alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: CFlowers@daktel.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:42:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

C. Flowers

Jamestown, ND 58401
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1399 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 258
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1399

                          [Report No. 110-816]

   Providing for proceedings during the period from August 1, 2008, 
                       through September 4, 2008.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 31, 2008

   Mr. McGovern, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing for proceedings during the period from August 1, 2008, 
                       through September 4, 2008.

    Resolved, That when the House adjourns by operation of the fifth 
section of this resolution on any legislative day during the period 
from August 1, 2008, through September 4, 2008, it shall stand 
adjourned until 11 a.m. on the third constitutional day thereafter.
    Sec. 2.  The Speaker may appoint Members to perform the duties of 
the Chair for the duration of the period addressed by the first section 
of this resolution as though under clause 8(a) of rule I.
    Sec. 3.  On each legislative day during the period addressed by the 
first section of this resolution, the Speaker may dispense with 
legislative business (other than any proceedings that may arise under 
clause 6 of rule XV).
    Sec. 4.  On each legislative day during the period addressed by the 
first section of this resolution, the Journal of the proceedings of the 
previous day shall be considered as approved.
    Sec. 5.  Unless the Speaker determines otherwise under section 3 of 
this resolution, on each legislative day during the period addressed by 
the first section of this resolution, after the third daily order of 
business under clause 1 of rule XIV (and any proceedings that may be 
sought under clause 6 of rule XV), the House shall stand adjourned 
pursuant to the first section of this resolution.
                                                 House Calendar No. 258

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1399

                          [Report No. 110-816]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Providing for proceedings during the period from August 1, 2008, 
                       through September 4, 2008.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 31, 2008

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62831-62832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19791]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-048, OMB Control No. 3235-0063]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Extension: Exchange 
Act Form 10-K

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 
20549-2736

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved 
collection of information discussed below.

[[Page 62832]]

    Form 10-K (17 CFR 249.310) is filed by issuers of securities to 
satisfy their annual reporting obligations under to Section 13 or 15(d) 
of the Exchange Act (``Exchange Act'') (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)). The 
information provided by Form 10-K is intended to ensure the adequacy of 
information available to investors and securities markets about an 
issuer. Form 10-K takes approximately 2,249.366 hours per response to 
prepare and is filed by approximately 8,292 respondents. We estimate 
that 75% of the approximately hours per response (1,687.025 hours) is 
prepared by the company for an annual reporting burden of 13,988,811 
hours (1,687.025 hours per response x 8,292 responses).
    An agency may conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to 
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently 
valid control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information 
collection at the following website: www.reginfo.gov. Find this 
particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day 
Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function. 
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
by October 13, 2023 to (i) www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain and (ii) 
David Bottom, Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and 
Exchange Commission, c/o John Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549, or by sending an email to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#59090b1806143830353b3621192a3c3a773e362f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fcacaebda3b19d95909e9384bc8f999fd29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 8, 2023.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-19791 Filed 9-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
H. Res. 1318 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 9, 2008. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

5811) to amend title 44, United States Code, to require preservation of certain electronic records by Federal agencies, to 

require a certification and reports relating to Presidential 

records, and for other purposes. All points of order against 

consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under 

clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment in the nature 

of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Oversight 

and Government Reform now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered 

as read. All points of order against provisions of the bill, as 

amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage 

without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate 

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 

minority member of the Committee on Oversight and Govern-
2 

•HRES 1318 EH 

ment Reform; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 5811 pursuant to 

this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 

question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the 

bill to such time as may be designated by the Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:01:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Garvin Tabor

Chaska, MN 55318
From: dianajhunter@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment on: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:52:21 PM

Dear Sir:

Please rescind the unjust and coercive mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be

covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to patients. If not, then expand conscience

protections for any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or

religious objections. I strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans

especially for drugs and devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as

ella and Plan B).

Please think again regarding your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Diana Hunter

Indianapolis, IN 46240
From: gcf@semo.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:52:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Brian Sharp

Poplar Bluff, MO 63901
#### In the Matter of the Contested Administration of the estate of Louis Molter, deceased.

Decree reversed, and proceedings remitted to the surrogate of Erie county with directions to proceed. The costs of this appeal to abide the final award of costs. Opinion by Barker, J.
From: icequeen.skadsem@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:29:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Leslie Skadsem

Chino, CA 91710
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEntropy Stable Staggered Grid Spectral Collocation for the Burgers' and Compressible Navier-Stokes EquationsStaggered grid, entropy stable discontinuous spectral collocation operators of any order are developed for Burgers' and the compressible Navier-Stokes equations on unstructured hexahedral elements. This generalization of previous entropy stable spectral collocation work [1, 2], extends the applicable set of points from tensor product, Legendre-Gauss-Lobatto (LGL) to a combination of tensor product Legendre-Gauss (LG) and LGL points. The new semi-discrete operators discretely conserve mass, momentum, energy and satisfy a mathematical entropy inequality for both Burgers' and the compressible Navier-Stokes equations in three spatial dimensions. They are valid for smooth as well as discontinuous flows. The staggered LG and conventional LGL point formulations are compared on several challenging test problems. The staggered LG operators are significantly more accurate, although more costly to implement. The LG and LGL operators exhibit similar robustness, as is demonstrated using test problems known to be problematic for operators that lack a nonlinearly stability proof for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations (e.g., discontinuous Galerkin, spectral difference, or flux reconstruction operators).Document ID20160001635Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsCarpenter, Mark H.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Parsani, Matteo*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Fisher, Travis C.*(Sandia National Labs. Albuquerque, NM, United States)*Nielsen, Eric J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredFebruary 5, 2016Publication DateDecember 1, 2015Subject CategoryNumerical AnalysisReport/Patent NumberNF1676L-22150NASA/TM-2015-218990L-20597Funding Number(s)WBS: WBS 794072.02.07.02.03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightPublic Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20160001635.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Central Command

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  ABOUT US    -  COMMAND PRIORITIES             
  -  LEADERSHIP             
  -  COMPONENT COMMANDS             
  -  HISTORY             
  -  POSTURE STATEMENT 
-  CENTCOM AOR    -  CENTCOM COALITION 
-  OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES    -  USMTM 
-  CONTACT    -  OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT             
  -  COMMUNITY RELATIONS             
  -  THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE             
  -  INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL             
  -  MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL 
-  MEDIA    -  SOCIAL MEDIA             
  -  NEWS ARTICLES             
  -  PRESS RELEASES             
  -  STATEMENTS             
  -  IMAGERY             
  -  VIDEOS             
  -  TRANSCRIPTS 
-  VISITORS AND PERSONNEL    -  FAMILY CENTER             
  -  FAMILY READINESS             
  -  CENTCOM WEBMAIL             
  -  SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY             
  -  ACCOUNTABILITY             
  -  EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS             
  -  USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS             
  -  FOIA LIBRARY             
  -  INNOVATION OASIS             
  -  WELCOME GUIDE 

HomeMEDIANEWS ARTICLESNews Article View

# NAVCENT hosts final planning conference for IMX 19

By Petty Officer 1st Class Jason AbramsU.S. Naval Forces Central Command / U.S. 5th Fleet

                MANAMA, Bahrain  –              

                Rear Adm. Curt Renshaw, deputy commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, addresses senior military leadership from countries participating in International Maritime Exercise (IMX) 19 during the IMX 19 final planning conference. IMX 19 is the world's most inclusive maritime exercise, designed to strengthen relationships, foster interoperability among supporting forces, and enhance maritime security operations, mine countermeasures (MCM), and maritime infrastructure capabilities in the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Jason Abrams/Released)            

                IMX 19            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Petty Officer 1st Class Jason Ab

VIRIN: 190715-N-EQ038-102

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT