alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 110 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 110

To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay adjustments 
                        for Members of Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2001

 Mr. Feingold introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay adjustments 
                        for Members of Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUSTMENTS FOR MEMBERS OF 
              CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 601(a) of the Legislative 
Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31) is repealed.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendments.--Section 601(a)(1) of such 
Act is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a)(1)'' and inserting ``(a)'';
            (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) as 
        paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; and
            (3) by striking ``as adjusted by paragraph (2) of this 
        subsection'' and inserting ``adjusted as provided by law''.
    (c) Effective Date.--This section shall take effect on February 1, 
2003.
                                 <all>
```
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.85 MB)
 
 19th CJCS
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
### NUMBER 13

- 1 1

- 00 3 83

- CV


## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ KATHLEEN WILD , A ppellant ,

v.
FRANK J. SCHUSTER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF FRANK SCHUSTER, ET AL. , Appellees

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the Probate Court at Law No. 3

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Kathleen Wild , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the

Probate Court at Law No. 3 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number P

- 12,779

- C

. Appellant ha s filed a notice to withdraw appeal on grounds that she no longer wishes to
pursue the appeal.2

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant = s motion to

withdraw the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P . 42.1(a). Appellant = s motion to withdraw the appeal is granted, and the appeal is
hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d)
("Absent agreement of the parties, th e court will tax costs against the appellant.").
Having dismissed the appeal at appellant = s request, no motion for rehearing will be
entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 22nd day of November , 20 1 1

.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-13-00775- CR NO. 03-13-00776- CR NO. 03-13-00777- CR
Leon Posada, Appellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 167 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT

NOS . D-1 -DC- 12- 2067 73, D- 1-DC- 13- 3005 36 & D-1 -DC- 12- 2066 79 HO NORAB LE P . DAVID W AHLB ERG, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O PI N I O N
L eon Posada, acting pro se, filed notices of appea l from his judgme nts of conviction for the offe nse of theft (trial court cause number D-1-D C-13-300536) and two offe nses of cre dit car d
or debit car d abuse (trial court cause numbers D-1-D C-12-206773 and D-1-D C-12-206679), all of which wer e enhanc ed by Posada’s prior felony convictions. See Tex. Penal Code §§ 31.03(e) (4)( A), 32.31. Howeve r, the trial court cer tified that: (1) eac h of these case s is a plea- barg ain case and Posada has no right of appea l, and (2) Posada waived the right of appea l. Posada and his counsel signe d all three of the trial c ourt’s ce rtifications.Acc ording ly , the appe als are dismiss ed. SeeTex. R. App. P . 25.2(a) (2), ( d).

J eff Rose, J ustice Be fore Justices Puryear , Rose, and Goodwin Dismissed for Want of J urisdiction Filed: De cembe r 31, 2013 Do Not Publish

2
From: David Laing

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: coverage of preventive care

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 6:45:58 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.
From: cameron.washburn@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:45:09 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Cameron washburn

San Diego, CA 92192
From: Ron Jandernoa

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Saturday, August 20, 2011 10:57:46 AM

 The way the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is being implemented is forcing

many to participate in a program against their deeply held moral and religious convictions.

 It limits any protections of conscience concerning this matter only to religious employers.

 What about the many employers who have religious convictions but are not house of

worship employers. The government with this way implementing the Affordable Care Act is

not taking into consideration the rights of conscience of these other employers. They are

being coerced against following their conscience in this controversial policy which the

government will be implementing. The government is taking a step to being more dictatorial.

 As Thomas Jefferson stated: “[O]ur rules can have authority over such natural rights only as we have submitted

to them. The rights of conscience we never submitted, we could not submit. We are answerable for them to our

God.” [Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), U.S. President. Notes on the State of Virginia (1787), Query 17, p. 159,

ed. William Peden (1954).] 

The bipartisan sponsored bill - Respect for Rights of Conscience Act (H.R. 1179, S.

1467) if passed would help ensure that the rights of conscience of all participants in our

nation's health care system will be respected.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 As of the date hereof, I, Eric Borrmann, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Quarterly Report of Plumtree Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Plumtree Software, Inc. By:
    
    /s/ Eric BorrmannName:
    
    Eric BorrmannTitle:
    
    Chief Financial OfficerDated:
    
    August 6, 2004
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided by Plumtree Software, Inc. and will be retained by Plumtree Software,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. 44
From: Robert New

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive Care and Contraception Access

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 3:36:21 PM

2 Teenies Tiny Rd.

Rutland, VT 05701

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Sincerely,

Robert New
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Central Command

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  ABOUT US    -  COMMAND PRIORITIES             
  -  LEADERSHIP             
  -  COMPONENT COMMANDS             
  -  HISTORY             
  -  POSTURE STATEMENT 
-  CENTCOM AOR    -  CENTCOM COALITION 
-  OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES    -  USMTM 
-  CONTACT    -  OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT             
  -  COMMUNITY RELATIONS             
  -  THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE             
  -  INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL             
  -  MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL 
-  MEDIA    -  SOCIAL MEDIA             
  -  NEWS ARTICLES             
  -  PRESS RELEASES             
  -  STATEMENTS             
  -  IMAGERY             
  -  VIDEOS             
  -  TRANSCRIPTS 
-  VISITORS AND PERSONNEL    -  FAMILY CENTER             
  -  FAMILY READINESS             
  -  CENTCOM WEBMAIL             
  -  SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY             
  -  ACCOUNTABILITY             
  -  EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS             
  -  USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS             
  -  FOIA LIBRARY             
  -  INNOVATION OASIS             
  -  WELCOME GUIDE 

HomeMEDIANEWS ARTICLESNews Article View

# Coalition live fire closes out Eager Lion 2019

By Sgt. 1st Class Darron SalzerTask Force Spartan

                JORDAN  –              

                An M1A2 Abrams main battle tank from the 3rd Armored Brigade Combat Team, 4th Infantry Division, fires its 120mm gun downrange during a coalition combined arms live fire exercise, part of Eager Lion 2019, in Jordan, Sept. 5, 2019. The CALFEX was the culminating event of the multinational exercise, which saw up to 30 different countries participating in allied training scenarios that improved their collective ability to plan and operate in a coalition-type environment. In its ninth year, Eager Lion is U.S. Central Command’s premiere exercise in the Levant region. (U.S. Army photo by Sgt. 1st Class Darron Salzer, Task Force Spartan)            

                Coalition live fire closes out Eager Lion 2019            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Sgt. 1st Class Darron Salzer

VIRIN: 190905-Z-TU749-101

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
## NUMBER 13 - 20 - 001 41 - C V COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN R E MARIO A. DAVILA

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Hinojosa Order Per Curiam

Relator Mario A. Davila f iled a petition for writ of mandamus and motion to stay in
the above cause on March 16 , 2020

. Through this original pro ceeding, relator seek s to compel the trial court to vacate its orders freezing discovery

. According to the petition, the underlying matter is a bill of review proceeding, and real party in interest, Easy Way Leisure Corporation d/b/a Easy Way Products Co. (Easy Way) , has filed a traditional motion for summary judgment against relator which is set for hearing on March 23, 2020. By motion to stay, relator seeks to stay the trial court proceedings pending resolution of this petition for writ of mandamus.2 T he Court , having examined and fully considered the motion to stay, is of the opinion that it should be granted in part and denied in part. Accordingly, we grant the motion to stay and order that that any hearing or ruling on Easy Way’s traditional motion for summary judgment is s tayed pending resolution of this original proceeding or further order of this Court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the case is finally decided.”). The motion to stay
is deni ed as to other trial court proceedings. The Court requests that the real part y in interest , Easy Way, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expi ration of ten days from the date of this order. See
id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. IT IS SO ORDERED. PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed the 17th day of March, 2020.
From: stgclawson@sbcglobal.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:20:58 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Tracy Clawson

Pflugerville, TX 78660
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 12.3



                                    PACCAR AND SUBSIDIARIES

                        COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                     (Thousands of Dollars)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                 Year Ended December 31               
                                   ---------------------------------------------------
                                     1995       1994       1993       1992      1991  
                                   --------   --------   --------   --------  --------
<S>                                <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>       <C>
FIXED CHARGES
     Interest expense
         PACCAR and
         Subsidiaries (1)          $123,480   $ 87,465   $ 64,000   $ 71,912  $ 94,264

         Portion of rentals
           deemed interest            5,727      5,494      6,001      6,870     6,785
                                   --------   --------   --------   --------  --------

TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                $129,207   $ 92,959   $ 70,001   $ 78,782  $101,049
                                   --------   --------   --------   --------  --------
                                   --------   --------   --------   --------  --------

EARNINGS
     Income before taxes - PACCAR 
         and Subsidiaries (2)      $399,562   $320,098   $219,757   $ 91,613  $ 48,344

FIXED CHARGES                       129,207     92,959     70,001     78,782   101,049
                                   --------   --------   --------   --------  --------

EARNINGS AS DEFINED                $528,769   $413,057   $289,758   $170,395  $149,393
                                   --------   --------   --------   --------  --------
                                   --------   --------   --------   --------  --------

RATIO OF EARNINGS
     TO FIXED CHARGES                  4.09x      4.44x      4.14x      2.16x     1.48x


</TABLE>

(1)  Exclusive of interest paid to PACCAR.

(2)  Includes before-tax earnings of wholly owned subsidiaries and 
     distributed income received from less than 50% owned subsidiaries.


                                      -31-
#### William Armour, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn City Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Dykman, J.