alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
DANIEL B R

AVO IZAR

R AR AS and C ELIA TOR

RES M O RENO, Pe titione rs, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 11-71570 Age n c y Nos. A075-734-587

A075-734-588
M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Oc tobe r 15, 2013 * * B e fore : FISHER , GOULD, a nd B YB EE, C irc uit Judge s. Danie l B ravo Iz a

rrara s a nd C e lia Torre s M ore no, na

tive s a nd c itiz e ns of M e x ic o, pe tition pro se

for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny ing the ir m otion to re ope n re m o va l proc e e dings. Our jurisdiction is gove rne d by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re v ie w for a buse of disc re tion theB IA’ s de nia l



# FIL ED OCT 23 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).of a

m otion to re ope n. N

ajmabadi v . Holde r , 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th C i r. 2010). W e de ny in pa

rt a n d dismiss in pa

rt the pe tition for re vie w . The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion in deny ing pe titione rs’ m otion to
re ope n whe re pe t itione rs fa ile d to e sta blish prima

fa c ie e ligibility for a sy l um , withholding of rem o v a l, or re lie f unde r the C onve ntion Against Torture
. Se e id. at 986 (a ge nc y

m ay de ny a m otion to re ope n ba se d on fa ilure to e s ta blish a prim a fa c i e c a se for the re lie f sought); De lgado-Ortiz v. Holde r, 600 F.3d 1148, 1151-52 (9th C ir. 2010) (holding tha t ge ne ra liz e d e vide nc e of viole nc e and c rim e wa s insuffic ie nt to e sta

blish e ligibility

for a sy lum , withholding, or re lie f unde r C AT). W e la c k jurisdic tion to re vie w the B IA’ s de c ision to not exe rc ise its sua sponte a uthority to re ope n re m o va l proc e e d i ngs. S e e Me j ia-He rnande

z v . Holde r , 633 F.3d 818, 823-24 (9th C ir. 2011). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D in par t; DISM ISSE D in par t.

1 1
- 7 1 5 7 0 2
EXHIBIT 31.2

302
CERTIFICATION FOR FORM 10-Q

CERTIFICATIONS

|I, Peter G.
  Williston, certify that:
|--------------------------------------
|                                      
|1.                                    
|                                      
|2.                                    
|                                      
|3.                                    
|                                      
|4.                                    
|                                      
|                                      
|                                      
|                                      
|                                      
|                                      
|                                      
|5.                                    
|                                      
|                                      
|                                      
|                                      

|Date:  August 13, 2004 |                                                              
|---------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|                       |                                                              
|                       |                                                              
|                       | /s/ Peter G.
  Williston                                     
|                       |                                                              
|                       | Peter G.
  Williston                                         
|                       | Senior Executive Vice President and Chief
  Financial Officer
Exhibit 11 -- Statement Re: Computation of Per-Share Earnings
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Year ended August 31,
                                                   1998            1997  
                                               ------------    ------------
       Basic:

          <S>                                    <C>             <C>
          Average shares outstanding              1,632,177       1,576,991
                                                  =========       =========
            
            Net income                           $  601,329      $  733,327
                                                  =========       =========

            Per-share amount                          $0.37           $0.47
                                                       ====            ====

            Diluted:

          Average shares outstanding              1,632,177       1,576,991
          Net effect of dilutive stock
            options - based on the
            treasury stock method.                  127,712         146,549
                                                  ---------       ---------

          Total                                   1,759,889       1,723,540
                                                  =========       =========

          Net income                             $  601,329      $  733,327
                                                  =========       =========

          Per-share amount                            $0.34           $0.43
                                                       ====            ====
</TABLE>
From: john.quinn@pb.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:48:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

JOHN QUINN

Rileyville, VA 22650
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 73 (Wednesday, April 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21502-21503]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08657]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8696 ]

Notice of Receipt of Cultural Property Request From the 
Government of the Arab Republic of Egypt

    Egypt, concerned that its cultural heritage is in jeopardy from 
pillage, made a request to the Government of the United States under 
Article 9 of the 1970 UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and 
Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of 
Cultural Property. The United States Department of State received this 
request in April 2014. Egypt's request seeks U.S. import restrictions 
on archaeological and

[[Page 21503]]

ethnological material from Egypt representing its prehistoric through 
Ottoman heritage.
    The specific contents of this request are treated as confidential 
government-to-government information, consistent with applicable U.S. 
law.
    Information about U.S. implementation of the 1970 UNESCO Convention 
can be found at http://eca.state.gov/cultural-heritage-center. A public 
summary of Egypt's request will be posted on that Web site.

    Dated: April 8, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-08657 Filed 4-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Receivable Acquisition & Management
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Max Khan, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Receivable Acquisition & Management Corporation and will be retained by
Receivable Acquisition & Management Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




January
13, 2010





By:
              /s/  Max KhanMax
      KhanChief
      Executive Officer,Chief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer
                and
      Principal Accounting Officer)
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.55 MB)
 
 USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72); Navy; CVN 72; deployment; CENTCOM;
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 13 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                 S. 13

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 22, 2002

  Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To extend authorization for the national flood insurance program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM.

    The National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.) 
is amended--
            (1) in section 1309(a)(2) (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)(2)), by 
        striking ``December 31, 2002'' and inserting ``December 31, 
        2003'';
            (2) in section 1319 (42 U.S.C. 4026), by striking 
        ``December 31, 2002'' and inserting ``December 31, 2003''.

            Passed the Senate November 20, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                   JERI THOMSON

                                                             Secretary.
```
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1341

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand human clinical

trials qualifying for the orphan drug credit, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 2, 2001

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, and Mr. JEFFORDS) introduced the

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand

human clinical trials qualifying for the orphan drug credit, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXPANDED HUMAN CLINICAL TRIALS QUALI4 FYING FOR ORPHAN DRUG CREDIT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subclause (I) of section

6 45C(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is

7 amended to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(I) after the date that the appli9 cation is filed for designation under

10 such section 526, and’’.
2

•S 1341 IS

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Clause (i) of sec2 tion 45C(b)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

3 is amended by inserting ‘‘which is’’ before ‘‘being’’ and

4 by inserting before the comma at the end ‘‘and which is

5 designated under section 526 of such Act’’.

6 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

7 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after

8 December 31, 2001.

9 SEC. 2. PUBLICATION OF FILING AND APPROVAL OF RE10 QUESTS FOR DESIGNATION OF DRUGS FOR

11 RARE DISEASES OR CONDITIONS.

12 Subsection (c) of section 526 of the Federal Food,

13 Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360bb) is amended

14 to read as follows:

15 ‘‘(c) Not less than monthly, the Secretary shall pub16 lish in the Federal Register, and otherwise make available

17 to the public, notice of requests for designation of a drug

18 under subsection (a) and approvals of such requests. Such

19 notice shall include—

20 ‘‘(1) the name and address of the manufacturer

21 and the sponsor;

22 ‘‘(2) the date of the request for designation or

23 of the approval of such request;

24 ‘‘(3) the nonproprietary name of the drug and

25 the name of the drug under which an application is
3

•S 1341 IS

1 filed under section 505(b) or section 351 of the Pub2 lic Health Service Act;

3 ‘‘(4) the rare disease or condition for which the

4 designation is requested or approved; and

5 ‘‘(5) the proposed indication for use of the

6 product.’’.

Æ
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 24, 2015

No. 04-15-00353-CV

IN THE MATTER OF W.E.L.,

From the 386th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1992JUV01331

Honorable Andy Mireles, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal is this date 

DENIED.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of September, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1222 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 1222

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 9, 2002

             Referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 89 River Street in Hoboken, New Jersey, as the ``Frank Sinatra Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF FRANK SINATRA POST
              OFFICE BUILDING.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 89 
River Street in Hoboken, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Frank Sinatra Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the Frank Sinatra Post Office 
Building.

            Passed the Senate March 22, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                  JERI THOMSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

FELICE BERENSON , Appellant,

v.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY , Appellee

.

No. 4D 14

- 3985

[April 27, 2016]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Richard L. Oftedal , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2008

- CA

033339 XXXXMB

.
Michael Vater and Kendrick Almaguer of The Ticktin Law Group, P.A., Deerfield Beach, for appellant.

Michele L. Stocker and Brandon S. Leon of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

We affirm. See Grosso v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A

. , No. 4D14

- 3971 (Fla. 4th DCA Apr

. 27 , 2016). The trial court did not abuse its discretion in deeming the Appellant’s post

- dismissal motion for costs abandoned where it languished on the docket for fourteen months without a request for hearing or other final resolution by the movant

.
Affirmed.

S TEVENSON , G ROSS and F ORST , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
PECL mt
“/AYIT- SE
LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION ; P02 2on

PUB.
BRAN UTATIONS Rascred hapa 201
Status: Posted
PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 02, 2011
Tracking No. 80ee40b7
‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of

Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services

under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0177
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Ok 3
aon Submitter Information

Submitter's Representative: NARAL Pro-Choice America

General Comment

I strongly support the new policy requiring health-insurance plans to cover birth control without a
copay, CMS-9992-IFC2, Thank you for this important improvement to women's health care.

I also want you to know that I am concerned that certain religious employers may be allowed to
opt out of the requirements. All women should have access to contraceptive coverage, regardless

of where they work.

This policy finally should make near-universal access to birth control
areality for all women who use it.

Improving women's access to birth control is positive in so many ways.
A woman who can plan when to have a family is able to participate in
society more fully. Allowing women to space their pregnancies
contributes to healthy childbearing. And ultimately, fewer unintended
pregnancies can reduce the need for abortion.

Thank you for following science-based recommendations and making
women’s health a priority.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000..._ 9/2/2011
From: jilldianeclark@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:21:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. I strongly oppose the government forcing insurance coverage on

Americans for drugs and devices that I oppose, because some of these can cause an abortion (such as

ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which prohibit

government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or religious

grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of unborn children. No Americans should be forced by the

federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jill Clark

Saint Louis, MO 63129
#### John O’Brian and another, Appellants, v. George Newbrook, Respondent.

Judgment of County Court affirmed. Opinion by Bradley, J.