alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 61470]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19250]



[[Page 61470]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARCHITECTURAL AND TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS COMPLIANCE BOARD

36 CFR Part 1190

[Docket No. ATBCB 2011-0004]
RIN 3014-AA26


Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public 
Right-of-Way

AGENCY: Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board 
(Access Board or Board) is correcting a final rule that appeared in the 
Federal Register of August 8, 2023. The document provided minimum 
guidelines for the accessibility of pedestrian facilities in the public 
right-of-way. The document had an incorrect effective date for the 
rule.

DATES:  The final rule is effective on October 7, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Frances Spiegel, Office of General 
Counsel, Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, 
1331 F Street NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20004-1111. Telephone 
(202) 272-0041. Email address <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d0a3a0b9b5b7b5bc90b1b3b3b5a3a3fdecb1f0b8a2b5b6ed" http: board.gov">board.gov</a>">spiegel@access-board.gov</a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR. Doc. 2023-16149, appearing on page 
53604 in the first column, in the Federal Register of Tuesday, August 
8, 2023, correct the DATES caption to read:

DATES: The final rule is effective on October 7, 2023.

    Dated: August 31, 2023.
Christopher Kuczynski,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2023-19250 Filed 9-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8150-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
From: Sister Miriam, DLJC

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: I oppose the Definition of Religious Employer in Health Care Rules

Date: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 9:11:30 AM

Dear Ms Sebillius:

The current definition of religious employer does not provide true

conscience protection for those committed to preserving life. Health

care plans should not be forced to violate the moral and religious

convictions of providers or employees in order to participate in the

health care system. Requiring such an unacceptable demand

threatens both universal access to health care and religious

freedom of conscience. Please reconsider changing this definition to

reflect the true protection of conscience.

Thank you,

Maureen M Grady

Amarillo, TX 79101
From: Kristen Wood

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 10:29:44 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you so much for prioritizing women's basic health care needs! I appreciate your leadership and

have shared your success with many of my friends.

Sincerely,

Kristen Wood

16208 232nd Street Ct E

Graham, WA 98338
From: Crystal Dirkson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 7:32:40 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Crystal Dirkson

2011 4th st nw

apt 2

minot, nd 58703
**Archive**
Department of Housing and Urban Development

Accompanying Report of the National Performance Review
Office of the Vice President
Washington, DC 
September 1993
Contents- Executive Summary   - Recommendations and Actions HUD01:  Reinvent Public Housing 
HUD02:  Improve Multi-Family Asset Managementand Disposition 
HUD03:  Improve Single-Family Asset Management and Disposition
HUD04:  Create an Assisted Housing/Rent SubsidyDemonstration Project 
HUD05:  Establish a New Housing Production Program
HUD06:  Streamline HUD Field Operations
HUD07:  Refinance Section 235 Mortgages
HUD08:  Reduce Section 8 Contract Rent Payments
HUD09:  Consolidate Section 8 Housing Certificates and Vouchers
HUD10:  Reduce Operating Subsidies for Vacancies 
Agency Reinvention Activities
Summary of Fiscal Impact
Apendix
Accompanying Reports of the National Performance Review
From: The Silver Web

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RE:rights

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 10:31:54 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Religion is a private matter, between the individual & whom/whatever they may or may not

perceive as a "higher power". It has NO place in the arena of healthcare wich includes

reproductive decisions, rights, & government provided healthcare. for the public.

Sincerly, R.H. Girshick
From: S. Rogers

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Reaffirm women"s access to full preventive services

Date: Sunday, August 14, 2011 1:33:26 PM

Having fought for more than 40 years for reproductive choice, I join with the

American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the

new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Sherry Rogers

111-23 76th Road

Flushing, NY 11375

The Equal Rights Amendment 

Simple Justice

It's about Time !

I am using the Free version of SPAMfighter.

SPAMfighter has removed 21146 of my spam emails to date.

Do you have a slow PC? Try free scan!
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAmerican Residential Investment Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Judith A. Berry, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section906”), that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| August 14,  2003 |
|------------------|
|             | /s/ Judith  A. Berry |   |
|             | Judith A.  Berry |
|             | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

*A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.*

 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7002

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SHANIESTA KENAY BANKS, a/k/a Shaniesta Keene,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior

District Judge. (2:13-cr-00157-RGD-TEM-1; 2:16-cv-00285-RGD)

Submitted: December 14, 2016 Decided: December 27, 2016

Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shaniesta Kenay Banks, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Marie Yusi, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Shaniesta Kenay Banks seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing as untimely her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). 

When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the 

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 

336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Banks has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a 

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 
3

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
From: Noelle Davis

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Friday, August 05, 2011 12:59:09 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Noelle Davis

2704 Hawk Drive NE

Marietta, GA 30066
From: Ellen McInnis

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Accept recommendations of Institution of Medicine

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 4:06:20 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new law

and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
-----Original Message----- 

From: Kevin Hurlahe [mailto:khurlahe@mac.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 7:16 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33 - No Mandatory Annuitization 

Greetings: 

To whom it may concern, 

Please maintain complete investor freedom for defined contribution 

plans (e.g. IRA, 403b, 401k, etc). 

Please do not require any form of mandatory annuitization, or any 

required/mandatory investment choices. 

Please maintain complete individual freedom of choice and personal 

sovereignty. 

Thank you, 

Kevin Hurlahe
From: Esther Megerman

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 10:42:11 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Esther Megerman

10124 Mackey

Overland Park, KS 66212
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
| The undersigned hereby certifies, in my capacity as an officer of NSTAR, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   (i)                                                                                                                                                                                           | the enclosed Quarterly Report of NSTAR on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|   (ii)                                                                                                                                                                                          | the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of NSTAR. |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |  |
| Dated: August 4, 2004      |  | By:   | /s/ JAMES J. JUDGE       |
|-----------------------------------------------------|--|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                     |  |                 | James J. Judge                                         |
|                                                     |  |                 | Senior Vice President,                                 |
|                                                     |  |                 | Treasurer and Chief                                    |
|                                                     |  |                 | Financial Officer                                      |
From: ajfaily@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: appropriate care for women

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:44:01 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

It would be unfair and oppressive to deny women insurance coverage for the

method of contraception they themselves select. Please support the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine.

Alice Jane Faily

Marietta, Georgia
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the report of CommScope, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),each of the undersigned officers of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

(1)          The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| By:    |   | /s/ FRANK M. DRENDEL                                 |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Frank M. Drendel                                     |
|   |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                 |
|   |   |                                                 |
| Date:  |   | August 2,  2007                                      |
|   |   |                                                 |
|   |   |                                                 |
| By:    |   | /s/ JEARLD L. LEONHARDT                              |   |
|   |   | Jearld L. Leonhardt                                  |
|   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   |                                                 |
| Date:  |   | August 2, 2007                                       |

 

1

----
From: Denise Lytle

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Women need access to conceptive services!

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 9:55:57 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Sincerely,

Denise Lytle

73 Poplar St.

Fords, NJ 08863

Why not check out The Happy Harpy at Cafe Press & Etsy & pass it on!

If you like unique jewelry, artwork, t-shirts, etc., this is the place for

you!

http://www.cafepress.com/happyharpy

http://www.etsy.com/shop.php?user_id=7113778
From: JAMES PETRELL [mailto:jhp1940@q.com] 

Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 11:45 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

 

 

Do Not Take My 401K and IRA dollars!!! I 

do not want US Treasuries in my tax 

deferred investments!!!

 

James Petrell

22825 N Las Vegas Dr

Sun City West, AZ 85375

jhp1940@q.com