alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 15.1

 

 

 

 

 

August 1, 2005

 

 

Securities and Exchange Commission450 Fifth Street, N.W.Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Commissioners:

 

 

We are aware that our report dated August 1, 2005 on our review of interim financial information of NSTAR for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004 and included in the Company's quarterly report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 is incorporated by reference in its Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-78285) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-78285, 333-85559 and 333-87272).

 

 

Very truly yours,

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPBoston, Massachusetts
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1400

To amend the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility

Act of 1996 to extend the deadline for aliens to present a border

crossing card that contains a biometric identifier matching the appropriate biometric characteristic of the alien.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 4, 2001

Mr. KYL (for himself and Mr. BROWNBACK) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant

Responsibility Act of 1996 to extend the deadline for

aliens to present a border crossing card that contains

a biometric identifier matching the appropriate biometric

characteristic of the alien.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR PRESENTATION

4 OF CERTAIN BORDER CROSSING IDENTIFICA5 TION CARDS.

6 Section 104(b)(2) of the Illegal Immigration Reform

7 and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1101
2

•S 1400 IS

1 note) is amended by striking ‘‘5 years’’ and inserting ‘‘6

2 years’’.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-7092

JAMES HENRY SIMPSON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARTESHA BISHOP, Magistrate; MICHAEL POERSTEL, Officer; BROOK 

PETTIT, Assistant Commonwealth Attorney; JOSHUA BOYLES, Assistant 

Commonwealth Attorney; BEVERLY SNUKALS, Judge; JUDGE HERBERT C. 

GILL, Judge; THOMAS B. HOOVER, Judge; WALTER STOUT, Judge; 

CLARENCE N. JENKINS, Judge; DONALD LEMONS, Chief Justice; ABIGAIL 

PAULES, Public Defender; MELVIN TODDS, JR., Court Appointed Attorney,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:18-cv-00263-JAG-RCY)

Submitted: November 21, 2019 Decided: November 26, 2019

Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Simpson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Simpson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

(2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error: Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), bars Simpson’s 

present claims. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 200, Misc.

#### Sanchez *v.*Taylor, Warden.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene*and *Isabel L. Blair*for respondent.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
September 3, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
Filer Support 2
Mail Stop 1-4
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington DC 20549


Dear Sir/Madam:

We have read Item 4 included in the Form 8-K dated  September 3, 2002 of Tangent
Solutions,  Inc. filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission and are in
agreement with the statements contained therein.

/s/ Sweeney, Gates & Co.


Copy to: Vito Bellezza
                  President
                  Tangent Solutions, Inc.
                  6801 Powerline Road
                  Ft. Lauderdale FL 33309
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1360

To reauthorize the Price-Anderson provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of

1954.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 3, 2001

Mr. VOINOVICH (for himself, Mr. INHOFE, Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire, and

Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To reauthorize the Price-Anderson provisions of the Atomic

Energy Act of 1954.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PRICE-ANDERSON REAUTHORIZATION.

4 (a) INDEMNIFICATION OF LICENSEES.—Section

5 170c. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C.

6 2210(c)) is amended—

7 (1) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘LI8 CENSES’’ and inserting ‘‘LICENSEES’’; and

9 (2) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘August 1,

10 2002’’ and inserting ‘‘August 1, 2012’’.
2

•S 1360 IS

1 (b) REPORTS TO CONGRESS.—Section 170p. of the

2 Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2210(p)) is

3 amended by striking ‘‘August 1, 1998’’ and inserting ‘‘Au4 gust 1, 2008’’.

5 (c) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by this

6 section apply with respect to nuclear incidents occurring

7 on or after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
From: nemcpastor@windstream.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:25:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Miller

Lincoln, NE 68505
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 07-7228
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. ELDRED DONELL EADY, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:00-cr-00041; 5:04-cv-00094) Submitted: April 17, 2008 Decided: April 21, 2008 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eldred Donell Eady, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Eldred Donell Eady seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Eady has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 371, Misc.

#### Bolden *v.*Pegelow et al.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall*and *Harold H. Greene*for respondents.

C. A. 4th

Cir. Certiorari denied.
From: adeedue@frontiernet.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:23:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Arthur Clevinger

Needles, CA 92363
# Combined Task Force 152 Conducts Exercise in Arabian Gulf with Unmanned Vessel 

/ Published Jan. 26, 2023
MANAMA, Bahrain , 
A Bahrain-led multinational task force from Combined Maritime Forces practiced vessel boarding procedures during exercise Falcon Warrior, Jan. 24-25, while operating with an unmanned system in the Arabian Gulf.

Ships and boats from Bahrain, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia sailed simultaneously in regional waters while operating with a MARTAC T-38 Devil Ray unmanned surface vessel from U.S. 5th Fleet’s Task Force 59. The exercise was led by Combined Task Force (CTF) 152. 

“We appreciate the great opportunity provided by exercise Falcon Warrior for crewed and uncrewed teams to work together to provide safety, security, and stability in the maritime environment within the Arabian Gulf,” said Royal Bahrain Naval Force Capt. Rashed Al-Ameen, commander of CTF 152.

Participating forces met ashore Jan. 23 at the U.S. Navy base in Bahrain, where CTF 152 is headquartered. CTF 152 personnel received briefings on Task Force 59’s unmanned systems and artificial intelligence platforms during a daylong tour.

While operating at sea the following two days, maritime units rehearsed vessel boarding and search procedures to enhance partner collaboration and interoperability. 

“The opportunity for the boarding teams to work together and share skills was invaluable,” said Royal Australian Navy Cmdr. Matthew Ryall, the operations director for Combined Maritime Forces.

Established in 2004, CTF 152 is one of four task forces under the Combined Maritime Forces, the largest international naval partnership in the world, consisting of 38 member-nations and partners. CTF 152 operates inside the Arabian Gulf to ensure maritime security and promote regional maritime cooperation.
EXHIBIT 23.1

                 Report of Independent Public Accountants

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report dated January 20, 1998, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of F&M Bancorp and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and
1996 and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three year
period ended December 31, 1997, which report appears on page 43 of the 1997
F&M Bancorp Annual Report, into the Form 10-K and into the following
previously filed Registration Statements of F&M Bancorp: Numbers 33-39941 and
33-39942 on Form S-8, and 33-39940 on Form S-3.


                              /s/ Arthur Andersen, LLP
                              ------------------------
                              Arthur Andersen, LLP

Washington, D.C.
March 18, 1998
#### Garret M. Clute, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment reversed, referee discharged, new' trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.
Parliamentary and Municipal Elections In MontenegroA Report Prepared by the Staff of the Commission on Securityand Cooperation in EuropeAugust 1998
**MAP OF SERBIA AND MONTENEGRO**
No. 298.

#### Land, Executor, et al. *v.*United States.

*John E. Adams*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorjer, Meyer Rothwacks*and *Arthur I. Gould*for the United States.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
     I, Elissa J. Lindsoe, Chief Financial Officer of Identix Incorporatedcertify that:
 1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of IdentixIncorporated;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.         By:                           /s/ Elissa J. Lindsoe    Elissa J. Lindsoe
Development, Inc. and

Gateway Centennial 

Development, /s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 10, 2015

No. 04-15-00736-CV

THE CITY OF LAREDO,

Appellant

v.

NORTHTOWN DEVELOPMENT, INC. AND GATEWAY CENTENNIAL 

DEVELOPMENT, CO.,

Appellees

From the 111th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CV-7001705-D2

Honorable Monica Z. Notzon, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In this accelerated appeal, Appellant’s brief is due to be filed with this court on December 

15, 2015. On November 30, 2015, Appellant filed an unopposed first motion for a thirty-day 

extension of time to file Appellant’s brief.

Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due on January 14, 2016. 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 10th day of December, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
ICR stack test data, Sanders Lead Company 

 

Dear Mr. French. 

Attached is preliminary stack test data for the sources tested at Sanders Lead Company being submitted per the July 2, 

2010 ICR request. 

This data is still preliminary and has not gone through all the QC, but we for the most part it is correct. We have not 

compiled all the support (appendices) data but will include in the final report. 

Please let me know if you have any questions. 

Billy R. Nichols, P.E. 

URS Corporation 

1000 Corporate Centre Drive, Suite 250 

Franklin, TN 37067 

office 615-771-2480 

direct line 615-224-2135 

fax 615-771-2459 

cellular 615-202-6556 

Email: billy_nichols@urscorp.com 

From: <Billy_Nichols@URSCorp.com>

To: Danny.Greene@erg.com; French.Chuck@epamail.epa.gov

Date: 9/30/2010 5:28 PM

Subject: ICR stack test data, Sanders Lead Company

CC: rb@sanderslead.com

Attachments:

 

Sanders Lead Stack 5 draft report.pdf; Sanders Lead Stack 4A draft report.pdf; Sanders Lead 

Stack 10 draft report.pdf

This e-mail and any attachments contain URS Corporation confidential information that may be proprietary or privileged. If you receive this message in error or 

are not the intended recipient, you should not retain, distribute, disclose or use any of this information and you should destroy the e-mail and any attachments or 

copies.

Page 1 of 1
From: dhvepalmer@windwireless.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:08:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dale Palmer

, 99003-9667
December 4, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CLAUDIA HARPER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS INDEPENDENT COEXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF JAMES WESLEY CLERK, JR., AND 

ALICE CLARK, Appellants

NO. 14-14-00022-CV V.

KIRBY CORPORATION AND KIRBY INLAND MARINE, L.P., Appellees

________________________________

Today the Court heard appellants’ motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

order granting a partial summary judgment signed October 28, 2013, and made 

appealable by an order of severance signed December 6, 2013. Having considered 

the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
6546 Woodland Oaks Dr.

Magnolia, TX 77354

(832) 212-6011

Q500 Typhoon UA Specifications:

Q500 TYPHOON Aircraft

Flight Time Up to 25 Minutes

Height 240mm (9.45 in)

Width 420mm (16.54 in)

Diagonal Length Without Rotor Blades 565mm (22.2 in)

Propeller/Main Rotor Diameter 330mm (13.0 in)

Weight Without Battery and Payload 1130g (40.0 oz)

Battery 5400mAh 3S 11.1V LiPo (included)

Charger 3S 11.1V LiPo DC Balancing Smart Charger with AC Adapter (included)

Transmitter 10-channel 2.4GHz with 5.8GHz video downlink (included)

3 Flight Modes Smart, Angle and Home Modes

Maximum Flying Height Default 400 Feet Above Ground Level (Adjustable via the Q500 GUI)

Maximum Rotational Velocity 65°/s

Maximum Bank Angle 35°

Maximum Climb Rate in Smart and Angle mode 3m/s

Maximum Descent Rate in Smart and Angle mode 2m/s

Radio Control Frequency Band 2.4GHz

Takeoff Weight With Battery and CGO2-GB 1700g