alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2410

MANDIE SUE MILLS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CA-98-1181-3-19)

Submitted: March 2, 1999 Decided: April 13, 1999

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Dargan McMaster, Bryan P. Stirling, TOMPKINS & MCMASTER,

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. J. Rene Josey, United

States Attorney, Frances C. Trapp, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Mandie Sue Mills appeals the district court’s order dismissing

her claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Although we recognize the grievous loss suffered by Mrs. Mills, application of the

Feres doctrine compels the conclusion that relief in a judicial

forum is simply unavailable. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Mills v. United States, No. CA-98-

1181-3-19 (D.S.C. July 21, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
From: nbs94@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:49:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Nadeen Friend

Plainfield, IL 60544
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00508

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A .R.G. , A.L.G., and J.P.C

. , Children

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- PA

- 01536 Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE MARION , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, that portion of the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental rights is REVERSED and the cause is REMANDED for further proceedings.

SIGNED December 11, 2013.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:31:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

By order of commitment and conscience, no individual or business owes loyalty nor should have to obey

an out-of-control strong-armed government when it comes to ethics and morals. It is to God first that

we owe obedience.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Susan Hart

Menlo Park, CA 94025
AFS - 12 - 465 - E

July 25, 2012 Ms. Ellen Birmingham United Air L ines, Inc. 233 South Wacker Drive, 23 rd Floor Chicago, I L 60606 Dear Ms. Birmingham : This is in response to y our letter dated July 9, 2012 , petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on beha lf of United Air L ines, Inc. (United) , from an exemption from § § 61.39(a)(1) and (b)(1)(i) and 61.157(b) and (c) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . The FAA finds that United is covered under Air Transport Association of America d.b.a. Air lines for America’s Exemption No. 10566. Therefore, the FAA will take no further action on y our petition and Docket number FAA - 2012 - 0757 is being closed. Sincerely , /s/ Id a M. Klepper Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 13 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 13

   To extend authorization for the national flood insurance program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 20, 2002

 Mr. Sarbanes (for himself, Mr. Bond, and Ms. Mikulski) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice, considered, and read the third 
                            time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend authorization for the national flood insurance program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM.

    The National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.) 
is amended--
            (1) in section 1309(a)(2) (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)(2)), by 
        striking ``December 31, 2002'' and inserting ``December 31, 
        2003''; and
            (2) in section 1319 (42 U.S.C. 4026), by striking 
        ``December 31, 2002'' and inserting ``December 31, 2003''.
                                 <all>
```
From: hcrull@bbnmedia.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:36:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carolyn Crull

Indian Trail, NC 28079
Appendix E Emissions and Air Quality Modeling for SEMAP Final Report
1 .pdf File Included in Electronic Copy Only
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Orthoplus Products, Inc., a/a/o Atiana Colston, Plaintiff-Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Global Liberty Insurance Company of New York, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Carolyn Walker-Diallo, J.), dated July 20, 2018, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Order (Carolyn Walker-Diallo, J.), dated July 20, 2018, reversed, with $10 costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.</p><p>Defendant-insurer established its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the underlying first-party no-fault claims as premature. Even accepting plaintiff's assertion that it submitted certain verification documents to defendant, the record establishes that plaintiff did not fully respond to defendant's requests for additional verification, which were properly mailed to plaintiff's attorney as authorized by counsel's prior correspondence to defendant (<i>see St. Vincent's Hosp. of Richmond v American Tr. Ins. Co.</i>, 299 AD2d 338 [2002];<a href="../2012/2012_52195.htm" target="_blank"><i> GNK Med. Supply, Inc. v Tri-State Consumer Ins. Co.</i>, 37 Misc 3d 138</a>[A], 2012 NY Slip Op 52195[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2012]). Since verification remained outstanding, the then-applicable thirty-day period to pay or deny the claims did not begin to run, the claims were not overdue, and plaintiff's action is premature (<a href="../2011/2011_00214.htm" target="_blank"><i>see St. Vincent Med. Care, P.C. v Country Wide Ins. Co.</i>, 80 AD3d 599</a>, 600 [2011]; <i>Westchester County Med. Ctr. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co., </i>262 AD2d 553 [1999]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: June 19, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
From: mollypops@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:46:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Linda Williams

, 93654-2282
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue


Registration No.  333-35460
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)
PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  039				Trade Date: 01/18/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated
  September 8, 2000)						Issue Date:  01/23/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement January 18, 2001

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION
OR REPAYMENT
  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or
     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any
Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivor's		applicable
                                                             regular or special
  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No
                                                                 	record dates)

14911QBQ3  6.50%      01/15/11	  100%	      1.50%	 Quarterly	  YES	   YES
                                              Callable at 100% on 01/15/03 and
									                                          semi-annually thereafter



Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:
____  Yes	  X   No						N/A



(1) The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not
affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the
effective date of the change.

(2) Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to
Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the
time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 28, 2016

d0620

Order 

Clerk

June 28, 2016

151254

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 151254

COA: 318599

Wayne CC: 12-011767-FC

KEVIN-JAMEL RASHARD MYERS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 24, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 221, Misc.

#### Whitsel *v.*Beto, Corrections Manager.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In
connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Comarco, Inc. I, Winston E. Hickman, Chief Financial Officer of Comarco, Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | This annual report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Comarco, Inc.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 30, 2008 |  | /s/ WINSTON E. HICKMAN 
|                     |  | Winston E. Hickman     
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original copy of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue


Registration No.  333-35460
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)
PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  058				Trade Date: 03/15/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated
  September 8, 2000)						Issue Date:  03/20/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement March 15, 2001

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION
OR REPAYMENT
  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or
     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any
Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivor's		applicable
                                                            regular or special
  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No
                                                                 	record dates)

14911QCK5	   5.75%	03/15/06	100%	        1.0%  Semi-Annually	      YES	    NO



Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:
____  Yes	  X   No						N/A



(1) The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not
affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the
effective date of the change.

(2) Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to
Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the
time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
EXHIBIT 10.1





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT





The Board of Directors


BakBone Software Incorporated:





We consent to the inclusion of our report dated June 5, 2002, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of BakBone Software Incorporated as of March 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year ended March 31, 2002, the eleven months ended March 31, 2001, and the year ended April 30, 2000, which report appears in the annual report on Form 20-F of
BakBone Software Incorporated.





KPMG LLP





San Diego, California


June 14, 2002
Order entered January 6, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00826-CR

EX PARTE KOFFI SEMEGNON DOKE

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-80876-2013

ORDER

Appellant is appealing the trial court’s order denying his post-conviction 

application for writ of habeas corpus. On September 18, 2020, the Court issued a 

scheduling order that directed the trial court to file a certification of appellant’s 

right to appeal with the clerk’s record. The clerk’s record filed on October 5, 2020 

does not contain the trial court’s certification. On November 6, 2020, the Court 

again ordered the trial court to prepare and file a certification of the right to appeal. 

To date, no certification has been filed.

We ORDER the trial court to file, by January 22, 2021, a certification of 

appellant’s right to appeal the denial of his post-conviction writ application.
–2–

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to transmit copies of this order, by 

electronic transmission, to the Honorable Tom Nowak, Presiding Judge, 366th 

Judicial District Court; and to counsel for the parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE