alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       2,132,897
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,150,082
<ALLOWANCES>                                   605,147
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,953,077
<PP&E>                                       2,656,715
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,034,326
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,720,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          419,753
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,191
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,210,149
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,720,093
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,256,896
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,374,414
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               311,820
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,405
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,069,455
<INCOME-TAX>                                   829,086
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,240,369
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,240,369
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14


</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman,

 Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 

 

April 6, 2018 

p0404 

Order 

 

Clerk 

April 6, 2018 

154566 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 154566 

 COA: 327208 

Saginaw CC: 14-040317-FC 

DEVAUN LAROY LOPEZ, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On January 11, 2018, the Court heard oral argument on the application for leave to 

appeal the August 18, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals. On order of the Court, the 

application is again considered. MCR 7.305(H)(1). In lieu of granting leave to appeal, 

we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals. We understand the Court of 

Appeals as having decided the case on evidentiary grounds. MRE 804(a) provides, in 

relevant part, that “[a] declarant is not unavailable as a witness if exemption, refusal, 

claim of lack of memory, inability, or absence is due to the procurement or wrongdoing 

of the proponent of a statement for the purpose of preventing the witness from attending 

or testifying.” (Emphasis added). In finding error requiring a new trial, the Court of 

Appeals determined that the trial court record established that the prosecutor’s conduct 

procured the unavailability of the witness and could not be justified. But that is a factual 

determination that should first be decided by the trial court, and it fails to address the text 

of the rule. The plain language of the exception to “unavailability” under MRE 804(a) 

mandates that the court consider whether the conduct of the proponent of the statement 

was for the purpose of causing the declarant to be unavailable. The trial court found that 

the witness was unavailable because he felt threatened by the prosecutor, but did not 

consider whether the prosecutor intended to cause the declarant to refuse to testify when 

engaging in that conduct. We therefore REMAND this case to the Saginaw Circuit Court 

for a determination of whether the witness was unavailable due to the prosecutor’s 

procurement or wrongdoing for the purpose of preventing the witness from attending or 

testifying, consistent with MRE 804(a). We express no opinion on any constitutional 

issues that the defendant may have argued. 

 We do not retain jurisdiction.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                APPENDIX A TO ITEM 601(C) OF REGULATION S-K
                    COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES
                         ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0               2,162,698
<SECURITIES>                                   168,979                 316,158
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,753,422               7,714,737
<ALLOWANCES>                                   100,000                 100,000
<INVENTORY>                                  2,696,432               2,860,114
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,014,557              13,548,616
<PP&E>                                     173,378,861             153,304,212
<DEPRECIATION>                              86,229,072              81,314,625
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             147,339,429             115,063,963
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,617,435              16,070,073
<BONDS>                                     11,239,000               2,014,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          137,500                 150,000
<PREFERRED>                                    484,900               1,692,641
<COMMON>                                    28,966,466              27,398,214
<OTHER-SE>                                  67,517,087              52,565,460
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               147,339,429             115,063,963
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            78,483,514              67,054,006
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               58,390,372              51,349,967
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               593,179                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                 323,075
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                 705,112
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             19,499,963              17,045,092
<INCOME-TAX>                                 7,898,159               6,583,671
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         11,601,804              10,461,421
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              2,239,045                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                13,840,849              10,368,886
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.16                    4.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     6.13                    4.64
        

</TABLE>
From: pm2421@att.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:03:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patti Morman

Stone Mountain, GA 30088
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-18-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                              21
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         60,433
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,824
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,250
<COMMON>                                        30,250
<OTHER-SE>                                         324
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  60,824
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    893
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     5
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   898
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              898
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                     37
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    861
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         861
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       324
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    10.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    10.19
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.55
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Merrimack,

Feb. 2, 1915.

#### Ellen S. Abbott *v.*Isabel F. Abbott.

Petition eor Partition. At the April term, 1914, of the superior court, the plaintiff’s motion that the answer to the petition be disallowed was denied by *Branch,*J., subject to exception.

*Joseph S. Matthews*(by brief and orally), for the plaintiff.

*George V. Hill*(by brief and orally), for the defendant.

*Per Curiam.*

It was conceded at the argument that there was no legal objection to a physical partition of the premises. Whether the premises can be so divided is a question of fact for the trial court. Laws 1913, c. 21, s. 3. As there appears to be little, if any, doubt *602that in fact such division can be made without great prejudice or inconvenience, ordinary convenience in procedure requires the determination of that question before discussion of the proposition whether upon the facts stated a sale of the whole can be ordered.

*Case discharged.*
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-116076), Form S-8 (No. 333-114512) and Form S-4
(No. 333-112309) of Laidlaw International, Inc. of our report dated November 18,
2003 relating to the financial statements for the period from June 1, 2003 to
August 31, 2003, which appears in this Form 10-K.




PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants
Mississauga, Ontario
November 14, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Cornerstone Fund III and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial instruments.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      40,587,011
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  138,367
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,137,470<F1>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,137,470<F2>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,585,090<F3>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,806,886
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,778,204
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,778,204
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,778,204
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net unrealized
gain on open contracts of $2,580,803, net option premiums received of
($291,412) and due from DWR of $122,701.
<F2>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $680,730, accrued management
fees of $142,387, common administrative expenses payable of $137,548,
accrued brokerage commissions of $129,098 and accrued transaction fees
and costs oif $12,349.
<F3>Total revenue includes realized trading revenue of $8,925,181, net
change in unrealized of ($2,997,491) and interest income of $1,657,400.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Registration No. 333-35460 424 (b)(2)

Pricing Supplement No:322 Cusip:14912LR52
Dated: May 3, 2001 
*	Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation

	Medium-Term Notes, Series F

	(Fixed Rate)

	With Maturities of 9 Months or More from Date of Issue
	Interest payable each April 1 and October 1 and at Maturity
Principal Amount: Interest Rate: Proceed Amount:

$50,000,000 5.17% $49,912,500

Original Issue Date: Commission Fee: Maturity Date:

05/08/2001 $87,500 08/08/2003

	 

Dealer:

Chase Securities Inc.	

 

Specified Currency: Option to Elect Payment Authorized Denominations

x U.S. dollars in U.S. dollars (only applicable if

_ Other:___________ (only applicable if Specified Currency is

Specified Currency is other than U.S.

other than U.S. dollars): N/A 

N/A 

The Note is a: Exchange Rate Agent X Global Note (if other than First 

Certificated Note Trust New York): N/A (only applicable if

Specified Currency 

is other than U.S. dollars) 

Original Issue Total Amount of OID: N/A Terms of Amortizing Discount Note: Notes: N/A

Yes x No Issue Price (expressed 

as a percentage of 

aggregate principal 

amount): 100%

Redemption Date(s) (including Redemption Price(s): N/A any applicable regular or 

special record dates): N/A

	 

Repayment Date(s) (including Repayment Price(s): N/A any applicable regular or

special record dates): 

N/A

Interest Rate Reset Option: _ Yes X No

Optional Reset Dates (only applicable if option to reset interest rate): N/A

Basis for Interest Rate Reset (only applicable if option to reset interest rate): N/A

Stated Maturity Extension Option: _ Yes x No

Extension Period(s) and Final Maturity Date (only applicable if option to extend stated maturity): N/A

Basis for Interest Rate During Extension Period (only applicable if option to extend stated maturity): N/A

 

 

Historical Exchange Rate (only applicable if Specified Currency other than U.S. dollars): N/A

The interest rates on the Notes may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any Note offered prior to the effective date of the change. Prior to the date ofthis Pricing Supplement, $2,734.0 mm principal amount of the Notes had been sold at interest rates then in effect. Additionally, the total principal amount of the Notes offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement dated June1, 2000 and Prospectus dated May 11, 2000 has been reduced from $4,000.0 mm to $3,500.0 mm. $500 mm principal amount of debt securities registered pursuant to Registration Statement No. 333-35460 are being offered by Caterpillar Financial ServicesCorporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus each dated September 8, 2000.

	_________________________________
**	Pricing Supplement to Prospectus Supplement dated June 1, 2000

	and Prospectus dated May 11, 2000***
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Keith G. Rickard, Chief Executive Officer of BakBone Software Incorporated (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance
with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (Section 906) that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: June 29, 2004



/s/    Keith G. RickardKeith G. Rickard Chief Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Registrant and will be retained by Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of First Robinson
Financial Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ending December
31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), we, Rick L. Catt, Chief Executive Officer and Jamie E.
McReynolds, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of the written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to First Robinson Financial
Corporation and will be retained by First Robinson Financial Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



BY:  /s/ Rick L. Catt                               BY: /s/ Jamie E. Mcreynolds
---------------------                               ---------------------------
Name:  Rick L. Catt                                 Name:  Jamie E. McReynolds
Chief Executive Officer                             Chief Financial Officer
February 11, 2005                                   February 11, 2005

                                       31
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Annual Report (the "Report") of Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended
June 30, 2002, I, Duane J. Roth, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, do hereby certify as follows:



Date:
September 27, 2002

|By: |  | /s/                                   |  | 
|--- |  | ------------------------------------- |  | 
|    |  | Duane J. Roth
Chief Executive Officer |  | 

---

QuickLinks