alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: bjmusser@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:32:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Janis Musser

Clearfield, PA 16830
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ACORN HOLDING CORP. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                   0000737243
<NAME>                  ACORN HOLDING CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,012,124
<SECURITIES>                                   212,952
<RECEIVABLES>                                  397,502
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    2,454,583
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4,186,885
<PP&E>                                         2,012,537
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,338,591
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,622,401
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          903,643
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       16,273
<OTHER-SE>                                     6,702,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,622,401
<SALES>                                        7,068,689
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,068,689
<CGS>                                          4,727,708
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,460,944
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (20,989)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                678,750
<INCOME-TAX>                                   160,546
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            518,204
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   518,204
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .32



</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00171-CV

ANTHONY E. GILL APPELLANT

V.

CSL PLASMA, INC. APPELLEE 

------------

FROM THE 141ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 141-274975-14

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Withdraw Appeal,” which is 

unopposed. It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, 

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

/s/ Sue Walker

SUE WALKER

JUSTICE

PANEL: WALKER, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ. 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

DELIVERED: July 16, 2015
#### Michael Donnelly, Respondent, *v.*Patrick J. McArdle, Appellant.

Reported below, 158 App. Div. 805.

(Submitted January 6, 1913;

decided January 14, 1913.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judi*680cial department, entered October 31, 1912, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee in an action to dissolve a partnership and for an accounting.

The motion was made upon the ground that the Appellate Division had unanimously decided that the findings of fact were supported by the evidence and that the exceptions were frivolous.

*James W. Osborne*for motion.

*Andrew J. Nellis*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFrequency Domain Identification ToolboxThis report documents software written in MATLAB programming language for performing identification of systems from frequency response functions. MATLAB is a commercial software environment which allows easy manipulation of data matrices and provides other intrinsic matrix functions capabilities. Algorithms programmed in this collection of subroutines have been documented elsewhere but all references are provided in this document. A main feature of this software is the use of matrix fraction descriptions and system realization theory to identify state space models directly from test data. All subroutines have templates for the user to use as guidelines.Document ID19970001136Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHorta, Lucas G.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Juang, Jer-Nan*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Chen, Chung-Wen*(North Carolina State Univ. Raleigh, NC United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1996Subject CategoryInstrumentation And PhotographyReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-109039NAS 1.15:109039Accession Number97N10989Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 233-10-14-03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970001136.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Jfourtl) Court of

gntonto,

August 16, 2013

No.04-ll-00677-CV

SMOOTH SOLUTIONS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,

Appellant

v.

LIGHT AGE, INC.,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2005-CI-13168

Honorable David A. Berchelmann, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee's Motion for Extension of Time to File Motion for Rehearing is

GRANTED.

U/ttdA

Marialyo BarnAfd, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of August, 2013.

Keit

Clerk of Court
Apr 17 15 12:57p LAW OFFICES



### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION- OFFICE OF 

### HEARINGS WASHINGTON, D.C.

ADMINISTRATOR Federal Aviation Administration Complainant,
v. 

### Rugby Aviation, LLC, Respondent. 

### ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 

### FAA Hearing DocketNo. (unassigned) Judge (unassigned)
FAA Case. No. 2014NMOI0021

ANSWER p.1



### Respondent, Rugby Aviation, LLC, by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby responds to the numbered paragraphs in the Administrator's complaint as follows: Paragraph I

### -I. Paragraph II-1. 

### Paragraph Il-2. Paragraph II-3. Paragraph Il-4. Paragraph II-5. Paragraph II-6. Paragraph II-7. Paragraph II-8. Paragraph Il-9. Paragraph IIl-Ia. Paragraph Ill-lb. 

### Paragraph III-2. Paragraph III-3. ADMITTED ADMITTED ADMITTED ADMITTED ADMITTED ADMITTED DENIED ADMITTED as to a letter being received butDENIED as to ailegation. DENIED ADMITTED DENIED DENIED DENIED DENIEDApr 17 15 12:57p LAW OFFICES p.2

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

1. Respondent reasonablyrelied uponthe FAA whose dutyit 

### was to properly advise them ofthe properprocedure to followin adding a "doing business as" to their operation specification and thengave them incorrect advice and information. 2. The Administrator's failure to follow internal procedures warrants a waiver oftheimposition ofsanction.

REQUESTED RELIEF
Respondent respectfullyrequests thatthe Board deny the complaint andreverse the Administrator's Order Imposing a Civil Penalty, dated April 

### 9, 2015.
Respectfully submitted, this 17 1 h dayofApri12015,

The Law Offices ofJ.C. Becker, Inc., P.S.

J.C. Be er. Coun{el fo; PO Bo · 13 Mill Cre , W A 98082-1253 Phone: (425) 280-2004 Email: jc@lojcb.comApr 17 15 12:58p LAW OFFICES

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that l have this date faxed and emailed, the foregoing ANS\VER addressed to: Hearing Docket Federai Av:iation Administration Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk AGC-430, Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2WJOOO 800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591 Fax (202) 267-1293

and, further, that I have this date faxed and mailed, byregular mail, a copy ofthe foregoing ANSWER addressed to:
Robert Spitzer, FAA Attorney NW Mountain Region/FAA 1601 Lind Ave SW Renton, WA 98057 Fax (425) 227-1007

Dated: 4/17/2015 Attorney 

### J:C. Be er, WSBA #19350 

## I p.3
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 19, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 64447]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20244]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Initial Review Group; Training and Workforce Development 
Study Section--D.
    Date: October 12, 2023.
    Time: 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of 
General Medical Sciences, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, 
Bethesda, Maryland 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Marc Rigas, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review, National Institutes of General Medical 
Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 
3AN18C, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, 301-827-0648, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#96fbf7e4f5b8e4fff1f7e5d6f8fffeb8f1f9e0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5a373b28397428333d3b291a343332743d352c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.859, 
Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 14, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-20244 Filed 9-18-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
From: tgcljm@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:15:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

LAURENCE MILY

Columbus, OH 43085
#### Robert S. Minturn, Respondent, *v.*Samuel Green, Appellant.

*Minturn*v. Green, 146 App. Div. 878, affirmed.

(Argued February 7, 1913;

decided February 25, 1913.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first, judicial department, entered July 13, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to recover rent alleged to be due under a lease to which a counterclaim had been interposed asking for a reformation of the lease on the ground *739of fraud and duress, for a reduction of the rent and for an accounting.

*Alexander Rosenthal*and *David Steckler*for appellant.

*George L. Shearer*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Cuddeback, Hogan and Miller, JJ.
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No. 333-35460

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO. 073				Trade Date: 05/03/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

September 8, 2000)						Issue Date: 05/08/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement May 03, 2001
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

or	Stated				 Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		 Price to	 Discounts & Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2) Commissions Frequency	 Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QDA6 5.15% 05/15/04	100%	 0.8% Semi-Annually	 YES	 NO	

 

 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____ Yes	 X No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount. Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-26-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-26-2000
<CASH>                                         124,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               24,758,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   852,000
<INVENTORY>                                 13,482,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,704,000
<PP&E>                                       8,271,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,774,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,248,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       39,148,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 11,066,000
<COMMON>                                       168,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,248,000
<SALES>                                     55,608,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            55,608,000
<CGS>                                       37,343,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               51,860,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,978,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,968,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,770,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    97,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,673,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,673,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
NUMBER 13-19-00353-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

TATIYANA GENEVA ALTECOR, Appellant,

v.

ALLEN MICHAEL EGAN AND 

UNITED PROPERTY AND 

CASUALTY INSURANCE, Appellees. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 370th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras

Appellant, Tatiyana Geneva Altecor, filed an appeal from the trial court’s denial of 

her motion to allocate settlement funds in cause number C-2974-17-G currently pending 

in the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. This cause is before the Court on 
2

appellee United’s motion to dismiss the appeal, appellant’s response, and the appellate 

record.

Appellant’s notice of appeal seeks to appeal the trial court’s ruling on her motion 

to allocate settlement funds. Upon review of the record, it appears there is no written 

order for this Court to consider. In terms of appellate jurisdiction, appellate courts only 

have jurisdiction to review final judgments and certain interlocutory orders identified by 

statute. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Because there 

is no final judgment or order subject to appeal, the notice of appeal is premature. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1, 27.1(a).

The Court, having considered the record, appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal,

and appellant’s response, is of the opinion that the motion to dismiss should be granted. 

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3(a). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

DORI CONTRERAS

Chief Justice 

Delivered and filed the

14th day of November, 2019.
No. 65104.

#### Roberts, Reilly & Sons et al. *v.*United States,

protests 315939-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue herein is the same as that involved in *United States*v. *Dodge & Olcott, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 100, C.A.D. 737), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
From: sgligora@christianassembly.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:37:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Shannon Gligora

Westerville, OH 43081