alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: rextunes@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:27:59 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rex Schnelle

Franklin, TN 37064
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the
dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
 Date: May 14, 2010
    /s/ Robert A. OrtenzioRobert A OrtenzioChief Executive Officer/s/ Martin F. JacksonMartin F. JacksonExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
From: Jeanne

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive care coverage - Institute of Medicine recommendations

Date: Saturday, August 13, 2011 6:10:39 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care

under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services,

are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Jeanne Hebeisen
#### William H. Gale and another, Respondents, v. John H. Haverly, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by Pratt, J.
Pesticide Detects in Water - IA

Ellerhoff, Jim 

t

o

:

Jordan Page 01/27/2010 10:39 AM

Cc:

"daikerd@doacs.state.fl.us", "Eckermann, Chuck", "Corell, Chuck 

[DNR]" , "Skopec, Mary [DNR]", "O'Brien, Eric [DNR]", 

"Whipple, John"

Dear Jordan: Pursuant to a request by Dave Daiker, FL, for states to provide pesticide 

water monitoring data to you for your work regarding the Pesticides and NPDES permit 

process, I have attached a link to the IAPEST Database.

http://www.igsb.uiowa.edu/webapps/iapest/

Since 1991, the Pesticide Bureau has worked cooperatively with the Iowa Department 

of Natural Resources / Iowa Geological (IDNR/IGWS) and Water Survey for the 

development and maintenance of a database for pesticide residue detections in both 

surface and ground water. If you have any questions on the database, you may wish to 

contact Dr. Mary Skopec, IDNR/IGWS.

If I can be of further assistance, please contact me.

With regards, Jim

Jim Ellerhoff

Program Coordinator

Pesticide Bureau

IA Dept. of Agriculture & Land Stewardship

(515) 281-8506
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.26 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**SECTION 302**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I,Judith A. Berry, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AmNet Mortgage, Inc.;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrantand have:

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report, based on such evaluation; and

 

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date:  November 14, 2005 |
|-------------------------------|
|                          |
|                          |
| /s/  Judith A. Berry          |   |   |   |
| Judith  A. Berry              |
| Chief  Financial Officer      |

 

----
Flight Shop v. City of Bend -16-14-12- Motion to Extend Time 

9-AWA-AGC-Part-16, 

:sne,llev Ewalt to· gfirestone@bendoregon.gov, 0211112015 02,

18 PM 

· rfranz@franzlaw.comcastbiz.net, 

pablo.nuesch@spiegelmcd.com 

Cc: "meh@francishansen.com", Leonard Kirsch , Shelley Ewalt 

Attached is the Complainants' Motion to Extend Time to Respond in FAA Docket No. 

16-14-12. 

Shelley A. Ewalt 

Of Counsel, McBreen & Kopko 

Direct: (703) 399-6078 

Email: sewalt@mklawnyc.com 

D<Jcket No 16-14-12Complainant 

~ Motion !o Ex!encl Time :pdf 

RECEIVED 

FEB 1 3 2015 

PART 16 DOCKETS 
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

In re the Complaint of 

THE FLIGHT SHOP, INC, D/B/A PROFESSIONAL AIR, 

and 

AERO FACILITIES, LLC 

Complainants, 

-against• 

CITY OF .BEND, OREGON MUNICIPAL AIRPORT 

Respondent. 

Pursuant to Part 16 of the Federal Aviation Regulations 

RECEIVED 

FEB 1 2 2015 

PART 16 DOCKETS 

Docket No. :16-14-12 

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND 

1. On February 6, 2015, the Respondent submitted its Answer, Motion to 

Dismiss, and Motion for Summary Judgment in Docket 16-14-12. Under the l'<ttt 16 

Procedural Rules, a response to a motion and a Reply shall be made within ten days. of the 

c4tte ofseryice. 

2, The Complainant, with the consent of the Respondent, requests a twenty 

day extension, until and including March 9, 2015, in order to file the Complainant's 

consolidated response.to Motions and Reply to the Answer. 

3. The Complainant similarly consents to a twenty day extension to the 

deadline of which the Respondent may submit its Rebuttal. 

Page 1 
Dated: December 30, 2014 

Jericho, New York 

~t/1~ Leonard D. Kirsch, Esq. 

McBreen & Kopko 

Attorneys for Complainants 

500 North Broadway 

Jericho, New York 11753 

Tel: (516) 364-1095 

F!Dt: (516) 364-0612 

CERTIFICATION 

l hereby certify that on February 11, 2015, I served the foregoing Unopposed 

Motion to Extend Time to Respond on the following persons electronically: 

]\l[r. Pablo Niiesch, Attorney for City of Bend 

Spiegel & McDiarmid LLP 

187 5 Eye Street, NW 

Suite 700 

Washington, DC 20006 

Mr. Robert Franz, Jr., Attorney for City of Bend 

Law Office of Robert E. Franz Jr. 

730 B St 

Sprl:ngtleld, OR 97477 

Gary Firestone, City Attorney 

CltyofBend 

City Hall, 710 NW Wall Street 

P.O. Box431 

Bend, OR 97709 

Dated: February 11,2015 

Jericho, New York 

~~' ~-- _/ 

Leonard D. Kirsc , Esq, 

Page2 
McBreen & Kopko 

Attorneys for Complainant 

500 North Broadway 

Jericho, New York 11753 

Tel: (516) 3.64-1095 

Fax: (516) 364-0612 

Page3
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Select Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin
F. Jackson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 11, 2005

                               /s/ Martin F. Jackson
                               -----------------------------------------------
                               Martin F. Jackson
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Exhibit 23
 



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Board of Directors
Ameritech Corporation

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our reports dated January 17, 1996 included (or incorporated by
reference) in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995, into
Ameritech Corporation's previously filed Registration Statement File Nos. 
33-26366, 2-97037, 33-30593, 33-32705, 33-34006, 33-36790, 33-47608, 33-49036,
33-51771, 33-51773 and 33-00897.


 
                                         Arthur Andersen LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 11, 1996
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF**  **MONTANA**

ALLIED WASTE SERVICES OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, d/b/a REPUBLIC SERVICES OF MONTANA , Defendant/ Appell ant ,

vs.

LH RESIDENTIAL LLC and OTIS STREET LLC, both d/b/a MONTANA CRESTVIEW,
Plaintiff/Appellees

. **Cause No. DA 23** 

**- 0721** 

**ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT’S**  **SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR**  **EXTENSION OF TIME** 

Upon consideration of Appellant Allied Waste Services of North America,
LLC d/b/a Republic Services of Montana’s unopposed motion seeking a second

30

- day extension of time to file its opening brief, and for good cause, the motion is
GRANTED. Appell ant shall file its opening brief on or before April 2 3 , 202 4

.

ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED AND DATED BELOW

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 11 2024

03/11/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0721
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Central Command

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  ABOUT US    -  COMMAND PRIORITIES             
  -  LEADERSHIP             
  -  COMPONENT COMMANDS             
  -  HISTORY             
  -  POSTURE STATEMENT 
-  CENTCOM AOR    -  CENTCOM COALITION 
-  OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES    -  USMTM 
-  CONTACT    -  OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT             
  -  COMMUNITY RELATIONS             
  -  THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE             
  -  INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL             
  -  MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL 
-  MEDIA    -  SOCIAL MEDIA             
  -  NEWS ARTICLES             
  -  PRESS RELEASES             
  -  STATEMENTS             
  -  IMAGERY             
  -  VIDEOS             
  -  TRANSCRIPTS 
-  VISITORS AND PERSONNEL    -  FAMILY CENTER             
  -  FAMILY READINESS             
  -  CENTCOM WEBMAIL             
  -  SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY             
  -  ACCOUNTABILITY             
  -  EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS             
  -  USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS             
  -  FOIA LIBRARY             
  -  INNOVATION OASIS             
  -  WELCOME GUIDE 

HomeMEDIANEWS ARTICLESNews Article View

# From Eye Level to Sky Level

By Gunnery Sgt. Melissa MarnellSpecial Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force Crisis Response - Central Command

                SAUDI ARABIA  –              

                U.S. Marines assigned to the Special Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force – Crisis Response – Central Command conduct training with the Light Marine Air Defense Integrated System (LMADIS) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, June 12, 2021. The MADIS series allows Low Altitude Air Defense Marines to keep pace with the maneuver force in order to protect it from precision fires and enemy close air support, specifically targeting enemy unmanned aircraft systems. The LMADIS is mounted on a Polaris MRZR and contains a radar as well as an Electronic Warfare suite. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Gunnery Sgt. Melissa Marnell)            

                From Eye Level to Sky Level            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Gunnery Sgt. Melissa Marnell

VIRIN: 210324-M-DY697-0018B

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
**EXHIBIT12.3**

 

**PACCARand Subsidiaries**

 

**COMPUTATIONOF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

 

**PURSUANTTO SEC REPORTING REQUIREMENTS**

(Millionsof Dollars)

 

 

 
|                                                    |   | Year ended  December 31 |      |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|-----------|
|                                                    |   | **2001**                |      | 2000 |   | 1999 |   | 1998 |   | 1997 |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                                           |   |                    |      |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest expense                                        |   |                    |      |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| PACCAR and  subsidiaries (1)                            |   | **$**                   | **216.9** |   | $ | 249.2 |   | $ | 188.3 |   | $ | 165.0 |   | $ | 146.9 |   |
|                                                    |   |                    |      |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Portion of rentals  deemed interest                     |   | **13.5**                |      | 13.2 |   | 17.7 |   | 14.6 |   | 7.1 |   |
|                                                    |   |                    |      |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                                     |   | **$**                   | **230.4** |   | $ | 262.4 |   | $ | 206.0 |   | $ | 179.6 |   | $ | 154.0 |   |
|                                                    |   |                    |      |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| EARNINGS                                                |   |                    |      |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Income before taxes —  PACCAR and Subsidiaries (2) |   | **$**                   | **255.3** |   | $ | 665.1 |   | $ | 923.2 |   | $ | 653.1 |   | $ | 534.7 |   |
|                                                    |   |                    |      |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                                           |   | **230.4**               |      | 262.4 |   | 206.0 |   | 179.6 |   | 154.0 |   |
|                                                    |   |                    |      |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| EARNINGS AS DEFINED                                     |   | **$**                   | **485.7** |   | $ | 927.5 |   | $ | 1,129.2 |   | $ | 832.7 |   | $ | 688.7 |   |
|                                                    |   |                    |      |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| RATIO OF EARNINGS TO  FIXED CHARGES                     |   | **2.11x**               |      | 3.53x |   | 5.48x |   | 4.64x |   | 4.47x |   |

 

----

(1)           Exclusive of interest paid to PACCAR

 

(2)           Includesbefore-tax earnings of wholly-owned subsidiaries.

 

 

 

----
EX-4.68



 Exhibit 4.68 

English Summary 
 of

 Supplemental Agreement to the Ancillary Telecommunications Services Agreement 

Between 
 China
Telecommunications Corporation 
 and 

China Telecom Corporation Limited 
 China
Telecommunications Corporation (“Party A”) and China Telecom Corporation Limited (“Party B”) entered into the Supplemental Agreement to the Ancillary Telecommunications Services Agreement on September 23, 2015. 

The key terms and conditions of the Supplemental Agreement are as follows: 

1. The Parties agree to amend Article 3.1 of the Ancillary Telecommunications Services Agreement as follows: “The charges payable under the Ancillary
Telecommunications Services Agreement shall be determined by reference to market prices. Market prices shall mean the prices at which the same or similar type of products or services are provided by Independent Third Parties in the ordinary course
of business and under normal commercial terms. When determining the relevant market prices, to the extent practicable, management of the Company shall take into account the prices of at least two similar and comparable transactions entered into with
or carried out by Independent Third Parties in the ordinary course of business in the corresponding period for reference. 
 For avoidance of doubt, where
there is no or it is not possible to determine the market prices, the prices are to be agreed between the parties based on the reasonable costs incurred in providing the services plus the amount of the relevant taxes and reasonable profit margin.
For this purpose, reasonable profit margin is to be fairly determined by negotiations between the parties in accordance with the internal policies of the Company. When determining the relevant reasonable profit margin, to the extent practicable,
management of the Company shall take into account the profit margin of at least two similar and comparable transactions entered into with Independent Third Parties in the corresponding period or the relevant industry profit margin for
reference.” 
 2. The execution, validity, performance, interpretation of this Supplemental Agreement and any relevant dispute resolutions shall be
governed by the PRC laws. 
 3. This Supplemental Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 2016. If there is any conflict between this
Supplemental Agreement and the Ancillary Telecommunications Services Agreement, this Supplemental Agreement shall prevail.