alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# U.S. and Royal Saudi air forces continue counter-UAS partnership

/ Published Aug. 5, 2021
AL UDEID AIR BASE, Qatar , 
Protecting U.S. and allied forces against unmanned aerial system attacks continues to be a top priority in the U.S. Central Command theater of operations.   

In response, U.S. Air Forces Central and partner nations are continuing an ongoing series of integration missions through the summer of 2021.

On July 29, U.S. and Royal Saudi aircraft participated in a combined training operation to evaluate their ability to collaboratively track and destroy a simulated invading UAS within regional airspace.

“Protecting U.S., Coalition and partner nation forces by countering the UAS threat remains a critical concern across the region,” said Col. Matt Dietz, U.S. AFCENT Director of Operations. “Our Saudi Arabian partners share that concern, and together we’re building on previous training to develop an effective, collaborative capability to protect our common interests.”

U.S. AFCENT works closely with partner nations to ensure the security and stability of regional airspace.
From: Barbara Terry

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Women"s Preventive Health Care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:20:51 PM

Please make certain that women's care is protected in any legislation regarding employer health

insurance coverage.

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine pertaining to the coverage of preventive care under

the new health care law.

Please reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger.

Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers.

For example, hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement,

even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption

would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
Exhibit 32

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                          PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
(the "Report") of Cimnet, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30,
2005, I, John D. Richardson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:


     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


                                       /s/ JOHN D. RICHARDSON
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       John D. Richardson
                                       Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Principal Accounting Officer


August 15, 2005

                                       18
Exhibit












LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC.


FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This First Amendment to the Employment Agreement (the “Amendment”) is made effective as of February 23, 2016 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Limelight Networks, Inc. (the “Company”) and Robert Lento (the “Executive”). 
RECITALS
A.The Company and Executive entered into that certain Employment Agreement dated as of January 22, 2013 (the “Agreement”); and 
B.The Company and Executive desire to amend the Agreement to modify certain existing aspects of Executive’s employment with the Company.  Defined terms used in this Amendment identified with an initial capital letter have the meaning given such terms in the Agreement.


NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and Executive agree that in consideration of the foregoing and the promises and covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows:


AGREEMENT
1.     Severance. Section 7(b) of the Agreement is modified to read in its entirety as follows:
(b)    Termination Without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason in Connection with a Change of Control.  If Executive’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause or Executive terminates voluntarily for Good Reason and the termination is in Connection with a Change of Control, then, subject to Section 8, Executive will receive: (i) continued payment of Executive’s Base Salary for the year in which the termination occurs (subject to applicable tax withholdings), for twenty four (24) months, such amounts to be paid in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll policies; (ii) the payment in an amount equal to 200% of Executive’s Target Annual Incentive for the year in which the termination occurs (subject to applicable tax withholdings), such amounts to be paid in accordance with the Company’s normal payroll policies over the course of twenty four (24) months; (iii) 100% of Executive’s then outstanding unvested Equity Awards will vest, and (iv) reimbursement for premiums paid for continued health benefits for Executive (and any eligible dependents) under the Company’s health plans until the earlier of (A) twelve (12) months, payable when such premiums are due (provided Executive validly elects to continue coverage under COBRA), or (B) the date upon which Executive and Executive’s eligible dependents become covered under similar plans.


		
	2.
	Full Force and Effect.  To the extent not expressly amended hereby, the Agreement remains in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the date first set forth above. 
		
	ROBERT A. LENTO
	LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC.


  /s/ Robert A. Lento          /s/ Sajid Malhotra        
Signature    Signature 
Robert A. Lento        Sajid Malhotra    
Executive    Chief Financial Officer    
    


February 24, 2016                          February 25, 2016               
Date                            Date 


1
From: Betty Turner

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 10:14:09 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations

would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths

and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1057 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1057

  To authorize the addition of lands to Pu`uhonua o Honaunau National 
    Historical Park in the State of Hawaii, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 14, 2001

 Mr. Akaka (for himself and Mr. Inouye) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the addition of lands to Pu`uhonua o Honaunau National 
    Historical Park in the State of Hawaii, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pu`uhonua o Honaunau National 
Historical Park Addition Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONS TO PU`UHONUA O HONAUNAU NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK.

    The first section of the Act of July 26, 1955 (69 Stat. 376, ch. 
385; 16 U.S.C. 397), is amended--
            (1) by striking ``That when'' and inserting ``Section 1. 
        (a) When''; and
            (2) by adding at the end thereof the following new 
        subsections:
    ``(b) The boundaries of Pu`uhonua o Honaunau National Historical 
Park are hereby modifed to include approximately 238 acres of lands and 
interests therein within the area identified as `Parcel A' on the map 
entitled `Pu`uhonua o Honaunau National Historical Park Proposed 
Boundary Additions, Ki`ilae Village', numbered PUHO-P 415/82,013 and 
dated May, 2001.
    ``(c) The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to acquire 
approximately 159 acres of lands and interests therein within the area 
identified as `Parcel B' on the map referenced in subsection (b). Upon 
the acquisition of such lands or interests therein, the Secretary shall 
modify the boundaries of Pu`uhonua o Honaunau National Historical Park 
to include such lands or interests therein.''.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATIONS OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out this Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           11621
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           36559
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  1480
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      29080
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              77
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                78
<LOANS>                                         434070
<ALLOWANCE>                                       2379
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  530412
<DEPOSITS>                                      376984
<SHORT-TERM>                                     10000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               6178
<LONG-TERM>                                      17000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            44
<OTHER-SE>                                      120250
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  530412
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   8537
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 1091
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  9628
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                4315
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4597
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             5031
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      200
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   2993
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   2742
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        2742
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      1686
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.97
<LOANS-NON>                                       1051
<LOANS-PAST>                                       230
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   618
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                   3717
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  2179
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 2379
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              2379
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.15.2

                              TERMINATION AGREEMENT
                                   (WEISHAHN)

         The undersigned (the "Employee"), in consideration of the payment of
one (1) year's Base Salary, does hereby agree to the termination of his
Employment Agreement dated August 10, 2000 with Heritage Holdings, Inc., as
assigned to U.S. Propane, L.P. effective as of the closing of the Contribution
Agreement dated November 6, 2003 between LaGrange Energy L.P. and each of
Heritage Propane Partners, L.P. and Heritage Operating, L.P.

         This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts and by
original or facsimile signatures delivered by the parties to the other, each of
which shall be deemed an original, but all of which constitute one and the same
document.

         The parties hereto agree that the Employee shall continue as an at will
employee.

         Dated January 20, 2004.

                                    U. S. PROPANE, L.P.

                                    By U.S. Propane, L.L.C., General Partner

                                    By: ____________________________________

                                    Its: President

                                    ________________________________________
                                    Curtis L. Weishahn

                                                                "Employee"
EXHIBIT 99.1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<S>  <C>               <C>      <C>
The undersigned hereby certifies, in my capacity as an
officer of NSTAR, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

  (i)  the enclosed Quarterly Report of NSTAR on Form 10-Q
       for the period ended March 31, 2003 fully complies
       with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report
       fairly presents, in all material respects, the
       financial condition and results of operation of
       NSTAR.

Dated:  May 9, 2003        By:   /s/ THOMAS J. MAY
                                 Thomas J. May
                                 Chairman, President and
                                 Chief Executive Officer

</TABLE>
No. 163, Misc.

#### Hillyard, Administrator, *v.*National Dairy Products Corp. et al.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Ivan Elliott*for respondents.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
**EXHIBIT 32**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the report ofCommScope, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Companyhereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| By:    | /s/ FRANK M. DRENDEL                                  |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Frank M. Drendel                                      |   |
|   | Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer                 |   |
|   |                                                  |   |
| Date:  | November 7, 2007                                      |   |
|   |                                                  |   |
|   |                                                  |   |
| By:    | /s/ JEARLD L. LEONHARDT                               |   |
|   | Jearld L. Leonhardt                                   |   |
|   | Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   |                                                  |   |
| Date:  | November 7, 2007                                      |   |

 

1

----
From: john.zitkus@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:56:56 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Zitkus

Mundelein, IL 60060
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Winmax Trading Group,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the period ended June 30,  2004,  as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C  Section  1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      o     the Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
            of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      o     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


      February 23, 2005


      By: /s/ Gerald E. Sklar
      -----------------------
      Gerald E. Sklar, President, Chief Executive Officer,
      Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
URIC:NAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 19-0484

CLARK FORK COALITION, ROCK CREEK

ALLIANCE, EARTHWORKS, AND MONTANA

ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER,

Petitioners and Appellees,

FILED

MAY 1 5 2020

Bowen Greenw000

Clerk of Suprerne CourState of Mnntana

v. ORDER

MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL

RESOURCES AND CONSERVATION, and

RC RESOURCES, INC.,

Respondents and Appellants.

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for

oral argument before the Court sitting en banc and is hereby set for argument on

Wednesday, July 15, 2020, at 9:30 a.m. in the Courtroom of the Montana Supreme Court,

Joseph P. Mazurek Justice Building, Helena, Montana.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to M. R. App. P. 17(3), oral argument

times in this cause number shall be forty (40) minutes for the Appellants and thirty (30)

minutes for the Appellees.

Counsel should be mindful of the provisions of M. R. App. P. 17(6).

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the

Honorable Kathy Seeley, 11iy - ,trict Judge.

DATED this 1 6 Lif of May, 2020.

For the Court,

Chief Justice

05/15/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0484