alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: kcline12@neo.rr.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:13:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

k Cline Sr

New Wilmington, PA 16142
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1175 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1175

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To modify the boundary of Vicksburg National Military Park to include 
the property known as Pemberton's Headquarters, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Vicksburg National Military Park 
Boundary Modification Act of 2002''.

SEC. 2. BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.

    The boundary of Vicksburg National Military Park is modified to 
include the property known as Pemberton's Headquarters, as generally 
depicted on the map entitled ``Boundary Map, Pemberton's Headquarters 
at Vicksburg National Military Park'', numbered 306/80015A, and dated 
August, 2001. The map shall be on file and available for inspection in 
the appropriate offices of the National Park Service.

SEC. 3. ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY.

    (a) Pemberton's Headquarters.--The Secretary of the Interior is 
authorized to acquire the properties described in section 2 and 3(b) by 
purchase, donation, or exchange, except that each property may only be 
acquired with the consent of the owner thereof.
    (b) Parking.--The Secretary is also authorized to acquire not more 
than one acre of land, or interest therein, adjacent to or near 
Pemberton's Headquarters for the purpose of providing parking and other 
facilities related to the operation of Pemberton's Headquarters. Upon 
the acquisition of the property referenced in this subsection, the 
Secretary add it to Vicksburg National Military Park and shall modify 
the boundaries of the park to reflect its inclusion.

SEC. 4. ADMINISTRATION.

    The Secretary shall administer any properties acquired under this 
Act as part of the Vicksburg National Military Park in accordance with 
applicable laws and regulations.

SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out this Act.

            Passed the Senate July 24, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1175

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To modify the boundary of Vicksburg National Military Park to include 
the property known as Pemberton's Headquarters, and for other purposes.
```
From: docfoy@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:34:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Andrew Foy

Aurora, WV 26705
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Army SBIR accomplishments**
 
1994 | 1996
 
SuDoc:D 101.1/18:
Item Number:0325-A-03 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000548574
 
November 13, 2017
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           1,711
<SECURITIES>                                        71
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,943
<ALLOWANCES>                                       171
<INVENTORY>                                        430
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,505
<PP&E>                                          46,869
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,777
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,880
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,390
<BONDS>                                          7,924
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,007
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,880
<SALES>                                            455
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,886
<CGS>                                              640
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,639
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,955
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   213
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 724
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,588
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,024
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,564
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,796)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,232)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.24)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION VII 901 NORTH 5TH STREET KANSAS CITY, KANSAS 66101

September 23, 2011

Irene D Schlemmer

4909 Browne Street Omaha, Nebraska 68104

RE: SAID: 20788

1106 South 43 Street
Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Assessment

Dear Owner/Resident:

A Lead Based Paint assessment was recently performed on your property by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as part of the Omaha Lead site investigation. The purpose of this assessment is to determine whether a significant quantity of LBP is present on the exterior surface of structures, where deteriorating paint conditions (peeling, flaking, cracking, etc) exist that might increase lead concentrations in the yard above acceptable levels.

Enclosed are the LBP assessment sheets for 1106 South 43 Street. The EPA has developed paint stabilization eligibility criteria that involve measuring the amount of deteriorated LBP on a structure and calculating the concentration of lead in soils around the home that would result if all of the identified deteriorated paint were to fall to the ground and uniformly mix with the soil under certain assumptions. During the LBP assessment, the areal extent of the deteriorated paint observed on structure surfaces was estimated and the lead content in the deteriorated paint was measured using an X-Ray Fluorescence instrument.

The data obtained during the LBP assessment was used to estimate the increase in soil lead concentration that would result if all of the deteriorating paint identified in the assessment were to fall to the ground and mix with surface soil within six feet of the foundation of the structure. For purposes of this calculation, the deteriorating LBP on a structure is assumed to fall onto the ground surface within six feet of the foundation and be uniformly mixed with the top one inch of soil. The estimated lead concentration in the soil potentially caused by the deteriorating LBP provides a measure of the severity of LBP deterioration on individual structures. The EPA uses these criteria to rank properties based on the potential for recontamination of soil to occur. Paint stabilization is being offered at only those households with the most severe LBP problems, particularly where children under the age of seven reside.

The LBP assessment performed by the EPA using the above criteria indicated that your house IS NOT eligible for paint stabilization.If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the EPA Public Information Center at (402) 731-3045.

Sincerely,

Pauletta R. France-Isetts Project Coordinator Environmental Protection Agency

Enclosures
Para información en español, llame al EPA Information Center (402) 731-3045.Omaha Lead Site LBP Assessment

LEGEND: H

- N

- P

- 01

- 20788 Samples Analyzed 1 I [- BVlD Number 

# 1 Sample Number XRF Umt: Book: /8/ 

## 1 1 -Materm P = Pant Date. G/ZL, d8 Time: 

# tfl,

!-~lde of Structure N = North S = South E = East W = West Staff /trC< &/&+f I Structure Type H = House G = Garage S = Shed F = Fence

Sample Number Lead Loadmg StructurelFeature Substrate Color Deteriorated
Window, siding, porch, etc.) (Wood, concrete, etc.) Area

ft'
No. 93, Misc.

#### Johnson *v.*United States.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Robert G. Maysack*for the United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
p. 1


# OAR Box 

# 1875 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 34 ) ll-E-5 2 Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 9

Printed 12/1/200811:12:46

AM Sheet 34 of 86P. 2 

# A-90-1 9 ll-E-5 2 DATE : Augus t 5 , 199 2 SUBJECT : Hazardou s Organi c NESHA P (HON ) Meetin g wit h Stat e

Representative s Attache d i s a n agend a fo r a teleconferenc e i n whic h Jef f Clark , Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlanning an d Standards , update d member s o f th e Nationa l Governor s Association' s Ai r Implementatio n Tas k Forc e abou t th e HON . Attachment : • • 1 ' •A\

' J 

### i i < ~ — • • • *• 

### • 

### DEC 1 8 

### 199 2

C'"'y a'k.--' » •• • •_-' _ t . l l

mgmll.memos.dc tP. 3 

### N/CnONA L " GOVERNORS ASSGEIAnO N Ro y Rome r Governo r

o f Colorad o Chairma n Carrol l A . Campbel l Jr . Governo r

o f Sout hCarolin a Vic e Chairma n Raymon dC . Schcppac h Executiv e Directo r Hal l o f th e State s 44 4 Nort hCapito l Stree t Washington , D.C . 20001-157 2 Telephon e (202 ) 624-530 0

**** * AGEND A 

### Th e State Environmenta l Commissioners ' Ai rImplementatio n Tas k Force Conferenc e Cal l Wit

hEP A- Wednesday , Augus t 5 , 2:0 0 p.m . ED T Conferenc e Line : 202-260-784 4 Updat e o n HON/Strateg y

• EPABriefing s Wit

hOM B

• Discoun t

Facto r

• Interpollutan t

Averagin g Titl e I V NO

xRul e Briefin g b y EP Aan dInpu tFro mState s Ne wSourc e Revie

wRule s an d VO C Bankin g an d Tradin g Briefin g b y EP

A an d Inpu tFro m State s . Economi c Incentive s Rul e (tim e permitting ) Briefing b y EP

A an d Inpu tFro mState s
```

[House Report 107-696]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

107th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     107-696

======================================================================

 
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 
 2215, 21ST CENTURY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE APPROPRIATIONS AUTHORIZATION 
                                  ACT

                                _______
                                

 September 25, 2002.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

    Mrs. Pryce of Ohio, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the 
                               following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 552]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 552, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany H.R. 2215, the 21st Century 
Department of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act, and 
against its consideration. The rule further provides that the 
conference report shall be considered as read.

                                  

```
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**SECTION 302**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, John M. Robbins, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AmNetMortgage, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrantand have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: May 16, 2005 |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
|                    |
| /s/ John M. Robbins     |   |
| John M. Robbins         |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
From: gward.lwc@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:43:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gary Ward

Manhattan, KS 66502
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Terrell Dewayne Dopson, Appellant

No. 06

- 18

- 00027

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 4th District Court of Rusk County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR17

- 110 ). Opinion delivered by Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment

of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to indicate that Dopson pled

“true” to the single revocation allegation and violated “Term 15” of the terms and conditions of

his community supervision

. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Terrell Dewayne Do pson, has adequately indicated his inability

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED AUGUST 8, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### HARRIS *v.*FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION et al.

No. 100.

Decided October 8, 1962.

*M. H. Rosenhouse*for appellant.

*Benjamin T. Shuman*for appellees.

Per Curiam.

The motion' to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.