alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Ron Greulich

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Thursday, August 04, 2011 7:58:02 AM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Ron Greulich
Fortville, Indiana
From: Catherine Epstein

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you!

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:41:40 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I cannot thank you enough for your recent decision to cover the full cost of contraception, with no copay, beginning in August 2012.

Amidst what sometimes feels like a chronic degrading of women's health in federal policy, this decision

places a much-needed priority on family health. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and

making contraception available to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will

significantly reduce long-term health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Catherine Epstein

125 Lafayette Ave

2A

Brooklyn, NY 11217
No. 247, Misc.

#### Miller *v.*Pate, Warden.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.

*Donald Page Moore*for petitioner.

*William G. Clark, Attorney*General of Illinois, and *William C. Wines, Raymond S. Sarnow*and *A. Zola Groves,*Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 23

- 00744

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.M.P. , L.R.S., B.J.S., J.K.R., and M.R., Children

From the 73rd Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022PA00058

Honorable Antonia Arteaga , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED. Appellant is unable to afford payment of court costs; no costs are taxed in this appeal.

SIGNED January 31, 2024.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND FOR THE NINE
MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       1,430,900
<SECURITIES>                                10,515,300
<RECEIVABLES>                               28,210,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                   981,000
<INVENTORY>                                 42,169,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            39,175,700
<PP&E>                                       2,232,700
<DEPRECIATION>                                 280,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              85,406,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,549,500
<BONDS>                                      2,741,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  54,936,200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                85,406,100
<SALES>                                     34,722,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,722,600
<CGS>                                       25,679,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               25,679,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,597,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             470,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,554,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,867,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,687,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,687,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18


</TABLE>
https://fdms.erulemaking.net/.../component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Print&PrintId=0900006480b1675b&Comment=true[8/18/2010 3:02:55 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: August 18, 2010

Received: July 10, 2010

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 80b1675b

Comments Due: August 27, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: HHS-OS-2010-0014

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Preexisting Condition Exclusions, Lifetime and Annual Limits,

Rescissions, and PatientProtections

Comment On: HHS-OS-2010-0014-0001

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Preexisting Condition Exclusions, Lifetime and Annual Limits,

Rescissions, and PatientProtections

Document: HHS-OS-2010-0014-DRAFT-0007

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-15278

Submitter Information

Name: Beverly Youngs

General Comment

Yjes seem worthy of passing into law. How will it be monitered and/or enforced?
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 61657]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19420]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of 
the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the 
Securities and Exchange Commission Small Business Capital Formation 
Advisory Committee will hold a public meeting on Tuesday, September 19, 
2023, at the Commission's headquarters and via videoconference.

PLACE: The meeting will be hybrid, with some Committee members 
attending by remote means (videoconference) and others in-person at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, in 
Multi-Purpose Room LL-006. Members of the public may watch the webcast 
of the meeting on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

STATUS: The meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to 
the public via webcast on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov. This 
Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a majority of the 
Commission may attend the meeting.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The agenda for the meeting includes matters 
relating to rules and regulations affecting small and emerging 
businesses and their investors under the federal securities laws.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed; 
please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary 
at (202) 551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: September 5, 2023.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-19420 Filed 9-5-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.87 MB)
 
 Sailors President Navy George H.W. Bush
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Marcia J Bailey

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Cover women"s preventive health care completely

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:21:46 PM

I join with many others in asking you to make preventive health care for women the

rule for insurance coverage. In our country we have a separation of church and

state, so no one should be able to decide for women whether or not they will be

able to receive these covered services. Any employees who do not want the

services will, of course, not be compelled to have them.

Please ensure that women have access to preventive health care. It means that

many fewer of them will suffer complications to their health. Also please reject any

religious refusal exemption proposals. We have many who believe a certain way,

but because of the legal separation of church and state in this country, their

opinions should not impact those who may believe differently.

Thank you for your consideration.

-- 

We must have the stubbornness to accept our gladness in the ruthless furnace of

this world. - Jack Gilbert
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1998 FORM 10-QSB OF ON STAGE ENTERTAINMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,195
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      964
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,241
<PP&E>                                          20,807
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,706
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,301
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,942
<BONDS>                                         13,312
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            72
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,976
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,301
<SALES>                                          6,205
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,205
<CGS>                                            3,917
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,471
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (527)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (528)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (528)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        

</TABLE>
From: Jonathan Netherton

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Public comment on HHS implementation of IOM recommendations

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:57:24 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.
EXHIBIT 32





SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY DWIGHT O. SEEGMILLER





In connection with the Annual Report of Hills Bancorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dwight O. Seegmiller, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:  March 10, 2010
By: /s/Dwight O. SeegmillerDwight O. Seegmiller, Director and President














SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION BY JAMES G. PRATT





In connection with the Annual Report of Hills Bancorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James G. Pratt, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  March 10, 2010
By: /s/James G. PrattJames G. Pratt, Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer
June 6, 2013

Memo to: EPA Docket (EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0268)

Subject: Summary of April 2013 presentations given at the National Radiological 

Emergency Preparedness Conference regarding updates to the Protective Action 

Guides (PAGs) Manual and X-Ray Guidance (FGR Report 14)

On April 9, 2013, EPA staff gave an Agency update to the National Radiological Emergency 

Preparedness (NREP) Conference at the request of conference organizers. The update focused on 

radiation protection activities over the past year, including publication of two proposals for 

public comment: “PAG Manual: Protective Action Guides and Planning Guidance for 

Radiological Incidents” and “Radiation Protection Guidance for Diagnostic and Interventional 

X-Ray Procedures: Federal Guidance Report No. 14.” EPA staff provided a brief overview of the 

differences between the current (1992) and newly proposed PAG Manuals and answered 

questions. Staff from federal, state and local radiation programs, industry and academia 

participated.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       7,014,542
<SECURITIES>                                 2,299,494
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,491,356
<ALLOWANCES>                                   139,822
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,370,138
<PP&E>                                      35,647,633
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,231,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              64,061,430
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,656,788
<BONDS>                                     38,040,967
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       369,134
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,177,468
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                64,061,430
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            15,244,282
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,494,948
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,244,136
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,301,882
<INCOME-TAX>                                   220,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,081,382
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,081,382
<EPS-BASIC>                                       2.50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.50


</TABLE>
#### William H. Waring. Respondent, v. Moses Chamberlain, Appellant.

Judgment and-order affirmed. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                      PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>          459,854
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>              0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>              76,842
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>           104,689
<OTHER-ASSETS>                       1,522
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     642,907
<COMMON>                             5,848
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>          102,817
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                 65,115
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>     173,780
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               35,000
<PREFERRED>                          2,224
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>               173,672
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                  32,100
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>           0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>        8,876
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>              0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                         0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>     217,255
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>      642,907
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>          108,485
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                 9,674
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          80,773
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>          90,447
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>             18,038
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                       0
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>      18,038
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>             4,445
<NET-INCOME>                        13,593
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>            773
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>       12,820
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>             3,825
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>            3,839
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>              29,839
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         5.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                         5.48
        

</TABLE>