alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Marilyn Freeman

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive care under new health care law

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 9:16:02 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.
From: Donna Vaughn

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Health care

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 4:59:30 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Donna Vaughn AAUW public policy Alameda Ca
1 The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-4394

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Todd Andes, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 2, 2007 Filed: April 6, 2007

___________ Before COLLOTON, HANSEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Todd Andes appeals the sent ence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to a felon-in-possession offense. In a brief file d under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), his counsel asserts that Andes’s 188-month sentence is excessive and that the district court violated Andes’ s rights when it enhanced his sentence based on prior convictions.-2- We enforce the broad appeal waiver in cluded in Andes’s plea agreement: the plea colloquy reflects that Andes understood and voluntarily accepted the terms of the plea agreement, including the waiver; this appeal falls with in the scope of the waiver; and no injustice would result. SeeUnited States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (discussing enforceab ility of appeal waiver); see also United States v. Estrada-Bahena , 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (enforcing appeal waiver in Anders case). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal, a nd we grant counsel leave to withdraw.

______________________________
From: Cheri Dzubak

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 11:36:57 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Sincerely,

Cheryl Dzubak
Waiver Request Support Document

77 Attachment 3

2013 Amendments to HD OBD and OBD II Monitoring Requirements That Clarify Existing Requirements 188

Amendments to HD OBD Requirements in Title 13, CCR section 1971.1

A. Section (a): Purpose/ [1968.2(a)] B. Section (c): Definitions 1. “Alternate-fueled engine” 2. “Calculated load value” 3. “Emission Standard” /[1968.2(c)] 4. “Evaporative emission standards” /[1968.2(c)] 5. “Exhaust emission standards” or “tailpipe emission standards”/[1968.2(c)] 6. “Fueled engine operation” 7. “Hybrid vehicle” 8. “Ignition cycle” 9. “Malfunction” 10.“Permanent fault code” 11.“Propulsion system active” 12.“Small volume manufacturer” C. Section (d): General Requirements 1. Section (d)(2.2.2)(D): Storage and erasure of freeze frame conditions 2. Section (2.3.1)(A) and (2.3.2)(A): MIL Extinguishing and Fault Code Erasure Protocol 3. Sections (2.3.1)(C)(ii)b.3 and (2.3.2)(D)(ii)b.3: Erasing a Permanent Fault Code 4. Subsection (d)(4.3.2)(B): Denominator Specifications 5. Section (d)(4.3.2)(C): Specifications for incrementing denominator – evaporative system monitors 6. Section (d)(5.1.1): Standardized tracking and reporting of monitor performance 7. Section (d)(5.5.2)(B): Ignition Cycle Counter- specifications for incrementing D. Section (f): Monitoring Requirements for Gasoline/Spark-Ignited Engines 1. Section (f)(2.3.6): Monitoring conditions 2. Section (f)(7.1): Evaporative System Monitoring E. Section (h): Standardization Requirements 1. Section (h)(1): Reference Documents 2. Section (h)(3.2): SAE J1939 Communication Protocol

188 Amendments to provisions of the OBD II regulation are indicated by providing the corresponding provision in section 1968.2 in brackets [ ].Waiver Request Support Document

78 3. Section (h)(4.1): Readiness Status 4. Sections (h)(4.2.2) and (h)(4.2.3)(E): Data Stream 5. Section (h)(4.5.5): Test Results when Fault Memory Cleared 6. Section (h)(4.7.5): Software Calibration Verification Number (CVN) 7. Section (h)(6): Service Information F. Section (i): Monitoring System Demonstration Requirements for Certification 1. Section (i)(3.1.2)/ [1968.2(h)(4.3)]: Diesel Misfire Monitor 2. Section (i)(3.2.1): Gasoline Fuel System 3. Section (i)(5.1.3): Evaluation Protocol
Attachment 1 

Manatee Site Visit Presentation 





Attachment 2 

Manatee Water Flow Diagram
From: Roger Hulsey

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Health Services for Women

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 2:47:56 AM

Allow women to have health services of their choice, and not be dependent on what

their employer's religious beliefs are.
From: flippydes@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: preventive care

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 11:00:11 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Donna Erickson

Public Policy Chair

AAUW Aurora Area
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk April 29, 2013

d0422 

# Order

April 29, 2013

146402

- 4

DIANE M. BIES

- RICE,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146402

- 3

COA: 295631; 295634

Wayne CC: 08

- 100728

- DO

ALVIN FOSTER RICE, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant,

and

DAVID FINDLING,

Appellee.

_________________________________________/

DIANE M. BIES

- RICE,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146404

COA: 300271

Wayne CC: 08

- 100728

- DO

ALVIN FOSTER RICE, JR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 4, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
From: Mcgraw, Thomas

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: CMS-9992-IFC 2

Date: Monday, August 08, 2011 12:39:23 PM

I OPPOSE ALL OF THESE PROPOSOTIONS AS WRITTEN,T.McGraw,D.O.
From: Christina Paolucci

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 10:13:21 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Christina Paolucci

1894 Merryhill Drive

Columbus, OH 43219
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 12, 2019

No. 04-19-00543-CV

Elsa PRADO, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Rolando Prado, Jr., Deceased, 

and as Next Friend of A.P., Minor; Elizabeth Prado; Rolando Prado; and Maria Prado,

Appellants

v.

LONESTAR RESOURCES, INC. and Ezra Alderman Ranches, Inc.,

Appellees

From the 81st Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-07-00095-CVL

Honorable Susan D. Reed, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellants’ unopposed first motion for an extension of time, requesting sixty days to file 

their brief, is granted in part. We order the appellants’ brief due January 6, 2020.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of December, 2019.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.53 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
P.O. Box 60908 Fairbanks, AK 99706 / 5525 Airport Industrial Rd., Fairbanks AK 99709

Telephone (907) 450-2375 Fax (907) 450-2326

1

February 3, 2014

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, ARM

800 Independence Avenue, Room 810

Washington, DC 20591

Via electronic submission on web site

Re: Exemption No. 4296 for FAR 91.9(a)

Everts Air Fuel wishes to extend and amend its present Exemption No. 4296, granting 

relief from the requirements of FAR 91.31(3).

We request this exemption based on the ongoing requirements of our business in 

supplying isolated villages by the only means of transportation available in the State of

Alaska. The reasons and facts as described in the request that resulted in the granting of 

Exemption No. 4296 remain unchanged. We ask that it include the following DC-6 

aircraft operated by Everts: registration Nos. N251CE, N400UA, N444CE, N451CE, 

N7780B, N7919C, N51599, N888DG, N747CE, and the addition of N351CE. 

Everts Air Fuel would like to note that under Conditions and Limitations in the 

exemption, that item number 2 has the incorrect maximum zero fuel weight. The weight 

is listed as 87,460 and should be 87,360.

In considering the foregoing, we request that extending and amending our exemption is in 

the public interest and desire that Exemption No. 4296 be granted.

Sincerely, 

James A. Young

Director of Operations

Everts Air Fuel
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                       9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                            11,531
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>             3,857
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                   5,030
<TRADING-ASSETS>                       0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>       62,966
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>               202
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                 204
<LOANS>                          275,030
<ALLOWANCE>                        3,084
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   373,108
<DEPOSITS>                       296,859
<SHORT-TERM>                       4,250
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                2,925
<LONG-TERM>                       42,107
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            1
<COMMON>                              33
<OTHER-SE>                        26,933
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>   373,108
<INTEREST-LOAN>                   12,574
<INTEREST-INVEST>                  2,159
<INTEREST-OTHER>                     310
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                  15,043
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                 6,090
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 7,758
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>              7,285
<LOAN-LOSSES>                        364
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                    46
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                    8,132
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      726
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>           630
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                         630
<EPS-BASIC>                        .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                        .23
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                         0
<LOANS-NON>                        1,223
<LOANS-PAST>                           0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                       0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                      442
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                   2,880
<CHARGE-OFFS>                        315
<RECOVERIES>                         174
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                  3,084
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>               3,084
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                0



</TABLE>
From: Aliza Keddem

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 8:25:23 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Aliza Keddem

36 NE 76 Avenue

Portland, Oregon 97213
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 173 (Friday, September 8, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 62136]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19448]



[[Page 62136]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #18016 and #18017; VERMONT Disaster Number VT-
00046]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of Vermont

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 5.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Vermont (FEMA-4720-DR), dated 07/14/
2023.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Flooding, Landslides, and Mudslides.
    Incident Period: 07/07/2023 through 07/17/2023.

DATES: Issued on 08/31/2023.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/12/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/15/2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Vermont, dated 07/14/2023, is hereby 
amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical 
damages as a result of this disaster to 10/12/2023.
    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco S[aacute]nchez, Jr.,
Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2023-19448 Filed 9-7-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
     CommScope, Inc. condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for
     the nine months ended September 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety
     by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001035884
<NAME>                        CommScope, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1999
<CASH>                                               6,823
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      138,851
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5,524
<INVENTORY>                                         36,691
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   199,447
<PP&E>                                             253,760
<DEPRECIATION>                                      94,816
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     541,566
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               86,659
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               508
<OTHER-SE>                                         256,507
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       541,566
<SALES>                                            537,268
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   537,268
<CGS>                                              396,040
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      396,040
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7,789
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     75,528
<INCOME-TAX>                                        27,938
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 47,590
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        47,590
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.92



</TABLE>