alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OoKS

TRACTOR ~—snceisas SINGE 19445

www.broockstractor.com
August 12, 2010

The Honorable Phyllis Borzi, Assistant Secretary
Employee Benefits Security Administration

U.S. Department of Labor

Washington, D.C. 20210

Attn: RIN 1210-AB42

’ The Honorable Jay Angoff, Director
Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Washington, D.C. 20201
File Code: OCIIO-9991-IFC.

Re: Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status asa Grandfathered Health: J
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Position: Modifications to a Plan’s Provider Network or Self-funded Status Should Not Affect Grandfather Status
Dear Ms. Borzi and Mr. Angoff:

On behalf of Brooks Tractor Inc., | am writing to ask you to give employers and health plans the flexibility necessary to
focus on delivering high-value health care through their provider networks and urge you not to subject plans to increased
regulations if they opt to self-fund their health benefits.

We have been self funding our benefit plan for almost 4 years and believe it is critical in providing quality, safe health care
for our employees, while giving us some power to negotiate reasonable charges based on performance. Without the
unencumbered ability to remove a provider from the network because of low performance or higher than average costs we
are not able to do our part in achieving a high value health system. We provide health benefits to our employees because
we care about their wellbeing and the wellbeing of their families. Those, and the fact that self funded employers have a
significant financial stake in the health of their employees, are the reasons you have seen a strong commitment to quality,
safety and weliness initiatives from self-funded employers. The best way to ensure these efforts continue is to ensure that
there is a return on these investments — both for us as the plan sponsor and for our enrollees. By subjecting self-funded
plans to additional regulations you will discourage employers from self funding. which is likely to negate any e} ‘
investment gained over the past several years.

A number of provisions in the Patient Protection ai

Thank you for your consideration of these comments. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. -

Sincerely, ya
K

Mary Kay Brook:
General Man

ie: 1900 W. MAIN ST. ~ P.O. Box 9 ~ Sun Prairie, 53590 ~ 608/837-5141 ~ Fax: 608/837-4012
JOHN DEERE Milwaukee 414/462-9790  DePere 920/336-5711 WestSalem 608/786-2644 HITACHI
# U.S. General James Mattis consults with Oman leaders

/ Published Oct. 19, 2011

MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla (October 18, 2011) — The Commander of U.S. Central Command Gen. James Mattis departed Oman yesterday after visiting with senior Omani military and security officials as part of a regularly scheduled visit with partner nations in the region.

Mattis visited with Lt Gen Ahmed bin Harith al Nabhani, Chief of Staff of the Sultan’s Armed Forces (SAF), and other senior defense officials to gain their appreciation of regional issues and to discuss issues of security cooperation.

The visit is the third visit that Mattis has made to the country since taking command of CENTCOM just over a year ago.
From: Mary Cassleman

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:23:21 AM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. The HHS ruling requires provision of

free Group 1 carcinogens for women in the form of oral contraceptives. The

International Agency for Research on Cancer, an arm of the World Health

Organization, lists estrogen-progestogen oral contraceptives among 106 other deadly

substances like arsenic, asbestos, and tobacco on its most dangerous list of

substances-those classified as "carcinogenic to humans."

The deadly effects of contraception on babies, women, the environment, and

marriages are well documented.

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.This flies in the face

of the conscience protections that Americans have historically enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.
Sincerely,

Mary Cassleman

Spring Lake, Michigan
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Home
  MEDIA
  NEWS ARTICLES
  News Article View
 Download
 Details
 Share
 Download
 Details
 Share
 News
 USCENTCOM conference targets the hybrid threat U.S. Central Command Public Affairs
 
 SHARE
 PRINT
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### George C. Genet, Appellant, v. The City of Brooklyn, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.;

Pratt, J., not sitting.
**Exhibit 31.1**SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATIONCERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERI, Robert A. Ortenzio, President and Chief Executive Officer of Select Medical Holdings Corporationand Select Medical Corporation, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Select Medical HoldingsCorporation and Select Medical Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrants’ other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrants, including their consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants’ disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants’internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants’most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrants’ internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants’ other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants’auditors and the audit committee of the registrants’ board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrants’ ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrants’ internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: May 15, 2007   /s/ Robert A. Ortenzio     Robert A. Ortenzio  Chief Executive Officer  Select Medical Holdings Corporation and Select Medical Corporation
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, S. W. Yong, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Trio-Tech
International, a California corporation;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.       The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: September 25, 2003

                             /s/ S. W. YONG
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                             S. W. Yong, Chief Executive
                             Officer and President (principal executive officer)
From: melbissey@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:20:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Melvin Bissey

Kirksville, MO 63501
EXHIBIT 32.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Century Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brad A. Morrice, Vice Chairman, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    BRAD A.
MORRICEBrad A. Morrice Vice Chairman, President and Chief Operating Officer May 7, 2004




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification is being furnished with the Companys Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the
Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.3 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
_________________ 

_________________ 

Cite as: 596 U. S. ____ (2022) 1 

Statement of BREYER, J. 

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

No. 21A632 

CARL WAYNE BUNTION v. BOBBY LUMPKIN, 

DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF 

CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL 

INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, ET AL. 

ON APPLICATION FOR STAY 

[April 21, 2022] 

The application for stay of execution of sentence of death 

presented to JUSTICE ALITO and by him referred to the

Court is denied. 

Statement of JUSTICE BREYER respecting the denial of application for stay. 

This case illustrates a serious legal and practical problem 

with the death penalty as it is currently administered. As 

I have previously noted, Carl Wayne Buntion has been on 

death row under threat of execution for 30 years. Buntion 

v. Lumpkin, 595 U. S. ___ (2021) (statement respecting denial of certiorari). Twenty of those years, he tells us, were

spent in solitary confinement. Id., at ___ (slip op., at 1). We 

have described even four weeks of waiting in prison under

the threat of execution as “one of the most horrible feelings

to which [a person] can be subjected.” In re Medley, 134 

U. S. 160, 172 (1890). Buntion has suffered under such conditions for decades. When efforts to administer the death 

penalty produce results such as this, it raises serious questions about whether that practice complies with the Constitution’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. 

I have expressed concerns about the constitutionality of the 

death penalty in the past, and I am compelled to do so again

in light of the facts and history of Buntion’s case. See, e.g., 
 

2 BUNTION v. LUMPKIN 

Statement of BREYER, J. 

Hamm v. Dunn, 583 U. S. ___ (2018) (statement respecting

denial of application for stay and denial of certiorari); Smith 

v. Ryan, 581 U. S. ___ (2017) (statement respecting denial

of certiorari); Glossip v. Gross, 576 U. S. 863, 908 (2015) 

(dissenting opinion).