alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Caroline Luley

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Access to Preventive Care and Contraception

Date: Thursday, August 18, 2011 5:42:49 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care. A person should not have the right to control your right to health care

just because they hired you. If they do not provide the insurance, what business is it of theirs?

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work. And many of these women, like me, do not share these

religious beliefs and should not be forced to live in accordance with them. We are not a

theocracy.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Thanks,

Caroline Luley

FLORIDA
From: Karen Gadson-Tapp

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive Care Coverage

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 1:31:15 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine

as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care

law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would

provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an

ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health

providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt

from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.

--

Karen
#### Charles E. Levy, Appellant, *v.*Louis S. Berg, Respondent.

Reported below, 149 App. Div. 948.

(Argued April 29,1912;

decided May 7, 1912.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 1, 1912, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict.

The motion was made upon the ground that the action was one for services, the affirmance by the Appellate Division unanimous, and that permission to appeal had not been obtained.

*Charles 8. Mackenzie*for motion.

*Walter F. Wood*opposed.

Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.
file:///C|/..._List_29-08-2011_12-55-54-352/Document%20List%2029-08-2011%2012-55-54-352_docs/EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0031.html[8/29/2011 1:19:00 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: August 29, 2011

Received: August 10, 2011

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 80edd5f8

Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0018

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of

Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0018-0002

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services under

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0031

Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Helen Walterbach

Address:

7907 NW Eastside

Parkville, MO, 64152-1663

Email: waltercrew@yahoo.com

General Comment

Please don't force me to pay for abortion-inducing drugs with my healthcare premiums;

The HHS mandate will undermine Missouri law which allows people of faith to opt out of abortioninducing emergency contraception and birth control coverage;

Catholic institutions should not be forced to provide emergency contraception that can cause abortion

and birth control, because use of these drugs violates Church teaching;

Pregnancy is not a disease; Abortion is an elective surgery.

Preserve the rights of conscience and religious liberty for people of faith.
From: Elizabeth Eddison

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 4:43:59 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Elizabeth Eddison

227 S Norton Ave

Los Angeles, CA 90004
U.S. Renewable Fuel & Oxygenate Plant Net Production of Finished Gasoline (Thousand Barrels)

file:///C|/

... y%20Documents/U_S_%20Renewable%20Fuel%20&%20Oxygenate%20Plant%20Net%20Production%20of%20Finished%20Gasoline%20(Thousand%20Barre ls).htm [9/18/2013 9:00:32 AM]

View History: Monthly Annual Download Data (XLS File)



### U.S. Renewable Fuel & Oxygenate Plant Net Production of Finished Gasoline (Thousand Barrels) Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2009 -30 -26 -27 -14 -16 -15 -19 -14 -12 -19 -17 -19 2010 -18 -8 -5 -9 4 4 6 10 6 5 4 12 2011 11 10 28 39 33 22 16 14 12 5 7 10 2012 5 12 36 35 38 35 31 35 35 29 15 1 2013 9 18 25 31 52 66

- = No Data Reported;

-- = Not Applicable; NA = Not Available; W = Withheld to avoid disclosure of individual company data. Release Date: 8/29/2013 Next Release Date: Last Week of September 2013 Referring Pages: Motor Gasoline Supply and Disposition U.S. Supply and Disposition Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011-1095 Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-241-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Modification and 

Inspection 6.0 $ 510.00 $346 $ 856.00 69 $59,064.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $59,064

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):

Indicates related information in AD Manual, FAA-IR-M-8040.1C. DOUBLE CLICK to follow the link

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO

*Explanation: 
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO

*Explanation:
Sl()-1()()4()5-()()1 

Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority 

One Terminal Drive, Suite 50l • Nashville, TN 37P!--) 4114 • 615-275-I600 

March 26.2010 

The Honorable Ray H. LaHood 

Secretar)' 

U.S. Department of'Iransponation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SI: 

Washington. DC 20590 

Docket DOT-OST-2()l 04B« 

Dear Mr. Secretary: :-j 

As President and Chief lixcculive Officer of the Metropolitan Nashville Aiqiort 

Authority. ! am writing to encourage your support of approval for the application for 

antitrust immunity and proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines and 

Japan Airlines. The proposed alliance between these two airlines i.s vital for oneworld to 

coiTipete ctTcctively with the Star and SkyTeam alliance. This increased interalliancc 

competition will in turn enhance the benefits of the Department's Open Skies policy ~ 

first by solidifying U.S.-Japan Open Skies, then by serving as a Ibundation for further 

libcrali/ation across Asia. 

Approval of this application as is by the l!.S. Department of Ifanspoilation would enable 

the oneworld alliance airlines to work closely together n> deliver highly competitive air 

transportation services. .Approval for .A.A'J.Al. alliance will ha\e a positive impact on air 

travel by offering customers more service, scheduling and pricing options and will help to 

ensure that customers contiinic to benefit from having three competitive air alliances to 

choose from. 

American Airlines has been a strategic partner with Nashville International Airport (BNA) 

for many decades. American and its affiliates operate 60 flights in and out of Nashville 

daily, making them number two in terms of our largest carriers. 

We have always been supportive of initiatives like those inentioned earlier which benetit 

BNA's customers and partners and our community and region. Thank you in advance for 

your time and consideration. 

Sincerely, ^^ 

c ^^^^^ 

Raul L. Reualado. C.A.r;. 

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Kjri ^" Dfcyn. Miy;'; F-'isnl r.^ G:iti:3'j^! PRESIDENT AND CEO 

James H Choek. Ml, Ch3imi;>ii Jac-. O 8ove:n,i.;.r jr BM A '.lirsin Ran! L f?t\;alado C.A ti 

Jul! H. Mosloy. Vice Cliairtntiti Rod Psf.iy Rtiti'-rt J, VVfiikor 

Dexter Samuels. Secreiary
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of Rogers Communications Inc.

We consent to the use of:



| |  | our report dated February 11, 2016 on the consolidated financial statements of Rogers Communications Inc. (the Company) which
comprise the consolidated statements of financial position of the Company as at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, and the consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows
for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2015, and notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information; and
|- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | our report dated February 11, 2016 on the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015,
|- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

each of which is included in this annual report on Form 40-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2015.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such reports in Registration Statement No. 333-193960 and 333-178511 on
Form F-10 and Registration Statement No. 333-170234 on Form F-3D of the Company.

/s/ KPMG LLP

Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants

February 11, 2016

Toronto,
Canada
----

**EXHIBIT        32.01**

|   | 1. | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                  William Pagano      |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | William                  Pagano          |   |
|   | Chief                  Executive Officer |   |

| Date: |   May                    21, 2007 |   |
|-------|---------------------------------------------|--------|

----
From: glmoe@comporium.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive Health Care Coverage

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 7:39:55 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1026

To designate the United States Post Office located at 60 Third Avenue

in Long Branch, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Pat King Post Office Building’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 13, 2001

Mr. TORRICELLI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To designate the United States Post Office located at 60

Third Avenue in Long Branch, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Pat

King Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PAT KING POST OFFICE

4 BUILDING.

5 The United States Post Office located at 60 Third

6 Avenue in Long Branch, New Jersey, shall be known and

7 designated as the ‘‘Pat King Post Office Building’’.

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the United
2

•S 1026 IS

1 States Post Office referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

2 to be a reference to the Pat King Post Office Building.

Æ
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.71 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Diana Cherkas

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:21:22 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Diana Cherkas

260 Palisade Ave

Apt 1

Jersey City, NJ 07307
From: Nicole Gooden

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: IOM Recommendations

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 4:59:46 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking

you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for

all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions

even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal

exemption provisions.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.57 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil