alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
--- -

08-10-10 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department ofHealth and Human Services :­

Attention: OCII0-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8Ol6 r 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Below are my comments regarding the Interim FinalRule for Group Health Plans and Health 

Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient 

Protection and Affordable Care Act (pP ACA). 

- - -- - ~-- - - ~- ~- - - "",,-:-. 

I believe that every effort should be made to increase the number ofindividuals covered by 

PPACA, especially as ofJanuary 1, 2014 when most ofthe reform components (Insurance 

Exchanges, Subsidies, Tax Credits, etc.) come into play. 

The average consumer has a broad definition of "benefits." Consumers view their health plan 

beyond the covered benefits, cost sharing, and the contribution levels associated with the plan. 

It is my opinion that the Rule may still result in some confusion to the marketplace in its 

application. For example, ifan employer raised the copayment level beyond the maximum in one 

area (i.e. outpatient services) but retained the copayment level for primary care doctor visits, 

does that mean a loss ofgrandfather status? Clarity will be critical both for the employer and the~ 

employee. 

Even by the most optimistic estimates, a substantial portion ofthe employee population will 

remain outside the PPACA as ofJanuary 2014 based on the current rules. While I understand the 

difficulty involved in making change, creating another large sub-population of excluded 

individuals will only add to costs, increase confusion, and mitigate the potential impact ofthe 

legislation. 

The Rule needs to be clear, reasonable, and with no ambiguities involved in determining whether 

- - _a group health plan is, "in or out.~ . The decisions the.federal govermnent m~es today ~ll 

detennirie the outcomes for tomorrow. We may need to make some difficult decisions to create 

a sustainable health care system that will support a growing economy in the future. That means 

getting as many citizens across the country participating at the beginning to make it work and 

delivering on its promises to retain their support. 

Thank you for the op~rtunity to comment on this regulation. 

'::;-i} , ' ! ~ J' .. -.It: '. ,> • " !".:: ,.. , , 

, ­

~ "t..~ ~'1 < f' c'.:; ~'..~~ 

, . ~ ..

,.. ' . ~ .' ," .
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors
Rogers Communications Inc. We consent to the use of our audit report dated February 15, 2005, except as to note 23, which is
as of March 7, 2005, and except as to note 2(s)(i), which
is as of May 20, 2005, on the consolidated balance sheets of Rogers Communications Inc. and
subsidiaries as at December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income,
deficit and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2004
incorporated by reference in this amended annual report on Form 40-F/A. /s/ KPMG LLP
Chartered Accountants Toronto, Canada
February 15, 2005, except
as to note 23, which is as
of March 7, 2005 and except 
as to note 2(s)(i), which 
is as of May 20, 2005 6
#### Rhoda Lawrence, Respondent, v. The President, etc., of the Delaware and Hudson Canal Company, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.;

Fish, J., dissenting.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 178 (Friday, September 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 63639]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19974]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #18118 and #18119; FLORIDA Disaster Number FL-
00192]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of Florida

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 3.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-4734-DR), dated 08/31/
2023.
    Incident: Hurricane Idalia.
    Incident Period: 08/27/2023 through 09/04/2023.

DATES: Issued on 09/09/2023.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/30/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/31/2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Florida, dated 08/31/2023, is hereby 
amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the 
disaster:

Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Manatee, 
Sarasota.
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    Florida: Charlotte, DeSoto, Hardee.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco S[aacute]nchez, Jr.,
Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2023-19974 Filed 9-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
IV 

110TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1311 

Expressing support for the designation of National GEAR UP Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2008 

Mr. FATTAH (for himself and Mr. SOUDER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 

Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of National GEAR 

UP Day. 

Whereas Congress created the Gaining Early Awareness and 

Readiness for Undergraduate Programs (GEAR UP) in 

1998 to increase the number of low-income students who 

are prepared to enter and succeed in postsecondary education; 

Whereas increasing the number of low-income students who 

complete postsecondary education is critical to the health 

and vitality of our communities and the Nation as a 

whole; 

Whereas GEAR UP is currently providing essential college 

preparatory services to 640,000 students in over 5,000 

schools across 46 States, the District of Columbia, America Samoa, Palau, and Puerto Rico; 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1311 IH 

Whereas GEAR UP students are taking more rigorous and 

advanced courses, graduating from high school and enrolling in postsecondary education at rates significantly 

higher than their low-income peers; 

Whereas these remarkable achievements are attributable to 

the selfless dedication of the students, families, education 

professionals, and business and community leaders involved in GEAR UP; 

Whereas the National Council for Community and Education 

Partnerships and the Department of Education work in 

partnership to provide technical assistance and host national conferences to strengthen GEAR UP programs 

throughout the Nation; and 

Whereas July 22, 2008, would be an appropriate day to designate as National GEAR UP Day: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives ex2 presses support for the designation of a National GEAR 

3 UP Day. 

Æ 


smartinez on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
Merrimack,

Oct. 7, 1913.

#### Chester L. Tinkham *v.*Boston & Maine Railroad.

*A*plea in. abatement which alleges the pendency of a prior suit for the same causéis bad on demurrer if the record of the prior action is not enrolled.

Where it is doubtful whether a plaintiff can secure his rights under an original declaration or by an amendment thereof, justice does not require the abatement of a second suit for the same cause of action.

In such case the superior court may order a consolidation of the suits, or by some other convenient procedure may protect the rights of both parties and afford them an opportunity to litigate the merits of their controversy.

Case, under the federal employer’s liability act, to recover for personal injuries received while working for the defendant in the conduct of interstate commerce. The defendant pleaded in abatement that a prior suit for the same cause of action was pending. The plea sets out the declaration in the former suit (which counts upon negligence at common law only), but does not enroll the record. The plaintiff demurred to the plea. Transferred without a ruling from the April term, 1913, of the superior court by *Plummer,*J.

*Robert W. Upton*(by brief and orally), for the plaintiff.

*Streeter, Demond, Woodworth & Sulloway (Mr. Sulloway*orally)-, for the defendant.

Peaslee, J.

“The plea in abatement is bad. It does not fully set out the record of the prior action. The rule is uniform in this state, that a defendant, who by plea in abatement relies on the record or process of any court, must enroll in or with his plea the record or process on which he relies. *Smith*v. *Insurance Co.,*22 N. H. [21], 25.” *Ladd*v. *Stratton,*59 N. H. 200.

The argument of the defendant in the case at bar, that the rule as to enrollment does not apply when both cases are in the same court, cannot prevail. That was the situation in the case above quoted from, and the point was then fully argued by counsel. 119 Briefs & Cases 457. But this does not dispose of the case under our liberal practice. The right of the defendant to be protected from harassing litigation is a substantial one, not to be defeated by any technical rule of pleading. *Gamsby*v. *Ray,*52 N. H. 513. The question here is what on the whole justice requires.

*112It appears from the statement of counsel at the argument, that when the second suit was instituted it was at least a doubtful question whether he could secure his rights under the original declaration, or by an amendment thereof. Under such circumstances, justice -does not require that the second suit be dismissed It also appeared “that the plaintiff had moved, in the superior court, that the two •cases be consolidated or tried together, and that the defendant ■opposed the granting of the motion. Upon the facts now before this court, there seems to be no good reason why the motion should not be granted, so that the parties may proceed to try out the .merits of all parts of their controversy.

Such order will be made, on the facts as they hereafter appear in the superior court, as will fully protect the rights of both parties.

*Case discharged.*

All concurred.
#### Eliza W. Parkhurst, Respondent, v. Robert H. Berdell, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion hy Dykman, J.
No. 58, Misc.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Julia P. Cooper*for the United States.

#### Ellis *v.*United States.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
From: Carolyn Oliver

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Religious exemptions

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:59:39 PM

As a woman and a tax paying citizen of the United States, I agree with and support the

position expressed by the AAUW in the following paragraphs:

I join with the American Association of University Women in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under

the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services,

are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I am a Christian who cares about the health of both the mothers-to-be and their unborn

offstpring. I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
* Pursuant to 5 THC IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 97-30814

_____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus RODNEY JAMES LANDRY, Defendant-Appellant.

_______________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Western District of Louisiana

(97-CR-60013-01)

_______________________________________________________ May 11, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, REAVLEY and JOLLY, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Finding no error in the validity of the guilty plea or the sentence imposed, we affirm the conviction and sentence. AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1








CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT





In connection with the annual report of TransGlobe Energy Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ross G. Clarkson, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





|   |                                                                                                                                  
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



















/s/    Ross G. Clarkson


Name: Ross G. Clarkson


Title:  Chief Executive Officer


March 13, 2014














A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





This certification accompanies the Form 40-F to which it relates, is not to be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 40-F), except to the extent that the Registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.51 MB)
 
 U.S. CENTCOM Readiness U.S. Military Joint Service Macdill Airforce Base
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
IV 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 535 

Recognizing Tiger Woods for his service to the Nation in promoting excellence 

and good sportsmanship, and in breaking barriers with grace and dignity 

by showing that golf is a sport for all people. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2002 

Mr. BACA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Tiger Woods for his service to the Nation in 

promoting excellence and good sportsmanship, and in 

breaking barriers with grace and dignity by showing 

that golf is a sport for all people. 

Whereas although Tiger Woods is only 25 years old and in 

his 5th full year as a professional golfer, he has 9 major 

championship titles among his victories; 

Whereas Tiger Woods is the 5th player in history to win all 

4 major championships (Masters, U.S. Open, British 

Open, and PGA Championship), joining the ranks of 

Gene Sarazen, Ben Hogan, Gary Player, and Jack 

Nicklaus; 

Whereas Tiger Woods can be compared with Jack Nicklaus 

as being one of the greatest golfers of all time; 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 535 IH 

Whereas Tiger Woods has changed the standard by which we 

judge excellence in golf; 

Whereas Tiger Woods has broken barriers with grace and 

dignity by showing that golf is a sport for all people, regardless of race, color, or creed; 

Whereas Tiger Woods has inspired countless people of all 

ages, impressing upon them that their hopes, dreams, 

and prayers may be achieved through hard work, persistence, education, and good sportsmanship; 

Whereas Tiger Woods established the Tiger Woods Foundation in 1996, which financially supports communities and 

organizations that nurture family values and adults’ involvement in children’s lives; and 

Whereas the Tiger Woods Foundation Clinics give thousands 

of youngsters golf lessons and also draw attention and 

support to the organizations that allow inner-city children 

access to golf: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House recognizes Tiger Woods for 

2 his service to the Nation in promoting excellence and good 

3 sportsmanship, and in breaking barriers with grace and 

4 dignity by showing that golf is a sport for all people. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 62831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19813]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


International Product Change--Priority Mail Express 
International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package 
International Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a Priority Mail Express 
International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package 
International Service contract to the list of Negotiated Service 
Agreements in the Competitive Product List in the Mail Classification 
Schedule.

DATES: Date of notice: September 13, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher C. Meyerson, (202) 268-
7820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 6, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail 
International & First-Class Package International Service Contract 26 
to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2023-259 and CP2023-262.

Sarah Sullivan,
Attorney, Ethics & Legal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2023-19813 Filed 9-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
No. 279.

#### Anspach et al. *v.*United States.

*Arthur Warner*and *S. Ward Sullivan*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Richard W. Schmude*for the United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Other data used in the MATS MACT floor analyses 

 

To: Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov 

 

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 

Cortney -- 

Attached is the file of the data used for the MACT floor analyses. The 

data are listed by facility (ORIS) code. Note, for filterable PM (fPM), 

one needs to look to the new columns to the right of the main data 

columns for the updated values. To make it easier to review, we have 

placed all fpm data in the green columns even if those data stayed the 

same as in the main data columns for easier review. Also, note that these 

data are all data for which we could determine an emission factor. This 

does not mean that the data were used in a floor (e.g., zinc). 

You also requested a listing of the numbers of units in the coal-fired 

population and the number of units in the respective MACT floor pools. 

Those numbers are: 

Total coal-fired population: 1,082 EGUs 

Low rank virgin coal-fired EGUs: 36 EGUs 

Number in the "non-low rank virgin coal" Hg MACT floor pool: 47 EGUs 

Number in the "low rank virgin coal" Hg MACT floor pool: 2 EGUs 

Number in the HCl MACT floor pool: 130 EGUs 

Number in the PM MACT floor pool: 130 EGUs 

Thank you. 

Deliberative Document -- FOIA Exempt 

Bill Maxwell 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

U.S. EPA Mail Code D243-01 

109 T.W. Alexander Drive 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Phone: 919-541-5430 

FAX: 919-541-5450 

OMB_all data used_12_5_11.xlsx
No. 394.

#### Commissioner of Internal Revenue *v.*Kuntz, Executrix.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer*and *Wayne G. Barnett*for petitioner.

Respondent *pro se.*

Motion to dispense with printing response to petition for writ of certiorari granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied.

The Chief Justice is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.