alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: coleyndonna@earthlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:26:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Donna Creech

Barnwell, SC 29812
From: jcnelson@weber.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:24:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Janet Nelson

Layton, UT 84040
From: stephenmajewski@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:25:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Stephen Majewski

Medford, NJ 08055
From: tswams@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:54:41 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tamra Willner

Chicago, IL 60631
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1390 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 22, 2008.
Whereas barely 18 percent of 12th grade students perform at or above the 
        proficient level in science;
Whereas the need for science education, especially outside the classroom, is 
        crucial to our country's ability to remain globally competitive;
Whereas today only 32.4 percent of undergraduates in the United States are 
        leaving college with a bachelor's degree in science or engineering, 
        compared to 63.3 percent in Japan, 62.1 percent in Germany, and 56.2 
        percent in China;
Whereas American businesses will face a competitive crisis with the advancing 
        science- and technology-driven global economy unless they have a 
        workforce that has been trained in scientific fields;
Whereas the future global economy will be driven by market sectors that are 
        based in science, engineering, and technology;
Whereas current scientists and engineers are retiring in record numbers, 
        creating a potentially large void of skilled workers;
Whereas 4-H and other out-of-school programs that focus on science, engineering 
        and technology are an important part of educating and developing leaders 
        who are well-trained and technically competent;
Whereas 4-H is preparing America's future workforce by developing their passion 
        for science, engineering, and technology at an early age;
Whereas 4-H's educational programs have an unparalleled reach of more than 
        6,000,000 youth in all 50 States;
Whereas 4-H, in partnership with more than 106 land-grant universities, shape 
        programs in the sciences that are important to today's workforce and 
        critical for managing the world's resources for years to come;
Whereas youth, parents, teachers, schools, and youth organizations have the 
        ability to participate in fun, accessible, science-related activities 
        that encourage youth exploration and experimentation at an early age; 
        and
Whereas October 8, 2008 would be an appropriate day to designate as 4-H National 
        Youth Science Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses support for the designation of a 4-H National Youth 
        Science Day;
            (2) requests that the President issue a proclamation calling upon 
        the people of the United States to observe 4-H National Youth Science 
        Day;
            (3) encourages the people of the United States to observe the day 
        with appropriate ceremonies and activities; and
            (4) encourages young people of all ages and backgrounds to pursue 
        science studies and enter into science careers.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
9TM Define Location
97 TM Probable Location
-@ Sprcuiative Lecation

El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro NHT
Legend



| Ae
re ee
5

, 7

*¢
4
ee a



Map 21S
El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro NHT

Legend
7 Detinite Location
= Probable Location



EI Camino Real de Tierra Adentro NHT

Legend
7m Desinie Location
977 Probable Location N

« Specuative Locabon A



TM Detinte Location
= Probable Location
-@ Speculative Lecation

-

EI Camino Real de Tierra Adentro NHT
Legend



A

TM Detinite Location
© = Probable Location
7 Specstative Location

-

EI Camino Real de Tierra Adentro NHT
Legend
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the
period ended December 31, 1999 and to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-93651, 333-94827 and
333-83599) of our report dated March 17, 2000, except for the subsequent events
described in Note 10, as to which the date is March 23, 2000, and Note 21, as to
which the date is April 7, 2000, on our audits of the balance sheets of
Dental/Medical Diagnostic Systems, Inc. as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and
the results of its operations and cash flows for each of the years in the three
year period ended December 31, 1999.



PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Woodland Hills, California
April 24, 2000
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1481 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1481

To extend the moratorium enacted by the Internet Tax Freedom Act for 2 
   years, and encourage States to simplify their sales and use taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 2, 2001

   Mr. Wyden (for himself, Mr. McCain, and Mr. Leahy) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the moratorium enacted by the Internet Tax Freedom Act for 2 
   years, and encourage States to simplify their sales and use taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Internet Tax Moratorium Extension 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF INTERNET TAX FREEDOM ACT MORATORIUM FOR 2 YEARS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1101(a) of the Internet Tax Freedom Act 
(47 U.S.C. 151 nt.) is amended by striking ``3 years after the date of 
enactment of this
Act--'' and inserting ``on October 21, 2003:''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 1101(a) of that Act (47 U.S.C. 
151 nt.) is further amended--
            (1) by striking ``taxes'' in paragraph (1) and inserting 
        ``Taxes'';
            (2) by striking ``1998; and'' in paragraph (1) and 
        inserting ``1998.''; and
            (3) by striking ``multiple'' in paragraph (2) and inserting 
        ``Multiple''.

SEC. 3. SENSE OF THE CONGRESS.

    It is the sense of the Congress that State governments and 
interested business organizations should expedite efforts to develop a 
streamlined simplified plan for protecting State revenues affected by 
Internet use without unnecessarily burdening interstate commerce.
                                 <all>
```
### May 11,2015

The Honora b le An t hony R

. Foxx Secretary of Transportation US Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, D

. C

. 20590



### Dear Secretary 

### Foxx : 

## ... I

.



# -.**·.~. =.** **rml!~~IJ! tct.YPi~~~;jh)rtnc** **vo~ ,.!~n** **~n~ntaep** · fake 

### to tevet

## ~ ptaying 

### field tor Amerialn 

### businesses and maintain 

### thil envlronminf0ffi1t

. mlfhttttrwp;atttioft tn 

### wiation-estabtisbed by 

### Open

_ Skies policy that hiS 

### been 

### auclal for America's success.

Tbe 

### tens of 

### bHUons of dollars In subsidies 

### are dlstorti• the free 

### market framework 

### estab l ished by 

### Ope n 

### Skies**~nd** they 

### will 

### ultimately have 

### a neaatlve 

### economic Impact 

### hire In the 

### United Stites if 

### we allow them to

### ~nue~,-ft~ 

## uniien playing 

### fiefdtCfeated'bv these 

## massive**subsidiesJs.~J:.tlP.I·~~ffl.f!'~'~~t>V.m!ed**

## iri~**~m~~ Airfl~** **0!'~" ~Hna~mtle~ol~~~~Jf..~~-~~ft~t;!(Mt'ead** **~-~~ ~~·GfAMirlcanjtJbs:'4n:fad,.~•·•n•.•~llltNte.~•l~•fW** **~~rn··** ·.;!"·

### fPa~\'shlp<'fdr 

## Oi*ft.**~'*****Sltles~*h** route-ttfl'ts

### IDst!~QJtar. _.., ..

### lf'lJ.~wm**~§~** ln

. . an:..fM"P 

### net loss 

### of 121 good 

# u.s. jobs. 

### These are jobs 

### tflat 

## we can Ill afford to lose 

### and they 

### should not be lost as' 

# a result of 

### unfair competition from foreign 

### carritrs.

6 '**~q ~~~**  - . · 1**·~f<''** ; )l;l/,6(j 2· :.¥11;;,r,1**~;:JL&;>** '1uQ**!I.JCl.~~·i?·** : " .Cl.9:.r

. ; 9!10 C'11JJWt..l(.l: ., : 111 ·F,l t •c/1



# s 10-150518-017 !!r**2~~,,** :.:il.,'€.;. ! :n'**~o** ;; 1::; , 2 · ;;cc uc1u;. 1 !J! ::! '-f.Jv!.; lt .E. c• :t.;.wsw :JJ• Ot ''0!uUJo;,:c• 1 '.!W**~r::';!** ··f, J \ 'J'.t: (' 1 n:'i (LI!:. ··**r,. ~;o**  · W, 1



### For**infonnat1o~** 

### visit \VVJV. 

### .njchamber.com, or call {609} 989-7888 j oo;::.. : ...1 

### am not seeklna 

### to end the Open Sides 

### ..,_ments 

### with Qatar and the UA£, 

### nor am t ralsJna concerns with 

### reprd to 

## any of 

### the more than one hundred 

### other Open Skies 

## aareements. I am simply requestlna tha t the 

## u.s. aovemment open consultations with Qatar and 

### the UAE , w hi ch are p rovided f or within the Open Skies agreeme n t s th emse lv es and hold o ff on the addition of new routes. 

# Sl 7Uet--

Thomas**~.** Bracken President and CEO New Jersey State Chamber of Commerce



### 510-150518-017 For 

### information, vi 

### t t www.njchamber.com, or ca ll {609) 98g.7888THE STA R

NEw ]E RSEY C11 RER OF CoMMERCE 216 WEST STATE STREET

. TRENTON, NJ 08608



# s 10-150518-017 The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx 

### Secretary of Transportation US Department of Transportation 

### 1200 New 

### Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590



### I. I· II 

### II' I I I • 

### I I' 

### I 

### I I 

### I 

### II,,,, , ,,,,''"" tl•lll .,.,,.,, . , 

### ''1'1 I
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>            1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                              73
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      547
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      14469
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 18217
<PP&E>                                           13789
<DEPRECIATION>                                    5543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   27121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7459
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                       18645
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     27121
<SALES>                                          16457
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 16457
<CGS>                                            13417
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    13417
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  6820
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  55
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3768)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1512)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2256)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2256)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.44)
        

</TABLE>
No. 289.

#### Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. *v.*Slaughter.

*Prime F. Osborn, Norman C. Shepard*and *Frank G. Kurka*for petitioner.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
From: canda1410@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:13:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Chuck Hunt

Schaumburg, IL 60193