alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: jcarlson@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:18:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Carlson

Lexington, KY 40511
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40934

Summary Calendar

 

ARNULFO RODRIGUEZ,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT

OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-97-CV-238

- - - - - - - - - -

March 11, 1999

Before JOHNSON, DUHE’, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Arnulfo Rodriguez, Texas prisoner # 665576, appeals the

district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Rodriguez contends that he

received ineffective assistance of trial counsel because his

attorney failed to investigate the murder indictment to see if it

was returned by the grand jury before the victim had died and

because his attorney failed to challenge the state court’s entry

of a deadly-weapon finding.
No. 98-40934

-2-

To prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel,

a defendant must show: (1) that his counsel’s performance was

deficient in that it fell below an objective standard of

reasonableness; and (2) that the deficient performance prejudiced

his defense. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 689-694

(1984). “A fair assessment of attorney performance requires that

every effort be made to eliminate the distorting effects of

hindsight, to reconstruct the circumstances of counsel’s

challenged conduct, and to evaluate the conduct from counsel’s

perspective at the time.” Id. at 689. To show Strickland

prejudice, a defendant must demonstrate that counsel’s errors

were so serious as to “render[] the result of the trial

unreliable or the proceeding fundamentally unfair.” Lockhart v.

Fretwell, 506 U.S. 364, 372 (1993). A failure to establish

either deficient performance or prejudice defeats the claim. 

Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697.

Upon de novo review, Rodriguez has not demonstrated either

deficient performance or prejudice arising from counsel’s failure

to challenge the second indictment or from his failure to object

to the deadly-weapon finding. Because Rodriguez has failed to

demonstrate that he has met the Strickland test for ineffective

assistance of counsel, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32-2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund VI, L.P., Series 5 (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Melanie R. Wenk, Vice President - Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.








/s/MELANIE R. WENK


Melanie R. Wenk


Vice President-Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.





Date: January 28, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1374 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 22, 2008.
Whereas the Grand Coulee Dam was one of the largest public construction projects 
        of President Franklin D. Roosevelt's ``New Deal'', in response to the 
        Great Depression;
Whereas construction of the Grand Coulee Dam began in the summer of 1933 and was 
        completed in 1942;
Whereas 107 individuals lost their lives during the construction process;
Whereas the Grand Coulee Dam became the largest concrete structure in the world, 
        with 12 million cubic yards of concrete--enough to build a sidewalk 
        around the Earth twice;
Whereas during World War II electricity from the Grand Coulee Dam was needed to 
        run the aluminum plants that supported the production of ships and 
        planes;
Whereas forecasts of energy shortages in the 1960s led to the construction of a 
        3rd power plant at the Grand Coulee Dam, more than doubling its 
        generating capacity;
Whereas the 3 primary purposes of the Grand Coulee Dam are generating 6.5 
        million kilowatts of electricity, supplying water for irrigation as part 
        of the Columbia Basin Project, and providing much-needed flood control 
        to the Columbia River Basin;
Whereas the Columbia Basin Project includes 300 miles of canals and more than 
        3,000 miles of irrigation ditches, which supply water to 500,000 acres 
        of farmland, an area twice the size of the State of Delaware;
Whereas the crops grown on this farmland are worth more than $500 million per 
        year; and
Whereas the Grand Coulee Dam is the cornerstone of the electric power system in 
        the State of Washington and the largest hydroelectric power facility in 
        North America: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commemorates the 75th anniversary of the Grand Coulee Dam;
            (2) honors the sacrifice of the 107 individuals who lost their lives 
        during the construction of the Grand Coulee Dam; and
            (3) recognizes that--
                    (A) the Grand Coulee Dam continues to play a critical role 
                in the national and economic security of the United States by 
                providing vital electric power and crop irrigation;
                    (B) hydroelectric power is a clean, renewable resource that 
                is emissions-free and plays a major role in controlling 
                emissions of greenhouse gases; and
                    (C) having clean, affordable hydroelectric power helps 
                reduce the reliance of the United States on foreign oil imports 
                and supports the successful wind power industry in the 
                Northwestern United States by ensuring the availability of 
                electricity in the absence of sufficient wind power.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: marthachilders@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:41:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Martha Childers

, 29841-1807
No. 332.

#### Boesche, Administrator, *v.*Udall, Secretary of the Interior.

*Lewis E. Hoffman*and *Leon BenEzra*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Roger P. Marquis*and *A. Donald Mileur*for respondent.

The petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is granted limited to the question presented by the petition which reads as follows:

> “Whether the Secretary of the Interior has authority under Section 31 of the Mineral Leasing Act, as amended, to cancel oil and gas leases by administrative action, for failure to comply with the Department’s regulations.”
Exhibit 10.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The
Board of Directors
BakBone Software Incorporated:

We
consent to the inclusion of our report dated June 22, 2001, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of BakBone Software Incorporated as of March 31, 2001 and
April 30, 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations and accumulated deficit and cash flows for the eleven months ended March 31, 2001 and the year ended
April 30, 2000, which report appears in the registration statement on Form 20-F of BakBone Software Incorporated.

|                                    |  | /s/ KPMG LLP
|----------------------------------- |  | ------------
|                                    |  |             
|San Diego, California
July 11, 2001 |  |             

1

---

QuickLinks
#### Edward W Connor v. Fanny Hohorst and others.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinions by

Barnard, P. J., and Dykman, J.
#### Same v. Same.

— Order affirmed, with ten dolíais costs and disbursements.
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No.  333-59540

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  213				Trade Date: 08/22/02
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

  June 1, 2001)							Issue Date:  08/27/02
The Date of this Pricing Supplement August 26, 2002
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QJW2    4.45%	08/15/08	     100%	       1.0%                Quarterly	     YES	    NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		      Date		Count

$4,455,000.00	$4,410,450.00	ABN AMRO Inc.	   11/15/02		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes	  X   No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.   Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $687.424 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under a Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
Additionally, the total principal amount of PowerNotes(SM) offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001 has been increased from $500.0mm to $750.0mm.  $250.0mm principal amount of debt securities registered pursuant to Registration Statement No. 333-59540 originally offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement dated June 15, 2001 and related Prospectus dated May 25, 2001 are being offered as PowerNotes(SM) by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
Exhibit 31.2**WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Yuyun Tristan Kuo, Chief Financial Officer of Cuisine Solutions, Inc. certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-K of Cuisine Solutions, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Iare responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscalquarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.       Dated: September 22, 2006         /s/ YUYUN TRISTAN KUO     Yuyun Tristan Kuo    Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary    (Principal Financial Officer)  
54
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

                      INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

                          LIST OF SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES



Beneco Enterprises, Inc.
Capital National Insurance Company
Chi Mei Entech, Ltd.
Chi Mei International Technology, Ltd.
Gradient Corporation
IT Corporation
IT Tulsa Holdings, Inc. (formerly IT-McGill Pollution Control Systems, Inc.)
International Technology Europe Ltd.
IT Brownfields Services Corporation
IT Corporation de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
IT Corporation of North Carolina
IT Corporation Limited (formerly IT-McGill Limited)
IT Europe Pollution Control Engineering, Ltd. (formerly IT-McGill Pollution 
     Control Systems, Ltd.)
IT International Holdings, Inc.
IT Investment Holdings, Inc.
Jellinek, Schwartz & Connolly, Inc.
LandBank, Inc.
OHM Corporation
OHM Remediation Services Corporation
OHM Energy Services, Inc.
Pacific Environmental Group, Inc.
PHR Environmental Consultants, Inc.
Universal Professional Insurance Company
No. 428.

#### Christian et al. *v.*Jemison et al.

*John V. Parker*and *F. W. Middleton, Jr.*for petitioners.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# The Nevada State Implementation Plan

for the

2010 Nitrogen Dioxide Primary NAAQS:

Demonstration of Adequacy

Submitted

January 18 , 2013
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Acorn Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 29, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John G. Jacob, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

              (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

              (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                     /s/  John G. Jacob
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     John G. Jacob, Chief Financial Officer
                                     November 13, 2002
<PAGE>

                                                 Exhibit 23.1


                 CONSENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
32-92053, 33-2171, 33-17848 (Post-Effective Amendment No. 1), 33-33803,
33-33807, 33-39323, 33-36911, 33-45176, 33-45231, 33-45233, 33-56952,
33-58708, 33-72158, 033-55265  (Post-Effective Amendment No. 1), 033-60379,
033-63547, 333-11639, 333-15923, 333-29099, 333-70459, and 333-74371 of 3Com
Corporation on Form S-8 of our report dated June 22, 1999, appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of 3Com Corporation for the year ended May 28,
1999.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San Jose, California
August 16, 1999
EXHIBIT 32.2



           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10K of First
Keystone Corporation (the "Corporation") for the period ended
December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report"), I, David R. Saracino, Treasurer and CFO,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

   1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
       13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
       in all material respects, the financial condition and
       results of operations of the Corporation as of and for the
       period covered by the Report.







                                /s/ David R. Saracino
                                _________________________
                                David R. Saracino
                                Treasurer and CFO


March 9, 2006


                               74