alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[No. 3862.]

#### Olson et al. v. Mammoth Mining & Milling Co.

1. Bill op *Exceptions*— To *a judgment,*Is no .longer required. (Laws 1911, c. 6, sec. 24).

2. *Error*— Finding *on Sufficient Though Conflicting Evidence,*will not be disturbed.

*Error to Ban Miguel District Court.*Hon. Sprigg Shackleford, Judge.

Mr: L. C. Kinikin, for plaintiffs in error. '

Mr. H. M. Hogg, Mr. C. L. Watson, for defendant in error.

Cunningham, Presiding Judge.

On March 13, 1909, the defendant in error filed its action in the county court to recover á balance claimed to be due on the purchase price of an electric motor. After issues joined the case was tried in the county court, resulting in a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $261.21. Thereupon plaintiffs in error appealed their case to the district court where again judgment went against them for a like amount, from which judgment this appeal is prosecuted. There appears to be no question as to the amount of the judgment, providing 'the plaintiffs in error were liable at all, since the counsel stipulated or assented that the verdict, if a verdict was *456rendered in favor of the plaintiff below (defendant in error here),-should be tbe same as that given in tbe county court. By consent of counsel for tbe respective parties tbe court instructed tbe jury orally, neither party tendering any instructions or saving any exceptions to tbe court’s instructions. The record is singularly free from objections to tbe introduction of testimony, inasmuch as practically every question to which tbe plaintiffs in error objected was withdrawn by counsel for defendant in error.

It is contended that we may not review tbe judgment in this cause because no exception was saved thereto. Since tbe briefs were filed in this case tbe legislature has amended tbe law pertaining to appeals and writs of error so that it is no longer necessary, in order to have a judgment reviewed, to save an exception thereto, and in express terms this provision is made to apply to all causes pending at tbe time of tbe adoption of tbe same, as well as to causes thereafter appealed from. See section 24, chapter 6, Session Laws 1911, page 18.

Tbe plaintiffs in error insist that they bad never purchased tbe motor, but bad originally rented it from tbe defendant in error, and that thereafter tbe plaintiff in error Olson had individually purchased tbe implement and paid therefor. Tbe testimony was conflicting, but was amply sufficient to sustain tbe verdict and judgment rendered thereon, and tbe judgment of tbe trial court will be affirmed.
No. 521, Misc.

#### O’Connor *v.*United States.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME OF THE
COMPANY ON THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          527099
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 25937098
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              27554116
<PP&E>                                         1292260
<DEPRECIATION>                                  156786
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                28821645
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         24904813
<BONDS>                                         235605
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         22000
<OTHER-SE>                                     3659227
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  28821645
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7222617
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  7416825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1159240
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1353448)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1353448)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1353448)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.54)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1271 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 26, 2008.
Whereas the President of the United States has issued a proclamation designating 
        the month of June 2008 as National Homeownership Month;
Whereas the people of the United States are one of the best-housed populations 
        in the world;
Whereas owning a home is a fundamental part of the American dream and is the 
        largest personal investment many families will ever make;
Whereas homeownership provides economic security for homeowners by aiding them 
        in building wealth over time and strengthens communities through a 
        greater stake among homeowners in local schools, civic organizations, 
        and churches;
Whereas creating affordable homeownership opportunities requires the commitment 
        and cooperation of the private, public, and nonprofit sectors, including 
        the Federal Government and State and local governments;
Whereas homeownership can be sustained through appropriate homeownership 
        education and informed borrowers; and
Whereas affordable homeownership will play a vital role in resolving the crisis 
        in the United States housing market: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) fully supports the goals and ideals of National Homeownership 
        Month; and
            (2) recognizes the importance of homeownership in building strong 
        communities and families.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
A UUI ...... I..!O-..NO..-n.:.....--n--MftO....-• 

LW ... -. .... ..,or .. m~-.,,...,-ua•!llr•Qnt.~· ~••-..-tr~•· "'""' ..... -~~ A ~ ..... COUWIIM!f~I,O..,..._ _.~_-..,;n,..,....., 

t&l - ..... ~.,.,~~ll,l;-l'l .... ~ ........ ...,._~~ " ___ ut_,.._.._..,.-sw•-•_....,.~~~­

_.,III'Odld,..._,.~,...,........, 

. ..._ __ ___ .... _...,._.,..1) 1)·-·---..... ... ............ --"-"'"'-~--··-­ -- A_'_" ____ _ -"_..,. .. ...,....,.. __ ._....._._~---AI(-

---~-· \f\'tiiWfi'(~~IIWltlal1 

0 /lf\l!IOWQ:WnJII:S:otJ'-

o --I)"'IJ-.... 11--.-. --1)~.-..-..... ~(11 

. ._,. -

---~- ... ~ ....... ·-f/·11,_~_... ,._0'_" --

--..... -. ... _____ _ --~· .. --,.--,. -

--·-~ .. -· .... "-' -~:.0--

..... _,__...,.._ .

• ... ..,IW!el" 

"'~-~ _ .. ~_...._.._,.,. _ _,~ __ _ -:::-.. ~-"··-........... .......... 

-··-

_,'"_..""~~r.,__ ~-··--·1:· o .,._ • .,__IOIW<N;Irlol,tor-N 

-·-~--.. ~--,.. ----

• .....,._ .. ___ l•tn:._., _ _... 

. 

-

.....,_·~-~--~-

.--..... ~ _,_,... ... - ... __ '-'" 

--
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
South Jersey Gas Company (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Edward J. Graham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




-------------------------------
Name:  Edward J. Graham
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
August 9, 2004
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-13-00554- CV

Louveni a Henderson, App ellant

v. F ederal Hom e Loan MortgageCorporat ion, App ellee

F ROM TH E CO UNTY COURT AT LAW NO . 4 O F WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY NO. 13- 0590 -CC4, HO NORAB LE JO HN Mc MASTER, J UDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
After L ouvenia Hende rson failed to timely file her appellant’ s brief, the cler k of this Court wrote her advising that her brief was overdue and that if she did not file her brief or otherwise respond by Fe bruar

y 18, 2014, her appea l would be subject to dismiss al for want of prosec ution. The Fe bruar y 18 deadline has passed, and Hende rson has madeno response . Acc ording ly , we dismiss this appeal for

want of pr osecution. See Tex. R. App. P . 38.8(a) ; 42.3(b).

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief Justice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Rose Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: Mar ch 7, 2014
<PAGE>


                            LNB Bancorp, Inc.

                         Exhibit to Form 10 - K/A

             (For the twelve months ended December 31, 2002)

                        Exhibit Number (99.1)

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of LNB Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary
C. Smith, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Gary C. Smith


Gary C. Smith
President and
Chief Executive Officer
March 27, 2003
<PAGE>
                            LNB Bancorp, Inc.

                         Exhibit to Form 10 - K/A

              (For the twelve months ended December 31, 2002)

                        Exhibit Number (99.2)

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of LNB Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K/A for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Gregory D. Friedman, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Gregory D. Friedman


Gregory D. Friedman, CPA
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Corporate Secretary
March 27, 2003
**Exhibit23.1**

**Consentof Grant Thornton LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

We have issued ourreports dated July 27, 2007, accompanying the consolidated financial statements(which report expressed an unqualified opinion and contains an explanatoryparagraph relating to the adoption of SFAS 123R effective June 1, 2006) andschedule and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controlover financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Immucor, Inc. on Form10-K for the year ended May 31, 2007.  Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in theRegistration Statements of Immucor, Inc. on Forms S-8 (file numbers 333-131399,33-41406, 33-49882, 033-62097, 333-90552, 333-109210, and 333-131902).
| /s/ Grant Thornton LLP |   |
|------------------------|--------|
| Atlanta, Georgia       |
| July 27, 2007          |

 

----
From: jark@omnicityusa.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:58:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rita Brankle

Huntington, IN 46750
#### In re SHRIVER.

(District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

October 26, 1903.)

No. 1,477.

1. Bankruptcy—Discharge—Findings oe Referee.

A finding of facts on an issue as to the right of a bankrupt to a discharge, made by a referee who has seen and heard the witnesses, should be upheld, except when it clearly appears to be wrong, since much may depend upon the truthfulness as well as the accuracy of the witnesses.

In Bankruptcy. On exceptions to report of referee refusing discharge.

Hopper & Buckman, for the bankrupt.

Maurice W. Sloan and John Houston Merrill, for the trustee.

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

The facts found by the referee abundantly justify his conclusions, and, after a careful consideration of the testimony, I am unable to say that the facts have not been correctly ascertained. In such an inquiry as this much depends upon the truthfulness (not merely the accuracy) of the oral testimony. In determining this question, the referee, who has heard the witnesses and has observed their bearing and their manner of testifying, enjoys so great an advantage over the judge who only reads the written report of the witnesses’ words that I should not be justified in overruling his findings, unless I entertained a clear conviction that he had *512erred. The best that I can say, however, for the earnest and capable argument on behalf of the bankrupt, is that I have sometimes felt inclined to believe that it might be correct; but I have nevertheless always returned to the position that the general rule should be followed, and that a finding of fact that depends upon oral testimony, and has been made by a tribunal that has seen and heard the witnesses, should be upheld, except when it clearly appears to be wrong.

The report of the referee is approved, and the discharge of the bankrupt is refused.
**EXHIBIT 23CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTSThe Board of DirectorsCUISINE SOLUTIONS, INC.:**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements,(Nos. 33-60614 and 33-60616) on Form S-8 of Cuisine Solutions, Inc. of ourreport dated September 5, 2003, relating to the consolidated balance sheet ofCuisine Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 28, 2003, and the relatedconsolidated statement of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cashflows for the year then ended, and related schedule, which report appears inthe June 28, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of Cuisine Solutions, Inc.
**GRANT THORNTON LLP**
Vienna, Virginia
From: gergen6@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:13:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Julie Gergen

Austin, TX 78749
From: olenze@mi.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:03:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Othmar Lenze II

Farmington, MI 48331
No. 203.

#### Cardarella et al. *v.*United States.

*Walter A. Raymond*and *Kenneth C. West*for petitioners. *Solicitor General Cox*for the United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            Certification Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atrium Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric W.
Long, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Eric W. Long
--------------------------------------------
Eric W. Long
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



                                      E-3