alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: frojek@swccpas.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:05:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Frank Rojek

Buffalo, NY 14223
From: Stanely@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:14:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Anything else you might be able to do to invalidate Mr. Obama (aka Barry Soetoro)'s socialist medical

take-over scheme would also be appreciated.

Sincerely,

Kurt Snyder

Warren, MI 48092
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1309 

Recognizing and honoring the 44th anniversary of the passage of the Civil 

Rights Act of 1964 and those who worked to achieve this goal. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2008 

Mrs. DRAKE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Labor, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and honoring the 44th anniversary of the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and those who 

worked to achieve this goal. 

Whereas the bedrock principle upon which this Nation was 

founded is that ‘‘all men are created equal’’; 

Whereas, to promote this fundamental principle, the Civil 

Rights Act of 1964 was introduced on June 11, 1963, 

and was passed by a majority of at least 70 percent in 

both Houses of Congress, despite a filibuster in the Senate; 

Whereas the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited discrimination in places of public accommodation on the basis of 

race, color, religion, or national origin, amended prior law 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1309 IH 

to mandate that voting procedures be applied equally, 

and established the Equal Employment Opportunity 

Commission; 

Whereas July 2, 2008, marks the 44th anniversary of President Lyndon Baines Johnson’s signing of the Civil Rights 

Act of 1964; and 

Whereas the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 served 

as a loud proclamation by the American people that segregation and discrimination were no longer socially acceptable in the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes and honors the 44th anniversary of the passage of 

3 the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and all those who worked 

4 tirelessly to make this historic legislation the law of the 

5 land. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 62829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19787]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 40-8903-LA; ASLBP No. 23-980-03-LA-BD01]


Homestake Mining Company of California; Establishment of Atomic 
Safety and Licensing Board

    Pursuant to the Commission's regulations, see, e.g., 10 CFR 2.103, 
2.104, 2.105, 2.300, 2.309, 2.313, 2.318, 2.321, notice is hereby given 
that an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (Board) is being established 
to preside over the following proceeding:

Homestake Mining Company of California (Denial of License Amendment 
Request)

    This Board is being established pursuant to a September 5, 2023 
hearing demand filed by Homestake Mining Company of California 
(Homestake). Homestake challenges the NRC Staff's decision in an August 
15, 2023 letter denying Homestake's request to amend its license for 
the Grants Reclamation Project (License No. SUA-1471) in Cibola County, 
New Mexico.
    The Board is comprised of the following Administrative Judges:

Michael M. Gibson, Chair, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001
G. Paul Bollwerk, III, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dr. Sue H. Abreu, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001

    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed 
in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule. See 10 CFR 2.302.
    Rockville, Maryland.

    Dated: September 7, 2023.
Edward R. Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 2023-19787 Filed 9-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
From: contrarymary.2@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:37:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Lilienthal

Altadena, CA 91001
No. 125, Misc.

#### Burns *v.*United States.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Robert G. Maysack*for the United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
From: info@os91.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:49:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to demand in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Ganster

Winter Garden, FL 34787
LEGAL GUIDANCE
a

HONORARIA BAN

On February 22, 1995, the U.S. Supreme
Court held unconstitutional the honoraria ban
at Section 501(b) of the Ethics in Government
Act of 1978 as it applies to Federal Executive
Branch employees below the grade of GS-16.

As enacted, this statute prohibited a Member
of Congress, federal officer, or other
Government employee from accepting an
honorarium for making an appearance or
speech, or writing an article. Individual
members, and a union representing, a class
composed of all Executive Branch employees
below grade GS-16 initiated suit, alleging that
the statute was an unconstitutional abridgment
of their freedom of speech.

The ban covered speaking and articles on all
possible topics including such matters as
religion, history, dance, and the environment,
even if they were unrelated to the employee's
official duties.

The Court held that Section 501(b) does
violate the First Amendment.

Using the balancing test set forth in Pickering
v. Board of Ed. of Township High School
District, 391 U.S. 563, 568, the Court sought
to “arrive at a balance between the interest of
the (employee), as a citizen, in commenting
upon matters of public concern and the interest
of the State, as an employer, in promoting the
efficiency of the public services it performs
through its employees."

Although Section 501(b) did not prohibit any
speech nor discriminate among speakers, and
only prohibited receiving compensation for
speeches and articles, the Court found that it
was a significant burden on federal employee's

expression. This curtailment imposes a
significant burden on the public's right to read
and hear what Government employees would
otherwise have written and said.

Should you desire further information, consult
with your organizations designated ethics
counselor.

NMLC point of contact is Mr. John R. Osing,
Jr., Office of the Counsel, who may be reached
at (301) 619-2157 or by DSN at 343-2157.
From: hendrickson.ray@mindspring.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:51:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ray Hendricklson

Fayetteville, NC 28306
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ayman S. Ashour, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Quarterly Report of Identive Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Identive Group, Inc.



|                      |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 8, 2012 |  | /s/ AYMAN S. ASHOUR                              
|                      |  | Ayman S. Ashour                                  
|                      |  | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  | (Principal Executive Officer)                    

I, David Wear, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Quarterly Report of Identive Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2012 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Identive Group, Inc.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: August 8, 2012 |  | /s/ DAVID WEAR                       
|                      |  | David Wear                           
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|                      |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
From: mlgreim@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:19:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mary Lou Greim

Excelsior Springs, MO 64024
Exhibit 8.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF BAKBONE SOFTWARE INCORPORATED

|Subsidiary                      |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |  | Percentage Owned |  
|------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- |  | ---------------- | -
|BakBone Software, Inc.          |  | U.S.                          |  | 100              | %
|BakBone Acquisition Corp.       |  | U.S.                          |  | 100              | %
|Tracer Technologies Japan, K.K. |  | Japan                         |  | 50               | %
|NVS Holdings Inc.               |  | Alberta                       |  | 100              | %
|NetVault Holdings Limited       |  | U.K.                          |  | 100              | %
|BakBone Software Limited        |  | U.K.                          |  | 100              | %
|BakBone Software K.K.           |  | Japan                         |  | 47               | %

1

---

QuickLinks
From: schapman@nts-online.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:38:34 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Karen Chapman

Wichita Falls, TX 76309