alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: jjme@westriv.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:32:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Janel Johannes

Underwood, ND 58576
No. 491.

#### Andrews *v.*United States; and Donovan *v.*United States.

No. 494.

Certiorari, *ante,*p. 812, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The motions for the appointment of counsel are granted and it is ordered that *E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr., Esquire,*of Washington, D. C., a member of the Bar of this Court, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for petitioners in these cases.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Signature Eyewear, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael Prince, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/    Michael Prince
--------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
September 19, 2005
From: pmross@q.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:21:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John H Ross

Montrose, CO 81401
EXHIBIT 31.2

                       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
              PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, Michael Schumacher, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Marwich II,
Ltd.

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this annual report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrant and we have:

          a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
prepared;

          b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such valuation; and

          c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

     5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors:

          a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

          b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.

Dated:  May 4, 2005

/s/ Michael Schumacher
Michael Schumacher
President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Last Will, etc., of Henry P. Eysaman, deceased.

The decree of the surrogate of Herkimer county affirmed, with costs of respondents payable out of the fund.— (Code, §2589.) Opinions by

Boardman, J., and Hardin, P. J.;

dissenting opinion by Follett, J.
No. 421.

#### Goya Foods, Inc., *v.*National Labor Relations Board.

*Morton Singer*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli*and *Norton J. Come*for respondent.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
EX-10.4



 EXHIBIT 10.4 

Joy Global Inc. 
 September 11, 2012 
 AMENDMENT #1 TO THE 

JOY GLOBAL INC. 2007 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 The Joy Global Inc. 2007 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows, effective with respect to (a) awards granted under the Plan on or after October 27, 2012 (the
“Effective Date”), and (b) each award granted under the Plan before, and still outstanding on, the Effective Date (each a “Prior Award”), except that this amendment will not apply to a Prior Award to the extent that this
amendment would impair the rights of an Eligible Individual (as defined in the Plan): 
 1. Section 1(aa) is amended to read: 

(aa) “Retirement” means retirement from active employment with the Company, a Subsidiary or an Affiliate at or after age
55 having completed 5 years of continuous service as an employee of the Company, a Subsidiary, or an Affiliate. 
 2. The definitions of
“Early Retirement” and “Normal Retirement” in Sections 1(n) and 1(u), respectively, are deleted and the remaining subsections of Section 1 are renumbered accordingly.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

Nos. 96-50042 & 96-50073

USDC Nos. W-95-CV-173, 174

__________________

BARRY LYNN GILMORE,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM J. HARDIN, Dr.,

 Defendant-Appellee,

 * * * * * * * * *

BARRY LYNN GILMORE,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

DAN SMITH, Sheriff; JOHNSON, Lt.;

SHELLY HOWELL, Dr.; W.J. BRYAN,

Jail Administrator; HARDIN, Dr.,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

- - - - - - - - - -

July 11, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
No. 96-50042 & 96-50073

- 2 -

Barry Lynn Gilmore (Texas prisoner # 621324) seeks in forma

pauperis (IFP) status to appeal the district court's dismissal,

as frivolous, of his civil rights suits alleging deliberate

indifference to his medical needs. We have reviewed Gilmore's

contentions and the records and determined that his appeals are

frivolous. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Therefore leave to

appeal IFP is DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED. Gilmore's

motion for the appointment of counsel on appeal is DENIED as

moot.

IFP DENIED; APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
# Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure

(SPCC) Rule

The Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) rule includes requirements for oil spill prevention, preparedness, and response to prevent oil discharges to navigable waters and adjoining shorelines. The rule requires specific facilities to p repare, amend, and implement SPCC Plans. The SPCC rule is part of the Oil Pollution Prevention regulation , which also includes the Facility Response Plan (FRP) rule

. 

### http://www.epa.gov/oem/content/spcc/index.htm
#### CARR *v.*NEW YORK.

No. 265.

Decided October 8, 1962.

*Irwin N. Wilpon*for appellant.

*Louis J. Lefkowitz,*Attorney General of New York, and *Paxton Blair,*Solicitor General, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Bandelier

National

Monument

Santa Fe

National

Forest

Santa Fe

National

Forest

Pecos

Wilderness

Santa Fe

National

Forest

Santa Fe

National

Forest

Section 7 of 7

United States Department of the Interior

National Park Service

Bureau of Land Management

0 5 10 miles

NORTH

Rio Arriba County

Santa Fe County

Santa Fe County

San Miguel County

Ortiz

Mountains

New Mexico

Santa

Fe

Los Alamos County

Auto Tour Route

High-Potential Historic Sites

El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro

National Historic Trail

Auto Tour Route

High-Potential Historic Site

New Mexico

Mexico

Texas

Santa Fe

Albuquerque

El Paso Ciudad

Juarez

25

25

285

84

74

68

El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro

National Historic Trail

Aqua Fria Street

599

San Gabriel

Santa

Clara

Pueblo

San

Ildefonso

Pueblo

Cochiti

Pueblo

San Juan Pueblo

Agua

Fria

Santa Fe Plaza

Palace of the

Governors

Las Golondrinas

La

Cienega

San Marcos Pueblo

Cieneguilla

El Alamo

La

Bajada

Map 3GDSC/APRIL 2004/661/2012A 7 OF 7
Exhibit 10.39

Amendment No. 1 to the

Employment Agreement

between

Bluehill ID AG

and

Mr. John Rogers

The Parties hereto have agreed to amend the Employment Agreement as follows:



| | 1. | As of 1 April 2010 the Base Salary as defined in Article 3.1 of the Employment Agreement shall amount to CHF 175000 per annum.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |                           |  |                                    
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|Jongny, 16 March 2010 |  |  |  | St. Gallen, 16 March 2010
|                      |  | 
|                      |  |  |  | Bluehill ID AG           
|                      |  | 
|/s/ John Rogers       |  |  |  | /s / Ayman S. Ashour     
|John Rogers           |  |  |  | By:                       |  | Ayman S. Ashour                    
|                      |  |  |  | Title:                    |  | President of the Board of Directors
From: peclinefelter@roadrunner.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:51:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Steve Clinefelter

Fallbrook, CA 92028
No. 310.

#### Carnal *v.*Arkansas.

*Charles J. Lincoln*for petitioner.

Supreme Court of Arkansas. Certiorari denied.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K





CURRENT REPORT





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





DATE OF REPORT (Date of earliest event reported): March 19, 2015





CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION


(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)





Delaware (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION)001-11241 (COMMISSION FILE NUMBER)37-1105865 (IRS EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)





2120 West End Avenue, Nashville, Tennessee    37203-0001 (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)    (ZIP CODE)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (615) 341-1000





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:





o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))











1


---






Item 8.01 Other Events .





Exhibits are filed herewith in connection with the issuance on March 19, 2015 by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation (the “Company”) of $4,753,000 aggregate principal amount of its 2.200% PowerNotes® due March 15, 2021 (the “Notes”) pursuant to the Company’s previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-195039) (the “Registration Statement”) and the related Prospectus dated April 4, 2014, Prospectus Supplement dated April 4, 2014 and Pricing Supplement dated March 16, 2015 relating to the Notes.





Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits .





(d) Exhibits . The following Exhibits are filed as part of this Report and as Exhibits to the Registration Statement:





ExhibitNumberDescription5.1Opinion of Sidley Austin LLP, as to the legality of the Notes.23.1Consent of Sidley Austin LLP (included as part of Exhibit 5.1).


2


---






SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





Caterpillar Financial Services CorporationBy:/s/ Leslie S. ZmuggName: Leslie S. Zmugg Title:   Secretary





Date: March 19, 2015


3


---



EXHIBIT INDEX





ExhibitNumberDescription5.1Opinion of Sidley Austin LLP, as to the legality of the Notes.23.1Consent of Sidley Austin LLP (included as part of Exhibit 5.1).








4
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 Certification of Chief Administrative Officer I, Steven A. Schumm, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Enstar Income Program 1984-1, L.P.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)
    
    [Reserved];  (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure control and
procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evalutation; and  (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during
the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and
the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial
information; and  (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the
registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: April 13, 2004 /s/ Steven A. Schumm
Steven A. Schumm
Director, Executive Vice President and
Chief Administrative Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)