alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY

In connection with the annual report of TransGlobe Energy Corp.
  (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31,
  2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the Report), I, Ross G. Clarkson, Chief Executive Officer of the
  Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.



|/s/ Ross Clarkson              | 
|------------------------------ | 
|Name: Ross G. Clarkson         | 
|Title: Chief Executive Officer | 
|August 9, 2006                 | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule
  13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
  has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
  furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 40-F to which it relates,
  is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to
  be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities
  Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after
  the date of the Form 40-F), irrespective of any general incorporation language
  contained in such filing.

---
|                      |   | 2008 |   |   | 2007   |   |   | CHANGE |
|---------------------------|--------|------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Revenues                  |   | $    | 661    |   |   | $      | 780    |   |   |   | (15 | %) |
| Profit      Before Tax    |   | $    | (10    | )      |   | $      | 172    |   |   |   | (106 | %) |
| Profit      After Tax     |   | $    | 13     |   |   | $      | 113    |   |   |   | (88 | %) |
| New      Retail Financing |   | $    | 3,428  |   |   | $      | 4,100  |   |   |   | (16 | %) |
| Total      Assets         |   | $    | 33,082 |   |   | $      | 29,429 |   |   |   | 12 | %  |

|                      |   | 2008 |   |   | 2007   |   |   | CHANGE |
|---------------------------|--------|------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| Revenues                  |   | $    | 2,999  |   |   | $      | 2,998  |   |   |   | 0 | %  |
| Profit      Before Tax    |   | $    | 505    |   |   | $      | 728    |   |   |   | (31 | %) |
| Profit      After Tax     |   | $    | 385    |   |   | $      | 494    |   |   |   | (22 | %) |
| New      Retail Financing |   | $    | 15,879 |   |   | $      | 14,074 |   |   |   | 13 | %  |

| For      the Period: 2/17/2009 to 2/23/2009 |
|---------------------------------------------|

| Coupon | Interest                           | Maturity | Callable   | Survivor'sOption | Price1 | Yield2 | Moody's | S&P | CUSIP     |
|--------|------------------------------------|----------|------------|------------------|--------|--------|---------|---------|-----------|
| 4.500% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 2/15/11  | NO         | YES§        | 100.00 | 4.500% | A2      | A       | 14912HNJ5 |
| 5.050% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 2/15/13  | NO         | YES§        | 100.00 | 5.050% | A2      | A       | 14912HNK2 |
| 6.000% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 2/15/16  | 2/15/11*** | YES§        | 100.00 | 6.000% | A2      | A       | 14912HNL0 |
From: rustynails@cableone.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:56:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John R. Turner

Chino Valley, AZ 86323
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1649

ERIC EMANUEL TAYLOR,
Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

BARACK OBAMA,
Defendant – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00254-RAJ-JEB)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 5, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Emanuel Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Eric Emmanuel Taylor appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his complaint as frivolous, pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (2006). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Obama , No.
2:09-cv-00254-RAJ-JEB (E.D. Va. June 3, 2009). We also deny as
moot Taylor’s motions to expedite and for oral argument. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
| **Fair Value Measurements  (Details 3) (Level 2, USD $)In Millions, unless otherwise specified** | Sep. 30, 2012 | Dec. 31, 2011 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| Level 2                                                                                          |          |          |
| **Fair Value, Assets and Liabilities Measured on Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis**              |          |          |
| Fair value of impaired loans                                                                     | $ 201         | $ 141         |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
The fair value of impaired loans.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**cfsc_FairValueOfImpairedLoans**Namespace Prefix:**cfsc_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_FairValueAssetsAndLiabilitiesMeasuredOnRecurringAndNonrecurringBasisLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| (1)       | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)       | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |   |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Michael Prince            |   |   |   |   |
| Chief Executive Officer       |   |   |   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer  |   |   |   |   |
| March 11, 2011                |   |   |   |   |
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 29, 2018

No. 04

- 1 8

- 00 039

- CV

IN RE DAIMLER TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA LLC

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

On January 24, 2018 , relator filed a n unopposed Motion for Seal of Petition for Writ of

Mandamus and Mandamus Record. We GRANT the motion and ORDER that relator’s Petition

for Writ of Mandamus and Mandamus Record be filed under se al. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 9.2(c)(3).



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED T O:

____________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 201 4

- CI

- 07361 , styled Ricardo Garza, et al. v. Daimler Trucks North

America, et al. , pending in the 45th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Antonia Arteaga

presiding.
From: smggerace@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:19:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Shirley Gerace

, 61301-1273
Order entered July 10, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00846-CV

IN RE CHELSEA DAVIS, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-01240

ORDER

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus. We ORDER relator to bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE 

JUSTICE
No. 213.

#### Noble et ux. *v.*De Vas.

*Paul N. Cotro-Manes*for petitioners.

Supreme Court of Utah. Certiorari denied.
From: amh1108@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:51:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Allison Thorson

Largo, FL 33773
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No. 333-35460

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO. 069				Trade Date: 04/18/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

September 8, 2000)						Issue Date: 05/01/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement April 18, 2001
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

or	Stated				 Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		 Price to	 Discounts & Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2) Commissions Frequency	 Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QCW9 5.5%	05/15/05	100%	 1.0%  MONTHLY	 YES	 NO	

 

 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____ Yes	 X No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount. Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
From: Ann McDonald

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Women"s Preventive Health Care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:49:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger.

Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run

health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the

coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies.

If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

An Interested Woman Citizen
No. 594.

#### Muse *v.*United States Casualty Co.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
DSC/APRIL 2004/661/2012A 6 OF 7

0 5 10 miles

NORTH

New

Mexico

25

Albuquerque

Sandia

Mountain

Wilderness

Cibola

National

Forest

Sandoval County

Sandoval County

Bernalillo County

Torrance County

Santa Fe County

Ortiz

Mountains

Santa Fe

National

Forest

Bandelier

National

Monument

Bandelier

Santa Fe

National

Forest

Section 6 of 7

United States Department of the Interior

National Park Service

Bureau of Land Management

Auto Tour Route

High-Potential Historic Sites

El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro

National Historic Trail

Auto Tour Route

High-Potential Historic Site

R oi Grande

New Mexico

Mexico

Texas

Santa Fe

Albuquerque

El Paso Ciudad

Juarez

25

285

84

313

Pueblo

Santo Domingo

Cochiti

Pueblo

Pueblo

San Felipe

Coronado

State

Monument

Santa

Ana

Pueblo Bernalillo

Sandia Pueblo

Alameda

Los

Ranchos

de

Albuquerque

El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro

National Historic Trail

Map 3F

Taos BLM Field Office

Albuquerque BLM Field Office
EXHIBIT 4.52






                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


$8,720.02                  Milpitas, California                  August 16, 2000



For value received, ADATOM.com, Inc., promises to pay Sri Jagannathan the sum of
Eight  Thousand  Seven Hundred  Twenty  dollars and two cents  ($8,720.02)  with
interest at the rate of Ten  Percent  per annum  (10%)  until  paid.  Any unpaid
interest  will  become  part  of  the  principal.   Interest  payable  quarterly
commencing  on September  30, 2000.  Principal of Eight  thousand  Eight hundred
Twenty Seven dollars and Fifty-three  cents ($8,827.53) is due in one payment on
September  30, 2000.  Principal may be paid in whole or in part prior to the due
date without penalty or premium.

Should  default be made in payment of principal  and/or  interest  when due, the
whole sum of principal and interest shall become  immediately due, at the option
of the  holder of the note.  If action be  instituted  on this  note,  The maker
promises to pay such sum as a Court may fix as attorney's fees.






Adatom.com, Inc.

By: /s/ MICHAEL M. WHEELER
    -----------------------
        Michael M. Wheeler
        Controller





                                      E-50
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Elementary Secondary EducationHomeworkMathematics InstructionParent ParticipationParents as Teachers

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
#### S. Eugene Newcomb, Respondent, v. H. Joseph Buddington, Sole Survivor, etc., Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vail Banks, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter G. Williston,
Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Peter G. Williston
Peter G. Williston
Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
May 7, 2003