alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: "Higgins, Cortney" < Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov >

To: Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/08/2012 10:05 AM

Subject: RE: EO 12866 review

- NESHAP Portland Cement

Hi Sharon,

Has the estimate of affected sources changed? If so, have those sources been accounted for in the CISWI

rule?

Thanks,

Cortney

From: Sharon Nizich [ mailto:Nizich.Sharon@epamail.epa.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 12:59 PM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Cc: Keith Barnett; Steven Silverman; Charlotte Bertrand; Peter Westlin; Steffan Johnson;

Laney, Michael N.

Subject: EO 12866 review

- NESHAP Portland Cement

Hello Cortney

Please find attached a compare/redline version of the PC package DRAFT, and a clean version. This

version contains responses to your earlier comments, but also you will see that Sections "III.D

- Proposed Amendments to PM E xisting and New Source NESHAP and NSPS", and "III.L

- Coal Mills

(NESHAP and NSPS)", have undergone considerable revision, both in response to your comments and to

better explain rationale.

Please let me know when you would like to discuss this version. TH ANK YOU.

(See attached file: EO12866 NESHAP and NSPS Portland Cement CLEAN June 6 2012.docm)(See attached

file: EO12866 NESHAP and NSPS Portland Cement Reconsideration Redline June 6 2012.docx)

Sharon V. Nizich

Minerals and Manufacturing Group (MMG)

Sec tor Policies and Programs Division

OAQPS

- US EPA

RTP NC 27711

919/541

- 2825
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0647 SAT Date: 7/2/2013 Print Date: 9/3/2014

Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 1 Health: PMN compound; Eco: intact material 2 3 Health: p artial incineration/degradation product ; Eco: high concern for to of incomplete incineration products to terrestrial organisms
Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 3 1 1 PMN 3 2 2 Deg Pdt

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Inhalation Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: LUNG Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0647 FATE:

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorptionTime for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong PBT Potential: PMN P3B1; Deg Pdt P3B2 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is nil all routes based on physical/chemical p roperties. There is concern for lung effects if respirable particles are inhaled from lung overload associated with high molecular weight polymers and from waterproofing of the lungs. Low moderate concern.
For the potential incomplete incineration product, based on test data for the analogue concerns are liver toxicity, blood toxicity, and male reproductive toxicity [rat 28-day oral NOAEL = 50 mg/kg, LOAEL = 150 mg/kg with liver toxicity; rat 90-day oral LOAEL = 10 mg/kg based on decreased body weight in males at all doses and liver toxicity and anemia at 200 mg/kg; there were toxic effects on the testes in 2 males in the 90-day oral study that were judged by the reviewer to be indicative of the potential for male reproductive toxicity. There is also concern for immunosuppression and oncogenicity based on data for

Test Data: negative in Salmonella and E coli

Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 * fish

_ chronic value * daphnid

_ chronic value *
algal

_ chronic value *
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for nonionic polymers; SAR chemical class = p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;
high concern for toxicity of incomplete incineration products to terrestrial organismsFactors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) *

SARs nonionic polymers SAR Class
Ecotox Category N onionic Polymers
Ecotox Factors Comments:
SAT Chair: Becky Jones
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Elementary Secondary EducationHigher EducationResource MaterialsScience ActivitiesScience InstructionTeaching MethodsWorld Wide Web

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
From: sashawhitedove@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:52:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Stephanie Steinlicht

Bemidji, MN 56601
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ALEX PIERRE
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 890

[October 11, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barbara R. Duffy , Judge; L.T. Case No. 14

- 000 408

CF10A

.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Paul O'Neil, As sistant Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regio nal Counsel, Fourth District, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melanie Dale Surber, Assistant Attor ney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER
, C.J., L EVINE and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
From: pawct2010@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:57:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gustave Pribnow

Pawcatuck, CT 06379
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                          50800
<SECURITIES>                    87200
<RECEIVABLES>                   482100
<ALLOWANCES>                    (13500)
<INVENTORY>                     381000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1113000
<PP&E>                          1773100
<DEPRECIATION>                  (891400)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2547900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           471700
<BONDS>                         222500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        140100
<OTHER-SE>                      1391000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    2547900
<SALES>                         2530100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2574400
<CGS>                           1726100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   2192700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                27100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                5500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              23300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 325800
<INCOME-TAX>                    117300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             208500
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    208500
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   1.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                   1.57
        

</TABLE>
From: Armando A. García

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Support Access to Preventive Care and Contraception

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:13:21 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Armando A. García
No. 150.

#### Silver, doing business as Municipal Securities Co., et al. *v.*New York Stock Exchange.

*David I. Shapiro*for petitioners.

*A. Donald MacKinnon*for respondent.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Lionel Kestenbaum*and *Melvin Spaeth*for the United States, as *amicus curiae,*in support of the petition.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 25, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 25, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A20I0113. FEDERATED SERVICE INSURANCE COMPANY v. GLORIA JEAN PRICE 

et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

16CV65969
#### Jacob L. Beck, Respondent, v. Elliot O. Worden, Appellant.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                              UNITED BANCORP, INC
                                    EXHIBITS

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of United Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James W. Everson,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ James W. Everson

James W. Everson
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
March 15, 2003
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.46 MB)
 
 Train camp buehring Warfighter Journalism defend Middle East 204th PAD Protect 204th Public Affairs Detachment Story live-fire 1st Armored Division U.S. Army Central Command third army arcent Patton’s Own Public affairs specialist broadcast specialist Bradley fighting vehicle kuwaiti land forces 3rd abct u.s. army central Public Affairs JOINT Operation m1 abrams U.S. Army Soldier Army training News Centcom tank Artillery exercise USARCENT Kuwait sniper deployment army reserve
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

I, John M. Robbins, Chief Executive Officer ofAmerican Residential Investment Trust, Inc. (the “Registrant”), do herebycertify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, basedon my knowledge:

 

(1) the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as anexhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
| Dated: November 13, 2002 | /s/  John M. Robbins |   |
|--------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                     | John M. Robbins           |
|                     | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

----
#### Herbert E. Vanderbogart, Respondent, v. Wallace J. Nash, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Board-man, J.
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect toCertain Terrorist Attacks

Consistent with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. 1622(d), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency previously declared on September 14, 2001, in Proclamation 7463, with respect to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the continuing and immediate threat of further attacks on the United States.

Because the terrorist threat continues, the national emergency declared on September 14, 2001, and the powers and authorities adopted to deal with that emergency must continue in effect beyond September 14, 2023. Therefore, I am continuing in effect for an additional year the national emergency that was declared on September 14, 2001, with respect to the terrorist threat.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 2023-19741

Billing code 3395-F3-P
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.57 MB)
 
 Bold Tigers Air Expeditionary Wing familiy 32 391st FS AF F-15 Strike Eagle Air Force Fighter Squadron deployed 332AEW
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vail Banks, Inc. (the "Company") onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter G. Williston,Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:-  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
-  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company.

 
/s/ Peter G. Williston     
Peter G. WillistonSenior Executive VicePresident and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 7, 2003