alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 136

To amend the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988 to extend

trade negotiating and trade agreement implementing authority.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 22, 2001

Mr. GRAMM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act of

1988 to extend trade negotiating and trade agreement

implementing authority.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fast Track Trade Ne5 gotiating Authority Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO TRADE NEGOTIATING AUTHOR7 ITY.

8 (a) EXTENSION.—Section 1102 (a)(1)(A), (b)(1),

9 and (c)(1) of the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act

10 of 1988 (19 U.S.C. 2902 (a)(1)(A), (b)(1), and (c)(1))
2

S 136 IS

1 are amended by striking ‘‘June 1, 1993’’ each place it ap2 pears and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2004’’.

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—

4 (1) Section 1102 (a)(1) and (b)(1) of such Act

5 are amended by striking ‘‘purposes, policies, and ob6 jectives of this title’’ each place it appears and in7 serting ‘‘policies and objectives of the United

8 States’’.

9 (2) Section 1102(a)(2)(A) of such Act is

10 amended by striking ‘‘August 23, 1988’’ each place

11 it appears and inserting ‘‘January 22, 2001’’.

12 (3) Subsections (b)(2) and (c)(3)(A) of section

13 1102 of such Act are amended by striking ‘‘applica14 ble objectives described in section 1101 of this title’’

15 each place it appears and inserting ‘‘policies and ob16 jectives of the United States’’.

17 (4) Subsection (d)(2)(B) of section 1102 of

18 such Act is amended by striking ‘‘applicable pur19 poses, policies, and objectives of this title’’ and in20 serting ‘‘policies and objectives of the United

21 States’’.

22 (5) Section 1103(b)(1)(A) of such Act is

23 amended by striking ‘‘June 1, 1991’’ and inserting

24 ‘‘December 31, 2004’’.
3

S 136 IS

1 (6) Subsection (a)(2)(B)(i) of section 1103 of

2 such Act is amended by striking ‘‘applicable pur3 poses, policies, and objectives of this title’’ and in4 serting ‘‘policies and objectives of the United

5 States’’.

Æ
**Exhibit 10**

** **

**AMENDMENTNO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**

 

THIS AMENDMENTNO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is dated as of April 30, 2004by and between NetBank, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the “Company”), andDouglas K. Freeman (the “Executive”).

 

W I T N E S S E D

 

WHEREAS, the Company and theExecutive are parties to a certain Employment Agreement dated as of November18, 2001 as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement dated as ofApril 1, 2002 (collectively, the “Original Agreement”); and

 

WHEREAS, the Company and theExecutive wish to amend the Original Agreement as more particularly set forthin this Amendment,

 

NOW,THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed as follows:

 

1.                                   Amendments.

 

(a)  A new Section 2(c) is hereby added to theOriginal Agreement to read as follows:

 

“TheExecutive shall be based primarily and reside in the general area ofJacksonville, Florida.”

 

(b)  The last two sentences of Section 3(c) ofthe Original Agreement are hereby deleted and the following sentence shall be addedat the end of said Section 3(c):

 

“TheCompany shall provide a relocation package for the movement of household goodsto the Executive in order to assist the Executive in the relocation of hissecondary residence from the Atlanta area.”

 

(c)  The term “Business Location” and thedefinition thereof, all as set forth in Annex A of the Original Agreement, arehereby deleted in their entirety.

 

2.  Miscellaneous.

 

(a)                                  This Amendmentmay be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original,and said counterparts shall constitute but one and the same instrument.

(b)                                 Except asexpressly amended and modified by this Amendment, the Original Agreement shallcontinue to be and remain in full force and effect in accordance with itsterms.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive has hereunto set the Executive’s hand and theCompany has caused this Amendment to be executed in its name on its behalf, allas of the day and year first above written.

 
|   | /s/ Douglas  K. Freeman |                            |
|--------|-------------------------|---------------------------------|
|   | Douglas K.  Freeman     |
|   |                    |
|   |                    |
|   | NETBANK, INC.           |
|   |                    |
|   | By:                     | /s/ Thomas  L. Little, Jr.      |   |
|   |                    | Thomas L.  Little, Jr.          |
|   |                    | Chief Human  Resource Executive |
|        |                         |                                 |  |  |  |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

 STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      The undersigned, Charles F. Finn, is the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Wayne Savings Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
30, 2003 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that:

            A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

            B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  covered by the Report.

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that
this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.


August 14, 2003                                     /s/ Charles F. Finn
---------------                                     ----------------------------
Dated                                               Charles F. Finn


                                       23
From: CONNIE LAPOS

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Monday, August 15, 2011 7:15:47 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

CONNIE LAPOS
BROADVIEW HEIGHTS, Ohio
' 

SERVED: JANUARY 24, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, PC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

TRANS STATES AIRLINES, LLC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0907 

HEARING NOTICE 

) 

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered 

commencing Aprilll and 12,2013, inclusive; U.S. Tax Court, Courtroom 9.170, 

Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse, 111 South lOth Street, St. Louis, MO. 63102. 

Hearings will commence at 9:00a.m. and conclude at 4:30p.m. each day. The parties 

should vacate the courthouse on or before 5:00p.m. each day. 

SO ORDERED. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachments - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0907 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Mr. Richard A Leach, CEO 

Trans States Airlines, LLC, Respondent 

11495 Navaid Road, Suite 303 

Bridgeton, MO 63044 

David J. A Hayes III, Respondent's Counsel 

Vice-President & General Counsel 

Trans States Holdings, Inc. 

11495 Navaid Road 

Bridgeton, MO 63044 

TEL: 314-222-4316 

FAX: 314-222-4311 

David B. Kessler, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, ACE-7 

Central Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Room 506, DOT Building 

901 Locust 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

TEL: 816-329-3763 

FAX: 816-329-3771 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 

2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2 
FDMS No. FAA-2012-0907 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

Office ofHearings, M-20, 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC20590 · 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Staff Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

3
ORIC1NAI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 19-0523

SUSAN HENSLEY,

Petitioner and Appellant,

v.

MONTANA STATE FUND,

Respondent and Appellee.

FILED

MAY 0 8 2020

Bowen GreenwOod

Clerk of Supreme Court

State of Montana

ORDER

Justice Laurie McKinnon has recused herself frorn this matter, which has been set

for oral argument on July 8, 2020.

IT IS ORDERED that the Honorable Jessica T. Fehr, District Judge, will sit as a

member of this Court in place of Justice McKinnon.

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to all counsel of record and to

the Honorable Jessica T. Fehr, District Judge.

04 13c.

DATED this 0 day of May, 2020.

For the Court,

i/

ief Justice

IXO

05/08/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0523
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 21, 2018

a1217 

# Order

Clerk December 21, 2018

157755

JAMES RATZA,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 157755

COA: 342968

Macomb CC: 2015

- 004231

- NO

AJE, LLC d/b/a KART 2 KART, LLC,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 6, 2018 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, becaus e we are not persuaded

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit 31.2**SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATIONCERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERI, Martin F. Jackson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Select MedicalHoldings Corporation and Select Medical Corporation, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Select Medical HoldingsCorporation and Select Medical Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrants’ other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrants, including their consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants’ disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants’internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants’most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrants’ internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants’ other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants’auditors and the audit committee of the registrants’ board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrants’ ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrants’ internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: May 15, 2007   /s/ Martin F. Jackson     Martin F. Jackson  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  Select Medical Holdings Corporation and Select Medical Corporation
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors ofZYGO CORPORATION:

We consent to incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-44333, No. 33-62087, No. 33-57060, No. 33-20880, and No. 33-34619 on Forms S-8 of Zygo Corporation of our reports dated September 7, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Zygo Corporation and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2005 and 2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows and related schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended June 30, 2005, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2005, which reports appear in the June 30, 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Zygo Corporation.

KPMG LLP

Stamford, ConnecticutSeptember 7, 2005
From: Jennie Wenger

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 8:41:44 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

I appreciate your attention to this issue, and the opportunity to comment.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Jennie Wenger

437 Milledge Terr

Athens, Ga 30606
From: kyhiyee@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:42:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

ron matile

Berea, KY 40403
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1459 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1459

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 550 West Fort Street in Boise, Idaho, as the ``James A. McClure 
            Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JAMES A. MCCLURE FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED 
              STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 550 
West Fort Street in Boise, Idaho, shall be known and designated as the 
``James A. McClure Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the James A. McClure Federal Building and United States Courthouse.

            Passed the Senate November 15, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1459

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 550 West Fort Street in Boise, Idaho, as the ``James A. McClure 
            Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.
```