alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:44:33 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Spencer Ruff

Rochester, MN 55904
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
EX-27.98
RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00000
<CASH>                                          44,212
<SECURITIES>                                     3,638
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,742
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,585
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,232
<PP&E>                                          82,320
<DEPRECIATION>                                (18,215)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 439,218
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           80,970
<BONDS>                                         99,035
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,613
<OTHER-SE>                                     152,189
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   439,218
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               247,545
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  241,432
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (8,767)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,897
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,983
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,384
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (6,401)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (27,067)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (33,468)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (1.330)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.320)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Receivable Acquisition & Management
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Max Khan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Receivable Acquisition & Management Corporation and will be retained by
Receivable Acquisition & Management Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




December
29, 2008




By:
                      /s/  Max KhanMax Khan
                          Chief
      Executive Officer,
                          Chief
      Financial Officer
                          (Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
      Officer)
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Bilingual EducationElementary Secondary EducationEnglish (Second Language)Hispanic AmericansInstructional EffectivenessLanguage MinoritiesLanguage ResearchLimited English SpeakingNative Language InstructionSecond Language Learning

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-12-000062527-DEC-201211:42 AM
From: theltong@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:28:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Thelma Tong

Moorpark, CA 93021
From: joseph.wilson@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:39:28 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Joseph Wilson

Allen, TX 75013
Exhibit 32.2  Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    In connection with the Quarterly Report of NSTAR (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James J. Judge, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:(i)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date:  July 31, 2009By:/s/ JAMES J. JUDGEJames J. JudgeSenior Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer
From: lindalangley@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:32:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask you IN THE STRONGEST POSSIBLE WAY that you rescind the unjust and

coercive mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health

insurance with no co-pay to patients. It does not make sense to continue to MANDATE THINGS THAT

WILL ULTIMATELY MAKE INSURANCE TOO EXPENSIVE FOR EVERYONE, MAKING BASIC HEALTH CARE

NEEDS LEFT UNMET- AND WHY WITHOUT COPAY EVEN.. SERVING SPECIAL INTERESTS?

If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for any organizations that

provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I strongly oppose the

government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and devices that I

oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Linda langley

Nicholasville, KY 40356
From: kknight777@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:37:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

K Knight

Dallas, TX 75206
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



As of the date hereof, I, Eric Borrmann, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Plumtree Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Plumtree Software, Inc.



By:

/s/ Eric BorrmannName:

Eric BorrmannTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDated:

May 4, 2005




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by Plumtree Software, Inc. and will be retained by Plumtree Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, each ofthe undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report of NetBank,Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Date: May 10, 2005               |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
|                                  |
| /s/ Douglas K. Freeman                |
| Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer |
|                                  |
| /s/ Steven F. Herbert                 |
| Chief Financial Executive             |

 

 

 

1

----
SERVED FEBRUARY 9, 2011 

^^••^ARTMENTOF 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION . .1 V^PORTATIQN 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS . 'r): I OPFRAt lOlvS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

3; nq '.!,. 

... Q O 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SAMUEL JOSEPH LATHAM 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10WP0009 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FAA No. FAA-2010- 0624* 

AMENDED HEARING NOTICE 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

on March 11,2011, inclusive, in the U.S. Department of Labor Courtroom, Suite 

5150, the Glenn M. Anderson Federal Building, 501 West Ocean Boulevard, Long 

Beach, CA. 90802. Hearings v^ll commence at 9:00 a.m. and conclude at 4:30 p.m. each 

day. Settled cases will not be removed from the docket until the Judge receives the 

proper pleading(s). Pleadings may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courier or 

postal service. 

'Richard C. Goodwin* 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

' Materials filed in the FAA Hearing Docket (except for materials filed in security cases) are also available 

for viewing at http://www. reeulations. ^ov. 
f Fedc|^ikYiation Administratiojt) 

I iQOil^^dence Avenue, S.W 

r Wasj^pai, DC 20591 

f Atteiili! Hearing Docket Clerk, |\! 

I Wilbur Wright Buildi 

I 33690 Sibn d St. 

! Wildc^CA 92595 

I TEL: -^1^92-4897 

I l4err#^M| Cofhpkflnani'sCoufiisel 

t (te^m&^otia f tdiiri^el '''•' ' 

I :^i^^Pfi c R^i6n, AWP-7 

f F^^^Witidft Administration' 

i:Rp.^i^07 

I Los Aipes, CA 90009-2007 

I IBL: S0-725-7117 

I FAX: 35t<l^25-6816 

I T|e I^iial?le Richard C, GoodVSin, i 

I • Cp5c^^^||arings, M-20 

I lis. I^lpien t of Transportatioh 

11200 l^;J^sey Avenue, S.E. 

IBAstB^l l Ground Floor, Room Eli|^i||||St' ' ' 

|\^sh|^|i,'D C 20590 '^^^^^ » t 

jfTit:, ;|(ppiey-Advisor 202-3 66-213« 

I Ifc l Assistam 202-366-5121 

fFAX:i2ii^66-7536 

aial Aviation Adnrii 

DC 20591, Attentioii; 

-::>' ^ f
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cybertel Communications Corp. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), We, Richard D. Mangiarelli, Chief Executive Officer and
Richard Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Registrant.


Date: 5-14-04                            /s/Richard D. Mangiarelli
     --------                            -------------------------
                                         Richard D. Mangiarelli
                                         Chief Executive Officer

Date: 5-14-04                            /s/Richard Schmidt
     --------                            ------------------------
                                         Richard Schmidt
                                         Chief Financial Officer
From: george.dengler@bms.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:16:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

George Dengler

Gillette, NJ 07933
No. 232.

#### Liberian Carriers, Inc., et al. *v.*Tampa Ship Repair & Dry Dock Co., Inc.

*Richard H. Sommer*and *Edward L. Smith*for petitioners.

*Nicholas J. Healy III*for respondent.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.