alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: ankalways135@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:28:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Amber Olney

Bourbonnais, IL 60914
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1367 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 253
110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1367

                          [Report No. 110-768]

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2008

    Mr. Welch of Vermont, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

    Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the legislative 
day of Thursday, July 24, 2008, for the Speaker to entertain motions 
that the House suspend the rules relating to the bill (H.R. 6578) to 
provide for the sale of light grade petroleum from the Strategic 
Petroleum Reserve and its replacement with heavy grade petroleum.
                                                 House Calendar No. 253

110th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1367

                          [Report No. 110-768]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 23, 2008

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Exhibit 10.22 - First Amendment OFK






FIRST AMENDMENT TO
CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT


This First Amendment to Change in Control Agreement (this “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of December 19, 2012, between Shiloh Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) and Owen F. Kline (the “Executive”).
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive are party to that certain Change in Control Agreement, dated as of August 25, 2011 (the “Agreement”);
WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein in order to cause the Agreement to comply with Code Section 409A; and
WHEREAS, capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.
AGREEMENT
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1.    Section 2(c) of the Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows:


“(c)  Severance Payment. For all purposes under this Agreement, upon the Executive becoming eligible for the Severance Payment as provided above, the Company shall pay to the Executive a lump sum in cash equal to the sum of (i) 1.5 times the Executive's annual base salary at the time of (A) the Change in Control or (B) separation from service, whichever is higher, plus (ii) 1.5 times the Executive's target bonus for the fiscal year in which the Change in Control or separation from service occurs, whichever is higher, on the sixtieth day following the effective date of the Executive's separation from service (the “Payment Date”).”
 
2.    Section 2(h) of the Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows:


“(h)    Conditions. All payments and benefits provided under this Section 2 are conditioned on the Executive's continuing compliance with this Agreement (including, but not limited to Section 4 hereof) and any other agreement between the Company and the Executive, and the Executive's execution (and effectiveness) of a release of claims and covenant not to sue substantially in the form provided in Exhibit A upon termination of employment (the “Release”).  If the Company does not receive an executed Release and the revocation period for such Release has not expired prior to the Payment Date, the Company shall have no obligation to make payments and pro rate benefits under Section 2(a)-(c) and Section 2(f).”
3.    This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.  


4.    Other than this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed and delivered as of the date first set forth above.
SHILOH INDUSTRIES, INC.




By:                    
Name: Ramzi Hermiz
Title: President and CEO






______________________________
Owen F. Kline
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Coupon | Interest | Maturity | Callable | Survivor's Option | Price | CUSIP |   |
| 2.125% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 11/15/2022 | No | Yes § | 100.00 | 14912HQA1 |   |
From: san12tex@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:16:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

sandra cervi

Porter, TX 77365
No. 62710.

#### Quality Importers, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 208027-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the collector’s reports, received in evidence at the trial, shows that duty and internal revenue tax were assessed on certain missing merchandise. Following *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Diversity (Student)Elementary Secondary EducationEthnicityFamily CharacteristicsFoster ChildrenHomosexualityParent ParticipationRacial DifferencesSocial Support GroupsTeaching MethodsUrban Schools

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<CIK>               0001036262
<NAME>              INTEST CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

       

<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                    12,513
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                              4,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                 144
<INVENTORY>                                1,830
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          18,758
<PP&E>                                     1,335
<DEPRECIATION>                               873
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            20,629
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      2,960
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                      59
<OTHER-SE>                                17,610
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              20,629
<SALES>                                    5,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           5,626
<CGS>                                      2,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1,756
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            1,822
<INCOME-TAX>                                 668
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        1,154
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                               1,154
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .19
<FN>
<F1>EPS - PRIMARY AND EPS - DILUTED REFLECT THE IMPACT OF
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS' BOARD STATEMENT NO. 128.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
From: kardolaum@charter.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:54:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Karna Godridge

Hampstead, NC 28443
No. 591.

#### Nelson-Ryan Flight Service, Inc., *v.*Lange, Trustee.

*William D. Donnelly*for petitioner.

*Robert Wm. Rischmiller*for respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota. Certiorari denied.
From: cgparker45@charter.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:51:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Curt Parker

, 63011-1871
From: jcschul@ameritech.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:11:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections.

(Thou shalt not kill!) I strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans

especially for drugs and devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as

ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect and respect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to

being forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services,

especially when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be

forced by the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the

strongest way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of

mandatory preventive services.

Sincerely,

James C. Schul

Dayton, Ohio

Sincerely,

James Schul

Dayton, OH 45440
From: rod.farrington@embarqmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 2:01:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rodney Farrington

Navasota, TX 77868
MICROMUSE INC.



Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each
of the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, in his capacity as an officer of Micromuse Inc. (the Company), that, to his knowledge:



(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: August 9, 2005



By:

/S/ LLOYD A. CARNEYLloyd A. CarneyChairman and Chief Executive OfficerBy:

/S/ IAN HALIFAXIan HalifaxChief Financial Officer




This certification is not deemed
to be filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities
Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.