alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 25.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

We, the undersigned directors and officers of PACCAR Financial Corp., a Washington corporation, hereby severally constitute and appoint A. J. Wold our true and
lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power to him to sign for us, and in our names in the capacities indicated below, a Form 10-K of this corporation for
fiscal year 2000 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, together with any and all amendments to said
Form 10-K, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by our said attorney-in-fact to said Form 10-K and any and
all amendments thereto.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF each of the undersigned has executed this power of attorney as of the 9th of March 2001.

|/s/ANDREW J. WOLDAndrew J. Wold           |  | President and Director |  | /s/MARK C. PIGOTTMark C. Pigott             |  | Chairman of the Board and Director
|----------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|/s/PATRICIA A. DONOHOEPatricia A. Donohoe |  | Treasurer              |  | /s/KENNETH R. GANGLKenneth R. Gangl         |  | Vice Chairman and Director        
|/s/BARRY E. PRATHERBarry E. Prather       |  | Controller             |  | /s/DAVID J. HOVINDDavid J. Hovind           |  | Director                          
|                                          |  |                        |  | /s/MICHAEL A. TEMBREULLMichael A. Tembreull |  | Director                          

---

QuickLinks
From: georgeb@trbc.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:44:55 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

George Bieri

Lynchburg, VA 24502
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.02 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
No. 468, Misc.

#### Cornes *v.*Pate, Warden.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
- All
            - Title
            - Author
            - Subject
            - Date
            - Full-Text

            -                              Explore                            ******                - Educational Resources
              - Archival Collections
              -                                      Themes                                    ******                  - Economic Data
                - Federal Reserve
                - View all 
              - Timelines 
            -                              Browse                            ******                - Titles
              - Authors
              - Subjects
              - Dates 
            -                              About                            ******                - About FRASER
              - FAQ
              - Contact Us
              -                                      FRASER API                                    ******                  - REST API
                - OAI-PMH 
            - Inside FRASER Blog

            - **

Home                 > Browse by Title > To Extend the Period During Which Direct Obligations of the United States May Be Used as Collateral Security for Federal Reserve Notes

              																	United States. Congress. House. Committee on Banking and Currency, 1865-1974					 and 	Seventy-Fifth Congress, 1937-1939. 						*To Extend the Period During Which Direct Obligations of the United States May Be Used as Collateral Security for Federal Reserve Notes : Hearings Before the Committee on Banking and Currency, House of Representatives, Seventy-Fifth Congress, First Session, on S. 417, February 16, 18, 1937*,												Washington: 								U.S. Government Printing Office, 										February 16, 18, 1937,									https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/739,			accessed on September 22, 2024.						    

        - **FRASER**
        - About
        - FAQ
        - Legal and Privacy
        - FRASER API

          -                              @FedFRASER 
          - ** Contact Us
          -  **  What's New  
          -  **  Inside FRASER
Exhibit 21
                                                                  ----------

                    SUBSIDIARIES OF PACIFIC TELESIS GROUP


Name                                            State of Incorporation
----                                            ----------------------

Pacific Bell                                    California
Pacific Bell Directory                          California
Pacific Bell Information Services               California
Pacific Bell Mobile Services                    California
Pacific Bell Internet Services                  California
Pacific Bell Network Integration                California
Nevada Bell                                     Nevada
Pacific Telesis Mobile Services                 California
Pacific Bell Communications                     California
Pacific Telesis Enterprises                     California
Pacific Telesis Enhanced Services               California
Pacific Bell Interactive Media                  California
Pacific Bell Video Services                     California
Cross Country Wireless, Inc.                    Delaware
Pacific Telesis Wireless Broadband Services     California
Telesis Technologies Laboratory, Inc.           California
PacTel Capital Resources                        California
PacTel Capital Funding                          California
PacTel Re Insurance Company, Inc.               Hawaii
Pacific Telesis - Washington                    California
JOHN ELIAS BALDACCI GOVERNORJanuary 3, 2008 David Conroy, Chief Air Programs Branch U .S. EPA Region I 1 Congress St., Suite 1100 Boston, Ma. 02114-2023 RE: Certification of Required SIPElements Under Section 110(a)(1) and (2) for the 8-hour Ozone NAAQS I am pleased to submit the enclosed documentation that the Maine State Implementation Plan for air quality adequately meets the Clean AirAct (CAA) "infrastructure requirements of section 110a(1) and (2). As you know, pursuant to sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the CAA, all states are required to submit plans to provide for the implementation, maintenance and enforcement of the 8- hour ozone and PM2

.5 standards. Sections 110(a)(1) and (2) require states to address basic SIPrequirements, including emissions inventories, monitoring, and modeling to assure attainment and maintenance of the standards no later than three years after the promulgation of a new standard (July 2000) . In March of 2004, a lawsuit was initiated against EPAfor failure to take action against states that had not made SIPsubmissions to meet the requirements of sections 110(a)(1) and (2). EPAsubsequently entered into a consent decree that obligated it to determine whether states have made thesubmissions necessary to meet the section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) requirements relating to interstate transport no laterthan March 15, 2005, and the section 110(a)(1) and (2) requirements for ozone by December 15, 20071'2. The Maine Department of Environmental Protection is submitting this document to certify that its existing SIPalreadysatisfies all section 110(a)(1) and (2) requirements with the exception of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)3. The initial MaineState Implementation Plan was approved by EPAon October 28, 1972, and has subsequently been revised and

' This date has been extended until January 8, 2008. 2 The section 110(a)(1) and (2) requirements for PM 2.5 must be met by October 5, 2008. 3The Department has posted its section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) submittal toa 30-day commentperiod with AUGUSTA opportunity to request a public hearing. The comment deadline is February 4, 2008. 17 STATE HOUSE STATION BANGOR AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-0017 106 HOGAN ROAD (207) 287-7688 FAX

: (207) 287-7826 BANGOR, MAINE 04401 RAY BLDG., HOSPITAL ST. (207) 941-4570 FAX : (207) 941-4584 STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

DAVID P . LITTELL COMMISSIONER

PORTLAND PRESQUE ISLE 312 CANCO ROAD 1235 CENTRAL DRIVE, SKYWAY PARK PORTLAND, MAINE 04103 PRESQUE ISLE, MAINE 04769-2094 (207) 822-6300 FAX: (207) 822-6303 (207) 764-0477 FAX: (207) 760-3143 web site: www

.maine .gov/dep printed on recycled paperexpanded on numerous occasions. The infrastructure elements required by section

110(a)(2) are fully addressed by existing Maine statutes, regulations and plans. If you should have anyquestions, please contactJeff Crawford at 207-287-2437. Sincerely,

ames P . Brooks, Director Bureau of Air Quality Attachments (7) cc: Ann Arnold Rich Burkhart Jeff Crawford SIPfile (w/encl .) EPAfile
From: cdelerno@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:28:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Christian DeLerno

Metairie, LA 70001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                            JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                  23,468
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           32,671
<ALLOWANCES>                                               425
<INVENTORY>                                             24,533
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        86,753
<PP&E>                                                  32,503
<DEPRECIATION>                                          15,469
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         142,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   48,565
<BONDS>                                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                                   137
<OTHER-SE>                                            (101,234)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           142,768
<SALES>                                                 87,702
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        87,702
<CGS>                                                   40,869
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           40,869
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        51,094
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       6,422
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (10,718)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            (2,207)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (8,189)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (8,189)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             (.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (.51)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and Correspondence Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will be held via teleconference.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, October 12, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kelvin Johnson at 1-888-912-1227 or (504) 202-9679.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and Correspondence Project Committee will be held Thursday, October 12, 2023, at 3:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Ann Tabat. For more information, please contact Kelvin Johnson at 1-888-912-1227 or (504) 202-9679, or write TAP Office, 1555 Poydras Street, 2nd Floor, MS 12, New Orleans, LA 70112 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include a committee discussion about the IRS response to Issue 53484-LTR 3030C (Bal-Due/Interest Due). There will be a discussion of the Difficult/Challenging Letters/Notices, and a Review of Notice CP503.                

Dated: September 6, 2023.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2023-19750 Filed 9-12-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
From: crossco@earthlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:07:25 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Greg Cross

Pomona, CA 91767
#### Henry C. Adams, Appellant, v. Oliver M. Arkenburgh, Testamentary Guardian, Respondent.

Order modified as p *iv*order filed,

without costs Landon, J., not acting.
From: d.janicki@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:14:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Deborah Janicki

Ponte Vedra Beach, FL 32082
No. 278.

#### Rock Island Motor Transit Co. *v.*Conditioned Air Corp.

*B. A. Webster, Jr.*and *Alden B. Howland*for petitioner.

*Harris M. Coggeshall*for respondent.

Supreme Court of Iowa. Certiorari denied.