alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.22 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
No. 457.

#### California Dump Truck Owners Association et al. *v.*Heavy, Highway, Building & Construction Teamsters Committee for Northern California et al.

*Robert M. Adams, Jr.*and *Scott Elder*for petitioners.

*David Previant, Duane B. Beeson*and *Florian Bartosic*for respondents.

District Court of Appeal of California, First Appellate District. Certiorari denied.
No. 57, Misc.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Robert G. May sack*for the United States.

#### Munson *v.*United States.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
# Eiropas Savienības C 54A/2017

| | ISSN 1977-0952 |
| --- | --- |
| Eiropas Savienības
  Oficiālais Vēstnesis | C 54A |
| | |
| Izdevums latviešu valodā | Informācija un paziņojumi | 60. gadagājums2017. gada 21. februāris |

ISSN 1977-0952

Eiropas Savienības

Oficiālais Vēstnesis

C 54A

Izdevums latviešu valodā

Informācija un paziņojumi

60. gadagājums2017. gada 21. februāris

---

| Paziņojums Nr. | Saturs | Lappuse |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Atzinumi |
| | ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS |
| | Padome |
| 2017/C 54 A/01 | Piemēroto kandidātu sarakstu derīguma termiņa pagarināšana | 1 |

Paziņojums Nr.

Saturs

Lappuse

V   Atzinumi

ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS

Padome

2017/C 54 A/01

Piemēroto kandidātu sarakstu derīguma termiņa pagarināšana

1

---

| LV | |
| --- | --- |

LV

---

V Atzinumi

ADMINISTRATĪVAS PROCEDŪRAS

Padome

| 21.2.2017 | LV | Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis | CA 54/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2017

LV

Eiropas Savienības Oficiālais Vēstnesis

CA 54/1

---

Piemēroto kandidātu sarakstu derīguma termiņa pagarināšana

(2017/C 054 A/01)

Ar Eiropas Savienības Padomes ģenerālsekretāra lēmumu to piemēroto kandidātu sarakstu derīguma termiņš, kas sastādīti pēc tālāk tekstā minētajiem atklātajiem konkursiem, tiek pagarināts līdz 2019. gada 31. decembrim.

| CONS/AD/430


  (divi profili) | lai izveidotu vecāko administratoru rezervi Eiropas Drošības un aizsardzības politikas (EDAP) jomā. Konkurss attiecas uz diviem AD 9 pakāpes profiliem (1. profils: vecākie stratēģijas plānotāji krīžu pārvarēšanas operācijām un misijām; 2. profils: vecākie spēju attīstības plānotāji militārā/civilā/kosmosa jomā); paziņojums publicēts
  Eiropas Savienības Oficiālajā Vēstnesī C 178 A 2008. gada 15. jūlijā. |
| --- | --- |
| CONS-COMM/AD/433 | lai izveidotu rezervi ar AD 12 pakāpes nodaļas vadītāja amata kandidātiem tulkošanas jomā, kuriem galvenā valoda ir īru valoda; paziņojums publicēts
  Eiropas Savienības Oficiālajā Vēstnesī C 99 A 2009. gada 30. aprīlī. |

CONS/AD/430

(divi profili)

lai izveidotu vecāko administratoru rezervi Eiropas Drošības un aizsardzības politikas (EDAP) jomā. Konkurss attiecas uz diviem AD 9 pakāpes profiliem (1. profils: vecākie stratēģijas plānotāji krīžu pārvarēšanas operācijām un misijām; 2. profils: vecākie spēju attīstības plānotāji militārā/civilā/kosmosa jomā); paziņojums publicēts
  Eiropas Savienības Oficiālajā Vēstnesī C 178 A 2008. gada 15. jūlijā.

CONS-COMM/AD/433

lai izveidotu rezervi ar AD 12 pakāpes nodaļas vadītāja amata kandidātiem tulkošanas jomā, kuriem galvenā valoda ir īru valoda; paziņojums publicēts
  Eiropas Savienības Oficiālajā Vēstnesī C 99 A 2009. gada 30. aprīlī.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.2

                            [MEDTRONIC LETTERHEAD]


April 19, 1999

Mr. John Lyon
Chief Executive Officer                                  VIA FACSIMILE
Vista Medical Technologies                               ORIGINAL VIA COURIER
5451 Avenida Encinas, Suite A
Carlsbad, CA 92008

Dear John,

This letter will confirm our discussions of last Thursday, April 15, in which
Medtronic Sofamor Danek consents to amending those certain agreements with
Vista to change its spinal application distribution rights for the Vista
visualization systems from exclusive to non-exclusive. While our in-house
counsel is preparing the written amendment to the distribution agreement
consistent with this change, you should feel free to negotiate and enter into
other non-exclusive agreements for these rights as you see fit.

Please let me know if you have any questions on this consent. We will send
you the amendment shortly.

Sincerely,

/s/ Bob Paulson

cc: John Meslow
    Ron Pickard
    Bob Compton
    Cliff Owens
    Mike Ellwein
    Shawn McCormick
    Tom Ehlinger
    Steve Phillips
    Joe Moctezuma
From: vsink1

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: I Support Access to Preventive Care and Contraception

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 1:35:17 AM

Importance: High

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Respectfully,

-- 

V. Sink

V. Sink

vsink1@yahoo.com
From: Lyn Kagey

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Contraception services should be available to everyone

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:13:24 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Lyn Kagey

San Diego, CA 92124

P Go Green: Please do not print this e-mail unless you really need to.

NOTICE:

If you received this transmission in error, please permanently delete the material.

Disclosure or use of this message by persons other than the intended recipient is

prohibited.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03- 09 -00 388 -CV In re Mar io Lavon Gam ble ORI GINAL PRO CEEDING FRO M B ELL COUNTY M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N Relator Mar io L avon Gamble filed a pe tition for writ of m andamus, c omplaining that the trial cour

t ha d not se t his motion for DNA testing for a hear ing. See Tex. R. App. P . 52.8. Since his filing, the tria l court has pr ovided this Court with an or der showing that Gamble’ s motion was hear d and denied. Gamble has rec eived the r elief he soug ht throug h his origina l proce eding , and any appea l of the denial of his motion for DNA testingmust be conducte d throug h a dire ct appe al. See Te x. Cod e Cr im. P. 6 4. 05 (We st 2 00 6) . We de ny the pe tit ion

fo r wri t of

mand amus .

__________________________________________ David Pury ear , J ustice Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Pemberton and Waldrop Filed: August 27, 2009
From: ben.lee@byu.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:38:39 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Benjamin Lee

, 85143-4898
From: deb.baucum@verizon.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:30:40 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gary Baucum

Long Beach, CA 90807
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

<PAGE>




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the periodic  report on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended  September  30, 2003 (the  "Report") of  Industrial  Minerals,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  I, Robert  Stoutley,  Chief  Executive  Officer and President of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18USC ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: November 10, 2003

/s/Robert Stoutley
-----------------------------------------------------
Robert Stoutley, Chief Executive Officer and President


         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
-88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

 44

▲ ★

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 2000

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/21

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 21 Jun 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
From: msauers74@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:07:24 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Minsan Sauers

Cold Spring, MN 56320
From: spednut@financier.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:01:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Edward Vigil

Albuquerque, NM 87153
From: judges5@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:14:14 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Deborah Cozzetti

Puyallup, WA 98373