alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (7.7 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76

 38

 39

 40

★

▲▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.06 N 76.88 W Meters AGL
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.01

                    CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of The Travelers Insurance Company
     (the  "Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2002
     as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
     (the  "Report"), George C. Kokulis, as Chief Executive Officer of the
     Company, and Glenn D. Lammey, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
     each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted
     pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

     /s/ George C. Kokulis
     -------------------------

     George C. Kokulis
     Chief Executive Officer
     March 21, 2003

     /s/ Glenn D. Lammey
     --------------------------

     Glenn D. Lammey
     Chief Financial Officer
     March 21, 2003

     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
     the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
     of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

                                       84
Exhibit 23



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To the Board of Directors
Hills Bancorporation

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February
7, 2002 with respect to the financial  statements of Hills  Bancorporation  and
subsidiaries  included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hills Bancorporation
for the year ended  December 31, 2001 in Registrant  Statement  No.  33-73606 on
Form S-8 filed  December 30, 1993 and  Registrant  Statement No. 33-2657 on Form
S-8 filed January 10, 1986.


/s/  McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP


Iowa City, Iowa
March 25, 2002
-----Original Message----- 

From: Roger Zimmerman [mailto:rogerzim@verizon.net] 

Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 8:56 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 

I am completely opposed to a government takeover or management of 

retirement accounts. 

Federal and state governments are demonstrably incapable of managing 

their own finances. If they took over private accounts in the way 

suggested by this proposal, they would no doubt figure out some way to 

squander the savings of the American people. Our hard-earned money 

would be used to provide pork so that politicians could be reelected. 

It would be a moral abomination, and the American economy would never 

recover. 

The government should keep its hands off of my retirement funds. 

Roger Zimmerman 

32 Hastings Street 

Wellesley, MA 

02481
<TABLE> <S> <C>


       

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      11,224,089
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      75,338,625
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             6,490,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 44,669,346
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       7,027,339
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         6,955,270
<LOANS>                                    285,572,390
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,601,120
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             450,650,171
<DEPOSITS>                                 361,598,332
<SHORT-TERM>                                10,800,155
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,804,946
<LONG-TERM>                                  6,057,453
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,135
<OTHER-SE>                                  69,365,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             450,650,171
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             12,733,173
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,831,722
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               418,509
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            14,983,404
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           7,234,336
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,756,444
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        7,226,960
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  303,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              7,151,187
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,510,241
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,510,241
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,004,709
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,929,508
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             1,119,465
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,178,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,601,120
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  616,268
<RECOVERIES>                                    87,884
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,376,236
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         2,376,236
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


        

</TABLE>
From: Laura Nowicki

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Please support the Rights of Conscience Act (H.R. 1179)

Date: Friday, August 05, 2011 12:07:12 AM

I am writing regarding the recent decision by the Department of Health and Human Services

(HHS) to mandate free coverage of contraception, surgical sterilization, and known abortioninducing drugs. I feel strongly that this decision leaves healthcare professionals and taxpayers at

grave risk of having their moral and religious convictions trampled upon as well as endangering

the lives of countless women.

In this country we should protect the choice of individuals, we should allow them the

freedom to make their own decision whether or not to participate in such procedures--not

mandate them.

Also, we cannot consider contraception "preventative care" since pregnancy is not a disease, and

also when hormonal contraception CAUSES increased risk of stroke, cancer, premature

delivery, and abortions increase the risk of suicide, breastcancer, premature delivery, etc.

The FDA is currently reevaluating the saftey of newer hormonal contraception due to the

increased risks to women. DO NOT mandate funding for these deadly drugs and please, please

fund further research to the potential risks to women!

Our mothers, sisters, daughters and friends deserve better!

Please support the Rights of Conscience Act (H.R. 1179)

and do not go through with the mandate for coverage of contraception, surgical sterilization and

abortion-inducing drugs!

Thank you

Laura Nowicki

970-926-8746
# Quick-reaction FET shows off skills at EL19

/ Published Sept. 5, 2019
AMMAN, Jordan, 

                Canadian Army Master Cpl. Elizabeth Inman, 1 Canadian Mechanized Brigade Group Headquarters and Signal Squadron, provides in the field training to a member of the Jordan Armed Forces, Mohamed Bin Zayed Brigade/Quick Reaction Force Female Engagement Team during a coalition situational training exercise lane during Exercise Eager Lion 19, near Amman, Jordan on Sept. 3, 2019. The Canadian Armed Forces team is the second team working specifically with the JAF FET. (U.S. Army National Guard photo by Cpl. Elizabeth Scott)            

                Quick-reaction FET shows off skills at EL19            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Cpl. Elizabeth Scott

VIRIN: 190902-Z-GG783-0581
**EXHIBIT 23(a)**

 

**INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S CONSENT**

 

To the Board of Directors and 

Stockholders ofSpire Corporation: 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theCompany’s previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-22223) of our report dated March 18, 2004 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Spire Corporation and subsidiaries, which appears in this Form 10-KSB.

 

/s/ VITALE, CATURANO & COMPANY, P.C. 

 

Boston, Massachusetts 

March 26, 2004
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1118

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991

to identify certain routes in New Mexico as part of the Ports-to-Plains

Corridor, a high priority corridor on the National Highway System.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 28, 2001

Mr. BINGAMAN (for himself and Mr. DOMENICI) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce,

Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To amend the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency

Act of 1991 to identify certain routes in New Mexico

as part of the Ports-to-Plains Corridor, a high priority

corridor on the National Highway System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. IDENTIFICATION OF PORTS-TO-PLAINS HIGH

4 PRIORITY CORRIDOR ROUTES IN NEW MEX5 ICO.

6 Section 1105(c)(38) of the Intermodal Surface

7 Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (105 Stat. 2032;

8 114 Stat. 2763A–201) is amended—
2

•S 1118 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (A), by redesignating

2 clauses (i) through (viii) as subclauses (I) through

3 (VIII), respectively;

4 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (A) as

5 clause (i);

6 (3) by striking ‘‘(38) The’’ and inserting

7 ‘‘(38)(A) The’’;

8 (4) in subparagraph (A) (as designated by

9 paragraph (3))—

10 (A) in clause (i) (as redesignated by para11 graph (2))—

12 (i) in subclause (VII) (as redesignated

13 by paragraph (1)), by striking ‘‘and’’ at

14 the end;

15 (ii) in subclause (VIII) (as redesig16 nated by paragraph (1)), by striking the

17 period at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’;

18 and

19 (iii) by adding at the end the fol20 lowing:

21 ‘‘(IX) United States Route 87 from

22 Dumas to the border between the States of

23 Texas and New Mexico.’’; and

24 (B) by adding at the end the following:
3

•S 1118 IS

1 ‘‘(ii) In the States of New Mexico and Col2 orado, the Ports-to-Plains Corridor shall gen3 erally follow—

4 ‘‘(I) United States Route 87 from the

5 border between the States of Texas and

6 New Mexico to Raton, New Mexico; and

7 ‘‘(II) Interstate Route 25 from Raton,

8 New Mexico, to Denver, Colorado.’’; and

9 (5) by striking ‘‘(B) The corridor designation

10 contained in paragraph (A)’’ and inserting the fol11 lowing:

12 ‘‘(B) The corridor designation contained in sub13 clauses (I) through (VIII) of subparagraph (A)(i)’’.

Æ
# Contributions to the Gold Metallogeny of Northern Nevada

Open-File Report 98-3381998

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORBRUCE BABBITT, Secretary

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEYCharles G. Groat, Director

This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

1U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park

## Summary

## Abstract

#### To view the full PDF version of this publication, you will need Adobe Reader.

---

CLICK HERE or the map button above to open the PDF navigation page (376 KB) with links to the 23 chapters (53.5 MB).

CLICK HERE to see the README file from the CDROM version of this publication.

CLICK HERE to access the individual chapters.  To download a file to your computer, right click (PC) or click-and-hold (Mac) on the file name and follow the pop-up menu.  Note:  cross-document links on files you download will only work if you also download the documents (and directory structure) that are the targets of those links.

---



### Availability of this publication

U.S. Geological SurveyInformation Services, National Mapping DivisionBox 25046Denver Federal CenterDenver, CO  80225-0046 Telephone: (888) ASK-USGS

ISBN:  0-607-91629-X

Current pricing information is available from http://mapping.usgs.gov/esic/prices/.

---
From: scott finamore

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 8:54:13 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger.

Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run

health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the

coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies.

If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

-- 

Scott Finamore

Citrus Springs, Florida
From: Anne Quinn

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 11:06:21 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Anne Quinn
Phoenix, Arizona
From: Camille Nerney

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:50:59 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Camille Nerney

PO Box 93

Long Lake, NY 12847
From: David Barker

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Definition of "Religious Employer"

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 4:54:34 PM

The current definition of religious employer does not provide true conscience protection for those

committed to preserving life. Health care plans should not be forced to violate the moral and

religious convictions of providers or employees in order to participate in the health care system.

Requiring such an unacceptable demand threatens both universal access to health care and

religious freedom of conscience.

David Barker, E.I.T.

Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc.

5225 Village Creek Drive, Suite 200

Plano, Texas 75093

Phone: 972-931-0694

Fax: 972-931-9538

www.daa-civil.com
Ob motion to dismiss appeal.

Appeal dismissed December 18, 1923.

#### J. FELDER *v.*S. A. FOSTER LBR. CO., a Corporation.

(220 Pac. 1018.)

Cfosts — Facts Held to Show That Appeal was Taken for Purpose of Delay.

Where no motion or demurrer was decided adversely to defendant in the trial court, and no motion for nonsuit or for directed verdict was made by defendant, and' no exception taken by defendant to any ruling or instruction of the court, and there was no motion by defendant for judgment, notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, and a verdict was rendered for the plaintiff after a trial on the merits, the defendant’s appeal, during which he took no steps to file any transcript, was taken for delay, and the judgment will be affirmed against defendant and sureties on appeal bond with damages for delay.

From Multnomah: George W. Stapleton, Judge.

In Banc.

Appeal Dismissed.

For the motion, *Messrs. Flegel, Reynolds, Flegel & Smith.*

McBRIDE, C. J.

This is a case of an abandoned appeal. The defendant served notice of appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $265.32 and costs and disbursements taxed at $34.50. Defendant served a timely notice of appeal and its undertaking, but thereafter took no step to file any transcript in this case. Plaintiff brings a transcript of his judgment here, together with the undertaking of defendant on appeal, and moves that the appeal be dismissed and the judgment affirmed. This motion is accompanied by an affidavit of A. F. Flegel, Jr., one of the attorneys for plaintiff, to the effect that no motion or demurrer was decided adversely to defendant in the Circuit Court; that no motion for nonsuit *480or for directed verdict was made at said trial by the defendant; that no exceptions were taken by defendant to any ruling or instruction of the court during or connected with said trial, nor was there any motion made by defendant for judgment notwithstanding the verdict of the jury, nor for a new trial; that said cause was tried by a jury upon its merits and a verdict duly rendered by the jury in favor of plaintiff and against defendant; together with other statements tending to establish the fact that the appeal was taken really for delay and in order to prevent an execution upon the judgment in the case at bar until another case between the same parties had been decided. There is no counter-affidavit.

This is clearly a case where the appeal was taken for delay and the judgment will therefore be affirmed against defendant and its sureties, together with damages for delay in the sum of $29.98.

Appeal Dismissed.