alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Mental Health Special Emphasis Panel; Non-Pharmacological Clinical Trials.                    

*Date:*                         October 6, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Serena Chu, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20852, 301-500-5829,                         *serena.chu@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.242, Mental Health Research Grants, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: September 6, 2023.

Melanie J. Pantoja, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-19566 Filed 9-11-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certificationof Chief Financial Officer**

 

I,Neil J. Abitabilo, Chief Financial Officer of Atlantic Express TransportationCorp. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany  for the quarter ended September 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|     | /s/ Neil J. Abitabilo     |   |
|----------|---------------------------|--------|
|     | Neil J. Abitabilo         |
| * * | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

Date: December 5,2005

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Reportpursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is notto be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.

 

----
#### William Burke, Appellant, v. John Quinn, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Bradley, J.;

Smith, P. J., not voting.
https://fdms.erulemaking.net/...component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480b2e62f&Comment=true[8/12/2010 11:45:22 AM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: August 12, 2010

Received: August 11, 2010

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 80b2e62f

Comments Due: August 11, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: HHS-OS-2010-0012

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Dependent Coverage of Children to Age 26, etc.

Comment On: HHS-OS-2010-0012-0001

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Dependent Coverage of Children to Age 26, etc.

Document: HHS-OS-2010-0012-DRAFT-0029

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-11391

Submitter Information

Name: David Ermer

Organization: Association of Federal Health Organizations

General Comment

Please accept the comments of the Association of Federal Health Organizations on this interim final rule.
From: Gloria Klimczak

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Religious Refusal

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:38:49 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
From: kleebretta@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:01:09 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

marcia Kelly

Indianapolis, IN 46239
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 61629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19213]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 7, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
August 30, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
43 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2023-251, CP2023-254.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-19213 Filed 9-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 25, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-21224 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MANUEL CANO-RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-02-CR-357-ALL

-------------------- Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Manuel Cano-Ramirez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United Statesafter deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. CanoRamirez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Cano-Ramirez maintains that he pleaded guilty toNo. 02-21224 -2- an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the maximum term of imprisonment and supervised release which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Cano-Ramirez acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
H. Res. 126

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 27, 2007.

Whereas the University of Southern California (USC) Trojan 

football team achieved many historic accomplishments 

during the 2006 season; 

Whereas the USC Trojan football team achieved its fifth consecutive Associated Press (AP) Top 4 finish; 

Whereas USC was invited to make an unprecedented fifth 

consecutive Bowl Championship Series bowl appearance; 

Whereas USC won an unprecedented fifth consecutive Pacific-10 Conference championship; 

Whereas USC achieved its fifth consecutive season of at least 

11 victories, an achievement equaled by only 3 other Division I schools in the history of National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) football; 

Whereas USC accomplished these feats while playing the second most difficult schedule in the Nation; 

Whereas USC boasts a 33-game winning streak for all home 

games, as well as a 23-game winning streak for Pac-10 

home games; 

Whereas USC has maintained a top 10 ranking in the Associated Press College Football Poll for the past 56 editions; 

Whereas USC has won 56 of its last 60 games; 
2

•HRES 126 EH 

Whereas during the 2006 season, USC featured 5 All-American first team players (wide receivers Dwayne Jarrett 

and Steve Smith, center Ryan Kalil, offensive tackle Sam 

Baker, and defensive tackle Sedrick Ellis); 

Whereas USC head football coach Pete Carroll has the best 

winning percentage of any current NCAA Division I football coach with at least 5 years of experience; 

Whereas the annual Rose Bowl is the oldest of all college 

bowl games, and its history and prestige have earned it 

the title ‘‘The Granddaddy of Them All’’; 

Whereas USC has played in the Rose Bowl on 31 occasions 

and won 22 times, both records exceeding any other collegiate football program; 

Whereas during the 2007 Rose Bowl game, USC featured a 

second half offensive explosion behind a game recordtying 4 touchdown passes from quarterback John David 

Booty; 

Whereas during the 2007 Rose Bowl game, wide receiver 

Dwayne Jarrett caught 2 touchdown passes, was named 

Offensive Most Valuable Player for the game, and became USC’s career receptions leader with 11 catches for 

205 yards; 

Whereas during the 2007 Rose Bowl game, linebacker Brian 

Cushing made 7 tackles, 4 tackles for losses, 2.5 sacks, 

and forced a fumble, and he was named the Defensive 

Most Valuable Player for the game; and 

Whereas, under the leadership of USC’s 10th president, Steven B. Sample, USC has established itself as a worldclass research university, known for its leadership in the 

fields of communication, media, the sciences, and the 

arts: Now, therefore, be it 
3

•HRES 126 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) commends the University of Southern California 

Trojan football team and USC President Steven B. 

Sample for USC’s victory in the 2007 Rose Bowl; and 

(2) recognizes the achievements of the players, 

coaches, students, alumni, and staff who were instrumental in helping the University of Southern California 

win the Rose Bowl. 

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT  99.7








CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT





In connection with the annual report of TransGlobe Energy Corporation (the “Registrant”) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward D. Ok, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                                  
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.










/s/   Edward D. Ok


Name: Edward D. Ok


Title:  Chief Financial Officer


March 7, 2018
From: Martha O"Day

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 11:10:21 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Martha O'Day

392 Central Pk W

Apt 19R

New York, NY 10025
No. 146, Misc.

#### Dees *v.*Rivers et al.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene*and *Isabel L. Blair*for respondents.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
### -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/30 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.06 N 76.88 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■


## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●


## ★ ● ● ● ●
#### MISSOURI ex rel. JOHNSON, ADMINISTRATRIX, et al. *v.*CLAY, SUPERINTENDENT OF DIVISION OF INSURANCE, et al.

No. 607.

Decided January 21, 1963.

*Walter A. Raymond*for appellants.

*Thomas F. Eagleton,*Attorney General of Missouri, *Harry H. Kay,*Special Assistant Attorney General, and *John C. Baumann*for Clay, and *James M. Douglas*and *William G. Guerri*for Aetna Insurance Co., appellees.

Per Curiam.

The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
From: Ruth nelson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 7:05:16 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Ruth nelson

93 concord st

seabrook, NH 03874
US Navy surface forces and AC-130W gunships conduct joint operations in Arabian Gulf
 
  By Commander, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command , 5th Fleet Public Affairs - NAVCENT
  ARABIAN GULF - U.S. Navy Cyclone-class patrol coastal ships (PC) and P-8A Poseidon aircraft assigned to U.S. Naval Forces Central Command (NAVCENT) conducted a first of its kind joint exercise with AC-130W Stinger II gunships assigned to Special Operations Command Central (SOCCENT), March 8 and 9. The exercise, which is designed to enhance the capabilities of U.S. forces to respond to surface threats, involved U.S. Navy P-8 aircraft performing long range reconnaissance and PCs selecting simulated surface targets for the AC-130W to engage. “Our surface forces integrating with aircraft that have the firepower of an AC-130W brings a capability to the joint force that profoundly enhances our lethality in the maritime environment.  The addition of the Gunship to the joint maritime battle significantly enhances our ability to detect, track, engage and defeat surface threats in order to control water space in the Arabian Gulf,” said Capt. Peter Mirisola, Commander, Destroyer Squadron (DESRON) 50/Commander, Combined Task Force (CTF) 55. “The effectiveness of this joint capability to conduct maritime strike, reconnaissance and armed overwatch was clearly displayed during this live-fire event.” The AC-130W is employed in multiple theaters using 30mm, 105mm, and precision guided munitions to execute close air support and air interdiction missions. This exercise marks the first time these assets have been integrated in direct support of maritime security operations in the Arabian Gulf. While this is the first integration of the AC-130W in this capacity, similar integration operations with Special Operations assets were conducted in the Gulf between U.S. Naval Forces and MH-6M Little Bird helicopters during Operation Earnest Will from 1987 to 1988. “We’ve effectively employed similar joint capabilities in the past to counter belligerent forces that attempt to disrupt or hinder the free flow of commerce and freedom of navigation in this region using force, or attack U.S., coalition, or partner forces in a conflict,” said Vice Adm. Jim Malloy, commander, NAVCENT. “We will continue to work across component commands and coalition partners to further improve the lethality of our forces through our ability to simultaneously engage a multitude of threats in the Arabian Gulf, Red Sea and adjacent waters.” DESRON 50/CTF 55 conducts maritime security operations in support of regional security and stability. Its responsibilities include planning and executing a robust regional engagement program with coalition forces from regional partners and allied navies who deploy to the Arabian Gulf. The U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations encompasses about 2.5 million square miles of water area and includes the Arabian Gulf, Arabian Sea, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea and parts of the Indian Ocean. The expanse is comprised of 20 countries and includes three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, the Suez Canal and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait at the southern tip of Yemen.