alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: speak2me@email.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:34:25 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bryan Herbes

, 34209-4231
Exhibit 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of LNB Bancorp, Inc. (the Corporation) for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Terry M. White, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

|/s/ Terry M. White      | 
|----------------------- | 
|Terry M. White         
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 2, 2007          

---
From: mnbedford@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:29:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marian Bedford

Arcadia, FL 34269
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                      ODS NETWORKS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

    The following table lists the subsidiaries of the Registrant as of March 1,
2000, the state or other jurisdiction of incorporation and the names under which
such subsidiaries do business. The Registrant owns all of the outstanding voting
securities of each subsidiary.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           JURISDICTION                  NAME UNDER
                                                OF                    WHICH SUBSIDIARY
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                         ORGANIZATION              IS DOING BUSINESS
------------------                        --------------  ----------------------------------------
<S>                                       <C>             <C>
ODS Networks, Inc.                           Delaware                ODS Networks, Inc.

Intrusion.com, Inc.                          Delaware               Intrusion.com, Inc.

Optical Data Systems, Inc.                    Nevada             Optical Data Systems, Inc.

ODS, Inc.                                     Nevada                     ODS, Inc.

Optical Data Systems--Texas, Inc.             Texas          Optical Data Systems--Texas, Inc.

ODS Networks GmbH                            Germany                 ODS Networks GmbH

ODS Networks Ltd.                         United Kingdom             ODS Networks Ltd.

ODS Ltd.                                  United Kingdom                  ODS Ltd.

ODS Networks SARL                             France                 ODS Networks SARL

Optical Data Systems, Ltda                    Brazil             Optical Data Systems, Ltda

Optical Data Systems (Barbados) Ltd.         Barbados       Optical Data Systems (Barbados) Ltd.

ODS Networks Sdn. Bhd.                       Malaysia              ODS Networks Sdn. Bhd.

ODS Investments, Inc.                         Nevada               ODS Investments, Inc.
</TABLE>
<page>
				       EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Cornerstone
Fund III (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey A.
Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.








By:	  /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		March 30, 2004
From: marcyj7@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:54:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Thank you,

Mrs Jackson

Sincerely,

Marcy Jackson

Cedar Park, TX 78613
From: gottkinder@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:00:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Eldon "Ray" Blumhorst

Sherman Oaks, CA 91423
RlMENTOF 

:;PORW!ON 

FREEDOM JETS 

Aviation, Inc. 

no strings, just wings. 

SiVo 

^n ' B A i<> 0 ' 

April 12, 2011 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Exemption No.: 9923 from 14 CFR (FAR Section) 91.147 

To Whom It May Concern: 

We are in receipt of your recent correspondence dated March 22, 2011 regarding Freedom 

Jets Aviation, Inc. Exemption No.: 9923 from 14 CFR (FAR Section) 91.147. We would like 

to inform you at this time that our company no longer operates a flight school and we are 

strictiy a Part 91/135 operation only. Therefore, we will not be seeking relief from requiring 

a second drug and alcohol program for 14 CFR 91.147 sigjitseeing operations in accordance 

with the requirements established under 14 CFR 11.61 - ll.lOl. 

Should you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, I can be reached at the 

number noted below or my cell phone number 860-455-5556. 

Sincere] 

Brian P. Sut 

President 

/cms 

39 Airport Road - North Windham - CT 06256 • tel 1.860.456.4156 - fax 1.860.456.2540
# Continuation of the Exercise of Certain Authorities Under the Trading With the Enemy Act

# Memorandum for the Secretary of State [and] the Secretary of the Treasury

                        Under section 101(b) of Public Law 95-223 (91 Stat. 1625; 50 U.S.C. 4305 note), and a previous determination on September 2, 2022 (87                         *FR*                         54859, September 8, 2022), the exercise of certain authorities under the Trading With the Enemy Act is scheduled to expire on September 14, 2023.                    

I hereby determine that the continuation of the exercise of those authorities with respect to Cuba for 1 year is in the national interest of the United States.

Therefore, consistent with the authority vested in me by section 101(b) of Public Law 95-223, I continue for 1 year, until September 14, 2024, the exercise of those authorities with respect to Cuba, as implemented by the Cuban Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 515.

                        The Secretary of the Treasury is authorized and directed to publish this determination in the                         *Federal Register*.                    

[FR Doc. 2023-20302

Billing code 4811-33-P
From: Rona Armillas

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 2:15:12 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Rona Armillas

34 Plaza Street

Brooklyn, NY 11238
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Highway Administration

          - [Docket No. FHWA-2023-0003]

# AGENCY:

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Department of Transportation (DOT).

# ACTION:

Notice; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

                        The FHWA is withdrawing the notice, “Agency Information Collection Activities: Request for Comments for a New Information Collection,” published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on February 8, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Janelle Hinton, (202) 366 1604/                        *janelle.hinton@dot.gov;*                         Martha Kenley, (202) 604-6979/                        *martha.kenley@dot.gov,*                         Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Civil Rights, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The FHWA is withdrawing the notice published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 8, 2023 at 88 FR 8339 (FR Number 2023-02640).                

Issued on: September 7, 2023.

Jazmyne Lewis,

Information Collection Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-19717 Filed 9-14-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-22-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM EXCEL
SWITCHING CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE
PERIOD ENDING MARCH 31, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          58,738
<SECURITIES>                                    66,965
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,220
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,500)
<INVENTORY>                                      9,476
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               183,275
<PP&E>                                          20,674
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 223,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,825
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           345
<OTHER-SE>                                     173,102
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   223,230
<SALES>                                         36,615
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,615
<CGS>                                           10,785
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,785
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,500
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,349)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,679
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,263
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,416
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,416
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
From: barbarakarg@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:43:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Barbara Karg

Riverdale, NJ 07457
From: kcscj@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:08:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am appalled that the HHS is recomending that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be

covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to patients. Some of those procedures are well

known to cause abortions in the early stages of life, which is morally objectional to large numbers of

taxpayers.

At the very least you should expand conscience protections for any organizations that provide individual

and group insurance and have moral or religious objections.

Also the definition of religious employer should offer an authentic conscience protection for any

organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such insurance to their

employees.

No Americans should be forced by the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object

to. I again urge you to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of

mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carol Miller

Oakland, OR 97462
#### Darius M. Bliss, Appellant, v. Hamilton Wallis and others, Respondents.

— Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
No. 400.

#### Goldberg *v.*United States et al.

*Victor Hugo Wright*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger*and *Lionel Kestenbaum*for the United States et al.

*Vincent P. McDevitt*and *Eugene J. Bradley*for Philadelphia Electric Co.

Motion of Philadelphia Electric Co. to be added as a party respondent granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.