Use these links to rapidly review the documentTABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)ý

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010ORo

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the transition period
from                        to


Commission file number: 1-13011

COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC.(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE(State or other jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)

76-0526487(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)


675 Bering Drive
Suite 400
Houston, Texas 77057(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant's
telephone number, including area code:(713) 830-9600

Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes ý    No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to
be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that
the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o    No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer ý

Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a
smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company o


Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). Yes o    No ý

The number of shares outstanding of the issuer's common stock, as of July 30, 2010 was 37,931,235.



---





Table of Contents



COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC.  INDEX TO FORM 10-Q  FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2010



PagePart IFinancial InformationItem 1Financial StatementsCOMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC.Consolidated Balance Sheets


1Consolidated Statements of Operations


2Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity


3Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


4Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


5Item 2Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


17Item 3Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk


30Item 4Controls and Procedures


31Part IIOther InformationItem 1Legal Proceedings


32Item 2Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds


32Item 6Exhibits


33Signatures


34


---





Table of Contents



COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC.        CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS        (In Thousands, Except Share Amounts)

December 31,
2009

June 30,
2010(Unaudited)ASSETSCURRENT ASSETS:Cash and cash equivalents

$
127,850

$
107,602Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $7,253 and $6,185, respectively


203,353


208,183Other receivables


5,801


4,325Income tax receivable


20,075


17,451Inventories


9,817


9,290Prepaid expenses and other


25,827


23,960Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings


20,432


22,098Total current assets


413,155


392,909PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET


34,671


31,897GOODWILL


100,194


98,759IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET


19,380


18,412MARKETABLE SECURITIES


4,721


3,777OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS


2,827


2,733Total assets

$
574,948

$
548,487LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYCURRENT LIABILITIES:Current maturities of long-term debt

$
250

$
Current maturities of notes to former owners


917


2,316Accounts payable


83,848


78,038Accrued compensation and benefits


38,043


30,844Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings


66,343


60,033Accrued self-insurance expense


26,881


27,081Other current liabilities


32,748


31,124Total current liabilities


249,030


229,436LONG-TERM DEBT, NET OF CURRENT MATURITIES





NOTES TO FORMER OWNERS, NET OF CURRENT MATURITIES


6,441


4,375DEFERRED INCOME TAX LIABILITIES


9,603


6,348OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES


3,890


3,801Total liabilities


268,964


243,960COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIESSTOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:Preferred stock, $.01 par, 5,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding





Common stock, $.01 par, 102,969,912 shares authorized, 41,123,365 and 41,123,365 shares issued, respectively


411


411Treasury stock, at cost, 3,129,460 and 3,192,116 shares, respectively


(33,810
)

(34,399
)Additional paid-in capital


326,103


325,397Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)


(181
)

(145
)Retained earnings (deficit)


13,461


13,263Total stockholders' equity


305,984


304,527Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

$
574,948

$
548,487


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

1

---





Table of Contents

COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC.        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS        (In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)        (Unaudited)

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Six Months Ended
June 30,2009

2010

2009

2010REVENUES

$
300,349

$
249,588

$
580,623

$
486,063COST OF SERVICES


242,028


207,623


467,149


404,590Gross profit


58,321


41,965


113,474


81,473SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES


41,276


35,611


84,462


73,020GOODWILL IMPAIRMENT





4,446





4,446(GAIN) LOSS ON SALE OF ASSETS


5


(468
)

3


(473
)Operating income


17,040


2,376


29,009


4,480OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):Interest income


148


80


375


144Interest expense


(308
)

(289
)

(645
)

(574
)Other


9


(6
)

2


6Other income (expense)


(151
)

(215
)

(268
)

(424
)INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES


16,889


2,161


28,741


4,056INCOME TAX EXPENSE


6,491


515


11,221


1,245INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS


10,398


1,646


17,520


2,811DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:Operating loss, net of income tax benefit of $60, $, $133 and $


(207
)




(387
)

Estimated gain (loss) on disposition, including income tax benefit of $, $, $ and $29


(93
)




(93
)

762NET INCOME

$
10,098

$
1,646

$
17,040

$
3,573INCOME PER SHARE:BasicIncome from continuing operations

$
0.27

$
0.04

$
0.46

$
0.08Discontinued operationsLoss from operations


(0.01
)




(0.01
)

Estimated gain (loss) on disposition











0.02Net income

$
0.26

$
0.04

$
0.45

$
0.10DilutedIncome from continuing operations

$
0.27

$
0.04

$
0.45

$
0.07Discontinued operationsLoss from operations


(0.01
)




(0.01
)

Estimated gain (loss) on disposition











0.02Net income

$
0.26

$
0.04

$
0.44

$
0.09SHARES USED IN COMPUTING INCOME PER SHARE:Basic


38,136


37,598


38,207


37,566Diluted


38,533


37,848


38,610


37,834DIVIDENDS PER SHARE

$
0.045

$
0.050

$
0.090

$
0.100


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

2

---





Table of Contents

COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC.        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        (In Thousands, Except Share Amounts)

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYCommon Stock

Treasury Stock



Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)Comprehensive
Income

Additional
Paid-In
Capital

Retained
Earnings
(Deficit)

Total
Stockholders'
EquityShares

Amount

Shares

AmountBALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2008





41,123,365

$
411


(2,453,245
)
$
(27,069
)
$
328,621

$
(326
)
$
(15,166
)
$
286,471Comprehensive Income:Net income

$
34,182




















34,182


34,182Realized gain on marketable securities reclassified into earnings, net of tax


145

















145





145Comprehensive Income

$
34,327Issuance of Stock:Issuance of shares for options exercised including tax benefit











354,700


3,815


(1,626
)







2,189Issuance of restricted stock











241,857


2,652


(2,652
)







Shares received in lieu of tax withholding payment on vested restricted stock











(45,779
)

(459
)










(459
)Stock-based compensation expense

















3,454








3,454Forfeiture of unvested restricted stock











(15,193
)

(165
)

165








Tax benefit from vesting of restricted stock

















(124
)







(124
)Dividends

















(1,735
)




(5,555
)

(7,290
)Share repurchase











(1,211,800
)

(12,584
)










(12,584
)BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2009





41,123,365


411


(3,129,460
)

(33,810
)

326,103


(181
)

13,461


305,984Comprehensive Income:Net income (unaudited)

$
3,573




















3,573


3,573Realized gain on marketable securities, reclassified into earnings, net of tax (unaudited)


36

















36





36Comprehensive Income (unaudited)

$
3,609Issuance of Stock:Issuance of shares for options exercised including tax benefit (unaudited)











84,959


918


(373
)







545Issuance of restricted stock (unaudited)











225,122


2,755


(2,505
)







250Shares received in lieu of tax withholding payment on vested restricted stock (unaudited)











(50,340
)

(609
)










(609
)Stock-based compensation expense (unaudited)

















2,074








2,074Tax benefit from vesting of restricted stock (unaudited)

















108








108Dividends (unaudited)























(3,771
)

(3,771
)Other (unaudited)

















(10
)







(10
)Share repurchase (unaudited)











(322,397
)

(3,653
)










(3,653
)BALANCE AT JUNE 30, 2010 (unaudited)





41,123,365

$
411


(3,192,116
)
$
(34,399
)
$
325,397

$
(145
)
$
13,263

$
304,527


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

3

---





Table of Contents

COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC.        CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS        (In Thousands)        (Unaudited)

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Six Months Ended
June 30,2009

2010

2009

2010CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIESNet income

$
10,098

$
1,646

$
17,040

$
3,573Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activitiesEstimated loss (gain) on disposition of discontinued operations


93





93


(762
)Amortization of identifiable intangible assets


959


983


1,802


2,146Depreciation expense


2,381


2,461


4,816


4,934Goodwill impairment





4,446





4,446Bad debt expense


1,722


180


2,110


123Deferred tax (benefit) expense


(1,793
)

(1,825
)

(2,047
)

(3,266
)Amortization of debt financing costs


27


27


54


54Loss (gain) on sale of assets


6


(468
)

4


(473
)Stock-based compensation expense


778


923


2,062


2,074Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions(Increase) decrease inReceivables, net


(11,935
)

(1,940
)

7,870


(1,669
)Inventories


401


(31
)

1,131


532Prepaid expenses and other current assets


(733
)

1,475


(1,100
)

2,329Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings


1,189


(2,508
)

2,799


(1,621
)Other noncurrent assets


(60
)

(598
)

(34
)

(332
)Increase (decrease) inAccounts payable and accrued liabilities


8,192


(67
)

(18,865
)

(16,290
)Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings


12,173


(3,904
)

2,735


(6,373
)Other long-term liabilities


386


(38
)

(519
)

(124
)Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities


23,884


762


19,951


(10,699
)CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:Purchases of property, plant and equipment


(2,662
)

(860
)

(4,434
)

(2,082
)Proceeds from sales of property and equipment


99


1,115


174


1,218Proceeds from notes receivable





47





95Proceeds from businesses sold


44





306


1,169Sale of marketable securities


1,000


1,000


2,000


1,925Cash paid for acquisitions, earnouts and intangible assets, net of cash acquired


(3,849
)




(3,849
)

(3,577
)Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities


(5,368
)

1,302


(5,803
)

(1,252
)CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:Net borrowings on revolving line of credit











Payments on other long-term debt


(667
)

(667
)

(1,709
)

(917
)Payments of dividends to shareholders


(1,718
)

(1,889
)

(3,453
)

(3,771
)Share repurchase program and shares received in lieu of tax withholding


(4,211
)

(2,046
)

(6,191
)

(4,262
)Excess tax benefit of stock-based compensation


72


279


154


432Proceeds from exercise of options


274


91


451


221Net cash used in financing activities


(6,250
)

(4,232
)

(10,748
)

(8,297
)NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS


12,266


(2,168
)

3,400


(20,248
)CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of periodcontinuing and discontinued operations


108,149


109,770


117,015


127,850CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of periodcontinuing and discontinued operations

$
120,415

$
107,602

$
120,415

$
107,602


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

---





Table of Contents

COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC.        CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS        June 30, 2010        (Unaudited)

1. Business and Organization

Comfort Systems USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation, provides comprehensive heating, ventilation and air conditioning ("HVAC") installation, maintenance, repair and replacement
services within the mechanical services industry. We operate primarily in the commercial, industrial and institutional HVAC markets, and perform most of our services within office buildings, retail
centers, apartment complexes, manufacturing plants, and healthcare, education and government facilities. In addition to standard HVAC services, we provide specialized applications such as building
automation control systems, fire protection, process cooling, electronic monitoring and process piping. Certain locations also perform related activities such as electrical service and plumbing.
Approximately 47% of our consolidated 2010 revenues are attributable to installation of systems in newly constructed facilities, with the remaining 53% attributable to maintenance, repair and
replacement services. The following service activities account for our consolidated 2010 revenues: HVAC 77%, plumbing 14%, building automation control systems 5%, and other 4%. These service
activities are within the mechanical services industry which is the single industry segment we serve.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies



These interim statements should be read in conjunction with the historical Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes of
Comfort Systems included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the
"Form 10-K").

The
accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements were prepared using generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and the instructions to
Form 10-Q and applicable rules of Regulation S-X of the SEC. Accordingly, these financial statements do not include all the footnotes required by generally
accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements, and should be read in conjunction with the Form 10-K. We believe all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation
of these interim statements have been included and are of a normal and recurring nature. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full fiscal
year.



We consider all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

5

---



Table of Contents

COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

Cash
paid (in thousands) for:

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Six Months Ended
June 30,2009

2010

2009

2010Interest

$
270

$
240

$
539

$
412Income taxes for continuing operations


11,010


827


12,717


1,653Income taxes for discontinued operations


38





38


Total

$
11,318

$
1,067

$
13,294

$
2,065




Our activities are within the mechanical services industry which is the single industry segment we serve. Each operating subsidiary
represents an operating segment and these segments have been aggregated, as the operating units meet all of the aggregation criteria.



The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires the use of estimates and
assumptions by management in determining the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and disclosures regarding contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ
from those estimates. The most significant estimates used in our financial statements affect revenue and cost recognition for construction contracts, the allowance for doubtful accounts,
self-insurance accruals, deferred tax assets, warranty accruals, fair value accounting for acquisitions and the quantification of fair value for reporting units in connection with our
goodwill impairment testing.



We are subject to income tax in the United States and Puerto Rico and we file a consolidated return for federal income tax
purposes. Income taxes are provided for under the liability method, which takes into account differences between financial statement treatment and tax treatment of certain transactions.

Deferred
income taxes are based on the difference between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities. The deferred income tax provision represents the change during
the reporting period in the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities, net of the effect of acquisitions and dispositions. Deferred tax assets include tax loss and credit carry-forwards and are
reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

We
regularly evaluate valuation allowances established for deferred tax assets for which future realization is uncertain. We perform this evaluation each quarter. Estimations of required
valuation allowances include estimates of future taxable income. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is

6

---



Table of Contents

COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)

dependent
upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which the activity underlying these assets becomes deductible. We consider projected future taxable income and tax planning
strategies in making this assessment. If actual future taxable income is less than the estimates, we may not realize all or a portion of the recorded deferred tax assets.

Significant
judgment is required in assessing the timing and amounts of deductible and taxable items. We establish reserves when, despite our belief that our tax return positions are
fully supportable, we believe that certain positions may be challenged and potentially disallowed. When facts and circumstances change, we adjust these reserves through our provision for income taxes.

To
the extent interest and penalties may be assessed by taxing authorities on any underpayment of income tax, such amounts have been accrued and are classified as a component of income
tax expense in our consolidated statements of operations.

Our
year to date effective tax rate for 2010 was 30.7%, as compared to 39.0% in 2009. The decrease in the effective tax rate for 2010 is primarily due to the release of certain valuation
allowances during the second quarter of 2010.



Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, accounts receivable, other receivables, accounts
payable, notes to former owners and a revolving credit facility. We believe that the carrying values of these instruments on the accompanying balance sheets approximate their fair values.

Marketable
securities are classified as available-for-sale. These investments are recorded at fair value and are classified as marketable securities in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The changes in fair values, net of applicable taxes, are recorded as unrealized gains (losses) as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
in stockholders' equity.



In the first quarter of 2010, certain disclosure provisions of the FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-06 became
effective for the Company. This standard clarified existing fair value requirements under the FASB ASC's Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic 820, including the level of disaggregation
required for fair value disclosures and disclosure of the valuation techniques and inputs used in estimating Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements. Our adoption of this standard
did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.



Certain reclassifications have been made in prior period financial statements to conform to current period presentation. These
reclassifications have not resulted in any changes to previously reported net income for any periods.

7

---



Table of Contents

COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

3. Fair Value Measurements

We use a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy, which gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active
markets, is comprised of the following three levels:



The
assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2010 are as follows (in thousands):

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date UsingTotal

Quoted Prices In
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)Cash and cash equivalents

$
107,602

$
107,602

$


$
Auction rate securities

$
3,777

$


$


$
3,777


Cash
and cash equivalents consist primarily of highly rated money market funds at a variety of well-known institutions with original maturities of three months or less. The
original cost of these assets approximates fair value due to their short term maturity.

As
of June 30, 2010, our marketable securities consisted of $3.8 million of auction rate securities, which are variable rate debt instruments, having long-term
maturities (with final maturities up to June 2032), but whose interest rates are designed to reset through an auction process at 35 day intervals. We had investments in marketable
securities of $5.6 million as of December 31, 2009. All of our auction rate securities are high quality municipal obligations which have high investment grade ratings or otherwise are
backed by high investment grade rated insurance agencies. We sold $0.9 million of these auction rate securities during the first quarter of 2010, and $1.0 million during the second
quarter of 2010, at face value. The remaining $3.8 million has been classified as a noncurrent asset on
the consolidated balance sheet as we have the intent and ability to hold these securities until the market for auction rate securities stabilizes or until the issuer refinances the underlying
security.

The
auction events for some of these instruments failed during 2008 due to events in the credit markets. As a result, we have determined the estimated fair values of these securities
based on discounted cash flow analyses or other types of valuation models. We have performed and routinely update these valuations considering, among other items, the creditworthiness of the
counterparty, the timing of expected future cash flows, and the possibility that a discount may be required if we choose to sell the securities in the absence of a successful auction. These securities
are also compared, when possible, to observable market data with similar characteristics.

8

---



Table of Contents

COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

3. Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

In
association with our estimate of fair value as of June 30, 2010, we have recorded a temporary unrealized decline in fair value of $0.1 million, net of tax, with an
offsetting entry to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). We continue to believe that this decline is due to liquidity issues rather than credit issues. We continue to collect interest when
due on all of our auction rate securities. Any future fluctuation in fair value related to these instruments that we deem to be temporary, including any recoveries of previous write-downs, would be
recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). If we determine that any future valuation adjustment was other than temporary, we would record a charge to earnings as appropriate.

We
measure certain assets, including our goodwill and intangible assets, at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets are recognized at fair value when they are deemed to be
other-than-temporarily impaired. Such fair value calculations are based on significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) in accordance with the fair value hierarchy. During
the six months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $4.4 million. We did not recognize any other impairments on those assets required to be measured at fair
value on a nonrecurring basis.

4. Acquisitions

We completed one acquisition in the first quarter of 2010 which was not material. Additional contingent purchase price ("earn-out") has been and will be paid if certain
acquisitions achieve predetermined profitability targets. There were no acquisitions during the first half of 2009. Our consolidated balance sheets include preliminary allocations of the purchase
price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on estimates of fair value, pending completion of final valuation and purchase price adjustments. The results of operations of these
acquisitions are included in our consolidated financial statements from their respective acquisition dates.

5. Discontinued Operations

We sold a small operating company in June 2009. This company's after-tax loss of $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 has been reported in
discontinued operations under "Operating loss, net of income tax benefit." During the first quarter of 2010, we recorded an income tax benefit of $0.3 million related to the adjustment of
certain valuation allowances related to this discontinued operation.

Our
consolidated statements of operations and the related earnings per share amounts have been restated to reflect the effects of this discontinued operation. No interest expense was
allocated to this discontinued operation.

9

---



Table of Contents

COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

5. Discontinued Operations (Continued)

Revenues and pre-tax loss related to this company in 2009 and 2010 were as follows (in thousands):

Three Months
Ended
June 30,

Six Months
Ended
June 30,2009

2010

2009

2010Revenues

$
779

$


$
1,795

$
Pre-tax loss

$
(267
)
$


$
(520
)
$



Sale of Companies to EmcorIn March 2002, we sold 19 operations to Emcor Group, Inc. ("Emcor"). The total purchase price was
$186.25 million, including the assumption by Emcor of approximately $22.1 million of subordinated notes to former owners of certain of the divested companies. Of Emcor's purchase price,
$5 million was deposited into an escrow account to secure potential obligations on our part to indemnify Emcor for future claims and contingencies arising from events and circumstances prior to
closing, all as specified in the transaction documents. Of this escrow, $4 million has been applied in determining our liability to Emcor in connection with the settlement of certain claims.
The remaining $1 million of escrow was disbursed to us in March 2010.

There
are ongoing open matters relating to this transaction that we continue to address with Emcor. We do not believe these open matters, either individually or in the aggregate, will
have a material adverse effect on our financial position when ultimately resolved. During the fourth quarter of 2009, we recorded a gain of $0.8 million based upon a review of open matters.
During the first quarter of 2010, in connection with the final escrow release, we recorded an additional gain of $0.5 million (net of income tax expense of $0.3 million) based upon a
further review of open matters. The gain recorded
during the first quarter is included in discontinued operations in the caption "Estimated gain (loss) on disposition, including income tax benefit."

6. Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets, net

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill are as follows (in thousands):

December 31,
2009

June 30,
2010Balance at beginning of year

$
90,940

$
100,194Additions


9,254


3,011Impairment adjustment





(4,446
)Balance at end of year

$
100,194

$
98,759


We
recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $4.4 million ($2.7 million after tax, or $0.07 per diluted share) during the second quarter of 2010. This impairment charge
resulted from our estimation that the operating environment, conditions and performance at our operating location based in Delaware could no longer support the related goodwill balance. Impairment
must be reflected when the fair value of a given business unit in excess of the fair value of its identifiable net assets falls below the

10

---



Table of Contents

COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

6. Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets, net (Continued)

goodwill
asset balance carried for that unit on our books. The fair value was estimated using a discounted cash flow model combined with market valuation approaches.

Identifiable
intangible assets consist of the following (dollars in thousands):

December 31, 2009

June 30, 2010Estimated Useful
Lives in Years

Gross
Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Gross
Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
AmortizationCustomer relationships

2 - 8

$
10,943

$
(2,196
)
$
11,535

$
(3,137
)Backlog

1 - 2


4,150


(3,304
)

4,160


(3,690
)Noncompete agreements

2 - 7


2,960


(1,046
)

3,320


(1,372
)Tradenames

2 - 10, Indefinite


9,240


(1,367
)

9,470


(1,874
)Total



$
27,293

$
(7,913
)
$
28,485

$
(10,073
)


7. Long-Term Debt Obligations

Long-term debt obligations consist of the following (in thousands):

December 31,
2009

June 30,
2010Revolving credit facility

$


$
Other debt


250


Notes to former owners


7,358


6,691Total debt


7,608


6,691Lesscurrent portion


(1,167
)

(2,316
)Total long-term portion of debt

$
6,441

$
4,375




We have a $100.0 million senior credit facility (the "Facility") provided by a syndicate of banks which is available for
borrowings and letters of credit and is secured by the capital stock of our current and future subsidiaries. The Facility was scheduled to expire in February 2012. On July 16, 2010, we entered
into a new senior credit facility arrangement and increased the amount to $125 million and extended the term to July 2014. See Note 10 "Subsequent Events" for additional information. As
of June 30, 2010, we had no outstanding borrowings, $33.9 million in letters of credit outstanding, and $66.1 million of credit available.

We
have a choice of two interest rate options for borrowings under the Facility; these rates are floating rates determined by the broad financial markets, meaning they can and do move up
and down from time to time. We estimate that the interest rate applicable to the borrowings under the Facility would be approximately 1.60% as of June 30, 2010. Commitment fees are payable on
the portion of the revolving loan capacity not in use for borrowings or letters of credit at any given time. These fees range

11

---



Table of Contents

COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

7. Long-Term Debt Obligations (Continued)

from
0.20%-0.30% per annum, based on the ratio of debt to Credit Facility Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in the credit agreement.

The
Facility contains financial covenants defining various financial measures and the levels of these measures with which we must comply. The Facility's principal financial covenants
include:

Leverage RatioThe Facility requires that the ratio of our total indebtedness less cash and cash equivalents to our Credit Facility Adjusted EBITDA
not exceed 2.50. The leverage ratio as of June 30, 2010 was 0.13.

Fixed Charge Coverage RatioThe Facility requires that the ratio of Credit Facility Adjusted EBITDA, less non-financed capital
expenditures, tax provision, dividends and amounts used to repurchase stock to the sum of interest expense and scheduled principal payments be at least 1.50. Capital expenditures, tax provision,
dividends and stock repurchase payments are defined under the Facility for purposes of this covenant to be amounts for the four quarters ending as of any given quarterly covenant compliance
measurement date. The calculation of the fixed charge coverage ratio excludes acquisitions, stock repurchases and the payment of cash dividends, at any time that the Leverage Ratio does not exceed
1.0. The fixed charge coverage ratio as of June 30, 2010 was 10.36.

Other RestrictionsThe Facility permits acquisitions of up to $25.0 million per transaction, or $50.0 million in the aggregate. However,
these limitations only apply when the Leverage Ratio is greater than 1.0.

While
the Facility's financial covenants do not specifically govern capacity under the Facility, if our debt level under the Facility at a quarter-end covenant compliance
measurement date were to
cause us to violate the Facility's debt-to-Credit Facility Adjusted EBITDA covenant, our borrowing capacity under the Facility and the favorable terms that we currently have
could be negatively impacted by the lenders.

We
are in compliance with all the financial covenants as of June 30, 2010.



We issued subordinated notes to the former owners of acquired companies, as part of the consideration used to acquire these companies.
These notes had an outstanding balance of $6.7 million as of June 30, 2010, of which $2.3 million is current as of June 30, 2010 and bear interest, payable annually, at a
weighted average interest rate of 4.8%.

8. Commitments and Contingencies



We are subject to certain legal and regulatory claims, including lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. We maintain various
insurance coverages to minimize financial risk associated with these claims. We have estimated and provided accruals for probable losses and related legal fees associated with certain litigation in
the accompanying consolidated financial statements. While we

12

---



Table of Contents

COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

8. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

cannot
predict the outcome of these proceedings, in management's opinion and based on reports of counsel, any liability arising from these matters individually and in the aggregate will not have a
material effect on our operating results or financial condition, after giving effect to provisions already recorded.

In
addition to the matters described above, we have accrued $6.5 million as of June 30, 2010 for potential and asserted backcharges from several customers of our large
multi-family operation based in Texas. The additions and reductions to the accrual were included in "Cost of Services". The accrual is included in "Other Current Liabilities". We believe these
accruals reflect a probable outcome with respect to such backcharges and potential backcharges, however, if we are not successful in resolving these disputes, we may in the future experience a
material adverse effect on our operating results.

The
following summarizes the backcharge activity during the six months ended June 30, 2010 (in thousands):

Balance at December 31, 2009

$
6,489Additions


Utilization


Balance at June 30, 2010

$
6,489




Many customers, particularly in connection with new construction, require us to post performance and payment bonds issued by a
financial institution known as a surety. If we fail to perform under the terms of a contract or to pay subcontractors and vendors who provided goods or services under a contract, the customer may
demand that the surety make payments or provide services under the bond. We must reimburse the surety for any expenses or outlays it incurs. To date, we are not aware of any losses to our sureties in
connection with bonds the sureties have posted on our behalf, and do not expect such losses to be incurred in the foreseeable future.

Surety
market conditions remain challenging as a result of significant losses incurred by many sureties in recent periods, both in the construction industry as well as in certain larger
corporate bankruptcies. As a result, less bonding capacity is available in the market and terms have become more restrictive. Further, under standard terms in the surety market, sureties issue bonds
on a project-by-project basis, and can decline to issue bonds at any time. Historically, approximately 25% to 35% of our business has required bonds. While we have strong
surety relationships to support our bonding needs, current market conditions as well as changes in the sureties' assessment of our operating and financial risk could cause the sureties to decline to
issue bonds for our work. If that were to occur, the alternatives include doing more business that does not require bonds, posting other forms of collateral for project performance such as letters of
credit or cash, and seeking bonding capacity from other sureties. We would likely also encounter concerns from customers, suppliers and other market participants as to our creditworthiness. While we
believe our general operating and financial characteristics, including a significant amount of cash on our balance sheet, would enable us to

13

---



Table of Contents

COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

8. Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

ultimately
respond effectively to an interruption in the availability of bonding capacity, such an interruption would likely cause our revenues and profits to decline in the near term.



We are substantially self-insured for worker's compensation, employer's liability, auto liability, general liability and
employee group health claims, in view of the relatively high per-incident deductibles we absorb under our insurance arrangements for these risks. Losses up to deductible amounts are
estimated and accrued based upon known facts, historical trends and industry averages. Loss estimates associated with the larger and longer-developing risks, such as worker's compensation, auto
liability and general liability, are reviewed by a third-party actuary quarterly.

Our
self-insurance arrangements currently are as follows:



14

---



Table of Contents

COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

9. Stockholders' Equity



Basic earnings per share ("EPS") is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding during the year. Diluted EPS is computed considering the dilutive effect of stock options and contingently issuable restricted stock.

There
were approximately 0.6 million and 0.5 million of anti-dilutive stock options that were excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively. There were approximately 0.6 million and 0.5 million of anti-dilutive stock options that were excluded from the calculation
of diluted EPS for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2010, respectively.

The
following table reconciles the number of shares outstanding with the number of shares used in computing basic and diluted earnings per share for each of the periods presented (in
thousands):

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Six Months Ended
June 30,2009

2010

2009

2010Common shares outstanding, end of period(a)


38,006


37,565


38,006


37,565Effect of using weighted average common shares outstanding


130


33


201


1Shares used in computing earnings per sharebasic


38,136


37,598


38,207


37,566Effect of shares issuable under stock option plans based on the treasury stock method


383


250


395


268Effect of contingently issuable restricted stock


14





8


Shares used in computing earnings per sharediluted


38,533


37,848


38,610


37,834


(a)Excludes
0.4 million and 0.4 million shares of unvested contingently issuable restricted stock outstanding as of June 30, 2009 and
2010, respectively.




On March 29, 2007, our Board of Directors (the "Board") approved a stock repurchase program to acquire up to one million shares
of our outstanding common stock. As of December 31, 2009, the Board approved extensions of the program to cover an additional 3.9 million shares. During the first quarter of 2010, the
Board approved an extension of the program to cover an additional 0.7 million shares. Since the inception of the repurchase program, the Board has approved 5.6 million shares to be
repurchased.

The
share repurchases will be made from time to time at our discretion in the open market or privately negotiated transactions as permitted by securities laws and other legal
requirements, and subject to market conditions and other factors. The Board may modify, suspend, extend or terminate the program at any time. We repurchased 0.3 million shares during the six
months ended June 30, 2010, at an average price of $11.33 per share. Since the inception of the program in 2007, we have

15

---



Table of Contents

COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC.

CONDENSED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

June 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

9. Stockholders' Equity (Continued)

repurchased
a cumulative total of 4.7 million shares as of June 30, 2010, at an average price of $11.16 per share.

10. Subsequent Events

On July 16, 2010, we entered into a new senior credit facility arrangement (the "New Facility") provided by a syndicate of banks. The New Facility consists of a
$125 million revolving credit facility, which is available for borrowings and letters of credit, and a maturity date in July 2014. As of August 1, 2010, the total of the New Facility was
$125 million, with no outstanding borrowings, $33.9 million in letters of credit outstanding and $91.1 million of credit available. The New Facility has slightly higher interest
rates and the financial covenants are substantially consistent with the previous facility. We will write-off approximately $0.2 million in the third quarter of 2010 related to the
unamortized debt costs associated with the previous facility.

On
July 28, 2010, we acquired ColonialWebb Contractors Company ("ColonialWebb"). ColonialWebb is headquartered in Richmond, Virginia and had 2009 revenues of approximately
$218.7 million and pre-tax income of approximately $23.0 million. The purchase price was approximately $81.3 million, which consisted of $57.1 million in cash and
$24.2 million in notes. Further, the final purchase price will be adjusted pursuant to a working capital adjustment and four-year earn-out period.

16

---





Table of Contents

Item 2.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our historical Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes thereto
included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and the Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended
December 31, 2009 (the "Form 10-K"). This discussion contains "forward-looking statements" regarding our business and industry within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on our current plans and expectations and involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual future activities and results of
operations to be materially different from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ include risks set forth in "Item 1A.
Company Risk Factors" included in our Form 10-K. The terms "Comfort Systems," "we," "us," or "the Company," refer to Comfort Systems USA, Inc. or Comfort Systems
USA, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, as appropriate in the context.



We are a national provider of comprehensive HVAC installation, maintenance, repair and replacement services within the mechanical
services industry. The services we provide address a very broad need, as air is circulated through almost all commercial, industrial and institutional buildings virtually year-round. We
operate primarily in the commercial, industrial and institutional HVAC markets and perform most of our services within office buildings, retail centers, apartment complexes, manufacturing plants, and
healthcare, education and government facilities. In addition to standard HVAC services, we provide specialized applications such as building automation control systems, fire protection, process
cooling, electronic monitoring and process piping. Certain locations also perform related activities such as electrical service and plumbing.



Approximately 83% of our revenues are earned on a project basis for installation of HVAC systems in newly constructed facilities or for
replacement of HVAC systems in existing facilities. Customers hire us to ensure such systems deliver specified or generally expected heating, cooling, conditioning and circulation of air in a
facility. This entails installing core system equipment such as packaged heating and air conditioning units, or in the case of larger facilities, separate core components such as chillers, boilers,
air handlers, and cooling towers. We also typically install connecting and distribution elements such as piping and ducting. Our responsibilities usually require conforming the systems to
pre-established engineering drawings and equipment and performance specifications, which we frequently participate in establishing. Our project management responsibilities include staging
equipment and materials to project sites, deploying labor to perform the work, and coordinating with other service providers on the project, including any subcontractors we might use to deliver our
portion of the work.

When
competing for project business, we usually estimate the costs we will incur on a project, then propose a bid to the customer that includes a contract price and other performance and
payment terms. Our bid price and terms are intended to cover our estimated costs on the project and provide a profit margin to us commensurate with the value of the installed system to the customer,
the risk that project costs or duration will vary from estimate, the schedule on which we will be paid, the opportunities for other work that we might forego by committing capacity to this project,
and other costs that we incur more broadly to support our operations but which are not specific to the project. Typically customers will seek bids from competitors for a given project. While the
criteria on which customers select the winning bid vary widely and include factors such as quality, technical expertise, on-time performance, post-project support and service,
and company history and financial strength, we believe that price is the most influential factor for most customers in choosing an HVAC installation and service provider.

17

---



Table of Contents

After
a customer accepts our bid, we generally enter into a contract with the customer that specifies what we will deliver on the project, what our related responsibilities are, and how
much and when we will be paid. Our overall price for the project is typically set at a fixed amount in the contract, although changes in project specifications or work conditions that result in
unexpected additional work are usually subject to additional payment from the customer via what are commonly known as change orders. Project contracts typically provide for periodic billings to the
customer as we meet progress milestones or incur cost on the project. Project contracts in our industry also frequently allow for a small portion of progress billings or contract price to be withheld
by the customer until after we have completed the work, typically for six months. Amounts withheld under this practice are known as retention or retainage.

Labor
and overhead costs account for the majority of our cost of service. Accordingly, labor management and utilization have the most impact on our project performance. Given the fixed
price nature of much of our project work, if our initial estimate of project costs is wrong or we incur cost overruns that cannot be recovered in change orders, we can experience reduced profits or
even significant losses on fixed price project work. We also perform some project work on a cost-plus or a time and materials basis, under which we are paid our costs incurred plus an
agreed-upon profit margin. These margins are typically less than fixed-price contract margins because there is less risk of unrecoverable cost overruns in cost-plus or time and
materials work.

As
of June 30, 2010, we had 4,436 projects in process. Our average project takes six to nine months to complete, with an average contract price of approximately $335,000. Our
projects generally require working capital funding of equipment and labor costs. Customer payments on periodic billings generally do not recover these costs until late in the job. Our average project
duration together with typical retention terms as discussed above generally allow us to complete the realization of revenue and earnings in cash within one year. We have what we believe is a
well-diversified distribution of revenues across end-use sectors that we believe reduces our exposure to negative developments in any given sector. Because of the integral
nature of HVAC and related controls systems to most buildings, we have the legal right in almost all cases to attach liens to buildings or related funding sources when we have not been fully paid for
installing systems, except with respect to some government buildings. The service work that we do, which is discussed further below, usually does not give rise to lien rights.

We
also perform larger HVAC projects. As of June 30, 2010, we had seven projects in process with a contract price of between $15 and $30 million, 14 projects between
$10 million and $15 million, 37 projects between $5 million and $10 million, and 202 projects between $1 million and $5 million. Taken together, projects with
contract prices of $1 million or more totaled $1,050.8 million of aggregate contract value as of June 30, 2010, or approximately 71%, out of a total contract value for all
projects in
progress of $1,484.5 million. Generally, projects closer in size to $1 million will be completed in one year or less. It is unusual for us to work on a project that exceeds two years in
length.

In
addition to project work, approximately 17% of our revenues represent maintenance and repair service on already-installed HVAC and controls systems. This kind of work usually takes
from a few hours to a few days to perform. Prices to the customer are usually based on the equipment and materials used in the service as well as technician labor time. We usually bill the customer
for service work when it is complete, typically with payment terms of up to thirty days. We also provide maintenance and repair service under ongoing contracts. Under these contracts, we are paid
regular monthly or quarterly amounts and provide specified service based on customer requirements. These agreements typically cover periods ranging from one to three years and are cancelable on 30 to
60 days notice.

A
relatively small portion of our revenues comes from national and regional account customers. These customers typically have multiple sites, and contract with us to perform maintenance
and repair service. These contracts may also provide for us to perform new or replacement systems installation.

18

---



Table of Contents

We
operate a national call center to dispatch technicians to sites requiring service. We perform the majority of this work with our own employees, with the balance being subcontracted to third parties
that meet our performance qualifications. We will also typically use proprietary information systems to maintain information on the customer's sites and equipment, including performance and service
records, and related cost data. These systems track the status of ongoing service and installation work, and may also monitor system performance data. Under these contractual relationships, we usually
provide consolidated billing and credit payment terms to the customer.



We manage our 40 operating units based on a variety of factors. Financial measures we emphasize include profitability, and use of
capital as indicated by cash flow and by other measures of working capital principally involving project cost, billings and receivables. We also monitor selling, general, administrative and indirect
project support expense, backlog, workforce size and mix, growth in revenues and profits, variation of actual project cost from original estimate, and overall financial performance in comparison to
budget and updated forecasts. Operational factors we emphasize include project selection, estimating, pricing, management and execution practices, labor utilization, safety, training, and the
make-up of both existing backlog as well as new business being pursued, in terms of project size, technical application and facility type, end-use customers and industries, and
location of the work.

Most
of our operations compete on a local or regional basis. Attracting and retaining effective operating unit managers is an important factor in our business, particularly in view of
the relative uniqueness of each market and operation, the importance of relationships with customers and other market participants such as architects and consulting engineers, and the high degree of
competition and low barriers to entry in most of our markets. Accordingly, we devote considerable attention to operating unit management quality, stability, and contingency planning, including related
considerations of compensation, and non-competition protection where applicable.



As an HVAC and building controls services provider, we operate in the broader nonresidential construction services industry and are
affected by trends in this sector. While we do not have operations in all major cities of the United States, we believe our national presence is sufficiently large that we experience trends in demand
for and pricing of our services that are consistent with trends in the national nonresidential construction sector. As a result, we monitor the views of major construction sector forecasters along
with macroeconomic factors they believe drive the sector, including trends in gross domestic product, interest rates, business investment, employment, demographics, and the general fiscal condition of
federal, state and local governments. Although nonresidential construction activity has demonstrated periods of both significant growth and decline, it has grown at a compound annual rate of
approximately 4.2% over the last twenty-five years.

Spending
decisions for building construction, renovation and system replacement are generally made on a project basis, usually with some degree of discretion as to when and if projects
proceed. With larger amounts of capital, time, and discretion involved, spending decisions are affected to a significant degree by uncertainty, particularly concerns about economic and financial
conditions and trends. We have experienced periods of time, when economic weakness caused a significant slowdown in decisions to proceed with installation and replacement project work.



Nonresidential building construction and renovation activity, as reported by the federal government, declined over the three year
period of 2001 to 2003, expanded moderately during 2004

19

---



Table of Contents

and
2005, and was strong over the three year period from 2006 to 2008. During the decline and through 2003, we responded to market challenges by pursuing work in sectors less affected by this
downturn, such as government, educational, and healthcare facilities, and by establishing marketing initiatives that take advantage of our size and range of expertise. We also responded to declining
gross profits over those years by reducing our selling, general, and administrative expenses, and our indirect project and service overhead costs. We believe our efforts in these areas partially
offset the decline in our profitability over that period. We experienced notable improvements in both industry activity as well as our own results from 2004 to 2008.

As
discussed at greater length in "Results of Operations" below, we have seen declining activity levels in our industry since late 2008 and we expect price competition to continue to be
strong, as local and regional competitors respond cautiously to changing conditions. We will continue our efforts to find the more active sectors in our markets, and to increase our regional and
national account business. Our primary emphasis for 2010 will be on execution and cost control, and on maintaining activity levels that will permit us to earn reasonable profits while preserving our
core workforce. We have increased our focus on project qualification, estimating, pricing and management, and on service performance.

As
a result of our continued strong emphasis on cash flow, our debt outstanding under our revolving credit facility is zero, and we have substantial uncommitted cash balances, as
discussed further in "Liquidity and Capital Resources" below. We have a credit facility in place with considerably less restrictive terms than those of our previous facilities; this facility was
scheduled to expire in February 2012. On July 16, 2010, we entered into a new senior credit facility arrangement and increased the amount to $125 million and extended the term to July
2014. We have strong surety relationships to support our bonding needs, and we believe our relationships with the surety markets are positive in light of our strong current results and financial
position. We have generated positive free cash flow in each of the last eleven calendar years and will continue our emphasis in this area. We believe that the relative size and strength of our balance
sheet and surety support as compared to most companies in our industry represent competitive advantages for us.



In response to the Commission's Release No. 33-8040, "Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure About Critical
Accounting Policies," we identified our critical accounting policies based upon the significance of the accounting policy to our overall financial statement presentation, as well as the complexity of
the accounting policy and our use of estimates and subjective assessments. We have concluded that our most critical accounting policy is our revenue recognition policy. As discussed elsewhere in this
report, our business has two service functions: (i) installation, which we account for under the percentage of completion method, and (ii) maintenance, repair and replacement, which we
account for as the services are performed, or in the case of replacement, under the percentage of completion method. In addition, we identified other critical accounting policies related to our
allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, the recording of our self-insurance liabilities, valuation of deferred tax assets and the assessment of goodwill impairment. These accounting
policies, as well as others, are described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Form 10-K.



Approximately 83% of our revenues were earned on a project basis and recognized through the percentage of completion method of
accounting. Under this method contract revenue recognizable at any time during the life of a contract is determined by multiplying expected total contract revenue by the percentage of contract costs
incurred at any time to total estimated contract costs. More specifically, as part of the negotiation and bidding process in which we engage in connection with obtaining installation contracts, we
estimate our contract costs, which include all direct materials (exclusive of rebates), labor and subcontract costs and indirect costs related to contract performance,

20

---



Table of Contents

such
as indirect labor, supplies, tools, repairs and depreciation costs. These contract costs are included in our results of operations under the caption "Cost of Services." Then, as we perform under
those contracts, we measure such costs incurred, compare them to total estimated costs to complete the contract, and recognize a corresponding proportion of contract revenue. Labor costs are
considered to be incurred as the work is performed. Subcontract labor is recognized as the work is performed, but is generally subjected to approval as to milestones or other evidence of completion.
Non-labor project cost consists of purchased equipment, prefabricated materials and other materials. Purchased equipment on our projects is substantially produced to job specifications and
is a value added element to our work. The costs are considered to be incurred when title is transferred to us, which typically is upon delivery to the worksite. Prefabricated materials, such as
ductwork and piping, are generally performed at our shops and recognized as contract costs when fabricated for the unique specifications of the job. Other materials cost are not significant and are
generally recorded
when delivered to the worksite. This measurement and comparison process requires updates to the estimate of total costs to complete the contract, and these updates may include subjective assessments.

We
generally do not incur significant costs prior to receiving a contract, and therefore, these costs are expensed as incurred. In limited circumstances, when significant
pre-contract costs are incurred, they are deferred if the costs can be directly associated with a specific contract and if their recoverability from the contract is probable. Upon
receiving the contract, these costs are included in contract costs. Deferred costs associated with unsuccessful contract bids are written off in the period that we are informed that we will not be
awarded the contract.

Our
contracts typically provide for a schedule of billings or invoices to the customer based on reaching agreed-upon milestones or as we incur costs. The schedules for such
billings usually do not precisely match the schedule on which we incur costs. As a result, contract revenues recognized in the statement of operations can and usually do differ from amounts that can
be billed or invoiced to the customer at any point during the contract. Amounts by which cumulative contract revenues recognized on a contract as of a given date exceed cumulative billings to the
customer under the contract are reflected as a current asset in our balance sheet under the caption "Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings." Amounts by which cumulative billings to the
customer under a contract as of a given date exceed cumulative contract revenues recognized on the contract are reflected as a current liability in our balance sheet under the caption "Billings in
excess of costs and estimated earnings."

The
percentage of completion method of accounting is also affected by changes in job performance, job conditions, and final contract settlements. These factors may result in revisions to
estimated costs and, therefore, revenues. Such revisions are frequently based on further estimates and subjective assessments. We recognize these revisions in the period in which they are determined.
If such revisions lead us to conclude that we will recognize a loss on a contract, the full amount of the estimated ultimate loss is recognized in the period we reach that conclusion, regardless of
the percentage of completion of the contract.

Revisions
to project costs and conditions can give rise to change orders under which the customer agrees to pay additional contract price. Revisions can also result in claims we might
make against the customer to recover project variances that have not been satisfactorily addressed through change orders with the customer. Except in certain circumstances, we do not recognize
revenues or margin based on change orders or claims until they have been agreed upon with the customer. The amount of revenue associated with unapproved change orders and claims is currently
immaterial. Variations from estimated project costs could have a significant impact on our operating results, depending on project size, and the recoverability of the variation via additional customer
payments.

21

---



Table of Contents



We are required to estimate the collectibility of accounts receivable and provide an allowance for doubtful accounts for receivable
amounts we believe we will not ultimately collect. This requires us to make certain judgments and estimates involving, among others, the creditworthiness of the customer, our prior collection history
with the customer, ongoing relationships with the customer, the aging of past due balances, our lien rights, if any, in the property where we performed the work, and the availability, if any, of
payment bonds applicable to our contract. These estimates are re-evaluated and adjusted as additional information is received.



We are substantially self-insured for worker's compensation, employer's liability, auto liability, general liability and
employee group health claims in view of the relatively high per-incident deductibles we absorb under our insurance arrangements for these risks. Losses up to deductible amounts are
estimated and accrued based upon
known facts, historical trends and industry averages. Loss estimates associated with the larger and longer-developing risksworker's compensation, auto liability and general
liabilityare reviewed by a third party actuary quarterly. We believe these accruals are adequate. However, insurance liabilities are difficult to estimate due to unknown factors,
including the severity of an injury, the determination of our liability in proportion to other parties, timely reporting of occurrences, ongoing treatment or loss mitigation, general trends in
litigation recovery outcomes and the effectiveness of safety and risk management programs. Therefore, if actual experience differs from the assumptions and estimates used for recording the
liabilities, adjustments may be required and would be recorded in the period that such experience becomes known.



We regularly evaluate valuation allowances established for deferred tax assets for which future realization is uncertain. We perform
this evaluation quarterly. Estimations of required valuation allowances include estimates of future taxable income. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of
future taxable income during the periods in which the activity underlying these assets becomes deductible. We consider projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this
assessment. If actual future taxable income differs from our estimates, we may not realize deferred tax assets to the extent we have estimated.



Goodwill is the excess of purchase cost over the fair value of the net assets of acquired businesses. We do not amortize goodwill. We
assess our goodwill asset amounts for impairment each year, and more frequently if circumstances suggest an impairment may have occurred. Impairment must be reflected when the fair value of a given
business unit in excess of the fair value of its identifiable net assets falls below the goodwill asset balance carried for that unit on our books. If other business units have had increases in their
fair value, such increases may not be recorded. Accordingly, such increases may not be netted against impairments at other business units. The requirements for assessing whether goodwill has been
impaired involve market-based information. This information, and its use in assessing goodwill, entails some degree of subjective assessment.

We
currently perform our annual impairment testing as of October 1 and any impairment charges resulting from this process are reported in the fourth quarter. We segregate our
operations into reporting units based on the degree of operating and financial independence of each unit and our related management of them. We perform our annual goodwill impairment testing at the
reporting unit level. We have 40 reporting units of which 27 reporting units have a goodwill balance. These reporting units are tested for impairment by comparing each unit's fair value to its
carrying value. The fair value

22

---



Table of Contents

of
each reporting unit was estimated using a discounted cash flow model combined with market valuation approaches. Significant estimates and assumptions are used in assessing the fair value of
reporting units. These estimates and assumptions involved future cash flows, growth rates, discount rates, weighted average cost of capital and estimates of market valuations for each of the reporting
units.

We
amortize identifiable intangible assets with finite lives over their useful lives. Changes in strategy and/or market condition, may result in adjustments to recorded intangible asset
balances.

Results of Operations (in thousands):

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Six Months Ended
June 30,2009

%

2010

%

2009

%

2010

%Revenues

$
300,349


100.0
%
$
249,588


100.0
%
$
580,623


100.0
%
$
486,063


100.0
%Cost of services


242,028


80.6
%

207,623


83.2
%

467,149


80.5
%

404,590


83.2
%Gross profit


58,321


19.4
%

41,965


16.8
%

113,474


19.5
%

81,473


16.8
%Selling, general and administrative expenses


41,276


13.7
%

35,611


14.3
%

84,462


14.5
%

73,020


15.0
%Goodwill impairment








4,446


1.8
%







4,446


0.9
%(Gain) loss on sale of assets


5





(468
)

(0.2
)%

3





(473
)

(0.1
)%Operating income


17,040


5.7
%

2,376


1.0
%

29,009


5.0
%

4,480


0.9
%Interest income


148





80





375


0.1
%

144


Interest expense


(308
)

(0.1
)%

(289
)

(0.1
)%

(645
)

(0.1
)%

(574
)

(0.1
)%Other income


9





(6
)




2





6


Income before income taxes


16,889


5.6
%

2,161


0.9
%

28,741


5.0
%

4,056


0.8
%Income tax expense


6,491





515





11,221





1,245Income from continuing operations


10,398


3.5
%

1,646


0.7
%

17,520


3.0
%

2,811


0.6
%Discontinued operationsOperating results, net of tax


(207
)










(387
)




Estimated gain (loss) on disposition, including tax


(93
)










(93
)




762Net income

$
10,098





1,646





17,040





3,573


RevenuesRevenues decreased $50.8 million, or 16.9% to $249.6 million for the second quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in
2009. Approximately 19.3% of the decrease in revenues related to the same store activity offset by 2.4% increase from 2009 acquisitions. The same store revenue decrease stemmed from reduced activity
in the nonresidential markets throughout the United States primarily in the education sector (approximately $29.8 million) as well as continued decreases in the multi-family sector
(approximately $18.3 million). We have seen decreased activity, primarily in our Delaware and Maryland operations, resulting from a significant decrease in these markets resulting in limited
new projects.

Revenues
for the first six months of 2010 decreased $94.6 million, or 16.3%, to $486.1 million as compared to the same period in 2009. Approximately 19.1% of the decrease
in revenues related to same store activity offset by 2.8% increase from 2009 acquisitions. The same store decrease stemmed primarily from decreased activity in the nonresidential markets throughout
the United States especially in the education sector (approximately $47.2 million) and in the multi-family sector (approximately $34.9 million). We have seen decreased activity, mainly
in our Delaware and Maryland operations resulting from the closeout of several large projects as well as a decline in market activity in both markets.

23

---



Table of Contents

Backlog
reflects revenues still to be recognized under contracted or committed installation and replacement project work. Project work generally lasts less than one year. Service
agreement revenues and service work and short duration projects which are generally billed as performed do not flow through backlog. Accordingly, backlog represents only a portion of our revenues for
any given future period, and it represents revenues that are likely to be reflected in our operating results over the next six to twelve months. As a result, we believe the predictive value of backlog
information is limited to indications of general revenue direction over the near term, and should not be interpreted as indicative of ongoing revenue performance over several quarters.

Backlog
as of June 30, 2010 was $506.5 million, a 3.5% decrease from March 31, 2010 backlog of $524.7 million, and a 20.8% decrease from the June 30,
2009 backlog of $639.8 million. On a same store basis, backlog decreased 23.6% from June 30, 2009. The sequential decrease was primarily related to our California and Virginia
operations. These decreases were partially offset by increased job bookings at our Arkansas and Iowa operations. The year-over-year decrease is primarily related to decreases
at our Colorado, Florida Panhandle, Maryland and Wisconsin operations due to the close out of several jobs and a decline in market activity.

Following
the three-year period of industry activity declines from 2001-2003 noted previously, we saw modest year-over-year revenue
increases at our ongoing operations beginning in mid-2003 and continuing throughout 2009. Based on our backlog and forecasts from industry construction analysts, we expect that activity
levels in our industry are likely to decrease over the next twelve months, particularly in the area of new construction.

We
continue to experience a noticeable amount of price competition in our markets, which restrains our ability to profitably increase revenues.

Gross ProfitGross profit decreased $16.4 million, or 28.0%, to $42.0 million for the second quarter of 2010 as compared to the same
period in 2009. As a percentage of revenues, gross profit decreased from 19.4% in 2009 to 16.8% in 2010. The quarter over quarter decrease in gross profit percentage resulted primarily from job
underperformance at our Alabama operation (approximately $1.3 million) and at one of our Maryland operations (approximately $1.5 million). We also had write downs on two jobs that are
substantially complete at our Delaware operation (approximately $1.7 million).

Gross
profit for the first six months of 2010 decreased $32.0 million, or 28.2% to $81.5 million, as compared to the same period in 2009. As a percentage of revenues, gross
profit decreased from 19.5% in 2009 to 16.8% in 2010. The year-over-year decrease in gross profit percentage for the first six months of 2010 resulted primarily from lower
profitability at our Central Florida operation (approximately $3.1 million), as well as write downs on two jobs that are substantially complete at our Delaware operation (approximately
$2.9 million) and job underperformance at one of our Maryland operations (approximately $1.5 million).

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses ("SG&A")SG&A decreased $5.7 million, or 13.7% for the second quarter of 2010 as compared to the
same period in 2009. On a same store basis, SG&A decreased $6.4 million, or 15.5%. The same store decrease was primarily related to lower bad debt expense, overhead reductions and lower
compensation accruals due to lower profitability during the second quarter of 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. As a percentage of revenues, SG&A increased from 13.7% in 2009 to 14.3% in
2010 due to a lower revenue base.

SG&A
decreased $11.4 million, or 13.5%, to $73.0 million for the first six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. On a same store basis,
SG&A decreased $12.8 million, or 15.2%. Approximately $5.8 million of the decrease is due to overhead reductions, lower compensation accruals and lower bad debt expense. As a percentage
of revenues, SG&A increased

24

---



Table of Contents

from
14.5% for the first six months of 2009 to 15.0% for the first six months of 2010 due to a lower revenue base.

Goodwill ImpairmentWe recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $4.4 million ($2.7 million after tax, or $0.07 per diluted share) during
the second quarter of 2010. This impairment charge resulted from our estimation that the operating environment, conditions and performance at our operating location based in Delaware could no longer
support the related goodwill balance. Impairment must be reflected when the fair value of a given business unit in excess of the fair value of its identifiable net assets falls below the goodwill
asset balance carried for that unit on our books.

Income Tax ExpenseOur year to date effective tax rate for 2010 was 30.7%, as compared to 39.0% in 2009. The decrease in the effective tax rate for
2010 is primarily due to the release of certain valuation allowances during the second quarter of 2010. Adjustments to tax reserves are analyzed and adjusted quarterly as events occur to warrant such
changes. Adjustments to tax reserves
are a component of the effective tax rate. We currently estimate our annual effective tax rate for 2010 will be between 37% and 40%.

OutlookWe expect that developing weakness in the underlying environment for nonresidential activity will affect 2010 activity levels in our industry
compared to recent years. Our backlog while still at solid levels by historical standards has been declining. Our primary emphasis for 2010 will be on execution including a focus on cost controls and
efficient project and service performance at the unit level. Based on our backlog and the weakening economic conditions for our industry, we expect continued profitability during 2010, but we expect
lower profitability than we achieved in 2009 as industry conditions continue to weaken.

Liquidity and Capital Resources:

Three Months Ended
June 30,

Six Months Ended
June 30,2009

2010

2009

2010(in thousands)Cash provided by (used in):Operating activities

$
23,884

$
762

$
19,951

$
(10,699
)Investing activities


(5,368
)

1,302


(5,803
)

(1,252
)Financing activities


(6,250
)

(4,232
)

(10,748
)

(8,297
)Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

$
12,266

$
(2,168
)
$
3,400

$
(20,248
)Free cash flow:Cash used in operating activities

$
23,884

$
762

$
19,951

$
(10,699
)Purchases of property and equipment


(2,662
)

(860
)

(4,434
)

(2,082
)Proceeds from sales of property and equipment


99


1,115


174


1,218Free cash flow

$
21,321

$
1,017

$
15,691

$
(11,563
)


Cash FlowWe define free cash flow as cash provided by operating activities less customary capital expenditures, plus the proceeds from asset sales.
Positive free cash flow represents funds available to invest in significant operating initiatives, to acquire other companies, or to reduce a company's outstanding debt or equity. If free cash flow is
negative, additional debt or equity is generally required to fund the outflow of cash. Free cash flow may be defined differently by other companies.

Our
business does not require significant amounts of investment in long-term fixed assets. The substantial majority of the capital used in our business is working capital
that funds our costs of labor and installed equipment deployed in project work until our customers pay us. Customary terms in our

25

---



Table of Contents

industry
allow customers to withhold a small portion of the contract price until after we have completed the work, typically for six months. Amounts withheld under this practice are known as retention
or retainage. Our average project duration together with typical retention terms generally allow us to complete the realization of revenue and earnings in cash within one year. Accordingly, we believe
free cash flow, by encompassing both profit margins and the use of working capital over our approximately one year working capital cycle, is an effective measure of operating effectiveness and
efficiency. We have included free cash flow information here for this reason, and because we are often asked about it by third parties evaluating us. However, free cash flow is not considered under
generally accepted accounting principles to be a primary measure of an entity's financial results, and accordingly free cash flow should not be considered an alternative to operating income, net
income, or amounts shown in our consolidated statements of cash flows as determined under generally accepted accounting principles.

For
the three months ended June 30, 2010, we had free cash flow of $1.0 million as compared to free cash flow of $21.3 million in 2009. For the six months ended
June 30, 2010, we had a negative free cash flow of $11.6 million as compared to free cash flow of $15.7 million for the first six months of 2009. This decrease is primarily due to
lower profitability.



As of June 30, 2010, our marketable securities consisted of $3.8 million of auction rate securities, which are variable
rate debt instruments, having long-term maturities, but whose interest rates are designed to reset through an auction process at 35 day intervals. We had investments in marketable
securities of $5.6 million as of December 31, 2009. All of our auction rate securities are high quality direct municipal obligations which have high investment grade ratings or otherwise
are backed by high investment grade rated insurance agencies. The auction events for some of these instruments failed during 2008 due to events in the credit markets. As a result, we have determined
the estimated fair values of these securities based on discounted cash flow analyses or other types of valuation models. We have performed and routinely update these valuations considering, among
other items, the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected future cash flows, and the possibility that a discount may be required if we choose to sell the securities in the absence
of a successful auction. These securities are also compared, when possible, to observable market data with similar characteristics.

In
association with our estimate of fair value as of June 30, 2010, we have recorded a temporary unrealized decline in fair value of $0.1 million, net of tax, with an
offsetting entry to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). We continue to believe that this decline is due to liquidity issues rather than credit issues. We continue to collect interest when
due on all of our auction rate securities. Any future fluctuation in fair value related to these instruments that we deem to be temporary, including any recoveries of previous write-downs, would be
recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), If we determine that any future valuation adjustment was other than temporary, we would record a charge to earnings as appropriate.

As
a result of the current situation in the auction markets, our ability to liquidate our investment in auction rate securities and fully recover the carrying value of our investment in
the near term may be limited or impossible. If in the future the issuers are unable to successfully close future auctions and their credit ratings deteriorate and if we determine that any future
valuation adjustment was other than temporary, we may be required to record an impairment charge on these investments. Because the tax
exempt interest rates on these bonds are relatively attractive, we believe that we may be able to liquidate our investment without significant loss in the foreseeable future; however, it could take
until the final maturity of the underlying notes (up to June 2032) to be repaid. Based on our expected operating cash flows, and our other sources of cash, we do not anticipate the potential lack of
liquidity on these investments will affect our ability to execute our current business plan.

26

---



Table of Contents



In March 2007, our Board of Directors (the "Board") approved a stock repurchase program to acquire up to one million shares of our
outstanding common stock. As of December 31, 2009, the Board approved extensions of the program to cover an additional 3.9 million shares. During the first quarter of 2010, the Board
approved an extension of the program to cover an additional 0.7 million shares. Since the inception of the repurchase program, the Board has approved 5.6 million shares to be
repurchased.

The
share repurchases will be made from time to time at our discretion in the open market or privately negotiated transactions as permitted by securities laws and other legal
requirements, and subject to market conditions and other factors. The Board may modify, suspend, extend or terminate the program at any time. We repurchased 0.3 million shares during the six
months ended June 30, 2010, at an average price of $11.33 per share. Since the inception of the repurchase program in 2007, we have repurchased a cumulative total of 4.7 million shares
as of June 30, 2010, at an average price of $11.16 per share.

Credit FacilityWe have a $100.0 million senior credit facility (the "Facility") provided by a syndicate of banks which is available for
borrowings and letters of credit and is secured by the capital stock of our current and future subsidiaries. The Facility was scheduled to expire in February 2012. On July 16, 2010, we entered
into a new senior credit facility arrangement and increased the amount to $125 million and extended the term to July 2014. See Note 10 "Subsequent Events" for additional information. As
of June 30, 2010, we had no outstanding borrowings, $33.9 million in letters of credit outstanding, and $66.1 million of credit available.

We
have a choice of two interest rate options for borrowings under the Facility; these rates are floating rates determined by the broad financial markets, meaning they can and do move up
and down from time to time. Excluding the amortization of debt financing and arrangement cost, we estimate that the
interest rate applicable to the borrowings under the Facility would be approximately 1.60% as of June 30, 2010. Commitment fees are payable on the portion of the capacity not in use for
borrowings or letters of credit at any given time. These fees range from 0.20%-0.30% per annum, based on the ratio of debt to Credit Facility Adjusted EBITDA.

The
Facility contains financial covenants defining various financial measures and the levels of these measures with which we must comply. The Facility's principal financial covenants
include:

Leverage RatioThe Facility requires that the ratio of our total indebtedness less cash and cash equivalents to our Credit Facility Adjusted EBITDA
not exceed 2.50. The leverage ratio as of June 30, 2010 was 0.13.

Fixed Charge Coverage RatioThe Facility requires that the ratio of Credit Facility Adjusted EBITDA, less non-financed capital
expenditures, tax provision, dividends and amounts used to repurchase stock to the sum of interest expense and scheduled principal payments be at least 1.50. Capital expenditures, tax provision,
dividends and stock repurchase payments are defined under the Facility for purposes of this covenant to be amounts for the four quarters ending as of any given quarterly covenant compliance
measurement date. The calculation of the fixed charge coverage ratio excludes acquisitions, stock repurchases and the payment of cash dividends, at any time that the Leverage Ratio does not exceed
1.0. The fixed charge coverage ratio as of June 30, 2010 was 10.36.

Other RestrictionsThe Facility permits acquisitions of up to $25.0 million per transaction, or $50.0 million in the aggregate. However,
these limitations only apply when the Leverage Ratio is greater than 1.0.

While
the Facility's financial covenants do not specifically govern capacity under the Facility, if our debt level under the Facility at a quarter-end covenant compliance
measurement date were to cause us

27

---



Table of Contents

to
violate the Facility's debt-to-Credit Facility Adjusted EBITDA covenant, our borrowing capacity under the Facility and the favorable terms that we currently have could be
negatively impacted by the lenders.

We
are in compliance with all the financial covenants as of June 30, 2010.

Notes to Former OwnersWe issued subordinated notes to the former owners of acquired companies, as part of the consideration used to acquire these
companies. These notes had an outstanding balance of $6.7 million, of which $2.3 million is current as of June 30, 2010. These notes bear interest, payable annually, at a weighted
average interest rate of 4.8%.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Other CommitmentsAs is common in our industry, we have entered into certain off-balance
sheet arrangements in the ordinary course of business that result in risks not directly reflected in our balance sheets. Our most significant off-balance sheet transactions include
liabilities associated with noncancelable operating leases. We also have other off-balance sheet obligations involving letters of credit and surety guarantees.

We
enter into noncancelable operating leases for many of our facility, vehicle and equipment needs. These leases allow us to conserve cash by paying a monthly lease rental fee for use of
facilities, vehicles and equipment rather than purchasing them. At the end of the lease, we have no further obligation to the lessor. If we decide to cancel or terminate a lease before the end of its
term, we would typically owe the lessor the remaining lease payments under the term of the lease.

Certain
of our vendors require letters of credit to ensure reimbursement for amounts they are disbursing on our behalf, such as to beneficiaries under our self-funded
insurance programs. We have also occasionally used letters of credit to guarantee performance under our contracts and to ensure payment to our subcontractors and vendors under those contracts. The
letters of credit we provide are actually issued by our lenders through the Facility as described above. A letter of credit commits the lenders to pay specified amounts to the holder of the letter of
credit if the holder demonstrates that we have failed to perform specified actions. If this were to occur, we would be required to reimburse the lenders. Depending on the circumstances of such a
reimbursement, we may also have to record a charge to earnings for the reimbursement. Absent a claim, there is no payment or reserving of funds by us in connection with a letter of credit. However,
because a claim on a letter of credit would require immediate reimbursement by us to our lenders, letters of credit are treated as a use of the Facility's capacity just the same as actual borrowings.
Claims against letters of credit are rare in our industry. To date we have not had a claim made against a letter of credit that resulted in payments by a lender or by us. We believe that it is
unlikely that we will have to fund claims under a letter of credit in the foreseeable future.

Many
customers, particularly in connection with new construction, require us to post performance and payment bonds issued by a financial institution known as a surety. If we fail to
perform under the terms of a contract or to pay subcontractors and vendors who provided goods or services under a
contract, the customer may demand that the surety make payments or provide services under the bond. We must reimburse the sureties for any expenses or outlays they incur. To date, we are not aware of
any losses to our sureties in connection with bonds the sureties have posted on our behalf, and we do not expect such losses to be incurred in the foreseeable future.

Surety
market conditions are currently challenging as a result of significant losses incurred by many sureties in recent periods, both in the construction industry as well as in certain
larger corporate bankruptcies. As a result, less bonding capacity is available in the market and terms have become more restrictive. Further, under standard terms in the surety market, sureties issue
bonds on a project-by-project basis, and can decline to issue bonds at any time. Historically, approximately 25% to 35% of our business has required bonds. While we have strong
surety relationships to support our bonding needs, current market conditions as well as changes in our sureties' assessment of our

28

---



Table of Contents

operating
and financial risk could cause our sureties to decline to issue bonds for our work. If that were to occur, our alternatives include doing more business that does not require bonds, posting
other forms of collateral for project performance such as letters of credit or cash, and seeking bonding capacity from other sureties. We would likely also encounter concerns from customers, suppliers
and other market participants as to our creditworthiness. While we believe our general operating and financial characteristics, including a significant amount of cash on our balance sheet, would
enable us to ultimately respond effectively to an interruption in the availability of bonding capacity, such an interruption would likely cause our revenues and profits to decline in the near term.

The
following recaps the future maturities of our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2010 (in thousands):

Twelve Months Ended June 30,2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Thereafter

TotalNotes to former owners

$
2,316

$
2,725

$
1,350

$
300

$


$


$
6,691Interest payable


252


208


40


9








509Operating lease obligations


9,188


8,115


6,966


4,945


2,972


5,613


37,799Total

$
11,756

$
11,048

$
8,356

$
5,254

$
2,972

$
5,613

$
44,999


Absent
any significant commitments of capital for items such as capital expenditures, acquisitions, dividends and share repurchases, it is reasonable to expect us to continue to maintain
excess cash on our balance sheet. Therefore, we assumed that we would continue our current status of not utilizing any borrowings under our revolving credit facility.

As
of June 30, 2010, we have $33.9 million letter of credit commitments, of which $33.5 million will expire in 2010 and $0.4 million will expire in 2011. The
substantial majority of these letters of credit are posted with insurers who disburse funds on our behalf in connection with our worker's compensation, auto liability and general liability insurance
program. These letters of credit provide additional security to the insurers that sufficient financial resources will be available to fund claims on our behalf, many of which develop over long periods
of time, should we ever encounter financial duress. Posting of letters of credit for this purpose is a common practice for entities that manage their self-insurance programs through
third-party insurers as we do. While most of these letter of credit commitments expire in 2010, we expect nearly all of them, particularly those supporting our insurance programs, will be renewed
annually.

Other
than the operating lease obligations noted above, we have no significant purchase or operating commitments outside of commitments to deliver equipment and provide labor in the
ordinary course of performing project work.

OutlookWe have generated positive net free cash flow for the last eleven calendar years, much of which occurred during challenging economic and
industry conditions. We also expect to have significant borrowing capacity under our credit facility and we continue to have substantial uncommitted cash balances. We believe these factors will
provide us with sufficient liquidity to fund our operations for the foreseeable future.

Cyclicality and Seasonality

Historically, the construction industry has been highly cyclical. As a result, our volume of business may be adversely affected by
declines in new installation and replacement projects in various geographic regions of the United States during periods of economic weakness.

29

---





Table of Contents

The HVAC industry is subject to seasonal variations. Specifically, the demand for new installation and replacement is generally lower during the winter months
(the first quarter of the year) due to reduced construction activity during inclement weather and less use of air conditioning during the colder months. Demand for HVAC services is generally higher in
the second and third calendar quarters due to increased construction activity and increased use of air conditioning during the warmer months. Accordingly, we expect our revenues and operating results
generally will be lower in the first and fourth calendar quarters.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In the first quarter of 2010, certain disclosure provisions of the FASB Accounting Standards Update 2010-06 became
effective for the Company. This standard clarified existing fair value requirements under the FASB ASC's Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic 820, including the level of disaggregation
required for fair value disclosures and disclosure of the valuation techniques and inputs used in estimating level 2 and level 3 fair value measurements. Our adoption of this standard
did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk primarily related to potential adverse changes in interest rates as discussed below. We are actively
involved in monitoring exposure to market risk and continue to develop and utilize appropriate risk management techniques. We are not exposed to any other significant financial market risks including
commodity price risk, foreign currency exchange risk or interest rate risks from the use of derivative financial instruments. We do not use derivative financial instruments.

We
have limited exposure to changes in interest rates under our revolving credit facility. We have a debt facility under which we may borrow funds in the future. We do not currently
foresee any borrowing needs. Our debt with fixed interest rates consists of notes to former owners of acquired companies.

The
following table presents principal amounts (stated in thousands) and related average interest rates by year of maturity for our debt obligations and their indicated fair market value
at June 30, 2010:

Twelve Months Ended June 30,2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

Thereafter

Fair ValueFixed Rate Debt

$
2,316

$
2,725

$
1,350

$
300

$


$


$
6,691Average Interest Rate


5.9
%

4.5
%

3.8
%

3.0
%







4.8
%


As
of June 30, 2010, our marketable securities consisted of $3.8 million of auction rate securities, which are variable rate debt instruments, having long-term
maturities, but whose interest rates are designed to reset through an auction process at 35 day intervals. We had investments in marketable securities of $5.6 million as of
December 31, 2009. All of our auction rate securities are high quality
direct municipal obligations which have high investment grade ratings or otherwise are backed by high investment grade rated insurance agencies. The auction events for some of these instruments failed
during 2008 due to events in the credit markets. As a result, we have determined the estimated fair values of these securities based on discounted cash flow analyses or other types of valuation
models. We have performed and routinely update these valuations considering, among other items, the creditworthiness of the counterparty, the timing of expected future cash flows, and the possibility
that a discount may be required if we choose to sell the securities in the absence of a successful auction. These securities are also compared, when possible, to observable market data with similar
characteristics.

30

---



Table of Contents

In
association with our estimate of fair value as of June 30, 2010, we have recorded a temporary unrealized decline in fair value of $0.1 million, net of tax, with an
offsetting entry to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). We continue to believe that this decline is due to liquidity issues rather than credit issues. We continue to collect interest when
due on all of our auction rate securities. Any future fluctuation in fair value related to these instruments that we deem to be temporary, including any recoveries of previous write-downs, would be
recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), If we determine that any future valuation adjustment was other than temporary, we would record a charge to earnings as appropriate.

As
a result of the current situation in the auction markets, our ability to liquidate our investment in auction rate securities and fully recover the carrying value of our investment in
the near term may be limited or impossible. If in the future the issuers are unable to successfully close future auctions and their credit ratings deteriorate and if we determine that any future
valuation adjustment was other than temporary, we may be required to record an impairment charge on these investments. Because the tax exempt interest rates on these bonds are relatively attractive,
we believe that we may be able to liquidate our investment without significant loss in the foreseeable future; however, it could take until the final maturity of the underlying notes (up to June 2032)
to be repaid. Based on our expected operating cash flows, and our other sources of cash, we do not anticipate the potential lack of liquidity on these investments will affect our ability to execute
our current business plan.

We
measure certain assets, including our goodwill and intangible assets, at a fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets are recognized at fair value when they are deemed to be
other-than-temporarily impaired. Such fair value calculations are based on significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) in accordance with the fair value hierarchy. During
the six months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $4.4 million. We did not recognize any other impairments on those assets required to be measured at fair
value on a nonrecurring basis.

Item 4.Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our executive management is responsible for ensuring the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures. We carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of
the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end
of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) during the three months ended June 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

31

---





Table of Contents

COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC.

PART IIOTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.Legal Proceedings

We are subject to certain claims and lawsuits arising in the normal course of business. We maintain various insurance coverages to
minimize financial risk associated with these claims. We have estimated and provided accruals for probable losses and related legal fees associated with certain of our litigation in our consolidated
financial statements. While we cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings, in our opinion and based on reports of counsel, any liability arising from these matters individually and in the
aggregate will not have a material effect on our operating results or financial condition, after giving effect to provisions already recorded.

Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

On March 29, 2007, our Board of Directors (the "Board") approved a stock repurchase program to acquire up to one million shares
of our outstanding common stock. As of December 31, 2009, the Board approved extensions of the program to cover an additional 3.9 million shares. During the first quarter of 2010, the
Board approved an extension of the program to cover an additional 0.7 million shares. Since the inception of the repurchase program, the Board has approved 5.6 million shares to be
repurchased.

The
share repurchases will be made from time to time at our discretion in the open market or privately negotiated transactions as permitted by securities laws and other legal
requirements, and subject to market conditions and other factors. The Board may modify, suspend, extend or terminate the program at any time. We repurchased 0.3 million shares during the six
months ended June 30, 2010, at an average price of $11.33 per share. Since the inception of the program, we have repurchased a cumulative total of 4.7 million shares as of
June 30, 2010, at an average price of $11.16 per share.

During
the quarter ended June 30, 2010, we purchased our common shares in the following amounts at the following average prices:

Period

Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased

Average Price
Paid
Per Share

Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs

Maximum Number of
Shares that May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plans or ProgramsApril 1 - April 30




$



4,600,537


1,022,750May 1 - May 31


87,800

$
10.88


4,688,337


934,950June 1 - June 30


46,169

$
10.45


4,734,506


888,781133,969

$
10.73


4,734,506


888,781


Under
our restricted share plan, employees may elect to have us withhold common shares to satisfy minimum statutory federal, state and local tax withholding obligations arising on the
vesting of
restricted stock awards and exercise of options. When we withhold these shares, we are required to remit to the appropriate taxing authorities the market price of the shares withheld, which could be
deemed a purchase of the common shares by us on the date of withholding.

32

---



Table of Contents

During
the quarter ended June 30, 2010, we withheld common shares to satisfy these tax withholding obligations as follows:

Period

Number of
Shares Purchased

Average Price
Paid Per ShareApril 1 - April 30


31,326

$
12.55May 1 - May 31


19,014

$
11.38June 1 - June 30





50,340

$
12.11


Item 6.Exhibits

(a)   Exhibits.

31.1

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of William F. Murdy pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.31.2

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of William George pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.1

Section 1350 Certification of William F. Murdy pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.2

Section 1350 Certification of William George pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


33

---





Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

COMFORT SYSTEMS USA, INC.August 2, 2010

By:

/s/ WILLIAM F. MURDY William F. Murdy Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive OfficerAugust 2, 2010

By:

/s/ WILLIAM GEORGE William George Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial OfficerAugust 2, 2010

By:

/s/ JULIE S. SHAEFF Julie S. Shaeff Senior Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer


34

---