alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: jrhoder11@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:24:29 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Rhoderick

Gresham, OR 97080
From: Tamara

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Care for Women

Date: Sunday, August 14, 2011 12:32:03 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine

as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care

law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would

provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an

ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health

providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt

from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.

Thank you,

Tamara Matz
EXHIBIT 23


                   Report of Independent Public Accountants


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated January 21, 1997, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of F&M Bancorp and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and
1995 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three year
period ended December 31, 1996 which report appears on page 43 of the 1996 F&M
Bancorp Annual Report and Form 10-K, into the following previously filed
Registration Statements of F&M Bancorp; Numbers 33-39941, 002-88390, 333-02433
and 333-16709 on Form S-8, and 33-39940 on Form S-3.


                                          /s/Arthur Anderson, LLP


Washington, DC
March 27, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                5
<MULTIPLIER>             1000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                           11,074
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    40,282
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        590
<INVENTORY>                                                      30,284
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 87,887
<PP&E>                                                           35,787
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   16,851
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                  143,735
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            52,892
<BONDS>                                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0
<COMMON>                                                            137
<OTHER-SE>                                                     (108,989)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                    143,735
<SALES>                                                         102,551
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                102,551
<CGS>                                                            49,620
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    40,036
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                9,855
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   6,173
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      1,923
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               4,250
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0
<CHANGES>                                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                                      4,250
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                       .47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                       .45
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Sw

2000"

CHEHALIS RIVER SYNCLINE

Mill Creek

1000" Ter

| Chehalis River
lo

SALZER CREEK FAULT

DOTY FAULT
Coal Creek

CHEHALIS ANTICLINE
SCAMMON CREEK FAULT
Bend in section

CENTRALIA SYNCLINE

‘Scammon Creek

& Chehalis River

GS.CHS Qh

N

KOPIAH FAULT

ENKNER VALLEY

BULLETIN 1053 PLATE 2

NE.

NORTHCRAFT MOUNTAIN CRAWFORD MOUNTAIN

2000'

— Bend in section

Bend in section

CRAWFORD MTN ANTICLINE

Deschutes River
>

Union Oil Co. FROST PRAIRIE

COAL CREEK FAULT

—
Ben lowes NK WSS
SSS SSS SSN
= SSS SSS SESS
——S
1000" SSSI S
2000’
3000’
4000/.

SW.

B CREGO HILL
Tor

=
SS

SC SESS
=—— ~

SSS SSS

WS

SEES
SSS RSS SAS'- SQ

SS

z 3

z
5 8 8
o 8 4
= ze 1)
= =
5S os >
is} ae =
z¢$ 3
i z & &
& 23 =
1 Tam & 4

S S&S SS SSS
SX WS

=

: : — —
: ¥: = Ate Ea pau eas —

Alluvium and Gravel, drift Sandstone Tuffaceous sandstone Siltstone Sandy siltstone Tuff Coal beds Basalt flows Andesite flows Intrusive igneous
landslide debris or conglomerate T, Tono No. 1 rock

UT, Upper Thompson

BD, Big Dirty

2 See a
For explanation of geologic letter symbols see plate 1 BB, Black Bear

GEOLOGIC SECTIONS OF THE CENTRALIA-CHEHALIS DISTRICT, WASHINGTON

1 0

CHEHALIS ANTICLINE

:
= Coal Creek
ie

CENTRALIA SYNCLINE

Bannse 1 3
4000"
w
= 2
Ss Zz 5 5
w 2 s x
5 5 5 © z © = x a 2 rnd 3 NE.
s J § 2 § 5 s z i rs] = a z
3B = 3 3 3 g 8 = yw 5 a Sy 2
3 ira 3 2 8 iz z 3 4 Sw z = Oz gt
8 i 8 28 Ss = 3 a oz = a 25 $8
£ Ge £ 5 S = a s Ee an ~ y fete) 3 3s
S ars = ee = if < a3) Pt a a2 =
2 zs Z 5 a] & Z z oz w at & 8
5 fet 2 = 4 = o 5 z ee oe Pa 2a a
a S é $3 3 < 8 3 = <a cs} a fo) 8 ge
88 Be 5 5 yg z 2 3 2 3 a
3
NS Es Q. = i Ed 8 a oso no
52 f esx! mu Diss ii a 8

b
5
sw wo. 2 2
Zz b z .
3 8 2h 3 3 BRS
z § Sie = at Re
a Rs Ris SG 2s
2 3 $ z b& Bes
< a
0 ga: cI 3 38 “38
, = s Selburn-Washington a8 x 8a zo
1000’ Ain ai et < 2 Ath Qi, Qi Q = ere
Sea level we
SS SSS “ res
1000’ FRR SSS SSS = we SSE
RS SSS SS SSS SSS SSS SSS SSS Wg OEE SE i
XE SSS = ASS SSASSS

3000/

INTERIOR— GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, WASHINGTON, D. Cc.
MR 1055

Scale 1:48,000
| Miles
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Food and Nutrition Service

          - 7 CFR Parts 210, 215, 220, 225, 226, and 235
          - [FNS-2016-0040]
          - RIN 0584-AE08

# AGENCY:

Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Food and Nutrition Service is correcting a final rule that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         on August 23, 2023. The document implements statutory requirements and policy improvements to strengthen administrative oversight and operational performance of the Child Nutrition Programs.                    

# DATES:

Effective September 22, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Megan Geiger, Senior Technical Advisor, Program Monitoring and Operational Support Division—4th floor, USDA Food and Nutrition Service, 1320 Braddock Place, Alexandria, VA 22314 or at                         *megan.geiger@usda.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In FR Doc. 2023-17992 appearing on page 57845 in the                     **Federal Register**                     of Wednesday, August 23, 2023, the following correction is made:                

§ 210.18

1. On page 57845, in the second column, instruction 6 for § 210.18, correct instruction b. to read as follows: 

b. Revise paragraphs (c), (f), (g) introductory text, (h) introductory text, and (h)(1) introductory text; 

Cynthia Long,

Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.

[FR Doc. 2023-19878 Filed 9-15-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-30-P
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10100.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10100.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
No. 645, Misc.

#### Davis *v.*Michigan.

Supreme Court of Michigan. Certiorari denied.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0004748 11-FEB-2014 10:31 AM
No. 202.

#### Sanders *v.*United States.

Certiorari, 370 U. S. 936, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The motion for the appointment of counsel is granted and it is ordered that *Fred M. Vinson, Jr., Esquire,*of Washington, D. C., a member of the Bar of this Court, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for the petitioner in this case.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                  5
<MULTIPLIER>               1,000

<S>                                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                               22,755
<SECURITIES>                                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                        53,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                                            620
<INVENTORY>                                                          33,129
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                    119,757
<PP&E>                                                               53,252
<DEPRECIATION>                                                      (22,228)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                      209,952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                54,073
<BONDS>                                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                                               0
<COMMON>                                                                137
<OTHER-SE>                                                         (102,003)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                        209,952
<SALES>                                                              62,485
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                     62,485
<CGS>                                                                30,342
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                        30,342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                     35,288
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    5,956
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                      (8,819)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                         (2,710)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                  (6,190)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                                         (6,190)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                           (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         (0.13)


</TABLE>
<PAGE> 29
                                                               Exhibit 15.1



                       Report of Independent Accountants



To the Shareholders and Trustees
 of NSTAR:


We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of NSTAR as of
September 30, 1999 and the related consolidated statements of income and
comprehensive income for the three and nine-month periods ended September 30,
1999 and 1998 and consolidated cash flows for the nine-month periods ended
September 30, 1999 and 1998.  These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures
to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial
and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit
conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the consolidated
financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such
an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the accompanying consolidated financial statements in order
for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.




Hartford, Connecticut               PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
November 15, 1999
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Robinson Financial
Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this
Certification (the “Report”), we, Rick L. Catt, Chief Executive Officer and
Jamie E. McReynolds, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
              the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
              the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or another document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of the written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to First Robinson Financial Corporation and will
be retained by First Robinson Financial Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





By:  /s/ Rick L.
    Catt
                  
                  By: /s/ Jamie E.
  McReynoldsName:  Rick
      L. Catt
                  
                  Name:  Jamie
      E. McReynoldsChief
      Executive Officer
                  
                  Chief
      Financial OfficerNovember  13,
      2009
                  
                  November
      13, 2009
From: bobkat63@epbfi.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:08:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bob Patty

Chattanooga, TN 37421
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Database DesignDatabasesDisabilitiesEducational ResearchElementary Secondary EducationInformation RetrievalInformation StorageSearch StrategiesSpecial Education

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>



<ARTICLE>                                            5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          26,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  491,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,600
<INVENTORY>                                    276,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               835,200
<PP&E>                                         596,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                 237,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,737,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          488,700
<BONDS>                                      2,332,100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,355,500)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,737,200
<SALES>                                        994,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               994,500
<CGS>                                          340,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  340,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             104,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (69,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (72,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (72,700)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0




</TABLE>