alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: jonesd@xmission.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comments regarding HHS policy on mandatory coverage ofcontraception

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 9:25:22 PM

I strongly disapprove of this policy. As the use of artificial means

of contraception contravenes my religious beliefs, this likely would

make it impossible for me to ethically maintain a health insurance

policy for my family. This, in turn, has the potential to create

obligations on public health care services in the case of serious

illness or accident. Thus, this policy has negative public health and

budgetary implications.

Dominic Jones, Ph.D.
From: Margie Sauter

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Friday, August 05, 2011 7:49:00 AM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Margie Sauter
Saline, Michigan
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.82 MB)
 
 U.S. Ambassador Elizabeth Richards U.S. military assistance Lebanese Armed Forces
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Exhibit 10q-11

AMENDMENT TO THE BELLSOUTH PERSONAL  RETIREMENT ACCOUNT PENSION PLAN

WHEREAS,
BellSotuh Corporation (the "Company") sponsors the BellSouth Personal Retirement Account Pension Plan (the "Plan"), which was amended and restated effective January 1,
1998, and subsequently amended from time to time; and

WHEREAS,
L.M. Berry and Company adopted the Plan subject to certain modifications described in Schedule 2 of the Plan; and

WHEREAS,
pursuant to Section 15.01 of the Plan, the BellSouth Employees' Benefit Claim Review Committee (the "Committee") is authorized to adopt nonmaterial amendments to the
Plan; and

WHEREAS,
the Committee approved, at its February 11, 2000 meeting, amendment to the Plan to provide the interest crediting rate of 6.15% for the L.M. Berry and Company
participants for the 2000 Plan Year; and

WHEREAS,
the Committee authorized Richard D. Sibbernsen, Chairman of the Committee, to approve plan amendment language consistent with such approval and to execute documents in
connection therewith;

NOW,
THEREFORE, the Committee hereby approves the following amendment of the Plan:



Any
other provisions of the Plan not amended herein shall remain in full force and effect.

This
Amendment shall be effective as of January 1, 2000.

|By:                     |  | /s/RICHARD D. SIBBERNSENRichard D. Sibbernsen
Vice PresidentHuman Resources
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: December 15, 2000

---

QuickLinks
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**SECTION 302**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, John M. Robbins, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AmNetMortgage, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: August 16, 2004 |
|----------------------------|
|                       |
|                       |
| /s/ John M. Robbins        |   |
| John M. Robbins            |
| Chief Executive Officer    |

 

----
From: Cathie Ragovin

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 10:58:03 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Cathie Ragovin

185 Newton St

Weston, Ma 02493
From: Sjplwc@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:08:25 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Steve Pauwels

Londonderry, NH 03053
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 61499]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19330]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-170-2023]


Foreign-Trade Zone 49; Application for Expansion of Subzone 49W; 
Getinge Group Logistics Americas LLC; East Windsor, New Jersey

    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) 
Board by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, grantee of FTZ 
49, requesting an expansion of Subzone 49W on behalf of Getinge Group 
Logistics Americas LLC (GGLA), located in East Windsor, New Jersey. The 
application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-
Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the regulations of 
the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally docketed on September 
1, 2023.
    The application requests authority to expand Subzone 49W to include 
the following new site: Site 2 (3.85 acres) 160 Princeton Hightstown 
Road, East Windsor, New Jersey. No authorization for production 
activity has been requested at this time. The subzone will be subject 
to the existing activation limit of FTZ 49.
    In accordance with the FTZ Board's regulations, Christopher Kemp of 
the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make 
recommendations to the Executive Secretary.
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary and sent to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5d3b29271d292f3c3938733a322b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fc9a8886bc888e9d9899d29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>. The closing period for their receipt is October 17, 
2023. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the 
foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period 
to November 1, 2023.
    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection 
in the ``Online FTZ Information Section'' section of the FTZ Board's 
website, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.
    For further information, contact Christopher Kemp at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#13507b617a60677c637b76613d58767e635367617277763d747c65"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="89cae1fbe0fafde6f9e1ecfba7c2ece4f9c9fdfbe8edeca7eee6ff">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 1, 2023.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-19330 Filed 9-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
From: John Curotto

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: coverage of preventive care under the new health

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 8:44:33 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government

to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage

requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption

would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s recommendations

and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions
From: olengreer@missouristate.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:30:12 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Olen Greer

Springfield, MO 65803
From: IRENE SENTER

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive care for women with no exceptions

Date: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 4:57:50 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care

under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services,

are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

This will be a throwback to a time when one was warned not to deliver one’s babies in a

Catholic hospital for fear that the baby might be saved at the expense of the mother’s

life. I am 82 years old and am fearful that we are denying proper healthcare to women

on ideological grounds. It is bad enough that Viagra has not been denied by any health

plan bur contraceptive care has.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Irene Senter
04/12/2010 13:13 8163294106 SAD PAGE 02/03 

Q 

u.s, Department 

of Transportation 

F«d6ral Aviation 

Administration 

Small Airplane Directorate 

901 Locust 

Kansas City, MO 64106 

J&'P. •© !^1 

Mr. William D. Holder 

Park County Sheriffs Office- Search & Rescue Dept. 

th 1311 ir " Street 

Cody, WY 82414-3536 

Dear Mr. Holder: 

This letter is to inform you that we have received and begun processing your petition for 

exemption. It acknowledges receipt of the petition and describes how we will process it. 

We Have the Petition 

We've received your January 20, 2010, petition on behalf of the Park County Sheriffs Office 

for an exemption from § 23.25 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). This 

exemption, if granted, would allow the Park County Sheriffs Office to operate the model 

Sky Litemational, Inc. model A-IB with a maximum weight of 2200 pounds. 

We've added your petition to the public docket (No. FAA-2010-0090) and we are 

processing it. We need additional information: 

1. Do the wheels and tires have static load ratings of at least 2200 pounds, 

2. Do the brakes have a design landing kinetic energy equivalent to that needed for a 

2200 pound weight, and 

3. Is there an Airplane Flight Manual that shows the takeoff performance for the 

airplane at 2200 pounds? 

How We'll Process the Petition 

A petition for an exemption, according to 14 CFR 11.63(d), must be sent to the FAA at least 

120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. In addition, we publish a 

summary of the petition in the Federal Register for public comment unless, according to 

14 CFR 11.87, we determine that good cause exists for not publishing it. 
04/12/2010 13:13 8163294106 SAD PAGE 03/03 

We will advise you of the agency's final decision on your petition as soon as possible. If 

you have any questions in the meantime, you may contact Mr. Leslie B. Taylor at 

(816) 329-4134, email leslie.b.taylor@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

,x^r-L Kim Smith 

Manager, Small Airplane Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service