alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: mudgeshere@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:45:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mike Mudge

Hemet, CA 92544
From: Sr. Leah Couvillion

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: I oppose the Definition of Religious Employer in Health Care Rules

Date: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 7:35:14 AM

The current definition of religious employer does not provide true conscience protection for those

committed to preserving life. Health care plans should not be forced to violate the moral and religious

convictions of providers or employees in order to participate in the health care system. Requiring such

an unacceptable demand threatens both universal access to health care and religious freedom of

conscience.

I totally hope and pray you vote for protection of conscience rights for health care workers,

pharmacists, etc.

Sister Leah Couvillion, SSND

1802 San Francisco Ave

Laredo, TX 78040-3831

956 568-5820
EX-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 CAPE BANK 

EMPLOYEES’ SAVINGS & PROFIT SHARING PLAN 

The Plan named above gives the Employer the right to amend it at any time. According to that right, the Plan is amended effective April 1, 2015 as
follows: 
 By striking the definition of Predecessor Employer from the DEFINITIONS SECTION of Article I and substituting the following: 

Predecessor Employer means, except for purposes of the CONTRIBUTION LIMITATION SECTION of Article III, a firm of which the Employer
was once a part (e.g., due to a spinoff or change of corporate status) or a firm absorbed by the Employer because of a merger or acquisition (stock or asset, including a division or an operation of such company) that maintained this Plan or that is
named below: 
 Boardwalk Bank 

Colonial Bank 
 By adding the following as the
third paragraph in the ROLLOVER CONTRIBUTIONS SECTION of Article III: 
 A Rollover Contribution may include a direct
rollover from Colonial Bank of an outstanding loan balance that is not in default for a Participant impacted by a business event in accordance with nondiscriminatory procedures set up by the Loan Administrator. For this purpose, a business event
means an acquisition, merger, or similar transaction involving a change in the employer of the employees of a trade or business. 
 By striking the first
paragraph in the ALLOCATION SECTION of Article III and substituting the following: 
 For purposes of Matching Contributions,
a person meets the allocation requirements of this section if he is an Active Participant on the last day of the Plan Year. 

For purposes of Contributions other than Matching Contributions, a person meets the allocation requirements of this section if
he is an Active Participant on the last day of the Plan Year and has at least 1,000 Hours of Service during the latest Accrual Computation Period ending on or before that date. 

This amendment is made an integral part of the aforesaid Plan and is controlling over the terms of said Plan with respect to the particular items addressed
expressly herein. All other provisions of the Plan remain unchanged and controlling. 
 Unless otherwise stated on any page of this amendment, eligibility
for benefits and the amount of any benefits payable to or on behalf of an individual who is an Inactive Participant on the effective date(s) stated above, shall be determined according to the provisions of the aforesaid Plan as in effect on the day
before he became an Inactive Participant. 
 Signing this amendment, the Employer, as plan sponsor, has made the decision to adopt this plan amendment. The
Employer is acting in reliance on its own discretion and on the legal and tax advice of its own advisors, and not that of any member of the Principal Financial Group or any representative of a member company of the Principal Financial Group. 

  

					
	Amendment No. 1	 	1	  	(4-60403)
		 		  	Subtype 110217









 Signed this 24th day of March, 2015. 

 

			
	CAPE BANK
		
	By	 	 /s/ Angie Hickman

	
	 VP, Compensation & Benefits

	Title



  

					
	Amendment No. 1	 	2	  	(4-60403)
		 		  	Subtype 110217
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1477 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1477

To provide for an election of an annuity under section 377 of title 28, 
        United States Code, for any qualified magistrate judge.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 1, 2001

 Mr. Bingaman (for himself and Mr. Domenici) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for an election of an annuity under section 377 of title 28, 
        United States Code, for any qualified magistrate judge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELECTION OF ANNUITY FOR A QUALIFIED MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

    (a) Definition.--In this section the term ``qualified magistrate 
judge'' means any person who--
            (1) retired as a magistrate judge before November 15, 1988; 
        and
            (2) on the date of filing an election under subsection 
        (b)--
                    (A) is serving as a recalled magistrate judge on a 
                full-time basis under section 636(h) of title 28, 
                United States Code; and
                    (B) has completed at least 5 years of full-time 
                recall service.
    (b) Election of Annuity.--The Director of the Administrative Office 
of the United States Courts may accept the election of a qualified 
magistrate judge to--
            (1) receive an annuity under section 377 of title 28, 
        United States Code; and
            (2) come within the purview of section 376 of such title.
    (c) Credit for Service.--Full-time recall service performed by a 
qualified magistrate judge shall be credited for service in calculating 
an annuity elected under this section.
    (d) Regulations.--The Director of the Administrative Office of the 
United States Courts may promulgate regulations to carry out this Act.
                                 <all>
```
From: nvsteele@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:47:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nathanael Steele

Los Angeles, CA 90032
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           7,247,032
<SECURITIES>                                       116,471
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1,371,3420
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,347,277
<PP&E>                                          15,967,355
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,681,899
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,536,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,975,314
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             7,982
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,970,433
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,536,884
<SALES>                                          8,544,086
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,241,636
<CGS>                                           22,327,597
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,327,597
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 140,886
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,226,847)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        18,960
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,245,807)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,245,807)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
From: wgoodgion@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:32:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Wendy Goodgion

Oklahoma City, OK 73127
| Advanced Search		  **OCTOBER 15, 2004  **             						Our **mission** is to provide financial policy, advice, and services to 			ensure our customers’ budgets are defensible and their program resources are 			properly and efficiently executed.						Our **vision** is to be recognized as the best headquarters comptroller 			organization within the DoD providing quality services which exceed our 			customers' expectations.		**This 													is an Official U.S. Navy Web Site**											This information resides on a DOD interest computer (DoD Resource Locator 											xxxxx)Important conditions, 												restrictions, and disclaimers apply.Please submit 												problems or questions to the NAVSEA webteam.   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSecondary Instability of Stationary Crossflow Vortices in Mach 6 Boundary Layer Over a Circular ConeHypersonic boundary layer flows over a circular cone at moderate incidence can support strong crossflow instability. Due to more efficient excitation of stationary crossflow vortices by surface roughness, such boundary layer flows may transition to turbulence via rapid amplification of the high-frequency secondary instabilities of finite amplitude stationary crossflow vortices. The amplification characteristics of these secondary instabilities are investigated for crossflow vortices generated by an azimuthally periodic array of roughness elements over a 7-degree half-angle circular cone in a Mach 6 free stream. Depending on the local amplitude of the stationary crossflow mode, the most unstable secondary disturbances either originate from the second (i.e., Mack) mode instabilities of the unperturbed boundary layer or correspond to genuine secondary instabilities that reduce to stable disturbances at sufficiently small amplitudes of the stationary crossflow vortex. The predicted frequencies of dominant secondary disturbances are similar to those measured during wind tunnel experiments at Purdue University and the Technical University of Braunschweig, Germany.Document ID20160002215Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsFei Li*(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)*Meelan M Choudhari*(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)*Pedro Paredes-Gonzalez*(Langley Research Center Hampton, Virginia, United States)*Lian Duan*(Missouri University of Science and Technology Rolla, Missouri, United States)*Date AcquiredFebruary 23, 2016Publication DateDecember 1, 2015Publication InformationPublisher: National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationSubject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberL-20650NF1676L-23272NASA/TM-2015-218997Funding Number(s)WBS: 109492.02.07.01.01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightUse by or on behalf of the US Gov. Permitted.KeywordsBoundary layer flowCircular conesCross flowStabilityVorticesAvailable DownloadsNameType20160002215.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 130 

Congratulating the National Football League champion Indianapolis Colts 

for winning Super Bowl XLI and for bringing the City of Indianapolis 

and the State of Indiana their first Lombardi Trophy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2007 

Ms. CARSON (for herself, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. VISCLOSKY, Mr. DONNELLY, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. BUYER, Mr. PENCE, Mr. ELLSWORTH, and Mr. 

HILL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the National Football League champion Indianapolis Colts for winning Super Bowl XLI and for 

bringing the City of Indianapolis and the State of Indiana their first Lombardi Trophy. 

Whereas on February 4, 2007, in Miami, Florida, the Indianapolis Colts defeated the Chicago Bears by a score of 29 

to 17 in Super Bowl XLI to win the National Football 

League (NFL) Championship; 

Whereas this is the first Super Bowl win for the Indianapolis 

Colts following an overall season record of 16–4 and a 

regular season record of 12–4; 

Whereas the Colts won their fourth American Football Conference (AFC) South Title this year and the AFC chamVerDate Aug 31 2005 22:23 Feb 06, 2007 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR130.IH HR130

hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 130 IH 

pionship title with a stunning come-from-behind 38–34 

victory over the New England Patriots on January 21, 

2007; 

Whereas Tony Dungy, in his fifth season with the Colts, is 

the first African-American head coach to win the Super 

Bowl and is one of the most respected coaches in the 

league, cultivating Championship success for the team 

and boasting 10-plus victories and playoff appearances in 

his first four seasons with the Colts; 

Whereas Colts Owner and Chief Executive Officer Jim Irsay, 

who assumed ownership of the Colts in 1997, has helped 

revitalize the Colts franchise along with Colts President 

Bill Polian whose name is synonymous with pro football 

success; 

Whereas quarterback Peyton Manning, who had 25 completions for 247 yards, was selected as the Most Valuable 

Player (MVP) of Super Bowl XLI; and 

Whereas the entire Colts franchise has become a model of 

professionalism, goodwill, and community service in representing the City of Indianapolis and the State of Indiana and brings pride to Hoosiers and Colts fans everywhere: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates the National Football League champion Indian3 apolis Colts for winning Super Bowl XLI and for bringing 

4 the City of Indianapolis and the State of Indiana their 

5 first Lombardi Trophy. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
From: mchoover2@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:40:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Louise Hoover

Mcpherson, KS 67460