alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1400 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1400

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility 
   Act of 1996 to extend the deadline for aliens to present a border 
    crossing card that contains a biometric identifier matching the 
           appropriate biometric characteristic of the alien.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR PRESENTATION OF CERTAIN BORDER 
              CROSSING IDENTIFICATION CARDS.

    Section 104(b)(2) of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant 
Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1101 note) is amended by striking 
``5 years'' and inserting ``6 years''.

            Passed the Senate December 20 (legislative day, December 
      18, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1400

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility 
   Act of 1996 to extend the deadline for aliens to present a border 
    crossing card that contains a biometric identifier matching the 
           appropriate biometric characteristic of the alien.
```
Exhibit








Aflac Incorporated 1st Quarter 2016 10-Q
EXHIBIT 10.20
	
			
	NOTICE OF GRANT OF PERFORMANCE BASED
	 
	AFLAC INCORPORATED

	RESTRICTED STOCK AND RESTRICTED
	 
	Worldwide Headquarters

	STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
	 
	1932 Wynnton Road

	 
	 
	Columbus,Georgia 31999






	
					
	«name»
	 
	Award Number:
	«Number»
	 

	«Address1»
	 
	Plan:
	«Plan»
	 

	«Address2»
	 
	 
	 
	 

	«Address3»
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 






Effective «Date», you have been granted an award of «Shares» shares of Aflac Incorporated (the Company) common stock.  The current total value of the Award at the date of issue was «Value».


These award shares are restricted until the date shown below and achievement of performance metrics described.
	
		
	              Shares
	     Full Vest

	              «Shares»
	     «Vestdate»






Summary of Award Terms:


The vesting of the performance award is based upon a performance requirement and a service requirement. The company will seek to achieve a statutory accounting basis RBC ratio of 500% threshold and 700% target.  For the three year period, stock will vest at 50% if threshold RBC ratio is achieved and 100% if target is attained.  Vesting will be determined using linear interpolation for an RBC ratio between 500% and 700%.  If the RBC falls below 500% there will be no vesting for the period.  If the RBC equals or exceeds 700% vesting will equal 100%. The additional service requirement is based upon the continued employment through the third anniversary of the grant date or the vesting provisions described in paragraph D of the attached agreement.


These shares of performance based restricted stock will be held in book entry form in the custody of the Company until the restrictions thereon have lapsed.  Subject to the restrictions set forth in the Plan and the Restricted Stock Award Agreement relating to this award, you shall possess all incidents of ownership with respect to the Shares, including the right to receive dividends with respect to such Shares and to vote such Shares.  In accordance with sections 4(a) and 8(e) of the Plan, any dividend paid on the award shares will be issued in Company common stock and held as additional restricted shares in the book entry account subject to the same terms and conditions attributable to the original grant until such time as all restrictions have lapsed on the shares with respect to which the dividends were paid.


By your signature and the Company's signature below, you and the Company agree that this award is granted under and governed by the terms and conditions of the Company's 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan (as Amended and Restated March 14, 2012) and the Restricted Stock Award Agreement relating to this award, which is attached to and made a part of this document.    


	
						
	/s/ Daniel P. Amos
	 
	             <<Date>>

	by Daniel P. Amos
	 
	 
	 
	Option Date
	 

	Aflac Incorporated
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 

	<<name>>
	 
	 
	 
	Date
No. 306.

#### Walsh *v.*United States.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Theodore George GilinsJcy*for the United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<NAME>                        VIRGINIA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
<CIK>                         0001036070
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          17,140
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  1500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     58,027
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          59,824
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            59,829
<LOANS>                                        256,715
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,505
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 399,634
<DEPOSITS>                                     353,232
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,460
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,616
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,326
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 399,634
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,328
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,011
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   105
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                21,444
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               9,553
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,801
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,643
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      560
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,160
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,135
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,135
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,213
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.11
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.38
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,139
<LOANS-PAST>                                       348
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,039
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      122
<RECOVERIES>                                        28
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,505
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,786
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            719
        

</TABLE>
From: kilgos5@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:29:00 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gary Kilgo

Ball, LA 71405
Page 1 of 1

REG 120 841-70

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS As of: September 01, 2011
BRANCH Received: August 15, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 01, 2011
Tracking No. 80ee17d2

(Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0113
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Bernice Maslan
Address:
Seattle, WA,

General Comment

I strongly support the new policy requiring health insurance plans to cover birth contro] without a
copay, CMS-9992-IBC2. Thank you!

I am concerned about religious employers being able to opt out of this. All women should have
access to contraceptive coverage, regardless of employer. This policy should finally make near
universal access to birth control a reality for all women who use it.

Thank you for following science based recommendations and making women's health a priority!

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000... 9/1/2011
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of REV Holdings Inc.
     (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
     Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
     Todd J. Slotkin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
     pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
     the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:


              (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


              (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.


     /s/ Todd J. Slotkin
     -------------------
     Todd J. Slotkin
     Chief Financial Officer
     November 14, 2002

     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
     the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
     of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### ELLEN KELLY, Respondent, *v.*THE NEW YORK AND SEA BEACH RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant.

*Negligence*— *liability of a railroad company to a passenger injured by defects in Us ears.*

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial made upon the minutes of the justice before whom the action was tried.

The action was brought to recover damages for injuries sustained by the plaintiff by a fall in getting out of one of the defendant’s cars.

The court at General Term said: “ The plaintiff was a passenger on one of the open cars of the defendant, and when she was about to alight from the car, one of the curtain hooks caught her dolman and she was swung from her balance and thrown to the ground, and received the injuries complained of in this action.

“ The car was furnished with cross seats, with upright stanchions at the end, to which curtains were attached to be drawn together when the weather required. One of the curtains at the end of the seat was furnished with a ring, and the opposite curtain was furnished with a snap-hook, so that the curtains were held together by the hook and ring. When in order the point of the snap hook was protected by the pressure of the snap or latch against the point, which formed a continuous smooth surface, from which all substances would pass without being caught. The snap of the hook which caught the garment of the plaintiff was broken, and the hook was left pendent and without a guard, and that defect, and the failure to remove it, is the negligence underlying this action.

“ The main facts relating to the accident and injury are without dispute.. The defective and broken condition of the hook was *487established, and that was sufficient to impose liability upon the defendant if the case of the plaintiff was otherwise made out.

£‘ The questions of negligence and contributory negligence were fairly submitted to the jury, and the verdict was for the plaintiff, and that now carries all the questions of fact in her favor.”

“ There are no errors disclosed by the record, and the judgment and order denying a motion for a new trial should be affirmed, with costs.”

*A. P. &*IF. Man, for the appellant.

*Chas. J.*Patterson, for the respondent.

Opinion by

Dykman, J.;

Barnard, P. J., and Pratt, J.,. concurred.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs.
# Diario Oficial C 54A/21 d

| | ISSN 1977-0928 |
| --- | --- |
| Diario Oficial
  de la Unión Europea | C 54A |
| | |
| Edición en lengua española | Comunicaciones e informaciones | 60.° año21 de febrero de 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0928

Diario Oficial

de la Unión Europea

C 54A

Edición en lengua española

Comunicaciones e informaciones

60.° año21 de febrero de 2017

---

| Número de información | Sumario | Página |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Anuncios |
| | PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS |
| | Consejo |
| 2017/C 54 A/01 | Prórroga del plazo de validez de las listas de aptitud | 1 |

Número de información

Sumario

Página

V   Anuncios

PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Consejo

2017/C 54 A/01

Prórroga del plazo de validez de las listas de aptitud

1

---

| ES | |
| --- | --- |

ES

---

V Anuncios

PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS

Consejo

| 21.2.2017 | ES | Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea | CA 54/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2017

ES

Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea

CA 54/1

---

Prórroga del plazo de validez de las listas de aptitud

(2017/C 054 A/01)

Por decisión del Secretario General del Consejo de la Unión Europea, se prorroga hasta el 31 de diciembre de 2019 el plazo de validez de las listas de aptitud elaboradas como resultado de las siguientes oposiciones generales:

| CONS/AD/430


  (dos funciones) | con objeto de constituir listas de reserva de administradores experimentados en el ámbito de la Política Europea de Seguridad y Defensa (PESD). Este concurso-oposición afecta a dos tipos de funciones con grado AD 9 (función 1: planificador estratégico experimentado para las operaciones y misiones de gestión de crisis; función 2: planificador experimentado para el desarrollo de capacidades en los ámbitos militar, civil y espacial) cuyo anuncio fue publicado en el
  Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea C 178 A de 15 de julio de 2008. |
| --- | --- |
| CONS-COMM/AD/433 | para elaborar una lista de reserva para la provisión de una plaza de jefe de unidad (AD 12) con el irlandés como idioma principal, en los servicios de traducción, cuyo anuncio fue publicado en el
  Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea C 99 A de 30 de abril de 2009. |

CONS/AD/430

(dos funciones)

con objeto de constituir listas de reserva de administradores experimentados en el ámbito de la Política Europea de Seguridad y Defensa (PESD). Este concurso-oposición afecta a dos tipos de funciones con grado AD 9 (función 1: planificador estratégico experimentado para las operaciones y misiones de gestión de crisis; función 2: planificador experimentado para el desarrollo de capacidades en los ámbitos militar, civil y espacial) cuyo anuncio fue publicado en el
  Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea C 178 A de 15 de julio de 2008.

CONS-COMM/AD/433

para elaborar una lista de reserva para la provisión de una plaza de jefe de unidad (AD 12) con el irlandés como idioma principal, en los servicios de traducción, cuyo anuncio fue publicado en el
  Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea C 99 A de 30 de abril de 2009.

---
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 76

Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 6, 2001

Mr. LINDER submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating majority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Members be, and

2 are hereby, elected to the following standing committee of

3 the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT:

5 Mr. Portman, Mr. Hastings of Washington, Mr. Hutch6 inson, and Mrs. Biggert.

Æ
No. 166, Misc.

#### Rivers *v.*Myers, Correctional Superintendent.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.44 MB)
 
 CJTF-HOA jtac Grand Bara africa mv-22 Soldiers Army Djibouti F-16 AIR FORCE MARINE CORPS MARINES
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Nancy Griffin

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Support access to contraception

Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 10:00:48 AM

Sincerely,

-- 

Nancy A. Griffin

Gainesville, FL

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking

you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

I believe that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption

would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal

exemption provisions.