alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: james.foote@snet.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:26:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James Foote

Farmington, CT 06032
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue


Registration No.  333-35460
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)
PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  052				Trade Date: 02/28/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated
  September 8, 2000)						Issue Date:  03/06/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement February 28, 2001

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION
OR REPAYMENT
  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or
     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any
Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivor's		applicable
                                                             regular or special
  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No
                                                                 	record dates)

14911QCD1	   5.875%	03/15/06	100%	         1.0%	Semi-Annually	      YES	    NO



Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:
____  Yes	  X   No						N/A



(1) The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not
affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the
effective date of the change.

(2) Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to
Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the
time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 62892]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19750]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This 
meeting will be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, October 12, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelvin Johnson at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(504) 202-9679.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee will be held Thursday, October 12, 
2023, at 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral 
comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited 
time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate 
must be made with Ann Tabat. For more information, please contact 
Kelvin Johnson at 1-888-912-1227 or (504) 202-9679, or write TAP 
Office, 1555 Poydras Street, 2nd Floor, MS 12, New Orleans, LA 70112 or 
contact us at the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will 
include a committee discussion about the IRS response to Issue 53484-
LTR 3030C (Bal-Due/Interest Due). There will be a discussion of the 
Difficult/Challenging Letters/Notices, and a Review of Notice CP503.

    Dated: September 6, 2023.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2023-19750 Filed 9-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT

P-11-0230

Focus Ready Draft 3/21/2011

ENGINEER: Prothero \ CLM

PV (kg/yr): 

Revision Notes/Assessment Overview:

SUBMITTER: Goulston Technologies, Inc. (submitter)

USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Yes LABEL: No

Gen Eqpt: Adequate ventilation, especially where drums or tank wagons are being opened. Plastic protective 

gloves recommended. Safety glasses.

Respirator: Use NIOSH approved respirator if adequate ventilation cannot be provided at any time.

Health Effects: ( - May cause nonspecific discomfort such as nausea. May 

cause slight skin irritation. May cause eye irritation with blurring, tearing, or discomfort. May cause abnormal liver 

function.

TLV/PEL: - none established

CRSS: (3/10/2011):

Chemical Name: 

S-H2O: Dispersible g/L @ 

VP: 1.0E-6 torr @ 

MW: 

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:

 

 

Consumer Use:

SAT (concerns): (3/11/2011):

Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P1 B1 T1 -

Health: 2, Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 3, Water (All releases to water with a CC = 4.00 ppb)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1A

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 3
Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

P2 REC:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW:

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 3
P-11-0230

Use: 

Number of Sites/Location: 

 

Basis:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

For intended use (coating on imported yarn), WATER release not expected. AIR - negligible (low VP liquid); if 

What-If: 

to: 

from: 

basis:

RELEASE TOTAL

 kg/yr - sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 

Basis:

Dermal:

Exposure to

What-If: 

Number of workers (all sites) with Dermal exposure:

Basis:

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1311 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 22, 2008.
Whereas Congress created the Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for 
        Undergraduate Programs (GEAR UP) in 1998 to increase the number of low-
        income students who are prepared to enter and succeed in postsecondary 
        education;
Whereas increasing the number of low-income students who complete postsecondary 
        education is critical to the health and vitality of our communities and 
        the Nation as a whole;
Whereas GEAR UP is currently providing essential college preparatory services to 
        640,000 students in over 5,000 schools across 46 States, the District of 
        Columbia, America Samoa, Palau, and Puerto Rico;
Whereas GEAR UP students are taking more rigorous and advanced courses, 
        graduating from high school and enrolling in postsecondary education at 
        rates significantly higher than their low-income peers;
Whereas these remarkable achievements are attributable to the selfless 
        dedication of the students, families, education professionals, and 
        business and community leaders involved in GEAR UP;
Whereas the National Council for Community and Education Partnerships and the 
        Department of Education work in partnership to provide technical 
        assistance and host national conferences to strengthen GEAR UP programs 
        throughout the Nation; and
Whereas July 22, 2008, would be an appropriate day to designate as National GEAR 
        UP Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives expresses support for the 
designation of a National GEAR UP Day.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
From: kecaccounting@earthlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:00:57 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

REBECCA ROGERS

Dudley, NC 28333
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.87 MB)
 
 Grand Slam Wing AEW 379TH AEW 379TH al udeid al Udeid Air Base Sothwest Asia AF.MIL Public Affairs Department of Defense Operation Inherent Resolve Centcom 379th Air Expeditionary Wing Qatar AIR FORCE
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Rockingham,

Dec. 2, 1913.

#### Isaac Hershberg *& a. v.*Charles A. Morrison.

Assumpsit, for clothing manufactured by the plaintiffs for the defendant. Trial by jury and verdict for the defendant. Transferred from the April term, 1913, of the superior court by *Young,*J.

The defendant testified that he gave the order for the merchandise to the plaintiffs’ traveling salesman, whom he had previously dealt with as the representative of another clothing house which had permitted him to return goods whenever he desired to do so. When the order was given the salesman said he was in a position to use the defendant better than before, and the latter then understood that he had the right to return the whole or any part of the goods. When the goods were delivered in accordance with the order, the defendant found himself overstocked and unable to pay, and at once returned them to the plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs excepted to the denial of a motion for the direction of a verdict in their favor and to the admission of evidence as to the defendant’s former custom of returning goods. ’

*Frink, Marvin & Batchelder,*for the plaintiffs.

*Eastman, Scammon & Gardner,*for the defendant.

Parsons, C. J.

No question of law which requires consideration is presented. Whether the defendant reasonably understood the contract to give him the right of return was a question of fact. That fact being found for him, there was no contract to accept the goods upon delivery. Not having agreed to accept and keep the goods, the defendant is not liable for not doing so. Evidence of the *590defendant’s general custom was excluded. The salesman’s statement that he could use the defendant better than before raised the question how he had before used him. The defendant could tell the jury what he knew about it. His credibility was for them.

*Exceptions overruled.*

Young, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
From: kayoss@totalkayoss.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:41:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kristen Ellingson

, 5770
From: donele@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Women"s Health Care -- Religious

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:33:47 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Thank you,

Don Shaw
JOHN ELIAS BALDACCI GOVERNOR

December 11, 2009 Curtis Spalding Regional Administrator United States Environmental Protection Agency Region 1 One Congress St ., Suite 1100-ORA Boston, MA 02114-2023

DearAdministrator Spalding: The State ofMaine Department of Environmental Protection (Maine DEP) respectfully submits the enclosed application for delegation to implement and enforce Maine's Chapter 125 Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaners Regulation in lieu ofthe National Emissions for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs) for area source Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Facilities. We submit the application pursuant to the provisions in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, part 63, subpart E, on behalf ofthe State of Maine that will implement and enforce Chapter 125 . We request delegation to substitute Chapter 125 forthose provisions of the NESHAPs for Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Facilities (40 CFRPart 63, Subpart M) for non-major sources only. We are submitting this application ofbehalf of the State of Maine. Maine Statute 38 M

.R.S .A ., Section 585-B provides the authority for the Department to directly implement and enforce Chapter 125. On April 24, 2006, EPA approved Maine's Chapter 125 regulation for area source dry cleaners as a substitute fortheNational Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning facilities at 40CFRPart 63, Subpart M . EPA subsequently amended the Dry Cleaner NESHAPS, which changes Maine DEPhas incorporated into Chapter 125. DAVIO P. LITTELL COMMISSIONER

AUGUSTA 17 STATE HOUSE STATION BANGOR PORTLAND PRESQUE ISLE AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-0017 106 HOGAN ROAD, SUITE 6 312 CANCOROAD 1235 CENTRAL DRIVE, SKYWAY PARK (207) 287-7688 FAX

: (207) 287-7826 BANGOR, MAINE 04401 PORTLAND, MAINE 04103 PRESQUE ISLE, MAINE 04679-2094 RAY BLDG., HOSPITAL ST. (207) 941-4570 FAX : (207) 941-4584 (207) 822-6300 FAX : (207) 822-6303 (207) 764-0477 FAX : (207) 760-3143 STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

web site: www

.maine .gov/depFor your review, the equivalencydemonstration table and supporting narrative are

enclosed. The equivalency demonstration table generally follows the format identified in the U .S. EPA's 40 CFR63, Subpart E Guidance Document . Again, we appreciate the support provided by you and your staff . Ifyou have any questions, please contact Andrea Lani ofmy staffat 207-287-2437. Sincerely, ~~ 1'- Q&'k.- James P . Brooks Director, Bureau ofAir Quality Enclosures Cc: Steven Rapp, US EPA, New England Region Susan Lancey, US EPA, New England Region Mary Beth Smuts, US EPA, New England Region
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**McDATA Corporation**

 

CertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 ofTitle 18, United States Code)

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of McDATACorporation, a Delaware corporation (the“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

TheCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31,2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:             April 15,  2004 | /s/ JOHN A. KELLEY, JR.                         |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                | John A. Kelley, Jr.                             |
|                                                                                                | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
No. 256.

#### In re Estate of Hurst.

*Robert M. Taylor*for petitioner Alker.

/. *Pennington Straus*for residuary legatees, and *Ralph S. Snyder,*Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in opposition.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied.