alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: humphrey15@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:06:37 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

Rescind the unjust and coercive mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be

covered by private health insurance with no co-pay to patients. If you choose to ride roughshod over

the views of those who object, expand conscience protections for any organizations that provide

individual and group insurance and have any objections, especially moral or religious objections. The

government should not be forcing free insurance coverage on Americans for drugs and devices that

cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

Also, reconsider your definition of religious employer. Offer an authentic conscience protection for any

organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such insurance to their

employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which prohibit government

discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or religious grounds. The

definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include churches, but will still

mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections will be required to

choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees health insurance.

No Americans should be forced by the federal government essentially to subsidize services they object

to. Reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory preventive

services.

Sincerely,

Chris Humphrey

Pittsburgh, PA 15201
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 19

- 00092

- CV

Noble Capital Servicing, LLC, Appellant

v.
Action Roofing & Construction, Inc., Appellee

FROM THE 126TH DISTR ICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D

- 1

- GN

- 19

- 000222 , THE HONORABLE DON R. BURGESS, JUDGE PRES IDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Noble Capital Servicing, LLC has filed an unopposed motion to

dismiss the appeal, advising that the i nterlocutory appeal is moot due to a final judgment

rendered by the trial cou rt. We grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

__________________________________________ Thoma s J. Baker, Justice

Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: June 26, 2019
From: Robert Edwards

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Support Access to Preventive Care and Contraception!

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 11:14:05 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of

the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care

under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element

of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious

refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions

even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply

to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though

they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access

to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s recommendations and

rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Robert Edwards

163 Willow Street

Wilkes-Barre, PA. 18702f
From: jerryphillipssr@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:31:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jerry Phillips

Arlington, TX 76013
From: judy@cpcnwo.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:39:05 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Judy Van Wagner

Bryan, OH 43506
**Exhibit 3.7**

 

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT**

**OF**

**AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION**

**OF**

**NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION,**

**a Delaware corporation**

 

It is hereby certified that: 

 

1.    The name of the corporation is New Century Financial Corporation (the “Corporation”). 

 

2.    The Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended by deleting Section 4.1 of Article IVthereof and by substituting in lieu thereof the following new Section 4.1 of Article IV: 

 

“**Section 4.1    Capital Stock**.    The total number of shares of capital stockwhich the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is 107,500,000, of which (i) 100,000,000 shares shall be Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”), and (ii) 7,500,000 shares shall be Preferred Stock, par value$0.01 per share (the “Preferred Stock”). The Board of Directors of the Corporation shall have the full authority permitted by law to fix by resolution full, limited, multiple, fractional or non-voting rights, and such designations,preferences, limitations or restrictions thereof of any series that may be desired in respect of the Preferred Stock.”******

 

3.    The amendment of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation herein certified has been duly adopted in accordance withthe provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. 

 

[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank] 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,** this Certificate of Amendment has been duly executed by a duly authorizedofficer of the Corporation on the 10th day of September, 2003. 

 
**NEW CENTURY FINANCIAL CORPORATION**By: /s/    ROBERT K. COLE         
Name:
 Robert K. Cole
Title:
 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
 

S-1
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.39 MB)
 
 cvn 69 uss dwight d. eisenhower ike Ike Deployment Arabian gulf OIR Operation Inherent Resolve
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Lois Hardy

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: "Preventive Care"

Date: Thursday, August 18, 2011 4:59:14 PM

I strongly DISAGREE with the AAUW position on not exempting employers

from providing FREE contraception for employees. This is a personal

decision for people, and I strongly feel that such provisions are not

expensive in any case, and no one should be forced to pay taxes to

provide this. If people want it, they can pay the small amount of

cost. In any case, employers (Ex: hospitals) should not be forced to

provide such coverage and should suffer no penalty for not doing so.

After all, this is supposed to be a free country, and we shouldn't be

forced to pay taxes for something we find abhorrent. It is well known

that some contraceptives are also abortifacients, and I cannot support

anything that would destroy a human life, no matter how small.

I am 79 years old, and have been married for a long time, but

unfortunately was not blessed with children. I strongly feel that life

is a wonderful gift, and that we should encourage self-control. We need

EDUCATION, not free contraceptives. Natural family planning is a much

better choice; it allows people to choose whether or not to become

pregnant, with no fatal (for the fetus) consequences. Again - it just

takes EDUCATION!

Sincerely,

Lois Hardy

Apple Valley, CA
From: Barbara Ramsey

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 12:51:36 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Barbara Ramsey

5721 Vesper Ave

Sherman Oaks, CA 91411
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: RICHARD ALAN HAASE and Richard Alan Haase v. Countrywide 

Home Loans, Inc., Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Bank of 

America, NA, Barrett, Daffin, Turner & Englel, LLP, Deutsche Bank, 

AG, Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I, Inc., and Certificate Holders of 

Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I, Inc. Trust 2006-HE6, Mortgage PassThrough Certificates, Series 2006-HE6

Appellate case number: 01-20-00854-CV

Trial court case number: 07-DCV-161177

Trial court: 400th District Court of Fort Bend County

Appellant, Richard Alan Haase, filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed as Indigent and a 

Statement of Inability to Afford Payment of Court Costs or an Appeal Bond. We abate the appeal 

and refer the matter to the trial court to determine whether, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 20.1, appellant may proceed as indigent on appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(b)(3)(B)

(providing that appellate court may refer matter to trial court).

The trial court shall set a hearing on the determination of indigence and give the parties 

reasonable notice of the hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(b)(3)(B). The trial court shall hear 

evidence during the hearing and shall make such findings of fact and render such orders as the 

court deems appropriate. The trial court clerk is directed to file with the Clerk of this Court a 

clerk’s record containing the final judgment, notice(s) of appeal, the trial court’s signed order 

determining whether appellant is indigent, and any other documents directly related to 

appellant’s Motion for Leave to Proceed as Indigent and his Statement of Inability to Afford 

Payment of Court Costs or an Appeal Bond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1). The court reporter is 

directed to file with the Clerk of this Court a record of the hearing on appellant’s Motion for 

Leave to Proceed as Indigent. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(d). 

The trial court clerk and court reporter must file the required records with the Clerk of 

this Court no later than 45 days from the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active 

docket. The appeal will be reinstated when the appropriate records are filed with this Court.
It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___________/s/ Veronica Rivas-Molloy______________

 Acting individually 

Date: February 2, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10Q PERIOD
ENDING JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      13,532,778              13,532,778
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                               50,790,001              50,790,001
<ALLOWANCES>                                 2,300,000               2,300,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            72,796,652              72,796,652
<PP&E>                                      75,818,387              75,818,387
<DEPRECIATION>                              (8,499,411)             (8,499,411)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             213,584,893             213,584,893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      (50,166,992)            (50,166,992)
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      (21,435,840)            (21,435,840)
<PREFERRED>                                (10,062,500)            (10,062,500)
<COMMON>                                       (21,081)                (21,081)
<OTHER-SE>                                 (14,625,085)            (14,625,085)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              (213,584,893)           (213,584,893)
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           (71,938,855)           (136,173,694)
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               66,038,285             125,536,036
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               150,177                 296,551
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,658,683               5,288,058
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (3,258,919)             (5,369,197)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,269,539               2,093,987
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,883,924)             (3,124,536)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.30)                  (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Senesco Technologies, Inc.
for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, Joel Brooks, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:




(1) The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Senesco
Technologies, Inc.


Dated: November 16, 2009
                  
                  
                  /s/ Joel Brooks *Joel
      Brooks
                      Chief
      Financial Officer and Treasurer
                      (principal
      financial and accounting officer)


*
            A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
  request.
EXHIBIT32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of Journal Register Company (the‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember  24,  2006, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), we, Robert M.Jelenic,  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,and Julie A. Beck, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

/s/ RobertM.Jelenic                                                        RobertM.  JelenicChairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficerNovember  03,2006

/s/ Julie A.Beck                                                                JulieA. BeckSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerNovember  03,  2006

This certification accompaniesthe Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the‘‘Exchange Act’’), or incorporated by referencein any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or theExchange Act, except as may be expressly set forth by specificreference in any such filing. A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears intyped form within the electronic version of this written statementrequired by Section 906, has been provided to Journal Register Companyand will be retained by Journal Register Company and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

----
No. 492, Misc.

#### Bell *v.*New York.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Harold Boland Shapiro*for respondent.

Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.