# Patent

## Title
Heterogeneous in-situ polymer blend

## Abstract

A heterogeneous in-situ polymer blend comprising a continuous phase comprising a polypropylene having a crystallinity of at least 30% and a melting point temperature Tm greater than 130° C., and a heat of fusion ΔHf greater than 65 J/g; and a dispersed phase comprising particles of an elastomeric copolymer dispersed in the continuous phase and having an average particle size of less than 5 micron, the elastomeric copolymer comprising ethylene units and 0.001 to 5 wt % diene by weight of the copolymer, and having a crystallinity of less than 20% and being at least partially cross-linked such that the degree of cross-link is at least 20%.

## Background
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 11/454,950 filed on Jun. 16, 2006, and also claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/693,030 filed Jun. 22, 2005, each of which is incorporated by reference.


BACKGROUND
Heterogeneous polymer blends comprising a elastomeric copolymer dispersed in a matrix of a polypropylene are very useful and, depending on the properties and the relative amounts of the first and elastomeric copolymers, a wide variety of such polymer blends can be produced. Of particular interest are polymer blends, also referred to as thermoplastic elastomers, in which the polypropylene is a thermoplastic material, such as polypropylene, and the elastomeric copolymer is an elastomeric material, such as an ethylene-propylene elastomer or an ethylene-propylene-diene (EPDM) rubber. Examples of such thermoplastic elastomers include polypropylene impact copolymers, thermoplastic olefins and thermoplastic vulcanizates.
Unlike conventional vulcanized rubbers, thermoplastic elastomers can be processed and recycled like thermoplastic materials, yet have properties and performance similar to that of vulcanized rubber at service temperatures. For this reason, thermoplastic elastomers are useful for making a variety of articles such as weather seals, hoses, belts, gaskets, moldings, boots, elastic fibers and like articles. They are also particularly useful for making articles by blow molding, extrusion, injection molding, thermo-forming, elasto-welding and compression molding techniques. In addition, thermoplastic elastomers are often used for making vehicle parts, such as but not limited to, weather seals, brake parts including, but not limited to cups, coupling disks, diaphragm cups, boots such as constant velocity joints and rack and pinion joints, tubing, sealing gaskets, parts of hydraulically or pneumatically operated apparatus, o-rings, pistons, valves, valve seats, and valve guides.
One method of making the aforementioned polymer blends is by mixing two different polymers after they have been polymerized to achieve a target set of properties. However, this method is relatively expensive making it much more desirable to make blends by direct polymerization. Blending by direct polymerization typically uses multiple reactors in series, where the product from one reactor is fed to a second reactor having a different polymerizing environment, resulting in a final product that is an intimate mix of two different products. Examples of such processes employing vanadium catalysts in series reactor operation to produce different types of EPDM compositions are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,629,212, 4,016,342, and 4,306.041.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,245,856 discloses a thermoplastic olefin composition comprising polypropylene, an ethylene-α-olefin elastomer and a compatabilizer comprising an ethylene-propylene copolymer having a propylene content of greater than 80 wt %. According to this patent, the individual components of the composition can be separately manufactured and mechanically blended together in a mechanical mixer or two or more of the components can be prepared as a reactor blend using a series of reactors where each component is prepared in a separate reactor and the reactant is then transferred to another reactor where a second component is prepared. In the absence of the compatabilizer, the elastomer phase is said to be uneven with particles greater than 5 microns in size, whereas the addition of the compatabilizer is said to improve dispersion such that the elastomer phase has a particle size of about 1 micron. The elastomer phase of this polymer blend is not cross-linked.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,207,756 describes a process for producing a blend of a continuous phase of a semi-crystalline plastic, such as polypropylene, and a discontinuous phase of an amorphous elastomer, such as a terpolymer of ethylene, a C3-C20 α-olefin and a non-conjugated diene. The blends are produced in series reactors by producing a polypropylene component in a first reactor, directing the effluent to a second reactor and producing the elastomeric copolymer component in solution in the second reactor in the presence of the polypropyleneic component. U.S. Pat. No. 6,319,998 also discloses using series solution polymerizations to produce blends of ethylene copolymers. U.S. Pat. No. 6,770,714 discloses the use of parallel polymerizations to produce different polymeric components that are then blended through extrusion or using other conventional mixing equipment. One polymeric component is a propylene homopolymer or copolymer and the elastomeric copolymeric component is an ethylene copolymer.
One particularly useful form of thermoplastic elastomer is a thermoplastic vulcanizate (“TPV”), which comprises a thermoplastic resin matrix, such as polypropylene, within which are dispersed particles of a cured elastomeric material, such as an EPDM rubber. TPVs are normally produced by a process of “dynamic vulcanization”, which is a process of vulcanizing or cross-linking the elastomeric component during intimate melt mixing with the thermoplastic resin, together with plasticizers (e.g. process oils), fillers, stabilizers, and a cross-linking system, under high shear and above the melting point of the thermoplastic. The mixing is typically done in a twin-screw extruder, to create a fine dispersion of the elastomeric material within the thermoplastic resin while the elastomeric material is cured. The levels of thermoplastic resin and plasticizer (oil) can be adjusted to produce grades having different profiles of hardness, rheology and engineering properties, although in general it is difficult to produce TPVs by dynamic vulcanization in which the content of the elastomeric phase is greater than 50 wt % of the overall polymer blend. Examples of dynamic vulcanization are described in the U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,130,535 and 4,311,628.
However, while dynamic vulcanization is effective in producing TPVs with a unique profile of properties, it is expensive and suffers from a number of disadvantages. Thus the production of quality product is technically challenging and specialized equipment is needed. Moreover, the process involves many steps, each one critical to the eventual quality of the final product. Forming the polymer blend normally involves separately comminuting bales of the elastomeric polymer (which is typically how EPDM rubber is commercially distributed), mechanically mixing it with the thermoplastic resin along with the processing oils, cross-linking agents, and other ingredients in a suitable high shear mixing device to comminute the rubber particles and cure them to generate cured rubber particles embedded in a continuous thermoplastic resin matrix. The cured rubber particles in the finished products have an averaged particle size of 1 to 10 microns. Careful injection of processing oil helps manage the rheological characteristics of the fluid in the reactive extruder (to minimize pressure buildup) as well as product properties such as hardness. Precise control over the size and distribution of the cross-linked elastomer particles is sought, as it affects properties such as elastic recovery (as measured through compression set). While the products produced with existing technology have many desirable properties, there are gaps in the overall properties profile. Some of these are the need for higher service temperatures, improved elastic recovery, softer products, higher tensile strength, easier processability, oil-free compositions, and/or colorless products.
An improved process for producing TPVs is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,388,016, incorporated herein in its entirety, in which a polymer blend is produced by solution polymerization in series reactors employing metallocene catalysts and the resultant blend is subjected to dynamic vulcanization. In particular, the process involves feeding a first set of monomers selected from ethylene and higher α-olefins, and a solvent, to a first continuous flow stirred tank reactor, adding a metallocene catalyst to the first reactor in an amount of 50 to 100 wt % of the total amount of catalyst added to all reactors, operating the first reactor to polymerize the monomers to produce an effluent containing a polypropylene, feeding the effluent from the first reactor to a second continuous flow stirred tank reactor, feeding a second set of monomers selected from ethylene, higher α-olefins and non-conjugated dienes, and optionally additional solvent, to the second reactor, operating the second reactor to polymerize the second monomers to produce a elastomeric copolymer containing diene, recovering the resulting first and elastomeric copolymers and blending them with a curing agent under conditions of heat and shear sufficient to cause the blend to flow and to at least partially crosslink the diene-containing polymer and form a dispersion of cured diene-containing particles in a matrix of the polypropylene. It will, however, be seen that this improved process still relies on dynamic vulcanization to cure the elastomeric component. As a result the cured diene-containing particles have an average particle size in the range of 1 to 10 microns
SUMMARY
The invention includes a heterogeneous in-situ polymer blend comprising: (a) a continuous phase comprising a polypropylene having a crystallinity of at least 30% and a melting point temperature Tm greater than 130° C., and a heat of fusion ΔHf greater than 65 J/g; and (b) a dispersed phase comprising particles of an elastomeric copolymer dispersed in the continuous phase and having an average particle size of less than 5 micron, the elastomeric copolymer comprising ethylene units and 0.001 to 5 wt % diene by weight of the copolymer, and having a crystallinity of less than 20% and being at least partially cross-linked such that the degree of cross-link is at least 20%.
Also included in the invention is a process for producing an in-situ heterogeneous polymer blend comprising (a) a continuous phase comprising a polypropylene that is semi-crystalline; and (b) a dispersed phase comprising particles of a elastomeric copolymer different from the polypropylene dispersed in said continuous phase, the elastomeric copolymer having a crystallinity less than that of the polypropylene and being at least partially cross-linked, the process comprising: (i) polymerizing at least one first monomer to produce a polypropylene that is at least partially crystalline; and (ii) contacting at least part of said polypropylene with at least one second monomer and at least one diene under conditions sufficient to polymerize said second monomer to produce said elastomeric copolymer and simultaneously cross-link said elastomeric copolymer such that the dispersed phase produced by said contacting (ii) comprises at least a fraction which is insoluble in xylene.



DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIGS. 1A and 1B are atomic force micrographs (AFM) of the polymer blend produced in Example 1A and 1B, respectively.
FIG. 1C is a transmission electron micrograph (TEM) of a molded part cross-section produced from the polymer blend of Example 1A.
FIG. 1D is a histogram of particle sizes for the polymer blend of Example 1A obtained from an AFM image.
FIG. 1E is a histogram of particle sizes for the polymer blend of Example 1A obtained from a TEM image.
FIG. 1F is a DSC trace of the xylene insolubles of Example 1B.
FIG. 1G is a transmission electron micrograph (TEM) of a molded part cross-section produced from the polymer blend of Example 1C
FIG. 1H are transmission electron micrographs (TEM) of molded part cross-sections produced from Santoprene 201-55 and 201-55F.
FIG. 2A is an atomic force micrograph (AFM) of the polymer blend produced in Example 2C.
FIG. 2B is a transmission electron micrograph (TEM) of a molded part cross-section produced from the polymer blend of Example 2C.
FIG. 2C is a Van Gurp-Palmen plot for Examples 1A and 2C, and Santoprene 201-55 and 201-73.



DETAILED DESCRIPTION
For purposes of this invention and the claims thereto when a polymer or oligomer is referred to as comprising an olefin, the olefin present in the polymer or oligomer is the polymerized or oligomerized form of the olefin, respectively. Likewise the use of the term polymer is meant to encompass homopolymers and copolymers. In addition the term copolymer includes any polymer having 2 or more monomers. Thus, as used herein, the term “polypropylene” means a polymer made of at least 50% propylene units, preferably at least 70% propylene units, more preferably at least 80% propylene units, even more preferably at least 90% propylene units, even more preferably at least 95% propylene units or 100% propylene units.
As used herein the term “substantially free of processing oil” means that the relevant product contains little or no of the oil-based processing aids, such as extender oils, synthetic processing oils, oligomeric extenders, or a combination thereof, that are added to conventional polymer blends to control the rheological characteristics of the blends during dynamic vulcanization. Preferably the relevant product contains less than 1 wt % processing oil, more preferably less than 0.5 wt %, preferably less than 0.1 wt % processing oil. The amount of oil in the polymer blend is determined using solvent extraction as described the example section. By virtue of the fact that the elastomeric copolymer of the polymer blend of the invention is formed as at least partially cross-linked particles dispersed in the polypropylene phase in the polymerization reactor, the need for a subsequent dynamic vulcanization step and hence the need for addition of processing oil is avoided. It is, however, to be appreciated that in some cases the polymer blend of the invention may be subjected to post-polymerization curing and/or vulcanization to produce additional cross-linking of the elastomeric copolymer.
The term “vulcanization” refers to the physicochemical change resulting from cross-linking of the unsaturated regions within a polymer or polymers which may or may not be facilitated by a cross-linking agent, which is usually effected by application of heat and/or sheer forces to the polymer or polymer blend, such as by single or twin-screw extrusion. As used herein the term “cross-linking agent” means any of the additives conventionally added to polymer blends to effect curing of one or more components of the blend during a post-polymerization, vulcanization or dynamic vulcanization step. Examples of known cross-linking agents include sulfur, sulfur donors, metal oxides, resin systems, such as phenolic resins, peroxide-based systems, hydrosilation with platinum or peroxide and the like, both with and without accelerators and co-agents.
The phrase “dynamic vulcanization” refers to a vulcanization or curing process for a rubber contained in a blend with a thermoplastic resin, wherein the rubber is cross-linked or vulcanized under conditions of high shear at a temperature above the melting point of the thermoplastic. Dynamic vulcanization can occur in the presence of a processing oil, or the oil can be added after dynamic vulcanization (i.e., post added), or both (i.e., some can be added prior to dynamic vulcanization and some can be added after dynamic vulcanization).
As used herein the term “bulky monomer” means an olefin monomer that is not a linear C2 to C20 α-olefin. Bulky monomers include cyclic olefin monomers, such as 5-ethylidene-2-norbornadiene (ENB), 5-vinyl-2-norbornene (VNB) and cyclopentadiene; branched olefin monomers, such as 3,5,5-trimethyl hexene-1; and macromonomers, such as terminally unsaturated oligomers or terminally unsaturated polymers.
As used herein, the term “terminal unsaturation” is defined to mean vinyl unsaturation, vinylene unsaturation or vinylidene unsaturation on a polymer chain end, with vinyl unsaturation being preferred.
As used herein, the term “heterogeneous blend” means a composition having two or more morphological phases in the same state. For example, a blend of two polymers where one polymer forms discrete packets dispersed in a matrix or “continuous phase” of another polymer is said to be heterogeneous in the solid state. Also a heterogeneous blend is defined to include co-continuous blends where the blend components are separately visible, but it is unclear which is the “continuous phase” and which is the discontinuous phase. Such morphology is determined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) or atomic force microscopy (AFM). In the event the SEM and AFM provide different data, then the AFM data are used.
In contrast, a “homogeneous blend” is a composition having substantially one morphological phase in the same state. For example a blend of two polymers where one polymer is miscible with another polymer is said to be homogeneous in the solid state. Such morphology is determined using scanning electron microscopy. By “miscible” is meant that that the blend of two or more polymers exhibits single-phase behavior for the glass transition temperature, e.g. the Tg would exist as a single, sharp transition temperature on a dynamic mechanical thermal analyzer (DMTA) trace of tan δ (i.e., the ratio of the loss modulus to the storage modulus) versus temperature. By contrast, two separate transition temperatures would be observed for an immiscible blend, typically corresponding to the temperatures for each of the individual components of the blend. Thus a polymer blend is miscible when there is one Tg indicated on the DMTA trace. A miscible blend is homogeneous, while an immiscible blend is heterogeneous.
The heterogeneous polymer blend of the invention comprises particles of an “at least partially cross-linked elastomeric copolymer”, wherein the cross-linking is produced by an in-situ reaction between a diene and the elastomeric copolymer followed by a post-polymerization curing step. The inventive blends are referred to as “in-situ”, meaning there has been no post-reactor blending, vulcanization, etc., but simply a polymer blend formed from the polymerization process. The presence and amount of such partially cross-linked polymers in the blend can be determined by a multi-step solvent extraction process. In this process the product of the post-polymerization curing step is first contacted with cyclohexane at 25° C. for 48 hours to dissolve the unvulcanized and lightly branched elastomeric components of the blend and then the remaining solids are refluxed at the boiling temperature of xylene for 24 hours with xylene to isolate the “at least partially cross-linked polymer”. The “at least partially cross-linked polymer” is also referred to herein as “xylene insolubles”. Details of the solvent extraction procedure are given in the Examples.
Melting temperature (Tm) and crystallization temperature (Tc), referred to herein, are measured using Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) according to ASTM E 794-85. Details of the DSC test are given in the Examples. Heat of fusion (ΔHf) is measured according to ASTM D 3417-99, and percentage crystallinity is calculated using ΔHf as described below.
This invention relates to a heterogeneous polymer blend comprising a semi-crystalline (at least 30% crystalline) polypropylene that constitutes the continuous phase and particles of an elastomeric copolymer different from, and less crystalline than, the polypropylene dispersed within the continuous phase. The dispersed particles typically have an average size of less than 5 or 4 or 3 microns, for example in the range of about 50 nanometers to less than 0.5 microns. Preferably, the dispersed particles have an average size of less than 3 micron, such as less than 2 microns, for example less than or equal to 1 micron, for example between about 100 nanometers and about 1 micron. The discrete particles of the elastomeric copolymer are produced by an in-situ cross-linking chemistry that takes place concurrently with the synthesis of the elastomeric copolymer.
This invention relates to a heterogeneous polymer blend comprising a semi-crystalline (at least 30% crystalline) polypropylene that constitutes the continuous phase and particles of a elastomeric copolymer different from, and less crystalline than, the polypropylene dispersed within the continuous phase. The dispersed particles have an average size of less than 10 micron, normally less than 3 micron, preferably less than 2 microns, more preferably less than 1 micron, and most preferably between about 50 nanometers and about 0.5 microns.
The inventive heterogeneous blends are believed to contain hybrid polymer. While not wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that some or all of the discrete particles of the elastomeric copolymer are produced by means of an in-situ cross-linking chemistry that takes place concurrently with the synthesis of the elastomeric copolymer and conveniently in the same polymerization reaction zone.
This invention also relates to a process for making the above in-situ polymer blend. In a reactor, a semi-crystalline polypropylene forming a continuous phase of the blend is produced in a first polymerization step. In a second step, the elastomeric copolymer is synthesized, in the presence of the polypropylene. The elastomer copolymer takes the form of a fine particle size dispersion in the semi-crystalline phase. The elastomer copolymer is cross-linked through the use of multifunctional monomers, particularly a diene having at least two polymerizable unsaturated groups, with the degree of crosslinking being controlled by the reaction environment during the polymerization. No cross-linking agents are used in the inventive in-situ blend. While not wishing to bound by theory, it is believed that reactive intermediates generated in the first reactor (or “step”) engage in the polymerization processes taking place in the second reactor, producing hybrid polymers (also known as branch-block copolymers) that combine the characteristics of the polymers formed in the first and second reactor zones, such as the melting temperature of the polypropylene and the lower glass transition temperatures of the elastomeric copolymer.
Following the two polymerization steps, the product composition, direct from the polymerization reactor, can undergo a typical polymer finishing operation, where suitable additives are incorporated and the polymer is melt homogenized. The finished product displays easy processability, high elastic recovery, high tensile strength and elongation. Heretofore, such properties were only possible via dynamic vulcanization.
Continuous Phase of the Blend
The continuous phase of the present heterogeneous polymer blend may be any crystalline or semi-crystalline thermoplastic polymer or a mixture thereof. Preferable thermoplastic polymers are polypropylenes have a crystallinity of at least 30%, more preferably at least 40%, and most preferably at least 60% as determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The polypropylene provides the composition with required tensile strength and temperature resistance. Accordingly, the “polypropylenes” useful herein have a melting temperature, as measured by DSC, above 120° C., preferably above 130° C., more preferably above 140° C., and most preferably within a range of from 130 or 140 or 145 or 150° C. to 165 or 170° C. Typically, the polypropylene has a crystallization temperature (Tc) between about 92 and about 120° C., such as between about 95 and about 110° C. The polypropylene useful herein preferably comprise vinyl terminal groups of at least 0.35 vinyls/chain, preferably 0.45 vinyls/chain, preferably within the range from 0.40 or 0.45 vinyl/chain to 0.60 or 0.80 or 1.0 vinyl/chain.
In any embodiment, the continuous phase of the inventive compositions is a “polypropylene” which comprises propylene homopolymers, copolymers of propylene, or mixtures of propylene homopolymers and copolymers. The term “crystalline,” as used herein, characterizes those polymers that possess high degrees of inter- and intra-molecular order in the solid state. Heat of fusion (ΔHf), a measure of crystallinity, greater than 65 J/g, alternatively at least 70 J/g, alternatively at least 80 J/g, or within a range of from 65 or 70 J/g to 90 or 100 or 110 J/g as determined by DSC analysis, is preferred. The ΔHf is dependent on the composition of the polypropylene. A propylene homopolymer will have a higher ΔHf than a copolymer or blend of a homopolymer and copolymer.
The continuous phase can vary widely in composition. For example, substantially isotactic polypropylene homopolymer or propylene copolymer containing 10 wt % or less of a comonomer can be used (i.e. at least 90% by weight propylene). Further, polypropylene segments may be part of graft or block copolymers having a sharp melting point above 110° C., and alternatively above 115° C., and alternatively above 130° C., and more preferably above 140° C., or and most preferably within a range of from 145 or 150° C. to 165 or 170° C. and characteristic of the stereoregular propylene sequences. The continuous phase continuous phase may be a combination of homopolypropylene, and/or random, and/or block copolymers as described herein. When the continuous phase is a random copolymer, the percentage of the copolymerized α-olefin in the copolymer is, in general, up to 9% by weight, alternatively 0.5% to 8% by weight, alternatively 2% to 6% by weight. The preferred α-olefins contain 2 or from 4 to 12 carbon atoms. One, two or more α-olefins can be copolymerized with propylene.
Dispersed Phase of the Blend
The dispersed phase of the inventive heterogeneous polymer blend is generally an elastomeric copolymer and is polymerized and at the same time cross-linked in the presence of the polypropylene or other crystalline or semi-crystalline thermoplastic polymer. The “elastomeric copolymer” is generally an amorphous or low crystallinity (having a crystallinity of less than 20%) polymer and in particular may include any elastomer or mixture thereof that is capable of forming a cross-linked system during the polymerization. Most preferable elastomeric copolymers for use in the present invention are rubbery copolymers produced by copolymerizing two or more α-olefins with at least one diene. More typically, the elastomeric component is a copolymer of ethylene with at least one α-olefin monomer, and at least one diene monomer. The α-olefins may include, but are not limited to, C3 to C20 α-olefins, such as propylene, 1-butene, 1-hexene, 4-methyl-1-pentene, 1-octene, 1-decene, or combinations thereof. The preferred α-olefins are propylene, 1-hexene, 1-octene or combinations thereof. Thus, for example, the elastomeric copolymer can be an ethylene-propylene-diene terpolymer. Typically, the elastomeric copolymer contains at least 15 wt % of the C3 to C20 olefin and at least 0.0001 wt % of the diene. More preferably, the diene units are present within a range of from 0.01 or 0.1 or 1.0 wt % to 2 or 5 wt % of the elastomeric copolymer; the α-olefin units are preferably present to within a range of from 20 or 30 wt % to 40 or 50 or 60 wt % of the elastomeric copolymer, the remainder of the copolymer being ethylene units, preferably at least 20 wt % or 30 wt % or 40 wt % or of the elastomeric copolymer in the polymer blends, or within a range from 10 or 15 or 20 or 25 or 30 wt % to 40 or 45 or 50 or 60 wt %.
Another suitable elastomeric polymer for use in the present invention includes amorphous polypropylene.
In any embodiment, the inventive blend comprises a diene that has at least two polymerizable unsaturated bonds that can readily be incorporated into polymers to form cross-linked polymers. Examples of such dienes include α,ω-dienes (such as butadiene, 1,4-pentadiene, 1,5-hexadiene, 1,6-heptadiene, 1,7-octadiene, 1,8-nonadiene, 1,9-decadiene, 1,10-undecadiene, 1,11-dodecadiene, 1,12-tridecadiene, and 1,13-tetradecadiene) and certain multi-ring alicyclic fused and bridged ring dienes (such as tetrahydroindene; norbornadiene; dicyclopentadiene; bicyclo-(2.2.1)-hepta-2,5-diene; 5-vinyl-2-norbornene; 3,7-dimethyl-1,7-octadiene; 1,4-cyclohexadiene; 1,5-cyclooctadiene; 1,7-cyclododecadiene and vinyl cyclohexene).
In any embodiment of the inventive blend, a diene that has at least two unsaturated bonds wherein one of the unsaturated bonds is readily incorporated into a polymer may be present in addition to at least one of those dienes above. The second bond may partially take part in polymerization to form cross-linked polymers but normally provides at least some unsaturated bonds in the polymer product suitable for subsequent functionalization (such as with maleic acid or maleic anhydride), curing or vulcanization in post polymerization processes. Examples of dienes according to said further embodiment include, but are not limited to butadiene, pentadiene, hexadiene, heptadiene, octadiene, nonadiene, decadiene, undecadiene, dodecadiene, tridecadiene, tetradecadiene, pentadecadiene, hexadecadiene, heptadecadiene, octadecadiene, nonadecadiene, icosadiene, heneicosadiene, docosadiene, tricosadiene, tetracosadiene, pentacosadiene, hexacosadiene, heptacosadiene, octacosadiene, nonacosadiene, triacontadiene, and polybutadienes having a molecular weight (Mw) of less than 1000 g/mol. Examples of straight chain acyclic dienes include, but are not limited to 1,4-hexadiene and 1,6-octadiene. Examples of branched chain acyclic dienes include, but are not limited to 5-methyl-1,4-hexadiene, 3,7-dimethyl-1,6-octadiene, and 3,7-dimethyl-1,7-octadiene. Examples of single ring alicyclic dienes include, but are not limited to 1,4-cyclohexadiene, 1,5-cyclooctadiene, and 1,7-cyclododecadiene. Examples of multi-ring alicyclic fused and bridged ring dienes include, but are not limited to tetrahydroindene; norbornadiene; methyl-tetrahydroindene; dicyclopentadiene; bicyclo-(2.2.1)-hepta-2,5-diene; and alkenyl-, alkylidene-, cycloalkenyl-, and cylcoalkyliene norbornenes [including, e.g., 5-methylene-2-norbornene, 5-ethylidene-2-norbornene, 5-propenyl-2-norbornene, 5-isopropylidene-2-norbornene, 5-(4-cyclopentenyl)-2-norbornene, 5-cyclohexylidene-2-norbornene, and 5-vinyl-2-norbornene]. Examples of cycloalkenyl-substituted alkenes include, but are not limited to vinyl cyclohexene, allyl cyclohexene, vinyl cyclooctene, 4-vinyl cyclohexene, allyl cyclodecene, vinyl cyclododecene, and tetracyclo (A-11,12)-5,8-dodecene.
According to one aspect of the invention, during the elastomeric copolymerization step to produce the elastomeric phase, it is believed that a distribution of cross-products are formed emanating principally from the grafting of the first thermoplastic polymer to the second elastomeric polymer. These hybrid cross-products, also known as branch-block copolymers, form when reactive intermediates from the polypropylene polymerization step cross-over into the elastomeric copolymerization step and participate in the polymerization of the elastomeric copolymer. The presence of branch-block copolymers is believed to influence the events occurring during the polymerization as well as product properties. The extent of influence depends on the population distribution of the branch-block copolymer fraction.
The amount of elastomeric copolymer relative to the polypropylene may vary widely depending on the nature of the polymers and the intended use of the final polymer blend. In particular, however, one advantage of the process of the invention is the ability to be able to produce a heterogeneous polymer blend in which the discrete particles of the elastomeric copolymer comprise more than 50 wt %, such as more than 60 wt %, for example more than 70 wt % of the total heterogeneous polymer blend. In any embodiment, the weight ratio of the elastomeric copolymer to the polypropylene is generally from about 90:10 to about 50:50, more preferably from about 80:20 to about 60:40, and most preferably from about 75:25 to about 65:35. For TPO or impact copolymer applications, the weight ratio of the elastomeric copolymer to the polypropylene is generally from about 49:51 to about 10:90, more preferably from 35:65 to about 15:85.
Production of the Polymer Blend
According to the invention, the polymer composition is produced by a novel two-step process. In the first step, a crystalline thermoplastic polymer, preferably polypropylene as described above, is produced by polymerizing at least one first monomer in one or more polymerization zones, most preferably propylene and optionally a minor amount of ethylene. The effluent from the first step is then fed into a elastomeric copolymerization step where an elastomer is produced in the presence of the polymer produced in the first step. The elastomer is in-situ cross-linked, at least partially, in the elastomeric copolymerization zone. After removal of the polymerization medium, the cross-linked elastomer forms finely dispersed particles embedded within the crystalline thermoplastic matrix.
In an alternative embodiment, the first step of polymerization is replaced with addition of pre-made crystalline thermoplastic polymer. The pre-made polymer can be produced in a separate system or can be a commercially available product. The crystalline thermoplastic polymer can be dissolved in a solvent and then added into a reaction medium for the elastomeric copolymerization step. The crystalline thermoplastic polymer can be also ground into fine powder and then added into the reaction medium for the elastomeric copolymerization step.
Any known polymerization process may be used to produce the thermoplastic polymer. For example, the polymer may be a propylene homopolymer obtained by homopolymerization of propylene in a single stage or multiple stage reactor. Copolymers may be obtained by copolymerizing propylene and an α-olefin having 2 or from 4 to 20 carbon atoms in a single stage or multiple stage reactor. Polymerization methods include high pressure, slurry, gas, bulk, suspension, supercritical, or solution phase, or a combination thereof, using a traditional Ziegler-Natta catalyst or a single-site, metallocene catalyst system, or combinations thereof including bimetallic (i.e, Z/N and/or metallocene) catalysts. Preferred catalysts are those capable of polymerizing a C2 to C20 olefin to produce a polypropylene having at least 30% crystallinity and at least 0.01% terminal unsaturation. The catalysts can be in the form of a homogeneous solution, supported, or a combination thereof. Polymerization may be carried out by a continuous, a semi-continuous or batch process and may include use of chain transfer agents, scavengers, or other such additives as deemed applicable. By “continuous” is meant a system that operates (or is intended to operate) without interruption or cessation. For example a continuous process to produce a polymer would be one where the reactants are continually introduced into one or more reactors and polymer product is continually withdrawn.
Where the thermoplastic matrix comprises a polyolefin, such as a propylene polymer or copolymer, the polyolefin will generally be produced in the presence of a single site catalyst, preferably a metallocene catalyst, with an activator and optional scavenger. Preferred metallocene catalysts are those capable of polymerizing a C2 to C20 olefin to produce a polypropylene having at least 30% crystallinity.
Preferred metallocene catalysts useful for producing the polypropylene in the process of the invention are not narrowly defined but generally it is found that the most suitable are those in the generic class of bridged, substituted bis(cyclopentadienyl) metallocenes, specifically bridged, substituted bis(indenyl) metallocenes known to produce high molecular weight, high melting temperature, highly isotactic propylene polymers. Particularly suitable catalysts are bridged bis-indenyl metallocene catalysts having a substituent on one or both of the 2- and 4-positions on each indenyl ring or those having a substituent on the 2-, 4-, and 7-positions on each indenyl ring. Generally speaking, those of the generic class disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,770,753 (fully incorporated herein by reference) should be suitable, however, it has been found that the exact polymer obtained is dependent on the metallocene's specific substitution pattern, among other things. A specific list of useful catalyst compounds is found at WO 2004/026921 page 29 paragraph [00100] to page 66, line 4. In another embodiment, the catalyst compounds described at WO 2004/026921 page 66, paragraph [00103] to page 70, line 3 may also be used in the practice of this invention.
Particularly preferred are racemic metallocenes, such as rac-dimethylsiladiyl(2-isopropyl,4-phenylindenyl)2 zirconium dichloride; rac-dimethylsiladiyl(2-isopropyl,4-[1-naphthyl]indenyl)2 zirconium dichloride; rac-dimethylsiladiyl(2-isopropyl,4-[3,5-dimethylphenyl]indenyl)2 zirconium dichloride; rac-dimethylsiladiyl(2-isopropyl,4-[ortho-methyl-phenyl]indenyl)2 zirconium dichloride; rac-dimethylsilyl bis-(2-methyl, 4-phenylindenyl)zirconium dichloride, rac dimethylsiladlyl bis-(2-methyl, 4-napthylindenyl) zirconium dichloride, rac-dimethyl siladiyl(2-isopropyl, 4-[3,5 di-t-butyl-phenyl]indenyl)2 zirconium dichloride; rac-dimethyl siladiyl(2-isopropyl, 4-[orthophenyl-phenyl]indenyl)2 zirconium dichloride, rac-diphenylsiladiyl(2-methyl-4-[1-naphthyl]indenyl)2 zirconium dichloride and rac-biphenyl siladiyl(2-isopropyl, 4-[3,5 di-t-butyl-phenyl]indenyl)2 zirconium dichloride. Alkylated variants of these metallocenes (e.g. di-methyl instead of dichloride) are also useful, particularly when combined with a non-coordinating anion type activator. These and other metallocene compositions are described in detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,376,407, 6,376.408, 6,376,409, 6,376,410, 6,376,411, 6,376,412, 6,376,413, 6,376,627, 6,380,120, 6,380,121, 6,380,122, 6,380,123, 6,380,124, 6,380,330, 6,380,331, 6,380,334, 6,399,723 and 6,825,372.
The manner of activation of the catalyst used in the first polymerization step can vary. Alumoxane and preferably methyl alumoxane (MAO) can be used. Non-or weakly coordinating anion activators (NCA) may be obtained in any of the ways described in EP277004 and EP426637. Activation generally is believed to involve abstraction of an anionic group such as the methyl group to form a metallocene cation, although according to some literature zwitterions may be produced. The NCA precursor can be an ion pair of a borate or aluminate in which the precursor cation is eliminated upon activation in some manner, e.g. trityl or ammonium derivatives of tetrakis pentafluorophenyl boron (See EP277004). The NCA precursor can be a neutral compound such as a borane, which is formed into a cation by the abstraction of and incorporation of the anionic group abstracted from the metallocene (See EP426638).
The alumoxane activator may be utilized in an amount to provide a molar aluminum to metallocene ratio of from 1:1 to 20,000:1 or more. The non-coordinating compatible anion activator may be utilized in an amount to provide a molar ratio of metallocene compound to non-coordinating anion of 10:1 to 1:1.
Particularly useful activators include dimethylaniliniumtetrakis (pentafluorophenyl) borate and dimethyl anilinium tetrakis(heptafluoro-2-naphthyl) borate. For a more detailed description of useful activators please see WO 2004/026921 page 72, paragraph [00119] to page 81 paragraph [00151]. A list of particularly useful activators that can be used in the practice of this invention may be found at page 72, paragraph [00177] to page 74, paragraph [00178] of WO 2004/046214.
Preferably, the first polymerization step is conducted in a continuous, stirred tank reactor. Tubular reactors equipped with the hardware to introduce feeds, catalysts and cross-linking agents in staged manner can also be used. Generally, polymerization reactors are agitated (stirred) to reduce or avoid concentration gradients. Reaction environments include the case where the monomer(s) acts as diluent or solvent as well as the case where a liquid hydrocarbon is used as diluent or solvent. Preferred hydrocarbon liquids include both aliphatic and aromatic fluids such as desulphurized light virgin naphtha and alkanes, such as propane, isobutane, mixed butanes, hexane, pentane, isopentane, cyclohexane, isooctane, and octane. In an alternate embodiment a perfluorocarbon or hydrofluorocarbon is used as the solvent or diluent.
Suitable conditions for the first polymerization step include a temperature from about 50 to about 250° C., preferably from about 50 to about 150° C. more preferably from about 70 to about 150° C. and a pressure of 0.1 MPa or more, preferably 2 MPa or more. The upper pressure limit is not critically constrained but is typically 200 MPa or less, preferably, 120 MPa or less, except when operating ins supercritical phase then the pressure and temperature are above the critical point of the reaction media in question (typically over 95° C. and 4.6 MPa for propylene polymerizations). For more information on running supercritical polymerizations, please see WO 2004/026921. Temperature control in the reactor is generally obtained by balancing the heat of polymerization with reactor cooling via reactor jackets or cooling coils, auto refrigeration, pre-chilled feeds, vaporization of liquid medium (diluent, monomers or solvent) or combinations of all three. Adiabatic reactors with pre-chilled feeds may also be used.
In the elastomeric copolymerization step, some or all of the polypropylene formed in the first step is contacted with at least one second monomer, typically ethylene and/or a C3 to C20 olefin, and at least one diene as described above, under conditions sufficient to polymerize the second monomer(s) to produce the elastomeric copolymer and also cross-link said elastomeric copolymer. As a result of the cross-linking that occurs with the elastomeric copolymerization step, the product of the elastomeric copolymerization step contains at least a fraction which is insoluble in xylene. Preferably, the amount of said xylene insoluble fraction by weight of the elastomeric copolymer, also referred to herein as the degree of cross-link of the elastomeric copolymer, is at least 4%, such as at least 10%, such as at least 20%, such as at least 40%, such as at least 50%.
Any known polymerization process, including solution, suspension, slurry, supercritical and gas phase polymerization processes, and any known polymerization catalyst can be used to produce the elastomeric copolymer component. Generally, the catalyst used to produce the elastomeric copolymer component should be capable of polymerizing bulky monomers and also be capable of producing a polymer having an Mw of 20,000 or more and a crystallinity of less than 20%.
In one embodiment, the catalyst employed to produce the elastomeric copolymer component is the same as, or is compatible with, the catalyst used to produce the thermoplastic matrix. In such a case, the first and elastomeric copolymerization zones can be in a multiple-zone reactor, or separate, series-connected reactors, with the entire effluent from the first polymerization zone, including any active catalyst, being transferred to the elastomeric copolymerization zone. Additional catalyst can then be added, as necessary to the elastomeric copolymerization zone. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the process of the invention is conducted in two or more series-connected, continuous flow, stirred tank or tubular reactors using metallocene catalysts.
In another embodiment, catalyst quenching is applied between the two polymerization zones and a separate catalyst is introduced in the second reaction zone to produce the elastomer component. Catalyst quenching agents (such as air or an alcohol) may be introduced into the effluent from the first polymerization zone right after the reactor exit to deactivate the catalyst used for the first polymerization. Scavenger may be useful and can be fed into the effluent downstream of the catalyst quenching agent injection point or the elastomeric copolymerization zone.
Where a separate catalyst is used to produce the elastomeric elastomeric copolymer, this is conveniently one of, or a mixture of, metallocene compounds of either or both of the following types:

    
    
        1) Cyclopentadienyl (Cp) complexes which have two Cp ring systems for ligands. The Cp ligands form a sandwich complex with the metal and can be free to rotate (unbridged) or locked into a rigid configuration through a bridging group. The Cp ring ligands can be like or unlike, unsubstituted, substituted, or a derivative thereof such as a heterocyclic ring system which may be substituted, and the substitutions can be fused to form other saturated or unsaturated rings systems such as tetrahydroindenyl, indenyl, or fluorenyl ring systems. These cyclopentadienyl complexes are represented by the formula

(Cp1R1m)R3n(Cp2R2p)MXq 

        wherein Cp1 of ligand (Cp1R1m) and Cp2 of ligand (Cp2 R2p) are the same or different cyclopentadienyl rings, R1 and R2 each is, independently, a halogen or a hydrocarbyl, halocarbyl, hydrocarbyl-substituted organometalloid or halocarbyl-substituted organometalloid group containing up to about 20 carbon atoms, m is 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5, p is 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5, and two R1 and/or R2 substituents on adjacent carbon atoms of the cyclopentadienyl ring associated there with can be joined together to form a ring containing from 4 to about 20 carbon atoms, R3 is a bridging group, n is the number of atoms in the direct chain between the two ligands and is 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8, preferably 0, 1, 2, or 3, M is a transition metal having a valence of 3, 4, 5, or 6, preferably from Group 4, 5, or 6 of the Periodic Table of the Elements and is preferably in its highest oxidation state, each X is a non-cyclopentadienyl ligand and is, independently, a halogen or a hydrocarbyl, oxyhydrocarbyl, halocarbyl, hydrocarbyl-substituted organometalloid, oxyhydrocarbyl-substituted organometalloid or halocarbyl-substituted organometalloid group containing up to about 20 carbon atoms, q is equal to the valence of M minus 2.
        2) Monocyclopentadienyl complexes which have only one Cp ring system as a ligand. The Cp ligand forms a half-sandwich complex with the metal and can be free to rotate (unbridged) or locked into a rigid configuration through a bridging group to a heteroatom-containing ligand. The Cp ring ligand can be unsubstituted, substituted, or a derivative thereof such as a heterocyclic ring system which may be substituted, and the substitutions can be fused to form other saturated or unsaturated rings systems such as tetrahydroindenyl, indenyl, or fluorenyl ring systems. The heteroatom containing ligand is bound to both the metal and optionally to the Cp ligand through the bridging group. The heteroatom itself is an atom with a coordination number of three from Group 15 or 16 of the periodic table of the elements. These monocyclopentadienyl complexes are represented by the formula

(Cp1R1m)R3n(YR2)MXs 

        wherein R1 is, each independently, a halogen or a hydrocarbyl, halocarbyl, hydrocarbyl-substituted organometalloid or halocarbyl-substituted organometalloid group containing up to about 20 carbon atoms, m is 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5, and two R1 substituents on adjacent carbon atoms of the cyclopentadienyl ring associated therewith can be joined together to form a ring containing from 4 to about 20 carbon atoms, R3 is a bridging group, n is 0, 1, 2, or 3, M is a transition metal having a valence of from 3, 4, 5, or 6, preferably from Group 4, 5, or 6 of the Periodic Table of the Elements and is preferably in its highest oxidation state, Y is a heteroatom containing group in which the heteroatom is an element with a coordination number of three from Group 15 or a coordination number of two from Group 16 preferably nitrogen, phosphorous, oxygen, or sulfur, R2 is a radical selected independently from the group consisting of C1 to C20 hydrocarbon radicals, substituted C1 to C20 hydrocarbon radicals, wherein one or more hydrogen atoms is replaced with a halogen atom, and when Y is three coordinate and unbridged there may be two R2 groups on Y each independently a radical selected from a group consisting of C1 to C20 hydrocarbon radicals, substituted C1 to C20 hydrocarbon radicals, wherein one or more hydrogen atoms is replaced with a halogen atom, and each X is a non-cyclopentadienyl ligand and is, independently, a halogen or a hydrocarbyl, oxyhydrocarbyl, halocarbyl, hydrocarbyl-substituted organometalloid, oxyhydrocarbyl-substituted organometalloid or halocarbyl-substituted organometalloid group containing up to about 20 carbon atoms, s is equal to the valence of M minus 2; and Cp1 is a Cp ring.
    
    


Examples of suitable biscyclopentadienyl metallocenes of the type described in Group 1 above for the invention are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,324,800; 5,198,401; 5,278,119; 5,387,568; 5,120,867; 5,017,714; 4,871,705; 4,542,199; 4,752,597; 5,132,262; 5,391,629; 5,243,001; 5,278,264; 5,296,434; and 5,304,614, all of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Illustrative, but not limiting examples of preferred biscyclopentadienyl metallocenes of the type described in Group 1 above for the invention are the racemic isomers of:
μ-(CH3)2 Si(indenyl)2 M(Cl)2 
μ-(CH3)2 Si(indenyl)2 M(CH3)2 
μ-(CH3)2 Si(tetrahydroindenyl)2 M(Cl)2 
μ-(CH3)2 Si(tetrahydroindenyl)2 M(CH3)2 
μ-(CH3)2 Si(indenyl)2 M(CH2CH3)2 
μ-(C6H5)2 C(indenyl)2 M(CH3)2 
wherein M is chosen from a group consisting of Zr and Hf.
Examples of suitable unsymmetrical cyclopentadienyl metallocenes of the type described in Group 1 above for the invention are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,892,851; 5,334,677; 5,416.228; and 5,449,651; and are described in publication 110 J AM. CHEM. SOC. 6255 (1988), all of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Illustrative, but not limiting examples of preferred unsymmetrical cyclopentadienyl metallocenes of the type described in Group 1 above for the invention are:
μ-(C6H5)2 C(cyclopentadienyl)(fluorenyl)M(R)2 
μ-(C6H5)2 C(3-methylcyclopentadienyl)(fluorenyl)M(R)2 
μ-(CH3)2 C(cyclopentadienyl)(fluorenyl)M(R)2 
μ-(C6H5)2 C(cyclopentadienyl)(2-methylindenyl)M(R)2 
μ-(C6H5)2 C(3-methylcyclopentadienyl)(2-methylindenyl)M(R)2 
μ-(p-triethylsilylphenyl)2 C(cyclopentadienyl)(3,8-di-t-butylfluorenyl) M(R)2 
μ-(C6H5)2 C(cyclopentadienyl)(2,7-dimethylindenyl)M(R)2 
μ-(CH3)2 C(cyclopentadienyl)(2,7-dimethylindenyl)M(R)2,
wherein M is chosen from the group consisting of Zr and Hf and R is chosen from the group consisting of Cl and CH3.
Examples of suitable monocyclopentadienyl metallocenes of the type described in group 2 above for the invention are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,026,798; 5,057,475; 5,350,723; 5,264,405; 5,055,438 and are described in WO 96/002244, all of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Illustrative, but not limiting examples of preferred monocyclopentadienyl metallocenes of the type described in group 2 above for the invention are:
μ-(CH3)2 Si(cyclopentadienyl)(1-adamantylamido)M(R)2 
μ-(CH3)2 Si(3-tertbutylcyclopentadienyl)(1-adamantylamido)M(R)2 
μ-(CH3)2 Si(tetramethylcyclopentadienyl)(1-adamantylamido)M(R)2 
μ-(CH3)2 C(tetramethylcyclopentadienyl)(1-adamantylamido)M(R)2 
μ-(CH3)2 Si(tetramethylcyclopentadienyl)(1-tertbutylamido)M(R)2 
μ-(CH3)2 Si(fluorenyl)(1-tertbutylamido)M(R)2 
μ-(CH3)2 Si(tetramethylcyclopentadienyl)(1-cyclododecylamido)M(R)2 
μ-(CH3)2 C(tetramethylcyclopentadienyl)(1-cyclododecylamido)M(R)2 
wherein M is selected from a group consisting of Ti, Zr, and Hf and wherein R is selected from Cl and CH3.
Another class of organometallic complexes that are useful catalysts for producing the elastomeric copolymer component are those with diimido ligand systems such as those described in WO 96/23010 assigned to Du Pont. These catalytic polymerization compounds are incorporated here by reference.
In a preferred processing mode, the conditions in the elastomeric copolymerization zone are arranged not only to copolymerize the elastomer monomers with the bifunctional monomer, such as a diene, but also to cause at least partial cross-linking of resultant elastomer. Typical conditions in the elastomeric copolymerization zone include a temperature of about 10° C. to about 250° C. and a pressure of about 0.1 MPa to about 200 MPa.
The elastomeric copolymer, which is at least partially cross-linked in the copolymerization reaction of olefins and dienes, may be prepared by solution, suspension or slurry polymerization of the olefins and diene under conditions in which the catalyst site remains relatively insoluble and/or immobile so that the polymer chains are rapidly immobilized following their formation. Such immobilization is affected, for example, by (1) using a solid, insoluble catalyst, (2) maintaining the polymerization below the crystalline melting point of thermoplastic polymers made in the first step and (3) using low solvency solvent such as a fluorinated hydrocarbon.
In a solution process, the un-crosslinked elastomeric copolymers are preferably dissolved (or are soluble) in the polymerization media. The elastomeric copolymers are then phase separated from the reaction media to form micro-particles when the polymers are cross-linked. This in-situ cross-link and phase separation facilitates the process to produce polymers of high molecular weight.
In a solution process, the un-crosslinked elastomeric copolymers are dissolved (or are soluble) in the polymerization media. The elastomeric copolymers are then phase separated from the reaction media to form micro-particles when the polymers are cross-linked. This in-situ cross-link and phase separation facilitates the process to produce high molecular weight polymers. Maintaining the polymerization conditions in the second step below the cloudy point of the thermoplastic polymer produced in the first step is instrumental to producing second polymer with micro-sized gel in the second step of polymerization. Previously, it wasn't well understood why the presence of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) can reduce reactor gel formation. The speculation was that the iPP formed microscopic pockets within the crystalline network in the reaction medium in the second step. The second polymerization and cross-linking reaction takes place within the microscopic pockets. This confined polymerization environments prevent the micro-gel particles from agglomeration, thereby minimizing inter-particle cross-linking and formation of larger gels. In contrast, if the cross-linking reaction is not controlled to localized domains, uncontrolled cross-linking will interconnect the polymeric contents of the entire reactor, leading to reactor macro-gel formation and fouling.
By selecting the catalysts, the polymerization reaction conditions, and/or by introducing a diene modifier, some molecules of the polypropylene(s) and the elastomeric copolymer(s) can be linked together to produce branch-block structures. While not wishing to be bound by theory, the branch-block copolymer is believed to comprise an amorphous backbone having crystalline side chains originating from the polypropylene.
To effectively incorporate the polymer chains of the polypropylene into the growing chains of the elastomeric copolymer, it is preferable that the first polymerization step produces macromonomers having reactive termini, such as vinyl end groups. By macromonomers having reactive termini is meant a polymer having twelve or more carbon atoms (preferably 20 or more, more preferably 30 or more, more preferably between 12 and 8000 carbon atoms) and having a vinyl, vinylidene, vinylene or other terminal group that can be polymerized into a growing polymer chain. By capable of polymerizing macromonomer having reactive termini is meant a catalyst component that can incorporate a macromonomer (which tend to be molecules larger than a typical single monomer such as ethylene or propylene), having reactive termini into a growing polymer chain. Vinyl terminated chains are generally more reactive than vinylene or vinylidene terminated chains. Generally, it is desirable that the first polymerization step produces a polypropylene having at least 0.35 vinyls/chain, preferably at least 0.45 vinyls/chain.
Optionally the polypropylenes are copolymers of one or more α-olefins and one or more of monomers having at least two olefinically unsaturated bonds. Both of these unsaturated bonds are suitable for and readily incorporated into a growing polymer chain by coordination polymerization using either the first or second catalyst systems independently such that one double bond is incorporated into the polypropylene segments while another double bond is incorporated into the second elastomeric polymer segments for form a branched block copolymer. In a preferred embodiment these monomers having at least two olefinically unsaturated bonds are di-olefins, preferably di-vinyl monomers.
A polymer can be recovered from the effluent of either the first polymerization step or the elastomeric copolymerization step by separating the polymer from other constituents of the effluent using conventional separation means. For example, polymer can be recovered from either effluent by coagulation with a non-solvent such as isopropyl alcohol, acetone, or n-butyl alcohol, or the polymer can be recovered by stripping the solvent or other media with heat or steam. One or more conventional additives such as antioxidants can be incorporated in the polymer during the recovery procedure. Possible antioxidants include phenyl-beta-naphthylamine; di-tert-butylhydroquinone, triphenyl phosphate, heptylated diphenylamine, 2,2′-methylene-bis(4-methyl-6-tert-butyl)phenol, and 2,2,4-trimethyl-6-phenyl-1,2-dihydroquinoline. Other methods of recovery such as by the use of lower critical solution temperature (LCST) followed by devolatilization are also envisioned. The catalyst may be deactivated as part of the separation procedure to reduce or eliminate further uncontrolled polymerization downstream the polymer recovery processes. Deactivation may be effected by the mixing with suitable polar substances such as water, whose residual effect following recycle can be counteracted by suitable sieves or scavenging systems.
Properties of the Polymer Blend
By virtue of the novel polymerization process used in its production, the heterogeneous polymer blend of the invention not only comprises particles of the elastomeric copolymer dispersed within a matrix of the first thermoplastic polymer but also at least a portion the dispersed phase is cross-linked and preferably comprises a hybrid species of said first and elastomeric copolymers having characteristics of the first and elastomeric copolymers such as a melting temperature, preferably of at least 100° C. in the xylene insoluble fraction. In addition, it is found that the particles of the elastomeric copolymer tend be more evenly distributed and significantly smaller, typically having an average diameter of less than 1 micron, than products obtained by conventional reactive extrusion techniques.
In addition, since at least some cross-linking of the dispersed phase occurs during the elastomeric copolymerization step, rather than all the cross-linking being effected in a subsequent dynamic extrusion step, the dispersed phase of the heterogeneous polymer blend of the invention comprises at least a fraction which is insoluble in xylene and which is substantially free of the cross-linking agents normally added to polymers blends to effect cross-linking during post-polymerization, dynamic extrusion. By “substantially free” is meant that the dispersed phase contains less than 10,000 ppm, such as less than 2.500 ppm, 1,000 ppm, such as less than 1,000 ppm, such as less than 10 ppm, of a cross-linking agent.
Polymers with bimodal distributions of molecular weight and composition can be produced by the polymerization process of the invention, by, for example, controlling the polymerization conditions in the first and the elastomeric copolymerization zones and selecting the catalysts for the first and the elastomeric copolymerizations, such as by using multiple catalysts in each polymerization zone. Some of the polymer chains produced in the first polymerization zone are still live in the elastomeric copolymerization zone. The polymer chains so produced in the elastomeric copolymerization zone contain crystalline polymer segments and amorphous polymer segments and form blocky structures. The blocky compositions have characteristics of both the first and elastomeric copolymers.
The individual components of the heterogeneous polymer blend of the invention can readily be separated by solvent extraction. In a suitable solvent extraction regime, the blend, without undergoing any additional processing steps, is contacted with cyclohexane at 25° C. for 48 hours to dissolve the uncured and branched elastomeric components of the blend and then the remaining solids are refluxed at the boiling temperature of xylene for 24 hours with xylene to dissolve the continuous thermoplastic phase material. The remaining xylene insolubles comprise the cross-linked hybrid copolymers of the first and elastomeric copolymers. These hybrid copolymers typically exhibit a melting temperature in excess of 100° C.
The in-situ reactor blend of the present invention has several measurable features. In any embodiment the melting point temperature of the in-situ reactor blend is within a range from 145 or 148° C. to 160 or 165 or 170° C. In any embodiment the in-situ reactor blend has a ΔHf within the range from 18 or 20 or 25 J/g to 45 or 50 or 60 or 65 or 70 or 75 J/g.
In one embodiment, the polymer blend described herein has a Tensile Strength at break (as measured by ISO 37 at 23° C.) of 0.5 MPa (72 psi) or more, alternatively 0.75 MPa or more, alternatively 1.0 MPa (145 psi) or more, alternatively 1.5 MPa (218 psi) or more, alternatively 2.0 MPa (290 psi) or more, alternatively 2.5 MPa (363 psi) or more, alternatively 3.0 MPa (435 psi) or more, alternatively 3.5 MPa (508 psi) or more.
In another embodiment, the polymer blend described herein has a Shore hardness of 30A to 90D, preferably 15A to 90D (as measured by ISO 868).
In another embodiment, the polymer blend described herein has an Ultimate Elongation (as measured by ISO 37) of 20% or more, preferably 30% or more, more preferably 40% or more.
In another embodiment, the polymer blend described herein has a Compression Set (as measured by ISO 815A) of 90% or less, preferably 70% or less, more preferably 50% or less, more preferably 30% or less, more preferably 10% or less.
In another embodiment, the polymer blend described herein has a Tension Set (as measured by ISO 2285) of 100% or less, preferably 80% or less, more preferably 60% or less, more preferably 20% or less, more preferably 5% or less, more preferably 1% or less.
In another embodiment, the polymer blend described herein has an oil swell (as measured by ASTM D471) of 500% or less, preferably 250% or less, more preferably 100% or less.
More particularly, in any embodiment the in-situ reactor blend has a Shore A Hardness within the range from 40 or 50 to 70 or 80 or 90. In any embodiment the post-polymerization vulcanized blend has a 100% Modulus of greater than 200 or 250 or 300 or 350 or 400 or 500 or 600 psi, or within the range from 200 or 250 or 300 or 400 or 500 psi to 1500 or 2000 or 2100 or 2300 or 2500 psi. In any embodiment, the post-polymerization vulcanized blend has an Ultimate Elongation within the range from 80 or 100 to 140 or 200 or 340 or 360 or 400%. In any embodiment, the post-polymerization vulcanized blend has a Compression set within the range from (70° C./22 Hrs) 20 or 24 or 26% to 60 or 64 or 68 or 70 or 74%. In any embodiment, the post-polymerization vulcanized blend has a Tension Set within the range from 6 or 8 or 10% to 35 or 40 or 45%. Finally, in any embodiment the post-polymerization vulcanized blend has an Ultimate Tension Strength within the range from 300 or 400 or 500 or 520 psi to 2300 or 2400 or 2500 or 2600 psi.
Additives
The heterogeneous polymer blend according to the invention may optionally contain reinforcing and non-reinforcing fillers, plasticizers, antioxidants, stabilizers, rubber processing oils, extender oils, lubricants, antiblocking agents, antistatic agents, waxes, foaming agents, pigments, flame retardants and other processing aids known in the rubber compounding art. Such additives may comprise up to about 70 wt %, more preferably up to about 65 wt %, of the total composition. Fillers and extenders which can be utilized include conventional inorganics such as calcium carbonate, clays, silica, talc, titanium dioxide, carbon black and the like. The rubber processing oils generally are paraffinic, naphthenic or aromatic oils derived from petroleum fractions. The oils are selected from those ordinarily used in conjunction with the specific rubber or rubber component present in the composition.
The additives such as fillers and oils can be introduced into the heterogeneous polymer blend during the polymerization in either the first polymerization zone or the elastomeric copolymerization zone. The additives can be added into the effluent from the elastomeric copolymerization zone and are preferably added into the polymer blend after removal of solvent or diluent through melt blending.
Additional polymers can also be added to form blends. In one or more embodiments, the additional polymers include thermoplastic resins. Exemplary thermoplastic resins include crystalline and crystallizable polyolefins. Also, suitable thermoplastic resins may include copolymers of polyolefins with styrene, such as a styrene-ethylene copolymer. In one or more embodiments, the thermoplastic resins are formed by polymerizing ethylene or α-olefins such as propylene, 1-butene, 1-hexene, 1-octene, 2-methyl-1-propene, 3-methyl-1-pentene, 4-methyl-1-pentene, 5-methyl-1-hexene, and mixtures thereof. Copolymers of ethylene and propylene and ethylene and propylene with another α-olefin such as 1-butene, 1-hexene, 1-octene, 2-methyl-1-propene, 3-methyl-1-pentene, 4-methyl-1-pentene, 5-methyl-1-hexene or mixtures thereof are also contemplated. Specifically included are homopolypropylene, impact, and random copolymers of propylene with ethylene or the higher α-olefins, described above, or with C10-C20 diolefins. Preferably, the homopolypropylene has a melting point of at least 130° C., for example at least 140° C. and preferably less than or equal to 160° C., a ΔHf of at least 75 J/g, alternatively at least 80 J/g, as determined by DSC analysis, and weight average molecular weight (Mw) of at least 100,000, alternatively at least 500,000. Comonomer contents for these propylene copolymers will typically be from 1 to about 30% by weight of the polymer, for example. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,268,438, 6,288,171, and 6,245,856. Copolymers available under the tradename VistamaxxTM propylene-based elastomers (ExxonMobil) are specifically included. Blends or mixtures of two or more polyolefin thermoplastics such as described herein, or with other polymeric modifiers, are also suitable in accordance with this invention. These homopolymers and copolymers may be synthesized by using an appropriate polymerization technique known in the art such as, but not limited to, the conventional Ziegler-Natta type polymerizations, and catalysis employing single-site organometallic catalysts including, but not limited to, metallocene catalysts.
Uses of the Polymer Blends
The heterogeneous in-situ polymer blends described herein may be shaped into desirable end use articles by any suitable means known in the art. They are particularly useful for making articles by blow molding, extrusion, injection molding, thermoforming, gas foaming, elasto-welding and compression molding techniques.
Thermoforming is a process of forming at least one pliable plastic sheet into a desired shape. An embodiment of a thermoforming sequence is described; however this should not be construed as limiting the thermoforming methods useful with the compositions of this invention. First, an extrudate film of the composition of this invention (and any other layers or materials) is placed on a shuttle rack to hold it during heating. The shuttle rack indexes into the oven which pre-heats the film before forming. Once the film is heated, the shuttle rack indexes back to the forming tool. The film is then vacuumed onto the forming tool to hold it in place and the forming tool is closed. The forming tool can be either “male” or “female” type tools. The tool stays closed to cool the film and the tool is then opened. The shaped laminate is then removed from the tool.
Thermoforming is accomplished by vacuum, positive air pressure, plug-assisted vacuum forming, or combinations and variations of these, once the sheet of material reaches thermoforming temperatures, typically of from 140° C. to 185° C. or higher. A pre-stretched bubble step is used, especially on large parts, to improve material distribution. In one embodiment, an articulating rack lifts the heated laminate towards a male forming tool, assisted by the application of a vacuum from orifices in the male forming tool. Once the laminate is firmly formed about the male forming tool, the thermoformed shaped laminate is then cooled, typically by blowers. Plug-assisted forming is generally used for small, deep drawn parts. Plug material, design, and timing can be critical to optimization of the process. Plugs made from insulating foam avoid premature quenching of the plastic. The plug shape is usually similar to the mold cavity, but smaller and without part detail. A round plug bottom will usually promote even material distribution and uniform side-wall thickness.
The shaped laminate is then cooled in the mold. Sufficient cooling to maintain a mold temperature of 30° C. to 65° C. is desirable. The part is below 90° C. to 100° C. before ejection in one embodiment. For the good behavior in thermoforming, the lowest melt flow rate polymers are desirable. The shaped laminate is then trimmed of excess laminate material.
Blow molding is another suitable forming means, which includes injection blow molding, multi-layer blow molding, extrusion blow molding, and stretch blow molding, and is especially suitable for substantially closed or hollow objects, such as, for example, gas tanks and other fluid containers. Blow molding is described in more detail in, for example, CONCISE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF POLYMER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING 90-92 (Jacqueline I. Kroschwitz, ed. John Wiley & Sons 1990).
In yet another embodiment of the formation and shaping process, profile co-extrusion can be used. The profile co-extrusion process parameters are as above for the blow molding process, except the die temperatures (dual zone top and bottom) range from 150° C. to 235° C., the feed blocks are from 90° C. to 250° C., and the water cooling tank temperatures are from 10° C. to 40° C.
One embodiment of an injection molding process is described as follows. The shaped laminate is placed into the injection molding tool. The mold is closed and the substrate material is injected into the mold. The substrate material has a melt temperature between 200° C. and 300° C., such as between 215° C. and 250° C. and is injected into the mold at an injection speed of between 2 and 10 seconds. After injection, the material is packed or held at a predetermined time and pressure to make the part dimensionally and aesthetically correct. Typical time periods are from 5 to 25 seconds and pressures from 1.380 kPa to 10,400 kPa. The mold is cooled between 10° C. and 70° C. to cool the substrate. The temperature will depend on the desired gloss and appearance desired. Typical cooling time is from 10 to 30 seconds, depending on part on the thickness. Finally, the mold is opened and the shaped composite article ejected.
Likewise, molded articles may be fabricated by injecting molten polymer into a mold that shapes and solidifies the molten polymer into desirable geometry and thickness of molded articles. Sheet may be made either by extruding a substantially flat profile from a die, onto a chill roll, or alternatively by calendaring. Sheet will generally be considered to have a thickness of from 10 mils to 100 mils (254 μm to 2540 μm), although sheet may be substantially thicker. Tubing or pipe may be obtained by profile extrusion for uses in medical, potable water, land drainage applications or the like. The profile extrusion process involves the extrusion of molten polymer through a die. The extruded tubing or pipe is then solidified by chill water or cooling air into a continuous extruded articles. The tubing will generally be in the range of from 0.31 cm to 2.54 cm in outside diameter, and have a wall thickness of in the range of from 254 cm to 0.5 cm. The pipe will generally be in the range of from 2.54 cm to 254 cm in outside diameter, and have a wall thickness of in the range of from 0.5 cm to 15 cm. Sheet made from the products of an embodiment of a version of the present invention may be used to form containers. Such containers may be formed by thermoforming, solid phase pressure forming, stamping and other shaping techniques. Sheets may also be formed to cover floors or walls or other surfaces.
In an embodiment of the thermoforming process, the oven temperature is between 160° C. and 195° C., the time in the oven between 10 and 20 seconds, and the die temperature, typically a male die, between 10° C. and 71° C. The final thickness of the cooled (room temperature), shaped laminate is from 10 μm to 6000 μm in one embodiment, from 200 μm to 6000 μm in another embodiment, and from 250 μm to 3000 μm in yet another embodiment, and from 500 μm to 1550 μm in yet another embodiment, a desirable range being any combination of any upper thickness limit with any lower thickness limit.
In an embodiment of the injection molding process, wherein a substrate material is injection molded into a tool including the shaped laminate, the melt temperature of the substrate material is between 230° C. and 255° C. in one embodiment, and between 235° C. and 250° C. in another embodiment, the fill time from 2 to 10 seconds in one embodiment, from 2 to 8 seconds in another embodiment, and a tool temperature of from 25° C. to 65° C. in one embodiment, and from 27° C. and 60° C. in another embodiment. In a desirable embodiment, the substrate material is at a temperature that is hot enough to melt any tie-layer material or backing layer to achieve adhesion between the layers.
In yet another embodiment of the invention, the in-situ polymer blends of this invention may be secured to a substrate material using a blow molding operation. Blow molding is particularly useful in such applications as for making closed articles such as fuel tanks and other fluid containers, playground equipment, outdoor furniture and small enclosed structures. In one embodiment of this process, Compositions of this invention are extruded through a multi-layer head, followed by placement of the uncooled laminate into a parison in the mold. The mold, with either male or female patterns inside, is then closed and air is blown into the mold to form the part.
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the steps outlined above may be varied, depending upon the desired result. For example, an extruded sheet of the compositions of this invention may be directly thermoformed or blow molded without cooling, thus skipping a cooling step. Other parameters may be varied as well in order to achieve a finished composite article having desirable features.
The in-situ polymer blends of this invention are useful for making a variety of articles such as weather seals, hoses, belts, gaskets, moldings, boots, elastic fibers and like articles. Foamed end-use articles are also envisioned. More specifically, the blends of the invention are particularly useful for making vehicle parts, such as but not limited to, weather seals, brake parts including, but not limited to cups, coupling disks, diaphragm cups, boots such as constant velocity joints and rack and pinion joints, tubing, sealing gaskets, parts of hydraulically or pneumatically operated apparatus, o-rings, pistons, valves, valve seats, valve guides, and other elastomeric polymer based parts or elastomeric polymers combined with other materials such as metal, plastic combination materials which will be known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Also contemplated are transmission belts including V-belts, toothed belts with truncated ribs containing fabric faced V's, ground short fiber reinforced Vs or molded gum with short fiber flocked V's. The cross section of such belts and their number of ribs may vary with the final use of the belt, the type of market and the power to transmit. They also can be flat made of textile fabric reinforcement with frictioned outside faces. Vehicles contemplated where these parts will find application include, but are not limited to passenger autos, motorcycles, trucks, boats and other vehicular conveyances.
EXAMPLES
The invention will now be more particularly described with reference to the Examples and the accompanying drawings.
In the Examples, molecular weights (number average molecular weight (Mn), weight average molecular weight (Mw), and z-average molecular weight (Mz)) were determined using a Waters 150 Size Exclusion Chromatograph (SEC) equipped with a differential refractive index detector (DRI), an online low angle light scattering (LALLS) detector and a viscometer (VIS). The details of these detectors as well as their calibrations have been described by, for example, T. Sun, P. Brant, R. R. Chance, and W. W. Graessley, in 34(19) MACROMOLECULES 6812-6820 (2001), incorporated herein by reference. Solvent for the SEC experiment was prepared by adding 6 grams of butylated hydroxy toluene (BHT) as an antioxidant to a 4 liter bottle of 1,2,4 Trichlorobenzene (TCB) (Aldrich Reagent grade) and waiting for the BHT to solubilize. The TCB mixture was then filtered through a 0.7 micron glass pre-filter and subsequently through a 0.1 micron Teflon filter. There was an additional online 0.7 micron glass pre-filter/0.22 micron Teflon filter assembly between the high pressure pump and SEC columns. The TCB was then degassed with an online degasser (Phenomenex, Model DG-4000) before entering the SEC. Polymer solutions were prepared by placing dry polymer in a glass container, adding the desired amount of TCB, then heating the mixture at 160° C. with continuous agitation for about 2 hours. All quantities were measured gravimetrically. The TCB densities used to express the polymer concentration in mass/volume units were 1.463 g/ml at room temperature and 1.324 g/ml at 135° C. The injection concentration ranged from 1.0 to 2.0 mg/ml, with lower concentrations being used for higher molecular weight samples.
The branching index in the Examples was measured using SEC with an on-line viscometer (SEC-VIS) and is reported as g′ at each molecular weight in the SEC trace. The branching index g′ is defined as:




  
    g
    ′
  
  =
  
    
      η
      b
    
    
      η
      l
    
  




where ηb is the intrinsic viscosity of the branched polymer and ηl is the intrinsic viscosity of a linear polymer of the same viscosity-averaged molecular weight (Mv) as the branched polymer. ηl=KMvα, K and α were measured values for linear polymers and should be obtained on the same SEC-DRI-LS-VIS instrument as the one used for branching index measurement. For polypropylene samples presented in this invention, K=0.0002288 and α=0.705 were used. The SEC-DRI-LS-VIS method obviates the need to correct for polydispersities, since the intrinsic viscosity and the molecular weight were measured at individual elution volumes, which arguably contain narrowly dispersed polymer. Linear polymers selected as standards for comparison should be of the same viscosity average molecular weight, monomer content and composition distribution. Linear character for polymer containing C2 to C10 monomers is confirmed by Carbon-13 NMR using the method of Randall (C29 (2&3) REV. MACROMOL. CHEM. PHYS. 285-297). Linear character for C11 and above monomers is confirmed by GPC analysis using a MALLS detector. For example, for a copolymer of propylene, the NMR should not indicate branching greater than that of the co-monomer (i.e. if the comonomer is butene, branches of greater than two carbons should not be present). For a homopolymer of propylene, the GPC should not show branches of more than one carbon atom. When a linear standard is desired for a polymer where the comonomer is C9 or more, one can refer to T. Sun, P. Brant, R. R. Chance, and W. W. Graessley, 34(19) MACROMOLECULES 6812-6820 (2001) for protocols on determining standards for those polymers. In the case of syndiotactic polymers, the standard should have a comparable amount of syndiotacticty as measured by Carbon 13 NMR. The viscosity averaged g′ was calculated using the following equation:





  
    g
    vls
    ′
  
  =
  
    
      ∑
      
        
          
            C
            i
          
          ⁡
          
            [
            
              η
              i
            
            ]
          
        
        b
      
    
    
      ∑
      
        
          C
          i
        
        ⁢
        
          KM
          i
          a
        
      
    
  




Where Ci is the polymer concentration in the slice i in the polymer peak, and [ηi]b is the viscosity of the branched polymer in slice i of the polymer peak, and Mi is the weight averaged molecular weight in slice i of the polymer peak measured by light scattering, K and α are as defined above.
Peak melting point (Tm) and peak crystallization temperature (Tc) were determined using the following procedure according to ASTM E 794-85. Crystallinity was calculated using ΔHf determined using ASTM D 3417-99. Differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) data were obtained using a TA Instruments model Q100 machine or a Perkin-Elmer DSC-7. Samples weighing approximately 5-10 mg were sealed in aluminum sample pans. The DSC data were recorded by first cooling the sample to −100° C. and then gradually heating it to 200° C. at a rate of 10° C./minute. The sample was kept at 200° C. for 5 minutes before a second cooling-heating cycle was applied. Both the first and second cycle thermal events were recorded. Areas under the melting curves were measured and used to determine the ΔHf and the degree of crystallinity. The percent crystallinity is calculated using the formula, [area under the curve (Joules/gram)/B (Joules/gram)]*100, where B is the ΔHf for the homopolymer of the major monomer component. These values for B were obtained from the Polymer Handbook. Fourth Edition, published by John Wiley and Sons, New York 1999. A value of 189 J/g (B) was used as the ΔHf for 100% crystalline polypropylene. A value of 290 J/g is used for the ΔHf for 100% crystalline polyethylene. For polymers displaying multiple cooling and melting peaks, all the peak crystallization temperatures and peaks melting temperatures were reported. The ΔHf for each melting peak was calculated individually.
The glass transition temperature (Tg) was measured by ASTM E 1356 using a TA Instruments model Q100 machine.
Morphology data were obtained using an Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) in tapping phase. All specimens were analyzed within 8 hours after cryofacing to prevent specimen relaxation. During cryofacing, the specimens were cooled to −130° C. and cut with diamond knives in a Reichert cryogenic microtome. They were then stored in a dissector under flowing dry nitrogen gas to warm up to ambient temperatures without condensation being formed. Finally, the faced specimens were mounted in a miniature steel vise for AFM analysis. The AFM measurements were performed in air on a NanoScope Dimension 3000 scanning probe microscope (Digital Instrument) using a rectangular 225-mm Si cantilever. The stiffness of the cantilever was about 4 N/m with a resonance frequency of about 70 kHz. The free vibration amplitude was high, in the range of 80 nm to 100 nm, with a RMS setting of 3.8 volts. While the set point ratio was maintained at a value equal to or lower than 0.5, the contact set point was adjusted routinely to ensure repulsive contacts with positive phase shifts. The cantilever was running at or slightly below its resonance frequency.
AFM phase images of all specimens were converted into a TIFF format and processed using PHOTOSHOP (Adobe Systems, Inc.). The image processing tool kit (Reindeer Games. Inc.) was applied for image measurements. Results of image measurements were written into a text file for subsequent data processing using EXCEL (Microsoft) or MATLAB (MathWorks, Inc.) for computing sizes/shapes of dispersed phases, co-continuity factor of co-continuous phases, or nearest-neighbor inter-particle distances.
Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) was used to study details of the interface between the ethylene/propylene/diene rubber and the semi-crystalline polypropylene phases. The instrument used was the JEOL 2000FX microscope. A heavy metal staining technique was employed to provide contrast to delineate the details of the sample morphology. Ruthenium tetroxide provides excellent contrast between amorphous and crystalline regions and was used. Lower density and amorphous polymers take up more stain than do higher density and more crystalline components. Thus heavily stained components appear darker in TEM amplitude contrast images whereas less heavily stained materials appear lighter. The TEM analytical method used involved:

    
    
        Setting the orientation of the plane of analysis. Typically the MD-ND (machine direction/normal direction) plane is preferred for samples that may be oriented in the machine direction.
        Creating a deformation-free face through the bulk polymer sample using a cryomicrotome.
        Staining with ruthenium tetroxide vapor for about 8 hours.
        Cutting and collecting ultrathin (about 100 nm) sections from the stained face using an ultramicrotome. The cutting is done using a diamond knife. Sections are floated onto TEM grids.
        Loading sections into the TEM for examination at the appropriate accelerating voltage (typically 160 to 200 kV).
        Examining the sections to determine level of sampling needed.
        Acquiring digital images using appropriate vendor software.
    
    


The ethylene content of ethylene/propylene copolymers was determined using FTIR according to the following technique. A thin homogeneous film of polymer, pressed at a temperature of about 150° C. was mounted on a Perkin Elmer Spectrum 2000 infrared spectrophotometer. A full spectrum of the sample from 600 cm−1 to 4000 cm−1 was recorded and the area under propylene band at about 1165 cm−1 and the area of ethylene band at about 732 cm−1 in the spectrum were calculated. The baseline integration range for the methylene rocking band is nominally from 695 cm−1 to the minimum between 745 and 775 cm−1. For the polypropylene band the baseline and integration range is nominally from 1195 to 1126 cm−1. The ethylene content in wt % was calculated according to the following equation:

ethylene content(wt. %)=72.698-86.495X+13.696X2 

where X=AR/(AR+1) and AR is the ratio of the area for the peak at about 1165 cm−1 to the area of the peak at about 732 cm−1.

The number of vinyl chain ends, vinylidene chain ends and vinylene chain ends is determined using 1H NMR at 120° C. using deuterated tetrachloroethane as the solvent on an at least 250 MHz NMR spectrometer, and in selected cases, confirmed by 13C NMR. Resconi has reported proton and carbon assignments (neat perdeuterated tetrachloroethane used for proton spectra, while a 50:50 mixture of normal and perdeuterated tetrachloroethane was used for carbon spectra; all spectra were recorded at 100° C. on a Bruker spectrometer operating at 500 MHz for proton and 125 MHz for carbon) for vinyl terminated propylene oligomers in 114 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 1025-1032 (1992) that are useful herein. Vinyl chain ends are reported as a molar percentage of the total number of moles of unsaturated groups (that is, the sum of allyl chain ends, vinylidene chain ends, vinylene chain ends, and the like) or vinyl per chain.
Solvent extraction was used to isolate the different polymer species of the in-reactor polymer blends. The fractionations were carried out in a two-step successive solvent extraction when the polymer blend did not contain any oil: one involves cyclohexane extraction, the other xylene Soxhlet extraction. In the cyclohexane solvent extraction, about 0.3 gram of polymer was dissolved in about 60 ml of cyclohexane to isolate the uncured and lightly branched elastomeric components of the polymer blend. The mixture was continuously stirred at room temperature for about 48 hours. The soluble fraction (referred as cyclohexane solubles) was separated from the insoluble material (referred as cyclohexane insolubles) using filtration under vacuum. The insoluble material was then subjected to the xylene soxhlet extraction procedure. In this step, the insoluble material from the room temperature cyclohexane extraction was first extracted for about 24 hours with xylene. The xylene insoluble portion (referred as xylene insolubles) was recovered by filtration and is the extract containing the at least partially cross-linked elastomeric copolymer. The remaining portion was cooled down to room temperature and retained in a glass container for 24 hours for precipitation. The precipitated component (referred as xylene precipitate) was recovered through filtration and the soluble component (referred as xylene soluble) was recovered by evaporating the xylene solvent. The xylene precipitate fraction is where the thermoplastic crystalline component resides. In the case of blends containing paraffinic oil, plasticizer and the like, another Soxhlet solvent extraction step was performed on the sample for 24 hours to isolate the oil from the blend before the cyclohexane extraction and xylene Soxhlet extraction using an azeoptrope of acetone and cyclohexane in the ratio 2:1 by volume. The soluble fraction is referred as to azeoptrope solubles.
In order to measure the physical properties of the polymer blends, samples were first mixed in a Brabender melt mixer with about 45 mL mixing head. The polymer was stabilized with antioxidant during mixing in the Brabender. The Brabender was operated at 100 rpm and at temperature of 180° C. Mixing time at temperature was 5-10 minutes, after which the sample was removed from the mixing chamber. The homogenized samples were molded under compression into film on a Carver hydraulic press for analysis. About 7 grams of the homogenized polymer were molded between brass platens lined with TeflonTM coated aluminum foil. A 0.033 inch (0.08 cm) thick chase with a square opening 4 inch×4 inch (10.2×10.2 cm) was used to control sample thickness. After one minute of preheat at 170° C. or 180° C., under minimal pressure, the hydraulic load was gradually increased to 10,000 to 15,000 lbs, at which it was held for three minutes. Subsequently the sample and molding plates were cooled for three minutes under 10,000 to 15,000 lbs load between the water-cooled platens of the press. Plaques were allowed to equilibrate at room temperature for a minimum of 24 hours prior to physical property testing.
β relaxation, Loss Modulus (E′′) and Storage Modulus (E′) were measured by dynamic mechanical thermal analysis (DMTA). The instrument used was the RSA II, Rheometrics Solid Analyzer II from TA Instruments, New Castle. Del. The instrument was operated in tension mode and used molded rectangular samples. Sample conditions were: 0.1% strain, 1 Hz frequency, and 2° C. per minute heating rate, covering the temperature range from −135° C. to the melting point of the sample. Samples were molded at about 200° C. Typical sample dimensions were 23 mm length×6.4 mm width×thickness between 0.25 mm and 0.7 mm, depending on the sample. Tan δ is the ratio of E′′/E′. The output of these DMTA experiments is the storage modulus (E′) and loss modulus (E′′). The storage modulus measures the elastic response or the ability of the material to store energy, and the loss modulus measures the viscous response or the ability of the material to dissipate energy. The ratio of E′′E′(=tan δ) gives a measure of the damping ability of the material. Energy dissipation mechanisms (i.e., relaxation modes) show up as peaks in tan δ, and are associated with a drop in E′ as a function of temperature. The uncertainty associated with reported values of E′ is expected to be on the order of ±10%, due to variability introduced by the molding process.
Shore hardness was determined according to ISO 868 at 23° C. using a Durometer.
Stress-strain properties such as ultimate tensile strength, ultimate elongation, and 100% modulus were measured on 2 mm thick compression molded plaques at 23° C. by using an Instron testing machine according to ISO 37.
Compression set test was measured according to ISO 815A.
Tension set was measured according to ISO 2285.
Oil swell (oil gain) was determined after soaking a die-cut sample from compression molded plaque in IRM No. 3 fluid for 24 hours at 125° C. according to ASTM D 471.
Viscosity was measured using LCR (Laboratory Capillary Rheometer) according to ASTM D 3835-02 using a Dynisco Capillary rheometer at 30:1 L/D (length/diameter) ratio, a shear rate of 1200 1/s and a temperature of 204° C. The entrance angle of the laboratory capillary rheometer is 180°, barrel diameter is 9.55 mm. The heat soak time is 6 minutes.
Examples 1A to 1C
Three polymer blends were produced in a two-stage polymerization reaction by polymerizing propylene in a first stage to make homopolymer, and copolymerizing propylene and ethylene as well as a diene cross-linking agent in a second stage in the presence of the homopolymer produced in the first stage. The polymerization was carried out in an autoclave reactor equipped with a stirrer, an external water/steam jacket for temperature control, a regulated supply of dry nitrogen, ethylene, propylene, and a septum inlet for introduction of other solvents, catalysts and scavenger solutions. The reactor was first washed using hot toluene and then dried and degassed thoroughly prior to use. All the solvents and monomers were purified by passing through a 1-liter basic alumina column activated at 600° C., followed by a column of molecular sieves activated at 600° C. or Selexsorb CD column prior to transferring into the reactor.
In the first stage of polymerization, triisobutyl aluminum (TIBAL) (25 wt % in hexane, purchased from Sigma-Aldrich) solution was first added to the reactor. Then the catalyst solution was cannulated into the reactor using solvent. In succession, solvent (diluent) and propylene were added into the reactor. All of these were conducted at room temperature. The mixture was then stirred and heated to a desired temperature. The first stage of polymerization was ended when the desired amount of polypropylene was produced, determined by monitoring the reactor pressure during the reaction. Thereafter, the reactor was depressurized by venting the unreacted propylene and solvent to the atmosphere until the reactor pressure reached about 5 psig (34.5 kPa) to maintain an inert atmosphere in the reactor for the continuation of polymerization in the second stage.
In the second stage of polymerization, propylene was added into the mixture produced in the first stage. The mixture was then stirred and heated to a desired reaction temperature. In succession, diene and ethylene were added into the reactor. The ethylene was fed on demand to maintain a relative constant reactor pressure during the polymerization reaction. The ethylene consumption was monitored during the reaction using a mass flow meter. The polymerization reaction was terminated when desired amount of rubber was produced. Thereafter, the reactor was cooled down and unreacted monomer and solvent (diluent) were vented to the atmosphere. The resulting mixture, containing mostly solvent, polymer and unreacted monomers, was collected in a collection box and first air-dried in a hood to evaporate most of the solvent, and then dried in a vacuum oven at a temperature of about 90° C. for about 12 hours.
1,9-decadiene was used as the diene cross-linking agent in the elastomeric copolymerization stage. The 1,9-decadiene was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and was purified by first passing through an alumina column activated at high temperature under nitrogen, followed by a molecular sieve activated at high temperature under nitrogen.
Rac-dimethylsilyl bis(2-methyl, 4-phenylindenyl)zirconium dimethyl catalyst preactivated with N,N-dimethylanilinium tetrakis (pentafluorophenyl) borate (both obtained from Albemarle) at a molar ratio of about 1:1 in toluene was fed into the reactor in Stage 1. Example 1A and 1C were conducted in a 0.5-liter autoclave reactor with no additional catalyst being added in Stage 2. Example 1B was produced in a 1-liter autoclave reactor with additional catalyst added in the second stage of polymerization. No reactor depressurization was used at the end of stage 1 and no additional propylene was added into the reactor in the second stage in Example 1B. Details of the experimental conditions, catalysts employed and the properties of the resultant polymer blends are listed in Table 1A below.









TABLE 1A









Example #











1A
1B
1C











Polymerization in Stage 1












Reaction temperature (° C.)
70
70
70



Amount of catalyst (mg)
2
0.5
2



Propylene #1 (ml)
125
500
125



Hexane (ml)
125
700
125



TIBAL (25 wt %) (ml)
0.5
4
0.5



Reaction time in stage 1 (min)
15
3.2
15







Polymerization in Stage 2












Reaction temperature (° C.)
70
85
70



Amount of catalyst (mg)
0
0.72
0



Propylene #2 (ml)
100
0
70



Ethylene head pressure (psi)
100
180
100



1,9-decadiene (ml)
0.3
6
100



Hexane (ml)
0
100
0.1



Reaction time in stage 2 (min)
60
28
60



Yield (g)
78.8
151.7
99.9



Tc (° C.)
119.8
109.4
121.5



Tm (° C.)
155.9
156.9
155.6



Heat of fusion (J/g)
36.3
24.6
60.4



Tg (° C.)
−50.1
−35.4
−46.6



Ethylene content (wt %)
22.6
19.1
19.5



Xylene precipitate (wt %)
44.4
27.3
76.4



Xylene insolubles (wt %)
27.2
40.2
1.0



Xylene solubles (wt %)
10.2
7.7
7.5



Cyclohexane solubles (wt %)
18.2
24.9
15.1



Degree of cross-link (%)
48.9
55.3
4.1










Degree of cross-link is defined as:




  
    Degree
    ⁢
    
      
    
    ⁢
    of
    ⁢
    
      
    
    ⁢
    cross
    ⁢
    
      -
    
    ⁢
    link
  
  =
  
    
      
        Percent
        ⁢
        
          
        
        ⁢
        of
        ⁢
        
          
        
        ⁢
        xylene
        ⁢
        
          
        
        ⁢
        insoluble
      
      
        100
        -
        
          percent
          ⁢
          
            
          
          ⁢
          of
          ⁢
          
            
          
          ⁢
          xylene
          ⁢
          
            
          
          ⁢
          precipitate
        
      
    
    ×
    100
  




Desirably, the degree of cross-link for the inventive, in situ blend (prior to post-reactor cross-linking) is at least 20 or 30 or 40%, or within a range from 20 or 30 or 35% to 70 or 80 or 85 or 90%.
The Tg values shown in the table above refer to the elastomer component in the reactor-produced blend examples. The values provide an indication of the amorphous nature of the elastomer component; thus Example 1A which contains a higher level of ethylene comonomer appears more amorphous than Example 1B with a higher Tg. The Tg of the polypropylene component—located primarily in the xylene precipitate fraction—is generally about 0° C., typical for semi-crystalline propylene homopolymers.
The two polymer blends produced in Examples 1A and 1B were subjected to solvent extraction. The amount of each extracted fraction is expressed as the wt % of the total polymer blend and is listed in Table 1A. Some of the physical properties of these fractionated components are listed in Table 1B and 1C.







TABLE 1B







Physical properties for the fractions obtained through solvent


extraction for Example 1A












Cyclohexane
Xylene
Xylene
Xylene


Fraction
solubles
Insolubles
Precipitates
Solubles














Tc (° C.)
15.0
—
—
—


Tm (° C.)
—
146
154
—


Tg (° C.)
−50.9
—
—
—


Heat of fusion (J/g)
—
 35
—
—


Mn (kg/mol)
26.4
—
—
—


Mw (kg/mol)
72.8
—
—
—


Mz (kg/mol)
273.5
—
—
—


g'vis
0.84
—
—
—


Ethylene content
—
—
—
—


(wt %)
















TABLE 1C







Physical properties for the fractions obtained through solvent


extraction for Example 1B













cyclo-
cyclo-






hexane
hexane
xylene
xylene
xylene


Fraction
solubles
insolubles
insolubles
precipitates
solubles















Tc (° C.)
12.8
—
—
—
—


Tm (° C.)
65.0
—
—
—
—


Tg (° C.)
−40.5
—
—
—
—


Heat of fusion
3.3
—
—
—
—


(J/g)


Mn (kg/mol)
11.4
—
—
196.5
 69.8


Mw (kg/mol)
34.0
—
—
432.5
225.1


Mz (kg/mol)
92.6
—
—
877.9
955.9


g'vis
—
—
—
—
—


Ethylene
25.7
16.9
—
—
—


content (wt %)









The polymer blends produced in Examples 1A and 1B were melt mixed and molded under compression into plaques, and tested for thermoplastic elastomer applications. Examples 1B was also compounded with about 30% of Sunpar 150 M oil at an elevated temperature in a Brabender mixer, and molded under compression into plaques, and tested for thermoplastic elastomer applications. The performance data are listed in Table 1D.







TABLE 1D







Performance data for Examples 1A and 1B










Polymer
1A
1B
1B













Polymer (%)
100
100
70


Oil (Sunpar 150 M) (%)
0
0
30


Hardness (SHORE)
33D
72A
49A


Ultimate tension strength (psi)
2101
1144
542


(ISO37)


Ultimate elongation (%) (ISO37)
153
332
340


100% Modulus (psi)
1953
673
274


Viscosity (Pa-s)
135
179.6
75.6


Tension set (%) (ISO2285)
7.5
19.75
15.75


Compression set, 70° C./22 Hrs (%)
62.18
62.74
48.47


(ISO815A)


Weight gain, 121° C./24 hrs (%)
330.16
495.15
380.2









The morphology of each of the blends produced in Examples 1A and 1B was examined using AFM according to the procedure described above and the results are shown in FIGS. 1A and 1B. It was observed that the rubber was in the discrete particle phase embedded in polypropylene matrix. The particle size of the dispersed phase varied in a range of 0.04 to 3 μm with an average particle size of about 0.48 μm for the dispersed phase of the blend of Example 1A (see FIG. 1D). The particle size at the lower end was estimated due to the limitation of AFM image resolution. The presence of sub-micrometer particles is illustrated in the TEM image shown in FIG. 1C. The particle size distribution of the dispersed phase at the lower end of particle size was analyzed using TEM image. As an example, FIG. 1E shows the data obtained from the TEM image of Example 1A.
DSC melting and crystallization on the xylene insoluble fraction from Example 1B is shown in FIG. 1F. The xylene insoluble fraction is mainly crosslinked elastomer produced in the reactor. The DSC first heating shows the presence of an exotherm starting at about 175° C. This exotherm is unexpected, because it occurs during heating and because the sample fraction contains primarily crosslinked rubber. Generally, crystallization (of a propylene polymer in this case) would be suspected from the presence of an exotherm. This is however unlikely, given that it occurs at such a high temperature. It is believed that this exotherm reflects shrinkage in the sample. Some of the crosslinked elastomer appears to be linked to a small amount of polypropylene, which constrains its movement. Following the melting of the polypropylene (complete by about 175° C.), mobility is regained and the elastomer is able to shrink. Subsequent crystallization and 2nd heating of this fraction also exhibit a response, as is seen by baseline changes at about this temperature. This observation points to the capability of the process to produce cross products, which offer novel product features (in this case unexpected high levels of shrinkage).
In addition to the capability offered by the process to form novel cross products, unique morphologies are noted in the polypropylene matrix. An example of such a morphology is shown in FIG. 1G. This TEM micrograph is of Example 1C. FIG. 1G shows the uniform, fine-sized rubber particles delivered by the process (largest dimension about 0.2 μm). This is to be compared against a size generally 0.5 μm or larger for current commercial TPVs via dynamic vulcanization, as shown in FIG. 1H, which is are TEM representations for Santoprene grade 201-55 (available from Advanced Elastomer Systems in Akron. Ohio). Additionally, the micrograph of FIG. 1G shows the presence of spherulites with transverse oriented lamellae, different from the more usual radially-oriented lamellae. The presence of these transverse spherulites in metallocene polypropylene has been related to the gamma phase or polymorph of polypropylene crystals (reference: R.G. Alamo and coworkers, Polymer, 45, 3441-3455, 2004). The presence of gamma phase crystallites, along with the more common alpha form, provides a broadened melting range. This offers benefits for the blends of this invention in certain thermoplastic fabricating operations (e.g. thermoforming).
Examples 2A to 2C
These three samples were produced in a 2-liter autoclave reactor equipped similarly to the 0.5 liter reactor described in Examples 1A and 1B. These examples demonstrate a two-stage polymerization reaction with the use of rac-dimethylsilyl bis(2-methyl-4-phenylindenyl)zirconium dimethyl catalyst (Catalyst A) in the first stage to produce polypropylene and [di(p-triethylsilylphenyl)methylene](cyclopentadienyl) (3,8-di-t-butylfluorenyl)hafnium dimethyl catalyst (Catalyst B) (obtained from Albemarle) in the second stage to produce ethylene propylene diene rubber. Both catalysts were preactivated by dimethylanilinum tetrakis(heptafluoro-2-naphthyl) borate at a molar ratio of 1:1 in toluene. The general procedure described above in Examples 1A and 1B was followed with the following exceptions: (1) tri-n-octylaluminum (TNOA) (25 wt % in hexane, Sigma Aldrich) was used as a scavenger, (2) no reactor depressurization at the end of stage 1; (3) about 6 ml of air was injected into the reactor at the end of stage 1 to deactivate the Catalyst A and then additional 5 ml of TNOA was injected at about 10 minutes after; (4) the second stage polymerization started with ethylene addition and diene was injected after ethylene introduction; (5) Catalyst B was injected into reactor in stage 2 right after diene addition. The detailed reaction condition and polymer properties are listed in Table 2A.









TABLE 2A









Example #











2A
2B
2C











Polymerization in Stage 1












Reaction temperature (° C.)
75
75
75



Amount of catalyst A (mg)
0.60
0.50
0.50



Propylene #1 (ml)
700
700
700



Toluene (ml)
500
500
500



TNOA (25 wt %) (ml)
8.0
8.0
8.0



Reaction time in stage 1 (min)
11.0
7.0
7.0







Polymerization in Stage 2












Reaction temperature (° C.)
75
75
80



Amount of catalyst B (mg)
1.20
1.00
1.10



Propylene #2 (ml)
0
0
0



Ethylene head pressure (psi)
230
250
250



1,9-decadiene (ml)
47.0
50.0
50.0



Toluene (ml)
300
300
300



Reaction time in stage 2 (min)
22
8
19



Yield (g)
57.3
53.1
119.0



Tc (° C.)
109.3
111.4
102.4



Tm (° C.)
157.8
155.3
150.6



Heat of fusion (J/g)
50.6
40.0
22.8



Tg (° C.)
−46.4
−48.1
−44.0



Ethylene content (wt %)


22.4



Xylene precipitate (wt %)
45.03
45.03
22.73



Xylene insolubles (wt %)
23.12
29.73
60.08



Xylene solubles (wt %)
22.43
18.39
11.23



Cyclohexane solubles (wt %)
9.42
6.85
5.97



Degree of cross-link (%)
42.1
54.1
77.8










The polymer blends produced in Examples 2A to 2C were subjected to solvent extraction. The amount of each fraction is listed in Table 2A. Some of the physical properties of the fractionated components for the polymer blend of Example 2C are listed in Table 2B.







TABLE 2B







Physical properties for the fractions obtained through solvent


extraction for Example 2C













Xylene





Cyclohexane
Insoluble film
Xylene
Xylene


Fraction
Solubles
without filler
Precipitate
Solubles





Tc (° C.)
—
—
117.46
—


Tm (° C.)
—
—
154.98
—


Tg (° C.)
—
—
—
—


Heat of fusion
—
—
114.10
—


(J/g)


Ethylene content
—
27.7
—
—


(wt %)









The polymer blends produced in Examples 2A to 2C were melt mixed and molded under compression into plaques, and tested for thermoplastic elastomer applications. Example 2C was also formulated with Paralux 6001R oil during the melt mixing. The performance data are listed in Table 2C.







TABLE 2C







Performance data for Examples 2A to 2C











Polymer
2A
2B
2C
2C














Polymer (%)
100.0
100.0
100.0
69.93


Oil (Paralux 6001R)
0
0
0
30.07


(%)


Hardness (SHORE)
88A
91A
75A
57A


Ultimate tension
2037
2330
1255
617.4


strength (psi) (ISO37)


Ultimate elongation
286
364
125
203.8


(%) (ISO37)


100% Modulus (psi)
1517
17040
1138
356.1


Viscosity (Pa-s)
NA
NA
NA
198.7


Tension set (%)
36.5
39.2
15
8.5


(ISO2285)


Compression set,
55.1
56.9
29.4
27.6


70° C./22 Hrs (%)


(ISO815A)


Weight gain, 121° C./24 hrs
171.3
186.1
254.9
235.0


(%)









A transmission electron micrograph of a molded part cross-section produced from the polymer blend of Example 2C is shown in FIG. 2A.
Reactor blend Examples 1A and 2C were analyzed by small angle oscillatory shear experiments. This rheological analysis provides data on the viscoelastic properties of the polymer blends. Measurements include those of the storage and loss modulii (G′, G′′) over a range of frequencies, at a given melt temperature. The rheological data were analyzed using the Van Gurp—Palmen treatment (M. Van Gurp and J. Palmen, 67(5) RHEOLOGY BULLETIN (1998)), whereby the phase angle δ (=tan−1 (G′′/G′)) is plotted against the absolute value of the complex modulus |G*|=(G′2+G′′2)1/2. This representation of linear viscoelastic data is a powerful means of characterizing molecular and structural features of polymers. For example, low levels of long chain branching in polyolefins can be detected and quantified on a relative basis, using this methodology. The data are shown in FIG. 2C. The figure shows the region of δ vs |G*| where current commercial Santoprene grades (from Advanced Elastomer Systems in Akron, Ohio) reside. These products are TPVs produced via dynamic vulcanization.
Example 3A
This example demonstrates a series dual-reactor continuous solution process with the use of rac-dimethylsilyl bis(2-methyl-4-phenylindenyl)zirconium dimethyl catalyst (Catalyst A) in the first reactor to produce polypropylene and [di(p-triethylsilylphenyl)methylene](cyclopentadienyl) (3,8-di-t-butylfluorenyl)hafnium dimethyl catalyst (Catalyst B) in the second reactor to produce ethylene/propylene/diene copolymer. Polymerization was performed in a series dual-reactor continuous solution process. Both of the reactors were 0.5-liter stainless steel autoclave reactors and were equipped with a stirrer, a water-cooling/steam-heating element with a temperature controller, and a pressure controller. Solvents, monomers such as ethylene and propylene were first purified by passing through a three-column purification system. The purification system consisted of an Oxiclear column (Model #RGP-R1-500 from Labelear) followed by a 5A and a 3A molecular sieve columns. Purification columns were regenerated periodically whenever there was evidence of lower activity of polymerization. Both the 3A and 5A molecular sieve columns were regenerated in-house under nitrogen at a set temperature of 260° C. and 315° C., respectively. The molecular sieve material was purchased from Aldrich. Oxiclear column was regenerated in the original manufacture.
The solvent feed to the reactors was measured by a mass-flow meter. A Pulsafeed pump controlled the solvent flow rate and increased the solvent pressure to the reactors. The compressed, liquefied propylene feed was measured by a mass flow meter and the flow was controlled by a Pulsafeed pump. The diene was fed into the reactor through an Eldex pump and the flow rate was measured using a Micro-Motion Coriolis-type flow meter. The solvent, monomers and diene were fed into a manifold first. Ethylene from in-house supply was delivered as a gas solubilized in the chilled solvent/monomer mixture in the manifold. The mixture of solvent and monomers were then chilled to about −15° C. by passing through a chiller prior to feeding into the reactor through a single tube. Ethylene flow rate was metered through a Brookfield mass flow controller.
Catalyst A was preactivated with dimethyl anilinium tetrakis(heptafluoro-2-naphthyl) borate. The catalyst B was preactivated with N,N-dimethylanilinium tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl) borate. Both of them were preactivated at a molar ratio of 1:1 in 700 ml of toluene. All catalyst solutions were kept in an inert atmosphere with <1.5 ppm water content and fed into reactors by metering pumps. Tri-n-octylaluminum (TNOA) solution was used as a scavenger.
The reactors were first cleaned by continuously pumping solvent (e.g., hexane) and scavenger through the reactor system for at least one hour at a maximum allowed temperature (about 150° C.). After cleaning, the reactors were heated/cooled to the desired temperature using water/steam mixture flowing through the reactor jacket and controlled at a set pressure with controlled solvent flow. Monomers and catalyst solutions were then fed into the reactor. An automatic temperature control system was used to control and to maintain the reactors at set temperatures. Onset of polymerization activity was determined by observations of a viscous product and lower temperature of water-steam mixture. Once the activity was established and system reached steady state, the reactors were lined out by continuing operating the system under the established condition for a time period of at least five times of mean residence time prior to sample collection. The resulting mixture from the second reactor, containing mostly solvent, polymer and unreacted monomers, was collected in a collection box. The collected samples were first air-dried in a hood to evaporate most of the solvent, and then dried in a vacuum oven at a temperature of about 90° C. for about 12 hours. The vacuum oven dried samples were weighed to obtain yields. All the reactions were carried out at a pressure of about 2.41 MPa-g.
Propylene, solvent, Catalyst A solution and scavenger were fed into the first reactor. The content of the first reactor flows into the second reactor. Catalyst B solution, ethylene and diene were fed into the second reactor. The detailed reaction conditions and polymer properties are listed in Table 3A.










TABLE 3A







1st reactor
2nd reactor




















Polymerization temperature (C.)
80
110



Propylene feed rate (g/min)
14
0



Ethylene feed rate (SLPM)
0
6



1,9-decadiene feed rate (ml/min)
0
0.108



Toluene feed rate (ml/min)
80



Catalyst B feed rate (mole/min)
0
4.61 × 10−8



Catalyst A feed rate (mole/min)
4.16 × 10−8
0











Yield (g/min)
11.5




Tc (° C.)
111.3



Tm (° C.)
157.1



Tg (° C.)
−49.0



Heat of fusion (J/g)
25.8










Examples 4A to 4C
These three samples were produced in a 2-liter autoclave reactor equipped similarly to the 0.5-liter reactor described in Example 1A. Catalysts used were rac-dimethylsilyl bis(2-methyl-4-phenylindenyl)zirconium dimethyl catalyst (Catalyst A) in the first stage to produce polypropylene and [di(p-triethylsilylphenyl)methylene](cyclopentadienyl) (3,8-di-t-butylfluorenyl)hafnium dimethyl catalyst (Catalyst B) in the second stage to produce ethylene propylene diene rubber. Both catalysts were preactivated by dimethylanilinum tetrakis(heptafluoro-2-naphthyl) borate at a molar ratio of about 1:1 in toluene. The procedure described above in Example 2A to 2C was followed except that 5-vinyl-2-norbornene (VNB) was used as the cross-linking agent in the second stage of polymerization. VNB was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and was purified by first passing through an alumina column activated at high temperature under nitrogen, followed by a molecular sieve activated at high temperature under nitrogen. The detailed reaction conditions and polymer properties are listed in Table 4A.









TABLE 4A









Example #











4A
4B
4C











Polymerization in Stage #1












Reaction temperature (° C.)
75
75
75



Amount of catalyst A (mg)
0.5
0.5
0.5



Propylene #1 (ml)
600
600
600



Toluene (ml)
500
500
500



TNOA (25 wt %) (ml)
3
3
3



Reaction time in stage 1 (min)
8
5.5
3







Polymerization in Stage #2












Reaction temperature (° C.)
75
75
75



Amount of catalyst B (mg)
1.5
1.6
2



Propylene #2 (ml)
100
100
100



Ethylene head pressure (psi)
230
230
230



VNB (ml)
10
20
40



Toluene (ml)
300
300
300



TNOA (25 wt %) (ml)
10
10
10



Reaction time in stage 2 (min)
48
37
20



Yield (g)
56
101
104



Tc (° C.)
113.7
111.0
111.1



Tm (° C.)
157.4
158.6
157.7



Heat of fusion (J/g)
28.8
35.5
49.0



Tg (° C.)
−52.5
−51.2
−51.5



Xylene precipitate (wt %)
61.5
45.1
51.2



Xylene insolubles (wt %)
2.0
18.9
27.3



Xylene solubles (wt %)
8.2
28.3
17.1



Cyclohexane solubles (wt %)
28.3
7.6
4.5



Degree of cross-link (%)
5.1
34.5
56.0







(TNOA is tri-n-octyl-aluminum)






The polymer blends produced in Examples 4A to 4C were subjected to solvent extraction using the procedure described above. The amount of each fraction expressed as wt % and the calculated degree of cross-link are listed in Table 4A.
The polymer blends produced in Examples 4A to 4C were melt mixed and molded under compression into plaques, and tested for thermoplastic elastomer applications. The performance data are listed in Table 4B.







TABLE 4B







Performence data for polymer blends produced in Examples


4A to 4C










Polymer blend
4A
4B
4C





Hardness
76A
87A
94A


Ultimate tension strength (MPa)
3.90
11.14
17.54


Ultimate elongation (%)
292
403
468


100% Modulus (MPa)
3.72
8.78
11.60


Tension Set (%)
36.75
31.75
37.25


Compression set, 70° C./22 Hrs (%)
68.9
60.6
55.5


Weight gain, 121° C./24 hrs (%)
511.3
354.9
200.4









Comparative Example with Diene ENB

Polymerizations were carried out in two, one liter stirred reactors in series with continuous flow of feeds to the system and continuous withdrawal of products. Isohexane (used as the solvent), and monomers (e.g., ethylene, propylene and ENB (5-ethylidene-2-norbornene)) were purified over beds of alumina and molecular sieves. Toluene for preparing catalyst solutions was also purified by the same technique. All feeds were pumped into the reactors by metering pumps except for the ethylene which flowed as a gas under its own pressure through a Brooksfield flow controller. All liquid flow rates were measured using Brooksfield mass flow controller. The reactors were equipped with a stirrer, a water cooling/steam heating element with a temperature controller and a pressure controller. The reactors were maintained at a pressure in excess of the vapor pressure of the reactant mixture to keep the reactants in the liquid phase. The reactors were operated liquid full. Ethylene and propylene feeds were combined into one stream and then mixed with a pre-chilled isohexane stream that had been cooled to at least 0° C. ENB was diluted with isohexane and fed into the reactor using a metering pump.
An isohexane solution of triisobutyl aluminum scavenger was added to the combined solvent and monomer stream just before it entered the reactor to further reduce the concentration of any catalyst poisons. The feed rate of the scavenger solution was adjusted in a range from 0 (no scavenger) to 1.5E-05 mole per minute to optimize catalyst activity, rac-dimethyl silylbis(indenyl)hafnium dimethyl was pre-activated with N,N-dimethyl anilinium tetrakis (pentafluorophenyl) borate at molar ratio of about 1:1 in toluene. The catalyst solution was then fed into the first reactor through a separate port using an Isco syringe pump.
Ethylene, propylene and pre-activated catalyst solution were fed into the first reactor, and ethylene/propylene copolymer was produced in the first reactor. The solution of polymer, solvent, unconverted monomers, and catalyst exiting the first reactor entered the second reactor. ENB and additional isohexane, ethylene and propylene were fed into the second reactor through a separate port. The product from the second reactor exited through a pressure control valve that reduced the pressure to atmospheric. This caused the unconverted monomers in the solution to flash into a vapor phase which was vented from the top of a vapor liquid separator. The liquid phase, comprising mainly polymer and solvent, flowed out the bottom of the separator and was collected for polymer recovery. Isopropanol was added the polymer solution leaving the second reactor to quench the polymerization and precipitate the polymer. Polymer was then recovered from solution by steam stripping following by drying in a vacuum oven. The vacuum oven dried samples were weighed to obtain yields. The detailed polymerization process conditions are listed in Table 5.







TABLE 5







EP - EP/ENB using rac-dimethylsilyl bisindenyl hafnium


dimethyl











Reactor configuration
1sr reactor
2nd reactor
















Reaction Temperature
° C.
60
80



Reactor Pressure
psig
350
350



Isohexane A fed rate
ml/min
92
36



Ethylene fed rate
g/hr
15
234



Propylene fed rate
g/hr
360
42



ENB fed rate
g/hr
0
12.9



Catalyst feed rate
g/hr
0.00835
0



Yield
gram
—
428.3



Overall Conversion
%
—
70.2



Xylene insolubles
wt %
—
0.33










The polymer collected from the second reactor was sent to Polyhedron Laboratories, Inc. (10626 Kinghurst St., Houston, Tex. 77099) for fractionation using xylene at reflux. The sample has 0.33 wt % of xylene insoluble. Xylene insoluble is a measure of degree of cross-linking. This test indicates that the sample does not contain cross-linked component. To create cross-linked polymer structures during the polymerization, diene must have at least two polymerizable double bonds. The rubber component can be cross-linked during the polymerization through reactivity at both double bond sites. ENB has two double bonds but only one of them is polymerizable in a metallocene system. During polymerization, ENB is incorporated into a growing polymer chain through the endocyclic double bond only; leaving the exocyclic double bond unreacted. Since it is unreactive during the polymerization, no reactor crosslinking can occur. The unreacted double bond is available for use (e.g., crosslinking and functionalization) post-reactor.
Inventive and Comparative Examples of High Vinyl Chain End and High Tm Polypropylene in the First Reactor
It was found that the crystallinity of polypropylene produced in the first stage of polymerization influenced the production of the second polymer with micro-sized gel in the second stage of polymerization. Previously, it wasn't well understood why the presence of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) can reduce reactor gel formation. The speculation was that the iPP formed microscopic pockets within the crystalline network in the reaction medium in the second stage. The second polymerization and cross-linking reaction takes place within the microscopic pockets. This confined polymerization environments prevents the micro-gel particles from agglomeration, thereby minimizing inter-particle cross-linking and formation of larger, undesirable gels. In contrast, if the cross-linking reaction is not controlled to localized domains, uncontrolled cross-linking will interconnect the polymeric contents of the entire reactor, leading to reactor macro-gel formation and fouling.
To examine the properties of polypropylene made in the first reactor, a separated experiment was carried out to make polypropylene using the same catalyst system. The polypropylenes (iPP) were produced in a 0.5-liter Autoclave reactor operated in the continuous stirred-tank solution process. The reactor was equipped with a stirrer, a water-cooling/steam-heating element with a temperature controller, and a pressure controller. Solvents, monomers such as propylene were first purified by passing through beds of alumina and molecular sieves.
The solvent feed rate to the reactors was measured by a mass flow meter. A Pulsa feed pump increased the solvent pressure to the reactors. The compressed, liquefied propylene feed was measured by a mass flow meter and the flow was controlled by a Pulsa feed pump. The solvent and monomers were fed into a manifold first. The mixture of solvent and monomers were then chilled to about −15° C. by passing through a chiller prior to feeding into the reactor through a single port. The collected samples were first air-dried in a hood to evaporate most of the solvent, and then dried in a vacuum oven at a temperature of about 90° C. for about 12 hours. The vacuum oven dried samples were weighed to obtain yields. Monomer conversion was calculated basing the polymer yield on the amount of monomers fed into the reactor. All the reactions were carried out at a pressure of about 2.4 MPa/g.
A rac-dimethylsilyl bis(2-methyl-4-phenylindenyl) zirconium dimethyl (catalyst A) was used. This catalyst was pre-activated with N,N-dimethyl anilinium tetrakis (heptafluoro-2-naphthyl) borate (Activator 1) at a molar ratio of about 1:1 in 900 ml of toluene. For comparison, rac-dimethylsilyl bisindenyl hafnium dimethyl (Catalyst D) was also used. This catalyst was pre-activated with N,N-dimethylanilinium tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl) borate (Activator II) at a molar ratio of about 1:1 in toluene. All catalyst solutions were kept in an inert atmosphere and fed into reactor by metering pumps. Tri-n-octylaluminum (TNOAL) solution (available from Sigma Aldrich, Milwaukee. WI) was further diluted in isohexane and used as a scavenger. Both catalyst feed rate and scavenger feed rate were adjusted to achieved the conversion listed in the following table. Hexane was used as solvent and its feed rate was 52.5 gram/min. Propylene feed rate was 14 gram/min. The detailed process conditions and some characteristics of the polypropylene are listed in Tables 6 and 7.







TABLE 6







Polypropylene made using rac-dimethylsilyl bis(2-methyl-4-


phenylindenyl) zirconium dimethyl









Example #













PP01
PP02
PP03
PP04
PP05
















Polymerization temperature
130
120
110
100
90


(° C.)


Conversion (%)
57.9
60.8
62.0
62.5
63.4


Productivity (g polymer/g
48,660
51,060
52,110
52,470
53,280


catalyst)


Mn DRI (g/mol)
8,679
16,218
24.286
36,835
56,615


Mw DRI (g/mol)
23,374
38,463
57,795
91,361
138,606


Mz DRI (g/mol)
37,524
67,243
100,413
166,096
259,498


Tc (° C.)
95.1
98.8
103.6
106.0
109.4


Tm (° C.)
132.2
137.2
143.4
146.1
152.9


Heat of fusion (J/g)
92.3
91.5
97.6
106.6
98.7


Vinyls/chain
0.48
—
0.64
—
1.01
















TABLE 7







Polypropylene made using rac-dimethylsilyl bisindenyl hafnium


dimethyl









Example #












PP06
PP07
PP08
PP09















Polymerization
130
110
90
70


temperature (° C.)


Conversion (%)
73.9
88.1
86.1
108.6


Productivity
10,906
13,010
12,798
16,077


(g polymer/


g catalyst)


Mn DRI (g/mol)
3,117
6,131
15,592
37,866


Mw DRI (g/mol)
10,245
16,349
32,349
79,075


Mz DRI (g/mol)
153,994
28,412
52,216
132,391


Tc (° C.)
32.3
49.3
68.4
91.7


Tm (° C.)
69.0
90.3
107.8
127.6


Heat of fusion (J/g)
19.6
35.6
56.5
67.7


Vinyls/chain
0.35
0.21
0.13
0.30









All documents described herein are incorporated by reference herein, including any priority documents and/or testing procedures to the extent they are not inconsistent with this text. While there have been described what are presently believed to be the preferred embodiments of the present invention, those skilled in the art will realize that other and further embodiments can be made without departing from the spirit of the invention, and is intended to include all such further modifications and changes as come within the true scope of the claims set forth herein.

## Claims

1. A heterogeneous in-situ cross-linked polymer blend comprising:
(a) a continuous phase comprising a polypropylene having a crystallinity of at least 30% and a melting point temperature Tm greater than 140 ° C., and a heat of fusion ΔHf greater than 65 J/g, and comprising vinyl terminal groups within a range from 0.4 to 1.0 vinyl/chain; and
(b) 50 wt % or more by weight of the blend of a dispersed phase comprising particles of an elastomeric copolymer dispersed in the continuous phase and having an average particle size of less than 5 micron, the elastomeric copolymer comprising from 20 to 60 wt % of C3 to C20 α-olefin units by weight of the copolymer, 0.001 to 5 wt % of diene units by weight of the copolymer, and the remainder of the elastomeric copolymer being ethylene-derived units, and having a crystallinity of less than 20% and being at least partially cross-linked such that the degree of cross-link is at least 20%, wherein the diene is selected from the group consisting of 1,7-octadiene, 1,8-nonadiene, 1,9-decadiene, 1,10-undecadiene, 1,11-dodecadiene, 1,12-tridecadiene, and 1,13-tetradecadiene;
(c) the blend having a Tensile Strength at break of 0.5 MPa or more, a Tension set of 80% or less, and a melting point temperature Tm within a range from 145° C. to 170° C. with no post-polymerization vulcanization; and
(d) wherein no cross-linking agent is present, and the discrete particles of the elastomeric copolymer are produced by an in-situ cross-linking taking place concurrently with the synthesis of the elastomeric copolymer.

2. The in-situ cross-linked polymer blend of claim 1 wherein no more than about 50 wt % of the elastomeric copolymer is extractable in cyclohexane at 23° C.

3. The in-situ cross-linked polymer blend of claim 1, wherein the degree of cross-link is at least 30%.

4. The in-situ cross-linked polymer blend of claim 1, wherein the polypropylene is a homopolymer.

5. The in-situ cross-linked polymer blend of claim 1, wherein the polypropylene is a copolymer comprising up to 9 wt % of alpha-olefins having 2 or from 4 to 12 carbon atoms.

6. The in-situ cross-linked polymer blend of claim 1, wherein the blend has a ΔHf within the range from 18 J/g to 75 J/g.

7. The in-situ cross-linked polymer blend of claim 1, wherein the average particle size of the particles of the elastomeric copolymer is between about 50 nanometers and less than 5 microns.

8. The in-situ cross-linked polymer blend of claim 1, wherein the average particle size of the particles of the elastomeric copolymer is between about 100 nanometers and about 1 micron.

9. The in-situ cross-linked polymer blend of claim 1, and further including one or more additives selected from fillers, extenders, plasticizers, antioxidants, stabilizers, oils, lubricants, and additional polymers.

10. The in-situ cross-linked polymer blend of claim 1, the polypropylene having a Tm within the range from 145 to 170° C.

11. The in-situ cross-linked polymer blend of claim 1, the elastomeric copolymer comprising within the range from 1.0 wt % to 5 wt % diene units.