alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 9A

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY

In connection with the annual report of TransGlobe Energy
  Corp. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December
  31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the Report), I, Ross G. Clarkson, Chief Executive Officer of the
  Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

s/s Ross Clarkson

Name: Ross G. Clarkson
  Title: Chief Executive Officer 
  May 14, 2004

---

EXHIBIT 9B

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY

In connection with the annual report of TransGlobe Energy
  Corp. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December
  31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the Report), I, David C. Ferguson, Chief Financial Officer of the
  Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

s/s/ David Ferguson

Name: David C. Ferguson
  Title: Chief Financial Officer 
  May 14, 2004

---
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT

In connection with the annual report of TransGlobe Energy
Corporation (the Registrant) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, David C. Ferguson, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and                      
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                    
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Registrant.

|/s/ David
      Ferguson       | 
|------------------------------ | 
|Name: David C. Ferguson        | 
|Title: Chief Financial Officer | 
|March 15, 2012                 | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule
13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the
Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 40-F to which it
relates, is not to be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
and is not to be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 40-F), except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates
it by reference.

---
#            

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (R)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-109182

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  495                                                                   Trade Date:  10/18/04

(To Prospectus Supplement dated November 6, 2003 &

  Prospectus dated October 15,2003)                                                              Issue Date:   10/21/04

The Date of this Pricing SupplementOctober 18, 2004

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                                   Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                   Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment     Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)   Maturity  Public (2) Commissions       Frequency       Option  Yes/No     record dates)

14911QWQ0  4.10%        04/15/12        100%                1.25%                 Monthly                       YES         NO                                                                                                                                        

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Principal                                                                                 1st Payment             Day         

Amount                  Proceeds                  Dealer                           Date                   Count

$710,000.00            $701,125.00            ABN AMROInc.        11/15/04               30/360    

Original Issue DiscountNote:                                                                          Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                  N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (R) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (R) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $200.251 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (R) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (R) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated October 15,2003.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
From: morton4vtrep@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:11:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Richard Morton

Brattleboro, VT 05301
No. 160, Misc.

#### Mendenhall *v.*Texas et al.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. Certiorari denied.
<page>			            EXHIBIT 32.02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Cornerstone
Fund III (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Kevin Perry,
Chief Financial Officer, Demeter Management Corporation, the
general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.








By:	  /s/	Kevin Perry

Name:		Kevin Perry
Title:	Chief Financial Officer

Date:		March 31, 2005
#### Sarah T. Cross, Appellant, v. James W. Brooks, Respondent.

Order offirmed, without costs.
No. 369.

#### Perricone et ux. *v.*New Jersey et al.

*Hayden C. Covington*for petitioners.

Supreme Court of New Jersey. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.66
JOINDER AGREEMENT
January 5, 2016
Sovereign Co-Invest II, LLC (“Co-Invest II”) is executing and delivering this Joinder Agreement pursuant to Section 5.07(c) of the Second Amended and Restated Stockholders’ Agreement, dated as of February 6, 2015, by and among Sabre Corporation (“Sabre”) and the stockholders of Sabre who are party thereto (the “Stockholders’ Agreement”) in connection with the distribution by Sovereign Co-Invest, LLC (“Co-Invest”) of 7,984,086 shares of Sabre common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), to Co-Invest II pursuant to the terms of the amended and restated limited liability company operating agreement of Co-Invest.      
By executing and delivering this Joinder Agreement to the Stockholders’ Agreement, Co-Invest II hereby adopts and approves the Stockholders’ Agreement and acknowledges, agrees and confirms, effective commencing on the date hereof, to be bound by and to comply with all of the terms, provisions and conditions of the Stockholders’ Agreement, and that its shares of Common Stock be subject thereto, in the same manner as if Co-Invest II was an original signatory to the Stockholders’ Agreement.
This Joinder Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to the conflicts of law principles thereof. This Joinder Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts (including counterparts submitted via facsimile or email), each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but each of which together shall constitute one and the same document.
[Signature Page Follows]


	
			
	 
	 
	 












Accordingly, as of the date first written above, the undersigned has executed and delivered this Joinder Agreement.
SOVEREIGN CO-INVEST II, LLC
By:  Sovereign Manager Co‐Invest, LLC, 
      its managing member
		
	By: /s/ Clive Bode
	 
 Name:     Clive Bode 
 Title:  Vice President    








	
	
	[Signature Page to Joinder Agreement – Stockholders’ Agreement]












Acknowledged and Accepted:


SABRE CORPORATION




By: /s/ Chris Nester    
Name:  Chris Nester
Title:  Senior Vice President               
     and Treasurer




	
	
	[Signature Page to Joinder Agreement – Stockholders’ Agreement]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

June 25, 2012

h0618

Order 

June 25, 2012

144146

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144146

COA: 301833

Wayne CC: 95-002061-FC

P. J. KENNETH JEFFERSON, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 5, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Twelfth Court of Appeals 1517 West Front St., Ste 354 Tyler, Texas 75702

RE: No. 12-14-00332-CV Robert C. Morris vs. Sherri Milligan, Et Al T/C No- 349-6270
Dear Court Clerk, June 18, 2015 FILED INCOURTOFAPPEALS 12thCourtofAnpealsDistrict 

# mnl^ TYLERTEXAS 

### CATHYS. LUSK, CLERK 

### I amwriting to inquire if the attorney for the Appellee's has filed his appeal Brief, as of this date. I beleive the deadline for filing has passed and I have not 

### recieved any notice for an extension of time to file or a copy of the appellate brief he filed, if he has filed oneCould you please inform me if the Appellee's have filed an Appellate Brief, what date, or if the Appellee's have filed for an extensionof time? 

### Thank you for your time andassistance in this matter, it is greatly appreciated and welcomed. Sincerely,

cc: file Morris Appellant Pro Se TDCJ-ID | 1311083 Smith Unit 1313 CR 19 Lamesa, Texas 79331
No. 542.

#### Western Air Lines, Inc., *v.*City and County of San Francisco.

*Hugh W. Darling*for petitioner.

*Thomas M. O’Connor, Robert M. Desky*and *Harold C. Faulkner*for respondent.

District Court of Appeal

of California, First Appellate District. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T B AN QU O D . YO UN G, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. J OE MC GR AT H, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 08- 16021 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 3 - c v - 0 1 6 7 4 - M CE ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M orr i s on C . E ngl a nd, D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. B a nquo D . Y oung appe a l s f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s or de rde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. P ur s ua ntt o A n de rs v . Ca lifo rn ia , 386 U . S . 738 (196 7), Y ou ng ’ s c ou nsel has f i l ed a bri ef

st at i ng there ar e no g roun ds for r el i ef w ith r e g a r dto th e c e rtif ie dis s u e a n dam o tio n to w ith d r a w a s c o u n s e l o f r e c o r d . 

# FI LED SEP 29 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 16021 2 W e have provi ded the appel l antw i th the op po rtun i ty t o fi l e apro se s up pl em ent al b r i e f a n dwe h a v e c o n s i d e r e dh i s No v e m b e r1 9 , 2 0 0 8 i n f o rm a l b r i e f

. No a ns w e r i ng br i e f

ha s be e n f

i l e d. T he st at e c ou rt ’ s det erm i nat i on of the i ss ue ce rt i fi ed for app ea l , that suff i ci entevi dence w as pres ent ed atY ou ng ’ s tri al t o sup po rthi s c on vi ct i on s, w as no tcontraryt o, no r i nv ol ved an u nrea sonabl e app l i ca t i on of, cl earl y e st abl i shed f e d e r a l la w . See 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 4 ( d ) ; J a c k s o n v . V ir g in ia , 443 U . S . 307, 319 ( 1979) . O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the r e c or d pur s ua ntt o P e n s o n v . O h io , 4 8 8 U . S . 7 5 , 8 0 -8 1 (1 9 8 8 ), d i scl o ses n o arg u ab l e g ro u n d s fo r rel i ef. A cco rd i n g l y, w e d e n yc o u n s e l’s r e q u e s t to e x p a n dth e c e rtif ic a te o f ap p e a lab ility . See 9th C i r. R . 2 2 - 1 ( e ) ; s e e al

s o Hi i v ala v . W

ood , 19 5 F . 3d 10 98 , 11 04 -05 (9th C i r. 19 99 ) ( per curi am ). W e c on strue the du e proces s argum ent s i n Y ou ng ’ s pro se supp l em ent al br i e f a s am ot i on t o e xpa nd the c e rt i f i c a t e of appe a l abi l i ty . S o c ons true d, the m o tio n is d e n ie d . See id . C o u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED , an dth e d istrict co u rt’s j u d g m en ti s A FFI R M ED .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5                                           EXHIBIT 27
<MULTIPLIER>1000
       
<S>                               <C>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                    11,074
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             40,282
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 590
<INVENTORY>                                               30,284
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          87,887
<PP&E>                                                    35,787
<DEPRECIATION>                                            16,851
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           140,914
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                     52,892
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                     137
<OTHER-SE>                                              (111,947)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             140,914
<SALES>                                                  102,551
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         102,551
<CGS>                                                     49,620
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             42,857
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         9,855
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            3,352
<INCOME-TAX>                                               1,923
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        1,429
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                               1,429
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                .15
        

</TABLE>
From: jerry.venable@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:47:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jerry Venable

Glendale, AZ 85310