alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.14 MB)
 
 Air Terminal Operations Center ATOC undisclosed location 407th Air Expeditionary Group 407th Expeditionary Logistics Readiness Squadron Operation Inherent Resolve Southwest Asia 407th AEG C-17 Globemaster III OIR deployed 407th ELRS vehicle operations material
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Penny Dixon-Gumm

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: women’s preventive health

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 10:18:08 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

"The most violent element in society is ignorance."

Emma Goldman
Docket Number: FAA-2012-0592
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1173 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1173

     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the work 
opportunity credit to the employment of any adult food stamp recipient.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 12, 2001

   Mr. Bayh introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend the work 
opportunity credit to the employment of any adult food stamp recipient.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT TO EMPLOYMENT OF ANY 
              ADULT FOOD STAMP RECIPIENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 51(d)(8)(A)(i) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 (defining qualified food stamp recipient) is amended by 
striking ``but not age 25''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to individuals who begin work for the employer after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
James F. Johnson, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Brenda Robinson, et at., 

Defendants. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

FILED 

JAN 15 2009 

NANCY MAYER WHITTINGTON CLERK 

U.S. DISTRleT COURT ) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 08-2149 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Plaintiff moves for reconsideration of the Order filed December 11, 2008, dismissing this 

case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff requests in the alternative that the 

submission be treated as his notice of appeal. A motion for reconsideration need not be granted 

"unless the district court finds that there is an intervening change in controlling law, the 

availability of new evidence or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice." 

Firestone v. Firestone, 76 F.3d 1205, 1208 (D.C. Cir. 1996) (citations and quotation marks 

omitted). The motion provides no basis for vacating the dismissal order. Accordingly, it is this 

~ -&...= day of January 2009, 

ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for reconsideration [Dkt. No.5] is DENIED; and it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk docket the submission also as plaintiffs notice of 

appeal.
Exhibit 32

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                          PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
(the "Report") of Cimnet, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30,
2004, I, John D. Richardson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


                                       /s/ JOHN D. RICHARDSON
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       John D. Richardson
                                       Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Principal Accounting Officer

August 16, 2004

                                       17
26
LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION AE —@/ 26341 341-16 Page | of 1
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS SEP 1 2011
BRAN

|As of: September 01, 2011
Received: August 21, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 01, 2011
Tracking No. 80ce812f

‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0135
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Rebecca Evans
Address:

632 NW 75th St

Seattle, wa, United Kingdom, 98117
Email: celloevans@yahoo.com

General Comment

I am a strong supporter of the new policy (CMS-9992-IFC2) requiring health insurance plans to
cover birth control without a co-pay. This is an important improvement to women's health care.
Improving women's access to birth control is positive in so many ways. A woman who can plan
when to have a family is able to participate in society more fully. Allowing women to space their
pregnancies contributes to healthy childbearing. And ultimately, fewer unintended pregnancies
can reduce the need for abortion.

As always when birth control is involved certain religious elements & employers may try to opt
out of the requirements, and I am very concerned that they should not be allowed to do that. All
women should have access to contraceptive coverage, regardless of where they work.

This policy finally should make near-universal access to birth control a reality for all women who
use it.

Thank you for following science-based recommendations and making women's health a priority.

Thank you, Rebecca Evans

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000... 9/1/2011
From: Ann Crockett

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Unfair to Women per usual!

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:20:40 PM

Do not crumble to the heavy handed religious lobbies to eliminate the possibility of birth control for all

women working anywhere. None of them give a hoot for the damaged or unwanted/unneeded babies

born in our country today. Make our country stronger by making our females and their babies planned

and stronger!
Exhibit 11b


                              Ameritech Corporation
                 Computation of Fully Diluted Earnings Per Share
                                        
                                        
                                         1996            1995             1994
                                         ----            ----             ----
Income before extraordinary   
item                           $2,133,712,000  $2,007,635,000   $1,170,426,000
                               ==============  ==============   ==============

Weighted average number of
shares outstanding                551,853,953     553,621,693      549,238,304

Additional dilutive effect of
outstanding options (as determined
by the application of the treasury
stock method)                       2,747,922       3,063,153          993,665
                               --------------  --------------   --------------

Weighted average shares outstanding
on which fully diluted earnings
per share are based               554,601,875     556,684,846      550,231,969

Fully diluted earnings per share        $3.85           $3.61            $2.13
                               ==============  ==============   ==============




This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K, Item 601
(b)11, although not required by footnote 2 to paragraph 14 of Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution of less
than three percent.  Accordingly, reported EPS does not consider dilutive
securities.


Amounts for prior years have been restated to reflect inclusion of the
windfall tax benefit when applying the treasury stock method to determine
the dilutive effect of outstanding options.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0587

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSE MARTINEZ JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 29, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 26 2022

07/26/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0587
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 138 (Tuesday, July 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 42762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18123]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending July 9, 
2011

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2011-0124.
    Date Filed: July 7, 2011.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: TC2 Within Africa, Within Middle East, between Middle East 
and Africa, Mail Vote 685 Adoption, Composite Resolution 071c, e-
Tariffs, 6-24 June 2011.

    Intended Effective Date: October 1, 2011.
Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2011-18123 Filed 7-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.37 MB)
 
 Defense Secretary Ash Carter released statements last night welcoming decisions by two coalition nat
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Ellen Friedman

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 10:01:13 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs. I had every confidence that the sister of

my friends Donald and Gina would do that.

Sincerely,

Ellen Friedman

34 Berkeley St

Somerville, MA 02143
From: Diane Stanley

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Proposed Legislation

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 2:29:24 PM

I oppose the proposed definition of "religious employer."

The current definition of religious employer does not provide true conscience protection for those

committed to preserving life as I am.

The government should not force health-care plans to violate the moral and religious convictions of

providers or employees who want to participate in the health-care system.

Using the present definition of religious employer threatens both universal access to healthcare to all

and the religious freedom of conscience to those committed to preserving life.

Respectfully submitted:

Diane Stanley

Texas
From: Thomas of Baltimore

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Support Access to Preventive Care and Contraception!

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 10:30:38 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
From: Loretta Nardini

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 11:41:12 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
PEG —/4$68/-09 Page 1 of 1

ESSING DIVISION. we 9 Om
TEOACATIC! b REGULATIONS

BRANCH

As of: Aprit 09, 2010
pena © 2
PUBLIC SUBMISSION Prestes: 9:1 09, 2010,
Comments Due: May 03, 2010)
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0006
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants & Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Comment On: IRS-2010-0006-0001
Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in
Retirement Plans

Document: IRS-2010-0006-0066
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-02028

ee

Submitter Information

Name: Johnny W. Porter
Address:
16305 Dalmalley Ln
Dallas, TX, 75248
Submitter's Representative: Johnny Porter

General Comment

I think the federal government does not deserve the ability to handle my hard earned and saved
money. The way Congress spends money now is irresponsible and is not going away. They will
only use my money to support other people who have not sacrificed or saved one penney for
retirement.

Social Security will be a joke in 5 to 10 yers and this program will follow the same fate.

Keep the Federal Government out of my retirement plans.

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 4/9/2010
---

---

Exhibit 23.3

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8, (File No. 333-61895 and File No.
333-55970) and Forms S-3,( File No. 333-140968 , File No. 333-140969 and , File No.
333-140974) of our report dated March 5, 2007 relating to the financial statements of
Carmel Container Systems Ltd.s 2006 annual report, which appears in this Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007, of Ampal  American Israel Corporation.

Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
Member of Ernst & Young   Global
Haifa ,Israel
March 13, 2008



---

---
From: Darlene Kay Fields

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RE: Support Access to Preventive Care and Contraception!

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 12:56:13 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care

under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.”

These preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide

countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive

services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some

groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so

hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even

though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption

would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Darlene

mom062651@yahoo.com

928-432-1559

Only Two Defining Forces Have Ever Offered To Die For You, JESUS CHRIST Who Died For

Your Sins And The American Soldier, Who Died For Your Freedom.