alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AFS-11-045-E 

Dec 20 2010 

 Exemption No. 6883F 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2000-8436 

Mr. Mark E. Ehrhart 

William J. Hughes Technical Center 

Atlantic City Airport 

Atlantic City, NJ 08037 

Dear Mr. Ehrhart: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 6883, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated February 4, 2009, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of the William J. Hughes Technical Center (Technical Center) for an extension of 

Exemption No. 6883, as amended. That exemption from §§ 91.117(a), 91.119(c), 91.159(a), 

and 91.303(e) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) permits the Technical 

Center to conduct flight operations in support of its research and development projects 

without meeting certain FAA regulations governing aircraft speed, minimum safe altitudes, 

cruising altitudes for flights conducted under visual flight rules, and aerobatic flight. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the Technical 

Center. 
 2

Our Decision 

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 6883, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision 

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 6883, as amended, to 

April 30, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 6883. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-26-1999
<CASH>                                       1,225,000
<SECURITIES>                                 8,936,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,503,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,132,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,770,000
<PP&E>                                      11,154,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (7,916,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,818,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,754,000
<BONDS>                                      1,457,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       141,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,466,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,818,000
<SALES>                                     20,722,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            20,722,000
<CGS>                                       15,670,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,670,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,672,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (208,000)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (727,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (733,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (733,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 24-0305 

REECE WANDLER, 

Petitioner, 

v . 

CAPT. JASON KOWALSKI, 

Respondent. 

GRANT OF MOTION TO 

PROCEED WITHOUT 

PAYMENT OF FILING FEE 

Motion to proceed without payment of the filing fee in this matter is 

GRANTED. 

DATED May 1'5, 2024. 

BOWEN GREENWOOD 

Clerk of the Supreme Court 

05/15/2024

Case Number: OP 24-0305
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          42,583                  31,446
<SECURITIES>                                    10,157                  16,682
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,454                  16,868
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,719                     377
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,913                  68,905
<PP&E>                                          17,625                  11,575
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,742                   2,343
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 114,280                  81,367
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,611                  22,305
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        74,402                  63,241
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,174                  (4,930)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   114,250                  81,367
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,008                  16,240
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,107                   2,492
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,509                  11,871
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 484                     335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,876                   2,212
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,057                     816
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,819                   1,396
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17                    0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.15                    0.05
        

</TABLE>
From: liz_craine@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:21:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth Craine

Brooksville, FL 34602
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2008 (the
Report) of Immucor, Inc. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



|              |  |                          
|------------- |  | -------------------------
|July 24, 2008 |  | /s/ Gioacchino De Chirico
|              |  | Gioacchino De Chirico    
|              |  | Chief Executive Officer
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1443

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 2000 to modify a

provision relating to easement prohibitions.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 20, 2001

Mr. MILLER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 2000

to modify a provision relating to easement prohibitions.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LAKE SIDNEY LANIER, GEORGIA, HOME PRES4 ERVATION.

5 Section 516(b)(2) of the Water Resources Develop6 ment Act of 2000 (Public Law 106–541; 114 Stat. 2651)

7 is amended by striking ‘‘(if ’’ and all that follows through

8 ‘‘level)’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1467 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1467

 To amend the Hmong Veterans' Naturalization Act of 2000 to extend the 
             deadlines for application and payment of fees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 26, 2001

    Mr. Wellstone (for himself, Mr. Helms, Mr. Kohl, Mr. Akaka, Mr. 
  Feingold, Mr. Inouye, and Mr. Reed) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Hmong Veterans' Naturalization Act of 2000 to extend the 
             deadlines for application and payment of fees.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bruce Vento Hmong Veterans' 
Naturalization Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF DEADLINES.

    Section 6 of the Hmong Veterans' Naturalization Act of 2000 (Public 
Law 106-207; 8 U.S.C. 1423 note) (as amended by Public Law 106-415) is 
amended by striking ``18 months'' each place such term appears and 
inserting ``36 months''.
                                 <all>
```
ADDENDUM D2. — PROPOSED OPPS COMMENT INDICATORS FOR CY 2013
 

ADDENDUM D2.— PROPOSED OPPS COMMENT INDICATORS FOR 

CY 2013 

Comment 

Indicator Descriptor 

NI New code for the next calendar year or existing code with substantial 

revision to its code descriptor in the next calendar year as compared to 

current calendar year, interim APC assignment; comments will be 

accepted on the interim APC assignment for the new code. 

CH Active HCPCS code in current year and next calendar year, status 

indicator and/or APC assignment has changed; or active HCPCS code 

that will be discontinued at the end of the current calendar year.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned
Chief Executive Officer of Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. (the "Company"), hereby
certify, based on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the
Company for the year ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  September 28, 2005


BY: /s/ DUANE J. ROTH
    ---------------------------
        Duane J. Roth
        Chief Executive Officer
From: cherylroggen@earthlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:19:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cheryl Roggensack

Brentwood, TN 37027
<page>
			            EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Cornerstone
Fund II (the "Partnership") on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey A.
Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.







By:    /s/ Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:      Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:     President

Date:      March 30, 2004
From: griffos01@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:38:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rebecca Griffo

Beaverton, OR 97006
From: bnbwhitlow@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:50:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Beulah Whitlow

Coupeville, WA 98239
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Select Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin
F. Jackson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sections 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 11, 2006

                                /s/  Martin F. Jackson
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Martin F. Jackson
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer