alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: bj_trouth_mather55@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:42:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Betty Mather

Gainesville, FL 32605
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

1:00 p.m. on Thursday, September 21, 2023.

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: September 14, 2023.

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-20224 Filed 9-14-23; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
From: gnks905@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:22:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gerry & Kay Stoneburner

Holland, MI 49424
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 50-OFF
STORES, INC.'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31,
1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BE REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                             821
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      718
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     12,975
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,908
<PP&E>                                           7,276
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,287
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,255
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,835
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           122
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,952)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,255
<SALES>                                        106,194
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               106,194
<CGS>                                           78,560
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,560
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,493
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,672
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (43,457)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       153
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (43,457)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (43,610)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.57)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 64904]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20354]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 3562-000]


KEI (Maine) Power Management (III), LLC; Notice of Authorization 
for Continued Project Operation

    The license for the Barker Mill Upper Hydroelectric Project No. 
3562 was issued for a period ending July 31, 2023.
    Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), requires the 
Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue from year-to-
year an annual license to the then licensee(s) under the terms and 
conditions of the prior license until a new license is issued, or the 
project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 15 or any other 
applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior license waived 
the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based on section 9(b) 
of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), and as set forth 
at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project has filed an 
application for a subsequent license, the licensee may continue to 
operate the project in accordance with the terms and conditions of the 
license after the minor or minor part license expires, until the 
Commission acts on its application. If the licensee of such a project 
has not filed an application for a subsequent license, then it may be 
required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to continue project operations 
until the Commission issues someone else a license for the project or 
otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 3562 is issued to 
KEI (Maine) Power Management (III), LLC for a period effective August 
1, 2023, through July 31, 2024, or until the issuance of a new license 
for the project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes 
first. If issuance of a new license (or other disposition) does not 
take place on or before July 31, 2024, notice is hereby given that, 
pursuant to 18 CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) 
of the FPA is renewed automatically without further order or notice by 
the Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that KEI (Maine) Power Management (III), LLC is authorized 
to continue operation of Barker Mill Upper Hydroelectric Project under 
the terms and conditions of the prior license until the issuance of a 
new license for the project or other disposition under the FPA, 
whichever comes first.

    Dated: September 14, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-20354 Filed 9-19-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
|                                                      | Three Month Period | Nine Month Period
|----------------------------------------------------- | ------------------ | -----------------
|                                                      | 2000               | 1999             
|Net Earnings (in thousands)                           | $54                | $205             
|Basic earnings per share:                             |                    |                  
|Weighted average shares outstanding                   | 859,625            | 859,625          
|Less unearned employee stock ownership plan shares    | (38,940)           | (46,599)         
|Less shares repurchased                               | (281,818)          | (130,736)        
|Average option shares granted                         | 0                  | 0                
|Less assumed purchase of shares using treasury method | 0                  | 0                
|Common and common equivalent shares outstanding       | 538,867            | 682,290          
|Earnings per common share - basic                     | $0.10              | $0.30            
|Diluted earnings per share:                           |                    |                  
|Weighted average shares outstanding                   | 859,625            | 859,625          
|Less unearned employee stock ownership plan shares    | (38,940)           | (46,599)         
|Less shares repurchased                               | (281,818)          | (130,736)        
|Average option shares granted  (2)                    | 52,613             | 35,075           
|Less assumed purchase of shares using treasury method | (52,613)           | (35,075)         
|Common and common equivalent shares outstanding       | 538,867            | 682,290          
|Earnings per common share - diluted                   | $0.10              | $0.30
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           4,322
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,540
<ALLOWANCES>                                       217
<INVENTORY>                                     20,629
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,117
<PP&E>                                           4,415
<DEPRECIATION>                                     652
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,235
<BONDS>                                         16,332
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            57
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,308
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,932
<SALES>                                         30,985
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,985
<CGS>                                           21,915
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,271
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 397
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    387
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       387
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the audited
consolidation financial statements of the company for the year ended April 30,
1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the form 10-KSB for fiscal
1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         231,111
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,375,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                   144,637
<INVENTORY>                                  1,790,890
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,668,447
<PP&E>                                       5,588,848
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,322,250
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,963,368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,512,276
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,140
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,668,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,963,368
<SALES>                                     19,035,036
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,035,036
<CGS>                                       15,259,962
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,993,588
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             376,558
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                664,890
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            664,890
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   664,890
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.66
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.66
        

</TABLE>
From: dmherb3816@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:13:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dale Herbstritt

Clemmons, NC 27012
EXHIBIT 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                              MARWICH II, LTD.
                    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.D. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Annual Report of Marwich II, Ltd. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2001, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Peter Porath, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Peter Porath
Peter Porath
Vice-President, Chief Executive Officer
November 15, 2004
#### PENSICK & GORDON, INC., *v.*CALIFORNIA MOTOR EXPRESS et al.

No. 222.

Decided December 3, 1962.

*Carl M. Gould*for petitioner.

*Theodore W. Russell, George L. Catlin*and *Joseph P. Loeb*for respondents.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of *Hewitt-Robins Inc.*v. *Eastern Freight-Ways, Inc., ante,*p. 84.

Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Stewart, and Mr. Justice White would affirm the judgment below for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion in *Hewitt-Robins.*
No. 60968.

protests 960613-G, etc. (New York).

#### Prime Fur Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) or *Prime Fur Corp.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1802) and lambskin plates similar to those the subject of A. *S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643) or C. D. 1802, *supra,*the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in C. D. 1480 and C. D. 1643, *supra.*