alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

I, Dean Personne, the chief executive
officer of Peak International Limited (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2006 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: February 13, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Dean Personne      
|                        |  |  |  | Dean Personne          
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

I, John Supan, the chief financial officer
of Peak International Limited (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2006 (the Report), fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: February 13, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ John Supan         
|                        |  |  |  | John Supan             
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
Order filed, January 29, 2015

.

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

____________ NO. 01

- 14

- 00950

- CV

REBECCA A. HEWITT

- BURGIN , Appellant

V.

JOHN NTAGHA AND PAMELA NTAGHA , Appe llee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 3

Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Case 14

- CCV

- 053751



### ORDER The reporter’s record in this case was due January 13, 2015

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend ti me for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Robin Rosen , the official (or substitute) court reporter, to file the record
in this a ppeal , if any, within 30 days of the date of this order

.

/s/ Harvey Brown Acting individually
IV 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 543

Expressing the sense of the House that Congress should complete action 

on H.R. 4019, making marriage tax relief permanent. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2002

Mr. WELLER (for himself and Mr. HASTERT) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House that Congress should 

complete action on H.R. 4019, making marriage tax 

relief permanent.

Whereas there are more than 36,000,000 American working 

couples that are affected by the unfair marriage tax penalty; 

Whereas this unfair tax punishes our society’s most basic institution by discouraging couples from getting married; 

Whereas this burdensome tax forces married couples to pay 

higher taxes than they would if they were single; 

Whereas a bipartisan majority of the House of Representatives passed H.R. 4019 on June 13, 2002, permanently 

extending the marriage penalty relief provided by the 
2

•HRES 543 IH 

Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 

2001; 

Whereas failure to enact permanent marriage tax relief will 

reimpose the unfair marriage tax penalty after 2010 on 

more than 36,000,000 married working couples; 

Whereas permanent marriage tax penalty relief will encourage and promote the values of marriage, family and hard 

work; and 

Whereas the Senate has not passed H.R. 4019 or equivalent 

legislation: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the Congress should complete action on 

3 H.R. 4019 and the Congress should present it to the 

4 President prior to adjournment of the 107th Congress so 

5 that 36,000,000 married couples can benefit from perma6 nent marriage penalty tax relief.

Æ
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the filing of the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report") by FCCC, Inc. (the "Registrant"), I, Martin Cohen, Chairman of the Board, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Registrant.





| | /s/Martin CohenName: Martin Cohen
Title: Chairman of the Board, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: June 25, 2004
K EG - |20 371-0

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION

Page 1 of 1

Wier vA _ AUG 3 4 As of: August 31, 2011
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS 6 31 20m Received: August 09, 2011

BRANCH Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: August 31, 2011

Tracking No. 80edc3bf
‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: [RS-2010-0017-0044
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

UnXnowA 4 Submitter Information

General Comment

It is wrong for the US government to force any employer to pay for contraceptive measures for its
employees. Further, it is an egregious idea that any religious employers or any employer of an
organization that maintains a right-to-life/pro-life worldview should be forced to fund something
that goes against there deeply held beliefs. Please ensure that their are protections for these groups
in place. Thank you.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=0900... 8/31/2011
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1400 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1400

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 23, 2002

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility 
   Act of 1996 to extend the deadline for aliens to present a border 
    crossing card that contains a biometric identifier matching the 
           appropriate biometric characteristic of the alien.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR PRESENTATION OF CERTAIN BORDER 
              CROSSING IDENTIFICATION CARDS.

    Section 104(b)(2) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant 
Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended by striking 
``5 years'' and inserting ``6 years''.

            Passed the Senate December 20 (legislative day, December 
      18, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                  JERI THOMSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
442728 © ~58 ~(In pocket)

Taste 1—Foraminifera from the Skookumchuck formation in the Centralia-Chehalis district, Washington

[Species arranged taxonomically, with frequency of occurrence indicated as follows: V, very abundant; A, abundant; C, common; F, few; R, rare]

Locality No.

‘Quinqueloculina goods pees
hperalts Hepna goa Hanna.
_minuta Beck.

lobos

Marginuli c
Marginulina sp.

Dentalina colei Ci
Gommunis (40

ymson
Guttulina irregularis (d’Orbigny) -
Globulina of ‘ar (ftanna‘and Yanna).

Glanduli

Renton ct halijardi Cushinan
cf. applini Howe and Wallace.
ef. planatum Cushman and Thomas.
2. 4

El aphldans of. smithi Cushman and Dusenbury.

tofrondicularia packardi Cushman and Schen
Robertina weshingtanenste Beck .
Butimine ovata cowlitzensis Bu

Gprotdtee condom! (Cstenan and
Eponides yegu

Ceratobulimina washburni Cushman and 8

Ors
Glanigerina ef, locuinoiaes Phannet~
Cibicides haydoni (Cushman and Schenck)
hodgei Cushman and Schenck.
lobetulus (Walker and Jeoob)
jeck.

111050

111060

| 1103s
| saro030
| 11040

Species
[present in
Cowlitz

XXXXXXX! X! X! XXXXXX:!

Explanation of samples arranged according to locality numbers follows:

No. Map reference
Geological Survey drill hole K-

De
nae
(1)

Map reference

Geological Survey drill hole 1
Geological Survey drill hole J

No. Map reference
{11021 Geological Survey drill hole ..
0.

11060 Geological Survey drill hole BI
111061 Geological Survey drill hole E~%
111001 Geological Survey drill hole G..
{11038 Geologieal Survey drill hole P-.
f ieal Survey drill hole Q-

iit -do..
111051 Geological Survey drill hole U_

Map reference
Geological Survey aril! hole V.
-do.. —
No. 231.

#### Rhodes *v.*Star Herald Printing Co. et al.

Supreme Court of Nebraska. Certiorari denied.
From: bcmcpa@zoominternet.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:00:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Brian McCarrier

Butler, PA 16001
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. American Ice Company, Respondent, *v.*The State Board of Tax Commissioners, Appellant.

*People ex rel. American Ice Co.*v. *State Board of Tax Comrs.*153 App. Div. 532, modified.

(Argued February 26, 1913;

decided March 18, 1913.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 26, 1912, which reversed a determination of *767the defendant as to the amount of a tax payable upon a mortgage executed by the relator.

*Thomas Carmody, Attorney-General (Franklin Kennedy*of counsel), for appellant.

*Newell Lyon*and *Frank R. Savidge*for respondent.

Order of Appellate Division reversed and determination of the state board of tax commissioners fixing the amount of the mortgage tax to be paid by the relator modified by deducting in the computation of such tax the amount of the prior liens on the real estate covered by such mortgage, without costs to any party in any court, and the matter is remitted to said board to compute said tax in accordance herewith, on dissenting opinion of Lyon, J., below.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Collin and Hogan, JJ.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRUCE A. NORVELL, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD 

ASSOCIATION; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 19-35705 

D.C. No. 1:16-cv-00195-BLWREB 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Idaho

B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 23, 2021**

San Francisco, California

Before: OWENS, BADE, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Bruce A. Norvell appeals pro se the district court’s judgment in his action 

seeking declaratory and injunctive relief regarding terms defined in certain

healthcare plans. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal based on 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

standing, Braunstein v. Ariz. Dep’t of Transp., 683 F.3d 1177, 1184 (9th Cir. 

2012), and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), Colony Cove 

Props., LLC v. City of Carson, 640 F.3d 948, 955 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.

Norvell, an enrollee in the Federal Employee Benefit Health Act 

(“FEHBA”), alleged that the defendants, which include various healthcare 

companies and government agencies, violated federal statutes and regulations by 

insufficiently defining “outpatient” versus “inpatient” in various healthcare plan 

materials. Norvell alleged that, as a result, he is unable to understand and compare 

health benefits plans and cannot “exercise an informed choice” among them. See 5 

U.S.C. § 8907(a).

The district court properly found that Norvell failed to adequately allege 

standing. Norvell asserts that his inability to choose among competing plans is a 

concrete injury. But even if we assume that the statutes at issue were established 

to protect his interests, Norvell failed to allege any procedural violations that 

caused him concrete harm. See Robins v. Spokeo, Inc., 867 F.3d 1108, 1113 (9th 

Cir. 2017); see also TransUnion LLC v. Ramirez, 141 S. Ct. 2190, 2214 (2021)

(“An asserted informational injury that causes no adverse effects cannot satisfy 

Article III.” (internal quotation marks omitted)).

Because Norvell has no standing, we lack jurisdiction to consider the other 

grounds for dismissal. See Env’t Prot. Info. Ctr., Inc. v. Pac. Lumber Co., 257 
3

F.3d 1071, 1076–77 (9th Cir. 2001) (“The Supreme Court has repeatedly 

emphasized that ‘[w]ithout jurisdiction the court cannot proceed at all in any cause.

Jurisdiction is power to declare the law, and when it ceases to exist, the only

function remaining to the court is that of announcing the fact and dismissing the

cause.’” (alteration in original) (quoting Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 

523 U.S. 83, 94 (1998))).

1

AFFIRMED.

1 Norvell’s motions for rehearing en banc and to be allowed extra pages for his 

rehearing en banc motions (Docket Entry Nos. 40, 45, 46) are denied.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Robinson Financial
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jamie E. McReynolds, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



By: /s/ Jamie E. McReynolds
    -----------------------
Name:  Jamie E. McReynolds
Chief Financial Officer
February 12, 2003










                                       28
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue


Registration No.  333-35460
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)
PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  064				Trade Date: 04/05/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated
  September 8, 2000)						Issue Date:  04/10/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement April 5, 2001

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION
OR REPAYMENT
Date and terms of redemption or repayment
(including any applicable regular or special record dates)

  CUSIP
     or	Stated				                                 Interest
Common	Interest		        Price to	   Discounts &   Payment	   Survivor's
  Code	  Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions  Frequency	 Option	 Yes/No

14911QCR0 5.25%	 04/15/05	 100%	        1.0%     Quarterly	      YES	    NO


Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:
____  Yes	  X   No						N/A



(1) The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not
affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the
effective date of the change.

(2) Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to
Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the
time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the March
31, 1999 Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          34,858
<SECURITIES>                                   626,193
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,070
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,416
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               677,705
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 677,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          233,488
<BONDS>                                        340,590
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            81
<OTHER-SE>                                     103,546
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   677,705
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,710
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,358
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   950
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,788
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,614
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,614
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,614
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20
<FN>
<F1>For Purposes of this Exhibit, Primary means Basic.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
1 The Honorable MichaelJ. Davis, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.



## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2541

___________ Barbara J. Ochoa, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Kenneth S. Apfel, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: September 7, 1999 Filed: September 10, 1999

___________ Before BEAM, LOKEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. BarbaraOchoa appeals the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Social Security, upholding the Commissioner & s decision to deny Ochoa & s application for disability insurance benefits. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude substantial evidence on the record as a whole supported the Commissioner’s decision that Ochoa was not disabled within the meaning of the Social-2-

Security Act, and we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s report, which the district court adopted. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.