alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

# AGENCY:

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) has released an exposure draft titled                         *Management's Discussion and Analysis: Rescinding and Replacing SFFAS 15.*                         Respondents are encouraged to comment on any part of the exposure draft.                    

# DATES:

Written comments are requested by December 7, 2023.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Written comments should be submitted via                         *https://gaosurvey.gao.gov/​jfe/​form/​SV_​6thq8SVhOJtNtWu*                         or sent to                         *fasab@fasab.gov.*                         Emails should be addressed to Monica R. Valentine, Executive Director, Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board, 441 G Street NW, Suite 1155, Washington, DC 20548. The exposure draft is available on the FASAB website at                         *https://www.fasab.gov/​documents-for-comment/​.*                         Copies can be obtained by contacting FASAB at (202) 512-7350.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Monica R. Valentine, Executive Director, 441 G Street NW, Suite 1155, Washington, DC 20548, or call (202) 512-7350.

(Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3511(d); Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. 1001-1014.)

Dated: September 7, 2023.

Monica R. Valentine,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2023-19620 Filed 9-11-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
#            

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (R)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-109182

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  466                                                              Trade Date:  08/06/04

(To Prospectus Supplement dated November 6, 2003 &

  Prospectus dated October 15,2003)                                                         Issue Date:   08/12/04

The Date of this Pricing SupplementAugust 6, 2004

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                             Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                 Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common   Interest                       Price to   Discounts&         Payment       Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)     Maturity    Public (2)  Commissions       Frequency        Option    Yes/No     record dates)

14911QVK4  4.5%          08/15/11          100%             1.26%             Semi-Annually             YES        NO                                                                                                                                                                                                      

                                                                                                                                                                                                              

Principal                                                                               1st Payment               Day         

Amount                   Proceeds                   Dealer                           Date                   Count

$1,482,000.00           $1,463,326.80           ABN AMROInc.         02/15/05                               30/360     

Original Issue DiscountNote:                                                                     Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes               X   No                                                                              N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (R) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (R) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $132.558 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (R) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (R) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated October 15,2003.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
From: lewald79@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:21:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as Ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Laura Ewald

Murray, KY 42071
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           13001
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            35,053,540
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 10,724,355
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     34,405,044
<ALLOWANCE>                                    391,707
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              81,104,248
<DEPOSITS>                                  46,031,211
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            109,521
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    43,692,770
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,729,254)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              81,104,248
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                434,064
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              474,076
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               908,140
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             604,544
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             604,544
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          303,596
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  391,707
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,679,176
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,738,494)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,738,494)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.96
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.01
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 60,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              391,707
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           391,707
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### William H. Leinkauf, Respondent, v. Emil Calman and another, Appellants.

— Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          22,242
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,322
<ALLOWANCES>                                    23,145
<INVENTORY>                                      7,797
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,494
<PP&E>                                         510,316
<DEPRECIATION>                                  82,162
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 588,155
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,650
<BONDS>                                        252,957
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           246
<OTHER-SE>                                     269,929
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   588,155
<SALES>                                        392,148
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               392,148
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  320,842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                25,602
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,257
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,849
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,355
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,494
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,494
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.98


</TABLE>
#### James Mingay and others, Plaintiffs, v. The Holly Manufacturing Company, Defendant.

Order modified by reducing allowance to $500.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7440

ALPHONSO STEVE BRYANT, Petitioner - Appellant, versusRONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-00-261-3) Submitted: January 18, 2001 Decided: January 25, 2001 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alphonso Steve Bryant, Appellant Pro Se. Mark L. Earley, Attorney General, Steven Andrew Witmer, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The district court’s memorandum opinion incorrectly states that Bryant had until June 8, 2000 to file his § 2254 petition, rather than June 8, 1999. This error does not affect the district court’s conclusion that Bryant’s petition was barred by the statute of limitations. 2 PER CURIAM: Alphonso Steve Bryant seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. * Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Bryant v. Angelone , No. CA00-261-3 (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*Thomas Byrnes, v. Stephen B. French and others

—Order affirmed, without costs. Opin-

ion

*Per Curiam*
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1310

To provide for the sale of certain real property in the Newlands Project,

Nevada, to the city of Fallon, Nevada.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 2, 2001

Mr. REID introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To provide for the sale of certain real property in the

Newlands Project, Nevada, to the city of Fallon, Nevada.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fallon Rail Freight

5 Loading Facility Transfer Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE TO THE CITY OF FALLON, NEVADA.

7 (a) CONVEYANCE.—

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsections (b)

9 and (c), the Secretary of the Interior shall convey to

10 the city of Fallon, Nevada, all right, title, and inter-
2

•S 1310 IS

1 est of the United States in and to approximately 6.3

2 acres of real property in the Newlands Reclamation

3 Project, Nevada, generally known as ‘‘380 North

4 Taylor Street, Fallon, Nevada’’, and identified for

5 disposition on the map entitled ‘‘Fallon Rail Freight

6 Loading Facility’’.

7 (2) MAP.—The map referred to in paragraph

8 (1) shall be on file and available for public inspec9 tion in—

10 (A) the office of the Commissioner of Rec11 lamation; and

12 (B) the office of the Area Manager of the

13 Bureau of Reclamation, Carson City, Nevada.

14 (b) CONSIDERATION.—

15 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall require

16 that, as consideration for the conveyance under sub17 section (a), the city of Fallon, Nevada, shall pay to

18 the United States an amount equal to the fair mar19 ket value of the real property, as determined—

20 (A) by an appraisal of the real property

21 conducted not later than 60 days after the date

22 of enactment of this Act by an independent ap23 praiser approved by the Commissioner of Rec24 lamation; and
3

•S 1310 IS

1 (B) without taking into consideration the

2 value of any structure or other improvement on

3 the property.

4 (2) CREDIT OF PROCEEDS.—The amount paid

5 to the United States under paragraph (1) shall be

6 credited, in accordance with section 204(c) of the

7 Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of

8 1949 (40 U.S.C. 485(c)), to the appropriate fund in

9 the Treasury relating to the Newlands Reclamation

10 Project, Nevada.

11 (c) LIABILITY.—The conveyance under subsection (a)

12 shall not occur until such date as the Commissioner of

13 Reclamation certifies that all liability issues relating to the

14 property (including issues of environmental liability) have

15 been resolved.

Æ
or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, cause

appearing, this petition is dismissed.

It is so ORDERED. CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT TRACE K. LINDEMAN BY: 

## IDWU 41\k1A--4

cc: Hon. Frank P. Sullivan, District Judge, Family Court Division Aaron Grigsby Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER 2 (0)-1947
Hardesty 

po_ki)t 

Parraguirre 

321, 324 (1996). We therefore conclude that the district court did not err 

in denying appellant's motion. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2 

cc: Hon. Kathleen E. Delaney, District Judge 

Michael Leon Williams 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

2We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in 

proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude 

that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent 

that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those 

submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings 

below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance. 

J. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

' 4 

2 

!,-‘7F1A7()T;(1,1711-.1: 7 441,7:: :'.111‹1141(1-'111A1,3E niz-101411 -T:W„;
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.51 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 30 (Friday, February 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 8125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-03061]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Sixty-Fifth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 135, Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 135, Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
Sixty-Fifth meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 135, Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment.

DATES: The meeting will be held April 14-16, 2015 from 9:00 a.m. to 
5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held NIAR, 4004 N. Webb Rd., Wichita, KS 
67226.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-
0652/(202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org or Sophie Bousquet, sbousquet@rtca.org, 202-330-0663.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 135. The agenda will 
include the following:

April 14-16

     Chairmen's Opening Remarks, Introductions.
     Approval of Summary from the Sixty-Fourth Meeting--(RTCA 
Paper No. 021-15/SC135-700).
     Review Revised Terms of Reference.
     Review DO-160H/ED-14H Schedule.
     Present New Change Proposal Forms.
     Review Change New Proposals.
     Review Working Group Activities.
     New/Unfinished Business.
     Establish date/locations for Next SC-135 Meetings.
     Closing and Adjourn.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the ``FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT'' section. Members of the public 
may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 10, 2015.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Program Oversight and Administration, 
Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-03061 Filed 2-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```