alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion filed January 6, 2017

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-16-00355-CV

__________

THE ESTATE OF HSI SHIH TSENG, A/K/A LISA TSENG, BY 

AND THROUGH YUEH CHU TENG, MOTHER OF THE 

DECEDENT, AND YUEH CHU TENG, INDIVIDUALLY, 

Appellants

V.

RONNIE M. LANGFORD AND ROSEMARY LANGFORD, 

Appellees

On Appeal from the 90th District Court

Stephens County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV31243

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellants filed a notice of appeal from an order in which the trial court 

granted a summary judgment in favor of Ronnie M. Langford. Upon docketing the 

case, we notified the parties that the trial court’s order did not appear to be a final 
2

appealable order, and we requested that Appellants respond and show grounds to 

continue this appeal. 

Unless specifically authorized by statute, appeals may be taken only from 

final judgments. Tex. A & M Univ. Sys. v. Koseoglu, 233 S.W.3d 835, 840–41 (Tex. 

2007); Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191 (Tex. 2001). Because the trial 

court’s summary judgment order does not dispose of all parties and all claims and 

does not reflect that it is final and appealable, it is not a final appealable order. In a 

response filed in this court, Appellants concur that we do not have jurisdiction at this 

time, and they request that we dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this 

appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). 

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

January 6, 2017

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
EXHIBIT 32.2  Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant To 
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    The undersigned hereby certifies, in my capacity as an officer of NSTAR, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:(i)the enclosed Quarterly Report of NSTAR on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(ii)the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of NSTAR.  Dated: July 28, 2006By:/s/ JAMES J. JUDGEJames J. JudgeSenior Vice President,Treasurer and ChiefFinancial Officer
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.94 MB)
 
 JOEP JAF New Jersey National Guard Task Force Spartan interoperability Soldiers Army Guard ceremony Jordan USARCENT National Guard Army National Guard ARCENT coalition ASG-J 102 CAV Jordan Border Guard Force JTC-J Joint Operational Engagement Program
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY

In connection with the annual report of TransGlobe Energy Corp.
(the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, David C. Ferguson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

/s/ David FergusonName: David C. Ferguson
Title: Chief Financial Officer March 27, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule
13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has
been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

This certification accompanies the Form 40-F to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 40-F), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
From: JOHN-SOTR@JUNO.COM

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:14:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

JOHN E. JONES

Blackwood, NJ 08012
#### John G. Wendel, Appellant, *v.*Royal Insurance Company et al., Respondents.

*Wendel*v. *Royal Insurance*Co., 146 App. Div. 951, affirmed.

(Argued January 31, 1913;

decided February 14, 1913.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 21,1911, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict in an action to recover damages alleged to have been caused plaintiff’s building through loss of lateral support resulting from excavations by defendants on adjoining lands.

*Lewis L. Delafield, Edward S. Clinch, Burlock E. Rabell*and *Alfred Gregory*for appellant.

*Edwin D. Worcester*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Werner, Chase, Collin, Cuddeback and Miller, JJ.
From: Ben Goodin/Shelly Young

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Reject religious refusal

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 11:59:44 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as

pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care law,

and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide

countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological

distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to

make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the

exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals

with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage

requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and

ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.

Ben Goodin
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0004230

27-MAR-2014

10:13 AM
### -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0 38.5 39.0 39.5 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/22 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 77.38 WMeters AGL 

## ★

■ ■ 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★

● 

## ★ ● ● ● ●
[No. 2448.]

#### Croot v. The Board of Trustees of The Town of Manitou.

1. Certiorari — Jurisdiction.

The province of certiorari is tp inquire only into the question of jurisdiction..

*2552. Cities and Towns — Intoxicating 'Liquors — Canceling License— Certiorari — Jurisdiction.

The district court cannot hy certiorari review the action of the board of trustees of a town in canceling a license to sell liquors, unless it he shown, that the hoard acted without jurisdiction.

*Appeal from the District Court of El Paso County.*

Mr. W. K. Brown and Mr. O. P. Grimes, for appellant.

Mr. John W. Kriger, for appellee.

Gunter, J.

*Certiorari*out of the district court of El Paso county directed to appellee hoard whereby it was sought to review its action canceling a license to sell liquors held by appellant. A hearing upon the return to the writ and certain evidence resulted in a judgment quashing the writ and dismissing the action.

If appellee board had jurisdiction of the subject-matter and of the person, in its action annulling the iicense, such action cannot be reviewed on *certiorari.*The province of *certiorari*is to inquire only into the question of *jurisdiction.*— City-Council *of Cripple Creek v. Hanley,*19 Colo. App. 390, and authorities cited.

It was incumbent upon appellant in order to justify the court in issuing the writ of *certiorari*to review the action of appellee board, to show that such board acted without jurisdiction in its cancellation of appellant’s license. There was no showing before the district court that appellee board was without jurisdiction to make the order cancelling the license of appellee. For aught that appears it acted within ■its jurisdiction.

Judgment affirmed. ■ *Affirmed.*
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.86 MB)
 
 US Army maintenance CENTCOM National Guard Illinois OIR CJTF logistics ARCENT sustainability Chicago 103rd ESC FirstTeam 108th Sustainment Brigade WeSucceed ArmyLife 1ST TSC key leader engagement
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: davidkitkoph.d@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:23:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Kitko

Cincinnati, OH 45241
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.1


                                     NSTAR
               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                       Twelve Months Ended June 30, 2000
                                 (in thousands)



Net income from continuing operations                           $160,676
Income taxes                                                      70,949
Fixed charges - (including securitization certificates)          197,359
                                                                --------
   Total                                                        $428,984
                                                                ========
Interest expense                                                $180,359
Interest component of rentals                                     17,000
                                                                --------
   Total                                                        $197,359
                                                                ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                  2.17
                                                                ========
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.06 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
No. 53, Misc.

#### In re Disbarment of Chopak.

It having been reported to the Court that Jules Chopak, of Brooklyn, State of New York, has been disbarred from the practice of law in all the courts of the State of New York by judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Judicial Department, duly entered on the 30th day of June, A. D., 1960, and this Court by order of April 6, 1962, having suspended the said Jules Chopak from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent, who has filed a return thereto; now, upon consideration of the rule to show cause and the return aforesaid;

It is ordered that the said Jules Chopak be, and he is hereby disbarred, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
From: DaveBaity@cableone.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:08:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Baity

Natchez, MS 39120