alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY

In connection with the annual report of TransGlobe Energy
  Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December
  31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the “Report”), I, Ross G. Clarkson, Chief Executive Officer of
  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.

|/s/
      Ross Clarkson                                                            | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                                   | 
|Name: Ross G. Clarkson 
      Title: Chief Executive Officer 
      March 24, 2005 | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule
  13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
  has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
  furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 40-F to which it relates,
  is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to
  be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities
  Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after
  the date of the Form 40-F), irrespective of any general incorporation language
  contained in such filing.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50140

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JIM DANIEL THOMPSON

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:06-CR-244-ALL

Before JOLLY, DENNIS and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jim Daniel Thompson appeals his sentence for possessing with intent to

distribute five grams or more of cocaine base. He was sentenced above his 92-

to 115-month guideline range to 150 months of imprisonment. He argues that

the district court, misapplying 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), imposed an unreasonable

sentence.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 26, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-50140

2

Citing Thompson’s extensive criminal history, his lack of respect for the

law, the need to deter him from future criminal conduct, and the need to protect

the public, the district court did not misapply § 3553(a). See United States v.

Zuniga-Peralta, 442 F.3d 345, 347-48 (5th Cir. 2006). Thompson has not shown

that his sentence is unreasonable. See id. (affirming upward departure to 60-

month sentence where maximum guideline range sentence was 33 months);

accord United States v. Smith, 417 F.3d 483, 485-86 (5th Cir. 2005) (affirming

upward departure to 120-month sentence where maximum guideline range

sentence was 41 months).

AFFIRMED.
From: susimann@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:27:25 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B). I also

strongly oppose the mandating of anything to private companies by the Federal Government.

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

susi mann

Huntsville, AL 35802
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                            4437
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       3187
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             950
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               956
<LOANS>                                          54288
<ALLOWANCE>                                        632
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   65842
<DEPOSITS>                                       52505
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                692
<LONG-TERM>                                       5500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                        7141
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   65842
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   1153
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   61
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     9
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  1223
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 546
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 624
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              599
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       34
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    559
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    287
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         287
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       175
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.46
<LOANS-NON>                                        685
<LOANS-PAST>                                       143
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   620
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       23
<RECOVERIES>                                         1
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  632
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            632
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

 

 

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

To the Shareholders and Trustees of NSTAR:

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of NSTAR (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries as of June 30, 2005, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income and retained earnings foreach of the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004 and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004.  These interim financial statements are theresponsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and makinginquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of anopinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally acceptedin the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income,comprehensive income, retained earnings, and of cash flows for the year then ended, management's assessment of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of the Company's internal controlover financial reporting as of December 31, 2004; and in our report dated February 18, 2005, we expressed unqualified opinions thereon.  The consolidated financial statements and management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting referred to above are not presented herein.  In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2005, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance sheetfrom which it has been derived.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPBoston, MassachusettsAugust 1, 2005
From: james_bromley1@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:24:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services. This is just another example of how government under the Obama regime is

attempting to push its lack of morality onto the rest of us. Protestant, Catholic, Mormon and Islamic

religious followers should be speaking out fervently against these attempts.

T

Sincerely,

James Bromley

Bremerton, WA 98311
#### RAGAN *v.*CITY OF SEATTLE et al.

No. 121.

Decided October 8, 1962.

*Francis Hoague*for appellant.

*A. C. Van Soelen*for City of Seattle, appellee.

*J. Duane Vance*and *William S. Howard, Jr.*for Washington Music Merchants, Inc., intervening appellee.

Per Curiam.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
No. 265, Misc.

#### Doyon *v.*Maine.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Frank E. Hancock,*Attorney General of Maine, and *Richard A. Foley,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit
      32.2





Multiband
      Corporation





Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As
      Adopted Pursuant to


Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
      connection with this Annual Report Form 10-K, Multiband Corporation (the
“Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2006, I, Steven M. Bell, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.  This
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and


2.  The
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
                  April 4, 2007
                Steven
                    Bell/s/
                    Steven Bell
                  Chief
                    Financial Officer
|  | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Corporation as of and for the period covered by the  Report. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:          March 12, 2010 | /s/ J. Gerald Bazewicz                    |
|---------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                              |                                      |
|                                              | J.      Gerald Bazewicz                   |
|                                              | President      and Chief ExecutiveOfficer |

----
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1312 

Commemorating the 25th anniversary of the Space Foundation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2008 

Mr. LAMBORN (for himself, Ms. HARMAN, Mr. REYES, and Mr. UDALL of Colorado) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Science and Technology 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the 25th anniversary of the Space 

Foundation. 

Whereas, on March 21, 1983, the United States Space Foundation was founded by a small group of pioneering individuals in Colorado Springs, Colorado; 

Whereas 2008 marks the 25th year of excellence and service 

of the Space Foundation; 

Whereas the mission of the Space Foundation is to advance 

space-related endeavors to inspire, enable, and propel humanity; 

Whereas the Space Foundation has become the leading nonprofit organization advancing the exploration, development, and use of space and space education for the benefit of all humankind; 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1312 IH 

Whereas the Space Foundation embraces all aspects of space 

including commercial, civil, and national security; 

Whereas the current national security environment requires 

extensive use and advancement of space-based assets; 

Whereas the Space Foundation has contributed to space education programs in all 50 States and also in Europe and 

Asia; 

Whereas the Space Foundation is regarded internationally as 

a leading space advocacy organization, and is a member 

of the United States Delegation to the United Nations 

Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space; and 

Whereas the Space Foundation hosts the National Space 

Symposium and Strategic Space and Defense, 2 of the 

top conferences for space professionals: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the contributions made by the 

3 Space Foundation; and 

4 (2) commemorates the Space Foundation’s 25 

5 years of excellence and support to the Nation. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
No. 538.

#### Campisi *v.*United States.

*Jerome Lewis*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Jerome M. Feit*for the United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000736035
<NAME> MEGO FINANCIAL CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,842
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,279
<ALLOWANCES>                                    16,794
<INVENTORY>                                     40,611
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          33,812
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,550
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 165,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         84,449
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           184
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,667
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   165,597
<SALES>                                         45,746
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                84,714
<CGS>                                            5,842
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   38,450
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                38,246
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,510
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,597
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,018
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,167
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,851
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,851
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24<F1>
<FN>
<F1>CUMULATIVE PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND - $240
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
From: radgam@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:29:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Miri Gambill

Potomac, MD 20854
No. 650, Misc.

#### Kilgallen *v.*New York.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 183.

#### Green Truck Sales, Inc., *v.*Hoegh Lines.

*Francis J. Gabel*for petitioner.

*L. Robert Wood*for respondent.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.