alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 62780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19765]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), DOE.

ACTION: Rescindment of a system of records notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 and Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-108, the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (Commission or FERC) proposes to rescind an existing system 
of records notice. Specifically, the following SORN is being proposed 
for rescindment: ``FERC--50: Commission Accounting System Records.'' 
The basis for rescindment is explained below.

DATES: Please submit comments on this rescindment notice on or before 
October 13, 2023. If no public comment is received during the period 
allowed for comment or unless otherwise published in the Federal 
Register by FERC, the rescindment will become effective a minimum of 30 
days after the date of publication in the Federal Register. If FERC 
receives public comments, FERC shall review the comments to determine 
whether any changes to the notice are necessary.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted in writing to Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, or 
electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8cfcfee5faedeff5cceae9feefa2ebe3fa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b2c2c0dbc4d3d1cbf2d4d7c0d19cd5ddc4">[email protected]</span></a>. Comments should indicate that they 
are submitted in response to Commission Accounting System Records 
(FERC-50).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 
Geoff Gilliar, Director, Office of Executive Director, Financial 
Information Technology and Travel Division, 888 First Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-6088.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Commission Accounting System Records was 
identified for rescindment from the FERC's Privacy Act systems of 
records inventory because the Departmental Integrated Standardized Core 
Accounting System was decommissioned and replaced by PeopleSoft 
Financials. OMB requires that each agency provide assurance that 
systems of records do not duplicate any existing agency or government-
wide systems of records. The decommissioned system was replaced by 
another IT system which is covered by an existing system of records 
FERC-56: PeopleSoft Financials 87 FR 2777 (January 19, 2022).

SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER: Commission's Accounting System Records--FERC--
50
HISTORY:
    65 FR 21760 (April 24, 2000)

    Dated: September 7, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-19765 Filed 9-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of VTEX Energy,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending January 31, 2006 (the "Report"),  I,
Stephen F. Noser, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/S/ Stephen F. Noser
---------------------
Stephen F. Noser
Chief Executive Officer
April 24, 2006
. Page 1 of 1
REC 12089)-/0
LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION

PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS As of: September 01, 2011
BRANCH Received: August 09, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 01, 2011

Tracking No. 80edc3d7

‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0116
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Tom English
Address: California
Organization: none

General Comment

Since pregnancy is not a disease, contraceptives should not be considered or included as a part of
preventive health care. Moreover, non-abortificient contraception is readily and inexpensively
available to anyone desiring to use it. For this reason alone it should not be included in
preventative health care.

In view of the above, REQUIRING religious organizations to provide contraception benefits to
their employees is especially egregious and should not be included in any healthcare plan.
Likewise for other organizations that are opposed to abortion and contraception. These
organizations are a small percent of the total anyhow, so what is the point of forcing them to
provide such services?

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000... 9/1/2011
From: anthonymullen@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:42:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Anthony Mullen

Drexel Hill, PA 19026
EXHIBIT 31.1
 SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION
AND
SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATION
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Select Medical Holdings Corporation and
Select Medical Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  May 14, 2010
    /s/ Robert A. OrtenzioRobert A. OrtenzioChief Executive Officer
| Illinois HomeAbout UsNewsProgramsTechnical ResourcesPartnershipsFeaturesContact Us  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| SearchIllinoisAll NRCS SitesNRCS, FSA & RD forNews- Congressional Information
- IL State Report
- News Releases
- Presentations
- Publications
-  Photo Gallery
- Success Stories
-  Find a Service Center
- Midwest Region

PublicationsNewsletters
Listed below are IL NRCS newsletters available. Publications available to download require    Adobe Acrobat Reader 5.0 or higher (FREE software).  Please contact thePublic Affairs Staff at (217) 353.6609 if you need assistance. 
Newsletters Available Issue**Community Assistance Newsletter**Issues Available:      Summer 2002Winter 2001/2002Summer 2001Winter 2000/2001Summer 2000Spring 2000**Outreach Insider Newsletter**       Issues Available:      July       2001November 2000July       2000March 2000October 1999May 1999December 1998**Watershed Planning Newsletter**Issues Available:      Vol. 2 (Vol. 2 2002) Vol. 1 (Vol. 1 2002) Vol. 3 (Fall/Winter 2001) Vol. 2 (Summer 2001) Vol. 1       (Spring 2001)
 
 Back to Top  **Illinois NRCS Home**  | 		Site Map  | 		Contact  | 		Accessibility  | 		NRCS  | 		USDA |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Signature Eyewear, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael Prince, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Michael Prince
-----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
March 14, 2008
#### BENJAMIN E. VALENTINE, Respondent, v. MYERS’ SANITARY DEPOT, Appellant, Impleaded with ANDREW G. MYERS.

*Appea/rance*— how *it must be*made— *Code of Omit Procedme, sec.*431.

The defendant corporation in this case, although it had not been served with a copy of the summons and complaint, moved, without serving any formal notice of appearance, to have the complaint made more definite and certain. Thereupon the plaintiff procured an *ex pa/rie*order discontinuing the action as to the corporate defendant.

*Held,*that this was proper; that the service of the notice of motion was not equivalent to an appearance.

Appeal from an order made at a Special Term, refusing to vacate an order for the discontinuance of this action as against the appellant (a corporation), who was originally impleaded with the individual defendant.

•Under section 421 of the Code of Civil Procedure, a defendant can only appear by serving a notice of appearance, or a copy of a demurrer or answer.

The moving papers of the appellant show that the only service •of summons was upon the defendant Myers individually ; that he appeared by due notice of appearance, but that no summons was served on the corporation; and that there was no appearance or pleading served in behalf of the corporation.

The corporation served a notice of a motion to have the complaint made more definite and certain. The plaintiff thereupon procured •an order to be entered discontinuing the action as against the corporation.

The corporation claiming that the notice of motion, which it had served, was an appearance, moved to vacate the order of •discontinuance.

*202
      *O. A. C.*Barnett, for the appellant.

*B. E.*Yalentme, for the respondent.'

Barnard, JP. J.:

The defendant, “ Myers’ Sanitary Depot,” was not served with the summons and complaint in this action. Having in some way become possessed of a copy of the complaint which had been served upon the defendant Myers, it caused a motion to be made to make the complaint more definite and certain. It gave no notice of appearance with the notice of motion. This notice was signed by an attorney of the court. Before the present Code a notice of motion was held in many cases to be an appearance. Under these decisions there grew up a practice by which a notice of motion was made a special appearance, and only for the purposes of the motion. The Code (§ 421) now provides that an appearance “must be made” by notice of appearance, copy demurrer or copy answer. Before ah appearance it has always been right to discontinue without costs. Under this section there was no formal appearance. and the order of discontinuance was properly granted *ex parte,*although it was made after the service of the notice of motion upon the plaintiff’s attorney. *(Couch*v. *Mulhane,*63 How., 79; *Douglas*v. *Haberstro,*8 Abb. N. C., 230.)

The order should be affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Pratt, J., concurred.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,****As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/Afor the period ended May 31, 2007 (the “Report”) of Immucor, Inc. (the “Registrant”),as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Icertify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

(2)       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.
| September 7, 2007 | /s/ Patrick D. Waddy            |
|------------------------|---------------------------------|
|                   | Patrick D. Waddy                |
|                   | Interim Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23b

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
listed below of BellSouth Corporation:

      -     Form S-3 (File No. 333-120170),

      -     Form S-3 (File No. 333-117772),

      -     Form S-8 (File No. 333-115035),

      -     Form S-8 (File No. 333-115036),

      -     Form S-8 (File No. 333-105710),

      -     Form S-8 (File No. 333-115034),

      -     Form S-8 (File No. 333-75660);

of our report dated March 4, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Cingular Wireless LLC, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of BellSouth Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
March 4, 2005
Exhibit









Exhibit 10.2(p)





Amendment to 
Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement
This Amendment, effective March 9, 2016 to the Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of March 2, 2015 is made between Anthem, Inc. (the “Company”) and the Participant set forth in the accompanying Notice of Option Grant to the Agreement.  This Amendment is included in and made part of the Agreement.  
1.A new Section 3(f) is added to read as follows, existing Section 3(f) is renumbered as Section 3(g) and all cross-references are updated accordingly:
(f).    Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason - Cigna Corporation Acquisition.  Unless section 3(e) is applicable and notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement to the contrary, this Section shall apply for the period beginning on the date that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger among Anthem, Anthem Merger Sub Corp., and Cigna Corporation dated as of July 23, 2015 (the “Merger Agreement”) is approved under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 in accordance with Section 3.1(c)(iii)(A) of the Merger Agreement (the “HSR Approval Date”) and ending on the earlier of (1) the third anniversary of the “Closing Date” as defined in the Merger Agreement or (2) the date the acquisition of Cigna Corporation is terminated (the “Cigna Integration Period”).  The Option shall immediately become fully exercisable and shall remain exercisable for a period of forty-five (45) days from the date of a Participant’s Termination, but not later than the Expiration Date noted on the attached Schedule A if the Participant does not otherwise meet the requirements of Retirement as set forth in Section 3(a) above at Termination and, during the Cigna Integration Period, the Participation’s Termination is either (A) by the Company or an Affiliate without Cause or (B) by the Participant for Good Reason (as defined in the Executive Agreement Plan), provided that for clause (B), the Participant participates in the Executive Agreement Plan as of the HSR Approval Date. 
2.    Effect on Agreement.  This Amendment has no effect on the other terms of the Agreement and the Agreement shall otherwise continue in effect.  
	
				
	 
	ANTHEM, INC.

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Printed:
	 
	Jose Thomas

	 
	Its:
	 
	EVP & Chief Human Resources Officer

	 
	 
	 
	Anthem, Inc.










Amendment - Stock Option Agreement - 2015
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Optical Data Systems, Inc. and also into the Registration Statement (Form S-
8, No. 33-58570) pertaining to the 1983 Incentive Stock Option Plan of Optical
Data Systems, Inc. and the 1987 Incentive Stock Option Plan of Optical Data
Systems, Inc., the Registration Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-34476) pertaining to
the 1995 Stock Option Plan of Optical Data Systems, Inc., the Registration
Statement (Form S-8, No. 33-34484) pertaining to the 1995 Non-employee Director
Stock Option Plan of Optical Data Systems, Inc., and the Registration Statement
(Form S-8, No. 33-80898) pertaining to the ODS 401(k) Savings Plan of Optical
Data Systems, Inc. of our report dated January 21, 1997, included in the 1996
Annual Report to Stockholders of Optical Data Systems, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Optical Data
Systems, Inc. listed in Item 14(a)2.  This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits.  In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.


                                                         ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Dallas, Texas
March 13, 1997