alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Central Command

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  ABOUT US    -  COMMAND PRIORITIES             
  -  LEADERSHIP             
  -  COMPONENT COMMANDS             
  -  HISTORY             
  -  POSTURE STATEMENT 
-  CENTCOM AOR    -  CENTCOM COALITION 
-  OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES    -  USMTM 
-  CONTACT    -  OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT             
  -  COMMUNITY RELATIONS             
  -  THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE             
  -  INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL             
  -  MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL 
-  MEDIA    -  SOCIAL MEDIA             
  -  NEWS ARTICLES             
  -  PRESS RELEASES             
  -  STATEMENTS             
  -  IMAGERY             
  -  VIDEOS             
  -  TRANSCRIPTS 
-  VISITORS AND PERSONNEL    -  FAMILY CENTER             
  -  FAMILY READINESS             
  -  CENTCOM WEBMAIL             
  -  SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY             
  -  ACCOUNTABILITY             
  -  EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS             
  -  USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS             
  -  FOIA LIBRARY             
  -  INNOVATION OASIS             
  -  WELCOME GUIDE 

HomeMEDIANEWS ARTICLESNews Article View

# Expediting Avionics in the Middle East - 1107th TASMG

By Spc. Dakota Vanidestine103rd Sustainment Command (Expeditionary)

                KUWAIT  –              

                Soldiers of the 1107th Theater Aviation Sustainment Maintenance Group work to offload a CH-47 (Chinook) helicopter at Camp Buehring, Kuwait, Feb. 03, 2020. (Courtesy photo)            

                Expediting Avionics in the Middle East            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Tom Gagnier

VIRIN: 200203-A-AB111-710

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
From: Doug & Nancy Edwards

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Contraceptive Care

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 2:51:07 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive

care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious

employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would

provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

An employer should not have the right to impose personal/religious beliefs on employees

of other faiths.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive

services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some

groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so

hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even

though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption

would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work. I urge you

to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
#### The Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Company, Respondent, v. John M. Durkard and others, Appellants.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Haight, J.
From: arjuve@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:21:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rhonda Juve

Lincoln, NE 68505
461298 © = 58 (In pocket)

Base from plaretable map by R. S. Velkanje, 1952

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1058 PLATE 3

For locolity of sample
of inset see figure 2

EXPLANATION
z
s
feat cine 4
Dashed where inferred = Paystreak vein
7
| |,
Racioetve arborateneratte |
_ dissl 3 Basalt dike ~
Dashed where inferred &
i
a H
te g
\Nonradioactive carbonate vein | 3
‘ 4762-a composite of al
from Morker vei
z
4
5 ple 4603 consists of chips taken at
a random along length of ve

Strike and dip of beds
4578
.

Locality of sample
é
U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey
‘triangulation marker

consists of chips token at
jong length of vein

SECGNAMON 18S

Geology by J. R. Houston and R. S. Velikanje, 1952,
GEOLOGIC SKETCH MAP OF PITCHER ISLAND, SALMON BAY AREA, SOUTHEASTERN ALASKA

100 ° 400 Feet
4 ? 1 1 L ei
Page | of 1

/ (O-1Q0359/-10 meg 4 2011

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION As of: Au
a NG ‘ : August 31, 2011
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS Received: August 15, 2011
RANCH Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: August 31, 2011

Tracking No. 80ce1840
‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0092
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Christy G Cufley
Address:
51 Pine St #309
Edmonds, 98020

General Comment

Strongly encouraging you to pass the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: AMendment
(document ID IRS_FRDOC_0001-0763).

This will have an enormous, positive effect on women in our country and the quality of their lives,
and those of their children.

While I am a staunch pro-choice voter, this amendment werves to limit the need for termination of
pregnancies because they can be prevented! It's a WIN- WIN-WIN situation for everyone.

Sincerely,
Christy Cufley

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=0900... 8/31/2011
EXHIBIT 31.1


                           CERTIFICATION

I, J. Gerald Bazewicz, President and Chief Executive Officer,
certify, that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10K for the
period ended December 31, 2004, of First Keystone Corporation.

   2.   Based on my knowledge, the quarterly report does not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report.

   3   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this quarterly report,
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this annual report.

   4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
      15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

        a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
   or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
   designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
   information relating to the registrant, including its
   consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
   within those entities, particularly during the period in
   which this annual report is being prepared;

        b)   intentionally omitted;

        c)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
   disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
   annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
   disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
   period covered by this annual report based upon such
   evaluation; and

        d)   disclosed in this report any change in the
   registrant's internal control over financial reporting that
   occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter
   that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
   materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
   financial reporting; and

   5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

        a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or
   operation of the internal controls which could adversely
   affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
   and report financial data and have identified for the
   registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal
   controls; and

        b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
   management or other employees who have a significant role in
   the registrant's internal controls.




                        /s/ J. Gerald Bazewicz
                        J. Gerald Bazewicz
                        President and Chief Executive Officer



Date:  March 8, 2005


                               70
No. 323.

#### Smith *v.*Florida.

*Herbert S. Thatcher*and *Edward D. Cowart*for petitioner.

*Richard W. Ervin,*Attorney General of Florida, and *George R. Georgieff,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Supreme Court of Florida. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1







              CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements 
(Forms S-3 and S-8) of Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. of our report dated July 
31, 1998, except Note 8, as to which the date is August 14, 1998, with 
respect to the consolidated financial statements of Alliance Pharmaceutical 
Corp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 
1998.



                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP





San Diego, California
September 8, 1998
From: ESTEERMERR@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: new health plans

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 8:25:23 AM

E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA@dol.gov

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


                              IDENTIX INCORPORATED
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

                             As of September 1, 2001



<TABLE>
<S>                                                       <C>
Wholly-owned Subsidiary:                                  Place of Incorporation:

Identix Public Sector, Inc. (formerly ANADAC, Inc.)       Virginia, USA
Legislative Demographic Services, Inc. (1)                Delaware, USA
Identicator Technology, Inc.                              Delaware, USA
iTrust, Inc.                                              Nevada, USA
Identix International, Inc.                               California, USA
Biometric Applications & Technology, Inc.                 Missouri, USA
Identix Australia Pty Ltd.                                New South Wales, Australia

50%-owned Subsidiary:

Sylvan/Identix Fingerprinting Centers L.L.C.              Delaware, USA
</TABLE>

(1) 100%-owned by Identix Public Sector, Inc.
H. Res. 133

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 8, 2007.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 547) to facilitate the development of markets 

for alternative fuels and Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel fuel 

through research, development, and demonstration and data 

collection. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed 

with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. 

General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman 

and ranking minority member of the Committee on Science 

and Technology. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be 

in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of 

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the 

nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
2

•HRES 133 EH 

Science and Technology now printed in the bill. Each section 

of the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute 

shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill 

for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole 

may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the 

Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed 

in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for 

that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and 

report the bill to the House with such amendments as may 

have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote 

in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee 

of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in 

the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be 

considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 

final passage without intervening motion except one motion 

to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest:

Clerk.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 81487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33244]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Agency Information Collection Extension; Correction

AGENCY: U.S. Department of Energy.

ACTION: Submission for Office of Management and Budget (OMB) review; 
comment request; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) published a document in the 
Federal Register of December 16, 2011, announcing the submission of an 
information collection request to the OMB for extension under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The information 
collection requests a three-year extension of its ``Technology 
Partnerships Ombudsmen Reporting Requirements'', OMB Control Number 
1910-5118. This document corrects errors in that notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
copies of the Information collection instrument and instructions should 
be directed to Kathleen Binder at kathleen.binder@hq.doe.gov.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of December 16, 2011, in FR Doc. 2011-
32251, please make the following corrections:
    On page 78252, first column, under the heading SUMMARY, the second 
sentence is corrected to read: The information collection requests a 
three-year extension of its ``Technology Partnerships Ombudsmen 
Reporting Requirements'', OMB Control Number 1910-5118.
    On page 78252, second column, under the heading SUPPLEMENTARY 
INFORMATION, (1) is corrected to read: (1) OMB No. 1910-5118;

    Issued in Washington, DC on December 21, 2011.
Kathleen M. Binder,
Director, Office of Conflict Prevention and Resolution, Office of 
Hearings and Appeals.
[FR Doc. 2011-33244 Filed 12-27-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 12(b)



                             D&N CAPITAL CORPORATION
                Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges
                    and preferred stock dividend requirements


                    For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2000
                          (In thousands, except ratio)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                                      <C>
           Net income                                                    $  948

           Fixed charges:
                 Advisory fees                                               31

           Total fixed charges                                               31

           Earnings before fixed charges                                 $  979

           Fixed charges, as above                                           31

           Preferred stock dividend requirement                             681

           Fixed charges including preferred stock dividends             $  712

           Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred
                 stock dividends requirements                              1.38
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cybertel Capital Corporation (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), We, Albert Gomez, Chief Executive Officer and Richard
Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.



Date: 11-18-05                            /s/Albert Gomez
     ---------                            -------------------------
                                          Albert Gomez
                                          Chief Executive Officer

Date: 11-18-05                            /s/Richard Schmidt
     ---------                            ------------------------
                                          Richard Schmidt
                                          Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          As of the date hereof, I, EricBorrmann, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Plumtree Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter endedSeptember 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Plumtree Software, Inc.

|  
By:

/s/  ERIC BORRMANN

 
 
 
Name:

**Eric Borrmann**

 
Title:

**Chief Financial Officer**

 
Dated:

**November 12, 2002** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. 82.

#### New York Central Railroad Co. *v.*United States et al.

*Kenneth H. Landmark*on the motion by appellant to dismiss appeal.

*Solicitor General Cox*and *Robert W. Ginnane*for the United States et al. on the memorandum in response.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 370 U. S. 902.) Upon the suggestion of mootness, the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York is vacated and the case is remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint.
No. 370, Misc.

#### Surratt *v.*United States.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller*and *Beatrice Rosenberg*for the United States.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
#### JOHNSON *v.*MISSISSIPPI.

No. 625, Misc.

Decided January 7, 1963.

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.