alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:18:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Frederick Martin

Tucson, AZ 85710
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.1



SCHEDULE OF COMPENSATION FOR
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
Adopted effective as of February 26, 2016


This schedule describes the compensation payable by ChannelAdvisor Corporation (the “Company”) to individuals who are not employed by the Company but serve as members of the Company's Board of Directors. The compensation consists of cash and equity compensation components as described below.  In addition, the Company will pay or reimburse directors for reasonable expenses incurred in performing the duties of the director in accordance with the Company's business expense reimbursement policy and procedures. This schedule is not intended to create any contractual obligation with any director and may be amended by the Company at any time.


Cash Compensation:


Annual retainer for indicated role:


	
		
	Member of the Board of Directors
	$50,000

	Chair of the Audit Committee
	$20,000

	Chair of the Compensation Committee
	$10,000

	Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
	$6,000

	Member of the Audit Committee
	$7,000

	Member of the Compensation Committee
	$5,000






Each non-employee director will be paid the retainer listed above for membership on the Board of Directors and for each other role in which the director serves. Committee Chairs will receive the retainer for service as chair in lieu of the retainer for committee membership. Effective July 1, 2014, the retainer will be earned on the first day of the fiscal quarter in which the director serves in the indicated role. No adjustment will be made nor any repayment due in the event that a director does not serve in the indicated role for the remainder of the quarter. Retainers are in lieu of meeting fees.


Equity Compensation:


Each non-employee director then serving on the Board will be granted on the first business day of March a restricted stock unit award having a value equal to $150,000 based on the closing price per share of the Company’s common stock two business days before the grant date. The award will be granted pursuant to the Company's 2013 Equity Incentive Plan. The award vests in full on the first anniversary of the grant date, provided that the director is serving as a member of the Board of Directors or as an employee or Consultant of the Company or an Affiliate under the Plan on the date of vesting. The awards will be awarded only if approved by the Compensation Committee on or before the grant date. Awards will be made pursuant to the applicable form of Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice and Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement as approved by the Compensation Committee from time to time.
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No.  333-59540

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  220				Trade Date: 09/12/02
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

  June 1, 2001)							Issue Date:  09/17/02
The Date of this Pricing Supplement September 13, 2002
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QKD2   2.85%	09/15/05	     100%	        .7%                 Monthly 	     YES	    NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		      Date		Count

$856,000.00	$850,008.00	ABN AMRO Inc.	   10/15/02		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes	  X   No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.   Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $710.193 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under a Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
Additionally, the total principal amount of PowerNotes(SM) offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001 has been increased from $500.0mm to $750.0mm.  $250.0mm principal amount of debt securities registered pursuant to Registration Statement No. 333-59540 originally offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement dated June 15, 2001 and related Prospectus dated May 25, 2001 are being offered as PowerNotes(SM) by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
From: davepanee@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:05:27 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Reynolds

La Verne, CA 91750
August 15, 2014

Dr. John J. Coleman, Ph

. D

. 6981 Tepper Drive Clifton, Virginia 20124

- 1600

Dear Dr. Coleman:

This is in response to your March 18, 2014

, letter to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to undertake a project to amend Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) § 121.343 to require cockpit voice recorders (CVR) and flight data recorders (FDR) to communicate their

data on a real

- time basis by telemetry or wireless (radio) communications to ground stations that

would be mana ged by the airlines.

In your petition you cite hypothetical circumstances that may have led to the disappearance of Malaysian Airlines flight 370. Your petition conveys your belief that mandating real

- time

transmission of data from CVR and FDR equipment to ground stations would provide a means of immediately identifying aircraft deviating from their flight plans.

The Malaysian airplane is still under open investigation. As such, it would be inappropriate for the FAA to take regulatory action at this ti me. However, we will consider your petition should we undertake rulemaking on this subject in the future.

Thank you for your interest in aviation safety.

Sincerely,

//s//

John S. Duncan Director, Flight Standards Service
From: lucki1s@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:55:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Deborah Gately

Walnut, CA 91789
From: nandjwhip@earthlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:56:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unConstitutioonal unjust

and coercive mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health

insurance with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience

protections for any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or

religious objections. I strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans

especially for drugs and devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as

ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nelson Whipple

Charlotte, NC 28207
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION**

**REQUIRED BY RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE**

**ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED**

I, Bruce R. York, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of MDRNA, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) andinternal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designedunder our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 8, 2009
From: Brian Merrill [mailto:bmerrill@tanglewoodwealth.com] 

Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 11:15 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Cc: Wong, Fred - EBSA 

Subject: submission

I feel strongly that active management should be an option within 401(k) plans, in Target Funds

and even as a QDIA. Limiting options to passive investments simply would not be a good idea as

many companies and participants will not feel well taken care of. Whether active or passive

investments exist within a plan, the key is education by the retirement advisor, consultant, etc.

How the participants use the funds is 80% of the battle. The other 20% comes down to the

investment due diligence of the investment committee, fiduciaries, and advisors. Some may

prefer active funds and others passive funds but it would be a true shame to limit the options.

At our firm we use a combination of both active and passive funds for our wealth management

clients at any given time. Why should a participant in a retirement plan not have the same

access to funds if they are deemed appropriate by the fiduciaries of the company? That does not

make any sense.  

“Investment Models” is also a tricky concept. It sounds good in theory but unfortunately will not

work in the real world. This may sound simple but our retirement plans will not be as effective

as they can be until Advisors and Consultants are given access to as many funds as possible, they

have  a certain level of skill in fund selection (with the fiduciary duty to select the best, not

something suitable), and then a live person communicates the funds in the plan as well as risks

and rewards to the participants. There should be someone to take questions from the

participants going forward as well. Until a plan follows those rules, the retirement outcomes of

the participants have been compromised in my personal opinion.  

Historical data is also an important concept. It is absolutely necessary in understanding the risks

and rewards of an investment. It does not give you all of the information but it does give you a

decent start. But I think that this information is best used and analyzed by a professional advisor

to take into consideration the “practical considerations” of the day. Black box models using

historical data are not the answer. An advisor using the data as a starting point is.  

Brian Merrill   

Important Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments are confidential 

and may 

be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any 
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this message or any attachment is prohibited. 

If 

you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by returning it to 

the 

sender and deleting this copy from your system. All e-mail sent to or from this address 

will 

be received or otherwise recorded by Tanglewood’s e-mail system and is subject to 

archival, 

monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to, someone other than the recipient. Thank 

you.
From: tstevenshome@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:50:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tom Stevens

Dallas, TX 75229
No. 124,

No. 842,

No. 885,

No. 907,

No. 910,

No. 956,

No. 974,

No. 977,

No. 1028,

October Term, 1961.

October Term, 1961.

October Term, 1961.

October Term, 1961.

October Term, 1961.

October Term, 1961.

October Term, 1961.

October Term, 1961.

October Term, 1961.

#### Creek Nation *v.*United States, Kelly *v.*United States, Williams *v.*Hot Shoppes, Inc., N. V. Handelsbureau La Mola *v.*Kennedy, Attorney General, Wilburn Boat Co. et al. *v.*Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co., Grieco *v.*United States, Art National Manufacturers Distributing Co. et al. *v.*Federal Trade Commission, Funkhouser *v.*United States, Atkinson et al. *v.*City of Dallas,

370 U. S. 157;

369 U. S. 886;

370 U. S. 925;

370 U. S. 940;

370 U. S. 925;

370 U. S. 925;

370 U. S. 939;

370 U. S. 939; and

370 U. S. 939.

Petitions for rehearing denied.