alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549





Form 8-K





Current Report





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





Date of Report  (Date of earliest event reported): July 25, 2012





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation


(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)





001-11241


(Commission File Number)





Delaware37-1105865(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(IRS Employer Identification Number)





2120 West End Avenue


Nashville, Tennessee 37203-0001


(Address of principal executive offices, with zip code)





(615) 341-1000


(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)








Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:








Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))







---




Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.





On July 25, 2012, Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation issued a press release reporting financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2012.  A copy of the press release is attached hereto as Exhibit 99.1 and incorporated into this Item 2.02 by reference.





The information in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, is being furnished in accordance with the provisions of General Instruction B.2 of Form 8-K.








Item 9.01.  Financial Statements and Exhibits.





d)Exhibits:99.1Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated July 25, 2012








SIGNATURES





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation








Date:  July 25, 2012By:/s/ J. Wesley BlumenshineJ. Wesley BlumenshineSecretary





2


---




EXHIBIT INDEX





Exhibit No.Description99.1Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated July 25, 2012














3
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 136 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 136

 To amend the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 to extend 
     trade negotiating and trade agreement implementing authority.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2001

   Mr. Gramm introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 to extend 
     trade negotiating and trade agreement implementing authority.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fast Track Trade Negotiating 
Authority Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO TRADE NEGOTIATING AUTHORITY.

    (a) Extension.--Section 1102 (a)(1)(A), (b)(1), and (c)(1) of the 
Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 (19 U.S.C. 2902 
(a)(1)(A), (b)(1), and (c)(1)) are amended by striking ``June 1, 1993'' 
each place it appears and inserting ``December 31, 2004''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--
            (1) Section 1102 (a)(1) and (b)(1) of such Act are amended 
        by striking ``purposes, policies, and objectives of this 
        title'' each place it appears and inserting ``policies and 
        objectives of the United States''.
            (2) Section 1102(a)(2)(A) of such Act is amended by 
        striking ``August 23, 1988'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``January 22, 2001''.
            (3) Subsections (b)(2) and (c)(3)(A) of section 1102 of 
        such Act are amended by striking ``applicable objectives 
        described in section 1101 of this title'' each place it appears 
        and inserting ``policies and objectives of the United States''.
            (4) Subsection (d)(2)(B) of section 1102 of such Act is 
        amended by striking ``applicable purposes, policies, and 
        objectives of this title'' and inserting ``policies and 
        objectives of the United States''.
            (5) Section 1103(b)(1)(A) of such Act is amended by 
        striking ``June 1, 1991'' and inserting ``December 31, 2004''.
            (6) Subsection (a)(2)(B)(i) of section 1103 of such Act is 
        amended by striking ``applicable purposes, policies, and 
        objectives of this title'' and inserting ``policies and 
        objectives of the United States''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1144 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1144

 To amend title III of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act 
    (42 U.S.C. 11331 et seq.) to reauthorize the Federal Emergency 
      Management Food and Shelter Program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 29, 2001

Mr. Lieberman (for himself, Ms. Collins, Mr. Levin, Mr. Durbin, and Mr. 
Akaka) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
                to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title III of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act 
    (42 U.S.C. 11331 et seq.) to reauthorize the Federal Emergency 
      Management Food and Shelter Program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 322 of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act (42 
U.S.C. 11352) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 322. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this title 
$150,000,000 for fiscal year 2002, $160,000,000 for fiscal year 2003, 
and $170,000,000 for fiscal year 2004.''.

SEC. 2. NAME CHANGE TO NOMINATING ORGANIZATION.

    Section 301(b) of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act 
(42 U.S.C. 11331(b)) is amended by striking paragraph (5) and inserting 
the following:
            ``(5) United Jewish Communities.''.

SEC. 3. PARTICIPATION OF HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS ON LOCAL BOARDS.

    Section 316(a) of the Stewart B. McKinney Homeless Assistance Act 
(42 U.S.C. 11346(a)) is amended by striking paragraph (6) and inserting 
the following:
            ``(6) guidelines requiring each local board to include in 
        their membership not less than 1 homeless individual, former 
        homeless individual, homeless advocate, or recipient of food or 
        shelter services, except that such guidelines may waive such 
        requirement for any board unable to meet such requirement if 
        the board otherwise consults with homeless individuals, former 
        homeless individuals, homeless advocates, or recipients of food 
        or shelter services.''.
                                 <all>
```
On November 4, 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Value
Line, Inc. (VLI), Value Line Securities, Inc. (currently, EULAV Securities,
Inc. (ESI)), Jean B. Buttner, former Chairman, President and Chief Executive
Officer of VLI and David Henigson, a former Director and Officer of VLI,
settled a matter related to brokerage commissions charged by ESI to certain
Value Line mutual funds (Funds) from 1986 through November of 2004. The
matter also involved alleged misleading disclosures provided by VLI to the
Boards of Directors/Trustees and shareholders of the Funds regarding such
brokerage commissions. VLI agreed to pay disgorgement in the amount of
$24,168,979 (representing disgorgement of commissions received), prejudgment
interest of $9,536,786, and a civil penalty in the amount of $10,000,000.
Also as part of the settlement, Mrs. Buttner and Mr. Henigson each agreed
to pay a civil penalty, are barred from association with any broker, dealer
or investment adviser, and are prohibited from serving as an employee,
officer, director, member of an advisory board, investment adviser or depositor
 of, or principal underwriter for, a registered investment company or
affiliated person of such investment adviser, depositor, or principal
underwriter, subject to a limited exception (limited in scope and for a
one-year period) for Mrs. Buttner. Pursuant to Section 308(a) of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, a fund will be created for VLIs disgorgement,
interest and penalty (Fair Fund). VLI will bear all costs associated with any
Fair Fund distribution, including retaining a third-party consultant approved
by the SEC staff to administer any Fair Fund distribution.  VLI informed the
Funds Boards that it has paid the settlement, continues to have adequate
liquid assets, and that the resolution of this matter will not have a
materially adverse effect on the ability of EULAV Asset Management LLC
(EULAV), the Funds investment adviser, or ESI, the Funds distributor, to
perform their respective contracts with the Funds.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 36684

STATE OF IDAHO ,
Plaintiff-Respondent ,

v.

GERALD B. CUMMINGS, JR. ,
Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2010 Unpublishe d Opinion No. 562

Filed: July 23, 2010

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Twin Falls County. Hon. G. Richard Bevan , District Judge.

Order revoking probation and reinstating previously suspended unified seven

- year sentence, with one and one

- half year determinate term, for possession of a controlled substance, affirmed

.
Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden , Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

______________________________________________ Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM
Gerald B. Cummings, Jr. pled guilt y to possession of a controlled substance, I.C. § 37

- 2732(c)(1), and the district court imposed a unified seven

- year sentence, with a one and one

- half
year determinate term. The court suspended the sentence and placed Cummings on probation.
This probatio n was subsequently revoked and the suspended sentence ordered into execution.
Cummings filed an I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of his sentence, which the district court denied. On appeal, Cummings does not challenge the district court’s decision to revok e probation, but argues only that this sentence is excessive.2

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the
factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

n eed not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.
1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho
722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007).
When we review a sentence that is ordered into execution following a period of
probation, we wi ll examine the entire record encompassing events before and after the original
judgment. State v. Hanington , 148 Idaho 26, 29, 218 P.3d 5, 8 (Ct. App. 2009). We base our
review upon the facts existing when the sentence was imposed as well as events occurring
between the original sentencing and the revocation of probation. Id. Applying these standards,
and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its

discretion. Therefore, the order revoking probation and directing execution of Cummings’s
previously suspended sentence is affirmed.
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of REV Holdings LLC (the"Company") for the period ended June 30, 2005as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the "Report"), I, Ronald O. Perelman, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Ronald O. Perelman     Ronald O.PerelmanChief Executive OfficerAugust 11,2005

----
**NIH Office of Extramural Research
        [ Search This Site ]               [ Document Index ]               [ Site Map ]Return To NIH Guide Home Page:     [ Graphical Version ]     [ Text Version ]
*For Weeks Ending:*
- July 30  July 23July 16
- July 9  July 2June 25
- June 18  June 11June 4
- May 28  May 21May 14
- May 7  April 30April 23
- April 16  April 9April 2
- March 26  March 19March 12
- March 5  February 26February 19
- February 12  February 5January 29
- January 22  January 15January 8
*Go To OER:     [ Graphical Version ]     [ Text Only Version ]
web posting: 1999/07/19*Webmaster*      *

**
118 STAT. 2632 PUBLIC LAW 108–442—DEC. 3, 2004

Public Law 108–442

108th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1050 North

Hills Boulevard in Reno, Nevada, as the ‘‘Guardians of Freedom Memorial Post

Office Building’’ and to authorize the installation of a plaque at such site, and

for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF GUARDIANS OF FREEDOM MEMORIAL

POST OFFICE BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Post Office

located at 1050 North Hills Boulevard in Reno, Nevada, shall be

known and designated as the ‘‘Guardians of Freedom Memorial

Post Office Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Guardians of Freedom Memorial Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. INSTALLATION OF PLAQUE.

(a) AGREEMENT.—The Postmaster General may enter into an

agreement with the Office of Veterans’ Services of the State of

Nevada under which the Office of Veterans’ Services of the State

of Nevada agrees—

(1) to install a plaque to be displayed at the Guardians

of Freedom Memorial Post Office Building referred to in section

1(a); and

(2) to maintain and update such plaque, as appropriate

and in accordance with subsections (b) and (c).

(b) INSCRIPTIONS.—

(1) DEDICATION.—The plaque installed pursuant to subsection (a) shall bear the following inscription: ‘‘This post office

building is dedicated in the memory of those men and women

of the State of Nevada who have lost their lives while serving

in the Armed Forces of the United States in the Global War

on Terrorism and in Operation Iraqi Freedom.’’.

(2) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.—The plaque installed pursuant to subsection (a) shall also include with respect to the

men and women of the Armed Forces referred to in paragraph

(1) inscriptions containing the names, ranks, branches of

service, hometowns, and dates of death of such men and women.

Dec. 3, 2004

[S. 2640]

PUBLIC LAW 108–442—DEC. 3, 2004 118 STAT. 2633

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2640 (H.R. 4442):

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

July 22, considered and passed Senate.

Nov. 16, considered and passed House.

Æ

(c) EXPENDITURE OF COSTS.—The agreement referred to in subsection (a) shall provide that the Office of Veterans’ Services of

the State of Nevada shall have sole responsibility for the expenditure of all costs associated with the installation, maintenance, and

updating of the plaque.

Approved December 3, 2004.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                          512480
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1827569
<ALLOWANCES>                                     25000
<INVENTORY>                                    4618001
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8981337
<PP&E>                                         4199831
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2375826
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                11273033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3901027
<BONDS>                                         278775
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          2546320
<PREFERRED>                                    2546320
<COMMON>                                      10599285
<OTHER-SE>                                       24750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  11273033
<SALES>                                       17779415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              17779415
<CGS>                                         10873499
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 10873499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4794563
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               75686
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2054824
<INCOME-TAX>                                    819000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1235824
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1235824
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
From: joecolannino@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:37:53 PM

To whom it may concern,

You must rescind the fascist mandate that contraceptives and sterilization procedures are to be covered

by private health insurance with no co-pay to patients. The policy is not only fascist and Nazi-esque, but

a violation of the First and Fifth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution along with a whole host of

established law. All persons have a God-given right to oppose these policies and you must grant them

conscience protections for moral or religious reasons in order to remain moral and legal yourselves

rather than to perpetuate an illegitimate and ultimately irrelevant government. Government cannot,

should not, and must not force Americans to pay for drugs, procedures, and devices that end life -- I

am speaking specifically of abortifacients, abortions, and the use of abortive instruments. Hastening the

death of human babies can in no way be considered "health care" and makes a mockery of the term.

You must offer an authentic conscience protection for any organization and business that has moral or

religious objection to providing such insurance to their employees because your legal mandate clearly

violates a wide variety of laws that prohibit government discrimination against those who object to

various health services on moral or religious grounds. Yet your definition of "religious employer" is so

narrow as to exclude businesses and organizations that have conscience objections.

The federal executive branch of the government has now become vulgar, wayward, and repugnant --

both generally and specifically as regards the will of the people who overwhelming oppose your actions.

We will remember at the polls, but more importantly, God will judge us all for our actions. I shudder for

how we will fare as a nation if we allow and abet the taking of human life for the convenience of the

self-centered and the shameless and politic advance of career against conscience.

Sincerely,

Joseph Colannino

Mercer Island, WA 98040
From: mabrown7777@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:17:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michele Brown

Temple, GA 30179
FW: DOT concurrence for Transportation Conformity Restructuring

Camille.Mittelholtz to

:

Meg Patulski, Leila Cook

Cc

:

Cecilia.Ho, Helen.Serassio, adam.stephenson, Linda.Lawson

From: <Camille.Mittelholtz@dot.gov>

To: Meg Patulski/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, Leila Cook/AA/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: <Cecilia.Ho@dot.gov>, <Helen.Serassio@dot.gov>, <adam.stephenson@dot.gov>, <Linda.Lawson@dot.gov>

restructure final concur_7_18_11.pdf 

Attached is a copy of the DOT concurrence in the Transportation Conformity Restructuring rule, signed 

in July 2011. We have reviewed the rule and preamble that includes announcement that EPA is not 

taking final action at this time on the proposal that areas analyze a near-term analysis year when using 

the budget test. The prior DOT concurrence remains valid for this update.

Camille Mittelholtz

Deputy Director, Office of Safety, Energy and Environment

Office of the Secretary of Transportation/Office of Transportation Policy

202 366-4861