alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: mark@search4integrity.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:11:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mark Hayakawa

La Habra, CA 90631
Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 11, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134670 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

LATIF Z. ORAM a/k/a RANDY Z. ORAM, Marilyn Kelly 

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/ Maura D. Corrigan 

Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices and 

O.B. PROPERITES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/

Counter-Plaintiff/Third-Party

 Defendant,
 

and 

O. B. PROPERTIES and JAM SOUND 

SPECIALIST, INC., 

Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/

Counter-Plaintiffs/Third-Party

Plaintiffs, 

v SC: 134670 

 COA: 267077 

Oakland CC: 2002-039499-CK 

JOHN ORAM and GARY ORAM,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs/

Counter-Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

INTERNATIONAL OUTDOOR, INC., VISION 

PROPERTIES, INC., DISCOUNT PAGING 

COMPANY, INC., and FUTURE VISION

PROPERTIES, LLC, 

 Third-Party Defendants, 

and 

ARMAND VELARDO, S. HADDAD, and 

BRADLEY LAMBERT, 

 Intervening Plaintiffs, 

and 
 _________________________________________ 

 

2 

HARRY CENDROWSKI,

Intervening Plaintiff-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 22, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 

7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether the circuit court 

properly imposed the sanction of dismissal with prejudice and whether the dismissal 

order was a “verdict” as defined in MCR 2.403(O)(4) for purposes of ordering case 

evaluation sanctions. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date 

of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers. 

s0108 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 11, 2008 

Clerk
#            

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (R)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-109182

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  492                                                                   Trade Date:  10/12/04

(To Prospectus Supplement dated November 6, 2003 &

  Prospectus dated October 15,2003)                                                              Issue Date:   10/15/04

The Date of this Pricing SupplementOctober 12, 2004

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                                   Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                   Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment     Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)   Maturity  Public (2) Commissions       Frequency       Option  Yes/No     record dates)

14911QWM9  4.25%       04/15/12        100%                1.23%                 Monthly                       YES         NO                                                                                                                

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Principal                                                                                 1st Payment             Day         

Amount                  Proceeds                  Dealer                           Date                   Count

$2,456,000.00         $2,425,791.20         ABN AMRO Inc.        11/15/04               30/360    

Original Issue Discount Note:                                                                         Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                  N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (R) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (R) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $187.037 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (R) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (R) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated October 15,2003.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
Case No. 8,148.

#### LAWRENCE et al. v. WICKWARE et al.

[4 McLean, 56.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Michigan.

June Term, 1845.

State Exemption — Exemption Law Passed aptee Suit Commenced — Greater Exemption— Adoption op Law by Coukt.

A suit after it shall have been commenced, cannot be affected by a state law extending the exemption of the property of the defendants, such law never having been adopted by the court; and the law previously adopted authorized an exemption to a more limited extent.

[This was a bill in equity by Lawrence and Keese against Wickware and Cobb.]

Mr. Fraser, for complainants.

Mr. Emmons, for defendants.

OriNION OF

THE COURT.

This is -a case in chancery, in which a receiver was appointed, and the legislature of the state having passed a law exempting certain articles of property from execution, in addition to those formerly exempted, a motion is made to extend the exemption under the recent act. But THE COURT held, that the revised act which had been adopted by the court, and under which the present proceedings were instituted, should govern the case. The property was ordered to be sold.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Thomas James David STEELE, Appellant.

No. 00-2672.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted July 5, 2001.

Filed July 10, 2001.

Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Thomas James David Steele appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court1 for the Western District of *486Missouri after he pleaded guilty to stealing firearms, in violation of 18 U.S .C. § 924(m). The district court sentenced Steele to 120 months imprisonment and three years supervised release. Counsel has moved to withdraw on appeal pursuant to *Anders v. California,*386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has filed a brief arguing the district court erred in counting two prior burglaries of “inhabitable structures” as crimes of violence. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

We find Steele’s base offense level was properly enhanced under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(l) (base offense level is 26 if, inter alia, defendant had at least two prior felony convictions of crime of violence or controlled substance offense), as we have repeatedly held that burglaries of commercial buildings qualify as crimes of violence, *see United States v. Stevens,*149 F.3d 747, 749 (8th Cir.) (adopting per se rule), *cert. denied,*525 U.S. 1009, 119 S.Ct. 527, 142 L.Ed.2d 437 (1998); *United States v. Hascall,*76 F.3d 902, 906 (8th Cir.), *cert. denied,*519 U.S. 948, 117 S.Ct. 358, 136 L.Ed.2d 250 (1996).

After review of counsel’s *Anders*brief, along with our independent review of the record in accordance with *Penson v. Ohio,*488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues.

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Dean Whipple, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.
#### Frances Jewhurst, Respondent, v. The City of Syracuse, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue


Registration No.  333-35460
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)
PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  063				Trade Date: 03/29/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated
  September 8, 2000)						Issue Date:  04/03/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement March 29, 2001

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION
OR REPAYMENT
Date and terms of redemption or repayment
(including any applicable regular or special record dates)

  CUSIP
     or	Stated				                                   Interest
Common	Interest		           Price to	   Discounts &   Payment	 Survivor's
  Code	  Rate (1)	Maturity 	Public (2) 	Commissions  Frequency Option    Yes/No

14911QCQ2  5.375%	04/15/06	   100%	     1.0%         Monthly	      YES	   NO



Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:
____  Yes	  X   No						N/A



(1) The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not
affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the
effective date of the change.

(2) Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to
Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the
time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation shee
EXHIBIT 32-2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund VI, L.P., Series 5 (the “Partnership”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Melanie R. Wenk, Vice President -Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:





3.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





4.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.








/s/MELANIE R. WENK


Melanie R. Wenk


Vice President-Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.





Date: February 4, 2011
No. 560.

#### Colton et al. *v.*United States.

*Boris Kostelanetz*and *George G. Gallantz*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer*and *Joseph M. Howard*for the United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1422 

Recognizing and promoting awareness of Chiari malformation and expressing 

support for designation of a ‘‘National Chiari Malformation Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2008 

Mr. KANJORSKI submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and promoting awareness of Chiari malformation 

and expressing support for designation of a ‘‘National 

Chiari Malformation Month’’. 

Whereas Chiari malformation, as recognized by the National 

Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, includes 

a complex group of disorders characterized by herniation 

of the cerebellum; 

Whereas the herniated tissue blocks the circulation of cerebrospinal fluid in the brain which can lead to the formation of a cavity within the spinal cord; 

Whereas symptoms of Type I Chiari malformation include severe headache, dizziness, vertigo, disequilibrium, visual 

disturbances, difficulty swallowing, heart palpitations, 

sleep apnea, impaired fine motor skills, chronic fatigue, 

and painful tingling of the hands and feet; 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1422 IH 

Whereas because of the complex symptomology, patients with 

Type I Chiari malformation are frequently misdiagnosed; 

Whereas Type II Chiari malformation, also called ArnoldChiari malformation, is usually accompanied by a 

myelomeningocele, a form of spina bifida that occurs 

when the spinal canal and the backbone do not close before birth, causing the spinal cord to protrude through an 

opening in the back, which can result in partial or complete paralysis below the spinal opening; 

Whereas Type III Chiari malformation, the most serious 

form, results in severe and often irreversible neurological 

defects; 

Whereas treatment for this disorder is not a certain and definitive path, and medication may ease certain symptoms 

such as pain, but often surgery is the only treatment 

available to correct functional disturbances or halt the 

progression of damage to the central nervous system; 

Whereas until recently, Chiari malformation was regarded as 

a rare condition, but with the increased use of magnetic 

resonance imaging, the number of reported cases has 

risen from 200,000 to 2,000,000 Americans; 

Whereas new genetic studies support a hereditary tendency 

with a transmissibility rate of 12 percent; 

Whereas the studies also found that women are three times 

more likely to be afflicted by the debilitating disorder 

than men; and 

Whereas September 2008 would be an appropriate month to 

designate as ‘‘National Chiari Malformation Month’’: 

Now, therefore, be it 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1422 IH 

1 Resolved, That the United States House of Rep2 resentatives— 

3 (1) recognizes the importance of making citi4 zens of the United States aware of Chiari malforma5 tion and helps promote advocacy for this important 

6 cause; and 

7 (2) supports the designation of a ‘‘National 

8 Chiari Malformation Month’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on PROD1PC67 with BILLS
From: mlaborde49@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:29:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michael Laborde

Marksville, LA 71351
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Graduate StudentsGraduate StudyHigher EducationResource MaterialsScience EducationTeacher EducationTeaching AssistantsTeaching MethodsWorld Wide Web

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
From: Boyan Toshkoff

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 6:11:16 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Boyan Toshkoff

65-09 99th. Street Apt. 6Q

Rego Park, NY 11374
#### Mary Ann Blashfield, as Administratrix, Respondent, v. H. Wilson Blashfield, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
AUG 24 PEC 126 8G 1-/6 Page | of 1

LEGAL PROCESSING sisal As of: August 31, 2011
PUBLICATION & REGULATIO Received: August 09, 2011
BRANCH Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: August 31, 2011

Tracking No. 80edc405
‘(Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0057
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Brian D Hahn
Address:
Fort Wayne, IN,

General Comment

There has been increased pressure from NARAL and other Pro-Abortion Political Action
Committees who are trying to persuade congress to eliminate the religious exemptions in every
possible way. Contraceptives are so widely available through free clinics that forcing religious
organizations and or employers to provide access to these is unthinkable. I shouldn't even have to
write this comment, it should be generally understood that religion is protected so that their sacred
beliefs are not interfered with by the government. Please do not give in to the political pressure by
anti-religious establishments.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectlId=0900..._ 8/31/2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,584,800
<SECURITIES>                                10,327,300
<RECEIVABLES>                               15,722,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                   560,000
<INVENTORY>                                 47,592,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            27,074,400
<PP&E>                                       2,187,800
<DEPRECIATION>                                 167,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              79,235,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,307,700
<BONDS>                                      1,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  58,869,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                79,235,800
<SALES>                                     19,463,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,640,600
<CGS>                                       17,039,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                35,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             402,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,791,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,144,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,646,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,646,700
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2











Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2010 (the “Report”) of Immucor, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.











July 23, 2010                                                                                                    /s/ Richard A. Flynt


Richard A. Flynt


Chief Financial Officer