alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

         I, Steven Malin, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of A.B. Watley Group
Inc.

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have;

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this
quarterly report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

         Date: February 9, 2005           /s/ Steven Malin
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Steven Malin
                                          Principal Executive Officer
<PAGE>




                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                Certification of the Principal Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  of  A.B.  Watley  Group  Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-Q for the three months ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Robert  Malin, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:



     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                 /s/ Robert Malin
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 Robert Malin
                                                 Principal Financial Officer
                                                 Date: April 15, 2003




                                      -24-
<PAGE>
Order entered April 20, 2021 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00231-CV 

IN RE BURNCO TEXAS, LLC, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 298th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-05488 

ORDER 

Before Justices Osborne, Pedersen, III, and Goldstein 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for 

writ of mandamus, and we DENY relator’s emergency motion for temporary relief 

as moot. 

/s/ LESLIE OSBORNE 

 JUSTICE
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7002** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. SHANIESTA KENAY BANKS, a/k/a Shaniesta Keene , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. ( 2:13

- cr - 00157

- RGD

- TEM

- 1; 2:16

- cv - 00285

- RGD )

Submitted : December 14, 2016 Decided: December 27, 2016

Before WYNN and DIAZ , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Shaniesta Kenay Banks, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Marie Yusi, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Shaniesta Kenay Banks seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice o r judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) ; see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently review ed the record and conclude that Banks has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispe nse with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are3 adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
From: jwb@frc.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Please Oppose the Contraceptive Mandate

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 9:15:09 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jared Bridges

Washington, DC 20001
**Exhibit 3.1**

 

**[STAMP]**

 

CERTIFICATEOF AMENDMENT

TOTHE

AMENDEDAND RESTATED ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

OF

ONSTAGE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.,

aNevada corporation

 

The undersigned herebycertify that:

 

1.             They are the duly elected and acting President andSecretary of On Stage Entertainment, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the“Corporation”); and

 

2.             Section 1 of Article IV of the Amended and RestatedArticles of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby amended to read in itsentirety as follows:

 

“Section1.  Number and Class.  The total number of shares of capital stockthat the Corporation shall have authority to issue is One Hundred Ten Million(110,000,000), consisting of One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares of“Common Stock,” $.01 par value per share (the “Common Stock”), and Ten Million(10,000,000) shares of “Preferred Stock,” par value $0.1 per share (the“Preferred Stock”) in one or more series. The Board of Directors is expressly authorized to provide for the issueof any or all of the shares of Preferred Stock in one or more series, and tofix the number of shares and to determine or alter for each such series, suchvoting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such designations,preferences and relative participating, optional or other rights and suchqualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof as shall be stated andexpressed in the resolution or resolutions adopted by the Board of Directorsfor the issue of such shares and as may be permitted by the Nevada RevisedStatutes.  The Board of Directors isalso expressly authorized to increase or decrease (but not below the number ofshares of any such series then outstanding) the number of shares of any seriesof Preferred Stock subsequent to the issue of shares of that series.  In case the number of shares of any suchseries shall be so decreased, the shares constituting such decrease shallresume the status they had prior to the adoption of the resolution originallyfixing the number of shares of such series.”

 

3.             This Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles ofIncorporation was duly approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporation.

 

4.             This Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles ofIncorporation was duly adopted and approved by the stockholders of theCorporation in accordance with the applicable provisions of Section 78.320 and78.390 of the Nevada Revised Statutes by the holders of a majority of theoutstanding shares of capital stock of the Corporation.

 

----

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theCorporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by Timothy J. Parrott andChristopher R. Grobl, the President and Secretary, respectively, as of this12th day of March 2001.

 

 
|   | /s/ Timothy J. Parrott   |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | Timothy J. Parrott       |
|   | President                |
|   |                     |
|   | /s/ Christopher R. Grobl |   |
|   | Christopher R. Grobl     |
|   | Secretary                |

 

2

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

 
| The undersigned hereby certifies, in my capacity as an officer of NSTAR, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   (i)                                                                                                                                                                                                   | the enclosed Quarterly Report of NSTAR on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

  |
|   (ii)                                                                                                                                                                                                  | the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of NSTAR.

  |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |   |

 
| Dated: October 29, 2004      |   | By:   | /s/ JAMES J. JUDGE       |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                  |   |            | James J. Judge                                         |
|                                                  |   |            | Senior Vice President,                                 |
|                                                  |   |            | Treasurer and Chief                                    |
|                                                  |   |            | Financial Officer                                      |
From: Margie Jacobsen

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Support Access to Preventive Care and Contraception!

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 1:42:11 AM

Support Access to Preventive Care and

Contraception!

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking

you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.”

If “religious refusal”are expanded, certain employers would be exempt from

having to provide coverage for contraceptive services to their female

employees if the employer is opposed to contraception. Religious refusal

provisions allow the decision makers at “religious employers” to determine

what sort of contraception, if any, their female employees will have access to.

If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal

exemption provisions.
##### 



Exhibit 21.1 IDENTIX INCORPORATED
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES As of August 1, 2004 Wholly-owned Subsidiary:
    
    Place of Incorporation:Visionics Corporation
    
    Delaware, USALegislative Demographic Services, Inc.
    
    Delaware, USAIdenticator Technology, Inc.
    
    Delaware, USAiTrust, Inc.
    
    Nevada, USAIdentix International, Inc.
    
    California, USABiometric Applications & Technology, Inc.
    
    Missouri, USAIdentix Australia Pty Ltd.
    
    New South Wales, AustraliaIdentix Identification Services
    
    Delaware, USA
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7429

JOEY DUANE SCOTT , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. ERICA A. HOOKS , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. Catherine C. Eagles , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv - 00174

- CCE

- JEP )

Submitted : April 19, 2018 Decided: April 23, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Joey Duane Scott, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 P ER CURIAM: Joey Duane Scott seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dis missing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a subs tantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)

. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must
demonstrat e both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Scott has not made the requ isite showing. Accordingly, although we grant Scott’s motion s for leave to file a supplemental informal brief, we deny his motions to appoint counsel, to remand the case for an evidentiary hearing, to review the appeal de novo, and for bail or re lease pending appeal, deny a certificate of appealability , and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

SITKI OZKARDES, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4194

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed July 12, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Chris Helinger, Judge.

Sitki Ozkardes, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will be held via teleconference.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, October 12, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Conchata Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 214-413-6550.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Communications Project Committee will be held Thursday, October 12, 2023, at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Conchata Holloway. For more information, please contact Conchata Holloway at 1-888-912-1227 or 214-413-6550, or write TAP Office, 1114 Commerce St., MC 1005, Dallas, TX 75242 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda includes a committee discussion involving Increase E-filing of Forms/Tax Returns, Entities with multiple EINs, and Effectively measuring outreach.                

Dated: September 6, 2023.

Kevin Brown,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2023-19749 Filed 9-12-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.27 MB)
 
 Operation Inherent Resolve U.S. Central Command
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil