alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: violastowe@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Support Access to Preventative Care & Contraception

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 11:02:28 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

This issue shouldn't be about politics and personal religious opinions. THIS is an issue vital to

health, safety and the consciousness of living on this earth. Please support access to

preventative care and contraception. 

Kind regards,

*Curtine Metcalf
From: sussieee@coz.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:05:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Roberta Reed

Oklahoma City, OK 73110
From: lestety@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:13:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Daniel Lester

American Fork, UT 84003
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA-1176]
 AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice.
 ACTION: Notice; correction.
 SUMMARY: The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) published a document in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         of April 4, 2023, concerning a notice of application for bulk manufacturer of Controlled Substances. That document listed a drug code/controlled substance in error as it was not requested by the registrant (2270—Pentobarbital). Additionally, the document listed duplicates of 7 other drug codes in error (1100, 1105, 1205, 1724, 8333, 9780, 9801).


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Correction In the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     of April 4, 2023, in FR Doc. 2023-06952 (88 FR 19990), on page 19990, in columns 1 and 2, under the requested controlled substances/drug codes, it should read as such: Controlled substance
Drug code
ScheduleGamma Hydroxybutyric Acid
2010
ITetrahydrocannabinols
7370
IPsilocybin
7437
ICodeine-N-oxide
9053
INoroxymorphone
9145
IDifenoxin
9168
IMorphine-N-oxide
9307
INormorphine
9313
IAlphamethadol
9605
IBetamethadol
9609
INorlevorphanol
9634
IAcetyl Fentanyl (N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)-N-phenylacetamide)
9821
IButyryl Fentanyl
9822
IFentanyl related-compounds as defined in 21 CFR 1308.11(h)
9850
IAmphetamine
1100
IIMethamphetamine
1105
IILisdexamfetamine
1205
IIMethylphenidate
1724
IINabilone
7379
IIANPP (4-Anilino-N-phenethyl-4-piperidine)
8333
IIPhenylacetone
8501
IICodeine
9050
IIDihydrocodeine
9120
IIOxycodone
9143
IIHydromorphone
9150
IIDiphenoxylate
9170
IIEcgonine
9180
IIHydrocodone
9193
IILevorphanol
9220
IIIsomethadone
9226
IIMeperidine
9230
IIMeperidine intermediate-A
9232
IIMeperidine intermediate-B
9233
IIMeperidine intermediate-C
9234
IIMethadone
9250
IIMethadone intermediate
9254
IIDextropropoxyphene, bulk (non-dosage forms)
9273
IIMorphine
9300
IIOripavine
9330
IIThebaine
9333
IIOpium tincture
9630
II( print page 60988)Opium, powdered
9639
IIOxymorphone
9652
IINoroxymorphone
9668
IIAlfentanil
9737
IIRemifentanil
9739
IISufentanil
9740
IITapentadol
9780
IIFentanyl
9801
II
 Claude Redd, Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2023-19179 Filed 9-5-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL BRAVO IZARRARAS and

CELIA TORRES MORENO,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-71570

Agency Nos. A075-734-587

A075-734-588

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 15, 2013** 

Before: FISHER, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. 

Daniel Bravo Izarraras and Celia Torres Moreno, natives and citizens of

Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is

governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial

FILED

OCT 23 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
of a motion to reopen. Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). 

We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to

reopen where petitioners failed to establish prima facie eligibility for asylum,

withholding of removal, or relief under the Convention Against Torture. See id. at

986 (agency may deny a motion to reopen based on failure to establish a prima

facie case for the relief sought); Delgado-Ortiz v. Holder, 600 F.3d 1148, 1151-52

(9th Cir. 2010) (holding that generalized evidence of violence and crime was

insufficient to establish eligibility for asylum, withholding, or relief under CAT).

We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s decision to not exercise its sua

sponte authority to reopen removal proceedings. See Mejia-Hernandez v. Holder,

633 F.3d 818, 823-24 (9th Cir. 2011).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

2 11-71570
EXHIBIT 31.2302 CERTIFICATIONI, Ronald J. Fior, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Callidus Software Inc. on Form 10-Q;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of this annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 14, 2006       /s/ RONALD J. FIOR *Ronald J. Fior*    *Chief Financial Officer,*
From: Lisa Dakes

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 10:21:09 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Lisa Dakes

7631 C Street

Chesapeake Beach, Md 20732
Exhibit 31.2  Sarbanes - Oxley Section 302 Certification  I, James J. Judge, certify that:1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NSTAR;2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of NSTAR as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;4.NSTAR's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for NSTAR and have:a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to NSTAR, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b)designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)evaluated the effectiveness of NSTAR's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, based on such evaluation; andd)disclosed in this quarterly report any change in NSTARs internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, NSTARs internal control over financial reporting.5.NSTAR's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to NSTAR's auditors and the audit committee of NSTAR's board of trustees:a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect NSTAR's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in NSTAR's internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  July 28, 2006By:/s/ JAMES J. JUDGEJames J. JudgeSenior Vice President,Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1317

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for equitable

reimbursement rates under the medicare program to Medicare+Choice

organizations.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

AUGUST 2, 2001

Mr. SCHUMER (for himself and Mr. SANTORUM) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

for equitable reimbursement rates under the medicare

program to Medicare+Choice organizations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare+Choice Eq5 uity and Access Act of 2001’’.
2

•S 1317 IS

1 SEC. 2. OPTION TO RECEIVE PAYMENT BASED ON ANNUAL

2 AREA-SPECIFIC MEDICARE+CHOICE CAPITA3 TION RATE.

4 Section 1853(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

5 1395w–23(c)) is amended—

6 (1) in paragraph (1)—

7 (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph

8 (A), by striking ‘‘or (C)’’ and inserting ‘‘(C), or,

9 in the case of payments for months beginning

10 on or after January 1, 2002, (D)’’; and

11 (B) by adding at the end the following new

12 subparagraph:

13 ‘‘(D) ANNUAL AREA-SPECIFIC

14 MEDICARE+CHOICE CAPITATION RATE.—The

15 annual area-specific Medicare+Choice capita16 tion rate for the Medicare+Choice payment

17 area, as determined under paragraph (3) for

18 the year.’’; and

19 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘(1)(A)’’ and

20 inserting ‘‘subparagraphs (A) and (D) of paragraph

21 (1)’’.

22 SEC. 3. PERMANENTLY REMOVING APPLICATION OF BUDG23 ET NEUTRALITY TO BLENDED CAPITATION

24 RATE.

25 Section 1853(c) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

26 1395w–23(c)) is amended—
3

•S 1317 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (1)(A), in the matter following

2 clause (ii), by inserting ‘‘(for years before 2002)’’

3 after ‘‘multiplied’’; and

4 (2) in paragraph (5), by inserting ‘‘(before

5 2002)’’ after ‘‘for each year’’.

6 SEC. 4. REVISION OF FORMULA USED TO CALCULATE THE

7 NATIONAL STANDARDIZED ANNUAL

8 MEDICARE+CHOICE CAPITATION RATE TO

9 REFLECT MEDICARE+CHOICE ENROLLMENT.

10 Section 1853(c)(4)(B)(i)(II) of the Social Security

11 Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–23(c)(4)(B)(i)(II)) is amended by

12 inserting ‘‘(or, in the case of calculations for payments for

13 months beginning on or after January 1, 2002, the aver14 age number of medicare beneficiaries enrolled in a

15 Medicare+Choice plan that are)’’ after ‘‘medicare bene16 ficiaries’’.

Æ
#### Hannah Deffendarfar, Appellant, v. George W. Dicks and others, Respondents.

Judgment affirmed, Without costs. Opinions, by

Brady and Daniels, J.,

and by Davis, P. J., dissenting.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.93 MB)
 
 U.S. Department of Defense U.S. Air Force USCENTCOM U.S. Army AFCENT Airman Magazine
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Lbj1215lbj@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: (no subject)

Date: Thursday, August 18, 2011 6:50:20 PM

 join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for "religious employers." These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that "religious refusal" exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so Catholic hospitals would be exempt

from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If

granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where

they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM's

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.