alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 62893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19745]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This 
meeting will be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, October 10, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ann Tabat at 1-888-912-1227 or (602) 
636-9143.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee will be held Tuesday, October 10, 2023, 
at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments 
or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and 
structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Ann Tabat. For more information, please contact Ann Tabat at 
1-888-912-1227 or (602) 636-9143, or write TAP Office, 4041 N Central 
Ave., Phoenix, AZ 85012 or contact us at the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will include a committee discussion 
involving 57139 Digital Assets/Cryptocurrency; and 64919 Decedent and 
Trust forms and publications.

    Dated: September 6, 2023.
Kevin Brown,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2023-19745 Filed 9-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
No. 193.

#### Aetna Insurance Co. *v.*Vernon et al.

*David Bland*for petitioner.

*William F. Walsh*for respondents.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Coupon | Interest | Maturity | Callable | Survivor's Option | Price | CUSIP |   |
| 2.550% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 5/15/2023 | No | Yes § | 100.00 | 14912HQH6 |   |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |  |
| (†††) | First Payment date 11/15/2013 |   |
|                    |   |
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.76 MB)
 
 Grand Slam Wing AEW 379TH AEW 379TH al udeid al Udeid Air Base Sothwest Asia AF.MIL Public Affairs Department of Defense Operation Inherent Resolve Centcom 379th Air Expeditionary Wing Qatar AIR FORCE
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Rural Business-Cooperative Service

          - [Docket #: RBS-22-BUSINESS-0029]

# AGENCY:

Rural Business-Cooperative Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Rural Business-Cooperative Service (the Agency) is issuing a notice of the Agency's intention to remove the self-imposed restriction that all Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 applications that were submitted under the Rural Energy for America Program (REAP) prior to June 30, 2023, and were not funded in the national unrestricted pooling competitions, must be withdrawn.

# DATES:

This notice is effective September 14, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jonathan Burns, Program Management Division, Rural Business-Cooperative Service, United States Department of Agriculture, 774-678-7238 or email                         *CPgrants@usda.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background

                    The Agency published two funding opportunity notices and a correction notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     for REAP for FY23. The first notice published December 16, 2022 (87 FR 77059), the second notice on March 31, 2023 (88 FR 19239), and the correction notice published May 31, 2023 (88 FR 34823). The two funding notices state that obligations will take place through                           ( print page 63054)                        September 30, 2023, and complete and eligible applications which were not funded in the national unrestricted pooling must be withdrawn. The Agency is removing the self-imposed deadline on the national unrestricted pooling competitions for FY23 due to the overwhelming response to REAP for FY 2023. The Agency will continue processing applications received by June 30, 2023, into the first quarter of FY 2024 for participation in these national competitions. Unfunded applications from the national competitions will not be moved into the next FY 2024 funding cycle and must be withdrawn.                

Karama Neal,

Administrator, Rural Business-Cooperative Service.

[FR Doc. 2023-19868 Filed 9-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-XY-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6701

IN RE: JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER,

Petitioner.

On Petition for a Writ of Mandamus.

Submitted: June 20, 2007 Decided: July 30, 2007

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Julian Edward Rochester, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Julian E. Rochester petitions this court for a writ of

mandamus. He seeks to appeal the district court’s refusal, in

accordance with a prefiling injunction, to process a petition for

writ of mandamus that Rochester attempted to file in that court.

Rochester also appears to seek an order compelling the South

Carolina state courts to hear a postconviction review petition and

to set aside two state court judgments. Mandamus is a drastic

remedy and should be used only in extraordinary situations.

Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re

Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). The party seeking

mandamus relief carries the heavy burden of showing that he has no

other adequate means to attain the relief he desires and that his

entitlement to such relief is clear and indisputable. Allied Chem.

Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35 (1980). Rochester has

failed to make the requisite showing. We accordingly deny the

motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the

mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
From: wingsaseagles1@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:53:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gary Miller

, 04052
Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of RegeneRx (the "Company") on Form
10QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, J.J. Finkelstein,
Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

November 12, 2002                                   /s/ J.J. Finkelstein
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Chief Executive and Financial Officer
From: jimmyoz@optonline.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:20:28 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

CHARLES DAWSON

, 08820-1015
#### Michael Gienty, Respondent, *v.*Knights of Columbus, Appellant.

*Gienty*v. *Knights of Columbus,*146 App. Div. 497, affirmed.

(Argued April 12, 1912;

decided April 30, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 2, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor *578of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover on a certificate of life insurance.

*William P. Gregg*and *John W. Lyon*for appellant.

*John Bright*and *Thomas Watts*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J.; G-ray, Werner, Hiscogk, Chase and Collin, JJ. Absent: Willard Bartlett, J.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended May 31, 2008 (the
Report) of Immucor, Inc. (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.



|              |  |                        
|------------- |  | -----------------------
|July 24, 2008 |  | /s/ Richard A. Flynt   
|              |  | Richard A. Flynt       
|              |  | Chief Financial Officer
Naked Brand Group, Inc. - Exhibit 10.40 - Filed by newsfilecorp.com






Exhibit 10.40 

Description of Oral Arrangement with Kai-Hsiang Lin 

In connection with Mr. Lin’s services as the Company’s Vice
President of Finance, the Company has agreed to provide Mr. Lin the following
compensation terms and benefits: 

	 	1. 	
      Annual cash salary equal to $140,000;

	 	 	 
	 	2. 	
      Eligible to participate in the Company’s benefit
      plans;

	 	 	 
	 	3. 	
      Eligible to participate in the Company’s long-term equity
      incentive plans; and

	 	 	 
	 	4. 	
      Entitled to 3 weeks’
vacation.
#### WILLARD HITCHMAN, as Commissioner of Highways of the TOWN OF SHARON, Appellant, *v.*ADAM R. BAXTER, Respondent.

*Action for penalties in a Justices’ Court*— *a proper reference to the statute mustie indorsed upon the*summons— *Code of Civil Procedure, sec.*1897.

In this action, brought in a Justice’s Court against a commissioner of highways-to recover a penalty, the indorsement upon the summons read as follows: “For a penalty imposed under and according to the provisions of section 19, chapter 16, title 1, part 1 of the several statutes relating to overseers of highways and highway labor: ”

*Held;*that the indorsement was utterly indefinite and was insufficient to give the reasonable notice required by section 1897 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schoharie county, reversing a judgment rendered in a Justice’s Court in favor of the plaintiff.

*W. G. Lamont,*for the appellant.

*L. W.*Baxter, for the respondent.

By the Court

We are of the opinion that the indorsement on the summons was fatally defective. The indorsement was “for a penalty imposed under and according to the provisions of section 19, chapter 16, title 1, part 1 of the several statutes relating to overseers of highways and highway labor.” If that was intended to refer to the Revised Statutes, then section 19 has nothing to do with penalties. But the language is not enough to designate the Revised Statutes. The reference to “ the several statutes ” is utterly indefinite. The plaintiff has no right to set a conundrum for the defendant to guess. He must, give reasonable notice, such as would ordinarily be understood, and' such as would enable the defendant to discover on what statute he was sued. It may not have been necessary to specify the section, under Code section 1897, if there was only one penalty. But the plaintiff chose to specify a-section which could not be correct and his notice was practi.cally of no use.

*272We are satisfied that the indorsement was not sufficiently definite, and without examining the other points we affirm the judgment of the County Court, with costs.

Present — Learned, P. J., Landon and Fish, JJ.

Judgment of County Court affirmed, with costs.
#### Marion G. Campion, by Addison S. Pratt, Her Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, *v.*John M. Farley et al., Respondents, and Mary L. Campion, Appellant.

(Submitted December 9, 1913;

decided December 17, 1913.)

Motion to modify remittitur granted, without costs. (See 206 N. Y. 728.)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,691
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         122,929
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                19,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     16,618
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           9,749
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            10,019
<LOANS>                                        116,870
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,941
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 175,488
<DEPOSITS>                                     157,771
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,016
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,634
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,066
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  16,700
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  2,774
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  395
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 3,374
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,314
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,314
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,061
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      375
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   5
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,602
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    728
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         728
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   5.296
<LOANS-NON>                                        750
<LOANS-PAST>                                       327
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  3,340
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,705
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      185
<RECOVERIES>                                        46
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,941
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,941
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>