alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-25-1999
<CASH>                                           6,092
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,961
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (219)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,799
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,723
<PP&E>                                          10,514
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,135
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,934
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,654
<OTHER-SE>                                         397
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,932
<SALES>                                         21,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,181
<CGS>                                           15,504
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,504
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,329
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    240
<INCOME-TAX>                                        45
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                195
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       195
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1





 


uSell.com, Inc.


Amendment to the 2008 Equity Incentive
Plan


 


 


uSell.com, Inc. amends its 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”)
as follows:


 


Section 4 of the Plan shall be deleted
and replaced by the following:


 


 


4.Common Stock. The Common Stock subject to Stock
Rights shall be authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock, par value $0.0001, or shares of Common Stock reacquired by the
Company in any manner, including purchase, forfeiture or otherwise. The aggregate number of shares of Common Stock which may be
issued pursuant to the Plan is 1,582,023 subject to adjustment as provided in Section 14. Any such shares may be issued under ISOs,
Non-Qualified Options, Restricted Stock, RSUs or SARs, so long as the number of shares so issued does not exceed the limitations
in this Section. If any Stock Rights granted under the Plan shall expire or terminate for any reason without having been exercised
in full or shall cease for any reason to be exercisable in whole or in part, or if the Company shall reacquire any unvested shares,
the unpurchased shares subject to such Stock Rights and any unvested shares so reacquired by the Company shall again be available
for grants under the Plan.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1026 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1026

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the United States Post Office located at 60 Third Avenue 
 in Long Branch, New Jersey, as the ``Pat King Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PAT KING POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    The United States Post Office located at 60 Third Avenue in Long 
Branch, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as the ``Pat King 
Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States Post Office referred 
to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Pat King Post 
Office Building.

            Passed the Senate August 3, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1026

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the United States Post Office located at 60 Third Avenue 
 in Long Branch, New Jersey, as the ``Pat King Post Office Building''.
```
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.25 MB)
 
 SDF Operation Inherent Resolve U.S. Army Central Command Syria CENTCOM SOF Humanitarian Aid ISIS Combined Joint Task Force Syrian Democratic Forces Daesh Internal Security Forces CSOJTF-L Advise Assist Enable al Hol Asayish Combined Special Operations Joint Task Force - Levant
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
No. 470, Misc.

#### Bybee *v.*Illinois.

Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 90 (Friday, May 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 26710]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10690]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 90 / Friday, May 9, 2014 / Notices

[[Page 26710]]

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service

Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to Sauter 
Farms Inc. of Bennett, Colorado, an exclusive license to the feed 
barley variety named ``Mesa.''

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 9, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Nakanishi of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's rights in this 
plant variety are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this plant variety as Sauter Farms Inc. of 
Bennett, Colorado has submitted a complete and sufficient application 
for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-
bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 
and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted 
unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this published Notice, 
the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and 
argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be 
consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Mojdeh Bahar,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-10690 Filed 5-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
```
From: Guess

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: I stand with AAUW

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:45:23 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Allman Brothers Street Team: Check it out http://www.allmanbrothersband.com/index.php?

vst=80404
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Clear Search
 
  FIRST

        

        

        
        1 (current)
        
        2
        
        3
        
        4
        
        5
        

        


        


        LAST
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: james hennigan

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Saturday, August 13, 2011 5:06:42 PM

"The current definition of religious employer does not provide true conscience

protection for those committed to preserving life. Health care plans should not be

forced to violate the moral and religious convictions of providers or employees in

order to participate in the health care system. Requiring such an unacceptable

demand threatens both universal access to health care and religious freedom of

conscience." Mrs. A.S. Michlik Dallas Texas
From: mark_sutton_75252@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:19:35 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mark Sutton

Pueblo, CO 81005
EXHIBIT 32.2
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


<S>   <C>                        <C>     <C>
The undersigned hereby certifies, in my capacity as an
officer of NSTAR, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

  (i)  the enclosed Quarterly Report of NSTAR on Form 10-Q
       for the period ended June 30, 2003 fully complies
       with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
       the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

  (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report
       fairly presents, in all material respects, the
       financial condition and results of operation of
       NSTAR.


Dated:  August 8, 2003          By:    /s/ James J. Judge
                                      James J. Judge
                                      Senior Vice President,
                                      Treasurer and Chief
                                      Financial Officer


</TABLE>
file:///C|/..._List_29-08-2011_12-55-54-352/Document%20List%2029-08-2011%2012-55-54-352_docs/EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0040.html[8/29/2011 1:20:24 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: August 29, 2011

Received: August 23, 2011

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 80eeab47

Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0018

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of

Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0018-0002

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services under

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0040

Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Becky Schaefer

Address:

Kingston, TN,

General Comment

I do not agree with your rule and its very limited religious exemption regarding birth control pills, and

abortion related pills and services. It is entirely none of your business if an insurance does not desire

to offer these particular services. One does not have to be RELIGIOUS to be offended by abortion or

providing pills to stop/kill a fetus. I am offended that you, as the Federal Government, are

demanding these services be provided free of charge by all insurances that don't fall under your

"narrow" scope of exemption. I respectfully request that you stop your attack on employer funded

insurances and private citizens' consciences. This regulation will completely eliminate the right of

employers to follow their conscience and refuse to offer birth control drugs to their employees in

company-funded health care plans. Many employers object to using their company resources to pay

for birth control, and many more strongly object to using company resources to pay for abortioninducing drugs like “Ella” and the “morning after pill." I insist that you stop this horrible ruling and

allow ANY insurance to opt out of this requirement.
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 0 9

- 4 0 6 8 7 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. C A R M E L O L O P E Z

- N I E V E S , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e S o u t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 2 : 0 9

- C R

- 1 8 0

- 1

B e f o r e S M I T H , P R A D O , a n d H A Y N E S , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : * T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t C a r m e l o L o p e z - N i e v e s h a s m o v e d f

o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s

v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. L o p e z - N i e v e s h a s n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 20 , 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-40687 Document: 00511086014 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010
No. 502.

#### Rains *v.*Nebraska.

*Claude T. Wood*for petitioner.

*Clarence A. H. Meyer,*Attorney General of Nebraska, and *Cecil S. Brubaker,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Supreme Court of Nebraska. Certiorari denied.
From: Judy Marshall

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 12:50:17 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.
#### The Salvation Army in the United States, Respondent, *v.*The American Salvation Army, Appellant.

*Salvation Army in the United States*v. *American Salvation*Army, 141 App. Div. 931, affirmed.

(Argued May 15, 1912;

decided June 4, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, *620entered December 29, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to restrain the defendant from using a name containing the words *“*Salvation Army.”

*Wilson Lee Cannon*for appellant.

*D-Cady Herrick, George C. Lay*and *Frederick W. Garvin*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ. Absent: Werner, J.