alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| **Loans (Unfunded Commitment) (Details) (USD $)In Millions, unless otherwise specified** |        |        | 3 Months Ended |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|----------------|
||
| **Unfunded Commitments [Line Items]**                                                    |   |   |           |
| Expected usage percentage of remaining unfunded commitments                              |   |   | 10.00%         |
| Reserve for unfunded commitments                                                         | $ 0.6  | $ 0.6  |           |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Expected usage percentage of unfunded commitments to lend.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**fnbn_LoansAndLeasesReceivableUnfundedCommitmentsExpectedUsagePercentage**Namespace Prefix:**fnbn_**Data Type:**num:percentItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
The amount of reserve for unfunded commitments for which the entity is obligated, to lend.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**fnbn_LoansAndLeasesReceivableUnfundedCommitmentsReserve**Namespace Prefix:**fnbn_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**credit**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                          |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**fnbn_UnfundedCommitmentsLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**fnbn_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON PAGES 3
AND 4 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,417,276
<SECURITIES>                                 2,090,125
<RECEIVABLES>                                  665,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                    36,333
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,191,756
<PP&E>                                       1,525,924
<DEPRECIATION>                               (325,435)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,470,047
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          376,315
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,515,209
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,470,047
<SALES>                                        676,415
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               676,415
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,480,341
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                43,510
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,855
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (754,188)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (754,188)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (754,188)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of ALCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Colman Au, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.    By: /s/ Colman Au, Chief Financial Officer  Date: March 27, 2009
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-521
In Re: ROBERT M. BRANISH, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (CA-96-1005-3) Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 8, 1997 Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert M. Branish, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert M. Branish, a federal prisoner, petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). Branish contends that the district court in which his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997) motion was pending has erroneouslyrefused to accept jurisdiction over claims asserted in his supplemental motions filed in that court. A court will not entertain a § 2241 petition unless a motionpursuant to § 2255 is "inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of [an inmate's] detention." See Swain v. Pressley , 430 U.S.372, 381 (1977). The petitioner bears the burden of showing the inadequacy or ineffectiveness o f a § 2255 motion. McGhee v. Hanberry , 604 F.2d 9, 10 (5th Cir. 1979). Because Branish has an adequate remedy under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, namely an appeal from a final order disposing of the motion or aFed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion challenging the dismissal of his supplemental motions, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss this petition. Branish's motion for release on bail pending disposition of this petition is now moot and is denied for that reason. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
     I, Joseph J. Atick, Chief Executive Officer of Identix Incorporatedcertify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of IdentixIncorporated;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         By:                            /s/ Joseph J. Atick    Joseph J. Atick
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, Joel San Antonio, hereby certify that, to
the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report of Warrantech Corporation on Form
10-K for the year ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934, and that the information contained in that Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Warrantech Corporation.


Date: June 23, 2003                      /s/ Joel San Antonio
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Joel San Antonio
                                         Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
                                         Director


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required
by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Warrantech Corporation and will be retained by Warrantech
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.


<PAGE>
From: dcporter@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: dcporter@juno.com

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:53:15 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Darrell Porter

Las Vegas, NV 89136
Page | of 1
A 4
LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION KEG 10034 /- LO SEP 02 201
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS

BRANCH ‘As of: September 02, 2011

Received: August 15, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION _ Posted: september 02, 2011
Tracking No. 80ee0bbd

Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of

Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0178
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Chhewun SF Submitter Information

Submitter's Representative: NARAL Pro-Choice America

General Comment

I strongly support the new policy requiring health-insurance plans to cover birth control without a
copay, CMS-9992-IFC2. Thank you for this important improvement to women's health care.

T also want you to know that I am concerned that certain religious employers may be allowed to
opt out of the requirements. All women should have access to contraceptive coverage, regardless

of where they work.

This policy finally should make near-universal access to birth control
areality for all women who use it.

Improving women's access to birth control is positive in so many ways.
A woman who can plan when to have a family is able to participate in
society more fully. Allowing women to space their pregnancies
contributes to healthy childbearing. And ultimately, fewer unintended
pregnancies can reduce the need for abortion.

Thank you for following science-based recommendations and making
women's health a priority.

http://fdms,erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000... 9/2/2011
From: winning@myibocs.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:00:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lindy Book

Boca Raton, FL 33487
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        I, John H. Kunze, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Plumtree Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Plumtree Software, Inc.

                                 By:    /s/ John H. Kunze
                                        ------------------
                                 Name:  John H. Kunze
                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer

        I, Eric Borrmann, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Plumtree Software, Inc, on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of Plumtree Software, Inc.

                                 By:    /s/ Eric Borrmann
                                        ----------------------
                                 Name:  Eric Borrmann
                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAmNet Mortgage, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, John M. Robbins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| May 17,  2004 |                     |
|---------------|--------------------------|
|          | /s/ John M.  Robbins     |   |
|          | John M.  Robbins         |
|          | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.*

 

----
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-15-00197-CR

KEITH DAVIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 354th District Court

Hunt County, Texas

Trial Court No. 29,282

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Keith Davis has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. The motion was signed by both Davis

and his counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). As authorized by Rule 42.2(a), we grant the motion.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Ralph K. Burgess

Justice

Date Submitted: April 18, 2016

Date Decided: April 19, 2016

Do Not Publish