alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from National
Property Investors 7 1996 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000732439
<NAME> NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           5,471
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          45,023
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,372
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         20,317
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,846
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,745
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,339
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,306
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 33
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (90)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (57)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.93)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
From: Christina Fong

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:33:07 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Sincerely,

Christina Fong

56 Monroe Center NW #4

Grand Rapids, MI 49503

Christina Fong

http://ogreogress.com/christinafong

_______________________________________________________

Unlimited Disk, Data Transfer, PHP/MySQL Domain Hosting

 http://www.doteasy.com
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Industrial  Minerals,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report") I, John
Melnyk,  Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 10, 2005


Name: John Melnyk

/s/John Melnyk
---------------------------------------------------------
Position: Chief Financial Officer and Secretary/Treasurer


This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
From: jeanette.v@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: preventitive contraceptive services for all who need it

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 1:52:22 AM

I urge you to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” Preventative contraceptive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

.... “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive services.

Some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers,

so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement,

even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger

exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

All women should be able to make their own decisions and not be restricted by someone

else’s beliefs.
"Gregg, R. Juge" <rjgregg@sidley.com>

04/11/2011 12:00 PM To Group A-AND-R-DOCKET@EPA

cc

bcc

Subject Docket #: EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0051

7 attachments

Gina McCarthy 4-8-11 FINAL.pd f Cold end memo response 4-8-11 FINAL.pd f Keith Barnett Memo 3-21-11.pd f

HCl Floor Spreadsheet-No CISWI_mnl.xls HCl Floor Spreadsheet-No CISWI_mnl.xlsNo CISWI THCanalysis_03_01_11 - summary.xls No CISWI THCanalysis_03_01_11 - summary.xls

PM Floor Spreadsheet-No CISWI.XLS PM Floor Spreadsheet-No CISWI.XLSUPLpooled_corrected_intqry_MACT-No CISWI_mnl.xlsx UPLpooled_corrected_intqry_MACT-No CISWI_mnl.xlsx

From: O’Hare, A ndrew

Sent: Friday, A pril 08, 2011 4:42 PM

To: 'mccarthy.gina@epa.gov'; 'silverman.steven@ epa.gov'; 'tsirigotis.peter@epa.gov'; 'barnett.keith@epa.gov' Subject: PCA Response to EPA Correspondence on NESHAP

Ms. McCarthy,

Attached please find the response of the Portland Cement Association to correspondence (referred to

herein as the “cold end” memorandum) recently received from EPA regarding certain aspects of the portland cement national emission standard for hazardous air pollutants (NESHAP).

Also attached is a request for a meeting to discuss PCA perspectives on these matters.

Thank you, Andy O’Hare

Andrew T. O'Hare

Vice President, Regulatory Affairs

Portland Cement Association

500 New Jersey Avenue, 7th Floor Washington, DC 20001

Office: (202) 408

‐ 9494

Fax: (202) 408

‐ 0877

Cell: (202) 270

‐ 0094

e

‐ mail: aohare@cement.org

### ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To comply with certain U.S. Treasury regulations, we inform you that, unless expressly stated otherwise, any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication, including attachments, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding any penalties that may be imposed on such taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service. In addition, if any such tax advice is used or referred to by other parties in promoting, marketing or recommending any partnership or other entity, investment plan or arrangement, then (i) the advice should be construed as written in connection with the promotion or marketing by others of the transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed in this communication and (ii) the taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer's particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

******************************************************************************

********************** This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, p lease delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us immediately.

*****************************************************************

***********************************
From: Carla Gilbert

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: women"s health care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:23:00 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Thank you.

I am using the Free version of SPAMfighter.

SPAMfighter has removed 2976 of my spam emails to date.

Do you have a slow PC? Try free scan!
#            

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES®

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-124310

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  635                                                                   Trade Date:  08/29/05

(To Prospectus Supplement dated July 7, 2005 &

  Prospectus dated May 13,2005)                                                                    Issue Date:   09/01/05

The Date of this Pricing SupplementAugust 29, 2005

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                                   Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                  Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment     Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)   Maturity  Public (2) Commissions       Frequency       Option  Yes/No     record dates)

14911QH46   4.25%         03/15/09        100%                0.75%              Semi-Annually              YES         NO                                                                                                                

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

Principal                                                                                 1st Payment             Day         

Amount                  Proceeds                  Dealer                           Date                   Count

$623,000.00            $618,327.50            ABN AMROInc.        03/15/06                              30/360    

Original Issue Discount Note:                                                                         Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                  N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes® may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes® offered prior to the effective date of the change.  After the issuance of the PowerNotes® covered by this

Pricing Supplement, $949.133 mm principal amount of PowerNotes® remain available for sale

pursuant to the accompanying Prospectus Supplement.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
Order entered November 8, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-18-00247-CR

CARSTEN HEDEMANN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1434917-R

ORDER

We reinstate this appeal. Appellant’s N ove mber 7, 2019 S eco nd Motion for

Continuance of Evidentiary Hearing is GRANTED. Accordingly the scheduling for this

remanded proceeding is revised as follows:

We abate this appeal and ORDER the trial court (1) to conduct an evidentiary hearing on 

appellant’s motion for new trial at the court’s earliest convenience after D e c e m b e r 1 1 ,

2 019, (2) to make written findings explaining its ruling on that motion, and (3) to arrange for its

ruling and findings to be included in a supplemental clerk’s record filed within two weeks of the

date of the hearing.
We ORDER a reporter’s record from the hearing on the motion for new trial to be filed

within two weeks of the date of the hearing.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Gary

Stephens, Judge of Dallas County’s Auxiliary Court No. 8, and to the parties. The parties are 

instructed going forward that any motion filed during the abatement must include a certificate of 

conference.

The appeal will be reinstated two weeks after the date of the hearing or when the

supplemental clerk’s record and reporter’s record are filed, whichever occurs sooner.

/Bill Pedersen, III/ 

BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Peak International Limited (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dean Personne, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 13, 2007



/s/ Dean PersonneDean PersonneChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.2

                          Independent Auditors' Consent

The Board of Directors
Ithaca Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-32429) on Form S-8 of Ithaca Industries, Inc. of our report dated March 27,
1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of Ithaca Industries, Inc. and
subsidiaries as of January 31, 1998 and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year ended
January 31, 1998; the 10-week period ended February 1, 1997; and the 42-week
period ended November 22, 1996 and the related financial statement schedule,
which report appears in the January 30, 1999 annual report on Form 10-K of
Ithaca Industries.

                                                    /s/ KPMG LLP
                                                    ------------
                                                    KPMG LLP

Atlanta Georgia
May 10, 1999
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Assistive Devices (for Disabled)Behavior ProblemsBrailleCompliance (Legal)DisabilitiesEducational LegislationElementary Secondary EducationFederal LegislationIndividualized Education ProgramsLimited English SpeakingParent RoleStudent Educational ObjectivesStudent EvaluationTeamwork

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Identifiers - Laws, Policies, & Programs:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
#### Robert L. Searchy, Respondent, *v.*Casualty Company of America, Appellant.

*Searcy*v. *Casualty Co. of America,*149 App. Div. 316, appeal dismissed.

(Argued April 29, 1912;

decided May 7, 1912.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered February 23, 1912, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action on a contract for services.

The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal was from an unanimous affirmance in an action specified in subdivision 2 of section 191 of the Code of Civil Procedure and that permission to appeal had not been obtained.

*I. B. Oeland*for motion.

*Theodore R. Lord*opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date:  May 3, 2010  |   |  /s/ Kent M. Adams                          |
|------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                     |   |  Kent M. Adams                                   |
|                                     |   |  President, Director and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                     |   |                                                  |
|                                     |   |                                                  |
|  Date:  May 3, 2010       |   |  /s/ James A. Duensing                      |
|                                     |   |  James A. Duensing                               |
|                                     |   |  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial    |
|                                     |   |  Officer                                         |
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41687

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

– Appellee,

v. LUGARDO VAZQUEZ

- HERNANDEZ,

Defendant

– Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:15

- CR

- 507

- 1

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * Lugardo Vazquez

- Hernandez raised in this appeal a challenge to the

assessment of a Sentencing Guideline enhancement based on the classific ation of his prior Texas convi ction as an aggravated felony. Vazquez

- Hernandez has
been released from imprisonment and no longer wishes to pursue challenge to

* Pursuant to Fifth Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Fifth Circuit Rule 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 10, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41687 Document: 00514595086 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/10/2018No. 15

- 41687

2 his term of imprisonment or Sentencing Guideline calculation. Accordingly, we DISMISS his appea l as to these issues. Vazquez

- Hernandez does assert that the district court’s judgment should reflect that he was convicted and sentenced under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) rather than (b)(2). We REMAND to the district court for the limited purpose of entering a corrected judgment to reflect a conviction and sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1). See, e.g. , United States v. Gonzalez

- Longoria , 894 F.3d 1274, 1274 (5th Cir. 2018). T here being no further issues pending before the court, we do not retain jurisdictio n. Mandate to issue forthwith. Case: 15-41687 Document: 00514595086 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/10/2018