alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

      We  consent  to  the   incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 333-112150,  333-109785, 333-101436, 333-89364,
333-73766),  Form  S-8  (File  No.  333-64618)  and S-1  (File  No.  333-122717,
333-121775,  333-117268) of Multiband  Corporation  and  subsidiaries  (formerly
known as Vicom, Incorporated and subsidiaries) of our report dated March 8, 2005
(except as to Note 16, as to which the date is April 8, 2005),  which appears in
this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.


                                       /s/ VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 15, 2005
# September 28: USFOR-A provides updated statement on CIVCAS accusations in Nangarhar

/ Published Sept. 28, 2016
USFOR-A PUBLIC AFFAIRS2016-09-28-US-01**United States Forces -** Afghanistan takes all allegations of civilian casualties very seriously.Nangarhar province has been a focus for Daesh activity since 2015. Daesh seek to use the area to train, equip, disseminate propaganda, and expand their control over innocent Afghans.Our Afghan partners, especially their special forces, have been working diligently to disrupt and destroy Daesh in Southern Nangarhar, and we continue to work alongside them to support their efforts. The ANDSF have significantly reduced Daesh presence and inflicted hundreds of casualties on them. In addition and as part of US unilateral counter-terrorism operations, US forces also killed their leader in Afghanistan, Hafiz Sayed Khan, in late July.Daesh is killing innocent Afghan men, women, and children. They continue to put innocent lives at risk by deliberately surrounding themselves with civilians and dressing in female attire. We have repeatedly said that we will target Daesh wherever they are in order to disrupt their operations, degrade their attack networks, and protect innocent lives.We won't discuss the details of the specific counter-terrorism operation conducted in Nangarhar on 28 September because we are still reviewing all materials related to the strike. We take every possible measure to avoid civilian casualties in these operations, and will continue to work with Afghan authorities to determine if there is cause for additional investigation as we partner with the Afghan government in the broader fight against terrorism.We will continue our mission to degrade, disrupt, and destroy Daesh and to help our Afghan partners to do the same.
SERVED: MAY 3, 2011 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

TRM ENTERPRISES, LLC 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10CE0005 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2010-0794 

•^•,-Tf/ENT OF 

;^;PORWION 

• i' OPFRATIOMS 

V-U A q:3! 

ORDER OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

DISMISSING PROCEEDING WITH PREJUDICE 

By notice served April 29, 2011, Complainant states that, pursuant to settlement, it 

"withdraws its Complaint dated September 13, 2010." A copy of an Order Assessing Civil 

Penalty in the original case number for this proceeding, 2010CE190009, dated April 29, 2011, is 

enclosed with the notice. Accordingly, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, this proceeding is 

dismissed with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED. 

Ronnie A. Yodi 

Chief Administrative 

Attachment: Service List 
sm^ 

FAA Docket No. CP10CE0005 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

oRiGmmi^^<^^^ 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, A( 

Wilbur Wright Building—Slllife1^t^E 

A/ ' 

Mark B. Sizemore, Partner 

TRM Enterprises, LLC, Respondent 

3201 Bristol Hwy. 

Johnson City, TN 37601-1565 

.•f-.•'•-'•• 

• W Christopher R. Stevenson, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel ,-liil^ v ^,t 

Southern Region - ; .» 

Federal Aviation Administration „«, ,. 

P.O. Box 20636 4'^ v 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable Rormie A. Yoder, 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

-<Dffice ofHcarkigs, M-20, Room E12-320 ,;,,:,/ gafiminw 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S .E. | « -^tsr'ijl? '*' 

Washington, DC 20590 '^ 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or b^^ 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, $.W.,'^ 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

I cowisit, use the following address: Federal 

fWti^t Building—5uit^ 2WlO()b, Washington, 

-2-
From: sharonolney@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:00:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sharon Olney

Colorado Springs, CO 80906
From: Janet Bergin

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: coverage of preventive care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 11:10:53 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Thank you,

Janet Bergin
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      32,192,608
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               25,906,951
<ALLOWANCES>                                    60,914
<INVENTORY>                                 13,850,250
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           120,983,240
<PP&E>                                      96,927,360
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,903,990
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             553,493,363
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       72,113,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       112,232
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,314,920)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               553,493,363
<SALES>                                     97,377,152
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            97,377,152
<CGS>                                       93,435,761
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               93,435,761
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,606,211
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,825,519
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,107,182)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    71,389
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,178,571)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,178,571)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>
From: Sandra Villalobos

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Please support IOM recommendation for Women"s preventive health care

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:27:36 AM

To whom it may concern

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Thank you

Sandra
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

Exhibit 27 contains summary information extracted from OMI Corp. and
subsidiaries Consolidated condensed financial statements and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          32,569
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,016
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,207
<PP&E>                                         646,135
<DEPRECIATION>                                 277,694
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 565,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           84,861
<BONDS>                                        259,284
<COMMON>                                        15,521
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     129,674
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   565,486
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               239,880
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  208,192
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                70,369
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,708
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (50,869)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (18,973)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (31,896)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.04)
        


</TABLE>
[Cite as State ex rel. Sevayega v. McMonagle, 122 Ohio St.3d 54, 2009-Ohio-2367.]

T HE S TATE EX REL . S EVAYEGA , A PPELLANT , v. M C M ONAGLE , J UDGE , A PPELLEE . [Cite as State ex rel. Sevayega v. McMonagle, 122 Ohio St.3d 54, 2009-Ohio-2367.] Appeal from dismissal of a petition for a writ of procedendo – Procedendo not available to compel performance of a duty already performed – Judgment affirmed. (No. 2009-0106

─ Submitted May 19, 2009

─ Decided May 28, 2009.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 92157, 2008-Ohio-6275.

____________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the complaint of appellant , Reginald D. Sevayega, for a writ of procedendo. A writ of procedendo will not issue to compel the performance of a duty that has already been performed. State ex rel. Howard v. Skow , 102 Ohio St.3d 423, 2004-Ohio3652, 811 N.E.2d 1128, ¶ 9. Moreover, insofar as Sevayega contests the propriety of the ruling he received on his postconviction motion, he had an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law by way of appeal. Extraordinary relief in procedendo will not be granted if there is an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. State ex rel. George v. Burnside , 118 Ohio St.3d 406, 2008-Ohio-2702, 889 N.E.2d 533, ¶ 7. Judgment affirmed.
M OYER , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , and C UPP , JJ., concur.

____________________S UPREME C OURT OF O HIO

2 Reginald D. Sevayega, pro se. William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Pr osecuting Attorney, and Pamela Bolton, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. D. Jim Brady, amicus curiae.

____________________
SERVED: JUNE 4, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

WILLIAM A. CURTRIGHT 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2015-1319 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2014NM090046) has been assi~ed 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST -BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Dr. William Ames Curtright, Respondent 

P.O. Box 1350 

Jefferson, OR 97352 

David F. Shayne, Complainant's Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue S.W. 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-1847 

FAJ<: 425-227-1007 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

F AJ<: 202-366-7536 

DocketNo. FAA-2015-1319 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

# Foreign Trade

Skip top of page navigation

###### You are here: Census.gov › Business & Industry ›Foreign Trade › U.S. International Trade Data

                - Main
                - About
                - Data
                - Outreach
                - AES
                - Regulations
                - Reference
                - Definitions
                - Schedule B
                - FAQs

### More DATA

                          - Trade Highlights
                          - Balance by Partner Country
                          - Country/Product Trade
                          - State/Metropolitan Data
                          - Historical Series
                          - Notices and Corrections
                          - Related Party Trade
                          - Press Releases
                          - Data Products

### Important Links

                          - Global Reach Blog
                          - Newsletters
                          - ACE AESDirect
                          Related Sites- Business and Industry
- Briefing Room
- North American Industry                Classification System (NAICS)
Economic Indicator Database
                          Geographic Concordance - Annual SubscriptionDownload a file- Click on the appropriate month below to download your file.
-  If you are having technical difficulties or need help, feel free to email us at ftd.data.dissemination@census.gov or call 301-763-2311 for immediate assistance.
- Record	      layouts of the files are  available	      online .
Select Statistical Month:- 2013 Geographic Concordance  (Available on March 7, 2013)

                          Export Training
Collection of videos to enhance export training.

Spanish Language Webinars 2020-2021 (Seminarios en Línea en Español 2020-2021)
2017 And Prior Year Webinars Archive.
Upcoming Outreach Activities
Upcoming Outreach Activities
Contact Us
				Contact the International Trade Macro Analysis Branch: Email us! or use our feedback form!

                  Call us: (301)763-2311 or 1-800-549-0595 option 4			  
CONNECT WITH US**********- Information Quality
- Data Linkage Infrastructure
- Data Protection and Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- FOIA
- Inspector General
- No FEAR Act
- U.S. Department of Commerce
- USA.gov

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
✕Is this page helpful?YesNo✕NO THANKS255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached✕Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions?  Source: U.S. Census Bureau | Foreign Trade |  ftdwebmaster@census.gov |     Last Revised:  June 17, 2022
1 The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-2671

___________ Michael Terrell, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Steven Schwerb; Eric Lingard; Michael * Marks, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: August 10, 2007 Filed: August 16, 2007

___________ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Michael Terrell appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his civil rights lawsuit. We agree w ith the district court that Terrell failed to counter defendants’ evidence showing their actions did not violate his constitutional rights, seeParks v. City of Horseshoe Bend, Ark. , 480 F.3d 837, 839 (8th Cir. 2007) (to survive summary judgment motion, nonmovant must present more than scintilla of evidence and must advance specific fact s to create genuine trialworthy issue);-2- Johnson v. Blaukat , 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006) (summary judgment standard of review); and we reject as meritless Terrell’s arguments for reversal. Further, to the extent he was attemp ting to bring criminal charge s for kidnaping and abduction, he cannot do so, see Linda R.S. v. Richard D. , 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973). Finally, to the extent he challenges the district court’s de nial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion, we find no abuse of discretion. See Brooks v. Ferguson-Florissant Sch. Dist. , 113 F.3d 903, 905 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
EXHIBIT 32


                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                          PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
(the "Report") of Cimnet, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30,
2006, I, John D. Richardson, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report, fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                       BY: /s/ JOHN D. RICHARDSON
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           John D. Richardson
                                           Chairman of the Board,
                                           Chief Executive Officer and
                                           Principal Accounting Officer


August 14, 2006
Order entered July 31, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00362-CR

No. 05-18-00363-CR

No. 05-18-00364-CR

JOHN F. SEAY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17-44837-P, F17-44838-P & F17-44846-P

ORDER

On May 2, 2019, we ordered appellant to file his brief by May 31, 2019. We cautioned 

appellant that the failure to do so would result in these cases being submitted without appellant’s 

briefs. To date, appellant has not filed a brief nor has he communicated with the Court regarding 

the appeals.

We ORDER these appeals submitted without appellant’s brief. An opinion will issue in 

due course.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE