12332 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 45 / Monday, March 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

(A) Imports into the U.S. of qualifying 

wool by the eligible person; and 

(B) Such qualifying wool that was 

manufactured in the U.S. by the eligible 

person. 

(ii) Direct and indirect importers—(A) 

In general. Eligible persons that import 

qualifying wool through a third party 

broker are considered to be indirect 

importers of the qualifying wool. 

Persons that directly import qualifying 

wool and pay the import duty for such 

wool are considered to be direct 

importers of the qualifying wool. 

(B) Reported dollar value. Eligible 

persons must state in their annual 

affidavit whether, in the calendar year 

immediately preceding the payment, 

they were direct or indirect importers, 

and the dollar value of the imported 

qualifying wool. The reported dollar 

value of imports by indirect importers 

will be subject to a 10% reduction. 

(C) Affirmation. An eligible person 

shall annually affirm in the affidavit 

that, in the calendar year immediately 

preceding the payment, the eligible 

person 

(1) Directly or indirectly imported the 

qualifying wool into the U.S.; 

(2) Manufactured the qualifying wool 

in the U.S.; and 

(3) Imported qualifying wool from the 

country of origin identified in the 

affidavit. 

(iii) Import documentation—(A) 

Direct imports. Applicable to the 

calendar year immediately preceding 

the payment, an eligible person that 

directly imported qualifying wool is 

required to submit to FAS as part of the 

affidavit package scanned copies of CBP 

Form 7501 ‘‘Entry Summary’’ for the 

relevant calculations made in the 

affidavit. 

(B) Indirect imports. Applicable to the 

calendar year immediately preceding 

the payment, an eligible person that 

indirectly imported qualifying wool is 

required to submit to FAS as part of the 

affidavit package invoices from third 

party brokers for the relevant 

calculations made in the affidavit. 

(3) Manufacture of qualifying wool. 

When reporting the annual dollar value 

and quantity of imported qualifying 

wool, and the annual dollar value and 

quantity of the qualifying wool that was 

manufactured, an eligible person may 

either have manufactured the qualifying 

wool on its own behalf or had another 

person manufacture the qualifying wool, 

provided the eligible person owned the 

qualifying wool at the time of 

manufacture. 

Dated: February 25, 2015. 

Phil C. Karsting, 

Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service, 

and Vice President, Commodity Credit 

Corporation. 

[FR Doc. 2015–04385 Filed 3–6–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–10–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0347; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–NM–173–AD; Amendment 

39–18109; AD 2015–04–07] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

The Boeing Company Model 767–200 

and –300 series airplanes equipped with 

Pratt & Whitney Model JT9D or PW4000 

engines. This AD was prompted by a 

report of several cases of low hydraulic 

pressure or loss of electrical power to 

the alternating current motor pump 

(ACMP) on the left engine. This AD 

requires inspecting for damage of the 

wiring bundles in the left engine’s strut 

and corrective actions if necessary, and 

installing new wire support brackets 

and bundle clamps. We are issuing this 

AD to detect and correct chafed wire 

bundles due to rubbing against structure 

or a hydraulic piping elbow, which 

could result in electrical arcing in a 

flammable fluid leakage zone, and 

provide a possible ignition source for 

fuel vapors and hydraulic fluids. Ignited 

fuel vapors or hydraulic fluid in an area 

without a fire detection or suppression 

system could result in an uncontained 

engine strut fire and structural damage 

to the engine strut. 

DATES: This AD is effective April 13, 

2015. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of certain publications listed in this AD 

as of April 13, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: For service information 

identified in this AD, contact Boeing 

Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data 

& Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, 

MC 2H–65, Seattle, WA 98124–2207; 

telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1; 

fax 206–766–5680; Internet https://

www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view 

this referenced service information at 

the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Renton, WA. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, 

call 425–227–1221. It is also available 

on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0347. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0347; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this AD, the regulatory 

evaluation, any comments received, and 

other information. The address for the 

Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is 

Docket Management Facility, U.S. 

Department of Transportation, Docket 

Operations, M–30, West Building 

Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 

DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Philip Sheridan, Senior Aerospace 

Engineer, Systems and Equipment 

Branch, ANM–130S, FAA, Seattle 

Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; 

phone: 425–917–6441; fax: 425–917– 

6590; email: philip.sheridan@faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 by adding an AD that would 

apply to certain The Boeing Company 

Model 767–200 and –300 series 

airplanes equipped with Pratt & 

Whitney Model JT9D or PW4000 

engines. The NPRM published in the 

Federal Register on June 30, 2014 (79 

FR 36680). The NPRM was prompted by 

a report of several cases of low 

hydraulic pressure or loss of electrical 

power to the ACMP on the left engine. 

The NPRM proposed to require 

inspecting for damage of the wiring 

bundles in the left engine’s strut and 

corrective actions if necessary, and 

installing new wire support brackets 

and bundle clamps. We are issuing this 

AD to detect and correct chafed wire 

bundles due to rubbing against structure 

or a hydraulic piping elbow, which 

could result in electrical arcing in a 

flammable fluid leakage zone, and 

provide a possible ignition source for 

fuel vapors and hydraulic fluids. Ignited 

fuel vapors or hydraulic fluid in an area 

without a fire detection or suppression 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 45 / Monday, March 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 12333 

system could result in an uncontained 

engine strut fire and structural damage 

to the engine strut. 

Comments 

We gave the public the opportunity to 

participate in developing this AD. The 

following presents the comments 

received on the NPRM (79 FR 36680, 

June 30, 2014) and the FAA’s response 

to each comment. 

Request To Include Airplanes Equipped 

With General Electric Engines 

Boeing requested that paragraphs (c), 

(g), and (h) of the proposed AD (79 FR 

36680, June 30, 2014) be revised to 

include Model 767 airplanes that are 

equipped with General Electric engines. 

Boeing stated that the identified unsafe 

condition for Model 767 airplanes 

equipped with Pratt & Whitney engines 

also exists on Model 767 airplanes 

equipped with General Electric engines. 

Boeing also noted that it has issued 

Service Bulletins 767–29A0098 and 

767–29A0100 to address the unsafe 

condition for the airplanes with General 

Electric Model CF6–80A or CF6–80C2 

engines. 

We agree that a similar unsafe 

condition might exist for Model 767 

airplanes that are equipped with 

General Electric engines. We are 

evaluating the potential for this unsafe 

condition to exist on those airplanes 

and might consider further rulemaking 

for those airplanes. However, while we 

determine whether further rulemaking 

is appropriate for those airplanes with 

General Electric engines, we consider it 

appropriate to proceed with issuance of 

this AD for Model 767 airplanes 

equipped with Pratt & Whitney engines. 

We have not changed this AD in this 

regard. 

Request To Clarify Certain Figures in 

Service Information 

United Airlines stated that it has no 

issues with the reason for the NPRM (79 

FR 36680, June 30, 2014) or the 

proposed actions. However, United 

Airlines did have concerns about the 

clarity of some parts of Boeing Alert 

Service Bulletin 767–29A0115, dated 

May 22, 2013. 

• Figure 2 has an illustration that 

shows four wire bundles, but Step 1 of 

the figure only specifies three wire 

bundles to inspect. Another figure, 

Figure 3, also has the same illustration 

that shows four wire bundles, but Step 

1 of Figure 3 specifies four wire bundles 

to inspect. It is unclear if the illustration 

or the Step 1 is incorrect. 

• Step 1 in Figure 4 specifies 

removing two Hi-Loks and a bracket; 

then the Hi-Loks are re-installed in Step 

4, which seems to indicate the bracket 

should be discarded. However, Figure 4 

does not specify what to do with that 

bracket, which means it is not clear 

what the new Hi-loks would be 

retaining or if the other bracket that is 

apparently attached to the bulkhead 

web remains. 

• Steps 2 and 3 of Figure 4 each 

specify to remove four bolts, but a note 

for Step 3 states ‘‘do not remove valve 

mounting brackets.’’ It seems the 

mounting brackets will fall free at that 

time and, if that is the case, the note 

should say ‘‘retain brackets for reuse.’’ 

• Figure 4 does not specify ‘‘remove 

and discard’’ for certain parts that are 

not re-used, especially those parts that 

are duplicated in the new parts kit. 

We agree that Figure 4 of Boeing Alert 

Service Bulletin 767–29A0115, dated 

May 22, 2013, could be improved for 

clarity. However, Figure 4 of Boeing 

Alert Service Bulletin 767–29A0115, 

dated May 22, 2013, was referenced by 

a step in the Accomplishment 

Instructions that was not labeled ‘‘RC’’ 

(required for compliance) and may be 

deviated from as specified in paragraph 

(j)(4) of this AD. We revised paragraph 

(j)(4) of this AD to specify that steps that 

are not marked ‘‘RC’’ may be deviated 

from using accepted methods in 

accordance with the operator’s 

maintenance or inspection program 

without obtaining approval of an 

alternative method of compliance 

(AMOC), provided the ‘‘RC’’-marked 

steps can still be done and the airplane 

can be put back in a serviceable 

condition. 

Figure 3 of Boeing Alert Service 

Bulletin 767–29A0115, dated May 22, 

2013, is correct. 

Figure 2 of Boeing Alert Service 

Bulletin 767–29A0115, dated May 22, 

2013, was identified in a step labeled 

‘‘RC’’ in the Accomplishment 

Instructions as a figure that must be 

done to comply with this AD. We agree 

that the illustration for Figure 2 is 

misleading with regard to the number of 

wire bundles that must be inspected. 

However, the title of Figure 2 clearly 

indicates the correct wire bundle 

numbers (three) and wire bundle 

identification (W290, W390, and W398) 

to inspect, and the number of wire 

bundles specified in Step 1 of the figure 

is also correct. 

FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 20– 

176A, ‘‘Service Bulletins Related to 

Airworthiness Directives and Indicating 

FAA Approval on Service Documents,’’ 

dated June 16, 2014 (http://rgl.faa.gov/

Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/

rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/0/

979ddd1479e1ec6f86257cfc0052d4e9/

$FILE/AC%2020-176A.PDF), states that 

‘‘To avoid subjective misinterpretation, 

the text in the accomplishment 

instructions must be the authoritative 

information.’’ Therefore, we regard the 

text in Figure 2 to be more authoritative 

than the illustration for Figure 2. 

To clarify this information, we added 

a new Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD 

and renumbered a subsequent note 

accordingly. Note 1 to paragraph (g) of 

this AD clarifies that the illustration in 

Figure 2 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

767–29A0115, dated May 22, 2013, 

shows four wire bundles, but the text in 

Figure 2 correctly identifies three wire 

bundles to be inspected. Following the 

text in Figure 2 will result in 

accomplishment of the appropriate 

actions; no approval of an alternative 

method of compliance (AMOC) is 

needed to address this issue. We 

conclude that this will enable operators 

to successfully incorporate the service 

information. 

Effect of Winglets on Accomplishment 

of the Proposed Actions 

Aviation Partners Boeing stated that 

the installation of winglets per 

Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) 

ST01920SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/

Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/

rgstc.nsf/0/59027F43B9A7486E86257

B1D006591EE?OpenDocument&

Highlight=st01920se) does not affect the 

accomplishment of the manufacturer’s 

service instructions. 

Conclusion 

We reviewed the relevant data, 

considered the comments received, and 

determined that air safety and the 

public interest require adopting this AD 

as proposed except for minor editorial 

changes. We have determined that these 

minor changes: 

• Are consistent with the intent that 

was proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 

36680, June 30, 2014) for correcting the 

unsafe condition; and 

• Do not add any additional burden 

upon the public than was already 

proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 36680, 

June 30, 2014). 

Related Service Information Under 1 

CFR Part 51 

We reviewed Boeing Alert Service 

Bulletin 767–29A0115, dated May 22, 

2013. The service information describes 

procedures for inspection of wire 

bundles and replacement of wire 

support bracket in the left engine strut. 

This service information is reasonably 

available; see ADDRESSES for ways to 

access this service information. 

Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767– 

29A0115, dated May 22, 2013, specifies 

concurrent or prior accomplishment of 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
12334 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 45 / Monday, March 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

Boeing Service Bulletin 767–29–0057, 

Revision 3, dated June 9, 2011, for 

modification of certain wire bundles. 

Boeing Service Bulletin 767–29–0057, 

Revision 3, dated June 9, 2011, 

describes procedures for modifying 

certain wire bundles. This service 

information is reasonably available; see 

ADDRESSES for ways to access this 

service information. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this AD affects 126 

airplanes of U.S. registry. 

We estimate the following costs to 

comply with this AD: 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Cost on U.S. 

operators 

Inspection and installation .............................. 13 work-hours × $85 per hour = $1,105 ........ $349 $1,454 $183,204 

We have received no definitive data 

that would enable us to provide cost 

estimates for the on-condition actions 

specified in this AD. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

This AD will not have federalism 

implications under Executive Order 

13132. This AD will not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866, 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), 

(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation 

in Alaska, and 

(4) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new airworthiness 

directive (AD): 

2015–04–07 The Boeing Company: 

Amendment 39–18109; Docket No. 

FAA–2014–0347; Directorate Identifier 

2013–NM–173–AD. 

(a) Effective Date 

This AD is effective April 13, 2015. 

(b) Affected ADs 

None. 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to The Boeing Company 

Model 767–200 and –300 series airplanes, 

certificated in any category, equipped with 

Pratt & Whitney Model JT9D or PW4000 

engines, as identified in Boeing Alert Service 

Bulletin 767–29A0115, dated May 22, 2013. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 29, Hydraulic Power. 

(e) Unsafe Condition 

This AD was prompted by a report of 

several cases of low hydraulic pressure or 

loss of electrical power to the alternating 

current motor pump (ACMP) on the left 

engine. We are issuing this AD to detect and 

correct chafed wire bundles due to rubbing 

against structure or a hydraulic piping elbow, 

which could result in electrical arcing in a 

flammable fluid leakage zone, and provide a 

possible ignition source for fuel vapors and 

hydraulic fluids. Ignited fuel vapors or 

hydraulic fluid in an area without a fire 

detection or suppression system could result 

in an uncontained engine strut fire and 

structural damage to the engine strut. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Inspection and Corrective Actions 

Within 48 months after the effective date 

of this AD, do a detailed inspection for 

damage of the wiring bundles in the left 

engine’s strut, and all applicable corrective 

actions; and install new wire support 

brackets and bundle clamps; in accordance 

with the Accomplishment Instructions of 

Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767–29A0115, 

dated May 22, 2013. Do all applicable 

corrective actions before further flight. 

Note 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD: The 

illustration in Figure 2 of Boeing Alert 

Service Bulletin 767–29A0115, dated May 

22, 2013, shows four wire bundles, but the 

text in Figure 2 correctly identifies three wire 

bundles to be inspected. Following the text 

in Figure 2 will result in accomplishment of 

the appropriate actions; no approval of an 

alternative method of compliance (AMOC) is 

needed to address this issue. 

(h) Prior or Concurrent Action 

For airplanes identified as Group 1 

airplanes in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 

767–29A0115, dated May 22, 2013: Prior to 

or concurrently with doing the actions 

required by paragraph (g) of this AD, do a 

modification of the wire bundles, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 767– 

29–0057, Revision 3, dated June 9, 2011. 

Note 2 to paragraph (h) of this AD: For 

certain airplanes, paragraph (b) of AD 2004– 

16–12, Amendment 39–13768 (69 FR 51002, 

August 17, 2004), references Boeing Service 

Bulletin 767–29–0057, dated December 16, 

1993; and Boeing Service Bulletin 767–29– 

0057, Revision 1, dated August 14, 2003; as 

concurrent requirements. 

(i) Credit for Previous Actions 

This paragraph provides credit for the 

actions specified in paragraph (h) of this AD, 

if those actions were performed before the 

effective date of this AD using any of the 

service information identified in paragraphs 

(i)(1), (i)(2), and (i)(3) of this AD. 

(1) Boeing Service Bulletin 767–29–0057, 

dated December 16, 1993, which was 

incorporated by reference in AD 2000–19–09, 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 45 / Monday, March 9, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 12335 

Amendment 39–11910 (65 FR 58641, October 

2, 2000). 

(2) Boeing Service Bulletin 767–29–0057, 

Revision 1, dated August 14, 2003, which 

was incorporated by reference in AD 2004– 

16–12, Amendment 39–13768 (69 FR 51002, 

August 17, 2004). 

(3) Boeing Service Bulletin 767–29–0057, 

Revision 2, dated September 24, 2009, which 

is not incorporated by reference in this AD. 

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the 

authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if 

requested using the procedures found in 14 

CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, 

send your request to your principal inspector 

or local Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the manager of the ACO, send it to the 

attention of the person identified in 

paragraph (k) of this AD. Information may be 

emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOCRequests@faa.gov. 

(2) Before using any approved AMOC, 

notify your appropriate principal inspector, 

or lacking a principal inspector, the manager 

of the local flight standards district office/

certificate holding district office. 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair 

required by this AD if it is approved by the 

Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) that has 

been authorized by the Manager, Seattle 

ACO, to make those findings. For a repair 

method to be approved, the repair must meet 

the certification basis of the airplane, and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

(4) If the service information contains steps 

that are labeled as RC (Required for 

Compliance), those steps must be done to 

comply with this AD; any steps that are not 

labeled as RC are recommended. Those steps 

that are not labeled as RC may be deviated 

from using accepted methods in accordance 

with the operator’s maintenance or 

inspection program without obtaining 

approval of an AMOC, provided the steps 

labeled as RC can be done and the airplane 

can be put back in a serviceable condition. 

Any substitutions or changes to steps labeled 

as RC require approval of an AMOC. 

(k) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Philip Sheridan, Senior Aerospace 

Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, 

ANM–130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft 

Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917– 

6441; fax: 425–917–6590; email: 

philip.sheridan@faa.gov. 

(2) Service information identified in this 

AD that is not incorporated by reference is 

available at the addresses specified in 

paragraphs (l)(3) and (l)(4) of this AD. 

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767– 

29A0115, dated May 22, 2013. 

(ii) Boeing Service Bulletin 767–29–0057, 

Revision 3, dated June 9, 2011. 

(3) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 

Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, 

Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206– 

544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; 

Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. 

(4) You may view this service information 

at FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 

Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

(5) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 

19, 2015. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2015–03978 Filed 3–6–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0601; Airspace 

Docket No. 14–ANE–7] 

Amendment of Class E Airspace; 

Manchester, NH 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action amends Class E 

Airspace at Manchester, NH, as a new 

approach procedure has been 

developed, requiring airspace redesign 

at Manchester Airport. This enhances 

the safety and management of 

instrument flight rules (IFR) operations 

at the airport. This action also updates 

the geographic coordinates of the 

airport. 

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, April 30, 

2015. The Director of the Federal 

Register approves this incorporation by 

reference action under title 1, Code of 

Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to 

the annual revision of FAA Order 

7400.9 and publication of conforming 

amendments. 

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.9Y, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points can be viewed online at the FAA 

Air Traffic Plans and Publications Web 

site at http://www.faa.gov/

documentLibrary/media/Order/JO_

7400.9Y.pdf. An additional link on this 

site entitled Airspace Amendments is 

updated routinely with the most current 

airspace designations and reporting 

points. It may also be viewed online at 

http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/

publications/. The Order is also 

available for inspection at the National 

Archives and Records Administration 

(NARA). For information on the 

availability of this material at NARA, 

call 202–741–6030, or go to http://

www.archives.gov/federal_register/

code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_

locations.html. 

FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, is 

published yearly and effective on 

September 15. For further information, 

you can contact the Airspace Policy and 

Regulations Group, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW., Washington DC, 20591; 

telephone: 202–267–8783. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

Fornito, Operations Support Group, 

Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation 

Administration, P.O. Box 20636, 

Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone (404) 

305–6364. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

History 

On October 16, 2014, the FAA 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 

to amend Class E airspace at Manchester 

Airport, Manchester, NH, (79 FR 62079). 

Interested parties were invited to 

participate in this rulemaking effort by 

submitting written comments on the 

proposal to the FAA. One anonymous, 

positive comment was received. 

Class E airspace designations are 

published in paragraph 6003 of FAA 

Order 7400.9Y dated August 6, 2014, 

and effective September 15, 2014, which 

is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 

71.1. The Class E airspace designations 

listed in this document will be 

published subsequently in the Order. 

Availability and Summary of 

Documents for Incorporation by 

Reference 

This document amends FAA Order 

7400.9Y, Airspace Designations and 

Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2014, 

and effective September 15, 2014. FAA 

Order 7400.9Y is publicly available as 

listed in the ADDRESSES section of this 

final rule. FAA Order 7400.9Y lists 

Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, 

air traffic service routes, and reporting 

points. 


rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES