EBot"-z.A-i"3 -7/•/o7 

ENTEC Services 

Pollution Control System Evaluation and Source Emissions Testing 

Boral Brick 

Muskogee, Oklahoma 

DIFF Baghouse Emissions Testing 

DIFF Out•et- PM w/HCi / HF 

DIFF inlet HC! ! HF 

July 25, 2007 

Entec Project No.: 27175 

16-D Commerce Avenue Hueytown, Alabama 35023 Phone: (205) 491-6676 Fax (205) 491-6614 

www.entecservices.com 
Entec Services, inc. 

16-D Commerce Avenue 

Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Telephone: (205) 491-6676 

Fax: (205) 491-6614 

Results of the Ju•y 25, 2007 

D•FF Baghouse Emissions Testing for 

D•FF Out•et PM w! HCi / HF and DIFF •r•let HCI / HF at the 

Boral Brick facility •ocated in 

Muscogee, Oklahoma 

Submitted to: 

Boral Brick Company 

P.O. Box 1178 

Columbus, Georgia 31902 

Attention: Mr. Frank Porter 

Entec Project No. 27175 

Completed By: 

Tommy z, Jr. 

Project Leader 

Report Submitted August 3, 2007 

Reviewed By: 

Tom Lotz 

Technical Services Manager 

hereby certify to the best of my knowledge al• fieBd sampling and laboratory analysis performed for 

this report is authentic and accurate, it has been checked for compBeteness and accuracy. 
Boral Brick Company 

Table of Contents 

Section Page No. 

Executive Summary 1 

Emissions Summary 2 

Detailed Test Results 4 

Sampling Procedures 11 

Location of Test Ports 15 

Method 5 / 26A Sampling Train 17 

DIFF Outlet Field Data Sheets 18 

Test Run 1 19 

Test Run 2 24 

Test Run 3 28 

DIFF Inlet Field Data Sheets 32 

Test Run 1 33 

Test Run 2 37 

Test Run 3 40 

Control Room Production Data 43 

Test Protocol 45 

QSTI Certification Documentation 58 

Quality Control / Quality Assurance Procedures 61 

Field QA / QC Checklist 66 

Meter Orifice Check and Temperature Check 68 

Fyrite / Orsat Standardization 72 

Preliminary Traverse and Cyclonic Flow Verification 75 

Laboratory Analysis 76 

Equipment Calibrations 82 

Safety Documentation 96 

Nomenclature and Test Calculations 98 
Executive Summary 

Bora• Brick Company located in Muscogee, Oklahoma retained Entec Services, inc. to 

perform a particulate matter emissions testing on the D•FF Baghouse Testing. Mr. 

Tommy Lotz, Jr., Mr. Johnathan Cochran and Mr. Ryan Harris of Entec Services, inc. 

conducted the testing on July 25, 2007. Representing Boral Brick Company was Mr. 

Frank Porter who coordinated testing with the control room production activity. Entec 

Services, inc. encountered no difficulties in the field collection of the samples or in the 

laboratory analysis of the samples. 

oi 

0 1.1_ LI... (1} 

= X • O- 0 )7" U.. 

0 0 E 0 • • 

.=• 

>., "• •o .• o 

x • o :• • 
Detailed Test Results 
Entec Services, Inc. 

SOURCE OVERVIEW 

SOURCE OWNER: 

PLANT LOCATION: 

SOURCE(S) NAME(S): 

SOURCE(S) CONDITION: 

SOURCE(S) SHAPE: 

PROBE WASH CHEMICAL: 

TEST PERFORMED: 

REFERENCE METHOD TESTS: 

PROJECT MANAGER 

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST-ASSISTANT 

OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: 

RULING AGENCY 

Boral Brick 

Muskogee, OK 

Outlet of DIFF Baghouse 

Compliance Testing 

Circular 

Acetone 

Particulate and HCI / HF Testing 

Sample Location 

Volumetric Flow 

Molecular Weight 

Moisture Content 

Particulate 

HCI/HF 

Mr. Tim Draheim 

Mr. Ryan Harris 

Mr. Frank Porter 

Oklahoma DEQ 

DATES TESTS CONDUCTED: 

ENTEC PROJECT NUMBER: 

07/25/07 

27175 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

26A 
ENTEC Services, Inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

INPUT TEST DATA 

Client: Boral Brick Job No.: 27175 

Source: Outlet of DIFF Baghouse Data Input By: Tommy Lotz, Jr. 

Field Data Units Test Data 

Run Number 

Test Date 

Time Test Run Began Ended 

Sampling Time 

Stack Area 

Symbol 

Military Time 

minutes 

07/25/07 

0949-1054 

60 

2 

07/25/07 

1135-1240 

60 

07/25/07 

1320-1422 

6O 

AVERAGE 

60 

As Ft 30.272 30.272 30.272 

Barometric Pressure Pba, in. Hg 30.06 30.06 30.06 30.06 

P9 

Dn 

Vm 

in. H20 

tm 

in. H20 

inches 

dcf 

Stack Static Pressure 

Pitot Tube Correction factor 

F 

in. H20 

-0.33 

0.84 

0.986 

1.800 

0.242 

42.105 

100.5 

1.47 

-0.35 

Meter Correction Factor 

Meter Delta H @ 

Nozzle Diameter 

0.84 

0.986 

1.800 

0.242 

41.975 

104.0 

1.46 

-0.29 

0.84 

0.986 

1.800 

0.242 

Meter Volume 41.590 

Meter Temperature 

Avg. Orifice Delta H 

Impingers Weight Gain (Moisture) 

&H 

103.2 

1.40 

-0.32 

0.84 

0.986 

1.800 

Wimp 

Wsg 

O• 

0.242 

41.890 

102.5 

1.45 

grams 42.4 41.8 41.0 41.7 

grams Silica Gel Impinger Weight Gain (Moisture) 8.9 10.1 7.1 8.7 

Oxygen Concentration, dry basis 

iCarbon Dioxide Concentration, dry basis 

Avg. Sq. Rt. of Delta P 

Stack Temperature 

Total Hydrogen Chloride collected, mg 

Total Hydrogen Fluoride collected, mg 

Total particulate collected 

(sqrt &P)avg 

20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 

CO, % 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 

(in. Hz0) 0.795 0.790 0.775 0.787 

F 

HCL 

HF 

369.8 372.7 

0.92 

0.02 

5.9 

0.09 

372.7 

1.00 

0.02 

5.9 

0.02 

5.8 

mg 

mg 

mg 

371.7 

0.67 

0.02 

5.9 

Below Detection Limit 
ENTEC Services, Inc. 

Client: Boral Brick Job No.: 27175 

Source: Outlet of DIFF Baghouse Data Input By: To•y Lotz, Jr. 

Description Formulas Symbol Units Calculated Data 

Run Number 2 3 AVERAGE 

•ime Began-Ended Military'lime 0949-1054 1135-1240 1320-142; 

1. Stack Pressure Pbar P•/13.6 P= in. Hg 30.04 30.03 30.04 30.04 

2. Meter Pressure =P•ar &H 113,( Pm in. Hg 30.17 30.17 30.16 30.17 

3. Standard Meter Volume 17.64"Y* (V.•'Tm)* (P•=r &H 113.( V,•=ul dscf 39.421 39.054 38.745 39.073 

4a. Standard Volume of Water Vapor Condensed 

4b. Standard Volume of Water Collected in Silica Gel 

:0,0470•VV•m• V,•==) =of 1.995 1.967 1.929 1.964 

v..•,,=) scf 0.420 0.476 0.335 0.410 

B• fraction 0.0577 0.0589 0.0552 0.0573 

TB• fraction 11.0665 11.4526 11.4509 11.3233 

M= gig-mole 

M= glg-ntole 

=(60•0•)'HF•e*Q• HF qbs•r Ibs•r 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 

(60#•0)*•*Q, PMR Ib/hr 1.21 1.23 1,21 1.22 

=T#P=*[0.002•9*V•¢+ Vm*Y*p• V. a• 65.522 65.218 64.•2 65,061 

=0.0471•W• 

5. Moisture Fraction =(Vwclstd) Vws•{=td)ll(Vwd=d) Vwsgf=td Vmlstd) 

=Vr•=•) (TB•|/(1-TB.•) 

=TV•===/0.04707; 

6. Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (Theoretical) 

7. Standard Water Volume @ Saturation (Theoretical) 

8. Volume of Water @ Saturation (Theoretical) 

9. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, dry basis 0.32-(o•)+ o.44*(co•)+0o2s*(10o-(oz)-(co•)] 

10. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, wet basis Md*(1-B•=)+18.0"(I•=} 

11. Average Stack Gas Velocity 

12. Stack Gas Flow @ Stack Conditions 

85.49'G=*(sqrt •P)•g'SQRT((T.) (Ps'Mw)) 

60.vs*A• 

Q.*(T•/Ts)-(p=/p=• 13. Stack Gas Flow @ Standard Conditions 

•4. Stack Gas Flow @ Dry Standard Conditions 

14b. Hydrogen Chloride concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. =(0.01543*HGL•,)/Q=te 

14b. Hydrogen Fluoride concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. 

15. Particulate concentration @ Standard Conditions 

-43.337 -42.790 -42.452 -42.860 

-920.7 -909.1 -901.9 -910.6 

15b. Hydrogen Chloride emissions, Ibs per hour 

15b. Hydrogen Fluoride emissions, Ibs per hour 

21. Particulate emissions 

28.960 28.800 28.800 28.853 

22. Volume collected through nozzle 

28.327 28.164 28.204 28.232 

56.38 56.30 55.20 55.958 

102,411 102,251 100,252 101,638 

65,390 65,061 63,798 64,750 

61,615 61,230 60,276 61,040 

3.444E-05 3.95tE-04 3.664E-04 2.653E-04 

:O'0154•m•m•: 0.0023 0.0023 0,0023 0.0023 

=(60r/000)'HCLQ=•*Q== 0.02 0.21 0.19 0.14 

24. Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent oo*vn (60*v,'A.°e) % 101.06 100.75 101.53 101.11 

Post Meter Odfice Cal. (EMC ALT-009 Yqa) Y, !i ii!i !iii!•!iiiiiiiii .0.:•..9.3.,1, (•.7..4. 0.9863 0.9923 

Below detection limit 
Entec Services, Inc. 

SOURCE OVERVIEW 

SOURCE OWNER: Boral Bricks 

PLANT LOCATION: 

SOURCE(S) NAME(S): 

SOURCE(S) CONDITION: 

SOURCE(S) SHAPE: 

PROBE WASH CHEMICAL: 

Muskogee, OK 

Inlet to DIFF Baghouse 

Compliance 

Circular 

Acetone 

TEST PERFORMED: 

REFERENCE METHOD TESTS: 

PROJECT MANAGER 

HCl / HF Testing 

Sample Location 

Volumetric Flow 

Molecular Weight 

Moisture Content 

HCI / HF 

Mr. Tim Draheim 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

1 

2 

3 

4 

26A 

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST TEAM LEADER 

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST ASSISTANT 

Mr. Tommy Lotz, Jr. 

Mr. Johnathan Cochran 

OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: Mr. Frank Porter 

RULING AGENCY Oklahoma DEQ 

DATES TESTS CONDUCTED: 07/25/07 

ENTEC PROJECT NUMBER: 27175 
Source: Inlet to DIFF Baghouee Data Input By: Tommy Lotz, dr. 

Field Data 

Run Number 

Test Date 

Time Test Run Began Ended 

Sampling Time 

Stack Area 

Barometric Pressure 

Stack Static Pressure 

Pitot Tube Correction factor 

Meter Correction Factor 

Meter Delta H @ 

,•lozzle Diameter 

Meter Volume 

Meter Temperature 

Avg. Orifice Delta H 

Impingers Weight Gain (Moisture) 

Silica Gel Impinger Weight Gain (Moisture) 

Oxygen Concentration, dry basis 

Carbon Dioxide Concentration, dry basis 

•,vg. Sq. Rt. of Delta P 

Stack Temperature 

total Hydrogen Chloride collected, mg 

rotal Hydrogen Fluoride collected, mg 

Symbol Units 

Military Time 

0 minutes 

As Ft 

P•ar in. Hg 

C, 

Y 

.•H@ 

Dn 

AH 

Wimp 

CO2 

(sqrt AP)avg 

HCL 

HF 

in. Hz0 

in. H20 

inches 

dcf 

F 

in. Hz0 

grams 

grams 

% 

mg 

mg 

07/25/07 

0950-1055 

6O 

18.665 

30.06 

-4.50 

0.84 

0.991 

1.822 

0.245 

44.728 

94.6 

1.79 

66.7 

12.6 

17.0 

3.0 

0.961 

527.7 

11.10 

143 

Test Data 

07/25/07 

1135-1240 

6O 

07/25/07 

1320-1425 

6O 

18.665 18.665 

30.06 30.08 

-4.50 

0.84 

0.991 

1.822 

0.245 

46.983 

98.4 

1.92 

76.2 

10.2 

17.0 

3.0 

1.009 

535.2 

7.43 

156 

AVERAGE 

6O 

30.06 

0.991 

1.822 

0.245 

45.167 

103.6 

1.75 

68.3 

7.3 

17.0 

3.0 

0.959 

531.1 

6.37 

145 

0.991 

1.822 

0.245 

45.626 

98.8 

1.82 

70.4 

10.0 

17.0 

3.0 

0.976 

531.3 

8.30 

148 
ENTEC Services, Inc. 

i::iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii•iii::iCommerce::•i::iiiii::iiiiiiAve.iiiiiiii::::::iii::!!iiiHue•town'iii::•ii::i•ii•i•iAlabamaiiiiii;:•::!!i•!• iiiiiiiiii::!iiiiii::i::i::i::i::i::::::iiiii::i::65023 

CALCULA'IED TEST DATA 

Client: Boral Bricks Job No.: 27175 

Source: Inlet to DIFF Baghouse Data Input By: Tommy Lotz, Jr. 

Description Formulas Symbol Units Calculated Data 

Run Number 2 3 

Test Date 

Time Began-Ended Militaw Time 

1. Stack Pressure P•ar Pg/13.6 Ps in. Hg 

2. Meter Pressure Pb=r &H 113.6 Pm in. Hg 

3. Standard Meter Volume 17-64"Y" (Vm/T•.)* (P•a•+ •,H 113.6 V.•=t=• dscf 

4a. Standard Volume of Water Vapor Condensed =0.0470s'w•p v•,• scf 

4b. Standard Volume of Water Collected in Silica Gel =o.0471•'W,• v,•,,,• scf 

07/25/07 07/25/07 07/25/07 

0950-1055 1135-1240 1320-1425 

29.73 29.73 29.73 

AVERAGE 

29.73 

30.19 30.20 30.19 30.19 

42.569 44.421 42.296 43.096 

3.139 3.586 3.214 3.313 

0.594 0.481 0.344 0.473 

5. Moisture Fraction =(Vw•=a• V,s•(=a•)l(V•:•=d• Vwsgl=d) Vn•=al] S• fraction 0.0806 0.0839 0.0776 0.0807 

9. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, dry basis 0.32"(o=)+ 0.44=(co2)+o.28*(100-(oz).(co2)] M= g/g-mole 29.160 29.160 29.160 29.160 

10. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, wet basis Md*{1-Bws)+18.0*(B•=] M, g/g-,mole 28.260 28.224 28.294 28.259 

11. Average Stack Gas Velocity 85.49"C=*(sqrt &P),v•'SQRT((T=) (Ps*Mw)) vs ft/s 74.85 78.89 74.71 76.152 

12. Stack Gas Flow @ Stack Conditions S0"vs*A, O= acrm 83,821 88,357 83,675 85,284 

13. Stack Gas Flow @ Standard Conditions Qa*(T=#Ts)*(Ps/P•t•} Qs scfm 44,505 46,562 44,277 45 115 

14. Stack Gas Flow @ Dry Standard Conditions Q,*(1-Bv, s)*(T=c•Ts)*(PJPst=) Q• dscfm 40,917 42,657 40,841 41,472 

14b. Hydrogen Chloride concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. =(0.01543*HCLm•)IQ•a HCLcs grldscf 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.003 

14b. Hydrogen Fluoride concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. =(0.01543*HF•|IQ,u HFcs gr/dscf 0.052 0.054 0.053 0.053 

15b. Hydrogen Chloride emissions, Ibs per hour =(S0F/000)*HCLQ=t=*Q== HC! -Ibs/hr Ibs/hr 1.41 0.94 0.81 1.06 

15b. Hydrogen Fluoride emissions, Ibs per hour =(60/'/'000)*HFQs•'Qsm HF-tbsRtr Ibs/kr 18.18 19.81 18.52 18.84 

22. Volume collected through nozzle =Ts/P,*[0.0026•9*V,¢+ V•,y*pM'r•l v, acf 87.207 92.014 86.658 88.626 

!24. Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent 10o"vn/(S0=v=*A•*e]• % 98.86 98.96 98.41 98.74 

!i:.i !iii==!:::-=:=.===-:=ii-:i-"ii!i!•!:.! 1.0039 1.0009 1.0063 J % Difference, (Calibration must be within 6% of original Y.factor) :•:;:•:•:•:•:•:•::•::•::•#•::•::::::::•::::•::•::::•::•::•::•::•::•::::•::::•::•::•:•:•:::•:::• -1.54e/• 
Sampling Procedures 
P roced u res 

The particulate and gas emission rates were determined using EPA Methods 1-5, and 

26A CFR Title 40, Part 60, Appendix Ao The calibration and quality assurance 

procedures of EPA CFR 40 Part 60 Appendix A for all methods, and the "Quality 

Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement System" Volume III Stationary 

Source-Specific Methods were followed throughout the duration of the field and 

laboratory testing. 

The most current version for each method (as described in the Federal Register) was 

used. 

Stack Gas Volumetric Flow Methods 1 and 2 

The velocity of the gas stream was determined according to EPA Reference Method 1 

and 2 by reading the instantaneous velocity head with an inclined manometer at each 

sampling point with a calibrated S-type pitot tube attached adjacent to the sample nozzle. 

The stack pressure was measured with the static side of an S-type pitot tube. A 

calibrated pyrometer was used to measure stack temperature at each sampling point. 

The stack was previously tested for cyclonic flow according to EPA Reference Method 1. 

Stack Gas Molecular Weight Method 3 

The carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations were determined using EPA Reference 

Method 3 (Fyrite Method). A sample of the flue gas was extracted from the gas stream 

during each test. These samples were analyzed with a Fyrite gas analyzer. The 

molecular weight of the gas was calculated using the moisture, oxygen and carbon 

dioxide content and the measured stack gas temperature. 

Moisture Content Method 4 

The moisture content used for calculating the gas stream flow rate was determined by 

measuring the amount of condensed moisture in the glass impingers in the sampling 

train as described in EPA Reference Method 4 at the completion of each test. The 

moisture content will be conducted in conjunction with EPA Method 26A. 
The moisture collection system consists of four glass impingers. The first four impingers 

were charged with 100 ml each with the fourth charged with silica gel. Ice is placed 

around the impingers. The outlet temperature of the condenser is monitored and 

recorded throughout the duration of the testing to verify the temperature is below 68 o F. 

Hydrogen Chloride I Hydrogen Fluoride with Particulate Method 5 / 26A 

Hydrogen Chloride / Hydrogen Fluoride with particulate matter was determined at the 

Outlet only. The Inlet was sampled for Hydrogen Chloride / Hydrogen Fluoride. 

Preliminary data was used to determine stack temperature, pressure, and range of 

velocity heads, moisture content and stack gas dry molecular weight prior to sampling. 

The meter box was leak checked from the pump to the orifice. Initial and final leak 

checks of the sampling system and pitot lines were performed as outlined in Method 5 

and will be recorded on the data sheets. The nozzle (glass or Teflon with an angle of 

taper of 30 degrees and of button hook design) was calibrated before and after the test 

using a micrometer and will be also recorded on the data sheets. 

The sampling probe was placed at each sampling point to provide a total sampling time 

of at least 60 minutes and a volume of at least 31.8 cubic feet. The gases were drawn 

through a glass nozzle attached to a heated glass lined probe. The gases then 

proceeded through borosilicate glass filter holder, with a Teflon frit filter support through 

a tarred Teflon filter to remove particulate matter. The exit of the filter will be maintained 

at a temperature of greater than 248 0 F. These temperatures will be recorded at each 

point on the data sheets. 

The gases were then scrubbed through a series of four impingers (optional impinger not 

included) to capture hydrogen halides and halogens and moisture. The first and second 

impingers contained approximately 100 ml of a 0.1N H2SO4 solution and the third and 

fourth impingers contained approximately 100 ml of a 0.1 N NaOH solution. The fifth 

impinger contained approximately 250 grams of pre-weighed silica gel to remove any 

remaining moisture. The gases passed through the impinger series in an ice bath to 

maintain a maximum exit temperature of 68 0 F. This temperature was recorded on the 

data sheets. The clean and cool gases then entered the meter box where the gas flow 

and temperature were measured. 

13 
The inlet duct configuration, which is located vertically on the top of the circular duct did 

not allow for the impinger train to be connected to the back of the hot box. An additional 

ten (10) foot unheated Teflon line was used as a jumper to the impingers that was 

securely located on the platform below the port. At the completion of each test run the 

ten foot jumper line was cleaned with distilled water (DI) into the first impinger sample 

recovery bottle. 

14 
Entec Services, Inc 

16 D Commerce Ave. Hue•town AL 35023 

STACK DRAWING & TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION 

Client: Boral Bricks Job No. 27175 

Source: Inletto DIFF Baghouse input By: Tom Lotz, St. 

Type of Traverse: Velocity (V) or Particulate (P): P Port Type Nipple Port Diameter 4 

Stack Diameter, inches: 58.5 Stack Area, Ft2: 18.665 

Stack Height, feet: 100 Number of Ports: 2 

Stack Properties: Inches Duct Diameters Length of Port, inches: 12.50 

Upstream Disturbance: 312.0 5.33 Total Number of Traverse Points: 20 

Downstream Disturbance: 312.0 5.33 Number of Points per diameter: 10 

58.5 

312.l: NC.ES 

312.0 .c.Es 

Point No. 

Inside Stack Outside Nipple 

Inches Inches 

1 1.5 14.0 

2 4.8 17,3 

3 8.5 21.0 

4 13,2 25.7 

5 20.0 32.5 

6 38.5 51.0 

7 45.3 57.8 

8 50.0 62.5 

9 53.7 66.2 

10 57.0 69.5 

Adjusted points diameter > 24" no point closer than 1.0 inch 

Adjusted points diameter < 24" no point closer than 0.5 inch 

Stack Diameters between 12-24 inches minimum points are 8 

4 points per port if the 8 2 diameters downstream and 

upstream criteria is met. 

15 
Entec Services, Inc 

16 D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, AL 35023 

STACK DRAWING & TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION 

Client: Boral Brick Job No. 27175 

Source: Outlet of DIFF Baghouse Input By: Art Otero 

Type of Traverse: Velocity (V) or Particulate (P): P 

Stack Diameter, inches: 74.5 

Stack Height, feet: 100 

Stack Properties: Inches Duct Diameters 

Upstream Disturbance: 250.0 

Downstream Disturbance: 384.0 

3.36 

5.15 

Port Type Nipple 

Stack Area, FtZ: 

Number of Ports: 

Length of Port, inches: 

Total Number of Traverse Points: 

Number of Points per diameter: 

Port Diameter 6 

30.272 

2 

6.50 

20 

10 

74.5 INCHES 

0.(• NCHES 

Point N• 

Inside Stack Outside Nipple 

Inches Inches 

1.9 8.4 

2 6.1 12.6 

3 10.9 17.4 

4 16.8 23.3 

5 25.5 32.0 

6 49.0 55.5 

7 57.7 64.2 

8 63.6 70.1 

9 68.4 74.9 

10 72.6 79.1 

Adjusted points diameter > 24" no point closer than 1.0 inch 

Adjusted points diameter <_ 24" no point closer than 0.5 inch 

Stack Diameters between 12-24 inches minimum points are 8 

4 points per port if the 8 2 diameters downstream and 

upstream criteria is met. 

INCHES 

16 
Method 5/26A Sampling Train 

Filter Exit Temperature 

(>2489 F) 

Holder and Probe 

• Temperature • 10#01ml 

Sensors • 0 1N 

1 •;so 

Exhaust 

npmg, 

#2 

100ml 

0.1N 

t•SO 

npmg 

#3 #4 

0.1N 0.1N 

qaOt qaOt 

Impinger Exit Temperature 

(<68 F) 

np 

IceBath 

•5 

-2:;0 

lic•3 

OOO0 • OJ 

Temp. and Flow 

Controllers 

17