alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: deeberdy@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:01:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Deidre Berdy

Sevierville, TN 37876
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of CommScope, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                                    
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------
|By:                     |  | /s/ FRANK M. DRENDEL                               
|                        |  | Frank M. Drendel                                   
|                        |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer               
|                       
|Date:    April 29, 2010
|                        | 
|By:                     |  | /s/ JEARLD L. LEONHARDT                            
|                        |  | Jearld L. Leonhardt                                
|                        |  | Executive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
|                        | 
|Date:                   |  | April 29, 2010
**NIH Office of Extramural Research
        [ Search This Site ]               [ Document Index ]               [ Site Map ]Return To NIH Guide Home Page:     [ Graphical Version ]     [ Text Version ]- December 20  December 13December 6
- November 29  November 22November 15
- November 8  November 1October 25
- October 18  October 11October 4
- September 27  September 20September 6
- August 30  August 16August 9
- August 2  July 26July 19
- July 12  July 5June 28
- June 21  June 14June 7
- May 24  May 17May 10
- May 3  April 26April 19
- April 5  March 29March 22
- March 15  March 8March 1
- February 23  February 16February 9
- February 2  January 26
*Go To OER:     [ Graphical Version ]     [ Text Only Version ]
web posting: 1997/11/10*Webmaster*      *

**
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

SCHEDULE OF CHANGE IN CONTROL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS 

On March 21, 2016, the Registrant entered into a Change in Control Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Samuel L. Hillard, Vice President,
Corporate Development & Strategy. 
 In accordance with the Instructions to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant has omitted filing the
Change in Control Employment Agreement as an exhibit to this Form 10-Q because it is substantially identical to the Form of Change in Control Employment Agreement by and between P. H. Glatfelter Company and certain employees, which is filed as
Exhibit 10 (q) to our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
From: Charleen Gorrell

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Contraception

Date: Friday, August 19, 2011 12:54:59 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine

pertaining to coverage of preventive care for women under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for "religious

employers." These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary

health care. Rejecting the inclusion of contraceptive access would be

treating women as second class citizens.

Thank you

Charleen Gorrell
No. 562.

#### Plisco et al. *v.*United States.

*H. Clifford Allder*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer*and *Joseph M. Howard*for the United States.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
No. 398.

#### Tennessee *v.*Myers et al.

*G. Edward Friar*and *William A. Reynolds*on the petition.

*George F. McCanless,*Attorney General of Tennessee, and *Thomas E. Fox,*Assistant Attorney General, on the motion to dismiss the petition.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Tennessee. The motion of the Attorney General of Tennessee to dismiss the petition for writ of certiorari is granted.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BULLETIN 1052 PLATE 13,
(GEOLOGICAL SUI

a
tie
£
: 5 ooh
5 &
: i
3 ep 2 ad
z cai
Fa e
Fe 5
5 5]
 g- 5
3 8
8 Za
z = s
Eo g
B a a
3 B
FA 2
fo i |
z ° ie
5
A . 1 1 , fl 1 1 rl f 1 =
a Cor oF Oe 0.8 1.0 * 7 7 0.05 OF Os 10 2 s o Ey
RESISTIVITY X SQUARE OF POROSITY, IN OHM-METERS RESISTIVITY X SQUARE OF POROSITY, IN OHM-METERS
(A-CORRELATION BETWEEN POROSITIES AND ELECTRIC-LOG DATA FOR DRILL HOLE SP-25 B.-CORRELATION BETWEEN POROSITIES AND ELECTRIC-LOG DATA FOR DRILL HOLE SP-131
we
on ra
2 5
3 - va 5
= ° =|
A od ager
= =
z
5 } ° 2 ot
rs &
& Ey
zs 2
2 ae
Ed é
2 ° 3
8 g
Pane a ae
=
Fe
5
A f : : 1 1 : 4 fl fi fl 1 fl A
3 oa i + 5 6 % a as 5 2 = J 7% to
RESISTIVITY X SQUARE OF POROSITY, IN OHM-METERS RESISTIVITY X SQUARE OF POROSITY, IN OHM-METERS
C-CORRELATION BETWEEN POROSITIES AND ELECTRIC-LOG DATA FOR DRILL HOLE SP.139 D.-CORRELATION BETWEEN POROSITIES AND ELECTRIC-LOG DATA FOR DRILL HOLE SP-147
a
2 ¢
FA 3
g 3 °
q ba S cof °
z z °
a Fd
3 6
go ce
a 8
2 2
= } . a
i £ i
e e f
3 2 °
z 4 z+ A
4 «
£ is
1 . : . A 1 1 ay
5, oc oF aE 35 6 : = © 2
RESISTIVITY X SQUARE OF POROSITY, IN OHM-METERS RESISTIVITY X SQUARE OF POROSITY, IN OHM-METERS
E.-CORRELATION BETWEEN POROSITIES AND ELECTRIC-LOG DATA FOR DRILL HOLE SP-254 F.-CORRELATION BETWEEN POROSITIES AND ELECTRIC-LOG DATA FOR DRILL HOLE SP-284

CORRELATION OF LABORATORY MEASUREMENTS ON CORES WITH ELECTRIC-LOG DATA

496731 © - 59 (In pocket)
From: Gino Marinelli

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 3:32:38 PM
From: S.Armbruster@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:33:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Stephanie Armbruster

Youngsville, LA 70592
<PAGE>
 
                        COMPANY:  WORLD OF SCIENCE, INC.
                                  TICKER: WOSI
                                 EXCHANGE:  NMS

                                FORM-TYPE:  10-Q
          Exhibit 11.  Statement re Computation of Per Share Earnings


                          FILING-DATE:  June 16, 1998

                                   Exhibit 11

                             WORLD OF SCIENCE, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE NET LOSS
                     (In thousands, except per share data)


                                                            QUARTER ENDED
                                                            -------------
                                        
BASIC LOSS PER SHARE:                               MAY 2, 1998     MAY 3, 1997
                                                    -----------     -----------
 
Net loss                                              $(1,079)       $ (867)
                                                                     
Weighted average common shares outstanding              5,080         3,423
                                                                     
Basic loss per share                                  $ (0.21)       $(0.25)
                                                      =======        ======
 
DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE:
 
Net loss                                              $(1,079)       $ (867)
                                                                     
Weighted average common shares outstanding              5,080         3,423
                                                                     
Diluted loss per share                                $ (0.21)       $(0.25)
                                                      =======        ======
From: gen11njn11@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:09:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Diane Paratore

Aliso Viejo, CA 92656
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT PATRICK KRANAK, Petitioner

v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (US AIRWAYS), Respondents : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 152 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 28th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
No. 622, Misc.

#### Janosko *v.*New York.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Louis J. Lefkowitz,*Attorney General of New York, and *Anthony J. Lokot,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Judicial Department. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 11.1


               Schedule Regarding Computation of Per Share Loss
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

ACTUAL                                     For the Three         For the period          For the Three         For the Nine
                                            Months Ended         February 20, 1996         Months Ended         Months Ended
                                         September 30, 1996   (Date of Incorporation)   September 30, 1997   September 30, 1997
                                                               to September 30, 1996
<S>                                      <C>                  <C>                       <C>                  <C>
Net loss                                   $  (1,216,502)         $   (1,227,800)          $  (1,518,364)       $  (4,738,494)
                                           --------------         ---------------          --------------       --------------
                                           --------------         ---------------          --------------       --------------
Weighted average common 
shares outstanding                               996,586                 939,207               4,672,821            2,412,906
                                           --------------         ---------------          --------------       --------------
                                           --------------         ---------------          --------------       --------------

Net income (loss) per 
common and common equivalent share                $(1.22)                 $(1.31)                  $(.32)              $(1.96)
                                           --------------         ---------------          --------------       --------------
                                           --------------         ---------------          --------------       --------------
</TABLE>
From: wahassociatesinc@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:43:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Wayne & Sue Hertel

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33306
#### Joseph Bushtis, Appellant, *v.*Catskill Cement Company, Respondent.

(Submitted January 20, 1913;

decided January 28, 1913.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 198 N. Y. 548.)
From: mainz05er@charter.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:08:38 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kenneth Peterson, Sr.

, 30265-1377
No. 195.

#### Woods *v.*Illinois.

*Howard T. Savage*for petitioner.

Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP III FOR
TWELVE  MONTHS  ENDED  DECEMBER  31,  1996,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,868,048
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  584,166
<ALLOWANCES>                                   584,097
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,232,409
<PP&E>                                      12,449,443
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,837,777
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,869,221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,311,387
<BONDS>                                      5,431,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,869,221
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,429,043
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,357,211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               142,165
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,315,147
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (928,168)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              3,501,323
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,430,990
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (141.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>