alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1158

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the active business

definition relating to distributions of stock and securities of controlled

corporations.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 10, 2001

Mr. BREAUX introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify

the active business definition relating to distributions

of stock and securities of controlled corporations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF ACTIVE BUSINESS DEFINI4 TION.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 355(b)(2) of the Internal

6 Revenue Code of 1986 (defining active conduct of a trade

7 or business) is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing: ‘‘For purposes of subparagraph (A), all corpora9 tions that are members of the same affiliated group (as
2

•S 1158 IS

1 defined in section 1504(a)) shall be treated as a single

2 corporation.’’.

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

4 this section shall apply to distributions or transfers after

5 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
----

| Delaware                                            | 37-1105865                                |
|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| (State      or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS      Employer Identification Number) |

|   |   |   | Written      communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR      230.425)                  |
|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |                                                                                                             |
|   |   |   | Soliciting material      pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR  240.14a-12)                     |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                             |
|   |   |   | Pre-commencement      communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR      240.14d-2(b)) |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                             |
|   |   |   | Pre-commencement      communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR      240.13e-4(c)) |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                             |

----

| c)     | Exhibits: |   |
|--------|-----------|--------|
|   |      | 99.1   | 3rd      Quarter 2008 Results Press Release dated October 21,  2008 |
|   |      |   |   |
|   |      |   |   |

| Date:  October      21, 2008 |           By:  /s/ Michael G.      Sposato                                                      |
|----------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   |                       Michael      G. Sposato |
|                                   |                       Secretary               |

----
From: garamirez3@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:23:17 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

James Ramirez

Santa Maria, CA 93454
#### The Putnam County Chemical Works, Respondent, v Frederick Jochen, Appellant.

Order modified as directed in opinion, and affirmed as modified. Opinion by

Brady, J.
REG |2 049)- JO Page 1 of 1

EGAL PROCESSING DIVISION
PUBLICATION. & REGULATIONS As of: August 31, 2011
BRANCH Received: August 11, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: August 31, 2011

Tracking No. 80edde20

(Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0076
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Joan Teresa Paul
Address:

730 Lynkirk Lane
Kirkwood, MO, 63122
Email: joantpaul@charter.net

Phone: 314-822-7467

General Comment

«Please don't force me to pay for abortion-inducing drugs with my healthcare premiums;
*The HHS mandate will undermine Missouri law which allows people of faith to opt out of
abortion-inducing emergency contraception and birth control coverage;

Catholic institutions should not be forced to provide emergency contraception that can cause
abortion and birth control, because use of these drugs violates Church teaching;

*Pregnancy is not a disease;

«Preserve the rights of conscience and religious liberty for people of faith.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectlId=0900... 8/31/2011
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained insuch report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

This 9th day of November, 2004.

 

 
|   /s/ Douglas K. Freeman   |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                 |
|   /s/ Steven F. Herbert    |   |
| Chief Financial Executive            |

 

----
From: Kate Loree

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:15:09 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Kate Loree

5060 Kester Avenue 203

Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Journal Register Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, James W. Hall, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Julie A. Beck, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ James W. HallJames W. HallChairman and Chief Executive OfficerMay 9, 2008


/s/ Julie A. BeckJulie A. BeckExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 9, 2008


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as may be expressly set forth by specific reference in any such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Journal Register Company and will be retained by Journal Register Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



34



---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                       New Century Financial Corporation
                                 
                Statement Re Computation of Per Share Earnings

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                    Three Months Ended March 31,
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                        1999            1998
                                                    ------------    ------------
<S>                                                 <C>             <C>
Basic:                                              
                                                    
Net earnings                                        $ 9,812,000     $ 6,233,000
                                                    ===========     ============
                                                                     
    Weighted average common shares outstanding       14,278,901      14,004,153
                                                    -----------     ------------
                                                                     
Earnings per share                                  $      0.69     $      0.45
                                                    ===========     ============
                                                                     
Diluted:                                                             
                                                                     
Net earnings                                        $ 9,812,000     $ 6,233,000
                                                    ===========     ============
                                                                     
Weighted average number of common and common                         
  equivalent shares outstanding:                                     
    Weighted average common shares outstanding       14,278,901      14,004,153
    Dilutive effect of convertible preferred stock, 
    stock options and warrants, after application     3,707,345         960,281
                                                    -----------     ------------
                                                     17,986,245      14,964,434
                                                    ===========     ============
                                                                     
Earnings per share                                  $      0.55     $      0.42
                                                    ===========     ============
</TABLE>
ExpressJet Holdings, Inc.




	
Exhibit 10.4










AMENDMENT No 4 TO LETTER OF AGREEMENT GPJ-004/96


This Amendment No. 4 to Letter of Agreement GPJ-004/96, dated as of January 12, 2004 (this “Amendment 4”) relates to Letter of Agreement GPJ-004/96 dated August 5, 1996, as amended from time to time (“Letter 004/96”) between EMBRAER - Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronáutica S.A. (“EMBRAER”) and ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., formerly known as
New ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. (as assignee from ExpressJet Airlines, Inc. formerly known as Continental Express, Inc.) (“BUYER”), and
concerns Purchase Agreement No. GPJ-003/96 (the “Purchase Agreement”) dated
August 5, 1996 as amended from time to time. This Amendment 4 is between EMBRAER and BUYER, collectively referred to herein as the
“PARTIES”.





This Amendment 4 constitutes an amendment and modification of the Letter Agreement GPJ-004/96. All
capitalized terms used in this Amendment 4 and not defined herein, shall have the meaning given in the Purchase Agreement, and in case of any conflict between this Amendment 4,
Letter 004/96 and the Purchase Agreement, the terms of this
Amendment 4 shall control.





This Amendment 4 sets forth further agreements between EMBRAER and BUYER relative to


"[CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO
A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]"





NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, EMBRAER and BUYER hereby agree as follows:





1.    The text of
Article 12 of Amendment No. 2 to Letter 004/96 shall be entirely deleted and replaced as follows:  
"[CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT]"





2.    All other terms and conditions of the Letter 004/96, which are not specifically amended by this Amendment 4
shall remain in full force and effect without any change.





[Intentionally left in blank]




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, EMBRAER and BUYER, by their duly authorized officers, have entered into and executed
this Amendment 4 to be effective as of the date first written above.









	
EMBRAER - Empresa Brasileira

 de Aeronáutica S.A.

		
EXPRESSJET AIRLINES, INC.


	
 

	
 

	
	
By:           /s/ Satoshi
Yokota                                   

		
By:            /s/ Frederick S.
Cromer                          


	
Name:     Satoshi Yokota

		
Name:       Frederick S. Cromer


	
Title:        Executive VP, Development and Industry

		
Title:          VP and Chief Financial Officer


	
 

		
	
By:           /s/ Flavio
Rimoli                                       

		
	
Name:     Flavio Rimoli

		
	
Title:        Sr. VP, Airline Market

		
	
 

		
	
Date:       March 19, 2004

		
Date:         March 30, 2004


	
Place:      Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP

		
Place:       Houston, TX, USA


	
 

		
	
Witness:  /s/ Erika L.
Natali                                      

		
Witness:   /s/ Kristy A.
Nicholas                               


	
Name:     Erika Lulai Natali

		
Name:       Kristy A. Nicholas
From: Dior Vargas

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 9:27:31 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Dior Vargas

4 East 107th St Apt 18G

New York, NY 10029
SEP 2 20H REG-]20341- /o Bos TEHD

LEGAL PROCESSING DI ViSiON

PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS Aslor|Semremben 02,20
BRANCH Received: August 10, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 02, 2011

Tracking No. 80edc9cb

(Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of Preventive
Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services under Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0139
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Michael Neil Holt
Address:

6231 61st Ave SE

Snohomish, WA, 98290
Email: m.iostreams@gmail.com
Submitter's Representative: Rick Larsen
Organization: n/a
Government Agency Type: State
Government Agency: n/a

General Comment

1 am concerned that certain groups such as NARAL, are seeking to include religious employers in the
requirement to provide coverage which includes birth control for employees, especially drugs designed to
cause abortion.

Contraceptives are not a medical necessity, nor is pregnancy a disease. Birth control is already widely
available, and publicly funded programs already provide for women who cannot afford it.

Tam concerned that forcing religious employers to provide this redundant access to a non-necessity, is
designed solely for the purpose of further eroding the faith based heritage of our country, and is not at all
designed to address any true needs.

Further, that this requirement not only violates the said employers rights, but also what most perceive as the
"separation of church and state".

Please do not allow this to requirement to be forced on religious employers.

Best regards,
Michael Holt

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000... 9/2/2011
a a . Py lofl
AUG 21 REG- 1 2085 1-/6 “we

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION
OS & peers iad As of: August 31,2011

Received: August 09, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION __ Posted: August 31, 2011

Tracking No. 80ede3da

‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0051
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Patricia Marie Clark-Varga
Address:

574 Castle Blvd.

Akron, OH, 44313
Email: patcv1984@yahoo.com

General Comment

Contraception (medications and devices) and sterilization of healthy women to prevent
childbearing are opposed by the Roman Catholic Church as well as by other Christian, Jewish and
Muslim religions.

None of these methods treats an illness or disease.

We fully support Church teaching and want to see this RULE REMOVED from government-
provided health care.

WE DO NOT WANT OUR CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS, NOR ANY

RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS, TO BE FORCED TO VIOLATE THEIR CONSCIENCES BY
HAVING TO PROVIDE THESE "SERVICES."

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=0900... 8/31/2011
file:///C|/..._List_29-08-2011_12-55-54-352/Document%20List%2029-08-2011%2012-55-54-352_docs/EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0067.html[8/29/2011 2:42:38 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: August 29, 2011

Received: August 26, 2011

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 80efe011

Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0018

Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of

Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0018-0002

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services under

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: EBSA-2010-0018-DRAFT-0067

Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Kris Miller

Address:

POB 554

Frisco, 81657

Email: kmiller@vailgov.com

General Comment

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the recent amendments to the PPACA regarding

women's health care. As a human resources professional (for a local government agency) who is

responsible for balancing the needs of both the employer and the employee, I am in a unique

position to evaluate the pros and cons of this guidance. 

I applaud the agencies for ensuring that health care services are available and affordable for all

Americans - especially women and children. However, the cost sharing component the rental of

breast feeding equipment is my major concern with the recent amendment. 

Although I support the encouragement of nursing infants by new mothers, I don’t support the health

plans covering 100% of the cost for the equipment. Being a mom who breast fed my children, I can

attest that there is no equipment required to be successful. While the equipment I used was

convenient for me, it is not necessary. This convenience is clearly beneficial to working mothers like

me, but that alone should not dictate that health plans are the party responsible for the costs. While

requiring plans to cover this equipment (similar to other durable medical equipment)may be a step in

the right direction, there should be a cost-share decision by the plan. I’ve found that if someone has

a little “skin in the game”, like a co-pay, they are more likely to use the services. For example, if I

have to pay to use the health club, I’m more likely to workout there regularly than if I’m not writing

that check every month. I would hate to see every mother get the equipment and only half ever use

it, thus wasting plan dollars that could have offset expenses elsewhere. This is especially true in a

health plan that is subsidized by taxes, such as the one provided by my local government employer.

Also, as both a taxpayer and HR manager for a government organization, I am concerned about the

taxpayer’s full 100% responsibility in this area.