alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: judith ownbey

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Approval of Preventive Services of Institute of Medicine

Date: Monday, August 15, 2011 3:13:37 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Judith Ownbey

-----------------------------------------

The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use

of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and/or work

product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended

recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that

you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of

this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us

immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.5


2016-2018 LTI Umbrella Plan
2016-2018 Performance Goal and Award Pool
The performance goal for the LTI Performance Period shall be an average of $5.0 million per year over the LTI Performance Period in Net cash provided by operating activities, as reported in the Company’s Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows (“Cash Flow”).  The maximum value of shares of common stock issuable upon reaching performance goal shall equal 15% of the aggregate Cash Flow over the LTI Performance Period.
Allocation of Award Pool to Executives
	
			
	Executive Name
	Executive Title
	Percent of Pool Allocated 
to Executive1

	Jack A. Hockema
	Chief Executive Officer
	49.2523%

	Keith A. Harvey
	President and Chief Operating Officer
	26.5257%

	John M. Donnan
	EVP - Legal, Compliance and Human Resources
	10.5066%

	John Barneson
	SVP - Corporate Development
	8.6157%

	[Other Designated Participant]
	[Designated Participant Title]
	  
5.0997%






1 Subject to an aggregate maximum value per executive of $5.0 million and an aggregate maximum of 500,000 shares of common stock per executive per calendar year, pursuant to the Equity Incentive Plan.


Administrative Provisions


The 2016-2018 LTI Umbrella Plan only applies to the calculation and award of incentive awards, if any.  There will be no duplication of benefits created by the 2016-2018 LTI Umbrella Plan.


The 2016-2018 LTI Umbrella Plan will not increase any benefits that may be payable under any severance and/or change in control agreements
No. 92.

#### Leonard *v.*United States.

*George Edward Leonard, pro se, Richard T. Brewster*and *Eberhard P. Deutsch*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox*for the United States.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Claims. Dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.
From: Suzanne Antone

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:44:16 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care

under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services,

are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

I believe the right to individual privacy is highly important for all men and women in the

United States. In the workplace the separation of church (regardless of which faith) and state

should be considered so each of us can make the personal choices that impact our health and

our bodies.
From: Kathleen Konti

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 10:12:46 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 108

To reduce the number of executive branch political appointees.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 22, 2001

Mr. FEINGOLD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To reduce the number of executive branch political

appointees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION IN NUMBER OF POLITICAL AP4 POINTEES.

5 (a) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘political

6 appointee’’ means any individual who—

7 (1) is employed in a position on the executive

8 schedule under sections 5312 through 5316 of title

9 5, United States Code;

10 (2) is a limited term appointee, limited emer11 gency appointee, or noncareer appointee in the sen-
2

•S 108 IS

1 ior executive service as defined under section

2 3132(a) (5), (6), and (7) of title 5, United States

3 Code, respectively; or

4 (3) is employed in a position in the executive

5 branch of the Government of a confidential or pol6 icy-determining character under Schedule C of sub7 part C of part 213 of title 5 of the Code of Federal

8 Regulations.

9 (b) LIMITATION.—The President, acting through the

10 Office of Management and Budget and the Office of Per11 sonnel Management, shall take such actions as necessary

12 (including reduction in force actions under procedures es13 tablished under section 3595 of title 5, United States

14 Code) to ensure that the total number of political ap15 pointees shall not exceed 2,000.

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section shall take effect

17 on October 1, 2001.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1198 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1198

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
             To reauthorize Franchise Fund Pilot Programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF FRANCHISE FUND PILOT PROGRAMS.

    Section 403(f) of the Federal Financial Management Act of 1994 (31 
U.S.C. 501 note) is amended by striking ``October 1, 2001'' and 
inserting ``October 1, 2002''.

            Passed the Senate August 3, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1198

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

             To reauthorize Franchise Fund Pilot Programs.
```
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 62553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19557]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


Record of Decision for Comprehensive Airspace Initiative at Moody 
Air Force Base, Georgia Environmental Impact Statement

ACTION: Notice of availability of Record of Decision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 15, 2023, the Department of the Air Force (DAF) 
signed the Record of Decision (ROD) for Comprehensive Airspace 
Initiative at Moody Air Force Base, Georgia, Environmental Impact 
Statement.

ADDRESSES: Mr. Lorence Busker, 23rd Civil Engineer Squadron, 3485 
Georgia Street, Moody Air Force Base, Georgia 31699-1707, Telephone: 
(229) 257-2396; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e884879a8d868b8dc68a9d9b838d9aa89d9bc6898ec6858184"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ec80839e89828f89c28e999f87899eac999fc28d8ac2818580">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The DAF has selected Modified Alternative 1: 
Create the Corsair North Low, Corsair South Low, Mustang Low, and 
Warhawk Low Military Operations Areas (MOAs) with a floor of 1,000 ft 
above ground level (AGL) and a ceiling of 7,999 ft above mean sea level 
(MSL) beneath and within the lateral confines of the existing Corsair 
North, Corsair South, Mustang and Warhawk MOAs, respectively; create 
the Thud Low MOA with a floor of 4,000 ft AGL and a ceiling of 7,999 ft 
MSL beneath and within the lateral confines of the existing Thud MOA; 
create Grand Bay MOA with a floor of 100 ft AGL and a ceiling of 499 ft 
AGL beneath and within the lateral confines of the existing Restricted 
Area R-3008C; and lower the floor of Moody 2 North MOA from 500 ft AGL 
to 100 ft AGL. Based on this decision, the DAF will request the Federal 
Aviation Administration modify the low-altitude airspace floors to 
enhance low-altitude training within the Moody Airspace Complex.
    The DAF decision documented in the ROD was based on matters 
discussed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement, inputs from the 
public and regulatory agencies, and other relevant factors. The Final 
Environmental Impact Statement was made available to the public on May 
19, 2023, through a Notice of Availability in the Federal Register (88 
FR 32215) with a waiting period that ended on June 20, 2023.
    Authority: This Notice of Availability is published pursuant to the 
regulations (40 CFR part 1506.6) implementing the provisions of the 
National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.) and the Air 
Force's Environmental Impact Analysis Process (32 CFR parts 989.21(b) 
and 989.24(b)(7)).

Mia Day,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-19557 Filed 9-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of A.D.K., C.D.K., and J.Z.K, Children

No. 06

- 19

- 00019

- CV Appeal from the 62nd District Court of Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 86752 ).
Memorandum Opinion delivered b y Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice
Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial cour t

. We note that the appellant has adequately indicated his inability to pay costs of appeal.

Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 26, 2019
BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III
CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### Christine L. Palmer, Appellant, v. Eliza J. Jones and others, Respondents.

— Judgment modified by striking therefrom the words” on the merits of said action,” and as modified affirmed, without costs of the appeal to either party.
From: Judy Sam

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: HHS decision on Contraceptive access and coverage

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:18:10 PM

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. 

Please accept the Institute of Medicine's recommendations regarding coverage for preventive care for

women.

Thank you.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 10, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-20509 Conference Calendar

MASSOOD DANESH PAJOOH, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MELINDA HARMON, U.S. District Judge, United States District Judge, individually; DON J. DEGABRIELLE, The Assistant United States Government Attorney, individually; JOHN DOE, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-03-CV-155

-------------------- Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Massood Danesh Pajooh appeals the dismissal with prejudice of his suit brought pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971) , and other grounds. Pajooh argues that defendants DeGabrielle and Judge Harmon are not absolutely immune from suit for damages. Judge Harmon enjoys absolute immunity because Pajooh’s claims for damages arose out of acts she performed in theNo. 03-20509 -2- exercise of her judicial functions. See Mitchell v. McBryde , 944 F.2d 229, 230 (5th Cir. 1991). DeGabrielle enjoys absolute immunity because his conduct was “intimately associated with the judicial phase of the criminal process.” See Beck v. Texas State Bd. of Dental Examiners , 204 F.3d 629, 637 (5th Cir. 2000). Pajooh argues that the district court erred when it determined that he had failed to state a claim upon which declaratory or injunctive relief could be granted. Pajooh’s unsupported conclusory accusations do not suffice to prevent a motion to dismiss. See Taylor v. Books A Million, Inc. , 296 F.3d 376, 378 (5th Cir. 2002), cert. denied , 123 S. Ct. 1287 (2003). The district court’s dismissal with prejudice of Pajooh’s suit is
AFFIRMED.
Page 1 of 2

RECIMBULO «7!

‘As of: September 02, 2011

Received: August 16, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 02, 2011
Tracking No. 80¢e2657

‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of

Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0158
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Uaaian Submitter Information

Address:
Dublin, 43017-1796
Submitter's Representative: NARAL Pro-Choice America

General Comment

I strongly support the new policy requiring health-insurance plans to cover birth control without a
copay, CMS-9992-IFC2. Thank you for this important improvement to women's health care.

I also want you to know that J am concerned that certain religious employers may be allowed to
opt out of the requirements. All women should have access to contraceptive coverage, regardless

of where they work.

This policy finally should make near-universal access to birth control
a reality for all women who use it.

Using oral contraceptives is preventative care for my sisters and I, as
our mother passed away due to ovarian cancer. Though we now have a
heightened risk of ovarian cancer, using birth control greatly reduces
this risk. I ask that you keep my situation in mind; I know it is only
one of a multitude.

Improving women's access to birth control is positive in so many ways.
A woman who can plan when to have a family is able to participate in

_ http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000... 9/2/2011


Page 2 of 2

society more fully. Allowing women to space their pregnancies
contributes to healthy childbearing. And ultimately, fewer unintended
pregnancies can reduce the need for abortion.

Thank you for following science-based recommendations and making
women's health a priority.

http://fdms.erulemaking .net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000... 9/2/2011
No. 602.

#### Conner Air Lines, Inc., et al. *v.*Aviation Credit Corp.

*Don G. Nicholson*for petitioners.

*Robert V. Smith*and *Laurence A. Schroeder*for respondent.

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 226, Misc.

#### Hill *v.*United States.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller*and *Beatrice Rosenberg*for the United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 24, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D19-1389 Lower Tribunal No. 93-10518B

________________ 

### Damon Peterson, Appellant,
vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Veronica A. Diaz, Judge. Daniel J. Tibbitt, P.A., and Daniel Tibbitt, for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before EMAS, C.J., and SCALES and LOBREE, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Franklin v. State, 258 So. 3d 1239, 1241 (Fla. 2018), cert. denied sub nom . Franklin v. Florida, 139 S. Ct. 2646 (2019); State v. Michel, 257 So. 3d 3 (Fla. 2018). See also Wright v. State, 308 So. 3d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020); Adams v. State, 949 So. 2d 1125, 1126 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Melton v. State, 304 So. 3d 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020).
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.04 MB)
 
 F-35 Aircraft Aviation F-35A F-35A Lightning II Fighter Jets Lightning
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil