alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council

          - [Docket No. AS23-12]

# AGENCY:

Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

In accordance with section 1104(b) of title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:

*Location:*                     This will be a virtual meeting via Webex. Please visit the agency's homepage (                    *www.asc.gov*) and access the provided registration link in the News and Events section. You MUST register in advance to attend this Meeting.                

*Date:*                     September 13, 2023.                

*Time:*                     10:00 a.m. ET.                

*Status:*                     Open.                

## Reports

Chair

Executive Director

Delegated State Compliance Reviews

Grants Director

Financial Manager

## Action and Discussion Items

Approval of Minutes

June 14, 2023 Quarterly Meeting Minutes

FY24 ASC Budget Proposal

Proposed Enforcement Rule

*How to Attend and Observe an ASC Meeting:*                     The meeting will be open to the public via live webcast only. Visit the agency's homepage (                    *www.asc.gov*) and access the provided registration link in the News and Events section. The meeting space is intended to accommodate public attendees. However, if the space will not accommodate all requests, the ASC may refuse attendance on that reasonable basis. The use of any video or audio tape recording device, photographing device, or any other electronic or mechanical device designed for similar purposes is prohibited at ASC Meetings.                

James R. Park,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2023-19466 Filed 9-7-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
From: Debbie Warnock [mailto:ps125-1@tx.rr.com] 

Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2010 11:17 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: retirement accounts

I dare say that I hardly recognize this country anymore!  We are not Communists so, keep your

hands off of our retirement savings!  Contrary to what you may think, it is not your money, it is

ours to do with as we please! I am sick of government lies about how responsible they are to

spend my money when they have proven that they are the worst at it!  Social Security and

Medicare are almost bankrupt and they think that we stupidly want another entitlement for

them to mismanage.  Our country will only survive if we get back to the founding principles of

small government that gets out of the way and lets  it ‘s people be prosperous!  Every time the

government takes away our money, it is just more money of the system of creating wealth.  I am

sick of the mentality that wants the government to wipe your butt from cradle to grave!

Debbie Warnock
#### Butler-Butler, Incorporated, Appellant, *v.*Nicholas E. Marcoglou, Respondent.

*Butler-Butler, Inc.,*v. *Marcoglou,*146 App. Div. 940, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted March 18, 1912;

decided March 26, 1912.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in. the first judicial department, entered October 27, 1911, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion for an injunction *pendente lite.*

*545The motion was made upon the ground that the Court of Appeals had no jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.

*Frank E. Hippie*for motion.

No one opposed.

Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.
From: Paul Viren [mailto:Paul@virenandassociates.com] 

Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 6:08 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Cc: Katie Jelinek 

Subject: 2010 investment advice proposed rule

To our friends at the Department of Labor,

As a financial advisor and fee based planner I have been watching intently the discussion within

the DOL and the Whitehouse regarding our industry and offering the 401(k) clients retirement

planning and investment advice.  Our firm works with hundreds of plan participants individually

in guiding them to setting their retirement goals and helping them in making wise and informed

investment decisions.  In my practice we are compensated on a basis point fee with no fund

incentive to push a particular product.  In fact we point out the advantages of low cost

managers and index funds for those clients that would rather have a passive versus active

manager approach.   

The bottom line for me is that each plan participant needs to be offered plan advice and

assistance for helping them reach their retirement goals and to also make sound investment

choices based on solid advice. I understand that there are some advisors that will take

advantage of the clients and the plan that is in place.  This is a reasonability of the plan sponsor

and the trustee to make certain that the advice offered is prudent and not financially

incentivized.  I am not at all in favor of the employee or plan trustee paying an extra fee to get

access to the advice.  This hurdle will only compound the problem of limiting access to advice

since most plan participants or trustees will not directly pay this type of fee.  They are most

comfortable with the bundled approach towards having advice be offered.   

Thank you for reviewing my comments and I am always open to discussion or questions.   

Best wishes,

Paul   

Paul S. Viren, CLU, ChFC

Financial Planner

400 S Jefferson, Ste 451

Spokane WA  99204

Ph: 509.462.0747

Fax: 509.838.7641

www.virenandassociates.com

Securities offered through LPL Financial, Member FINRA/SIPC, Investment Advice offered through Strategic Wealth Advisors Group, Inc. a regis
Financial. 

This message and any attachments contain information from Viren and Associates, Inc., which may be confidential and/or privileged and is inte

transmission.  If you are not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient,

or use of this transmission is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this transmission in error, please (i) notify the sender immediately by e‐ma

message.  If you do not wish to receive marketing emails from this sender, please send an email to lora@virenandassociates.com or a postcard
No. 237, Misc.

#### Jackson *v.*United States.

Motion for leave to proceed *in forma pauperis*and petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Claims granted. Case *901transferred to the appellate docket.

*Charles D. Ablard*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Guilfoyle*and *Alan S. Rosenthal*for the United States.
From: Linda Stanley

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Sunday, August 14, 2011 9:16:45 AM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Linda Stanley
Cabot, Arkansas
Dr y Page | of |
fe REG-) 2085 1-/0 sere
LEGAL PROCESSING .
PUBLICATION re DIVISION As of: August 31, 2011

BRANCH CATIONS Received: August 09, 2011
Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: August 31, 2011

Tracking No. 80edc3f9
‘(Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: [RS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0056
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Molly Duke Frame
Address:
3390 Hickory Street
Cottonwood, CA, 96022

General Comment

Pregnacy is preventable by abstinance from intercourse.

It is not a "right" to have abortion paid for by taxpayers.

People whose consciences prohibit abortion should not be required to participate in it or to pay for
it.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=0900... 8/31/2011
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.49 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
---

---

Exhibit 23.4

Rotterdam, 3 March 2009

Re: Consent Chemship B.V.

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-61895
and File No. 333-55970) and Forms S-3 (File No. 333-140968, File No. 333-140969 and File
No. 333-140974) of our report dated February 12, 2009 relating to the financial statements
for consolidation purposes of Chemship B.V., which appears in this Form 10-K of Ampal
 American Israel Corporation.

Yours faithfully,

MAZARS PAARDEKOOPER HOFFMAN
ACCOUNTANTS N.V.

O. Opzitter
RA



---

---
From: Michele Azzaro

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Please Accept the IOM"s Recommendation WITHOUT the Proposed Religious Exemptions

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:53:10 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Michele in Dallas, TX

-- 

~ Achieving morality without any invisible means of support.
From: Julie Wymetalek

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Protect Rights of Conscience

Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 1:52:24 AM

That Catholic run healthcare facilities have to not perform abortions.
Exhibit 12 
                               NYNEX CORPORATION
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                  (IN MILLIONS)

                                                                           Year
<TABLE>
                                                               1995        1994        1993          1992          1991
<CAPTION>

<S>                                                          <C>         <C>           <C>         <C>           <C>     
Earnings
     Earnings before Interest Expense, 
       Extraordinary Item and Cumulative 
       Effect of Change in Accounting Principle              $1,803.4    $1,466.4      $387.1      $1,995.8      $1,326.8
     Federal, State and Local Income Taxes                      640.9       303.7      (172.7)        570.4         192.1
     Estimated Interest Portion of Rental Expense*              117.3       109.0       117.3         126.2         127.9
     Priority Distributions                                      47.1        29.9        15.2           -             -
                                                             --------    --------      ------      --------      --------
         Total Earnings*                                     $2,608.7    $1,909.0      $346.9      $2,692.4      $1,646.8
                                                             ========    ========      ======      ========      ========


Fixed Charges

     Total Interest Expense                                  $  733.9    $  673.8      $659.5      $  684.6      $  726.0
     Estimated Interest Portion of Rental Expense*              117.3       109.0       117.3         126.2         127.9
     Priority Distributions                                      47.1        29.9        15.2           -             -
                                                             --------    --------      ------      --------      --------
         Total Fixed Charges*                                $  898.3    $  812.7      $792.0      $  810.8      $  853.9
                                                             ========    ========      ======      ========      ========

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**                             2.90        2.35         .44          3.32          1.93
                                                             ========    ========      ======      ========      ========
</TABLE>

*    Restated to conform to current year's presentation.
**   Earnings were  inadequate  to cover Fixed Charges by $445.1  million for
     the year ended  December 31, 1993 as a result of $2.1 billion of fourth 
     quarter 1993 business restructuring charges ($1.4 billion after-tax).
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1097

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to issue right-of-way permits

for natural gas pipelines within the boundary of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 25, 2001

Mr. THOMPSON (for himself and Mr. FRIST) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to issue rightof-way permits for natural gas pipelines within the

boundary of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. NATURAL GAS PIPELINES WITHIN THE BOUND4 ARY OF THE GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NA5 TIONAL PARK.

6 (a) PERMIT FOR NATURAL GAS PIPELINES.—

7 (1) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary of the In8 terior may issue right-of-way permits for natural gas

9 pipelines that are—
2

•S 1097 IS

1 (A) within the boundary of the Great

2 Smoky Mountains National Park (as of the

3 date of enactment of this Act);

4 (B) not otherwise authorized by Federal

5 law; and

6 (C) not subject to valid rights of property

7 ownership.

8 (2) CONDITIONS.—A permit issued under para9 graph (1) shall be subject to any terms and condi10 tions that the Secretary determines necessary.

11 (b) PERMIT FOR PROPOSED NATURAL GAS PIPE12 LINES.—

13 (1) AUTHORIZATION.—The Secretary may issue

14 right-of-way permits for natural gas pipelines within

15 the boundary of the Great Smoky Mountains Na16 tional Park that are proposed for construction in—

17 (A) the Foothills Parkway;

18 (B) the Foothills Parkway Spur between

19 Pigeon Forge and Gatlinburg; and

20 (C) the Gatlinburg Bypass.

21 (2) CONDITIONS.—A permit issued under para22 graph (1) shall be subject to any terms and condi23 tions that the Secretary determines necessary,

24 including—
3

•S 1097 IS

1 (A) provisions for the protection and res2 toration of resources that are disturbed by pipe3 line construction; and

4 (B) assurances that construction and oper5 ation of the pipeline will be compatible with the

6 purposes of the Park.

Æ
From: Linda J Lumley

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: IOM"s recs on preventive services

Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 7:32:27 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for "religious employers." These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that "religious refusal" exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so Catholic hospitals would be exempt from the coverage

requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger

exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM's

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Linda Lumley

Battle Creek, MI
<PAGE> 22
                                                               Exhibit 15.1



                       Report of Independent Accountants



To the Shareholders and Trustees
 of BEC Energy


We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of BEC Energy
(BEC) as of September 30, 1998 and the related statements of income for the
three and nine-month periods ended September 30, 1998 and 1997 and cash flows
for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 1998 and 1997.  These financial
statements are the responsibility of BEC's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures
to financial data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial
and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit
conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the accompanying financial statements in order for them to
be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.




Boston, Massachusetts               PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
October 22, 1998