alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-18243) and related prospectus pertaining to the
registration of 4,143,750 shares of Questron Technology, Inc. common stock, in
the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-84222) and related Prospectus
pertaining to the registration of 214,044 shares of Questron Technology, Inc.
common stock, in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-63555) and related
Prospectus pertaining to the registration of 601,744 shares of Questron
Technology, Inc. common stock, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
33-87628) pertaining to the registration of 75,667 shares of Questron
Technology, Inc. common stock issuable pursuant to the various stock option
plans of Questron Technology, Inc., in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.
333-07049) and related Prospectus pertaining to the registration of 107,000
shares of Questron Technology, Inc. common stock, in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3 No. 333-40835) and related Prospectus pertaining to the registration
of 125,912 shares of Questron Technology, Inc. common stock, in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-42983) pertaining to the registration of 60,000
shares of Questron Technology, Inc. common stock issuable upon the exercise of
options granted pursuant to a stock option grant agreement made in connection
with an acquisition, of our report dated March 15, 2000 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Questron Technology, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.




                                                 ERNST & YOUNG LLP



New York, New York
March 29, 2000


                                       83
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1029

To clarify the authority of the Department of Housing and Urban Development with respect to the use of fees during fiscal year 2001 for the

manufactured housing program.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 13, 2001

Mr. SARBANES (for himself, Mr. GRAMM, Mr. REED, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. ALLARD, Mr. BAYH, Mr. ENZI, Mr. JOHNSON, Ms. MIKULSKI,

and Mr. BOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed

A BILL

To clarify the authority of the Department of Housing and

Urban Development with respect to the use of fees during fiscal year 2001 for the manufactured housing program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MANUFACTURED HOUSING.

4 (a) AVAILABILITY OF FEES.—Notwithstanding sec5 tion 620(e)(2) of the National Manufactured Housing

6 Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (42

7 U.S.C. 5419(e)(2)), any fees collected under that Act, in-
2

•S 1029 CPS

1 cluding any fees collected before the date of enactment of

2 the American Homeownership and Economic Opportunity

3 Act of 2000 (12 U.S.C. 1701 note) and remaining unobli4 gated on the date of enactment of this Act, shall be avail5 able for expenditure to offset the expenses incurred by the

6 Secretary under the National Manufactured Housing Con7 struction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C.

8 5401 et seq.), otherwise in accordance with section 620

9 of that Act.

10 (b) DURATION.—The authority for the use of fees

11 provided for in subsection (a) shall remain in effect during

12 the period beginning in fiscal year 2001 and ending on

13 the effective date of the first appropriations Act referred

14 to in section 620(e)(2) of the National Manufactured

15 Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974

16 (42 U.S.C. 5419(e)(2)) that is enacted with respect to a

17 fiscal year after fiscal year 2001.

Æ
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Pilot-induced oscillationresearch [microform] : the status at the end of the century**
 
Volmes: 010203
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.55:210389/V.1-3
Item Number:0830-H-10 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000547442
 
January 30, 2020
#### Andrew J. Neubauer, as Administrator of the Estate of Stanislaus Prezebinda, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*S. Pearson and Son, Incorporated, Respondent.

*Neubauer*v. *Pearson & Son, Inc.,*147 App. Div. 912, affirmed.

(Argued April 2, 1912;

decided April 30, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered November 24, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been occasioned through the negligence of defendant, his employer.

*Martin T. Mantón*for appellant,

*Hugh A. Bayne*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., G-ray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
From: Candis Harbison

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 8:51:27 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

Thank you for siding with Benjamin Franklin, as in "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure".

Sincerely,

Candis Harbison

120 E. 2nd Place

Panama City, FL 32401
CERTIFICATIONS*



EXHIBIT 10.12



CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC.

1600 SMITH ST.

HOUSTON, TEXAS  77002


March 12, 2004


Mr. Gordon M. Bethune

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

Continental Airlines, Inc.

1600 Smith St., Dept. HQSEO

Houston, TX  77002


Dear Mr. Bethune:


The purpose of this letter agreement is to amend your employment agreement with Continental Airlines, Inc. (the "Company") to take into account the March 12, 2004 amendment to the definition of "Change in Control" in the Company's various employee benefit plans and programs, including the Incentive Plan 2000 and the Long Term Incentive Performance Award Program.  The definition of Change in Control was amended to delete references to certain Excluded Persons and to update those individuals who comprise the Incumbent Board, all as such terms are used in the Change in Control definition.  The Company has provided you a copy of the amended Change in Control definition.


You and the Company agree that your current employment agreement is amended so that all references therein to "Change in Control" (other than the reference to "Change in Control" that appears in clause (ii) of Section 4.7 of your current employment agreement, which shall not be affected by this amendment) refer to such amended "Change in Control" definition.   


If you agree with the foregoing, please sign the enclosed copy of this letter agreement and return the enclosed copy to me, whereby this letter agreement shall be a binding agreement between you and the Company and shall amend your current employment agreement accordingly.


Sincerely,


/s/ Michael H. Campbell











Michael H. Campbell

Senior Vice President - Human

Resources and Labor Relations


Agreed:

/s/ Gordon M. Bethune_____

Gordon M. Bethune
From: Francine Shacter

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Reject exemptions for "religious employees"

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 11:46:16 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the

exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would

be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and

ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Francine Shacter
# Two civilian contractors wounded in IED attack

/ Published Dec. 29, 2008

**FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 26, 2008                                                                                        

Release Number 20082612-02

**Two civilian contractors wounded in IED attack
KABUL, Afghanistan – Two civilian contractors were wounded this morning in western Afghanistan when their convoy was struck by a suicide vehicle bomber. The incident took place about 9:20 a.m.

The injured personnel have been transported to medical facilities. Coalition personnel have secured the scene, and the incident is under investigation.

-30-

United States Forces Afghanistan’s mission, in coordination with NATO’s International Security Assistance Force, is to conduct operations to defeat terrorist networks and insurgents by developing effective governance and building the Afghan National Security Force.  Effective security throughout the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan facilitates continued regional stability and increases economic development for the people of Afghanistan.

Contact Information – US Forces Afghanistan Public Affairs Office

Tel +93 (0) 799 51 2919 or cell phone 0093 (0) 788 189 049

USFOR-A-MediaRelations@afghan.swa.army.mil****
Exhibit 15.1      August 1, 2008   Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20549  Commissioners:  We are aware that our report dated August 1, 2008 on our review of interim financial information of NSTAR for the three and six-monthperiods ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007 and included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 is incorporated by reference in its Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-117014), Form S-4 (No. 333-78285) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-142595 and 333-87272).  Very truly yours,    /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 61605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19258]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Initial Review Group, Digestive Diseases and 
Nutrition C Study Section NIDDK DDK-C Digestive Diseases and 
Nutrition Mentored K Applications.
    Date: October 11-13, 2023.
    Time: 5:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, NIDDK Democracy II, Suite 
7000A 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Peter J. Kozel, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, NIDDK/Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of 
Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Room 7009 Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
594-4721, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cfa4a0b5aaa3bf8fa2aea6a3e1a1a6a7e1a8a0b9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4a2125302f263a0a272b232664242322642d253c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: August 31, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-19258 Filed 9-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
From: Kathryn Wheeler

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: IOM recs

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 5:52:40 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Katie Wheeler

29 Sunnyside Ave

Reading MA 01867
Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation


2120 West End Ave.


Nashville, Tennessee 37203











February 15, 2023





U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F. Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549





Re:    Notice of disclosure filed in Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 under Section  219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 and Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.








Ladies and Gentlemen:





Pursuant to Section 13(r) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, notice is hereby provided that Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation has included a disclosure involving limited and lawful dealings with the Federal Security Service of Russia in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, which was filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on February 15, 2023.





Sincerely,





/s/ James M. Rooney


James M. Rooney


Secretary
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8551

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

CARL EDWARD BENNETT, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief 

District Judge. (0:07-cv-70021-JFA; 0:04-cr-00657-JFA-2) 

Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 4, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Carl Edward Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

Carl Edward Bennett seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2008) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bennett has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.∗

 We 

 ∗

 To the extent Bennett also seeks to appeal from the 

district court’s order, lowering his sentence from 360 months of 

imprisonment to 292 months under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 

2000 & Supp. 2009), we note that he is entitled to no other 

relief. See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 251-52 (4th 

Cir. 2009) (noting that when a sentence is within the Sentencing 

Guidelines applicable at the time of the original sentencing, a 

district court is not authorized under § 3582(c)(2) to reduce a 

defendant’s sentence below the amended sentencing range). 

2 
3 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed January

12 , 2023

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00804

- CV

EX PARTE W.K.B.

On Appeal from the 295th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Caus e No. 2022

- 45089

MEMORA N DUM OPINION This is an appeal from a final order signed September 30, 2022. On December 30, 2022, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.
We dismiss the appeal

.
PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of C h i ef Justice Ch ristophe r and Ju stices Bourliot and Wilson.
From: Emily Ann McCullough

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Thursday, August 04, 2011 9:42:28 AM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Emily Ann McCullough
Alexandria, Louisiana
EXHIBIT 4.34





                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


$20,000                          Milpitas, California              July 31, 2000



For value received,  ADATOM.com,  Inc.,  promises to pay Michele Ware the sum of
Twenty thousand dollars and no cents  ($20,000.00)  with interest at the rate of
Ten Percent per annum (10%) until paid. Any unpaid  interest will become part of
the  principal.  Interest  payable  quarterly  commencing on September 30, 2000.
Principal of $Twenty  thousand three hundred thirty four dollars and twenty-five
cents ($20,  334.25) is due in one payment on September 30, 2000.  Principal may
be paid in whole or in part prior to the due date without penalty or premium.

Should  default be made in payment of principal  and/or  interest  when due, the
whole sum of principal and interest shall become  immediately due, at the option
of the  holder of the note.  If action be  instituted  on this  note,  The maker
promises to pay such sum as a Court may fix as attorney's fees.






Adatom.com, Inc.

By: __________________
Michael M. Wheeler
Controller


                                      E-54
From: james hennigan

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: prtoec

Date: Saturday, August 13, 2011 5:06:15 PM

"The current definition of religious employer does not provide true conscience

protection for those committed to preserving life. Health care plans should not be

forced to violate the moral and religious convictions of providers or employees in

order to participate in the health care system. Requiring such an unacceptable

demand threatens both universal access to health care and religious freedom of

conscience." Mr. James A. Hennigan