alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001035901
<NAME>                        CIMNET, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                             1
<CURRENCY>                             USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                           1
<CASH>                                22,082
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                        347,476
<ALLOWANCES>                          17,622
<INVENTORY>                           59,801
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     541,199
<PP&E>                               687,631
<DEPRECIATION>                       472,147
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     3,343,859
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                938,791
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<COMMON>                                 609
<OTHER-SE>                         2,401,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       3,343,859
<SALES>                            2,326,969
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   2,326,969
<CGS>                                339,813
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      2,414,473
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    16,398
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     (443,714)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 (443,714)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                        (443,714)
<EPS-BASIC>                            (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (0.08)


</TABLE>
From: schroeder1947@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:50:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Martin Schroeder

Naperville, IL 60564
#### Albert F. Mitchell, Respondent, v. George L. Weed, Appellant, Impleaded with others.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinions by

Bockes and Landon, JJ.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.16 MB)
 
 Defense Secretary Ash Carter discussed three major decisions that the United States has made regardi
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.08 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT
In the Interest of E.A.L., a child.



### ___________________________

E.L., Appellant,


### v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and GUARDIAN AD LITEM PROGRAM,

Appellees. No. 2D23-2113 March 8, 2024 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Sherwood S. Coleman, Judge. Joseph Anthony Manzo, Largo, for Appellant. Bruce Bartlett, State Attorney, and Leslie M. Layne, Assistant State Attorney, Clearwater, for Appellee Department of Children and Families. Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, Tallahassee; and Robert Scavone, Jr. and Shannon McLin, Orlando, Pro Bono for the Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office Defending Best Interests Project, for Appellee Guardian ad Litem Program.2

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. LaROSE, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication 

### .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM UNAUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATION BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS ON FORM
10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-KSB
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,695,727
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,704,233
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,000
<INVENTORY>                                    988,580
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,150,190
<PP&E>                                      24,015,445
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,242,437
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,268,822
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,173,044
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,571
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,058,207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,268,822
<SALES>                                     10,372,190
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            23,014,441
<CGS>                                        6,587,331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,239,062
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (32,856)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,808,235
<INCOME-TAX>                                   141,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,667,235
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Select Medical Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Martin
F. Jackson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Martin F. Jackson

Martin F. Jackson
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
May 12, 2003

A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Select Medical
Corporation and will be retained by Select Medical Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0612

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JONAH MICAH WARR,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until April 5, 2023, to prepare, 

file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

February 27 2023

02/27/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0612
EXHIBIT 32.2

Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

I, John Supan, the chief financial officer
of Peak International Limited (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my knowledge,

(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 10, 2006 |  | /s/ John Supan         
|                      |  | John Supan             
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
BULLETIN 1052 PLATE 12

UNITED @TATCC OCPAMTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

246

Drill Hole SP
Favorable ore sand from 12.1 to 73.1 feet below collar

Drill Hole SP-210
Favoroble ore sand from 69.0 fo 120.8 feet below collor

2000

Counts per minute
1000

9

Onms

Radiooctivity Tog

Resistonce 10g

Collar elevotion 7432 ft

Millivolts
2

°

Resistivity logs

‘Notural-patential log

38
'E
38
2
a
ie
3384
27
5 a

Feet 0

Radivoctivity tog

Resistance tog

Resistivity togs

Naturo-potentiol fog

Drill Hole SP-I37
Favorable ore sand from 84.4 to 162.1 feet below collar

357

Favorable ore sand from 85.4 to 141.9 feet below collor

Drill Hole SP.

Collar elevation 7542 ft

Counts per minute
1000 2000

°

Rodiccctivity tog

Resistonce log

Milfivolt:
Hivolts

Resistivity logs

Notural-potential log

Counts per minute
1990 2000

9

Radiooctivity 1ag

Resistonce log

Milliyotts

bop

:

Resistivity logs

Noturol-potential tog

-393

Drill Hole YC
Favorable ore sand from 87.2 to 102.0 feet belaw collar

Drill Hole LC-114
Favorable ore sand from 33.5 to 102.0 feet below collar

Counts per minute

0

Ohm-meters ‘Ohms

Mitlivotts

Counts per minute

rs

‘Ohm

Collar elevation 6764 ft

Millivolts

20 Feet

1000 2000

SL, a

9 qo m0

g

Radioactivity log

Resistance log

Resistivity logs

Notural-potential tog

Radiacctivity log

Resistance log

Resistivity logs

Notural-potential tog

SP- 220

Drill Hole
Semifovorable ore sand from © to 88.2 feet below collar

Collor elevation 7460 ft

EXPLANATION

Sondstone

Gray-green mudstone

Red-brown mudstone

496731 0 = 59 (In pocket)

Resistivity measured with a normal

Resistivity measured with o normal
4 inch electrode spacing

24-inch electrode spacing

2000

Rodicaetivity tog

Counts per minute
0 1000

Resistonce log

Millivolts
af

9
i

Resistivity logs

Noturol-potential tog

ELECTRIC, RADIOACTIVITY, AND CORE LOGS IN DRILL HOLES THROUGH MINERALIZED GROUND
No. 598, Misc.

#### In re Disbarment of Gately.

It having been reported to the Court that John H. Gately, of Colorado Springs, State of Colorado, has been disbarred from the practice of law in all the courts of the State of Colorado by judgment of the Supreme Court of the State of Colorado, duly entered on the 24th day of July, A. D., 1961, and this Court by order of October 15, 1962, having suspended the said John H. Gately from the practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred ;

And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued and served upon the respondent, who has filed a return thereto; now, upon consideration of the rule to show cause and the return aforesaid;

It is Ordered that the said John H. Gately be, and he is hereby, disbarred, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
#### Edwin Williams, Respondent v. James McAllister, Appellant.

Judgment and order appealed from reversed, and demurrer sustained with costs, with leave to the plaintiff to amend complaint within twenty days on payment of the costs of this appeal and of the demurrer. Opinion by

Smith, P. J
From: tpsakis681@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:31:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ted Sakelarakis

Andover, CT 06232
ADDENDUM D2.

— PROPOSED OPPS COMMENT INDICATORS FOR CY 2013

ADDENDUM D2.

— PROPOSED OPPS COMMENT INDICATORS FOR CY 201 3
Comment
Indicator Descriptor

NI New code for the next calendar year or existing code with substantial revision to its code descripto r in the next calendar year as compared to current calendar year, interim APC assignment; comments will be accepted on the interim APC assignment for the new code.

CH Active HCPCS code in current year and next calendar year, status
indicator and/or APC a ssignment has changed; or active HCPCS code that will be discontinued at the end of the current calendar year.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

In the Interest of C.G.L. and A.C.L., Minor

Children

No. 06

- 13

- 00068

- CV Appeal from the 71st District Court of Harrison County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 10

- 0714

- A ). Memorandum Opinion delive red by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss

and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We further order that the appellant pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED MARCH 6, 2014

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
No. 352, Misc.

#### Boyes *v.*United States.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller*and *Beatrice Rosenberg*for the United States.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

College AdministrationCollege FacultyCommunity CollegesEducational ChangeGovernanceGoverning BoardsGovernment School RelationshipPartnerships in EducationPolicy FormationStudent School RelationshipTwo Year Colleges

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 22, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 22, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16D0317. EARNEST JAMES CEASAR v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2007CR1823