alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael Thomas, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
**Exhibit 24.13**

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

**KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS** that I, **Stephen D. Steinour**do hereby appoint JohnW. Rowe and William A. Von Hoene, Jr., or either of them, attorney for me and in my name and on my behalf to sign the annual Securities and Exchange Commission report on Form 10-K for 2008 of Exelon Corporation, together with any amendments thereto,to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and generally to do and perform all things necessary to be done in the premises as fully and effectually in all respects as I could do if personally present. 

**Stephen D. Steinour**

**DATE: February 1, 2009**
From: monkezunc@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:39:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

Having the federal government require private insurance companies to pay for services that are or may

be morally objectionable is much like the federal government requiring lenders to finance the mistakes

of those who otherwise couldn't qualify for home loans. In other words, this decision is a disaster in the

making.

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Grant DiCianni

Temecula, CA 92592
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JULY 8, 2009

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 08-14553

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 07-00315-CR-J-20-TEM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GARRISON HARRIS,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(July 8, 2009)

Before MARCUS, PRYOR and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Garrison Harris appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a

firearm. 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2). Harris argues that the government

failed to prove that he knowingly possessed the firearm. We affirm.
We review de novo the denial of a judgment of acquittal. See United States

v. Evans, 473 F.3d 1115, 1118 (11th Cir. 2006). To establish that a person is a

felon in possession of a firearm, the government must prove beyond a reasonable

doubt that the defendant was a convicted felon who knowingly possessed a firearm

and that the firearm affected interstate commerce. See United States v. Glover,

431 F.3d 744, 748 (11th Cir. 2005). The possession may be constructive, in which

case the government must prove the defendant exercised either “‘ownership,

dominion, or control’ over the firearm.” United States v. Molina, 443 F.3d 824,

829 (11th Cir. 2006) (quoting United States v. Ferg, 504 F.2d 914, 916 (5th Cir.

1974)).

The district court did not err by denying Harris’s motion for a judgment of

acquittal. Harris admitted to the arresting officers that he knew a firearm was in

the car and he had attempted to conceal the firearm behind the passenger seat. 

Harris’s statement established that he knowingly possessed the weapon.

Harris’s conviction is AFFIRMED.

2
# Diario Oficial C 64A/28 d

| | ISSN 1977-0928 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 64A |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 60.° año28 de febrero de 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0928

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 64A

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

60.° año28 de febrero de 2017

---

| Número de información | Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Anuncios |
| | PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS |
| | Parlamento Europeo |
| 2017/C 64 A/01 | Procedimiento de selección PE/195/S — Agente temporal — Jefe de Unidad (AD 14) — Lista de aptitud | 1 |

Número de información

Sumario

Página

V   Anuncios

PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Parlamento Europeo

2017/C 64 A/01

Procedimiento de selección PE/195/S — Agente temporal — Jefe de Unidad (AD 14) — Lista de aptitud

1

---

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

V Anuncios

PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Parlamento Europeo

| 28.2.2017 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | CA 64/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2017

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

CA 64/1

---

PROCEDIMIENTO DE SELECCIÓN PE/195/S

Agente temporal — Jefe de Unidad (AD 14)

LISTA DE APTITUD

(2017/C 064 A/01)

| 1. | BORDEZ, Emmanuel |
| --- | --- |

1.

BORDEZ, Emmanuel

La lista de aptitud se aprobó el 14 de febrero de 2017.

---
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1366

For the relief of Lindita Idrizi Heath.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 3, 2001

Mr. NICKLES introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Lindita Idrizi Heath.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR LINDITA

4 IDRIZI HEATH.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section

6 101(b)(1) and subsections (a) and (b) of section 201 of

7 the Immigration and Nationality Act, Lindita Idrizi Heath

8 shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for

9 adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted

10 for permanent residence upon filing an application for

11 issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of that
2

•S 1366 IS

1 Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resi2 dent.

3 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Lindita Idrizi

4 Heath enters the United States before the filing deadline

5 specified in subsection (c), Lindita Idrizi Heath shall be

6 considered to have entered and remained lawfully and

7 shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of

8 status under section 245 of the Immigration and Nation9 ality Act as of the date of enactment of this Act.

10 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

11 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap12 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica13 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees

14 within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act.

15 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.—

16 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res17 idence to Lindita Idrizi Heath, the Secretary of State shall

18 instruct the proper officer to reduce by one, during the

19 current or next following fiscal year, the total number of

20 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the

21 country of birth of Lindita Idrizi Heath under section

22 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if appli23 cable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made

24 available to natives of the country of birth of Lindita Idrizi

25 Heath under section 202(e) of that Act.
3

•S 1366 IS

1 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY FOR CITIZENSHIP.

2 For purposes of section 320 of the Immigration and

3 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1431; relating to the automatic

4 acquisition of citizenship by certain children born outside

5 the United States), Lindita Idrizi Heath shall be consid6 ered to have satisfied the requirements applicable to

7 adopted children under section 101(b)(1) of that Act (8

8 U.S.C. 1101(b)(1)).

9 SEC. 3. LIMITATION.

10 No natural parent, brother, or sister, if any, of

11 Lindita Idrizi Heath shall, by virtue of such relationship,

12 be accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immi13 gration and Nationality Act.

Æ
From: Gloria Morotti

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive care for women

Date: Sunday, August 14, 2011 2:43:46 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger.

Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run

health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the

coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies.

If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Gloria Morotti
From: jandevro@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:04:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

rusty devereaux

Idaho Falls, ID 83404
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 164 (Friday, August 25, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 58264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18337]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL OP-OFA-083]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed August 14, 2023, 10 a.m. EST Through August 21, 2023, 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxapps.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-II/public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20230106, Final, USFS, MN, Lutsen Mountains Ski Area Expansion 
Project, Review Period Ends: 10/10/2023, Contact: Orry Hatcher 218-626-
4300.
EIS No. 20230107, Final, NRC, TN, Environmental Impact Statement for 
the Construction Permit for the Kairos Hermes Test Reactor, Review 
Period Ends: 09/25/2023, Contact: Tamsen Dozier 301-401-2272.

    Dated: August 22, 2023.
Julie A. Roemele,
Acting Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2023-18337 Filed 8-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
From: Ruth Yurchuck

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Access to contraception

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:39:15 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.
From: tigeratheart@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:39:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sydney Anderson

Colorado Springs, CO 80921
EXHIBIT
32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Vail Banks, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gary
S. Judd, Chief Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer) of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                         
|2. | The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Gary S.
  Judd                     
|---------------------------------------
|                                       
|                                       
|                                       
|Gary S. Judd                           
|Chief
  Executive Officer and President
|October 25, 2004
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue


Registration No.  333-35460
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)
PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  044				Trade Date: 02/08/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated
  September 8, 2000)						Issue Date:  02/13/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement February 08, 2001

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION
OR REPAYMENT
  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or
     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any
Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivor's		applicable
                                                             regular or special
  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No
                                                                 	record dates)

14911QBV2  5.65%       02/15/05	  100%	      1.0%	  Semi-Annually	  YES	   NO



Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:
____  Yes	  X   No						N/A



(1) The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not
affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the
effective date of the change.

(2) Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to
Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the
time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
From: tannerb@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:14:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ben Tanner

Las Vegas, NV 89183
FORM 10-Q

UNITED STATES 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

			 

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002       

Commission File No.                 0-13295                       

 

 

         CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION         

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Academic FreedomEvaluation ProblemsFaculty College RelationshipFaculty EvaluationFaculty PromotionFreedom of SpeechGradingHigher EducationLegal ProblemsLibel and SlanderPrivacyReliabilityStudent Evaluation of Teacher PerformanceTeacher AttitudesTenureValidity

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget