alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: nancy foster

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Reject exemptions for "religious employers" to coverage of women"t preventive care.

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:54:06 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Contraception is a vital medical treatment for many women, and no employer

has a right to prevent a female employee from following her own mind and her

doctor's health care advice. Each prescription for contraception is written for an

individual, and no individual is forced to use contraception against her will and

her own personal religious conscience, so there is no valid reason to permit

employers to exercise a religious choice in their employees' health care decisions

in this area any more than it would be regarding medication and treatment for

any other.

Otherwise, you are saying that women are competent to make medical decisions

only about their employers' religiously-approved parts of their OWN BODIES.

This is ridiculous on its face and shouldn't be permitted. The goal for these socalled "religious employers" is to expand their standing under the law into other

areas of women's health decisions, and you shouldn't reward their disingenuous

stand in order to try to placate them. Such people won't be happy until they

take away all women's rights to make medical choices, and pretending you don't

know that simply doesn't cut it. Don't help them control and infantilize women.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 11, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 132193 & (58) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 132193 

 COA: 261724 

Kent CC: 03-007771-FC 

ERNEST GORDON, III,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the July 13, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1010 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 11, 2006 

Clerk
#### Isaac Terwilliger and another, Respondents, v. Daniel McEnerny, Appellant.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Pratt, J.; Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
From: Sara Michalski

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 11:53:37 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Sara Michalski

1500 E University Dr

Tempe, AZ 85281
#### Michael McCarthy v. James O’Hara.

Leave granted to appeal to the Court of Appeals, on the ground that the case involves a question of law which ought to be determined by that court.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 177 (Thursday, September 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63130-63131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19917]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Justice Programs

[OJP (BJA) Docket No. 1816]


Meeting of the Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor Review Board

AGENCY: Office of Justice Programs (OJP), Bureau of Justice Assistance 
(BJA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an announcement of a meeting (via WebEx/conference 
call-in) of the Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor Review Board to 
cover a range of issues of importance to the Board, to include but not 
limited to: Membership/terms; Board Bylaws; program marketing and 
outreach.

DATES: November 15, 2023, 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. EST.

ADDRESSES: This meeting will be held virtually using web conferencing 
technology. The public may hear the proceedings of this virtual 
meeting/conference call by registering at last

[[Page 63131]]

seven (7) days in advance with Gregory Joy (contact information below).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Joy, Policy Advisor, Bureau of 
Justice Assistance, Office of Justice Programs, by telephone at (202) 
514-1369, or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f3b48196949c818add999c8ab38680979c99dd949c85"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f7b085929098858ed99d988eb7828493989dd9909881">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor 
Review Board carries out those advisory functions specified in 42 
U.S.C. 15202. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 15201, the President of the United 
States is authorized to award the Public Safety Officer Medal of Valor, 
the highest national award for valor by a public safety officer.
    This virtual meeting/conference call is open to the public to 
participate remotely. For security purposes, members of the public who 
wish to participate must register at least seven (7) days in advance of 
the meeting/conference call by contacting Mr. Joy.
    Access to the virtual meeting/conference call will not be allowed 
without prior registration. Please submit any comments or written 
statements for consideration by the Review Board in writing at least 
seven (7) days in advance of the meeting date.

Gregory Joy,
Policy Advisor/Designated Federal Officer, Bureau of Justice 
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2023-19917 Filed 9-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
From: Ada Southerland

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Health Care

Date: Friday, August 19, 2011 1:31:10 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new law

and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access

to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive

services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some

groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so

hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement,

even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger

exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the quarterly report of Cybertel Capital Corporation (the
      "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      James A. Wheeler, CEO, President and director of the Registrant, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
      belief:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.




Cybertel
                Capital CorporationDate: August
              14, 2007
            By:
            /s/  James
              A. WheelerJames
              A. WheelerPresident,
                CEO and director





J:\CyberTel
      Capital\1934 Act\10QSB-06.30.07\CYBERTEL_CAPITAL_CORP_10QSB_06-30-2006 version
      3.doc




17
No. 341, Misc.

#### Hill *v.*Oklahoma et al.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT32.4**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of New Century Financial Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, BradA. Morrice, Vice Chairman, President and Chief Operating Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)               The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/    BRAD A. MORRICE                                                 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | **Brad A. Morrice  Vice Chairman, President and Chief  Operating Officer  August 9, 2004** |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished with the Company’s Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2004 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. It is not being filedfor purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any generalincorporation language in such filing.

 

----
H. Res. 83

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 8, 2001.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce individual income tax

rates. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment.

The amendment recommended by the Committee on Ways

and Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as

adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered

on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment

thereto to final passage without intervening motion except:

(1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Ways and Means; (2) the further amendment printed in the report of the Committee on

Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered by Representative Rangel of New York or his designee, which shall be in

order without intervention of any point of order, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for one
2

•HRES 83 EH

hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an

opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without

instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

I, Judith A. Berry, Chief Financial Officer ofAmerican Residential Investment Trust, Inc. (the “Registrant”), do herebycertify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, basedon my knowledge:

 

(1) the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as anexhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| Dated:  May 14, 2003 |   | /s/  Judith A. Berry |   |
|---------------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|                      |   | Judith A. Berry           |
|                      |   | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to American Residential InvestmentTrust, Inc. and will be retained by American Residential Investment Trust, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
No. 174, Misc.

#### Skantze *v.*United States.

*T. Emmett McKenzie*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Julia P. Cooper*for the United States.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
|   |   |
|--------|--------|

**Filed      Pursuant To Rule 433, Registration No. 333-124310**
** **

**$1,000,000,000**

**CATERPILLAR      FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION**

| **For                the Period: 2/20/2007 to 2/26/2007** |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|
| **Coupon**                                                | **Interest** | **Maturity** | **Callable** | **Survivor's****Option** | **Price****1** | **Yield****2** | **Moody's** | **S&P** | **CUSIP** |
| 4.950%                                                    | Semi-Annual(†††) | 3/15/09 | NO | YES§  | 100.00 | 4.950% | A2 | A | 14912HBK5 |
| 5.400%                                                    | Monthly(†) | 3/15/17 | 3/15/09*  | YES§  | 100.00 | 5.461% | A2 | A | 14912HBG4 |
| 5.600%                                                    | Monthly(†) | 3/15/22 | 3/15/10*  | YES§  | 100.00 | 5.665% | A2 | A | 14912HBH2 |
| 5.750%                                                    | Semi-Annual(†††) | 3/15/27 | 3/15/11***  | YES§  | 100.00 | 5.749% | A2 | A | 14912HBJ8 |

*All      offerings are subject to prior sale.*
No. 556, Misc.

#### Rinieri *v.*United States.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Jerome M. Feit*for the United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
From: aetinydancer@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:25:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Heather Carter

Fort Worth, TX 76131
From: Lauren Crosby

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Access to Preventive Care and Contraception!

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 4:56:07 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger.

Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run

health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the

coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies.

If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

Please, do not continue to leave women behind in the new law. We were already left

behind once, when access to abortions was removed from the bill. Please do not

continue to neglect the rights, privacy and health of women.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (15.25 MB)
 
 Ceremony 379th AEW EABG Activation
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil