alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 174 (Monday, September 11, 2023)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 62433]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19741]



[[Page 62431]]

Vol. 88

Monday,

No. 174

September 11, 2023

Part II





The President





-----------------------------------------------------------------------



Notice of September 7, 2023--Continuation of the National Emergency 
With Respect to Certain Terrorist Attacks



Notice of September 7, 2023--Continuation of the National Emergency 
With Respect to Ethiopia



Notice of September 7, 2023--Continuation of the National Emergency 
With Respect to Foreign Interference in or Undermining Public 
Confidence in United States Elections



Notice of September 7, 2023--Continuation of the National Emergency 
With Respect to Persons Who Commit, Threaten To Commit, or Support 
Terrorism


                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 88 , No. 174 / Monday, September 11, 2023 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 62433]]

                Notice of September 7, 2023

                
Continuation of the National Emergency With 
                Respect to Certain Terrorist Attacks

                Consistent with section 202(d) of the National 
                Emergencies Act, 50 U.S.C. 1622(d), I am continuing for 
                1 year the national emergency previously declared on 
                September 14, 2001, in Proclamation 7463, with respect 
                to the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and the 
                continuing and immediate threat of further attacks on 
                the United States.

                Because the terrorist threat continues, the national 
                emergency declared on September 14, 2001, and the 
                powers and authorities adopted to deal with that 
                emergency must continue in effect beyond September 14, 
                2023. Therefore, I am continuing in effect for an 
                additional year the national emergency that was 
                declared on September 14, 2001, with respect to the 
                terrorist threat.

                This notice shall be published in the Federal Register 
                and transmitted to the Congress.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    September 7, 2023.

[FR Doc. 2023-19741
Filed 9-8-23; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3395-F3-P
============= 

MDL No. 15-0256 

============= 

IN RE NATIONAL LLOYDS INSURANCE COMPANY HAIL STORM LITIGATION 

============================================== 

ON REVIEW BY THE MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION PANEL 

============================================== 

 

This order is issued in response to National Lloyd’s motion to transfer. National 

Lloyds is ordered to file a supplement to its motion to address In re Farmers Insurance 

Company Wind/Hail Storm Litigation, No. 14-0882 (Tex. M.D.L. Panel April 7, 2015) by 

April 24. Real Parties in Interest are ordered to file a response to the motion to transfer 

and supplement to the motion to transfer by May 11. Any reply must be filed by May 20. 

National Lloyds is further ordered to file, along with its supplement to motion to 

transfer, two supplements to Appendix A, listing (1) the cases grouped by county and, 

within each county, grouped by the court and (2) the cases grouped by the date of the storm 

along with the location and type of storm.
#### John F. Coffin, Respondent, v. Felix Hickey, Appellant.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
From: danjasws@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:06:53 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

William Swartz

Califon, NJ 07830
----

|   | (1) | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November 8, 2010 |   | /s/Phillip E. Becker                                                          |
|------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date             |   | Phillip E. BeckerPresident and Chief Executive Officer                        |
|             |   |                                                                          |
|             |   |                                                                          |
| November 8, 2010 |   | /s/H. Stewart Fitz Gibbon III                                                 |
| Date             |   | H. Stewart Fitz Gibbon IIIExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer |

----
No. 673, Misc.

#### Wright *v.*Illinois.

Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Vail Banks, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary S. Judd, Chief
      Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer) of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/
      Gary S.
      Judd





Gary
      S.
      Judd


Chief
      Executive Officer and President


May
      15,
      2006
No. 519.

#### Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc., *v.*United States.

*J. A. Dickinson*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Guilfoyle*and *Alan S. Rosenthal*for the United States.

Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.
No. 587, Misc.

#### Smith *v.*Rodriguez.

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.
From: pleccese@visionrobotics.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:38:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Paul Leccese

San Diego, CA 92129
No. 491, Misc.

#### Wallace *v.*New York.

Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.
No. 244.

#### Mamula *v.*United Steelworkers of America et al.

*Harry Alan Sherman*for petitioner.

*David E. Feller, Elliot Bredhoff, Jerry D. Anker*and *Ernest G. Nassar*for respondents.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 8-K

                                 CURRENT REPORT
                     PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


        Date of report (Date of earliest event reported) August 28, 2002


                             Tangent Solutions, Inc.
               (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)


Delaware                             2-96392-A                        65-0952956
(State or Other Jurisdiction        (Commission                    (IRS Employer
of Incorporation)                   File Number)             Identification No.)


               6801 Powerline Road, Fort  Lauderdale,  Florida 33309 (Address of
               principal executive offices; zip code)


        Registrant's telephone number, including area code (954) 935-8109


          (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)


<page>


Item 4. Changes in Registrant's Certifying Accountant.

(a)(i) Sweeney Gates & Co. was dismissed by the  Registrant as the  Registrant's
principal independent accountant effective August 28, 2002.

(ii) The principal accountant's report on the financial statements for either of
the past two years did not contain an adverse  opinion or disclaimer of opinion,
nor  was  either  modified  as  to  uncertainty,   audit  scope,  or  accounting
principles.

(iii) The decision to change  accountants was approved by the Board of Directors
of the Registrant.

(iv) During the  registrant's  two most recent  fiscal years and any  subsequent
interim  period  through the date of the principal  accountant's  termination on
August 28, 2002, there were no disagreements  with the former  accountant on any
matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or
auditing scope or procedure,  which, if not resolved to the former  accountant's
satisfaction,  would have caused it to make  reference to the subject  matter of
the disagreement(s) in connection with its report.

(2) Radin Glass & Co. has been engaged as the principal  accountant to audit the
Registrant's financial statements effective as of August 28, 2002.


Item 7. Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits.

(a-b) None.

(c) Exhibits.

Index of Exhibits:

(16) Letter on Change in Certifying Accountant


<page>

                                   SIGNATURES

Pursuant  to the  requirements  of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934,  the
registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

                                            TANGENT SOLUTIONS, INC.

Date:  September 3, 2002
                                            By:  /s/  Vito Bellezza

                                                 Vito Bellezza
                                                 President and CEO
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1224 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1224

     To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the 
         availability of Medicare cost contracts for 10 years.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 24, 2001

  Mr. Allard introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend the 
         availability of Medicare cost contracts for 10 years.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medicare Cost Contract Extension Act 
of 2001''.

SEC. 2. TEN-YEAR EXTENSION OF MEDICARE COST CONTRACTS.

    Section 1876(h)(5)(C) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395mm(h)(5)(C)), as redesignated by section 634(1) of the Medicare, 
Medicaid, and SCHIP Benefits Improvement and Protection Act of 2000 
(114 Stat. 2763A-568), as enacted into law by section 1(a)(6) of Public 
Law 106-554), is amended by striking ``2004'' and inserting ``2014''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Solely for the purpose of Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  and
solely to the extent this  certification is applicable to Amendment No. 1 to the
Annual  Report of  Warrantech  Corporation  (the  "Company") on Form 10-K/A (the
"Report"),  the undersigned  hereby certify that this Report fully complies with
the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934 and that the information  contained in this Report fairly presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: July 2, 2004                    /s/ Joel San Antonio
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                      Joel San Antonio
                                      Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
                                      Director


Date: July 2, 2004                    /s/ Richard Gavino
                                      ---------------------------------------
                                      Richard Gavino
                                      Executive Vice President,
                                      Chief Financial Officer,
                                      Chief Accounting Officer, and Treasurer


                                       64
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION
      1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of
      Consolidated Resources Health Care Fund II (the “Partnership”)
      on  Form 10-K for the period ending  December 31, 2006 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, John F. McMullan, Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial
      Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
      pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, subject to the
      qualification noted below:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies
      with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange
      Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
      results of the operations of the Partnership.




Date:  July
                31,
                2007
            By:
            /s/
                John F.
                McMullan


John F. McMullan


Chief Financial Officer (chief executive officer and chief financial officer
      of
      the Partnership)
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
From: cindy@washemc.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:33:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cindy Andrews

Sandersville, GA 31082
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1



                             IDENTIX INCORPORATED
                             LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

                            As of September 1, 2000


Wholly-owned Subsidiary:                          Place of Incorporation


ANADAC, Inc.                                      Virginia, USA
Legislative Demographic Services, Inc.   (1)      Delaware, USA
Identicator Technology, Inc.                      Delaware, USA
itrust, Inc                                       Nevada, USA
Identix International, Inc.                       California, USA
Biometric Applications & Technology, Inc.         Missouri, USA
Identix Australia Pty Ltd.                        New South Wales, Australia


50%-owned Subsidiary:
Sylvan/Identix Fingerprinting Centers L.L.C.      Delaware, USA


(1) 100% owned by ANADAC, Inc.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
%os. %. b. Allan, QE@@ a 
Eon. 8. b . AllaL%, grg4 b 

In opioioo 30. O-886, this Ge rtzmt FxdC that a sbsriff 

or soast8bls vwfn be s=titbd to 0 r 8 umal livs per @@it I8fii) 

oail*otloa tw on tke trial ir* in the fwtiw ecurt, li ho 

sotuallp sol&sotsd the trial r88, *s ml1 as on the iii20 in 

seib ocurt, it he aatwlly sollsotod the rino in said wurt. 

Bsforr paflo6 ovsr the cunowt ot the tine whieb hu bear. 

dollsofOd In tts mnw or Sot tbs um of ths State or ovunty, 

tkr QfflOWU w?a mra responsible ter the aollaotior; are en- 

*ltt& to dsttuot 88 oOsmls8iono flftasn per 4wt (l#G)of 

#I* emmint-ten par 0-t (lO$) rcr the dletxiict or iwunty sttornsf, aad fly0 Jmr oent (WI tor tlrs Ols.erl ot oourt ar other 

0rfl0w ehwged by 38~ wlt4 the e033eetio~ or tar rm. -- 

Texan a.arleprudsno~, Vol. 19, page fms. 

In the OQM o? 5. 99’846, . war tp 

116 sta%ed that: 

I4hantw Cabmty v. EoggeWo et al, lS7 

lindlrrg of lbati *St out in WI& oas+, it 

8htIt tte exwola@ ar 8uOh duty ot oollrobion IIyans 

only th8ir autiwrlty to rwdvs ths mxioy ?XWG tb* 

psrron saluagsd to p&f, or imar the oiiioer by 8&m 

it 1s 1s tabt OoUOQteU, md pay ovar to ths preps? 

so ur o a r . l 

*T&o oG@rts of this litate bsve rdogtd tkw 

ml10 of oon8tru 

3 

rtrio%ly t&wee statute8 prworibin6 rw8 ror pub o orfZOOr8 *ma ag8inst pmbf.ttlnl; 

such tnrs by implioetrlon a8 ro@sx%is both thb fix21~6 cl t&a iaes anb the ofriser who is to reoslre 

tham. . . *EC public oS'losr QUA rl$46raa* Zrcm t&a 

rtato tfrasury, or ita9OllJ in it8 Oixw*e 'to t&s 

tnmury, any Bo5oy without 8 l4r wA%hQrASin$ hiE?l 

tc do ao, an4 olwrly itri~ag the awmnt.~* = 

.*. 

(Par*athrsir ourr)