alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<page>				       EXHIBIT 32.01


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Dean Witter Cornerstone
Fund III (the ?Partnership?) on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the ?Report?), I, Jeffrey A.
Rothman, President, Demeter Management Corporation, the general
partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.








By:	  /s/	Jeffrey A. Rothman

Name:		Jeffrey A. Rothman
Title:	President

Date:		March 31, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Dean
Witter Cornerstone Fund II and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      29,949,571
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  107,373<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,113,096<F2>
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,113,096<F3>
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,826,329<F4>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,229,786
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,596,543
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,596,543
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,596,543
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Receivables include interest receivable of $91,948 and due from
DWR of $15,425.
<F2>In addition to cash and receivables, total assets include net unrealized
gain on open contracts of $2,056,152.
<F3>Liabilities include redemptions payable of $173,375, accrued management
fees of $106,613, accrued administrative expenses payable of $22,428, and
accrued incentive fees of $413,951.
<F4>Total revenue includes realized trading revenue of $5,592,885, net
change in unrealized of $52,473 and interest income of $1,180,971.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
From: ruznarsr1withGOD@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:19:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert Reuzenaar

Lafayette, IN 47905
No. 170, Misc.

#### Morris *v.*Taylor.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Third Supreme Judicial District. Certiorari denied.
From: oneeye367@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:31:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Vincent Barone

Brooklyn, NY 11223
#### Hannah P. Frey, Respondent, v. The American Exchange National Bank, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Brady, J.
#### Clara A. Abbey, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.;

Barker, J., not sitting.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1085

In re: JOHN DOE,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:01-cr-00027-M-1)

Submitted: March 21, 2023 Decided: March 24, 2023

Before WYNN and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Doe, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1085 Doc: 10 Filed: 03/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

John Doe petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly 

delayed in ruling on his motions for relief under the First Step Act. He seeks an order from 

this court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay 

in the district court. Accordingly, while we grant Doe leave to proceed by pseudonym, we 

deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1085 Doc: 10 Filed: 03/24/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1378 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1378

  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to authorize and 
direct the Speaker to issue rules permitting the display outside of the 
  offices of Members, Delegates, and the Resident Commissioner in the 
   House office buildings of tributes to members of the Armed Forces 
      killed in United States engagements in Iraq or Afghanistan.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 24, 2008

 Mr. Jones of North Carolina submitted the following resolution; which 
                 was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to authorize and 
direct the Speaker to issue rules permitting the display outside of the 
  offices of Members, Delegates, and the Resident Commissioner in the 
   House office buildings of tributes to members of the Armed Forces 
      killed in United States engagements in Iraq or Afghanistan.

    Resolved, That rule I of the Rules of the House of Representatives 
is amended by adding at the end the following new clause:
``Rules respecting displays
    ``13. The Speaker is authorized and directed to issue rules 
permitting the display outside of the offices of Members, Delegates, 
and the Resident Commissioner in the House office buildings of tributes 
to members of the Armed Forces killed in United States engagements in 
Iraq or Afghanistan. Any such tribute outside of the office of any 
Member, Delegate, or the Resident Commissioner may remain there until 
such rules are issued.''.
                                 <all>
```
From: jobett67@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:14:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Betty Van Slycke

Olney, MD 20832
----

**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY**

 In connection with the annual report of TransGlobe Energy  Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December  31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof  (the “Report”), I, David C. Ferguson, Chief Financial Officer of the  Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1.  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of        section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       |
|--------|----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |     |                                                                                                                                                               |
|   | 2.  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations        of the Company. |

*s/s/ David Ferguson*Name: David C. Ferguson   Title: Chief Financial Officer  November 19, 2004 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.3

                           CERTIFICATION OF TREASURER

I, Robert F. Aufenanger, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Excelsior Private
Equity Fund II, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: September 15, 2003

/s/ Robert F. Aufenanger
------------------------
Robert F. Aufenanger, Treasurer
From: pastorsteve@pppbc.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:14:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Steve Turrentine

Colorado Springs, CO 80916
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1300 

Supporting efforts to raise awareness, improve education, and encourage 

research of inflammatory breast cancer. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2008 

Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York (for herself and Mrs. EMERSON) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting efforts to raise awareness, improve education, 

and encourage research of inflammatory breast cancer. 

Whereas inflammatory breast cancer is a rare but very aggressive type of breast cancer in which the cancer cells 

block the lymph vessels in the skin of the breast; 

Whereas inflammatory breast cancer accounts for between 1 

and 6 percent of all breast cancer cases in the United 

States; 

Whereas inflammatory breast cancer is more common than 

acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children; 

Whereas inflammatory breast cancer may have environmental 

causes; 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1300 IH 

Whereas inflammatory breast cancer is particularly difficult 

to detect because the early signs of breast cancer, such 

as a breast lump or suspicious area on a routine screening mammogram, are rarely present in inflammatory 

breast cancer; 

Whereas inflammatory breast cancer tends to affect women 

at a younger age than most breast cancers; 

Whereas black women are more likely to have inflammatory 

breast cancer than white women; 

Whereas inflammatory breast cancer is more likely to have 

metastasised at the time of diagnosis than noninflammatory breast cancer cases; 

Whereas the 5 year survival rate for patients with inflammatory breast cancer is between 25 and 50 percent, 

which is significantly lower than the survival rate for patients with noninflammatory breast cancer; 

Whereas the incidence rate for inflammatory breast cancer is 

on the rise, and the cause of this increase is unknown; 

Whereas organizations such as the Inflammatory Breast Cancer Foundation are working to increase awareness of the 

disease in the public and medical communities; 

Whereas the MD Anderson Cancer Center at the University 

of Texas is among one of the only facilities in the country 

to have a clinic specifically dedicated to inflammatory 

breast cancer; and 

Whereas many physicians remain unaware of inflammatory 

breast cancer and diagnosis is frequently delayed due to 

a lack of knowledge in both the lay and medical communities: Now, therefore, be it 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1300 IH 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the Federal Government has a responsi3 bility to— 

4 (1) endeavor to raise awareness and improve 

5 education about inflammatory breast cancer; 

6 (2) encourage the American Medical Associa7 tion to take steps to immediately increase awareness 

8 of inflammatory breast cancer among physicians; 

9 (3) encourage research that will improve treat10 ments for inflammatory breast cancer; and 

11 (4) continue to consider ways to improve access 

12 to information on inflammatory breast cancer for 

13 both doctors and patients. 

Æ 


jbell on PROD1PC69 with BILLS