alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         246,283
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,531
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               310,576
<PP&E>                                       5,389,465
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,917,212
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,815,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          184,339
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,630,784
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,815,123
<SALES>                                      3,211,240
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,257,416
<CGS>                                        2,701,717
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,701,717
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               540,912
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,787  
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,787
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,787
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.62
        


</TABLE>
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Cultural AwarenessDisability IdentificationEducational DiagnosisElementary Secondary EducationLimited English SpeakingMigrant ChildrenMigrant EducationParent School RelationshipReferralStudent EvaluationStudent Placement

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
EXHIBIT
32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vail Banks, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Raymond E. Verlinde, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                         
|2. | The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Raymond E. Verlinde                                                                                          
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                 
|                                                                                                                 
|Raymond E. Verlinde                                                                                              
|Senior
  Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer
  (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|November 15, 2004
Order filed, January 29, 2015.

 In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

____________

NO. 01-14-00950-CV

REBECCA A. HEWITT-BURGIN, Appellant

V.

JOHN NTAGHA AND PAMELA NTAGHA, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 3

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Case 14-CCV-053751

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due January 13, 2015. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The 

record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed 

timely, we issue the following order.

We order Robin Rosen, the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record 

in this appeal, if any, within 30 days of the date of this order.

/s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually
From: edwardharper@fuse.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:51:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Edward Harper

Fairfield, OH 45014
**Filed        Pursuant To Rule 433,        Registration No. 333-124310**

**$1,000,000,000**

**CATERPILLAR        FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION**

| **For                  the Period: 12/3/2007 to 12/10/2007** |                               |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
| **Coupon**                                                   | **Interest**                       | **Maturity** | **Callable** | **Survivor's****Option** | **Price1** | **Yield2** | **Moody's** | **S&P** | **CUSIP** |
| 4.000%                                                       | Semi-Annual(†††) | 12/15/09 | NO | YES§ | 100.00 | 4.000% | A2 | A | 14912HHC7 |
| 5.150%                                                       | Semi-Annual(†††) | 12/15/17 | 12/15/09*** | YES§ | 100.00 | 5.150% | A2 | A | 14912HHD5 |
| 5.500%                                                       | Semi-Annual(†††) | 12/15/22 | 12/15/10*** | YES§ | 100.00 | 5.500% | A2 | A | 14912HHE3 |
| 5.650%                                                       | Semi-Annual(†††) | 12/15/27 | 12/15/11*** | YES§ | 100.00 | 5.650% | A2 | A | 14912HHF0 |

*All        offerings are subject to prior        sale.*
From: eamysmom@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:16:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sandra Eddins

Wetumpka, AL 36092
From: deniseduke@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:04:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Denise Duke

Crofton, MD 21114
No. 258.

#### Alexander *v.*County Board of Arlington County et al.

*Samuel W. Tucker*for petitioner.

*William J. Hassan, Peter J. Kostik*and *James H. Simmonds*for respondents.

Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Certiorari denied.
QuesTech, Inc. and Subsidiaries


         Exhibit 11 - Statement Re:  Computation of Per-Share Earnings

<TABLE>
                                            Year Ended December 31
                                          1996        1995       1994

<S>                                   <C>          <C>         <C>
Net Income                            $  818,300   $ 520,100   $ 317,800

Primary Earnings:

  Shares
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding ....   1,572,381   1,556,508   1,568,000   
    Common stock equivalents .......     122,124     135,459      50,386   
    SECT shares, weighted ..........    <176,131>   <207,287>   <221,792>
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding
      as adjusted ..................   1,518,374   1,484,680   1,396,594

  Primary earnings per common share:  $     0.54   $    0.35   $    0.23
</TABLE>
<TABLE>


<S>                                    <C>         <C>         <C>
Fully Diluted Earnings:
  Shares
    Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding ....   1,572,381   1,556,508   1,568,000
    Common stock equivalents .......     128,507     190,987      64,694
    SECT shares ....................    <176,131>   <207,287>   <221,792>   
Weighted average number of
      common shares outstanding
      as adjusted ..................   1,524,757   1,540,208   1,410,902

  Fully diluted earnings per common
    share:                             $    0.54   $    0.34   $    0.23
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 178 (Friday, September 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63573-63574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19967]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[FR ID: 171427]


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Rescindment of a system of records notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FCC's Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (WTB) database 
stores applications for radiotelephone (wireless) operator's licenses 
or permits prior to the implementation of the FCC's universal licensing 
system in 2001 and related materials. These documents contain the 
personally identifiable information of individuals who voluntarily 
submit their contact information to the WTB.

DATES: The rescindment will become effective 30 days after publication.

ADDRESSES: Comments can be submitted to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#49193b203f282a30092f2a2a672e263f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ebbb99829d8a8892ab8d8888c58c849d">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information please contact 
Katherine C. Clark at 202-418-1773 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1040627966717369507673733e777f66"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c191b3a8b7a0a2b881a7a2a2efa6aeb7">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Privacy Act provides that an agency may 
collect or maintain in its records

[[Page 63574]]

only information about individuals that is relevant and necessary to 
accomplish a purpose that is required by a statute or executive order. 
The FCC has determined that the FCC/WTB-5, Application Review List for 
Present or Former Licensees, Operators, or Unlicensed Persons Operating 
Radio Equipment, system of records no longer meets this standard, 
because WTB no longer maintains the system's manual lists, nor has it 
retained any paper files from this system. The lists are now contained 
in an electronic alert list in the FCC/WTB-1, Wireless Services 
Licensing Records, system of records. All of the paper records for this 
system have been destroyed in accordance with the retention and 
disposal provisions of the WTB-5 SORN. Therefore, the FCC proposes to 
rescind FCC/WTB-5, Application Review List for Present or Former 
Licensees, Operators, or Unlicensed Persons Operating Radio Equipment 
Improperly.

SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER:
    FCC/WTB-5, Application Review List for Present or Former Licensees, 
Operators, or Unlicensed Persons Operating Radio Equipment Improperly.

HISTORY:
    71 FR 17271 (April 5, 2006).

Katura Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-19967 Filed 9-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 581.

#### Whitson *v.*Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Frank E. Horka*for respondent.

District Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District. Certiorari denied.
No. 417, Misc.

#### Smith *v.*Hand, Warden.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Official Journal C 64A/28 F

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 64A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6028 February 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 64A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6028 February 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2017/C 64 A/01 | Selection Procedure PE/195/S — Temporary staff member — Head of Unit (AD 14) — List of suitable candidates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

2017/C 64 A/01

Selection Procedure PE/195/S — Temporary staff member — Head of Unit (AD 14) — List of suitable candidates

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

V Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Parliament

| 28.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 64/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 64/1

---

SELECTION PROCEDURE PE/195/S

Temporary staff member — Head of Unit (AD 14)

LIST OF SUITABLE CANDIDATES

(2017/C 064 A/01)

| 1. | BORDEZ, Emmanuel |
| --- | --- |

1.

BORDEZ, Emmanuel

The list of suitable candidates was adopted on 14 February 2017.

---
No. 546.

#### Eastland et ux. *v.*Campbell, District Director of Internal Revenue.

*Allen E. Pye*and *J. Robt. Dobbs, Jr.*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, Meyer Rothwacks*and *Harold C. Wilkenfeld*for respondent.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
From: cilaterreur@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:24:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Claude Laterreur

North Port, FL 34288
From: MickeyFerguson@alumni.cmu.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:37:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michael Ferguson

Temecula, CA 92591