alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Mary C. Powers.

(Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

December, 1911.)

Executors and administrators — Debts and liabilities of the estate: Of estate or of representative — Funeral ■ expenses: Rights and

remedies of creditors and claimants and defenses — To enforce payment of funeral expenses.

It is the duty of the personal representative in the first instance to bury the dead and the expenses thereof are preferential claims. If another bury the dead he may recover the reasonable costs thereof.

*86Payment of funeral expenses may now be enforced under section 2729 of the Code of Civil Procedure if six months have not elapsed since the rejection of the claim by the personal representatives, and the claimant by such rejection is not put to his action within that period.

Proceeding to compel the payment by the administratrix of the-funeral expenses of decedent.

Joseph Fennelly, for petitioner.

Jacob I. Weiner,, for administratrix.

Fowler, S.

This is an application by the assignee of a funeral bill for payment thereof under subdivision 3 of section 2729, Code of Civil Procedure. The application is opposed on the ground '-that the -administratrix rejected the claim, and that thereby the assignee of the claim is put to an action. But the surrogate, since the year 1901, may, under subdivision 3, section 2729, Code of Civil Procedure, fix and determine- the amount due for reasonable funeral expenses incurred, if six months have not elapsed since the rejection of the claim by the personal representatives. Such claims stand upon a special footing in both the old law and the modern law. It is the duty of the administratrix in the first instance to bury the dead, and the-expenses thereof are preferential claims.- If another bury -the dead he may recover the reasonable cos-ts thereof. These are very old principles, established for centuries. 1 Salk. 296; Godolph, Pt. 2, Chap. 26, § 2; Kessler v. Hessen, 19 Abb. N. C. 86; Patterson v. Patterson, 59 N. Y. 574, 582. If the executor or administrator bury the dead with lavish or wanton expenditure this is a devastavit of the estate, and a loss to hiit and not to the creditors, legatees or next of kin of deceased. To recover such expenses of' the administratrix the claimant must always first show that they are reasonable and in accordance with the condition of the estate and the station in life of the deceased. Patterson v. Patterson, 59 N. Y. 583, 584. I have examined the evidence and the claims for the burial. Ho evidence wás given showing any necessity for embalming the body, and I think the person who ordered it *87must incur the expenses thereof, fifteen dollars. So of the charge for porters. I am satisfied that they were the drivers of thé coaches, and I disallow that item, ten dollai-s. It seems to me that in all other respects the undertaker’s hill is reasonable. I grant the application with the exception noted. Submit order.

Judgment.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofIntrusion Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, G. Ward Paxton, Chief Executive Officer of the Companycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| March 29, 2010 | /s/ G. Ward Paxton      |   |
|---------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                | G. Ward Paxton          |
|                | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
#### Abbie Lasher, Appellant, *v.*Thomas F. McDermott, as Executor of Rose Quest, Deceased, Respondent, Impleaded with Others.

*Lasher*v. McDermott, 144 App. Div. 843, affirmed.

(Argued March 29, 1912;

decided April 12, 1912.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 4, 1911, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury and granting a new trial in an action to compel specific performance of an alleged contract by decedent to devise certain property to plaintiff.

*Charles B. Templeton*for appellant.

*Andrew J. Nellis*for respondent.

Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscocic and Collin, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Qof webMethods, Inc. (the Company) for the period endedDecember 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “Report”), I, Mary Dridi, theChief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of theCompany, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:          (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) the information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Mary Dridi       Name: Mary Dridi Title:     Executive Vice President and     Chief Financial OfficerDate: February 14, 2005
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

AUTOLIV, INC. 

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION POLICY 

Effective January 1, 2016 
 The following
shall remain in effect until changed by the Board: 
  

					
	 Annual Base Retainer*
	  			
	 All Non-Employee Directors other than Chairman
	  	$	240,000	  
	 Non-executive Chairman
	  	$	390,000	  
	 Lead Director Annual Supplemental Retainer
	  	$	40,000	  
	 Committee Chair Annual Supplemental Retainers
	  			
	 Audit Committee
	  	$	30,000	  
	 Compensation Committee
	  	$	20,000	  
	 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
	  	$	20,000	  
	 Compliance Committee
	  	$	20,000	  

 Lead Director and Committee Chair retainers will be split and paid in two equal cash payments in each calendar year. 

 

	*The	Annual Base Retainer will be paid in arrears, as follows: 

 Fifty percent (50%) of the applicable Annual
Base Retainer will be paid in cash (the “Cash Payment”). The Cash Payment will be split and paid in two equal payments in each calendar year (each date a “Cash Payment Date”), and will be prorated using the
Proration Factor (as defined below). 
 Subject to share availability under the amended and restated Autoliv, Inc. 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, as the same
may be amended from time to time (the “Plan”), fifty percent (50%) of the applicable Annual Base Retainer will be paid in the form of fully-vested shares of Common Stock (as defined in the Plan) (the “Annual Stock
Grant”) on the date in each calendar year when the Company grants its annual incentives for employees for the coming year (the “Grant Date”, typically in February). The number of shares in the Annual Stock Grant will be
determined by multiplying the Proration Factor by the amount determined by (A) dividing the amount that is fifty percent (50%) of the applicable Annual Base Retainer by the Fair Market Value (as defined in the Plan) of the Common Stock on
the Grant Date, and (B) rounding to the nearest whole number. The Annual Stock Grants will be granted under, and subject to the terms and conditions of, the Plan. 

The “Proration Factor” is a fraction, (a) the numerator of which is the number of full months of service as a non-employee director
during, as applicable, (i) the calendar year immediately preceding the calendar year of the Grant Date or (ii) the 6 month period immediately preceding the 6 month period of the Cash Payment Date and (b) the denominator of which is,
as applicable, (i) 12, as to the Annual Stock Grant or (ii) 6, as to the Cash Payment. 
 Non-employee directors are required to hold shares of
Common Stock granted pursuant to the Annual Stock Grants until he or she has met the ownership requirements set forth in the Autoliv, Inc. Stock Ownership Policy for Non-Employee Directors.
From: Jane Pecsvaradi

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: IOM recommendations pertaining to coverage of preventive care under the new health care law

Date: Thursday, August 18, 2011 8:58:57 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for "religious employers." These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that "religious refusal" exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply

to religiously-run health providers, so Catholic hospitals would be exempt from the coverage requirement,

even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM's recommendations

and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.51 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Exhibit 10.3


 


LEASE AMENDMENT AGREEMENT


 


Between


 


FIDIA FARMACEUTICI S.P.A. with registered office in Abano Terme (PD), via


Ponte della Fabbrica 3/A, Italy, V.A.T. No. 00204260285 (hereinafter "Fidia")


 


and


 


FIDIA ADVANCED BIOPOLYMERS S.r.l. with registered office in Abano Terme


(PD), via Ponte della Fabbrica 3/B, Italy, V.A.T. No. 03641500289 (hereinafter "FAB")


 


(hereinafter jointly referred to as the "Parties" and each one as a
"Party")


 


WHEREAS


 


on December 30, 2009, Fidia and FAB entered into a lease agreement (the "Agreement")
related to the lease of certain Property (as defined in the Agreement);


 


 


Fidia and FAB hereby agree as follows:


 


		1)	Definitions included in the Agreement shall have the same meaning in this Lease Amendment Agreement.



 


		2)	With effect as of September 20, 2010, Annex A to the Agreement is replaced by the revised Annex A attached to this Lease Amendment
Agreement.



 


		3)	With effect as of September 20, 2010, Recital (C) to the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:



 


"the Lessor is the owner of the premises located at Abano Terme (PD),
Via Ponte della Fabbrica 3/A and 3/B, registered with the NCT F. 10 mapp. 632 and NCEU F. 10 mapp. 632, as described
by the extract from the Land Registry and maps as per Annex A hereto and identified as follows (the "Property"):


 


		(1)	portion of the building named F2 ("Building F2 – Maps 0008_59 e 0008_02") per mq 380 for warehouse use;



 


		(2)	portion of the building named "Istituto di Ricerca" (LR1 – Maps 0005 e 0006) for mq 1,174 for laboratories
and production facility Tissue Tech and for mq 1,268 for office (ground floor and first floor);".



 






    	-1-



     

    




 





		4)	With effect as of September 20, 2010:



		a)	the table in Section 3.1, is replaced by the following table:



 





	Area	Mq.	
        Monthly rent/mq

        (Euro)
	
        Monthly rent

        (Euro)

	
        Istituto di Ricerca

        (LR1 - Maps 0005 e 006) - Offices

        Warehouse ("Building F2 –Map 0008_59")
	1,268	14.29	18,119
	373	5.11	1,906
	
        Warehouse

        (“Building F2 – Map 0008_02”)
	7	14.29	100
	Istituto di Ricerca (LR1 - Map 0005)- Research Laboratories	655	17.05	11,168
	Istituto di Ricerca (LR1 - Map 006)- Production facility Tissue Tech	519	17.05	8,849
	Amount	2,822	 	41,042







 


And, b) the total amount in line to of Section 31 from September 20, 2010
is Euro 41,042.


 


 



    	-2-



     

    




 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed or caused this Lease Amendment Agreement
to be executed.


 


Abano Terme, September 20, 2010


 


 


FIDIA FARMACEUTICI S.P.A.


 


By: /s/ Antonio Germani


Antonio Germani, Chief Executive Officer


 


 


FIDIA ADVANCED BIOPOLYMERS S.R.L.


 


By: /s/ Charles H. Sherwood, Ph.D.


Charles Sherwood, President


 




 


 


 


-3-
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 177 (Thursday, September 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 63130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19918]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Justice Programs

[OJP (BJA) Docket No. 1815]


Meeting of the Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor Review Board

AGENCY: Office of Justice Programs (OJP), Bureau of Justice Assistance 
(BJA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an announcement of a meeting (via WebEx/conference 
call-in) of the Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor Review Board to 
consider nominations for the 2022-2023 Medal of Valor, and to make a 
limited number of recommendations for submission to the U.S. Attorney 
General to be cited. Additional issues of importance to the Board may 
also be discussed.

DATES: October 12, 2023, 12:30 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. EDT.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held virtually using web conferencing 
technology. The public may hear the proceedings of this virtual 
meeting/conference call by registering with Gregory Joy at last seven 
(7) days in advance with Gregory Joy (contact information below).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Joy, Policy Advisor, Bureau of 
Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, by telephone at (202) 
514-1369, or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f6b184939199848fd89c998fb6838592999cd8919980"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="82c5f0e7e5edf0fbace8edfbc2f7f1e6ede8ace5edf4">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor 
Review Board carries out those advisory functions specified in 42 
U.S.C. 15202. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 15201, the President of the United 
States is authorized to award the Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor, 
the highest national award for valor by a public safety officer.
    This virtual meeting/conference call is open to the public to 
participate remotely. For security purposes, members of the public who 
wish to participate must register at least seven (7) days in advance of 
the meeting/conference call by contacting Mr. Joy.
    Access to the virtual meeting/conference call will not be allowed 
without prior registration. Please submit any comments or written 
statements for consideration by the Review Board in writing at least 
seven (7) days in advance of the meeting date.

Gregory Joy,
Policy Advisor/Designated Federal Officer, Bureau of Justice 
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2023-19918 Filed 9-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 4.81


 


 


 





Power of Attorney


 


I, Zhang Jing, a Chinese citizen
with Chinese Identification Card No. 422802198106210042, and a holder of 50% of the entire registered capital in Shenzhen
Tongfu Technology Co., Ltd(the “Company”) (“My Shareholding”), hereby irrevocably authorize E-Sun
Sky Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“WFOE”) to exercise the following rights relating to My Shareholding during the
term of this Power of Attorney:


 


WFOE is hereby authorized
to act on behalf of myself as my exclusive agent and attorney with respect of all matters concerning My Shareholding, including
without limitation to: 1) attend shareholder’s meetings of Company; 2) exercise all the shareholders’ rights and shareholders’
voting rights I am entitled to under the laws of China and Company’s Articles of Association during the shareholders’
meeting, including but not limited to decide on the sale or transfer or pledge or disposition of My Shareholding in part or in
whole and execute relevant legal documents; and 3) designate and appoint on behalf of myself the legal representative, the executive
director, supervisor, the manager and other senior management members of Company.


 


Without limiting the
generality of the powers granted hereunder, WFOE shall have the power and authority under this Power of Attorney to execute the
Transfer Contracts stipulated in Exclusive Option Agreement, to which I am required to be a party, on behalf of myself, and to
effect the terms of the Share Pledge Agreement and Exclusive Option Agreement, both dated the date hereof, to which I am a party.


 


All the actions associated
with My Shareholding conducted by WFOE shall be deemed as my own actions, and all the documents related to My Shareholding executed
by WFOE shall be deemed to be executed by me. I hereby acknowledge and ratify those actions and/or documents by WFOE.


 


WFOE is entitled to
re-authorize or assign its rights related to the aforesaid matters to any other person or entity at its own discretion and without
giving prior notice to me or obtaining my consent.


 


This Power of Attorney
is coupled with an interest and shall be irrevocable and continuously valid from the date of execution of this Power of Attorney,
so long as I am a shareholder of Company.


 


This Power of Attorney
is written in Chinese and English; in case there is any conflict between the Chinese version and the English version, the Chinese
version shall prevail.


 


By: /s/ Zhang Jing


Date: Dec 20, 2015
No. 395.

#### Commissioner of Internal Revenue *v.*Estate of Olsen et al.

The Chief Justice is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer*and *Wayne G. Barnett*for petitioner.

*Leland W. Scott*for respondents.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1288 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 31, 2008.
Whereas college and university campuses are not immune from the crime problems 
        that face the rest of society in the United States;
Whereas a total of 37 homicides, 8,112 forcible-sex offenses, 8,923 aggravated 
        assaults, and 3,071 cases of arson were reported on college and 
        university campuses from 2004 to 2006, in accordance with the reporting 
        requirements under the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy 
        and Campus Crime Statistics Act (20 U.S.C. 1092(f); Public Law 89-329);
Whereas criminal experts estimate that between \1/5\ and \1/4\ of female 
        students become the victim of a completed or attempted rape, usually by 
        someone they know, during their college careers, but fewer than 5 
        percent report the assault to law enforcement;
Whereas each year, 13 percent of female students enrolled in an undergraduate 
        program at a college or university will be victims of stalking;
Whereas 1,700 college and university students between the ages of 18 and 24 die 
        each year from unintentional alcohol-related injuries, including motor 
        vehicle accidents;
Whereas Security On Campus, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as ``SOC''), a 
        national nonprofit group dedicated to promoting safety and security on 
        college and university campuses, has designated September as National 
        Campus Safety Awareness Month;
Whereas each September since 2005, SOC has partnered with colleges and 
        universities across the United States to offer National Campus Safety 
        Awareness Month educational programming on sexual assault, alcohol and 
        other drug abuse, hazing, stalking, and other critical campus safety 
        issues; and
Whereas National Campus Safety Awareness Month provides an opportunity for 
        entire campus communities to become engaged in efforts to improve campus 
        safety: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Campus Safety 
        Awareness Month; and
            (2) encourages colleges and universities throughout the United 
        States to provide campus safety and other crime awareness and prevention 
        programs to all students throughout the year.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 129 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      February 6, 2007.
    Resolved,  That Lorraine C. Miller of the State of Texas, be, and is hereby, 
chosen Clerk of the House of Representatives, effective February 15, 2007; and 
That Daniel P. Beard of the State of Maryland be, and is hereby, chosen Chief 
Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives, effective February 15, 
2007.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```