alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: jnemarnik@morrow-meadows.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:49:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

JOHN NEMARNIK

Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91701
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

                    On October 8, 2023, the Commission will discontinue utilization and access of the Commission's email address, for Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and Critical Energy Infrastructure Information (CEII) requests,                     *foia-ceii@ferc.gov.*                     As of                           ( print page 63102)                        October 8, 2023, requesters should use the following email addresses:                

                    1.                     *foia@ferc.gov*                     for FOIA requests; and                

                    2.                     *ceii@ferc.gov*                     for CEII requests.                

The Commission's FOIA and CEII web pages will be updated to reflect these changes.

In addition, the Department of Justice's Office of Information Policy, which is responsible for overseeing FOIA compliance, will be timely notified of these programmatic changes.

                    Please direct questions to Carolyn Templeton, Director—Strategic Operations and Special Projects; Office of External Affairs, at                     *carolyn.templeton@ferc.gov*                     or at 202-502-8785.                

Dated: September 8, 2023.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-19882 Filed 9-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<PAGE>



                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2

                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
REV Holdings LLC (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), Todd J. Slotkin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of THe
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Todd J. Slotkin
---------------------
Name: Todd J. Slotkin
Title: Chief Financial Officer of REV Holdings LLC
Date: April  25, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




                                       11
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<MULTIPLIER>               1,000

<S>                                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                             9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                   DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                                        SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                                    6,178
<SECURITIES>                                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                            55,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                                               (607)
<INVENTORY>                                                              39,501
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                        111,813
<PP&E>                                                                   50,053
<DEPRECIATION>                                                          (20,805)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                          196,246
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                    58,661
<BONDS>                                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                                    137
<OTHER-SE>                                                             (106,920)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                            196,246
<SALES>                                                                 185,198
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                        185,198
<CGS>                                                                    99,204
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                            99,204
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         66,470
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                       16,007
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                           4,765
<INCOME-TAX>                                                              2,471
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                       2,510
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                              2,510
<EPS-BASIC>                                                               .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                               .26


</TABLE>
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 21, 2011

h1114 

# Order

November 21, 2011

143480

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143480 COA: 294561 MARTEZ CEDRICK WILLIAMS, Oa kland CC: 2009-225795-FC Defendant-Appellant.

___________________ _________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 16, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
#            

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (R)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-109182

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  487                                                                   Trade Date:  09/24/04

(To Prospectus Supplement dated November 6, 2003 &

  Prospectus dated October 15,2003)                                                              Issue Date:   09/30/04

The Date of this Pricing SupplementSeptember 24, 2004

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                                   Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                  Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment     Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)   Maturity  Public (2) Commissions       Frequency       Option  Yes/No     record dates)

14911QWG2  4.25%        03/15/13        100%                1.49%                  Monthly                      YES         NO                                                                                        

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Principal                                                                                 1st Payment             Day         

Amount                  Proceeds                  Dealer                           Date                   Count

$635,000.00            $625,538.50            ABN AMROInc.        10/15/04               30/360    

Original Issue DiscountNote:                                                                          Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                  N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (R) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (R) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $170.086 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (R) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (R) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated October 15,2003.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 May 20, 2020 a0513

Order 

Clerk

May 20, 2020

160726

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 160726

COA: 350791

Roscommon CC: 18-008042-FH

JASON WARREN BRACKNEY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 31, 2019 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

CAVANAGH, J. (concurring).

I concur in the Court’s order denying defendant’s application for leave to appeal. 

I write separately, however, to express that such denial is without prejudice to 

defendant’s ability to file a motion for relief from judgment under MCR Subchapter 

6.500 based on any claim relating to the issue of whether defendant was deprived of his 

Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel when his trial attorney 

failed to file an interlocutory appeal of the trial court’s order(s) denying defendant’s 

motion to suppress evidence or negotiate a conditional plea, as well as the issue of 

whether appellate counsel was ineffective for not raising these issues on appeal.
No. 269, Misc.

#### Shifflett *v.*Cunningham, Penitentiary Superintendent.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Reno S. Harp III,*Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, for respondent.

Supreme Court of Appeals

of Virginia. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                            5

       
<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                                  JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                                    DEC-31-1996

<CASH>                                                       1,339,758
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  396,975
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    53,554
<INVENTORY>                                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                             1,723,363
<PP&E>                                                       7,178,912
<DEPRECIATION>                                               3,738,651
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                               5,499,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        1,072,320
<BONDS>                                                      4,205,585
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                                     221,562
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                 5,499,467
<SALES>                                                      7,189,448
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             7,218,563
<CGS>                                                        5,516,102
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                6,616,840
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             323,011
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                278,712
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            278,712
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   278,712
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       17.840
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       17.840
        

</TABLE>
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1269 

Honoring the 110th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence of the 

Philippines. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 12, 2008 

Ms. RICHARDSON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the 110th anniversary of the Declaration of 

Independence of the Philippines. 

1 Resolved, That Congress— 

2 (1) recognizes the historic significance of the 

3 110th anniversary of the establishment of the sov4 ereign and independent country of the Philippines on 

5 June 12, 1898; 

6 (2) reaffirms the bonds of friendship and co7 operation which have existed between the United 

8 States and the Philippines and commits to strength9 ening those bonds; 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1269 IH 

1 (3) commends the people of the Philippines for 

2 enduring through struggle and hardship; 

3 (4) reaffirms its enduring support for the Phil4 ippines; 

5 (5) supports increased public awareness of the 

6 events surrounding the Declaration of Independence 

7 of the Philippines, and the vibrant and beautiful cul8 ture of the Philippines; and 

9 (6) recognizes the courage and bravery of the 

10 Filipino and Filipino American servicemen and serv11 icewomen who have fought alongside and in the 

12 United States Armed Forces. 

Æ 


wwoods2 on PRODPC68 with BILLS
No. 359.

#### Nafie *v.*United States.

*Morris A. Shenker*and *Murry L. Randall*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Kirby W. Patterson*for the United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 489, Misc.

#### Reed *v.*New York.

*Leon Polsky*for petitioner.

*Frank S. Hogan, H. Richard Uviller*and *Robert Popper*for respondent.

Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.
From: dan@aegltd.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:09:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dan Rhodes

Blacklick, OH 43004
---

| | Reply to: J.G. (Jeff) Lawson 
        Direct Phone:(403) 260-0267
        Direct Fax:(403) 260-0337jgl@bdplaw.com
      Assistant: Tammy Belsham/Nancy Dhaliwal 
        Direct Phone:(403) 260-5715/260-0336
        Our File: 54925-15
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



May 14, 2004

British Columbia Securities Commission 
  Alberta Securities Commission 
  Ontario Securities Commission 
  Autorité des marchés financiers du Québec

Dear Sirs/Mesdames:

|Re: | TransGlobe Energy Corporation (the "Company")
      - NI 44-101 AIF Filing
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

On behalf of the Company, we hereby give notice that for the
  purposes of NI 44-101, the Company is relying on its Annual Information Form
  filed under NI 51-102 under SEDAR project number 647713.

Yours truly,

BURNET, DUCKWORTH & PALMER LLP

> 

J.G. (Jeff) Lawson 
  Counsel

JGL\tlb



---