alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.17**

 

**FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE**

 

This First Amendment to Lease (the “First Amendment”), dated as of November 26, 2002 is made by and between Marlborough Campus Limited Partnership, a Massachusetts limited partnership **(“Landlord”)**, and 3Com Corporation, a Delaware corporation **(“Tenant”)**.

 

BACKGROUND

 

WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a lease (the “Lease”) dated as of November 26, 2002, pursuant to which Landlord leased to Tenant certain space located in Marlborough, Massachusetts; and

 

WHEREAS, through a mutual mistake, the Lease omitted certain provisions to which the parties had agreed and the parties wish to amend to the Lease to add said provisions.

 

AGREEMENTS

 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions of the parties set forth in the Lease and this First Amendment, and for other good and valuable consideration, the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:

 

1.         Defined Terms.  Capitalized terms used in this First amendment and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Lease.

 

2.         Transition Period.  Landlord and Tenant agree that Section 1.1.1 of the Lease, is amended as follows: the words “sixty (60)” in the second line of said Section are hereby deleted and replaced with “ninety (90)”, with respect to the duration of the Transition Period.

 

3.         Additional Rent for Interim Premises.  A new section 4.9 shall be added to the Lease to read as follows:

 

“4.9  Additional Rent for Interim Premises.  Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in addition to all other sums payable pursuant to this Lease, commencing on the sixty-first day after the Commencement Date and continuing until such time as Tenant has vacated the Interim Premises in accordance with the provisions of Section 1.1.1., above, Tenant shall pay to Landlord, as Additional Rent, the sum Landlord reasonably estimates for utility usage for the Interim Premises”.

 

4.         Lease Ratified and Confirmed.  Except as specifically modified hereby, the Lease shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.  In the event of any inconsistency between the terms and conditions of this First Amendment and the terms and conditions of the Lease, the terms and conditions of this First Amendment shall govern.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have caused this Lease to be executed the day and date first above written.

 

 

| **“Landlord”** |
|--------------------------|

 

| MARLBOROUGH CAMPUS LIMITED |
|----------------------------|
| PARTNERSHIP                |  
 

By:  Bergen of Marlborough, Inc., general partner

 

By:  

/s/ signature illegible  

 

Its:  

Vice President  

 

 

**“Tenant”**

 

3COM CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation

 

Attest:

By:  

/s/ Mark Michael   

 

By:  /s/ LaLonda Hanson

Name:  

Mark Michael

 

Name: LaLonda Hanson

Title:  

Senior Vice President

 

Title:  

Executive Legal Assistant

(Corporate Seal)

 

 

  |
From: Eldon Wedlock

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment wrt IOM"s Recommendations for coverage of preventive care.

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:42:30 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as they pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law - and to reject any exemptions for socalled “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care – they

should not be subject to the veto of a woman’s employer.

The AAUW – and I – believe that any so called “religious refusal” exemptions would

unjustly deny women access to contraceptive services. But others, driven by an

irrational, ideological distaste for contraceptive services, are pushing the government to

make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-affiliated health care providers, so hospitals with religious

connections would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ

people of all faiths and ideologies. This larger exemption, if granted, would deny access

to thousands of women just because of where they work, and would blow a whole in the

Institute’s recommendation.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed “religious refusal exemption” provisions.

May I add that the exemptions, in my opinion, run counter to (at least) the spirit of the

First Amendment to the US Constitution, by creating an exemption solely for a religious

“purpose.”
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31,2005 (the “Report”) of Immucor, Inc. (the “Registrant”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the bestof my knowledge, that:

 

(1)                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| October 18, 2005 | /s/ Edward L. Gallup    |   |
|------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|             | Edward L. Gallup        |
|             | Chief Executive Officer |
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vail Banks, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary S. Judd, Chief Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Gary S. Judd
Gary S. JuddChief Executive Officer and PresidentMay 13, 2004
#### WELLENS *v.*DILLON, SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY, et al.

No. 122.

Decided October 8, 1962.

Appellant *pm se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Guilfoyle*and *Morton Hollander*for appellees.

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Exhibit 21



                               MAJOR SUBSIDIARIES
                              (as of March 1, 1997)




                                                     State or Country
                  Name                               of Organization

New England Telephone and Telegraph Company                 New York
         Telesector Resources Group, Inc.*                  Delaware

New York Telephone Company                                  New York
         Empire City Subway Company (Limited)               New York
         Telesector Resources Group, Inc.*                  Delaware

NYNEX Asset Management Company                              Delaware

NYNEX Capital Funding Company                               Delaware

NYNEX Credit Company                                        Delaware

NYNEX Government Affairs Company                            Delaware

NYNEX Information Resources Company                         Delaware

NYNEX Science & Technology, Inc.                            Delaware

NYNEX Trade Finance Company                                 Delaware

NYNEX Entertainment & Information Services Company          Delaware

NYNEX Worldwide Services Group, Inc.                        Delaware
         NYNEX Long Distance Company                        Delaware
         NYNEX Network Systems Company                      Delaware
                  NYNEX CableComms Group PLC                England & Wales
                  NYNEX CableComms Group Inc.               Delaware


*  Telesector Resources Group, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of New York
   Telephone Company and New England Telephone and Telegraph Company.
From: gjohnston@homerschools.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:20:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Geraldine Johnston

New Lenox, IL 60451
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 62604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19621]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice: 23-095]


NASA Federal Advisory Committees; Charter Renewals

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Notice of charter renewals for four NASA Federal advisory 
committees.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), and 
after consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General 
Services Administration, the NASA Administrator has determined that 
renewal of the charters of four NASA Federal advisory committees is in 
the public interest in connection with the performance of duties 
imposed on NASA by law. These four advisory committees are: 
Astrophysics Advisory Committee, Earth Science Advisory Committee, 
Heliophysics Advisory Committee, and Planetary Science Advisory 
Committee. The renewed charters are for a two-year period ending August 
30, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Patricia Diane Rausch, NASA 
Advisory Committee Management Officer, NASA Headquarters, Washington, 
DC 20546; or 202-358-4510 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cfaba6aea1aae1bdaebabcaca78fa1aebcaee1a8a0b9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="315558505f541f435044425259715f5042501f565e47">[email protected]</span></a>.

Patricia Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2023-19621 Filed 9-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<page>			            EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Cornerstone
Fund III (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin Perry, Chief
Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Partnership.








By:	  /s/	Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 31, 2006
#### Matter of Judicial Settlement of David Hawley as Guardian.

— Order of surrogate affirmed» witn costs. Opinion by

Pratt. J.
From: joann.latham@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:53:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jo Ann Latham

, 30096-2672
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.18 MB)
 
 McKenzie Milley CJCS CENTCOM SECDEF Austin
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-01-1999
<CASH>                                           5,143
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   35,219
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     35,920
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,167
<PP&E>                                          38,456
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,906
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,934
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,516
<BONDS>                                        236,544
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            4,349
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (161,967)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   107,934
<SALES>                                        115,422
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               115,422
<CGS>                                           64,769
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   94,380
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    60
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,651
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,451
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,391
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,060
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,060
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
H. Res. 1421 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 25, 2008. 

Whereas on the morning of October 23, 1983, at approximately 6:20 a.m., a truck packed with explosives broke 

security and detonated outside of the United States Marine Corps barracks in Beirut, Lebanon; 

Whereas 241 members of the Armed Forces of the United 

States were killed in the blast, and many more were injured; 

Whereas a total of 272 members of the Armed Forces from 

39 States and Puerto Rico died while serving in Beirut, 

Lebanon, from 1982 to 1984; 

Whereas the members of the Armed Forces were part of a 

multinational peacekeeping force; and 

Whereas the honor and sacrifice of the victims will never be 

forgotten: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives, on the 

25th anniversary of the bombing of the United States Marine 

Corps barracks in Beirut, Lebanon— 

(1) honors and remembers the service and sacrifice 

of the members of the Armed Forces who were victims 
2 

•HRES 1421 EH 

of the bombing and those who died in Beirut from 1982 

to 1984; and 

(2) joins family and friends in mourning the members of the Armed Forces who lost their lives in the 

tragic bombing and while serving as peacekeepers in Beirut. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 624, Misc.

#### Swanson *v.*California.

District Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District. Certiorari denied.
#### The Metropolitan Manufacturing Company, Respondent, v. Joseph W. Dunning and others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.;

Barker. J., not sitting.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00727-CV

GLORIA GARCIA

v.

GENESIS CRUDE OIL L.P.

On Appeal from the

229th District Court of Duval County, Texas

Trial Cause No. DC-12-200

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

April 28, 2016
#### Franklin Simmons and others, Respondents, v. Albertus Larrowe, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed on the opinion of the referee.
#### FLEISCHER *v.*W. P. I. X., INC., et al.

No. 78, Misc.

Decided October 8, 1962.

*Gustave B. Garfield*for appellant.

*Daniel Huttenbrauck*and *Seymour Shainswit*for appellees.

Per Curiam.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.