alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: geraldinemaye@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:38:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Geraldine Mayer

Oak Forest, IL 60452
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.07 MB)
 
 Kuwait Army National Guard Camp Buehring California National Guard Task Force Phoenix
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: stargazereyes38@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:46:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

barbara folding

Trenton, MI 48183
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Wallace W. Evans, Appellant, *v.*William F. Baker, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York, Respondent.

*People ex rel. Evans*v. Baker, 148 App. Div. 896, affirmed.

(Argued May 1, 1912;

decided May 21, 1912.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 29, 1911, which dismissed a writ of certiorari and confirmed the proceedings of the defendant in dismissing the relator from the police department of the city of New York.

*Jacob Rouss*and *Louis J. Grant*for appellant.

*Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel (Terence Farley*and *Harry Crone*of counsel), for respondent.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hisoock and Collin, JJ.
#### John Gullery, Respondent, *v.*Constantine J. MacGuire, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

January, 1912.)

Negligence — Contributory negligence — Question for jury — Automobile accident.

Where, in an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in being run over by defendant’s automobile, it appears that before starting to cross the street the plaintiff saw the defendant’s automobile approaching rapidly about 200 feet away according to plaintiff, but apparently somewhat closer according to other testimony produced by him, although evidence introduced by the defendant negatived the existence of contributory negligence on plaintiff’s part, the question for the jury still remains whether under the circumstances the plaintiff acted as a reasonably prudent man; and it was error for the court to refuse to charge that even if the accident happened in the manner testified to by the plaintiff and his witnesses the verdict may be for the defendant.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal 'Court of the city of New York, borough of Manhattan, ninth district, entered upon a verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

James, Schell & Elkus (Edgar J. Treacy, of counsel), for appellant.

■ Harry M. Steinhardt, for respondent.

Lehmau, J.

The plaintiff was run down by the defendant’s automobile. He has recovered judgment for the injuries thereby sustained. He testified that, before starting to cross the street, he saw the defendant’s automobile approaching rapidly. The automobile was- then about 200 feet away, according to the plaintiff, but apparently somewhat closer according to other testimony produced by him. If the defend*126ant had rested at the close of the plaintiffs cáse, the trial justice could not have directed a verdict for the plaintiff; for it is -a question of fact for the jury whether o>r not.under the circumstances the plaintiff showed reasonable care in leaving a place of safety and proceeding across the street without regard to the approaching automobile. The defendant did, however, introduce other evidence'which, if true, negatived both his own negligence and the absence of contributory negligence of the plaintiff. The issues to he considered by the jury were not only those raised by the conflict of testimony; but, even if they believed the plaintiff, they were still hound to consider whether under the circumstances he acted as a reasonably prudent man. In a similar case (Netterfield v. New York City R. Co., 129 App. Div. 56) it is held that it was fatal error for the trial justice to refuse to charge that, even if the accident happened in the manner testified to by the plaintiff and his witnesses, the verdict may be for the defendant. In the case under consideration the trial justice refused the same request, and his error in my opinion requires that the judgment be reversed.

Giegerioh and Pendleton, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.
From: nurselinhah@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:32:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Linda Hahnel

Bracey, VA 23919
EXHIBIT 12

                  THE CIT GROUP HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                        Year Ended December 31,
                                                                -----------------------------------
                                                                  1996           1995         1994
                                                                --------       --------      ------
                                                                      Dollar Amounts in Millions
<S>                                                              <C>          <C>            <C>   
Net income                                                       $ 260.1      $  225.3       $201.1
Provision for income taxes                                         155.7         139.8        123.9
                                                                --------      --------       ------
Earnings before provision for income taxes                         415.8         365.1        325.0
                                                                --------      --------       ------
Fixed Charges:                                                                               
   Interest and debt expenses on indebtedness                      848.3         831.5        614.0
   Interest factor--one third of rentals on real and                                         
      personal properties                                            8.1           7.9          7.9
                                                                --------      --------       ------
Total fixed charges                                                856.4         839.4        621.9
                                                                --------      --------       ------
                                                                                             
      Total earnings before provisions for income taxes and                                  
        fixed charges                                           $1,272.2      $1,204.5       $946.9
                                                                ========      ========       ======
Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                 1.49          1.44         1.52

</TABLE>
From: hpoe84@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Life and Religious Freedom

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:32:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Heather Poe

Pollock, LA 71467
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 12, 2010

d1109 

# Order

November 12, 2010

141998 & (21)(22)

MONICA D. CAPELLI, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 141998 COA: 300168 Macomb CC: 2 004-001403-DM ANDREW M. CAPELLI, Defendant-Appellee.

_____________ _______________ ___________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the Octobe r 19, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we ar e not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motio n for stay is DENIED.
**EXHIBIT      32**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

|   | (1) | The                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended                December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of                Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15                U.S.C.                78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| February                8, 2007 |   | /s/                Phillip E. Becker                 |
|---------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Date                            |   | Phillip                E. Becker                     |
|                            |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
|                            |   |                                                 |
|                            |   |                                                 |
|                            |   |                                                 |
| February                8, 2007 |   | /s/                H. Stewart Fitz Gibbon III        |
| Date                            |   | H.                Stewart Fitz Gibbon III            |
|                            |   | Executive                Vice President and          |
|                            |   | Chief                Financial Officer               |
From: Aaron

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Proposed definition of "religious employer"

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 10:25:28 PM

Dear U.S. Department of Health and Human Services:

 The current definition of religious employer does not provide true conscience protection for those

commited to preserving life. Health care plans should not be forced to violate the moral and religious

convictions of providers or employers in order to participate in the health care system. Requiring such

an unacceptable demand threatens both universal access to health care and religious freedom of

conscience.

 Sincerely,

 Aaron Foley
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, John Fitzgerald, Chief Financial Officer of BakBone Software Incorporated (the Registrant), do hereby certify in accordance
with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (Section 906) that, based on my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant, to which this certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: June 29, 2004



/s/    John FitzgeraldJohn Fitzgerald Chief Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section
906, has been provided to Registrant and will be retained by Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.