alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. 40-8903-LA; ASLBP No. 23-980-03-LA-BD01]

                    Pursuant to the Commission's regulations,                     *see, e.g.,*10 CFR 2.103, 2.104, 2.105, 2.300, 2.309, 2.313, 2.318, 2.321, notice is hereby given that an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (Board) is being established to preside over the following proceeding:                

## Homestake Mining Company of California (Denial of License Amendment Request)

This Board is being established pursuant to a September 5, 2023 hearing demand filed by Homestake Mining Company of California (Homestake). Homestake challenges the NRC Staff's decision in an August 15, 2023 letter denying Homestake's request to amend its license for the Grants Reclamation Project (License No. SUA-1471) in Cibola County, New Mexico.

The Board is comprised of the following Administrative Judges:

Michael M. Gibson, Chair, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001

G. Paul Bollwerk, III, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001

Dr. Sue H. Abreu, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001

                    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule.                     *See*10 CFR 2.302.                

Rockville, Maryland.

Dated: September 7, 2023.

Edward R. Hawkens,

Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.

[FR Doc. 2023-19787 Filed 9-12-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
From: nrnbrg@earthlink.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:54:56 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gary Noerenberg

Marietta, GA 30067
# Euroopa Liidu C 64A/28.

| | ISSN 1977-0898 |
| --- | --- |
| Euroopa Liidu
  Teataja | C 64A |
| | |
| Eestikeelne väljaanne | Teave ja teatised | 60. Aastakäik28. veebruar 2017 |

ISSN 1977-0898

Euroopa Liidu

Teataja

C 64A

Eestikeelne väljaanne

Teave ja teatised

60. Aastakäik28. veebruar 2017

---

| Teatis nr | Sisukord | Lehekülg |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Teated |
| | HALDUSMENETLUSED |
| | Euroopa Parlament |
| 2017/C 64 A/01 | Valikumenetlus PE/195/S — Ajutine teenistuja – üksuse juhataja (AD 14) — Sobivate kandidaatide nimekiri | 1 |

Teatis nr

Sisukord

Lehekülg

V   Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Euroopa Parlament

2017/C 64 A/01

Valikumenetlus PE/195/S — Ajutine teenistuja – üksuse juhataja (AD 14) — Sobivate kandidaatide nimekiri

1

---

| ET | |
| --- | --- |

ET

---

V Teated

HALDUSMENETLUSED

Euroopa Parlament

| 28.2.2017 | ET | Euroopa Liidu Teataja | CA 64/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2017

ET

Euroopa Liidu Teataja

CA 64/1

---

VALIKUMENETLUS PE/195/S

Ajutine teenistuja – üksuse juhataja (AD 14)

SOBIVATE KANDIDAATIDE NIMEKIRI

(2017/C 064 A/01)

| 1. | BORDEZ, Emmanuel |
| --- | --- |

1.

BORDEZ, Emmanuel

Sobivate kandidaatide nimekiri kinnitati 14. veebruaril 2017.

---
· , 

The Honorable Ron Wyden 

Department of Energy 

Washington, DC 20585 

October 17, 2013 

Chainnan, Senate Committee on Energy 

and Natural Resources 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 205 I 0 

Dear Chainnan Wyden: 

Thank you for your September 19.2013. letter to Energy Secretary Moniz regarding the 

Department of Energy's (DOE or Department) participation in the development of the 

2015 International Energy Conservation Code (IEee). DOE's participation in the industry 

process for the review and modification of building codes is guided by Title III of the 

Energy Conservation and Production Act, as amended. The Act specifies that DOE shall 

"seek adoption of all technologically feasible and economically justified energy efficiency 

measures." 

As your letter noted, DOE published a Notice in the Federal Register on April 19,2013, 

outlining the process by which the Department participates in IECe development (78 FR 

23550). As outlined in this process, DOE provided an opportunity for the public to 

comment on its efficiency concepts and draft proposals for the 2015 IEee. DOE selected 

a subset of these proposals to analyze and put forward at the International Code Council 

(ICC) Committee Action Hearings based in part on feedback and supporting data from 

stakeholders regarding the energy efficiency savings. 

DOE participated in the ICC process in a manner consistent with its stated policy at the 

October 2013 ICC public comment hearings. DOE delivered testimony and voted on 

behalf of its proposals, as well as delivered testimony and voted on proposals for which 

DOE had perfonned applicable analyses and that had been published previous to the 

bearing. DOE delivered testimony and voted at the hearings in a marmer consistent with 

ICC's rules and procedures. 

The Department values your inquiry and support of building energy efficiency codes. If 

you have additional questions, please contact me or Ms. Martha Oliver, Office of 

Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs, at (202)586-5450. 

Sincerely, 

Kathleen B. Hogan 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency 

Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 

t.+) P,inted with soy ink on , ... ...-1 ...... ~~~-.
-78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0

 38.5

 39.0

 39.5

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/22

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 77.38 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

★

■ ■ ■ ■

★

●

★

●

●

●

●
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel Member Conflict: Development Biology Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         October 18, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Room 2137B, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Vera A. Cherkasova, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, 6710B Rockledge Drive, Room 2137B, Bethesda, MD 20892, (240) 731-6040,                         *vera.cherkasova@nih.gov*.                     

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 28, 2023.

Tyeshia M. Roberson-Curtis, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-18931 Filed 8-31-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:08:23 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

C. Benjamin
From: pfpashie911-7@live.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:19:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Faith Paszkiewicz

Campbellsport, WI 53010
From: Elaine Smith

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 4:54:05 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Elaine Smith

63 Swimming Pen Dr

Middleburg, FL 32068
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
| The undersigned hereby certifies, in my capacity as an officer of NSTAR, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|    (i)    | the enclosed Quarterly Report of NSTAR on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    |                                                                                                                                                                                                        |  |  |  |
|    (ii)   | the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of NSTAR.                                               |
| Dated: November 7, 2003 |    | By:    | /s/ THOMAS J. MAY                               |
|-------------------------|--------------|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |              |                       |                                                                                                                                                                                                       | Thomas J. May |
|                         |              |                       |                                                                                                                                                                                                       | Chairman, President and |
|                         |              |                       |                                                                                                                                                                                                       | and Chief Executive Officer |
Case: 17-11035 Date Filed: 09/20/2017 Page: 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT
32.2**
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Vail Banks, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Raymond E. Verlinde,
Chief Administrative Officer, (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/
Raymond E. Verlinde
 Raymond E. Verlinde
 Chief
Administrative Officer
 (Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
 May 13,
2005
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1423

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide tax relief for

military or civilian employees of the United States who are victims

of terrorist attacks against the United States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 13, 2001

Mr. BUNNING introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

tax relief for military or civilian employees of the United

States who are victims of terrorist attacks against the

United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCOME TAXES OF UNITED STATES MILITARY

4 AND CIVILIAN EMPLOYEES WHO ARE VIC5 TIMS OF TERRORIST ATTACKS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 692(c) of the Internal

7 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to income taxes of mili8 tary or civilian employees of the United States dying as
2

•S 1423 IS

1 a result of injuries sustained overseas) is amended by

2 striking ‘‘outside the United States’’.

3 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The heading of sec4 tion 692(c) of such Code is amended by striking ‘‘OVER5 SEAS’’ and inserting ‘‘AS A RESULT OF TERRORISTIC OR

6 MILITARY ACTION’’.

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

8 this section shall apply to taxable years ending on or after

9 September 11, 2001.

10 SEC. 2. RELIEF FROM ADDITIONAL ESTATE TAX.

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2201 of the Internal Rev12 enue Code of 1986 is amended—

13 (1) in the first sentence by inserting ‘‘(a) IN

14 GENERAL.—’’ before ‘‘The additional estate tax’’,

15 and

16 (2) by adding at the end the following:

17 ‘‘(b) UNITED STATES MILITARY OR CIVILIAN EM18 PLOYEES WHO ARE VICTIMS OF CERTAIN TERRORIST AT19 TACKS.—The additional estate tax shall not apply to the

20 transfer of the taxable estate of any individual dying while

21 in active service as a military or civilian employee of the

22 United States if such decedent dies as a result of wounds

23 or injuries incurred in a terroristic or military action (as

24 defined in section 692(c)(2)). The preceding sentence shall

25 not apply with respect to any individual whom the Sec-
3

•S 1423 IS

1 retary determines was a perpetrator of any such terrorist

2 attack.’’.

3 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENTS.—

4 (1) The heading of section 2201 of such Code

5 is amended to read as follows:

6 ‘‘SEC. 2201. COMBAT ZONE-RELATED DEATHS OF MEMBERS

7 OF THE ARMED FORCES AND DEATHS OF VIC8 TIMS OF CERTAIN TERRORIST ATTACKS.’’.

9 (2) The item relating to section 2201 in the

10 table of sections for subchapter C of chapter 11 of

11 such Code is amended to read as follows:

‘‘Sec. 2201. Combat zone-related deaths of members of the Armed

Forces and deaths of victims of certain terrorist attacks.’’.

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

13 this section shall apply to estates of decedents dying on

14 or after September 11, 2001.

Æ