alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit










SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”), between Taylor Morrison, Inc. (together with any successor thereto, the “Company”) and Darrell Sherman (“Executive”), is entered into on February 26, 2016.


RECITALS:


WHEREAS, the parties entered into an Employment Agreement, effective as of February 1, 2011, as amended by that certain First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated December 28, 2012 (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”);


WHEREAS, Executive and the Company have agreed to amend and modify certain terms of the Employment Agreement, with the understanding that all other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, and other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Executive agree as follows:


1.     The reference to “Vice President and General Counsel” in Section 4 of the Employment Agreement is hereby replaced with “Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary.”


2.     The last sentence of the second paragraph of Section 12.4 of the Employment Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


“For purposes of this Agreement, ‘Change in Control’ shall have the meaning ascribed to such term as set forth in the Taylor Morrison Home Corporation 2013 Omnibus Equity Award Plan, as amended from time to time, or any successor plan thereto.”


3.     Affirmation.     Except as specifically modified herein, all remaining provisions, terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


4.     Miscellaneous.     This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.




*    *    *























































IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment, or caused this Amendment to be duly executed on their respective behalf by their respective duly authorized officers, all effective as of the date and year first written above.


TAYLOR MORRISON, INC.                        EXECUTIVE


By: /s/ Sheryl Palmer                            /s/ Darrell Sherman
Sheryl Palmer                                 Darrell Sherman
President and Chief Executive Officer
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Coupon | Interest | Maturity | Callable | Survivor's Option | Price | CUSIP |   |
| 2.250% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 6/15/2024 | 12/15/2016 * | Yes § | 100.00 | 14912HSB7 |   |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |  |
| (†††) | First Payment date 12/15/2016 |   |
|                    |   |
No. 643.

#### Nature Food Centres, Inc., et al. *v.*United States.

*Milton A. Bass*and *Solomon H. Friend*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *William W. Goodrich*for the United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 69183.

#### Ritter & Ritter Importers, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 64/9639 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

An examination of the papers in the case showing that the protest was not filed within the 60-day period provided by section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, the protest was dismissed as untimely.
From: tobrien@megadyne.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:35:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

TOM O'BRIEN

Sandy, UT 84094
|                                                      |
|------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                      |  |  |  |  |
|                                                 |   |   |   |   |
| Delaware(STATE OR OTHERJURISDICTION OFINCORPORATION) |   |   001-11241(COMMISSION FILENUMBER) |   | 37-1105865(IRS EMPLOYERIDENTIFICATIONNUMBER) |

|                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                            |  |  |  |  |
|                                                                                                                                                                                       |   |   |   |   |
|         2120 West End Avenue, Nashville, Tennessee            37203-0001(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)    (ZIP CODE) |

----

----

|         |
|---------|
|         |  |  |
|    |   |   |
| Exhibit |   |   |
| Number  |   | Description |
| 23.1    |   | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
| 99.1    |   | General and Financial Information |
| 101.INS |   | XBRL Instance Document |
| 101.SCH |   | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
| 101.CAL |   | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
| 101.DEF |   | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
| 101.LAB |   | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
| 101.PRE |   | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |

----

|                      |
|----------------------|
|                      |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|                 |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                 |   | Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation |   |   |
|                 |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Date: August 7, 2012 |   | By: |   | /s/ J. Wesley Blumenshine |   |   |
|                 |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                 |   |   |   | Name: J. Wesley BlumenshineTitle:   Secretary |   |   |

----

|         |
|---------|
|         |  |  |
|    |   |   |
| Exhibit |   |   |
| Number  |   | Description |
| 23.1    |   | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
| 99.1    |   | General and Financial Information |
| 101.INS |   | XBRL Instance Document |
| 101.SCH |   | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
| 101.CAL |   | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
| 101.DEF |   | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
| 101.LAB |   | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
| 101.PRE |   | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
#### FREDERICK C. RANKINS and CHARLES F. RANKINS, Respondents, *v.*HERMAN C. GRUPE, Appellant.

*■Agreement to resell property received in payment of a debt*— when *void under the statute of frauds.*

April second the plaintiffs sold and delivered to one Ansicker two barrels of barbed wire worth sixty dollars. On April fifteenth Ansicker, not having paid for the wire, agreed to return the wire to fhe plaintiff in payment of the debt owing for it, the wire to be delivered the next day. Thereafter and on the: same day Ansicker made a general assignment for the benefit of creditors.

*jBeld,*that the agreement between Ansicker and the plaintiff was in fact a sale and therefore void under the statute of frauds, and that the title to the wire passed to the assignee.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady county, affirming a judgment of a justice of the peace in favor of the plaintiffs.

The action was brought to recover the possession of two barrels-, of barbed wire worth sixty dollars, sold by the plaintiffs to one; Ansicker, the defendant’s assignor. The plaintiffs claimed that the-property had been reconveyed to them on April fifteenth, prior to the making of the assignment.

*482
      *Yates (&*Cutler, for the appellant.

*Jacob W. Clute,*for the respondents.

Learned, P. J.:

The plaintiffs had sold and delivered the wire to Ansicker on the second of April, and it thus had become his property. The plaintiffs had not even a right of stoppage *m trcmsitu.*All they had was the debt which Ansicker owed them for the wire. When, therefore, they went to Ansicker on the fifteenth day of April and he agreed to return the wire in payment of the debt, the agreement was one of sale to them. It was not the annulling of an executory contract. The wire was not delivered, and was not to be delivered, till the next morning. It was not paid for by plaintiffs, for they did not release the debt owing to them.- They only agreed to accept the -wire in payment of the debt. This was merely a contract executory. Even without regard to the statute of fraud's, it is quite doubtful whether by this arrangement any title to the wire passed to the plaintiff. Certainly under the statute (the wire being worth over sixty dollars) they acquired no title. Before the next morning Ansicker had made an assignment to the defendant and had.delivered the wire, with other property, to him. The plaintiffs, therefore, have no right of recovery, even admitting that the assignment was not executed until after the agreement between them and Ansicker.

' Judgment of County Court and of justice reversed, with costs.

Present — Learned, P. J.,'Bocees and Landon, JJ.

Judgment of County Court and of justice of the peace reversed, with costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-29-1999
<CASH>                                             681
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,879
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,345)
<INVENTORY>                                     31,857
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,542
<PP&E>                                          33,891
<DEPRECIATION>                                (16,161)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 109,627
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,185
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,391
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,153
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   109,627
<SALES>                                         22,907
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,907
<CGS>                                           19,606
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,606
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,842
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 957
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,910)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        20
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,930)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      23
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,953)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.99)


</TABLE>
P roduct Grade Reference Adiprene LFP3560D

CAS Number 1558862
- 08
- 0 C arbonic acid, dimethyl ester , polymer with 1,4 - diisocyanatobenzene, 1,6 - hexanediol and 1, 5 - pentanediol
. The simplest possible combination for the shortest polymer chain is shown below :
"Gregg, R. Juge" 

<rjgregg@sidley.com>

04/11/2011 12:00 PM

To Group A-AND-R-DOCKET@EPA

cc

bcc

Subject Docket #: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0051

7 attachments

Gina McCarthy 4-8-11 FINAL.pdf Cold end memo response 4-8-11 FINAL.pdf Keith Barnett Memo 3-21-11.pdf

HCl Floor Spreadsheet-No CISWI_mnl.xls HCl Floor Spreadsheet-No CISWI_mnl.xlsNo CISWI THCanalysis_03_01_11 - summary.xls No CISWI THCanalysis_03_01_11 - summary.xls

PM Floor Spreadsheet-No CISWI.XLS PM Floor Spreadsheet-No CISWI.XLSUPLpooled_corrected_intqry_MACT-No CISWI_mnl.xlsx UPLpooled_corrected_intqry_MACT-No CISWI_mnl.xlsx

From: O’Hare, Andrew 

Sent: Friday, April 08, 2011 4:42 PM

To: 'mccarthy.gina@epa.gov'; 'silverman.steven@epa.gov'; 'tsirigotis.peter@epa.gov'; 

'barnett.keith@epa.gov'

Subject: PCA Response to EPA Correspondence on NESHAP

Ms. McCarthy,

Attached please find the response of the Portland Cement Association to correspondence (referred to

herein as the “cold end” memorandum) recently received from EPA regarding certain aspects of the

portland cement national emission standard for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP).  

Also attached is a request for a meeting to discuss PCA perspectives on these matters.  

Thank you,

Andy O’Hare

Andrew T. O'Hare

Vice President, Regulatory Affairs

Portland Cement Association

500 New Jersey Avenue, 7th Floor

Washington, DC 20001

Office: (202) 408‐9494

Fax: (202) 408‐0877

Cell: (202) 270‐0094

e‐mail: aohare@cement.org
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To comply with certain U.S. Treasury regulations, we inform you

that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this

communication, including attachments, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be

used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed on such 

taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, if any such tax advice is used or referred

to by other parties in promoting, marketing or recommending any partnership or other entity,

investment plan or arrangement, then (i) the advice should be construed as written in connection

with the promotion or marketing by others of the transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed in this

communication and (ii) the taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer's particular

circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

******************************************************************************

**********************

This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.

If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us

immediately.

*****************************************************************

***********************************
From: Ron&Linda Williams

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Institute of Medicine recommendations

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 12:14:33 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Linda Williams
**EXHIBIT 32**

** **

# **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

# ** **

In connection with the report of CommScope,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| By:    |  /s/ Frank M. Drendel                            |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Frank M. Drendel                                      |
|   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                  |
|   |                                                  |
|   |                                                  |
| Date:  | August 9, 2004                                        |   |
|   |                                                  |   |
|   |                                                  |   |
| By:    |  /s/ Jearld L. Leonhardt                         |   |
|   | Jearld L. Leonhardt                                   |
|   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |
|   |                                                  |
|   |                                                  |
| Date:  | August 9, 2004                                        |   |
|        |                                                       |        |  |  |  |  |  |

 

----
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Population profile of theUnited States [electronic resource].**
 
1982 | 1983-84| 1984-85 | 1989
1991 | 1993| 1995 | 1997 | 1999
2000 | 2003
 
SuDoc Number:C 3.186/8:
Item Number:0142-C-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000542602
 
January 30, 2020
From: Rita Barron

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: healthcare

Date: Sunday, August 14, 2011 7:53:54 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

 Rita Barron
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 134 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 12, 2007.
Whereas the United States must remain vigilant against all threats to the 
        homeland, including acts of terrorism, natural disasters, and other 
        emergencies;
Whereas the Department of Homeland Security marked its 4th anniversary on 
        January 24, 2007;
Whereas the more than 208,000 employees of the Department work tirelessly to 
        prepare the Nation to counter acts of terrorism, natural disasters, and 
        other emergencies;
Whereas the Department's employees work diligently to deter, detect, and prevent 
        acts of terrorism;
Whereas the Department's employees stand willing, ready, and able to respond if 
        catastrophe strikes;
Whereas the Department's employees support the Department's mission to protect 
        continuously the Nation's borders, airports, seaports, rail lines, and 
        other transit systems;
Whereas the Department's employees, together with employees of other agencies 
        and departments of the Federal Government, work with State, local, and 
        tribal partners to enhance disaster preparedness at all levels of 
        government;
Whereas the Department's employees are called upon to sacrifice time with their 
        families to work long hours to fulfill the Department's vital mission; 
        and
Whereas the Nation is indebted to the Department's employees for their efforts 
        and contributions: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives recognizes and honors the 
employees of the Department of Homeland Security for their exceptional efforts 
and contributions to protect and secure the Nation.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```