alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Sl()-1()()4()5-()() 1

Metropolita n Nashvill e Airpor t Authorit y On e Termina l Drive , Suit e 50 l • Nashville , T N 37P!-- ) 411 4 • 615-275-I60 0 Marc h 26.201 0 Th e Honorabl e Ra

y H . LaHoo d Secretar) ' U.S . Departmen

t of'Iransponatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave , SI : Washington . D

C 2059 0 Docke t DOT-OST-2() l 04B « Dea r Mr . Secretary : :- j As Presiden

t an dChie f lixcculiv e Office

r o f th e Metropolita

n Nashvill e Aiqior

t Authority . ! a

mwritin g t

o encourag e you

r suppor t o f approval fo

r th e applicatio n fo

r antitrus t immunit y an dpropose djoin t

busines s agreement

filedby America

n Airline s an

d Japa n Airlines . Th e propose dallianc e between thes e tw o airline s i. s vita l fo r oneworl dt

o coiTipet e ctTcctivel

y wit h th e Sta r an dSkyTea malliance . Thi s increase dinterallianc c competitio n will i

n tur n enhanc e th e benefit s of th e Department' s Open Skie s polic y ~ first by solidifyin g U.S.-Japa

n Open Skies , the

n b y servin g a s aIbundatio n fo r furthe r libcrali/atio n acros s Asia . Approva l o f thi s applicatio n a s i s by th e l!.S . Departmen t o f Ifanspoilatio n wouldenabl e the oneworl dallianc e airline s t o wor k closely together

n > delive r highl y competitiv e ai

r transportatio n services . .Approva l fo r .A.A'J.Al . allianc e will ha\ e apositiv e impact on ai r travel b y offerin g customer s more service , schedulin g an dpricin g option s an

dwill hel p t o ensur e tha t customer s contiini c t

o benefi t fro mhavin g thre e competitiv e air alliance s t

o choos e from . America n Airline s ha s bee n astrategi c partner wit h Nashvill e International Airpor t (BNA ) fo r man y decades . America

n an dit s affiliate s operate 6 0 flight s i n andou t o f Nashvill e daily , makin g the mnumber tw o i n term s o f ou r larges t carriers . W e hav e alway s been supportiv e o f initiative s lik

e thos e inentione dearlie r

whic h beneti t BNA' s customer s an

dpartner s an

dou r communit

y an dregion . Than

k yo u i n advanc e fo

r you r time an dconsideration . Sincerely , ^ ^ 

# c ^^^^ ^ Rau l L . Reualado . C.A.r; . BOAR D O F COMMISSIONER S Kjr i ^ " Dfcyn . Miy;' ; F-'isn l r. ^ G:iti:3'j^ ! PRESIDEN T AN D CE O Jame s H Choek . Ml , Ch3imi;>i i Jac- . O 8ove:n,i.;. rj rB M A '.lirsi n Ran ! L f?t\;alad o C. A t i Jul ! H . Mosloy . Vic e Cliairtntit i Ro d Psf.i y Rtiti'-r t J , VVfiiko r Dexte rSamuels . Secreiar y
EXHIBIT 32.1

    STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
                          2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      The undersigned, Charles F. Finn, is the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Wayne Savings Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2003 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that:

            A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

            B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.


February 12, 2004                       /s/ Charles F. Finn
--------------------                    ---------------------------------
Dated                                   Charles F. Finn
|blank                                                                               | Info_Art | Appalachian Regional
         Commission
         
         Appalachian Reporter                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     | Appalachian Regional
         Commission
         
         Appalachian Reporter
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Appalachian Regional
         Commission
         
         Appalachian Reporter
|ARC                                                                                 |          | Autumn 1998 Appalachian Reporter
AprilJune 1998 Appalachian Reporter
JanuaryMarch 1998 Appalachian Reporter
SeptemberNovember 1997 Appalachian Reporter
JulyAugust 1997 Appalachian Reporter
MayJune 1997 Appalachian Reporter
MarchApril 1997 Appalachian Reporter
JanuaryFebruary 1997 Appalachian Reporter 
NovemberDecember 1996 Appalachian Reporter
         
         
       About
         ARC | ARC Federal, State, and
          Local Partners|ARC
         Programs|How to Apply for a
         Grant|       News, Events, and Publications|Socioeconomic Data|What's New|Home |Site Index|Feedback
From: Danielle Fulmer

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive Care and Religious Refusal

Date: Sunday, August 14, 2011 11:41:51 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking

you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for

all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions

even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal

exemption provisions.
I 

### Supreme Court ofthe United States Office ofthe Clerk 

### Washington, DC 20543-0001 Scott S. Harris Clerk of the Court 

### March 16, 2015 (202)479-3011 Clerk Court of Criminal Appeals ofTexas P.O. Box 12308 Capitol Station Austin, TX 78711 Re: Robert Lynn Pruett v. Texas No. 14-8837 (Your No. WR-62, 09902) Dear Clerk: The petition for a writ ofcertiorari in the above entitled case was filed on 

### March 10, 2015 and placed on the docket March 16, 2015 as No. 14-8837. Sincerely, Scott S. Harris, Clerk by



# ,s?^U 6 Redmond K. Barnes Case Analyst 

# COURTOFCRIfpALAPPEALS 23 2015
H. Res. 496

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

July 22, 2002.

Whereas studies have shown an alarming increase in steroid

use among children, who may be modeling their behavior

after professional athletes;

Whereas one report said that steroid use by high school boys

was as high as 12 percent;

Whereas earlier this year, 2 retired Major League Baseball

players, each having been a Most Valuable Player, admitted to steroid use, unleashing a wave of articles about

rampant use throughout the league;

Whereas the stories have focused on the muscle-enhancing aspect of steroids, linking it to a surge in power hitting

among many players;

Whereas the Nation’s children are receiving the wrong message, namely that drug use is not only permissible, but

desirable if an individual wants to perform at his or her

best;

Whereas the truth is that steroids are dangerous and harmful

to an individual’s health and have no place in our national pastime or the lives of the Nation’s children;

Whereas other professional sports, notably football, basketball, and even the Olympics, already ban steroids, a dan-
2

•HRES 496 EH

gerous drug that often causes liver damage, kidney failure, heart disease, and brain tumors;

Whereas although steroid use is illegal without a doctor’s prescription, the failure in Major League Baseball to test for

such use has led to speculation that steroids are widely

abused by many of today’s players;

Whereas professional baseball players have tremendous influence on children and therefore have an obligation to attempt to be good role models;

Whereas the question of rampant, systemic steroid abuse now

hangs over a game that the people of the United States

love; and

Whereas instituting mandatory steroid testing will send the

right message to the public, namely that Major League

Baseball is serious about banning steroids and will continually work to protect the integrity of the game: Now,

therefore, be it

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that—

(1) Major League Baseball and the Major League

Baseball Players Association should implement a mandatory steroid testing program; and

(2) such a program would send a clear message to

our Nation’s children that steroids are dangerous, illegal,
3

•HRES 496 EH

and morally offensive to our country’s competitive spirit

and one of our most cherished sports.

Attest:

Clerk.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 26, 2016

d1017

Order 

Clerk

October 26, 2016

150703 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 150703

COA: 315247 

Wayne CC: 12-009230-FC

RONALD JOHNSON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of December 22, 2015, the Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney was 

directed to file a supplemental brief. On order of the Court, the brief having been 

received, the application for leave to appeal the November 4, 2014 judgment of the Court 

of Appeals is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting 

leave to appeal, we REVERSE in part the judgment of the Court of Appeals, we 

VACATE the sentence of the Wayne Circuit Court, and we REMAND this case to the 

trial court for resentencing pursuant to People v Francisco, 474 Mich 82 (2006). The 

trial court erred in assigning 50 points for Prior Record Variable 1 (PRV 1), MCL 777.51. 

As the prosecutor concedes, the record supports a score of only 25 points because the 

defendant only has one prior high severity felony conviction. In all other respects, leave 

to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions 

presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7729

CHRISTOPHER L. BLACKWOOD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GARY D. MAYNARD; BILL WHITE; DON DRISKELL;

JOHN MAXY; PERCY JONES; RICHARD HARVEYD; DON

LEHMON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge.

(CA-02-1767-3-23BC)

Submitted: January 30, 2003 Decided: February 20, 2003

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher L. Blackwood, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Roy Settana,

Jr., MCKAY, MCKAY & SETTANA, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher L. Blackwood seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying Blackwood’s motion for reconsideration of the

magistrate judge’s denial of his motion for appointment of counsel.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28

U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order

Blackwood seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, although

we grant Blackwood’s Motion Requesting to Add Supporting Evidence

to Informal Brief, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
From: Barbara Turner

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Critical Preventive Health Care Services

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 12:17:55 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking

you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological

distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make

exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption

to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though

they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger

exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where

they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.

Barbara
Front side BMS board

S S

C1

IC6

IC5

IC4

IC9 IC2 IC3

IC14 

IC16

IC17

IC19

C2

C3

IC1

IC7

IC4

IC7

IC8

IC10

IC10 IC11

T1

IC12

IC13

IC15

IC16 IC19

IC18
IC 2,3,4-AQW210 623 

IC1-MC9S12DG128MPV-ND C1-PCE3155TR-ND 

C2 - PCE3155TR-ND 

C3 - PCE3155TR-ND IC5-

IC6- 495-1868-2-ND 

IC7- TLE42754D-ND 

C3 - PCE3155TR-ND 

IC8- 497-1548-1-ND 

IC10- 160-1305-5-ND 

IC9-IPS041L-ND 

IC11- 516-1731-1-ND
IC13- 631-1011-6-ND

IC12- 601636

T1-811-1556-5-ND 

IC18, IC19- MM74HC14SJX-ND 

IC14- 606 SS 21

IC13- 631-1011-6-ND

IC15- 497-1170-2-ND 

IC16, IC17-OPA343UA/2K5-ND 
Other side of the board

IC20 IC21

IC22 IC23

IC24

IC25 IC26

IC27

IC28 

IC29 IC30

IC31
IC20, IC21, IC22, IC23- 296-17563-2-ND

IC28, IC29, IC30- 255-2130-2-ND 

IC32- MM74HC14SJX-ND

IC31- IPS041L-ND
Exhibit 99.1

**Report of Independent Accountants**

To the Shareholders and Trustees of NSTAR:

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of NSTAR and its subsidiaries as of March 31, 2004, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, and retained earnings for eachof the three-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2003, and the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2003.  These interim financial statements are the responsibility of theCompany’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures andmaking inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regardingthe financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally acceptedin the United States of America.

We previously audited in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensiveincome, retained earnings, and of cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated January 20, 2004 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.  In our opinion, the information set forth inthe accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2003 is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPBoston, Massachusetts

May 3, 2004

The “Report of Independent Accountants” included above is not a “report” or “part of a Registration Statement” prepared or certified by an independent accountant within the meanings of Sections 7 and11 of the Securities Act of 1933, and the accountants’ Section 11 liability does not extend to such report.
From: Williams, Michelle [mailto:M_WILLIAMS@IWGBWD.com] 

Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 4:50 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA; kirsten_gillibrand@gillibrand.senate.gov 

Subject: Re: RIN 1210-AB33

To my current DOL and government representatives: 

 I am writing because I was very much disturbed by a recent article I read in our 

local paper, The Rome Sentinel, regarding the U.S. government trying to gain 

control of and access to our 401(k) and/or IRA monies via a possible regulation 

to change them to provide an annuity! 

 I am personally outraged by this latest attempt to take my hard earned money! 

Isn’t it bad enough that I have to work two jobs and still struggle to keep my 

house, vehicle, household and medical bills paid up with out any money or time 

left over to enjoy the fruits of my labors?! Must I also have to worry about my 

hard-earned retirement fund being in jeopardy of be pilfered from me? 

 I was always taught growing up if I was willing to work hard and save for my 

future that I could have something to be proud of and enough money to enjoy my 

retirement when I was ready. But, each year that dream seems to get farther and 

farther out of reach and frankly it’s very frustrating and discouraging! More and 

more now it seems that in this current society, it no longer pays to be a hardworking middle class family who takes pride in their work and their home and 

tries to plan for their future! Instead we are penalized for trying to do what we 

were taught and we end up struggling every day just to keep our heads above 

water! Of course, we make too much money (just) to qualify for any type of 

assistance, but just enough money to be taxed to within an inch of our lives for 

our efforts. I wonder if you can relate to our situation or even know what it’s like 

to constantly live with a sickening, drowning sensation in the pit of your 

stomach!? 

 However, I am not writing you in order to complain about my family’s current 

struggles at this time. My main purpose is to let you know that requiring 401(k) 

and/or IRA plans to make distributions in annuity form is not acceptable us in any 

way, shape or form! I am asking you to please do what you can to put a stop to 

this proposal and any others like it that could jeopardize my family’s already 

tenuous financial situation and future! 

Sincerely, 

Michelle M. Williams 

Michelle M. Williams 

1739 State Route 69 

Camden, NY 13316
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

 

Registration No.  333-59540

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  194				Trade Date: 06/26/02
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated

  June 1, 2001)							Issue Date:  07/02/02
The Date of this Pricing Supplement June 26, 2002
SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or

     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any

Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &         Payment	Survivors		applicable regular or special

  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions       Frequency	  Option	Yes/No	record dates)

14911QJB8   4.85%	07/15/08	     100%	       1.10%                 Semi-Annually	     YES	    NO	

Principal						1st Payment	Day	

Amount		Proceeds		Dealer		      Date		Count

$1,566,000.00	$1,548,774.00	ABN AMRO Inc.	    1/15/03		30/360	
 

Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes	  X   No						N/A

 

 
- The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.   Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $636.870 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.  Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under a Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
Additionally, the total principal amount of PowerNotes(SM) offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001 has been increased from $500.0mm to $750.0mm.  $250.0mm principal amount of debt securities registered pursuant to Registration Statement No. 333-59540 originally offered by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement dated June 15, 2001 and related Prospectus dated May 25, 2001 are being offered as PowerNotes(SM) by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation pursuant to its Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated June 1, 2001.
- Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.