alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**302 CERTIFICATION FOR FORM 10-Q**
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Lisa M. Dillon, certify that:
- I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vail Banks, Inc. (theregistrant); 
- Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
- Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
- The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
- designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; 
- evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  
- disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and  
- The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
- all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  
- any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.  

Date:  November 7, 2003
 
/s/ Lisa M.Dillon                                                
 
Lisa M. Dillon
 
President
From: raygoza6@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:21:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ronald Raygoza

Rowland Heights, CA 91748
No. 390.

#### Wiggs *v.*United States.

*A. K. Black*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Theodore George Gilinsky*for the United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:42:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mark Sigala

Sonora, CA 95370
No. 77, Misc.

#### Stevenson *v.*United States,

*ante,*p. 835.

Petition for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
COMPUCOM SYSTEMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES 

 

Exhibit 23 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS 

 

The Board of Directors 

CompuCom Systems, Inc.: 

 

Weconsent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No. 33-2304, No. 33-30175, No. 33-30056, No. 33-39914, No. 33-43275, No. 33-63307, No. 33-63309, No. 33-76832, No. 33-85268, No. 333-58623, No. 333-69051, No. 333-84559, No.333-48846, No. 333-48904, No. 333-69043, and No. 333-91350) on Form S-8 and the Registration Statements (No. 33-43367, No. 33-47002, No. 33-64341, No. 33-78746, No. 33-78756 and No. 333-12609) on Form S-3 of CompuCom Systems, Inc. of our reportdated February 6, 2004, related to the consolidated balance sheets of CompuCom Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for eachof the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the December 31, 2003 annual report on Form 10-K of CompuCom Systems, Inc. 

 

KPMG LLP 

 

Dallas, Texas 

March 12, 2004
From: mcdrmbldr@gusseology.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:44:50 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James McDowall

Webster, FL 33597
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12170]

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 506(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (the “Act”) (22 U.S.C. 2318(a)(1)) and Presidential Delegation of Authority dated June 13, 2023, I hereby determine that:
    - an unforeseen emergency exists which requires immediate military assistance to Ukraine; and
    - the emergency requirement cannot be met under the authority of the Arms Export Control Act or any other provision of law.

I, therefore, pursuant to authority delegated to me by the President, direct the drawdown of up to $325 million in defense articles and services of the Department of Defense, and military education and training, under the authority of section 506(a)(1) of the Act, to provide assistance to Ukraine. The Department of State will coordinate implementation of this drawdown.

                    This determination shall be reported to the Congress and published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: June 13, 2023.

Antony Blinken,

Secretary of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-19589 Filed 9-11-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of AmNet Mortgage, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John M. Robbins, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
| August 15,  2005 |                     |
|------------------|--------------------------|
|             | /s/ John M.  Robbins     |   |
|             | John M.  Robbins         |
|             | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
**NIH Office of Extramural Research
        [ Search This Site ]               [ Document Index ]               [ Site Map ]Return To NIH Guide Home Page:     [ Graphical Version ]     [ Text Version ]- December 19  December 5November 21
- November 7  October 24October 17
- October 10  October 3September 26
- September 19  September 5August 29
- August 22  August 15August 8
- August 1  July 25July 18
- June 27  June 20June 13
- June 6  May 30May 23
- May 16  May 9May 2
- April 25  April 11April 4
- March 28  March 21March 14
- March 7  February 21February 14
- February 7  January 31January 17
- January 10   *Go To OER:     [ Graphical Version ]     [ Text Only Version ]
web posting: 1997/12/22*Webmaster*      *

**
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 24, 2017

s0517 

# Order

Clerk May 24, 2017

154067

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154067

COA: 326216

Wayne CC: 14

- 008690

- FH

JAMES PATRICK AUVIL,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2016

judgm ent of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
From: batesdl@charter.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:37:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Leslie Bates

Kennewick, WA 99336
EXHIBIT 31.2
 SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION
AND
SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATION
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Select Medical Holdings Corporation and
Select Medical Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 13, 2009
    /s/ Martin F. JacksonMartin F. JacksonExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
NO. 07-01-0147-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

NOVEMBER 6, 2001

______________________________

TRUMAN TOMMY MATTHEWS

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 155th DISTRICT COURT OF WALLER COUNTY;

NO. 98-05-9372; HON. DAN R. BECK, PRESIDING

_______________________________

ABATEMENT AND REMAND

_______________________________

Before QUINN, REAVIS, and JOHNSON, JJ.

Truman Tommy Matthews (appellant) appeals his conviction for murder. Both the

clerk’s and court reporter’s records were filed by September 20, 2001. Thus, appellant’s

brief was due on October 22, 2001. However, one was not filed on that date. By letter

dated October 26, 2001, we notified appellant’s counsel, Kristine C. Woldy, of the expired

deadline and directed her to respond to our notification of same by Monday, November 5,

2001, or the appeal would be abated to the trial court pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8. 
2

November 5, 2001 came and went without any response by counsel to our notice, without

counsel tendering a brief, and without counsel filing a motion for extension of time to file

a brief. 

Consequently, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the 155th District

Court of Waller County (trial court) for further proceedings. Upon remand, the trial court

shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be given and, thereafter, conduct a hearing

to determine the following:

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; and

2. whether appellant is indigent; 

3. whether appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel due

to counsel’s failure to timely file a brief. See Evitts v. Lucey, 469 U.S. 387,

394, 105 S. Ct. 830, 834-35, 83 L. Ed. 2d 821, 828 (1985) (holding that an

indigent defendant is entitled to the effective assistance of counsel on the

first appeal as of right and that counsel must be available to assist in

preparing and submitting an appellate brief). 

We further direct the trial court to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law

addressing the foregoing subjects. Should the trial court find that appellant desires to

pursue this appeal, is indigent, and was denied effective assistance of counsel, then we

further direct the court to appoint new counsel to assist in the prosecution of the appeal.

The name, address, phone number, telefax number, and state bar number of the new

counsel who will represent appellant on appeal must also be included in the court’s

findings of fact and conclusions of law. Furthermore, the trial court shall also cause to be
3

developed: 1) a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings of fact and conclusions

of law and 2) a reporter’s record transcribing the evidence and argument presented at the

aforementioned hearing. Additionally, the trial court shall cause the supplemental clerk’s

record to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before December 6, 2001. Should

additional time be needed to perform these tasks, the trial court may request same on or

before December 6, 2001. 

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
No. 147, Misc.

#### Senna *v.*Kennedy, Police Commissioner of the City of New York, et al.

*Carl L. Shipley, Thomas A. Ziebarth*and *Samuel Resnicoff*for petitioner.

*Leo A. Larkin*and *Seymour B. Quel*for respondents.

Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.