alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Susan Rushton

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Contraceptives

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 12:41:21 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the recommendations 

of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care law. Please reject

any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new law and 

would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

"Religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive services. However, others, driven by

an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even 

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so 

hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ 

people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women 

just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s recommendations and 

rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Thank you,

Susan Rushton
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The National Nursing HomeSurvey [electronic resource]: ... summary.**
 
1977 | 1985 | 1995 | 1997 | 1999 | 2004
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.6209/14:
Item Number:0500-E-25 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000729986
 
September 27, 2018
From: geokatie1@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:01:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kathleen Stevenson

North Hills, CA 91343
From: Paula Taylor

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Monday, August 08, 2011 11:00:25 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

The US Department of Health and Human Services recently issued new mandates

concerning preventive health services to be covered by insurance plans. These mandates

require that all insurance plans provide coverage for all prescription contraceptives

approved by the FDA, as well as abortifacients such as the "morning after" pill and "Ella"

(a drug similar to RU-486 which can induce an abortion some weeks into pregnancy).

I am sadly disappointed with this final Act of HHS, due to its failure to ensure respect for

rights of conscience when developing such mandates.

Respect for conscience is continually tested and challenged, yet it is essential that such

conscience protection be granted for not only religious employers, but for all employers,

insurers, and policy issuers with moral, ethical, or religious objections as well.

Sincerely,

Paula Taylor

760 Ridgewood Dr.

Mandeville, LA

985-792-4847

Be one in a Million Catholics Confronting Global Poverty

This message has been scanned by the Archdiocese of New Orleans Virus/Spam

filter.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-23-00744-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.M.P., L.R.S., B.J.S., J.K.R., and M.R., Children

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022PA00058

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. Appellant is unable to afford payment of court costs; no costs are taxed in this appeal. 

SIGNED January 31, 2024.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

December 12, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00543

- CV

Elsa PRADO , Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Rolando Prado, Jr., Deceased, and as Next Friend of A.P., Minor; Elizabeth Prado; Rolando Prado; and Maria Prado

, Appellants

v.

LONESTAR RESOURCES, INC. and Ezra Alderman Ranches, Inc., App ellees

From the 81st Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16

- 07

- 00095

- CVL Honorable Susan D. Reed, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellants’ unopposed first motion for an extension of time, requesting sixty days to file their brief, is granted in part. We order the appellants’ brief due January 6, 2020.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 12th day of December, 2019

.

_________ __________________________ M ichael A. C r uz , Clerk of Court
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.02 MB)
 
 83 Expeditionary Rescue Squadron
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Danielle Grondin

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 4:45:03 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Danielle Grondin

2413 N Spaulding Ave

Chicago, IL 60647
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     CommScope, Inc. condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for
     the three months ended March 31, 2000 and is qualified in its entirety
     by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001035884
<NAME>                        CommScope, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-2000
<CASH>                                               2,278
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      162,974
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5,266
<INVENTORY>                                         60,930
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   245,241
<PP&E>                                             300,576
<DEPRECIATION>                                     104,763
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     624,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               90,692
<BONDS>                                            172,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               510
<OTHER-SE>                                         300,004
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       624,606
<SALES>                                            203,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   203,939
<CGS>                                              151,586
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      151,586
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   2,388
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     26,964
<INCOME-TAX>                                        10,237
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 16,727
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        16,727
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.32



</TABLE>
From: jonh bickford

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Friday, August 05, 2011 3:19:41 AM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

jonh bickford
the woodlands, Texas
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document









































 
 

  Exhibit 10.25    
    


 
    HALCÓN RESOURCES CORPORATION
  
    SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED
  SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
  Adopted March 9, 2016    
    


        Each non-employee member serving on the Board of Directors (each, a "Director," and
collectively, the "Directors") of Halcón Resources Corporation (the "Company") shall be
paid compensation in the form of cash, represented in an annual amount, as set forth in the summary below: 

 






					
	 
	 	Amount(1)	 
	 Annual Retainer:
	 	

$	198,000	 
	 Additional Annual Retainer:
	 	 	 	 
	 Lead Director
	 	

$	50,000	 
	 Additional Annual Retainers—Chair:
	 	 	 	 
	 Audit Committee Chair
	 	

$	25,000	 
	 Compensation Committee Chair
	 	

$	15,000	 
	 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair
	 	

$	12,500	 
	 Reserves Committee Chair
	 	

$	12,500	 
	 Additional Annual Retainers—Committee Member:
	 	 	 	 
	 Audit Committee Member
	 	

$	7,500	 
	 Compensation Committee Member
	 	

$	5,000	 
	 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Member
	 	

$	5,000	 
	 Reserves Committee Member
	 	

$	5,000	 




 


   

   


 
 


	(1)
	Payable in monthly installments and pro-rated for partial year
terms.











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.25


HALCÓN RESOURCES CORPORATION SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED SUMMARY OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION Adopted March 9, 2016
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 169 (Friday, September 1, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 60451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18938]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL OP-OFA-084]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed August 21, 2023 10 a.m. EST Through August 28, 2023 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

    Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make 
public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's 
comment letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxapps.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-II/public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20230108, Final, USDA, OR, Predator Damage Management in 
Oregon, Review Period Ends: 10/02/2023, Contact: Kevin Christnesen 503-
820-2851.
EIS No. 20230109, Draft, NOAA, CA, Proposed Chumash Heritage National 
Marine Sanctuary, Comment Period Ends: 10/25/2023, Contact: Paul Michel 
831-647-4201.
EIS No. 20230110, Final, TxDOT, TX, I-35 Capital Express Central 
Project, Contact: Doug Booher 512-416-2663.

    Under 23 U.S.C. 139(n)(2), TxDOT has issued a single document that 
consists of a final environmental impact statement and record of 
decision. Therefore, the 30-day wait/review period under NEPA does not 
apply to this action.

    Dated: August 28, 2023.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2023-18938 Filed 8-31-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit  10.1


 


AMENDMENT NO.
2 


TO 


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment
No. 2 to the Employment Agreement (“Amendment”), dated April 27, 2016, is by and between Drone Aviation Holding
Corp., a Nevada corporation with an address 11651 Central Parkway #118, Jacksonville, FL 32224 (the “Company”),
and Kevin Hess (the “Executive”).


WHEREAS, the parties
entered into an Employment Agreement on May 18, 2015 (the “Employment Agreement”); and


WHEREAS, the parties
entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement on October 2, 2015 (Hess Amendment No. 1); and


WHEREAS, the parties
wish to further amend the Employment Agreement as set forth below, with the understanding that all other provisions of the Employment
Agreement shall remain unchanged;


NOW, THEREFORE,
in consideration of the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto agree as follows:


1.Section 2 of the Hess Amendment
No. 1 shall be amended in its entirety to read as follows:


 


The Employee shall serve as Chief
Technology Officer of the Corporation, with such duties, responsibilities and authority as are commensurate and consistent
with his position, as may be, from time to time, assigned to him by the Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”)
of the Corporation. The Employee shall report directly to the CEO. During the Term (as defined in Section 3), the Employee shall
devote all of his full business time and efforts to the performance of his duties hereunder unless otherwise authorized by the
Board. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the expenditure of reasonable amounts of time by the Employee for the making of passive personal
investments, the conduct of business affairs and charitable and professional activities shall be allowed, provided such activities
do not materially interfere with the services required to be rendered to the Corporation hereunder and do not violate the restrictive
covenants set forth in Section 9 below.


 


2.Section 3 of the Employment Agreement-
Term of Employment- is hereby extended by one (1) year until May 18, 2018.


 


3. The terms and conditions of all other sections of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have
executed this agreement as of the date first stated above.


 


 


 



    	 		 



    	 



    




[Signature
Page to the Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement]





	 	 	DRONE AVIATION HOLDING CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	 	By: /s/ Kendall Carpenter
	 	 	Name: Kendall W. Carpenter
	 	 	Title: Chief Financial Officer
	 	 	
	 	 	By: /s/ Kevin Hess
	 	 	Name: Kevin Hess
	 	 	Title: Chief
Technology Officer




	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 







    	 	2
```

                                                OMB Approval No. 2700-0087

**SUN-EARTH CONNECTIONSUPPORTING RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY,SUBORBITAL, GUEST INVESTIGATOR,AND EDUCATION PROGRAMS**NASA Research AnnouncementSoliciting Proposals for Basic Researchsubmitted on or beforeAugust 20, 1996NRA 96-OSS-09Issued:  May 20, 1996Notice of Intent Due: June 20, 1996Proposals Due:  August 20, 1996Office of Space ScienceNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationWashington, DC   20546-0001
```
Hillsborough, 1

May 7, 1912.

#### Clara A. Kidder *v.*Boston *&*Maine Railroad. Herbert M. Kidder *v.*Same.

Case, for negligence. The two suits are by husband and wife to recover for her personal injuries, and were tried together by jury. At the close of the plaintiffs’ evidence the defendant moved for nonsuits. The parties agreed upon the amount of damages, and that there should be judgments for the plaintiffs if there was evidence of the defendant’s fault. The motions for nonsuits were thereupon granted, and the plaintiffs excepted. Transferred from the September term, 1911, of the superior court by *Chamberlin,*J.

Taggart, *Burroughs & Wyman {Mr. Wyman*orally), for the plaintiffs.

*Branch & Branch {Oliver W. Branch*orally), for the defendant.

Peaslee, J.

These are suits to recover for injuries suffered by the wife by being thrown from a wagon while traveling upon a highway in Goffstown, near the defendant’s right of way. The fault charged is the negligent blowing of a locomotive whistle, whereby the plaintiff’s horse became frightened, ran away, and so caused the injuries. The parties agree as to the law governing their rights and liabilities. It is a question solely of whether there was substantial evidence that it was unreasonable conduct to blow the whistle when and as it was blown upon this occasion.

The only evidence upon the point is the wife’s testimony. From this it could be found that as she was driving in a westerly direction along the highway nearly parallel with the defendant’s right of way, a freight train approached from the east and when some rods behind her blew an unusually loud blast of the whistle. There was no whistling post at that point and no one upon the track ahead of the train. Two objections to the sufficiency of this evidence are urged. It is said that there may have been justifiable cause for blowing the whistle. This is undoubtedly true; but it is also true that the appearances indicated there was no such cause, and this warranted the submission of the question to the jury. The other objection is that there is no evidence that the engineer *580could control the loudness of the blast. This does not help the defendant. If the engineer could blow loud or soft, if he blew knowing it might respond in either manner, or if the whistle was one which always gave a more than ordinarily loud sound, the important facts are not changed. In either case it was his duty to use reasonable care not to make ah unreasonable noise.

*Exception sustained.*

All concurred.