alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1(1)



Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer



I, Calvin Reed, the chief executive officer of Peak International Limited (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter
63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: February 13, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Calvin Reed        
|                        |  |  |  |                        
|                        |  |  |  | Calvin Reed            
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

---

|(1) | In accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K and SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986, Final Rule: Managements Reports on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting and Certification of Disclosure in Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the certification furnished in this Exhibit 32.1 is deemed to accompany this Form 10-Q and will not be deemed filed for purpose of Section 18 of the Exchange
Act. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
May 11,2015 

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Secretary Foxx: ... I . 

-. ·.~. =.rml!~~IJ! tct.YPi~~~;jh)rtnc vo~ ,.!~n ~n~ntaep · fake to tevet ~ ptaying field tor 

Amerialn businesses and maintain thil envlronminf0ffi1t.mlfhttttrwp;atttioft tn wiation-estabtisbed by Open_ 

Skies policy that hiS been auclal for America's success. 

Tbe tens of bHUons of dollars In subsidies are dlstorti• the free market framework established by Open Skies 

~nd they will ultimately have a neaatlve economic Impact hire In the United Stites if we allow them to 

~nue~,-ft~ uniien playing fiefdtCfeated'bv these massive subsidiesJs.~J:.tlP.I·~~ffl.f!'~'~~t>V.m!ed 

iri~ ~m~~ Airfl~ 0!'~" ~Hna~mtle~ol~~~~Jf..~~-~~ft~t;!(Mt'ead ~-~~ ~~·GfAMirlcanjtJbs:'4n:fad,.~•·•n•.•~llltNte.~•l~•fW ~~rn·· ·.;!"· 

fPa~\'shlp<'fdr Oi*ft. ~'* Sltles~*h route-ttfl'ts IDst!~QJtar. _.., .. lf'lJ.~wm ~§~ ln .. an:..fM"P net 

loss of 121 good u.s. jobs. These are jobs tflat we can Ill afford to lose and they should not be lost as' a result of 

unfair competition from foreign carritrs. 

6 ' ~q ~~~ -. · 1 ·~f<'' ;)l;l/,6(j 2· :.¥11;;,r,1 ~;:JL&;> '1uQ !I.JCl.~~·i?· :" .Cl.9:.r.; 9!10 C'11JJWt..l(.l: ., : 111 

·F,l t •c/1 

s 10-150518-017 

!!r 2~~,, 

:.:il.,'€.;. 

! :n' ~o ;; 1::; , 2 · ;;cc uc1u;.1 !J! ::! '-f.Jv!.; lt .E. c• :t.;.wsw :JJ• 

Ot ''0!uUJo;,:c• 1 '.!W ~r::';! ··f, J \ 'J'.t: (' 1 n:'i (LI!:. ·· r,. ~;o ·W, 1 

For infonnat1o~ visit \VVJV. .njchamber.com, or call {609} 989-7888 

j 

oo;::.. : ... 
1 am not seeklna to end the Open Sides ..,_ments with Qatar and the UA£, nor am t ralsJna concerns with 

reprd to any of the more than one hundred other Open Skies aareements. I am simply requestlna that the u.s. 

aovemment open consultations with Qatar and the UAE, which are provided for within the Open Skies 

agreements themselves and hold off on the addition of new routes. 

Sl7Uet--

Thomas ~. Bracken 

President and CEO 

New Jersey State Chamber of Commerce 

510-150518-017 For information, vi tt www.njchamber.com, or call {609) 98g.7888 
THE STA R 

NEw ]E RSEY C11 RER OF CoMMERCE 

216 WEST STATE STREET . TRENTON, NJ 08608 

s 10-150518-017 

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

I. I· II II' I I I• I I' I I I I II,,,,,,,,,''"" tl•lll .,.,,.,,., ''1'1 I
From: NicciDPRN@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: (no subject)

Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 8:02:19 PM

If a healthcare provider doesn't provide not only preventive healhcare measures, but also contraception

for women, they should loose funding. Those monies are provided by taxpayers who have many

different religious and moral views.
**Exhibit 31.2****Section 302 Certification****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Alan D. Horn, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Rogers Communications Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and theaudit committee of the issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.    Date: *March 8, 2006*         */s/ Alan D. Horn*       Alan D. Horn
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

NOTICE OF INTENT TO DISMISS FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

Appellate case name: Joel D. Mallory, Jr. v. West Bellfort Property Owners 

Association

Appellate case number: 01-14-00936-CV

Trial court case number: 1039665

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County

The Court has directed me to notify you, as a pro se appellant, that the Court may 

dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). Your notice of 

appeal of the order granting summary judgment may not have been timely filed. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(1); TEX. R. CIV. P. 329b(a); Powell v. Linh Nutrition Programs, 

Inc., No. 01-03-00919-CV, 2005 WL 375334, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Feb. 

17, 2005, no pet.) (holding that deadline for appealing from trial court’s order denying 

motion for new trial runs from date of signing of final judgment, not from date of order 

denying motion for new trial). Without a timely filed notice of appeal, this Court lacks 

jurisdiction over the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.1, 26.1.

Accordingly, the Court has directed me to notify you that the Court may dismiss 

this appeal for want of jurisdiction unless you file a written response to this notice, 

providing a detailed explanation, citing relevant portions of the record, statutes, rules, and 

case law to show that this Court has jurisdiction over the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.3(a). Any response must be filed within 14 days of the date of this notice. You must 

respond in writing even if you have previously claimed your notice of appeal was timely 

filed. If a meritorious response is not received in the form described above by the 

deadline, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction without further notice.

Clerk’s signature: 

 Clerk of the Court

Date: March 17, 2015
#### The People of the State of New York *ex rel.*The Superintendents of the Poor of the Town of Oswegatchie v. The Board of Supervisors of St. Lawrence County.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Bockes, J.
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1465

To authorize the President to provide assistance to Pakistan and India

through September 30, 2003.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 25, 2001

Mr. BROWNBACK (for himself and Mr. MCCONNELL) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

A BILL

To authorize the President to provide assistance to Pakistan

and India through September 30, 2003.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. LIMITED AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE

4 TO PAKISTAN AND INDIA.

5 (a) AUTHORITY.—

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other

7 provision of law, the President is authorized, for

8 Pakistan and India, to provide assistance, enter into

9 contracts, take actions in international financial in10 stitutions, sell, lease, or authorize the export of de-
2

•S 1465 IS

1 fense articles or defense services, authorize the ex2 port of dual-use items, or extend other financial as3 sistance, under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961,

4 the Arms Export Control Act, the Export-Import

5 Bank Act of 1945, or any other provision of law, if

6 the President determines that it is in the national

7 interest of the United States and important to

8 United States efforts to respond to, deter, or prevent

9 acts of international terrorism.

10 (2) CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION RE11 QUIRED.—The authority of this section may be exer12 cised only after notification to the appropriate com13 mittees of Congress.

14 (b) STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this

15 section shall be construed to authorize the President to

16 provide for nuclear cooperation with India or Pakistan.

17 (c) PERIOD FOR EXERCISE OF AUTHORITY.—The au18 thority of this paragraph may be exercised through Sep19 tember 30, 2003.

Æ
Exhibit 10.2
Execution Copy

AMENDMENT NO. 6  TO MASTER LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT

This AMENDMENT NO. 6 is dated as of October 29, 2001 (this "Amendment"), and amends the Master Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2000, as
amended (the "Loan and Security Agreement"), and is between NC Capital Corporation and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Mortgage Capital Inc.

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to make a certain amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement as hereinafter set forth; and

WHEREAS,
pursuant to Section 11.4 of the Loan and Security Agreement, the parties hereto are permitted to amend the Loan and Security Agreement:

NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the above recitals and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto
agree as follows:

SECTION
1.Definitions.  Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meanings set forth
in the Loan and Security Agreement.

SECTION
2.Amendment.  The Loan and Security Agreement is hereby amended as set forth below:



SECTION
3.Survival.  Except as expressly amended hereby, the Loan and Security Agreement shall continue
in full force and effect in accordance with the provisions thereof and the Loan and Security Agreement is in all respects hereby ratified, confirmed and preserved. This Amendment and all its
provisions shall be deemed a part of the Loan and Security Agreement in the manner and to the extent herein provided.

SECTION
4.Successors and Assigns.  This Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the
parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns.

SECTION
5.Governing Law.  This Amendment shall be governed by New York law without reference to its
choice of law doctrine.

SECTION
6.Counterparts.  This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of which
taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument, and any of the parties hereto may execute this Amendment by signing any such counterpart.

*
* *

---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 6 to be duly executed as of this 29th day of October 2001.

| |  | NC CAPITAL CORPORATION                          
| |  | ------------------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                             
| |  | Name:                                           
| |  | Title:                                          
| |  | MORGAN STANLEY DEAN WITTER MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC.
| |  | By:                                             
| |  | Name:                                           
| |  | Title:                                          

---

QuickLinks
04/12/201 0 13:1 3 816329410 6 SA D PAG E 02/0 3 

# Q

u.s , Departmen t o f Transportatio n F«d6ra l Aviatio n Administratio n Smal l Airplan e Directorate 90 1 Locust Kansa s City , M O 6410 6

J&'P . • © !^ 1

Mr . WilliamD . Holde r Par k County Sheriff

s Office

- Searc h& Rescu e Dept . t h 131 1 ir " Stree t Cody , W Y 82414-353 6 Dea r Mr . Holder : Thi s lette r i s t o informyo u tha t

w e hav e receive dan dbegu n processin g you r petitio n fo

r exemption . I t

acknowledge s receip t

o f th e petitio n an ddescribe s ho w w e wil l proces s it . W e Hav e th e Petitio n We'v e receive dyou r

Januar y 20 , 2010 , petitio n o n behal f o f th e Park Count y Sheriff

s Offic e fo r a n exemptio n from§ 23.2 5 o f Titl e 14 , Cod e o f

Federal Regulation s (1 4 CFR) . Thi s exemption , i f

granted , woul dallo w th e Par k County Sheriff

s Offic e t o operat e th e mode l Sk y Litemational , Inc . model A-I B wit hamaximu mweigh t

o f 220 0 pounds . We'v e adde dyou r

petitio n t o th e publi c docke t (No . FAA-2010-0090 ) an dw e ar e processin g it . W e nee dadditiona l information : 1 . D o th e wheel s an dtire s hav e stati c loadrating s o f a t leas t 220 0 pounds , 2 . D o th e brake s hav e adesig n landin g kineti c energ y equivalen t t o tha t neede dfo r

a 220 0 poun dweight , an d 3 . I s ther e an Airplan e Fligh t Manual that

show s th e takeof

f performanc e for

th e airplan e at

220 0 pounds ? Ho w We'l l Proces s th e Petitio n A petitio n fo

r an exemption , accordin g t o 1 4 CFR11.63(d) , mus t b e sen t to th e FA A a

t leas t 12 0 day s befor e th e propose deffectiv e dat e o f th e exemption . In addition , w e publis ha summary o f

th e petitio n i n th e Federa l Registe r for publi c commen t

unless , accordin g t o 1 4 CF R11.87 , w e determin e tha t goo dcaus e exist s fo

r not publishin g it .04/12/201 0 13:1 3 816329410 6 SA D PAG E03/0 3

W e wil l advis e yo u o f

th e agency' s fina

l decisio n o n your

petitio n a s soo n a s possible . I f yo u hav e an y question s i n th e meantime , yo u ma y contac t Mr . Lesli e B . Taylo r

at (816 ) 329-4134 , emai l leslie.b.taylor@faa.gov . Sincerely , ,x^r-LKi mSmith Manager , Smal l Airplane Directorat e Aircraf t Certificatio n Servic e
```

[House Report 107-682]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     107-682

======================================================================

 
PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 
  1646, FOREIGN RELATIONS AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEARS 2002 AND 
                                  2003

                                _______
                                

 September 24, 2002.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

 Mr. Diaz-Balart, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 545]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 545, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany H.R. 1646, the Foreign Relations 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Years 2002 and 2003, and against 
its consideration. The resolution further provides that the 
conference report shall be considered as read.

                                

```
FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENT
                             TO
        AMERITECH KEY MANAGEMENT LIFE INSURANCE PLAN
                              
                              

     Pursuant to authority reserved to Ameritech Corporation
(the "Company") by the provisions of the Ameritech Key
Management Life Insurance Plan (Effective as of December 1,
1995) (the "Plan"), the Plan is hereby amended effective as
of July 1, 1996 as follows:

     To delete subsection 3.2 of the Plan in its entirety
and to substitute the following therefor:

     "3.2  Automatic Increases in Policy Coverage.  The
total amount described in subsection 2.1 payable as a death
benefit (based upon the Participant's market rate and target
bonus award at the time he purchases the Policy) under a
Policy shall be indexed a the rate of a) seven percent (7%)
for each Policy Year (following the initial Policy Year)
that begins while he remains employed by the Company or an
Employer, and rounded to the next higher $1,000, for any
Participant who has a Policy Effective Date of July 1, 1996
or earlier, and b) at a rate to be established from time to
time by the Plan Administrator  for each Policy Year
(following the initial Policy Year) that begins while he
remains employed by the Company or an Employer, and rounded
to the next higher $1,000, for any Participant who has a
Policy Effective Date of January 1, 1997 or later;  provided
that i) the rate established by the Plan Administrator shall
be no less than five percent (5%) and no greater than seven
percent (7%), and ii) the rate established for any Policy
purchased by the Plan Administrator with a Policy Effective
Date of January 1, 1997 or later shall be subject to
Committee approval."

Dated:  June 25, 1996


                              AMERITECH CORPORATION

                              By: /s/ Walter M. Oliver
                                   Senior Vice President -
                                   Human Resources


Concur:


/s/ T.P. Hester
Executive Vice President and
General Counsel
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-61853,
333-51790, 333-31548, 333-63802, 333-100727, 333-109179) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 33-58359, 33-60437, 333-10003, 333-33249, 333-83677, 333-51906, 33-30007, 33-68208,
333-33265, 333-10005, 333-33251, 333-83669, 333-33291, 33-21241, 333-55126, 333-42371,
333-81275, 333-87967, 333-81277, 333-83673, 333-64103, 333-83681, 333-51872, 333-52202,
333-66130, 333-70310, 333-76762, 333-76766, 333-76768, 333-76770, 333-100722, 333-90514,
333-90512, 333-90510, 333-64095, 333-106691, 333-106692, 333-111314, 333-116650, 333-116651,
333-116653, 333-114184, 333-125723, 333-125724, 333-125726, 333-139491, 333-139492, 333-143467, 333-143468, 333-143469) of Genzyme
Corporation of our report dated February 29, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the
Genzyme Corporation Annual Report, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
February 29, 2008 relating to Genzyme Corporation's financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K, and of our report dated February 25, 2008 relating
to the financial statements of BioMarin/Genzyme LLC, which appears in this Form 10-K.

|/s/PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP           |  | 
|--------------------------------------- |  | 
|Boston, Massachusetts
February 29, 2008 |  | 

---



QuickLinks
From: Joyce Graf

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Opposed to exemption for "regligious employers"

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 2:47:53 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the

exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would

be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and

ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Joyce F. Graf

Co-president, AAUW Maryland

1368 Canterbury Way

Rockville, MD 20854