alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel Program Project.                    

*Date:*                         October 17, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         11:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dario Dieguez, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Aging, Scientific Review Branch, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue (2W218), Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-3101,                         *dario.dieguez@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 6, 2023.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-19625 Filed 9-11-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
From: conniemboff@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:50:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

constance burke

Naples, FL 34113
From: garylhern@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:52:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

gary hern

Imperial Beach, CA 91932
From: retrospam@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:44:20 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nathan Eckel

Wilmington, DE 19804
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
consolidated  financial  statements  of GFSI Holdings Inc. for the quarter ended
April 2, 1999 and is qualified  in its  entirety by reference to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001036180
<NAME>                        GFSI Holdings Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-02-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         10,036
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  29,250
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    33,835
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               75,956
<PP&E>                                         38,456
<DEPRECIATION>                                 18,835
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          24,992
<BONDS>                                        235,572
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          4,455
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (162,580)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103,931
<SALES>                                        160,229
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               160,229
<CGS>                                          89,533
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  44,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               141
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             18,818
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                7,683
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,129
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            4,554
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,554
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
James Ray JunekAppellee/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 2, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00394

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellant

v.

James Ray JUNEK

, Appelle e

From the County Court at Law, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR14

- 0145

Honorable Susan Harris, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellee’s First Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. Th e

appellant’s brief is due on October 28, 2015.

_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd day of October, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         929,364
<SECURITIES>                                 1,289,519
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,388,240
<ALLOWANCES>                                   375,220
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,557,995
<PP&E>                                       2,543,631
<DEPRECIATION>                                 819,302
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,800,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,343,506
<BONDS>                                          4,953
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,820
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,404,421
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,800,700
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,825,348
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,924,352
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               352,132
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,738
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,027,867
<INCOME-TAX>                                   415,392
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            612,475
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   612,475
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Date:	May 14, 2010

/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 177 (Thursday, September 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63101-63102]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19882]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Notice Announcing New Freedom of Information Act and Critical 
Energy Infrastructure Information Email Addresses

    On October 8, 2023, the Commission will discontinue utilization and 
access of the Commission's email address, for Freedom of Information 
Act (FOIA) requests and Critical Energy Infrastructure Information 
(CEII) requests, foia-<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#086b6d6161486e6d7a6b266f677e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4724222e2e072122352469202831">[email protected]</span></a>. As of

[[Page 63102]]

October 8, 2023, requesters should use the following email addresses:
    1. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a1c7cec8c0e1c7c4d3c28fc6ced7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="50363f393110363522337e373f26">[email protected]</span></a> for FOIA requests; and
    2. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6407010d0d24020116074a030b12"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8deee8e4e4cdebe8ffeea3eae2fb">[email protected]</span></a> for CEII requests.
    The Commission's FOIA and CEII web pages will be updated to reflect 
these changes.
    In addition, the Department of Justice's Office of Information 
Policy, which is responsible for overseeing FOIA compliance, will be 
timely notified of these programmatic changes.
    Please direct questions to Carolyn Templeton, Director--Strategic 
Operations and Special Projects; Office of External Affairs, at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#56353724393a2f387822333b263a33223938163033243578313920"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="335052415c5f4a5d1d47565e435f56475c5d73555641501d545c45">[email protected]</span></a> or at 202-502-8785.

    Dated: September 8, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-19882 Filed 9-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
From: minhngthi@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:02:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Minh Thi

Anaheim, CA 92806
No. 146.

No. 68, Misc.

#### Colorado Anti-Discrimination Commission et al. *v.*Continental Air Lines, Inc.; and Green *v.*Continental Air Lines, Inc.

*Duke W. Dunbar,*Attorney General of Colorado, and *Floyd B. Engeman,*Assistant Attorney General, for petitioners in No. 146.

*T. Raber Taylor*for petitioner in No. 68, Mise.

*Patrick M. Westfeldt*for respondent in both cases.

A memorandum for the United States, as *amicus curiae,*in support of the petitions in both cases was filed by *Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene*and *David Rubin.*Brief of *amici curiae*in support of the petition in No. 146 was filed by *Stanley Mosk,*Attorney General of California, *Howard H. Jewel,*Assistant Attorney General, *Victor D. Sonenberg,*Deputy Attorney General, and *Charles E. Wilson*for the State of California, and *Thomas F. Eagleton,*Attorney General of Missouri, and *James J. Murphy,*Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Missouri.

On petitions for writs of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Colorado. The petition for writ of certiorari in No. 146 is granted. The motion for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*and the petition for writ of certiorari in No. 68, Misc., are also granted and the case is transferred to the appellate docket.
Table of Contents

REVHOLDINGS LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of REV Holdings LLC (the ‘‘Company’’)for the period ended June  30,  2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), I, Ronald O. Perelman, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

/s/ Ronald O.Perelman                        Ronald O.PerelmanChief Executive OfficerAugust 10,2006

----
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 62894]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19747]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects 
Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special 
Projects Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will be 
held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, October 11, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or 
202-317-4110.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects 
Committee will be held Wednesday, October 11, 2023, at 11:00 a.m. 
Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure 
of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with 
Antoinette Ross. For more information please contact Antoinette Ross at 
1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4110, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution 
Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website: 
http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda includes a committee discussion 
involving Expand VITA Programs that Service International Taxpayers; 
Video Conference Calls for US Taxpayers; IP Pin Letter for Overseas 
Taxpayers; Estate Gift Tax; Provide Clarity on Free File Pricing Under 
IRS.gov; Form 706 Estate Gift Tax Forms and Instructions; and Tax 
Practioners Revealing Their PII.

    Dated: September 6, 2023.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2023-19747 Filed 9-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P