alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1


            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the documents listed below of
our report dated February 28, 2005 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedules of John Hancock Financial Services, Inc. included in
the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004:

o     Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-62668) of John Hancock Financial
      Services, Inc. and the related Prospectus pertaining to the registration
      of up to $1,000,000,000 of its debt securities, preferred stock, common
      stock, warrants, stock purchase contracts and stock purchase units, and

o     Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-102743) of John Hancock Financial
      Services, Inc. and the related Prospectus Supplement pertaining to the
      registration of guarantees relating to market value adjustment interests
      under deferred annuity contracts.


                                                     /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 16, 2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7947

JOSEPH E. MILTIER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOHN JABE, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-95-1364-AM)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 28, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph E. Miltier, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond Bagwell,

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

Miltier v. Jabe, No. CA-95-1364-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 16, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
From: Jerrod.strid@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:42:27 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jerrod Strid

Renton, WA 98055
No. 283, Misc.

#### Davis *v.*Myers, Correctional Superintendent.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied.
No. 319, Misc.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox*for the United States.

#### Miller *v.*United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                   CERTIFICATION OF CO-CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Douglas A. Lindgren, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report, as amended, of Excelsior Private
Equity Fund II, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: September 12, 2003

/s/ Douglas A. Lindgren
----------------------------
Douglas A. Lindgren, Co-Chief Executive Officer
From: barbpigott@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:03:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Barbara Pigott

Los Alamos, NM 87544
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.48 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.51 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OC TOBER 16, 2013

NO. 03

- 13

- 00020

- CV

Agbolade Odutayo, Appellant

v.

Richards Memorial Hospital, et al., Appellee s

APPEAL FROM 20TH DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, ROSE AND GO ODWIN

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

IT APPEARING to this Court that the appellant has failed to file a brief, and, accordingly, has

failed to prosecute the appeal: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjud ged and ordered that the

appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. IT IS FURTHER ordered that the appellant pay all

costs relating to this appeal both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision be

certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            1098
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       1808
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            2761
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              2773
<LOANS>                                          39512
<ALLOWANCE>                                        305
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   46950
<DEPOSITS>                                       35425
<SHORT-TERM>                                      1500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                642
<LONG-TERM>                                       3000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                        6379
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   46950
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   1687
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  135
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     3
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  1825
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 862
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1069
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              756
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       30
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    603
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    276
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         276
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       178
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.53
<LOANS-NON>                                         68
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   284
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       14
<RECOVERIES>                                         5
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  305
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            305
        

</TABLE>
# Houthis fire anti-ship cruise missile toward Red Sea

/ Published Jan. 30, 2024

Jan. 30, 2024Release Number 20240130 – 01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

**TAMPA, Fla. –**On Jan. 30, at approximately 11:30 p.m. (Sanaa time), Iranian-backed Houthi militants fired one anti-ship cruise missile from Houthi-controlled areas of Yemen toward the Red Sea. The missile was successfully shot down by USS Gravely (DDG 107). There were no injuries or damage reported.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1181 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 130
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1181

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2719 South Webster Street in Kokomo, Indiana, as the ``Elwood Haynes 
                  `Bud' Hillis Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 16, 2001

  Mr. Lugar (for himself and Mr. Bayh) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental 
                                Affairs

                             August 2, 2001

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2719 South Webster Street in Kokomo, Indiana, as the ``Elwood Haynes 
                  `Bud' Hillis Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ELWOOD HAYNES ``BUD'' HILLIS POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    (a) In General.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2719 South Webster Street in Kokomo, Indiana, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Elwood Haynes `Bud' Hillis Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Elwood 
Haynes ``Bud'' Hillis Post Office Building.
                                                       Calendar No. 130

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1181

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 2719 South Webster Street in Kokomo, Indiana, as the ``Elwood Haynes 
                  `Bud' Hillis Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 2, 2001

                       Reported without amendment
```
file:///C|/..._List_29-08-2011_12-55-54-352/Document%20List%2029-08-2011%2012-55-54-352_docs/EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0056.html[8/29/2011 2:37:41 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: August 29, 2011

Received: August 24, 2011

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 80eeb94f

Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0018

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of

Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0018-0002

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services under

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0056

Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Natalia O Seda

Address:

730 Clinton Ave.

South Plainfield, NJ, 07080

Email: nelsonseda@comcast.net

Phone: 908-834-2074

Organization: HSLDA Member

General Comment

Dear Sirs, 

I think that this law should not be passed and that religious organizations and colleges should not be

forced to fund abortion pills. This is horrible and the law should be changed. We should always be

given the right to do what is right or wrong according to our concsience. This pill is wrong not only

morally but scientifically. I believe that not only is this horrible before God because HE hates the

shedding of innoncent blood, but also for the woman because I am pretty sure this pill will have

terrible side affects which can harm them phsically and prevent them from having children at a later

date, or worse yet cause harm to thier body. This pill is wrong in so many ways and I would like to

see that HSLDA and other religious organizations should have the right to say NO we don't want to

fund the abortion pill.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1424 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1424

   To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide permanent 
        authority for the admission of ``S'' visa nonimmigrants.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2001

Mr. Kennedy (for himself, Mr. Brownback, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Hatch, and Mr. 
     Durbin) introduced the following bill; which was read twice, 
              considered, read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide permanent 
        authority for the admission of ``S'' visa nonimmigrants.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT AUTHORITY FOR ADMISSION OF ``S'' VISA 
              NONIMMIGRANTS.

    Section 214(k) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1184(k)) is amended--
            (1) by striking (2);
            (2) by redesignating paragraphs (3), (4), and (5) as 
        paragraphs (2), (3), and (4), respectively; and
            (3) in paragraph (4)(E) (as redesignated), by striking 
        ``paragraph (4)'' and inserting ``paragraph (3)''.
                                 <all>
```