alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-23-044]

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

 United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE: 

September 21, 2023 at 11:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS: 

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        1.                         *Agendas for future meetings:*                         none.                    

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Commission vote on Inv. Nos 701-TA-487 and 731-TA-1197-1198 (Second Review) (Steel Wire Garment Hangers from Taiwan and Vietnam). The Commission currently is scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on September 29, 2023.

                        5.                         *Outstanding action jackets:*                         none.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, 202-205-2000.

The Commission is holding the meeting under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: September 12, 2023.

Sharon Bellamy,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-20093 Filed 9-13-23; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

KENNETH JON PINER,

Petitioner

v.

BLAIR COUNTY COMMON PLEAS 

COURT,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 5 WM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of March, 2018, the Application for Leave to File Original 

Process, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus/Extraordinary Relief, and the Application for 

Relief are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ellis, 626 A.2d 1137 (Pa. 1993) 

(explaining that hybrid representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED 

to forward the filings to counsel of record.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>            5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                       NOV-23-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                         JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                               66
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        27,742
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1,256
<INVENTORY>                                          65,680
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     96,863
<PP&E>                                               36,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                       853
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       133,687
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                33,340
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           19,259
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         133,687
<SALES>                                              42,708
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     42,708
<CGS>                                                38,221
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        38,221
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     2
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,385
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (4,157)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (1,400)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (2,757)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (2,757)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.28)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.28)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 3.1.2

                            CERTIFICATE OF RETIREMENT

                                       OF

                                 PREFERRED STOCK

                        (18 Okla. St. Ann. Section 1078)


     We, the undersigned Vice President and Assistant Secretary of Dobson
Communications Corporation, an Oklahoma corporation, pursuant to Section 78 of
the Oklahoma General Corporation Act, do hereby certify that:

     1.   Dobson Communications Corporation (the "Corporation") has acquired
          31,352 shares of its 12 1/4% Senior Exchangeable Preferred Stock (the
          12 1/4% Preferred Shares") and 27,232 shares of its 13% Senior
          Exchangeable Preferred Stock due 2009 (the "13% Preferred Shares" and,
          together with the 12 1/4% Preferred Shares, the "Subject Shares"), all
          of which are issued but not outstanding.

     2.   The Corporation's Certificate of Incorporation prohibits the
          reissuance of the 12 1/4% Preferred Shares as part of the Series
          designated as the 12 1/4% Senior Exchangeable Preferred Stock.

     3.   The Corporation's Certificate of Incorporation prohibits the
          reissuance of the 13% Preferred Shares as part of the Series
          designated as the 13% Senior Exchangeable Preferred Stock due 2009.

     4.   By action duly taken by its Board of Directors pursuant to Section 78
          of the Oklahoma General Corporation Act, the Corporation has retired
          the Subject Shares and the Subject Shares have become part of the
          authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock of the Corporation,
          undesignated as to Series.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate of
Retirement of Preferred Stock as Vice President and Assistant Secretary of
Dobson Communications Corporation as of February 21, 2003.




                         /s/  RON L. RIPLEY
                         ------------------------------------
                         Ronald L. Ripley, Vice President



                         /s/  TRENT LEFORCE
                         -------------------------------------
                         Trent LeForce, Assistant Secretary
From: sylvia.cianciulli@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:01:27 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sylvia Cianciulli

Woodside, NY 11377
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 04 50 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 3 - CE - 0 13 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
SERVED: AUGUST 26, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

Certified Aviation Services, LLC 

DOCKET NO. FAA 2014-0408 

(Civil Penalty Action). 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

On July 15,2014, the Federal Aviation Adminis~ration (hereinafter referred to as 

"Complainant") filed a Complaint. On July I 0, 2014, Certified Aviation Services, LLC 

(hereinafter referred to as "Respondent") filed a Request for Hearing. 

On August 7, 2014, Respondent requested that its hearing request be withdrawn. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney 

may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the 

consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney withdraws the complaint or 

a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative law judge 

shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, the within filed Request to Withdraw Complaint having been read and 

considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. Resj:>Ondent' s Request to Withdraw Complaint be and is hereby granted; and 

2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

-·-··r:"-r-: <---r/·····1 j J '\ ----! \"::-· "ff ·:·- "<::"";'"- •. ;. \.'. f 1 '-.X.,rCi,...A ·- \ • . l < , .• AJ, '-··~.1 

................ 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
'-..... 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

William Corteal 

Certified Aviation Services, LLC, Respondent 

1150 South Vineyard A venue 

Ontario, CA 91761 

TEL: 909-458-6462 

FAX: 909-605-0390 

Jeffrey M. Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Northwest Mountain Region (ANM-7) 

1601 Lind A venue Southwest 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2161 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. F AA-20 14-0408 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
From: GFaw863890@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:45:49 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gregory Faw

Wilkesboro, NC 28697
From: gmurray12@roadrunner.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:14:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

You are constitutionally off-base and intrusive; you are asking me to ignore my conscience, my most

valuable tool in life. I ask that you RESCIND the coercive mandate about contraceptive and steriilzation

procedures be funded with my contributions without my having any say in the matter.

WHERE DO WE LIVE? Under what constitution are we being governed? Are we in the same place?

WHAT HAS BEWITCHED YOU?

YOU MUST PROVIDE FOR MORAL OR RELIGIOUS OBJECTIONS. This is STILL the United States of

America, governed by our Constitution. You cannot impose this on us without serious consequences for

our future as a nation. Perhaps, though, this is what you are after all along -- control of the population

and the destruction of our form of government.

In addition, I strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially

for drugs and devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and

Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Virginia Murray

Simi Valley, CA 93063
From: howie@trailerrentalco.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: howie@trailerrentalco.com

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:10:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Howard Norton

Salt Lake City, UT 84127
From: nancyee@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: No exemptions for "religious employers"

Date: Saturday, August 13, 2011 8:35:15 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s
EXHIBIT 4.50




                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


$20,000                      Milpitas, California             September 15, 2000



For value received,  ADATOM.com, Inc., promises to pay Richard Barton the sum of
Twenty  Thousand and no cents ($20,000) with interest at the rate of Ten Percent
per annum  (10%)  until  paid.  Any  unpaid  interest  will  become  part of the
principal.  Interest  payable  quarterly  commencing on September 30, 2000.  The
Principal of Twenty Thousand  Eighty Seven dollars and  Sixty-Seven  Cents ($20,
087.67) is due in one payment on September  30, 2000.  Principal  may be paid in
whole or in part prior to the due date without penalty or premium.

Should  default be made in payment of principal  and/or  interest  when due, the
whole sum of principal and interest shall become  immediately due, at the option
of the  holder of the note.  If action be  instituted  on this  note,  The maker
promises to pay such sum as a Court may fix as attorney's fees.






Adatom.com, Inc.

By: /s/ MICHAEL M. WHEELER
    -----------------------
        Michael M. Wheeler
        Controller




                                      E-48