alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Gianna DaGiau

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Sunday, August 07, 2011 2:05:52 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Gianna DaGiau

4624 Overlook Drive

Bloomington, MN 55437
Exhibit 10.2
Vital Health Technologies, Inc.
Form 10-KSB
File No. 000-15243

                         PROMISSORY NOTE

$50,000                                 Minneapolis, Minnesota
                                        December 30, 1997

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Vital Heart Systems, Inc. ("Borrower")
promises to pay Aurora Capital Management, L.L.C. or assigns,
("Holder") at such address as may be designated from time to time
by Holder, the principal sum of FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($50,000)
with interest thereon as set forth herein, on the following terms
and conditions:

1. Interest. Borrower will pay interest on the unpaid principle
amount hereof from time to time outstanding at the rate of six
(6%) per annum Interest pursuant to this Note shall be calculated
on the basis of actual days elapsed and a '160 day calendar year,
but payment of such interest shall be deferred until the end of
the term of this Note.

2. Payment Schedule. Principle and interest on this Note shall be
payable in a single payment of the entire principle balance and
all accrued interest on December 30 1998.

3. Prepayment. This Note may be prepaid, in whole or in part, at
any time at the Borrowers option. All payments on this Note shall
be credited first to accrued and unpaid interest hereunder, and
the balance to principle.

4. Conversion. This Note may be converted to shares of Vital
Heart Systems, Inc. common stock at a price per share of five
cents ($.05).  The conversion price is following any reverse
stock split or equity restructuring.

5. Waiver. Borrower hereby waives presentment for payment, notice
of nonpayment, protest, notice of protest and all other notice,
filing suit and diligence in collecting this Note and any
requirement that Holder proceed against any collateral or any
other party prior to or in order to enforce payment of this Note,
and further consents to any extension, rearrangement, renewal or
postponement of the time for payment of this Note and to any
other indulgence with respect hereto without notice, consent or
consideration.

6. Costs of Collection. Borrower agrees to pay all costs of
collection of this Note, including, but not limited to,
reasonable attorneys' fees and legal expenses.

7. Notices. All notices required pursuant to the terms of this
Note shall be in writing and either delivered personally or sent
by United States mail. If sent by mail notice shall be deemed
given the second day following its posting when deposited in the
US mail properly addressed and postage prepaid.


                 				      E-29
<PAGE>




8. Governing Law. This Note shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Note has been executed as of the date
set forth above.

/s/ John Mondati
    John Mondati



                   				      E-30
<PAGE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1120 

CA 13-01692 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF THOMAS MANN, 

PETITIONER-APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRIAN FISCHER, COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY 

SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (LEAH R. NOWOTARSKI OF

COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. 

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (KATE H. NEPVEU OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County (Mark

H. Dadd, A.J.), entered August 19, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to

CPLR article 78. The judgment dismissed the petition. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment dismissing his

petition seeking to annul the Parole Board’s determination denying him

parole release. “This appeal must be dismissed as moot because the

determination expired during the pendency of this appeal, and the

Parole Board denied petitioner’s subsequent request for parole

release” (Matter of Patterson v Berbary, 1 AD3d 943, 943, appeal

dismissed and lv denied 2 NY3d 731; see Matter of Robles v Evans, 100

AD3d 1455, 1455). Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the exception

to the mootness doctrine does not apply here (see generally Matter of

Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715; Matter of Sanchez v Evans,

111 AD3d 1315, 1315). 

Entered: November 21, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
U i W Ai t 

U

nique Ways Airpor

t

with Environmental 

APRI

4 5 T H INTERNATIONAL AVIATION SNOW S

BUBU
BNIA Case Study

MARK LINER

NATURALLY WALLACE CONSULTING, L
BNIA - Overview

 110 d il fli ht 25 t 110 daily flights, 25 gates 96” Avg. snow fall  ~330,000 gallons glycol yearly 1.2 MGD stormwater runoff At gate de-icing Limited sewage plant discharge
Need to treat al

Hi h V i bilit i Fl d C t 

4500050000

 Hi

gh Variabilit

y i

n Flows and Concen

t

3500040000

D/l)

200002500030000

ntration (mg-BOD

100001500020000

Conce

0

5000

0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000 400000 

Flow (gpd)
Somewhere 
U de g ou d ea

nderground Trea
How i

Mulch Layer Influent Line

Water Level

Air Line Air Drain L

 Line
How 

 E h b d i 300’ Each bed is 300’ x

166’ x 5’

 ~2 2 illi ll 2.2 million gallons 10,000 pounds of 

oxygen per day







Buffalo Airport Deicing Fluid Treatment 2010-201

En

gineered Wetland with Patented Forced Bed Aerat

16,000

18,000

g

Influent CBOD5/TOC: 2.25

Effluent CBOD5/TOC: 0.45

Based on Stantec's Engineered 

14,000

,

Influent

Wetland Treatment System BNIA Calibration of TOC Meters Report (6/4/2010)

10,00012,000

CBOD5

L)

8,000

Calculated

(mg/L

4,0006,000

0

2,000

10/29/2010 11/18/2010 12/8/2010 12/28/2010 1/17/2011 2/6/2011 2/26/2011 3/18/2011 

Naturally Wallace Consulting, LLC www.naturallywallace.com
Buffalo Airport Deicing Fluid Treatment 2010

Engineered Wetland with Forced Bed Aeratio

35,000 

Engineered Wetland Total Load (lb BOD/d) Design Load (lb BOD/d) BOD R

30,000 

Treatment Efficiency

20 000 25,000 

D5/d)

Actual Load

15,000 

20,000 

oad (lbs BOD

10,000 

Lo

5,000 

- 

10/29/2010 11/18/2010 12/8/2010 12/28/2010 1/17/2011 2/6/2011 2/26/2011 3/18/2011 

Naturally Wallace Consulting, LLC www.naturallywallace.com
Lessons L

 N d t t l ti 

Need t

o screen out 

plasti

c wrappers; 

clog the dosing lines

 K f h i ddi i 

Keep on top

of 

t

h

e nutrient

addi

tion;

need it to break down the glycol

 You can under aerate but you can’t o

aerate

 Buy as much upstream storage volum

can 
Qu
From: Virginia Garcia-Bunuel

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: I Support Access to Preventive Care and Contraception!

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 7:04:41 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work. This would create undue hardship for may employed

women. Any woman knows whether or not she would use preventive care or contraception, she

needs no employer to be between her and her doctors and her beliefs. It is none of an employers

business what an employee does regarding her (or his) personal health care. Codifying this right

to employers is a gross invasion of privacy and must not be permitted.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
From: Lauren Morgan

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Friday, August 05, 2011 10:19:41 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Lauren Morgan

6 Belladonna Court

Owings Mills, Md 21117
W
. TIMOTH Y HAITHCOC K GLEN N A
. BARFIE1. D B
. GEOFFRE Y HULS E REBECC A B
. KINSE Y WORT H T
. HAITHCOC KI I HAITHCOCK , BARFIELD , HULS E & KINSEY , PLL C ATTORNEY S A T LA W 2 3 1 EAS T WALNU T STREE T POS T OFFIC E DRAWE R 7 GOIDSBORO , NORT H CAROLIN A a7533-<»<x» 7

TELEPHON E (919 ) 735-842 0 FA X (919 ) 734-629 6 haithcockahbhklaw.co m barfieldOhbhklaw.co m hulseOhbhklaw.co m kinseyOhbhkiaw.co m worthhOhbhklaw.co m February 9 , 200 9 

# i CEOW FE B 2 3 Z009 £ 8 3 2 

# 2m . AIRPORTS/ENVIRONMENTA L

LAW , AGC-60 0 ' 

# i Mr . Jonatha n Cros s Federa l Aviatio n Authority Offic e o f th e Chie f Counsel Attn : FA A Par t 1 6 Airpor t Proceeding s Docket AGC-61 0 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S W Washington , D

C 2059 1 An db y Facsimil e to : 1-202-267-519 4 Re : Delber t

Johnso n d/b/ aTw o Dog s Aviatio n v . Goldsboro-Wayn e Airpor t Authority , Docke t Nt» . 16-08-1 1 C D

-— I

Dea r Mr . Cross : I amwritin g t o reques t

a n extensio n throug hFebruary 28 , 200 9 withi n whic ht o repl y t o th e Respondent' s Answe r an dMotio n t o Dismiss
. I hav e consulte dwithRespondent' s counsel , Mr . Harrel l Everett an dh e indicate s hi s consen t t o th e extensio n requested
. Pleas e not e tha t

th e Responden t

wa s grante da3 0 da y extensio n t o Answer , wit

hPetitioner' s consent . Th e Answer , Motion , an d Memorandu mi n Support

i s 4 4 pages , an di s accompanie db y extensiv e supportin g documentatio n includ.ing affidavit s an dothe r document s no t

previousl y availabl e t o Petitioner
. Pleas e confir

mtha t th e Petitione r

shal l b e permitte da n extensio n throug hFebruary 28 , 200 9 t o repl y t o th e Respondent' s Answer an dMotio n t o Dismiss
.

Wit hwarmes t

regards , [ , BARFIELD , H

I len hA . Barfi

i GAB/g b NSEY, PLL C

Cc : Harrel l Everett Pabl o Nuesc h
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of A.D.K., C.D.K., and 

J.Z.K, Children

No. 06-19-00019-CV

Appeal from the 62nd District Court of 

Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 86752). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal. 

Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 26, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
From: lisaschmitz65@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:34:18 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lisa Schmitz

Jefferson City, MO 65101
From: Judith Fierstein

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Thursday, August 18, 2011 1:50:29 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Judith Fierstein

330 Alden st

Redwood city, Ca 94063
#### Helena Carlson, Respondent, v. The Oceanic Steam Navigation Company (Limited), Appellant.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
From: Diane Keeney

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: I Support Access to Preventive Care and Contraception

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 12:24:45 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine

as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care

law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would

provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.

 Sincerely,

Diane

____________________

Diane S. Keeney, PhD

Adjunct Assistant Professor of Medicine

607 Light Hall (mailstop 0146)

Nashville, TN 37232-0146

615-322-3318

diane.keeney@vanderbilt.edu
LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 1 2G Page 1 of
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS BEG 12654 /-10 SEP 1 20n

As of: September 01, 2011

Received: August 15, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 01, 2011
Tracking No. 80ee1813

(Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0130
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Tiffany N Hankins
Address:
Seattle, WA,

General Comment

Thank you for supporting no-cost birth control. This is a vast improvement for health care in
preventing unintended pregnancies and sends a message to women that their health care is just as
important as a man's. It is unfair and a violation of the separation of church and state to allow
exemptions for some religious employers. Studies show that religious women have a wide range
of views on contraceptives and many of them use some form of contraceptives. Don't abandon
women now when you've come so close to doing what is right.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000,.. 9/1/2011
From: danny@headrick.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:43:50 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Danny Stringer

, 39443-7832
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Central Command

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  ABOUT US    -  COMMAND PRIORITIES             
  -  LEADERSHIP             
  -  COMPONENT COMMANDS             
  -  HISTORY             
  -  POSTURE STATEMENT 
-  CENTCOM AOR    -  CENTCOM COALITION 
-  OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES    -  USMTM 
-  CONTACT    -  OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT             
  -  COMMUNITY RELATIONS             
  -  THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE             
  -  INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL             
  -  MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL 
-  MEDIA    -  SOCIAL MEDIA             
  -  NEWS ARTICLES             
  -  PRESS RELEASES             
  -  STATEMENTS             
  -  IMAGERY             
  -  VIDEOS             
  -  TRANSCRIPTS 
-  VISITORS AND PERSONNEL    -  FAMILY CENTER             
  -  FAMILY READINESS             
  -  CENTCOM WEBMAIL             
  -  SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY             
  -  ACCOUNTABILITY             
  -  EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS             
  -  USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS             
  -  FOIA LIBRARY             
  -  INNOVATION OASIS             
  -  WELCOME GUIDE 

HomeMEDIANEWS ARTICLESNews Article View

# ‘Flying Tigers’ bound into Eager Lion

By Luis Delgadillo244th Expeditionary Combat Aviation Brigade

                KING ABDULLAH II AIR BASE, Jordan  –              

                244th Combat Aviation Brigade Soldiers with Task Force Javelin offload a UH-60 Blackhawk helicopter from a U.S. Air Force Strategic Airlift C-17, shortly after arriving to King Abdullah II Air Base, Jordan, in anticipation of Eager Lion 19, Aug. 12, 2019. Eager Lion is U.S. Central Command’s premiere military training exercise in the Levant region. The event provides U.S. forces, Royal Jordanian Armed Forces, and 27 other participating nations the opportunity to improve their collective ability to plan and operate in a coalition environment.            

                ‘Flying Tigers’ bound into Eager Lion            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Luis Delgadillo

VIRIN: 190812-A-RR687-0037

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT