alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 21, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 13, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 8 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-267, CP2023-270.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-20409 Filed 9-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
| **Fair Value Measurements  (Details 3) (Level 2, USD $)In Millions, unless otherwise specified** | Jun. 30, 2012 | Dec. 31, 2011 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| Level 2                                                                                          |          |          |
| **Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis [Line Items]** |          |          |
| Fair value of impaired loans                                                                     | $ 219         | $ 141         |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
The fair value of impaired loans.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**cfsc_FairValueOfImpairedLoans**Namespace Prefix:**cfsc_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_FairValueAssetsAndLiabilitiesMeasuredOnRecurringAndNonrecurringBasisLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                            			 <C>                  		   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>          		        12-MOS          	                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             MAY-31-1997           	  MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  MAY-31-1997         		  MAY-31-1996
<CASH>                         15,718,234     	  	      20,533,422
<SECURITIES>            	               0                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                  11,461,595      		        9,304,018
<ALLOWANCES>                      395,076  	  	            350,545
<INVENTORY>                   	 7,622,764  		            5,932,923
<CURRENT-ASSETS>               37,130,070      		       36,477,187
<PP&E>                          8,985,729  	   	         6,285,912
<DEPRECIATION>                	 3,652,419 		             3,029,388
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 57,725,646  	    	       47,206,858
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          5,262,029     		         3,952,813
<BONDS>                        10,665,658  		            3,908,795
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0	                       0
<PREFERRED>                          		 0	                       0
<COMMON>                      	   807,873     	            805,438
<OTHER-SE>        	            40,412,995     		        38,539,812
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   57,725,646     		        47,206,858
<SALES>           	            35,653,617     		        30,964,057
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               35,653,617     		        30,964,057
<CGS>                          15,055,254   	  	        12,004,831
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  15,055,254 		            12,004,831
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               17,621,531               15,365,449
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                366,525                  294,322
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 3,142,204                4,176,286
<INCOME-TAX>                    1,302,290                1,403,651
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             1,839,914                2,772,635
<DISCONTINUED>                          0                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0                        0
<CHANGES>                               0                        0
<NET-INCOME>                    1,839,914                2,772,635
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         .23                      .35
<EPS-DILUTED>                         .22                      .32
        


</TABLE>
From: rosededcarlo@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:31:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rosa Carlo

Philadelphia, PA 19124
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 11, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-50449

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

STEVEN ANDREW BERG

Defendant - Appellant

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:04-CR-268-ALL

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Steven Andrew Berg appeals his conviction for possession

with the intent to distribute more than five kilograms of

cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841. He argues that the

prosecutor’s closing argument improperly commented on his postarrest, post-Miranda silence, in violation of Doyle v. Ohio, 426

U.S. 610 (1976), and that the error requires automatic reversal.

A prosecutor violates a defendant’s due process rights by

commenting on a defendant’s post-arrest, post-Miranda warning
No. 05-50449

-2-

silence in an attempt to impeach the defendant’s exculpatory

testimony offered at trial. Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610, 619-20

(1976). Contrary to Berg’s assertion, the prosecutor’s comments

regarding his silently “looking straight ahead” reference his

silence during secondary inspection, which silence occurred prior

to any arrest and thus do not violate Doyle. See United States

v. Musquiz, 45 F.3d 927, 930 (5th Cir. 1995).

Berg also objects to the prosecutor’s comment on his failure

to say anything after he was arrested and placed in a holding

cell. Although the remark referenced Berg’s post-arrest silence,

there is no evidence in the record that Berg’s silence at that

point was induced by Miranda warnings, a prerequisite for a Doyle

violation. See Doyle, 426 U.S. at 619-20. Even if a Doyle

violation is assumed, however, the error was harmless given that

the statement was not linked to the exculpatory statement Berg

offered at trial, that the trial court sustained Berg’s objection

and gave a curative instruction, and that the evidence of Berg’s

guilt was overwhelming. See United States v. Rodriguez, 43 F.3d

117, 123 (5th Cir. 1995); United States v. Carter, 953 F.2d 1449,

1466 (5th Cir. 1992); Chapman v. United States, 547 F.2d 1240,

1247-48 (5th Cir. 1977).

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
#### VITORATOS *v.*YACOBUCCI, CLERK.

No. 408, Misc.

Decided October 15, 1962.

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in (a) the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-30782) pertaining to The Investment-Incentive Plan for John
Hancock Employees and the John Hancock Savings and Investment Plan of John
Hancock Financial Services, Inc., (b) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-30718) pertaining to the John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. Long-Term
Stock Incentive Plan, (c) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-52034)
pertaining to The Investment Incentive Plan for the Employees of the John
Hancock Funds Companies and (d) the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-55064) pertaining to the John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. Incentive
Compensation Plan for Employees, Long-Term Incentive Plan for Senior Executives
and Deferred Compensation Plan for Executives of our report dated February 8,
2001 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of John Hancock
Financial Services, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2000.


                                                   /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 23, 2001
#### La ROSE *v.*TAHASH, WARDEN.

No. 445, Misc.

Decided November 19, 1962.

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
From: lindadeane@optonline.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:41:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Linda Deane

Norwalk, CT 06851
From: bjreyesnixon@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:11:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Brenda Reyes-Nixon

Akron, OH 44333
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 14, 2019

No. 04-19-00332-CV

Lee B. WHEELER, Trustee of the L& P Children's Trust and Nancy Wheeler Plumlee,

Appellants

v.

SAN MIGUEL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC.,

Appellee

From the 36th Judicial District Court, McMullen County, Texas

Trial Court No. M-17-0027-CV-A

Honorable Starr Boldrick Bauer, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s third amended motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief 

is due October 18, 2019. No further extensions of time will be granted absent extenuating 

circumstances.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of October, 2019.

___________________________________

LUZ ESTRADA,

Chief Deputy Clerk
#### Hat Sweat Manufacturing Company, Respondent, v. William H. Reinoehl and another, Appellants.

— Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Low-Interest Loans for Residential Solar Heating and Cooling Equipment

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking, Currency, and Housing, 1975-1977					 and 	Ninety-Fourth Congress, 1975-1977. 						*Low-Interest Loans for Residential Solar Heating and Cooling Equipment : Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Housing and Community Development of the Committee on Banking, Currency and Housing, House of Representatives, Ninety-Fourth Congress, First Session, on H.R. 3849, H.R. 8524, November 5, 1975*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										November 5, 1975,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/222,			accessed on September 12, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
From: mjburch@midwaycoop.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:06:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

M Burch

Osborne, KS 67473
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Coupon | Interest | Maturity | Callable | Survivor's Option | Price | CUSIP |   |
| 1.250% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 10/15/2019 | 10/15/2017 * | Yes § | 100.00 | 14912HSV3 |   |
| 2.100% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 10/15/2023 | 10/15/2018 * | Yes § | 100.00 | 14912HSW1 |   |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |  |
| (†††) | First Payment date 4/15/2017 |   |
|                    |   |