alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7847

RONALD G. BAILEY-EL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PRISON HEALTHCARE SERVICES, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-98-1510-WMN) Submitted: May 4, 1999 Decided: June 24, 1999 Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald G. Bailey-El, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Ronald Bailey-El appeals from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his complaint under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998). The district court’s dismissal without prejudice is not appealable. See Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers’ Local Union 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). A dismissal without prejudice is a final order only if “‘no amendment [to the complaint] could cure the defects in the plaintiff’s case.’” Id. at 1066 (quoting Coniston Corp. v. Village of Hoffman Estates , 844 F.2d 461, 463 (7th Cir. 1988)). In ascertaining whether a dismissal without prejudice is reviewable in this court, the court must determine “whether the plaintiff could save his action by merely amending his complaint.” Domino Sugar , 10 F.3d at 1066-67. In this case, Bailey-El may move the district court to reopen his case and file an amended complaint either realleging Prison Healthcare Services as the proper defendant or, alternatively, naming another party as the proper defendant. Therefore, the dismissal order is not appealable. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 23.3****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement on Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-59641,33-59645, 333-15537, 333-38895, 333-65818, and 333-119873) andForm S-3 (No. 333-65846) of CT Communications Inc. ofour reports dated February 13, 2004**,**except forNote 8, as to which the date is March 3, 2004,relating to the financial statements of the North Carolina RSA 5Cellular Partnership, North Carolina RSA 15 CellularPartnership, South Carolina RSA No. 3 Cellular GeneralPartnership, South Carolina RSA No. 4 Cellular GeneralPartnership, South Carolina RSA No. 5 Cellular GeneralPartnership, South Carolina RSA No. 6 Cellular GeneralPartnership, South Carolina RSA No. 7 Cellular GeneralPartnership, and South Carolina RSA No. 9 Cellular GeneralPartnership and of our reports dated February 13, 2004,except for Note 9, as to which the date is March 3,2004 relating to the financial statements of the South CarolinaRSA No. 2 Cellular General Partnership and South CarolinaRSA No. 8 Cellular General Partnership, which appear in CTCommunications, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/ A(Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31, 2004.     /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPLittle Rock, ArkansasApril 28, 2005
No. 473, Misc.

#### Williams *v.*Eckle, Correctional Superintendent.

Supreme Court of Ohio. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 23.2
 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-224366-01 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 333-46161 and 333-158774 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 21, 2020, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of Arizona Public Service Company and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of Arizona Public Service Company and subsidiaries' internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.
 
 /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
 Phoenix, Arizona
 February 21, 2020
From: gmdgmdgmd@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:41:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gwen Dorrough

Dardanelle, AR 72834
# Publicatieblad C 64A/28 f

| | ISSN 1977-0995 |
| --- | --- |
| Publicatieblad
  van de Europese Unie | C 64A |
| | |
| Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal | Mededelingen en bekendmakingen | 60e jaargang28 februari 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0995

Publicatieblad

van de Europese Unie

C 64A

Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal

Mededelingen en bekendmakingen

60e jaargang28 februari 2017

---

| Nummer | Inhoud | Bladzijde |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Bekendmakingen |
| | BESTUURLIJKE PROCEDURES |
| | Europees Parlement |
| 2017/C 64 A/01 | Selectieprocedure PE/195/S — Tijdelijk functionaris — Eenheidshoofd (AD 14) — Lijst van geschikte kandidaten | 1 |

Nummer

Inhoud

Bladzijde

V   Bekendmakingen

BESTUURLIJKE PROCEDURES

Europees Parlement

2017/C 64 A/01

Selectieprocedure PE/195/S — Tijdelijk functionaris — Eenheidshoofd (AD 14) — Lijst van geschikte kandidaten

1

---

| NL | |
| --- | --- |

NL

---

V Bekendmakingen

BESTUURLIJKE PROCEDURES

Europees Parlement

| 28.2.2017 | NL | Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie | CA 64/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2017

NL

Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie

CA 64/1

---

SELECTIEPROCEDURE PE/195/S

Tijdelijk functionaris — Eenheidshoofd (AD 14)

LIJST VAN GESCHIKTE KANDIDATEN

(2017/C 064 A/01)

| 1. | BORDEZ, Emmanuel |
| --- | --- |

1.

BORDEZ, Emmanuel

De lijst werd vastgesteld op 14 februari 2017.

---
From: Kathleen Sweeney

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 7:48:22 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Kathleen Sweeney

15 Rock Street

Cold Spring, NY 10516
No. 443, Misc.

#### Conklin *v.*New York.

Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.
SUB-ITEM 77Q1 (a)(1): Articles of Supplementary

Incorporated by reference to exhibit (a.2) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 46 to
the Registrant's registration statement filed on Form 485BPOS on July 28, 2006.
### City of

OFFICE OF THE MAYOR E.ric P-:>ookmeyer, Mayor May 29,2015 Kevin Schlemmer Chief, EssentialAirService & DomesticAnalysis Division United States DepartmentofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Petition ofMason City, IA for a Waiverfrom the 10-EnplanementStatus DocketDOT-OST-2001-10684 DearMr. Schlemmer: 10 First Street Northwest Mason City, lA 50401-3224 (641) 421-3600 www.masoncity.net

On behalf of the City of Mason City, Iowa, I am submitting this petition for a waiver exemption from 49 U.S.C. 

### § 41731(a)(1)(B)in terminating our EAS eligibility based upon the 10 passenger per day statute. This request is based upon airport enplanement history and the fact that Great Lakes Airlines suspended all air service on February 1, 2014. Great Lakes entered our market in 2012 and during that time ridership declined drastically due to reliability issues, numerous cancellations as well as the pilot shortage that hit the airline industry in 2013. I have attached a history of enplanement/deplanements which demonstrates our airport's ability to far exceed the 10-enplanement rule in prioryears of commercial service atourairport. Air Choice One commenced service at Mason City on November 17, 2014 and from the beginning the community and the entireNorthIowa Region has supported the new carrier. The airport's enplanement/deplanement numbers have doubled and in some cases tripled from theprevious carrier. We appreciate the opportunity to receive a waiver exemption based upon our history and the special circumstances thatnegatively impacted our airportin 2013 and2014. Sincerely,
MayorEricBookmeyer City ofMason City,Iowa

AN EQUAL OPPORTUNlTY EMPLOYER
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 25, 2020.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 25, 2020

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21I0078. DIONTE MARICE PEEK v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

SU20CR0272
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


The Board of Directors
F&M Bancorp


We consent to incorporation by reference of our report dated January 24, 1996,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of F&M Bancorp and its subsidiary
as of December 31, 1995 and 1994 and the related consolidated statements of
income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three year period ended December 31, 1995, which report appears on page
46 of the 1995 F&M Bancorp Annual Report and Form 10-K, in the following
Registration Statements of F&M Bancorp:  Numbers 33-39941 and 33-39942 on Form
S-8, and 33-39940 on Form S-3.


Keller Bruner & Company L.L.C.


Frederick, Maryland
March 26, 1996





                                      -1-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5
<LEGEND>                               TIME WARNER INC.
                                       FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

    This schedule contains summary financial information extracted  from  the
financial statements of Time Warner Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1995
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          628
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 2,541
<ALLOWANCES>                                    786
<INVENTORY>                                     443
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              3,720
<PP&E>                                        1,988
<DEPRECIATION>                                  869
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               22,132
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         3,027
<BONDS>                                       9,907
<COMMON>                                        388
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                      30
<OTHER-SE>                                    3,249
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 22,132
<SALES>                                       8,067
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              8,067
<CGS>                                         4,682
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 4,682
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              877
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2
<INCOME-TAX>                                    126
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (124)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (42)
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (166)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.57)
        


<PAGE>
#### In the Matter of Adelaide L. Otis.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSpace Station Cathode Ignition Test Status at 32,000 CyclesA plasma contactor system has been baselined for the International Space Station for structural potential control. An ignition procedure was developed for the plasma contactor hollow cathode assembly (HCA). To demonstrate the required 99% HCA ignition reliability over 6,000 cycles, an ignition test was conducted. An accelerated test procedure was employed to rapidly accumulate ignition cycles. The test procedure minimized the differences between accelerated and non-accelerated test results. The development HCA used in this test has achieved 32,000 ignitions to date. The HCA has been qualified for cyclic operation, which could reduce xenon consumption and extend the life of the plasma contactor system.Document ID19980001012Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeReprint (Version printed in journal)AuthorsZakany, James S.*(NYMA, Inc. Brook Park, OH United States)*Pinero, Luis R.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1997Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberE-10969IEPC-97-167NASA/TM-97-206293NAS 1.15:206293Meeting InformationMeeting: International Electric Propulsion ConferenceLocation: Cleveland, OHCountry: United StatesStart Date: August 24, 1997End Date: August 28, 1997Sponsors:Electric Rocket Propulsion SocietyFunding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-27186PROJECT: RTOP 477-72-10Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19980001012.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
From: wgriswold@centurylink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:36:02 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Wilburn Griswold

Hollister, MO 65672
Filed Pursuant To Rule 433,
Registration No. 333-150218













CATERPILLAR
FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION




For
      the Period: 11/25/2008 to 12/1/2008




Coupon
            Interest
            Maturity
            Callable
            Survivor's
              Option
            Price1
            Yield2
            Moody's
            S&P
            CUSIP5.400%
            Semi-Annual(†††)
            12/15/10
            NO
            YES§
            100.00
            5.400%
            A2
            A
            14912HMY3




Settlement
Date - Thursday, December 4, 2008


Pricing
Supplement as of Monday, December 1, 2008




(†††)
First Payment date 6/15/2009








§ The
limit for any individual deceased owner or beneficial interest is $200,000
annually. Limit in aggregate is 1% of outstanding principal amount of PowerNotes
as of the end of the most recent fiscal year. For complete details, see the
prospectus.







1 Prices
are quoted as a percentage of par.


2Yields are quoted on a semi-annual bond
equivalent yield basis.






Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation has filed a registration statement (including
prospectus) with the SEC for the offering to which this communication relates.
Before you invest, you should read the prospectus in that registration statement
and the other documents Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation has filed
with the SEC for more complete information about Caterpillar Financial Services
Corporation and this offering. You may get these documents for free by visiting
EDGAR on the SEC web site at www.sec.gov. Alternatively, Caterpillar Financial
Services Corporation, any underwriter or any dealer participating in the
offering will arrange to send you the prospectus if you request it by calling
(866) 658-3267.






All offerings are
subject to prior sale.






Under no circumstances shall this
information constitute an offer to sell, nor shall there be any sale of the
securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would
be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of
such jurisdiction.
From: dana-holland@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:24:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dana Holland

Keller, TX 76244
#### Hiram C. Pettibone v. William E. Drakeford.

Motion for roargutnent granted.