alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Coupon | Interest | Maturity | Callable | Survivor's Option | Price | CUSIP |   |
| 1.700% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 5/15/2020 | No | Yes § | 100.00 | 14912HQG8 |   |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |  |
| (†††) | First Payment date 11/15/2013 |   |
|                    |   |
No. 62.

#### Northern Natural Gas Co. *v.*State Corporation Commission of Kansas.

Appeal from the *932Supreme Court of Kansas. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 370 U. S. 901.) The motion of Mid-Continent Oil & Gas Association for leave to file brief, as *amicus curiae,*is granted.

*W. W. Heard*on the motion.

Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.97 MB)
 
 CMF USCENTCOM CENTCOM NAVCENT C5F
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.04 MB)
 
 Town Hall Commandant of the Marine Corps COMMANDANT CMC U.S. Marine Corps United States Marine Corps usmc
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<PAGE>

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by 
reference of our reports dated February 12, 1997 on our audits of the 
consolidated financial statements and Supplementary Selected Proportionate 
Results of Operations of U S WEST, Inc., the combined financial statements of 
U S WEST Communications Group, and the combined financial statements and 
Supplementary Selected Proportionate Results of Operations of U S WEST Media 
Group as of December 31, 1996 included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, 
into U S WEST, Inc.'s previously filed Registration Statements on Forms S-3 
(Nos. 33-50047, 33-50047-01, 333-14865, 333-14865-01, 33-50049, 33-50049-01, 
33-62451 and 33-63087) and on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-01931, 33-63089, 33-63093, 
33-63085 and 33-63091). We also consent to the incorporation by reference of 
our report dated February 12, 1997 on the related consolidated financial 
statement schedule of U S WEST, Inc. which is included on page S-1 in this 
Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/S/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 27, 1997.
07/04 RULE 5

Rule 5. Effective Date (Adopted 5/23/72, Revised 4/13/04)

All Rules are effective for all equipment as of the effective date of their

adoption, unless indicated otherwise. When an effective date is otherwise

indicated, existing equipment shall be subject to the previous Rule until the

newly adopted Rule becomes effective.

"Existing equipment" means all equipment that is in use or is under

construction on the date of rule adoption.
From: ghafzalla@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:22:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Girgis Hafzalla

Seattle, WA 98133
[No. 2424.]

#### Fitzhugh v. Nicholas.

1. Change of Venue — Discretion—Appellate Practice.

The granting-or refusing a motion for change of venue on the ground of prejudice of the inhabitants is within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be reviewed unless it clearly appears that there was an abuse of such discretion.

2. Change of Venue — Notice.

It -would be error to grant a change of venue of an action *235without reasonable notiee of the application for the change having been given the adverse party or his attorney.

3. Juries — Verdicts—Instructions.

Where a jury of six returned a unanimous verdict, an erroneous instruction which told the jury that five of their number might return a verdict, was not prejudicial.

*Appeal from the County Court of El Paso County.*

Mr. Geo. Q. Richmond, for appellant.

Messrs. Ore & McKesson, for appellee.

Mr. A. M. Nicholas, *pro se.*

Maxwell, J.

Appellant, defendant below, moved for a change of venue because of the prejudice of the inhabitants of the county, and supported the motion by her affidavit, to the effect that she had reason to believe and did believe that the inhabitants of El,Paso county were so prejudiced against her that- she could not secure a fair and impartial trial in such county; that such belief was based upon information derived from prominent citizens of said county and from several attorneys who had represented her in other litigations ; that she had made diligent inquiry among the people of the county and had been advised that it was the general opinion of a large number of the inhabitants of the county that she would not and could not receive a fair and impartial trial before any jury selected from the inhabitants of .the county.

The motion for change of venue was denied, and error is assigned thereon.

The granting or refusing motions of this character is within the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be reviewed unless it clearly appears that there was abuse of this discretion. . .

Sec. 30 Mills’ Ann. Code, under which this motion was made,' requires reasonable notice of. the *236application for the change of venue to be given the adverse party or his attorney.

This was not done.

In the absence of such notice, it would have been error to have granted a change of venue.

No error was committed in denying the motion.

Trial to a jury of six resulted in a unanimous verdict against appellant, upon which judgment was rendered.

The court instructed the jury that a verdict might be returned by not less than five of their number agreeing thereto, in which event each juror agreeing to the verdict should subscribe his name thereto.

Error is assigned upon the giving of this instruction.

This court has ruled, in *Adams Express Co. v. Aldridge, ante, 74,*that such an instruction in the face of a unanimous verdict does not constitute reversible error.

See, also, *First National Bank v. Foster,*9 Wyo. 157, 63 Pac. 1056.

There being no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed. *Affirmed.*
#### James V. Wright, Executor, Respondent, v. Jane Dugan and others, Appellants, Impleaded with Ellen McCann and others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs of the respective parties out of the fund. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23
- 40631 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Bonita Rena Pennygraph,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22
- CR
- 214 - 3

**________________ ______________**  Before **Jones, Southwick,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Bonita Rena Pennygraph has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pennygraph has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and th e relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 23, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-40631 Document: 51-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/23/2024No. 23
- 40631

2 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 23-40631 Document: 51-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/23/2024
No. 313, Misc.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall*and *Harold H. Greene*for respondent.

#### Sims *v.*Willingham, Warden.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
From: cel90@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:45:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Caitlin Littlejohn

,
From: bobby@rchubbard.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:53:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert Hubbard

Flagstaff, AZ 86001
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1291 

Expressing gratitude for the contributions of the American GI Forum on 

its 60th anniversary. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2008 

Mr. RODRIGUEZ (for himself and Mr. ORTIZ) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing gratitude for the contributions of the American 

GI Forum on its 60th anniversary. 

Whereas millions of veterans returning home from World 

War II looked to the guarantee of educational, medical, 

housing, and other basic benefits provided by the GI bill; 

Whereas these benefits were denied in large part to Americans of Mexican descent and other Hispanics throughout 

the United States; 

Whereas the American GI Forum was founded in 1948 by 

Army Major Hector P. Garcia, a physician from Corpus 

Christi, Texas, in response to such inequities; 

Whereas the Forum’s motto is ‘‘Education Is Our Freedom 

and Freedom Should Be Everybody’s Business’’; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 1291 IH 

Whereas in 1998 the Forum was granted a Federal charter 

pursuant to an Act of Congress (Public Law 105–231); 

Whereas one of the purposes expressed in the Forum’s charter is ‘‘fostering and enlarging equal educational opportunities, equal economic opportunities, equal justice under 

the law, and equal political opportunities for all United 

States citizens, regardless of race, color, religion, sex, or 

national origin’’; 

Whereas the Forum’s Veterans Outreach Program is based in 

San Antonio, Texas, and provides training, employment, 

and counseling for veterans in the Southwestern United 

States; and 

Whereas the American GI Forum continues to be a beacon 

of hope and an avenue for involvement for returning veterans and ordinary citizens aspiring to improve conditions within their own communities: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the need for equal access to vet3 erans’ benefits for all who have honorably served; 

4 (2) supports the goals, ideals, and deeds of the 

5 American GI Forum and its members; 

6 (3) commends the work of the American GI 

7 Forum on its 60th anniversary; and 

8 (4) encourages others to join with the American 

9 GI Forum to ensure that veterans are never again 

10 denied the benefits they rightfully deserve. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT DEONTAE THOMAS ) DOC #R12198, )

Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-021 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed August 22, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge. Deontae Thomas, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Tampa, for Appellee. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MORRIS, BLACK, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
EC

/R Incorporated Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989

501 Eastowne Drive, Suite 325 y Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 

Telephone: (919) 484-0222 y Fax: (919) 484-0122 

 

MEMORANDUM 

DATE: February 9, 2010 

SUBJECT: Existing Population of Stationary RICE - Attachments 

FROM: Tanya Parise, EC/R, Inc. 

 

TO: Melanie King, EPA OAQPS/SPPD/ESG 

The purpose of this memorandum is to document the information used to estimate the 

population of existing stationary engines used to estimate the national impacts associated with 

the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Existing Stationary 

Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines (RICE) in 40 CFR part 63, subpart ZZZZ. Provided 

in the Attachments to this memorandum are several tables illustrating the Power Systems 

Research information that was used to estimate the population and projection of stationary spark 

ignition and compression ignition (CI) engines. This memorandum contains information 

supporting the memorandum entitled “Existing Population of Stationary RICE,” which is 

available from the rulemaking docket as Document ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0029-0014. 

This information supports the population estimates developed to estimate impacts from 

stationary existing RICE less than or equal to 500 horsepower (HP) that are located at major 

sources, stationary existing RICE that are located at area sources, and stationary existing nonemergency CI RICE greater than 500 HP located at major sources that are subject to 40 CFR part 

63, subpart ZZZZ. 
2 

Attachments 

Spreadsheet Tables with PSR Information 

Used to Estimate the Population and Projection 

of Stationary Engines
ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * 

OF MARYLAND 

Petitioner 

IN THE 

COURT OF APPEALS 

OF MARYLAND 

Misc. Docket AG No. 88 

V. 

September Tenn, 2015 

JOSEPH D. REID II 

Respondent. 

ORDER 

This matter came before the Court on the Joint Petition of the Attorney Grievance 

Commission of Maryland and Respondent, Joseph D. Reid, II, to indefmitely suspend the 

Respondent from the practice of law with Respondent having the right to apply for readmission 

after one year. The Court having considered the Petition, it is this 30thday o 

March ,2016. 

ORDERED, that Respondent, Joseph D. Reid II, be and he is hereby indefinitely 

suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland for violating Rules 1.1, 1.3 and 

8.4(a), (c) and (d) of the Maryland Lawyers' Rules of Professional Conduct; and it is further 

ORDERED, that, the Clerk of this Court shall remove the name of Joseph D. Reid II 

from the register of attorneys in the Court and certify that fact to the Client Protection Fund of 

the Bar of Maryland and all Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State in accordance with 

Maryland Rule 16-772(d); and it is further 

ORDERED, that the Respondent may apply for readmission after a period of one year. 

/s/ Lynne A. Battaglia 

Senior Judge
****
| Commission on the Future of theUnited States Aerospace Industry 1235 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 940Arlington, Virginia 22202 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|