alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE> 25
                                                               Exhibit 15.1



                       Report of Independent Accountants



To the Shareholders and Trustees
 of BEC Energy


We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of BEC Energy
(BEC) as of June 30, 1999 and the related statements of income for the three
and six-month periods ended June 30, 1999 and 1998 and cash flows for the
six-month periods ended June 30, 1999 and 1998.  These financial statements
are the responsibility of management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures
to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial
and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit
conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the accompanying financial statements in order for them to
be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.




Boston, Massachusetts               PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
July 22, 1999
Exhibit 32



Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)



The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Virginia
Financial Group, Inc., respectively, certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Virginia Financial Group, Inc. at the dates and
for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), and no purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely
upon the foregoing certification for any purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                       |  |                                                     
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2005 |  | /s/ O. R. Barham, Jr.                               
|                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                       | 
|Date: November 9, 2005 |  | /s/ Jeffrey W. Farrar                               
|                       |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Development, Inc. and Gateway Centennial Development, /s



# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

December 10, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00736

- CV

THE CITY OF LAREDO

, Appellant

v.

NORTHTOWN DEVELOPMENT, INC. AND GATEWAY CENTENNIAL DEVELOPMENT, CO

., Appellees

From th e 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CV

- 7001705

- D2 Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

In this accelerated appeal, Appellant’s brief is due to be filed with this court on December 15, 2015. On November 30, 2015, Appellant filed an unopposed first motion for a thirty

- day extension of time to file Appellant ’ s brief.
Appellant ’ s motion is GRANTED. Appellant ’ s brief is due on January 14, 2016

.

____ _____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 10th day of December, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
From: MyGod.Jesus@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:38:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mercedes Obeso

San Diego, CA 92111
From: ben.j.jimenez@boeing.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:39:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Benito Jimenez

Chino Hills, CA 91709
#### UNITED STATES *v.*BROWN et al.

No. 128.

Decided October 8, 1962.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger*and *Lionel Kestenbaum*for the United States.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed. *United States*v. *Wise,*370 U. S. 405.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Hillsborough,

Dec., 1899.

#### Parent *v.*Nashua Manufacturing Co.

A servant wbo voluntarily, without request from the master, engages in work which he was not hired to perform, assumes the risk of injury attendant thereon.

Opinions of experts are not admissible when there is no evidence tending to prove the facts upon which the opinions purport to be based.

Case, for personal injuries. The plaintiff was employed by the defendants as a weaver. He had nothing to do with the belts or machinery, which were under the care of a loom-fixer. On July 26,1895, the loom-fixer, who was engaged in adjusting a belt, beckoned the plaintiff to come to him, and he did so. While the loom-fixer held the belt in place upon an upper pulley, the plaintiff placed his foot against it and attempted to kick or push it upon a lower pulley. While so engaged, the plaintiff was caught by the belt and carried over the shafting, receiving the injuries complained of. There was no evidence as to the cause of the bolt catching him.

The plaintiff offered the testimony of expert loom-fixers to show that, with belts and pulleys arranged like those in question, the drawing up of the belt by which the plaintiff was caught must have been caused by contact with another belt (running to a loom in the room above) when the latter was in a certain position, which would be when the upper loom was in motion. There was no evidence as to the position of the second belt at the time of the accident, or whether the loom in the room above was running. The evidence was excluded, and the plaintiff excepted.

A verdict was ordered for the defendants, and the plaintiff excepted.

*Timothy J. Hotuard*and *Taggart & Bingham,*for the plaintiff.

*200*George B. French*and *Burnham, Brown & Warren,*for the defendants.

Parsons, J.

As there was no defect or fault in the machinery or belting, the plaintiff’s injury must be attributed to his own carelessness, or to the risk naturally attendant upon the work which he undertook. This work was beyond the scope of the duty which he was employed to perform, and there is no evidence that the loom-fixer had any authority to permit or require him to perform it. Yoluntarily engaging in work for which he was not hired, without request from the master, he assumed the risk attendant thereon. *McGill*v. *Granite Co., ante, p.*125.

The evidence of the loom-fixers as to their opinion of the cause of the accident was properly excluded. The facts upon which the opinions were based not having been proved, the opinions, if admissible at all, were immaterial.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Peaslee, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
No. 242.

#### Carlson *v.*Dickman et al.

*Eugene Oressman, Randall B. Kester*and *Roy F. Shields*for petitioner.

*Leo Pfeffer, Steve Anderson*and *John D. Mosser*for respondents.

Supreme Court of Oregon. Certiorari denied.
From: drbell@prlnet.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:52:07 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gordon Bell

, 64064-1183
City Office: PO !3nx 47070 Atka, Alai!ci 99547 P!rono: 9{f7·839·2233 " Fax: 9iii'"B3SJ.2234 

r\dm\nistrntcr: 750 vlt Birn:t 0202. "' Allchorage, Alaska 99$15 * Phone: 907-S22.·tY3M " f'Bn: Oilu;:·;;;,,".'';:," 

AprH 26, 2012 

DEUVERED VfA EMAIL ·o 

Kevin Adams 

US Department of Transportation ..t::-

Essent!al Air Service Program 

RE: Atka Essentlal Air Servlce Contract/ 1)G> e-i:e.A- -t 't "'tS - ~ (, "'3 

Dear Mr. Adams: 

Earlier this week City Administrator Julie Dirks and the Atka Tribal Coundf President Mark Snigaroff met 

with representatives of Servant Air and Grant Aviation to discuss the proposals to provide air 

transportation servlces to Atka. The Information obtained during those meetings was shared with the 

rest of the community and was discussed at a recent City Council meeting. 

The City of Atka, as the local government of the community of Atka,. supports granting the Essential Air 

Service subsidy for Atka to Grant Aviation. It is generally felt that as a larger airline Grant Aviation is 

better able to meet the transportation needs of Atka. 

Please contact City Administrator Julie Dirks at 907-52.2-03!34 

anything else. 

Signed, 

Mayor
----

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  June 9, 2011 |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   |
|                          |   |
| /s/ KARL F. LOPKER            |   |
| Karl F. Lopker                |   |
| Chief Executive Officer  |   |
| QAD Inc.                      |   |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 132 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 132

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that housing 
 assistance provided under the Native American Housing Assistance and 
   Self-Determination Act of 1996 be treated for purposes of the low-
   income housing credit in the same manner as comparable assistance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2001

  Mr. Johnson (for himself, Mr. Inouye, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Baucus, Mr. 
 Reid, Mr. Dorgan, Mr. Daschle, Ms. Snowe, and Mr. Conrad) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                               on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that housing 
 assistance provided under the Native American Housing Assistance and 
   Self-Determination Act of 1996 be treated for purposes of the low-
   income housing credit in the same manner as comparable assistance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Low Income Housing Tax Credit for 
Native Americans Act''.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN NATIVE AMERICAN HOUSING ASSISTANCE DISREGARDED IN 
              DETERMINING WHETHER BUILDING IS FEDERALLY SUBSIDIZED FOR 
              PURPOSES OF THE LOW-INCOME HOUSING CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (E) of section 42(i)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to determination of whether 
building is federally subsidized) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i), by inserting ``or the Native American 
        Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (25 
        U.S.C. 4101 et seq.) (as in effect on the date of the enactment 
        of the Low Income Housing Tax Credit for Native Americans 
        Act)'' after ``this subparagraph)'', and
            (2) in the subparagraph heading, by inserting ``or native 
        american housing assistance'' after ``home assistance''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1366 

Recognizing Honor Flight Michigan, Inc., for its important work in recognizing World War II veterans and expressing condolences to the family 

and friends of David Cameron following his death. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2008 

Mr. KNOLLENBERG submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Honor Flight Michigan, Inc., for its important 

work in recognizing World War II veterans and expressing condolences to the family and friends of David Cameron following his death. 

Whereas there are an estimated 3,000,000 World War II veterans alive today; 

Whereas Honor Flight Michigan, Inc., is a nonprofit organization founded by David and Carole Cameron; 

Whereas Honor Flight Michigan raises funds to send World 

War II veterans from Michigan to see the World War II 

Memorial in Washington, District of Columbia, at no cost 

to the veteran; 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1366 IH 

Whereas Honor Flight Michigan works with local veterans organizations to ensure every Michigan veteran who wants 

to see the World War II Memorial can do so; 

Whereas Honor Flight Michigan is funded by donations from 

people across the United States; 

Whereas Honor Flight Michigan makes 2 trips per month to 

our Nation’s Capital between April and November; 

Whereas Honor Flight Michigan has made 13 trips to Washington, District of Columbia, since April 2007 to give 

World War II veterans a chance to see the Memorial 

erected in recognition of their service to our Nation; 

Whereas Honor Flight Michigan helped pave the way for over 

30 States to provide a similar opportunity for their 

World War II veterans; 

Whereas David Cameron was a founding member of the nationwide Honor Flight Network, which works to bring 

veterans from across the country to the World War II 

Memorial; 

Whereas David Cameron, a businessman from Royal Oak, 

Michigan, who dedicated the last 2 years of his life to 

veterans, passed away on Sunday, June 8, 2008; and 

Whereas David Cameron is survived by his wife, Carole, and 

3 sons: Michael, Don, and David: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors the mission of Honor Flight Michi3 gan and the World War II veterans who so honor4 ably served our Nation; 

5 (2) recognizes the patriotism of David and Car6 ole Cameron; and 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1366 IH 

1 (3) mourns the loss of David Cameron. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | (1) | The                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended                June                30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Sections                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.                78m(a) or                78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| August                13, 2007 |   | /s/                Phillip E. Becker                            |
|--------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date                           |   | Phillip                E. Becker                                |
|                           |   | President                and Chief  Executive Officer |
|                           |   |                                                            |
|                           |   |                                                            |
|                           |   |                                                            |
| August                13, 2007 |   | /s/                H. Stewart Fitz Gibbon III                   |
| Date                           |   | H.                Stewart Fitz Gibbon III                       |
|                           |   | Executive                Vice President and                     |
|                           |   | Chief                Financial Officer                          |