alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE    
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TRANSGLOBE ENERGY CORPORATION FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-KSB
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         588,664
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  400,172
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               988,836
<PP&E>                                      14,170,500
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,498,523
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,423,660
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          477,912
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                    13,945,748
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,423,660
<SALES>                                      1,113,274
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,113,274
<CGS>                                          799,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  799,195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,084,175
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (770,096)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (770,096)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (770,096)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of webMethods, Inc.
(the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mary
Dridi, the Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of the Company
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                        |  |                                                                                           
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: February 13, 2004 |  | /S/ MARY DRIDIName: Mary Dridi
Title: Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Hood lb SO2/hr Waste lb

SO2/hr May 1994, Furnace 12 (1 hood, 1 waste stack) 2.48 1.29 2.46 0.63 1.23 0.62 May 1994, Furnace 11 waste stack 1104 0.69 0.66 2.11 waste stack 1105 2.94 2.92 1.42 Jan 1995, Furnace 12 waste stack 1205 0.79 0.60 0.90

Northshore has two furnaces. Each furnace has three hood exhaust stacks and two waste exhaust stacks.

Page 1 of 3lb SO2/hr Furnace Tested Test Date Hood lb SO2/hr Waste

lb SO2/hr 2.60 Furnace 12 May 1994 1 1.23 0.60 1.26 2 2.46 0.62 1.24 3 2.48 0.63 1.24 4 0.66 1.24 5 0.69 1.24 6 0.79 1.38 Furnace 11 May 1994 7 0.90 1.32 8 1.29 4.20 9 1.42 5.8 10 2.11 5.8 11 2.92 2.8 12 2.94 1.54 Furnace 12 January 1995

n = 3 12 1.18
m = (n + 1)*.95 3.8 12.35 1.78 UPL = xm= 2.48 2.94 2.4 Furnace 11 July 2010 2.6 3 hood exhaust = 7.43 2.6 2 waste exhaust = 5.89 2.6 Furnace total = 13.32 Waste Gas Stack Test Data

Northshore

Page 2 of 31.18 1.5

lb SO2/hr Furnace Tested Test Date 1.24 1.8

[1] 7.5 Furnace 12 May 1994 [2] 1.24 1.8 [1] 7.5 [2] 1.24 1.8 [1] 3.6 [2] 1.24 2.4 [1] 1.8 [2] 1.26 3.6 [1] 5.7 [2] 1.32 5.7 [1] 7.5 [2] 1.38 7.5 [1] 1.54 7.5 [1] 1.78 7.5 [1] 2.4 [1] 2.60 [1] 2.6 [1] 2.6 [1] 2.6 [1] 2.8 [1] 4.20 [1] 2.4 Furnace 11 July 2010 [2] 5.8 [1] 1.8 [2] 5.8 [1] 1.8 [2] n = 19 10 [1] 1.5 [2] m = (n + 1)*.95 19 10.45 UPL = xm= 5.80 7.50

13.30 Hood Exhaust Stack Test Data

Total Furnace UPL =

Page 3 of 3
From: cebb@roadrunner.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:02:13 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Clarence Ebbinga

Enterprise, AL 36330
From: jc5765@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:35:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B). Without

any change, these actions are disproportinate and discrimanatory to people of color and reminds me of

the days of Margaret Sanger who spearheaded efforts to sterile the poor and indigent members of our

society. Similar efforts were used in Nazi Germany in the 1930s and 40s....horrible results!

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joseph and Connie Mertan

, 20105-2662
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Century Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert K. Cole, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    ROBERT K. COLE





Robert K. Cole

Chief Executive Officer

May 14, 2003





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to New Century and will be retained by New Century and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification accompanied the Form 10-Q filing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. It is being reproduced herein for information only. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of New Century, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
No. 619.

#### Tri-Pharmacy, Inc., et al. *v.*Virginia.

*Carl J. Batter, Carl J. Batter, Jr.*and *Karl G. Sorg*for petitioners.

Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia. Certiorari denied.
From: Mary Stuhr

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Monday, August 15, 2011 4:49:33 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Mary Stuhr
Addison, Illinois
No. 338, Misc.

#### Spinney *v.*New York.

Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.
#### FULGHUM *v.*LOUISIANA.

No. 244, Misc.

Decided October 8, 1962.

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
***RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE***
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1996 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             216
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,289
<ALLOWANCES>                                        95
<INVENTORY>                                      4,529
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,205
<PP&E>                                           1,237
<DEPRECIATION>                                     453
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,590
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,964
<BONDS>                                          5,417
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            49
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,590
<SALES>                                          8,572
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,572
<CGS>                                            3,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,017
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (738)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (788)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 50
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,231
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,281
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .27<F1>
<FN>
<F1>WE HAVE CALCULATED EARNINGS PER SHARE AMOUNTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAS 128
"EARNINGS PER SHARE".  WE HAVE ENTERED BASIC AND DILUTED AMOUNTS IN PLACE OF
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>


</TABLE>
99–008

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ! 2d Session 107–684

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF HOUSE RESOLUTION 540, EXPRESSING THE SENSE OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES THAT CONGRESS 

SHOULD COMPLETE ACTION ON H.R. 3762, THE PENSION SECURITY ACT 

OF 2002 AND HOUSE RESOLUTION 544, EXPRESSING THE SENSE OF THE 

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ON PERMANENCY OF PENSION REFORM 

PROVISIONS AND HOUSE RESOLUTION 543, EXPRESSING THE SENSE OF 

THE HOUSE THAT CONGRESS SHOULD COMPLETE ACTION ON H.R. 4019, 

MAKING MARRIAGE TAX RELIEF PERMANENT

SEPTEMBER 24, 2002.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 547]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 547, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of House Resolution 

540, expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

Congress should complete action on H.R. 3762, the Pension Security Act of 2002; House Resolution 544, expressing the sense of the 

House of Representatives on permanency of pension reform provisions; and House Resolution 543, expressing the sense of the House 

that Congress should complete action on H.R. 4019, making marriage tax relief permanent under a closed rule. 

The rule provides that House Resolution 540 shall be debatable 

in the House for one hour equally divided among and controlled by 

the chairmen and ranking minority members of the Committees on 

Education and the Workforce and Ways and Means. The rule provides that House Resolution 540 shall be considered as read for 

amendment. 

The rule provides that House Resolution 544 shall be debatable 

in the House for one hour equally divided and controlled by the 

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways 

2

and Means. The rule provides that House Resolution 544 shall be 

considered as read for amendment. 

The rule provides that House Resolution 543 shall be debatable 

in the House for one hour equally divided and controlled by the 

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways 

and Means. The rule provides that House Resolution 543 shall be 

considered as read for amendment.

Æ
#### William W. Robinson, Appellant, v. Luke Robinson, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Smith, P. J.
Exhibit 32



Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)



The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Virginia
Financial Group, Inc., respectively, certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, which accompanies this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Virginia Financial Group, Inc. at the dates and for the periods
indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), and no purchaser or seller of securities or any other person shall be entitled to rely upon the foregoing certification
for any purpose. The undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                 |  |                                                     
|---------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|November 5, 2004 |  | /s/ O.R. Barham, Jr.                                
|                 |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                 | 
|                 |  | /s/ Jeffrey W. Farrar                               
|                 |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



31
Exhibit 99.1


THE FOLLOWING STATEMENT IS BEING MADE TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SOLELY FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C.
1350), WHICH CARRIES WITH IT CERTAIN PENALTIES IN THE EVENT OF A KNOWING OR
WILLFUL REPRESENTATION.


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20549

         Re:  The Flight International Group, Inc.

Ladies and Gentlemen:

         In accordance with the requirements of Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned, David E.
Sandlin and Robert Dynan, President and Principal Financial Officer,
respectively, of The Flight International Group, Inc. (the "Company"), certify
that:

(1)       the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year
          ended April 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
          Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated as of this 16th day of  August, 2002



                                            /s/ David E. Sandlin
                                            David E. Sandlin, President


                                            /s/ Robert Dynan
                                            Robert Dynan, Principal
                                            Financial Officer
Memo to: EPA Docket (EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0218) 

From: Anthony Nesky, EPA/OAR/ORIA/RPD 

Subject: Request for a public hearing on the proposed rule “Revisions to National Emission 

Standards for Radon Emissions from Operating Mill Tailings; Proposed Rule.” 

On June 10, 2014, Jennifer Thurston of INFORM Colorado called Anthony Nesky of the EPA Radiation 

Protection Division (RPD) in the Office of Radiation and Indoor Air (ORIA), in the Office of Air and 

Radiation (OAR), at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to request a public hearing on the 

proposed rule “Revisions to National Emission Standards for Radon Emissions from Operating Mill 

Tailings; Proposed Rule,” 79 Fed. Reg. 25,388 (May 2, 2014), which proposes revisions to 40 CFR Part 61, 

Subpart W. Ms. Thurston explained that she was requesting the public hearing on behalf of a number of

organizations who wanted public hearings in multiple locations.