alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.01 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Linda Zeman

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: health care law

Date: Friday, August 19, 2011 8:16:42 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under

the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for "religious employers." These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that "religious refusal" exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services,

are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing

for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so Catholic hospitals would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and

ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM's

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

-- 

Linda Zeman

847-395-8112

cell 847-366-7704
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

###### National Endowment for the Arts

# AGENCY:

National Endowment for the Arts.

# ACTION:

Notice of meetings.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts will be held by teleconference or videoconference.

# DATES:

                        See the                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         section for individual meeting times and dates. All meetings are Eastern time and ending times are approximate:                    

# ADDRESSES:

National Endowment for the Arts, Constitution Center, 400 7th St. SW, Washington, DC 20506.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Further information with reference to these meetings can be obtained from David Travis, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC, 20506;                         *travisd@arts.gov,*                         or call 202-682-5001.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The closed portions of meetings are for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chair of March 11, 2022, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 10.

*The upcoming meetings are:*

*NEA Leadership Project Panel*                     (review of applications): This meeting will be closed.                

*Date and time:*                     September 26, 2023; 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.                

Dated: September 1, 2023.

David Travis,

Specialist, National Endowment for the Arts.

[FR Doc. 2023-19296 Filed 9-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
From: Marlena Lange

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: women"s health

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:37:04 PM

There is no reason why women should not be given full access and coverage to preventative

services.

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Marlena Lange

23 Royce Ave.

Middletown, NY10940
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

College StudentsEducational AssessmentEvaluation MethodsHigher EducationKnowledge LevelStudent Educational ObjectivesStudent EvaluationThinking Skills

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 15

- 00015

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF L.E.S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 76th District Court Titus County, Texas Trial Court No. 37,180

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.2 

### O R D E R Appellant Father appeals from the termination of his parental rights to L.E.S. The clerk’s record in this accelerated appeal was filed February 27, 2015, and the reporter’s record was filed March 31, 2015, making Father’s brief due April 20, 2015. Having received neither Father’s brief nor a motion to extend the deadline for filing that brief, our clerk’s office contacte d counsel via email and voicemail, advising that Father’s brief was late and that a motion for extension of time in which to file such brief had not been filed. Counsel did not to respond to these messages, has not filed a brief, and has not filed a motio n for extension of time in which to file a brief. This is an appeal from the termination of Father’s parental rights to L.E.S., which, by statute, is accelerated. See T EX
. F AM
. C ODE A NN . § 109.002(a) (West 2014). Further, under Rule 6.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Judicial Administration, we are required, “so far as reasonably possible, [to] ensure that the appeal is brought to final disposition” within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was filed. See T EX
. R. J UD
. A DMIN
. 6.2 , reprinted in T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. tit. 2, subtit. F app. (West 2013) . After weighing these considerations, we feel compelled to order the brief filed. By this order, we set the final deadline for filing appellant’s brief as May 11, 2015, which gives counsel twenty

- one days from the original due date to complete the brief. Should appellant fail to file a brief on or before May 11, 2015 , this appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution.
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3. IT IS SO ORDERED. BY THE COURT Date: April 2 8 , 20 15
From: Kathy Schneeman

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Friday, August 05, 2011 5:52:21 PM

No way should contraception be considered a mandated part of preventative health service. This would

be a violation of my conscience!
REC 120851 -/6 Page | of 1

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 7
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS ENCBAT Saale
Received: August 13, 2011
BRANCH
Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: August 31, 2011

Tracking No. 80ee03d3
‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0068
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Unknuwn 5S Submitter Information

General Comment

Don't force insurance companies to provide free preventative health care to women — including
contraceptives and pills that may cause abortions. Contraceptives are not a medical necessity and
pregnancy is not a disease.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=0900... 8/31/2011
#### Oliver C. Latimer, Respondent, *v.*Frank H. McKinnon, as Administrator of the Estate of James R. Baumes, Deceased, Appellant.

*Latimer*v. McKinnon, 142 App. Div. 920, affirmed.

(Argued March 7, 1912;

decided March 26, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 16, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury in an action to recover upon an undertaking.

*C. L. Andrus*for appellant.

*Wordsworth B. Matterson*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray,. Vann, Willard Bartlett, Chase and Collin, JJ. Not voting: Hisoock, J.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 62618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19560]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #18061 and #18062; HAWAII Disaster Number HI-
00073]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for the State of 
Hawaii

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment to the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Hawaii (FEMA-4724-DR), dated 08/10/
2023.
    Incident: Wildfires.
    Incident Period: 08/08/2023 and continuing.

DATES: Issued on 08/31/2023.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/10/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/10/2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the President's 
major disaster declaration for the state of Hawaii, dated 08/10/2023, 
is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    Hawaii: Hawaii, Honolulu, Kauai.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco S[aacute]nchez, Jr.,
Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2023-19560 Filed 9-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
From: evelynmiller2008@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive Health Care for women

Date: Monday, August 15, 2011 8:30:04 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Sincerely,

Evelyn F. Miller
Page 1 of 1

maa Q-1?
LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION AEG AGH 0 AUG 1 2 7010
PUBLICATION & ECULATIONS
RANCH

As of: August 12, 2010

PU BLIC Received: August 09, 2010

Posted: August 12, 2010
SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 20:0

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0058
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: laura w mcchesney
Address:
bronson, FL,

General Comment

See attached file(s)

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0058.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/12/2010


August 8, 2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Laura McChesney
From: Steve Hidalgo

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Conscience regulation by a government agency

Date: Monday, August 08, 2011 12:24:35 PM

To the unelected faceless bureaucrats at HHS and NLRB who now make the laws

without representation of the people:

I must express my disappointment over the HHS Department's flagrant disregard of

the Constitution and of the religious liberty and rights of conscience it guarantees.

The new rulings requiring group health insurance plans to cover contraceptive and

even abortifacent drugs are a violation of the rights of conscience and religious

freedom. The recent narrowing of the definition of a religious organization by HHS,

NLRB, and other agencies will require most religious organizations--Church schools,

Church hospitals, Church-based charitable organizations, and so on--to carry

insurance policies that pay into a government-mandated fund to pay for chemical

abortions and artificial contraception. This redefinition of a religious organization is

a fraud perpetrated on the American people, who are not confused about what

constitutes faith and religious belief. Moreover, this ruling exceeds the authority of

the Federal government's executive branch and clearly violates the Constitution.

Should it matter at all that it violates the President's executive order forbidding

government regulated healthcare from funding abortion, when so many promises

and guarantees given by this president have been broken and disregarded?

Stephen P. Hidalgo, Ph.D. (University of Notre Dame 1995), M.Div. (NotreDame

Seminary 2008)

cc. my elected Senators and Representative, the White House
From: Laurel Watson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Coverage of preventive care for Women

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:39:23 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger.

Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run

health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the

coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies.

If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions

"What appears on the surface of society seem to be multudinous problems,

but by use of critical point analysis they have a common root. 

For example we can make up a list of 'unsolvable' social problems, 

all of which are deemed to stem from different 'causes' in the world, such as:

poverty

crowded highways

massive immigration

rising gasoline prices and power consumption

environmental destruction

overwhelmed government agencies

progressive elimination of rain forests

excessive CO2 production

high taxation

crowded inner cities where crime and povery prevail

smog and air pollution

global warming

overcrowded landfills

overcrowded courts, jails, and prisons

overcrowded emergency rooms

overwhelming medical costs

overwhelming Social Security costs

a postal service overwhelmed by deficits

lack of dump sites

dwindling wildlife and natural resources

threatened extinction of species

pollution of the ocean

excessive case loads for all areas of welfare and human services

overwhelmed child protective services
rising costs of welfare and social services

long waits for service from all agencies

long lines at supermarkets

traffic jams

escalating police costs

overcrowded schools

teacher shortages

nursing shortages

rising noise pollution levels

invasion of privacy on every level

shortages of raw materials

shortages of dump space for toxic materials

overtaxed energy sources

pollution of streams, lakes, and rivers

starving nations and continents

Merely listing all the supposed diverse problems brings the awareness

that they all stem from the same single basis--the very simple and

obvious to see but unnoticed face of overpopulation. 

Thus we see the paradox that sending financial aid to a country results in a spurt of

birth rate and a worsening of the basic poverty level (e.g. Haiti)."

--Dr David Hawkins
Exhibit 32.2  Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    In connection with the Quarterly Report of NSTAR (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James J. Judge, Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:(i)the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 5, 2009By:/s/ JAMES J. JUDGEJames J. JudgeSenior Vice President,Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer