alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: awack@mail4me.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:39:36 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Beth Kleeman

Loveland, CO 80538
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



As of the date hereof, I, Eric Borrmann, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Plumtree Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Plumtree Software, Inc.



By:

/s/ Eric BorrmannName:

Eric BorrmannTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDated:

October 31, 2003
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 27, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-60448

Summary Calendar

KASSA WOLDEMARIAM LEMMA,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A77 893 067

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:*

Kassa Woldemariam Lemma challenges the decision of the Board

of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from the

Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his petition for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against

Torture (CAT). 

The BIA’s finding that Lemma failed to establish eligibility

for asylum is supported by the requisite substantial evidence.

See Mikhael v. INS, 115 F.3d 299, 304 (5th Cir. 1997); Faddoul v.
2

INS, 37 F.3d 185, 188 (5th Cir. 1994). And, because Lemma is not

eligible for asylum, he cannot meet the higher standard for

withholding of removal. See Faddoul, 37 F.3d at 188. Moreover,

Lemma failed to exhaust his claim for relief under the CAT,

therefore this court is without jurisdiction to consider it. See

Wang v. Ashcroft, 260 F.3d 448, 452-53 (5th Cir. 2001). 

Lemma’s claim that the IJ erred in excluding evidence under 8

C.F.R. §§ 3.33 and 287.6 (certification of foreign documents and

translations) fails because he has not demonstrated substantial

prejudice as a result of the exclusion. See Molina v. Sewell, 983

F.2d 676, 678 (5th Cir. 1993). His claim that his due process

rights were violated by such exclusion under 8 C.F.R. § 287.6(b)

fails for the same reason. See Anwar v. INS, 116 F.3d 140, 144

(5th Cir. 1997).

DENIED
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10.31





        
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan
Executive Performance Stock Unit Award
Grant Notice


Qualcomm Incorporated (the “Company”), pursuant to its 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), hereby grants to you, the Participant named below, a Performance Stock Unit Award (the “Award”) subject to all of the terms and conditions as set forth in this Executive Performance Stock Unit Award Grant Notice (“Grant Notice”), the Executive Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement (the “Agreement”), which is attached hereto, and the Plan, all of which are incorporated herein in their entirety.  A copy of the Plan can be obtained from the Stock Administration website, located on the Company’s internal webpage, or you may request a hard copy from the Stock Administration Department.




Participant:  «First_Name» «Last_Name»                Grant No.:  «Number»
		
	Emp #:  «ID»
	Date of Grant:  «Date_of_Grant»


Target Relative Total Shareholder Return (“RTSR”) Shares:  «Target RTSR Shares»
Target Return on Invested Capital (“ROIC”) Shares:  «Target ROIC Shares»
Performance Period: March 28, 2016 - March 28, 2019, or such shorter period provided in the Agreement
Vesting Date:  «Vesting Date»


Additional Terms/Acknowledgments:  You must acknowledge, in the form determined by the Company, receipt of, and represent that you have read, understand, accept and agree to the terms and conditions of, this Grant Notice, the Agreement and the Plan (including, but not limited to, the binding arbitration provision in Section 3.7 of the Plan).  


Qualcomm Incorporated




By: 
Steven M. Mollenkopf
Chief Executive Officer
Dated:  «Date_of_Grant»


Attachment:    Executive Performance Stock Unit Award Agreement (U.S. PSU-EX-A9)










02.16.16                                                U.S. PSU-EX A11
_ AG). / Page 1 of |
SEP] REG JAQBWN-LQ

ESSING DIVISION

& REGULATIONS As of: September 01, 2011

PUBLICATION & REGU! Received: August 09, 2011
Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 01, 2011

Tracking No. 80edc410
‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

LEGAL PROC

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0099
Comment on FR Doe # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: RICK MORGAN
Address:
2500 CANYON RD B-2
BULLHEAD CITY AZ., AZ, 86442
Phone: 928 444-1444

General Comment

i WANT TO VOICE MY SUPPORT TO ALLOW EXEMPTIONS FOR COVERAGE AND
DISPENSING OF MORNING AFTER PILLS AND CONTRACEPTION TO ANY EMPLOYER
OR MEDICAL PROVIDER OR PHARMACIST WHO HAS ANY RELIGIOUS OBJECTION
TO BEING PART OF HTESE ACTS.

THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD NOT DICTATE THAT ANYONE VIOLATE THEIR
BELIEFS TO PARTICIPATE IN AN IMMORAL ACT SUCH AS ABORTING A BABY OR
CONTRIBUTING TO THE SEX TRADE OR ABUSE OF WOMEN THROUGH THE
COMMERCIAL SEX TRADE.

THE SEPERATION OF CHURCH AND STATE GUARANTEES THAT THE GOVERNMENT
WILL NOT IMPOSE A MANDATORY RELIGION ON THE WHOLE COUNTRY AND
THAT EVERY PERSON WILL BE FREE TO FOLLOW THEIR OWN BELIEFS WITHOUT
INTERFERENCE FROM THE GOVERNMENT.

AS A DOCTOR, I WILL NOT PARTICIPATE IN ABORTIONS AND WILL FIGHT TO

DEFEND MY RIGHT TO NOT BE IMPLICATED IN THIS ACT AGAINST INNOCENT
BLOOD.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000... 9/1/2011
EXHIBIT 31.1

302
CERTIFICATION FOR FORM 10-Q

CERTIFICATIONS

|I, Gary S.
  Judd, certify that:
|--------------------------------
|                                
|1.                              
|                                
|2.                              
|                                
|3.                              
|                                
|4.                              
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                
|5.                              
|                                
|                                
|                                
|                                

|Date:  August 13, 2004 |                                        
|---------------------- | ---------------------------------------
|                       |                                        
|                       |                                        
|                       | /s/ Gary S.
  Judd                     
|                       |                                        
|                       | Gary S. Judd                           
|                       | Chief
  Executive Officer and President
NUMBER 13-08-00126-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

DAVID SOTO, APPELLANT,

v.

TEXAS STATE BANK, APPELLEE.

_____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, David Soto, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the

County Court at Law No. 2 of Hidalgo, County, Texas, in cause no. CL-06-2160-B. Upon

review of the documents before the Court, the notice of appeal is not in compliance with

Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(d)(7). The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that
2

steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.1,

42.3. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the

date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Appellant failed to respond to the Court’s notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to correct

the defect in this matter, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of

jurisdiction. See id. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF

JURISDICTION. See id. 42.3(b),(c).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 

filed this the 21st day of August, 2008.
EX-4.67



 Exhibit 4.67 

Amendment Agreement 
 of

 the 2014-2016 Comprehensive Service Agreement between 

China United Network Communications Group Co., Ltd and 

China United Network Communications Corporation 

Limited 
 Party A: China United Network
Communications Group Co., Ltd. 
 Party B: China United Network Communications Corporation Limited 

Whereas, 
 Party A and Party B
entered into the 2014-2016 Comprehensive Service Agreement between China United Network Communications Group Co., Ltd and China United Network Communications Corporation Limited (Reference No.: CU12-1001-2013-001118, hereinafter referred to as the
“Original Agreement”) on October 24, 2013. The Parties agreed to make the following amendments to certain terms and conditions provided in the Original Agreement due to the raise of the annual caps for comprehensive support services: 

 

	1.	The Parties agreed that, the arrangement stipulated in Article 5, Annex VII of the Original Agreement, “In 2014, 2015 and 2016, the transaction caps for the comprehensive support services provided by Party A to
Party B shall be RMB 1 billion yuan”, shall be amended as follows: “In 2014, 2015 and 2016, the transaction caps for the comprehensive support services provided by Party A to Party B shall be RMB 1 billion yuan, RMB 2 billion yuan and RMB
3.5 billion yuan respectively”, while the remaining part of this Article shall remain unchanged; 

  

	2.	Except as specifically amended hereby, the Original Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

  

	3.	This Agreement shall come into effect on the date as signed and sealed by the authorized representatives of the Parties. 

  

	4.	This Agreement is executed in four copies with each Party holding two copies, and all copies shall be equally authentic. 









					
	Party A: China United Network Communications Group Co., Ltd.	  		  	Party B: China United Network Communications Corporation Limited
			
	Authorized representative:	  		  	Authorized representative:
			
	Date: August 21, 2015	  		  	Date: August 21, 2015
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1287 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1287

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 2015 15th Street in Gulfport, Mississippi, as the ``Judge Dan M. 
     Russell, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 1, 2001

 Mr. Lott (for himself and Mr. Cochran) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 2015 15th Street in Gulfport, Mississippi, as the ``Judge Dan M. 
     Russell, Jr. Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JUDGE DAN M. RUSSELL, JR. FEDERAL BUILDING 
              AND UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 2015 
15th Street in Gulfport, Mississippi, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Judge Dan M. Russell, Jr. Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the Judge Dan M. Russell, Jr. Federal Building and United States 
Courthouse.
                                 <all>
```
From: Susan Bernofsky

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 4:42:59 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Susan Bernofsky

4 W. 105th St., 6A

NEW YORK, NY 10025
Exhibit 31.2

                              STATEMENT PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gerald E. Sklar, Chief Executive Officer, of Winmax Trading Group, Inc.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as enacted by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30,
            2005 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully
            complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
            Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   Information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of Winmax Trading Group, Inc.


Dated: Aug 12, 2005

                                                /s/ Gerald E. Sklar
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Gerald E. Sklar
                                                Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Winmax Trading Group, Inc. and
will be retained by Winmax Trading Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 1

ESSING DIVISION (aE G3. i/-/f) 7
sagncrnamrsssatanons PEOROSN LC SEP 0 2 21
BRANC!

As of: September 02, 2011
Received: August 16, 2011
Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 02, 2011

Tracking No. 80ce2416
‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of

Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services

under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0148
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Urknown bo
Submitter Information

Address: 908 14-1833
Submitter's Representative: NARAL Pro-Choice America

General Comment

I strongly support the new policy requiring health-insurance plans to cover birth control without a
copay, CMS-9992-IFC2. Thank you for this important improvement to women's health care.

I also want you to know that I am concerned that certain religious employers may be allowed to
opt out of the requirements. All women should have access to contraceptive coverage, regardless

of where they work.

This policy finally should make near-universal access to birth control
areality for all women who use it.

Improving women's access to birth control is positive in so many ways.
A woman who can plan when to have a family is able to participate in
society more fully. Allowing women to space their pregnancies
contributes to healthy childbearing. And ultimately, fewer unintended
pregnancies can reduce the need for abortion.

Thank you for following science-based recommendations and making
women's health a priority.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectlId=09000.... 9/2/2011
# Alaska Frontiers

*Frontiers*, the Bureau of Land Management's news journal for Alaska, delivers exciting and insightful articles on the latest environmental actions, news, policies, and recreational areas. *Frontiers *connects with a wide audience of active readership, especially those who live, explore, and travel on our spectacular public lands in Alaska.

### 2018

frontiers Fall Issue 130

### 2018

Alaska frontiers Magazine Summer Issue 129

### 2018

Alaska frontiers Magazine Winter Issue 128

### 2017

Alaska frontiers magazine Fall Issue 127

### 2017

Alaska frontiers magazine Summer Issue 126

### 2016

The Force of Science

### 2016

Fall in Love with Your Trails

### 2016

Abundance of Summer 

### 2016

Knowledge is Golden

### 2016

Fall in Love with Alaska

### 2016

Discover Your Public Lands

Back to the new Alaska Frontiers Blog
From: Dean

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:07:16 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine

as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care

law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would

provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an

ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health

providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt

from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.