alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Barbara Nessim

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 11:36:14 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I think it is a step in the right direction and I commend the Department of Health & Human Services'

landmark decision requiring health insurers to cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay,

beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy.

Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available to all women,

regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term health care costs

associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs. In the end it will save money for the

country and it will prevent unwanted abortions by preventing pregnancy to begin with.

Sincerely,

Barbara Nessim

90 East End Ave

#17A

New York, NY 10028
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1468

AN ACT

For the relief of Ilko Vasilev Ivanov, Anelia Marinova

Peneva, Marina Ilkova Ivanova, and Julia Ilkova Ivanova.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 1468 ES

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

2 In the administration of the Immigration and Nation3 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Ilko Vasilev Ivanov,

4 Anelia Marinova Peneva, Marina Ilkova Ivanova, and

5 Julia Ilkova Ivanova shall be held and considered to have

6 been lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent

7 residence as of the date of the enactment of this Act upon

8 payment of the required visa fees.

9 SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

10 Upon the granting of permanent residence to Ilko

11 Vasilev Ivanov, Anelia Marinova Peneva, Marina Ilkova

12 Ivanova, and Julia Ilkova Ivanova as provided in this Act,

13 the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to

14 reduce by the appropriate number during the current fis15 cal year the total number of immigrant visas available to

16 natives of the country of the aliens’ birth under subsection

17 (a) of section 203 of the Immigration and Nationality Act

18 (8 U.S.C. 1153).

Passed the Senate October 17, 2002.

Attest:

Secretary.
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1468

AN ACT

For the relief of Ilko Vasilev Ivanov, Anelia

Marinova Peneva, Marina Ilkova Ivanova, andJulia Ilkova Ivanova.
From: skpfoss@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:02:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Hubert Foss

Erwin, TN 37650
<TABLE> <S> <C>



      
<ARTICLE> 5                                      EXHIBIT 27



       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               13,004
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        35,890
<ALLOWANCES>                                            455
<INVENTORY>                                          28,130
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     83,832
<PP&E>                                               33,906
<DEPRECIATION>                                       16,006
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      147,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                46,187
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                137
<OTHER-SE>                                         (101,902)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        147,294
<SALES>                                             130,667
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    130,667
<CGS>                                                61,786
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        61,786
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     69,897
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   11,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (11,625)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (2,385)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (9,458)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (9,458)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.70)
        





</TABLE>
Order entered December 19, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00683-CR

AVERY DESMOND GRANT, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1921410-V

ORDER

The reporter’s record for this appeal is overdue. We ORDER Kelly 

Simmons, court reporter, 292nd Judicial District Court, to file the reporter’s record 

within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable 

Brandon Birmingham, Presiding Judge, 292nd Judicial District Court; Kelly 

Simmons, court reporter, 292nd Judicial District Court; and to counsel for all 

parties.
/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
---

---

Exhibit 23.8

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8, (File No.
333-61895, File No. 333-55970) and Forms S-3, (File No. 333- 140968, File No. 333-140969
and, File No. 333-140974) of our report dated February 26, 2008, relating to the financial
statements of Hod Hasharon Sport Center (1992) Limited Partnership which appears in this
Form 10-K of Ampal  American Israel Corporation.

KPMG Somekh Chaikin
 Tel Aviv

March 3, 2009



---

---
From: reitzelj@osti.gov

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:05:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James Reitzel

Knoxville, TN 37923
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 11 STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION
           OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

Earnings per share ("EPS") is calculated on a Basic EPS and Diluted EPS basis.
Basic EPS is calculated by dividing income available to common shareholders (the
numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (the
denominator) during the period. Income available to common shareholders is Net
Income in the table below and as reported in Bancorp's Consolidated Statement of
Income. No adjustments were required to net income for any EPS calculations.

   Diluted EPS is calculated by adjusting the denominator for all dilutive
potential common shares that were outstanding during the period. Bancorp had
stock options outstanding during the periods presented below which had a
dilutive effect on EPS. Therefore, the number of additional common shares that
would have been outstanding if the options had been exercised is added to the
denominator to arrive at the dilutive number of shares.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                   FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                1999             1998              1997
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                          <C>              <C>               <C>
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
Net income                                                      $13,063          $14,633           $15,885
Basic EPS
  Shares                                                     10,981,125       10,888,985        10,838,750
  EPS                                                           $  1.19          $  1.34           $  1.47
Dilutive shares
  Stock options                                                  59,861          115,827            72,656
  EPS                                                           $  0.01          $  0.01           $  0.01
Diluted EPS
  Shares including options                                   11,040,986       11,004,812        10,911,406
  EPS                                                           $  1.18          $  1.33           $  1.46
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



As of the date hereof, I, John Kunze, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Plumtree Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Plumtree Software, Inc.



By:

/s/ John KunzeName:

John KunzeTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDated:

October 31, 2003
April 6, 2000

PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

Mr. Kevern R. Joyce
From: lrinvestor@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:17:56 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am a healthcare provider and am here to say that it is not in our Country's best interest for this bill. I

have seen the effects on women who have gone through abortions and sterilization procedures and I

firmly disagree on the MANDATE of these procedures. As a christian, it is my religious belief that we

take no part in destroying life's. If an individual wants to participate in that kind of behavior they should

do it at there own cost. I should not have to support it morally, ethically or financially.

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Linda Roedl

, 99212-1718
From: kimrey16913@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:20:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

carol huntington

Puyallup, WA 98374
No. 142, Misc.

#### Puddu *v.*Royal Netherlands Steamship Co.

*Robert Klonsky*and *Philip F. DiCostanzo*for petitioner.

*George J. Conway*and *Michael J. Kenny*for respondent.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
U i W Ai t D lUniqueWaysAirportsDealwith Environmental IssuesAPRIL 18, 20114 5T HINTERNATIONAL AVIATION SNOW SYMPOSIUMBUFFALO NYBUFFALO,NYBNIA Case StudyMARK LINERNATURALLY WALLACE CONSULTING, LLCBNIA-Overview110 d il fli ht 25 t110 dailyflights,25gates96” Avg. snow fall~330,000 gallons glycol yearly1.2 MGD stormwater runoffAt gate de-icingLimited sewage plant dischargeNeed to treat all of thisHi h V i bilit i Fl d C t ti4500050000High VariabilityinFlowsand Concentrations3500040000

D /l)200002500030000

ntration (mg-BO D100001500020000

Conce05000050000100000150000200000250000300000350000400000450000500000Flow (gpd)Somewhere in hereUndergroundTreatmentde g ou d eat e tHow it worksMulch LayerInfluent LineWater LevelAir LineDrain LineAirLineHow big is itE h b d i 300’Each bed is300’x166’ x 5’2 2 illi ll~2.2milliongallons10,000 pounds ofoxygen per dayBuffalo Airport Deicing Fluid Treatment 2010-2011Engineered Wetland with Patented Forced Bed AerationTM16,00018,000gInfluent CBOD5/TOC: 2.25Effluent CBOD5/TOC: 0.45Based on Stantec's Engineered14,000,InfluentWetland Treatment SystemBNIA Calibration of TOC MetersReport (6/4/2010)10,00012,000

CBOD 5 L )8,000

Calculated (mg/ L4,0006,000Effluent02,00010/29/2010 11/18/2010 12/8/2010 12/28/2010 1/17/20112/6/2011 2/26/2011 3/18/2011 4/7/2011 4/27/2011Naturally Wallace Consulting, LLC www.naturallywallace.comBuffalo Airport Deicing Fluid Treatment 2010-2011Engineered Wetland with Forced Bed AerationTM100%35,000Engineered Wetland Total Load (lb BOD/d)Design Load (lb BOD/d)BOD Removal Efficiency80%90%30,000TreatmentEfficiency60%70%20 00025,000

D 5 /d)Actual Load40%50%15,00020,000

o ad (lbs BO D20%30%0%10,000

L o10%20%5,0000%-10/29/2010 11/18/2010 12/8/2010 12/28/2010 1/17/20112/6/2011 2/26/2011 3/18/2011 4/7/2011 4/27/2011Naturally WallaceConsulting,LLCwww.naturallywallace.comLessons LearnedN d t t l ti thNeed toscreenoutplasticwrappers;theyclog the dosing linesK f h i ddi i h bKeepontopofthenutrientaddition;thebugsneed it to break down the glycolYou can under aerate but you can’t overaerateBuy as much upstream storage volume as youcanQuestions
#### Pincus Cohn, Respondent, *v.*Daniel Spitzer et al., Appellants.

*Cohn*v. *Spitzer,*145 App. Div. 104, affirmed.

(Argued February 5, 1913;

decided February 25, 1913.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 12, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term, without a jury, in an action to recover upon a bond executed by defendants to accompany a second mortgage upon real property, the lien of which had been subsequently extinguished by the foreclosure of the first mortgage:

*Alexander Pfeiffer*for appellants.

*Warren Tubbs*and *Michael M. Cohn*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Spring, J., below.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Cuddeback, Hogan and Miller, JJ.
#### Sarah Jane Miller, Respondent, v. Henry J. McGuckin, Executor, and others, Appellants.

—Judgment modified as directed in opinion.

Order affirmed, without costs to either party. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
file:///C|/..._List_29-08-2011_12-55-54-352/Document%20List%2029-08-2011%2012-55-54-352_docs/EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0037.html[8/29/2011 1:20:23 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: August 29, 2011

Received: August 23, 2011

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 80eeaa90

Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0018

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of

Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0018-0002

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services under

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0037

Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: John Decker

General Comment

All religious institutions or individuals seeking to not use their funds for some purpose have the right

to said restrictions.

Let it come to the attention of all men in power to address, execute and alter these laws that the

provision of any service, medicine related or otherwise, is a pre-first amendment issue. By definition,

the freedom of expression, which the expenditure of funds is, is a constitutional freedom allotted to

all men. The first amendment sought to define these rights so that governments would not trample

them. In our constitutional republic there is no room for the inhibition of the free excercise of these

expressions.

Thank you.