alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered August 17, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00184-CR

VICTOR LEE WILKS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F16-41359-Y

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s August 16, 2018 motion to supplement the record on 

appeal. The Court GRANTS the motion.

We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FOURTEEN DAYS, either 

(1) a supplemental clerk’s record containing subpoenas and subpoena applications, filed and 

issued on or about February 23, 2018, addressed to The City of Mesquite Human Resources 

Department and Sergeant Cummings of the Mesquite Police Department; or (2) written 

verification that the subpoenas and subpoena applications are not in the district clerk’s 

possession.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
| Coupon | Interest | Maturity | Callable | Survivor's Option | Price | CUSIP |   |
| 2.100% | Semi-Annual(†††) | 3/15/2021 | 3/15/2018 * | Yes § | 100.00 | 14912HSZ4 |   |

|                         |
|-------------------------|
|                         |  |  |
| (†††) | First Payment date 9/15/2017 |   |
|                    |   |
ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS

Appellate Court

People v. Logan, 2011 IL App (1st) 093582

Appellate Court

Caption

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.

LEONARD LOGAN, Defendant-Appellant.

 District & No. First District, First Division

Docket No. 1–09–3582

Filed June 27, 2011

Held

(Note: This syllabus

constitutes no part of

the opinion of the court

but has been prepared

by the Reporter of

Decisions for the

convenience of the

reader.)

The appellate court upheld the trial court’s denial of defendant’s

postconviction petition following a third-stage evidentiary hearing after

his conviction for first-degree murder was affirmed on appeal where

polygraph evidence related to a witness was admitted only after she

testified that her statement and grand jury testimony implicating

defendant had been coerced, the evidence was used as a shield, not as a

sword, no one objected to the trial court’s decision to defer giving a

limiting instruction until the close of the trial, the instructions sufficiently

informed the jury that it was not to speculate as to the results of the

polygraph examinations, defendant’s trial counsel made a strategic

decision not to tender a limiting instruction, and defendant did not object

to the prosecutor’s argument that the witness confessed after failing her

second polygraph examination.

Decision Under 

Review

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County, No. 97–CR–19288; the

Hon. James Obbish, Judge, presiding.

Judgment Affirmed.
Page 1 of 1

AUG 3.1: REC-129551-/0
LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISIO)
Ss SION
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS As of: August 31, 2011
BRANCH Received: August 15, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: August 31, 2011

Tracking No. 80ce17ec
‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0053
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Sonia Honeydew
Address:
7035 Beach Dr SW #3
Seattle, 98136
Email: MsHoneydew@comeast.net

General Comment

Please ensure that all women have access to free contraception and other preventive services,
regardless of employer, for the health of American women and future generations. Thank you.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=0900... 8/31/2011
From: j.coward@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:32:07 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

JEROLD COWARD

San Antonio, TX 78248
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
CommScope, Inc. condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the
six months ended June 30, 1997 (Unaudited) and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  110,298
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,976
<INVENTORY>                                     52,618
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               178,230
<PP&E>                                         130,196
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 509,661
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,936
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                     417,186
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   509,661
<SALES>                                        307,165
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               307,165
<CGS>                                          228,554
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  228,554
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                30,120
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,266
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,710
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,605
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,105
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,105
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
From: Sharon & Jim Lieberman

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) recommendations for women’s preventive health care

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 1:34:17 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the recommendations of the 

Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions 

for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless 

women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive services, others, 

driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. 

Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious 

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If 

granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the 

proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.36 MB)
 
 Green Mountain Boys AEW 380th Air Expeditionary Wing holidays combined Crew isil cjtf-oir F-16 Fighting Falcon isis Liberation MOSUL Defend the region Join Task Force-Operation Inherent Resolve meals crew chief air refueling deliver decisive airpower OIR FOOD REFUELING KC-10 EXTENDER Operation Inherent Resolve USCENTCOM pilot Iraq AFCENT Sortie Boom Operator Christmas
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Exhibit 10.4



CDC Mortgage Capital Inc.

36th Floor

9 West 57th Street

New York, NY 10019



Attention: Raymond Sullivan



April 28, 2004



Dear Mr. Sullivan:



Reference is made to the Master Agreement dated as of June 23, 2003 among New Century Mortgage Corporation, NC Capital Corporation (collectively, the
Sellers), and CDC Mortgage Capital Inc. (the Buyer), as amended (the Agreement). Terms used in this letter not otherwise defined shall have meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.



Sellers would like to request a temporary increase in the Maximum Amount
under the Agreement to $700,000,000 (the Temporary Increase) from the date hereof to the opening of business on May 16, 2004. Except for this Temporary Increase, all other terms and conditions in the Agreement and all other Repurchase
Documents shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with their respective terms. New Century Financial Corporation, as Guarantor, consents to this Temporary Increase and reaffirms its Guaranty.



Kindly execute below to signify your consent to our request of Temporary
Increase.



Sincerely,NEW CENTURY MORTGAGE CORPORATION/s/    PATRICK
FLANAGANName: Patrick Flanagan Title: PresidentNC CAPITAL CORPORATION/s/    PATRICK
FLANAGANName: Patrick Flanagan Title: Chief Executive OfficerNEW CENTURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION, AS
GUARANTOR/s/    PATRICK
FLANAGANName: Patrick Flanagan Title: Executive Vice President




|                                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------
|Acknowledged and Agreed as of the date first written above
|                                                          
|CDC MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC.                                 
|                                                          
|/s/    ANTHONY
MALANGA                                    
|Name: Anthony Malanga Title: Managing Director            
|                                                          
|CDC MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC.                                 
|                                                          
|/s/    KATHY
LYNCH                                        
|Name: Kathy Lynch Title: Director
Page | of 1

BEB 1203 F/-/0 , SEP 02 2011

As of: September 02, 2011

Received: August 15, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 02, 2011
Tracking No. 80ee18a6

‘(Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

LEGAL PROCESSING DIViSION
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
BRANCH

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0169
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Yhkrown é
tots it Submitter Information

Address:
San Jose, 95129-4005
Submitter's Representative: NARAL Pro-Choice America

General Comment

I strongly support the new policy requiring health-insurance plans to cover birth control without a
copay, CMS-9992-IFC2. Thank you for this important improvement to women's health care.

Talso want you to know that I am concerned that certain religious employers may be allowed to
opt out of the requirements. All women should have access to contraceptive coverage, regardless

of where they work.

This policy finally should make near-universal access to birth control
a reality for all women who use it.

Improving women's access to birth control is positive in so many ways.
A woman who can plan when to have a family is able to participate in
society more fully. Allowing women to space their pregnancies
contributes to healthy childbearing. And ultimately, fewer unintended
pregnancies can reduce the need for abortion.

Thank you for following science-based recommendations and making
women's health a priority.

http://fdms.erulemaking net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000... 9/2/2011
From: Karen Coleman

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Coverage of perventive care under the new health care law

Date: Sunday, August 14, 2011 11:37:10 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger.

Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run

health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the

coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies.

If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Karen Coleman

Maryville TN
# 

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-97047

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  321                                                                   Trade Date: 8/11/03

(To Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2002 &

  Prospectus dated August  8,2002)                                                                                Issue Date:  8/14/03

The Date of this Pricing SupplementAugust  11, 2003

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

 CUSIP                                                                                                                                   Date and terms of redemption or

     or       Stated                                                                   Interest                                       repayment (includingany

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment     Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)   Maturity  Public (2) Commissions       Frequency       Option  Yes/No     record dates)

14911QPJ4     3.25%        08/15/07           100%               0.9%                 Quarterly                       YES           NO                                                              

                          

Principal                                                                                 1st Payment             Day         

Amount                  Proceeds                  Dealer                           Date                   Count

$2,458,000.00         $2,435,878.00         ABN AMRO Inc.        11/15/03                               30/360    

Original Issue DiscountNote:                                                                          Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                  N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $214.271 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated August 8,2002.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
From: slarsen53@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:28:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sharon Larsen

Sandown, NH 03873
No. 124.

#### Atlas Scraper & Engineering Co. *v.*Pursche.

*R. Welton Whann*and *Robert M. McManigal*for petitioner.

*Lewis E. Lyon*and *John B. Young*for respondent.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.