alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1468 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1468

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 For the relief of Ilko Vasilev Ivanov, Anelia Marinova Peneva, Marina 
               Ilkova Ivanova, and Julia Ilkova Ivanova.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    In the administration of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Ilko Vasilev Ivanov, Anelia Marinova Peneva, 
Marina Ilkova Ivanova, and Julia Ilkova Ivanova shall be held and 
considered to have been lawfully admitted to the United States for 
permanent residence as of the date of the enactment of this Act upon 
payment of the required visa fees.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Ilko Vasilev Ivanov, 
Anelia Marinova Peneva, Marina Ilkova Ivanova, and Julia Ilkova Ivanova 
as provided in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the 
proper officer to reduce by the appropriate number during the current 
fiscal year the total number of immigrant visas available to natives of 
the country of the aliens' birth under subsection (a) of section 203 of 
the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153).

            Passed the Senate October 17, 2002.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1468

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 For the relief of Ilko Vasilev Ivanov, Anelia Marinova Peneva, Marina 
               Ilkova Ivanova, and Julia Ilkova Ivanova.
```
EXHIBIT
32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vail Banks, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter
G. Williston, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                         
|2. | The
  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/ Peter G.
  Williston                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                             
|                                                             
|                                                             
|Peter G.
  Williston                                         
|Senior
  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|August 13,
  2004
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Select Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Martin F. Jackson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 15, 2006


                                        /s/ Martin F. Jackson
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Martin F. Jackson
                                        Senior Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 62620]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19590]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12169]


Determination Under Section 506(a)(1) and Section 614(a)(1) of 
the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 To Provide Military Assistance to 
Ukraine

    Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 506(a)(1) of the 
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (the ``Act'') (22 U.S.C. 2318(a)(1)) and 
Presidential Delegation of Authority dated July 7, 2023, I hereby 
determine that:
    <bullet> An unforeseen emergency exists which requires immediate 
military assistance to Ukraine; and
    <bullet> The emergency requirement cannot be met under the 
authority of the Arms Export Control Act or any other provision of law.
    In addition, pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 
614(a)(1) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 2364(a)(1)), and Presidential 
Delegation of Authority dated July 7, 2023, I hereby determine that it 
is important to the security interests of the United States to furnish 
up to $122 million in assistance under the Act to Ukraine without 
regard to any other provision of the law within the purview of section 
614(a)(1) of the Act.
    I, therefore, pursuant to authority delegated to me by the 
President, direct the drawdown of up to $800 million in defense 
articles and services of the Department of Defense and military 
education and training under the authority of section 506(a)(1) of the 
Act to provide assistance to Ukraine. The Department of State will 
coordinate implementation of this drawdown.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress and published 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: July 7, 2023.
Antony Blinken,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2023-19590 Filed 9-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 11, 2009

s0831 

# Order

September 11, 2009

138325 & (9)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138325 COA: 287814 Wayne CC: 2004-003608 GREGORY L EE BERRY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the January 5, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to re lief under MCR 6.508(D). The
motion to remand is DENIED.
From: "Craig, Nathan D" <Nathan.Craig@duke-energy.com> 

To: Ronald Jordan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: "Velte, John S" <John.Velte@duke-energy.com> 

Date: 12/22/2011 01:23 PM 

Subject: Questionable mercury data: Allen and Belews Creek Steam 

 Station 

Ron, 

As discussed yesterday, we have determine that some of the low level 

mercury results provided to EPA within the data spreadsheets from Allen 

and Belews Creek Steam Stations may be questionable. Please find 

attached the sampling dates and low level mercury results that we feel 

maybe suspect. After reviewing the analytical reports, we realized that 

there were issues associated with the quality control for these 

analyses. I have forwarded you the analytical reports for this data. 

Sorry for the confusion, but we only realized this issue after having a 

couple months to obtain and review the analytical reports. Our original 

intent of maintaining the data results were to assess the performance of 

the system and determine if there were any trends in the data. Quality 

control, therefore, was not a concern and we did not note any quality 

control issues within our spreadsheets. 

We have not conducted a thorough review of the remaining data to 

determine its validity. The attached data only represents issues with 

the low level mercury analyses that were readily noted within the 

analytical reports. 

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns, 

Nathan Craig 

Environmental Specialist III 

Water Management Group 

Office Phone: 704-382-9622 

Cell Phone: 704-315-8187 

Fax: 704-382-1681 

 (See attached file: Questionable Hg Data Allen.xlsx)(See attached file: 

Questionable Hg Data Belews Creek.xlsx)
Exhibit 99.1

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Shareholders of NSTAR:

We have reviewed
the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of NSTAR and its subsidiaries (the Company) as of March 31, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of income, retained earnings and comprehensive income for each of the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 and the consolidated statement of cash flows for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of
interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying consolidated interim financial statements for
them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We previously audited, in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, retained earnings, and cash
flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated February 5, 2010, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2009, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
|Boston, Massachusetts         
|                              
|May 3, 2010
From: JM Coleman

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Support Access to Preventive Care and Contraception!

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:01:01 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

-- 

Best regards,

Julia Coleman
From: freedom_justiceforall@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:57:32 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sandra Mendoza

Glenview, IL 60026
From: Linda Brosh

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: In support of NO cost preventive care for ALL women

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 11:48:15 AM

Hello,

I have been a nurse for over 35 years and I join with the American Association of

University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of

Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject

any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the

new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

How can an individual employers personal beliefs trump the legitimate healthcare needs

of their employees! While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some

groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ

people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Thank you, Linda

Linda Brosh RN, MA CCM

lmbrosh@comcast.net
NO. 07-10-00177-CV, 07-10-00178-CV, 07-10-00179-CV 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

AT AMARILLO 

PANEL A 

DECEMBER 10, 2010 

KENNETH GLENN WEBB, APPELLANT 

v. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 FROM THE 181ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY; 

NOS. 11,994-B, 18-617-B, 18-618-B; HONORABLE JOHN B. BOARD, JUDGE 

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

By order of this Court, dated May 27, 2010, each of the referenced causes were 

abated and remanded to the trial court for a period of 180 days to allow appellant, 

Kenneth Glenn Webb, time to take such action as necessary to establish that the 

appeals were not prematurely filed or to obtain final, appealable orders. To date, Webb 

has not established that the appeals were not prematurely filed nor has this Court been 

provided final, appealable orders. Consequently, we conclude that the notices of 

appeal filed by Webb in these causes were not appeals of final judgments or orders, 
2 

that no statutory authority would permit Webb to file interlocutory appeals on these 

causes, and that we, therefore, lack jurisdiction to hear these appeals. 

 For the foregoing reasons, the appeals in the referenced causes are dismissed 

for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). 

 Mackey K. Hancock 

 Justice
From: Mary Oberle Hubley

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: HR 1179

Date: Friday, August 05, 2011 12:28:02 PM

Please support HR 1179.

American citizens should not be forced to support programs that contradict their conscience

beliefs.

Sincerley,

Sig

Mary Oberle Hubley

1131 Guilford Street

Huntington, Indiana 46750
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.19 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### Matter of Probate of Last Will of Edwin B. Hunt, deceased.

Decree of surrogate affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, «I.
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76

38 39 40


### ★ ▲

▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/07 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.06 N 76.88 WMeters AGL
From: Frederik Norberg

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:18:31 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Frederik Norberg

311 Ronalds St. #5

Iowa City, IA 52245
#### John Kafka and another, Respondents, v. Mayer Wile, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant To

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NSTAR (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James J. Judge, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |     |  |                            
|----------------- |  | --- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: May 3, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ JAMES J. JUDGE         
|                  |  |     |  | James J. Judge             
|                  |  |     |  | Senior Vice President      
|                  |  |     |  | and Chief Financial Officer