alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HILLS BANCORPORATION                                                EXHIBIT 11

STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>

                                                                                   Year Ended December 31,
                                                                          ----------------------------------------
                                                                               1999         1998         1997
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                          <C>          <C>          <C>
Shares of common stock, beginning ........................................   1,469,443    1,467,754    1,465,385
                                                                          ========================================
Shares of common stock, ending ...........................................   1,495,941    1,469,443    1,467,754
                                                                          ========================================
Computation of weighted average number of basic and diluted shares:
   Common shares outstanding at the beginning of the year ................   1,469,443    1,467,754    1,465,385
   Weighted average number of net shares issued ..........................      14,097           18          529
                                                                          ----------------------------------------
              Weighted average shares outstanding (basic) ................   1,483,540    1,467,772    1,465,914
   Weighted average of potential dilutive shares
      attributable to stock options granted, computed under
      the treasury stock method ..........................................      11,784       22,702       18,040
                                                                          ----------------------------------------
              Weighted average number of shares (diluted) ................   1,495,324    1,490,474    1,483,954
                                                                          ========================================
Net income (In Thousands) ................................................ $     8,466  $     7,486  $     7,086
                                                                          ========================================
Earnings per share:
   Basic ................................................................. $      5.70  $      5.10  $      4.83
                                                                          ========================================
   Diluted ............................................................... $      5.66  $      5.02  $      4.78
                                                                          ========================================
Dividends per common share ............................................... $      1.30  $      1.20  $      1.05
                                                                          ========================================
</TABLE>
#### Joseph S. Mayer, Respondent, v. Louis Schissel, Appellant.

Motion denied.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 29, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 59482]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18622]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 1

[REG-124123-22]
RIN 1545-BQ57


Corporate Bond Yield Curve for Determining Present Value; Hearing 
Cancellation

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Cancellation of a public hearing on a proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document cancels a public hearing on proposed regulations 
specifying the methodology for constructing the corporate bond yield 
curve that is used to derive the interest rates used in calculating 
present value and making other calculations under a defined benefit 
plan, as well as for discounting unpaid losses and estimated salvage 
recoverable of insurance companies.

DATES: The public hearing scheduled for August 30, 2023, at 10 a.m. ET 
is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vivian Hayes of the Publications and 
Regulations Branch, Associate Chief Counsel (Procedure and 
Administration) at (202) 317-6901 (not a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice of proposed rulemaking and a notice 
of public hearing that appeared in the Federal Register on June 23, 
2023 (88 FR 41047) announced that a public hearing being held in person 
and by teleconference was scheduled for August 30, 2023, at 10 a.m. ET. 
The subject of the public hearing is under 26 CFR part 1.
    The public comment period for these regulations expired on August 
22, 2023. The notice of proposed rulemaking and notice of public 
hearing instructed those interested in testifying at the public hearing 
to submit a request to testify and an outline of the topics to be 
addressed. We did not receive a request to testify at the Public 
Hearing. Therefore, the public hearing scheduled for August 30, 2023, 
at 10 a.m. ET is cancelled.

Oluwafunmilayo A. Taylor,
Branch Chief, Publications and Regulations Branch, Associate Chief 
Counsel, (Procedure & Administration).
[FR Doc. 2023-18622 Filed 8-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
From: Mike Malloy

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: protect the rights of Christians

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 6:53:37 PM

The current definition of religious employer does not provide true

conscience protection for those committed to preserving life. Health

care plans should not be forced to violate the moral and religious

convictions of providers or employees in order to participate in the

health care system. Requiring such an unacceptable demand threatens

both universal access to health care and religious freedom of conscience.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.21 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Page 1 of 2



## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

NO. 15-0944

THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, P ETITIONER

V



### .

C.W.H., R ESPONDENT



### MANDATE

To the Trial Court of Nacogdoches County, Greetings:

Before our Supreme Court on October 20, 2017, the Cause, upon petition for review, to

revise or reverse your Judgment.

No. 15-0944 in the Supreme Court of Texas

No. 12-15-00062-CV in the Twelfth Court of Appeals

No. C0824736 in the 145th District Court of Nacogdoches County, Texas, was

determined; and therein our said Supreme Court entered its judgment or order in these words:

THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS, having heard this cause on petition for review

from the Court of Appeals for the Twelfth District, and having considered the appellate record,

briefs, and counsels’ argument, concludes that the court of appeals’ judgment should be

affirmed.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

1) The court of appeals’ judgment is affirmed;

2) The cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent

with the Court’s opinion; and

3) Each party shall bear its own costs in this Court.

Copies of this judgment and the Court’s opinion are certified to the Court of Appeals for

the Twelfth District and to the 145 th Judicial District Court of Nacogdoches County, Texas, for

observance.Page 2 of 2

Wherefore we command you to observe the order of our said Supreme Court in this

behalf, and in all things to have recognized, obeyed, and executed.

BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS,

with the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Austin,

this the 30th day of November, 2017

.

Blake A. Hawthorne

, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.87 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 46 (Tuesday, March 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 12697]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05241]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 9058]

Prepare for the One Hundred and Second Session of the 
International Maritime Organization's (IMO) Legal Committee; Notice of 
Public Meeting

    The Department of State will conduct an open meeting at 10:00 a.m. 
on Friday, April 3rd, 2015, in Room 2E16-06, United States Coast Guard 
Headquarters, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave SE., Washington, DC 
20593-7213. The primary purpose of the meeting is to prepare for the 
one hundred and second Session of the International Maritime 
Organization's (IMO) Legal Committee to be held at the IMO 
Headquarters, United Kingdom, April 14-April 16, 2015.
    The agenda items to be considered include:
     Adoption of the agenda and report on delegation 
credentials
     HNS Protocol, 2010
     Fair treatment of seafarers in the event of a maritime 
accident
     Piracy
     Technical cooperation activities related to maritime 
legislation
     Review of the status of conventions and other treaty 
instruments emanating from the Legal Committee
    Members of the public may attend this meeting up to the seating 
capacity of the room. To facilitate the building security process, and 
to request reasonable accommodation, those who plan to attend should 
contact the meeting coordinator, Ms. Bronwyn Douglass, by email at 
bronwyn.douglass@uscg.mil, by phone at 202.372.3793, or in writing at 
Commandant (CG-094), ATTN: Office of Maritime & International Law, US 
Coast Guard STOP 7213, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave SE., Washington 
DC 20593-7213 not later than March 27, 2015, 7 days prior to the 
meeting. Requests made after March 27, 2015 most likely will not be 
accommodated, and same day requests cannot be accommodated due to the 
building's security process. Please note that due to security 
considerations, two valid, government issued photo identifications must 
be presented to gain entrance to the Headquarters building. The 
Headquarters building is accessible by taxi and privately owned 
conveyance (public transportation is not generally available). However, 
parking in the vicinity of the building is extremely limited. 
Additional information regarding security and parking may be found at: 
http://www.uscg.mil/baseNCR/documents/visit_instructions.pdf. 
Additional information regarding this and other IMO public meetings may 
be found at: www.uscg.mil/imo.

    Dated: February 26, 2015.
Marc Zlomek,
U.S. Coast Guard Detailee, Office of Ocean and Polar Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-05241 Filed 3-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-09-P
```
From: Natalie Mueller

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 1:50:04 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Natalie Mueller

1303 Schley Ave

San Antonio, TX 78210
#### Florence M. Gibbs, Respondent, v. Jesse A. Hathaway, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed,, with costs. Opinion by Boardman, J.; dissenting opinion by Hardin, P. J.
EXHIBIT 32

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                          PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
(the "Report") of Cimnet, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September
30, 2003, I, John D. Richardson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

                           (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements
                           of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                           Act of 1934; and

                           (2) the information contained in the Report, fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                    /s/ JOHN D. RICHARDSON
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    John D. Richardson
                                    Chief Executive Officer and Principal
                                    Accounting Officer



November 14, 2003

                                       18
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------




             CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.1350, AS ADOPTED
              PURSUANT TO SS.906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the annual report of Spire Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A (the "Report") for the year ended December 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Roger
G. Little, Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


Dated:      November 20, 2009             By:  /s/ Roger G. Little
                                               --------------------------
                                               Roger G. Little
                                               Chairman of the Board,
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               and President
No. 438.

#### United States *v.*Singer Manufacturing Co.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Probable jurisdic*919tion noted.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger*and *Robert B. Hummel*for the United

States.

*Edwin J. Wesely*and *Edward A. Miller*for appellee.
From: M Fischer

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Birth control access and insurance cost containment

Date: Thursday, August 04, 2011 3:23:01 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

Dear Ms. Sebelius,

I applaud the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012. I also hope that HHS

will be able to contain costs and work with insurers to make sure health care costs will not needlessly

increase due to this legislation, to prevent consumers to see a significant increase in monthly insurance

costs which health care insurers will most likely try to pass on to us all.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

M Fischer

71 Maplefield

Pleasant Ridge, MI 48069
#### Margaret Guilfoyle, as Administratrix of the Estate of James Guilfoyle, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*Charles McDermott et al., as Receivers of the McDermott Contracting Company, Appellants.

*Guilfoyle*v. McDermott, 146 App. Div. 900, affirmed.

(Argued March 29, 1912;

decided April 12, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered October 11, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate alleged to have been occasioned through the negligence of defendants, his employers.

*William H. Harding*for appellants.

*Thomas Woods*for respondent. .

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hisoocic and Collin, JJ.
From: croyatson@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:53:36 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Bonnie Christenson

Saint Paul, MN 55124