alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1







DIRECTOR RESOLUTIONS 


OF


PETRICHOR CORP.


 (the “Company”)


WHEREAS: 



	A.	Chun-Hao Chang desires to appoint Mei-Chun Lin as Chief Financial Officer of the Company and as a director of the Company.






	B.	Mei-Chun Lin has consented to act as Chief Financial Officer of the Company and as a director of the Company.










BE IT RESOLVED THAT:



	1.	Chun-Hao Chang, has appointed Mei-Chun Lin as Chief Financial Officer of the Company and a director of the Company.






	2.	Mei-Chun Lin has consented to act as Chief Financial Officer of the Company and as a director of the Company.





Effective date: May 2, 2016












/s/ Chun-Hao Chang________                                


Chun-Hao Chang












/s/ Mei-Chun Lin___________


Mei-Chun Lin
file:///C|/..._List_29-08-2011_12-55-54-352/Document%20List%2029-08-2011%2012-55-54-352_docs/EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0068.html[8/29/2011 2:42:39 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: August 29, 2011

Received: August 26, 2011

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 80efe9f9

Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0018

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of

Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0018-0002

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services under

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0068

Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Kris Miller

Address:

POB 554

Frisco, CO, 80443

Email: kmiller@vailgov.com

General Comment

As a human resources professional, I applaud the agencies for ensuring that health care services are

available and affordable for all Americans. However, the cost sharing component of contraception and

is my concern with the recent amendment. 

Although prescription contraception may have health benefits to women, this should not be the only

factor to regulate cost-sharing. Compare this to cholesterol lowering prescriptions, which are also

important in the long-term wellness of patients – and considered by many as preventive care. How is

this different from women’s birth control pills? Where will the agencies go next... that ALL

prescriptions that are beneficial to a patient be free? If women are singled out for this, can we

expect the EEOC to rule that this is discriminatory to men since their “preventive” prescriptions are

not free? Will the EEOC suggest that health plans should also provide male contraception, such as

condoms, at no cost? While I might support having a reasonable cap on cost-sharing for generic

preventive prescriptions (all preventive– not just women’s contraception), it is unreasonable to

segment out only women’s contraceptives for such benefits. 

The so-called “day after pill” (approved by FDA as emergency contraceptive) makes this even more

complicated - Should this also be provided without cost sharing? In Colorado, governments are

prohibited from covering elective abortions and there are conflicting opinions on if these emergency

contraceptives can be covered by Colorado’s public employers. If this contraception is deemed

covered under this amendment, it could be in violation of Article 5, section 50 of the Colorado

Constitution.

As both a taxpayer and HR manager for a government organization, I am concerned about the

taxpayer’s obligation in this area. Most contraception coverage can be provided through health plans

– as currently required – with appropriate cost sharing.
From: Eleftheria Nakos

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:43:40 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Eleftheria Nakos

2024 Sprunt Avenue

Durham, NC 27705
No. 134.

#### Namet *v.*United States.

*John H. FitzGerald*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox*for the United States.

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari granted.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
 
STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
 
    Earnings per share ("EPS") is calculated on a Basic EPS and Diluted EPS
basis. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing income available to common
shareholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding (the denominator) during the period. Income available to common
shareholders is Net Income in the table below and as reported in Bancorp's
Consolidated Statement of Income. No adjustments were required to net income for
any EPS calculations.
 
    Diluted EPS is calculated by adjusting the denominator for all dilutive
potential common shares that were outstanding during the period. Bancorp had
stock options outstanding during the periods presented below which had a
dilutive effect on EPS. Therefore, the number of additional common shares that
would have been outstanding if the options had been exercised is added to the
denominator to arrive at the dilutive number of shares.
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                              FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                                             ----------------------------------
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)                                                          1998        1997        1996
                                                                             ----------  ----------  ----------
<S>                                                                          <C>         <C>         <C>
Net income.................................................................  $   13,092  $   14,226  $   10,401
                                                                             ----------  ----------  ----------
                                                                             ----------  ----------  ----------
Basic EPS
  Shares...................................................................   8,655,895   8,605,660   8,577,410
  EPS......................................................................  $     1.51  $     1.65  $     1.21
Dilutive shares
  Stock options............................................................     112,753      70,720      56,004
  EPS......................................................................  $     0.02  $     0.01  $     0.01
Diluted EPS
  Shares including options.................................................   8,768,648   8,676,380   8,633,414
  EPS......................................................................  $     1.49  $     1.64  $     1.20
</TABLE>
 
                                       71
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001036327
<NAME>                        GFSI, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         5,423
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  30,442
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    36,956
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               76,006
<PP&E>                                         40,067
<DEPRECIATION>                                 20,657
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 101,902
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          28,361
<BONDS>                                        170,999
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (92,225)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   101,902
<SALES>                                        153,642
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               153,642
<CGS>                                          92,947
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,316
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (97)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             13,286
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,137
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,348
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            6,789
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   6,789
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2 

 

**Rule 13a-14(a) Certification by the Chief Financial Officer**

 

I, William Snyder, certify that: 

 

1.    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Peak International Limited; 

 

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.    The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 8, 2003
From: bwildered@tds.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:18:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rebecca Wilson

Hot Springs, VA 24445
From: Jennifer

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Religious exemptions to contraception

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 3:49:55 AM

As we move toward making birth control universally accessible in this country, I urge to not to allow

religious exceptions for providers. This is simply not about religious freedom. No one has to take birth

control if they don't believe in it. But a medical provider has no right to deny a woman a medication

that Congress and the FDA have deemed legal. If a pharmacist feels they cannot morally dispense all

legal medications, (S)he should find a new line of work. Are police personnel allowed to only enforce

laws they happen to agree with? Of course not, and it should be no different for medical personnel.

Thank you,

Jennifer Hang
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21

                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                                          
                                          
     The following table lists the subsidiaries of the Registrant as of 
December 31, 1997, the state or other jurisdiction of incorporation and the 
names under which such subsidiaries do business.  The Registrant owns all of 
the outstanding voting securities of each subsidiary.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                       Name Under
                                             Jurisdiction of                         Which Subsidiary
Name of Subsidiary                            Organization                          Is Doing Business
---------------------------------            ---------------                 ---------------------------------
<S>                                          <C>                             <C>
ODS Networks, Inc.                              Delaware                           ODS Networks, Inc.

Optical Data Systems, Inc.                       Nevada                         Optical Data Systems, Inc.

ODS, Inc.                                        Nevada                               ODS, Inc.

Optical Data Systems-Texas, Inc.                  Texas                      Optical Data Systems-Texas, Inc.

ODS Networks GmbH                                Germany                           ODS Networks GmbH

ODS Networks Ltd.                             United Kingdom                        ODS Networks Ltd.

ODS Ltd.                                      United Kingdom                            ODS Ltd.

ODS Networks SARL                                 France                           ODS Networks SARL

Optical Data Systems, Ltda.                       Brazil                       Optical Data Systems, Ltda.

Optical Data Systems (Barbados) Ltd.             Barbados              Optical Data Systems (Barbados) Ltd.

ODS Networks Sdn. Bhd.                           Malaysia                       ODS Networks Sdn. Bhd.

</TABLE>
From: doulundsen@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:58:35 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Donald Oulundsen

Vero Beach, FL 32963
**EXHIBIT 15**

 

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

To the Members and Board of Managers of 

Excelsior Private Equity Fund II, Inc. 

 

We have reviewed theaccompanying statement of assets and liabilities of Excelsior Private Equity Fund II, Inc. (which was formerly known as Excelsior Partners Fund II, Inc.), the (“Fund”), including the portfolio of investments and summarized portfolio ofinvestments, as of July 31, 2004, and the related statements of operations for the three-month and nine-month periods then ended and the statements of changes in net assets and cash flows and the financial highlights for the nine-month period thenended. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. 

 

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analyticalprocedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. 

 

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accountingprinciples generally accepted in the United States of America. 

 

We havepreviously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the statement of assets and liabilities of the Fund, including the schedule of portfolio investments, as of October 31, 2003 andthe related statements of operations, changes in net assets and cash flows and the financial highlights for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated December 28, 2004, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financialstatements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying summarized portfolio of investments as of October 31, 2003 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the portfolio of investments which it has been derived.
From: rita53@ptd.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:40:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Don & Rita Faircloth

Etters, PA 17319