alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
***EXHIBIT 32(b)***

** **

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

** **

In connection with the reporton Form 10-Q of WWA Group, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, DigamberNaswa, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)  This report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)  The information contained in thisreport fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition ofthe registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results ofoperations of the registrant for the period covered by this report.

 

 

Date: August 17, 2011

 

 

/s/ Digamber Naswa

Digamber Naswa

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

This certificationaccompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, bedeemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, orthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or afterthe date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant and willbe retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request. 

 

 

----
Exhibit 99.2
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 101(A)(1), 101(C)(5), AND 111 OF THE EMERGENCY ECONOMIC
STABILIZATION ACT OF 2008, AS AMENDED BY THE AMERICAN RECOVERY AND
REINVESTMENT ACT OF 2009
        (A)
    
    SEO compensation plans that could lead SEOs to take unnecessary and excessive
risks that could threaten the value of the Corporation;(B)
    
    Employee compensation plans that unnecessarily expose the Corporation to risks;
and(C)
    
    Employee compensation plans that could encourage the manipulation of reported
earnings of the Corporation to enhance the compensation of an employee;




---



##### 



/s/ Gary J. ElekGary J. ElekChief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will be held via teleconference.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 10, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ann Tabat at 1-888-912-1227 or (602) 636-9143.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be held Tuesday, October 10, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Ann Tabat. For more information, please contact Ann Tabat at 1-888-912-1227 or (602) 636-9143, or write TAP Office, 4041 N Central Ave., Phoenix, AZ 85012 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include a committee discussion involving 57139 Digital Assets/Cryptocurrency; and 64919 Decedent and Trust forms and publications.                

Dated: September 6, 2023.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2023-19745 Filed 9-12-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



     The Board of Directors
     CompuCom Systems, Inc.:


         We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
     (No. 33-2304, No. 33-30175, No. 33-30056, No. 33-39914, No. 33-43275, No.
     33-63307, No. 33-63309, No. 33-76832, No. 33-85268, No. 333-58623, No. 333-
     69051 and No. 333-69043) on Form S-8 and the Registration Statements (No.
     33-43367, No. 33-47002, No. 33-64341, No. 33-78746, No. 33-78756 and No.
     333-12609) on Form S-3 of CompuCom Systems, Inc. of our report dated
     February 14, 2000, related to the consolidated balance sheets of CompuCom
     Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the
     related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and
     cash flows and related schedule for each of the years in the three-year
     period ended December 31, 1999, which report appears in the December 31,
     1999 annual report on Form 10-K of CompuCom Systems, Inc.





                                               KPMG LLP



     Dallas, Texas
     February 23, 2000
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice: 23-095]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

# ACTION:

Notice of charter renewals for four NASA Federal advisory committees.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), and after consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General Services Administration, the NASA Administrator has determined that renewal of the charters of four NASA Federal advisory committees is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on NASA by law. These four advisory committees are: Astrophysics Advisory Committee, Earth Science Advisory Committee, Heliophysics Advisory Committee, and Planetary Science Advisory Committee. The renewed charters are for a two-year period ending August 30, 2025.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Patricia Diane Rausch, NASA Advisory Committee Management Officer, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC 20546; or 202-358-4510 or                         *diane.rausch@nasa.gov.*

Patricia Rausch,

Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[FR Doc. 2023-19621 Filed 9-11-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted form consolidated
balance  sheets,  and  consolidated  statements  of income of the Company in the
Company"  Form 10-QSB and is  qualified  in its  entirety by  reference  to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            1,920,198
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    38,206,021
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1,301,308
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 39,823,885
<PP&E>                                            1,942,043
<DEPRECIATION>                                      431,289
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   42,518,229
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            41,815,873
<BONDS>                                           2,591,775
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                              26
<COMMON>                                             23,055
<OTHER-SE>                                       (1,912,500)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     42,518,229
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  9,902,395
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    11,237,691
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    872,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2,075,550
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (4,283,346)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (4,283,346)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (4,283,346)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (1.98)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.00
        


</TABLE>
From: HENRYMILLIEB@VERIZON.NET

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:36:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Thanks, Henry Buckwalter

Sincerely,

HENRY BUCKWALTER

Lancaster, PA 17601
From: scottcarm05@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:58:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carmen LaRue

Fort Wayne, IN 46814
From: Mary Ann Wolfe

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Friday, August 05, 2011 12:11:57 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Mary Ann Wolfe
Portland, Oregon
No. 67041.

protest 60/6664 (New York).

#### Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of candlesticks and candelabras similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62036, except that they are silver plated on metals other than nickel silver or copper, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
ex10-5.htm


	





 

 




 


 

W81XWH-15-C-0046

P00005

Page 2 of 2

 

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE 

 

SUMMARY OF CHANGES  

 

 

SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM 

 

 

 

The following have been modified: 

 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The Contractor’s final proposal dated 13 February 2015 is herein incorporated by reference. 

The Contractor’s final proposal (for LRIP option) dated 16 April 2015 is herein incorporated by reference. 

 

March 2016 (Mod P00005): The ARX-04 clinical program had to be revised based on the outcome of the Contractor’s pre-New Drug Application (NDA) meeting with the U. S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Contractor’s Issue Summary Report (ISR), dated 14 January 2016, is herein incorporated by reference. 

 

Government Property:

No Government-furnished property will be used in the performance of this contract. 

No Contractor-acquired, Government-owned property will be purchased for this contract. 

All equipment used in the performance of this contract (except where subcontractors are utilized) will be purchased by AcelRx using their own funds. 

 

 

 

SECTION F - DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE 

 

The following Delivery Schedule item for CLIN 0001 has been changed from:

 

	
 
	
DELIVERY DATE 
	
QUANTITY 
	
SHIP TO ADDRESS 
	
DODAAC 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
POP 11-MAY-2015 TO

10-NOV-2016 
	
N/A 
	
FORT DETRICK-USAMMDA

FORT DETRICK-USAMMDA

1430 FORT DETRICK

FREDERICK MD 21702

FOB: Destination 
	
W806YH 



 

 

To:

 

	
 
	
DELIVERY DATE 
	
QUANTITY 
	
SHIP TO ADDRESS 
	
DODAAC 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
POP 11-MAY-2015 TO

09-MAR-2017  
	
N/A 
	
FORT DETRICK-USAMMDA

FORT DETRICK-USAMMDA

1430 FORT DETRICK

FREDERICK MD 21702

FOB: Destination 
	
W806YH 



 

 

(End of Summary of Changes)
From: dtnoblet@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:57:26 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Doris Noblet

Alexandria, VA 22310
From: Davemult@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Please reject any religious refusal exemptions

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:59:36 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking

you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological

distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make

exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption

would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal

exemption provisions.

David S. Nichols

Portland, OR 97213