alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000732718
<NAME> U S WEST, INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             211
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,249
<ALLOWANCES>                                       136
<INVENTORY>                                        179
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,399
<PP&E>                                          39,223
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,643
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,315
<BONDS>                                         13,248
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,180
<PREFERRED>                                        923
<COMMON>                                        10,876
<OTHER-SE>                                       (475)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,740
<SALES>                                         15,235
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,235
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,429
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,083
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,222
<INCOME-TAX>                                       522
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (3)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       697
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.43<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.41<F2>
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENTS BASIC EPS AND HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO.128.
<F2>REPRESENTS DILUTED EPS AND HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SFAS NO.128.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
From: rjohnson@lamar.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:02:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Robin R Johnson

Denham Springs, LA 70727
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.02 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### John R. Thomas, Respondent, v. Savillian F. Traffarn, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Follett, J.
From: guzby1@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:12:10 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Luis Guzman

South Pasadena, CA 91030
AFS-12-465-E

July 25, 2012

Ms. Ellen Birmingham

United Air Lines, Inc.

233 South Wacker Drive, 23rd Floor

Chicago, IL 60606

Dear Ms. Birmingham:

This is in response to your letter dated July 9, 2012, petitioning the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) on behalf of United Air Lines, Inc. (United), from an exemption from 

§§ 61.39(a)(1) and (b)(1)(i) and 61.157(b) and (c) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations

(14 CFR).

The FAA finds that United is covered under Air Transport Association of America d.b.a.

Airlines for America’s Exemption No. 10566. Therefore, the FAA will take no further action 

on your petition and Docket number FAA-2012-0757 is being closed. 

Sincerely,

/s/

Ida M. Klepper

Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division
From: Fred_Gorris@ml.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:41:43 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Frederick Gorris

San Diego, CA 92122
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7659

EDWARD DANE JEFFUS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

STEPHANIE HOLLEMBAEK,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:15-hc-02240-D)

Submitted: April 18, 2017 Decided: April 21, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Dane Jeffus, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Edward Dane Jeffus appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) 

motion for relief from the court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed 

in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jeffus v. Hollembaek, No. 

5:15-hc-02240-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Steven J. Combs 05/13/2015

Droneview LLC

13550 Donop Road

Elmendorf TX 78112

(208) 610-6285

sccombs@earthlink.net

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Filed with www.regulations.gov

Re: Request for modification of Exemption No.11403, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0148.

Dear Sir or Madam,

Droneview LLC requests a modification of the above exemption number in the respect of adding 

an additional UAV to the business.

The UAV is the DJI Phantom 3 Professional which in all practical aspects of the flight 

characteristics is the same as the Phantom 2 Vision + in which Droneview was granted its 

exemption.

The differences from the Phantom 2 Vision + and the Phantom 3 professional is mainly the 

camera system and the camera system software. All of the previous safety standards and 

features from the Phantom 2 Vision + are incorporated into the Phantom 3 Professional as well 

as some easier to use and more intuitive remote control functions.

Droneview LLC will incorporate the Phantom 3 Professional into its business using the same 

pilot training and rigorous inspection procedures outlined in the original documents submitted 

under the Regulatory Docket FAA-2015-0148 with separate and serial number specific 

checklists and maintenance records.

The operator’s manual for the DJI Phantom 3 Professional as well as the quick start manual are 

available online at http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-3/download.

The file size is 13.2 Mb and will not upload to the Regulations.gov website as it’s too large.

If you have any questions please contact me at the information above.

Sincerely,

Steven J. Combs
# Publicatieblad C 54A/21 f

| | ISSN 1977-0995 |
| --- | --- |
| Publicatieblad
  van de Europese Unie | C 54A |
| | |
| Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal | Mededelingen en bekendmakingen | 60e jaargang21 februari 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0995

Publicatieblad

van de Europese Unie

C 54A

Uitgave in de Nederlandse taal

Mededelingen en bekendmakingen

60e jaargang21 februari 2017

---

| Nummer | Inhoud | Bladzijde |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Bekendmakingen |
| | BESTUURLIJKE PROCEDURES |
| | Raad |
| 2017/C 54 A/01 | Verlenging van de geldigheidsduur van de lijsten van de geschikte kandidaten | 1 |

Nummer

Inhoud

Bladzijde

V   Bekendmakingen

BESTUURLIJKE PROCEDURES

Raad

2017/C 54 A/01

Verlenging van de geldigheidsduur van de lijsten van de geschikte kandidaten

1

---

| NL | |
| --- | --- |

NL

---

V Bekendmakingen

BESTUURLIJKE PROCEDURES

Raad

| 21.2.2017 | NL | Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie | CA 54/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2017

NL

Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie

CA 54/1

---

Verlenging van de geldigheidsduur van de lijsten van de geschikte kandidaten

(2017/C 054 A/01)

Bij besluit van de secretaris-generaal van de Raad van de Europese Unie wordt de geldigheid van de lijsten van de geschikte kandidaten van de hierna vermelde algemene vergelijkende onderzoeken verlengd tot en met 31 december 2019:

| CONS/AD/430


  (twee profielen) | georganiseerd voor de vorming van een aanwervingsreserve van senior administrateurs op het gebied van het Europees veiligheids- en defensiebeleid (EVDB). Het vergelijkend onderzoek betreft twee profielen van rang AD 9 (profiel 1: senior strategische planners voor crisisbeheersingsoperaties en -missies; profiel 2: senior vermogensontwikkelingsplanners: militair/civiel/ruimte), bekendgemaakt in het
  Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie C 178 A van 15 juli 2008. |
| --- | --- |
| CONS-COMM/AD/433 | georganiseerd voor de vorming van een aanwervingsreserve voor hoofd Administratieve Eenheid (AD 12) op het gebied van vertaling voor de Ierse taal, bekendgemaakt in het
  Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie C 99 A van 30 april 2009. |

CONS/AD/430

(twee profielen)

georganiseerd voor de vorming van een aanwervingsreserve van senior administrateurs op het gebied van het Europees veiligheids- en defensiebeleid (EVDB). Het vergelijkend onderzoek betreft twee profielen van rang AD 9 (profiel 1: senior strategische planners voor crisisbeheersingsoperaties en -missies; profiel 2: senior vermogensontwikkelingsplanners: militair/civiel/ruimte), bekendgemaakt in het
  Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie C 178 A van 15 juli 2008.

CONS-COMM/AD/433

georganiseerd voor de vorming van een aanwervingsreserve voor hoofd Administratieve Eenheid (AD 12) op het gebied van vertaling voor de Ierse taal, bekendgemaakt in het
  Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie C 99 A van 30 april 2009.

---
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.19 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: carole.demarco@crossmark.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 1:00:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Carole DeMarco

Mckinney, TX 75070
From: pastorsteve@pppbc.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:14:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Steve Turrentine

Colorado Springs, CO 80916
No. 290, Misc.

#### Taylor *v.*Texas.

*John Cutler*for petitioner.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. Certiorari denied.