alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1287 

Commending the Honor Flight Network, its volunteers, and donors, for enabling World War II veterans to travel to our Nation’s capital to see 

the World War II Memorial created in their honor. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 19, 2008 

Mr. MORAN of Kansas (for himself, Mr. HOBSON, and Mr. SHULER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Veterans’ Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the Honor Flight Network, its volunteers, and 

donors, for enabling World War II veterans to travel 

to our Nation’s capital to see the World War II Memorial 

created in their honor. 

Whereas in 2004, nearly 60 years after World War II ended, 

veterans of that war and all those who supported the war 

effort at home received recognition of their service, sacrifice, and victory through the dedication of a national 

World War II Memorial located on the National Mall in 

Washington, District of Columbia; 

Whereas many veterans of World War II are now in their 80s 

and 90s, and are unable, physically or financially, to visit 

our Nation’s capital to see the World War II Memorial 

for themselves; 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 1287 IH 

Whereas Earl Morse of Ohio and Jeff Miller of North Carolina created the Honor Flight Network to enable World 

War II veterans to travel to the Memorial; 

Whereas now operating in communities in over 30 States, the 

Honor Flight Network is a grassroots, nonprofit organization that uses commercial and chartered flights to send 

veterans on an all-expenses paid trip to Washington, District of Columbia; 

Whereas the Honor Flights are staffed by volunteers and 

funded by donations; 

Whereas former Senator Bob Dole, himself a wounded veteran of World War II, led the fundraising campaign to 

build the Memorial and often greets veterans arriving at 

the Memorial through the Honor Flight Network; 

Whereas of the 16,000,000 veterans who served in World 

War II, an estimated 2,500,000 are alive today and dying 

at a rate of over 900 a day; and 

Whereas the Honor Flight Network is working against time 

to thank America’s World War II veterans: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives ex2 presses its deepest appreciation to the Honor Flight Net3 work, its volunteers, and donors, who honor America’s 

4 World War II veterans with an opportunity to see the 

5 World War II Memorial in Washington, District of Colum6 bia. 

Æ 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
MICROMUSE INC.



Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Micromuse Inc. for the quarter ended December 31, 2002, I, Michael L. Luetkemeyer, Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Micromuse Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



| | (1) |  | such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2002, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2002, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Micromuse Inc.
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: February 12, 2003



By:

/s/    MICHAEL L. LUETKEMEYERMichael L. Luetkemeyer Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       6,516,706
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,804,574
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 11,503,730
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,127,473
<PP&E>                                       3,200,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                 468,807
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,894,547
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,031,622
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        53,631
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,307,408
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,894,547
<SALES>                                     28,689,192
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,689,192
<CGS>                                       19,647,624
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,647,624
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,990,127
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             237,241
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                814,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                   322,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            492,200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   492,200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
From: mandoerin1@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:19:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Erin Strange

Derby, KS 67037
Exhibit 32.1

                             Multiband Corporation.
                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In  connection  with this Annual Report Form 10-K,  Multiband  Corporation
(the  "Company")  for the period ended  December  31, 2004,  I, James L. Mandel,
Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

1.    This Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and

2.    The information  contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,  in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


Date: July 20, 2005                     By: /s/ James L. Mandel
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Chief Executive Officer
alks_Ex_10-3



		

			Exhibit 10.3

		





		
			2011 Plan – US certificate
		

			
					
						
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Stock Option Award Certificate 

					
						(NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR) 

					
						 

					
					
						

					
						 

					
						ID: XXXXXXXX

					
						Connaught House

					
						1 Burlington Rd.

					
						Dublin 4, Ireland

				



		
			 
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						«FIRST_NAME» «MIDDLE_NAME» «LAST_NAME»

					
						«ADDRESS_LINE_1»

					
						«ADDRESS_LINE_2»

					
						«ADDRESS_LINE_3»

					
						«CITY»,  «STATE»    «ZIP_CODE»

					
					
						Option Number:

					
						Plan:

					
						 

					
						 

					
						 

					
						ID:

				



		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Effective «GRANT_DATE», you have been granted a Non-Qualified Option to buy «SHARES_GRANTED» shares of Alkermes plc (the “Company”) common stock at «OPTION_PRICE» per share.
		

		
			 
		

		
			Vesting details are available via your Bank of America Merrill Lynch Benefits Online account. The Non-Qualified Stock Option shall expire on the 10th anniversary of the date of grant (unless otherwise provided below).  
		

		
			 
		

		
			In the event of the termination of your service relationship with the Company, the Non-Qualified Stock Option shall vest and be exercisable in full on such termination of service relationship and the period during which the Non-Qualified Stock Option (to the extent that it is exercisable on the date of termination of the service relationship) may be exercised shall be three (3) years following the date of termination of the service relationship, but not beyond the original term of the Non-Qualified Stock Option.
		

		
			 
		

		
			The foregoing Non-Qualified Stock Option has been granted under and is governed by the terms and conditions of this Stock Option Award Certificate and the Alkermes plc 2011 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended (the “Plan”).
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						____________________________________________

					
						Alkermes plc

					
					
						______________________

					
						Date
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 178 (Friday, September 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 63556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-20103]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 9:00 a.m. EDT, Friday, September 22, 2023.

PLACE: Virtual meeting.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Enforcement matters. In the event that the 
time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the 
change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will 
be posted on the Commission's website at https://www.cftc.gov/.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-
5964.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: September 13, 2023.
Robert Sidman,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-20103 Filed 9-13-23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
No. 614, Misc.

#### Snyder *v.*Pennsylvania.

*David Kanner*and *Stanford Shmukler*for petitioner.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,****As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe period ended May 31, 2007 (the “Report”) of Immucor, Inc. (the “Registrant”),as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Icertify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)       The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

(2)       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.
| July 27, 2007 | /s/ Gioacchino De Chirico |
|---------------|---------------------------|
|          | Gioacchino De Chirico     |
|          | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

----
From: ken@upwardmarriages.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:15:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kenneth Haynes

Portland, OR 97223
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 12(b)



                            D&N CAPITAL CORPORATION
               Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges
                   and preferred stock dividend requirements


                     For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2001
                          (In thousands, except ratio)

<TABLE>
   <S>                                                   <C>
   Net income                                            $1,942

   Fixed charges:
       Advisory fees                                         73

   Total fixed charges                                       73

   Earnings before fixed charges                         $2,015

   Fixed charges, as above                                   73

   Preferred stock dividend requirement                   1,361

   Fixed charges including preferred stock dividends     $1,434

   Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred
       stock dividends requirements                        1.41

</TABLE>

                                      13
No. 621, Misc.

#### Shipman *v.*Indiana.

Supreme Court of Indiana. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of VTEX Energy,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2003 (the  "Report"),  We, Stephen F.
Noser,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Randal B. McDonald,  Jr., Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/Stephen F. Noser
--------------------------
Stephen F. Noser
Chief Executive Officer
September 19, 2003

/s/Randal B. McDonald, Jr.
--------------------------
Randal B. McDonald, Jr.
Chief Financial Officer
September 19, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.1



inTEST CORPORATION



In connection with the Quarterly Report of inTEST Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert E. Matthiessen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Date:	August 11, 2006

/s/ Robert E. Matthiessen
Robert E. Matthiessen
President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 123, Misc.

#### Ricks *v.*Pennsylvania et al.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF GREG EL a/k/a GREGORY L. TUCKER FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS § § No. 209, 2017 § §
Submitted: July 6, 2017 Decided: July 12 , 201 7
Before STRINE , Chief Justice; VALIHURA , and VAUGHN , Justices.
O R D E R
This 12 th day of July 2017 , it appears to the Court that: (1) On May 19, 2017 , Gregory El a/k/a Gregory L. Tucker (“Tucker”) filed
a doc ument with this Court entitled Writ of Mandamus, which t he Clerk of the Court
docketed as a request for extraordinary relief under Supreme Court Rule 43.
Tucker’s writ asks this Court to void a judgment of the Superior Court, docketed April 19, 2017 in Civil Action No. N16L

- 03

- 181, granting summary judgment to the plaintiff LSF9 Master Participation Trust (“the Trust”), and against Tucker and his wife, in a mortgage foreclosure action. Arguably, Tucker’s writ could be construed
as an attempt to timely appeal the Superior Court’s judgment in the mortgage
forecl osure action. (2) The Trust filed a response to Tucker’s writ on July 6, 201 7 . The Trust does not address the jurisdictional requirements of a pe tition for extraordinary relief.2

In stead , the Trust construes Tucker’s writ as an opening brief on appeal and argues that the judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on its merits. (3) Under Articl e IV, § 11 of the Delaware Constitution, this Court has limited jurisdiction to issue extraordinary writs. 1 The Court has the authority to issue
a writ of mandamus only when the petitioner can demonstrate a clear right to the performance of a duty, no other adequate remedy is available, and the trial court arbitrarily failed or refused to perform its duty. 2 An extraordinary writ will not be
issued if the petitioner has another adequate and complete remedy at law to correct the act of the trial court that is alleged to be erroneous. 3 In this case, Tucker clearly has an adequate remedy in the appellate process. Accordingly, his petition for a writ
of mand amus must be dismissed. (4) T o the extent we construe this matter as Tucker’s appeal from the Superior Court’s April 19, 2017 judgment in C.A. No. N16L

- 03

- 181, we have considered the parties’ respective positions carefully and have determined that the ju dgment below should be affirmed on the basis of, and for the reasons set forth in, the Superior Court’s well

- reasoned decision dated April 19, 2017.

1 Del. Const. art. IV, § 11(6) (providing that the Supreme Court may issue “writs of prohibition, quo warranto, certiorari and mandamus”). 2 In re Bordley , 545 A.2d 619, 620 (Del. 1988). 3 Canaday v. Superior Court , 116 A.2d 678, 682 (Del. 1955).3

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for a writ of
mandamus is DISMISSED. Alternatively, t he judgment of the Superior Court in
C.A. No. N16L

- 03

- 181 is AFFIRMED

. BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice