alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit439eta20151109vit







 1   Exhibit 4.39                                    Amendment Agreement No. IV   to the storage and handling contract ETA-V.Mogas-1      Between         Eurotank Amsterdam B.V.          And         Vitol SA     





 







 2   THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENT NO. IV is made on this 9th day of November 2015      BETWEEN      1. Eurotank Amsterdam B.V., a company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands with a   registered office at Van Riebeeckhavenweg 9, 1041 AD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (“the   Company”); and      AND      2. Vitol SA., a company incorporated under the laws of Switzerland with a registered office at 28   Boulevard du Pont d’Arve 28, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland(“the Client”)      together “the Parties” and individually “the Party”.      WHEREAS      (A) The Company and Client are parties to a storage and handling contract bearing reference number   ETA-V.Mogas-1 dated 1 January 2011 (“Contract”).       (B) The Company and Client have also entered into Amendment I dated 10th October 2012, Amendment   Agreement II dated 1 January 2013, Amendment Agreement (III) dated 7th April 2014 to the   Contract;       (C) For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,   the Company and the Client now wish to further amend the Contract in accordance with this   Amendment Agreement No. IV.        NOW THEREFORE it is agreed that with effect from the date of this Amendment Agreement No. IV:      1. The Company and the Client agree to extend the duration from 31 December 2015 to 31 December   2019.       2. The Company and the Client further agree to terminate Amendment II dated 1 January 2013 and   that Amendment I continues to remain valid.        3. Save to the extent as amended by this Amendment Agreement No. IV, all terms and conditions of   the Contract shall remain in full force and effect.       4. This Amendment Agreement No. IV may be executed in counterparts.       5. Clauses 21 and 22 of the Contract shall apply mutatis mutandis to this Amendment Agreement No.   IV as if references therein to the Contract were to this Amendment Agreement No. IV.      6. Capitalised terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment Agreement No. IV shall have the same   meaning as in the Contract.        





 







 3   IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Client and the Company have caused this Amendment Agreement No. IV to be   executed by their duly authorized representatives, as of the date first above written.            Eurotank Amsterdam B.V.                      /s/ Jack de Moel   Name: Jack de Moel   Position: Managing Director   Date: 09 November 2015   Place: Amsterdam   Vitol SA                     /s/ David Fransen   Name: David Fransen   Position: Managing Director   Date: 09 November 2015   Place:
#### Daniel McElwain, Respondent, v. Charles Muldowney and others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Bockes, J.
Belknap,

June, 1896.

#### Hart *v.*Hart.

To constitute extreme cruelty as a cause of divorce there must be, as matter of law, direct bodily injury, either actual or threatened and reasonably to be apprehended.

Libel eor Divorce, on the ground of extreme cruelty. Facts found by the court. The libel alleged personal violence; but, so far as this charge was sustained by the libelant’s evidence, it appeared to have been condoned. The libel alleged, and the libelant’s evidence tended to prove, that the libelee had so behaved as to wholly destroy the libelant’s marital peace and happiness; that on divers occasions she had addressed him *479In language both offensive and vexatious, and the use of such language toward him had been her customary and. habitual practice ; that at different times she had accused him of marital infidelity and of having contracted and imparted to her a certain venereal disease, which accusations she knew were false and without foundation; that she had told him she hated him, that she wished he was dead, that she would poison him, that she would take his life. There was no allegation or evidence that the conduct complained of injured the libelant’s health or endangered his reason, or that he had any fear of injury from the libelee.

At the close of the libelant’s evidence, the court, on motion of the libelee, dismissed the libel on the ground that the facts proved did not, as matter of law, constitute extreme cruelty, and the libelant excepted.

*Jewell, Stone, Owen Martin,*for the plaintiff’.

*Jewett Plummer,*for the defendant.

Blodgett, J.

To constitute extreme cruelty as a cause of divorce, there must be, as matter of law, direct bodily injury, cither actual or threatened and reasonably to be apprehended. *Robinson*v. *Robinson,*66 N. H. 600, 607, 608.

In the present case these essentials are wholly lacking. The only act of personal violence alleged is found to have been condoned, and there is no reasonable apprehension of its repetition, or of any other bodily harm. In a word, giving the most favorable construction for the plaintiff, such of the acts and conduct complained of as are open to consideration fall far short of establishing legal cruelty within the statutory meaning as construed in this jurisdiction. *Robinson*v. *Robinson, supra; Jenness*v. *Jenness,*60 N. H. 211.

*Exception overruled.*

Parsons, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-10164 Conference Calendar

__________________ RODNEY GLEN RICE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus JURADO; STATE OF TEXAS, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:95-CV-245
- - - - - - - - - - June 26, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Rodney Glen Rice, prisoner #669372, appeals the district court's dismissal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the State of Texas and Jurado, the prison library supervisor. Rice contends that Jurado violated his constitutional right of access to the court by scheduling him for library usage at times that conflicted partially with Rice's class and other supervised activities.No. 96-10164 -2- We have examined Rice's arguments and the record and find no error in the reasons adopted by the district court. Rice v. Jurado , No. 2:95-CV-245 (N.D. Tex. Jan. 20, 1996). Rice's appeal is dismissed as frivolous. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Rice that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Rice is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously decided by this court. APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Exhibit 32.1

                             Multiband Corporation.
                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In  connection  with this Annual Report Form 10-K,  Multiband  Corporation
(the  "Company")  for the period ended  December  31, 2004,  I, James L. Mandel,
Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

1.    This Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and

2.    The information  contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,  in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


Date: April 15, 2005                    By: /s/ James L. Mandel
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32





FACT Corporation





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of FACT Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jacqueline Tucker, as Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: November 19,  2010
By:
/s/Jacqueline TuckerName:
Jacqueline TuckerTitle:
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

August 8, 2002

Before

Hon. William J. Bauer, Circuit Judge

Hon. Richard A. Posner, Circuit Judge

Hon. Michael S. Kanne, Circuit Judge

No. 01-3565

IN RE:

HIGH FRUCTOSE CORN

SYRUP ANTITRUST

LITIGATION,

APPEAL OF:

CLASS PLAINTIFFS.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Central District

of Illinois.

No. 95 C 1477

Michael M. Mihm, Judge.

ORDER

On page 20 of the slip opinion, issued on June 18, 2002, fifth line from the end of the

page, the words "and citric acid" are hereby ordered deleted.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1270 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 167
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1270

  To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed at 8th 
 Avenue and Mill Street in Eugene, Oregon, as the ``Wayne Lyman Morse 
                      United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2001

    Mr. Wyden (for himself and Mr. Smith of Oregon) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Environment and Public Works

                           September 25, 2001

              Reported by Mr. Jeffords, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed at 8th 
 Avenue and Mill Street in Eugene, Oregon, as the ``Wayne Lyman Morse 
                      United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WAYNE LYMAN MORSE UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The United States courthouse to be constructed at 8th Avenue and 
Mill Street in Eugene, Oregon, shall be known and designated as the 
``Wayne Lyman Morse United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Wayne Lyman Morse 
United States Courthouse.

                                                       Calendar No. 167

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1270

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed at 8th 
 Avenue and Mill Street in Eugene, Oregon, as the ``Wayne Lyman Morse 
                      United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 25, 2001

                       Reported without amendment
```
exhibit10-2april272016.htm


 


 


 


EXTENSION AGREEMENT


 







THIS EXTENSION AGREEMENT (“Extension Agreement”) shall attach to and be made a part of that certain Employment Agreement (“Employment Agreement”) made and entered into as of the 9th  day of October, 2014, by and between Radio One, Inc.(“Company”) and Peter D. Thompson“Employee”).







Company and Employee hereby mutually agree to renew and extend the Employment Agreement for an additional term of 2 years, commencing January 1, 2017 and ending December 31, 2018 (“Renewal Term”), unless earlier terminated pursuant to the provisions of Section 10 of the Employment Agreement.


 


In consideration of Employee’s consent to the Renewal Term, following the full execution of this Extension Agreement, Company shall pay to Employee a one-time Signing Bonus in the amount of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000), subject to applicable deductions. Employee agrees that if Employee’s employment with Company terminates prior to December 31, 2018, Employee shall repay Company a pro rata share of the Signing Bonus at the rate of one-thirty- second (1/32) for each month or portion of a month that Employee’s employment is less than thirty-two (32) months; except hat Employee shall not be required to repay Company the pro rata share of the Signing Bonus if Employee’s employment is terminated by Company for other than cause pursuant to Section 10(b) of the Employment Agreement. Employee further agrees that Company shall be entitled to withhold from any compensation otherwise due Employee the amount of any portion of the Signing Bonus required to be repaid to Company. 


 


Except as expressly set forth in this Extension Agreement, all other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement will remain as set forth therein.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Extension Agreement to be effective as of the 21st day of April, 2016.


 


 


 


RADIO ONE, INC.                       PETER D. THOMPSON




 


By:                               Signature:                                                                







            Linda J. Vilardo


 


 


Title:   Executive Vice President                  Address:      


                                     


 


 


Date:                            Date:
-80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/30

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.06 N 76.88 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■ ■

■

★

●

●

●

●

★

●

●

●

●
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated March 12, 2008, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements incorporated by reference in the Annual Report of United
Bancorp, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statements of United Bancorp, Inc. on Forms S-8 (file No. 33-123036 effective
February 28, 2005) and S-3 (file No. 333-136708 effective August 17, 2006).


/s/ BKD, LLP

BKD, LLP

Cincinnati, Ohio
March 28, 2008
No. 563, Misc.

#### Gluckstern *v.*New York.

Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 99.1
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**** **

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vail Banks, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lisa M. Dillon, President (principal executive officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
- T he Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

  /s/ Lisa M. Dillon              Lisa M. DillonPresidentNovember 12, 2002
From: Hannah Brower

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 2:09:36 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Hannah Brower

New Orleans, LA

New Orleans, LA 70125
Appendix 11 

COP

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

-40 -30 -20 -10 0

Evaporating Temperature (degC)

COP
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 2320

In re: JESSE UPCHURCH , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

.

Submitted : December 21 , 2017 Decided: December 27, 2017

Before WILKINSON and D UNCAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition transferr ed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Jesse Upchurch , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM Jesse Upchurch has filed a petition for an original writ of habeas corpus challenging his North Carolina conviction s for driving while intoxicated and assault on a law enforcement officer and seeking immediate release. We ordinarily decline to entertain original habeas peti tions under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012), and this case provides no reason to depart from the general rule. Accordingly, in the interests of justice we
transfer the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North
Carolina. See 28 U. S.C. § 2241(b); Fed. R. App. P. 22(a). We deny Upchurch’s motion
for bail without prejudice and defer the disposition of Upchurch’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis to the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal cont entions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION TRANSFERRED
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2012-0041 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-167-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Central Command

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  ABOUT US    -  COMMAND PRIORITIES             
  -  LEADERSHIP             
  -  COMPONENT COMMANDS             
  -  HISTORY             
  -  POSTURE STATEMENT 
-  CENTCOM AOR    -  CENTCOM COALITION 
-  OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES    -  USMTM 
-  CONTACT    -  OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT             
  -  COMMUNITY RELATIONS             
  -  THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE             
  -  INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL             
  -  MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL 
-  MEDIA    -  SOCIAL MEDIA             
  -  NEWS ARTICLES             
  -  PRESS RELEASES             
  -  STATEMENTS             
  -  IMAGERY             
  -  VIDEOS             
  -  TRANSCRIPTS 
-  VISITORS AND PERSONNEL    -  FAMILY CENTER             
  -  FAMILY READINESS             
  -  CENTCOM WEBMAIL             
  -  SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY             
  -  ACCOUNTABILITY             
  -  EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS             
  -  USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS             
  -  FOIA LIBRARY             
  -  INNOVATION OASIS             
  -  WELCOME GUIDE 

HomeMEDIANEWS ARTICLESNews Article View

# Qatari and American Soldiers Build Camaraderie at Weapons Range

By 1st Lt. Stefan TenorioArea Support Group - Qatar

**CAMP AS SAYLIYAH, QATAR -- **

                A U.S. Soldier with the 578th Brigade Engineer Battalion fires down range as a Qatari safety observes his target at Al-Ghalail range, Sep. 12, 2018. The range provided a unique opportunity for Soldiers to build rapport with the Qatari soldiers from a Qatari base near Camp As Sayliyah. (U.S. Army photo by 1st. Lt. Stefan Tenorio)            

                Qatari and American Soldiers Build Camaraderie at Weapons Range            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: 1st Lt. Stefan Tenorio

VIRIN: 180912-A-JD162-961B

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT