alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Understudied Proteins Associated with Rare Diseases (R03) Review.                    

*Date:*                         November 15, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Carol (Chang-Sook) Kim, Ph.D., Scientific Review Administrator, Office of Grants Management and Scientific Review, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 1000, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-7940,                         *carolko@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.350, B—Cooperative Agreements; 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 6, 2023.

Melanie J. Pantoja, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-19563 Filed 9-11-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 18

- 1738 V

UNPUBLISHED

MICHELLE DEP INTO

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND

HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: April 14, 2020

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ;

Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine

Administration (SIRVA)

Andrew Donald Downing, Van Cott & Talamante, PLL C, Phoeni x, AZ , for petitioner.

Traci R. Patton , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On November 8, 2018

, Michelle DePinto filed a petition for compensation under

the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

. 2 (the

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that that she suffered a left shoulder injury related to

vaccine administration ( “ SIRVA ” ) as a result of a n influenza ( “ flu ” ) vaccination receiv ed

on De cember 9, 2016 . Petit ion at 1, 4 . The case was assigned to the Special

Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On April 13, 2020

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that P etitioner is entitled to compensa tion in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report

at 1. Specifically, R espondent agrees that “ petit ioner ’ s allege d injury is consistent with

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am

required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Managemen t and Promotion of

Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to

the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to

redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of

privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such

material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 19 86, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C.

§ 300aa (2012 ).2

SIRVA, as defined on the Vaccine Injury Table. Specifically, petitioner had no history of

pain, inf lammation, or dysfunction in her left shou lder; her pain and re duced range of

motion occurred within 4 8 hours of recei pt of an intr amuscular vaccination; her

symptoms w ere limited to the shoulder in w hich the vaccine was admini stered; and no

other condition or abnormality was identified to explain her sym ptoms. ” Id. at 4

.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitle d to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                           5
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                              841,230       
<SECURITIES>                        849,970      <F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                       199,339
<ALLOWANCES>                        0
<INVENTORY>                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    0
<PP&E>                              19,772,418   <F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                      5,303,058
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      16,409,588
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               0
<BONDS>                             11,337,336   <F3>                 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
<PREFERRED>                         0
<COMMON>                            4,225,415    <F4>
<OTHER-SE>                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        16,409,588
<SALES>                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    2,195,540    <F5>
<CGS>                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       1,368,180    <F6>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    (53,346)     <F7>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  1,000,142 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<CHANGES>                           0
<NET-INCOME>                        (119,436)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0

<FN>
<F1>   "SECURITIES" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURE
<F2>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE [LAND AND
BUILDING]
<F3>   "BONDS" REPRESENTS MORTGAGES PAYABLE
<F4>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERS' CAPITAL
<F5>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
INCOME
<F6>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES LESS INTEREST
<F7>   "OTHER EXPENSES" REPRESENTS EQUITY AND MINORITY INTEREST
IN JOINT VENTURES' NET INCOME/LOSS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
No. 221.

#### Milanovich *v.*United States.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

*Calvin H. Childress*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *J. F. Bishop*for the United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

BILLY DAVIS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4828

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed July 3, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Manatee County; Charles Sniffen, 

Judge.

Billy Davis, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Lee v. State, 679 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. 1996); Reed v. State, 

761 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Paris v. State, 156 So. 3d 578 (Fla. 3d DCA 

2015); Rutherford v. State, 93 So. 3d 1132 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

KHOUZAM, C.J., and SLEET and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Order entered October 1, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00557-CR

ARIEL DANIEL ERIVES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-85054-2019

ORDER

On July 9, 2021, appellant requested official court reporter Karla Kimbrell to 

prepare the reporter’s record in this appeal. That record was due on August 24, 

2021. When it was not filed, we notified Ms. Kimbrell by postcard dated August 

26, 2021 and directed her to file the reporter’s record by September 25, 2021. To

date, the reporter’s record has not been filed and we have had no communication 

from Ms. Kimbrell.
We ORDER court reporter Karla Kimbrell to file the complete reporter’s 

record in this appeal within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable 

Benjamin Smith, Presiding Judge, 380th Judicial District Court; Karla Kimbrell, 

official court reporter, 380th Judicial District Court; and counsel for all parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of AmNet Mortgage, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,John M. Robbins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 

 
| November 14,  2005 |                     |
|-------------------------|--------------------------|
|                    | /s/  John M. Robbins     |   |   |
|                    | John  M. Robbins         |
|                    | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
****U.S.        Department of Justice****Bureau of Justice Statistics****To the BJS****
From: jhickey@ednet10.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:00:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jeannette Hickey

Wolfe City, TX 75496
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                               0001035901
<NAME>                              CIMNET, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                   USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1
<CASH>                                        28,972
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                516,085
<ALLOWANCES>                                  25,556
<INVENTORY>                                   36,589
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             683,946
<PP&E>                                       683,667
<DEPRECIATION>                               456,845
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             3,542,549
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        947,526
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            609
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                 2,590,266
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               3,542,549
<SALES>                                    1,659,723
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           1,659,723
<CGS>                                        260,857
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1,641,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            13,234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (255,907)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (255,907)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                (255,907)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.05)


</TABLE>
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 37266

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

KENNETH BOYD CASE,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2010 Unpublished Opinion No. 627

Filed: September 3, 2010

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of one and one-half years, for possession of marijuana with 

intent to deliver, affirmed.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Diane M. Walker, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before LANSING, Chief Judge, GUTIERREZ, Judge

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Kenneth Boyd Case was convicted of possession of marijuana with intent to deliver, 

Idaho Code § 37-2732(a). The district court imposed a unified sentence of five years, with a 

minimum period of confinement of one and one-half years. Case appeals, contending that the 

sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of a sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 
2

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Case’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
From: jillthrift@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:57:49 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

JILL THRIFT

San Antonio, TX 78209
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES FOR
THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       8,384,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                373,733,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,349,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,707,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             733,467,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,306,000
<BONDS>                                    505,583,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       146,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 166,258,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               733,467,000
<SALES>                                     94,890,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           173,205,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               80,699,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          36,992,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             55,514,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                22,895,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         32,619,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                32,619,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.77


</TABLE>