alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

I, Michael L. Paxton, Chief Financial Officerof Intrusion Inc., certify that:

 

(1)         I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Intrusion Inc.:

 

(2)         Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

(3)         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

(4)         The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

(5)         The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(c)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

 
| Date: March 29,  2006 | /s/ Michael L. Paxton   |   |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                  | Michael L. Paxton       |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM 10-Q AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    2,551,165
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    485,419
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         941,621
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                     1,070,016
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 482,927
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,531,148
<COMMON>                                        56,577
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    1,018,618
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            394,907
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,470,102
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           49,339
<PREFERRED>                                     43,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,900,229
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             263,175
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  164,889
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,640,414
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                5,531,148
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      665,262
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            25,445
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     560,416
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     585,861
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         79,401
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               3,495
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  82,896
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        45,797
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,099
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      1,490
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   35,609
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        28,981
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       33,538
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          16,520
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62


</TABLE>
From: C NEUBECKER

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Conscience Protection of Health Care Workers

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 5:28:36 PM

Dear Sir/Madame:

The current definition of religious employer does not provide true conscience protection for those committed to

preserving life. Health care plans should not be forced to violate the moral and religious convictions of providers

or employees in order to participate in the health care system. Requiring such an unacceptable demand

threatens both universal access to health care and religious freedom of conscience. What are you doing to our

country?

Charles Neubecker

Plano, TX
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY

In connection with the annual report of TransGlobe Energy Corp.
  (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31,
  2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the Report), I, David C. Ferguson, Chief Financial Officer of the
  Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
        13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.



|/s/ David
      Ferguson       | 
|------------------------------ | 
|Name: David C. Ferguson        | 
|Title: Chief Financial Officer | 
|August 9, 2006                 | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Rule
  13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
  has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and
  furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 40-F to which it relates,
  is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to
  be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities
  Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after
  the date of the Form 40-F), irrespective of any general incorporation language
  contained in such filing.

---
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF TREASURER



I, Robert F. Aufenanger, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Excelsior Private Equity Fund II, Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                               
|-------------------------------
|Date: September 14, 2005       
|                               
|/s/ Robert F. Aufenanger       
|Robert F. Aufenanger, Treasurer
No. 363.

#### Ginsburg *v.*Ling, U. S. District Judge.

*Paul Ginsburg,*petitioner, *pro se.*

(Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied, *ante,*p. 889.) The motion of petitioner to remand is denied.
Searched for **http://www.nwbc.gov/**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.nwbc.gov/**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No.  333-59540

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  205				Trade Date: 08/01/02
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

  June 1, 2001)							Issue Date:  08/06/02
The Date of this Pricing Supplement August 5, 2002
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QJN2   2.50%	08/15/04	     100%	       0.65%                Monthly	     YES	    NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		      Date		Count

$881,000.00	$875,273.50	ABN AMRO Inc.	    9/15/02		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes	  X   No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.   Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $662.607 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under a Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
Additionally, the total principal amount of PowerNotes(SM) offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001 has been increased from $500.0mm to $750.0mm.  $250.0mm principal amount of debt securities registered pursuant to Registration Statement No. 333-59540 originally offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement dated June 15, 2001 and related Prospectus dated May 25, 2001 are being offered as PowerNotes(SM) by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
### JUDGMENT 

## Court of Appeals First District of Texas

NO. 01

- 14

- 00135

- CV
PETER HARDSTEEN, PAU LINA MAYBERG HARDSTE EN, AND INTERVENOR

TEXAS FARM BUREAU , Appellant s

V.

DEAN’S CAMPIN’ CO. , Appellee
Appeal from the 506th District Court of Grimes County. (Tr. Ct. No. 27885 ).

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by the trial court on January 3,
2014 . After submitting the case on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by the parties, the Court holds that there wa s reversible error in the trial court’s judgment in the following respect: granting summary judgment to appellee and denying summary judgment for appellants . Accordingly, the Court reverses the trial court’s judgment and
remands the case to the trial cour t for entry of judgment in the appellants’ favor and a determination of costs, if any.

The Court orders that the appellee, Dean’s Campin’ Co., pay all appellate costs.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below for observance.

Judgment render ed April 30 , 2015

.
Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Brown. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           9,620
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,066
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,049
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         270,296
<DEPRECIATION>                                  44,172
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 260,180
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        159,889
<COMMON>                                            40
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,144
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   260,180
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,770
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,211
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,619
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,985)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,985)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,437
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,726)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.93)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.93)
        

</TABLE>
No. 267.

#### Mid-America Telephone Co. *v.*Public Utilities Commission of Ohio et al.

*Mark McElroy,*Attorney General of Ohio, *Herbert T. Maher*and *Andrew R. Sarisky,*Assistant Attorneys General, and *E. N. Strand*for respondents.

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*denied. The alternative motion to dispense with printing the petition for certiorari granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Ohio denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 420 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          May 15, 2002.
    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a two-thirds 
vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is 
presented to the House is waived with respect to any resolution reported on the 
legislative day of Wednesday, May 15, 2002, providing for consideration or 
disposition of a bill to reauthorize and improve the program of block grants to 
States for temporary assistance for needy families, improve access to quality 
child care, and for other purposes.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      I, Charles F. Finn, President and Chief Executive Officer and Michael C.
Anderson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of Wayne Savings
Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:.

      (1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
            ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d); and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


February 10, 2005                       /s/ Charles F. Finn
-----------------                       --------------------------------
Date                                    Charles F. Finn, President
                                        And Chief Executive Officer


February 10, 2005                       /s/ Michael C. Anderson
-----------------                       --------------------------------
Date                                    Michael C. Anderson, Executive Vice
                                        President and Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-1775

VALERIE HESTER,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ELLIOTT ARMSTRONG; PARAMOUNT OF RALEIGH, LLC,

Defendants – Appellees,

and

PINE TREE VILLA ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:07-cv-00458-H)

Submitted: January 13, 2009 Decided: January 15, 2009

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Valerie Hester, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Valerie Hester appeals the district court’s order

granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissing

Hester’s complaint without prejudice for failure to properly

serve process on the Defendants. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Hester v. Armstrong ,
No. 5:07-cv-00458-H (E.D.N.C. June 19, 2008). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Access to EducationAdult EducationAdult LearningCooperative LearningEducational TrendsEmployer Employee RelationshipEqual EducationHolistic ApproachJob TrainingLabor EducationLifelong LearningLiteracy EducationPartnerships in EducationTrend AnalysisUnionsWork EnvironmentWorkplace Literacy

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
~.r_

After investigation. it was conduded thaI the damage of the pylon fuel

drain pipe had been caused by chafing oflhe pipe against over-length

screws that had been installed in accordance wjth the Illustrated Parts

Catalogue (We) during a mainteoancc phase oCthe Lower An Pylon

Fairing (LAPF).

•• '" The pipe drains thNiouble wall of the wing-to-pylon junction in lhe

event of fuel leakage.

An operator of an A300-600 aeroplane reported finding a cracked pylon

fuel drain pipe on engincl#l. "' .•.'"

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsl:If

listed abO\'e. This proposed AD results from mandarory continuing airworthiness

information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country (0 identify 77/&-f'lD

condition as:

ACTION: Nolice of proposed rulemaking(NPRM).

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). DOT.

1491 ().l3-P\

airplanes); and Model A310 Series Airplanes

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the prOOuc!

aillliancs., and Model C4-605R Variant F airplanes (Collectively Called A3(JO-6OOseri

Ainvortbiness Directives; Airbus Model A300 84-600. B4-600R. and F4..{}OORsenes

IIq7

IOocket No_FAA-ZOlO-*-**; Directorate Identifier 201~NM-044-ADI

Federal Aviation Administradoll

RJN 2120-AA64

14 CFR Part 39

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FAA Form 1350-14.1 (5-89) OFFICIAl RLE copy