alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 178 (Friday, September 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 63638]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19978]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #18147 and #18148; Georgia Disaster Number GA-
00161]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Georgia

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Georgia (FEMA-
4738-DR), dated 09/09/2023.
    Incident: Hurricane Idalia.
    Incident Period: 08/30/2023.

DATES: Issued on 09/09/2023.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/08/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 06/10/2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 09/09/2023, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Appling, Atkinson, Bacon, Berrien, Brantley, Brooks, 
Bulloch, Camden, Candler, Charlton, Clinch, Coffee, Colquitt, Cook, 
Echols, Emanuel, Glynn, Jeff Davis, Jenkins, Lanier, Lowndes, Pierce, 
Screven, Tattnall, Thomas, Tift, Ware, Wayne.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.375
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.375
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.375
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 18147 8 
and for economic injury is 18148 0.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco S[aacute]nchez, Jr.,
Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2023-19978 Filed 9-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
Page | of 2
poe REC NTHIL-10

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVI
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
BRANCH

As of: September 03, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted

Posted: September 03, 2010
SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0695
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Ronald John Mostowski
Address:
1500 Standiford Ave
Madesto, CA, 95350
Email: drpolish1@charter.net
Phone: 209-577-3300
Fax: 209 577-3569

General Comment

August 12, 2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status
as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 9/3/2010


Page 2 of 2

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Ronald J, Mostowski, D.C.

https://fdms.erulemaking net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 9/3/2010
| For      the Period: 11/4/2008 to 11/10/2008 |
|----------------------------------------------|

| Coupon | Interest                           | Maturity | Callable | Survivor'sOption | Price1 | Yield2 | Moody's | S&P | CUSIP     |
|--------|------------------------------------|----------|----------|------------------|--------|--------|---------|---------|-----------|
| 5.750% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 11/15/10 | NO       | YES§        | 100.00 | 5.750% | A2      | A       | 14912HMT4 |
| 6.500% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 11/15/12 | NO       | YES§        | 100.00 | 6.500% | A2      | A       | 14912HMU1 |
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





Form 8-K





Current Report





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report  (Date of earliest event reported): October 23, 2018





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation


(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)





001-11241


(Commission File Number)


Delaware37-1105865(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(IRS Employer Identification Number)





2120 West End Avenue


Nashville, Tennessee 37203-0001


(Address of principal executive offices, with zip code)





(615) 341-1000


(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:


oWritten communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)oSoliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))oPre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).





Emerging growth company o





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o








---







Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.





On October 23, 2018, Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation issued a press release reporting financial results for the quarter ended September 30, 2018.  A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated into this Item 2.02 by reference.





The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, is being furnished in accordance with the provisions of General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K.








Item 9.01.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.





d)Exhibits:The following is furnished as an exhibit to this report:Exhibit No.Description99.1Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated October 23, 2018








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation








Date:  October 23, 2018By:/s/ Leslie S. ZmuggLeslie S. ZmuggSecretary




















2
No. 520, Misc.

#### Bentz *v.*Washington.

Supreme Court of Washington. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of AE Biofuels, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eric A. McAfee,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Eric
              A.
              McAfeeEric
              A. McAfeeChief Executive
                Officer
              Date:
                March 28, 2008
No. 524, Misc.

#### Davis *v.*Maryland.

Court of Appeals of Maryland. Certiorari denied.
From: glorybees7@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:58:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

**If all business are run with money which states "ONE NATION UNDER GOD" then all

businesses/individual insurance plans should have the opportunity to opt out of this part of the plan!!

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kerri Troyan

Hillsborough, NJ 08844
**F e d e r a l    D e p o s i t o r y    L i b r a r y    P r o g r a m**
 ******Home****About the FDLP****Depository Management****Electronic Collection****Locator Tools & Services****Processing Tools****Publications****Q & A****askLPS** **·** **Calendar** **·** **Contacts** **·** **Library Directory** **·** **Site Index**  **·** **Site Search***** 
**Depository Library Promotional Materials
9. Local Accesss: Make the Connection at a Federal Depository Library (brochure) ( 50/package )Cover View
See also - cover view and inside left, center, right and back left, right.  
**ACTUAL size: Single sheet, 11 inches wide, 8 1/12 inches high,                   information on both sides, folded into thirds to form a brochure. Actual folded brochure size: width = 3 3/4 inches, height = 8 1/2 inches

A service of the Superintendent ofDocuments, U.S. Government Printing Office.Questions or comments: [email protected].Last updated: October 2, 2002 *******
From: batlecross@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:28:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Scott Shue

Jackson, CA 95642
Record of Communication

02-04-15

This afternoon (02-04-15) EPA Region 6 met wi th representatives from Xcel Energy (see Attachment 1) concerning our proposal on th e Texas and Oklahoma regional haze SIPs. The following summarizes the main discussion point s Xcel communicated to us regarding our analysis of the Tolk facility:

 Xcel believes we did not appr opriately consider the cost of acquiring additional water in costing dry scrubbers and the impact that w ould have on non- air environmental impacts.

 Xcel believes we did not appropriately consid er the cost of additional waste disposal in costing dry scrubbers and non- air environmental impacts.

 Xcel questioned our use of CAMx modeling and how we we ighed Xcel’s contribution against the influence of Me xico and natural conditions.

 Xcel questioned our use of metrics such as thresholds for control, and percent contribution over deciview impacts.

We asked that Xcel provide official written comm ents to these discussions points so that we can respond to those comments on the record.
#### Herman Van Slochem, Respondent, *v.*Harold G. Villard et al., Defendants, and Edward Ashforth et al., Appellants.

*Van Slochem,*v. *Villard (Ashforth),*154 App. Div. 166, affirmed.

(Argued February 27, 1913;.

decided March 18, 1913.)

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 7, 1912, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for judgment in favor of defendants, appellants, on the pleadings in an action for fraud and deceit.

The following question was certified: “ Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action ? ”

*Michael H. Cardozo, Jr.,*and *Brison Howie*for appellants.

*Henry L. Scheuerman*and *Herbert R. Limburg*for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs, question certified answered in the affirmative on opinion in *Van Slochem*v. *Villard*(207 N. Y. 587).

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Collin and Hogan, JJ.
No. 448.

#### Kravitz *v.*United States.

*Leon H. Kline*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, Meyer Rothwacks*and *John M. Brant*for the United States.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
From: daveblanke@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:43:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

How dare you force your Darwinian faith upon other religions! You, who claim to have no religion,

tyrannically impose regulations upon those who do in order to force compliance with your pseudointellectualist goals.

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dave Blanke

Florissant, MO 63031
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 30485 Summary Calendar

CHESTER BROWN , Petitioner

- Appellant

v. DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY , Respondent

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:19

- CV

- 9121

Before SMITH, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Chester Brown, Louisiana prisoner # 97411, was convicted of armed robbery and second

- degree murder and sentenced to imprisonment for life. The district court dismissed Brown’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 application with prejudice and denied his motion to stay the p roceedings pending the completion of his state post

- conviction proceedings. Brown now has filed

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 8, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-30485 Document: 00515375812 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/08/2020No. 19

- 30485

2 motion s for a certificate of appealability (COA) and for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. In his motion for a COA, Brown argues that the di strict court erred in dismissing his claim that he has new evidence , consisting of an affidavit from one of his original accusers now stating that Brown did not take any part in the crimes, which shows he is actually innocent

. To obtain a COA, Brown must make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See
28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Brown “satisfies this standard by demonstrating that jurists of reason could disagree with the district court’s resolution of his
constitutional c laims or tha t jurists could conclude the issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003). However, a freestanding claim of actual innocence does not state an independently cognizable ground for § 2254 relief. See Kinsel v. Cain , 647 F.3d 265, 270 n.20 (5th Cir. 2011) . Brown does not raise any other claim of constitutional error. Therefore, he has not shown that reasonable jurists would debate the district court’s resolution of his constitutional c laims , and his motion for a COA is DENIED. See Miller

- El , 537 U.S. at 327 . In light of this determination, his motion for leave to proceed IFP also is DENIE D.
Brown also challenges the district court’s denial of his motion to stay his § 2254 proceedings. “A COA is not required to review the district court’s ruling

on a non
- merits issue such as a stay.” Young v. Stephens , 795 F.3d 484, 494 (5th Cir. 2015). Because he has not shown he will raise a meritorious issue, he
has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion to stay the proceedings. See Rhines v. Weber , 544 U.S. 269, 277

- 78 (2005). The district court’s denial of Brown ’s motion to stay his § 2254 proceedings is AFFIRMED. Case: 19-30485 Document: 00515375812 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/08/2020
No. 280.

#### Vogelsang et al., doing business as Whitehouse Bros., *v.*Delta Air Lines, Inc.

*Simon Greenhill*for petitioners.

*John M. Aherne*for respondent.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.