alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1110 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1110

To require that the area of a zip code number shall be located entirely 
                within a State, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 27, 2001

   Mr. Enzi introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require that the area of a zip code number shall be located entirely 
                within a State, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AREAS WITH A ZIP CODE NUMBER WITHIN A SINGLE STATE.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section, the term--
            (1) ``State'' means each State of the United States, the 
        District of Columbia, and each possession of the United States; 
        and
            (2) ``zip code'' means the system used under the Postal 
        Service zoning improvement plan.
    (b) Zip Codes Within a State.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 120 days after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the United States Postal Service shall 
        take such actions as necessary (including the assignment or 
        reassignment of any zip code number) to ensure that the 
        geographic area to which any zip code number is assigned or 
        reassigned is located entirely within 1 State.
            (2) Application.--Paragraph (1) applies to zip code numbers 
        assigned or reassigned before, on, or after the date of 
        enactment of this Act.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 130 days after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Postmaster General shall submit a report to Congress 
detailing compliance with this section.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered March 2 5 , 2015

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 12

- 01714

- CV

RICKEY L. AND KAREN HOLLAND, Appellant s

V.

FRIEDMAN & FIEIGER, ET AL, Appellee s

On Appeal from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County , Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 09

- 15867



### O RDER

On the Court’s own motion, we ORDER Sharon Hazlewood, Official Court Reporter for

the Criminal District Court No. 7, to file, within seven (7) days of the date of this order, a

certified copy of the record from the January 13, 2012 hearing on appellan t s ’ motion for recusal.

/David Schenck/

DAVID SCHENCK

JUSTICE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Millie J. Newcomb, as Administratrix of the Estate of Sarah A. Wiggins, Deceased, Appellant.

*People*v. Newcomb, 146 App. Div. 904, appeal dismissed.

(Argued February 26, 1913;

decided March 18, 1913.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 9, 1912, which affirmed an order of the court at a Trial Term dismissing the complaint, without costs to either party, on the ground that the action, which was one to recover a penalty for the sale of adulterated milk, had abated by reason of the death of the original defendant.

Defendant claimed that the court had no power to deny defendant costs.

*O. M. Reilly*for appellant.

*Thomas Carmody, Attorney-General (Henry Selden Bacon*of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Collin and Hogan, JJ.
Filed 1/5/15 P. v. Barron CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. 

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

BRIGITTE ANN BARRON,

Defendant and Appellant.

 H040580

 (Santa Clara County

 Super. Ct. Nos. B1365928, B1369559,

 C1362445)

Defendant Brigitte Ann Barron was placed on probation after pleading no contest 

to second degree burglary (Pen. Code, §§ 459, 460, subd. (b)), and the court ordered as a 

condition of probation that she “not possess or use alcohol or illegally controlled 

substances or go to places that [sic] you know alcohol, illegal substances, or nonprescribed controlled substances are used or sold.” On appeal, she contends that this 

condition is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. She asks us to modify this 

condition to add the word “knowingly” so that it reads “not knowingly possess or use 

alcohol or illegally controlled substances . . . .” The Attorney General concedes that the 

condition must be modified to add “knowingly” to the prohibition against possession or 

use of “alcohol,” but she insists that the prohibition on possession or use of “illegally 

controlled substances” does not require the addition of the word “knowingly” because the 

condition “implicitly contains a knowledge element.”
2

The Attorney General relies on this court’s decision in People v. Rodriguez (2013) 

222 Cal.App.4th 578 (Rodriguez). In Rodriguez, the defendant challenged as 

unconstitutionally vague and overbroad a probation condition that she “ ‘[n]ot use or 

possess alcohol, intoxicants, narcotics, or other controlled substances without the 

prescription of a physician . . . .’” (Rodriguez, at pp. 592-593.) Although this court 

suggested that “a scienter element is reasonably implicit in this condition” with respect to 

controlled substances, it nevertheless ordered that the entire condition be modified to add

an express knowledge requirement because “the addition of an express knowledge 

requirement will eliminate any potential for vagueness or overbreadth in applying the 

condition.” (Rodriguez, at pp. 593-594.) We do the same in this case.

The order of probation is hereby modified so that the challenged condition reads: 

“You shall not knowingly possess or use alcohol or illegally controlled substances or go 

to places where you know alcohol, illegal substances, or non-prescribed controlled 

substances are used or sold.” As so modified, the order is affirmed.
3

_______________________________

Mihara, J.

WE CONCUR:

_____________________________

Elia, Acting P. J.

_____________________________

Bamattre-Manoukian, J.
From: Chris.Hagood@ge.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:02:06 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Chris Hagood

Goshen, KY 40026
EXHIBIT 21

                   LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF PRESIDENTIAL REALTY
                       CORPORATION AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2003

      (1)   PDL, Inc. organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, which
            carries on business under its own name.

      (2)   Presidential Realty of Iowa, Incorporated, organized under the laws
            of the State of Iowa, which carries on business under its own name.

      (3)   Presidential Continental Gardens Corp., organized under the laws of
            the State of Florida, which carries on business under its own name.

      (4)   Fairlawn Gardens Corp., organized under the laws of the State of
            West Virginia, which carries on business under its own name.

      (5)   Presidential Farrington Corp., organized under the laws of the State
            of Florida, which carries on business under its own name.

      (6)   Presidential Preston Lake Corp., organized under the laws of the
            State of Georgia, which carries on business under its own name.

      (7)   Presidential Matmor Corp., organized under the laws of the State of
            Delaware, which carries on business under its own name.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the periodic  report on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") of Industrial Minerals, Inc. (the "Company")
I, John Melnyk,  Acting Chief  Executive  Officer and  President of the Company,
certify,  pursuant  to 18USC  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: May 12, 2004

/s/John Melnyk
---------------------------------------------------------
John Melnyk, Acting Chief Executive Officer and President


         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132253 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132253 

 COA: 268922 

Hillsdale CC: 00-135878 

DAVID REEVES VAN AUKER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 28, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 29, 2006 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vail Banks, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter G. Williston, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Peter G. Williston
Peter G. WillistonSenior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 13, 2004
11:EEIEEMENTEIIEEMECUIR ESEMIEEEMEIMMEI 

cc: Hon. Rob Bare, District Judge 

John C. Peterson 

Las Vegas City Attorney 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

101 1947A 

2
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.5 MB)
 
 Syria Army National Guard California National Guard CH-47 Chinook Task Force Phoenix
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: benita campbell

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Institute of Medicine recommendations for preventative care coverage

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 6:28:20 AM

Please accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine pertaining to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law. Also, please reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new law and

would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others (driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive

services) are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger.

Some groups are even pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health

providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage

requirement--even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they

work.

You must ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Sincerely,

BJC
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Century Financial Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Edward F. Gotschall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                             /s/ Edward F. Gotschall


                             Edward F. Gotschall
                             Chief Financial Officer
                             November 14, 2002
| RATES EFFECTIVE for Variable Denomination Floating Rate Demand Notesas of  March 29, 2010: |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert Dinning, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Industrial Minerals,
Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and
have:

     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

     b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles;

     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an quarterly report) that has materially affected
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2007

/s/ Robert Dinning
-----------------------
Robert Dinning
Chief Financial Officer




<PAGE>
From: cgperry@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: women"s preventive care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:33:24 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of

Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious

employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the

new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an

ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups

are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health

providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care

by accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed

religious refusal exemption provisions.

Sincerely,

Dr. Catherine Perry

Niles, MI