alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1435 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1435

   To provide that covert investigative practices involving Federal 
  attorneys in criminal investigations and prosecutions shall not be 
considered dishonest, fraudulent, deceitful, or misrepresentative, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 19, 2001

 Mr. Wyden (for himself and Mr. Leahy) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide that covert investigative practices involving Federal 
  attorneys in criminal investigations and prosecutions shall not be 
considered dishonest, fraudulent, deceitful, or misrepresentative, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Investigation Enhancement 
Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. COVERT INVESTIGATIVE PRACTICES CONDUCTED BY FEDERAL ATTORNEYS.

    Section 530B(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after the first sentence, ``Notwithstanding any provision of 
State law, including disciplinary rules, statutes, regulations, 
constitutional provisions, or case law, a Government attorney may, for 
the purpose of enforcing Federal law, provide legal advice, 
authorization, concurrence, direction or supervision on conducting 
covert activities, and participate in such activities, even though such 
activities may require the use of deceit or misrepresentation.''
                                 <all>
```
No. 173.

#### Mound Company *v.*Texas Company.

*John Leroy Jeffers*for petitioner.

*Leon Jaworski*for respondent.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Merrimack,

May 5, 1914.

#### Charles S. Wentworth & Co. *v.*Edgar M. Reed.

Writ oe Entry, to foreclose a mortgage. The defendant pleaded *nul disseizin*with a brief statement of defence and filed a further answer in the nature of a bill in equity, joining Wentworth & Co. and Charles S. Wentworth, a non-resident, as defendants, and alleging in substance that the latter is the real owner of the mortgage and that as to him he has a valid defence to the action at law. An order for personal notice issued and was served on Wentworth outside the state, whereupon he appeared specially and moved that *596as to him the bill be dismissed. The motion was allowed, and the defendant excepted. Transferred from the April term, 1913, of the superior court by *Plummer,*J.

*Alvin F. Wentworth*and *Niles & TJpton {Mr. Upton*orally), for the plaintiffs.

*Martin & Howe {Mr. Howe*orally), for the defendant.

Young, J.

Although the court has not acquired jurisdiction of Wentworth so that any decree it may make will bind him personally, it has acquired jurisdiction of him in so far as the *locus*is concerned; in other words, the decree in this action will be *in personam*in so far as it relates to the defendant and Wentworth & Co., but *in rem*in so far as Wentworth is concerned, unless he appears generally. In that case it will be *in personam*as to all the parties.

*Exception sustained.*

Plummer, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

 

          I, Hugh T. Regan, Jr., certify that: 

          1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of inTEST Corporation; 

          2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

          3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

          4.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

        (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

        (b)  [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];

        (c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

        (d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

          5.    The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors: 

        (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

        (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 14, 2007/s/ Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
From: tmurakami07@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:43:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Timothy Murakami

Chino, CA 91710
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of VTEX Energy,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2004 (the  "Report"),  We, Stephen F.
Noser,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Randal B. McDonald,  Jr., Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/Stephen F. Noser
--------------------------
Stephen F. Noser
Chief Executive Officer
September 20, 2004

/s/Randal B. McDonald, Jr.
--------------------------
Randal B. McDonald, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
September 20, 2004
**** **EXHIBIT
        32.2**
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Vail Banks, Inc. (the "Company")
        on Form
        10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brady T. Burt,
        Chief
        Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350,
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 1.  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/
        Brady T. Burt
 
 Brady
        T.
        Burt
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 November
        10, 2005
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Coupon | Interest | Maturity | Callable | Survivor's Option | Price | CUSIP |   |
| 2.700% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 6/15/2023 | No | Yes § | 100.00 | 14912HQL7 |   |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |  |
| (†††) | First Payment date 12/15/2013 |   |
|                    |   |
From: Jambo

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: preventive services

Date: Saturday, August 13, 2011 12:19:04 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care

under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services,

are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Mrs. Rita Butler
Exhibit 32.2

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



          In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of VTEX Energy,  Inc. (the
     "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly  period ending January 31, 2006
     (the "Report"),  I, Randal B. McDonald, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the
     Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
     to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/S/ Randal B. McDonald, Jr.
---------------------------
Randal B. McDonald, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
April 24, 2006
From: cfhobbs@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:57:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Curtis Hobbs

Evansville, WY 82636
From: harriet leonard

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Support Health & Human Services birth control

Date: Friday, August 19, 2011 11:15:02 AM

Sirs:

I wholeheartedly support the Department of Health & Human Services

initiative to make birth control available

to those insured without co-pays.

I also feel this should be without expanded religious exemptions,

which only delay and confuse those

needing the service.

This has been recommended by the Institute of Medicine.

Sincerely,

Harriet Leonard
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. JAM ES FR

ANK B ERR

Y, a .k.a . Ja

m e s B e rry , a . k.a . Jim

B e rry , a .k.a . Jim

F. B e rry , a .k.a . Jim Frank B e rry , a .k.a . Thom a s Jose ph M oran, a .k.a . Ale x ande r R anda ll, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. Nos. 12-50380

13-50403 D.C . No. 8:07-c r-00127-DOC M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Dav id O. C arte r, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d July 22, 2014 ** B e fore : GOODW IN, C ANB Y, a nd C ALLAHAN, C irc uit Judge s . In the se c onsolida

te d a ppe a ls, Ja m e s Frank B e rry

a ppe a l s from

the distric t c ourt’ s 2012 judgme n t

re voking supervise d re le a se and im posing a n 11-m onth 

# F IL ED JUL 28 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).se nte nc e , a

nd the 2013 judgme n t re voking supervise d re le a se and im posing a n 18- m onth se n te nc e . Pursua

nt to Ande rs v . C

a lifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), B e rry ’ s c ounse l ha s file d a

brie f stating tha

t the re are no grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra

w a s c ounse l of re c ord. W e hav e provide d B e rry the opportunity to file a pro se supple m e n ta l brie f. No pro se supple m e nta l brie f or answe ring brie f ha s be e n file d . Our inde pe nde nt re v i e w of the re c ord pursua n t to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a rgua ble grounds for re lie f on dire c t a ppe a l. C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. AFFIRM E D.

12 - 5 03 8 0 & 1 3 - 5 0 4 0 3 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
| The undersigned hereby certifies, in my capacity as an officer of NSTAR, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   (i)                                                                                                                                                                                           | the enclosed Quarterly Report of NSTAR on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|   (ii)                                                                                                                                                                                          | the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of NSTAR. |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |  |
| Dated: May 5, 2004      |  | By:   | /s/ THOMAS J. MAY       |
|--------------------------------------------------|--|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                  |  |                 | Thomas J. May                                         |
|                                                  |  |                 | Chairman, President and                               |
|                                                  |  |                 | Chief Executive Officer                               |
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 72 (Friday, April 13, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 22290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-9040]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, April 11, 2012; 10 a.m.-11 a.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:
    Compliance Status Report.
    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: April 6, 2012.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-9040 Filed 4-11-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1406

For the relief of Tania Unzueta.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 5, 2001

Mr. DURBIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Tania Unzueta.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR TANIAN

4 UNZUETA.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, Tanian Unzueta shall be eligible for issuance of an

8 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an

9 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil10 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under

11 section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to

12 lawful permanent resident.
2

•S 1406 IS

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Tanian Unzueta

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have en4 tered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible,

5 be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of

6 the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of en7 actment of this Act.

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status are filed with appropriate

12 fees within 2 years after the date of enactment of this

13 Act.

14 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

15 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res16 idence to Tania Unzueta, the Secretary of State shall in17 struct the proper officer to reduce by one, during the cur18 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im19 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the

20 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the

21 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the

22 total number of immigrant visas that are made available

23 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section

24 202(e) of such Act.

Æ