alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: linda@ferebeeproperties.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:20:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Linda Tucker

Nashville, NC 27856
*Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that

have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on

the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless

expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession."

Pursuant to that Rule, the Court has determined that this opinion

should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

95-30087

 

CAJUN ELECTRIC POWER CORPORATIVE,

INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GULF STATES UTILITIES COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

 

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Middle District of Louisiana 

(91-CV-1091)

 

(September 29, 1995)

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and WIENER, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM*

 

In this appeal from the district court's grant of a

preliminary injunction in favor of Defendant-Appellee Gulf States

Utilities Company, we have now reviewed the applicable facts and

law as presented to us by able counsel in their outstanding briefs

and in their oral arguments before the court, and have deliberated

on the pertinent points raised in this appeal within the framework
2

of the long-standing, multi-faceted litigation that continues

between the parties and others in the district court. As a result,

we are satisfied that the district court did not abuse its

discretion in granting the subject injunction, and we therefore 

AFFIRM
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------


             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, AS ADOPTED
              PURSUANT TO SS.906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report of Spire Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K (the "Report") for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Christian
Dufresne, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: March 31, 2009                  By: /s/ Christian Dufresne
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Christian Dufresne
                                           Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### CURRY *v.*CURRY, administrator.

It appearing from the official entry made upon the bill of exceptions in this case that it was not filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court -within fifteen days from the date of the judge’s certificate, the writ of error must be dismissed.

Submitted May 28,

Decided August 14, 1907.

Motion to dismiss tlie writ of error.

*J. W. Quincey, 8. G. Townsend,*and *W. T. Diclcerson,*for plaintiff in efror.

*Wilson, Bennett & Lambdin*and *B. G. Diclcerson,*contra.

Cobb, P. J.

The bill of exceptions was certified by the judge on December 3, 1906. Service was acknowledged by counsel on December 26, 1906. It appears, from the official entry of the clerk of the trial court, that the bill of exceptions was filed in his office on December 26, 1906. A motion is made to dismiss the' *269writ of error upon the ground that it was not filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court within fifteen days from the date of the judge’s certificate. This motion must be sustained. *Swafford*v. Swafford, 125 *Ga.*386, and cases cited.

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
H. Res. 1285 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 20, 2008. 

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

6304) to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 

1978 to establish a procedure for authorizing certain acquisitions of foreign intelligence, and for other purposes. All 

points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The bill 

shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions of the bill are waived. The previous question shall be 

considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided among and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary and the 

chairman and ranking minority member of the Permanent 

Select Committee on Intelligence; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 6304 pursuant to 

this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 
2 

•HRES 1285 EH 

question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the 

bill to such time as may be designated by the Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No. 333-35460

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO. 072				Trade Date: 04/26/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

September 8, 2000)						Issue Date: 05/01/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement April 26, 2001
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

or	Stated				 Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		 Price to	 Discounts & Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2) Commissions Frequency	 Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QCZ2 5.45% 05/15/05	100%	 1.0% Semi-Annually	 YES	 NO	

 

 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____ Yes	 X No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount. Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
No. 477, Misc.

#### Giagnocavo *v.*American Can Co.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Emanuel Klein*for respondent.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
----

| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  February      20, 2009 |   | /s/ Kent M.      Adams                               |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                    |   | Kent      M. Adams                                   |   |
|                                    |   | President,      Director and Chief Executive Officer |   |

| Date:  February      20, 2009 |   | /s/ James A.      Duensing                               |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                    |   | James      A. Duensing                                   |   |
|                                    |   | Executive      Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer |   |

----
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > Alternative Approach to the Monetary Mechanism

              																	Brunner, Karl, 1916-1989					,	Meltzer, Allan H.					,	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking and Currency. Subcommittee on Domestic Finance, 1964-1975					 and 	Eighty-Eighth Congress, 1963-1965. 						*Alternative Approach to the Monetary Mechanism*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										August 17, 1964,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/397,			accessed on September 8, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
From: Marion Stillson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Reproductive Health Care

Date: Friday, August 19, 2011 11:24:55 AM

Thank you for this proposal! Please make it come true!

Marion Stillson, Reston, VA

AAUW member for more than 30 years
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6050

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RANDY CHRISTMAS, a/k/a Dough,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CR-95-198, CA-98-825-2)

Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randy Christmas, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Lee Keller, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Randy Christmas seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the

district court. See United States v. Christmas, Nos. CR-95-198;

CA-98-825-2 (S.D.W. Va. Dec. 18, 1998). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Patrick Jordan, Respondent, *v.*Timothy J. Phelan, Appellant.

*Jordan*v. Phelan, 140 App. Div. 933, affirmed.

(Argued May 13, 1912;

decided June 4, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 29,1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant, his employer.

*Joseph F. Daly, Frank PE. Richmond*and *Edward PE. Daly*for appellant.

*Richard J. Donovan*and *Herbert D. Cohen*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
H. Res. 1304 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 26, 2008. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 6052) to promote increased public transportation use, to promote increased use of alternative fuels in 

providing public transportation, and for other purposes. The 

first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of 

order against consideration of the bill are waived except those 

arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. General debate 

shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour 

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 

minority member of the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill shall 

be considered as read. All points of order against provisions 

in the bill are waived. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule 

XVIII, no amendment to the bill shall be in order except 
2 

•HRES 1304 EH 

those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the 

report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 

opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 

be subject to a demand for division of the question in the 

House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 

against such amendments are waived except those arising 

under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 

and report the bill to the House with such amendments as 

may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 

final passage without intervening motion except one motion 

to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. During consideration in the House of H.R. 6052 

pursuant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of 

the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to such time as may be designated by the 

Speaker. 

SEC. 3. It shall be in order at any time on the legislative 

day of Thursday, June 26, 2008, for the Speaker to entertain 

motions that the House suspend the rules relating to: 
3 

•HRES 1304 EH 

(a) a measure concerning the Commodity Exchange Act 

and energy markets; and 

(b) a measure concerning the issuance of oil and gas 

leases on Federal lands or waters. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
OAR Box 1669 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

$ J&S ll-E-14 

Docket Number: 

A-98-13 

Printed 9/23/2008 9:36:49 AM Sheet 82 of 110 

P.1 
P.2 

A-W3 

||-£f-<4 ' 

From: 

Date: 

Contact: 

Company: 

Telephone Contact Report 

Organic Liquids Distribution NESHAP 

Greg LaFlam, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

i — 

November 6,1997 ; 

Mr. Mark Saxton 

Support Terminal Services, Inc., Texas City, TX L. 

&',\ \ 3 £$ 

[, J,t, iii f LjOCivtT 

Telephone Number: (409) 948-3561 

Contact Summary: 

Mr. Saxton discussed the Texas City facility's environmental control situation. The 

facility operates under SIC code 4226. Some ofthe storage tanks are vented to enclosed flares. 

Some tank truck loadings are closed, while others are open. He also stated that some railcar 

loadings (such as acrylates) are controlled using vapor balance. There are 50 truck loading 

positions, each of which is capable of being vapor controlled (vapor balance or liquid 

scrubber/carbon canister control). The facility also has a leak detection/repair program for the 

storage tanks used to store products with a vapor pressure >0.5 psia, and on equipment 

components (weekly visual, quarterly instrument monitoring). 

The facility has two NPDES permits. One applies to water discharged to the bay after 

testing, while the other applies to a treatment system that uses "bugs" to reduce pollutants. The 

facility is a major source, and does not have a Title V permit (only a State permit). They prepare 

an annual emissions inventory for the State.
file:///C|/..._List_29-08-2011_12-55-54-352/Document%20List%2029-08-2011%2012-55-54-352_docs/EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0048.html[8/29/2011 2:06:36 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: August 29, 2011

Received: August 24, 2011

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 80eeaebb

Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0018

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of

Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0018-0002

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services under

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0048

Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

General Comment

I am a member of HSLDA and I agree 100% with their comments: HSLDA vigorously oppose the

illegally narrow religious exemption created in the Interim Final Rule. This exemption requires that a

religious organization show the following in order to receive an exemption: 

(1) The inculcation of religious values is the purpose of this organization;

(2) The organization primarily employs persons who share the religious tenets of the organization;

(3) The organization serves primarily persons who share the religious tenets of the organization; and

(4) The organization is a nonprofit organization as described in section 6033(a)(1) and section

6033(a)(3)(A)(i) or (iii) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

This proposed religious exemption would apply almost exclusively only to houses of worship, and

possibly some denominational seminaries. HSLDA & I believe that the religious exemption should be

broadened.

The Problem: religious and conscientious objections to paying for certain drugs.

The Proposed Religious Exemption violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

The Proposed Religious Exemption does not protect ordinary employers who have sincerely held

religious beliefs.

The Proposed Religious Exemption does not protect religious organizations.

The Proposed Religious Exemption specifically only applies to churches and other houses of worship.

Conclusion: protect the freedom of religion and the freedom of conscience for ALL Americans!
From: Helen Ferrante

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Thursday, August 04, 2011 12:37:49 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Helen Ferrante

405 East 14th Street-1F

New York, NY 10009
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.35 MB)
 
 AUAB 379th Air Expeditionary Wing Qatar KC-135 Al Udeid Air Base AIR REFUELING
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil