alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Home
  MEDIA
  NEWS ARTICLES
  News Article View
 Download
 Details
 Share
 News
 U.S. Navy, 50 Partners Start International Maritime Exercise 2023 By U.S. Naval Forces Central Command Public Affairs
 Known as International Maritime Exercise (IMX) 2023, the multinational event is combined with Cutlass Express, which is led by Naval Forces Europe-Africa. Both will involve more than 50 partner-nations and international organizations operating in the Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea, Indian Ocean and East African coastal regions.
Additionally, the combined exercise will include 7,000 personnel, 35 ships and more than 30 unmanned and artificial intelligence systems.
Participants will focus on five main areas: combined command and control, maritime security, mine countermeasures, unmanned systems and artificial intelligence integration, and global health.
IMX and Cutlass Express are scheduled to end March 16 and 17, respectively. This is the eighth iteration of IMX since the exercise was established in 2012.
The full list of participants is available here: www.dvidshub.net/image/7651844/imx-ce-2023-scheduled-participants-list
 SHARE
 PRINT
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<PAGE>   1

        [LETTERHEAD OF DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU BRIGHTMAN ALMAGOR & CO.]

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                   -----------------------------------------

As independent public accountants of Trinet Investments in High-Tech Ltd., we
hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated February 21, 1999,
included in Form 10-K of Ampal-American Israel Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 1998 (relating to the financial statements of Trinet Investments in
High-Tech Ltd. not included herein), into Ampal-American Israel Corporation's
previously filed Registration Statements No. 33-51023 and No. 33-55137.

/s/ Brightman Bar-Levav Friedman & Co.

Brightman Bar-Levav, Friedman & Co.
Certified Public Accountants

March 25, 1999.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 22

- 0108

__________________________________________________________________

Lung Green

, )

)

Plaintiff and Appellant, )

)

vs. ) Order

)

City of Great Falls and Montana Municipal )

Interlocal Authority )

)

Defendant s and Appellee s

. )

__________________________________________________________________

Based on the Stipulation re the Dismissal of Appeal

, signed by all parties

,

this appeal is dismissed with prejudice; each party to bear their own costs and

attorney fees.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 28 2022

07/28/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0108
From: strawberrysue@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:48:33 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sue Montgomery

Payson, AZ 85541
From: Kevin Vaught

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Access to preventive health care and contraception

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:38:32 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.
No. 453.

No. 495.

No. 510.

No. 522.

#### In re Alker, International Association of Machinists, AFL-CIO, et al. *v.*Central Airlines, Inc., Texas Carbonate Co. *v.*Phinney, District Director of Internal Revenue, United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma et al. *v.*Lutes et al.,

*ante,*p. 923;

*ante,*p. 934;

*ante,*p. 940; and

*ante,*p. 941.

Petitions for rehearing denied.
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Century Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward F. Gotschall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





/s/    EDWARD F. GOTSCHALL





Edward F. Gotschall

Chief Financial Officer

May 14, 2003





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to New Century and will be retained by New Century and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification accompanied the Form 10-Q filing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. It is being reproduced herein for information only. It is
not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of New Century, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
Exhibit 31.2

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard Schmidt, Chief Financial Officer of Cybertel Capital Corporation
(the "small business issuer"), certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the
Registrant;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this Quarterly Report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Quarterly Report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
Quarterly Report;

     4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)
for the Registrant and I have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the Registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within
          those entities, particularly during the period in which this
          Quarterly Report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure
          controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the
          filing date of this Quarterly Report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this Quarterly Report my conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on
          My evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function);

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
          internal controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's
          ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data
          and have identified for the Registrant's auditors any material
          weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
          other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's
          internal controls.


Dated: 11-18-05           Signature:  /s/Richard Schmidt
       --------                       -------------------------
                                      Richard Schmidt
                                      Chief Financial Officer
Sullivan, )

April 4, 1911.

#### Claremont *v.*Rand *& a.*

Where the intent of a written contract is unmistakable, though not stated in terms, a reformation is unnecessary.

Where taxpayers refuse to pay to a town a guaranteed income on an extension of water mains in accordance with their contract, an action of assumpsit against the signers of the agreement furnishes an adequate remedy and a bill in equity to enforce the contract cannot be maintained.

Whether the plaintiff in a bill in equity to enforce a contract should be permitted to amend by making the proceeding an action in assumpsit is a question determinable by the superior court.

Bill in Equity, to reform and enforce a contract of guaranty. The defendants demurred generally. Transferred from the Hay term, 1910, of the superior court by *Pike,*J.

In 1905, the plaintiff town “voted to authorize the water commissioners to extend the water mains from Draper’s corner, so called, along Maple avenue to and including the Sullivan County Fair Association grounds and Pinehurst, so called, provided the people along the line shall guarantee the water commissioners eight per cent upon the expense of extending the water main.” Thereafter the defendants signed the following document: “Having the .welfare of the town at heart, we, citizens of Claremont, stockholders of Sullivan County Fair Association, and others, do hereby agree to guarantee the eight per cent required by the town to extend the water main from Draper corner along Maple avenue to the Sullivan County Fair Association grounds and Pinehurst, so called; this guaranty to last only until rental of said main shall pay eight per *117cent. ” This offer was accepted by the town and the extension was made. The annual rental has been less than eight per cent of the cost of the extension, and the defendants refuse to pay the difference. The prayer of the bill is for a decree reforming the contract so that it shall read “ eight per cent a year in any one year, ” and for a decree for the unpaid deficiency.

*Rosea W. Parker*and *Ira G. Colby*(by brief and orally), for the plaintiff.

*Hurd & Kinney*and *Edward E. Leighton (Messrs. Kinney*and *Leighton*orally), for the defendants.

Peaslee, J.

The reformation prayed for is not needed. While it is true that the fact the guaranteed rental is an annual one is not stated in terms, yet it is manifestly so intended, and such is the legal interpretation of the language used. *Kendall*v. *Green,*67 N. H. 557.

No ground is shown upon which the bill can be maintained as a more convenient remedy than a suit in assumpsit against the signers of the agreement. In such a suit the plaintiff will be entitled to a judgment and execution against each defendant for the whole amount due. It is not apparent wherein equity could give a remedy more ample or more efficient. *Davison*v. *Davison,*71 N. H. 180.

Whether the plaintiff should be permitted to amend by making this proceeding a suit in assumpsit is a matter for the consideration of the superior court.

*Case discharged.*

Ali concurred.
From: cjcommans@urbanengineers.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:08:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Christopher Commans

Clifton Heights, PA 19018
----

(2004/C 88 E/0215)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0749/04

by Paul Rübig (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(11 March 2004)

Subject:   Introduction of the sector approach in EU development cooperation

The Commmission's development cooperation activities have undergone significant changes since the introduction of the sector approach, which increasingly provides for direct budget support to beneficiary countries. As a result, the amount of funding available for technical assistance (TA) in the form of projects for European consultancy firms is steadily decreasing, as in future a wide range of tasks will need to be carried out by the beneficiary state and its authorities.

Can the Commission provide statistics showing the absolute (in euro) and relative development of technical assistance (including procurement procedures) as a percentage of the Commission's estimated development budget (e.g. projects/budget support/total budget) from 1996 to the present day and, as a projection, until the end of the current financial period in 2006?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(30 April 2004)

The Commission is a member of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC) of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and as such has an obligation to provide full and regular reporting on its overall development aid, in accordance with standard DAC reporting formats.

One of the elements that it reports is the amount allocated to ‘Technical Co-operation’(TCO). Technical co-operation according to the DAC ‘comprises provision of resources where the main aim is to augment the stock of human intellectual capital, i.e. the level of knowledge, skills; technical know-how ...’ and amounts ‘primarily aimed at assisting the implementation of a project ...’

The attached table shows the amounts reported to the DAC as Technical co-operation in the period 1996-2002 as a proportion of the total amount of Official Development Assistance (ODA) during that period in Commitments and Disbursements. This ratio has varied between 5,4 and 3,2 % for commitments and in a ratio between 5,2 and 3,1 % for disbursements.

Technical Co-Operation of the EU reported to the DAC compared to the total Bilateral Official Aid

Considering that decisions on technical cooperation are taken in the framework of each specific project/programme, it is not possible to provide forecasts of commitments and payments.

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 114 (Friday, June 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 33990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-13903]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8762]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition; 
Determinations: ``Mysticism and Music in Iran: The Art of Ostad Elahi 
(1895-1974)''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Mysticism and Music in Iran: The Art of 
Ostad Elahi (1895-1974),'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign 
owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display 
of the exhibit objects at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New 
York, from on or about August 4, 2014, until on or about January 11, 
2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be 
determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: June 9, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-13903 Filed 6-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*New York Centadrink Company, Appellant.

*People*v. *N. Y. Centadrink Co.,*152 App. Div. 912, affirmed.

(Argued February 4, 1913;

decided February 25, 1913.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, *737entered September 10, 1912, which affirmed a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the Peace convicting the defendant of a violation of section 161 of the Labor Law as a second offense in that it did unlawfully, willfully and knowingly employ, permit and suffer a child under the age of sixteen years to work in and in connection with a stand for the sale of drinks, owned, conducted and operated by it.

*Robert H. Charlton*for appellant.

*James C. Cropsey, District Attorney (Hersey Egginton*and *Harry G. Anderson*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Cuddeback, Hogan and Miller, JJ.