Walter Davis,
President of Demeter Management Corporation, the general partner of
the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.







By:    /s/ Walter Davis

Name:      Walter Davis
Title:     President

Date:      March 23, 2007
MICROMUSE INC.



Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each
of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, in his capacity as an officer of Micromuse Inc. (the Company), that, to his knowledge:



(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: May 17, 2004



By:

/s/ LLOYD A. CARNEYLloyd A. Carney Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ MICHAEL L. LUETKEMEYERMichael L. Luetkemeyer Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




This certification is not deemed
to be filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officerof Providian Financial Corporation (the “Company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

1.               The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Dated: May 10, 2004

 

 
|   | /s/ Joseph W. Saunders                |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Joseph W. Saunders                    |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                  |
|   |                                  |
|   | /s/ Anthony F. Vuoto                  |   |
|   | Anthony F. Vuoto                      |
|   | Chief Financial Officer               |

 

----
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 0041 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2011 -NM - 167 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
From: ysa4@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:04:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Yolanda Shannon-Albert

Country Club Hills, IL 60478
<PAGE>


                                   EXHIBIT 21

                      INTRUSION.COM, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

     The following table lists the subsidiaries of the Registrant as of February
28, 2001, the state or other jurisdiction of incorporation and the names under
which such subsidiaries do business. The Registrant owns all of the outstanding
voting securities of each subsidiary.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         Jurisdiction                       Name under
                                             of                         which Subsidiary
          Name of Subsidiary             Organization                   is doing business
-------------------------------------   --------------       -------------------------------------
<S>                                     <C>                  <C>
 Intrusion.com, Inc.                       Delaware                   Intrusion.com, Inc.
 Optical Data Systems, Inc.                 Nevada                Optical Data Systems, Inc.
 ODS, Inc.                                  Nevada                         ODS, Inc.
 Optical Data Systems - Texas, Inc.          Texas            Optical Data Systems - Texas, Inc.
 Intrusion.com GmbH                         Germany                    Intruson.com GmbH
 Intrusion.com Limited                  United Kingdom               Intrusion.com Limited
 Intrusion.com Ltd.                     United Kingdom                Intrusion.com Ltd.
 Intrusion.com SARL                         France                    Intrusion.com SARL
 Optical Data Systems, Ltda                 Brazil                Optical Data Systems, Ltda
 Optical Data Systems (Barbados) Ltd.      Barbados          Optical Data Systems (Barbados) Ltd.
 Intrusion.com Sdn. Bhd.                   Malaysia                 Intrusion.com Sdn. Bhd.
 ODS Investments, Inc.                      Nevada                   ODS Investments, Inc.

</TABLE>
From: Judy Bonn

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Religious Refusal

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:10:45 PM

Dear HHS,

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care

under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services,

are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions. Please

do not set the women of this country back to a time when we had almost no rights at all!
From: myaac@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:36:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ariel Cote

Lincoln, RI 02865
##### 



Employment of the Executive
  Compensation
  Supplemental Retirement Benefit




---



##### 



Normal Retirement
  Early Retirement
  EarlyRetirement
    
    ApplicableAges
    
    Percentage57-61
    
    0%62
    
    25% of the full benefit (70%)63
    
    50% of the full benefit (70%)64
    
    75% of the full benefit (70%)
  Disability Benefit




---



##### 



Discharge Without Cause




---



##### 



Non-alienation of Benefits
   
 General Provisions
       BANKLORAIN NATIONAL BANK:/s/ Paulette Mager
    
    
    
    BY:
    
    /s/ J. F. Kidd/s/ Denise DeVito
    
    
    
    
    
    PresidentEXECUTIVE/s/ Paulette Mager
    
    
    
    /s/ Thomas P. Ryan/s/ Denise DeVito
    
    
    
    Thomas P. Ryan
Order e n te re d November 8, 2019

In T h e



## C o u r t of A p p e a l s

F ifth D i s tr i ct o f Tex a s a t D a l l a s

No. 05

- 18

- 00247

- CR

C A RS T EN HEDE M A N N, Ap p e l l a n t

V.

THE S T A TE OF TEX A S

, Ap p e l l e e

On Ap p e al f

r om the 2 6 5th J ud icial Dist r ict Court

Dallas Cou n ty, T e xas

T r ial Court Cause No. F

- 143491 7

- R



### O RD ER

W e r e ins t a te th i s a pp e a l. App e l l a nt’s N ove mber 7, 2019 S eco nd Mot i on for

C ont i nu a n c e of Evid e nt i a r y H e a ri n g is GRA N TE D

. A cc o rdi n g l y the s c h e dul i n g for th i s

re mand e d proc ee d i n g is r e vised a s follows:

W e a b a te th i s a pp e a l a nd ORDER the t ri a l c o u rt ( 1) to c ond u c t a n e vident i a r y h e a ri n g on

a pp e l l a nt’s mo t ion for n e w tri a l a t the c ourt ’ s e a rli e st c onv e nien c e a ft e r D e c e m b e r 1 1

,

2 019, (2) to make w r i t ten find i n g s e x plaining i t s rul i n g on that mo t ion, a nd (3) t o a r r a n g e f o r i t s

ruling a nd findin g s to be includ e d in a suppl e ment a l c le r k’s r e c ord fil e d with i n two w ee ks of the

d a te of the h ea ri n g

.W e ORDER a r e port e r ’ s r e c ord f r om the h e a ring on the mo t ion for n e w tri a l to be fil e d

with i n two w ee ks of the d a te of the h e a ri n g

.

W e DI R ECT the Cle r k of th i s Court to s e nd a c o p y of th i s ord e r to the Hono ra ble G a r y

S teph e ns, J ud g e of Da l la s C oun t y ’s A u x i l ia r y C o urt N o. 8, a nd to t he p a rt i e s. The parties are

instructed going forward that any motion filed during the abatement must include a certificate of

conference.

The a pp ea l will be r e i n stat e d two w ee ks a ft e r the d a t e of the h ea ri n g or wh e n the

suppl e ment a l cl e rk ’ s r e c ord a nd r e p o rt e r ’ s r e c o rd a re fil e d, whi c h e v e r oc c u rs soon e r.

/ B i l l P e d e rs e n, I I I

/

BI L L P E D ER S E N

, I I I

J UST I CE