alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: campbud@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:07:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Melvin Curtis

Grass Valley, CA 95949
From: Angelina Sulaka

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thanks for supporting birth control access for all women! Another Fem. Victory!

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 9:22:08 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Angelina Sulaka

11500 Villa Ct

Warren, Mi 48093
No. 388, Misc.

#### Foster *v.*New York.

Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.
From: q30049@miamidade.gov

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:58:51 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tonya McCarthy

Hollywood, FL 33023
EXHIBIT 99.1

        STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
                      ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     The  undersigned,  Charles F. Finn, is the  President  and Chief  Executive
Officer of Wayne Savings Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company").

     This  statement  is being  furnished in  connection  with the filing by the
Company of the Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
September 30, 2002 (the "Report").

     By execution of this statement, I certify that:

          A)   the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
               or 78o(d)) and

          B)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations  of the  Company  as of the dates and for the  periods
               covered by the Report.

     This  statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this  statement  will  accompany  the  Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.



November 14, 2002                     /s/ Charles F. Finn
------------------                    -----------------------------------
Dated                                 Charles F. Finn
Appendix 11COP00.511.522.533.54-40 -30 -20 -10 0Evaporating Temperature (degC)

COPR442AR404A
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.02 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: bugboys1915@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:28:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

G Musser

Narvon, PA 17555
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          48,467
<SECURITIES>                                   169,605
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,708
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     227,179
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,179
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,587
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
From: Amber Culver

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Religious refusal

Date: Sunday, August 14, 2011 5:23:14 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

Any individual, female or male, has the right and responsibility to work with their own physician to make

their own, individual, right decision regarding their preferences about health care, including

contraceptive care. There exists no need to institutionalize the issue. Please, accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine regarding coverage of preventive care and reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.”

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Thank you,

Amber Culver

amber.culver@sbcglobal.net
Exhibit 4.58 


 


 





Confirmation Letter


 


To:500WAN HK Limited (“500WAN
HK”)


 


Whereas:


 


500WAN HK is the sole shareholder of E-Sun
Sky Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“E-Sun Sky Computer”) and holds 100% of the equity interest in E-Sun Sky Computer;


 


E-Sun Sky Computer accepted a Power
of Attorney respectively from Yu Bo (Chinese Identification No.: 420106196805034857) on Nov 18, 2015 and Yin Zhiwei(Chinese Identification
No.: 440301198308211914) on Nov 18, 2015 (collectively referred to as the “POA”). Pursuant to the POA,
Yu Bo and Yin Zhiwei respectively delegate and authorize E-Sun Sky Computer to exercise their voting powers and all other
shareholder rights in respect of Shenzhen E-Sun Network Co., Ltd on their behalf (the “Rights”).


 


Now therefore, with respect to the exercise
of the Rights, E-Sun Sky Computer hereby confirms as follows:


 


		1.	E-Sun Sky Computer hereby confirms that, in exercising the Rights under the POA,
it shall obtain the consent from 500WAN HK in the manner allowed by the PRC Laws.



 


		2.	E-Sun Sky Computer further confirms that it shall exercise the Rights in accordance
with the instructions from the third party designated by 500WAN HK within the scope allowed by the PRC Laws.



 


		3.	This confirmation letter shall become effective upon execution, and maintain effective unless the
POA is terminated in accordance with the provisions thereof.



 


		4.	The execution, effectiveness, construction, performance, amendment and termination of this confirmation
letter and the resolution of disputes hereunder shall be governed by PRC Laws.



 


		5.	This confirmation letter is written in both Chinese and English language; in case there is any
conflict between the Chinese version and the English version, the Chinese version shall prevail.



【Signature
Page Follows】


 


 


E-Sun Sky Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd



By:/s/ Yu Bo


Name: Yu Bo


Title: Legal Representative


Date:2015. 11.18
From: Erin Rodman

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 10:16:04 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies. As a health care provider, I am very pleased

with this decision by HHS.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Erin Rodman

6013 Biron Way

Indianapolis, IN 46254
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
*** RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE ***
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
AMERITECH CORPORATION'S JUNE 30, 1996 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                         248,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,056,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    208,000                                 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,836,000
<PP&E>                                      31,357,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              18,132,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,167,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,950,000
<BONDS>                                      4,216,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       588,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,808,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,167,000
<SALES>                                              0<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,311,000
<CGS>                                                0<F3>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,543,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (124,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               167,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             252,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,640,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   595,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,045,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,045,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.94<F4>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.94<F4>
<FN>
<F1>WE HAVE NOT STATED SECURITIES SEPARATELY IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT MATERIAL. WE HAVE INCLUDED THEM IN THE "CASH" TAG.
<F2>NET SALES OF TANGIBLE PRODUCTS IS NOT MORE THAN 10% OF TOTAL OPERATING
REVENUES. WE THEREFORE HAVE NOT STATED THESE SALES SEPARATELY IN THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PER REGULATION S-X, RULE 5-03(B). WE HAVE INCLUDED
THESE SALES IN THE "TOTAL REVENUE" TAG.
<F3>WE HAVE INCLUDED COST OF TANGIBLE GOODS SOLD IN OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES 
IN OUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE "TOTAL COST" TAG, PER REGULATION
S-X, RULE 5-03(B).
<F4>WE HAVE CALCULATED EARNINGS PER SHARE AMOUNTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAS
128 "EARNINGS PER SHARE." WE HAVE ENTERED BASIC AND DILUTED AMOUNTS IN PLACE
OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY, AND REFLECT THE TWO-FOR-ONE
STOCK SPLIT EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 31, 1997.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
file:///C|/..._List_29-08-2011_12-55-54-352/Document%20List%2029-08-2011%2012-55-54-352_docs/EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0064.html[8/29/2011 2:42:37 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: August 29, 2011

Received: August 25, 2011

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 80eee1fc

Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0018

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of

Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0018-0002

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services under

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0064

Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

General Comment

Dear Government Leaders,

I am writing to ask that the Religious Exemption for the PPACA be broadened to not only include

houses of worship, but also religious organizations, religious colleges, and employer-funded private

health insurance plans if the employer has a conscientious objection to using corporate funds to pay

for birth control or abortion-inducing drugs.

Thank you for you attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

A concerned United States Citizen
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of ALCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2007 (the "Report"), I, Andrew Liu, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.  /S/ Andrew Liu Andrew Liu, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman March 29, 2008
From: Wally Schmitt

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Acess to Preventive Care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:26:22 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.