alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1 to Form 10-QSB

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Cecil A. Brooks does hereby  certify that the  Quarterly  Report of  Cornerstone
Ministries Investments, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31,
2003 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 14, 2003.
/s/ Cecil A. Brooks, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

John T.  Ottinger,  does hereby  certify that the Annual  Report of  Cornerstone
Ministries Investments, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended March 31,
2003 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 14, 2003.

/s/ John T. Ottinger, Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1405

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain coins to

be acquired by individual retirement accounts and other individually

directed pension plan accounts.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 5, 2001

Mr. BREAUX introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow certain coins to be acquired by individual retirement accounts and other individually directed pension plan accounts.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN COINS NOT TREATED AS COLLECT4 IBLES.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 408(m)(3) of the Internal

6 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exception for certain

7 coins and bullion) is amended—
2

•S 1405 IS

1 (1) by inserting after clause (iv) in subpara2 graph (A) the following new clause:

3 ‘‘(v) any coin certified by a recognized

4 grading service and either traded on a na5 tionally recognized electronic network or

6 listed by a recognized wholesale reporting

7 service, and which is or was at any time

8 legal tender in the United States, or’’, and

9 (2) by striking ‘‘such bullion’’ in the matter fol10 lowing subparagraph (B) and inserting ‘‘such coin or

11 bullion (in either coin or bar form)’’.

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

13 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

14 December 31, 2001.

Æ
**Exhibit 10.41**

 

Executive Officer Reimbursement Program – Reimbursement of CertainLegal Expenses

 

OnSeptember 2, 2005, the company’s Board of Directors passed a resolutionauthorizing the company to reimburse its executive officers for legal feesreasonably incurred in connection with the proposed merger with Wachovia.  The fees to be reimbursed may be incurredthrough the earlier of (i) the termination of the merger agreement priorto completion of the merger, and (iii) the effective time of themerger.  In each case the fees mustrelate to (i) legal advice provided by one counsel to the executiveofficers, sought by the executive officers at the request of the Board inconnection with the negotiation of the executive officers’ respectiveemployment arrangements with Wachovia and (ii) matters directly related tothereto including their description in the company’s Securities and ExchangeCommission filings and other state public statements.

 

----
From: Arthur Baxter

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 12:50:24 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Arthur Baxter

POBox 135

Cedarville, ca 96104
From: teknovation@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:06:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

John Lackey

Haddonfield, NJ 08033
From: Cynthia Dobson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 1:03:20 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

This leads to more carefully planned and loved children, and less of those who have to end up on

Welfare, which seems to irate everyone, even though that is what majorly happens to those children

who's parents-if they are not able to care for them-end up in the responsiblility of.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Cynthia Dobson

3605 N. 5th Street

Phila., PA 19140
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     9
<LEGEND>
     (This  schedule   contains   financial   information   extracted  from  the
     consolidated  financial statements of Community First Banking Comapny as of
     or for the six months  ended June 30, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety
     by reference to such financial  statements (dollars in thousands except per
     share data).
</LEGEND>
<CIK>          0001035903
<NAME>         Community First Banking Company
<MULTIPLIER>                     1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                8,663
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                  421
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                        250
<TRADING-ASSETS>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>          61,960
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                  177
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                    176
<LOANS>                             313,925
<ALLOWANCE>                           3,645
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      401,304
<DEPOSITS>                          303,359
<SHORT-TERM>                         54,191
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                   3,078
<LONG-TERM>                          12,732
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               1
<COMMON>                                 33
<OTHER-SE>                           27,910
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>      401,304
<INTEREST-LOAN>                      14,291
<INTEREST-INVEST>                     2,226
<INTEREST-OTHER>                         57
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                     16,574
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                    6,394
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    8,434
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                 8,140
<LOAN-LOSSES>                           473
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                      (29)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                       5,817
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       3,791
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>            3,791
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                          2,564
<EPS-BASIC>                             .93
<EPS-DILUTED>                           .87
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                            0
<LOANS-NON>                             737
<LOANS-PAST>                              0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                          0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                         149
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                      3,379
<CHARGE-OFFS>                           325
<RECOVERIES>                            119
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                     3,646
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                  3,646
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                       0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                   0


</TABLE>
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial statements set forth in the Form 10-QSB On Stage  Entertainment,  Inc.
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001035514
<NAME>                        On Stage Entertainment, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     None

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         817
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  644
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    187
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2476
<PP&E>                                         14591
<DEPRECIATION>                                 5308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 11759
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          19523
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       72
<OTHER-SE>                                     (7766)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   11759
<SALES>                                        19651
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               19651
<CGS>                                          15392
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  15978
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3830
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1890
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8977)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8977)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8977)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
From: reyna alvarado

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Friday, August 05, 2011 3:06:22 AM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

reyna alvarado
new caney, Texas
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.37 MB)
 
 GazaHA
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: mark@delleva.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:58:51 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Mark DellEva

Grand Blanc, MI 48439
From: RCChristcrew@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:39:04 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Roberta Case

Randleman, NC 27317
EX-4.22



 Exhibit 4.22 

Shares Subscription Agreement 
 (This
Agreement is entered into between the following parties on January 30, 2016 in Beijing) 
 Issuer: China Tower Corporation Limited (“China
Tower”) 
 Subscriber: China Mobile Group Shandong Co., Ltd. 

Whereas the issuer and the subscriber have signed the Transaction Agreement of the Existing Telecommunication Tower and related Assets by Issuance of
Shares and Payment of Cash on October 14, 2015. Based on the above agreement and the specific circumstances of delivery of towers and related assets, the issuer has determined to issue a total of 119,344,615,024 shares at a par value of RMB1 per
share. 
  

	1.	Subscription Price 

 RMB1 per share. 

 

	2.	Subscription Amount and Quantity 

 The subscriber confirms to pay RMB8,053,048,991 to subscribe
for 8,053,048,991 shares. 
  

	3.	Subscription Method 

 The subscriber agrees to subscribe for the shares issued by investing with
assets. 
  

	4.	Payment Method 

 The subscriber has completed the actual payment of contribution before December
31, 2015. 
  

	5.	Shareholders’ Rights and Obligations 

 The both parties confirm that the subscriber shall
become the owner of shares subscribed for in this transaction from the effective date of this Agreement, and enjoy its shareholder rights and bear the corresponding obligations for such shares. The both parties agree that the issuer shall complete
the change to register of shareholders, revision of Articles of Association and change to industrial and commercial registration within 30 days after signing this Shares Subscription Agreement. 

 

	6.	Entry into Force and Counterparts 

 This Agreement shall enter into force on December 31, 2015.
This agreement is executed in six counterparts, each party holding two copies, and the rest shall be submitted for examination and approval/record filing. 

(Reminder of this page intentionally left blank) 








	
	Issuer: China Tower Corporation Limited (chop)
	Legal representative or authorized representative
	
	 /s/ GAO Chunlei

	
	Subscriber: China Mobile Group Shandong Co., Ltd.
	Legal representative or authorized representative
	
	 /s/ ZHANG Xuan