alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 178 (Friday, September 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 63574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20056]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

DATE AND TIME:  September 21, 2023; 1:00 p.m.

PLACE: The meeting will be held at the Surface Transportation Board at 
the address below and also streamed live at https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwKTAlGGHIA0xcN3bDt_Uqg.

Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street SW, Room #1042 (Hearing 
Room), Washington, DC 20423

STATUS: The meeting will be held on September 21, 2023, beginning at 
1:00 p.m. in the Hearing Room of the Surface Transportation Board and 
will be open for public observation. If technical issues prevent the 
Commission from streaming live, the Commission will post a recording of 
the meeting as soon as possible on the Commission's web page at 
www.fmc.gov. Any person wishing to attend the meeting in-person should 
report to Surface Transportation Board with enough time to clear 
building security procedures.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

1. Staff Briefing, Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022
2. Staff Briefing, Consumer Affairs and Dispute Resolution Services

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Amy Strauss, Acting Secretary, 
(202) 523-5725.

Jason Guthrie,
Federal Register Alternate Liaison Officer, Federal Maritime 
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-20056 Filed 9-12-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
#### Bridget Delahoyd, Respondent, v. Julia A. Alverson, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, except as to costs, and so modified as to give costs to defendant, no costs of appeal to either party. Opinion by

Cullen, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 24 - 0198

_________________ IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: DAVINA ATTAR - WILLIAMS,

Petitioner and Appellant, and STEVEN THOMAS WILLIAMS,

Respondent and Appellee. O R D E R

_________________ The record was filed for purposes of this appeal on June 7 , 2024 . T he opening brief is now overdue. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Appellant shall prepare, file , and serve the opening brief on appeal no later than August 2 3 , 2024 . Failure to file the brief within that time will result in dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all parties .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 23 2024

07/23/2024
From: Laura Magoon

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:51:03 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Laura Magoon

8515 Brodie Ln. #835

Austin, TX 78745
6546 Woodland Oaks Dr.

Magnolia, TX 77354

(832) 212

- 6011

Q500 Typhoon UA Specifications:



### Q500 TYPHOON Aircraft

Flight Time Up to 25 Minutes

Height 240mm (9.45 in)

Width 420mm (16.54 in)

Diagonal Length Without Rotor Blades 565mm (22.2 in)

Propeller/Main Rotor Diameter 330mm (13.0 in)

Weight Without Battery and Payload 1130g (40.0 oz)

Battery 5400mAh 3S 11.1V LiPo (included)

Charger 3S 11.1V LiPo DC Balancing Smart Charger with AC Adapter (included)

Transmitter 10

- channel 2.4GHz with 5.8 GHz video downlink (included)

3 Flight Modes Smart, Angle and Home Modes

Maximum Flying Height Default 400 Feet Above Ground Level (Adjustable via the Q500 GUI)

Maximum Rotational Velocity 65°/s

Maximum Bank Angle 35°

Maximum Climb Rate in Smart and Angle mode 3m/s

Maximum Descent Rate in Smart and Angle mode 2m/s

Radio Control Frequency Band 2.4GHz

Takeoff Weight With Battery and CGO2

- GB 1700g
From: iprogcnc@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:11:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Roger King

Rockford, IL 61109
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7421

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JERRELL ANTONIO THOMAS, a/k/a Baby Huey,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District

Judge. (CR-94-69)

Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 3, 1997

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerrell Antonio Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying Appellant's Petition for Disclosure of Signed Grand Jury Concurrence

Form. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Thomas, No. CR-94-69

(E.D. Va. July 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
From: cook@lovelandcook.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Mandated contraceptives and sterilization coverage

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:44:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as Ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Steve Cook

Loveland, CO 80537
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; NHLBI Mentored Clinical and Basic Science Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         October 19-20, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road, NW, Washington, DC 20015 (Hybrid Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Rajiv Kumar, Ph.D., Chief, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-4612,                         *rajiv.kumar@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 13, 2023.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-20157 Filed 9-18-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statement  Nos.
333-78893, 33-35863 and 33-42261 on Form S-3 of Immucor, Inc. and in the related
Prospectuses  and  Registration  Statement  Nos.  33-4636,  33-24199,  33-36554,
33-41406, 33-49882 and 33-62097 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Key Employee Stock
Incentive  Plan,  Salary  Reduction  Plan,  1983 Stock  Incentive  Plan and 1986
Incentive  Stock  Option  Plan;  1987  Non-Incentive  Stock  Option  Plan;  1989
Non-Incentive  Stock Option Plan; 1990 Stock Option Plan; 1990 Stock Option Plan
and 1995 Stock Option Plan, respectively,  of Immucor, Inc., of our report dated
July 21, 1999,  except for  Paragraph 7 of Note 4 as to which the date is August
24,  1999 and  paragraph 5 of Note 5 as to which the date is August 9, 1999 with
respect to the consolidated  financial statements and schedule of Immucor,  Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended May 31, 1999.


                                                  Ernst & Young LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
August 24, 1999
From: gcsarkis@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:52:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

george sarkis19114

,
Amendment No. 1
                    To The Petro, Inc. Supplemental Executive
                                 Retirement Plan

      WHEREAS, effective January 1, 1990, Petro, Inc. ("Petro") established the
Petro, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the "Plan") to provide
certain highly compensated employees of Petro with supplemental retirement
income, disability and survivor benefits in addition to benefits payable from
Petro's qualified plans and Social Security; and

      WHEREAS, Article XIV of the Plan vests the Committee (as such term is
defined in the Plan) with the authority to amend the Plan; and

      WHEREAS, the Petroleum Heat and Power Co., Inc. Retirement Plan (the
"Basic Plan") has been amended in order to freeze the accrued benefit of all
participants effective December 31, 1996; and

      WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Plan in order to freeze all
benefit accruals so that effective December 31, 1996, no additional benefits
shall accrue to Participants in the Plan;

      NOW THEREFORE, effective December 31, 1996, the Plan, which except as
otherwise herein provided shall remain in full force and effect, is hereby
amended as follows:
<PAGE>

      1. Article II, paragraph 2, "Accrued Benefit", is amended by adding the
following at the end thereof:

            "The Accrued Benefit of all Participants shall be frozen effective
            December 31, 1996."

      2. Article III, Eligibility, is amended by adding a new paragraph as
follows:

            "Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary,
            effective December 31, 1996 (i) each employee who was a Participant
            in the Plan on such date shall continue as a Participant and (ii) no
            other employee of Petro shall become a Participant in the Plan."

      3. A new Article XVI, Freezing of all Benefits Under the Plan shall be
added as follows:

            "Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, the
            Accrued Benefit of all Participants shall be frozen effective
            December 31, 1996."

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee, on behalf of Petro, has caused this
Amendment to be duly executed this day of November, 1996, effective December 31,
1996.

                        The Committee of the Petro, Inc.
                        Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan


                        __________________________________
                        Irik P. Sevin


                        __________________________________
                        Joseph Cavanaugh
From: JudyKlinect@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:16:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Judy Klinect

Merritt Island, FL 32952
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BANQUO D. YOUNG,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

JOE MCGRATH,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 08-16021

D.C. No. 2:03-cv-01674-MCE

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Morrison C. England, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Banquo D. Young appeals from the district court’s order denying his 28

U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), Young’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief

with regard to the certified issue and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. 

FILED

SEP 29 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-16021

We have provided the appellant with the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental

brief and we have considered his November 19, 2008 informal brief. No

answering brief has been filed.

The state court’s determination of the issue certified for appeal, that

sufficient evidence was presented at Young’s trial to support his convictions, was

not contrary to, nor involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established

federal law. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d); Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319

(1979). Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio,

488 U.S. 75, 80-81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief. Accordingly,

we deny counsel’s request to expand the certificate of appealability. See 9th Cir.

R. 22-1(e); see also Hiivala v. Wood, 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th Cir. 1999) (per

curiam).

We construe the due process arguments in Young’s pro se supplemental

brief as a motion to expand the certificate of appealability. So construed, the

motion is denied. See id.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.