alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: RobHARCH@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:41:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robert E. Hatfield II

Sincerely,

Robert II Hatfield

, 77080-6621
yearIdsourceTypeIDsourceTypePopulation

2016 11 5650 2016 21 71117 2016 31 53650 2016 32 28205 2016 41 144 2016 42 75 2016 43 976 2016 51 83 2016 52 5652 2016 53 726 2016 54 1307 2016 61 1205 2016 62 1442
No. 30, Misc.

No. 73, Misc.

#### Schaber *v.*Ohio; Holiday *v.*United States,

*ante,*p. 853; and

*ante,*p. 834.

Petitions for rehearing denied.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of these applications.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1354 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1354

    To require the Secretary of Agriculture to provide payments to 
        producers of forage crops for losses due to army worms.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 3, 2001

  Mrs. Carnahan (for herself and Mr. Leahy) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require the Secretary of Agriculture to provide payments to 
        producers of forage crops for losses due to army worms.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. COMPENSATION OF PRODUCERS FOR FORAGE LOSSES DUE TO ARMY 
              WORMS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Agriculture shall use not more 
than $25,000,000 of funds of the Commodity Credit Corporation to 
provide payments to producers of forage crops for losses due to army 
worms.
    (b) Amount.--
            (1) In general.--The amount of a payment made to a producer 
        under this section shall be equal to 65 percent of the average 
        price received by producers of a forage crop in the crop year 
        (as determined under paragraph (2)) for any deficiency in an 
        established regular cutting greater than 35 percent of the 
        established yield for the cutting, as determined by the 
        Secretary.
            (2) Average price.--For the purpose of paragraph (1), the 
        average price received by producers of a forage crop shall be 
        equal to the simple average price received by producers of the 
        crop, as determined by the Secretary, during the immediately 
        preceding 5 crop years, excluding the year in which the average 
        price was the highest and the year in which the average price 
        was the lowest.
            (3) Administration.--Except as provided in paragraph (1), 
        the amount of a payment made to a producer under this section 
        shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions 
        specified in section 196 of the Agricultural Market Transition 
        Act (7 U.S.C. 7333).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.1

        STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
                       ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     The  undersigned,  Michael C. Anderson,  is the Chief Financial  Officer of
Wayne Savings Bancshares, Inc.(the "Company").

     This  statement  is being  furnished in  connection  with the filing by the
Company of the Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002 (the "Report").

     By execution of this statement, I certify that:

          A)   the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
               or 78o(d)) and

          B)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations  of the  Company  as of the dates and for the  periods
               covered by the Report.

     This  statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this  statement  will  accompany  the  Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.



November 14, 2002                             /s/ Michael C. Anderson
------------------                            ---------------------------
Dated                                         Michael C. Anderson
# Gazzetta ufficiale C 64A/28 f

| | ISSN 1977-0944 |
| --- | --- |
| Gazzetta ufficiale
  dell’Unione europea | C 64A |
| | |
| Edizione in lingua italiana | Comunicazioni e informazioni | 60° anno28 febbraio 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0944

Gazzetta ufficiale

dell’Unione europea

C 64A

Edizione in lingua italiana

Comunicazioni e informazioni

60° anno28 febbraio 2017

---

| Numero d'informazione | Sommario | pagina |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Avvisi |
| | PROCEDIMENTI AMMINISTRATIVI |
| | Parlamento europeo |
| 2017/C 64 A/01 | Procedura di selezione PE/195/S — Agente temporaneo — Capo unità (AD 14) — Elenco di idoneità | 1 |

Numero d'informazione

Sommario

pagina

V   Avvisi

PROCEDIMENTI AMMINISTRATIVI

Parlamento europeo

2017/C 64 A/01

Procedura di selezione PE/195/S — Agente temporaneo — Capo unità (AD 14) — Elenco di idoneità

1

---

| IT | |
| --- | --- |

IT

---

V Avvisi

PROCEDIMENTI AMMINISTRATIVI

Parlamento europeo

| 28.2.2017 | IT | Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea | CA 64/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2017

IT

Gazzetta ufficiale dell’Unione europea

CA 64/1

---

PROCEDURA DI SELEZIONE PE/195/S

Agente temporaneo — Capo unità (AD 14)

ELENCO DI IDONEITÀ

(2017/C 064 A/01)

| 1. | BORDEZ, Emmanuel |
| --- | --- |

1.

BORDEZ, Emmanuel

L’elenco di idoneità è stato adottato il 14 febbraio 2017.

---
No. 434.

#### Roumeliotis et ux. *v.*Immigration and Naturalization Service.

*Francis S. Clamitz*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Felicia Dubrovsky*for respondent.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
From: spdunn01@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:08:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Stephen Dunn

Carlsbad, CA 92011
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2043
TAWANA S. ALLEN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FORD CREDIT, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CA-04-310-1) Submitted: December 16, 2004 Decided: December 20, 2004 Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Tawana S. Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Lynn Ogburn, III, Nancy Lewis Huegerich, POYNER & SPRUILL, L.L.P., Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Tawana S. Allen appeals the district court’s order dismissing her civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Allen v. Ford Credit , No. CA-04- 310-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 16, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6877

THOMAS TALMADGE EVANS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DANIEL T. MAHON, Warden, Dillwyn Correctional

Center; DIANE ELKO, Nurse, Dillwyn Correctional Center,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District

Judge. (CA-95-1178-R)

Submitted: July 23, 1996 Decided: August 6, 1996

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Talmadge Evans, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jill Theresa Bowers,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia;

Powell Murry Leitch, III, FLIPPIN, DENSMORE, MORSE, RUTHERFORD &

JESSEE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Evans v. Mahon, No. CA-95-1178-R (W.D. Va. May 9, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,069
<SECURITIES>                                       323
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,489
<ALLOWANCES>                                       312
<INVENTORY>                                        451
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,387
<PP&E>                                          61,009
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,378
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,453
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,395
<BONDS>                                          9,113
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,020
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,795
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,453
<SALES>                                            676
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,224
<CGS>                                              852
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,730
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,057
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   365
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,030
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,488
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,040
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,448
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,448
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.80


</TABLE>
#### Sophie M. La Grave, Appellant, *v.*Leopold Hellinger, Respondent.

*La Grave*v. *Hellinger,*144 App. Div. 397, affirmed.

(Argued April 11, 1912;

decided April 30, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 13, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to recover upon a bond.

*Frederick L. Taylor, Raymond D. Thurber*and *Archibald R. Watson*for appellant.

*Harold Nathan*for respondent. «

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

• Concur: Cullen, Ch. J.; Cray, Werner, Hiscocic, Chase and Collin, JJ. Absent: Willard Bartlett, J.
No. 181, Misc.

#### Holley *v.*United States.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Richard W. Schmude*for the United States.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
### ~ NEWARK REGIONAL BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP May18,2015

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx Secretary of Transportation US Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave SE Washington, DC 20590 The Honorable John F. Kerry Secretary of State US Department of State 2201 C Street NW Washington, DC 20520 The Honorable Penny Pritzker Secretary of Commerce US Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, D.C. 20230

Dear Secretary Kerry, Secretary Pritzker, and Secretary Foxx, I'm writing to you today to bring your attention to an important step we can take to level the playing field for American businesses and maintain the environment of fair market competition in aviation established by Open Skies policy that has been crucial for America's success. As president of the Newark Regional Business Partnership (NRBP), I am acutely aware of the considerable benefits Open Skies policy has brought to our region and state, in addition to the U.S. economy as a whole. The competitive atmosphere created by Open Skies improved service, lowered fares and increased air travel and commerce throughout the country. Over the past decade, Qatar Airways, Etihad Airways and Emirates Airline have received at least $42 billion in government subsidies, interest-free "loans," free land, and other unfair benefits in direct violation of U.S. Open Skies policy. I am reaching out to ask that the U.S. government open consultations with Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) in order to address the massive, market-distorting subsidies that those nations provide their state-owned airlines. The tens of billions of dollars in subsidies are distorting the free market framework established by Open Skies and they will ultimately have a negative economic impact here in the United States if we

60 Park Place, Suite 1800 • Newark, NJ 07102-5567 • P 973-522-0099 • F 973.824.6587 o www.newarkrbp.org

### Page Two Open Skies

allow them to continue. The uneven playing field created by these massive subsidies is forcing U.S. carriers like Delta, United and American Airlines out of an increasing number of international routes which, if allowed to continue, will lead the disappearance of thousands of American jobs. In fact, according to a white paper released by the Partnership for Open & Fair Skies, each route that is lost to Qatar, Etihad or Emirates will result in an average net loss of 821 good U.S. jobs. These are jobs that we can ill afford to lose and they should not be lost as a result of unfair competition from foreign carriers. I am not seeking to end the Open Skies agreements with Qatar and the UAE, nor am I raising concerns with regard to any of the more than one hundred other Open Skies agreements. I am simply requesting that the U.S. government open consultations with Qatar and the UAE, which are provided for within the Open Skies agreements themselves and hold off on the addition of new routes. Sincerely,



### ~ Chip Hallock President & CEO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM THE  CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED   FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  OF  PROVIDIAN  FINANCIAL  CORPORATION  AND
SUBSIDIARIES  FOR THE QUARTERLY  PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              87,333
<SECURITIES>                                       270,542
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,769,622
<ALLOWANCES>                                       249,440
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      0    <F1>
<PP&E>                                              65,689
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0    <F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,019,725
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 0    <F1>
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                               954
<OTHER-SE>                                         639,453
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,019,725
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   387,280
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      182,053
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    57,656
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  54,756
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     92,815
<INCOME-TAX>                                        36,707
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 56,108
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                        56,108
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.58
<FN>
<F1> Non-classified balance sheet
<F2> PP&E shown net
</FN>
        


</TABLE>