alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Adolph Kobitzsch, Appellant.

*People*v. *Kobitzsch,*148 App. Div. 892, affirmed.

(Submitted March 21, 1912;

decided April 9, 1912.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 16, 1911, which affirmed a judgment of the Court of General Sessions of the Peace in the county of New York rendered upon a verdict convicting the *551defendant of the crime of grand larceny in the second degree.

*Charles E. Le Barbier*for appellant.

*Charles S. Whitman, District Attorney (.Robert C. Taylor*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J.; Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
#### LANZA et al. *v.*WAGNER, MAYOR OF NEW YORK CITY, et al.

No. 452.

Decided November 13, 1962.

*Vito F. Lanza, pro se,*and *Samuel Shapiro*for appellants.

*Louis J. Lefkowitz,*Attorney General of New York, *Irving Galt,*Assistant Solicitor General, *Sheldon Raab,*Deputy Assistant Attorney General, *Leo A. Larkin*and *Seymour B. Quel*for appellees.

Per Curiam.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001036070
<NAME> VIRGINIA FINANCIAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          15,115
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              71
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 7,100
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     73,031
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          62,206
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            60,411
<LOANS>                                        305,169
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,601
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 476,186
<DEPOSITS>                                     405,536
<SHORT-TERM>                                    22,335
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,746
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,907
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,662
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 476,186
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,350
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,953
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    37
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 8,340
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               3,452
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,788
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,552
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      209
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  16
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,355
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,227
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,227
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,602
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.35
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,042
<LOANS-PAST>                                       521
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,470
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       95
<RECOVERIES>                                        17
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,601
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,293
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            308


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  Year Ending December 31 ,   
                             ---------------------------------
                                1995        1994        1993  
                             ---------   ---------   ---------
<S>                             <C>         <C>         <C>
Earnings per share:
  Primary
    Net Income                  1.84        1.84        1.76
  Fully diluted
    Net Income                  1.84        1.83        1.76
</TABLE>

Primary and fully diluted earnings per share are calculated using the
following number of adjusted weighted average shares outstanding:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                  Year Ending December 31,    
                             ---------------------------------
                               1995        1994         1993  
                             ---------   ---------   ---------
     <S>                     <C>         <C>         <C>
     Primary                 4,452,660   4,438,187   4,421,984

     Fully diluted           4,459,458   4,446,850   4,421,833
</TABLE>


The weighted average number of shares outstanding is adjusted to recognize the
dilutive effect, if any, of outstanding employee stock options on both a
primary and fully diluted basis.

The calculations of earnings per share above are based on the weighted average
number of shares outstanding including all common stock and common stock
equivalents in conformity with the instructions for Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
The calculation of earnings per share for financial reporting purposes is based
on the weighted average number of shares outstanding at December 31, 1995,
1994, and 1993, of 4,409,089, 4,393,312, and 4,378,445, respectively, without
giving effect to the common stock equivalents resulting from the assumed
exercise of stock options, which do not dilute earnings per share by more than
3 percent, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.





                                      -1-
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-569

Lower Tribunal No. 2013CF-321

_____________________________

MARVIN GLEN COOK,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hardee County.

Michael E. Raiden, Judge.

June 4, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

NARDELLA, WHITE and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Lisa B. Lott, Assistant Public Defender, 

Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Senior Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee. 

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
<TABLE> <S> <C>































































                                    <PAGE>

<ARTICLE>       5
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000,000
       
<S>                              <C>         
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1995 
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1995 
<PERIOD-END>                     DEC-31-1995 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         12-MOS 
<CASH>                                    76 
<SECURITIES>                               0 
<RECEIVABLES>                          1,637 
<ALLOWANCES>                             132 
<INVENTORY>                               58 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       2,583 
<PP&E>                                27,222 
<DEPRECIATION>                        15,837 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        15,841 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  4,641 
<BONDS>                                    0 
<COMMON>                                  43 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0 
<PREFERRED>                                0 
<OTHER-SE>                             2,147 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          15,841 
<SALES>                                    0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       9,042 
<CGS>                                      0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          7,031 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       442 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        1,611 
<INCOME-TAX>                             563 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    1,048 
<DISCONTINUED>                             0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        3,360 
<CHANGES>                                  0 
<NET-INCOME>                           2,312 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (5.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (5.43)


























        

</TABLE>
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.43 MB)
 
 CENTCOM Afghanistan
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Amy Goldblatt

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:38:12 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Amy Goldblatt

19 Wrenfield Lane

Smyrna, GA 30082
No. 223, Misc.

#### Brown *v.*LaVallee, Warden.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
From: leckerson@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:48:17 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Larry Eckerson

Chaska, MN 55318
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             15,296 
<SECURITIES>                                            0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                      43,973  
<ALLOWANCES>                                        (564)  
<INVENTORY>                                        35,352  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  103,484  
<PP&E>                                             45,181  
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (18,745)  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    179,657  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              54,856  
<BONDS>                                                 0  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0  
<PREFERRED>                                             0  
<COMMON>                                              137  
<OTHER-SE>                                      (108,608)  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      179,657  
<SALES>                                            58,705  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   58,705  
<CGS>                                              29,642  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      29,642  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   21,560  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  5,266  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     2,237  
<INCOME-TAX>                                        1,063  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 1,174  
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0  
<CHANGES>                                               0  
<NET-INCOME>                                        1,174  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .13  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .12  
                                               


</TABLE>
From: ron@spock.usc.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:28:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ron Blackwelder

Rancho Palos Verdes, CA 90275
Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cybertel Capital Corporation (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Quarterly Report"), We, Richard D. Mangiarelli, Chief Executive Officer and
Richard Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.


Date: 11-15-04                            /s/Richard D. Mangiarelli
     ---------                            -------------------------
                                          Richard D. Mangiarelli
                                          Chief Executive Officer

Date: 11-15-04                            /s/Richard Schmidt
     ---------                            ------------------
                                          Richard Schmidt
                                          Chief Financial Officer
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1361

To amend the Central Utah Project Completion Act to clarify the responsibilities of the Secretary of the Interior with respect to the Central Utah

Project, to redirect unexpended budget authority for the Central Utah

Project for wastewater treatment and reuse and other purposes, to provide for prepayment of repayment contracts for municipal and industrial

water delivery facilities, and to eliminate a deadline for such prepayment.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 3, 2001

Mr. BENNETT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the Central Utah Project Completion Act to clarify

the responsibilities of the Secretary of the Interior with

respect to the Central Utah Project, to redirect unexpended budget authority for the Central Utah Project

for wastewater treatment and reuse and other purposes,

to provide for prepayment of repayment contracts for

municipal and industrial water delivery facilities, and

to eliminate a deadline for such prepayment.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1361 IS

1 SECTION 1. AMENDMENTS TO THE CENTRAL UTAH

2 PROJECT COMPLETION ACT.

3 (a) CLARIFICATION OF SECRETARIAL RESPONSIBIL4 ITIES.—Section 201(e) of the Central Utah Project Com5 pletion Act (Public Law 102–575; 106 Stat. 4608) is

6 amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘identified in this Act,’’ and in8 serting ‘‘identified in this title and the Act of April

9 11, 1956 (70 Stat. 105; chapter 203) (commonly

10 known as the ‘Colorado River Storage Project Act’),

11 relating to the Central Utah Project (including over12 sight for all phases of the Central Utah Project, the

13 administration of all prior and future contracts, and

14 operation and maintenance of previously constructed

15 facilities),’’; and

16 (2) by striking ‘‘his responsibilities under this

17 Act’’ and inserting ‘‘those responsibilities’’.

18 (b) USE OF UNEXPENDED BUDGET AUTHORITY.—

19 Section 202(c) of the Central Utah Project Completion

20 Act (106 Stat. 4611; 113 Stat. 1698) is amended in the

21 first sentence—

22 (1) by striking ‘‘in this title up to $60,000,000’’

23 and inserting ‘‘for units of the Central Utah

24 Project’’; and
3

•S 1361 IS

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘(including use of reverse os2 mosis membrane technologies, water recycling, and

3 conjunctive use)’’ after ‘‘conservation measures’’.

4 (c) PREPAYMENT OF REPAYMENT.—Section 210 of

5 the Central Utah Project Completion Act (106 Stat. 4624;

6 110 Stat. 3387) is amended—

7 (1) in the second sentence—

8 (A) by inserting ‘‘or any additional or sup9 plemental repayment contract’’ after ‘‘1985,’’;

10 and

11 (B) by inserting ‘‘of the Central Utah

12 Project’’ after ‘‘water delivery facilities’’; and

13 (2) by striking the fourth sentence.

Æ