alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Goofy7353@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:45:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lloyd Sanders

Richland, MO 65556
#### John H. Robbins, Respondent, v. Charlotte P. Robbins, Appellant.

Order affirmed, without costs.
AVAQMD Rule 1101 1101-1

Secondary Lead Smelters/Sulfur Oxides 

D1 12/08/11

RULE 1101 

Secondary Lead Smelters/Sulfur Oxides 

(a) A person shall not discharge into the atmosphere from any lead melting furnace such as 

described in Section (b) below, effluent process gas containing sulfur oxides in excess of the 

concentration and mass flow rate indicated by both subsections (a)(1) and (a)(2): 

(1) 200 ppm of sulfur oxides expressed as sulfur dioxide, measured at the point of emission 

to the atmosphere, and calculated on a dry basis averaged over a minimum of 15 

consecutive minutes, and 

(2) 2.1 kilograms of sulfur oxides per metric ton of process weight 

(4.2 pounds of sulfur oxides per short ton of process weight) expressed as sulfur 

dioxide. 

(b) This rule shall apply only to furnaces used to recover lead from the following: 

(1) Automotive batteries, and/or 

(2) Slag and dross resulting from the melting of automotive batteries. 

[SIP: Approved 9/2/81, 46 FR 43969, 40 CFR 52.220(c)(70)(i)(B)] 
1101-2 AVAQMD Rule 1101

Secondary Lead Smelters/Sulfur Oxides 

D1 12/08/11

This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JANAK SINGH,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-74202

Agency No. A090-004-557

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Janak Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board

of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming an immigration judge’s removal order. 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law,

FILED

JUN 02 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-74202

Aguilar Gonzalez v. Mukasey, 534 F.3d 1204, 1208 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny

the petition for review. 

We reject Singh’s contention that the Department of Homeland Security

(“DHS”) violated the confidentiality provisions of the Immigration Reform and

Control Act of 1986, 8 U.S.C. § 1255a(c)(5), by reviewing Singh’s legalization

application before initiating proceedings against him. It is undisputed that DHS

discovered Singh’s identity and non-citizen status during a raid that was unrelated

to his legalization application. DHS did not violate the confidentiality provision

when it subsequently verified the denial of Singh’s legalization application. See 8

U.S.C. § 1255a(c)(5)(D)(i) (information derived from the legalization application

that is not available from any other source, other than information furnished by an

applicant, may be used for the purposes of immigration enforcement). 

Singh’s remaining contention lacks merit.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.22 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1995 for May Limited Partnership 1983-2 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000735552
<NAME> MAY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1983-2
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             148
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      180
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   328
<PP&E>                                          16,582
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,972
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               27
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         911
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       938
<SALES>                                            603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   612
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      134
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   229
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    249
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                249
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       249
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    11.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.46
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

I, G. Ward Paxton, Chief Executive Officer ofIntrusion Inc., certify that:

 

(1)                          I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Intrusion Inc.:

 

(2)                          Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

(3)                          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

(4)                          The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)              Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)             Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)              Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

(5)                          The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)              Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)             Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:  March 26, 2004 | /s/ G. Ward Paxton      |   |
|----------------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                       | G. Ward Paxton          |
|                       | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
From: devavilluri@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:06:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Deva Villuri

Franklin Park, NJ 08823
From: jacbue@embarqmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:57:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jack Daniel

Johnson City, TN 37601
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                              88
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      272
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     20,083
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,479
<PP&E>                                          14,734
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,974
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,242
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            51
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,611
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,897
<SALES>                                         27,051
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,051
<CGS>                                           21,698
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,698
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,260
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,068)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,428)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,640)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,640)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.73)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



Cuisine Solutions, Inc.

Alexandria, Virginia



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-147987, 33-60616 and 333-92167) of Cuisine Solutions, Inc. of our report dated September 17, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appear in this Form 10-K.



| |  |                     
| |  | --------------------
| |  | /s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
| |  | BDO Seidman, LLP    



Bethesda, Maryland

September 17, 2008
---

EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the use of our reports dated March 9, 2010,
relating to the consolidated financial statements of TransGlobe Energy
Corporation (which report on the consolidated financial statements expressed an
unqualified opinion and includes a separate report titled Comments by
Independent Registered Chartered Accountants on Canada-United States of America
Reporting Differences referring to changes in accounting principles) and the
effectiveness of TransGlobe Energy Corporations internal control over financial
reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of TransGlobe Energy
Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

|March 22, 2010  | /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP                 
|--------------- | --------------------------------------------
|Calgary, Canada | Independent Registered Chartered Accountants



---
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our reports dated February 18, 1999 (except with respect to the
matters discussed in Note 22, as to which the date is March 22, 1999) on the
consolidated financial statements and the consolidated financial statement
schedule of MediaOne Group, Inc., as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1998, included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K into MediaOne Group, Inc.'s previously filed
registration statements on Forms S-3 (Nos. 33-50047, 33-50047-01 and 333-50227)
and on Forms S-8 (Nos. 333-01931, 33-63093, 33-63085, 33-63091, 333-24285 and
333-67679).
 
Denver, Colorado,
March 30, 1999.
United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C.   20549

Form 12b-25

Notification of Late Filing

(Check one):
___ Form 10-K __ Form 20-F __ Form 11-K  ___ Form 10-Q    X  Form N-SAR

For the Period Ended:            12/31/03

Part I - Registrant Information

Full Name of Registrant

Scudder Advisor Fund III

Former Name if Applicable



Address of Principal Executive Office (Street & Number)

One South Street
Baltimore, MD 21202

Part II - Rules 12b-25(b) and (c)

If the subject report could not be filed without unreasonable effort or
expense and the registrant seeks relief pursuant to Rule 12b-25(b), the
following should be completed.

(a) the reasons  described in  reasonable  detail in Part III of this
form could not be eliminated without unreasonable effort or expense.

(b) The subject annual report, semi-annual report, transition
report on Form 10-K,  Form 20-F,  11-K,  Form N-SAR, or portion
thereof, will be filed on or before the  fifteenth calendar day
following the  prescribed  due date; or the subject quarterly report
transition report on form 10-Q, or portion thereof will be filed on or
before the fifth calendar day following the prescribed due date

(c)     The accountant's statement or other exhibit required by Rule
12b-25(c)has been attached if applicable

Part III - Narrative

State below in reasonable detail the reasons why the Form 10-K, 11-
K, 10-Q, N-SAR, or the transition report or portion thereof, could
not be filed within the prescribed time period.

The registrant requests additional time to file form NSAR so that it
can compile the necessary information to file a complete and accurate
document.

Part IV - Other Information

(1)     Name and telephone number of person to contact in regard to
this notification

        Charles Rizzo, Vice President
        (410) 295-3488

(2)     Have all other periodic reports required under Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or Section 30 of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 during the preceding 12 months been
filed?

                Yes

(3) Is it anticipated that any significant change in results of
operations from the  corresponding  period for the last  fiscal  year
will be reflected  by the earnings statements to be included in the
subject report or portion thereof?

        No

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)    Scudder Advisor Fund
III

has caused this notification to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Date:   3/1/04	                            By:     Brendan Concannon
                                              /s/:    Brendan Concannon