alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
audited consolidated financial statements of the company for the year ended
April 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the form 10-KSB
for fiscal 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                              167647
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      5720787
<ALLOWANCES>                                         19687
<INVENTORY>                                        3023887
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  13274490
<PP&E>                                             8112709
<DEPRECIATION>                                     2799078
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    20130977
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             11043809
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             11095
<OTHER-SE>                                         4402628
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      20130977
<SALES>                                           29521241
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  29521241
<CGS>                                             24960317
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     28293483
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  349477
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     878281
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 878281
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        878281
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.85



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10l-2

                                    AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                              BELLSOUTH CORPORATION
                     SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

     THIS AMENDMENT is made to the BellSouth Corporation Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan (the "Plan"), effective as of December 31, 2005.

                                   WITNESSETH:

     WHEREAS, BellSouth Corporation (the "Company") sponsors the Plan, which was
amended and restated effective November 1, 1997; and

     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has delegated to the
Executive Nominating and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the
"Compensation Committee") authority to approve amendments to existing executive
compensation plans or programs, other than amendments involving significant
policy considerations or as otherwise appropriate; and

     WHEREAS, the Plan has previously been amended pursuant to actions of the
Compensation Committee at its November 24, 2003 and June 28, 2004 meetings; and

     WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee, at its November 28, 2005 meeting and
at its special meeting on January 10, 2006, approved further amendments to the
Plan to provide for capping the amount of lump sum death benefits under Section
5 of the Plan for current Plan Participants at the amount that would have been
payable had a Participant died on December 31, 2005 and, for all future Plan
Participants, to eliminate altogether death benefits described in Section 5 of
the Plan; and

     WHEREAS, the Compensation Committee authorized appropriate officers of the
Company to do such further acts and to execute such documents as may be
necessary or advisable to effectuate the purposes of its resolutions adopting
such Plan amendments;

     NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority delegated by the Compensation
Committee, the undersigned officer approves the following revisions to the Plan
document:

     Section 5 of the Plan shall be amended by inserting, immediately following
Section 5.1, a new Section 5.1A which shall read as follows:

<PAGE>

     1A.  Death Benefits After 2005.

          Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 5.1 preceding:

          (i) with respect to each Participant in the Plan on December 31, 2005,
     the amount of any death benefit payable pursuant to Section 5.1 shall in no
     event be based on base salary and/or Standard Award amounts greater than
     such Participant's base salary and the Standard Award applicable with
     respect to such Participant on December 31, 2005; and

          (ii) with respect to individuals who become eligible to participate in
     the Plan on or after January 1, 2006, no death benefits shall be payable
     pursuant to this Section 5.

     Any other provisions of the Plan not amended herein shall remain in full
force and effect.


January 19, 2006                        /s/ Richard D. Sibbernsen
Date                                    ----------------------------------------
                                        Vice President-Human Resources
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.22 MB)
 
 155th Armored Brigade Combat Team 155th ABCT Task Force Spartan 220th PAD USCENTCOM U.S. Central Command USARCENT CENTCOM Army Reserve MEDEVAC U.S. Army Central 220th Public Affairs Detachment EXERCISE BRIGHT STAR 18 BRIGHTSTAR18 EGYPT
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Alan and Janet Brumbaugh

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Planned Parenthood funding

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 10:41:37 PM

Planned Parenthood should not receive tax payer funds for abortions. States should be able to decide

to refuse to fund Planned Parenthood clinics that perform abortions.

Sincerely,

Janet Brumbaugh
<PAGE>   1

                    [Letterhead of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu]
                              Our Ref: 560540.DOC
                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants of Trinet Venture Capital Ltd., we hereby
consent to the incorporation of our report dated March 14, 2000, included in
Form 1O-K of Ampal-American Israel Corporation for the year ended December 31,
1999 (relating to the financial statement of Trinet Venture Capital Ltd. not
included herein), into Ampal-American Israel Corporation's previously filed
Registration Statements No. 33-51023 and No. 33-55137.


/s/ Brightman, Almagor & Co.
BRIGHTMAN ALMAGOR & CO.

Certified Public Accountants

A member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu

March 27, 2000.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Board of Directors and Stockholders of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc.

We consent to the use of our report dated February 28, 2008, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheets of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December
31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2007, which report is included herein.

/s/ J. H. Williams & Co., LLP
J.H. Williams & Co., LLP
Kingston, Pennsylvania
February 28, 2008

                                       76
file:///C|/..._List_29-08-2011_12-55-54-352/Document%20List%2029-08-2011%2012-55-54-352_docs/EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0041.html[8/29/2011 2:06:34 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: August 29, 2011

Received: August 23, 2011

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 80eeab3b

Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0018

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of

Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0018-0002

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services under

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0041

Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Corrie 

Address:

Lisbon,

General Comment

"The new guidelines require most health insurance plans in the United States—including those

offered by private employers—to provide full access to birth control, as well as abortion-inducing

drugs. 'Ella' and the 'morning after pill' have been shown to harm women, and actually kill the

developing baby by starving it of nutrients...Under the new HHS guidelines, most health insurance

plans in the United States will have to provide the full range of birth control drugs. No co-pay can be

required. From a fiscal perspective, it is impossible to see how this will bring down health care costs

because birth control drugs are extremely expensive. And more importantly, this regulation will

completely eliminate the right of employers to follow their conscience and refuse to offer birth control

drugs to their employees in company-funded health care plans. Many employers object to using their

company resources to pay for birth control, and many more strongly object to using company

resources to pay for abortion-inducing drugs...Unfortunately, the religious exemption is extremely

narrow and will only apply to churches and other houses of worship, and possibly denominational

seminaries. Religious organizations, most religious colleges, and other religious employers who have

conscientious objections to offering birth control or abortion-inducing drugs will be forced to choose

between abhorrent options. They will have to decide whether to end their insurance programs—

which will hurt millions of employees across the nation—or violate their conscience by including birth

control and abortion-inducing drugs in their insurance programs." (HSLDA statement) I believe that

this narrow religious exemption should be broadened to not only include houses of worship, but also

religious organizations, religious colleges, and employer-funded private health insurance plans if the

employer has a conscientious objection to using corporate funds to pay for birth control or abortioninducing drugs.
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1009

To require the provision of information to parents and adults concerning

bacterial meningitis and the availability of a vaccination with respect

to such disease.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 11, 2001

Mrs. HUTCHISON (for herself and Mr. VOINOVICH) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

A BILL

To require the provision of information to parents and adults

concerning bacterial meningitis and the availability of

a vaccination with respect to such disease.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Meningitis Immuniza5 tion Awareness Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

7 Congress makes the following findings:

8 (1) Approximately 3,000 cases of meningococcal

9 disease occur each year in the United States. Ap-
2

•S 1009 IS

1 proximately 10 to 13 percent of patients with such

2 disease die despite receiving antibiotics early in the

3 disease. Of those individuals who survive, an addi4 tional 10 percent have severe after-effects of the dis5 ease, including mental retardation, hearing loss, and

6 loss of limbs.

7 (2) There is a vaccine that protects individuals

8 against some types of bacterium Neisseria

9 meningitidis (also known as meningococcus), an im10 portant cause of bacterial meningitis and sepsis in

11 children and young adults. A single dose of the vac12 cine is recommended, and vaccination will decrease

13 the risk of the disease caused by Neisseria

14 meningitidis.

15 (3) Currently, the only group of individuals that

16 is vaccinated against bacterial meningitis is the

17 members of the armed forces. The only other group

18 of individuals that have been encouraged to get the

19 vaccine are those individuals attending college.

20 SEC. 3. PROVISION OF INFORMATION.

21 (a) DEVELOPMENT OF INFORMATION.—The Sec22 retary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with

23 the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Pre24 vention, shall develop and make available to entities de25 scribed in subsection (b) information concerning bacterial
3

•S 1009 IS

1 meningitis and the availability and effectiveness of vac2 cinations for individuals 2 years of age or older with re3 spect to such disease.

4 (b) ENTITIES.—An entity is described in this sub5 section if the entity—

6 (1) is—

7 (A) a child care center or provider that is

8 licensed or certified under an appropriate State

9 law;

10 (B) an elementary or secondary school (as

11 such terms are defined in the Elementary and

12 Secondary School Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 6301

13 et seq.);

14 (C) a college or university;

15 (D) a boarding school or summer camp;

16 (E) a prison or other detention facility; or

17 (F) any other entity that provides for the

18 housing of individuals in a dorm-like setting;

19 and

20 (2) any other entity determined appropriate by

21 the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

Æ
From: Sandy Sasso

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 7:35:48 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Sandy Sasso
Hatfield, Pennsylvania
Pi lof 1
REC 120 139-10 “we

ayy si
wcagtya DIY 1S ONS
ey PROCESSUS Sy aglO
LEGA ATION ae As of: September 01, 2011
P BRA) Received: August 09, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: August 31, 2011

Tracking No. 80edc40e
(Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0095
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Martha Troxel
Address: 1138 Prairie Dr NE
Email: CRPrairie1@imonmail.com

General Comment

Please retain all religious exemptions to providing contraceptives and pills that may cause
abortions, Also, please expand the religious exemptions to cover right-to-life organizations,
Catholic hospitals, and Christian radio stations, Thank-you!

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000.... 9/1/2011
No. 108.

No. 109.

No. 110.

No. 125.

#### Interstate Commerce Commission *v.*New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.; Sea-Land Service, Inc., *v.*New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.; Seatrain Lines, Inc., *v.*New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.; and United States *v.*New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co. et al.

*Robert W. Ginnane*and *B. Franklin Taylor, Jr.*for appellant in No. 108.

*Warren Price, Jr.*for appellant in No. 109.

*Ralph D. Ray*and *Warren E. Baker*for appellant in No. 110.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger*and *Lionel Kestenbaum*for the United States in No. 125.

*Carl Helmetag, Jr., James A. Bistline, Ernest D. Grinnell, Jr., J. Edgar McDonald, Charles P. Reynolds, Albert B. Russ, Jr.*and *Toll R. Ware*for appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. Probable jurisdiction noted.
#### Elisha M. Shurtliff, Respondent, v. The Utica and Black River Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Opiuion by

Boardman, J.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**SECTION 302**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, John M. Robbins, certifythat:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of AmNet Mortgage, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on suchevaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a) All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: August  15, 2005   |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
| /s/ John M.  Robbins     |   |
| John M.  Robbins         |
| Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----