alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Cuisine Solutions, Inc. (the Company), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



(a)

the Annual Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of the Company for the period ended June 28, 2008 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(b)

information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



| |     |                                                         
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ STANISLAS VILGRAIN                                  
| |     | Stanislas Vilgrain
Chief Executive Officer and President
| |    

September 15, 2008



| |     |                                                                            
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By: | /s/ RONALD ZILKOWSKI                                                       
| |     | Ronald Zilkowski
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary
| |    

September 15, 2008
From: intrudergal@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:49:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kim Ward

Comanche, OK 73529
#### George Aldridge and another, Appellants, v. John F. Clawson, Respondent.

— Reargument ordered.
No. 778, Misc.

#### Jackson *v.*Denno, Warden.

*Norman Redlich*for petitioner.

Motion for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted. Case transferred to the appellate docket.
From: diannemcinturf@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:48:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dianne McInturf

Roseville, CA 95747
EXHIBIT 10 iii 33

DESCRIPTION OF THE NYNEX SENIOR MANAGEMENT ACCOUNT BALANCE DEFERRAL PLAN

This Plan provides for the deferral and ultimate distribution of a Senior
Manager's short-term incentive awards, beginning with the amount earned in 1995
and payable in 1996.

The entire amount of each year's short-term incentive award is credited to a
"TSR Account," the value of which fluctuates to reflect NYNEX Corporation's
annualized total shareholder return.

Awards are first credited to the TSR Account as of March 1, 1996. Then, on March
1, 1997 and on each succeeding March 1, the following adjustments are made to
the TSR Account.

First, the accumulated TSR Account balance is credited to reflect NYNEX
Corporation's annualized total shareholder return for the preceding three
calendar years.

Second, the amount of the award that the Senior Manager earned during the
preceding calendar year is credited to the TSR Account.

Third, one-half of the TSR Account is debited from the adjusted TSR Account
balance.

Fourth, according to the Senior Manager's prior irrevocable election, the amount
debited either is paid immediately to the Senior Manager in cash, or is credited
to the Senior Manager's Account under the NYNEX Senior Management Incentive
Award Deferral Plan.

When the Senior Manager terminates employment with NYNEX Corporation or another
applicable Participating Company, the full remaining balance in his or her TSR
Account (adjusted to reflect earnings through the termination date) is paid to
the Senior Manager immediately in a single cash payment. Amounts previously
transferred to the NYNEX Senior Management Incentive Award Deferral Plan are
paid under the terms of that Plan.

At termination of employment, any short-term incentive award that had not
previously been credited under this Plan is paid in cash on March 1 of the year
following the year in which the services were performed that gave rise to the
award.

               NOTE:  THE ABOVE IS ONLY A BROAD  OUTLINE OF THE MAJOR  
               FEATURES OF THE PLAN.  ANY  BENEFITS  OR RIGHTS UNDER 
               THE PLAN  WILL BE  DETERMINED  BY THE SPECIFIC PLAN 
               PROVISIONS AS THEY APPLY TO EACH CASE.
From: judygnld@roadrunner.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:28:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

As a nurse with a 5 year degree I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind

the unjust and coercive mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by

private health insurance with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand

conscience protections for any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral

or religious objections. I strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans

especially for drugs and devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as

ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Judy Johnston

Anaheim, CA 92804
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1306 

Recognizing the dedication and honorable service of members of the National 

Guard who are serving or have served in Operation Jump Start. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2008 

Mr. BILBRAY (for himself, Mr. CAMPBELL of California, Mrs. BLACKBURN, 

Mr. ALEXANDER, Mrs. MYRICK, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. ROSKAM, Mr. MCCAUL of Texas, Mr. COBLE, Ms. 

GINNY BROWN-WAITE of Florida, Mr. JONES of North Carolina, Mr. 

SHULER, and Mr. BARTON of Texas) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the dedication and honorable service of members 

of the National Guard who are serving or have served 

in Operation Jump Start. 

Whereas, on May 15, 2006, President George W. Bush assigned the National Guard the mission to assist Customs 

and Border Protection along the southwest border; 

Whereas, beginning with 6,000 guardsmen and women and 

after 1 year drawing down to 3,000 citizen soldiers, Operation Jump Start has included 27,320 National Guard 

members from every State, territory, and the District of 

Columbia; 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1306 IH 

Whereas Operation Jump Start has provided significant assistance to Customs and Border Protection by supplementing and supporting Customs and Border Protection’s current efforts to secure our borders while Customs 

and Border Patrol hired and trained additional agents; 

Whereas the National Guard also continues to build and install border security infrastructure, provide surveillance 

and intelligence analysis, and provide aviation, logistical, 

and administrative support; 

Whereas the National Guard has assisted in the apprehension 

of over 176,346 illegal aliens, the seizure of over 1,116 

vehicles used to transport drugs and/or illegal aliens, and 

the confiscation of over 316,262 pounds of marijuana 

and over 5,224 pounds of cocaine; 

Whereas border security infrastructure improvements by the 

National Guard include over 95 miles of vehicle barriers, 

38 miles of new fence, and improvements to over 717 

miles of roads used to monitor remote border areas; and 

Whereas the National Guard has also assisted in the rescue 

of over 100 illegal aliens: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) unconditionally supports the members of the 

3 National Guard and their families; 

4 (2) recognizes the tremendous sacrifices made 

5 by members of the National Guard and their fami6 lies on behalf of the United States; 

7 (3) recognizes Guardsmen and women have 

8 served as bright examples of leadership, courage, 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1306 IH 

1 and service before self, with their service to the 

2 United States; and 

3 (4) recognizes the work the National Guard has 

4 put forth to secure our southwest border. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### Anna W. Brown v. The Long Island Railroad Company.

Reargument ordered.
#### Helen A. Babcock and others, Appellants, v. Oliver M. Arkenburgh, Respondent.

Order, so far as relates to continuing injunction* reversed, and order made as directed in opinion, and so far as relates to amending the complaint, affirmed with costs to abide event. Order to be settled by Daniels, J. Opinion by Daniels, J.
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Robinson Financial
Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ending December 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this
Certification (the “Report”), we, Rick L. Catt, Chief Executive Officer and
Jamie E. McReynolds, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or another document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of the written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to First Robinson Financial Corporation and will
be retained by First Robinson Financial Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





By:  /s/ Rick L.
    Catt
                              
                              By: /s/ Jamie E. McReynoldsName:  Rick
      L. Catt
                              Name:  Jamie
      E. McReynoldsChief
      Executive Officer
                              Chief
      Financial OfficerFebruary
      16, 2010
                              February
      16,
2010
H. Res. 602

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

November 13, 2002.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 124)

making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2003, and for other purposes. The joint resolution shall be

considered as read for amendment. The previous question

shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution to final

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of

debate on the joint resolution equally divided and controlled

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.

SEC. 2. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be

in order without intervention of any point of order to consider

in the House the bill (H.R. 5708) to reduce preexisting

PAYGO balances, and for other purposes. The bill shall be

considered as read for amendment. The previous question

shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage

without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on
2

•HRES 602 EH

the bill equally divided and controlled by the chairman and

ranking minority member of the Committee on the Budget;

and (2) one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
From: Paula Templemeyer

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 6:51:02 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Paula Templemeyer
Fort Dodge, Iowa
No. 461, Misc.

#### Clouthier *v.*Maroney, Correctional Superintendent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2323
RAMACHANDRAN VARADARAJAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OLYMPIC COMMITTEE; UNITED STATES FIELD HOCKEY ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virgi nia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-96-1062-A) Submitted: December 26, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1997 Before HALL, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ramachandran Varadarajan, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his action under the Amateur Sports Act, 36 U.S.C. §§ 371-395 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Varadarajan v. United States Olympic Comm. , No. CA-96-1062-A (E.D. Va. Aug. 5, 1996). We deny Appellant's Motion for Order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00001

- CV

Braums, Inc.

v.

Angelita Sifuentes §

§

§

§ From the 17th District Court

of Tarrant County (017

- 270194

- 14)

Febr uary 25, 2016

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and the

parties’ “Joint Motion to Vacate and Render Judgment Pursuant to Settlement”

and holds that the motion should be granted and the ca use should be dismissed.

Without regard to the merits and effectuating the parties’ settlement agreement,

we vacate the trial court’s judgment and dismiss the cause with prejudice.

Also relying on the settlement agreement, we order that each party shall

bear its own costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

S ECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot

______________ Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,456
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  179,813
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,672
<INVENTORY>                                    197,958
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               382,435
<PP&E>                                          86,878
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 462,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          147,266
<BONDS>                                         97,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     15,000
<COMMON>                                           461
<OTHER-SE>                                     194,739
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   462,590
<SALES>                                      1,699,268
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,949,802
<CGS>                                        1,523,034
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,682,257
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               199,564
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,947
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 58,658
<INCOME-TAX>                                    23,464
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,194
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.71


</TABLE>