alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.46


 


[Note: Translation from the original agreement
written in Chinese]


 


Execution Copy


Equity Interest
Transfer Agreement


 


According
to the resolutions of general meeting of shareholders of Beijing eLong Information Technology Co., Ltd., Haochuan Ding (hereinafter
referred to as the “Transferor”) and
Rong Zhou (hereinafter referred to as the “Transferee”)
enter into an agreement on the equity interest transfer:


 


		1.	The Transferor
is willing to transfer all equity interests in Beijing eLong Information Technology Co., Ltd. to the Transferee
at a price of RMB2 million (two million yuan only);



 


		2.	The Transferee
is willing to accept all equity interests of the Transferor in Beijing eLong Information Technology Co., Ltd.
at a price of RMB2 million (two million yuan only);



 


		3.	Transfer shall take
place on September 7, 2015; from the date of transfer, the Transferor shall no longer have the rights of the investor and
bear the obligations of the investor regarding the transferred equity interests, and the Transferee shall have the rights of the
investor and bear the obligations of the investor in the company with its amount of investment.



 


This
agreement shall take effect after being signed by the parties. This agreement is in quintuplicate, the parties each holding one
copy, other originals used for registration and filing of the governmental departments, all originals having equal legal effect.


 


[No text hereunder]


 


[signature page of Equity Interest Transfer
Agreement]


 


Transferor: Haochuan Ding


 


Signature: /s/ Haochuan Ding


 


Transferee: Rong Zhou


 


Signature: /s/ Rong Zhou
From: Linjb48@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:38:33 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Linda Schaffner

Bowie, MD 20716
I 

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 13

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 22, 2002

Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

AN ACT

To extend authorization for the national flood insurance 

program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE NATIONAL FLOOD 

4 INSURANCE PROGRAM. 

5 The National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 

6 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.) is amended—
2

S 13 RFH 

1 (1) in section 1309(a)(2) (42 U.S.C. 

2 4016(a)(2)), by striking ‘‘December 31, 2002’’ and 

3 inserting ‘‘December 31, 2003’’; 

4 (2) in section 1319 (42 U.S.C. 4026), by strik5 ing ‘‘December 31, 2002’’ and inserting ‘‘December 

6 31, 2003’’.

Passed the Senate November 20, 2002. 

Attest: JERI THOMSON 

Secretary.
From: Johnston, Ilda

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Health care law

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:33:26 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care

under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services,

are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.43 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Ross Patterson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Re: Support Access to Preventive Care and Contraception!

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 12:52:39 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine

as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care

law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would

provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an

ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health

providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt

from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 15.1


                       Report of Independent Accountants


To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders:

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of NSTAR
and its subsidiaries as of March 31, 2000, and the related condensed
consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income of retained earnings
and of cash flows for the three month period ended March 31, 2000. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements
in order for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.

We previously audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards,
the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1999, and the related
consolidated statement of income and comprehensive income, of retained earnings
and of cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our
report dated January 26, 2000 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the accompanying condensed
consolidated balance sheet information as of March 31, 2000, is fairly stated in
all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which
it has been derived.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
May 15, 2000
From: Baughman, Jeanne E.

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Access to Preventive Care and Contraception

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:27:29 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the

exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would

be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and

ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Jeanne
From: v8@flightline.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:35:36 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bill Visnovsky

Salt Lake City, UT 84121
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.27 MB)
 
 USS Mason Sailors Navy NAVCENT VBSS U.S. 5th Fleet
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
**Exhibit 12.2**

**PACCAR Financial Corp.**

**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

**PURSUANT TO THE SUPPORT AGREEMENT**

**BETWEEN THE COMPANY AND PACCAR**

(Millionsof Dollars)
| ** **                         | ** ** | **Year ended December 31** | ** ** |
|------------------------------------|------------|-------------------------------------------|------------|
| ** **                         | ** ** | **2006**                                  | ** ** | **2005** | ** ** | **2004** | ** ** | **2003** | ** ** | **2002** | ** ** |
|                               |       |                                      |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                      |       |                                      |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                   | ** ** | **$**                                     | **163.9**  |   | $ | 101.2 |   | $ | 67.9 |   | $ | 78.8 |   | $ | 114.7 |   |
| Facility and equipment  rental     | ** ** | **2.0**                                   |       | 1.9 |   | 1.9 |   | 1.8 |   | 1.8 |   |
|                               |       |                                      |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                | ** ** | **$**                                     | **165.9**  |   | $ | 103.1 |   | $ | 69.8 |   | $ | 80.6 |   | $ | 116.5 |   |
|                               |       |                                      |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| EARNINGS                           |       |                                      |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Income before taxes                | ** ** | **$**                                     | **136.3**  |   | $ | 120.0 |   | $ | 111.4 |   | $ | 78.1 |   | $ | 45.0 |   |
| Depreciation                       | ** ** | **79.2**                                  |       | 68.3 |   | 46.5 |   | 29.2 |   | 16.3 |   |
|                               | ** ** | **215.5**                                 |       | 188.3 |   | 157.9 |   | 107.3 |   | 61.3 |   |
|                               |       |                                      |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                      | ** ** | **165.9**                                 |       | 103.1 |   | 69.8 |   | 80.6 |   | 116.5 |   |
|                               |       |                                      |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS DEFINED                | ** ** | **$**                                     | **381.4**  |   | $ | 291.4 |   | $ | 227.7 |   | $ | 187.9 |   | $ | 177.8 |   |
|                               |       |                                      |       |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES | ** ** | **2.30**                                  | **x**      | 2.83 | x | 3.26 | x | 2.33 | x | 1.53 | x |

 

1

----
From: joanne groshardt

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: women need preventative health care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:34:28 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government

to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage

requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption

would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s recommendations

and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

thanks for your reading time,

joanne groshardt

writing is a narcotic fix of creative bliss.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk May 22, 2013

t0515 

# Order

May 22, 2013

146515

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146515

COA: 305493

Jackson CC: 10

- 006210

- FH

ANNA MARIE RAND,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 20, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmNetMortgage, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Judith A. Berry, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”),that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| May 16, 2005 |                    |
|-------------------|-------------------------|
|              |                    |
|              | /s/ Judith A. Berry     |   |
|              | Judith A. Berry         |
|              | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----