alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA 

Present: Judges Kelsey, Beales and Senior Judge Clements 

FLUOR DANIEL SERVICES CORPORATION 

 AND AMERICAN CASUALTY COMPANY OF 

 READING, PENNSYLVANIA 

 MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 1975-13-3 PER CURIAM 

 FEBRUARY 18, 2014 

ARCHIE SHORT 

 FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION 

 (Mark A. Stallings, on brief), for appellants. 

 (Amber H. Russo; HammondTownsend, PLC, on brief), for 

appellee. 

 Fluor Daniel Services Corporation and American Casualty Company of Reading, 

Pennsylvania (hereinafter “employer”) appeal a decision of the Workers’ Compensation 

Commission (hereinafter “commission”) finding that Archie Short (hereinafter “claimant”) 

suffered compensable injuries to his low back and bilateral hips by aggravating his pre-existing 

avascular necrosis, thereby entitling him to temporary total disability benefits from August 10, 

2011 through November 28, 2011. 

 Employer argues the evidence was insufficient to prove a causal connection between the 

April 5, 2010 accident and claimant’s avascular necrosis or to prove the medical treatment for his 

hips was related to the April 5, 2010 accident. It also contends the commission applied the 

wrong legal standard in determining whether there was a causal connection between the April 5, 

 *

 Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication. 

UNPUBLISHED 
 - 2 - 

2010 accident and the pre-existing condition.1

 We have reviewed the record and the 

commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Short v. Fluor Daniel Servs. Corp., 

JCN VA02000003943 (Sept. 13, 2013). We dispense with oral argument and summarily affirm 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code § 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27. 

 Affirmed. 

 1

 Because employer did not object to the legal standard applied by the commission, it has 

waived this argument on appeal. See Rule 5A:18.
From: pbenosky@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:33:01 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patricia Benosky

Ocala, FL 34482
# Stay Connected

## At a glance

CDC's Division of Tuberculosis Elimination offers many ways for public health professionals, health care providers, patients, and others to connect. 

## Follow CDC TB on social media

          - X/Twitter:  @CDC_TB  
          - Facebook:  @CDCTB  

You can also watch YouTube video content on CDC's tuberculosis (TB) playlist.

## Subscribe to CDC's TB Notes Newsletter

TB Notes is the Division of Tuberculosis Elimination’s quarterly newsletter. 

TB notes includes:
          - News and updates from CDC,  
          - Activities and highlights from state and local TB programs across the country, and  
          - Recent publications.  

### Subscribe to TB Notes‎

Subscribe to TB Notes

### TB Notes 2024 Issues

TB Notes Issue 1, 2024
July 12, 2024

## Visit Find TB Resources

Find TB Resources connects health care professionals, patients, and the public to an online library of resources, training, and educational materials.

You can help expand and enhance Find TB Resources by submitting your own TB materials.

Learn more by subscribing to the Find TB Resources monthly newsletter. 

## Sign up for TB updates

Stay up-to-date with the latest TB information. Sign up for TB updates using your email address. 

## Learn about upcoming TB events

CDC maintains a list of current and upcoming TB-related events. Learn about upcoming regional, national, and international events for the TB community.

## Order free TB education materials

CDC Publications On Demand allows people in the United States to order printed copies of TB materials such as:
          - Fact sheets,  
          - Posters,  
          - Booklets,  
          - Training resources, and  
          - Other educational materials  

Follow these instructions to place your order. 

## 		On This Page	

              - Follow CDC TB on social media
              - Subscribe to CDC's TB Notes Newsletter
              - Visit Find TB Resources
              - Sign up for TB updates
              - Learn about upcoming TB events
              - Order free TB education materials

SourcesPrintShare

FacebookLinkedInTwitterSyndicate

Division of Tuberculosis Elimination National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and Tuberculosis PreventionCenters for Disease Control and Prevention
From: carol.2turners@gmail.com on behalf of Carol A Turner

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Accept IOM"s recommendation for preventive heath care and contraception

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:37:31 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

-- 

Carol Turner

13821 Lake Wildwood Drive

Penn Valley, Ca 95946

650-255-3347
From: lhall@syracusediocese.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:13:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lisa Hall

Syracuse, NY 13201
From: dave@cedarstreetchurch.org

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:32:47 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

DAVID BAUER

Mason, MI 48854
From: Judy Helmich

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive care and contraception

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 11:46:00 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

I, Dean Personne, the chief executive
officer of Peak International Limited (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge,

(i) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 10, 2006 |  | /s/ Dean Personne      
|                      |  | Dean Personne          
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1021 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1021

  To reauthorize the Tropical Forest Conservation Act of 1998 through 
                           fiscal year 2004.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 12, 2001

 Mr. Lugar (for himself, Mr. Biden, Mr. Chafee, Mr. Craig, Mr. Kerry, 
  Mr. Leahy, Mr. Lieberman, Mr. Murkowski, Mr. Reed, and Mr. Roberts) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                     Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reauthorize the Tropical Forest Conservation Act of 1998 through 
                           fiscal year 2004.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS TO SUPPORT REDUCTION OF DEBT 
              UNDER THE FOREIGN ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1961 AND TITLE I OF 
              THE AGRICULTURAL TRADE DEVELOPMENT AND ASSISTANCE ACT OF 
              1954.

    (a) Reauthorization.--Section 806 of the Tropical Forest 
Conservation Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2431d) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new subsection:
    ``(d) Authorization of Appropriations for Fiscal Years After Fiscal 
Year 2001.--For the cost (as defined in section 502(5) of the Federal 
Credit Reform Act of 1990) for the reduction of any debt pursuant to 
this section or section 807, there are authorized to be appropriated to 
the President the following:
            ``(1) $50,000,000 for fiscal year 2002.
            ``(2) $75,000,000 for fiscal year 2003.
            ``(3) $100,000,000 for fiscal year 2004.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 808(a)(1)(D) of the Tropical 
Forest Conservation Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 2431f(a)(1)(D)) is amended 
by striking ``to appropriated under sections 806(a)(2) and 807(a)(2)'' 
and inserting ``to be appropriated under sections 806(a)(2), 807(a)(2), 
and 806(d)''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc. (the
Company), on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven A. Abney, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Acting Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |                                                                                                                                                         
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 31, 2005 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    STEVEN A.
ABNEY
|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Steven A. Abney Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Acting Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>
 
                       New Century Financial Corporation
                Statement Re Computation of Per Share Earnings
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
 
 
                                                         Six Months Ended           Three Months Ended
                                                             June 30,                    June 30,
                                                     -----------------------------------------------------
                                                        1998          1997          1998          1997
                                                     -----------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                  <C>           <C>           <C>            <C>
Basic:
 
Net earnings                                         $   13,725    $    7,420    $    7,492     $    5,073
                                                     =====================================================
 
    Weighted average common shares                   
     outstanding                                     14,037,678     2,414,063    14,070,835      4,408,899
                                                     -----------------------------------------------------
 
Earnings per share                                   $     0.98    $     3.07    $     0.53     $     1.15
                                                     =====================================================
 
Diluted:
 
Net earnings                                         $   13,725    $    7,420    $    7,492     $    5,073
                                                     =====================================================
 
Weighted average number of common and common
  equivalent shares outstanding:
    Weighted average common shares                   
     outstanding                                     14,037,678     2,414,063    14,070,835      4,408,899
    Dilutive effect of convertible preferred stock,
     stock options and warrants, after application      869,200     7,998,307       947,744      6,591,036   
                                                     -----------------------------------------------------
                                                     14,906,879    10,412,371    15,018,580     10,999,935
                                                                                                          
Earnings per share                                   $     0.92    $     0.71    $     0.50     $     0.46
                                                     ===================================================== 
                                                     
</TABLE>
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00747-CV

Rufus ODEM,

Appellant

v.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE, LLP, John Morgan, & Kathie Schwerdtfeger,

Appellees

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2007-CI-15162

Honorable David A. Berchelmann Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 1, 2010

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART

Appellant Rufus Odem filed a motion to dismissthis appeal as to appellee John Morgan. We

grant the motion and hold that the appeal as to appellee John Morgan is dismissed. See TEX.R.APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1). The appeal remains pending as to appellees Deloitte & Touche, LLP, and Kathie

Schwerdtfeger. Any costs incurred by appellee John Morgan are assessed against appellant. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)(absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM
From: Jonathan

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive Care & Contraception Make Medical/Financial Sense

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 3:44:02 AM

AAUW Recommendations Are Important!

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.