alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**SECTION302**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, John M. Robbins, certifythat:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of AmNet Mortgage, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on suchevaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a) All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b) any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: May  17, 2004      |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
|                     |
| /s/ John M.  Robbins     |   |
| John M.  Robbins         |
| Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [FR ID 170186]

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Federal Communications Commission published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of August 29, 2023, concerning a new Matching Program. The document provided an incorrect effective date and ending date of a new matching agreement between the Federal Communications Commission and the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Lori Alexiou, (202) 418-2001, or                         *privacy@fcc.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of August 29, 2023, in FR Doc. 88-59523, on page 59523, in the third column, correct the                     **DATES**                     caption to read:                

# DATES:

Written comments are due on or before September 28, 2023. This computer matching program will commence on October 15, 2023, and will conclude on April 14, 2025.

Dated: September 6, 2023.

Federal Communications Commission.

Katura Jackson,

Federal Register Liaison Officer, Office of the Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-19613 Filed 9-11-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of AmNet Mortgage, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JudithA. Berry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| August 16,  2004 |                     |
|-----------------------|--------------------------|
|                  |                     |
|                  | /s/  Judith A. Berry     |   |
|                  | Judith  A. Berry         |
|                  | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
From: Michael Collier

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Ensure women have access to quality preventive care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 10:51:51 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new law

and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access

to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive

services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some

groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so

hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement,

even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger

exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

<img src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/mesg/tsmileys2/04.gif">  Michael J.

Collier
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To the Board of Directors
Hills Bancorporation


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February
3, 1999 with respect to the  financial  statements of Hills  Bancorporation  and
subsidiaries  included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hills Bancorporation
for the year ended  December 31, 1998 in Registrant  Statement  No.  33-73606 on
Form S-8 filed  December 30, 1993 and  Registrant  Statement No. 33-2657 on Form
S-8 filed January 10, 1986.


                                             /s/ McGladrey & Pullen, LLP



Iowa City, Iowa
March 22, 1999
No. 458.

#### Wiman, Warden, et al. *v.*Argo.

*MacDonald Gallion,*Attorney General of Alabama, and *John C. Tyson III,*Assistant Attorney General, for petitioners.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### Courtlandt Babcock, Appellant, *v.*Richard H. Swartwout et al., Copartners under the Firm Name of Swartwout & Appenzellar, Respondents.

(Submitted February 24, 1913;

decided March 4, 1913.)

Motion to amend remittitur denied, with ten dollars costs. (See 207 N. Y. 650.)
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2008-1235, -1236, -1237 

LENCCO RACING CO., INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

JAMES JOLLIFFE, 

 Defendant, 

and 

MICRO BELMONT ENGINEERING, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

ARCTCO, INC. (now known as Arctic Cat, Inc.), 

 Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

BLACK MAGIC MOTOR SPORTS, INC., 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

Carl A. Hjort, III, The Bilicki Law Firm, P.C., of Jamestown, New York, argued for 

plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Byron A. Bilicki. 

Terence J. Linn, Van Dyke, Gardner, Linn & Burkhart, LLP, of Grand Rapids, 

Michigan, argued for defendants-appellees Micro Belmont Engineering and Black Magic 

Motor Sports, Inc. With him on the brief were Karl T. Ondersma, and Stephen B. Salai, 

Harter Secrest & Emery LLP, of Rochester, New York, for defendant-appellee Black Magic 

Motor Sports, Inc. 

Lawrence D. Graham, Black Lowe & Graham, PLLC, of Seattle, Washington, 

argued for defendant-appellee Artco, Inc. With him on the brief was Douglas A. Grady. 

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan 

Judge Robert Holmes Bell 
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

2008-1235, -1236, -1237 

LENCCO RACING CO., INC., 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

V. 

JAMES JOLLIFFE, 

Defendant, 

and 

MICRO BELMONT ENGINEERING, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

ARCTCO, INC. (now known as Arctic Cat, Inc.), 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

BLACK MAGIC MOTOR SPORTS, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

Judgment 

ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Western District of 

 Michigan 

In CASE NO(S). 1:97-CV-137, 1:97-CV-138 and 1:97-CV-139. 

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

Per Curiam (RADER, SCHALL, and DYK, Circuit Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 
 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED January 8, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly______________________

 Jan Horbaly, Clerk
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 2772

_____________________________ C ORY K ELSER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Esca mbia County

. Jan Shackelford , Judge

. December 27, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. See Perez v. State , 919 So. 2d 347, 359 (Fla. 2005) (noting that an issue never presented to the trial court in a motion to suppress or in the corresponding hearing is not pr operly preserved for appellate review ).

O STERHAUS , W INOKUR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Laurel Cornell Niles, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Barbara Debelius, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
October 24, 1962.

No. 340.

#### Foote *v.*Schwemler, Trustee in Bankruptcy.

*Edwin W. Brouse*for petitioner.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.
99–008

107TH CONGRESS REPORT " HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ! 2d Session 107–694

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 111, MAKING CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR 

THE FISCAL YEAR 2003

SEPTEMBER 25, 2002.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 550] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 550, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of House Joint Resolution 111, making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2003, 

and for other purposes, under a closed rule. The rule provides one 

hour of debate in the House equally divided and controlled by the 

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. 

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the 

joint resolution. Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit.

Æ
#### Victor Vervaeke et al., Appellants, *v.*James C. Fargo, as President of the American Express Company, Respondent.

*Vervaeke*v. Fargo, 142 App. Div. 928, affirmed.

(Argued January 16,1913;

decided February 4, 1913.)

Appeal from a judgment entered January 30, 1911, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, overruling plaintiff’s exceptions, ordered to be heard in the first instance by the Appellate Division, denying a motion for a new trial and directing judgment for defendant upon the verdict directed in his favor by the trial court, in an action to recover for damage to horses while being transported by defendant and alleged to have been occasioned by its negligence.

*L. P. Hancock*for appellants.

*Evan Hollister*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J.,Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Collin and Hogan, JJ. Notsitting: Chase, J.
From: Edh Stanley

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Accept the recommendations of the AAUW

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:27:14 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking

you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for

all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions

even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal

exemption provisions.
NUMBER 13-16-00403-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

JEREMY THAD NORTHCUTT, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

of Bell County, Texas.

O R D E R

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Jeremy Thad Northcutt, appeals a conviction for assault.1 The court 

reporter, Terry Johnston, filed exhibit volume 9 with this Court on October 7, 2016. Upon 

 

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals in Austin pursuant to a 

docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 

(West, Westlaw through 2015 R.S.). 
2

receiving the exhibit volume, the reporter was notified that the exhibit volume was not in 

compliance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. On October 24, 2016, the 

Clerk of the Court notified the reporter that the exhibit volume was marked received and 

directed the reporter to file an amended exhibit volume.

Appendix C of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 2(e) requires that in 

exhibit volumes, the court reporter must create bookmarks to mark the first page of each 

exhibit document. Rule 2(f) provides that in the event of a material violation of this rule 

in the preparation of a reporter’s record, on motion of a party or on the court’s own 

initiative, the appellate court may require the court reporter to amend the reporter’s record 

or to prepare a new reporter’s record in proper form. 

The reporter has failed to file an exhibit volume containing bookmarks as required 

by Appendix C of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 2(e). Accordingly, the 

reporter, Terry Johnston, is hereby ORDERED to file exhibit volume 9 with bookmarks on 

or before January 13, 2017. 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

4th day of January, 2017.
From: dan buck

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Monday, August 08, 2011 3:21:47 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

dan buck

1351 sherburne ave

st. paul, mn 55104
From: nhanson48@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Support Access to Contraception

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 4:11:42 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Sincerely,

Natalie Hanson

1815 Briarwood Dr.

Lansing, MI 48917
EXHIBIT 99.3



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of New Century Financial Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Brad A. Morrice, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    BRAD A. MORRICE





Brad A. Morrice

President and Chief Operating Officer

May 14, 2003





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to New Century and will be retained by New Century and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



The foregoing certification accompanied the Form 10-Q filing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. It is being reproduced herein for information only. It is
not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of New Century, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general
incorporation language in such filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Parole Commission

# DATE AND TIME:

 Thursday, September 7, 2023, at 1:30 p.m.

# PLACE: 

U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE, 3rd Floor, Washington, DC.

# STATUS: 

Open.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Approval of July 1, 2023, Quarterly Meeting Minutes.

2. Updates since July Quarterly Meeting from the Acting Chairman, Commissioner, Acting Chief of Staff/Case Operations Administrator, Case Services Administrator, Executive Officer, and General Counsel.

3. Discussion regarding potential change in DC Termination Guidelines.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Jacquelyn Graham, Staff Assistant to the Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission, 90 K Street NE, 3rd Floor, Washington, DC 20530, (202) 346-7010.

Dated: August 31, 2023.

Patricia K. Cushwa,

Chairman (Acting), U.S. Parole Commission.

[FR Doc. 2023-19171 Filed 8-31-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 4410-31-P