alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 4792

_____________________________
R OBERT U LM ,
Petitioner
,

v.

F LORIDA C OMMISSION ON O FFENDER R EVIEW , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

— Original Jurisdiction

.

February 5, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. Because Petitioner has not shown irreparable harm, we dismiss the petition for writ of certiorari for lack of jurisdiction. See Bailey v. State , 245 So. 3d 1015 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018).

W OLF , L EWIS , and W ETHERELL , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Robert Ulm, pro se
, Petitioner

. Rana Wallace, General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-16-00327-CV

Maxine ADAMS and Cecil Adams,

Appellants

v.

Christopher PRINE,

Appellee

From the 269th Judicial District Court, Harris County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-35653-a

Honorable Dan Hinde, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the portion of the trial court’s final 

judgment dismissing appellants’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against appellee in his individual capacity 

and the trial court’s order severing the appellants’ claims against appellee into a separate cause are 

REVERSED. The cause is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings. It is 

ORDERED that appellants recover their costs of this appeal from appellee.

SIGNED January 11, 2017.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Exhibit



    



FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
AVON PRODUCTS, INC. 2013 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN (AMENDED AND RESTATED)
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made to the Avon Products, Inc. 2013 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, by AVON PRODUCTS, INC., a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York (the “Company”).
INTRODUCTION
The Company maintains the Avon Products, Inc. 2013 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated (the “Plan”).  The Company now wishes to amend the Plan to (i) modify the definition of “Committee” and (ii) permit the Committee (as defined in the Plan) to delegate certain of its duties to a subcommittee.  Such amendment would be effective as of March 1, 2016 for awards outstanding under the Plan on or after such date.
AMENDMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Plan, effective as of March 1, 2016, as follows:
1.  By replacing Section 2(i) in its entirety with the following:
““Committee” means Compensation and Management Development Committee of the Board or such other the committee appointed by the Board to administer the Plan, (i) each member of which must be “independent” under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange, (ii) at least two members of which must satisfy the criteria for being an “outside director” for purposes of Code Section 162(m) and (iii) at least two members of which must satisfy the criteria for being a “non-employee director” for purposes of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act; provided that, with respect to Awards to non-employee directors under an Award Program, “Committee” means the Board or the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board.” 


2.   By adding the following sentence to the end of Section 8(a) thereof:


“The Committee may delegate the approval of certain transactions to subcommittees consisting solely of members of the Committee who are (i) “outside directors” for purposes of Code Section 162(m) or (ii) “non-employee directors” for purposes of Rule 16b-3 under the Exchange Act.”


Except as specifically amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect as prior to this First Amendment.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be executed on the date set forth below.
	
		
	 
	AVON PRODUCTS, INC.

	Dated: March 1, 2016
	By:       
Title:   








1
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1287 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1287

 Commending the Honor Flight Network, its volunteers, and donors, for 
enabling World War II veterans to travel to our Nation's capital to see 
           the World War II Memorial created in their honor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 2008

Mr. Moran of Kansas (for himself, Mr. Hobson, and Mr. Shuler) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Commending the Honor Flight Network, its volunteers, and donors, for 
enabling World War II veterans to travel to our Nation's capital to see 
           the World War II Memorial created in their honor.

Whereas in 2004, nearly 60 years after World War II ended, veterans of that war 
        and all those who supported the war effort at home received recognition 
        of their service, sacrifice, and victory through the dedication of a 
        national World War II Memorial located on the National Mall in 
        Washington, District of Columbia;
Whereas many veterans of World War II are now in their 80s and 90s, and are 
        unable, physically or financially, to visit our Nation's capital to see 
        the World War II Memorial for themselves;
Whereas Earl Morse of Ohio and Jeff Miller of North Carolina created the Honor 
        Flight Network to enable World War II veterans to travel to the 
        Memorial;
Whereas now operating in communities in over 30 States, the Honor Flight Network 
        is a grassroots, nonprofit organization that uses commercial and 
        chartered flights to send veterans on an all-expenses paid trip to 
        Washington, District of Columbia;
Whereas the Honor Flights are staffed by volunteers and funded by donations;
Whereas former Senator Bob Dole, himself a wounded veteran of World War II, led 
        the fundraising campaign to build the Memorial and often greets veterans 
        arriving at the Memorial through the Honor Flight Network;
Whereas of the 16,000,000 veterans who served in World War II, an estimated 
        2,500,000 are alive today and dying at a rate of over 900 a day; and
Whereas the Honor Flight Network is working against time to thank America's 
        World War II veterans: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives expresses its deepest 
appreciation to the Honor Flight Network, its volunteers, and donors, 
who honor America's World War II veterans with an opportunity to see 
the World War II Memorial in Washington, District of Columbia.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                             128
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        4
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   132
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     132
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               71
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                          49
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       132
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (4)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (96)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (96)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (96)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
From: Nadya Woelfer

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Accept recommendations of the IOM

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:55:33 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.
No. 573, Misc.

#### In re Disbarment of Brodstein.

Ellis Brodstein, Esquire, of Reading, Pennsylvania, having resigned as a member of the Bar of this Court, it is ordered that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice in this Court. The rule to show cause heretofore issued is discharged.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted form SGI
International's Form 10-K for the year ended Decmeber 31, 1997, and is qualified
in its entirely by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000737955
<NAME>                        SGI International
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     0

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         429,232
<SECURITIES>                                   402,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                  577,587
<ALLOWANCES>                                   84,460
<INVENTORY>                                    64,843
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,648,745
<PP&E>                                         1,378,529
<DEPRECIATION>                                 589,789
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,590,445
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,933,304
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    910
<COMMON>                                       39,927,760
<OTHER-SE>                                     (40,485,779)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,590,445
<SALES>                                        5,279,589
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,322,724
<CGS>                                          3,898,737
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,898,737
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6,390,513
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             741,776
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,708,302)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,708,302)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,708,302)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.88)




</TABLE>
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:49:35 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michael Kraemer

Tomah, WI 54660
NUMBER 13-11-00787-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE LORENZO YBARRA, JR.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1

Relator, Lorenzo Ybarra, Jr., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above 

cause on December 21, 2011, contending that the trial court erred in entering a 

judgment nunc pro tunc after the expiration of its plenary power. The trial court held 

that a clerical error existed in the divorce decree wherein it provided for a conveyance of 

.067 acres of land instead of 0.67 acres of land, the latter being the entirety of the parcel 

of property. The Court requested and received a response to the petition for writ of 

 

1

See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (―When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is 

not required to do so.‖); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
mandamus from the real party in interest, Dora Aguiar, formerly known as Dora Lopez 

Ybarra. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of 

mandamus and the response thereto, is of the opinion that relator has not shown 

himself entitled to the relief sought. See, e.g., Escobar v. Escobar, 711 S.W.2d 230, 

231 (Tex. 1986) (concluding that an error in the amount of acreage awarded to a 

claimant was a clerical error subject to correction by judgment nunc pro tunc); Davis v. 

Davis, 647 S.W.2d 781, 785 (Tex. Civ. App.—Austin 1983, no writ) (concluding that an 

error in the number of lots utilized to describe a residence was a clerical error subject to 

correction by nunc pro tunc); see also Sam Eng, Inc. v. Barnett Drywall & Supply, Inc., 

No. C14-87-00861-CV, 1988 Tex. App. LEXIS 956, at **5–6 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th 

Dist.] May 5, 1988, no writ) (not designated for publication) (same). Accordingly, the 

petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

20th day of January, 2012.
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Central Command

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  ABOUT US    -  COMMAND PRIORITIES             
  -  LEADERSHIP             
  -  COMPONENT COMMANDS             
  -  HISTORY             
  -  POSTURE STATEMENT 
-  CENTCOM AOR    -  CENTCOM COALITION 
-  OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES    -  USMTM 
-  CONTACT    -  OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT             
  -  COMMUNITY RELATIONS             
  -  THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE             
  -  INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL             
  -  MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL 
-  MEDIA    -  SOCIAL MEDIA             
  -  NEWS ARTICLES             
  -  PRESS RELEASES             
  -  STATEMENTS             
  -  IMAGERY             
  -  VIDEOS             
  -  TRANSCRIPTS 
-  VISITORS AND PERSONNEL    -  FAMILY CENTER             
  -  FAMILY READINESS             
  -  CENTCOM WEBMAIL             
  -  SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY             
  -  ACCOUNTABILITY             
  -  EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS             
  -  USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS             
  -  FOIA LIBRARY             
  -  INNOVATION OASIS             
  -  WELCOME GUIDE 

HomeMEDIANEWS ARTICLESNews Article View

# Defense leaders detail how Middle East, Africa fit in U.S. strategy

By Jim GaramoneDOD News

                WASHINGTON  –              

                U.S. Marine Corps Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr., the commander of U.S. Central Command, right, visits Airmen assigned to the 332 Air Expeditionary Wing, Jan. 24, 2020. McKenzie visited the USCENTCOM Area of Responsibility to discuss security and stability in the region with forward deployed service members. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Sgt. Roderick Jacquote)            

                USCENTCOM commander visits Airmen assigned to the 332 AEW            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Sgt. Roderick Jacquote

VIRIN: 200124-M-RX597-0015

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
From: don@metrochampion.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:05:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

d. harris

Arlington, TX 76015
Exhibit 4.28


 


 


Supplemental Agreement to the Financial
Services Framework Agreement


 


 


 


This Agreement is
entered into by and between the following parties in            as of ____________ :


 


 


 


Party A: China Southern Airlines Company
Limited (中国南方航空股份有限公司)
(hereinafter referred to as “Party A”)


 


Domicile: No. 278, Ji Chang Road, Guangzhou


 


Legal Representative: Si Xianmin


 


 


 


Party B: Southern Airlines Group Finance
Company Limited (中国南航集团财务有限公司)
(hereinafter referred to as “Party B”)


 


Domicile: No. 17, Hangyun South Street,
Baiyun District, Guangzhou


 


Legal Representative:


 


  


 


 


Based on the Financial
Services Framework Agreement entered into between Party A and Party B on 8 November 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the “Original
Agreement”), this supplemental agreement is entered into by both parties on the basis of equality and mutual benefit and
through friendly consultations, the specific terms of which are as follows:


 


1.Clause
1 of Article 8 (the “Transaction Cap”) of the Original Agreement shall be amended as follows: “Both parties to
the Agreement agree that, with effect from the effective date of the Agreement, the balance of Party A’s deposits placed
with Party B (including the corresponding interest accrued thereon) shall not exceed RMB8 billion on any given day, nor should
the balance of the outstanding loan provided by Party B (including the corresponding interests payable accrued thereon) exceed
the above-mentioned level on any given day.”


 






     


     


    

 


2. This supplemental
agreement shall be deemed as supplemental to the Original Agreement. In case of any inconsistency between the Original Agreement
and this supplemental agreement, this supplemental agreement shall prevail.


 


3. After approved
at the board meeting and general meeting of Party A, this supplemental agreement shall be effective from the date of obtaining
approval at the board meeting and general meeting of Party A and upon being signed and affixed with an official seal by both parties.


 


4. This supplemental
agreement is made in four counterparts with two copies held by each party, which shall have the same legal effect.


 


(Remainder of this page
is intentionally left blank)


 


 


 


Party A: China Southern
Airlines Company Limited


 


Authorized Representative:


 


 


 


 


 


Party B: Southern Airlines
Group Finance Company Limited


 


Authorized Representative:


 




 






    2