alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial statements set forth in the Form 10-QSB On Stage  Entertainment,  Inc.
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001035514
<NAME>                        On Stage Entertainment, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         281
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1108
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2680
<PP&E>                                         24127
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4754
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 23063
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          19819
<BONDS>                                        665
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       76
<OTHER-SE>                                     2503
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   23063
<SALES>                                        6272
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6272
<CGS>                                          2094
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5451
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1296
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             409
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (884)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (884)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (884)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.12)
        

</TABLE>
From: Tami Mena

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: oppose the proposed definition of "religious employer"

Date: Saturday, August 13, 2011 5:48:44 PM

The current definition of religious employer does not provide true conscience

protection for those committed to preserving life. Healthcare plans should not be

forced to violate the moral and religious convictions of providers or employees in

order to participate in the health care system. Requiring such an unacceptable

demand threatens both universal access to health care and religious freedom of

conscience.

Thank you for your consideration.

-Tami Mena - Austin, TX
From: Anita L. Ondrusek

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: IMS Preventive Care for Women

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 10:59:52 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject ALL exemptions including those proposed for “religious

employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide

countless women better access to necessary health care.
From: dslankard@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:56:36 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Dan Slankard

Linwood, KS 66052
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 4

- 00 046

- C R



### ____________________

IN RE ROLANDO GUTIERREZ

_______________________________________________________ ______________

Original Proceeding

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In this mandamus proceeding, Rolando Gutierrez seeks to compel the

Montgomery County Jail to allow him to spend more time in the law library while

he prepares his case for trial

. Although he does not identify the respondent by any

name other than Montgomery County Jail, Gutierrez evidently seeks mandamus

relief against the s heriff of Montgomery County

, or one or more deputies, in

connection with a criminal case that has not proceeded to judgment

. See Tex. Local

Gov’t Code Ann. § 351.041 (West 2005). Gutierrez is not requesting relief against

a judge of a district or county court

, and he has not shown that the requested relief

is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (a), (b)2 (West 2004)

. Because Gutierrez is not entitled to mandamus relief from this Court

,

we deny the petition for writ of mandamus

. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PETITION DENI ED

.

PER CURIAM

Opinion Delivered February 19, 2014
Do Not Publish

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 174 (Monday, September 11, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62358-62359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19692]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Thursday, September 14, 2023 at 10:30 a.m.

PLACE: Hybrid meeting: 1050 First Street NE, Washington, DC (12th 
Floor) and Virtual.
    Note: For those attending the meeting in person, current COVID-19 
safety protocols for visitors, which are based on the CDC COVID-19 
hospital admission level in Washington, DC, will be updated on the 
Commission's contact page by the Monday before the meeting. See the 
contact page at https://www.fec.gov/contact/. If you would like to 
virtually access the meeting, see the instructions below.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public, subject to the above-
referenced guidance regarding the COVID-19 hospital admission level and 
corresponding health and safety procedures. To access the meeting 
virtually, go to the Commission's website www.fec.gov and click on the 
banner to be taken to the meeting page.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
Proposed Directive Regarding Investigations Conducted by the Office of 
General Counsel
Audit Division Recommendation Memorandum on Citizens for Waters (A21-
01)
Management and Administrative Matters

[[Page 62359]]


CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.
    Individuals who plan to attend in person and who require special 
assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable 
accommodations, should contact Laura E. Sinram, Secretary and Clerk, at 
(202) 694-1040 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#186b7d7b6a7d6c796a61587e7d7b367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3546505647504154474c755350561b525a43">[email protected]</span></a>, at least 72 hours prior to the 
meeting date.

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Vicktoria J. Allen,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-19692 Filed 9-7-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.52 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: joyful1_2@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:58:51 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

J. Wise

Johnson City, TN 37604
From: Kghanen@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: (no subject)

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 11:14:05 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations

would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and

ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Sincerely,

KBH
From: Onofre Torres

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Access to preventive care and contraception

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 12:57:40 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care

under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services,

are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Onofre Torres
Page 1 of 1

REG J PK Y2-/6

fee)

cpg:

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION

PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
BRANCH As of: September 09, 2010

Received: August 16, 2010
PUBLIC Bere Fo oy aoun
SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2610

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0919
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

SS .

Submitter Information

Name: Barbara J Farrington
Address:

The Ohio Department of Insurance

50 West Town St., Suite 50

Columbus, OH, 43215
Email: barbara.farrington@insurance.ohio.gov
Phone: 614-995-5801
Fax! 614-644-3742
Submitter's Representative: Attorney
Organization: The Ohio Department of Insurance
Government Agency Type: State
Government Agency: Department of Insurance

General Comment

1. Clarify the meaning of the term "substantially" in reference to the elimination of benefits (page
20).

2. Regulation does not provide a time period for maintaining grandfathering records (page 15)--
suggest require plans/employers/insurers to maintain records documenting grandfather status for
five years,

3. Clarify whether a grandfathered plan is the health benefit plan issued to an individual or group
health plan, or if it is an insurance product marketed by an insurer as of March 23, 2010. Or,
whether it is all of the above.

4. Clarify whether insurer/employer should maintain documentation that verifies an individual or
employer (or bona fide association) elected to retain the health benefit plan in effect on Marcn
23, 2010

https://fdms.crulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 9/9/2010
Page | of 1

ger REG1BWIAN- 10
LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION

PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS As of: September 01, 2011
BRANCH Received: August 10, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 01, 2011
Tracking No. 80edcbbb

‘(Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0111
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Frieda Bowman
Address:
614 W Taylor St.
Kokomo, IN,
Government Agency Type: Local

General Comment

I do not want "right of conscience" removed from Obamacare. It is not right that people who have
beliefs that who violate their conscience to hand out birth control pills. We don't force people to
take religious things that don't believe in the Bible and yet you want to force Christians to hand
out birth control pills. We are to respect your wishes but you don't want to respect our beliefs. The
least you can do is respect our beliefs.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000.... 9/1/2011
# Úradný vestník C 64A/28.

| | ISSN 1977-1037 |
| --- | --- |
| Úradný vestník
  Európskej únie | C 64A |
| | |
| Slovenské vydanie | Informácie a oznámenia | Ročník 6028. februára 2017 |

ISSN 1977-1037

Úradný vestník

Európskej únie

C 64A

Slovenské vydanie

Informácie a oznámenia

Ročník 6028. februára 2017

---

| Číslo oznamu | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Oznamy |
| | ADMINISTRATÍVNE POSTUPY |
| | Európsky parlament |
| 2017/C 64 A/01 | Výberové konanie PE/195/S — Dočasný zamestnanec — vedúci oddelenia (AD 14) — Zoznam vhodných kandidátov | 1 |

Číslo oznamu

Obsah

Strana

V   Oznamy

ADMINISTRATÍVNE POSTUPY

Európsky parlament

2017/C 64 A/01

Výberové konanie PE/195/S — Dočasný zamestnanec — vedúci oddelenia (AD 14) — Zoznam vhodných kandidátov

1

---

| SK | |
| --- | --- |

SK

---

V Oznamy

ADMINISTRATÍVNE POSTUPY

Európsky parlament

| 28.2.2017 | SK | Úradný vestník Európskej únie | CA 64/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2017

SK

Úradný vestník Európskej únie

CA 64/1

---

VÝBEROVÉ KONANIE PE/195/S

Dočasný zamestnanec — vedúci oddelenia (AD 14)

ZOZNAM VHODNÝCH KANDIDÁTOV

(2017/C 064 A/01)

| 1. | BORDEZ, Emmanuel |
| --- | --- |

1.

BORDEZ, Emmanuel

Zoznam vhodných kandidátov bol prijatý 14. februára 2017.

---
From: LJDROLL@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: I oppose the Definition of Religious Employer in Health Care Rules

Date: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 10:26:02 AM

The current definition of religious employer does not provide true conscience protection for those

committed to preserving life. Health care plans should not be forced to violate the moral and religious

convictions of providers or employees in order to participate in the health care system. Requiring such

an unacceptable demand threatens both universal access to health care and religious freedom of

conscience.

Msgr. Larry J. Droll
From: kennyhaystead@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:59:37 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

KENNETH HAYSTEAD

Denver, CO 80218
From: Nancy Pare"

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: provide contraception & choices for women

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 6:16:18 PM

Do not impose others religious beliefs on needy women or any woman. Women

should have access to free contraception & to all choices in the area of reproductive

health. 

Sincerely,

Nancy M. Caswell

Mother

tax-payer

Music Educator