alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12
            CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION
                                 
         COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF  PROFIT TO FIXED CHARGES
                            (Unaudited)
                       (Millions of Dollars)
                                    Three Months
                                       Ended
                                  March     March
                                   31,       31,
                                   1998      1997
                                                   
Profit                            $  23.8   $  27.0
                                                   
Add:                                               
  Provision for income taxes         13.5      14.6
                                                   
Deduct:                                            
  Equity in profit of                (.7)      (.5)
partnerships
                                                   
Profit before taxes               $  36.6   $  41.1
                                                   
Fixed charges:                                     
  Interest on borrowed funds       $105.5   $  79.5
  Rentals at computed interest*        .9        .7
                                                   
Total fixed charges                $106.4   $  80.2
                                                   
Profit before taxes plus fixed     $143.0    $121.3
charges
                                                   
Ratio of profit before taxes                       
plus                                 1.34      1.51
  fixed charges to fixed charges
     
*Those portions of rent expense that are representative of interest
cost.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ALCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the
year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Yip Kam Ming, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/ Yip Kam Ming



Yip Kam Ming,

 Chief Financial Officer

November 10, 2006
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 155 (Thursday, August 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 49757]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-20402]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Office of Science, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), and in accordance with Title 41 of the 
Code of Federal Regulations, Section 102-3.65(a), and following 
consultation with the Committee Management Secretariat, General 
Services Administration, notice is hereby given that the Fusion Energy 
Sciences Advisory Committee will be renewed for a two-year period 
beginning on August 5, 2011.
    The Committee provides advice and recommendations to the Department 
of Energy on long-range plans, priorities, and strategies for advancing 
plasma science, fusion science, and fusion technology related to the 
Fusion Energy Sciences program.
    Additionally, the renewal of the Fusion Energy Sciences Advisory 
Committee has been determined to be essential to conduct Department of 
Energy business, and to be in the public interest in connection with 
the performance of duties imposed upon the Department of Energy by law 
and agreement. The Committee will continue to operate in accordance 
with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, and the 
rules and regulations in implementation of that Act.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Albert Opdenaker, Designated 
Federal Officer, at (301) 903-4927.

    Issued at Washington, DC on August 5, 2011.
Carol A. Matthews,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-20402 Filed 8-10-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
On motion to dismiss appeals.

Appeals dismissed December 27, 1923.

#### HANS GROWMAN *v.*CITY OF ASTORIA. ANTERO NIKULA and HENRY ASAIKAINEN *v.*CITY OF ASTORIA.

(220 Pac. 1118.)

From Clatsop: J. A. Eakin, Judge.

In Banc.

Appeals Dismissed.

For the motion, *Messrs. Norblad é Hesse.*

PER CURIAM.

These two cases were consolidated, for the purposes of trial, with the case of *Christina Kallunki*v. *City of Astoria,*but three separate verdicts were rendered, one in favor of Christina Kallunki for $1,000, one in favor of Hans Grow-man for $1,500, and one in favor of Nikula and Asaikainen for $300. Thereupon three separate appeals were perfected to this court and it was stipulated between the parties, substantially, that only one appeal, that of Christina Kallunki, should be heard here, and the other two cases should follow the course of the Kallunki appeal in all things.

The Kallunki appeal having been dismissed as an abandoned appeal, and judgment therein affirmed against the appellant and its sureties, these two cases will take the same course, and the judgment of the lower court in each case will be affirmed, as upon an abandoned appeal.

Appeal Dismissed and Judgment Aeeirmed.

Burnett, J., took no part in the consideration of this motion.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AP RIL 28, 2020

NO. 03

- 20

- 00106

- CV

S. W., Jr., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEF ORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, KE LLY, AND SMITH

MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on January 30, 2020 . Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment but that there was error requiring correction. Ther efore, the C ourt

modifies the trial court’s judgment to include the suffi x “ Jr. ” when referring to S.W., Jr. The

Court affirms the judgment as modified. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs,

no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
From: jckrmw@me.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:54:41 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carol Van Pelt

Fulton, IL 61252
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

I, Judith A. Berry, ChiefFinancial Officer of American Residential Investment Trust, Inc. (the“Registrant”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:

 

(1) theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant, to which this certification isattached as an exhibit (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| Dated:  August 14, 2002 | /s/  Judith A. Berry |   |
|-------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                    | Judith A.  Berry          |
|                    | Chief  Financial Officer  |

 

----
#### SHENANDOAH VALLEY BROADCASTING, INC., et al. *v.*AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS, AUTHORS & PUBLISHERS.

No. 592.

Decided January 14, 1963.

*Ralstone R. Irvine*and *Walter R. Mansfield*for appellants.

*Arthur H. Dean, William Piel, Jr., Herman Finkelstein*and *Lloyd N. Cutler*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

I, G. Ward Paxton, Chief Executive Officer ofIntrusion Inc., certify that:

 

(1)         I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Intrusion Inc.:

 

(2)         Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

(3)         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

(4)         The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

(5)         The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 

 
| Date: March 29,  2006 | /s/ G. Ward Paxton      |   |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|--------|
|                  | G. Ward Paxton          |
|                  | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.3

                           CERTIFICATION OF TREASURER

I, Robert F. Aufenanger, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report, as amended, of Excelsior Private
Equity Fund II, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: September 12, 2003

/s/ Robert F. Aufenanger
----------------------------
Robert F. Aufenanger, Treasurer
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10405 Conference Calendar

FRENANDO RAY TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CECIL G. PURYEAR; WALTON ELMER WILLIAMSON, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:96-CV-94

- - - - - - - - - - August 18, 1997 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Frenando Ray Taylor, Texas prisoner # 535001, appeals the judgment of the district court construing his pleadings as a complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and dismissing the complaint as frivolous. Taylor argues that the district court erred in not addressing his contentions concerning the recusal of a state trial judge in a state court proceeding.No. 97-10405 -2- Section 1983 is not a proper avenue to pursue the recusal of a state-court judge. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action as frivolous. See Ancar v. Sara Plasma, Inc. , 964 F.2d 465, 468 (5th Cir. 1992). Taylor’s appeal too is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We warn Taylor that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Taylor is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.03 MB)
 
 USS Ronald Reagan; US Navy; Carrier Strike Group 5; CVN 76; Flight Deck; 5th Fleet
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No.  333-59540

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  208				Trade Date: 08/08/02
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

  June 1, 2001)							Issue Date:  08/13/02
The Date of this Pricing Supplement August 12, 2002
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QJR3   4.50%	08/15/08	     100%	       0.90%                Semi-Annually	     YES	    NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		      Date		Count

$5,495,000.00	$5,445,545.00	ABN AMRO Inc.	    2/15/03		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes	  X   No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.   Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $668.925 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under a Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
Additionally, the total principal amount of PowerNotes(SM) offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001 has been increased from $500.0mm to $750.0mm.  $250.0mm principal amount of debt securities registered pursuant to Registration Statement No. 333-59540 originally offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement dated June 15, 2001 and related Prospectus dated May 25, 2001 are being offered as PowerNotes(SM) by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1459

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located

at 550 West Fort Street in Boise, Idaho, as the ‘‘James A. McClure

Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 25, 2001

Mr. CRAPO (for himself and Mr. CRAIG) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public

Works

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 550 West Fort Street in Boise, Idaho,

as the ‘‘James A. McClure Federal Building and United

States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JAMES A. MCCLURE FEDERAL

4 BUILDING AND UNITED STATES COURT5 HOUSE.

6 The Federal building and United States courthouse

7 located at 550 West Fort Street in Boise, Idaho, shall be
2

•S 1459 IS

1 known and designated as the ‘‘James A. McClure Federal

2 Building and United States Courthouse’’.

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

6 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec7 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the James

8 A. McClure Federal Building and United States Court9 house.

Æ