alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the “Report”)of Sistersville Bancorp, Inc., the (“Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Stanley M. Kiser, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

|                |                                                                              |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| August 8, 2003 |                                                                         |
|      | /s/ STANLEY M. KISER                                                         |
|           |                                                                              |
|           | Stanley M. Kiser                                                             |
|           | President and Chief Executive Officer                                        |
|           | (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer) |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          35,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  505,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,700
<INVENTORY>                                    309,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               920,700
<PP&E>                                         594,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                 225,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,870,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          526,600
<BONDS>                                      2,237,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,130,900)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,870,700
<SALES>                                      1,621,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,621,700
<CGS>                                          543,400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  543,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,400
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             156,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (33,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (40,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (31,500)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (51,700)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (123,500)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
file:///C|/..._List_29-08-2011_12-55-54-352/Document%20List%2029-08-2011%2012-55-54-352_docs/EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0055.html[8/29/2011 2:37:40 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: August 29, 2011

Received: August 24, 2011

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 80eeb3fd

Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0018

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of

Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0018-0002

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services under

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0055

Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Tiffany Johnson

Address:

10142 Angeles Rd.

Peyton, CO, 80831

Email: padme@btsdib.com

Organization: Civil Structural Design

General Comment

As a small business owner, my conscience prevents me from providing birth control coverage in my

employees' health-care plan. While I believe that this entire health-care legislation package is a gross

overreach of federal government powers, I believe this mandate to provide birth control coverage

requires swift action. Lift this mandate at once, in order that business owners can act in a manner

consistent with their firmly-held beliefs on this controversial issue.

There is no way that providing birth control coverage will save money. Birth control drugs are

expensive, encourage promiscuity, can be very dangerous (as in the case of the "morning-after pill"),

and have been linked to breast cancer in women. Also, and more importantly, a nation's future is its

children. Babies are not something to be feared or destroyed, but rather blessings from an Almighty

God who gives life as his greatest gift. Our country's disdain for children may become its undoing. In

any case, the federal government has no right to require me to fund the murder of the most

innocent and vulnerable in our society.

I urge HHS to re-think the mandate, and if repeal of the legislation isn't possible, to at least write

policies that do not violate conscience on controversial issues.
From: twmcgovern@centurylink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:44:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Thomas McGovern

Fort Wayne, IN 46814
No. 224.

#### Rhodes *v.*United States.

*John P. Witsil*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Guilfoyle*and *Alan S. Rosenthal*for the United States.

Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.
From: Chau, Jessica

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: preventative healthcare

Date: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 9:49:55 AM

Dear HHS:

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

AAUW believes, as do I, that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services. Others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

Health care policies should be science-based, not dictated by the ideological objections of a

minority. Covering preventative healthcare, particularly contraception, makes good fiscal sense and

should be adopted without reservation. I urge you to ensure women have access to quality

preventive care by accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal

exemption provisions.

Dr. Jessica Chau

Manchester CT
From: Mjkane61678@aol.com [mailto:Mjkane61678@aol.com] 

Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 8:30 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: 401 k

To Whom It may Concern: 

 

 I believe that it is helpful to provide certain individuals with options as it relates to making their 

retirement funds last longer, as long as the choices are optional. That advice and counsel is 

already available through banks and investment firms . The majority of us have planned for our 

retirement and do not need the government to interfere with our decisions regarding our 

retirement. The Social Security taxes we pay provide benefits for citizens, but most of us know 

that we need more than social security in our retirement years and have planned accordingly. I 

am STRONGLY opposed to ANY program which would require us to surrender our 401k plans to 

the government in return for an annuity of sorts, the terms of which will punish the families of 

those who die early. I am sure that I am not the only person who has maxed out on contributions 

under the law in order to make my retirement years as comfortable as possible. I do not want the 

government to decide how much money I receive and when I receive it, and what may be left for 

my children. 

 Michael J. Kane
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          37,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  443,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    22,200
<INVENTORY>                                    372,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               970,600
<PP&E>                                         596,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                 225,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,835,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          546,300
<BONDS>                                      2,121,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,078,900)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,835,700
<SALES>                                        534,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               534,300
<CGS>                                          185,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  185,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,800
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              60,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (34,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (38,200)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (38,200)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (76,400)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.31 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          55,601
<SECURITIES>                                    10,649
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,792
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     27,929
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               168,502
<PP&E>                                         245,153
<DEPRECIATION>                                (86,483)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 567,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,921
<BONDS>                                        168,424
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,522
<OTHER-SE>                                     181,165
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   567,214
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               330,516
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  282,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (21,045)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,395
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 57,377
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,664
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             29,713
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (547)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,166
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.170
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.140
        

</TABLE>
cc: Hon. Elissa F. Cadish, District Judge 

Gregory Scott Hermanski 

Attorney GeneraVCarson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 4909)
From: Roger Foppe

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Sunday, August 07, 2011 2:20:48 AM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Roger Foppe
Breese, Illinois
EXHIBIT 23

             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Star Technologies, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration 
Statements (No. 33-42042 and No. 2-97518) on Forms S-8 of 
Star Technologies, Inc. of our report dated May 9, 1997, 
relating to the consolidated statements of financial position 
of Star Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of March 31, 
1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of 
operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of 
the years in the three-year period ended March 31, 1997, and 
the related consolidated schedule, which report appears in 
the March 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Star 
Technologies, Inc.



KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP



McLean, Virginia
June 30, 1997
P. 1 

# RCRA Box 321 Prepped by Ryan Dugan



## Document

Number: 

# 213)OGRC-S001 4 Docket Number: 

# F-93-OGRC-FFFF F

Printed 5/8/2007 3:36:31 PM

Sheet 213 of 259P. 2 

## O&RC-SOOt^

A . A . OILFIEL D SERVICE , INC . Pos tOffic e Bo x520 8 HOBBS , NE WMEXIC O 88241-520 8 AugustA . Peters , Jr. , President Cyri l A . Scheller , Vice-President Barr yA . Peters , Vice-President

Septembe r 18 , 199 0 United State s Environmenta l Protectio nAgency 40 0 MStree t Washington , D.C . ATTN : Mr . Rober t Hal l Dea r Mr . Hall : Th e oi l industr

yi s facin

g man ynewan

d divers e challenges . Industr y competitivenes s i nthe worl d marke t a s wel l a s environmenta l respon sibilit ycontinu e t o pla ya ver yimportan t rol e i nthe decision s tha t affec t the industrie s abilit yt o mee t the energ yneed s o f the genera l public . W e a t A.A . Oilfiel d Service , Inc . ar e concerne d ove r the recen t E.P.A . decisio n t o no longe r exemp t waste s generate d b ysmal l crud e oi l reclamatio noperations . Th e E.P.A . exemptio nexpire s Septembe r 25 , 1990 . Th e waste s generate d b ycrud e oi l reclamatio nar e anaccumu latio no f stoc k oi l tan k bottoms . W e fai l t o se e the differenc e betwee nstoc k oi l tan k bottoms an

d reclaime d oi l tan k bottoms . Th e oi l salvage d fro

mstoc k tan

k bottom s i s marketabl e an d i s used to eas e America' s dependenc e onforeignoil . I f crud e oi l reclamatio n waste s ar e no t exempt , thes e plant s wil l b e forced t o clos e immed
iately . Plan t closing s woul d creat e a hug e an d immediat e proble

mo f accumulatio no f waste s a t the leas e site . Illega l dumping o f thes e waste s i nanunaccountabl e manne r woul d become a ver yseriou s problem . Environmenta l responsibilit yi s a mus t fo r al l industry . I t i s importan t t o the oi l industr yan d th e environmen t tha t reclaimed oi l tan k bottom s remai nexemp t fro mthe E.P.A . hazardou s wast e guidelines . Sincerely , Barry^A . Peters , Vics"-PresidentYEA

R 198 4 198 5 198 6 198 7 198 8 198 9 199 0 * 8 mos . TOTAL S PRODUCE D WATE R 575,12 5 bbl s 705,50 1 bbl s 608,63 3 bbl s 554,02 8 bbl s 444,26 7 bbl s 564,42 6 bbl s 351,56 0 bbl s 3,803,54 0 bbl s A.A . OILFIEL DSERVICE , INC . B/ S 10,12 5 bbl s 12,42 0 bbl s 10,71 5 bbl s 9,75 3 bbl s 7,82 1 bbl s 9,93 6 bbl s 6,18 9 bbl s 66,95 9 bbl s TOTA L 585,25 0 bbl s 717,92 1 bbl s 619,34 8 bbl s 563,78 1 bbl s 452,08 8 bbl s 574,36 2 bbl s 357,74 9 bbl s 3,870,49 9 bbl s RECOVERE D 

### OI L 4,33 7 bbl s 5,07 5 bbl s 3,96 6 bbl s 4,03 5 bbl s 4,45 0 bbl s 4,89 6 bbl s 6,24 4 bbl s 33,00 3 bbl s 

# i N j

4 t