alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1411 

Expressing support for designation of January 28, 2009, as ‘‘National Data 

Privacy Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 1, 2008 

Mr. PRICE of North Carolina submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of January 28, 2009, 

as ‘‘National Data Privacy Day’’. 

Whereas the Internet and the capabilities of modern technology cause data privacy issues to figure prominently in 

the lives of many people in the United States at work, 

in their interaction with government and public authorities, in the health field, in e-commerce transactions, and 

online generally; 

Whereas many individuals are unaware of data protection 

and privacy laws generally and of specific steps that can 

be taken to help protect the privacy of personal information online; 

Whereas ‘‘National Data Privacy Day’’ constitutes an international collaboration and a nationwide and statewide efVerDate Aug 31 2005 02:18 Aug 02, 2008 Jkt 069002 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR1411.IH HR1411

erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1411 IH 

fort to raise awareness about data privacy and the protection of personal information on the Internet; 

Whereas government officials from the United States and 

Europe, privacy professionals, academics, legal scholars, 

representatives of international businesses, and others 

with an interest in data privacy issues are working together on this date to further the discussion about data 

privacy and protection; 

Whereas privacy professionals and educators are being encouraged to take the time to discuss data privacy and 

protection issues with teens in high schools across the 

country; 

Whereas the recognition of ‘‘National Data Privacy Day’’ will 

encourage more people nationwide to be aware of data 

privacy concerns and to take steps to protect their personal information online; and 

Whereas January 28, 2009, would be an appropriate day to 

designate as ‘‘National Data Privacy Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of a ‘‘National 

3 Data Privacy Day’’; 

4 (2) encourages State and local governments to 

5 observe the day with appropriate activities that pro6 mote awareness of data privacy; 

7 (3) encourages privacy professionals and edu8 cators to discuss data privacy and protection issues 

9 with teens in high schools across the United States; 

10 and 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1411 IH 

1 (4) encourages individuals across the Nation to 

2 be aware of data privacy concerns and to take steps 

3 to protect their personal information online. 

Æ 


erowe on PRODPC61 with BILLS
From: judya25@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:29:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Judy Andrews

Buffalo, NY 14228
RECORD OF CONTACT WITH OUTSIDE PARTY TO 

DISCUSS ISSUES RELATED TO 

INFORMAL RULEMAKING

Th

AGENCY KEEPING 

RULEMAKING DOCKET

Employment and Training Administration/Office of 

Apprenticeship, Department of Labor

TITLE OF RULE Apprenticeship Programs; Equal Employment Opportunity, 

RIN 1205-AB59

STAGE OF RULEMAKING Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Issued, Comment Period Open

DATE OF DISCUSSION

January 19, 2016

NATURE OF DISCUSSION

PHONE __ MEETING __ EMAIL __X___ 

Party(ies)/Title(s)/Organization(s) Present or Represented

NAME TITLE/ORGANIZATION

Lauren Williams Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. 

Department of Labor Representatives Participating

NAME TITLE

Adele Gagliardi Administrator, Office of Policy Development and Research, ETA

Description of Factual Materials or Information Presented

Outside parties sent an email message with a request for clarification about applicability of regulatory

provisions to registered apprenticeship sponsors with five or more apprentices and to registered 

apprenticeship sponsors regardless of size.

The Department provided an email directing the outside parties to the preamble discussions of Proposed § 

30.3, Equal Opportunity Standards Applicable to All Sponsors, and to Proposed § 30.4, Affirmative Action 

Programs, on pages 68917 – 68921 of Federal Register of November 6, 2015 [80 FR 68907].
No. 145.

#### Greenhill et al. *v.*United States.

*Dudley Yoedicke, Eugene Gressman*and *Leon D. Hubert, Jr.*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Richard W. Schmude*for the United States.

Motion of petitioners to vacate and remand denied. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
H. Res. 1434 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 16, 2008. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 6842) to require the District of Columbia to 

revise its laws regarding the use and possession of firearms 

as necessary to comply with the requirements of the decision 

of the Supreme Court in the case of District of Columbia v. 

Heller, in a manner that protects the security interests of the 

Federal government and the people who work in, reside in, 

or visit the District of Columbia and does not undermine the 

efforts of law enforcement, homeland security, and military 

officials to protect the Nation’s capital from crime and terrorism. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 

All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived 

except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed 

one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
2 

•HRES 1434 EH 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform. After general debate the bill shall be 

considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The 

amendment recommended by the Committee on Oversight 

and Government Reform now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted in the House and in the Committee of the 

Whole. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as the original bill for the purpose of further amendment under the fiveminute rule and shall be considered as read. All points of 

order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. 

Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no further amendment to the bill, as amended, shall be in order except the 

amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the report 

of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. 

That amendment may be offered only by the Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, and shall 

not be subject to amendment. All points of order against that 

amendment are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 

10 of rule XXI. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill 

for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill, 

as amended, to the House with such further amendment as 

may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and any amendment thereto to 
3 

•HRES 1434 EH 

final passage without intervening motion except one motion 

to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration in the House of H.R. 6842 

pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of 

the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 

Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-28-1999
<CASH>                                         952,249
<SECURITIES>                                   709,365
<RECEIVABLES>                                  925,598
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (108,896)
<INVENTORY>                                    354,272
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,419,852
<PP&E>                                       1,561,230
<DEPRECIATION>                               (729,673)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,495,389
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,198,562
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,954,204
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,242,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,495,389
<SALES>                                      5,772,149
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,772,149
<CGS>                                        3,088,121
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,358,694
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               769,522
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                55,685
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,756
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                584,492
<INCOME-TAX>                                   181,719
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            403,874
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   403,874
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.09


</TABLE>
From: lowell.anderson1517@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:31:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lowell Anderson

Delta, CO 81416
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1997
<CASH>                                           8,913
<SECURITIES>                                    14,451
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,094
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,298
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,779
<PP&E>                                           9,674
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,576
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           281
<OTHER-SE>                                      32,458
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,453
<SALES>                                         62,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                62,625
<CGS>                                           18,854
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,201
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (382)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,952
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,381
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,571
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1315 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 10, 2008.
Whereas the National Aeronautics and Space Administration was established on 
        July 29, 1958;
Whereas on May 5, 1961, NASA successfully launched America's first manned 
        spacecraft, Freedom 7, piloted by Alan B. Shepard, Jr.;
Whereas in July of 1969 President John Kennedy's vision of landing a man on the 
        moon and returning him safely to Earth was realized with the Apollo 11 
        mission, commanded by Neil A. Armstrong, Lunar Module Pilot Edwin 
        ``Buzz'' Aldrin, Jr., and Command Module pilot Michael Collins;
Whereas on April 12, 1981, NASA began a new era of human space flight and 
        exploration with the launch of the first Space Shuttle Columbia, 
        commanded by John W. Young and piloted by Robert L. ``Bob'' Crippen;
Whereas NASA has greatly expanded our knowledge and understanding of our planet 
        and solar system through various unmanned vehicles utilized on numerous 
        missions;
Whereas, during the Cold War, NASA's achievements served as a source of national 
        pride and captured the imagination of the world by demonstrating a 
        peaceful use of our technological capabilities;
Whereas NASA now serves as a model for international cooperation and American 
        leadership through the International Space Station and other scientific 
        endeavors;
Whereas thanks to NASA and the far-reaching gaze of the Hubble Space Telescope, 
        we have seen further into our universe than ever before;
Whereas NASA space probes have landed on or flown by eight of the planets in our 
        solar system;
Whereas the aeronautics research by NASA has led to great discoveries and 
        advances in aircraft design and aviation;
Whereas the work done by NASA has expanded the scope of human knowledge, created 
        new technologies, and inspired young men and women to enter scientific 
        and engineering careers;
Whereas in the last fifty years, NASA has positively impacted almost every facet 
        of our lives; and
Whereas, thanks to the heroism, courage, and supreme sacrifice of our astronaut 
        corps over the last five decades, we are now able to live and work in 
        space for the benefit of all men: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the men and women of the National Aeronautics and Space 
        Administration on the occasion of its 50th Anniversary;
            (2) acknowledges the value of NASA's discoveries and 
        accomplishments; and
            (3) pledges to maintain America's position as the world leader in 
        aeronautics and space exploration and technology.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-25-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-25-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           8,461
<SECURITIES>                                     6,581
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,025
<ALLOWANCES>                                       676
<INVENTORY>                                     23,495
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,074
<PP&E>                                          45,941
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,411
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  79,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,157
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           105
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,892
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    79,504
<SALES>                                         93,954
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                93,954
<CGS>                                           57,285
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  109,499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,545)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,545)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,545)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.50)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

                              Multiband Corporation
                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In  connection  with this Annual Report Form 10-K,  Multiband  Corporation
(the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2004, I, Steven M. Bell, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

1.    This Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and

2.    The information  contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,  in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


Date: July 20, 2005                     By: /s/ Steven M. Bell
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Chief Financial Officer
No. 515.

#### Harshman *v.*United States.

*Francis Heisler*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Richard W. Schmude*for the United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted.