alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1346 

Recognizing that more than 160,000,000 people in India are considered 

untouchable and dehumanized by the caste system. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2008 

Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing that more than 160,000,000 people in India 

are considered untouchable and dehumanized by the 

caste system. 

Whereas the caste system, which dates back more than 2,000 

years, divides the population into higher castes which include priests and warriors and lower castes such as laborers; 

Whereas the untouchables’ most basic needs are not fulfilled, 

and untouchables face great difficulties in accessing employment, education, food, and health care; 

Whereas most untouchables are among the poorest people in 

the world, living on less than $1 per day; 

Whereas India’s untouchables are relegated to undesirable 

jobs and live in constant fear of being publicly humiliVerDate Aug 31 2005 21:33 Jul 18, 2008 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR1346.IH HR1346

hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1346 IH 

ated, paraded naked, beaten, and raped with impunity by 

upper caste Hindus seeking to keep them in their place; 

Whereas the police, village councils and government officials 

often support the caste system, which is based on Hindu 

religious teachings; 

Whereas many crimes go unreported due to fear of reprisal, 

police intimidation, inability to pay bribes demanded by 

police, or simply the knowledge that the police will do 

nothing; 

Whereas at the bottom of the untouchable caste are Dalits; 

Whereas nearly 90 percent of all poor Indians and 95 percent 

of all illiterate Indians are Dalits; 

Whereas every hour two Dalits are assaulted and every day 

three women are raped, two Dalits are murdered, and 

two Dalit homes are torched; and 

Whereas the caste system, a powerful tool for social segregation, runs deep in the minds of Indians and has implications in everyday life: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives, ac2 knowledging that caste-based discrimination is institu3 tionalized throughout India and that its corrosive influ4 ence on the Indian people must be effectively addressed, 

5 recognizes the caste system’s debilitating influence on the 

6 daily lives of millions in India and encourages the United 

7 States to work with India to find new approaches to this 

8 age-old problem. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

9:00 a.m. EDT, Friday, September 15, 2023.

# PLACE: 

Virtual meeting.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

                        Enforcement matters. In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.cftc.gov/​.*

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-5964.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

 Dated: September 6, 2023.

Robert Sidman,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2023-19495 Filed 9-6-23; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
AVAQMD Rule 1101 1101-1

Secondary Lead Smelters/Sulfur Oxides D1 12/08/11 

## RULE 1101

Secondary Lead Smelters/Sulfur Oxides

(a) A person shall not discharge into the atmospher e from any lead melting furnace such as described in Section (b) below, effluent process ga s containing sulfur oxides in excess of the concentration and mass flow rate indicated by both subsections (a)(1) and (a)(2):
(1) 200 ppm of sulfur oxides expressed as sulfur di oxide, measured at the point of emission to the atmosphere, and calculated on a dry basis av eraged over a minimum of 15 consecutive minutes, and
(2) 2.1 kilograms of sulfur oxides per metric ton o f process weight (4.2 pounds of sulfur oxides per short ton of proce ss weight) expressed as sulfur dioxide.

(b) This rule shall apply only to furnaces used to recover lead from the following:

(1) Automotive batteries, and/or
(2) Slag and dross resulting from the melting of au tomotive batteries.

[SIP: Approved 9/2/81, 46 FR 43969, 40 CFR 52.220( c)(70)(i)(B)]1101-2 AVAQMD Rule 1101 Secondary Lead Smelters/Sulfur Oxides D1 12/08/11 This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
No. 76, Misc.

#### Cruz *v.*United States.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox*for the United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   | Title of Each Class of |   | Maximum Aggregate |   | Amount of |   |
|   | Securities Offered |   | Offering Price(1) |   | Registration Fee(2) |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 1.900% PowerNotes®  Due May 15, 2019 |   | $3,731,000 |   | $427.57 |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | TOTAL |   |   |   | $427.57 |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |

|           |                                    |
|-----------|------------------------------------|
| (1)  | Excludes accrued interest, if any. |

|           |                                                                             |
|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | Calculated in accordance with Rule 457(r) under the Securities Act of 1933. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | CUSIP | Aggregate |   | Selling | Gross | Net | Coupon | Coupon |   | Coupon | Maturity | 1st Coupon | 1st |   | Survivor's | Product |   |
|   | Number | Principal |   | Price | Concession | Proceeds | Type | Rate |   | Frequency | Date | Date | Coupon |   | Option | Ranking |   |
|   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Amount |   |   |   |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   | 14912HPW4 | $3,731,000.00 |   | 100% | 1.45% | $3,676,900.50 | Fixed | 1.9% |   | Semi- | 5/15/2019 | 11/15/2012 | $9.39 |   | Yes | Senior Unsecured |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | Annual |   |   |   |   |   | Notes |   |
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# AGENCY:

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

# ACTION:

Notice of performance review board appointments.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the appointment of those individuals who have been selected to serve as members of the Performance Review Board (PRB). The PRB is comprised of a Chairperson and career senior executives that meet annually to review and evaluate performance appraisal documents. The PRB provides a written recommendation to the appointing authority for final approval of each SES and SL performance rating, performance-based pay adjustment, and performance award. The PRB is advised by the Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer, Office of Legal Counsel, and Office for Civil Rights, Diversity and Inclusion to ensure compliance with laws and regulations. Designated members will serve a 12-month term.

# DATES:

The board membership is applicable beginning on November 1, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Cynthia G. Pierre, Chief Operating Officer, EEOC, 131 M Street NE, Washington, DC 20507, (202) 291-3260.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the names and position of the EEOC PRB members are set forth below:

Mr. Carlton Hadden, Chair, Director, Office of Federal Operations, EEOC

Mr. Bradley Anderson, Director, Birmingham District, EEOC

Ms. Kimberly Essary, Deputy Chief Data Officer, EEOC

Ms. Gwendolyn Reams, Acting General Counsel, EEOC

Mr. Kevin Richardson, Chief Human Capital Officer, EEOC

Mr. Richard Toscano, Director, Equal Employment Opportunity Staff, U.S. Department of Justice

Ms. Jamie Williamson, Director, Philadelphia District, EEOC

      ( print page 61593)    
By the direction of the Commission.

Cynthia G. Pierre,

Chief Operating Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-19349 Filed 9-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statement  Nos.
333-78893, 33-35863 and 33-42261 on Form S-3 of Immucor, Inc. and in the related
Prospectuses  and  Registration  Statement  Nos.  33-4636,  33-24199,  33-36554,
33-41406, 33-49882 and 33-62097 on Form S-8 pertaining to the Key Employee Stock
Incentive  Plan,  Salary  Reduction  Plan,  1983 Stock  Incentive  Plan and 1986
Incentive  Stock  Option  Plan;  1987  Non-Incentive  Stock  Option  Plan;  1989
Non-Incentive  Stock Option Plan; 1990 Stock Option Plan; 1990 Stock Option Plan
and 1995 Stock Option Plan, respectively,  of Immucor, Inc., of our report dated
August  22,  2000  (except  for  paragraph  8 of Note 4, as to which the date is
August 29,  2000) with  respect to the  consolidated  financial  statements  and
schedule of Immucor, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended May 31, 2000.


                                                              Ernst & Young LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
August 29, 2000
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KING COUNTY,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

,

v.

CITY OF SAMMAMISH

,

Defendant

- Appell ant

. No. 17

- 35642

D.C. No. 2:17

- cv

- 00921

- JCC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington John C. Coughenour , District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 12 , 2018 Seattle, Washington

Before: CLIFTON and NGUYEN , Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF, * * Senior District Judge.

This over

- litigated case 1 concerns the placement of stop signs at the points

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

* * The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, Senior United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

1 The Court suggested that the parties mediate the case with the aid of the Court’s mediation program, but neither side accepted the suggestion. 

# FILED

AUG 3 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2

where a recreational trail that p laintiff

- appellee King County (the “County”) is

developing in a former railroad corridor intersects with two public roads for which

defen dant

- appell ant Sammamish City ( the “City” ) has easements

. The County and

the City disagree as to whether safety concerns dictate that the stop signs should

face trail users (walkers and bikers) or automobile traffic. When the City sought to

condition a construction permit on the County’s g i ving the cars the right of way,

the County took the position that it did not need that permit , withdrew its

application, and proceeded with construction.

After the City indicated that it would issue a stop

- work order if the County

continued construction without the permit, t he County filed an action seeking a

declaratory judgment that the City’s efforts to interfere with its construction

violated state and federal law

. The City thereupon issued a stop

- work order at the

construction site. The County move d for a preliminary injunction, which the

district court granted and the City now appeals.

The preliminary injunction provide d that:

1. King County is authorized to resume construction of South Segment A, including pavement and

construction of the intersections with 206 th Avenue SE

and SE 33 rd Street; and

2. The City shall not take any additional actions to impede or delay King County’s construction of the

intersections at 206 th Avenue SE and SE 33 rd Street, including any attempts to orient the stop signs toward

trail users.3

By its plain terms, the injunction applies only to the period of construction, and

King County has now completed construction of the intersections

. Accordingly,

the appeal must be dismissed as moot

. This dismissal is without prejudice

,

however, to the County’s continuing to litigate its c laims before the district court,

including by seeking to enjoin any effort by the City to relocate the stop signs to

give car traffic the right of way over walkers and bikers

.

DISMISSED

.
#### First National Bank v. Northwestern Elevator Co.

Where the abstract does not show that an appeal has been taken, this court will not assume jurisdiction, but will dismiss the appeal. Following Irrigation Co. v. Schone, (decided at this term.)

(Syllabus by the Court.

Opinion filed Nov. 30, 1891.)

Appeal from circuit court, Kingsbury county. Hon. J. O. Andrews, Judge.

Motion to dismiss appeal.

Allowed.

*Glass & Van BusMrlc*for appellant.

*A. P. Sohenian*and *B. A. Dunlap*for respondent.

• Per Curiam.

Respondent moves to dismiss appeal be*357cause the abstract does not show that any notice of appeal has been served as required by law, and because no bill of exceptions has been served or settled. The motion must be granted upon the first ground. Until the record which presents the case for review shows that we have jurisdiction, we can do nothing but decline to examine it. The same question was presented in Irrigation Co. v. Schone, 50 N. W. Rep. 356, (decided at this term,) where the views of the court are more fully expressed. The appeal is dismissed.

All the judges concurring.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of--

Glad's Original BBQ Express, LLC 

Under Contract No. CAR 06-116 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 58969 

Glenn H. Schlabs, Esq. 

Sherman & Howard L.L.C. 

Colorado Springs, CO 

Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

MAJ Cameron R. Edlefsen, JA 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 9 June 2014 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 58969, Appeal of Glad's Original 

BBQ Express, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREYD. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KING COUNTY,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

CITY OF SAMMAMISH,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-35642

D.C. No. 2:17-cv-00921-JCC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 12, 2018

Seattle, Washington

Before: CLIFTON and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF,** Senior District 

Judge.

This over-litigated case1concerns the placement of stop signs at the points 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, Senior United States District Judge for 

the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.

1 The Court suggested that the parties mediate the case with the aid of 

the Court’s mediation program, but neither side accepted the suggestion.

FILED

AUG 3 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 

where a recreational trail that plaintiff-appellee King County (the “County”) is 

developing in a former railroad corridor intersects with two public roads for which 

defendant-appellant Sammamish City (the “City”) has easements. The County and 

the City disagree as to whether safety concerns dictate that the stop signs should 

face trail users (walkers and bikers) or automobile traffic. When the City sought to 

condition a construction permit on the County’s giving the cars the right of way,

the County took the position that it did not need that permit, withdrew its 

application, and proceeded with construction.

After the City indicated that it would issue a stop-work order if the County 

continued construction without the permit, the County filed an action seeking a 

declaratory judgment that the City’s efforts to interfere with its construction 

violated state and federal law. The City thereupon issued a stop-work order at the

construction site. The County moved for a preliminary injunction, which the 

district court granted and the City now appeals. 

The preliminary injunction provided that:

1. King County is authorized to resume construction of 

South Segment A, including pavement and 

construction of the intersections with 206th Avenue SE 

and SE 33rd Street; and

2. The City shall not take any additional actions to impede 

or delay King County’s construction of the 

intersections at 206th Avenue SE and SE 33rd Street, 

including any attempts to orient the stop signs toward 

trail users.
 3 

By its plain terms, the injunction applies only to the period of construction, and 

King County has now completed construction of the intersections. Accordingly, 

the appeal must be dismissed as moot. This dismissal is without prejudice,

however, to the County’s continuing to litigate its claims before the district court, 

including by seeking to enjoin any effort by the City to relocate the stop signs to 

give car traffic the right of way over walkers and bikers.

DISMISSED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 14, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 6, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 50 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-261, CP2023-264.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-19832 Filed 9-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001036180
<NAME>                        GFSI HOLDINGS
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-01-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         854
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  38866
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    34824
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               77056
<PP&E>                                         40453
<DEPRECIATION>                                 20023
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          25341
<BONDS>                                        241919
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          4652
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (161927)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104812
<SALES>                                        54839
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               54839
<CGS>                                          33612
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  46224
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (96)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6157
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2554
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1006
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1548
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1548
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
From: Rich Brown

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Women"s rights to contraception

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:50:52 PM

To Whom It May Concern,

I just want to add my voice to those in support of expanded medical

coverage for female contraceptive services. This is a welcome change

that is long overdue.

Rich Brown

633 Military Rd. 

Lemay, Mo. 63125