alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.83 MB)
 
 Army Camp Arifjan deployment TOA 420th MCB Kkuwait
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

ENRIQUE AYON DUENAS,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 18

- 30193

D.C. No. 3:16

- cr

- 00079

- TMB

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Alaska

Timothy M. Burgess, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 11, 2019 **

Before: CANBY, GRABER, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Enrique Ayon Duenas appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 120

- month concurrent sentence s imposed following his guilty

- plea

convictions for drug conspiracy, in violation of 2 1 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A),

and 846, and money laundering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 ( h )

.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 14 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 30193

Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Duenas ’s counsel has filed

a brief stating that there a re no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw

as counsel of record. We have provided Duenas the opportunity to file a pro se

supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been

filed.

Duenas waived the right to appeal his sentence. Because the record

discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver, we dismiss Duenas ’s

appeal. See United States v. Watson , 582 F.3d 974, 986

- 88 (9th Cir. 2009).

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            5202
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       5649
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                             216
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                               218
<LOANS>                                          61590
<ALLOWANCE>                                        637
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   75008
<DEPOSITS>                                       61231
<SHORT-TERM>                                      2500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                584
<LONG-TERM>                                       3000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                        7689
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   75008
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   1320
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                   93
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    16
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                  1429
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 630
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 712
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              717
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       45
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    621
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    305
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         305
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       186
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.58
<LOANS-NON>                                         33
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   649
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       60
<RECOVERIES>                                         3
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  637
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            637


</TABLE>
From: Ronan, Tom

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Access to Preventive Care and Contraception!

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:16:56 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the recommendations

of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to

reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new law

and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive services,

others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make

exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health

providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though

they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands

of women just because of where they work.

I’m sorry but religion should have nothing to do with this law. People should be able to make up their own

minds on what type of contraception they use

and how it’s paid for. Their employers should have no say in the matter. 

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s recommendations and

rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Thomas W. Ronan

Operations Technical Analyst

ARAMARK

833 Chestnut St. 

8th Floor

Phila. Pa. 19107

ronan-tom@aramark.com

215-574-5306
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12173]

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 506(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (the “Act”) (22 U.S.C. 2318(a)(1)) and Presidential Delegation of Authority dated May 3, 2023, I hereby determine that:
    - an unforeseen emergency exists which requires immediate military assistance to Ukraine; and
    - the emergency requirement cannot be met under the authority of the Arms Export Control Act or any other provision of law.

I, therefore, pursuant to authority delegated to me by the President, direct the drawdown of up to $300 million in defense articles and services of the Department of Defense, and military education and training, under the authority of section 506(a)(1) of the Act to provide assistance to Ukraine. The Department of State will coordinate implementation of this drawdown.

                    This determination shall be reported to the Congress and published in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Dated: May 3, 2023.

Antony Blinken,

Secretary of State.

# Note:

 This document was received for publication by the Office of the Federal Register on September 6, 2023.

[FR Doc. 2023-19579 Filed 9-11-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
9/5 iz& ^r.

RECEIVED IH 15: ao*-cr&rnlmLfype»Ls. comCF ^muPPBALS

nnzOJexK : RbeLfytistk. M lo 2015

EWH- l%ll*Z-OSj

Dot oP &bz*e> &>epv3 ^^be^^^i/^^^^^"^^15

O/* tfe Ah^^^V*3d[ W>eJt; ^VfUu W/J/ lute** rne-orvA

Lipidsme-of rt!* Ste&^j ^i^o/AJ^aIL Afpn&iidizJft'.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1



                        AMPAL-AMERICAN ISRAEL CORPORATION

                               660 Madison Avenue
                            New York, New York 10021

               LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T

                                 March 27, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549-0408

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, Ampal-American
Israel Corporation has obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen
LLP ("Andersen") stating that the December 31, 2001 audit was subject to their
quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen
personnel working on the audit and availability of national office consultation,
and availability of personnel at affiliates of Arthur Andersen to conduct the
relevant portions of the audit.

                                        Very truly yours,

                                        Ampal-American Israel Corporation
From: Harriet Turner

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Healthcare services

Date: Friday, August 19, 2011 2:51:52 PM

*The current definition of religious employer does not provide true

conscience protection for those committed to preserving life.

*Healthcare plans should not be forced to violate the moral and

religious convictions of providers or employees in order to participate

in the health care system.

*Requiring such an unacceptable demand threatens both universal

access to health care and religious freedom of conscience.

Any so-called health care plan should improve life,

& strengthen available services -

*not hinder or shut down services - is this what you are attempting to

do -

shut down any faith-based health care services?

*We absolutely do NOT agree with this!

Brian & Harriet Turner

hkrturner@q.com
file:///C|/..._List_29-08-2011_12-55-54-352/Document%20List%2029-08-2011%2012-55-54-352_docs/EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0069.html[8/29/2011 2:42:39 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: August 29, 2011

Received: August 26, 2011

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 80f0576c

Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0018

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of

Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0018-0002

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services under

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0069

Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Dawn R Kavanagh

Address:

27962 Zook Rd.

Richwood, OH, 43344

Email: dawnkavanagh@rocketmail.com

Phone: 937-578-3483

General Comment

I oppose the illegally narrow religious exemption created in the Interim Final Rule. This proposed

religious exemption would apply almost exclusively only to houses of worship, and possibly some

denominational seminaries. The religious exemption should be broadened.

As a result of the HRSA guidlines, employers who have a pro-life, religious, or other conscientious

objection to facilitating the use of birth control drugs or abortion-inducing drugs are now required to

pay for the very drugs that they believe result in the death of a human being. According to the

dictates of their conscience, this would be murder and sinful.

They will either violate their religious and conscientious objections, or drop their health insurance

coverage for their employees, leading to a great hardship for millions of employees and their families

around the nation.

I urge HHS to adopt a robust religious exemption that will allow all employers who have religious and

conscientious objections to providing birth control drugs or abortion-inducing drugs to their

employees to opt out of the new HRSA guidelines. This religious exemption should also specifically

exempt all religious organizations under section 501(c) of the IRS code.

If HHS adopts these common sense suggestions for a new religious exemption, it will demonstrate

that the Department and the Obama Administration want to protect the religious freedom of all

employers in the United States.
IV 

House Calendar No. 232

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 587

[Report No. 107–757] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 16 (legislative day, OCTOBER 15), 2002

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules.

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of Wednesday, October 16, 

6 2002, providing for consideration or disposition of any of 

7 the following measures: 
2

HRES 587 RH 

1 (1) A joint resolution making further con2 tinuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003. 

3 (2) Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 5063) 

4 to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to pro5 vide a special rule for members of the uniformed 

6 services in determining the exclusion of gain from 

7 the sale of principal residence and to restore the tax 

8 exempt status of death gratuity payments to mem9 bers of the uniformed services.

House Calendar No. 232

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 587

[Report No. 107–757] 

RESOLUTION

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

OCTOBER 16 (legislative day, OCTOBER 15), 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1636

GRAYSON & KUBLI, P.C.,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JEFFREY P. GOLDSTEIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, Magistrate

Judge. (1:04-cv-01337-LO)

Submitted: April 20, 2007 Decided: June 11, 2007

Before WILLIAMS, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rand L. Gelber, Vienna, Virginia, for Appellant. Mary E. Harkins,

GRAYSON & KUBLI, P.C., McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Appellant Jeffrey P. Goldstein appeals the district

court’s judgment that he owed legal fees under a finding of breach

of contract, or, in the alternative, quantum meruit. After a bench

trial, this court reviews the district court's conclusions of law

de novo and its findings of fact for clear error. Minyard Enter.,

Inc. v. Southeastern Chem. & Solvent Co., 184 F.3d 373, 380 (4th

Cir. 1999); Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a). A finding of fact is clearly

erroneous when, “although there is evidence to support it, the

reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite

and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” United

States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395 (1948); In re

Green, 934 F.2d 568, 570 (4th Cir. 1991).

We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the joint

appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Grayson & Kubli v.

Goldstein, No. 1:04-cv-01337-LO (E.D. Va. Apr. 20, 2006). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of Cecelia L. Booth.

Decree reversed, and order entered directing trial by jury. Motion for leave to supply further proof denied, with costs. Opinion by Daniels, J.
From: Paul McCrum

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventative Care for Women

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 11:36:34 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger.

Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run

health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the

coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies.

If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Lisa McCrum
EXHIBIT 23




               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


To the Board of Directors
Hills Bancorporation

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February
14, 2000 with respect to the financial  statements of Hills  Bancorporation  and
subsidiaries  included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hills Bancorporation
for the year ended  December 31, 1999 in Registrant  Statement  No.  33-73606 on
Form S-8 filed  December 30, 1993 and  Registrant  Statement No. 33-2657 on Form
S-8 filed January 10, 1986.

                                                     /s/McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP


Iowa City, Iowa
March 15, 2000
Page 1 of 1

KR Et 12° 4491-10

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION As of: September 01, 2011
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS Received: August 09, 2011
BRANCH Status: Posted
PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 01, 2011
Tracking No. 80edc3cd
(Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0121
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Kenneth Lentz
Address:
Cary, NC, 27153
Email: LentzLandSurveying@att.net

General Comment

NO FORCED ABORTION COVERAGE FOR RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS!
NOT ABORTION NOR ABORTIFACIENTS!

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000..._ 9/1/2011
IV

House Calendar No. 163

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 427

[Report No. 107–483]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the

bill (H.R. 3448) to improve the ability of the United States to prevent,

prepare for, and respond to bioterrorism and other public health emergencies.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MAY 22 (legislative day, MAY 21), 2002

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution;

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to

accompany the bill (H.R. 3448) to improve the ability

of the United States to prevent, prepare for, and respond

to bioterrorism and other public health emergencies.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 3448) to improve the ability of

4 the United States to prevent, prepare for, and respond to

5 bioterrorism and other public health emergencies. All
2

HRES 427 RH

1 points of order against the conference report and against

2 its consideration are waived. The conference report shall

3 be considered as read.

House Calendar No. 163

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. RES. 427

[Report No. 107–483]

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 3448) to improve the ability of the United States to prevent,

prepare for, and respond to bioterrorism andother public health emergencies.

MAY 22 (legislative day, MAY 21), 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed