alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR
THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,096,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                526,218,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       8,715,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,245,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             985,499,349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       35,180,000
<BONDS>                                    746,834,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       147,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 173,719,349
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               985,499,349
<SALES>                                    (1,604,651)
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            35,933,349
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               33,201,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          17,392,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (14,659,651)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (6,057,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,602,651)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,602,651)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.63)


</TABLE>
No. 651.

#### Wisconsin et al. *v.*Udall, Secretary of the Interior.

*Roy G. Tulane,*Assistant Attorney General of Wisconsin, *Nicholas V. Olds,*Assistant Attorney General of Michigan, *Newell A. Clapp, Wendell Lund*and *Joseph B. Levin*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Guilfoyle, Morton Hollander*and *Kathryn H. Baldwin*for respondent.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                        MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                               17,031,925
<SECURITIES>                                                            286,099
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        23,290,035
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            940,328
<INVENTORY>                                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                     46,231,273
<PP&E>                                                               17,257,965
<DEPRECIATION>                                                        7,146,772
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                       66,124,255
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                32,629,105
<BONDS>                                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                                 90,911
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                                           25,211,826
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                         66,124,255
<SALES>                                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     61,044,135
<CGS>                                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       151,835,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                        324,585
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                        723,949
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      433,990
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                       7,754,735
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          2,960,020
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   4,794,715
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                          4,794,715
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                               .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                               .31
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice:12178]

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 506(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (the “Act”) (22 U.S.C. 2318(a)(1)) and Presidential Delegation of Authority dated January 6, 2023, I hereby determine that:
    - an unforeseen emergency exists which requires immediate military assistance to Ukraine; and
    - the emergency requirement cannot be met under the authority of the Arms Export Control Act or any other provision of law.

I, therefore, pursuant to authority delegated to me by the President, direct the drawdown of up to $2.85 billion in defense articles and services of the Department of Defense, and military education and training, under the authority of section 506(a)(1) of the Act to provide assistance to Ukraine. The Department of State will coordinate implementation of this drawdown.

                    This determination shall be reported to the Congress and published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: January 6, 2023.

Antony Blinken,

Secretary of State.

# Note:

 This document was received for publication by the Office of the Federal Register on September 6, 2023.

[FR Doc. 2023-19574 Filed 9-11-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
Name
    
    Jurisdiction3Com
Holdings Limited
    
    Cayman IslandsTippingPoint
Technologies, Inc.
    
    Delaware, U.S.A.3Com Technologies
    
    Cayman IslandsH3C Technologies Co., Limited (H3C)
    
    Hong KongHangzhou H3C Technologies Co., Ltd.**
    
    China
 
 *
    
    Omits subsidiaries that, considered in the aggregate as a single
subsidiary, do not constitute a significant subsidiary as of the end of the
2008 fiscal year (using the definition of significant subsidiary in Rule
1-02(w) of Regulation S-X).**
    
    100%-owned by H3C.
From: claudia trapp

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 1:24:19 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine

as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care

law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would

provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an

ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers,

so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the

coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths

and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.
From: mspjohn@charter.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:17:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Robert Baker

Chino, CA 91710
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      28,721,000
<SECURITIES>                                 4,806,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,995,000
<PP&E>                                      20,309,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              75,949,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,670,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      5,000
<COMMON>                                       472,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  32,789,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                75,949,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,000,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          (64,365,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,961,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (46,467,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (46,467,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (46,467,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.03)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Broadway Surface Railroad Company.

Report of commissioners confirmed. Opinions by

Daniels and Brady, JJ.,

and by Davis, P. J., dissenting.
No. 292, Misc.

#### Rushing *v.*Wainwright, Corrections Director.

Supreme Court of Florida. Certiorari denied.
From: obuist@charter.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:30:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Otto Buist

Holland, MI 49424
H. Res. 1298 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 25, 2008. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

2176) to provide for and approve the settlement of certain 

land claims of the Bay Mills Indian Community. All points 

of order against consideration of the bill are waived except 

those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. In lieu of the 

amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 

Committee on Natural Resources now printed in the bill, the 

amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the report 

of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall 

be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions of the 

bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be 

considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate, with 40 minutes equally divided and controlled by the 

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Natural Resources and 20 minutes equally divided and con-
2 

•HRES 1298 EH 

trolled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one motion to recommit 

with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 2176 pursuant to 

this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 

question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the 

bill to such time as may be designated by the Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,400
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           7,084
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     81,651
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          16,809
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            16,833
<LOANS>                                        152,151
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,371
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 267,399
<DEPOSITS>                                     217,647
<SHORT-TERM>                                     6,102
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,831
<LONG-TERM>                                      9,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,956
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 267,399
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,924
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,157
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   264
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                19,345
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,437
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 944
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,964
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      325
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  68
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,933
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,968
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,660
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.49
<LOANS-NON>                                        320
<LOANS-PAST>                                       336
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  3,775
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,267
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      271
<RECOVERIES>                                        50
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,371
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,371
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            724



</TABLE>
# CENTCOM reinforces support for Syrian Arab Coalition

/ Published May 27, 2016

May 27, 2016Release Number 2016027-14FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**TAMPA, Fla**.**—** Photographs of U.S. service members in Syria shown wearing patches associated with the Kurdish YPG have recently circulated through traditional and social media. To clarify: U.S. forces are advising and assisting Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), primarily Syrian Arab forces operating in the northern part of the country who are leading efforts in the campaign to defeat Daesh.Gen. Joseph Votel, commander of U.S. Central Command said, "We've been very clear from the outset of this campaign that to defeat Daesh we would need to work with many different elements operating on the ground in Iraq and Syria. In Syria, with the support of the 60-plus nation Counter-Daesh Coalition, the SDF, which includes the Syrian Arab Coalition, has made extraordinary progress over the past 20-plus months, retaking more than 18,000 square kilometers of territory previously held by the enemy. We will continue to support their efforts specific to the fight against Daesh. At the same time, we are enormously grateful for the tremendous support provided by our Coalition partners, especially the Turks. They remain integral to the accomplishment of our common objective which is the ultimate defeat of Daesh in Iraq and Syria."