alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: johnkarrie@ymail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:33:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

karrie jamsion

Nashville, AR 71852
From: katrich@shoreham.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:20:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

kathy Richardson

Middlebury, VT 05753
From: strattonfamily@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:07:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patricia Stratton

Lorton, VA 22079
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          11,083
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,634
<ALLOWANCES>                                       920
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,435
<PP&E>                                          14,724
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,565
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  49,551
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,049
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           179
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,131
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    49,551
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,104
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,117
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,373
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   387
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  78
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,990)<F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,990)<F1>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,990)<F1>
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.79)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.79)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Operating expenses, pretax, continuing and net income, as well as
earnings per share, include a $9.7 million intangible asset impairment
charge related to Partsvoice.
</FN>


</TABLE>
From: jeffrey.timm@me.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:52:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey Timm

Prescott, AZ 86301
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 12(b)


                             D&N CAPITAL CORPORATION
                Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges
                    and preferred stock dividend requirements

                  For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2000
                          (In thousands, except ratio)


Net income                                                         $ 2,873

Fixed charges:
           Advisory fees                                                94

Total fixed charges                                                     94

Earnings before fixed charges                                      $ 2,967

Fixed charges, as above                                                 94

Preferred stock dividend requirement                                 2,042

Fixed charges including preferred stock dividends                  $ 2,136

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred
  stock dividends requirements                                        1.39


                                     -14-
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

          Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
          Sec 1350), the undersigned, Daniel P. McCartney, Chief Executive
          Officer of Healthcare Services Group, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation
          (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

     The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 of the
     Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
     information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                         /s/ Daniel P. McCartney
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Daniel P. McCartney
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                                         March 10, 2005
Amendment No. 1 to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) made as of
December 17, 2012 (“Effective Date”) by and between BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Jean-Jacques Bienaimé (“Employee”). 

 

	1.	This Amendment No. 1 is intended to amend and modify that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Employee dated January 1,
2009 (the “Agreement”). The Agreement, together with this Amendment, shall constitute a single agreement. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.
Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remaining full force and effect according to its terms. 

  

	2.	The first sentence of Section 8 (h) is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety by the following: 


(h) Mechanics. All Termination Compensation described in Subsections 8(c) (1) above, if any, and the enhanced Termination
Compensation described in Subsections 8(d)(i), 8(d)(ii) and 8(d)(iv) through (vi) above, if any, shall be payable in one lump-sum payment within thirty (30) days of the Employee’s termination date, conditioned on Employee executing the
Company’s standard form severance and release agreement within twenty (20) days of the Employee’s termination, and shall be subject to customary withholding and other applicable payroll processes. If Employee fails to execute and deliver
the Company’s standard form severance and release agreement within twenty (20) days after the Employee’s termination, Employee will have no right to any Termination Compensation under this Agreement. 

 

	3.	This Amendment No. 1 may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the
same instrument. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Amendment have executed this Amendment as of the date
first written above. 
  

									
	BIOMARIN PHARMACEUTICAL INC.	 		 	EMPLOYEE
					
	By:	 	 /s/ G. Eric Davis
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Jean-Jacques Bienaimé

	Name: G. Eric Davis	 		 		 	Jean-Jacques Bienaimé
	Its:      Sr. Vice President & General Counsel
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*John Mulraney, Appellant.

(Argued January 13, 1913;

decided January 28, 1913.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Court of General Sessions of the Peace in the county of New York, rendered April 26, 1912, upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of murder in the first degree.

*Herbert R. Limburg*and *Ezra*P. *Prentice*for appellant.

*Charles S. Whitman, District Attorney (Robert C. Taylor*of counsel), for respondent,

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Werner, Hiscock, Chase, Collin and Hogan, JJ. Absent: Willard Bartlett, J.
From: sylvia@hamannco.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:37:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sylvia Harrison

El Cajon, CA 92019
Grafton,

May 4, 1915.

#### Fred L. Pattee *v.*John Moore.

Bill in Equity, to determine the location of a divisional line. The case was originally heard in the superior court before *Mitchell,*J., and on October 31, 1911, a decree was filed establishing the boundary. February 9, 1912, the plaintiff filed a motion for a modification of the decree, and a hearing was had thereon before Mr. Justice *Mitchell,*who died before taking any action. At the October term, 1914, of the superior court, there was a hearing on the motion before *Sawyer,*J., who entered up a new decree in accordance with the prayer, and the defendant excepted.

*John H. Noonan,*for the plaintiff.

*Hugh Moore*and *David F. Dudley*(both by brief and orally), for the defendant.

*604Young, J.

Whether the decree should be modified was a question of fact; consequently the only question of law raised by the defendant’s exception is whether there was any evidence to sustain the court’s finding. Instead of there being no evidence to sustain the court’s conclusion, it is the only conclusion that can be drawn from the evidence. „

*Exception overruled.*

All concurred.
From: plvisser@pionet.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:23:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Pam visser

Orange City, IA 51041
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATESD STATEMENT OF LOSS AND ACCUMULATED DEFICIT AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SYCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                         266,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  483,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               802,600
<PP&E>                                      10,708,100
<DEPRECIATION>                               (172,800)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,340,160
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,045,100
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  3,095,000
<COMMON>                                     1,455,420
<OTHER-SE>                                         600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,340,160
<SALES>                                        268,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               270,400
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  374,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             118,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (222,400)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (222,400)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (222,400)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
        

</TABLE>