alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.63 MB)
 
 JOEP JAF New Jersey National Guard Task Force Spartan interoperability Soldiers Army Guard ceremony Jordan USARCENT National Guard Army National Guard ARCENT coalition ASG-J 102 CAV Jordan Border Guard Force JTC-J Joint Operational Engagement Program
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
REG-JI0B51-10

Page 1 of 1

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION As of: August 31, 2011
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS i i
BRANCH Received: August 15, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: August 31, 2011

Tracking No. 80ce1832
‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0067
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Emily Johnson
Address:
Redmond, WA,

General Comment

I highly approve of this rule, which would make contraception affordable for the people who can
least afford an unwanted pregnancy.

Access to contraception provides families a chance to make choices about how many children
they can afford and when to have them.

In this economy, many people might choose to avoid or postpone pregnancy.

Even when insurance covers contraception, co-pays make it expensive--too expensive for some
families on the edge. You don't want to choose between feeding your current children and
preventing another mouth to feed.

Unwanted pregnancies cost tax payers and insurers money.

We are all better off if this rule is approved.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectlId=0900... 8/31/2011
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1269 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1269

 Honoring the 110th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence of 
                            the Philippines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2008

 Ms. Richardson submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                  to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Honoring the 110th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence of 
                            the Philippines.

    Resolved, That Congress--
            (1) recognizes the historic significance of the 110th 
        anniversary of the establishment of the sovereign and 
        independent country of the Philippines on June 12, 1898;
            (2) reaffirms the bonds of friendship and cooperation which 
        have existed between the United States and the Philippines and 
        commits to strengthening those bonds;
            (3) commends the people of the Philippines for enduring 
        through struggle and hardship;
            (4) reaffirms its enduring support for the Philippines;
            (5) supports increased public awareness of the events 
        surrounding the Declaration of Independence of the Philippines, 
        and the vibrant and beautiful culture of the Philippines; and
            (6) recognizes the courage and bravery of the Filipino and 
        Filipino American servicemen and servicewomen who have fought 
        alongside and in the United States Armed Forces.
                                 <all>
```
From: luis@larzabal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:37:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Luis Larzabal

Sunnyvale, CA 94089
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.14 MB)
 
 60mm Grenade Mortar 120mm Infantrymen Infantryman battle drill Call for Fire Forward Observer 11B 77th armored regiment MORTARS fire support specialist Shoot Bunker Infantry LIVE FIRE squad exercise squad movement Field artillery TACTICAL Soldiers move communicate Air Assault USARCENT
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 142

To amend the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, to make it unlawful

for a packer to own, feed, or control livestock intended for slaughter.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 22, 2001

Mr. JOHNSON (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. THOMAS, and Mr. DASCHLE)

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the

Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

A BILL

To amend the Packers and Stockyards Act, 1921, to make

it unlawful for a packer to own, feed, or control livestock

intended for slaughter.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON PACKERS OWNING, FEEDING,

4 OR CONTROLLING LIVESTOCK.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 202 of the Packers and

6 Stockyards Act, 1921 (7 U.S.C. 192), is amended—

7 (1) by redesignating subsections (f) and (g) as

8 subsections (g) and (h), respectively;
2

•S 142 IS

1 (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the fol2 lowing:

3 ‘‘(f) Own, feed, or control livestock intended for

4 slaughter (for more than 14 days prior to slaughter and

5 acting through the packer or a person that directly or indi6 rectly controls, or is controlled by or under common con7 trol with, the packer), except that this subsection shall not

8 apply to—

9 ‘‘(1) a cooperative, if a majority of the owner10 ship interest in the cooperative is held by active co11 operative members that—

12 ‘‘(A) own, feed, or control livestock; and

13 ‘‘(B) provide the livestock to the coopera14 tive for slaughter; or

15 ‘‘(2) a packer that is owned or controlled by

16 producers of a type of livestock, if during a calendar

17 year the packer slaughters less than 2 percent of the

18 head of that type of livestock slaughtered in the

19 United States; or’’; and

20 (3) in subsection (h) (as so redesignated), by

21 striking ‘‘or (e)’’ and inserting ‘‘(e), or (f)’’.

22 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—

23 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2),

24 the amendments made by subsection (a) take effect

25 on the date of enactment of this Act.
3

•S 142 IS

1 (2) TRANSITION RULES.—In the case of a pack2 er that on the date of enactment of this Act owns,

3 feeds, or controls livestock intended for slaughter in

4 violation of section 202(f) of the Packers and Stock5 yards Act, 1921 (as amended by subsection (a)), the

6 amendments made by subsection (a) apply to the

7 packer—

8 (A) in the case of a packer of swine, begin9 ning on the date that is 18 months after the

10 date of enactment of this Act; and

11 (B) in the case of a packer of any other

12 type of livestock, beginning as soon as prac13 ticable, but not later than 180 days, after the

14 date of enactment of this Act, as determined by

15 the Secretary of Agriculture.

Æ
From: Sister Digna Vela

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: I oppose the Definition of Religious Employer in Health Care Rules

Date: Monday, August 08, 2011 9:53:58 PM

The current definition of religious employer does not provide true

conscience protection for those committed to preserving life. Health care

plans should not be forced to violate the moral and religious convictions of

providers or employees in order to participate in the health care system.

Requiring such an unacceptable demand threatens both universal access to

health care and religious freedom of conscience.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**SECTION 302**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I,John M. Robbins, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AmNet Mortgage, Inc.;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report, based on such evaluation; and

 

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:  November 15, 2004 |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
|                     |
| /s/  John M. Robbins     |   |
| John  M. Robbins         |
| Chief  Executive Officer |

 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1262 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 27, 2008.
Whereas the decennial census is described in article I, section 2 of the 
        Constitution, which calls for an actual enumeration of the people every 
        10 years;
Whereas the decennial census is used to apportion seats in the House of 
        Representatives among the States;
Whereas the decennial census is crucial to Federal policymakers who distribute 
        billions of taxpayer dollars among many Federal programs based on the 
        results of those enumerations;
Whereas the first official census was conducted in 1790 under the leadership of 
        Thomas Jefferson, who was then the Secretary of State;
Whereas the 2010 decennial census will be the 23rd decennial census;
Whereas an accurate census is one that counts, as of the decennial census date, 
        all persons living in the United States, any territory or possession of 
        the United States, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and all Federal 
        civilian and military personnel serving abroad; and
Whereas an accurate 2010 decennial census is crucial for our democracy and the 
        equitable distribution of Federal funds: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That--
            (1) the House of Representatives demands that the 2010 decennial 
        census count every person living in the United States, any territory or 
        possession of the United States, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and 
        all Federal civilian and military personnel serving abroad; and
            (2) it is the sense of the House of Representatives that, in 
        conducting the 2010 decennial census, the Secretary of Commerce should 
        use all reasonable means to count every person living in the United 
        States, any territory or possession of the United States, or the 
        Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and all Federal civilian and military 
        personnel serving abroad.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
No. 312, Misc.

#### Fletcher *v.*Beto, Corrections Director.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Will Wilson,*Attorney General of Texas, *Sam R. Wilson, Irwin R. Salmanson*and *Alio B. Crow,*Assistant Attorneys General, and *Henry Wade*for respondent.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2



Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer



I, William Snyder, the chief financial officer of Peak International Limited (the Company), certify for the
purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2004 (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 24, 2005 |  | /s/ William Snyder     
|                     |  | William Snyder         
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### Esther S. Stanfield, as Administratrix of the Estate of Frederick Stanfield, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*Town of Hamburg, Respondent.

*Stanfield*v. *Town of Hamburg,*145 App. Div. 905, affirmed.

(Argued March 26, 1912;

decided April 9, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 15,1911, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint "by the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been occasioned through the negligence of defendant’s highway commissioner.

*Willard II. Ticknor*for appellant.

*Fred J. Blackmon*and *Albert L. Stratemeier*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscook and Collin, JJ.
From: heathm98@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:46:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Heath Martin

Bowling Green, KY 42103