alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

Received: October 26, 2017

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1k1-8zfz-xvzi

Comments Due: December 11, 2017

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2015-0017

Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits; Extension of Applicability 

Date

Comment On: EBSA-2015-0017-0291

Claims Procedure: Plans Providing Disability Benefits

Document: EBSA-2015-0017-DRAFT-0398

Comment on FR Doc # 2017-22082

Submitter Information

Name: Peter Sessions

General Comment

As an attorney working in the field of ERISA benefit disputes, I am writing to oppose 

the delay in the implementation of the Final Rule regarding claims procedure 

requirements for disability benefits.

The Final Rule is a valuable update to the ERISA regulations that ensures claimants 

receive fair treatment from plan administrators. The Department of Labor has already 

undergone a lengthy review process that took into consideration all arguments for and 

against the Final Rule, including the costs associated with it, which would be minimal. 

Indeed, the new Rule will hopefully reduce costs by clarifying the rights and duties of 

those involved in the benefit claim process.

I see no principled reason to delay the implementation of the Rule. The concerns that 

have been cited as a purported reason to postpone the Rule's implementation have 

already been fully vetted.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(y)

                         [IBM LETTERHEAD APPEARS HERE]




November 18, 1997

Mr. Jay Scott
Vice President, Product Services
CompuCom
7171 Forest Lane
Dallas, Texas 75230

Dear Jay:

IBM is pleased to offer to extend your Agreement for Participation in the IBM
Business Partner - PC, Authorized Assembler Program, dated 01/16/1997, (AAP
Agreement) to December 31, 1998.

Please indicate your agreement to this extension by signing below and
returning this letter to me. Your AAP Agreement will expire without
further notice on December 31, 1997 if you do not return the signed
letter to me by then.

We look forward to continuing our relationship so that IBM can work with you
more effectively, improve efficiency and reduce costs through our Advanced
Fulfillment Initiatives and the Authorized Assembler Program.

Sincerely,

/s/ BUD

John C. Nesbit
Policy Execution Manager, Authorized Assembler Program
IBM Personal Computer Company

Agreed to:

CompuCom


By: /s/ JAY SCOTT
   -----------------------------------

Title: VP Product Services
      --------------------------------

Date:  12/3/97
      --------------------------------
#### Rodney B. Smith and others, Respondents, v. Andrew S. Schoonmaker, Appellant.

Judgment reversed, new trial granted, costs to abide event. Opinion by

Peckham, J.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Vail Banks, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brady T. Burt, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.











/s/
      Brady T. Burt





Brady
      T.
      Burt


Chief
      Financial Officer


August
      12, 2005
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue


Registration No.  333-35460
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)
PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  062				Trade Date: 03/29/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated
  September 8, 2000)						Issue Date:  04/03/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement March 29, 2001

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION
OR REPAYMENT
Date and terms of redemption or repayment
(including any applicable regular or special record dates)

  CUSIP
     or	Stated				                                 Interest
Common	Interest		        Price to	   Discounts &   Payment	    Survivor's
  Code	  Rate (1)Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions   Frequency	  Option	  Yes/No

14911QCP4 5.2%	 04/15/05	 100%	        1.0%      Semi-Annually	  YES	    NO



Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:
____  Yes	  X   No						N/A



(1) The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not
affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the
effective date of the change.

(2) Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to
Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the
time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.3

                             PACCAR AND SUBSIDIARIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (Thousands of Dollars)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                            Year Ended December 31
                                   ----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      1996           1995          1994            1993           1992
                                   ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------

<S>                                <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
FIXED CHARGES
  Interest expense
    PACCAR and
    Subsidiaries (1)               $  131,807     $  123,480     $   87,465     $   64,000     $   71,912

    Portion of rentals
      deemed interest                   5,928          5,727          5,494          6,001          6,870
                                   ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------

TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                $  137,735     $  129,207     $   92,959     $   70,001     $   78,782
                                   ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
                                   ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------

EARNINGS
  Income before taxes - PACCAR
    and Subsidiaries (2)           $  312,925     $  399,562     $  320,098     $  219,757     $   91,613

FIXED CHARGES                         137,735        129,207         92,959         70,001         78,782
                                   ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------

EARNINGS AS DEFINED                $  450,660     $  528,769     $  413,057     $  289,758     $  170,395
                                   ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
                                   ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------     ----------
RATIO OF EARNINGS
  TO FIXED CHARGES                    3.27x          4.09x         4.44x           4.14x         2.16x
</TABLE>




(1)  Exclusive of interest paid to PACCAR.

(2)  Includes before-tax earnings of wholly owned subsidiaries and distributed
     income received from less than 50% owned subsidiaries.

                                      -30-
From: Meri Shadley

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 9:09:35 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Meri Shadley

555 Creighton Way

Reno, NV 89503
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS, THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
INCOME, AND THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS OF JOURNAL
REGISTER COMPANY FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 25, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                 DEC-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-25-2000
<CASH>                               2,884
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                       70,889
<ALLOWANCES>                         6,555
<INVENTORY>                          9,383
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    87,024
<PP&E>                             250,450
<DEPRECIATION>                     148,127
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     682,548
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               73,145
<BONDS>                            714,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<COMMON>                               484
<OTHER-SE>                        (197,525)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       682,548
<SALES>                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   237,300
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      133,658
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    14,166
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     2,036
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  26,595
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     39,006
<INCOME-TAX>                        15,408
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 22,757
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                        22,757
<EPS-BASIC>                           0.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0.50



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (the
Company), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Daniel J. Moos, President and Chief Operating Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) and Gene S. Bertcher, Executive Vice President and Interim Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                                                                    
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2009 |  | /s/    DANIEL J.
MOOS                                                                              
|                      |  | Daniel J. Moos President, Chief Operating Officer and Principal Executive Officer                  
|                      | 
|Dated: March 31, 2009 |  | /s/    GENE S.
BERTCHER                                                                            
|                      |  | Gene S. Bertcher Executive Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Principal Financial
Officer
From: mmjjbbb@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:51:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michael Barber

Hastings, MN 55033
From: Fluzynski@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:30:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Frances Luzynski

Saint Louis, MO 63109
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

NOTIS GLOBAL, INC. 

LOCK-UP AGREEMENT 

Reference is made to the 10% Convertible Debentures (each, a “Debenture,” and in the aggregate, the
“Debentures”) issued by Notis Global, Inc. (the “Company”) and held by the undersigned as of the date hereof. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Debentures. 

For good and valuable consideration, the receipt of and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the undersigned agrees that during the
period beginning on and including May 2, 2016 through and including May 13, 2016 (the “Restriction Period”), the undersigned will not (1) sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of any shares of Common Stock of the
Company or any options or other rights to purchase shares of Common Stock which the undersigned owns or has a right to acquire as of the date hereof, other than in connection with an offer made to all stockholders of the Company in connection with
merger, consolidation or similar transaction involving the Company, or (2) assign or transfer any of the Debentures, unless the recipient of such Debentures undertakes to comply with the terms of this Lock-up Agreement. The undersigned further
agree that the Company is authorized to and the Company agrees to place “stop orders” on its books to prevent any sale, transfer or disposition of shares of Common Stock held by the undersigned in violation hereof. Any subsequent issuance
to and/or acquisition by the undersigned of debentures or Common Stock or options or instruments convertible into Common Stock will be subject to all of the provisions of this Lock-Up Agreement. 

The restriction set forth in the immediately preceding paragraph shall not apply the conversion by the undersigned of any of the Debenture
into shares of Common Stock of the Company; provided, that, the Common Stock of the Company received upon such conversions shall remain subject to the restrictions provided for in this Agreement. 

[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 







 Dated:             , 2016 

 

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	  

	(Name of Debenture holder - Please Print)
	
	  

	(Signature)
	
	  

	(Name of Signatory if Stockholder is an entity - Please Print)
	
	  

	(Title of Signatory if Stockholder is an entity - Please Print)
		
	Address:	 	  

		
		 	  

		
		 	  



 [SIGNATURE PAGE TO LOCK-UP AGREEMENT]
No. 560, Misc.

#### Archey *v.*Nederlandsch-Amerikaansche Stoomvaart Maatschappij.

*Arthur J. Mandell*for petitioner.

*Carl G. Stearns*for respondent.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Sixth Supreme Judicial District. Certiorari denied.
No. 505,

October Term, 1960.

#### Cota *v.*California,

364 U. S. 921. Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.

The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
From: mabrown7777@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:17:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Michele Brown

Temple, GA 30179