alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
*** RESTATED FINANCIAL SCHEDULE ***
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
AMERITECH CORPORATION'S MARCH 31, 1997 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         175,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,290,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (314,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    200,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,680,000
<PP&E>                                      32,589,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,145,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,435,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,527,000
<BONDS>                                      4,296,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       588,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,282,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,435,000
<SALES>                                              0<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,859,000
<CGS>                                                0<F3>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,947,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (65,000)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             125,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                852,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   316,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            536,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   536,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.49<F4>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48<F4>
<FN>
<F1>WE HAVE NOT STATED SECURITIES SEPARATELY IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT MATERIAL. WE HAVE INCLUDED THEM IN THE "CASH" TAG.
<F2>NET SALES OF TANGIBLE PRODUCTS IS NOT MORE THAN 10% OF TOTAL OPERATING
REVENUES. WE THEREFORE HAVE NOT STATED THESE SALES SEPARATELY IN THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PER REGULATION S-X, RULE 5-03(B). WE HAVE INCLUDED
THESE SALES IN THE "TOTAL REVENUE" TAG.
<F3>WE HAVE INCLUDED COST OF TANGIBLE GOODS SOLD IN OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES 
IN OUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE "TOTAL COST" TAG, PER REGULATION
S-X, RULE 5-03(B).
<F4>WE HAVE CALCULATED EARNINGS PER SHARE AMOUNTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAS
128 "EARNINGS PER SHARE." WE HAVE ENTERED BASIC AND DILUTED AMOUNTS IN PLACE
OF PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY, AND REFLECT THE TWO-FOR-ONE
STOCK SPLIT EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 31, 1997.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
<Page>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption
"Experts-Independent Auditors" and to the use of our report dated April 14, 2004
in the Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (File No. 333-114235) and
related Prospectus of Claymore Securities Defined Portfolios, Series 175.


                                        /s/ Grant Thornton LLP
                                        --------------------------
                                        GRANT THORNTON LLP


Chicago, Illinois
April 14, 2004
**Exhibit 3.3**

 

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO**

**AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF**

**AMERICAN RESIDENTIAL INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.**

** **

**               **Jay M. Fuller and ClayStrittmatter hereby certify that:

 

1.             They are the President and Secretary, respectively, ofAmerican Residential Investment Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the"Corporation").

 

2.             Article I, Section 1 of the current Amended and RestatedBylaws of the Corporation was amended and restated in its entirety to read asfollows:

 

"1.           Annual Meeting.  The Corporation shall hold an annual meetingof its stockholders to elect directors and transact any other business withinits power, either at 10:00 a.m. on the third Tuesday of July in each year ifnot a legal holiday, or at such other time on such other day falling on or beforethe 31st day thereafter as shall be set by the Board of Directors.  Except as the Charter or statute providesotherwise, any business may be considered at an annual meeting without thepurpose of the meeting having been specified in the notice.  Failure to hold an annual meeting does notinvalidate the Corporation's existence or affect any otherwise valid corporateacts.  Meetings of stockholders shall beheld at the principal office of the Corporation or at such place in the UnitedStates as is set forth from time to time by the Board of Directors."

 

 

3.             The foregoing amendment of the Amended and RestatedBylaws of the Corporation was duly approved by the Board of Directors of theCorporation as of May 9, 2002.

 

We hereby declare that thematters set forth in this Certificate are true and correct of our ownknowledge.

 

 

 

 
|          |   |              |
|---------------|--------|-------------------|
| Jay M. Fuller |   | Clay Strittmatter |
| President     |   | Secretary         |
## Geology and Resource Assessment of Costa Rica at 1:500,000 Scale --
A Digital Representation of Maps of the U.S. Geological Survey's 1987 Folio I-1865

### By Paul G. Schruben

1996

Geologic map of  Costa Rica

### Project Overview

Conversion of the information from the original folio to a computerized 
digital format was undertaken to facilitate the presentation and analysis of
earth-science data.  Digital maps can be displayed at any scale or 
projection, whereas a paper map has a fixed scale and projection.  However, 
most of the maps on this disc are not intended to be used at any scale more 
detailed than 1:500,000.

A geographic information system (GIS) allows combining and overlaying of 
layers for analysis of spatial relations not readily apparent in the 
standard paper publication.  Digital information on geology, geophysics, and
geochemistry can be combined to create useful derivative products.

### History of the Maps

1. Physiographic base map at a scale of 1:500,000 with hypsography, 
place names, and drainage.
2. Geologic map at a scale of 1:500,000.
3. Regional geophysical maps, including gravity, aeromagnetic, and 
seismicity maps at various scales.
4. Mineral sites map at a scale of 1:500,000 showing mines, prospects, 
           and occurrences.
5. Volcanological framework of the Tilarán region important for 
           epithermal gold deposits at a scale of 1:100,000.
6. Rock sample locations, mining areas, and vein locations for several 
           parts of the country.
7. Permissive areas delineated for selected mineral deposit types.
8. Digital elevation model.

This CD-ROM contains most of the above maps; it lacks items 1 and 8 and 
the seismicity and aeromagnetic maps of item 3.  The linework was digitized 
from preliminary and printed maps with GSMAP (Selner and Taylor, 1987), a 
USGS-authored program for map editing and publishing.  Conversion from GSMAP
to ARC/INFO was accomplished through the use of the GSMARC program (Green 
and Selner, 1988).  The arcs and polygons were tagged using Alacarte 
(Wentworth and Fitzgibbon, 1991).

### Online Files for Costa Rica Assessment CD

View Costa Rica geology larger image

Description of DDS19 CD-ROM

Download entire CD - 27 mb .tar.Z compressed file. Remember to uncompress, then untar.

Download ArcView1 for PC files only - 3.4 mb .tar file

Errata and bug reports for DDS19

---
Index of Supporting Information For:

CMS - 1600 - P: Revisions to Pay ment Policies under the Phy sician Fee Schedule and Other Revisions to Part B for CY 2014 Title of Document Confidential info or proprietary data? Social Security

Act, Section 1833 No Social Security

Act, Section 1834 No Social Security

Act, Section 1861 No Social Security

Act, Section 1848 No Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 ( Pub.L. 112

– 96 ) No Balanced Budget Act of 1997 ( Pub.L . 105

– 33 ) No American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 ( Pub.L . 112

–240 ) No 42 C .F.R. 410 No
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.96 MB)
 
 Maiden Deployment USCENTCOM CENTCOM NAVCENT VBSS C5F Destroyer USCENTCOMPA Ralph Johnson
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
MANDATE

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE 408TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on November 19, 2014, the cause upon appeal to 

revise or reverse your judgment between

Bexar Appraisal District, Appellant

V.

Sivage Investments, Ltd. and Sivage Community Development, Inc, Appellee

No. 04-14-00227-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2012-CI-04570

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s 

orders are AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that Appellees Sivage Investments, 

Ltd. and Sivage Community Development, Inc.; Bitterblue Inc., Niemann 

Family Partnership, Linda Wittig, Custodian, et al., and Bitterblue/Two 

Creeks Phase Two Ltd.; Smithson Road Development, Ltd.; and LaCantera 

Development Corp., recover their costs of appeal from the Appellant Bexar 

Appraisal District.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth 

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Catherine Stone, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas, 

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on January 28, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 3853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-14-00227-CV

Bexar Appraisal District

v.

Sivage Investments, Ltd. and Sivage Community Development, Inc

(NO. 2012-CI-04570 IN 408TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BEXAR COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

INDIGENT

STATEWIDE EFILING FEE

SUPREME COURT CHAPTER 51 

FEE

FILING

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$25.00

$20.00

$50.00

$100.00

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

CONRY DAVIDSON

JOSEPH HARRISON IV

CONRY DAVIDSON

CONRY DAVIDSON

BEXAR APPRAISAL DISTRICT

BEXAR APPRAISAL DISTRICT

BEXAR APPRAISAL DISTRICT

BEXAR APPRAISAL DISTRICT

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF 

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of 

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and 

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for 

the Fourth District of Texas, this January 28, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

____________________________

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 3853
#### Adirondack League Club, Respondent, *v.*Marquis L. Keyes, Appellant.

*Adirondack League Club*v. *Keyes,*140 App. Div. 882, affirmed.

(Argued May 9, 1912;

decided May 24, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered July 20, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of *605plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to have canceled and set aside, as a cloud upon its title, a tax deed executed and delivered by the state comptroller to the defendant.

*George N. Ostrander*for appellant.

*TV. H. Van Steenbergh*and *Charles E. Snyder*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that according to the findings of the trial court, unanimously affirmed by the Appellate Division, that the assessment was not made by the board of assessors, or by public officers, or by any lawful authority, the tax was void for constitutional reasons; "no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
From: KATHY BATKIN

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Coverage of preventive health care for women

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:29:56 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the recommendations 

of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject 

any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new law and 

would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive services, 

others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make 

exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health 

providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though 

they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands 

of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s recommendations and 

rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

A 30-year AAUW member from Virginia
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
JUNE 30, 2000 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          14,431
<SECURITIES>                                 1,012,133
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,646
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,579
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,042,631
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,042,631
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,403
<BONDS>                                        949,334
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            81
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,042,631
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,121
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,045
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,496
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,779
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,801
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,801
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,801
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22


</TABLE>
From: rebrahl@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:53:36 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rebecca Rahl

Dumfries, VA 22025
Waiver Request Support Document

77

Attachment 3

2013 Amendments to HD OBD and OBD II Monitoring Requirements That 

Clarify Existing Requirements188

Amendments to HD OBD Requirements in Title 13, CCR section 1971.1

A. Section (a): Purpose/ [1968.2(a)]

B. Section (c): Definitions

1. “Alternate-fueled engine” 

2. “Calculated load value”

3. “Emission Standard” /[1968.2(c)]

4. “Evaporative emission standards” /[1968.2(c)]

5. “Exhaust emission standards” or “tailpipe emission 

standards”/[1968.2(c)]

6. “Fueled engine operation”

7. “Hybrid vehicle”

8. “Ignition cycle”

9. “Malfunction”

10.“Permanent fault code”

11.“Propulsion system active”

12.“Small volume manufacturer”

C. Section (d): General Requirements

1. Section (d)(2.2.2)(D): Storage and erasure of freeze frame conditions

2. Section (2.3.1)(A) and (2.3.2)(A): MIL Extinguishing and Fault Code 

Erasure Protocol

3. Sections (2.3.1)(C)(ii)b.3 and (2.3.2)(D)(ii)b.3: Erasing a Permanent 

Fault Code 

4. Subsection (d)(4.3.2)(B): Denominator Specifications

5. Section (d)(4.3.2)(C): Specifications for incrementing denominator –

evaporative system monitors

6. Section (d)(5.1.1): Standardized tracking and reporting of monitor 

performance

7. Section (d)(5.5.2)(B): Ignition Cycle Counter- specifications for 

incrementing

D. Section (f): Monitoring Requirements for Gasoline/Spark-Ignited Engines

1. Section (f)(2.3.6): Monitoring conditions

2. Section (f)(7.1): Evaporative System Monitoring

E. Section (h): Standardization Requirements

1. Section (h)(1): Reference Documents

2. Section (h)(3.2): SAE J1939 Communication Protocol

188 Amendments to provisions of the OBD II regulation are indicated by providing the 

corresponding provision in section 1968.2 in brackets [ ]. 
Waiver Request Support Document

78

3. Section (h)(4.1): Readiness Status

4. Sections (h)(4.2.2) and (h)(4.2.3)(E): Data Stream

5. Section (h)(4.5.5): Test Results when Fault Memory Cleared

6. Section (h)(4.7.5): Software Calibration Verification Number (CVN)

7. Section (h)(6): Service Information 

F. Section (i): Monitoring System Demonstration Requirements for 

Certification

1. Section (i)(3.1.2)/ [1968.2(h)(4.3)]: Diesel Misfire Monitor

2. Section (i)(3.2.1): Gasoline Fuel System

3. Section (i)(5.1.3): Evaluation Protocol