alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Motions Granted; Order filed August 12, 2022 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-22-00186-CV

____________

CONCEPT ENGINEERS, INC.; AND FRANK J. DILLARD & 

ASSOCIATES, INC.; LJA ENGINEERING, INC.; AND FRANK J. 

DILLARD, P.E., Appellants

V.

CITY OF GALVESTON, TEXAS AND CARDINAL CONTRACTORS, INC., 

Appellees

On Appeal from the 405th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 20-CV-1171

ORDER

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying appellants’ motions to 

compel arbitration signed February 22, 2022. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 

51.016, 171.098. On July 26, 2022, appellants filed motions to stay trial court 

proceedings pending resolution of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 29.3

We GRANT appellants’ motion to the extent of staying trial and ORDER

the trial STAYED until a final decision by this court on this interlocutory appeal, 

or until further order of this court. 

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Bourliot, Hassan, and Wilson.
© 2015 USAerobotix LLC

Maintenance Log

Total

Assessment

Time In Time Out Duration

Aircraft

Date In Date Out

N-Number:

Last PIC:

Last VO:

Last Mission ID:

Powerplant

Telemetry

PC

AP

Wiring

1

2

3

4

Landing Gear

Transmitter

1

2

3

4

Propellers

ESCs

Airframe

1

2

3

4

Component Physical 5 cycle test Balanced Replaced Repaired

Final Check

Component Damage Manufacturer Diagnosis

Date Initiated:

Date Completed:

Technician:
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








Certification
of Chief Executive Officer





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Industrial Minerals, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Robert G. Dinning, Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





November 16, 2009





/s/ Robert G.
Dinning


Robert G.
Dining


President
and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

------------------------------------------------------------ 

### PIEDMONT AIR LINES, INC

.

-----------------------------------------------------------



### NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME

On November 27, 2013

, the Department authorized Piedmont Airlines, Inc. (“ Piedmont ”)

, a U.S

.

c ommuter air carrier, 1 the use of the trade name “American Eagle” for one year from the

effective date of the merger between America n Airlines, Inc., and US Airways, Inc. The

Department limited the effectiveness of the authorization in light of the fact that the trade name

American Eagle, was used by American Eag le Airlines, Inc., as well as other U.S. air carriers.

On October 1, 2014, American Airlines, Inc. (“American”)

, requested that the Department issue

a new notice without the limiting condition. In support of its request, American states that

American E agle Airlines, Inc., has subsequently changed its corporate name to Envoy Air Inc.,

and thus the potential for public confusion no longer exi s ts. 2

By this notice

, the Department removes the aforementioned limitation placed on Piedmont and

acknowledges the continued use of the trade name “American Eagle” in its operations

.

Dated at Washington, D.C.

, October 29 , 201 4

.

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http:// www.regulations.gov

1 Piedmont ’s commuter certificate was last re issued by Order 81

- 8

- 124 , issued August 19, 1981.

2 See Order 2014

- 4

- 13, issued April 15, 2014.Attachment A

SE RVICE LIST FOR PIEDMONT AIRLINES, INC.

MR FRANCIS C. HEIL

SENIOR ATTORNEY

AMERICAN AIRLINES INC.

AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES INC

FRANCIS.HEIL@AA.COM OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E

- 36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

MR ALEC BRAMLETT

MANAGING DIRECTOR

LEGAL AND GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS

AMERICAN AIRLINES INC MR MARK MAZOR

CERTIFICATION MANAGE R

FAA AFS

- 900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166

MR CHESTER J. PIOLUNEK JR

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION MR PETER LYNCH

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR E NFORCEMENT

FAA / AGC

- 300

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591
From: Jo Hoffacker

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive Care and Contraception

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:51:24 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as

pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care law,

and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide

countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological

distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to

make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the

exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals

with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage

requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and

ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.
REG-IP 412-10 Page | of 1

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS las of: September 02, 2010

BRANCH a
PUBLIC Status: Posted

SUB Oo Tracking No. s0b2c4"a
U M ISSI N Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0573
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Silkia Torres
Address:
Kissimmee, FL,

General Comment

See attached file(s)

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0573.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P..._ 9/2/2010


8/11/10

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991—IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally commert on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Silkia Torres
From: robsherif@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:06:32 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sheri Fleming

Davenport, IA 52807
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: bc coverage=AWESOME

Date: Friday, August 05, 2011 2:57:38 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

WOOOHOOOOO!!! Way to go!!! There were many times as a college student and then post-college but

pre-real job where I didn't have the $40/mth to pay for bc. I was using it for regulating cycles. Thank

you SO MUCH for passing this!!!

Sincerely,

A. Kunce
EXHIBIT 23.01

                                177
<PAGE>

            
            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                                
As  independent  public  accountants, we hereby  consent  to  the
incorporation of our reports dated February 7, 1997 (1996  Annual
Report on Form 10-K and Supplemental Schedules), included in this
Form  10-K,  into  Rio  Hotel & Casino, Inc.'s  previously  filed
registration statements on Form S-8 (File No. 33-38752), Form S-8
(File No. 33-68130), Form S-8 (File No. 33-56860), Form S-3 (File
No.  33-70192), Form S-3 (File No. 33-51092), Form S-3 (File  No.
33-36598) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-869).


                              ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
March 28, 1997

<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                               
<ARTICLE>                                                         5
                                                    
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                            NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                                      1925469
<SECURITIES>                                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 11265
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                                  213004
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            2979697
<PP&E>                                                      4423430
<DEPRECIATION>                                               920248
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             18811344
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                        661604
<BONDS>                                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0
<PREFERRED>                                                       0
<COMMON>                                                   38506711
<OTHER-SE>                                                    46352
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               18811344
<SALES>                                                      298124
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             298124
<CGS>                                                        176115
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                521746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            4106638
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0
<CHANGES>                                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (4330260)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                 (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     0
        
 

</TABLE>
From: Pat Dewitt

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Religious refusal exceptions to women"s preventive health care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:16:46 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.”

I work for a religious institution of higher education which just might want to refuse this coverage. But

although I am religious, I would not agree with this. It would mean that the most extreme elements of

the religious community would take control of the rest of us. They have no right to impose their beliefs

on moderate, sensible religious persons.

These preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive

care by accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Thank you for your attention.

________________________________

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

This email, or its attachments, may contain private, confidential or privileged information of Shorter

University and is for the use of the intended recipient(s). Any unauthorized review, disclosure, or

distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error or you are not the intended and

authorized recipient, please notify the sender and permanently delete all copies of the respective email

and its attachments without reading them. Thank you for your cooperation.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                          419136
<SECURITIES>                                    127163
<RECEIVABLES>                                   596537
<ALLOWANCES>                                      9000
<INVENTORY>                                     956744
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2158249
<PP&E>                                          447730
<DEPRECIATION>                                  363780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4897556
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           547143
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         15712
<OTHER-SE>                                     4334701
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4897556
<SALES>                                        4206691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               4206691
<CGS>                                          1478799
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1478799
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1951549
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5881
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 987005
<INCOME-TAX>                                    321650
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             665355
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    665355
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .39
        

</TABLE>
From: encinojeff@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:05:34 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jeffrey Steffon

Encino, CA 91316
Posting an FDMS Docket without a Federal Register Notice 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: 

FROM: 

Posting EPA-HQ-OAR-20 15-0734 to Regulations.gov for Public Access 

Tina Ndoh ~ IJ:)e_ 

Thru: 

US EPA/ OARIOAQPS/SPPD/MMG 

Group 

Keith Barnett Leader 

~~ ~ 

US EPA/ OARIOAQPS/SPPD/MMG 

This memorandum authorizes the posting of EPA-HQ-OAR-20 15-0734 to 

Regulations.gov for public access. 

Tllis docket is for stakeholders to provide feedback on the design and implementation of 

the Clean Energy Incentive Program (CEIP). For additional information on the CEIP or 

the Clean Power Plan, please visit the following wcbsites: 

Clean Power Plan- www.epa.gov/cleanpowerplan 

CEIP- http://www2.epa.gov/cleanpowe rplan/fact-sheet-clean-energy-incentive-program 

This document wi ll be open for public comment from 11 /4/2015 to 1211 5/2015. 

Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-201 5-0734, by one 

of the following methods: 

• www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: a-and-r-Docket@epa.gov 

• Fax: 202-566-9774 

• Mail: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode 

28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Washington, DC 20460. 

EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without 

change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless the comment includes infonnation claimed to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBf) or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regul ations.gov 

Web site is an " anonymous access " system, which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you 

send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through 

http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address wi ll be automatically captured and 

included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on 
the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include 

your name and other contact infom1ation in the body of your comment and with any disk 

or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be abl e to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, avoid any form of encryption, 

and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public 

docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at 

http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

Should you have any questions regarding this memorandum, please contact Eri c Shultz at 

(202) 566-1883, or via emai l at schultz.eric@epa.gov.
From: Carol Newnam

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Access to Contraception

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 7:15:19 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Carol Newnam