alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Searched for **http://www.letsmove.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.letsmove.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 
    The following list sets forth the name of the Registrant and each of its
subsidiaries, the states or other jurisdictions under which they are organized,
and the percentage ownership of the voting securities of each corporation by its
immediate parent.
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
             NAME OF CORPORATION AND STATE                            PERCENTAGE OF VOTING SECURITIES
                 UNDER WHICH ORGANIZED                                  OWNED BY IMMEDIATE PARENT(1)
--------------------------------------------------------  --------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                       <C>
F&M BANCORP (MD)
    FARMERS & MECHANICS NATIONAL BANK
       - Key Holdings, Inc.
       - Key Management, Inc.
       - MD General Insurance Agency, Inc.
       - Keller-Stonebraker Insurance Co.
         - Charles S. Gardner, Inc. Agency, Inc.
         - Hagerstown Financial Planners, Inc.
         - JRH Insurance, Inc.
       - TBT Insurance, Inc.
       - TBT Investments, Inc.
       - TBT Title Holdings, Inc.
         - TBT Title I, Inc.
         - TBT Title II, Inc.
         - TBT Title III, Inc.
         - TBT Title IV, Inc.
         - TBT Title V, Inc.
         - TBT Title VI, Inc.
         - TBT Title VII, Inc.
         - TBT Title VIII, Inc.
         - TBT Title IX, Inc.
         - TBT Title X, Inc.
         - TBT Title XI, Inc.
         - TBT Title XII, Inc.
         - TBT Title XIII, Inc.
 
    HOME FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
     - RLC Associates, Inc.
     - CLC Associates, Inc.
       - Keystone General Partnership
     - Family Home Insurance Agency, Inc.
     - Ronald Harris Parker and Associates, Inc.
     - Home Appraisals, Inc.
       - TJW Associates, Inc.
 
    DMP, INC.
</TABLE>
 
(1)  Each company owns 100% of the outstanding common stock (or partnership
    interest(s) as the case may be) of each of its subsidiaries except CLC
    Associates, Inc., which owns an 80% general partnership interest in Keystone
    General Partnership.
 
                                       72
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Form 10-K annual report for the year ended December 31, 1996, and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      18,530         
<SECURITIES>                                     0    
<RECEIVABLES>                              103,680 
<ALLOWANCES>                               (4,461) 
<INVENTORY>                                  6,722      
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           133,816       
<PP&E>                                      96,014      
<DEPRECIATION>                            (50,701)    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             443,406          
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       52,758    
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       224 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0 
<PREFERRED>                                      0 
<OTHER-SE>                                 360,324       
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               443,406         
<SALES>                                          0        
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           281,445          
<CGS>                                            0          
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              242,044
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (207)       
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,143      
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,954       
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             26,511       
<INCOME-TAX>                                12,649      
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0      
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0      
<CHANGES>                                        0  
<NET-INCOME>                                13,862 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .62 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .62 
        
                                  


</TABLE>
From: kenlange12@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:57:57 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

ken lange

Celina, OH 45822
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period
ended December 31, 1999 and to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-93651, 333-94827 and
333-83599) of our report dated March 17, 2000, except for the subsequent event
described in Note 10, as to which the date is March 23, 2000, on our audits of
the balance sheets of Dental/Medical Diagnostic Systems, Inc. as of December 31,
1999 and 1998, and the results of its operations and cash flows for each of the
years in the three year period ended December 31, 1999.



PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Woodland Hills, California
March 29, 2000
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Excelsior Private Equity Fund II, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2006 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |     |  |                           
|------------------- |  | --- |  | --------------------------
|Date: June 14, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Leo P. Grohowski      
|                    |  |     |  | Leo P. Grohowski          
|                    |  |     |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  |    
|Date: June 14, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Raghav V. Nandagopal  
|                    |  |     |  | Raghav V. Nandagopal      
|                    |  |     |  | Co-Chief Executive Officer
|                    |  |    
|Date: June 14, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert F. Aufenanger  
|                    |  |     |  | Robert F. Aufenanger      
|                    |  |     |  | Treasurer                 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: janetscreations@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:41:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Janet Friedman

Florissant, MO 63033
From: arendel@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:22:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Alan Endel

Hamburg, AR 71646
From: amb@safe-mail.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:28:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Antoinette Brusseau

Denton, TX 76201
From: Judy Hawley

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 2:02:12 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care

under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services,

are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1421 

Solemnly commemorating the 25th anniversary of the tragic October 1983 

terrorist bombing of the United States Marine Corps Barracks in Beirut, 

Lebanon and remembering those who lost their lives and those who 

were injured. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2008 

Mr. JONES of North Carolina submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Solemnly commemorating the 25th anniversary of the tragic 

October 1983 terrorist bombing of the United States 

Marine Corps Barracks in Beirut, Lebanon and remembering those who lost their lives and those who were 

injured. 

Whereas on the morning of October 23, 1983, at approximately 6:20 a.m., a truck packed with explosives broke 

security and detonated outside of the United States Marine Corps barracks in Beirut, Lebanon; 

Whereas 241 members of the Armed Forces of the United 

States were killed in the blast, and many more were injured; 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1421 IH 

Whereas a total of 273 members of the Armed Forces from 

36 States across the United States were killed while serving in Beirut, Lebanon, from 1982 to 1984; 

Whereas the members of the Armed Forces were part of a 

multinational peacekeeping force; and 

Whereas the honor and sacrifice of the victims will never be 

forgotten: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives, on the 

2 25th anniversary of the bombing of the United States Ma3 rine Corps barracks in Beirut, Lebanon— 

4 (1) honors and remembers the service and sac5 rifice of the victims of the bombing; and 

6 (2) joins family and friends in mourning the 

7 victims who lost their lives in the tragic bombing. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
From: dotty.greeley@q.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:44:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize these immoral practices. I again urge you in the

strongest way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of

mandatory preventive services. Better yet, get rid of Obamacare altogether.

Sincerely,

Dotty Greeley

Fort Collins, CO 80528
No. 616, Misc.

#### Bassett *v.*Tahash, Warden.

Supreme Court of Minnesota. Certiorari denied.
<page>			            EXHIBIT 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Cornerstone
Fund II (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey A.
Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.







By:    /s/ Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:      Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:     President

Date:      March 31, 2005
[No. 3785.]

#### Parkdale Fuel Co. v. Taylor.

Bita of *Exceptions*— When *Necessary.*Under Sec. 24 of Chapter 6 of the laws of 1911, no exception need he taken to a final judgment, or to the denial of a motion for a new trial.

*Appeal from Boulder District Court.*

*Motion to Dismiss Appeal.*

Cunningham, Judge.

Appellee has filed a motion asking-that the appeal in this cause be dismissed on two grounds: First, on the ground that appellant failed to take an exception to the judgment of the trial court; second, that the appellant has failed to file with the clerk of the court a printed abstract of record as required by Rule 5 of this court. The last ground of the motion has heretofore been passed upon by this court, and under the showing made by appellant, the motion to dismiss on the ground was denied.

*81Our State Legislature, at its last session, passed au Act pertaining to Appeals and Writs of Error, containing the following provision:

> “No court of review of this state shall hereafter dismiss any appeal or writ of error or other proceeding for the review of any cause upon the ground that no exception was expressly saved to the judgment or final order or the overruling of a motion for a new trial, provided the party seeking such review appeared and participated in the hearing or trial of such cause upon which such judgment or final order was entered. Such exception shall he deemed to he saved hy operation of law and the reviewing court shall proceed in all respects, as if the same had been saved of record. This provision shall apply to all causes now pending in any court of review, as well as to causes hereafter taken there.” Sec. 24, Chap. 6, Session Laws 1911, p. 18.

This salutary provision disposes of the controversy raised by the first ground of appellee’s motion. Therefore, the same must be denied.

*Motion to Dismiss Denied.*
No. 431, Misc.

#### Foster *v.*New York.

*Audrey Fox Anderson*for petitioner.

Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.