alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,670,843
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  317,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      32,782,941
<DEPRECIATION>                            (14,661,016)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,931,225
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     22,514,175
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,420,978)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,931,225
<SALES>                                      6,434,691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,567,317
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,365,998
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             328,399
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,127,080)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,127,080)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,127,080)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will be held via teleconference.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, October 11, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4110.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects Committee will be held Wednesday, October 11, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Antoinette Ross. For more information please contact Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4110, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda includes a committee discussion involving Expand VITA Programs that Service International Taxpayers; Video Conference Calls for US Taxpayers; IP Pin Letter for Overseas Taxpayers; Estate Gift Tax; Provide Clarity on Free File Pricing Under                     *IRS.gov;*                     Form 706 Estate Gift Tax Forms and Instructions; and Tax Practioners Revealing Their PII.                

Dated: September 6, 2023.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2023-19747 Filed 9-12-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Order issued October 19, 2012

In The

Court of Appeal 

Bi trict of at Balla 

No. 05-11-00600-CV

BALDEV SINGH, HARMISH KAUR, WAHE GURU ONE, LLC,

AND SUBZI MANDI TEXAS, LLC, Appellants

HARVINDER SINGH AND RASPAL SINGH NIJJAR, Appellee

ORDER

The Court has before it the October 18, 2012 motion of appellants Baldev Singh, Harmish

Kaur, and Subzi Mandi Texas, LLC to substitute counsel. We GRANT the motion. The Clerk

of the Court is DIRECTED to remove John Reeder as counsel of record for the previously

named appellants and to substitute the following as lead counsel in his place:

Eric J. Chartan

Mohomad Said

Law Firm of Modjarrad & Abusaad

100 N. Central Expwy., Suite 1000

Richardson, TX 75080

John Reeder shall remain attorney of record for appellant Wahe Guru One, LLC, until a

motion to substitute counsel is filed on its behalf.

Submission of this case will not be delayed by appellants’ substitution of new counsel,

and the case will be submitted on the briefs currently on file.

MOLLY

PRESIDING JUSTICE
#### John S. Stubbs and another, Appellants, v. Edward C. Ripley and others, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinión by

Daniels, J.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MICHAEL E. DUZENSKI,

Petitioner

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent

______________________

2024-1927

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. CH-0752-22-0043-I-1.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the parties’ joint stipulation of 

voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 42(b),

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The stay is lifted, and the appeal is voluntarily dismissed.

Case: 24-1927 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 08/28/2024
2 DUZENSKI v. MSPB

(2) The parties shall bear their own costs.

August 28, 2024

 Date

FOR THE COURT

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 28, 2024

Case: 24-1927 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 08/28/2024
From: david.haney@lifeway.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:53:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

david haney

, 37216-2924
From: Elaine Hertel

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: PPACA

Date: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 9:16:22 PM

PPACA must contain

reasonable conscience protections for all Americans,

not just for “religious employers.”

Elaine Hertel
._ 756 

. . 

; 

i 

OFFICE OF THE AITORNEY GENERAL OF ‘TEXAS 

k AUSTIN 

c- 


co\mtg V8r 

ooxtaaeu to 

, l t a., !b8&'OLU%St8, i@ 

Chapter 1, Tltlb 13, Revised 

StPtUta8 lO~(YoW #apW 8, Title 88, R. 84 1999.) 

CFO-8 

-1,. 

8# 

c.c.A 

c l ,P. r iib 8On 

Aacistult 

,. 

,
EXHIBIT 10.23

SCHEDULE TO EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE AGREEMENT

The following is a list of our senior executive officers who are party to an Executive Severance Agreement, the form of which was filed as Exhibit 10.2 to
our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002:

Mara
G. Aspinall; Mark R. Bamforth; Earl M. Collier, Jr.; Zoltan A. Csimma; Thomas J. DesRosier; Richard H. Douglas; David D. Fleming; Georges A. Gemayel; James A. Geraghty; John V.
Heffernan; Elliot D. Hillback, Jr.; Alison F. Lawton; Mary McGrane; David J. McLachlan; John M. McPherson; David P. Meeker; C. Ann Merrifield; Richard A. Moscicki; Donald E. Pogorzelski; Alan E.
Smith; Sandford D. Smith; G. Jan van Heek; and Michael S. Wyzga.

We
are a party to Executive Severance Agreements with the executive officers named above, under which payments will be made under certain circumstances following a Change of Control of
the Company (as defined in the Executive Severance Agreements). The Executive Severance Agreements provide that in the event the officer's employment is terminated by the Company Without Cause (as
defined) or by the officer for Good Reason (as defined) following a Change of Control, the Company will make a lump sum severance payment to the officer of up to two times annual salary and bonus.
Upon such termination, the Executive Severance Agreements also provide for (i) a cash payment equal to the additional retirement benefit which would have been earned under the Company's
retirement plans if employment had continued for two years following the date of termination, (ii) participation in the life, accident and health insurance plans of the Company for such period
except to the extent such benefits are provided by a subsequent employer and (iii) in certain circumstances, legal costs and expenses associated with such termination.

---

QuickLinks
SEP 2 on REC 120535)-/0 Page | of |

aii

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS As of: September 02, 2011
BRANCH Received: August 09, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 02, 2011
Tracking No. 80edc3c5

‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0140
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Gregory Donner
Address:
60300 Pembrook Lane
Elkhart, IN, 46517

General Comment

I am adamantly opposed to the new guidelines forcing insurance companies to provide free
preventative health care to women--including contraceptives and pills that may cause abortions.
Without a copayment, the cost of birth control pills and abortifacients will be shared among
everyone in the insurance pool, which also blatantly disregards citizens' right to conscience.

Contraceptives are NOT a medical necessity and pregnancy is NOT a disease. Birth control is
already widely available and publicly funded programs already provide it for women who cannot
afford it.

Religious exemptions should be broadened, as the new guidelines explicitly fail to cover right-to-
life organizations, Catholic hospitals, and Christian radio stations.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000... 9/2/2011
From: hotrains1@optonline.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:34:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Philip Lent

, 06790-3223
No. 499.

#### Baldwin *v.*United States.

*Harry C. Kinne*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, Meyer RothioacJcs*and *John M. Brant*for the United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>
 


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectuses
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 33-57154, 
33-58718, 33-75812, 33-86648, 33-94722, 333-04885 and 333-33255) and in the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 33-4544, 33-53836, 33-74204, 333-04055
and 333-30693) of Identix Incorporated of our report dated July 28, 1998,
appearing on page 35 of this Form 10-K/A.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



San Jose, California 
April 15, 1999
From: dianapinkstock@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:54:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Diana Pinkstock

Newark, OH 43055
# Úradný vestník C 54A/21.

| | ISSN 1977-1037 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 54A |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Ročník 6021. februára 2017 |

ISSN 1977-1037

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 54A

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Ročník 6021. februára 2017

---

| Číslo oznamu | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Oznamy |
| | ADMINISTRATÍVNE POSTUPY |
| | Rada |
| 2017/C 54 A/01 | Predĺženie platnosti zoznamu vhodných kandidátov | 1 |

Číslo oznamu

Obsah

Strana

V   Oznamy

ADMINISTRATÍVNE POSTUPY

Rada

2017/C 54 A/01

Predĺženie platnosti zoznamu vhodných kandidátov

1

---

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

V Oznamy

ADMINISTRATÍVNE POSTUPY

Rada

| 21.2.2017 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | CA 54/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2017

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

CA 54/1

---

Predĺženie platnosti zoznamu vhodných kandidátov

(2017/C 054 A/01)

Na základe rozhodnutia generálneho tajomníka Rady Európskej únie sa predlžuje platnosť zoznamov vhodných kandidátov zostavených po týchto verejných výberových konaniach do 31. decembra 2019.

| CONS/AD/430


  (dva profily) | organizované s cieľom vytvoriť rezervné zoznamy vyšších administratívnych pracovníkov v oblasti európskej bezpečnostnej a obrannej politiky (EBOP). výberové konanie sa týka dvoch profilov v platovej triede AD 9 (profil 1: vyšší pracovníci v oblasti strategického plánovania operácií a misií krízového riadenia); profil 2: vyšší pracovníci v oblasti plánovania rozvoja spôsobilostí vo vojenskej/civilnej/vesmírnej oblasti; oznámenie o tomto výberovom konaní bolo uverejnené v 
  Úradnom vestníku Európskej únie C 178 A z 15. júla 2008. |
| --- | --- |
| CONS-COMM/AD/433 | organizované s cieľom vytvoriť rezervný zoznam na pozíciu vedúceho oddelenia pre preklady v platovej triede AD 12 s írčinou ako prvým jazykom; oznámenie o tomto výberovom konaní bolo uverejnené v 
  Úradnom vestníku Európskej únie C 99 A z 30. apríla 2009. |

CONS/AD/430

(dva profily)

organizované s cieľom vytvoriť rezervné zoznamy vyšších administratívnych pracovníkov v oblasti európskej bezpečnostnej a obrannej politiky (EBOP). výberové konanie sa týka dvoch profilov v platovej triede AD 9 (profil 1: vyšší pracovníci v oblasti strategického plánovania operácií a misií krízového riadenia); profil 2: vyšší pracovníci v oblasti plánovania rozvoja spôsobilostí vo vojenskej/civilnej/vesmírnej oblasti; oznámenie o tomto výberovom konaní bolo uverejnené v 
  Úradnom vestníku Európskej únie C 178 A z 15. júla 2008.

CONS-COMM/AD/433

organizované s cieľom vytvoriť rezervný zoznam na pozíciu vedúceho oddelenia pre preklady v platovej triede AD 12 s írčinou ako prvým jazykom; oznámenie o tomto výberovom konaní bolo uverejnené v 
  Úradnom vestníku Európskej únie C 99 A z 30. apríla 2009.

---
#### John A. Lee, Respondent, v. James M. Whallon, Appellant, Impleaded, etc.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements. Opinions by

Bockes, J. and Learned, P. J.;

Landon, J., not acting.
Exhibit 32

Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

The undersigned, as the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Virginia Financial Group, Inc., respectively, certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006, which accompanies this certification fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Virginia Financial Group, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), and no purchaser or seller
of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification for any purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                 |  |  |  |                                                     
|---------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|November 9, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ O. R. Barham, Jr.                               
|                 |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                 |  | 
|November 9, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Jeffrey W. Farrar                               
|                 |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
From: tiffany mann

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: contraception coverage

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:58:09 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions