NA

COMMITTEE ON EPA 542-R-98-001b

O

O T

T

A N C C M S

CDSM

THE CHALLENGES OF June 1998

MODERN SOCIETY www.clu-in.com

www.nato.int/ccms

NATO/CCMS Pilot Study

Evaluation of Demonstrated and

Emerging Technologies for the

Treatment and Clean Up of

Contaminated Land and

Groundwater

PHASE II

OVERVIEW REPORT

Number 219

NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION
Overview Report

NATO/CCMS Pilot Study

Evaluation of Demonstrated and Emerging

Technologies for the Treatment and Clean Up

of Contaminated Land and Groundwater

(Phase II)

June 1998
NOTICE

This report was prepared under the auspices of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’s Committee

on the Challenges of Modern Society (NATO/CCMS) as a service to the technical community by the

United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA). The document was funded by U.S. EPA’s

Technology Innovation Office under the direction of Michael Kosakowski (Work Assignment Manager).

Michael A. Smith of Berkhamsted, U.K., was the principal editor for the Pilot Study reports and the

author of this Overview Report. The Overview Report was edited and produced by Environmental

Management Support, Inc., of Silver Spring, Maryland, under U.S. EPA contract 68-W6-0014. Mention

of trade names or specific applications does not imply endorsement or acceptance by U.S. EPA.
NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, Phase II Overview Report

CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................... 1

2. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE .......................................... 2

3. RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER CCMS PROGRAMS ........................... 2

3.1 The CCMS Fellowship Program ........................................ 2

3.2 CCMS Study Visit Program ........................................... 2

4. ACCOMPLISHMENTS ................................................. 2

5. TECHNICAL OVERVIEW ............................................... 5

5.1 Introduction ...................................................... 5

5.2 Development Status ................................................ 5

5.3 In Situ vs. Ex Situ Technologies ........................................ 5

5.4 Technology Types ................................................. 5

5.5 Contaminants Treated ............................................... 6

6. THE PHASE III PILOT STUDY ........................................... 6

7. CONCLUSIONS ...................................................... 7

8. RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................. 7

9. REFERENCES ....................................................... 9

10. NATIONAL CONTACTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

i
NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, Phase II Overview Report

1. INTRODUCTION

This report provides an overview of the Phase II Pilot Study on the Evaluation of Demonstrated and

Emerging Technologies for Treatment and Clean Up of Contaminated Land and Groundwater. It also

contains the key conclusions of the Pilot Study and recommendations for further action. A detailed

account of the Phase II Pilot Study is provided in the Final Report (1).

The Phase II Pilot Study was proposed to NATO by the United States Environmental Protection Agency

(U.S. EPA) at the Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society’s (CCMS) plenary session in April

1992. Member countries voted on and accepted the proposal at the same meeting.

The study was conducted under the joint leadership of the United States, the Federal Republic of

Germany, and the Netherlands. It was co-chaired by Mr. Stephen James and Dr. Walter Kovalick, Jr.,

of U.S. EPA. Dr. Deniz Beten, Director of CCMS Programs, provided liaison with the NATO/CCMS

secretariat. Additional information on CCMS and the Pilot Studies may be obtained from the Country

Representatives listed at the back of this document.

The Pilot Study Group held a total of seven meetings during the course of the study. During these

meetings, countries submitted candidate projects that were discussed and voted on for inclusion in the

study based on criteria agreed upon by the participating countries. In-depth interim and final report

presentations on the implementation and results of these projects were made during the international

meetings and summarized in meeting proceedings. Australia, Austria, Canada, the Czech Republic,

Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the

United Kingdom, and the United States provided projects to the study. In addition, Belgium, Hong Kong,

Italy, New Zealand, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, and the Slovak Republic were represented at

one or more meetings by a government representative, a CCMS Fellow, or an individual expert.

Each project was planned and executed by the responsible organization, with project funding from the

various government and non-government organizations involved. The costs of participating in

international meetings and preparing project reports were generally met by these organizations

concerned, which in many cases were private companies.

Each international conference included host country presentations and a tour de table, during which

member countries discussed developments in national legislation, regulations, and research and

development programs. In addition, recognized experts in diverse technical fields gave invited papers

related to the challenges of soil and groundwater remediation, and CCMS Fellows provided presentations

and written reports on their work. These reports from Fellows were published as part of the proceedings

of the international meetings and are contained in Appendix V of the Final Report.

The Final Report was prepared by a voluntary team drawn from a number of countries. The Pilot Study

Directors acknowledge the efforts of the members of the team without whose contributions it would not

have been possible to produce the report. The Final Report was published by U.S. EPA. Contributions

towards the direct costs of preparing the Final Report have also been made by Denmark, Germany,

Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom.

The various Pilot Study activities resulted in extensive transfer of study findings to potential users of

new remediation technologies and to a wider technical and administrative audience. They also increased

the exchange of ideas on technology needs and fostered greater contact among experts and decisionmakers within both member and non-member countries.

1
NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, Phase II Overview Report

2. BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The problem of land and groundwater contamination from improper handling and disposal of hazardous

materials and wastes is faced by all countries. Many countries have committed resources to developing

advanced, innovative remediation technologies and to evaluating them under field conditions. The

ongoing challenge is how to maximize the value of these technology demonstrations and effectively

transfer the technologies both within and between countries. In addition, there has been an increasing

recognition of the need for approaches not dependent on advanced technologies and for technologies that

can be cost-effectively employed in the socioeconomic circumstances of Eastern and Central Europe and

developing countries.

The purpose of this NATO/CCMS pilot study was to identify, discuss, and review innovative, emerging,

and alternative technologies, and to transfer technical performance and economic information to potential

users of these technologies. A specific objective of the study was to identify “lessons learned” from the

technology demonstrations—both the successes and those that illustrated technology failures or limitations. The latter type of information is rarely presented in conferences or discussed in the technical

literature, but is very important for making informed decisions involving critical time and monetary

requirements. It is also useful for defining priorities in research and development programs.

3. RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER CCMS PROGRAMS

3.1 The CCMS Fellowship Program

The CCMS Fellowship Program made an important contribution to the success of the Phase II Pilot

Study, as it did to the two earlier Pilot Studies on the remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater.

It facilitated participation of several experts, including experts from countries such as Portugal, that

would otherwise not have had a presence in the Pilot Study. The participation of these experts enabled

a wider range of topics to be covered.

Ten NATO Fellowships were awarded under this Pilot Study. Nine Fellows conducted associated studies

and submitted project reports to the Pilot Study under guidance of the Pilot Study Directors. One edited

the Final Report and contributed to the content of the report; two other Fellows also contributed to the

preparation of the report. All of the Fellows attended one or more meetings of the Pilot Study Group

and played an active part in the discussions.

The Fellows came from private, university, and governmental organizations in the Federal Republic of

Germany, the Netherlands, Portugal, Turkey, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Their activities

covered a range of topics related to the Pilot Study, including an examination of the national approach

to such problems as costs and economics, quality management, innovative approaches to large-scale

remediation projects, and assessment of the performance of in situ treatment methods.

3.2 CCMS Study Visit Program

Participation by a number of individuals, including expert speakers, was made possible by the provision

of travel funds through the CCMS Study Visit Program.

4. ACCOMPLISHMENTS

The Pilot Study Group examined 52 different remediation technology projects from 14 countries during

the five-year program. The projects encompassed in situ and ex situ biological, physical-chemical, and

2
NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, Phase II Overview Report

thermal treatment technologies. Many of the projects involved two or more technologies, either in

integrated treatment systems or in parallel treatment. The reports on these projects revealed an ongoing

evolution of innovative and advanced technologies. The Pilot Study is believed to have been instrumental

in facilitating this development.

Non-member countries, including members of the North Atlantic Cooperation Council (NACC) took

increasing interest in and participated in the Phase II Pilot Study. For example:

• The first Pilot Study meeting was held in Budapest in 1992—the first CCMS meeting to be held in

a NACC country. A number of the participants presented papers at an international environmental

meeting held the previous week.

• The third meeting was held in Adelaide, Australia, in February 1995 and was co-hosted by the

Commonwealth EPA.

• Projects were contributed by a number of non-member countries including, Australia, the Czech

Republic, Hungary, Sweden, and Switzerland.

The Pilot Study was designed to provide participants with a broader view of the research strategies of

other countries to help them focus their own research strategy. Technology transfer from the Pilot Study

was promoted by circulating meeting reports, involving members in conferences and symposia, and

publishing papers in professional journals. Some examples of this activity are listed below:

• The proceedings of the Pilot Study meetings were provided to country representatives (nominated

by their respective countries for participation in the meetings) to duplicate and distribute within their

countries, as needed.

• In 1995, U.S. EPA published an Interim Status Report (2) that was distributed to all participating

countries and others worldwide.

• The German Federal Ministry of Environment, Nature Protection, and Reactor Safety (Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit) commissioned one CCMS Fellow to prepare

a report of the meeting held in Berlin in 1996 and a review of research needs (3). This report

was circulated to country representatives.

• During the Pilot Study meetings, participants visited soil treatment facilities, ongoing site cleanup,

and research institutions. These activities stimulated the participation of private companies in the

Pilot Study and enlarged the network of international experts and increased their interactions.

• The Pilot Study Director and Co-Directors provided annual reports to NATO/CCMS.

• The Co-Directors and other members of the Pilot Study served on numerous science advisory

committees and presented invited papers at national and international technology conferences and

symposia at national conferences in Australia, the Netherlands, Canada, Luxembourg, the United

Kingdom, and the United States. A special session based on the Pilot Study formed part of the

Netherlands Research Organization (TNO) international conference on contaminated soil, held in

Maastricht in 1995.

• A paper describing the current Pilot Study and the achievements of earlier studies on contaminated

land and groundwater (4) was presented at an International Symposium on the Rehabilitation of

3
NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, Phase II Overview Report

Military Sites and Demilitarization of Explosive Ordnance, held in Luxembourg 1994 and cosponsored by NATO, the World Health Organization, and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

• In the United Kingdom, a number of related reports were prepared for the U.K. Department of the

Environment. One of these formed the basis for a wider publication.

In addition to the technical issues that were the focus of this Pilot Study, each meeting started with a

tour de table, during which each country discussed developments in national legislation, regulations,

technical criteria, and guidelines (5). Understanding differences in policy and management strategies in

other countries has been helpful to study members for discussions when they returned to their countries.

Close liaison was maintained throughout the study with other international groups dealing with the

problems of contaminated land including:

• the CCMS Pilot Study on the Environmental Aspects of Reusing Military Lands;

• the “Ad hoc International Working Group” on Contaminated Land, which grew out of discussions

among country representatives attending the NATO/CCMS meetings. The Working Group exists to

provide a forum—open to any country—in which the issues and problems of contaminated land and

groundwater can be discussed at a national level and information can be freely exchanged to the

benefit of all participants;

• the Common Forum on Contaminated Land in the European Union, which also began through the

NATO/CCMS meetings;

• CARACAS* (the European Union’s [EU] Concerted Action on Risk Assessment for Contaminated

Sites);

• NICOLE* (the EU’s Concerted Action Network for Industrially Contaminated Land in Europe);

• the International Organization for Standardization’s (ISO) Technical Committee TC190: Soil Quality,

which is preparing international standards for soil and site assessment, including chemical,

biological, and physical testing methods; and

• the German-United States Bilateral Agreement, the goals of which are to:

—facilitate an understanding of each country’s approach to the remediation of contaminated sites;

—demonstrate innovative remedial technologies;

—compare quality assurance programs; and

—facilitate technology transfer.

* CARACAS (coordinated by the German Umweltbundesamt) and NICOLE are both funded by the European

Commission’s Directorate General XII under the Environment and Climate Research and Development Program.

4
NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, Phase II Overview Report

5. TECHNICAL OVERVIEW

5.1 Introduction

There were 52 active projects in the Pilot Study. Summary information on each project is provided in

Appendix IV (Volume 2 of the Final Report). The project summaries provide a technical abstract, which

summarizes the project’s progress and results, but is not a critical review of the project. The summaries

also provide the name of a technical contact for further information.

While the objective of the Pilot Study was to evaluate applications of particular technologies, a large

proportion of the projects involved more than one technology. Some involved the use of integrated

treatment systems combining more than one technology, and others involved the application of more than

one technology to deal with separate aspects of site contamination. Other projects concerned theoretical

studies, strategic scientific studies, or large-scale remediation projects for which the remediation strategy

had yet to be developed.

Because the projects are classified below in a variety of ways, they may be counted two or three times,

and not all projects may be included in each analysis. Furthermore, the categorization of projects is a

matter of judgment, and alternative categorizations may be possible. The projects are classified in the

following sections as follows:

• by the development status of the technology (Section 5.2);

• whether they are in situ or ex situ technologies, or a combination of both (Section 5.3);

• by the type of technology used (Section 5.4);

• by the contaminants treated (Section 5.5); and

• whether they involve a single technology, mixed technologies, or integrated treatment systems.

5.2 Development Status

Forty-nine of the 52 active projects were technology-based. The Pilot Study accepted technical projects

in two areas of development: “emerging” and “demonstration.” For the purposes of the Pilot Study, an

emerging technology is defined as being at bench- or pilot-scale, while a demonstrated technology is one

implemented at field- or full-scale. Demonstrated technologies are usually at or near to commercial

application. There was almost an even split of projects within the Pilot Study examining emerging and

demonstrated technologies.

5.3 In Situ vs. Ex Situ Technologies

There were 18 projects using in situ technologies: 26 projects using ex situ technologies, six projects

using both in situ and ex situ technologies, and two projects (Projects 22 and 56) for which the

remediation strategy had yet to be decided.

5.4 Technology Types

For the purposes of the Final Report the technologies described in each technical project were broadly

classified as one of five types: biological, chemical, physical-chemical, stabilization/solidification, or

5
NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, Phase II Overview Report

thermal. The additional categories of “integrated” and “mixed” are used to describe combinations of

technologies used as part of an overall remediation strategy. “Integrated” refers to approaches where two

or more technologies are used simultaneously or in series to treat a specific site problem. “Mixed”

projects involve two or more technologies used to treat different contaminated areas or media as part

of an overall remedial strategy.

The classification of projects was as follows (Note that some projects were counted twice.):

Technology

Type

Number of

Projects Examples of Technologies

Biological 24 bioventing, biopiles, slurry reactors, white rot fungi

Physical-Chemical 29 soil vapor extraction, soil washing, solvent

extraction, ultraviolet treatment

Chemical 4 photochemical oxidation, ozone treatment, sorption,

leaching

Thermal 5 thermal desorption, incineration, thermal

vitrification

Stabilization/Solidification 2 chemical fixation, grouting

Other 4 site characterizations, free-product recovery

There were 23 projects that relied upon a single technology, 19 that used integrated technologies, seven

mixed technologies, and three that did not involve treatment. Typical combinations were soil vapor

extraction with in situ biotreatment, soil washing followed by biotreatment, and soil washing followed

by thermal treatment.

5.5 Contaminants Treated

Forty of the 52 projects were concerned only with the treatment of organic contaminants, including

polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, polychlorinated biphenyls, and BTEX compounds (benzene, toluene,

ethylbenzene, and xylenes). Six projects dealt exclusively with metals, and six dealt with both inorganic

and organic contaminants. One project focused on remediation of inorganic sulfates and cyanides.

6. THE PHASE III PILOT STUDY

The country representatives and other participants in the Pilot Study agreed on the merit of a Phase III

Pilot Study—both for those countries having established programs to address contaminated land and for

those who have more recently begun to address contamination problems, such as countries in Central

and Eastern Europe. In addition, developing countries might benefit by avoiding the environmental

degradation that accompanied the industrialization of Europe and North America. Particular needs

identified included more extensive, cheaper, and sustainable treatment technologies, and studies of

containment methods.

The United States formally proposed a follow-up Pilot Study at the CCMS Plenary Meeting held in April

1997. The proposal was accepted, and Germany and The Netherlands agreed to participate as co-pilot

6
NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, Phase II Overview Report

countries. The new Pilot Study was welcomed by Cooperation Partners at the subsequent “Continuation

of the Plenary Meeting.” The first meeting of the new Pilot Study was held in Vienna, Austria, in

February 1998. Seven projects initiated during this Phase II study will be continued during the Phase

III study.

7. CONCLUSIONS

This Phase II Pilot Study again demonstrated the benefits of exchanging technical and economic

information on contaminated land and groundwater remediation technologies. The full conclusions of

the Pilot Study are presented in the Final Report, together with supporting statements. The conclusions

are based on the deliberations of the Pilot Study Group, case studies, expert speaker presentations,

special studies carried out by Fellows of the Pilot Study, and the experience and expertise of the

individual chapter authors. The conclusions are of four types:

• general conclusions arising from the Pilot Study;

• general conclusions about remediation and technology transfer;

• conclusions relating to individual chapters in the report; and

• research needs.

Seven of the conclusions listed in the Final Report are regarded as particularly important and are listed

below:

1. Remediation strategies in a number of countries are moving from technology-intensive treatment

processes to increasing use of land use management and extensive approaches such as natural

attenuation.

2. The intended future use of a site is increasingly a determining factor when setting clean-up

objectives and selecting a remediation strategy.

3. Integrated treatment systems are frequently needed for site remediation.

4. Energy efficiency practices influence plant design resulting in varying processing costs between

countries. This may make cost comparisons between countries difficult and lead to the choice

of different technologies to address similar problems.

5. All remediation activities require proper operation and management.

6. Independent evaluation and verification of technologies and uniform data collection are needed

for effective technology transfer.

7. Scientific understanding of processes is essential to avoid forming harmful end-products and

byproducts, ensure process optimization, avoid unwanted transfer of contaminants to other

media, and understand the limits of technical performance.

8. RECOMMENDATIONS

1) The CCMS is invited by the Pilot Study Directors to commend this Phase II Pilot Study Final Report

to the NATO Council for approval.

7
NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, Phase II Overview Report

All the participants in this phase of the study are commended for their professionalism, technical

expertise, and cooperation. The Pilot Study Directors particularly thank the two co-pilot countries,

Germany and The Netherlands, for their assistance. The CCMS Fellows are complimented on their

technical quality and personal input to the Pilot Study. The Expert Speaker activities were a major

success in stimulating discussion among participants. Over and above the technical successes of the

Pilot Study, a camaraderie was established between participants leading to extensive exchanges of

information outside of the Pilot Study. The progress of the Study was reported via formal interim

reports and numerous papers published in technical journals, and conference proceedings published

in North America, Europe, and Australia. Consequently, the CCMS is invited to commend the Final

Report to member governments and to the governments of the NACC countries drawing their

attention to the technical information, conclusions, and recommendations it contains.

2) The CCMS is requested to encourage participation of NATO and non-NATO countries in the

continuation study (Phase III Pilot Study).

The participation of NACC and other non-NATO countries has been a feature of the Phase II Pilot

Study with mutual benefit to all involved. The Pilot Study co-pilots will continue to elicit formal

participation by additional countries known to have contaminated land and groundwater programs.

CCMS is requested to draw the attention of member countries to the way in which formal

participation can open doors for researchers, regulators, and others from within and outside

government to high quality technology and information exchange activities and to an extensive

network of professional contacts. The CCMS is asked to encourage member countries to adopt

formal observer status, even if the countries wish to have only minimal active participation at an

official level.

3) The Phase III Pilot Study should maintain liaison with related international activities on

contaminated land.

The benefits to all participants has been enhanced by the parallel activities in policy-orientated areas

(e.g., the International Working Group on Contaminated Land and the Common Forum on

Contaminated Land) and technical areas such as risk assessment through CARACAS and soil quality

through the ISO Technical Committee 190. Liaison should be extended in the Phase III study to

include NICOLE, the European Environment Agency’s Soil Topic Centre, the World Health

Organization’s European Centre for Environment and Health and others involved in this technical

area. Close liaison should be continued with NATO/CCMS Pilot Studies dealing with contamination

of military installations.

4) The Phase III Pilot Study should publish an annual progress report and, as appropriate, periodic

technical reports on selected topics.

Preparing a technical report summarizing work over several years requires a considerable effort on

the part of all concerned. It involves not only critical review of submitted information, but also the

gathering of additional technical information and liaison with country representatives and project

authors. Furthermore, there is a considerable editorial effort required to combine the individual

contributions into a coherent and substantive final report. Preparation of the Final Report for this and

preceding Pilot Studies (1,2) has been possible because of the volunteer efforts of the writing teams.

8
NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, Phase II Overview Report

The remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater is a rapidly evolving field so that there is a

risk that much of the information provided in the Pilot Study report will already be out of date by

the time of publication. It is therefore recommended that this issue be addressed by:

• preparation of an annual report that could be widely distributed and serve as a working tool for

participants to monitor the progress of the Pilot Study, including the introduction and completion

of individual projects;

• the publication from time to time of technical and non-technical reports on specific topics as

seems appropriate; and

• the use of other channels of publication, such as technical journals and conference publications,

to ensure rapid dissemination of the results of individual projects and of the Pilot Study as a

whole.

9. REFERENCES

1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Technology Innovation Office, NATO/CCMS Pilot Study:

Evaluation of Demonstrated and Emerging Technologies for Treatment and Clean Up of

Contaminated Land and Groundwater, Phase II Final Report, EPA/542/R-98/001a, 1998.

2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, NATO/CCMS Pilot Study: Evaluation of Demonstrated and

Emerging Technologies for Treatment and Clean-up of Contaminated Land and Groundwater (Phase

II): Interim Status Report, 1995, EPA/542/R-95/006.

3. Smith, M.A., NATO/CCMS Pilot Study: Evaluation of Demonstrated and Emerging Technologies

for the Treatment and Clean-up of Contaminated Land and Groundwater: Interim Status Report and

Report on Meeting Held in Berlin in September 1996, Report for Bundesministerium für Umwelt,

Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit, 1996, Bonn, Germany.

4. Smith, M.A., “NATO/CCMS Pilot Study on remediation technologies for contaminated land and

groundwater,” In, Proc. 1994 Luxembourg International Conference on the Rehabilitation of Military

Sites and Demilitarization of Explosives Ordnance, 1994, pp 325-332.

9
NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, Phase II Overview Report

10. NATIONAL CONTACTS

Directors

Stephen C. James (Co-Director)

National Risk Management Research Laboratory

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

26 Martin Luther King Drive

Cincinnati, Ohio 45268

United States

tel: 513-569-7877

fax: 513-569-7680

E-mail: james.steve@epa.gov

Walter W. Kovalick, Jr. (Co-Director)

Technology Innovation Office

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

401 M Street, SW (5102G)

Washington, DC 20460

United States

tel: 703-603-9910

fax: 703-603-9135

E-mail: kovalick.walter@epa.gov

Co-Pilot Directors

Volker Franzius

Umweltbundesamt

Bismarckplatz 1

D-14193 Berlin

Germany

tel: 49/30-8903-2496

fax: 49/30-8903-2285 or -2103

H. Johan van Veen

The Netherlands Integrated Soil Research

Programme

P.O. Box 37

NL-6700 AA Wageningen

The Netherlands

tel: 31/317-484-170

fax: 31/317-485-051

E-mail: anneke.v.d.heuvel@spbo.beng.wau.nl

Country Representatives

Gillian King Rodda

Manager, Contaminated Sites

Environment Protection Group

Environment Australia

PO Box E305

Kingston ACT 2604

Australia

tel: 61-2-6274-1114

fax: 61-2-6274-1164

E-mail: gillian.king.rodda@ea.gov.au

Nora Auer

Federal Ministry of Environment, Youth and

Family Affairs

Dept. III/3

Stubenbastei 5

A-1010 Vienna

Austria

tel: 43/1-515-22-3449

fax: 43/1-513-1679-1008

E-mail: Nora.Auer@bmu.gv.at

Jacqueline Miller

Brussels University

Avenue Jeanne 44

1050 Brussels

Belgium

tel: 32/2-650-3183

fax: 32/2-650-3189

E-mail: jmiller@resulb.ulb.ac.be

Harry Whittaker

Emergencies Engineering Division

Environment Canada

3439 River Road

Ottawa, Ontario, K1A OH3

Canada

tel: 613/991-1841

fax: 613/991-1673

E-mail: harry.whittaker@etc.ec.gc.ca

10
NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, Phase II Overview Report

Jan Švoma

Aquatest a.s.

Geologicka 4

152 00 Prague 5

Czech Republic

tel: 420/2-581-83-80

fax: 420/2-581-77-58

E-mail: aquatest@aquatest.cz

Inge-Marie Skovgård

Contaminated Land Division

Danish Environmental Protection Agency

29 Strandgade

DK-1401 Copenhagen K

Denmark

tel: 45/3-266-0100 - direct 45/32660397

fax: 45/3-296-1656

E-mail: ims@mst.dk

Ari Seppänen

Ministry of Environment

P.O. Box 399

00121 Helsinki

Finland

tel: +358/9-199-197-15

fax: +358/9-199-196-30

René Goubier

Polluted Sites Team

ADEME

B.P. 406

49004 Angers Cedex 01

France

tel: 33/241-204-120

fax: 33/241-872-350

Antonios Kontopoulos*

National Technical University of Athens

GR-157 80 Zografos

Athens

Greece

*

Due to the death of Prof. Kontopoulos, communications

with the Greek delegation to the Pilot Study may be

directed to: Manolis Papadopoulos, tel: +30-1-772 2219;

fax: +30-1-772 2218, E-mail: papadop@metal.ntua.gr

Pál Varga

National Authority for the Environment

Fö u.44

H-1011 Budapest

Hungary

tel: 36/1-457-3530

fax: 36/1-201-4282

E-mail: vargap@kik.ktm.hu

Matthew Crowe

Environmental Management and Planning

Division

Environmental Protection Agency

P.O. Box 3000

Johnstown Castle Estate

County Wexford

Ireland

tel: +353 53 60600

fax: +353 53 60699

E-mail: m.crowe@epa.ie

Takeshi Nishio

Soil and Agricultural Chemicals Division

Environment Agency, Water Quality Bureau

Japan Environment Agency

1-2-2, Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-Ku

Tokyo 100

Japan

tel: +81-3-3580-3173

fax: +81/3-3593-1438

E-mail: takeshi_nishio@eanet.go.jp

Raymond Salter

Ministry for the Environment

84 Boullcott Street

P.O. Box 10362

Wellington

New Zealand

tel: 64/4-917-4000

fax: 64/4-917-7523

e-mail: rs@mfe.govt.nz

11
NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, Phase II Overview Report

Bjørn Bjørnstad

Norwegian Pollution Control Authority

P.O. Box 8100 Dep

N-0032 Oslo

Norway

tel: 47/22-257-3664

fax: 47/22-267-6706

E-mail: bjorn.bjornstad@sftospost.md.dep.

telemax.no

Ewa Marchwinska

Institute for Ecology of Industrial Areas

6 Kossutha Street

40-833 Katowice

Poland

tel: 48/32 -1546-031

fax.: 48/32 -1541-717

e-mail: ietu@ietu.katowice.pl

Marco Estrela

Instituto de Soldadura e Qualidade

Centro de Tecnologias Ambientais

Estrada Nacional 249–Km 3–Leiao (Tagus Park)

Apartado 119 - 2781 Oeiras Codex

Portugal

tel: +351/1-422-8100

fax: +351/1-422-8129

E-mail: maestrela@isq.pt

Branko Druzina

Institute of Public Health

Trubarjeva 2-Post Box 260

6100 Ljubljana

Slovenia

tel: 386/61-313-276

fax: 386/61-323-955

E-mail: branko.druzina@ivz.sigov.mail.si

Ingrid Hasselsten

Swedish Environmental Protection Agency

Blekholmsterrassen 36

S-106 48 Stockholm

Sweden

tel: 46/8-698-1179

fax: 46/8-698-1222

E-mail: inh@environ.se

Bernhard Hammer

BUWAL

Federal Department of the Interior

3003 Bern

Switzerland

tel: 41/31-322-9307

fax: 41/31-382-1546

Resat Apak

Istanbul University

Avcilar Campus, Avcilar 34850

Istanbul

Turkey

tel: 90/212-5911-998

fax: 90/212-5911-997

E-mail: rapak@istanbul.edu.tr

Kahraman Ünlü

Depratment of Environmental Engineering

Middle East Technical University

Inönü Bulvari

06531 Ankara

Turkey

tel: 90-312-210-1000

fax: 90-312-210-1260

E-mail: kunlu@rorqual.cc.metu.edu.tr

Ian D. Martin

Environment Agency

Olton Court

10 Warwick Road

Olton, West Midlands

United Kingdom

tel: 44/121-711-2324

fax: 44/121-711-5830

E-mail: ianmartin@environment-agency.gov.uk

12