alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF TREASURER

I, Robert F. Aufenanger, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Excelsior Private Equity Fund II, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my
knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for the periods
presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                               
|-------------------------------
|Date: March 16, 2007           
|                               
|/s/ Robert F. Aufenanger       
|Robert F. Aufenanger, Treasurer



23
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Coupon | Interest | Maturity | Callable | Survivor's Option | Price | CUSIP |   |
| 1.500% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 9/15/2020 | 9/15/2017 * | Yes § | 100.00 | 14912HSU5 |   |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |  |
| (†††) | First Payment date 3/15/2017 |   |
|                    |   |
<PAGE>
 
                                                            Exhibit 23



                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



The Board of Directors
CompuCom Systems, Inc.:


     We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(No. 33-2304, No. 33-30175, No. 33-30056, No. 33-39914, No. 33-43275, No. 33-
63307, No. 33-63309, No. 33-76382 and No. 33-85268) on Form S-8 and the
Registration Statements (No. 33-43367, No. 33-47002, No. 33-64341, No. 33-78746
and No. 33-78756) on Form S-3 of CompuCom Systems, Inc. of our report dated
January 31, 1996, related to the consolidated balance sheets of CompuCom
Systems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1995 and 1994, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows and
related schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 1995, which report appears in the December 31, 1995 annual report on Form 
10-K of CompuCom Systems, Inc.



                                            KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


 



Dallas, Texas
March xx, 1996
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-30660

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CHADWICK DENARD CHISHOLM,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:94-CR-19-1

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Chadwick Denard Chisholm, federal prisoner # 08652-35, is serving a 292-

month sentence for conspiracy to possess and possession with intent to distribute

cocaine base. Chisholm filed a motion, styled as a FED. R. CIV. P. 60(b) motion

to reopen his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceedings. Chisholm’s § 2255 motion was

denied in 1997, but he sought to reopen the matter to address an alleged

jurisdictional defect in the proceeding pursuant to Gonzalez v. Crosby, 545 U.S.

524, 531-33 (2005). The district court construed Chisholm’s pleading as an

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

October 9, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-30660

2

unauthorized successive § 2255 motion and dismissed the motion for lack of

jurisdiction.

Chisholm argues that, because the indictment against him failed to allege

a drug quantity, the indictment was defective and the district court lacked

jurisdiction to sentence him to more than the 20-year statutory maximum set

forth in 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(C). This specific argument constitutes a new

theory of relief. Although Chisholm challenged the adequacy of the district court

factual findings with respect to drug quantity in his § 2255 motion, he did not

raise the specific argument he asserts here. Accordingly, the district court did

not err in construing his motion as an unauthorized successive § 2255 motion.

See Gonzalez, 545 at 531, 532 & nn.4-5.

AFFIRMED.
------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1 

LEGAL PROC ~, . 

PUBLICATION:e:S~ DlVlSION 

As of: August 25, 2010 PUSLlcULATIONS Received: August 10, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 25, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2d20f SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-00lO 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-001O-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-20 10-0010-0384 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Claire Louise Sherman 

Address: 

12517 King Palm Drive 

Savannah, GA, 31419 

Email: moreta6@comcast.net 

Phone: 912-927-6774 

Submitter's Representative: Dr. Phillip Day 

Government Agency Type: Federal 

Government Agency: AHRQ 

General Comment 

See attached file(s) 

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0384.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

https:1 Ifdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency Icomponentlsubmitter InfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/25/2010 
August 10,2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-2010­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effOIt 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PP ACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Claire L. Sherman
November 14, 1962.

No. 381.

#### Battaglia *v.*United States.

*Theodore R. Kupferman*and *Sol Schwartz*for petitioner.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.
From: Darrendragovich@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:23:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Darren Dragovich

Englewood, CO 80112
VOLUME 9. TABLE OF CONTENTS

TECHNICAL STAFF ADMINISTRATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES 

 Page

CHAPTER 1. INSPECTOR RESPONSIBILITIES, ADMINISTRATION, AND CONDUCT 

Section 1. Responsibilities of Aviation Safety Inspectors

1. General ............................................................................................................. 9-1

3. Investigations.................................................................................................... 9-1

5. Surveillance ...................................................................................................... 9-2

7. Certification...................................................................................................... 9-2

9. Other Responsibilities ....................................................................................... 9-3

11. Inspector Resource Data Base ............................................................................ 9-3

12.-20. Reserved ............................................................................................................. 9-3

Section 2. Personal Ethics and Conduct

21. Purpose............................................................................................................. 9-23

23. On-the-Job Ethics and Conduct .......................................................................... 9-23

25. Off-the-Job Ethics and Conduct ......................................................................... 9-24

27. Outside Employment, Financial Interests, and Gifts ............................................ 9-25

28.-40. Reserved ............................................................................................................ 9-26

Section 3. Aviation Safety Inspector (ASI) Credentials

41. General ............................................................................................................. 9-45

43. Types of Credentials .......................................................................................... 9-45

45. Eligibility Requirements .................................................................................... 9-45

47. Application Procedures...................................................................................... 9-45

49. Use of Credentials ............................................................................................. 9-45

50.-60. Reserved ............................................................................................................9-46

12/20/94 8400.10 CHG 10

i
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.03 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#            

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (R)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-109182

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  471                                                                   Trade Date:  08/23/04

(To Prospectus Supplement dated November 6, 2003 &

  Prospectus dated October 15,2003)                                                              Issue Date:   08/26/04

The Date of this Pricing SupplementAugust 23, 2004

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                                   Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                   Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment     Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)   Maturity  Public (2) Commissions       Frequency       Option  Yes/No     record dates)

14911QVQ1  4.3%            08/15/11           100%              1.27%             Semi-Annually               YES         NO                                                                                                                                                                                                               

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Principal                                                                                 1st Payment             Day         

Amount                  Proceeds                  Dealer                           Date                   Count

$2,123,000.00         $2,096,037.90         ABN AMRO Inc.        02/15/05                               30/360    

Original Issue DiscountNote:                                                                          Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                  N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (R) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (R) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $141.020 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (R) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (R) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated October 15,2003.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
yearID sourceTypeID sourceTypePopulation 2022 11 6708.87 2022 21 84447.1 2022 31 63705.9 2022 32 33491.6 2022 41 170.764 2022 42 89.3813 2022 43 1159.32 2022 51 98.0584 2022 52 6711.32 2022 53 862.571 2022 54 1552.01 2022 61 1431.19 2022 62 1712.17
From: ronhorn9645@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:43:19 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ron Horn

Tulsa, OK 74137
From: Conlisk, Mary

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Mandatory contraception regulations

Date: Friday, August 05, 2011 11:17:05 AM

Catholic hospitals should be exempt from the mandatory regulation re: contraception. It is unfair

to require these organizations to go against their religious beliefs.

Thank you,

Mary & John Conlisk

226 N 250 W

Valparaiso, IN 46385