alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated balance sheet and statements of operations found on pages 27 and 28
of the Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 28, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          74,856
<SECURITIES>                                    16,764
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,076
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (1,290)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               110,167
<PP&E>                                          13,194
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (5,681)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 148,822
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,591
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       124,315
<OTHER-SE>                                     (11,084)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   148,822
<SALES>                                         20,139
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,139
<CGS>                                            1,062
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   595
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,364
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,835
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,529
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,529
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04



</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DAVID ONDRE CAREW,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-339

[March 3, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Kirk C. Volker, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

202009CF015199AXXXMB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, and David Ondre Carew, Sneads, pro 

se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sorraya M. SolagesJones, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, KLINGENSMITH and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATE OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF
DOBSON COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION I, Everett R. Dobson, Chief Executive Officer of Dobson Communications
Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2004, (the Report):  a.
    
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and thatb.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at June 30,
2004, and the results of the Companys operations for the period ended
June 30, 2004. August 9, 2004
    
    /S/ EVERETT R. DOBSONEverett R. DobsonChairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer
#### Frederic B. Studwell, Appellant, *v.*The Bush Company, Limited, Respondent, Impleaded with Another.

(Submitted January 6, 1913;

decided January 14, 1913.)

Motion for re-argument denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 206 N. Y. 416.)
No. 403, Misc.

#### Lieberman *v.*Columbus Bar Association.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Lawrence A. Ramey*for respondent.

Supreme Court of Ohio. Certiorari denied.
From: tas2b4life@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:06:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tracy Sikon

Adena, OH 43901
<Page>


                                   EXHIBIT 21

                         INTRUSION INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

     The following table lists the subsidiaries of the Registrant as of February
26, 2002, the state or other jurisdiction of incorporation and the names under
which such subsidiaries do business. The Registrant owns all of the outstanding
voting securities of each subsidiary.

<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                          Name under
                                         Jurisdiction of                which Subsidiary
       Name of Subsidiary                  Organization                 is doing business
--------------------------------        -----------------        -------------------------------
<S>                                     <C>                      <C>

 Intrusion.com GmbH                          Germany                    Intruson.com GmbH

 Intrusion.com Limited                   United Kingdom               Intrusion.com Limited

 Intrusion.com Ltd.                      United Kingdom                Intrusion.com Ltd.

 Intrusion.com SARL                          France                    Intrusion.com SARL

 Intrusion.com Sdn. Bhd.                    Malaysia                 Intrusion.com Sdn. Bhd.

</Table>
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1422

To provide for the expedited payment of certain benefits for a public safety

officer who was killed or suffered a catastrophic injury as a direct

and proximate result of a personal injury sustained in the line of duty

in connection with the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 13, 2001

Mrs. CLINTON (for herself, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. HATCH, Mr.

SPECTER, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. WARNER, Mr. SARBANES, Mr. ALLEN, Mr.

DASCHLE, Mr. NICKLES, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. INHOFE, and Mr. BYRD)

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the

Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide for the expedited payment of certain benefits

for a public safety officer who was killed or suffered

a catastrophic injury as a direct and proximate result

of a personal injury sustained in the line of duty in

connection with the terrorist attacks of September 11,

2001.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1422 IS

1 SECTION 1. EXPEDITED PAYMENT FOR HEROIC PUBLIC

2 SAFETY OFFICERS.

3 Notwithstanding the limitations of subsection (b) of

4 section 1201 or the provisions of subsections (c), (d), and

5 (e) of such section or section 1202 of title I of the Omni6 bus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42

7 U.S.C. 3796, 3796a), upon certification by a public agency

8 that a public safety officer employed by such agency was

9 killed or suffered a catastrophic injury as a direct and

10 proximate result of a personal injury sustained in the line

11 of duty as described in section 1201(a) of such Act in con12 nection with the rescue or recovery efforts related to the

13 terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the Director of

14 the Bureau of Justice Assistance shall pay to qualified

15 beneficiaries, not later than 30 days after receipt of such

16 certification, benefits described under subpart 1 of part

17 L of such Act (42 U.S.C. 3796 et seq.).

18 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

19 For purposes of this Act, the terms ‘‘catastrophic in20 jury’’, ‘‘public agency’’, and ‘‘public safety officer’’, have

21 the same meanings given such terms in section 1204 of

22 title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act

23 of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796b).

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 110th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1271 Introduced in House (IH)]

110th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1271

    Recognizing National Homeownership Month and the importance of 
                  homeownership in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2008

Mr. Gary G. Miller of California (for himself, Ms. Waters, Mr. Bachus, 
Mr. Roskam, Mrs. Biggert, Mr. Al Green of Texas, Mr. Davis of Kentucky, 
 Mr. Watt, Mr. Hinojosa, Mr. Neugebauer, and Mrs. Maloney of New York) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                         on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Recognizing National Homeownership Month and the importance of 
                  homeownership in the United States.

Whereas the President of the United States has issued a proclamation designating 
        the month of June 2008 as National Homeownership Month;
Whereas the people of the United States are one of the best-housed populations 
        in the world;
Whereas owning a home is a fundamental part of the American dream and is the 
        largest personal investment many families will ever make;
Whereas homeownership provides economic security for homeowners by aiding them 
        in building wealth over time and strengthens communities through a 
        greater stake among homeowners in local schools, civic organizations, 
        and churches;
Whereas creating affordable homeownership opportunities requires the commitment 
        and cooperation of the private, public, and nonprofit sectors, including 
        the Federal Government and State and local governments;
Whereas homeownership can be sustained through appropriate homeownership 
        education and informed borrowers; and
Whereas affordable homeownership will play a vital role in resolving the crisis 
        in the United States housing market: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) fully supports the goals and ideals of National 
        Homeownership Month; and
            (2) recognizes the importance of homeownership in building 
        strong communities and families.
                                 <all>
```
No. 90, Misc.

#### Bell *v.*Cochran, Corrections Director.

Supreme Court of Florida. Certiorari denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-20595

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE MANZUR ROMERO-LUNA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:10-CR-107-2

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jose Manzur Romero-Lunahas moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Romero-Luna has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

counsel’s assessmentthat the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 17, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-20595 Document: 00511823743 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/17/2012
No. 10-20595

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 10-20595 Document: 00511823743 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/17/2012
Exhibit 10mm

                    DESCRIPTION OF PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP
             GROUP PERSONAL UMBRELLA LIABILITY INSURANCE PROGRAM


Coverage: Group Personal Umbrella Liability

Insured:  All members of insured groups, 1.) All TEMG members, 2.) All Board
          of Directors, 3.) All  Non-Officer Business Unit Heads 4.)  All H-
          18's and 5.) All retired members who were previously insured under
          one of the other groups.


Limits:   $5,000,000               Per   occurrence,   excess  of   Required
                                   Underlying    Limits    of    Automobile,
                                   Snowmobile, & UM/UIM    $250,000/$500,000
                                   BI & $50,000 PD  or $300,000 ($325,000 in
                                   Texas) CSL per  occurrence.   Homeowners,
                                   Watercraft  & Employers  Liability
                                   $100,000 per occurrence

Additional   $5,000,000 excess     Per occurrence. Each
Limits:      $5,000,000.           member, at their option,
                                   may purchase an additional $5,000,000. of
                                   coverage   in   excess  of   the  primary
                                   umbrella   policy   making  their   total
                                   umbrella limits  $10,000,000.

Deductibles: None, but Required    Coverage applies excess
             Underlying Limits     Underlying Limits or
             or Retained Limit     $35,000 Retained Limit if
             applies               there is no Required
                                   Underlying Limit .

Description: The  program provides liability  limits for all  members of the
             groups  insured in excess of  what is provided  by the member's
             basic  homeowner's and automobile  policies. The Group Personal
             Umbrella  Program provides  additional limits  of coverage  for
             liability  arising out  of  member's homes,  rental  properties
             personal activities,  personal injury exposures  resulting from
             non-profit    directorship   and    officership,   automobiles,
             watercraft and recreational  vehicles. (Some items are  subject
             to specified limitations)

Exclusions:  Exclusions  include:  Intentionally caused  injuries, aircraft,
             some watercraft, damage caused by  cars or boats in prearranged
             races, providing  or failure to provide  professional services,
             business  activities,  transmission  of communicable  diseases,
             property damage to owned property. Refer to policy for complete
             list of exclusions.
From: sajswartz@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:47:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course, I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sondia Swartz

Easley, SC 29642
From: fmgard@bellsouth.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:33:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Freddy Gardner

Broxton, GA 31519
**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | (1) | The                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended                September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of                Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15                U.S.C.                78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November                13, 2007 |   | /s/                Phillip E. Becker                 |
|----------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Date                             |   | Phillip                E. Becker                     |
|                             |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
|                             |   |                                                 |
|                             |   |                                                 |
|                             |   |                                                 |
| November                13, 2007 |   | /s/                H. Stewart Fitz Gibbon III        |
| Date                             |   | H.                Stewart Fitz Gibbon III            |
|                             |   | Executive                Vice President and          |
|                             |   | Chief                Financial Officer               |