alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

The undersigned, as the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of StellarOne Corporation, respectively, certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
StellarOne Corporation at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), and no purchaser or seller of securities or any
other person shall be entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                   |  |                                                     
|------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date:  May 8, 2009 |  | /s/ O. R. Barham, Jr.                               
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                   | 
|                   |  | /s/ Jeffrey W. Farrar                               
|                   |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



33
#### Clayton S. Goss, Respondent, *v.*C. S. Goss & Company et al., Appellants.

*Goss*v. *Goss & Co.,*146 App. Div. 879, affirmed.

(Argued February 10, 1913;

decided February 25, 1913.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, *741entered July 14, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee in an action to recover upon certain promissory notes.

*Henry Escher, Jr.,*for appellants.

*Frank H. Platt*and *Livingston Platt*for respondent.

Judgment as against appellant C. S. Goss & Co. affirmed; as against appellant Foster reduced to the same amount as that of judgment against Goss & Co., and as reduced affirmed; no costs in this court to any party; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett, Chase, Cuddeback and Hogan, JJ. Taking no part: Miller, J.
No. 209, Misc.

#### Hirsch *v.*Archer-Daniels-Midland Co.

Petitioner *pro se. A. Donald MacKinnon*for respondent.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Bruce L. Claflin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of 3Com Corporation
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 28, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of 3Com Corporation.

|Date: |  | August 5, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/BRUCE L. CLAFLIN
|----- |  | -------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------
|      |  |                |  |     |  | Name:              
|      |  |                |  |     |  | Title:             

I,
Mark Slaven, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of 3Com Corporation on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 28, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of 3Com Corporation.

|Date: |  | August 5, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/MARK SLAVEN
|----- |  | -------------- |  | --- |  | --------------
|      |  |                |  |     |  | Name:         
|      |  |                |  |     |  | Title:        

---



QuickLinks
Tamica R. Whitaker, Plaintiff,
v. Shantell 

### L. Whitaker, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED AUG Z

## 0 2010 Clerk U.S. District &Bankruptcy 

### courtS for tile District of Columbia 

# 10 

# 1410

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs

### pro se complaint and application to proceed 

### informapauperis. The Court will grant plaintiffs application and dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matterjurisdiction. The subject matterjurisdiction ofthe federal district courts is limited and is set forth generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdiction is available only when a "federal question" is presented or the parties are ofdiverse citizenship and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. A party seeking relief in the district court must at least plead facts that bring the suit within the court'sjurisdiction. 

### See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Failure to plead such facts warrants dismissal ofthe action. 

### See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). Plaintiff, a resident ofthe District ofColumbia, sues another District ofColumbia resident for an alleged debt of $3,500. The complaint neither presents a federal question nor provides a basis for diversityjurisdiction because the parties are not ofdiverse citizenship and the amount in controversy is well below thejurisdictional minimum. Plaintiffs recourse lies, if

### at all, in the Superior Court ofthe District ofColumbia. A separate Order ofdismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

Date: August

# jA-, 2010

2
From: shalomup@charter.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:53:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bruce Peterson

Munising, MI 49862
From: brevels@suddenlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:08:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Billy Revels

Williamston, NC 27892
No. 580, Misc.

#### Bates *v.*California.

Supreme Court of California. Certiorari denied.
From: dbisbee1@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:20:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Bisbee

Toano, VA 23168
From: Joe LaRocco

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 12:36:07 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Joe LaRocco

21 Cedar Ave

Linden, NJ 07036
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 62582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19566]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Mental Health; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Mental Health Special 
Emphasis Panel; Non-Pharmacological Clinical Trials.
    Date: October 6, 2023.
    Time: 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Serena Chu, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental 
Health, National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-500-5829, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#087b6d7a6d6669266b607d48666160266f677e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3a495f485f545b1459524f7a545352145d554c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental 
Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 6, 2023.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-19566 Filed 9-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.1




AMENDMENT NUMBER FOUR
TO THE ASSURANT EXECUTIVE PENSION PLAN




THIS AMENDMENT to the Assurant Executive Pension Plan, as amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2009 (the “Plan”), is adopted by the Assurant, Inc. Benefit Plans Committee (the “Committee”) effective as of February 29, 2016.


W I T N E S S E T H:


WHEREAS, Assurant, Inc. (the “Company”) currently maintains the Plan;


WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 8 of the Plan, the Assurant, Inc. Benefit Plans Committee (the “Committee”) has the authority to amend the Plan, unless the amendments would significantly increase the Company’s liabilities for the Plan; and


WHEREAS, the Committee wishes to amend the Plan to freeze the further accrual of benefits under the Plan and the Committee has determined that such amendments will not significantly increase the Company’s liabilities for the Plan;


NOW THEREFORE, the Committee amends the Plan as follows:


1.


Effective as of February 29, 2016, a new Section 3.03 is hereby added to the Plan to read as follows:


“3.03    Plan Freeze    Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, all Pension Benefits accrued under this Plan shall be permanently frozen, effective February 29, 2016.”
2.
Effective as of February 29, 2016, the definition of “Annual Compensation” found in Article 11 of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows:
“Annual Compensation means “Annual Compensation” as defined in the Pension Plan. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in no event shall amounts paid after February 29, 2016 be taken into account as Annual Compensation hereunder. ”
3.
Effective as of February 29, 2016, the definition of “Executive Compensation” in Article 11 of the Plan is amended by adding the following new sentence at the end thereof:
“In addition, in no event shall amounts paid after February 29, 2016 be taken into account as Executive Compensation hereunder.”
4.


A new Section 4.04 is hereby added to the Plan to read as follows:


“4.04    Continuation of Vesting after February 29, 2016.  For the avoidance of doubt, notwithstanding the freezing of all Pension Benefits effective February 29, 2016, a Participant shall continue to accrue additional vesting service under this Article 4 after February 29, 2016.”


*  *  *  *  *


Except as amended herein, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.
 











 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has adopted this Amendment Number Four to the Assurant Executive Pension Plan on the date shown below, to be effective as of the dates set forth herein.




	
				
	 
	 
	 
	ASSURANT, INC.

	 
	 
	 
	BENEFIT PLANS COMMITTEE

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Date:
	1/25/2016
	By
	/s/ Robyn Price Stonehill

	 
	 
	 
	Robyn Price Stonehill
Chairperson, Assurant, Inc. Benefits Plan Committee
Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer
From: fwashburn@wm.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:43:04 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Faustina Washburn

O Neals, CA 93645
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          41,266
<SECURITIES>                                    13,954
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,073
<ALLOWANCES>                                       543
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         686,522
<DEPRECIATION>                                  84,986
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 714,195
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        503,406
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            86
<OTHER-SE>                                     179,026
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   714,195
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                82,039
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,497
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,694
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,697
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,219
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             30,219
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    30,219
<EPS-BASIC>                                       7.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     7.05


</TABLE>
No. 180.

#### General Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local Union No. 89, et al. *v.*Riss & Company, Inc.

*David Previant, Herbert S. Thatcher*and *Ralph H. Logan*for petitioners.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted.
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





As of the date hereof, I, John Kunze, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Plumtree Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Plumtree Software, Inc.





By:

/s/    John KunzeName:

John KunzeTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDated:

May 9, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.2



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date:	August 13, 2010

/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer