alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

House Calendar No. 243 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1299 

[Report No. 110–733] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3195) to restore the intent 

and protections of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2008 

Ms. SUTTON, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3195) to restore 

the intent and protections of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 3195) to restore the intent and protections of the Ameri4 cans with Disabilities Act of 1990. All points of order 

5 against consideration of the bill are waived except those 

6 arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI. The amendment 

7 in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Commstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

2 

•HRES 1299 RH 

1 mittee on Education and Labor now printed in the bill 

2 shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall 

3 be considered as read. All points of order against provi4 sions of the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous 

5 question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as 

6 amended, to final passage without intervening motion ex7 cept: (1) one hour of debate, with 40 minutes equally di8 vided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minor9 ity member of the Committee on Education and Labor and 

10 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman 

11 and ranking minority member of the Committee on the 

12 Judiciary; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without 

13 instructions. 

14 SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 3195 pursuant 

15 to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the 

16 previous question, the Chair may postpone further consid17 eration of the bill to such time as may be designated by 

18 the Speaker. 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS

House Calendar No. 243 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1299 

[Report No. 110

–733] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3195) 

Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. to restore the intent and protections of the 

JUNE 24, 2008 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATE OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF
DOBSON COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION I, Bruce R. Knooihuizen, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and principal financial
officer of Dobson Communications Corporation (the Company), hereby certify that to the best of my
knowledge, the quarterly report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31,
2005, (the Report):  a.
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, and thatb.
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of the Company at March 31, 2005, and the results of the Companys
operations for the three months ended March 31, 2005. May 10, 2005 /S/ Bruce R. KnooihuizenBruce R. KnooihuizenExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and principal financial officer
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue


Registration No.  333-35460
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)
PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  065				Trade Date: 04/05/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated
  September 8, 2000)						Issue Date:  04/10/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement April 5, 2001

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION
OR REPAYMENT
Date and terms of redemption or repayment
(including any appicable regular or special record dates)

  CUSIP
     or	Stated				                                Interest
Common	Interest		         Price to	  Discounts &  Payment	   Survivor's
  Code	 Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions  Frequency	 Option	Yes/No

14911QCS8   5.8%	04/15/08	100%	        1.25%      Monthly	      YES	    NO


Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:
____  Yes	  X   No						N/A



(1) The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not
affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the
effective date of the change.

(2) Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to
Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the
time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
#### The Attorney General v. Continental Life Insurance Company.

Bills allowed on filing affidavit that none of the services charged are included in any former bills.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           52600
<SECURITIES>                                    101600
<RECEIVABLES>                                   508000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (13500)
<INVENTORY>                                     432500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1223400
<PP&E>                                         1867800
<DEPRECIATION>                                (966300)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2707100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           683800
<BONDS>                                         222300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        140100
<OTHER-SE>                                     1321500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2707100
<SALES>                                        1234400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1250000
<CGS>                                           844600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1082700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  6600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               14100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 146600
<INCOME-TAX>                                     52800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              93800
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     93800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.76
        


</TABLE>
Rockingham,

Nov. *4,*1913.

#### Charles R. Quinn *v.*Daniel W. Badger *& a.*

The police officers of Portsmouth are not entitled to extra compensation for services rendered under a warrant issued by the mayor directing the killing of unlicensed dogs and the entry of complaints against their owners, unless the bills therefor have been approved by the city marshal or the police commissioners.

Bill in Equity, for an injunction. Trial by the court and decree for the plaintiff. Transferred from the October term, 1912, of ■the superior court by *Mitchell,*J.

*120The plaintiff is a taxpayer in Portsmouth, and the defendants are the mayor, treasurer, and three members of the police force of that city. May 8, 1912, the mayor issued to the defendant police officers the warrant provided for by section 11, chapter 60, Laws 1891, the police commissioners of the city joining therein. The police officers claim that they should be paid for services rendered, under the warrant, and this proceeding is brought to restrain the approval and payment of bills for such compensation.

The members of the police force are appointed by the police commissioners. The rules and regulations of the police department-provide that hours of regular service will be specified, that all officers are liable to be called into service at any time, and that no-extra compensation will be allowed “except upon bills approved by the marshal or the police commissioners, and ordered paid by proper-authority.” The work for which compensation is claimed was done-outside the regular hours of service, but upon days for which the-claimants received pay as policemen.

Subject to the defendants’ exception, the court ruled that the-police officers were not entitled to additional compensation for the-services in question and that the mayor and treasurer should be-enjoined from approving and paying the bills therefor.

*Arthur 0. Fuller,*for the plaintiff.

*Harry W. Peyser*and *Ernest L. Guptill,*for the defendants.

Young, J.

The contract the police officers made with the city provides that they shall not be paid for extra services unless the-bill for such services is approved by the marshal or the police commission. Their bill for serving the warrant has not been so approved, and there is no statute which provides that the city shall pay members of its police force for serving such warrants. It would be illegal, therefore, for the mayor to order this bill paid. *Sampson*v. *Rochester,*60 N. H. 477; *White*v. *Levant,*78 Me. 568.

*Defendants’ exception overruled.*

All concurred.
From: dmurphy@drury.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:55:22 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dudley Murphy

Springfield, MO 65804
#### Horace Inman, Respondent, v. Lewis E. Harrower and another, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Mem. by Learned, P. J.
|   |   |
|--------|--------|

**Filed      Pursuant To Rule 433, Registration No. 333-124310**
** **

**$1,000,000,000**

**CATERPILLAR      FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION**

| **For                the Period: 2/26/2007 to 3/5/2007** |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
| **Coupon**                                               | **Interest** | **Maturity** | **Callable** | **Survivor's****Option** | **Price****1** | **Yield****2** | **Moody's** | **S&P** | **CUSIP** |
| 4.900%                                                   | Semi-Annual(†††) | 3/15/09 | NO | YES§  | 100.00 | 4.900% | A2 | A | 14912HBL3 |
| 5.000%                                                   | Monthly(†) | 3/15/12 | 3/15/09*  | YES§  | 100.00 | 5.052% | A2 | A | 14912HBM1 |
| 5.200%                                                   | Semi-Annual(†††) | 3/15/14 | 3/15/09***  | YES§  | 100.00 | 5.199% | A2 | A | 14912HBN9 |
| 5.700%                                                   | Semi-Annual(†††) | 3/15/27 | 3/15/11***  | YES§  | 100.00 | 5.700% | A2 | A | 14912HBP4 |

*All      offerings are subject to prior sale.*
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Kelsey, Beal es and Senior Judge Clements

FLUOR DANIEL SERVICES CORPORATION AND AMERICAN CA SUALTY COMPANY OF READING, PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM OPINION * v. Record No. 1975-13-3 PER CURIAM FEBRUARY 18, 2014 ARCHIE SHORT

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Mark A. Stallings, on brief), for appellants. (Amber H. Russo; HammondTo wnsend, PLC, on brief), for appellee.

Fluor Daniel Services Corporation and American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania (hereinafter “employer”) appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (hereinafter “commi ssion”) finding that Archie Shor t (hereinafter “claimant”) suffered compensable injuries to his low back a nd bilateral hips by aggr avating his pre-existing avascular necrosis, thereby enti tling him to temporary total disa bility benefits from August 10, 2011 through November 28, 2011. Employer argues the evidence was insufficient to prove a causal connection between the April 5, 2010 accident and claimant’s avascular necr osis or to prove the medical treatment for his hips was related to the April 5, 2010 accident. It also contends the commission applied the wrong legal standard in determining whether th ere was a causal connectio n between the April 5,

* Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opin ion is not designated for publication.UNPUBLISHED- 2 - 2010 accident and the pre-existing condition. 1 We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and fi nd that this appeal is without meri t. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opi nion. See Short v. Fluor Daniel Servs. Corp., JCN VA02000003943 (Sept. 13, 2013). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequate ly presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional pr ocess. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.

1 Because employer did not object to the lega l standard applied by the commission, it has waived this argument on appeal. See Rule 5A:18.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

      STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     This certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of Section
     1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal
     Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any
     other person for any other purpose.

     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of BellSouth Corporation
     (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the
     Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
     undersigned, F. Duane Ackerman, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
     Officer of the Company, and W. Patrick Shannon, Chief Financial Officer, of
     the Company, certify that

          -    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          -    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


/s/ F. Duane Ackerman
-------------------------------------
F. Duane Ackerman

February 23, 2006


/s/ W. Patrick Shannon
-------------------------------------
W. Patrick Shannon

February 23, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to BellSouth Corporation and will be retained by BellSouth Corporation
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Docket Number FAA

- 2014

- 0491



### Contact. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Org a ni z a t i on Per s

on C o nta c ted Da t e Re sp

on

s

e

Transp o rt Cana d a A n t h o n y Wan

( 61 3 ) 9 5 2

- 4 410 01 / 14 / 16 No Ob jecti o n s

Bo m b ardier

Aero s p ace Jason Ho c h ste i n

5 14

- 85 5

- 5 000

X 5 95 9 4 01 / 14 / 16 No Ob jecti o n s
# U.S. Forces Conduct Joint Aviation Integration Exercise in the Gulf of Oman

/ Published Sept. 25, 2023
MANAMA, Bahrain , 
 U.S. Naval Forces Central Command and U.S. Air Forces Central (AFCENT) conducted a joint Air Operation in Maritime Surface Warfare (AOMSW) exercise in the Gulf of Oman, Sept. 23-24.  

The AOMSW exercise included a live Surface Combat Air Patrol and the employment of joint fires against surface threats improving the tactical proficiency. Participating platforms included Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt II’s from AFCENT’s 75th Fighter Squadron and U.S. Navy’s Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer, USS Stethem (DDG 63).

This exercise marks the sixth iteration of the joint and combined AOMSW between U.S. Navy and Air Force this year. Previous exercises incorporated the Air Force Two U.S. Air Force F-35A Lightning II aircraft operate alongside USS Bataan (LHD 5) & USS Thomas Hudner (DDG 116) in the Gulf of Oman, in August; An A-10 firing a 30mm practice rounds on a practice target on the surface of the water in July 10; A U.S. Navy P-8A Poseidon patrol aircraft, two United States Air Force A-10 Thunderbolt II attack aircraft, & three U.S. Coast Guard cutters with embarked U.S. Marine Corps joint terminal attack controllers, trained together in the Arabian Gulf, April 28; Guided-missile destroyer USS Paul Hamilton (DDG 60) and an HH-60W Jolly Green II helicopter conducted joint operations in the Gulf of Aden, April 2.

USS Stethem is are deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations to help ensure maritime security and stability in the Middle East region. The U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations encompasses nearly 2.5 million square miles of water area and includes the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea, parts of the Indian Ocean and three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, Suez Canal and Bab al-Mandeb.
---

EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED
ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the use of our report dated February 23, 2007,
  relating to the consolidated financial statements of TransGlobe Energy Corporation
  (which report on the financial statements expressed an unqualified opinion and
  includes a separate report titled Comments by Independent Registered Chartered
  Accountants on Canada-United States of America Reporting Difference referring
  to changes in accounting principles that have a material effect on the comparability
  of the financial statements), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of
  TransGlobe Energy Corporation for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.

|                         | signed                                    
|------------------------ | --------------------------------------------
|February 23, 2007        | Deloitte & Touche LLP                       
|Calgary, Alberta, Canada | Independent Registered Chartered Accountants

---
#### Joseph Cousin, as Executor, etc., Plaintiff, v. Wellington B. Searls, Defendant.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied; parts of order appealed from.reversed, with costs and. disbursements, and motion deuied, with ten dollars costs. Opinion by

Dykmau, J.;

Barnard, P. J., dissenting.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                         1667363
<SECURITIES>                                     49048
<RECEIVABLES>                                   678933
<ALLOWANCES>                                     12000
<INVENTORY>                                    1357461
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3864777
<PP&E>                                          547095
<DEPRECIATION>                                  430524
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6202026
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           847934
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         16468
<OTHER-SE>                                     5337624
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6202026
<SALES>                                        5565771
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5565771
<CGS>                                          2091518
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2091518
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2688130
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               19787
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 894129
<INCOME-TAX>                                    292800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             601329
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    601329
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1485 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1485

To amend the Poison Prevention Packaging Act to authorize the Consumer 
  Product Safety Commission to require child-proof caps for portable 
                          gasoline containers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 2, 2001

 Mrs. Carnahan introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Poison Prevention Packaging Act to authorize the Consumer 
  Product Safety Commission to require child-proof caps for portable 
                          gasoline containers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This act may be cited as the ``Children's Gasoline Burn Prevention 
Act''.

SEC. 2. CHILD-PROOF CAPS FOR GASOLINE CONTAINERS.

    Section 2(3) of the Poison Prevention Packaging Act (15 U.S.C. 
1471(3)) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and (B) as clauses 
        (i) and (ii), respectively;
            (2) by inserting ``(A)'' after ``(3)''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new sub-paragraph:
            ``(B) Such term includes a portable gasoline container.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 623.

#### Rickenbacker *v.*United States.

*C. Dickerman Williams*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Richard W. Schmude*for the United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.