alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1


 





LINE OF CREDIT PROMISSORY NOTE


 


	$600,000	October 1, 2009


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, RC-1, Inc., ("Borrower")
promises to pay to the order of General Pacific Partners, LLC ("Lender"), a California Limited Liability Company,
the principal sum of Six Hundred Thousand Dollars ($600,000), or so much thereof as may be disbursed to, or for the benefit
of the Borrower by Lender in Lender's sole and absolute discretion. It is the intent of the Borrower and Lender hereunder to create
a line of credit agreement between Borrower and Lender whereby Borrower may borrow up to $300,000 or 50% from Lender; provided,
however, that Lender has no obligation to lend Borrower any amounts hereunder and the decision to lend such money lies in the sole
and complete discretion of the Lender.


 


INTEREST & PRINCIPAL: The unpaid principal of this
line of credit shall bear simple interest at the rate of eight percent (8%) per annum. Interest shall be calculated based
on the principal balance as may be adjusted from time to time to reflect additional advances made hereunder. Interest on the unpaid
balance of this Note shall accrue monthly but shall not be due and payable until such time as when the principal balance of this
Note becomes due and payable. The principal balance of this Note shall be due and payable bi-annually. There shall be no
penalty for early repayment of all or any part of the principal.


 


SECURITY: This Note shall be secured by a mortgage ("Mortgage")
upon all property owned by the Borrower located in the state of California%


 


DEFAULT: The Borrower shall be in default of this Note
on the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) the Borrower shall fail to meet its obligation to make the required principal
or interest payments hereunder. (ii) the Borrower shall be dissolved or liquidated; (iii) the Borrower shall make an assignment
for the benefit of creditors or shall be unable to, or shall admit in writing their inability to pay their debts as they become
due; (iv) the Borrower shall commence any case, proceeding, or other action under any existing or future law of any jurisdiction
relating to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or relief of debtors, or any such action shall be commenced against the undersigned;
(v) the Borrower shall suffer a receiver to be appointed for it or for any of its property or shall suffer a garnishment, attachment,
levy or execution.


 


REMEDIES: Upon default of this Note, Lender may declare
the entire amount due and owing hereunder to be immediately due and payable. Lender may also use all remedies in law and in equity
to enforce and collect the amount owed under this Note.


 


Borrower hereby waives demand, presentment, notice of dishonor,
diligence in collecting, grace and notice of protest.
From: marvhodges@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:31:30 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Marvin Hodges

Pebble Beach, CA 93953
Page | of 1

fi - eae) ) AUG 3 1
ssinG DIVISION, IEG (2039/10 2att

LEGAL PROCESSING
TION & RE! [As of: August 31, 2011
PUBLICA BRANCH Received: August 12, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: August 31, 2011

Tracking No. 80edfd3e

‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0089
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Laura
Address:
3551 Oakcrest pl
crown point,

General Comment

Tam concerned that certain religious employers may be allowed to opt out of the requirements.
All women should have access to contraceptive coverage, regardless of where they work.”

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=0900.... 8/31/2011
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.57 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: kaoliver@express-news.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:51:37 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kathy Oliver

San Antonio, TX 78233
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# AGENCY:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (BSC, NCIPC); September 20, 2023, first session from 1 p.m. to 2:30 p.m., EDT (OPEN), and second session from 2:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m., EDT (CLOSED), in the original                         **Federal Register**                         notice.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Christopher R. Harper, Ph.D., Designated Federal Officer, Board of Scientific Counselors, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Mailstop S-1069, Atlanta, Georgia 30341. Telephone: (404) 718-8330; Email:                         *ncipcbsc@cdc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The virtual meeting was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 31, 2023, 88 FR 49463-49464.                

This meeting is being canceled in its entirety.

                    The Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                

Kalwant Smagh,

Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2023-19666 Filed 9-11-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001035826
<NAME> NETBANK
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,576,102
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            33,416,433
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 80,310,559
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    364,052,632
<ALLOWANCE>                                  4,312,285
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             526,463,208
<DEPOSITS>                                 332,678,334
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          5,036,752
<LONG-TERM>                                 45,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        85,985
<OTHER-SE>                                 143,662,137
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             526,463,208
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,011,818
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,214,914
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               331,118
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,557,850
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,023,760
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,559,707
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        2,998,143
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   49,806
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,147,536
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,046,516
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     691,516
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   691,516
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   2.681
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   389,626
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,472,364
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  388,490
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            4,312,285
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         4,312,285
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
From: Jessica Baker

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Support for Women

Date: Saturday, August 13, 2011 2:42:14 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 527 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 19, 2002.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the resolution (H. Res. 524) expressing the sense of the 
House that Congress should complete action on the Permanent Death Tax Repeal Act 
of 2002, and for consideration of the resolution. The resolution shall be 
considered as read for amendment. The resolution shall be debatable for one hour 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Ways and Means. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the resolution to final adoption without intervening motion.
    Sec. 2. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the resolution (H. Res. 525) expressing the sense of the 
House of Representatives that the 107th Congress should complete action on and 
present to the President, before September 30, 2002, legislation extending and 
strengthening the successful 1996 welfare reforms. The resolution shall be 
considered as read for amendment. The resolution shall be debatable for one hour 
equally divided among and controlled by the chairmen and ranking minority 
members of the Committees on Ways and Means and Education and the Workforce. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution to final 
adoption without intervening motion.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 23-3152

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Leonard Fisher, also known as Leonard Fisher, Jr. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Eastern

____________ Submitted: May 1, 2024 Filed: May 6, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________ Before GRUENDER, ERICKSON, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Leonard Fisher appeals the sentence the district court 1 imposed after a jury found him guilty of a firearm charge. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has

1 The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), challenging the

substantive reasonableness of the sentence. Upon careful review, we conclude that the district court did not impose a substantively unreasonable sentence, as the court properly considered the factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), and did not err in weighing the relevant factors. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (substantive reasonableness of sentence reviewed for abuse of discretion; abuse of discretion occurs when court fails to consider relevant factor, gives significant weight to improper or irrelevant factor, or commits clear error of judgment in weighing appropriate factors). We have reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
REb- 1203S J-/6 Page | of 1

LEGAL PRO,
Pl IBLICATION ENG DIVISION As of: August 31, 2011

BRANCH EGULATIONS Received: August 15, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: August 31, 2011

Tracking No. 80ee180b

‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: [RS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0054
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Sylvia
Address:
WA,

General Comment

I strongly support the new policy requiring health-insurance plans to cover birth control without a
co-pay, CMS-9992-IFC2. This is an important step in improving to women's health care in this
country.

I also want you to know that I am concerned that certain religious employers may be allowed to
opt out of the requirements. All women should have access to contraceptive coverage, regardless
of where they work.

I repeat, ALL WOMEN should have adequate access to contraception and it should be covered by
health insurance. The benefits for our country as well as individual citizens will be enormous. A
woman who can plan when to have a family is able to participate in society more fully. Allowing
women to space their pregnancies contributes to healthy childbearing. And ultimately, fewer
unintended pregnancies can reduce the need for abortion.

As a woman, a scientist, a mother and a grandmother, I want to commend you for following
science-based recommendations and making women's health a priority.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=0900... 8/31/2011
From: Jessica Thomason

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Access to Contraception

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 3:13:31 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Jessica Thomason, M.A.

Cool Girls, Inc. Project Coordinator

Community Psychology Doctoral Candidate

Georgia State University

P.O. Box 5010

Atlanta, GA 30302

404-413-6340

jthomason4@student.gsu.edu