U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

BALLAST ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDA

Forrestal Building

Room 1E-245

June 1, 1999

9:00 a.m.

DRAFT AGENDA

Expected Outcomes: Receive comments on the analysis, recommendations on standard levels

and factors to consider in setting standards.

9:00 am - 9:05 am Welcome (Dan Reicher)

9:05 am - 9:20 am Introductions and Agenda Review (Doug Brookman)

-Housekeeping

-Introduction

-Agenda Review

9:20 am - 9:30 am Assistant Secretary's Remarks (Dan Reicher)

9:30 am - 10: 00 am Summary of DOE Results for Electronic Standards (Carl Adams)

Scenarios Analyzed

• Results

Break as Needed

10:00 am - 12:00 pm Summary of Comments (Michael McCabe)

(after each topic there will be an opportunity for stakeholder

discussion)

• General comments

® Comparison of T12 to T8

• Price-efficiency

® Electricity prices

• Life-cycle-cost

• Energy savings and net present value

• Manufacturer impacts

12:00 pm - 1:00 pm Lunch

EE-RM-97-500 COMMENT 67B

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

BALLAST ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS 

Forrestal Building 

Room lE-245 

June 1, 1999 

9:00 a.m. 

DRAFT AGENDA 

Expected Outcomes: Receive comments on the analysis, recommendations on standard levels 

and factors to consider in setting standards. 

9:00 am - 9:05 am Welcome (Dan Reicher) 

9:05 am - 9:20 am Introductions and Agenda Review (Doug Brookman) 

• Housekeeping 

• Introduction 

II Agenda Review 

9:20 am - 9:30 am Assistant Secretary's Remarks (Dan Reicher) 

9:30 am - 10:00 am Summary of DOE Results for Electronic Standards (Carl Adams) 

• Scenarios Analyzed 

• Results 

Break as Needed 

10:00 am - 12:00 pm Summary of Comments (Michael McCabe) 

(after each topic there will be an opportunity for stakeholder 

discussion) 

• General comments 

• Comparison of T 12 to T8 

• Price-efficiency 

• Electricity prices 

• Life-cycle-cost 

• Energy savings and net present value 

• Manufacturer impacts 

12:00 pm - 1 :00 pm Lunch 
1:00 pm - 4:00 pm Discussion Questions (Dan Reicher)

Including:

• If you believe DOE should proceed with standards for ballasts,

what findings are most important to consider to support that

conclusion?

• If you believe DOE should conclude that further standards for

ballasts are not warranted , what findings are most important to

consider to support that conclusion?

• If DOE concludes further standards are not justified, what steps

could the Department take to support and increase the market

demand for electronic ballasts?

• If DOE decides to proceed with electronic standards, what can be

done to minimize the impacts on manufacturers, e.g., timing,

levels and exemptions to lessen the burdens?

4:00 pm Adjourn

EE-RM-97-500 COMMENT 67B

1 :00 pm - 4:00 pm Discussion Questions 

Including: 

(Dan Reicher) 

.. If you believe DOE should proceed with standards for ballasts, 

what findings are most important to consider to support that 

conclusion? 

" If you believe DOE should conclude that further standards for 

ballasts are not warranted, what findings are most important to 

consider to support that conclusion? 

If DOE concludes further standards are not justified, what steps 

could the Department take to support and increase the market 

demand for electronic ballasts? 

o If DOE decides to proceed with electronic standards, what can be 

done to minimize the impacts on manufacturers, e.g., timing, 

levels and exemptions to lessen the burdens? 

4:00 pm Adjourn