alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TORULE 13a-14(b) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, ASENACTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of IntrusionInc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31,2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Michael L. Paxton, Chief Financial Officer of the Companycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| March 29,  2010 | /s/ Michael L. Paxton   |   |
|----------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                 | Michael  L. Paxton      |
|                 | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. 333-109390 pertaining to the BakBone Software Incorporated 2002 Stock Option Plan and the BakBone Software Incorporated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan of our report dated June 23,2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of BakBone Software Incorporated included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2009. 

/s/    MAYER HOFFMAN MCCANN P.C. 

San Diego, California 

June 23, 2009
From: svglady@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:32:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you RESCIND the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Debbie Anderson

Hawthorne, CA 90250
From: Elle Acebo

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:51:09 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs. It sends a message that needs to be heard.

Sincerely,

Elle Acebo

10950 Biering Rd. apt. 2106

san antonio, TX 78249
Exhibit 4.45 


 


English Translation


 


Execution Copy







 


Equity Interest
Transfer Agreement


 


Pursuant
to the resolutions adopted at the general meeting of shareholders of Beijing eLong Information Technology Co., Ltd., Guangfu Cui
(hereinafter referred to as the “Transferor”)
and Hao Jiang (hereinafter referred to as the “Transferee”)
hereby enter into this equity interest transfer agreement as follows:







 





		1.	The Transferor
is willing to transfer all equity interests in Beijing eLong Information Technology Co., Ltd. to the Transferee
at a price of RMB14 million (fourteen million yuan only);



 


		2.	The Transferee
is willing to accept all equity interests of the Transferor in Beijing eLong Information Technology Co., Ltd.
at a price of RMB14 million (fourteen million yuan only);



 


		3.	Transfer shall
take place on September 7, 2015; from the date of transfer, the Transferor shall no longer have the rights, and bear the
obligations, of the investor regarding the transferred equity interests, and the Transferee shall assume all the rights and the
obligations of the investor in the company to the extent of his investment amount.








 





This
agreement shall take effect after being signed by the parties. This agreement is in quintuplicate with the parties each holding
one copy, and the other originals to be used for registration and filing with the governmental agencies; each of the originals
shall have the same legal effect.







 


[No text hereunder]


 


[signature page of Equity Interest Transfer
Agreement]


 


Transferor: Guangfu Cui


 


Signature: /s/ Guangfu Cui


 


Transferee: Hao Jiang


 


Signature: /s/ Hao Jiang
From: whitneys@southhillcalvary.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:12:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Whitney Sanchez

Puyallup, WA 98374
REC - [20 B9)-/0 Page | of 2

SEP 2 201)

LEGAL 6 Ke wavy GaN

PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS As of: September 02, 2011
BRANCH Received: August 24, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 02, 2011

Tracking No. 80eecc44
Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0138
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: A. Reichling
Address: 50659

General Comment

I see 3 main problems with the proposal to include birth control pills as mandatory, no cost
coverage in an insurance plan.

1. Pregnancy is not a disease. We should not be treating the encouragement or discouragement of
it as though it were. The inclusion of birth control pills and emergency contraceptives (abortion in
a pill) is morally wrong and a misuse of preventative care.

2. Iam a woman who does not use birth control. That is my choice. I should not be forced to pay
for the birth control of others. This bill will require that of me in federal taxes and the cost of my
own health care plan.

As coverage is made mandatory in a health insurance plan, the cost is driven up. This is a travesty
of the concept of insurance. The purpose of insurance is to cover the big items in life that we
cannot budget for.

Including birth control (and other optional items) in mandatory insurance coverage only transfers
the $10 - $20 cost of a prescription into an increase of $100s and $1000s of dollars in my
premium.

3. The religious exclusion included in this bill is a joke. A very sick joke. With this bill the

http://fdms.erulemaking .net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000... 9/2/2011


Page 2 of 2

department of HHS has determined that religious beliefs have no place outside of a church
building. That is wrong. Our religious beliefs are to affect our whole lives and there are great
Christian, Jewish and Muslim (and other) service groups that prove it on a daily basis. The work
done at homeless shelters, youth at-risk programs, hospitals, clinics, soup kitchens, food pantries
and a host of other organizations only exist because of the beliefs of the employees and volunteers
of those groups. In many, if not most cases, the people served do not follow the religious tenets of
the organization serving them.

When a religious group loses their protections and rights as a Christian/Jewish/Muslim

organization because they serve the needy among us, that is an attack against our Constitutional
protections.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000... 9/2/2011
In , Pp- - . Page | of 1
REG ] AVBG5)-/0
LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS As of: August 31, 2011
BRANCH Received: August 09, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: August 31, 2011

Tracking No. 80edc406
(Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0058
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Rose N
Address:
MO,
Email: nadlers4@hotmail.com

General Comment

Religious employers should not be forced to cover contraception.

Contraceptives are not a medical necessity and pregnancy is not a disease that employers should
have to fund.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=0900... 8/31/2011
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 3, 2011 

# Order

May 3, 2011

142787 & (21)

JOHN EDWIN GLASPIE, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 142787 v CoA: 301653 Eaton CC: 09-1369-NF FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, Defendant-Appellant,

and

EVAN JAMES STEVENS and JAMES EDWARD STEVENS, JR., Defendants.

________________ __________________

On order of the Chief Justice, a stipula tion signed by the atto rneys for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leav e to appeal is considered and, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application fo r leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
From: keithlsmail@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:05:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Keith Lovelace

Mckinney, TX 75069
NUMBER 13-09-00576-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

GLENDA POSTERT, Appellant,

v.

CALHOUN COUNTY, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 135th District Court

of Calhoun County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

O R D E R

Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on counsel’s failure to return the original exhibit in 

volume 3 of the clerk’s record to the Court. On August 24, 2012, the Court granted 

appellant’s motion to withdraw original exhibit in volume 3 of the clerk’s record, a 
2

multicolored map, to appellant’s counsel for a period of thirty days, until September 24, 

2012. The clerk’s office has contacted appellant’s counsel requesting the original exhibit

be returned. As of this date, the original exhibit has not been returned. 

Appellant’s counsel, O.F. Jones III, is hereby ORDERED to return the original 

exhibit in volume 3 of the clerk’s record to this Court on or before April 21, 2014. The 

Clerk of this Court is ORDERED to serve a copy of this order on O.F. Jones III by certified 

mail, return receipt requested.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

14th day of April, 2014.
From: green.clarice@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:53:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Clarice Green

San Jose, CA 95123
No. 551, Misc.

#### Boynton *v.*Ohio.

Supreme Court of Ohio. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ALCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Andrew Liu, President and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Andrew Liu



Andrew Liu, President and Chairman

September 14, 2006
### ...

.... 

## ..• • 

### Mare-h .3 1 .2.ot0**Mu-h~** betweu\ U.S EfA-**~~~** 4**~** Qean**E"ne~** 

## 1 Grro-tAf' fY\.**~mvd** 

### Hate. BA ft l 

### PU'..r


# I NAME 

# I ORGANIZATION 

# I PHONE 

# I E-MAIL 

# I

, UJ 

## e. 'l!r 17l/J;JJ Cevll::e..;:;;LSlOe..o(j.tCA-£.**Dtv~** 

### ,.,-y {j28) 3IO.(b7t3

### q2-~ 

## -- 

# 'i 8' , 

### :l8 D2 

### I kfse>@

· -frorYlier, 

## c.a

# ttl~**l~SZ-** 

# I**·** t'1

# ~Lrt;;:~~~ 

# To 

# V\,"Jwn \ /sJ I

### ~\Aek '«\.a:A 

### \j\j

### ~ 

## Co.J-ctl tJvl.**.\~c.** w'\e:!.:l**vJ:l-~** 6 

### --t.**f-. ~'**  

## it if- 

### 3/ 

### D · forJj
5ttt-**~""-** Cl f>ut..J 

### A-!fr,.ke 6of 3bo f3'11 4**~o;t** /r;4**6~~~** ()



### AA;JooA



# B.e s s 

# ter-
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Outreachinsider**
 
1995:May
2000:March | July
2001:July | November
 
SuDoc Number:A 57.75/2:
Item Number:0121-G-04 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000548025
 
July 10, 2018
No. 316, Misc.

#### Sartain *v.*United States.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Robert G. Maysack*for the United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
From: snotherlyhouse@embarqmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:24:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jeff Snotherly

Wilkesboro, NC 28697
#### Bartholomew Scott, Appellant, v. Elizabeth Sweeney and others, Respondents.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Landon, J.;

Parker, J., not sitting.