alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

Ryder Scott Company, L. P. hereby consents to the use of its name and to the reference of its report dated January 14, 2010,
relating to proved oil and natural gas reserves and future net revenues of Continental Resources, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009, in the Annual Report of Continental Resources, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009 and as an exhibit to the amendment on Form 10-K/A to such Annual Report on Form 10-K. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statement of Continental Resources, Inc. on Form S-8 (File
No. 333-145320, effective August 10, 2007) and the Registration Statement of Continental Resources, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-168182, effective July 16, 2010).



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Very truly yours,            
|                             
|/s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.
|Ryder Scott Company, L.P.    

Denver, Colorado

August 20, 2010
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Presidential Realty
Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Jeffrey F. Joseph, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
                the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
and





(2)
                the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the
      Company.





Presidential
      Realty CorporationBy:
                          /s/
      Jeffrey F. JosephJeffrey
      F. JosephChief
      Executive
Officer





Date:
March 25, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 178 (Friday, September 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63560-63561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19991]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas and Oil Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP22-1033-006.
    Applicants: Northern Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: 2023 Compliance of Settlement to be 
effective 1/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 9/11/23.
    Accession Number: 20230911-5043.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/23.

    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must 
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18 
CFR 385.211) on or before 5 p.m. eastern time on the specified comment 
date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/

[[Page 63561]]

fercgensearch.asp) by querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, 
call (202) 502-8659. The Commission's Office of Public Participation 
(OPP) supports meaningful public engagement and participation in 
Commission proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including 
landowners, environmental justice communities, Tribal members and 
others, access publicly available information and navigate Commission 
processes. For public inquiries and assistance with making filings such 
as interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c788979787a1a2b5a4e9a0a8b1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="256a757565434057460b424a53">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 11, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-19991 Filed 9-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### George H. Le Huray, as Receiver, etc., Appellant, v. Charles A. Hotchkiss and others, Respondents, and others.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Brady, J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001036148
<NAME> CYBERTEL, COMMUNICATIONS CORP.

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         1249811
<SECURITIES>                                   3222563
<RECEIVABLES>                                   366646
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5064122
<PP&E>                                          851575
<DEPRECIATION>                                  261838
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5911427
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           689483
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          3
<COMMON>                                          5981
<OTHER-SE>                                     5170447
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5911427
<SALES>                                        1163342
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1163342
<CGS>                                          1066627
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1066627
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4789773
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              609447
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (3488483)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (3488483)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (852420)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.63)


</TABLE>
From: sportznut1@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:52:30 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth Bartholomew

Portland, OR 97267
No. 282, Misc.

#### McAbee *v.*United States.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox*for the United States.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIce Accretion Prediction for a Typical Commercial Transport AircraftIce accretion calculations were made for a modern commercial transport using the NASA Lewis LEWICE3D ice accretion code. The ice accretion calculations were made for the wing and horizontal tail using both isolated flow models and flow models incorporating the entire airplane. The isolated flow model calculations were made to assess the validity of using these simplified models in lieu of the entire model in the ice accretion analysis of full aircraft. Ice shapes typifying a rime and a mixed ice shape were generated for a 30 minute hold condition. In general, the calculated ice shapes looked reasonable and appeared representative of a rime and a mixed ice conditions. The isolated flow model simplification was good for the main wing except at the root where it overpredicted the amount of accreted ice relative to the full aircraft flow model. For the horizontal tail the size and amount of predicted ice compared well for the two flow models, but the position of the accretions were more towards the upper surface for the aircraft flow model relative to the isolated flow model. This was attributed to downwash from the main wing which resulted in a lower effective angle of attack for the aircraft tail.Document ID19930006333Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsBidwell, C. S.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1993Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberAIAA PAPER 93-0174E-7499NAS 1.15:105976NASA-TM-105976Meeting InformationMeeting: Aerospace Sciences Meeting and ExhibitLocation: Reno, NVCountry: United StatesStart Date: January 11, 1993End Date: January 14, 1993Sponsors:AIAAAccession Number93N15522Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-68-10Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19930006333.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
From: Michele Whalen

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: women"s health

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:44:56 PM

Dear Sir or Madam,

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger.

Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run

health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the

coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies.

If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions

Sincerely,

Michele Whalen

Ogdensburg, NY
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 97-1600EM

_____________ Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern v. * District of Missouri. * Valcour Development Company, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: November 17, 1997

Filed: November 26, 1997

_____________ Before FAGG, WOLLMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. appeals from the adverse decisio n of the district court and the jury in this diversity action. After reviewing the record, we conclude there i s sufficient evidence to support the jury verdict and Wal-Mart's claims of trial error are without merit. Having ruled against Wal-Mart on the merits, we need not address its claim for prejudgment interest. We thus affirm the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**SECTION 302**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, John M. Robbins, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of American Residential Investment Trust, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for theregistrant and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on suchevaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: November 13, 2003 |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
|                    |
| /s/ John M. Robbins     |   |
| John M. Robbins         |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
From: ike.timm@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:32:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

IVAN TIMM

Janesville, WI 53548
Exhibit 99.1



                    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


     In connection  with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended May
31, 2002 (the "Report") of Immucor,  Inc. (the "Registrant"),  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the best of
my knowledge, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Registrant.



August 29, 2002                               /s/ Edward L. Gallup
                                              --------------------
                                              Edward L. Gallup
                                              Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 99.6








CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT





In connection with the annual report of TransGlobe Energy Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ross G. Clarkson, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





|   |                                                                                                                                  
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



















/s/    Ross G. Clarkson


Name: Ross G. Clarkson


Title:  Chief Executive Officer


March 15, 2017
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00588-CR

Derrick Hall, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 427TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-DC-08-300013, HONORABLE MELISSA YOUNG GOODWIN , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Derrick Hall pleaded guilty to the offense of attempted failure to register as a

sex offender. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 62.102 (West 2006). Punishment was assessed

at six months’ imprisonment in state jail. The district court has certified that this is a plea-bargain

case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

____________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop

Dismissed

Filed: January 28, 2009

Do Not Publish
|  |   |
|--|--------|

| For                the Period: 2/4/2008 to 2/11/2008 |
|------------------------------------------------------|

| Coupon | Interest                           | Maturity | Callable   | Survivor'sOption | Price1 | Yield2 | Moody's | S&P | CUSIP     |
|--------|------------------------------------|----------|------------|------------------|--------|--------|---------|---------|-----------|
| 3.250% | Monthly(†)                   | 8/15/10  | NO         | YES§        | 100.00 | 3.272% | A2      | A       | 14912HJC5 |
| 5.000% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 2/15/18  | 2/15/10*** | YES§        | 100.00 | 5.000% | A2      | A       | 14912HJD3 |
| 5.400% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 2/15/23  | 2/15/11*** | YES§        | 100.00 | 5.400% | A2      | A       | 14912HJE1 |
| 5.550% | Monthly(†)                   | 2/15/28  | 2/15/12*   | YES§        | 100.00 | 5.615% | A2      | A       | 14912HJF8 |