T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J O H N D A V I D S T O N E R , i ndi vi dua l l ya nd U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , E x. R el . John D avi d S t on er , P l ai n t i ffs - A p p el l an t s, a nd T H E S T A T E O F C A L I F O RN I A a nd C OU NT Y O F S AN T A C L AR A, P l ai n t i ffs, v. S AN T A C L AR A C OU NT Y O F F I C E OF E DU C AT I ON a n dE AS T S I DE UN I ON HI GH SC HO OL DI ST RI CT , D efen d an t s, a nd C O L L E E N B . W I L C O X ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 16768 D . C . N o . 5 : 0 3 -cv -0 4 6 2 2 -JW ME MOR AN DU M * 

# FI LED OC T 18 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALST he H onor abl e L oui s H . P ol l a k, S e ni orU ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJudge ** f orthe E a s t e rn D i s tr i c tof P e nns y l va ni a , s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on.

2 A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J a m e s W a r e , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r8, 2010 S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B e f or e : R E I N H A R D T a nd B E R Z O N , C i r c ui tJudge s , a nd P O L L A K , S e ni or D i stri ctJudg e. ** C a lif o rn iap r e c lu s io n law ap p lie s . Mi gra v . W arr e n C i t ySc h. D is t. B d. of E du c. , 46 5 U . S . 75 (198 4). A l tho ug h the di stri ctcourterre d i n app l yi ng fe dera l p r e c lu s io n law , o u rr e v ie w is d e n o v o , se e FarO ut P r od. , I nc . v . O s kar , 247 F . 3d 98 6, 99 3 (9th C i r. 20 01 ), and w e m ayaf fi rm the j ud gm entbel ow i f the re cord sup p o rt s d o i n g so u n d er th e p ro p er C al i fo rn i a st an d ard . Itd o es. I n C a l i f orni a , “ C ol l a t e r a l e s t oppe l pr e c l ude s r e l i t i ga t i on of i s s ue s a r gue d a nd de c i de d i n pr i orpr oc e e di ngs . T r a di t i ona l l y , [ C a l i f orni ac ourt s ] ha ve appl i e d the doc tr i ne onl yi f

s e ve r a l thr e s hol d r e qui r e m e nt s a r e f ul f i l l e d. F i r s t , the i s s ue s ought t o b e pre cl ud ed fr om re l i t i gat i on m ustbe i dent i ca l t o thatdeci ded i n a form er proceedi ng . S ec on d, thi s i ss ue m usthave been actual l y l i t i gat ed i n the form er pr oc e e di ng. T hi r d, i tm us tha ve be e n ne c e s s a r i l yde c i de d i n the f orm e rpr oc e e di ng. F o u rth , th e d eci si o n i n th e fo rm er p ro ceed i n g m u stb e fi n al an do n th e m eri t s.3

F in a lly , th e p a rtya g a in s t w h o m p r e c lu s io n is s o u g h t m u s t b e th e s a m e a s , o rin pri vi ty w i th, the party t o the form erproceedi ng . ” L u c ido v . Su p e r . C t. , 795 P . 2d 12 23 , 12 25 (C al . 19 90 ) ( i nt ernal ci t at i on s and footno t e om i tt ed). A l l fi v e co n d i t i o n s are m eth ere. F i rst , th e i ssu e u n d er th e F ed eral F al se C la im s A c t is id e n tic a l to th e o n e d e c id e du n d e rth e C a lif o rn iaF a ls e C la im s A c t: w h e th e rth e d e f

e n d a n ts r e c e iv e da n dk e p t f u n d s d is b u r s e db yth e C a lif o rn ia g o v e rn m e n t, s o m e o f

w h ic h c a m e f

r o m th e f e d e r a l g o v e rn m e n t, “a f

te rk n o w in g ly p resen t i n g o r cau si n g t o b e p resen t ed , m ak i n g , u si n g , o r cau si n g t o b e m ad e, fal se cl ai m s, re cords or s t at em ent s. ” C o m p a re 31 U . S . C . § 3729 w ith C a l . G ov’ tC ode § 1 2 6 5 1 . B o th f

a ls e c la im s a c ts r e q u ir e th e s a m e d e g r e e o f s c ie n te r . C o m

p a re 31 U . S . C . § 3 72 9(b)(1) w ith C al . G ov ’ tC od e § 12 65 0(b)(3). S e c o n da n dth ir d , th e C a lif o rn iaC o u rt o f

A p p e a l a c tu a llya n dn e c e s s a r ily a dj udi c a t e d thi s i s s ue i n a f f i rm i ng the di s m i s s a l of

S t one r ’ s c l a i m s a ga i ns tF i m i a ni and W on g for fa i l ure t o st at e s uffi ci entfa ct s and i n aff i rm i ng the grantof sum m ary a d ju d ic a tio n to W ilc o x o n th e b a s is o f in s u f f ic ie n t e v id e n c e . See H

erna ndezv. C i t yof P om ona , 20 7 P . 3d 50 6, 51 4 (C al . 20 09 ) ( fi nd i ng an i ss ue ac tual l y l i t i gat ed w he r e i t“ w a s r a i s e d, s ubm i tt e d f orde c i s i on, a nd a c tua l l yde c i de d” ) . T he op po rtun i ty t o l i t i gat e i n the S up er i or C ou rtand o n app ea l w as ful l and fai r.4

F ou rth, un der C al i forni a l aw , sust ai ni ng a dem urre r f or fa i l ure t o p l ea d s u f f ic ie n t f a c ts to s ta te ac la im is af in a l ju d g m e n t o n th e m e r its . Kan arek v. B u g l i o si , 1 0 8 C al . A p p . 3 d3 2 7 , 3 3 4 (1 9 8 0 ). S i m i l arl y, su m m ary ad j u d i cat i o n i s a f in a l ju d g m e n t o n th e m e r its . C o lu m b u s L i n e, In c. v. G ra y L i n e S i g h t-Seei n gC o s. A ss oc. , 1 2 0 C a l. A p p . 3 d6 2 2 , 6 2 9 ( 1 9 8 1 ) . F if th , S to n e rw a s th e s o le p a rtyto th e p r io rp r o c e e d in g a n dis th e s o le p a rty to th is p r o c e e d in g , b e c au s e n e ith e rC a lif o rn ian o rth e U n ite dS ta te s e x e r c is e dits r ig h t to in te rv e n e . C

f . U n i ted S ta tes ex rel. E isen stei n v. C i t y o f N ew Y o rk , 1 2 9 S. C t . 22 30 , 22 35 (200 9). F i nal l y, C al i forni a c ou rt s w ou l d n otfi nd thatthe pu bl i c i nt er es tre qu i re s the m t o di s r e ga r d the j udgm e nti n the pr i orc a s e . T hus , tha ti nt e r e s tdoe s not ov erri de the det erm i nat i on w e m ustm ake a ft erappl yi ng the fa ct ors c on si dere d abov e. AF F I RME D.