alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: leefam@tds.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:19:27 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Barry Lee

Haslett, MI 48840
From: Sue.tapp22@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:39:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sue Tapp

Cumming, GA 30028
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.47 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Order 2013

- 7

- 19 Served: July 24, 2013 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on the 24 th of July, 2013

Essential Air Service at

KAMUELA , HAWAII

Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq

. DOCKET OST

- 1997

- 2833

Order Extending Service Obligation

S ummary By this Order, the Department extends the Essential Air Serv i ce (EAS) ob l igation of Pacific Wings, LLC

, at Kamuela

, Hawaii , for an additional 30 days, th r ough September 10 , 201 3

. Background On March 14, 2013

, Pacific Wings filed a 90

- day notice of intent to suspend its subsidy

free EAS at Kamuela

, Hawaii . Order 201 3

- 4

- 17

, April 25, 2013 , prohibited Pacific Wings from suspending service through July 12

, 201 3, consisting of twelve nonstop round trips per week to Kahului (OGG), with 9

- seat Cessna Caravan aircraft , and requested proposals for replacement service

. By Order 2013

- 7

- 3, July 2, 2013, we selected Mokulele Flight Services, Inc., d/b/a Mokulele Ai r lines, to provide EAS to Kamuela. Pacific Wings is currently held in at Kamuela through August 11, 2013, by Order 2013

- 6

- 7. Mokulele has informally indicated that it would inaugurate service on September 21, 2013, which would require us to issue one more 30

- day hold in Order. Therefore, i n accordance with 49 U.S.C. § 41734 (c) , we must extend Pacific Wings ’s

ser vice obligation for an additional 30 days, thru September 10 , 2013, or until replacement service actually begins, whichever occurs first.

This Order is issued under authority assigned in 14 CFR Part 385.12(k)(5)

. Accordingly,

1. We require Pacific Wings, LLC. , to maintain the level of Essential A ir S ervice it was required to provide by Order 2013

- 4

- 17 , the same level it was providing when it filed notice

, thru September 10 , 2013;2. Th i s docket will remain open until further O rder of the Depart m ent; and

3. We will serve a copy of this O rder on the State of Hawaii , and the civic officials of Kamuela

, Hawaii , and on Pacific Wings, LLC.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of this O rder under the Department’s Regulations, 14 CFR Part 385.3 1(a) must file such petitions within seven ( 7 ) days after the date of service of this O rder.

This Order will be effective immediately , and the filing of a petition for review shall not preclude its effectiveness.

By:

TODD M. HOMAN Director Office of Aviation Analysis

(SEAL)

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at http://www.regulations.gov
Page | of 1

‘REG ]Q0891-/0

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION rm
TIONS s of: August 31, 2011
PUBLICATION NCH Received: August 11, 2011
Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: August 31, 2011

Tracking No. 80edelc5S
Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0079
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Linda Ruth Zellmer
Address:

225 Arlington Drive

Macomb, IL, 61455
Email: Linda_Zellmer@yahoo.com

General Comment

I would like to comment on the contraceptive coverage requirements in the "Women's Preventive
Services: Required Health Plan Coverage Guidelines." I fully support the regulations AS
WRITTEN and would like to request that there be NO EXEMPTIONS for Catholic hospitals in
rural areas. It is difficult enough to get health care in rural areas, and many of the people who
work at Catholic hospitals in these areas MAY NOT BE CATHOLIC. Therefore, granting
Catholic hospitals an exemption from paying for their employee's preventative care on religious
grounds means that you are allowing the Catholic hospitals to impose their misogynous views on
women who do not share their beliefs.

I commend you for the rule that you have proposed, and believe that ALL women should be
covered, irregardless of who they work for. Thank you. Linda Zellmer

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=0900... 8/31/2011
**Filed        Pursuant To Rule 433,        Registration No. 333-124310**

**$1,000,000,000**

**CATERPILLAR        FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION**

| **For                  the Period: 12/10/2007 to 12/17/2007** |                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
| **Coupon**                                                    | **Interest**                       | **Maturity** | **Callable** | **Survivor's****Option** | **Price1** | **Yield2** | **Moody's** | **S&P** | **CUSIP** |
| 4.200%                                                        | Semi-Annual(†††) | 12/15/09 | NO | YES§ | 100.00 | 4.200% | A2 | A | 14912HHG8 |
| 5.000%                                                        | Monthly(†)                   | 12/15/14 | 12/15/09* | YES§ | 100.00 | 5.052% | A2 | A | 14912HHH6 |
| 5.750%                                                        | Semi-Annual(†††) | 12/15/22 | 12/15/10*** | YES§ | 100.00 | 5.750% | A2 | A | 14912HHJ2 |
| 5.850%                                                        | Monthly(†)                   | 12/15/27 | 12/15/11* | YES§ | 100.00 | 5.922% | A2 | A | 14912HHK9 |

*All        offerings are subject to prior        sale.*
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.25 MB)
 
 NAVCENT IMSC HMS Cardigan Bay
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Page | of 1

REG JQ 08G)-/0

LEGAL PROCESSING Wi VISION [As of: August 31, 2011
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS Received: August 10, 2011
BRANCH Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: August 31, 2011

Tracking No. 80edd583
‘(Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0087
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Judith E. Bayba
Address:
Wausau, WI, 54401

General Comment

I am opposed to requiring all insurance plans to cover contraceptives, including abortifacients,
without any copayments, thus requiring those opposed to those "services" to pay for them.
Persons and employers with beliefs contrary to those "services" should not be forced against their
will to pay for them for others. Religious rights need to be respected. Contraceptives of any kind
are not medical necessities, and pregnancy is not a disease or illness. There are morally acceptable
ways to avoid unwanted pregnancy that does not cost anything. There are also many centers
where such services could be purchased by those desiring them, without forcing taxpayers that are
adamantly opposed to them to pay for them.

There is also a great need for conscience protections for practitioners and service providers that
will allow them to provide care to many persons. Forcing them to violate their beliefs or leave
their professions or close their services does no one any good.

Thank you for your cosideration of thse views.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=0900... 8/31/2011
From: Laurel Clark

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Pregnancy is not a disease

Date: Friday, September 02, 2011 7:05:12 AM

Contraception is not preventative medicine.

Contraception is unnatural and unhealthy for women.

It has become an accepted practice but is messes with one's hormones and is

harmful to a women's body. The risks are great and not discussed openly with

women.

I do not want to support financially in any way this practice.

A reply would be greatly appreciated. 

Laurel Clark

786-402-7743
No. 255, Misc.

#### Morris *v.*Cunningham, Penitentiary Superintendent.

Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      I, Charles F. Finn, President and Chief Executive Officer and Michael C.
Anderson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of Wayne Savings
Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:.

      (1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
            ended September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


November 10, 2004                         /s/ Charles F. Finn
--------------------------                --------------------------------------
Date                                      Charles F. Finn, President
                                          And Chief Executive Officer


November 10, 2004                         /s/ Michael C. Anderson
--------------------------                --------------------------------------
Date                                      Michael C. Anderson, Executive Vice
                                          President and Chief Financial Officer
From: Bea Yary

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Sunday, August 14, 2011 12:10:51 AM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Bea Yary
Chino Hills, California
No. 255.

#### Federal Trade Commission *v.*Timken Roller Bearing Co.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, J. William Doolittle, Robert B. Hummel, Irwin A. Seibel, James Mcl. Henderson*and *Alvin L. Berman*for petitioner.

*John G. Ketterer*for respondent.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Century Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert K. Cole, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                            /s/ ROBERT K. COLE


                                            Robert K. Cole
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                            August 12, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to New Century and will be retained by New Century and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished with New Century's Form 10-Q for
the period ended June 30, 2003 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350. It is not being
filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of New
Century, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
#### In the Matter of Charles Denison, etc.

— Application of receiver granted.
#### George Ferguson, as Administrator of the Estate of Carl T. Ferguson, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*Turner Construction Company, Respondent.

*Ferguson*v. *Turner Construction Co.,*152 App. Div. 695, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted January 13, 1913;

decided January 21, 1913.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment, entered October 16, 1912, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, which reversed an order setting aside a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term and granting a new trial and directed that said complaint be dismissed.

The motion was made upon the ground that appellant *689had failed to perfect his appeal by filing the required undertaking.

*Eidlitz & Hulse*for motion.

No one opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and .ten dollars costs of motion.