alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: czerniak@embarqmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:00:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lawrence Czerniak

Bellefontaine, OH 43311
No. 406, Misc.

#### Bryan *v.*United States.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller*and *Beatrice Rosenberg*for the United States.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
From: LINDA THOMAS

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: IOM"S RECOMMENDATION

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 10:55:14 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Linda Thomas

Home: 650-367-1133

Cell: 415-264-3443
Exhibit 11
<TABLE>
                           Lafayette Bancorporation
                     Computation of Earnings Per Share(1)
<CAPTION>
              Three Months                 Three Months
              Ended March 31,              Ended March 31,
                                   1997                         1996
                                           Fully                       Fully
                            Primary        Diluted       Primary       Diluted
<S>                           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Average Shares:
 Outstanding Common Shares    1,965,050     1,965,050     1,965,320     1,965,320
 Common Stock Equivalents:
   Stock Options                 72,072        72,072        47,784        47,784

Assumed Repurchase of Shares    (63,904)      (63,904)       (46,095)       (46,095)

Average Common and Common
 Equivalent Shares 
 Outstanding                  1,973,218     1,973,218     1,967,009     1,967,009

Net Income                   $1,120,000    $1,120,000    $1,001,000    $1,001,000

Earnings Per Share(2)             $ .57         $ .57          $ .51          $ .51
</TABLE>

(1) Average Common Shares and common stock equivalents
have been restated for all periods to reflect the 20
percent stock dividend in 1996.

(2) Stock options are not materially dilutive and have
been excluded from earnings per share in the consolidated
statements of income.


1595\04\EXHIBIT.11
From: iswetye@gmail.com on behalf of I. Swetye

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Please accept IOM"s recommendation

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 4:08:07 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive

care by accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the

proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

-- 

I Swetye
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT





In connection with the annual report of TransGlobe Energy Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Randall C. Neely, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





|   |                                                                                                                                  
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.










/s/   Randall C. Neely


Name: Randall C. Neely


Title:  Chief Financial Officer


March 13, 2014














A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification accompanies the Form 40-F to which it relates, is not to be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 40-F), except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### Edward F. McManus, Appellant, v. Catherine A. McManus, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                               CCFNB BANCORP, INC.

                           PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Annual Report of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Virginia D. Kocher, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in
                  all material respects the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Date: February 28, 2008                      /s/ Virginia D. Kocher
                                             ------------------------------
                                             Virginia D. Kocher
                                             Treasurer (Principal
                                             Financial Officer)

                                       80
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1424

AN ACT

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide

permanent authority for the admission of ‘‘S’’ visa nonimmigrants.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 1424 ES

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT AUTHORITY FOR ADMISSION OF

2 ‘‘S’’ VISA NONIMMIGRANTS.

3 Section 214(k) of the Immigration and Nationality

4 Act (8 U.S.C. 1184(k)) is amended—

5 (1) by striking (2);

6 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), and

7 (5) as paragraphs (2), (3), and (4), respectively; and

8 (3) in paragraph (4)(E) (as redesignated), by

9 striking ‘‘paragraph (4)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph

10 (3)’’.

Passed the Senate September 13, 2001.

Attest:

Secretary.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1424

AN ACT

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to

provide permanent authority for the admission of‘‘S’’ visa nonimmigrants.
From: vintagedrum@lisco.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:17:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ned Ingberman

Libertyville, IA 52567
From: cjschu@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:36:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Christine Schumann

Loveland, CO 80537
From: Evidenceb@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:33:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Brenda Schmidt

Henderson, NV 89012
No. 510.

#### Texas Carbonate Co. *v.*Phinney, District Director of Internal Revenue.

*Nat L. Hardy*and *Robt. H. Rice*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer*and *Harold M. Seidel*for respondent.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1455

To amend title 49, United States Code, to regulate the training of aliens

to operate jet-propelled aircraft, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 21, 2001

Ms. SNOWE (for herself and Mr. STEVENS) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and

Transportation

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to regulate the

training of aliens to operate jet-propelled aircraft, and

for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON TRAINING ALIENS TO OPER4 ATE JET-PROPELLED AIRCRAFT WITHOUT SE5 CURITY BACKGROUND CHECKS.

6 (a) PROHIBITION.—Chapter 449 of title 49, United

7 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing new section:
2

•S 1455 IS

1 ‘‘§ 44939. Training of aliens to operate jet-propelled

2 aircraft

3 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—No person subject to regulation

4 under this part may provide training in the operation of

5 any jet-propelled aircraft to any alien within the United

6 States unless the Attorney General issues to that person

7 a certification of the completion of a background investiga8 tion of the alien under subsection (b).

9 ‘‘(b) INVESTIGATION.—(1) Upon the joint request of

10 a person subject to regulation under this part and an alien

11 for the purposes of this section, the Attorney General

12 shall—

13 ‘‘(A) carry out a background investigation of

14 the alien; and

15 ‘‘(B) upon completing the investigation, issue a

16 certification of the completion of the investigation to

17 the person.

18 ‘‘(2) A background investigation of an alien under

19 this subsection shall consist of the following:

20 ‘‘(A) A determination of whether there is a

21 record of a criminal history for the alien and, if so,

22 a review of the record.

23 ‘‘(B) A determination of the status of the alien

24 under the immigration laws of the United States.

25 ‘‘(c) SANCTIONS.—A person who violates subsection

26 (a) shall be subject to administrative sanctions that the
3

•S 1455 IS

1 Secretary of Transportation shall prescribe in regulations.

2 The sanctions may include suspension and revocation of

3 licenses and certificates issued under this part.

4 ‘‘(d) COVERED TRAINING.—For the purposes of sub5 section (a), training includes in-flight training, training in

6 a simulator, and any other form or aspect of training.

7 ‘‘(e) ALIEN DEFINED.—In this section, the term

8 ‘alien’ has the meaning given the term in section 101(a)(3)

9 of the Immigration and Nationality Act.’’.

10 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

11 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by adding

12 at the end the following new item:

‘‘44939. Training of aliens to operate jet-propelled aircraft.’’.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001035770
<NAME> VAIL BANKS, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          30,019
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              45
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     34,811
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           5,445
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             5,418
<LOANS>                                        323,750
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,597
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 454,257
<DEPOSITS>                                     372,375
<SHORT-TERM>                                    21,075
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,421
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,041
<OTHER-SE>                                      51,345
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 454,257
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 23,233
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,614
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   848
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                25,695
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,777
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,818
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           17,877
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      230
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,598
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,449
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,449
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.75
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,860
<LOANS-PAST>                                         5
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    49
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  3,889
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,590
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      291
<RECOVERIES>                                        68
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,597
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,597
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,659



</TABLE>