alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
rp 5 / Page 1 of 1

REC -1204)-/0 8
LEGAL PROCESSING DE One
eho ad ' As of: August 31, 2011

Received: August 10, 2011

Status: Posted
PUBLIC SUBMISSION __ Posted: augus:31, 2011
Tracking No. 80edca49
‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0061
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Rhonda Morrison
Address:
2830 Barterbrook Road

Staunton, VA, 24401
Email: rmorrison! @yahoo.com

General Comment

I understand that NARAL is urging its members to write the Department of Health and Human
Services concerning the possible exemption of religious employers from providing contraceptive
coverage for women employees. I would ask that the exemption be broadened to allow religious
employers to practice their religion as written in the Bill of Rights, which would for many of the
organizations, be a refusal to use contraceptives. To force them to pay for others to use
contraceptives would be a violation of their right to freely exercise their religion. There are plenty
of programs already in place that provide contraceptives for women who cannot afford it. This
request for a removal of the exemption seems unnecessary and even coercive. Please act
decisively to ensure that such religious liberties are not violated.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=0900... 8/31/2011
#### Thomas J. Lewis, Respondent, v. The Delaware and Hudson Canal Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Martin,.J., delivered at Special Term.
From: Laura Gross

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 8:37:06 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Laura Gross
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Nos. 39 and 293.

#### Gastelum-Quinones *v.*Kennedy, Attorney General.

*David Rein*and *Joseph Forer*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Jerome M. Feit*for respondent.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari granted.
From: Gladys Nubla

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Access to Preventive Care and Contraception

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 2:19:52 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking

you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for 3religious employers.2 These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better

access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that 3religious refusal2 exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste

for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make

exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger

exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they

work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM1s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal

exemption provisions.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 20, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-50238

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HUGO RICHARD LUEVANO-GOMEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-02-CR-1597-ALL-PM

--------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Hugo Richard Luevano-Gomez appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Luevano-Gomez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element

of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have

been alleged in his indictment. Luevano-Gomez maintains that he
No. 03-50238

-2-

pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry

under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds

the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed

for that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Luevano-Gomez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
From: Sister Bogdanowicz

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 10:58:59 AM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Sister Bogdanowicz
Austin, Texas
Exhibit






FOURTH ALLONGE TO DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


April 25, 2016


THIS ALLONGE (“ALLONGE”) IS TO BE ATTACHED PERMANENTLY TO THE DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE MADE BY CONNECTICUT WATER SERVICE, INC. TO THE ORDER OF CITIZENS BANK OF CONNECTICUT (PREDECESSOR OF CITIZENS BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION), IN THE ORIGINAL PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF $9,000,000 ORIGINALLY DATED MAY 8, 2002, AS AMENDED BY THAT CERTAIN FIRST ALLONGE TO DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE DATED NOVEMBER 20, 2007, AS AMENDED BY THAT CERTAIN SECOND ALLONGE TO DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE DATED SEPTEMBER 15, 2009, AND AS AMENDED BY THAT CERTAIN THIRD ALLONGE TO DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE DATED OCTOBER 12, 2012 (THE “NOTE”).


All capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined in this Allonge shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Note.


Except as set forth in this Allonge, the Note remains in full force and effect and has not been modified or amended in any respect.


This Allonge and the Note shall be read, construed and interpreted as one and the same instrument.


The Note is hereby amended to provide that:  (a) any and all references therein to the principal amount of TWENTY MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($20,000,000.00), however and wherever depicted, shall hereinafter mean and refer to the principal amount of FORTY-FIVE MILLION AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($45,000,000.00); and (b) the unpaid principal amount of the Note shall be paid at the times and in the manner set forth in Section 6 of the Letter Agreement, but if not sooner paid, the entire unpaid principal amount of the Note, together with accrued and unpaid interest thereon, shall be due and payable on the Maturity Date (as defined by the Letter Agreement), unless such date shall be extended pursuant to Section 2 of the Letter Agreement.


To the extent necessary to assure the liability of Maker to the Bank or Holder of the Note, the signature of Maker appearing below shall be construed as both an endorsement and a reissue of the Note.
    
	
		
	 
	CONNECTICUT WATER SERVICE, INC.




By:    /s/  David C. Benoit
        Name:  David C. Benoit
        Title:  Senior Vice President – Finance 
        Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

	 
	 




The foregoing Allonge is hereby acknowledged and agreed to as of the date first set forth above.


	
	
	CITIZENS BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 




By:  /s/  Anthony Castellon
      Name:  Anthony Castellon
      Title:  Senior Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           7,068
<SECURITIES>                                    39,300
<RECEIVABLES>                                  114,660
<ALLOWANCES>                                       901
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               160,127
<PP&E>                                           5,380
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 165,507
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          145,376
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,724
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   165,507
<SALES>                                          8,807
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,355
<CGS>                                            4,152
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,152
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,332
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    45
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,826
<INCOME-TAX>                                       486
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,340
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,340
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .97
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .97
        

</TABLE>
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.22 MB)
 
 455th AEW 455 Air Expeditionary Wing 455 aew U.S. AIr Forces Central Freedom's sentinel U.S. Air Force USAF AFCENT Centcom 455th Air Expeditionary Wing United States Air Force Resolute Support Bagram Airfield Bagram U.S. Central Command Afghanistan
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.51 MB)
 
 MEMORIAL DAY Donald J. Trump JIm Mattis SecDef Chairman Joe Dunford President
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Cheryl Davidson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventative Service Medical Coverage

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:46:51 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger.

Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run

health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the

coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies.

If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

A right to access to coverage of preventive care is not a right if anyone has the

option to take it away from you. 

Personal choices needs to remain personal choices and not be mandated/restricted

by others.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/02

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 02 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                   LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF PRESIDENTIAL REALTY
                       CORPORATION DATED DECEMBER 31, 1998


(1)      PDL, Inc. organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, which
         carries on business under its own name.

(2)      Presidential Realty of Iowa, Incorporated, organized under the laws of
         the State of Iowa, which carries on business under its own name.

(3)      Presidential Continental Gardens Corp., organized under the laws of the
         State of Florida, which carries on business under its own name.

(4)      Fairlawn Gardens Corp., organized under the laws of the State of West
         Virginia, which carries on business under its own name.

(5)      Presidential Sunwood Corp., organized under the laws of the State of
         Florida, which carries on business under its own name.