alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.59 MB)
 
 AshCarter DEFENSE SECRETARY SecDef
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Mary Alice Pearce

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive Care

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 2:10:12 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the recommendations 

of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject 

any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new law and 

would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive services, 

others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make 

exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health 

providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though 

they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands

of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s recommendations and 

rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
From: Marianne S. Wokeck

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: alert

Date: Saturday, August 13, 2011 5:01:27 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to 

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of 

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for 

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new law 

and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access 

to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive 

services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some 

groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so 

hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, 

even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger 

exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they 

work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s 

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Marianne S. Wokeck, Ph.D.

430 N. Park Ave., 303

Indianapolis, IN 46202
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 5, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60675-60676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19089]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas and Oil Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: PR23-66-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  284.123 Rate Filing: COH Rate change effective 
July 31, 2023, to be effective 7/31/2023.
    Filed Date: 8/29/23.
    Accession Number: 20230829-5061.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: RP23-982-000.
    Applicants: Colorado Interstate Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing: Operational Purchase and Sales 
Report 2023 to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 8/29/23.
    Accession Number: 20230829-5069.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/11/23.

    Any person desiring to intervene, to protest, or to answer a 
complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with 
Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211, 
385.214, or 385.206) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the 
specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is 
necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports 
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission 
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, 
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access 
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For 
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as 
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#feb1aeaebe989b8c9dd0999188"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e9a6b9b9a98f8c9b8ac78e869f">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 60676]]


    Dated: August 29, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-19089 Filed 9-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00710

- CR

Daniel WEBSTER

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CR2112A

Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED May 29, 2019.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001035901
<NAME>                        CIMNET, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                       1
<CURRENCY>                                       USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1
<CASH>                                        1,689
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                               566,726
<ALLOWANCES>                                (28,300)
<INVENTORY>                                  82,777
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            696,987
<PP&E>                                      625,450
<DEPRECIATION>                              385,896
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              936,541
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       772,022
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     1,011,050
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  164,519
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                936,541
<SALES>                                   2,679,294
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          2,679,294
<CGS>                                       463,482
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             1,893,619
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             94,646
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           32,369
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             289,824
<INCOME-TAX>                                118,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         171,524
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                171,524
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.03


</TABLE>
From: maarmbruster

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Religious refusal exemption

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 6:15:33 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as they pertain to coverage of preventive care under

the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and of women's healthcare. They would provide

countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure that all women have equal access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Thank you for your consideration.

MaryAnn Armbruster, PhD
From: Nick Nicholas

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Access to Preventive Care and Contraception

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 8:42:31 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger.

Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run

health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the

coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies.

If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.
From: Sister Mary Elizabeth Merriam

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 4:41:12 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Sister Mary Elizabeth Merriam

Austin, Texas
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Winmax Trading Group,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      o     the Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
            of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      o     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Date: March 18, 2005


By: /s/ Gerald E. Sklar
-----------------------
        Gerald E. Sklar,
        President, Chief Executive Officer,
        Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
From: Jan Nyberg

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive Care health insurance

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 10:32:47 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care

under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.”

These preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless

women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive

services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some

groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so

hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even

though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption

would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

# Foreign Trade

Skip top of page navigation

###### You are here: Census.gov › Business & Industry ›Foreign Trade › U.S. International Trade Data

                - Main
                - About
                - Data
                - Outreach
                - AES
                - Regulations
                - Reference
                - Definitions
                - Schedule B
                - FAQs

### More DATA

                          - Trade Highlights
                          - Balance by Partner Country
                          - Country/Product Trade
                          - State/Metropolitan Data
                          - Historical Series
                          - Notices and Corrections
                          - Related Party Trade
                          - Press Releases
                          - Data Products

### Important Links

                          - Global Reach Blog
                          - Newsletters
                          - ACE AESDirect
                          Related Sites- Business and Industry
- Briefing Room
- North American Industry                Classification System (NAICS)
Economic Indicator Database
                          Commodity Concordance - Monthly SubscriptionDownload a file- Click on the appropriate month below to download your file.
-  If you are having technical difficulties or need help, feel free to email us at eid.international.trade.data@census.gov or call 301-763-2311 for immediate assistance.
- Record	      layouts of the files are  available	      online .
Select Statistical Month:-     January 2023  
-     February 2023 
-     March 2023  
-     April 2023  
-     May 2023  
-     June 2023 
-     July 2023 
-     August 2023 
-     September 2023  
-     October 2023 
-     November 2023 
-     December 2023 

                          Export Training
Collection of videos to enhance export training.

Spanish Language Webinars 2020-2021 (Seminarios en Línea en Español 2020-2021)
2017 And Prior Year Webinars Archive.
Upcoming Outreach Activities
Upcoming Outreach Activities
Contact Us
				Contact the International Trade Macro Analysis Branch: Email us! or use our feedback form!

                  Call us: (301)763-2311 or 1-800-549-0595 option 4			  
CONNECT WITH US**********- Information Quality
- Data Linkage Infrastructure
- Data Protection and Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- FOIA
- Inspector General
- No FEAR Act
- U.S. Department of Commerce
- USA.gov

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
✕Is this page helpful?YesNo✕NO THANKS255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached✕Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions?  Source: U.S. Census Bureau | Foreign Trade |  ftdwebmastet@census.gov |     Last Revised:  February 07, 2024
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50486

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE MANUELTORRES-MONTEJANO, also known as Jose Manuel Esquivas

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:06-CR-843-ALL

Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jose Manuel TorresMontejano raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United

States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a

penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v.

Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug.

28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 12, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
From: Deborah Chaiken

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women.

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 2:53:14 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I applaud the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy is a sound one, economically and ethically, and recognizes the importance of women's health

in our country's health care policy, an area that is often overlooked. Birth control is a critical part of

preventive care, and making contraception available to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability

to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term health care costs associated with unplanned

pregnancies.

Thank you for addressing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Deborah Chaiken

31 Pear St

Palmyra, NJ 08065
Exhibit 32.2

                                   Vicom, Inc.



                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with this Annual Report Form 10-K, Vicom, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003, I, Steven M. Bell, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.    This Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and
2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


Date: March 30, 2004             By:
                                         --------------------------------------
                                                   /s/ Steven M. Bell
                                                Chief Financial Officer