alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Crystal Reeck

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: In favor of IOM recommendations

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:58:09 PM

I feel very strongly that the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine (IOM)

should be adopted, allowing access to family planning services for women.

Having been fortunate enough never to experience an unplanned pregnancy, I

can sympathize with many women who may not be able to afford family

planning and preventive services. In tight budgets, healthcare costs often fall by

the wayside, exposing many women to unplanned pregnancies and their

associated health risks.

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work. I find this kind of plan

unacceptable.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality family planning and

preventive care by accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the

proposed religious refusal exemption provisions. Currently, religious

organizations (including mosques, synagogues, and churches) are allowed to

deny coverage of family planning based on religious grounds. Individual women

still have the right to decide to decline services if they have moral or religious

objections. Why impose standards that will increase risk and deny care to

others?
No. 524.

#### In re Moity.

Supreme Court of Louisiana. Certiorari denied.
exhibit416vttiterminatio







Exhibit 4.16         TERMINATION AGREEMENT   THIS AGREEMENT is made on 15 December 2015   BETWEEN:   (1) VTTI B.V. a company incorporated in the Netherlands with registered number ‎24404761 ("VTTI");   (2) ATT TANJUNG BIN SDN. BHD. (Company No.: 755986-P), a company incorporated in Malaysia   under the Companies Act 1965 of Malaysia ("ATT");   (3) COÖPERATIEVE CENTRALE RAIFFEISEN-BOERENLEENBANK B.A. TRADING   AS ‎RABOBANK INTERNATIONAL acting as Agent under the Senior Facility Agreement (as   defined below) (the "Agent").   IT IS AGREED as follows:   1. DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION   1.1 In this Agreement:   "Existing Subordination Agreement" means the subordination agreement dated 27 June 2014   between VTTI, ATT and the Agent;   "Party" means a party to this Agreement;   "Senior Facility Agreement" means the revolving facility agreement dated 26 June 2014 as amended   from time to time and made between, amongst others, VTTI MLP B.V.as the borrower, The Bank of   Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., Labuan Branch, BNP Paribas, Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-   Boerenleenbank B.A., trading as Rabobank International, The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking   Corporation Limited, ING Bank N.V., Oversea Chinese Banking Corporation, London Branch, Société   Générale and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation as arrangers, the Agent and certain financial   institutions as lenders; and   "Subordination Deed Poll" means the subordination deed poll to be executed by VTTI substantially in   the form annexed to the consent request letter dated on or about 25 November 2015 issued to the Agent.   2. TERMINATION   With effect from the date of delivery of the Subordination Deed Poll, each Party hereby agrees and   acknowledges that the Existing Subordination Agreement is terminated and shall cease to have further   effect.   3. MISCELLANEOUS   3.1 This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and all such counterparts when   executed and taken together shall constitute one and the same Agreement.   3.2 This Agreement and all non-contractual obligations arising from or connected with it are governed by   English law.   3.3 All the Parties irrevocably agree that the courts of England are to have exclusive jurisdiction to settle   any disputes which may arise out of or in connection with this agreement and any disputes relating to   non-contractual obligations arising from or in connection with their Agreement.     





 







IN WITNESS whereof this Agreement has been duly executed by the Parties on the day and year first above   written.      





 







VTTI   VTTI B.V.   /s/ Robert M.W.J.C. Nijst   Name: Robert M.W.J.C. Nijst            





 







ATT   ATT TANJUNG BIN SDN. BHD.      /s/ Robert M.W.J.C. Nijst   Name: Robert M.W.J.C. Nijst                     





 







AGENT   COÖPERATIEVE CENTRALE RAIFFEISEN-   BOERENLEENBANK B.A.‎ TRADING AS   RABOBANK INTERNATIONAL      /s/ S. Jurjens-Schoonhoven   Name: S. Jurjens-Schoonhoven      /s/ P. Meeth   Name: P. Meeth
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Ameritech Corporation's December 31, 1995 Consolidated Financial Statements and 
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         131,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,940,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                   166,200
<INVENTORY>                                    204,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,452,400      
<PP&E>                                      30,873,700    
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,416,900   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,942,600     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,761,900   
<BONDS>                                      4,513,200 
<COMMON>                                       587,600
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,426,900      
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,942,600        
<SALES>                                              0<F2>         
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,427,800     
<CGS>                                                0<F3>         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,124,800     
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (260,000)      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               209,500     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             468,900      
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,094,100      
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,086,500    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,007,600     
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0     
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,007,600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.63
<FN>

<F1> Securities are not material and therefore have not been stated separately
     in the financial statements. This amount is included in the Cash tag.

<F2> Net sales of tangible products is not more than 10% of total operating 
     revenues and therefore has not been stated separately in the financial 
     statements pursuant to Regulation S-X, Rule 5-03(b). This amount is 
     included in the "Total Revenues" tag.

<F3> Cost of tangible goods sold is included in cost of service and products in 
     the financial statements and the "Total Cost" tag, pursuant to Regulation 
     S-X, Rule 5-03(b).
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### American Bridge Company of New York, Respondent, *v.*Richard P. Lydon, as Executor of Richard W. Buckley, Deceased, et al., Appellants.

*American Bridge Co.*v. *Lydon,*145 App. Div. 916, affirmed.

(Argued December 17, 1912;

decided December 31, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 9, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action upon an alleged contract of guaranty.

*Robert C. Beatty, Roger H. Anderson*and *Robert L. Redfield*for appellants.

*Harlan F. Stone*and *Chester R. Dewey*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ. Absent: Werner, J.
From: Jean Langley

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Women"s health

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 2:31:19 PM

A women's health should not be subject to any one's beliefs except her

own.

Please accept IOM's recommendations and reject the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.
From: pdewindt@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Please Oppose the Contraceptive Mandate

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:04:02 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Paul De Windt

Hudsonville, MI 49426
BEG: 2G 54( ~ Li O Page 1 of 1
: SEP 0 2 20if

As of: September 02, 2011

Received: August 18, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 02, 2011
Tracking No. 80ce51fa

‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

LEGAL PROCESSING DIV!
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
H

RRANC

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of

Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0171
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Vakenown IR Submitter Information

Address:
Saint Helena, 94574-1251
Submitter's Representative: NARAL Pro-Choice America

General Comment

I strongly support the new policy requiring health-insurance plans to cover birth control without a
copay, CMS-9992-IFC2, Thank you for this important improvement to women's health care.

also want you to know that I am concerned that certain religious employers may be allowed to
opt out of the requirements. All women should have access to contraceptive coverage, regardless
of where they work,

This policy finally should make near-universal access to birth control
a reality for all women who use it.

Improving women's access to birth control is positive in so many ways.
A woman who can plan when to have a family is able to participate in
society more fully. Allowing women to space their pregnancies
contributes to healthy childbearing. And ultimately, fewer unintended
pregnancies can reduce the need for abortion.

Thank you for following science-based recommendations and making
women's health a priority.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000... 9/2/2011
From: Jacob Bonnert

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Friday, August 05, 2011 2:29:04 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Jacob Bonnert
Lockport, Illinois
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.93 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001035826
<NAME> NET.B@NK, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,705,160
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            18,947,605
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                233,391,626
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    519,337,246
<ALLOWANCE>                                  5,579,350
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             817,736,994
<DEPOSITS>                                 415,467,325
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          7,915,772
<LONG-TERM>                                156,590,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       292,530
<OTHER-SE>                                 237,471,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             817,736,994
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             13,716,920
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,913,014
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             1,349,196
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            17,979,130
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           8,869,625
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,290,152
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        7,688,978
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  104,806
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              5,851,247
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,210,174
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,459,174
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,459,174
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.89
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   553,235
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,472,364
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  378,599
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            5,579,350
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         5,579,350
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### John W. Whelan et al., as Trustees in Bankruptcy of E. Reboulin Fils & Co., Incorporated, Respondents, *v.*Henry Goldman et al., Doing Business under the Firm Name of Goldman, Sachs & Company, et al., Defendants. James Talcott, Respondent, and Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Appellant.

*Whelanv. Goldman,*145 App. Div. 919, affirmed.

(Argued March 5, 1912;

decided March 19, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 21, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant Talcott entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to recover and to deter*539mine the interests of the parties to the proceeds of certain policies of fire insurance."

*Dickinson W. Rickards*for appellant.

*W. Benton Crisp*and *Theodore M. Crisp*for plaintiffs, respondents.

*Arthur C. Rounds*for defendant, respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1


Certification Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


In connection with the annual report of Receivable Acquisition & Management
Corporation (the "COMPANY") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30,
2005 as filed with the SEC on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I hereby certify,
in my capacity as an officer of the Company, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                        /s/   Max Khan
                                        --------------
                                        By:   Max Khan
                                        Chief Executive Officer,
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        DATE: DECEMBER 28, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.1



Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer



I, Calvin Reed, the chief executive officer of Peak International Limited (the Company), certify for the
purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 15, 2004 |  | /s/ Calvin Reed        
|                        |  | Calvin Reed            
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer