alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION AND SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATIONCERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERI, Robert A. Ortenzio, Chief Executive Officer of Select Medical Holdings Corporationand Select Medical Corporation, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Select Medical HoldingsCorporation and Select Medical Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrants as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrants’ other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrants and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrants, including their consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants’ disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants’internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants’most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrants’ internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrants’ other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants’auditors and the audit committee of the registrants’ board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrants’ ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrants’ internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: August 13, 2007   /s/ Robert A. Ortenzio   Robert A. Ortenzio  Chief Executive Officer  Select Medical Holdings Corporation and Select Medical Corporation
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                              
<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>                                      
     (Replace this text with legend, if applicable)
</LEGEND>                                     
<CIK>                                              0000731727
<NAME>                                             Silverado Gold Mines Ltd.
                                                    
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  Nov-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     Dec-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       Nov-30-1998
<CASH>                                                           (4,396)
<SECURITIES>                                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                   367,427
<ALLOWANCES>                                                          0 
<INVENTORY>                                                      23,448
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                390,875
<PP&E>                                                        3,114,784
<DEPRECIATION>                                               (1,289,882)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                4,164,088
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         3,250,964
<BONDS>                                                               0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                                           0 
<COMMON>                                                     44,074,920
<OTHER-SE>                                                            0 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  4,164,088
<SALES>                                                         149,960
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                149,960
<CGS>                                                           324,450
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   428,289
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             15,973,158
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                      0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                    0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (16,251,487)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                          0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                   0  
<DISCONTINUED>                                                        0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                       0 
<CHANGES>                                                             0 
<NET-INCOME>                                                (16,251,487)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     (1.82)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                         0 
        
 

</TABLE>
From: Marge Mead

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Access to Preventive Care and Contraception

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 1:57:36 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Marjorie Mead
From: Mary Flaisig

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: New Health Care Law

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:44:39 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine on

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law. I urge you

to reject any exemptions for "religious employers." These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide

countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that "religious refusal" exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological

distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to

make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the

exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals

with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage

requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and

ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM's recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.

-----

No virus found in this message.

Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

Version: 10.0.1392 / Virus Database: 1520/3826 - Release Date: 08/10/11
From: patls@netzero.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 10:52:40 AM

Are we picking a state approved religion?
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-7077-N-15A]

# AGENCY:

Office of Multifamily Housing, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of the Housing and Urban Development (HUD) published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of August 28, 2023, a rescindment of a systems of records notice concerning the Integrated Real Estate Management System (iREMS). The document did not contain a comment closing date. This notice establishes a due date of September 27, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        LaDonne White; 451 Seventh Street SW, Room 10139; Washington, DC 20410-0001; telephone number 202-708-3054 (this is not a toll-free number). HUD welcomes and is prepared to receive calls from individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing, as well as individuals with speech or communication disabilities. To learn more about how to make an accessible telephone call, please visit                         *https://www.fcc.gov/​consumers/​guides/​telecommunications-relay-service-trs.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of August 28, 2023, in FR Doc 2023-18446, on page 58593, in the third column, add at the end of the Dates caption the following:                

*Comments Due Date:*                     September 27, 2023.                

Aaron Santa Anna,

Associate General Counsel, Office of Legislation and Regulations.

[FR Doc. 2023-18992 Filed 8-31-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-93,207-06

EX PARTE JASON MICHAEL BADYRKA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 1129647-B IN THE 182ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam. YEARY, J., filed a concurring opinion in which SLAUGHTER, J., joined.

O R D E R

Applicant pleaded guilty to robbery and two other charges, in exchange for three concurrent

eight-year sentenes. The First Court of Appeals dismissed his appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

Badyrka v. State, No. 01-21-00339-CR (Tex. App. — Houston [1 Dist.] November 16, 2021) (not st

designated for publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county

of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art.

11.07.

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because trial counsel failed to investigate,

failed to obtain discovery that would have disproved an element of the offense, and erroneously

advised Applicant regarding the nature of the charges and the consequences of his plea. Specifically,
2

Applicant alleges that trial counsel advised him that he would finish his obligations in 2015, and did

not advise him that the collateral effect of his guilty plea to robbery would be the loss of more than

eight years of street time credit on his prior 20-year sentences. Applicant has alleged facts that, if

true, might entitle him to relief. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent, 393 S.W.3d

781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the

appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claims. In developing the record, the trial court

may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall

determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by

counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX.CODE CRIM.

PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this

Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whethertrial counsel’s

performance was deficient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s alleged

deficient performance. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems

appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
3

Filed: June 15, 2022

Do not publish
From: Keith Turner

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Institute of Medicine Recommendation

Date: Saturday, August 13, 2011 3:39:32 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine

as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care

law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would

provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an

ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health

providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt

from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.

Keith Turner
From: Susan Harris Smith

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive Care coverage

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 10:34:48 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking

you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain

to coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to

reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services

are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological

distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to

make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the

exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even

though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of

where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.

--

Professor Susan Harris Smith

526 Cathedral

Department of English

University of Pittsburgh
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from 10-Q at
September  30,  2000 and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,805,052
<SECURITIES>                                     8,608,686
<RECEIVABLES>                                   50,974,005
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,739,000
<INVENTORY>                                      9,873,251
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                69,232,442
<PP&E>                                         246,075,209
<DEPRECIATION>                                 112,983,849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 241,797,415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,331,113
<BONDS>                                        189,708,615
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           250,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,718,696
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   241,797,415
<SALES>                                         39,062,804
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,542,385
<CGS>                                           35,716,353
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   87,732,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   111,501
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    30,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,968,414
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,437,591)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (3,796,915)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (8,437,591)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (4,640,676)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
From: Jennifer Moran

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 9:03:37 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Jennifer Moran

304 Mantorville Ave N

Kasson, MN 55944
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the periodic  report on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report") of Industrial Minerals, Inc. (the "Company")
I, John Melnyk,  Chief Financial Officer,  Secretary,  Treasurer and Director of
the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18USC ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Dated: May 12, 2004

/s/John Melnyk
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
John Melnyk, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director


         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.