alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 11.1
                                                                    ------------

                       New Century Financial Corporation
             Statement Re Computation of Per Share Earnings (Loss)
                                  (Unaudited)
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 

                                            Six Months Ended June 30                   Three Months Ended June 30
                                          -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            1997            1996                        1997             1996
                                          -----------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                       <C>              <C>                         <C>            <C>
Primary:

Net earnings (loss)                       $ 7,420,000      $ (815,000)                 $ 5,073,000    $  (317,000)
                                          =======================================================================

Weighted average number of common and
 common equivalent shares outstanding:
   Weighted average common shares
    outstanding                             7,373,226       6,348,618                    8,182,306      6,348,618
   Dilutive effect of stock options and
    warrants after application              3,390,780               -                    2,882,944              -
                                          -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           10,764,006       6,348,618                   11,065,250      6,348,618

Earnings (loss) per share                 $      0.69      $    (0.13)                 $      0.46    $     (0.05)
                                          =======================================================================
Fully Diluted:

Net earnings (loss)                       $ 7,420,000      $ (815,000)                 $ 5,073,000    $  (317,000)
                                          =======================================================================

Weighted average number of common and
 common equivalent shares outstanding:
   Weighted average common shares
    outstanding                             7,373,226       6,348,618                    8,182,306      6,348,618
   Dilutive effect of stock options
    and warrants after application          4,062,074               -                    3,484,470              -
                                          ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           11,435,300       6,348,618                   11,666,776      6,348,618

Earnings (loss) per share                 $      0.65      $    (0.13)                 $      0.43    $     (0.05)
                                          =======================================================================
</TABLE>
Exhibit








EXHIBT 10.1












AMENDMENT NO. 5
TO 
UNSECURED PROMISSORY NOTE


This instrument is Amendment No. 5 (this “Amendment”), dated as of April 26, 2016 to the Unsecured Promissory Note dated as of September 17, 2010 (the “Promissory Note”) issued by American Power Group, Inc. (formerly GreenMan Technologies, Inc.) (the “Company”) to Charles E. Coppa (the “Holder”). Terms used in this Amendment without definition which are defined in the Promissory Note have the same meanings in this Amendment as in the Promissory Note unless otherwise provided herein.    
    
WHEREAS, the Company has previously issued the Promissory Note to the Holder and amended the Promissory Note on April 27, 2012, April 30, 2014, September 24, 2014 and again on September 30, 2015;


WHEREAS, the Promissory Note shall remain in full force and effect with this Amendment No. 5; and


WHEREAS, the Company and the Holder now desire to further amend the Promissory Note; 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which the Parties hereby acknowledge, the Company and the Holder, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:


		
	1.
	The first paragraph of the Promissory Note is hereby amended by:




		
	(a)
	deleting the reference to “the second anniversary of the Closing (as defined below)” therein and replacing it with “payable in full on or before September 30, 2016”;




2.    The Holder waives any prior default under the Promissory Note.


3.    Except as otherwise amended by this Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Promissory Note shall remain in full force and effect. 


4.    This Amendment shall be governed by and construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 















IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date first written above.








AMERICAN POWER GROUP CORPORATION
        


By:  /s/ Maury Needham
Maury Needham
Chairman




HOLDER:
                            
/s/ Charles E. Coppa
Charles E. Coppa
cS 2, a3 7) 0) Page 1 of 1
LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION ACE 10 5H SEP 0 2 201i

PUBLICAT!
BRAS GULATIONS As of: September 02, 2011

Received: August 21, 2011
Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 02, 2011

Tracking No. 80ce7cd0 .
‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services

under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0159
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Ualowuin. df Submitter Information

Address: 45224-3246
Submitter's Representative: NARAL Pro-Choice America

General Comment

I strongly support the new policy requiring health-insurance plans to cover birth control without a
copay, CMS-9992-IFC2. Thank you for this important improvement to women's health care.

I also want you to know that I am concerned that certain religious employers may be allowed to
opt out of the requirements. All women should have access to contraceptive coverage, regardless
of where they work.

This policy finally should make near-universal access to birth control
areality for all women who use it.

Improving women's access to birth control is positive in so many ways.
A woman who can plan when to have a family is able to participate in
society more fully. Allowing women to space their pregnancies
contributes to healthy childbearing. And ultimately, fewer unintended
pregnancies can reduce the need for abortion.

Thank you for following science-based recommendations and making
women's health a priority.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000..._ 9/2/2011
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FIRECOM,
INC.'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENT OF INCOME AND STATEMENT OF CASH
FLOW FOR THE YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,061
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,978
<ALLOWANCES>                                       400
<INVENTORY>                                      1,912
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,501
<PP&E>                                           1,619
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,006
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,191
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,795
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           133
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,191
<SALES>                                         17,370
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,370
<CGS>                                           10,823
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,823
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,450
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (55)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  39
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,003
<INCOME-TAX>                                       899
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,104
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,104
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10


</TABLE>
No. 131.

#### Robert E. Lee & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*Veatch et al., doing business as Black & Veatch.

*Robert M. Hitch*for petitioners.

*Wesley M. Walker*and *Fletcher C. Mann*for respondents.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### John V. D. H. Bradt, Jr., as Executor of John V. D. H. Bradt, Sr., Deceased, Respondent, *v.*John H. Bradt, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.

*Bradt*v. *Bradt,*145 App. Div. 950, affirmed.

(Argued April 1, 1912;

decided April 30, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered September Y, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to determine the title to certain savings hank books.

*Marcus T. Hun*and *William A. Glenn*for appellant.

*William L. Visscher*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Cray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATE OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF

DOBSON COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

I, Everett R. Dobson, Chief Executive Officer of Dobson Communications
Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that to the best of his knowledge
the amended quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for its fiscal
quarter ended March 31, 2002, to which this Certificate is appended as an
exhibit (the Report):

a.     complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that

b.     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company at March 31, 2002, and
the results of the Companys operations for the three-month period ended
March 31, 2002.

|               |  |                                                                              
|-------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|August 6, 2002 |  | /s/ EVERETT R. DOBSON

Everett R. Dobson
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



       We consent to the  incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Boole & Babbage, Inc. of our report dated October 25, 1996, included in
the 1996 Annual Report to Stockholders of Boole & Babbage, Inc.

       Our audits also  included  the  financial  statement  schedule of Boole &
Babbage,  Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the  responsibility of the
Company's  management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered  in  relation  to the basic  financial  statements  taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

       We also consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration
Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-13837,  33-39248,  33-65145, 33-55588, 33-79782 and
333-02723)  pertaining  to the  1986  Incentive  Stock  Option  Plan,  the  1986
Supplemental  Stock Option Plan,  the Employee  Stock  Purchase  Plan,  the 1993
Nonemployee Directors' Stock Option Plan and the 1995 Stock Option Plan of Boole
& Babbage,  Inc. of our report  dated  October  25,  1996,  with  respect to the
consolidated  financial  statements  incorporated  herein by reference,  and our
report  included  in the  preceding  paragraph  with  respect  to the  financial
statement  schedule  included  in this  Annual  Report  (Form  10-K)  of Boole &
Babbage, Inc.






/s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP



San Jose, California
December 26, 1996
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:21:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Juan Cruz

, 32708-3612
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the annual report of TransGlobe Energy
Corporation (the Registrant) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Ross G. Clarkson, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and                       
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Registrant .

|/s/ Ross
      Clarkson        | 
|------------------------------ | 
|Name: Ross G. Clarkson         | 
|Title: Chief Executive Officer | 
|March 17, 2010                 | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule
13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the
Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 40-F to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 40-F), irrespective
of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
Page 1 of 1

a) A - HO{-/G
SEP 1 at REC 120% /6
PROCESSING DIVISION
eG A CATION & REGULATIONS As of: September 01, 2011
BRANCH Received: August 13, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 01, 2011

Tracking No. 80ee03b9
‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0100
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Gary John Jelich
Address:

40-53 61st Street

Apartment #4C

Woodside, NY, 11377
Email: garyjelich@yahoo.com
Phone: 718-478-6284

General Comment

Please uphold the conscience rights of religious organizations and employers to choose not to
fund birth control and abortions!

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000... 9/1/2011
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,359

EX PARTE JOSE LUIS AGUILAR, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. S-07-3241-CR IN THE 36TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM SAN PATRICIO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual

assault and indecency with a child and sentenced to two terms of twenty years’ imprisonment. 

Applicant contends that he was denied his right to appeal. On October 7, 2009, we remanded

this application for findings of fact and conclusions of law. On remand, the trial court found that

Applicant filed a pretrial motion to suppress that was denied and that he did not waive his right to

appeal the denial of this motion. The trial court also found that counsel was given the opportunity
2

to respond but provided no evidence that he advised Applicant on the “meaning and effect of the

judgment rendered by the court, his right to appeal from that judgment, the necessity of giving notice

of appeal and taking other steps to pursue an appeal, as well as expressing his professional judgment

as to possible grounds for appeal and their merit, and delineating advantages and disadvantages of

appeal.” Ex parte Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369, 374 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). The trial court concluded that

Applicant was denied his right to appeal and recommended that we grant him an out-of-time appeal.

We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal

of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. S-07-3241-CR from the 36th Judicial District Court of

San Patricio County. His out-of-time appeal shall be limited to any issues raised by written pretrial

motion. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal

so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. All time limits shall be

calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues.

We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file

a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Delivered: June 9, 2010

Do Not Publish
No. 187, Misc.

#### Joseph *v.*Lane, Warden.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### GEORGE PFORR, PLAINTIFF, v. AMERICAN CAKE COMPANY AND STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.

Decided April 20, 1933.

For the plaintiff, *Garey & Lane.*

For the defendants', *Robert Gordon.*

Ackerson, S. C. C.

This matter comes before me upon a motion by Frank Gordon and Frank Schapiro, partners trading as the American Cake Company, for an order to dismiss the summons and complaint as to the defendant “American Cake Company,” and to set aside the service thereof upon the ground that the “American Cake Company” is merely a trading name used by the said Frank Gordon and Frank Schapiro, as partners, and as such has no legal status and cannot, therefore, be a proper legal party to this suit.

Unfortunately, the question thus propounded cannot be decided on this motion, for the reason that the matter is presented upon the *ex parte*affidavits of the aforesaid individuals as partners which is not the proper practice in such cases.

As was pointed out by the Supreme Court in *Baldwin*v. Flagg, 43 *N. J. L.*495, the proper practice to support motions (or, rather, as they should be, rules to show cause) of this character in courts of law, as by depositions taken under rule, upon notice, or in accordance with the rules of the Supreme Court, and not by *ex parte*affidavits, as was done in this case. *Missell*v. Hayes, 86 *Id.*348 (at *p.*351); 91 *Atl. Rep.*322.

*290The plaintiff has submitted no affidavits, but this does not help the situation, because the *ex parte*affidavits which are before me cannot be considered for the reason above stated.

The present motion will, therefore, be denied without costs, and without prejudice to the right of the moving parties to bring the matter before the court upon rule to show cause and depositions taken thereunder upon notice pursuant to the rules of the Supreme Court.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 77 (Wednesday, April 22, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 22418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09241]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 90

Control of Emissions From Nonroad Spark-Ignition Engines at or 
Below 19 Kilowatts

CFR Correction

0
In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 87 to 95, revised 
as of July 1, 2014, on page 199, in Sec.  90.116, after paragraph (a) 
and before the first paragraph (1), add paragraph (b) introductory text 
to read as follows: ``(b) Engines will be divided into classes by the 
following:''.

[FR Doc. 2015-09241 Filed 4-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
No. 329, Misc.

#### Villarreal *v.*Texas.

*John J. Pichinson*for petitioner.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. Certiorari denied.