alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

October 29, 2010

Ted Schade

Air Pollution Control Officer

Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District

157 Short Street

Bishop, California 93514

Dear Mr. Schade :

Thank you for timely submission of the Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control

District’s 20 1 0 Ambient Air Monitoring Network P lan. We have reviewed the submitted

document and have found that it meets the minimum requirements set forth under 40

CFR Part 58.10.

Enclosed, please find our comments on the plan

. If you have any questions

regarding th is letter or the enclosed comments, please feel free to contact me at (415)

972

- 3851 or Michael Flagg at (415) 972

- 3372

.

Sincerely,

//s//

Matthew Lakin, Manager

Air Quality Analysis Office

Air Division

Enclosure

cc: Christopher La naneComments on 2010 Great Basin Network Plan

Please update next year’s annual network plan to reflect the following comments:

The monitoring objectives and purposes assigned to each monitoring site should

be consistent with EPA definitions. 40 CFR 58 App. D 1.1.1 outlines the six

general monitoring site types, which are commonly referred to as the monitoring

objectives :

(a) Highest Concentration

(b) Population Oriented

(c) Source Impact

(d) Background

(e) Transport

(f) Visibility Impacts

Tables 2 and 3 should be updated and combin ed to clearly reflect the monitoring

objectives and spatial scales for each site. Also, Table 3 should be updated to

reflect the requirements in Table D

- 1 in 40 CFR 58 App. D , which outlines the

appropriate relationship between the various monitori ng purpo ses and spatial

scales.

The site reports in Appendix C do not contain any information pertaining to semi

annual flow audits. The specific dates for the last two semi

- annual flow audits

should be included in each applicable site report.

The designation o f each monitor (e.g. FRM, FEM, or Non

- Regulatory) and the

respective method code should be included in the site reports.

The site reports from Keeler only contain information from a continuous PM 2.5

FDMS TEOM and two PM 10 TEOMs. The site reports do not in clude information

for the collocated filter based PM 2.5 and PM 10 instruments.

The site report from Mammoth Lakes does not include information from the filter

based PM 10 instrument located at the site.

Section 6.0 states that the district is responsible for monitoring in the Searles

Valley nonattainment area, though the plan does not include information from this

area and AQS indicates that the support agency is Mojave Desert AQMD.

Clarification on this issue would be very helpful.
EXHIBIT 31.2
 SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION
AND
SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATION
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Select Medical Holdings Corporation and
Select Medical Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Dated: August 12, 2010
    /s/ Martin F. JacksonMartin F. JacksonExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
From: david6699049@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:33:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Smith

Hudson, FL 34667
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, each of the undersigned herebycertifies that the Quarterly Report of NetBank, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:November 9, 2006

 
| /s/ Steven F. Herbert                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| Steven F. Herbert  Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                                       |   |
| /s/ James P. Gross                         |   |
| James P. Gross  Chief Finance Executive    |   |

 

1

----
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 3, 2011 

Order 

 

May 3, 2011 

142787 & (21) 

JOHN EDWIN GLASPIE, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 142787 

v CoA: 301653 

 Eaton CC: 09-1369-NF 

FARM BUREAU MUTUAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, 

 Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

EVAN JAMES STEVENS and 

JAMES EDWARD STEVENS, JR., 

 Defendants. 

__________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by the attorneys for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered and, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED that the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with 

prejudice and without costs.
From: Matt Benim

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Friday, August 19, 2011 11:34:08 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Matt Benim
Clackamas, Oregon
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 3.7

                     TRANSCONTINENTAL REALTY INVESTORS, INC.

                              ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

                  Decreasing the Number of Authorized Shares of
                    and Eliminating Series B Preferred Stock

     Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. is desiring to amend its Articles
of Incorporation, as heretofore amended, as more particularly described
hereinafter, hereby certifies as follows:

     1. The name of the Corporation (the "Corporation") whose Articles of
Incorporation, as heretofore amended (the "Articles of Incorporation") are being
amended hereby is

                     Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.

     2. Set forth immediately below is the text of the amendments (the
"Amendments") to the Articles of Incorporation being made hereby.

                                       A.

     Section 1 of the Designation (the "Designation") of the authorized number,
     preferences, limitations and relative rights of the Corporation's Series B
     Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock is hereby amended to read as
     follows:

          1. Number of Shares. The number of shares which shall constitute the
             ----------------
     Series B Preferred Stock shall be such number as may actually be issued by
     the Corporation, not to exceed a maximum of zero shares.

                                       B.

     The Designation, as amended by item A above, is hereby deleted from the
     Articles of Incorporation.

     Except as hereby amended, the Articles of Incorporation remain and shall
remain in full force and effect.

     3. The Amendments were adopted by the Corporation's Board of Directors at a
meeting held on December 12, 2001. There being no Holders of the Series B Stock,
no approval was required or obtained.

<PAGE>

     Dated this 12th day of December, 2001.

                                         Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc.

                                         By:   /s/ Robert A. Waldman
                                            ------------------------------------
                                               Robert A. Waldman, Secretary
#### Hannah Nirdlinger and others, Respondents, v. Jacob Nirdlinger and another, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs and with leave to defendants to answer over on the usual terms. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
                                                                      ----------

                                  Subsidiaries
                                  ------------



Pioneering Management Corporation

Pioneer Funds Distributor, Inc.

Pioneering Services Corporation

Pioneer Capital Corporation

Pioneer SBIC Corporation

Pioneer Associates, Inc.

Pioneer Plans Corporation

PIOGlobal Corporation

Pioneer Metals and Technology, Inc.

Pioneer Investments Corporation

Pioneer International Corporation

Pioneer Fund Management Company, Inc.

Pioneer Ventures Limited Partnership

Pioneer Real Estate Advisors, Inc.

Pioneer Exploration Limited

Pioneer Explorer, Inc.

Pioneer Omega, Inc.

Pioneer First Russia, Inc.

Luscinia, Inc.

Theta Enterprises, Inc.


<PAGE>   2

Pioneer Forest, Inc.

Pioneer Goldfields Holdings, Inc.

Pioneer Goldfields Limited

Pioneer Goldfields Trustees Limited

Teberebie Goldfields Limited

Lobenguela Exploration and Mining Company (Private) Limited

PIOGlobal Insurance Company Limited

Pioneer Fonds Marketing GmbH

Pioneer Management (Ireland) Limited

Pioneer First Polish Trust Fund Joint-Stock Company, s.a.

Pioneer Real Estate Advisors Sp z.o.o.

Financial Services Limited

Pioneer Polski Dom Maklerski, S.A.

Pioneer Czech Investment Company, a.s.

Closed Joint-Stock Company "Pioneer Metals International"

Closed Joint-Stock Company "Forest-Starma"

Closed Joint-Stock Company "Amgun-Forest"

Closed Joint-Stock Company "Udinskoye"

Closed Joint-Stock Company "Tas-Yurjah Mining Company"

Closed Joint-Stock Company "Pioneer Starma Equipment"

"Pioneer Investments"

Closed Joint-Stock Company "Pioneer Securities"


<PAGE>   3

Closed Joint-Stock Company "Management Company (KUIF)"

First Voucher Fund

Pioneer Bank (Joint-Stock Company)

Closed Joint-Stock Company "Pioneer Services"

Pioneering Management (Jersey) Limited

Pioneer Poland U.S. (Jersey) Limited

Pioneer Poland U.K. Limited

Pioneer Investment Poland Limited

UKS Securities Ltd.

AS Holdings, Inc.
# 

# CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue

Registration No.  333-97047

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (3)

PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  320                                                               Trade Date: 8/04/03

(To Prospectus Supplement dated August 15, 2002 &

  Prospectus dated August  8, 2002)                                                                     Issue Date:  8/07/03

The Date of this Pricing SupplementAugust  4, 2003

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION OR REPAYMENT

  CUSIP                                                                                                                                Date and terms of redemption or

     or        Stated                                                                  Interest                                    repayment (including any

Common  Interest                      Price to  Discounts &        Payment  Survivors                  applicable regular or special

  Code      Rate (1)               Maturity                Public (2)                Commissions      Frequency      Option     Yes/No                record dates)

14911QPH8     5.5%                       08/15/18           100%                    1.85%                 Quarterly           YES           YES               Callable at 100% beginning 08/15/06

                                                                                                                                                                                                                    and quarterly thereafter.                                 

                          

Principal                                                                                1st Payment Day         

Amount                   Proceeds                 Dealer                            Date                  Count

$3,112,000.00                $3,054,428.00         ABN AMROInc.                 11/15/03                 30/360    

Original Issue Discount Note:                                                                   Total Amount of OID:

____  Yes                X   No                                                                                   N/A

The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the effective date of the change.  Prior to the date of this Pricing Supplement, $211.159 mm principal amount of the PowerNotes (SM) were sold at interest rates then in effect.   Subsequent offerings of PowerNotes (SM) will be made under the Prospectus Supplement and Prospectus dated August 8,2002.

Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
} ROC LEG co DIVISION, AID AA IE Page 1 of 1
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS REG TREO if-1O SEP 1 20H

As of: September 01, 2011
Received: August 15, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 01, 2011
Tracking No. 80¢ce17cc

(Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0137
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Mary Elizabeth Hawkins
Address:

4415 Latona Avenue NE

Seattle, WA, 98105
Email: m.clizabeth.hawkins@gmail.com

General Comment

I strongly support the new policy requiring health-insurance plans to cover birth control without a
co-pay, CMS-9992-IFC2. Thank you for this important improvement to women's health care.

I also want you to know that I am concerned that certain religious employers may be allowed to
opt out of the requirements. All women should have access to contraceptive coverage, regardless
of where they work.

This policy finally should make near-universal access to birth control a reality for all women who
use it.

Improving women's access to birth control is positive in so many ways. A woman who can plan
when to have a family is able to participate in society more fully. Allowing women to space their
pregnancies contributes to healthy childbearing. And ultimately, fewer unintended pregnancies
can reduce the need for abortion.

Thank you for following science-based recommendations and making women's health a priority.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000.... 9/1/2011
No. 434, Misc.

#### Kiefaber *v.*Pennsylvania.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied.
---

---

EXHIBIT 23.4

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
ACCOUNTANT

We have issued our report dated
February 24, 2005 for the financial statements of Carmel Container Systems Ltd. for the
year ended December 31, 2004. We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement Form S-8 (File No. 333-61895 and File No. 333-55970), of our report
dated February 24, 2005 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Ampal
 American Israel Corporation incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

| |  | Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
Member of Ernst & Young Global
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------

Haifa ,Israel March 13,
2005



---

---