alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.07 MB)
 
 Lucca a retired Marine Corps military working dog has been selected as the first United States military working dog to receive this prestigious inter
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Oharashar@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: REJECT RELIGIOUS EXEMPTION

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 3:37:01 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking

you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological

distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make

exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption

to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption

would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal

exemption provisions.

SHARON O'HARA

17687 LAKE FOREST DR

PENN VALLEY, CA 95946
From: jeff@intertradesteel.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:31:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jeff Dunham

Robins, IA 52328
----

| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  October      31, 2008 | /s/  Kent M.  Adams    |
|----------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                                   | Kent      M. Adams               |
|                                   | President,      Director,        |
|                                   | and      Chief Executive Officer |

| Date:  October      31, 2008 | /s/  James A.      Duensing                  |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   | James      A. Duensing                                 |
|                                   | Executive Vice President and Chief |
|                                   | Financial      Officer                                 |

----
|                                                                         |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                         |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|                                                                    | Three Months EndedJune 30, |   | Six Months EndedJune 30, |
|                                                                    | 2012 |   | 2011 |   | 2012 |   | 2011 |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Profit                                                                  | $ | 104 |  |   | $ | 107 |  |   | $ | 224 |  |   | $ | 190 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Add:                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Provision for income taxes                                              | 39 |  |   | 40 |  |   | 85 |  |   | 69 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Profit before income taxes                                              | $ | 143 |  |   | $ | 147 |  |   | $ | 309 |  |   | $ | 259 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed charges:                                                          |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                                                        | $ | 198 |  |   | $ | 209 |  |   | $ | 402 |  |   | $ | 413 |  |
| Rentals at computed interest*                                           | 2 |  |   | 2 |  |   | 3 |  |   | 3 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Total fixed charges                                                     | $ | 200 |  |   | $ | 211 |  |   | $ | 405 |  |   | $ | 416 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Profit before income taxes plus fixed charges                           | $ | 343 |  |   | $ | 358 |  |   | $ | 714 |  |   | $ | 675 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio of profit before income taxes plus fixed charges to fixed charges | 1.72 |  |   | 1.70 |  |   | 1.76 |  |   | 1.62 |  |
|                                                                    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1341 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1341

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand human clinical 
 trials qualifying for the orphan drug credit, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 2001

 Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mr. Kennedy, and Mr. Jeffords) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand human clinical 
 trials qualifying for the orphan drug credit, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPANDED HUMAN CLINICAL TRIALS QUALIFYING FOR ORPHAN DRUG 
              CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Subclause (I) of section 45C(b)(2)(A)(ii) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
                                    ``(I) after the date that the 
                                application is filed for designation 
                                under such section 526, and''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Clause (i) of section 45C(b)(2)(A) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ``which is'' 
before ``being'' and by inserting before the comma at the end ``and 
which is designated under section 526 of such Act''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts paid or incurred after December 31, 2001.

SEC. 2. PUBLICATION OF FILING AND APPROVAL OF REQUESTS FOR DESIGNATION 
              OF DRUGS FOR RARE DISEASES OR CONDITIONS.

    Subsection (c) of section 526 of the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360bb) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(c) Not less than monthly, the Secretary shall publish in the 
Federal Register, and otherwise make available to the public, notice of 
requests for designation of a drug under subsection (a) and approvals 
of such requests. Such notice shall include--
            ``(1) the name and address of the manufacturer and the 
        sponsor;
            ``(2) the date of the request for designation or of the 
        approval of such request;
            ``(3) the nonproprietary name of the drug and the name of 
        the drug under which an application is filed under section 
        505(b) or section 351 of the Public Health Service Act;
            ``(4) the rare disease or condition for which the 
        designation is requested or approved; and
            ``(5) the proposed indication for use of the product.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### SPAHOS et al. *v.*MAYOR OF SAVANNAH BEACH, TYBEE ISLAND, GEORGIA, et al.

No. 474.

Decided December 10, 1962.

*Aaron Kravitch*and *Phyliss Kravitch*for appellants.

*Anton F. Solms, Jr.*for appellees.

Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
II

Calendar No. 220

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1459

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located

at 550 West Fort Street in Boise, Idaho, as the ‘‘James A. McClure

Federal Building and United States Courthouse’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 25, 2001

Mr. CRAPO (for himself and Mr. CRAIG) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public

Works

NOVEMBER 8, 2001

Reported by Mr. JEFFORDS, without amendment

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located at 550 West Fort Street in Boise, Idaho,

as the ‘‘James A. McClure Federal Building and United

States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1459 RS

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JAMES A. MCCLURE FEDERAL

2 BUILDING AND UNITED STATES COURT3 HOUSE.

4 The Federal building and United States courthouse

5 located at 550 West Fort Street in Boise, Idaho, shall be

6 known and designated as the ‘‘James A. McClure Federal

7 Building and United States Courthouse’’.

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

11 building and United States courthouse referred to in sec12 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the James

13 A. McClure Federal Building and United States Court14 house.

Calendar No. 220

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1459

A BILL

To designate the Federal building and United

States courthouse located at 550 West FortStreet in Boise, Idaho, as the ‘‘James A.McClure Federal Building and United StatesCourthouse’’.

NOVEMBER 8, 2001

Reported without amendment
From: aroth13@att.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Reject exemptions for "religious employers."

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 10:36:57 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

Any decision in regard to birth control should be the woman's, not her employers.

Thank you.
ry? TVA 2, ; Page 1 of 1
C6 -1KO39/-10
fi ‘ ¢ SEP 0 2 201

As of: September 02, 2011

Received: August 23, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION __ Posted: September 02, 2011
Tracking No. 80ce9cc0

Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

PROCESSING DIVISION

ihre
TONS

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of

Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0154
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

“ Submitter Information

Submitter's Representative: NARAL Pro-Choice America

General Comment

T strongly support the new policy requiring health-insurance plans to cover birth control without a
copay, CMS-9992-IFC2. Thank you for this important improvement to women's health care.

I also want you to know that I am concerned that certain religious employers may be allowed to
opt out of the requirements. All women should have access to contraceptive coverage, regardless
of where they work.

This policy finally should make neat-universal access to birth control
a reality for all women who use it.

Improving women’s access to birth control is positive in so many ways.
A woman who can plan when to have a family is able to participate in
society more fully. Allowing women to space their pregnancies
contributes to healthy childbearing. And ultimately, fewer unintended
pregnancies can reduce the need for abortion.

Thank you for following science-based recommendations and making
women's health a priority.

http://fdms.erulemaking .net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000... 9/2/2011
From: fmaddock54@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:18:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Florence Maddock

Columbia, SC 29209
SEP 1 201

As of: September 01, 2011
Received: August 15, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 01, 2011
Tracking No. 80ee189d

Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

+ EGAL PROCESSING DIVISION AAO ep Page | of 1
NBLICATION & REGULATIONS RE CALICO 3GI-1O
BRAN

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0133
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Carly Bergen

General Comment

I strongly support the new policy requiring health-insurance plans to cover birth control without a
co-pay, CMS-9992-IFC2. Thank you for this important improvement to women's health care.

I also want you to know that I am concerned that certain religious employers may be allowed to
opt out of the requirements. All women should have access to contraceptive coverage, regardless
of where they work. Women will then be free to make their own choices based on their own
religious beliefs, not those of their employer.

Improving women's access to birth control is positive in so many ways. A woman who can plan
when to have a family is able to participate in society more fully. This includes more time in the
workforce, when she can be earning an income and paying taxes. Allowing women to space their
pregnancies contributes to healthy childbearing. And ultimately, fewer unintended pregnancies
will reduce the need for abortion.

Thank you for following science-based recommendations and making women's health a priority.

Sincerely,
Carly Bergen, Medical Student Year 4

University of Washington
School of Medicine

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000... 9/1/2011
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Home
  MEDIA
  NEWS ARTICLES
  News Article View
 News
 U.S. and French Navies Display Interoperability in Recent Training Evolution U.S. 5th Fleet Public Affairs
 MANAMA, Bahrain --
 SHARE
 PRINT
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil