alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# USS Essex ARG, 11th MEU Conduct Kuwait Training

/ Published Sept. 30, 2021
CAMP GERBER, KUWAIT, 
Marines and Sailors from the Essex Amphibious Ready Group (ARG) and 11th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) are conducting sustainment training aboard multiple U.S. military installations and off the coast of Kuwait, Sep. 27.                 CAMP GERBER, Kuwait (Sept. 27, 2021) Marines assigned to the11th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU), disembark from an MV-22B Osprey attached to Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron (VMM) 165 (Reinforced), during sustainment training at Camp Gerber, Kuwait, Sept. 27. The Essex Amphibious Ready Group and the 11th MEU are deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations in support of naval operations to ensure maritime stability and security in the Central Region, connecting the Mediterranean and Pacific through the Western Indian Ocean and three strategic choke points. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Sgt. Jennessa Davey)                            USS Essex ARG, 11th MEU Conduct Kuwait Training                            CAMP GERBER, Kuwait (Sept. 27, 2021) Marines assigned to the11th Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU), disembark from an MV-22B Osprey attached to Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron (VMM) 165 (Reinforced), during sustainment training at Camp Gerber, Kuwait, Sept. 27. The Essex Amphibious Ready Group and the 11th MEU are deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations in support of naval operations to ensure maritime stability and security in the Central Region, connecting the Mediterranean and Pacific through the Western Indian Ocean and three strategic choke points. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Sgt. Jennessa Davey)            SHARE IMAGE:Download ImageImage DetailsPhoto By: Sgt. Jennessa DaveyVIRIN: 210926-M-OY115-1055BThe exercise will enable the 11th MEU to train together as a Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) to sustain its proficiency in operating as a ready and capable response force while in the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations.The 11th MEU consists of the Command Element; the Aviation Combat Element comprised of Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron (VMM) 165 (Reinforced) and Marine Attack Squadron (VMA) 214; the Ground Combat Element comprised of Battalion Landing Team 1/1; and the Logistics Combat Element comprised of Combat Logistics Battalion 11.Essex ARG is comprised of amphibious assault ship USS Essex (LHD 2), amphibious transport dock USS Portland (LPD 27), and amphibious dock landing ship USS Pearl Harbor (LSD 52).The Essex ARG/11th MEU is deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations in support of naval operations to ensure maritime stability and security in the Central Region, connecting the Mediterranean and the Pacific through the Western Indian Ocean and three strategic choke points. The ARG/MEU departed their home port of San Diego for a regularly scheduled deployment, Aug 12.For additional information, contact the 11th MEU Communication Strategy and Operations Director, Capt. Miraquel Ridenhour, at miraquel.ridenhour@essex.usmc.mil or Lt. Teresa Meadows, Amphibious Squadron One Public Affairs Officer, at teresa.meadows@lhd2.navy.mil.
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_______ _______ __________ No. ACM S 3 2571

_______ _______ __________ UNITED STATES Appellee

v.
Jo siah I. MAYO Airman (E

- 2 ) , U.S. Air Force, Appellant

_______ _______ __________ Appeal from the United States Air Force Trial Judiciary
Decided 12 February 2020

_______ _______ __________ Military Judge: Christopher M. Schumann

. Approved sentence: Bad

- conduct discharge, confinement for 5 months, and r eduction to E

- 1. Sentence adjudged 14 January 2019 by Sp CM convened at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada

. For Appellant: Major Stuart J. Anderson, USAF; Major Mark J. Schwartz , USAF

. For Appellee: Mary Ellen Payne , Esquire

. Before MINK, LEWIS, and D. JOHNSON
, Appellate Military Judges

.

_______ _______ __________ This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA R ule of Practice and Procedure 30 .4.

_______ _______ __________

PE R CURIAM :The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant ’ s substantial rights occurred. Arti cles 59(a) and 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice
, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c).United States v. Mayo , No. ACM S 3 2571

2 Manual for Courts

- Martial, United States (2016 ed.). Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

. *

FOR THE COURT

CAROL K. JOYCE Clerk of the Court

* We note Specification 1 of Charge II is incorrectly listed as “Specification” in the promulgating order. W e direct the publication of a corrected court

- martial order to remedy the error.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; NHLBI Single-Site and Pilot Clinical Trials Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         October 25-26, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Embassy Suites at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road NW, Washington, DC 20015.                              ( print page 63116)    

*Contact Person:*                         YingYing Li-Smerin, MD, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Room 207-P, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924, 301-827-7942,                         *lismerin@nhlbi.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS) 

Dated: September 11, 2023.

Melanie J. Pantoja,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-19902 Filed 9-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 24-0198

_________________

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

DAVINA ATTAR-WILLIAMS,

 Petitioner and Appellant,

 and

STEVEN THOMAS WILLIAMS,

 Respondent and Appellee.

O R D E R

_________________

The record was filed for purposes of this appeal on June 7, 2024. The opening brief 

is now overdue.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Appellant shall prepare, file, and serve the 

opening brief on appeal no later than August 23, 2024. Failure to file the brief within that 

time will result in dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and without further notice. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all parties. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 23 2024

07/23/2024
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue


Registration No.  333-35460
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)
PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  047				Trade Date: 02/15/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated
  September 8, 2000)						Issue Date:  02/21/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement February 15, 2001

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION
OR REPAYMENT
  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or
     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any
Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivor's		applicable
                                                             regular or special
  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No
                                                                	record dates)

14911QBY6	   5.75%	02/15/06	100%	         1.0%	   Monthly	      YES	    NO



Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:
____  Yes	  X   No						N/A



(1) The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not
affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the
effective date of the change.

(2) Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to
Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the
time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
#### Mary F. Murphy, Appellant, v. Eliza J. Jones and others, Respondents.

— Judgment modified by striking therefrom the words ‘‘on the merits in said action,” and as modified affirmed, without costs of the appeal to either party.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATE OF
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF
DOBSON COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION I, Everett R. Dobson, Chairman of the Board and principal executive officer of Dobson
Communications Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the
quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2005, (the
Report):  a.
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, and thatb.
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition of the Company at March 31, 2005, and the results of the
Companys operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005. May 10, 2005 /S/ EVERETT R. DOBSONEverett R. DobsonChairman of the Board and
principal executive officer
No. 612.

#### Kaiser et al. *v.*Price-Fewell, Inc.

*Eugene R. Warren*and *Bruce T. Bullion*for petitioners.

*Pat Mehaffy*for respondent.

Supreme Court of Arkansas. Certiorari denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 14, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 5, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 49 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-260, CP2023-263.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-19825 Filed 9-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 31.2302 CERTIFICATIONI, Ronald J. Fior, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Callidus Software Inc. on Form 10-Q;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of this annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 14, 2006                                                                                                              /s/ RONALD J. FIOR   *Ronald J. Fior*   *Chief Financial Officer,Senior Vice President, Finance and Operations*
From: jdthchffn@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:20:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Judith Chaffin

Sweet Home, OR 97386
No. 357.

#### Bramblett et al. *v.*Wilson.

*Donald R. Fran-son*and *John F. Sullivan*for petitioners.

Supreme Court of Arizona. Certiorari denied.
H. Res. 134

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 12, 2007.

Whereas the United States must remain vigilant against all 

threats to the homeland, including acts of terrorism, natural disasters, and other emergencies; 

Whereas the Department of Homeland Security marked its 

4th anniversary on January 24, 2007; 

Whereas the more than 208,000 employees of the Department work tirelessly to prepare the Nation to counter 

acts of terrorism, natural disasters, and other emergencies; 

Whereas the Department’s employees work diligently to 

deter, detect, and prevent acts of terrorism; 

Whereas the Department’s employees stand willing, ready, 

and able to respond if catastrophe strikes; 

Whereas the Department’s employees support the Department’s mission to protect continuously the Nation’s borders, airports, seaports, rail lines, and other transit systems; 

Whereas the Department’s employees, together with employees of other agencies and departments of the Federal 

Government, work with State, local, and tribal partners 

to enhance disaster preparedness at all levels of government; 
2

•HRES 134 EH 

Whereas the Department’s employees are called upon to sacrifice time with their families to work long hours to fulfill 

the Department’s vital mission; and 

Whereas the Nation is indebted to the Department’s employees for their efforts and contributions: Now, therefore, be 

it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes 

and honors the employees of the Department of Homeland 

Security for their exceptional efforts and contributions to protect and secure the Nation. 

Attest:

Clerk.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY

In connection with the annual report of TransGlobe Energy
  Corp. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December
  31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the Report), I, Ross G. Clarkson, Chief Executive Officer of the
  Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
        section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.

s/s Ross Clarkson 
  Name: Ross G. Clarkson 
  Title: Chief Executive Officer 
  November 19, 2004

---
From: deniseberrykoch@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:16:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Thank you for listening!

Kind Regards,

Denise Berry Koch

Sincerely,

Denise Koch

Flower Mound, TX 75028
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.44 N 77.04 W Meters AGL