alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 585 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 16, 2002.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the joint 
resolution (H.J. Res. 123) making further continuing appropriations for the 
fiscal year 2003, and for other purposes. The joint resolution shall be 
considered as read for amendment. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the joint resolution to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate on the joint resolution equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2. House Resolutions 550, 551, and 557 are laid on the table.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.37 MB)
 
 U.S. BS 17 Bright Star 2017 Exercise Bright Star 17 Centcom
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
**EXHIBIT
      23**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-3 (File No. 333-112150, 333- 109750, 333-109785, 333-89364, and 333-73766),
      Form S-8 (File No. 333-64618), and Form S-1 (File No. 333-122717, 333-121775,
      333-117268, and 333-129239) of Multiband Corporation and subsidiaries of our
      report dated **** March
      8,
      2006, which appears in this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
      December 31, 2005.







/s/
      VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP







Minneapolis,
      Minnesota


March
      31,
      2006
From: Cathryn Steele

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: "Religious Employer"

Date: Saturday, August 13, 2011 6:33:10 PM

Dear Sir or Ma’am:

The current definition of religious employer does not provide true conscience protection for those

committed to preserving life. Health care plans should not be forced to violate the moral and religious

convictions of providers or employees in order to participate in the health care system. Requiring such

an unacceptable demand threatens both universal access to health care and religious freedom of

conscience.

Sincerely,

Your Fellow American
#### General Contracting Company, Appellant, *v.*Henry P. Burgard, Respondent.

*General Contracting Co.*v. Burgard, 146 App. Div. 899, reversed.

(Argued February 7, 1913;

decided March 18, 1913.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered October 9, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict in an action on contract.

*Adolph Rebadow*for appellant.

*Eugene L. Falk*and *E. C. Schlenker*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

It was error for the court to charge the jury that if the money loaned by the defendant to Jones went into the work of cleaning the streets, it was to be regarded as a part of the cost to the defendant of completing the contract. The question was not solely whether the money went into the work. It was whether the defendant made an independent loan to Jones or an advance of money to pay in part the cost of the street cleaning as it progressed.

The order and judgment appealed from should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Cuddeback, Hogan and Miller, JJ., concur.

Order and judgment reversed, etc.
file:///C|/..._List_29-08-2011_12-55-54-352/Document%20List%2029-08-2011%2012-55-54-352_docs/EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0035.html[8/29/2011 1:20:23 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: August 29, 2011

Received: August 22, 2011

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 80ee9928

Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0018

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of

Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0018-0002

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services under

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0035

Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Susan Nowak

Address:

410 Scottfield Terrace

Ballwin, MO,

General Comment

I strongly object to the birth control mandate in insurance plans.
SFB Bancorp, Inc.

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

           CERTFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
                          OFFICER OF SFB BANCORP, INC.

            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with this Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB, that:

      o     the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
            and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

      o     the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the Company's financial condition and results of
            operations.


/s/ Peter W. Hampton                                    /s/ Bobby Hyatt
-----------------------                                 -----------------------
Chief Executive Officer                                 Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 13, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.1
FIRST AMENDMENT OF
FMC TECHNOLOGIES, INC. EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT PROGRAM
PART I SALARIED AND NONUNION HOURLY EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, FMC Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) maintains the FMC Technologies, Inc. Employees’ Retirement Program Part I Salaried and Nonunion Hourly Employees’ Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2013 (the “Plan”);
WHEREAS, the Company now deems it necessary and desirable to amend the Plan to provide for the full vesting of the accrued benefits of participants who cease to be employees of the Company effective April 30, 2014, as a result of the Company’s divestiture of its material handling products business to Syntron Material Handling, LLC, effective April 30, 2014; and
WHEREAS, this First Amendment shall supersede the provisions of the Plan to the extent those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions of the amendment;
NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue and in exercise of the powers reserved to the Company under Section 11.1 Plan Amendment or Termination of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of April 30, 2014:


•Section 4.1 of the Plan is hereby amended to add the following sentence to the end thereto to read as follows:
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, effective April 30, 2014, the accrued benefit of any Participant who ceased to be an employee of the Company effective as of April 30, 2014 as a result of the Company’s divestiture of its material handling products business to Syntron Material Handling, LLC, effective April 30, 2014, shall at all times be fully vested.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be executed by a duly authorized representative this 30th day of April, 2014.
FMC Technologies, Inc. 




By: /s/ Mark J. Scott    
Its:  VP, Administration
From: Megsicthus@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:55:52 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Megan Bradley

Grand Rapids, MI 49546
Exhibit 10.3
 SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION
RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT UNDER THE
2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
 Agreement Effective Date SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION Company JAMES E. DALTON, JR. Participant
 Plan
  Stock
   Award of Restricted Stock 5,000 Restricted
Stock
 Vesting Schedule
 Cumulative Shares ofVesting Dates
    
    Restricted Stock VestedAugust 11, 2011
    
    
    1,000August 11, 2012
    
    
    2,000August 11, 2013
    
    
    3,000August 11, 2014
    
    
    4,000August 11, 2015
    
    
    5,000




---



##### 



Section 5 Restricted Period
 Transferability
 Forfeiture of Restricted Stock
 Acceleration of Vesting Upon Change of Control
 Plan Governing
 Miscellaneous
   2




---



##### 



SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/   Robert A. OrtenzioName:
    Robert A. OrtenzioTitle:
    Chief Executive OfficerPARTICIPANT:/s/  James E, Dalton, Jr.James E. Dalton, Jr.  3
From: Elizabeth Reshower

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:59:38 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I thank you and the Department of Health & Human Services' for the landmark decision requiring health

insurers to cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth Reshower

3 Glade Creek Acres

Pisgah Forest, NC 28768
|                                            |
|--------------------------------------------|
| **This page has been relocated to:**

**** |
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 495 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 197
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 495

                          [Report No. 107-594]

                In the Matter of James A. Traficant, Jr.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 19, 2002

    Mr. Hefley from the Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, 
  reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House 
                   Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                In the Matter of James A. Traficant, Jr.

    Resolved, That, pursuant to Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 of the 
United States Constitution, Representative James A. Traficant, Jr., be, 
and he hereby is, expelled from the House of Representatives.

                                                 House Calendar No. 197

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 495

                          [Report No. 107-594]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

                In the Matter of James A. Traficant, Jr.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 19, 2002

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
DECEMBER 31, 1997 FORM 10-K OF HILLS BANCORPORATION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          15,508
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 2,447
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    114,244
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          23,840
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            24,230
<LOANS>                                        422,761
<ALLOWANCE>                                      8,010
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 603,102
<DEPOSITS>                                     479,770
<SHORT-TERM>                                     9,008
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             12,060
<LONG-TERM>                                     50,764
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            7,682
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,070
<OTHER-SE>                                      42,430
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 603,102
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 34,598
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,987
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   158
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                42,743
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              19,294
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,502
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           20,241
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,048
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 940
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 15,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,631
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,086
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,086
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.78
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.93
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                       954
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  9,566
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 7,311
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,128
<RECOVERIES>                                       779
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                8,010
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             8,010
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,421


</TABLE>
From: Shel Anderson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: my concern about provision of contraception without copay

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:53:03 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

-- 

Shel Anderson

1706 Rosetta St

Durham NC 27701

Phone: 910 515 3342
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1287

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located

at 2015 15th Street in Gulfport, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Judge Dan M.

Russell, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 1, 2001

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. COCHRAN) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public

Works

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 2015 15th Street in Gulfport, Mississippi, as the ‘‘Judge Dan M. Russell, Jr. Federal

Building and United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JUDGE DAN M. RUSSELL, JR.

4 FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED STATES

5 COURTHOUSE.

6 The Federal building and United States courthouse

7 located at 2015 15th Street in Gulfport, Mississippi, shall
2

•S 1287 IS

1 be known and designated as the ‘‘Judge Dan M. Russell,

2 Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

6 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec7 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Judge Dan

8 M. Russell, Jr. Federal Building and United States Court9 house.

Æ
From: Galia Goodman

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive Care/Birth control

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 10:43:51 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions. No one's individual

right to religious freedom should dictate anyone else's right to decent health care.

Galia Goodman, Durham, NC

Galia Goodman

galiag@mindspring.com

www.galiagoodman.com