alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Isadore Bernstein v. State of Nebraska.

Filed June 23, 1921.

No. 21875.

Criminal Law: Evidence: Telephonic Conversation. Evidence of telephonic conversation Between the defendant and another party is hearsay and incompetent, unless the party testifying could recognize and identify the voice of defendant.

Error to the district court for Douglas county: Alexander C. Troup, Judge.

*Reversed.*

*H. Fischer*and IF. *E. Eatteroth,*for plaintiff in error.

*Clarence A.*Davis, *Attorney*General, and *O. L. Dort, contra.*

Heard before Letton, Aldrich, Day and Dean, JJ., Good and Eaper, District Judges.

Aldrich, J.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the district court for Douglas county on a charge of receiving stolen property, and was sentenced to the penitentiary for an indeterminate period of from one to seven years; He brings the case to this court for review.

The property alleged to have been stolen was a case of cigars belonging to one Kiplinger. His name and address were on the box. The cigars, it is estimated, were worth $105.

The state’s principal witness was Henry Slack, a convict. His story was that at the time of the alleged stealing he was employed by the Omaha Merchants’ Express and Transfer Company; that he had the case of cigars and some tires in his truck when he left the freight office, and *338that he picked lip the witness Carl Rose on his way to Frieden’s store. Frieden, according to Slack’s testimony, said he would take all the “stuff” Slack would bring. Slack testified that they went from Frieden’s store to Bernstein’s place of business, where he delivered the cigars, receiving $25 in cash from Bernstein, with the arrangement that Bernstein was to pay him another $25 if the cigars were good.

Slack also testified that a telephonic conversation was had between Frieden and the defendant relative to defendant’s accepting the cigars in question. The defendant denied that Frieden called him on the telephone, and the establishing of the fact depends almost entirely upon Slack’s testimony, as Frieden was not called as a witness. Slack testified that Frieden “went inside and called this Bernstein.” Slack did not hear the defendant Bernstein’s voice at the other end of the line, and on this proposition the case of *National Bank of Ashland v. Cooper,*86 Neb. 792, is in point. It was there held: “The conversations, relating to a contract, had between parties thereto by telephone may be received in evidence, where the witness testifies positively that he recognized the person, with whom he was talking, by his voice.” It is plain, then, that neither Slack nor Rose could be allowed to testify that it was Bernstein at the other end of the line, unless they could identify his voice. *Dunham v. McMichael,*214 Pa. St. 485. Slack and Rose were comparative strangers to the defendant, not familiar enough with him to recognize his voice if they had heard it. Slack and Rose could testify only as to what they heard Frieden say. Hence, the reception of this evidence, in our judgment, was prejudicial error, and the defendant is entitled to a new trial on this phase of the case alone.

Reversed and remanded.
From: dtenpas@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:08:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dean Tenpas

Colorado Springs, CO 80919
Douglas Saitta

imprisonment, see NRS 207.190(1)(a), (2)(a); Parrish v. State, 116 Nev. 982, 989, 12 P.3d 953, 957 (2000). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.'

cc: Hon. Brent T. Adams, District Judge Marc Picker, Esq., Ltd. Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

'Turner's fast track statement does not comply with NRAP 3C(h)(1) and NRAP 32(a)(4) because it does not have 1-inch margins on all four sides. We caution Turner's counsel, Marc Picker, that future failure to comply with formatting requirements when filing briefs with this court may result in the imposition of sanctions. See NRAP 3C(n).

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2

. . „ ,:;11
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; AD Data Platform.                    

*Date:*                         November 3, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ramesh Vemuri, Ph.D., Chief, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C-212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7700,                         *rv23r@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 15, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-20435 Filed 9-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

      STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

This certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section 1350
of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal Procedures) of the
United States Code and shall not be relied on by any other person for any other
purpose.

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BellSouth Corporation (the
"Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, F.
Duane Ackerman, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of
the Company, and Ronald M. Dykes, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company,
certify that

      -     the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      -     information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
            respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
            Company.

/s/ F. Duane Ackerman
---------------------
F. Duane Ackerman

February 21, 2005

/s/ Ronald M. Dykes
---------------------
Ronald M. Dykes

February 21, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to BellSouth Corporation and will be retained by BellSouth Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### The Northwestern Insurance Company, Respondent, v. Francis B. Mooney and others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of the referee.
**Exhibit 32.2**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002     In connection with the Annual Report onForm 10-K of LNBBancorp, Inc. (the “Corporation”) for the periodending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Terry M. White, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Corporation.     /s/ Terry M. White           Terry M. White *Chief Financial Officer*March 13, 2006
82
Atlas Air, Inc. 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Suite 875 Washington, D.C. 20006

RUSSELL E. POMMER {202) 822-9121 -Telephone {202) 822-9152- Fax rpommer@atlasair.com January 24, 2012

Ms. Esta Rosenberg Chief, U.S. CauierLicensing Division Office ofInternational Aviation U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Application ofAtlas Air, Inc. for Renewal of Colombia Exemption Authority, Docket OST-2000-7477

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:
Atlas Air, Inc. ("Atlas") has completed its poll ofall carriers served with its application, filed January 17, 2012, for renewal ofits Colombia exemption authority. Please be advised that no carrier objects to the Atlas request. We therefore request expedited action on this matter.
Thank you very much for your consideration.

# -7;lyy~

# ~~er · Associate General Counsel and

Senior Director ofRegulatory Affairs

cc: Docket OST-2000-7477 All carriers served with initial application
From: shylavisser@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:38:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Shyla Colbert

Kirkland, WA 98034
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 133 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      February 8, 2007.
    Resolved,  That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the 
Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved 
into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for 
consideration of the bill (H.R. 547) to facilitate the development of markets 
for alternative fuels and Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel fuel through research, 
development, and demonstration and data collection. The first reading of the 
bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 
bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General 
debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Science and Technology. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to 
consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute 
rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
Science and Technology now printed in the bill. Each section of the committee 
amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. During 
consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the 
Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member 
offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion of the 
Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. 
Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may 
demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 
the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: 

88 FR 60442, September 1, 2023.

# PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF THE MEETING: 

9:00 a.m. EDT, Friday, September 8, 2023.

# CHANGES IN THE MEETING: 

The meeting has been canceled.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Christopher Kirkpatrick, Secretary of the Commission, 202-418-5964.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: September 7, 2023.

Christopher Kirkpatrick,

Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2023-19734 Filed 9-8-23; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
January 18, 1957

No. 60454.

#### Ebeling & Reuss Company *v.*United States,

protests 146559-K, etc.—

Plaintiff's application for rehearing granted to amend and correct decision. Rehearing denied on all other grounds. [Abstract 60263 corrected accordingly.]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<MULTIPLIER>               1,000

<S>                                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                                   52,828
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            26,722
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                610
<INVENTORY>                                                              19,075
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        133,844
<PP&E>                                                                   27,332
<DEPRECIATION>                                                           12,851
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                          221,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                    30,716
<BONDS>                                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                                    164
<OTHER-SE>                                                               11,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                            221,072
<SALES>                                                                 115,446
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        115,446
<CGS>                                                                    50,770
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                            50,770
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         59,278
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                       13,715
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                          (8,285)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                              2,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      (5,385)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                              954
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                             (48)
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             (4,479)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                               (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                             (0.08)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PAMECO CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                             147
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,676
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,094
<INVENTORY>                                    150,230
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               188,212
<PP&E>                                          25,022
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,923
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 264,570
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,758
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   264,570
<SALES>                                        159,117
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               159,117
<CGS>                                          121,915
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  159,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   814
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,779
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,067)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,433)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)


</TABLE>