alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the audited
consolidated financial statements of the company for the year ended April 30,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the form 10-KSB for
fiscal 1998.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-01-1997
<CASH>                                     $   104,008
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,187,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                   198,416
<INVENTORY>                                  2,087,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,675,340
<PP&E>                                       5,883,378
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,787,361
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,793,619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,886,982
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,140
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,394,033
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,793,619
<SALES>                                     22,060,399
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,060,399
<CGS>                                       18,272,492
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               20,935,976
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             365,540
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                758,883
<INCOME-TAX>                                    33,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            725,883
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   725,883
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.72
        


</TABLE>
From: dwaine@teecoproducts.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:14:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dwaine Goodwin

San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675
# Rules and Regulations

As credit unions grow larger and more complex, the regulatory framework must keep pace to maintain the strength and stability of the entire credit union system. In our rulemaking, the NCUA responds to these changes and addresses emerging risk.

We also endeavor to reduce the regulatory burden, where appropriate, and provide credit unions with more flexibility to manage their operations, reduce their administrative hurdles, and allow credit unions to better compete in the financial services marketplace.

## Federal Credit Union Act

The Federal Credit Union Act is the source of authority for all federally chartered credit unions and governs the coverage and terms of insured accounts at all federally insured credit unions.

## NCUA's Rules & Regulations

Access the current version of the NCUA's Rules and Regulations.

## Rulemakings and Proposals for Comment

The NCUA invites the public to submit a comment on any of its proposed rules. Additionally, you can view the agency’s recently approved final rules.

## Legal Opinions

As a public service, and in an effort to help credit unions, lawyers, and others having an interest in the law applicable to federally insured credit unions better understand the statutes and regulations administered by the National Credit Union Administration, the NCUA publishes certain of staff's legal opinions and interpretive letters issued since 1991.

## Regulatory Review

The NCUA reviews all of its regulations every three years. View the list of rules the agency is evaluating this year.

## Regulatory Reform Agenda

View the attachments to the NCUA Regulatory Reform Task Force's report and comment on the reform agenda notice.

## Interpretive Rulings and Policy Statements

These statements provide guidance and information on issues that affect credit union operations.

Last modified on
02/06/24
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   | Title of Each Class of |   | Maximum Aggregate |   | Amount of |   |   |
|   | Securities Offered |   | Offering Price(1) |   | Registration Fee(2) |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 2.200% PowerNotes®  Due March 15, 2021 |   | $4,753,000 |   | $552.30 |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | TOTAL |   |   |   | $552.30 |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |

|     |                                    |
|-----|------------------------------------|
| (1) | Excludes accrued interest, if any. |

|     |                                                                             |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | Calculated in accordance with Rule 457(r) under the Securities Act of 1933. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | CUSIP | Aggregate | Selling | Gross | Net |   | Coupon | Coupon | Coupon | Maturity | 1st Coupon | 1st |   | Survivor's |   | Product |   |   |
|   | Number | Principal | Price | Concession | Proceeds |   | Type | Rate | Frequency | Date | Date | Coupon |   | Option |   | Ranking |   |   |
|   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 14912HRP7 | $4,753,000.00 | 100% | 1.350% | $4,688,834.50 |   | Fixed | 2.200% | Semi- | 03/15/2021 | 09/15/2015 | $10.76 |   | Yes |   | Senior Unsecured |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Annual |   |   |   |   |   |   | Notes |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
Exhibit 11a


                              Ameritech Corporation
                    Computation of Primary Earnings Per Share
                                       
                                        
                                         1996            1995             1994
                                         ----            ----             ----
Net income (loss) after
extraordinary item             $2,133,712,000  $2,007,635,000 $(1,063,613,000)
                               ==============  ==============   ==============

Weighted average number of
shares outstanding                551,853,953     553,621,693      549,238,304

Additional dilutive effect of
outstanding options (as determined
by the application of the treasury
stock method)                       2,288,000       1,757,528          939,584
                               --------------  --------------   --------------

Weighted average shares outstanding
on which primary earnings per share
are based                         554,141,953     555,379,221      550,177,888

Primary earnings per share              $3.85           $3.61          ($1.93)
                               ==============  ==============   ==============




This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K, Item 601
(b)11, although not required by footnote 2 to paragraph 14 of Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution of less
than three percent.


Amounts for prior years have been restated to reflect inclusion of the
windfall tax benefit when applying the treasury stock method to determine
the dilutive effect of outstanding options.
From: joanie@jscruise.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:21:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joan Saunders

Littleton, CO 80129
From: fvsindelar@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:42:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Frank Sindelar

Saint Joseph, MO 64506
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 12

                              BELLSOUTH CORPORATION
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                              (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                  For the years ended December 31,
                                                                      1997         1998         1999         2000         2001
                                                                    -------      -------      -------      -------      -------
<S>                                                                 <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
1. Earnings

   (a) Income from continuing operations before
deductions for taxes and interest                                   $ 6,182      $ 6,588      $ 6,518      $ 7,926      $ 5,332

   (b) Portion of rental expense representative
of interest factor                                                       91           81           99          105           67

   (c) Equity in losses from less-than-50% owned
investments (accounted for under the equity
method of accounting)                                                    78           97          396          142          249

   (d) Excess of earnings over distributions of
less-than-50%-owned investments (accounted for
under the equity method of accounting)                                  (85)         (46)         (87)        (707)        (148)
                                                                    -------      -------      -------      -------      -------

         TOTAL                                                      $ 6,266      $ 6,720      $ 6,926      $ 7,466      $ 5,500
                                                                    =======      =======      =======      =======      =======

2. Fixed Charges

   (a) Interest                                                     $   783      $   867      $ 1,059      $ 1,361      $ 1,348

   (b) Portion of rental expense representative
of interest factor                                                       91           81           99          105           67
                                                                    -------      -------      -------      -------      -------

         TOTAL                                                      $   874      $   948      $ 1,158      $ 1,466      $ 1,415
                                                                    =======      =======      =======      =======      =======

   Ratio (1 divided by 2)                                              7.17         7.09         5.98         5.09         3.89
                                                                    =======      =======      =======      =======      =======
</TABLE>
From: darceyl777@bellsouth.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:32:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lori Darcey

Houma, LA 70364
Hillsborough,)

April 7, 1914.

#### Marion Fairgraves *v.*Stark Mills *& a.*

Where an action of tort for physical injuries to the person is pending at the time of the plaintiff’s decease, his administrator has two full terms in which to appear and assume prosecution of the suit, exclusive of the unexpired portion of the term in which the decedent’s death occurred.

Case, for negligence. Facts agreed. The action was entered at the September term, 1912, of the superior court, when it was continued to the following January term, which began January 7. The plaintiff died on that day. At the September term, 1913, the defendants moved that the action be abated upon the ground that no administrator of the plaintiff’s estate had appeared before the end of the second term after her decease. The court (Kivel, J.) denied the motion, and the defendants excepted. An administrator subsequently appeared before the end of the September term.

*Hollis & Murchie, Hiram A. Stearns,*and *Henry B. Stearns (Hiram A. Stearns*orally), for the administrator.

*Jones, Warren, Wilson & Manning*and *Charles D. Barnard (Mr. Manning*orally), for the defendants.

Walker, J.

The statute (P. S., c. 191, *s.*9) provides that if an action of tort “is pending at the time of the decease of one of the parties, it shall abate and be forever barred, unless the administrator of the deceased party, if the deceased was plaintiff, shall appear and assume the prosecution of the action before the end of the second term after the decease of such party.” As it is the duty of the court to construe and interpret the language of the statute, and not to vary its meaning by a legislative act of amendment, it is evident that the term of court during which the original plaintiff died cannot be deemed the first term after her decease, and that the succeeding term was not the second term after that event. The fact that she died on the first day of the term, rather than on the last day, is of little significance, since her death occurred during the January term, and under the statute the administrator had two full terms after her death in which to appear. As she died during the January term, the unexpired part of that term *216after her death was not the first term succeeding her decease, within the plain and unambiguous language of the statute. The limit set by the legislature was not reached until the end of the September term, the first term after the party’s death being the May term, and not, as claimed by the defendants, the January term. P. S., c. 2, s. 34.

*Exception overruled.*

All concurred.
EXHIBIT 32.2



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date:	November 14, 2008

/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
#### Joseph Robinson, v. Honora Moran.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Cullen, J,