alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1270

To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed at 8th Avenue

and Mill Street in Eugene, Oregon, as the ‘‘Wayne Lyman Morse United

States Courthouse’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 30, 2001

Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Mr. SMITH of Oregon) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment

and Public Works

A BILL

To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed

at 8th Avenue and Mill Street in Eugene, Oregon, as

the ‘‘Wayne Lyman Morse United States Courthouse’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WAYNE LYMAN MORSE

4 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.

5 The United States courthouse to be constructed at

6 8th Avenue and Mill Street in Eugene, Oregon, shall be

7 known and designated as the ‘‘Wayne Lyman Morse

8 United States Courthouse’’.
2

•S 1270 IS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the United

4 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed

5 to be a reference to the Wayne Lyman Morse United

6 States Courthouse.

Æ
May 24, 2012

Honorable Ray LaHood, Secretary U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, D.C. 20590

RE: DOT

- OST

- 2012

- 0083

Dear Secretary LaHood:

Please accept this letter of support for the application of Volaris to operat e scheduled passenger service between Denver International Airport (“DEN”) and Mexico City’s Benito

Ju á rez International Airport.

Colorado has lacked year

- round nonstop service to Mexico City since the bankruptcy of Mexicana in August 2010. The introdu ction of new service by Volaris will stimulate market demand, further growing passenger traffic that will benefit all carriers. In addition, new international air service is a key driver of new jobs and economic activity in the Denver metro
area and acros s the State of Colorado.

The Colorado Office of Economic Development & International Trade believes the expanded passenger service will be economically beneficial to growing the local and our national economy. Mexico is our s econd largest export market fo r Colorado's goods and services, and the improved passenger service will provide opportunities to expand these trade and economic relationships . Tourism and recreation opportunities to Colorado and the mountain west will
also increase because of this serv ice

.

Denver and Colorado are home to one of the largest Mexican

- American p opulations in the
United States . The strong community of interest, in addition to the growing business, tourism and cultural links between Colorado and Mexico, will greatly benefit from this new service.

Thank you for your consideration. We urge you to approve this application.

Sincerely,

Ken neth W. Lund

Executive Director
#### Katharine McDuffie, Respondent, *v.*The Financier Company, Appellant.

*McDuffie*v. *Financier Co.,*140 App. Div. 909, affirmed.

(Argued May 13, 1912;

decided June 4, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered November 3, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover money alleged to be due plaintiff on an account stated.

*Henry B. Twombly*and *Louis H. Hall*for appellant.

*Theron Cl. Strong*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Harry W. Moore et al., Appellants, to Set Aside the Alleged Election of Warden and Vestrymen of Trinity Church, Roslyn, N. Y. John Mann et al., Respondents.

*Matter of*Moore, 153 App. Div. 909, affirmed.

(Argued February 25, 1913;

decided March 11, 1913.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 4, 1912, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a petition to set aside an election of officers of Trinity Church, Roslyn, N. Y.

*Harry W. Moore*and *Henry M. W. Eastman*for appellants.

*Frederic H. Cowden*for respondents.

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Collin and Hogan, JJ.
From: Harriett Myers

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 9:05:20 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

I have long thought it both unfair and foolish to not include the costs of contraception in private health

insurance and public health programs. In my opinion, the same goes for full costs of pre and post natal

care.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Harriett Myers

815 Colorado Ave

Lynn Haven, FL 32444
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            4035
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       39
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4074
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              106
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        3968
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4074
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  4787
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   821
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3798
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3798
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3798
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     8.34
        

</TABLE>
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-2095

Lower Tribunal No. 2018-CA-012800-O

_____________________________

LUCIANO SUTERA SARDO,

Appellant, 

v.

ORANGE COUNTY CONVENTION CENTER, ORANGE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, and

ORANGE COUNTY,

Appellees.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County.

Jeffrey L. Ashton, Judge.

April 2, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

TRAVER, C.J., and STARGEL and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.

Paul G. Finizio, of The Finizio Law Group, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellant.

Jessica C. Conner, of Dean, Ringers, Morgan & Lawton, P.A., Orlando, for Appellee, Orange 

County Board of County Commissioners.

No Appearance for Appellees, Orange County Convention Center and Orange County. 

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Opinion filed November 29, 2018

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals __________

Nos. 11-18-00242-CR, 11-18-00243-CR,

11-18-00244-CR, & 11-18-00245-CR

__________

RICHARD DAVID MACK, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 266th District Court

Erath County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. CR 12376, CR 12377, CR 12378, & CR 12379

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Richard David Mack, Appellant, filed an untimely pro se notice of appeal 

from his convictions for the offenses of capital murder, for which he was sentenced 

to confinement for life. We dismiss the appeals.

The documents on file in these appeals indicate that Appellant’s sentences 

were imposed in 2006, and that his pro se notice of appeal was filed in the district 

clerk’s office on September 13, 2018. When the appeals were filed in this court, we 
2

notified Appellant by letter that his notice of appeal appeared to be untimely and that 

these appeals may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We requested that 

Appellant respond to our letter and show grounds to continue these appeals. 

Appellant has not filed a response showing any grounds upon which these appeals

may proceed. 

Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2, Appellant’s notice of appeal in each case

was due to be filed within thirty days after the date his sentence was imposed in open 

court. A notice of appeal must be in writing and filed with the clerk of the trial court. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(c)(1). The documents on file in this court reflect that 

Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed with the clerk of the trial court more than 

twelve years after his sentences were imposed. The notice of appeal was, therefore, 

untimely. Absent a timely filed notice of appeal or the granting of a timely motion 

for extension of time, we do not have jurisdiction to entertain these appeals. Slaton 

v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519

(Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993). 

Appellant has requested that this court appoint counsel for him in these 

appeals. We note that this court has no authority to appoint counsel and that, because 

the notice of appeal was untimely, we must dismiss the appeals.

These appeals are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

November 29, 2018 PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., 

Willson, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

Willson, J., not participating.

 1

Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, 

sitting by assignment.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 583 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 583

      Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a 
  commemorative postage stamp should be issued in remembrance of the 
                       victims of the Holocaust.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 10, 2002

  Mr. Israel (for himself, Mr. Lantos, and Mr. Cantor) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a 
  commemorative postage stamp should be issued in remembrance of the 
                       victims of the Holocaust.

Whereas the Holocaust was a defining event in history;
Whereas the atrocities against humanity that were committed during the Holocaust 
        were of a magnitude not seen either before or since the Holocaust;
Whereas remembering the Holocaust and the victims of the Holocaust may help 
        ensure that nothing similar is ever allowed to happen again;
Whereas the evil of the Holocaust underscores the need for tolerance, 
        sensitivity, pluralism, and democracy around the world;
Whereas another lesson of the Holocaust is the need to respect the basic human 
        rights of all;
Whereas many of those who survived the Holocaust rebuilt their lives and raised 
        their families in the United States, and contributed significantly to 
        this, their adopted homeland; and
Whereas 2005 will mark the 60th anniversary of the liberation of the Nazi 
        concentration camps by Allied troops: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) a commemorative postage stamp should be issued by the 
        United States Postal Service in remembrance of the victims of 
        the Holocaust; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
From: irene.tomk@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: protect conscience

Date: Sunday, August 07, 2011 2:02:47 AM

I am emailing to request a conscience clause for religious reasons or HR 1179 for

PPACA. Please give us back our religious freedom and therefore our conscience

rights!

 Irene kopczyk
From: Rea Reynolds

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 12:47:22 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of

Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious

employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the

new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly

deny women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an

ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups

are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health

providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt

from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would

deny access to thousands of women just because of where they

work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care

by accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed

religious refusal exemption provisions.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

Tuesday, September 12, 2023, at 10:30 a.m. and its continuation at the conclusion of the open meeting on September 14, 2023.

# PLACE:

1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC and virtual (this meeting will be a hybrid meeting.)

# STATUS:

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Compliance matters pursuant to 52 U.S.C. 30109.

Information the premature disclosure of which would be likely to have a considerable adverse effect on the implementation of a proposed Commission action.

Matters concerning participation in civil actions or proceedings or arbitration.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Judith Ingram, Press Officer. Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Vicktoria J. Allen,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2023-19438 Filed 9-5-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
From: Laura Dunn

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:58:12 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Laura Dunn

1368 W. Estes Ave. 3N

Chicago, IL 60626
EXHIBIT 4.35





                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


$22,000                          Milpitas, California             August 4, 2000



For value received,  ADATOM.com,  Inc.,  promises to pay Michele Ware the sum of
Twenty two thousand dollars and no cents  ($22,000.00) with interest at the rate
of Ten Percent per annum (10%) until paid. Any unpaid  interest will become part
of the principal.  Interest payable quarterly  commencing on September 30, 2000.
Principal  of $Twenty  two  thousand  three  hundred  thirty  seven  dollars and
fifty-three  cents ($22,  337.53) is due in one payment on  September  30, 2000.
Principal may be paid in whole or in part prior to the due date without  penalty
or premium.

Should  default be made in payment of principal  and/or  interest  when due, the
whole sum of principal and interest shall become  immediately due, at the option
of the  holder of the note.  If action be  instituted  on this  note,  The maker
promises to pay such sum as a Court may fix as attorney's fees.






Adatom.com, Inc.

By: __________________
Michael M. Wheeler
Controller


                                      E-55
FORM 10-Q

UNITED STATES 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

					

										 

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003
Commission File No.    0-13295
 

 

 CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION         

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 
**Delaware**37-1105865**(State of incorporation) **(IRS Employer Identification Number)****2120 West End Ave.

Nashville, Tennessee**37203-0001**(Address of principal executive offices)**(Zip Code)**Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (615) 341-1000            
   The Registrant is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Caterpillar Inc. and meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction (H)(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q, and is therefore filing this form with the reduced disclosure format.

    Indicate by a check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  

Yes  X   No       
    Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). 

Yes No  X  ********************
#### Alfred P. Lyon, Respondent, *v.*William E. Ward, Doing Business under the Name of McLeod, Ward & Company, Appellant.

*Lyon*v. *Ward,*146 App. Div. 891, affirmed.

(Argued January 17, 1913;

decided February 4, 1913.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered August 4, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant, his employer.

*Thomas F. Curran*and *James B. Henney*for appellant.

*Sydney A. Syme*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase, Collin and Hogan, JJ.
<PAGE> 22

                                                               Exhibit 99.1


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549



                           Re:  BEC Energy
                                Registration on
                                Forms S-3 and S-8



We are aware that our report dated April 22, 1999 on our review of the
interim financial information of BEC Energy (BEC) for the period ended
March 31, 1999 and included in this Form 10-Q is incorporated by reference
in BEC's registration statements on Form S-3 (File No. 33-59693) and on Form
S-8 (File Nos. 33-58457, 33-59662, 33-59682 and 333-30975-99).  Pursuant to
Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be
considered a part of the registration statements prepared or certified by us
within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.





Boston, Massachusetts               PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
April 22, 1999
From: Pat

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Contraceptive freedom

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:29:30 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger.

Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run

health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the

coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies.

If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.