alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.0



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2004, as filed with Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott T. Lewis, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Acting Principal Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                                                                                                                                        
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/    SCOTT T.
LEWIS                                                                                                                                  
|                      |  |     |  | Scott T. Lewis Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Acting Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1
  
 Certification Pursuant to
 
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Rogers Communications Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of British Columbia (the “Company”) for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each
of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
 
 1.the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 Dated:  February 26, 2010
“Nadir H. Mohamed”Nadir H. MohamedPresident and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 Dated:  February 26, 2010
“William W. Linton”William W. LintonExecutive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
From: Loretta Garretson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 5:14:33 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Loretta Garretson
Ann Arbor, Michigan
----

| Delaware                                       | 37-1105865                           |
|------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification Number) |

|   |   |   | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)                  |
|--------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |                                                                                                   |
|   |   |   | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)                 |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                   |
|   |   |   | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                   |
|   |   |   | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
|   |   |   |                                                                                                   |

----

| d)     | Exhibits: |   |
|--------|-----------|--------|
|   |      | 99.1   | Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated October 24, 2011 |
|   |      |   |   |
|   |      |   |   |

| Date:  October 24, 2011 |           By:  /s/ J. Wesley Blumenshine                                                      |
|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                              |                       J. Wesley Blumenshine |
|                              |                       Secretary             |

----

| EXHIBIT INDEX  |
|---------------------|
| Exhibit No.         | Description |
|                |   |
| 99.1                | Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated October 24, 2011 |
|                |   |

----
No. 620, Misc.

#### Poe *v.*Oregon.

Supreme Court of Oregon. Certiorari denied.
<PAGE> 30
                                                               Exhibit 99.1


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549



                           Re:  NSTAR
                                Registration on
                                Forms S-4 and S-8



We are aware that our report dated November 15, 1999 on our review of the
consolidated interim financial information of NSTAR as of and for the period
ended September 30, 1999 and included in NSTAR's quarterly report on Form
10-Q for the quarter then ended is incorporated by reference in NSTAR's
registration statement on Form S-4 and related amendments (File No.
333-78285) and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-85559).  Pursuant to Rule 436(c)
under the Securities Act of 1933, this report should not be considered a part
of the registration statements prepared or certified by us within the meaning
of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.





Hartford, Connecticut               PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
November 15, 1999
##### 



[Form of Director Change of Control Agreement  Full Single-Trigger]
  
     (i)
    
    The acquisition by any person (as such term is used in Sections 13(d) and
14(d) of the Exchange Act) of beneficial ownership (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under
said Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing fifty
percent (50%) or more of the total voting power represented by the Companys then
outstanding voting securities (it being understood that securities owned by any
person on the date hereof shall not be counted against such limit with respect to
such person); or(ii)
    
    A change in the composition of the Board of Directors of the Company (the
Board) occurring within a rolling two-year period, as a result of which fewer than
a majority of the directors are Incumbent Directors. Incumbent Directors shall
mean directors who either (A) are members of the Board as of the date hereof, or (B)
are elected, or nominated for election, to the Board with the affirmative votes of at
least a majority of the Incumbent Directors




---



##### 



at the time of such election or nomination (but shall not include an individual
not otherwise an Incumbent Director whose election or nomination is in connection
with an actual or threatened proxy contest relating to the election of directors
to the Board); or(iii)
    
    A merger or consolidation involving the Company other than a merger or
consolidation which would result in the voting securities of the Company outstanding
immediately prior thereto continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or
by being converted into voting securities of the Surviving Entity (including the
parent corporation of such Surviving Entity)) at least fifty percent (50%) of the
total voting power represented by the voting securities of the Company or such
Surviving Entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation, or a
sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all the Companys assets.
    
  [Name]
 2
From: GLORIA LEONARD

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: IOM and Preventive Care for Women

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 5:35:32 PM

To HHS Leaders:

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new law

and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access

to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive

services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some

groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so

hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement,

even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger

exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Gloria Leonard

Public Policy Co-Chair

AAUW San Jose
| EXHIBIT 99.2 |   |
|--------------|--------|

|   | CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

In connection with the Quarterly Report of USURF America, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the periodending September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, David M. Loflin, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934; and                               |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of the Company. |

| Dated: November 19, 2002 | /S/ DAVID M. LOFLIN                           |   |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     | David M. Loflin

Principal Accounting Officer |   |
|                     |                                          |   |
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40818

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee 

v. 

RAMON RESENDEZ-GONZALEZ, also known as Ramon Gonzales 

Resendez, also known as Ramon Gonzalez Resendez, also known as Ramon 

Rezendez Gonzalez, 

 Defendant - Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:15-CR-25-1 

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ramon ResendezGonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 

632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Resendez-Gonzalez has filed a response. We 

have reviewed counsel’s brief, Resendez-Gonzalez’s response, and the relevant 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fif h Circuit

FILED

May 4, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk

 Case: 16-40818 Document: 00513979841 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/04/2017
No. 16-40818

2 

portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment 

that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is 

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-40818 Document: 00513979841 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/04/2017
#### Julia L. Costello, Respondent, v. Ann M. Costello, Appellant.

Judgment overruling demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Dykman, J.;

Barnard, P. J., dissenting.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62620-62621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19575]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12177]


Determination Under Section 506(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance 
Act of 1961 To Provide Military Assistance to Ukraine

    Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 506(a)(1) of the 
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (the ``Act'') (22 U.S.C. 2318(a)(1)) and 
Presidential Delegation of Authority dated January 19, 2023, I hereby 
determine that:
    <bullet> an unforeseen emergency exists which requires immediate 
military assistance to Ukraine; and
    <bullet> the emergency requirement cannot be met under the 
authority of the Arms Export Control Act or any other provision of law.
    I, therefore, pursuant to authority delegated to me by the 
President, direct the drawdown of up to $2.5 billion in defense 
articles and services of the Department of Defense, and military 
education and training, under the authority of section 506(a)(1) of the 
Act to provide assistance to Ukraine. The Department of State will 
coordinate implementation of this drawdown.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress and published 
in the Federal Register.


[[Page 62621]]


    Dated: January 19, 2023.
Antony Blinken,
Secretary of State.

    Note:  This document was received for publication by the Office 
of the Federal Register on September 6, 2023.


[FR Doc. 2023-19575 Filed 9-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 174 (Monday, September 11, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62420-62421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19541]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice:12168]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Objects Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Marie Laurencin: Sapphic 
Paris'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad 
pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Marie Laurencin: Sapphic Paris'' 
at The Barnes Foundation, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural 
significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display 
within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. 
I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published 
in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ed9e888e99848283dfd9d8d4ad9e998c9988c38a829b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6a190f091e030504585e5f532a191e0b1e0f440d051c">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street, NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of

[[Page 62421]]

Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.

Nicole L. Elkon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2023-19541 Filed 9-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1286

To provide for greater access to child care services for Federal employees.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 1, 2001

Mrs. CARNAHAN (for herself and Ms. MIKULSKI) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To provide for greater access to child care services for

Federal employees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Care Afford5 ability for Federal Employees Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. CHILD CARE SERVICES FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYEES.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—An Executive agency that pro8 vides or proposes to provide child care services for Federal

9 employees may use appropriated funds (otherwise avail10 able to such agency for salaries and expenses) to provide
2

•S 1286 IS

1 child care, in a Federal or leased facility, or through con2 tract, for civilian employees of such agency.

3 (b) AFFORDABILITY.—Amounts used to provide such

4 child care services with respect to any such facility or con5 tractor shall be applied to improve the affordability of

6 child care for lower income Federal employees using or

7 seeking to use the child care services offered by such facil8 ity or contractor.

9 (c) REGULATIONS.—The Director of the Office of

10 Personnel Management shall, within 180 days after the

11 date of enactment of this Act, issue regulations necessary

12 to carry out this section.

13 (d) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the

14 term ‘‘Executive agency’’ has the meaning given such term

15 in section 105 of title 5, United States Code, but does

16 not include the General Accounting Office.

Æ
Page 1 of 1

NG DIVISION

REG- | 2084)-/0
LEGAL PROCESS }ULATIONS

ATION & REC As of: August 31, 2011
(aie BRANCH Reoabeedy Anigust 15, 2011
Status: Posted
PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: August 31, 2011
Tracking No. 80ee1940
‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0069
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Marilyn Ruth Gilbert
Address:
459 Shannon Drive, S.E.
Bainbridge Island, WA, 98110
Email: marilyn.b.gilbert@gmail.com

General Comment

Make birth control free and provide healthcare that prevents disease.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=0900... 8/31/2011
From: Imogene Gunnels

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Women"s Health Care

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 12:23:05 AM

I implore you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM's

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions. Please protect

women's health care.