Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 20, 2023 / Rules and Regulations 64803 

Airway segment Changeover points 

From To Distance From 

§ 95.8003 VOR Federal Airway Changeover Points 

V245 Is Amended To Delete Changeover Point 

NATCHEZ, MS VOR/DME ................................................ MAGNOLIA, MS VORTAC ............................................... 25 NATCHEZ 

[FR Doc. 2023–20316 Filed 9–19–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation 

and Enforcement 

30 CFR Part 925 

[SATS No. MO–049–FOR; Docket ID: OSM– 

2019–0001; S1D1S SS08011000 SX064A000 

234S180110; S2D2S SS08011000 

SX064A000 23XS501520] 

Missouri AML Plan 

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining 

Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior. 

ACTION: Final rule; approval of 

amendment. 

SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface 

Mining Reclamation and Enforcement 

(OSMRE), are approving an amendment 

to the Missouri Abandoned Mine Land 

Reclamation Fund and Abandoned 

Mine Reclamation and Restoration 

regulations under the Surface Mining 

Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 

(SMCRA or the Act). The amendment 

was submitted in response to two 

executive orders by the Governor of 

Missouri. Each State agency was 

directed to review and amend their 

regulations to ensure that they were 

efficient, effective, and necessary, and to 

significantly reduce the volume of 

regulations. Missouri’s amendments to 

their regulations will replace text to 

improve clarity and remove redundant 

sections already addressed under their 

Abandoned Mine State Reclamation 

Plan or elsewhere in their statutes and 

regulations (hereinafter, the Missouri 

Plan). 

DATES: Effective October 20, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

William Joseph, Chief, Alton Field 

Division, Office of Surface Mining 

Reclamation and Enforcement, 501 Belle 

Street, Suite 216, Alton, Illinois 62002. 

Telephone (618) 463–6460. Email: 

bjoseph@osmre.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background on the Missouri Program 

II. Submission of the Amendment 

III. OSMRE’s Findings 

IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments 

V. OSMRE’s Decision 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Background on the Missouri Program 

The Abandoned Mine Land 

Reclamation Program was established 

by Title IV of the Act (30 U.S.C. 1201 

et seq.) in response to concerns over 

extensive environmental damage caused 

by past coal mining activities. The 

program is funded by a reclamation fee 

collected on each ton of coal that is 

produced. The money collected is used 

to finance the reclamation of abandoned 

coal mines and other authorized 

activities. Section 405 of the Act allows 

States and Tribes to assume exclusive 

responsibility for reclamation activity 

within the State or on Tribal lands if 

they develop and submit for approval to 

the Secretary of the Interior a program 

(often referred to as a plan) for the 

reclamation of abandoned coal mines. 

On the basis of these criteria, the 

Secretary of the Interior approved the 

Missouri Plan effective January 29, 

1982. You can find background 

information on the Missouri Plan, 

including the Secretary’s findings, the 

disposition of comments, and the 

conditions of approval of the Missouri 

Plan in the January 29, 1982, Federal 

Register (47 FR 4253). You can also find 

later actions concerning the Missouri 

Plan and amendments to the Plan at 30 

CFR 925.20 and 925.25. 

II. Submission of the Amendment 

By letter dated March 6, 2019 

(Administrative Record No. MO–685), 

Missouri sent us an amendment to its 

Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation 

Fund and Abandoned Mine 

Reclamation and Restoration regulations 

under SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.) 

on its own initiative. We announced 

receipt of the proposed amendment in 

the May 10, 2019, Federal Register (84 

FR 20597). In the same document, we 

opened the public comment period and 

provided an opportunity for a public 

hearing or meeting on the adequacy of 

the amendment. We did not hold a 

public hearing or meeting because one 

was not requested. We did not receive 

any public comments on the proposed 

amendment. The public comment 

period ended on June 10, 2019. 

III. OSMRE’s Findings 

The following are the findings we 

made concerning the amendment under 

SMCRA and the Federal regulations at 

30 CFR 884. We are approving the 

amendment as described below. 

Missouri Executive Order 17–03 

(January 10, 2017) and Missouri 

Executive Order 18–04 (June 29, 2018) 

directed Missouri State agencies to 

review and revise existing state 

regulations to reduce textual length and 

regulatory burden. Several of Missouri’s 

revisions were proposed in response to 

these Orders. 

Missouri proposed to add more 

specific statutory citations to section 10 

CSR 40–9.010. We find the additional 

citations to be relevant and appropriate 

for inclusion. 

Missouri proposed to replace the 

phrase ‘‘shall include:’’ with 

‘‘includes:’’ in 10 CSR 40–9.010(2) with 

the goal of increasing clarity. We find 

that this change does not alter the 

meaning of the regulation, and therefore 

we approve the change. 

Missouri proposed to revise 10 CSR 

40–9.010 (3) from ‘‘the fund shall be 

used . . .’’ to ‘‘the fund are to be used 

. . .’’ (emphasis added). The State has 

determined that this change provides 

better clarity. OSMRE finds that this 

change does not alter the meaning of the 

regulation, and therefore we approve the 

change. 

Missouri proposed to revise section 

10 CSR 40–9.020(1), replacing ‘‘shall be 

used to offset the cost of reclamation 

. . .’’ with ‘‘are to be used to offset the 

cost of reclamation . . .’’ (emphasis 

added). Missouri further proposed 

changing ‘‘if not required for further 

reclamation . . .’’ to ‘‘if not needed for 

further reclamation . . .’’ (emphasis 

added). Missouri offers these changes in 

the assertion it improves the clarity of 

the regulation. OSMRE finds this does 

not alter the meaning of the regulation 

and approves. 

Missouri proposed to remove 

paragraphs 10 CSR 40–9.020(4) and (5) 

from their regulations entirely. These 

paragraphs address reclamation 

objectives and priorities as well as 

reclamation project evaluation factors. 

Reclamation goals and objectives are 

already included in State law at Mo. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
64804 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 20, 2023 / Rules and Regulations 

Rev. Stat. § 444.915 and in the Missouri 

Plan section titled Goals and 

Objectives—884.13(c)(1), pages C–1–1 

through C–1–6. Reclamation project 

evaluation factors are already addressed 

in the Missouri Plan section Project 

Ranking and Selection—884.13(c)(2), 

pages C–2–1 through C–2–7. We find 

the sections included in the statute and 

Missouri Plan have met the 

requirements of 30 CFR 884.13(c)(1) and 

(2), thereby rendering the referenced 

regulatory paragraphs unnecessary and 

we approve their removal from the 

regulations. 

Missouri proposed to amend 10 CSR 

40–9.030(2)(B) to replace the term 

‘‘general welfare’’ with ‘‘environment’’ 

with the stated goal of aligning with the 

Federal regulation. The Federal 

regulation, however, uses the term 

‘‘general welfare.’’ Nevertheless, we find 

that Missouri’s program remains 

consistent with the Federal regulation 

under the proposed amendment. Even if 

the term ‘‘environment’’ could be 

construed as a term with a more limited 

meaning than ‘‘general welfare,’’ we 

note that Missouri’s statute construes 

entry as an exercise of the police power 

for ‘‘the protection of public health, 

safety, and general welfare . . .’’ Mo. 

Rev. Stat. § 444.925(4). Thus, Missouri’s 

proposed amendment does not make 

Missouri’s program inconsistent with 

the Federal requirements. 

Missouri proposed to change 10 CSR 

40–9.030(2)(c) to replace ‘‘Entry 

required to investigate and explore 

reported emergency conditions will be 

governed by 10 CSR 40–9.030(4)’’ with 

‘‘Entry necessary to investigate and 

explore emergency conditions will be 

governed by 10 CSP 40–9.030(4)’’ 

(emphasis added). Missouri determined 

this change provided increased clarity. 

OSMRE finds this change does not alter 

the meaning of the regulation, and 

therefore we approve the change. 

Missouri proposed to amend 10 CSR 

40–9.030(3)(B)(2) by replacing the term 

‘‘the general welfare’’ with 

‘‘environment.’’ For the reasons stated 

above, we find that Missouri’s proposal 

is consistent with Federal requirements. 

Missouri proposed to change 10 CSR 

40–9.030(3) from ‘‘The owner of the 

land or water resources where entry 

must be made to restore, . . .’’ to ‘‘The 

owner of the land or water resources 

where entry is necessary to restore, 

. . .’’ (emphasis added). Missouri 

determined this change improves the 

clarity of the regulation. OSMRE finds 

the change does not alter the meaning 

of the regulation, and therefore we 

approve the change. 

Missouri proposed to revise 10 CSR 

40–9.030(3)(C) to read ‘‘The notice shall 

be in writing and mailed, return receipt 

requested’’ instead of ‘‘The notice shall 

be requested in writing and shall be 

mailed, return receipt requested’’ 

(emphasis added). The State determined 

removing the second ‘‘shall be’’ 

improved the readability of the 

regulation. OSMRE approves of this 

non-substantive change. 

Missouri proposed to amend 10 CSR 

40–9.040 to add more specific statutory 

citations. OSMRE approves the proposal 

because the additional citations are 

relevant and appropriate. 

Missouri proposed to remove sections 

10 CSR 40–9.040(1)(A)(1), (A)(2), and 

(B) and replace these sections with a 

cross-reference to the State statute: Mo. 

Rev. Stat. § 444.925.1. The information 

contained in the deleted sections is 

included by reference to 30 CFR part 

879 in section C–4–2 of the Missouri 

Plan and in Mo. Rev. Stat. § 444.925. 

The program remains as effective as the 

Federal counterpart regulation by 

including the necessary information by 

reference. Therefore, we approve this 

change. 

In 10 CSR 40–9.040(2), Missouri 

proposed to update the citation 

‘‘Interagency Land Acquisition 

Conference 1973’’ to ‘‘Interagency Land 

Acquisition Conference 2016’’. We 

approve Missouri’s proposal as 

consistent with the Federal requirement 

in 30 CFR 879.12(d). 

Missouri proposed to revise 10 CSR 

40–9.050 to change the citations to the 

State statutes (Mo. Rev. Stat. 

§§ 444.825.5 and 444.825.6) in the 

current regulation to the correct 

citations (Mo. Rev. Stat. §§ 444.925.5 

and 444.925.6). OSMRE approves of this 

correction. 

Missouri proposed to edit 10 CSR 40– 

9.050 to remove paragraphs (1)(B) and 

(1)(C) in their entirety. As background, 

section 407(f) of SMCRA authorizes the 

Secretary of the Interior to ‘‘provide by 

regulation that money derived from the 

lease, rental, or user charges of such 

acquired land and facilities thereon will 

be deposited in the fund.’’ 30 U.S.C. 

1237(f). Federal implementing 

regulations at 30 CFR 879.14 provide: 

‘‘Procedures for collection of user 

charges or the waiver of such charges by 

the OSM, State, or Indian tribe shall 

provide that all user fees collected shall 

be deposited in the appropriate 

Abandoned Mine Reclamation Fund.’’ 

Missouri’s previously approved 

regulations at 10 CSR 40–9.050(1)(B)– 

(C) provide that any user of acquired 

land must be charged a use fee and that 

such use fees will be deposited in the 

fund in accordance with 10 CSR 40– 

9.010. Missouri proposed to continue to 

allow use of acquired land under 10 

CSR 40–9.050(A), which is not proposed 

to be amended, while deleting the 

provisions about user fees in 10 CSR 

40–9.050(1)(B)–(C). Nevertheless, we 

find that Missouri continues to meet the 

requirements of 30 CFR 879.14 because 

a separate provision, 10 CSR 40– 

9.010(2)(B), specifies that monies 

collected by the State from charges for 

uses of acquired or reclaimed lands will 

be treated as revenue to the abandoned 

mine reclamation fund. Therefore, we 

approve this change. 

Missouri proposed to revise 10 CSR 

40–9.050(2)(E) to read, ‘‘All monies 

received from the disposal of land under 

this rule will be de-obligated and 

returned to the office,’’ instead of ‘‘All 

monies received from the disposal of 

land under this rule shall be deposited 

in the abandoned mine land fund.’’ 

‘‘Office’’ is defined in 10 CSR 40.9010(1) 

as OSMRE. More specific details 

outlining this requirement can be found 

in the Missouri Plan contained in 

section 30 C–4–2, which states that the 

provisions of 30 CFR part 879 will be 

followed. 30 CFR 879.15(b)(2)(h), in 

turn, dictates: ‘‘We will handle all 

monies received under this paragraph as 

unused funds in accordance with 

§ 886.20 of this Chapter.’’ We find this 

change to be no less effective than the 

Federal counterpart, and therefore we 

approve the change. 

The State proposed to revise 10 CSR 

40–9.060(1) to remove the word 

‘‘required’’ and replace it with 

‘‘necessary.’’ The State asserts that this 

change improves clarity and complies 

with Executive Order 17–03. OSMRE 

finds this does not alter the meaning of 

the regulation, and therefore we approve 

the change. 

The State proposed to revise 10 CSR 

40–9.060(2) to remove the word 

‘‘require’’ and replace it with 

‘‘necessitates.’’ The State asserts that 

this improves clarity and complies with 

Executive Order 17–03. OSMRE finds 

this does not alter the meaning of the 

regulation, and therefore we approve the 

change. 

Missouri proposed removal of 

‘‘acquired title prior to May 2, 1977 and 

who’’ from 10 CSR 40–9.060(3)(2). 

OSMRE removed this date under a 2008 

amendment to 30 CFR 882.13 (73 FR 

35236). This revision aligns the 

amended language exactly to the 

Federal counterpart; therefore, it is no 

less effective, and we approve the 

change. 

The State proposed to revise 10 CSR 

40–9.060(3) to remove the word ‘‘shall’’ 

and replace it with ‘‘will.’’ The State 

asserts that this improves clarity and 

complies with Missouri Executive Order 

17–03. OSMRE finds this proposal does 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 20, 2023 / Rules and Regulations 64805 

not alter the meaning of the regulation, 

and therefore we approve the change. 

IV. Summary and Disposition of 

Comments 

Public Comments 

We asked for public comments on the 

amendment. As noted in Section II, we 

did not receive any public comments on 

this proposed amendment. 

Federal Agency Comments 

On February 14, 2019, under 30 CFR 

732.17(h)(11)(i), we requested 

comments on the amendment from 

various Federal agencies with an actual 

or potential interest in the Missouri 

program (Administrative Record No. 

MO–685). We did not receive any 

comments. 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

Concurrence and Comments 

Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(ii), we 

are required to get a written concurrence 

from EPA for those provisions of the 

program amendment that relate to air or 

water quality standards issued under 

the authority of the Clean Water Act (33 

U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Clean Air Act 

(42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.). None of the 

revisions that Missouri proposed to 

make in this amendment pertain to air 

or water quality standards. Therefore, 

we did not ask EPA to concur on the 

amendment. However, on February 14, 

2019, under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i), we 

requested comments from the EPA on 

the amendment (Administrative Record 

No. MO–685). The EPA did not respond 

to our request. 

State Historical Preservation Officer 

(SHPO) and the Advisory Council on 

Historic Preservation (ACHP) 

Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(4), we are 

required to request comments from the 

SHPO and ACHP on amendments that 

may have an effect on historic 

properties. On February 14, 2019, we 

requested comments on the Missouri 

amendment (Administrative Record No. 

MO–685). We did not receive comments 

from the SHPO or the ACHP. 

V. OSMRE’s Decision 

Based on the above findings, we are 

approving Missouri’s submittal sent to 

us on March 6, 2019 (Administrative 

Record No. MO–685) because the 

proposed amendments are consistent 

with Federal standards. 

To implement this decision, we are 

amending the Federal regulations, at 30 

CFR part 925, that codify decisions 

concerning the Missouri program. In 

accordance with the Administrative 

Procedure Act, this rule will take effect 

30 days after the date of publication. 

Section 405 of SMCRA requires that 

each State with an abandoned mine 

reclamation program must have an 

approved State regulatory program 

pursuant to Section 503 of the Act. 

Section 503(a) of SMCRA requires that 

the State’s program demonstrate that the 

State has the capability of carrying out 

the provisions of the Act and meeting its 

purposes. SMCRA requires consistency 

of State and Federal standards. 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Executive Order 12630—Governmental 

Actions and Interference With 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights 

This rule would not effect a taking of 

private property or otherwise have 

taking implications that would result in 

private property being taken for 

government use without just 

compensation under the law. Therefore, 

a takings implication assessment is not 

required. This determination is based on 

an analysis of the corresponding Federal 

regulations. 

Executive Orders 12866—Regulatory 

Planning and Review,13563—Improving 

Regulation and Regulatory Review, and 

14094—Modernizing Regulatory Review 

Executive Order 12866, as amended 

by Executive Order 14094, provides that 

the Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs in the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) will review all significant 

rules. Pursuant to OMB guidance, dated 

October 12, 1993, the approval of State 

plan amendments are exempted from 

OMB review under Executive Order 

12866, as amended by Executive Order 

14094. Executive Order 13563, which 

reaffirms and supplements Executive 

Order 12866, retains this exemption. 

Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice 

Reform 

The Department of the Interior has 

reviewed this rule as required by 

Section 3 of Executive Order 12988. The 

Department determined that this 

Federal Register document meets the 

criteria of Section 3 of Executive Order 

12988, which is intended to ensure that 

the agency review its legislation and 

proposed regulations to eliminate 

drafting errors and ambiguity; that the 

agency write its legislation and 

regulations to minimize litigation; and 

that the agency’s legislation and 

regulations provide a clear legal 

standard for affected conduct rather 

than a general standard, and promote 

simplification and burden reduction. 

Because Section 3 focuses on the quality 

of Federal legislation and regulations, 

the Department limited its review under 

this Executive Order to the quality of 

this Federal Register document and to 

changes to the Federal regulations. The 

review under this Executive Order did 

not extend to the language of the State 

amendment that Missouri drafted. 

Executive Order 13132—Federalism 

This rule has potential Federalism 

implications as defined under Section 

1(a) of Executive Order 13132. 

Executive Order 13132 directs agencies 

to ‘‘grant the States the maximum 

administrative discretion possible’’ with 

respect to Federal statutes and 

regulations administered by the States. 

Missouri, through its approved 

reclamation program, implements and 

administers SMCRA and its 

implementing regulations at the state 

level. This rule approves an amendment 

to the Missouri reclamation program 

submitted and drafted by the State and, 

thus, is consistent with the direction to 

provide maximum administrative 

discretion to States. 

Executive Order 13175—Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

The Department of the Interior strives 

to strengthen its government-togovernment relationship with Tribes 

through a commitment to consultation 

with Tribes and recognition of their 

right to self-governance and Tribal 

sovereignty. We have evaluated this rule 

under the Department’s consultation 

policy and under the criteria in 

Executive Order 13175, and have 

determined that it has no substantial 

direct effects on Federally recognized 

Tribes or on the distribution of power 

and responsibilities between the Federal 

government and Tribes. Therefore, 

consultation under the Department’s 

Tribal consultation policy is not 

required. The basis for this 

determination is that our decision is on 

the Missouri plan, which does not 

include Tribal lands or regulation of 

activities on Tribal lands. Tribal lands 

are regulated independently under the 

applicable, approved Federal program. 

Executive Order 13211—Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use 

Executive Order 13211 requires 

agencies to prepare a Statement of 

Energy Effects for a rulemaking that is 

(1) considered significant under 

Executive Order 12866, and (2) likely to 

have a significant adverse effect on the 

supply, distribution, or use of energy. 

Because this rule is exempt from review 

under Executive Order 12866 and is not 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
64806 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 20, 2023 / Rules and Regulations 

significant energy action under the 

definition in Executive Order 13211, a 

Statement of Energy Effects is not 

required. 

Executive Order 13045—Protection of 

Children From Environmental Health 

Risks and Safety Risks 

This rule is not subject to Executive 

Order 13045 because this is not an 

economically significant regulatory 

action as defined by Executive Order 

12866; and this action does not address 

environmental health or safety risks 

disproportionately affecting children. 

National Environmental Policy Act 

This rule does not constitute a major 

Federal action significantly affecting the 

quality of the human environment. We 

are not required to provide a detailed 

statement under the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

because this rule qualifies for a 

categorical exclusion under the U.S. 

Department of the Interior Departmental 

Manual, part 516, section 13.5(B)(29). 

National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act (NTTAA; 15 U.S.C. 3701 et seq.) 

directs OSMRE to use voluntary 

consensus standards in its regulatory 

activities unless to do so would be 

inconsistent with applicable law or 

otherwise impractical. (OMB Circular 

A–119 at p. 14). This action is not 

subject to the requirements of section 

12(d) of the NTTAA because application 

of those requirements would be 

inconsistent with SMCRA. 

Paperwork Reduction Act 

This rule does not include requests 

and requirements of an individual, 

partnership, or corporation to obtain 

information and report it to a Federal 

agency. As this rule does not contain 

information collection requirements, a 

submission to OMB under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

3501 et seq.) is not required. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

This rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 

et seq.). The State submittal, which is 

the subject of this rule, is based upon 

corresponding Federal regulations for 

which an economic analysis was 

prepared and certification made that 

such regulations would not have a 

significant economic effect upon a 

substantial number of small entities. In 

making the determination as to whether 

this rule would have a significant 

economic impact, the Department relied 

upon the data and assumptions for the 

corresponding Federal regulations. 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act 

This rule is not a major rule under 5 

U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business 

Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. 

This rule: (a) does not have an annual 

effect on the economy of $100 million; 

(b) will not cause a major increase in 

costs or prices for consumers; 

individual industries; Federal, State, or 

local government agencies; or 

geographic regions; and (c) does not 

have significant adverse effects on 

competition, employment, investment, 

productivity, innovation, or the ability 

of U.S.-based enterprises to compete 

with foreign-based enterprises. This 

determination is based on an analysis of 

the corresponding Federal regulations, 

which were determined not to 

constitute a major rule. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

This rule does not impose an 

unfunded mandate on State, local, or 

Tribal governments, or the private sector 

of more than $100 million per year. The 

rule does not have a significant or 

unique effect on State, local, or Tribal 

governments or the private sector. This 

determination is based on an analysis of 

the corresponding Federal regulations, 

which were determined not to impose 

an unfunded mandate. Therefore, a 

statement containing the information 

required by the Unfunded Mandates 

Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not 

required. 

List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 925 

Intergovernmental relations, Surface 

mining, Underground mining. 

William L. Joseph, 

Acting Regional Director, OSMRE IRs 3, 4 

and 6. 

For the reasons set out in the 

preamble, 30 CFR part 925 is amended 

as follows: 

PART 925—MISSOURI 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 925 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq. 

■ 2. In § 925.25 amend the table by 

adding an entry for ‘‘March 6, 2019’’ at 

the end of the table to read as follows: 

§ 925.25 Approval of Missouri abandoned 

mine land reclamation plan amendments. 

* * * * * 

Original amendment 

submission date 

Date of final 

publication Citation/description 

*******

March 6, 2019 ......................... September 20, 

2023.

10 CSR 40–9.010 through 40–9.060. 

[FR Doc. 2023–20019 Filed 9–19–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–05–P 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1