alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: <Erin_Gawera@fws.gov>

To: Ana Oquendo/R4/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: <Heath_Rauschenberger@fws.gov>

Date: 11/13/2012 03:44 PM

Subject: Re: Fw: GHG PSD Application and Informal Consultation Under Section 7

Hello Ana,

The proposed activities as outlined in your development proposal for the Shady Hills Generating Station 

are not likely to adversely affect resources protected by the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 

amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) provided the standard protection measures for the eastern indigo 

snake are incorporated into the project plan. This finding fulfills the requirements of the Act. 

Thank you,

Erin Gawera 

***********************************************

Erin M. Gawera, Fish and Wildlife Biologist

US Fish and Wildlife Service

Email: erin_gawera@fws.gov

http://www.fws.gov/northflorida

7915 Baymeadows Way, Suite 200

Jacksonville, FL 32256-7517

904/731-3121 (direct)

904/731-3336 (main)

Fax: 904/731-3045 or 3048

----- Forwarded by Heath Rauschenberger/R4/FWS/DOI on 10/31/2012 05:16 PM -----

Oquendo.Ana@epamail.epa.gov

10/31/2012 04:52 PM

To Heath_Rauschenberger@fws.gov

cc jaxregs@fws.gov

Subject GHG PSD Application and Informal Consultation Under Section 7

Hi Dr. Rauschenberger,

Based on our conversation, I am sending an electronic copy of the letter about "Designation of NonFederal representative and Request for Informal Consultation under Section 7 of the Federal Endangered 
Species Act for the Proposed Shady Hills Generating Station." Jill Webster got back with me and 

indicated you are the appropriate contact for Section 7 matters.

I also attached the GHG PSD application. Appendices C and D might be of your interest.

(See attached file: Shady Hills FWS Input 10-17-12.pdf)(See attached file: Shady Hills GHG 

PSD Application Final 092112 PDF.pdf)

Thanks a lot!

Wishing you a great day!

Ana M. Oquendo

Air Permits Section

Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4

61 Forsyth Street, S.W.

Atlanta, GA 30303

email. oquendo.ana@epa.gov

phone. 404-562-9781

fax. 404-562-9019

Please consider the environment before printing this email. (See attached file: Shady Hills FWS Input 

10-17-12.pdf)(See attached file: Shady Hills GHG PSD Application Final 092112 PDF.pdf)
|   |   |
|--------|--------|

**Filed      Pursuant To Rule 433, Registration No. 333-124310**
** **

**$1,000,000,000**

**CATERPILLAR      FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION**

| **For                the Period: 3/12/2007 to 3/19/2007** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|
| **Coupon**                                                | **Interest** | **Maturity** | **Callable** | **Survivor's****Option** | **Price****1** | **Yield****2** | **Moody's** | **S&P** | **CUSIP** |
| 4.750%                                                    | Semi-Annual(†††) | 3/15/09 | NO | YES§  | 100.00 | 4.750% | A2 | A | 14912HBU3 |
| 5.150%                                                    | Semi-Annual(†††) | 3/15/14 | 3/15/09***  | YES§  | 100.00 | 5.150% | A2 | A | 14912HBV1 |
| 5.500%                                                    | Monthly(†) | 3/15/22 | 3/15/10*  | YES§  | 100.00 | 5.563% | A2 | A | 14912HBW9 |
| 5.650%                                                    | Semi-Annual(†††) | 3/15/27 | 3/15/11***  | YES§  | 100.00 | 5.650% | A2 | A | 14912HBX7 |

*All      offerings are subject to prior sale.*
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Select Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
A. Ortenzio, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 6, 2004

                                          /s/ Robert A. Ortenzio
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Robert A. Ortenzio
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of JournalRegister Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 25, 2005, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), we, Robert M. Jelenic, Chairmanand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jean B. Clifton,President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, each certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert M. Jelenic Robert M. JelenicChairman and Chief Executive Officer November 2, 2005

/s/ Jean B. Clifton Jean B. CliftonPresident and Chief Operating Officer (principal financialofficer) November 2, 2005

This certificationaccompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the"Exchange Act"), or incorporated by referencein any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theExchange Act, except as may be expressly set forth by specificreference in any such filing. A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears intyped form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to Journal Register Companyand will be retained by Journal Register Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:36:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Chester Morris

Emporia, KS 66801
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois  60604

March 25, 2008

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

No. 04‐3478

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District

                              Plaintiff‐Appellee,             Court for the Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division.

                     v.

No. 01 CR 326

RICHARD S. CONNORS,

Defendant‐Appellant. Ronald A. Guzman, Judge.

O R D E R

This case, unfortunately, fell through the cracks, but this order, finally, closes it.

On March 21, 2006, we issued an opinion affirming the conviction of Richard

Connors.  United States v. Connors, 441 F.3d 527 (7th Cir. 2006).  But we also ordered a

limited remand pursuant to United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir. 2005), so

the district court could tell us if the sentence Connors received would be different in

light of United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).  On February 20, 2007, the district

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 04-3478 2

court responded to our order and concluded that it would have imposed the same

sentence had it known that the sentencing guidelines were advisory, rather than

mandatory.  On February 27, 2007, we invited the parties, if they wished, to respond to

the district court’s order.  Mr. Connors responded with a “Statement of Position” on

March 6, 2007.  The government did not respond, and we didn’t act promptly on the

matter.  But today we act on the matter, albeit not very promptly.

Having considered the matter, we conclude that Mr. Connors received a

reasonable sentence.  Accordingly, the sentence imposed by the district court is

AFFIRMED.
##### 



CERTIFICATE OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF
DOBSON COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION
  a.
    
    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and thatb.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company
at March 31, 2006, and the results of the Companys operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006.
 May 10, 2006
    /s/ STEVEN P. DUSSEKSteven P. DussekChief Executive Officer
and principal executive officer
Exhibit 32

Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

The undersigned, as the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Virginia Financial Group, Inc., respectively, certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, which accompanies this certification fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Virginia Financial Group, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), and no purchaser or seller of
securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|            |  |                                                     
|----------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|May 9, 2007 |  | /s/ O. R. Barham, Jr.                               
|            |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|            | 
|May 9, 2007 |  | /s/ Jeffrey W. Farrar                               
|            |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



30
From: larrymontecino@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:29:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lorenzo Montecino

Goode, VA 24556
a> Ronald J. Hinderberger 

Lead Administrator 

Regulatory Administration 

Commercial Airplanes 

The Boeing Company 

P.O. Box 3707 MC 03-52 

Seattle, WA 98124-2207 

JUL 2 3 2Qtt 

RA-l 1-03915 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

o-

> 

UJ 

CD 

— O oo 

Subject: 

Model: 

Reference: 

Request for Amendment to FAA Exemption No. 

10268 Provision No. 1 

787-8 

FAA Exemption No. 10268 (Regulatory Docket 

No. FAA-2010-1284), issued on May 19,2011. 

The Boeing Company respectfully requests an amendment to provision #1 of the 

reference exemption. The FAA decision included the following provision in 

granting the exemption: 

^''For Model 787-8 airplanes granted a certificate of airworthiness before June 

30, 2014, the Airworthiness Limitations section of the Instructions for Continued 

Airworthiness must include a limitation that requires operators to verify 

contaminants have not accumulated on the fuel strainer located upstream of the 

engine driven fuel pump. The procedures must be accomplished after the first 

flight following any maintenance actions that result in personnel entry into the 

center wins fuel tank and before the next flight. The limitation must also require 

an inspection of the fuel cooled oil cooler if the fuel strainer has bypassed fuel." 

The current provision only allows for one flight cycle before all engines are 

required to be inspected before the next flight. The amendment to this provision 

is requested to allow for flight hours, instead of flight cycles, to be used for the 

physical inspection interval of the fiiel strainer and to limit the physical 

inspections to a single engine. This amended provision would be met by three 

separate inspections: 

• Inspection of the Engine Indication and Crew Alerting System (EICAS) 

and Operational Health Monitoring System (OHMS) messages to detect 

any bypass or impending bypass at the fuel strainers after the first flight; 

• Physical inspection of the engine fuel strainer after 20 flight hours for 

the first engine; 
^ . 

Page 2 

Mr. Breneman 

RA-l 1-03915 

• Physical inspection of the engine fuel strainer after 40 hours for the 

second engine. 

The rationale for requesting this amendment is to ensure that the engines are 

operated on center tank fliel for sufficient time for any maintenance related 

contaminants to be captured by the engine fuel strainers, while allowing 

adherence to the best practices of avoiding common multiple engine 

maintenance. 

Very truly yours, 

< ^ 

CvujtA.^M^^ 

ChristinVM. Thompson 

Lead Program Administrator, Development Projects 

(425) 266-6572, MC 03-56 

FAX: (425)294-9340 

cc 

Name 

Ken Schroer 

Ali Bahrami 

Jon Regimbal 

Sherry Vevea 

David Solar 

Ken Fontaine 

Letter 

Paper/EDT 

EDT 

EDT 

EDT 

EDT 

EDT 

Enclosures 

Yes 

EDT 

EDT 

EDT 

Yes 

Yes 

Comments 

ANM-IOOS 

ANM-IOOS 

ANM-140S 

ANM-140S 

EASA 

EASA
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports dated July 23, 2008, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and contains an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of new accounting standards effective June 1, 2007 and June 1,2006) and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Immucor, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2008. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports inthe Registration Statements of the Company on Forms S-8 (file numbers 333-131399, 33-41406, 33-49882, 033-62097, 333-90552, 333-109210, and 333-131902). 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP 

Atlanta, Georgia 

July 23, 2008
0 5 10 miles

NORTH

Caballo

Reserve Caballo

Mountains

Caballo

Lake

State

Park

Truth or

Consequences

J

o r n a

d

a

d e l M u e r t o

New

Mexico

Elephant

Butte

Lake

Elephant

Butte

Lake

State

Park

Fray

Cristobal

Mountains

San

Mateo

Mountains

Socorro County

Sierra County

Cibola

National

Forest

DSC/APRIL 2004/661/2012 3 OF 7

Route 1 Ends,

I-25 Begins

Auto Tour Route

New Mexico

Mexico

Texas

Santa Fe

Albuquerque

El Paso Ciudad

Juarez 1

25

El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro

National Historic Trail

Auto Tour Route

High-Potential Historic Site Section 3 of 7

United States Department of the Interior

National Park Service

Bureau of Land Management

Auto Tour Route

High-Potential Historic Sites

El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro

National Historic Trail

Fort

Craig

El Camino

Real

International

Heritage

Center

Valverde

El Contadero

Fray

Cristobal

Laguna

del

Muerto

Aleman

Map 3C

`

` Rio Grande

Socorro BLM Field Office

Las Cruces BLM Field Office

1
```

[Federal Register: August 3, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 148)]
[Notices]               
[Page 45600]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr03au10-42]                         

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================

[[Page 45600]]

AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION

 
African Development Foundation, Board of Directors Meeting

Time:  Tuesday, August 17, 2010, 8:30 a.m. to 1 p.m.

Place:  African Development Foundation, Conference Room, 1400 I Street, 
NW., Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005.

Date:  Tuesday, January 26, 2010.

Status: 1. Open session, Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 8:30 a.m. to 12 
a.m.; and
    2. Closed session, Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 12 p.m. to 1 p.m.
    Due to security requirements and limited seating, all individuals 
wishing to attend the open session of the meeting must notify Michele 
M. Rivard at (202) 673-3916 or mrivard@usadf.gov of your request to 
attend by 5 p.m. on Thursday, August 12, 2010.

Doris Martin,
General Counsel, USADF.
[FR Doc. 2010-19005 Filed 8-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
From: joanzacher@Verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:40:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joan Zacher

Middletown, NJ 07748