alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Samir Sheikh < Samir.Sheikh@valleyair.org >

Date: June 9, 2016 at 4:57:19 PM PDT

To: " Drake.Kerry@epa.gov " < Drake.Kerry@epa.gov >

Cc: Sheraz Gill < Sheraz.Gill@valleyair.org >, Dave Warner < dave.warner@valleyair.org > Subject: Manure Land Application

Hi Kerry, please se e the below write

- up as per our discussion (much thanks to Dave's team for putting this together).

The vast majority of manure generated from dairies and other cattle facilities in the San Joaquin Valley will be applied to cropland in the surrounding area because the manure is generally utilized as fertilizer to grow the crops

that are fed to the cattle. The manure used as fertilizer must be applied in accordance with Nutrient Management Plans that have been approved by the Regional Water Quality Cont rol Board to avoid excessive application of nitrogen and other nutrients. Liquid manure will always be applied on nearby cropland. Solid manure may be applied to fields that are further away while a small amount may be composted and sold as a soil

amendm ent. District Rule 4570

– Confined Animal Facilities specifies requirements and options to reduce VOC emissions from dairies and other cattle facilities in the San Joaquin Valley. For land application of solid manure the most common option chosen to comp ly with the rule is to incorporate all solid manure within 72 hours of land application. 75% of the permitted dairy facilities have selected this option to comply with the manure land application requirements of District Rule 4570. Of the 25% of dairies that have not selected this option, the majority of the solid waste will still be land applied, due to lack of other alternatives.
##### 



Exhibit 21
 TEMPLE-INLAND INC.
SUBSIDIARIES
  Jurisdiction ofSubsidiary Name
    
    IncorporationTIN Inc.
    
    DelawareCorporate Commercial Realty, Inc.
    
    DelawareDel-Tin Fiber L.L.C. (50%)
    
    DelawareGCC Southeastern Corporation
    
    DelawareGaylord Container de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoEl Morro Corrugated Box Corporation
    
    DelawareEl Morro Corrugated Box Corporation
    
    Puerto RicoHarima M.I.D, Inc. (25%)
    
    JapanInland International Holding Company
    
    DelawareCLS, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoCrockett Baja, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoInland Corrugados de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoGrupo Inland, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoInland Corrugados de Monterrey, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoIM Servicios, S.A. de C.V.
    
    MexicoInland Paper Company, Inc.
    
    IndianaMidwest Sheets Company, LLC
    
    DelawarePremier Boxboard L.L.C. (50%)
    
    DelawareSabine River & Northern Railroad Company
    
    TexasSchiffenhaus California, LLC (25%)
    
    DelawareScotch Investment Company
    
    TexasSunbelt Insurance Company
    
    TexasTemplar Essex Inc
    
    DelawareTemple Associates, Inc.
    
    TexasTemple-Inland Forest Products International Inc.
    
    Delaware507789 N.B. Ltd.
    
    New BrunswickTemple-Inland Resource Company
    
    NevadaTemple-Inland Funding Corporation
    
    NevadaTexas South-Eastern Railroad Company
    
    TexasTIN Land Financing LLC
    
    DelawareTIN Timber Financing LLC
    
    Delaware
mM- : Page | of 1
REGC-1204G)- 10

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION
ETON eS & REGULATIONS a of: ae ah a sot F

RAN eceived: August 17,

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION __ Posted: Augos.31,2011
Tracking No. 80ee2de8

‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0086
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Marie Anne Johantgen
Address:

3115 31st Ct. SE

Olympia, WA, 98501
Email: johantgen9220@comcast.net

General Comment

Access to birth control is critical to women's health. It is as basic as access to food and shelter.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=0900... 8/31/2011
From: June Cattell

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Recommendations

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:05:57 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that I have, on this 29th day of April, 2014, served the foregoing Letter of

Captain Moak to Secretary Foxx by causing a copy to be sent by electronic mail to the

addresses identified below:  

romanow@pillsburylaw.com

peter.nelson@pillsburylaw.com

steve.morrissey@united.com

dan.weiss@united.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

howard.kass@usairways.com

robert.wirick@aa.com

francis.heil@aa.com

rpommer@atlasair.com

mlbenge@zsrlaw.com

jesse.elliot@faa.gov

john.allen@faa.gov

nssparks@fedex.com

urskr@state.gov

dberg@airlines.org

jcasey@airlines.org

edw@ttd.org

mgoldman@sgbdc.com

vegard.einan@parat.com

jogabel@airfrance.fr

arthur.molins@dlh.de

pvs@eurocockpit.be

Louise Fawbush
Page | of 1

un 9 ) rr
Nee REC )2085)-/6
LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS As of: August 31, 2011
BRANCH Received: August 09, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: August 31, 2011

Tracking No. 80edc3de
‘(Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: [RS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0052
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Roger Cisse] Kuhn
Address:
15706 Peach Walker Drive
Bowie, MD, 20716
Email: rckuhn@verizon.net
Phone: 3014300650

General Comment

It is good that the department is trying to make allowances for religious beliefs. As far as I can
tell, however, these accommodations are inadequate. Where are the allowances for right-to-life
organizations, and religious hospitals and radio stations?

On a broader note, where is the protection from citizens being forced to pay for abortive
contraceptives because they do not have a choice of a different insurance plan?

Thank you for attempting to address the issue. Please take a much broader view of protecting our
right to freedom of conscience.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=0900... 8/31/2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME FUND ON PAGES
F-2-F-3 OF THE COMPANY'S 10-K FOR THE YEAR TO DATE AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          16,791
<SECURITIES>                                     4,760
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,145
<ALLOWANCES>                                       880
<INVENTORY>                                      9,262
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,586
<PP&E>                                          14,137
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,510
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,710
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,823
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           185
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,321
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,710
<SALES>                                         74,610
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,610
<CGS>                                           50,230
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   50,230
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,751
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (30,095)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,345)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (25,750)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.50)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.50)
        

</TABLE>
#### Julia E. Blackman, Respondent, v. Eliza Wheeler, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
From: altimusj@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:17:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Judy Altimus

Columbia City, IN 46725
NEW MEXICO 

Area Designations for the 

2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards 

The table below identifies the areas and associated counties or parts of counties in New Mexico that 

EPA intends to designate as nonattainment for the 2008 ozone national ambient air quality standards 

(2008 NAAQS). In accordance with section 107(d) of the Clean Air Act, EPA must designate an area 

“nonattainment” if it is violating the 2008 ozone NAAQS or if it is contributing to a violation of the 

2008 ozone NAAQS in a nearby area. The technical analyses supporting the boundaries for the 

individual nonattainment areas are provided below. 

Intended Nonattainment Areas in New Mexico

Area 

New Mexico’s Recommended 

Nonattainment Counties 

EPA’s Intended 

Nonattainment Counties 

None None None 

Governor Richardson submitted ozone designation recommendation letters for Albuquerque and the 

remaining counties in New Mexico to Acting Regional Administrator Starfield on February 5, 2009, and 

March 11, 2009, respectively. A recommendation of “nonattainment” for a portion of Dona Ana County 

was made, based on a design value of 0.076 ppm at the Desert View monitoring site (one of six in the 

county), from observations for the period from 2006 – 2008. 

In a follow-up ozone designation recommendation letter from Secretary Martin to Regional 

Administrator Armendariz, dated October 17, 2011, New Mexico revised its ozone designation 

recommendation to “attainment” for all counties. This revised recommendation was based on data for 

the period from 2008 – 2010, which indicates no violations of the 2008 ozone NAAQS in Dona Ana 

County or elsewhere in the state. 

EPA also received 2008 ozone designation recommendation letters from Governor Roybal of the Pueblo 

de San Ildefonso and Governor Dasheno of the Santa Clara Pueblo in March 2009. Governor Roybal 

recommended a designation of “attainment” for Pueblo de San Ildefonso, and Governor Dasheno 

recommended a designation of “unclassifiable” for Santa Clara Pueblo. 

EPA intends to designate all counties and tribal territories in New Mexico as “unclassifiable/attainment” 

for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. There are no ambient air quality monitors within the state of New Mexico 

with design values that indicate a violation of the 2008 ozone NAAQS, based on data for the period 

from 2008 - 2010, and there are no nonattainment areas or intended nonattainment areas that border the 

state of New Mexico. The nearest nonattainment areas are Phoenix in Arizona and Denver in Colorado.
From: highview@rapidnet.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:17:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kathy Peterson

Rapid City, SD 57702
Exhibit 99.1   Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  To the Shareholders of NSTAR:  We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balancesheetof NSTAR and its subsidiaries (the "Company")as of March 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, retained earnings and comprehensive income for each of the three-monthperiods ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008and the consolidatedstatement of cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008.  These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.  We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.  Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  We previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, retained earnings, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated February 9, 2009, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.  As discussed in Note A to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for noncontrolling interests.  The accompanying December 31, 2008 consolidated balance sheet reflects this change.    /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Boston, Massachusetts  May 5, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 173 (Friday, September 8, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 62108]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19453]



[[Page 62108]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

[NARA-2023-040]


State, Local, Tribal, and Private Sector Policy Advisory 
Committee (SLTPS-PAC); Meeting

AGENCY: Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO), National Archives 
and Records Administration (NARA).

ACTION: Notice of Federal advisory committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are announcing an upcoming meeting of the State, Local, 
Tribal, and Private Sector Policy Advisory Committee (SLTPS-PAC) in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act and implementing 
regulations.

DATES: The meeting will be on September 20, 2023, from 10 a.m. to 12 
p.m. (EST).

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be a virtual meeting. We will send 
instructions on how to access the meeting to those who register 
according to the instructions below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Harris Pag[aacute]n, ISOO 
Senior Program Analyst, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b3e0ffe7e3e0ece3f2f0f3ddd2c1d29dd4dcc5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3e6d726a6e6d616e7f7d7e505f4c5f10595148">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 357-5351. 
Contact ISOO at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#afe6fce0e0efc1ceddce81c8c0d9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="773e243838371916051659101801">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting is open to the public in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app 2) and 
implementing regulations at 41 CFR 102-3. The Committee will discuss 
matters relating to the classified national security information 
program for state, local, tribal, and private sector entities.
    Procedures: Please submit the name, email address, and telephone 
number of people planning to attend to Heather Harris Pag[aacute]n at 
ISOO (contact information above) no later than September 18, 2023. We 
will provide meeting access information to those who register.

Tasha Ford,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-19453 Filed 9-7-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>