alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: pkfs306@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:07:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patricia Slisz

Lake Villa, IL 60046
Unmanned Aerial Systems Development, Inc. 24 Water Street Holliston, MA 01746 Exemption No. 12459 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0912 U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Request to amend Exemption No. 12459 to allow Unmanned Aerial Systems Development, Inc. to add platforms under the same direction and limitations as provided within Exemption No. 12459, docket #FAA- 2015-0912, approved on August 14 , 2015. Dear Sir or Madam, Unmanned Aerial Systems Development, Inc. (UAS Development) was issued an exemption under Section 333 of the "FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012" numbered 12459 for the commercial use of the CarbonCore Cortex and 3DR Solo for aerial filming, commercial and industrial survey and data gathering. Since the exemption was granted, UAS Development has determined the need to add the Aibotix X-6, DJI Phantom 3, DJI Inspire, Cinestar X8, Cinestar Alta, Cinestar 8, Cinestar 6 and RC Timer Trooper 850 in order to remain competitive and enhance services provided to our clients and development partners

. The airworthiness of these sUAS have all been previously affirmed under Exemption # 12646 and other recently granted exemptions. The above listed airframes all have a gross weight under 55 pounds, forward speeds of less than 80 knots. These sUAS's will be operated in accordance with the limitations and restrictions enumerated in Exemption No. 12459 already granted UAS Development. Because the requested amendment would not set any precedent or otherwise raise any novel issue, and because the addition of these sUAS platforms to our fleet will not materially affect our already granted petition No. 12459 in any way, and because UAS Development seeks to begin these operations without delay, UAS Development respectfully requests the FAA to determine that good cause exists to dispense with publication of the summary of this petition in the Federal Register and grant the requested amendment expeditiously by summary means. Thank you for your kind consideration in the granting of this amendment. Best regards, Jeffrey S. Adams President, UAS Development, Inc.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Receivable Acquisition & Management
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Max Khan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Receivable Acquisition & Management Corporation and will be retained by
Receivable Acquisition & Management Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




January
12, 2011





By:
                    /s/
      Max KhanMax
      KhanChief
      Executive Officer,Chief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer
                      and
      Principal Accounting
Officer)
From: shess62@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:00:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sherry Hess

Quincy, IL 62305
Page 1 of 1

PEC-14VE 91-05

LEGAL PROCESSING Division FES 5 2010
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS

BRANCH As of: February 05, 2010
Received: February 04, 2010

PUBLIC SUBMISSION [rirsi:730y 05 01
Comments Due: May 03, 2010
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0006
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants & Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Comment On: IRS-2010-0006-0001
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in

Retirement Plans

Document: IRS-2010-0006-0009
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-02028

Submitter Information

Name: Gretta Secher-Jensen Kadow
Address:

240 Stonehaven Dr

Fayetteville, GA, 30215
Submitter's Representative: Westmoreland
Government Agency Type: Federal
Government Agency: IRS
—— — —

General Comment

I don't see how the government can require me to by an annuity in my 401k or IRA. I don't even
want that option made available. I'll give you hint why, Medicare unfunded liabilities of over 13
trillion dollars over the next 25 years, Social Security another program with unfunded liabilities,
and the PGBC who at last accounting was underfunded by almost 3 billion dollars. My retirement
was taken over by the PBGC, Social Security has not been fixed and Medicare is a mess and you
want to require me to put more of my hard earned dollars into a broken system? I can purchase
an annuity from any private vendor at any time if I choose to do so. I don't think the government
needs to go into this business. The budget isn't even balanced and you want me to invest my
hard saved dollars in a corporation like the United States Federal Government with the balance
sheet the way it is. If I read the proposal correctly, it would be mandatory that I purchase an
annuity from the government. This part of the proposal is so wrong on many accounts, the first
being it is my money, not the governments, the second being we already have Social Security
which is like an annuity and look how well that is working, the third, I don't need to be saved
from myself and the government does not always know what is best for me.

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 2/5/2010
From: Sophie Druffner

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: conscience protection

Date: Saturday, August 13, 2011 10:26:12 AM

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:

The current definition of religious employer does not provide true conscience

protection for those committed to preserving life. Health care plans should not be

forced to violate the moral and religious convictions of providers or employees in

order to participate in the health care system. Requiring such an unacceptable

demand threatens both universal access to health care and religious freedom of

conscience.

Sincerely,

Sophie D.
From: kenboles@suddenlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:28:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kenneth Boles

Quitman, TX 75783
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1438 Public Print (PP)]

                            October 2, 2001

                    Ordered to be printed as passed

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1438

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2002 for military 
activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and 
   for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe 
personnel strengths for such fiscal year for the Armed Forces, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Defense Authorization Act 
for Fiscal Year 2002''.
107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1438

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2002 for military 
activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and 
   for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe 
personnel strengths for such fiscal year for the Armed Forces, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 2, 2001

                    Ordered to be printed as passed
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         857,649
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  467,093
<ALLOWANCES>                                   431,151
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,914,558
<PP&E>                                         12,387,279
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5,544,716
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,757,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          612,694
<BONDS>                                        6,216,763
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,757,121
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,115,179
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,196,309
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               213,416
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,375,313
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,800,830
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                3,095,376
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,800,830
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  105.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
From: 1lnash@windstream.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:07:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lynette Nash

Lincoln, NE 68510
From: armroz120@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:53:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rosalyn Brandi

Hamden, CT 06517
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Douglas K. Freeman, ChiefExecutive Officer of NetBank, Inc., certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this quarterly reporton Form 10-Q of NetBank, Inc.;

 

2.                           Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                           Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.                           Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)              Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrants, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.                           Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)                          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)                              Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:  | May 10, 2004                           |   | /s/ Douglas  K. Freeman |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Douglas K.  Freeman                    |
|   | *Chairman and Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----