alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Hillsborough, )

April 2, 1912.

#### Livermore *& a., Ex’rs, v.*Wells *& a.*

Bill in Equity, for the construction of the will of Elizabeth A. Livermore. Trial by the court. Transferred without a ruling from the September term, 1911, of the superior court by Chamberlin, J.

The second clause of the will is as follows: “My shares in the New Hampshire Insurance Company, in the Souhegan National Bank of Milford, my railroad shares, government bonds, and any other bonds or written evidences or printed of property may be sold and after all bequests are paid the remainder may be divided among the children of my brother . . . and the children of my sister . . . and Laura R. Manning . . . and their heirs.” A codicil to the will is as follows: “Herein I designate Mrs. Harriet E. Wells to be my residuary legatee and so appoint.” The will was holographic and undated, but was executed on or prior to September 10, 1893. The testatrix died November 3, 1910.

In addition to the property described in the will, the inventory disclosed stock of the American Can Company and of the American Telephone and Telegraph Company, bonds, coupons from bonds, checks payable to the decedent, a promissory note payable to her, and cash on hand, all acquired subsequent to the execution of the will. The executors, as interested parties, pray for instructions as to whether the property last enumerated passes under the second clause of the will or uuder the codicil.

*577*Thomas L. Livermore & a.,*executors, *pro se.*

*Burnham, Brown, Jones & Warren (Robert L. Manning*orally), for Charles B. Manning and others.

Bingham, J.

The intention of the testatrix, as disclosed in her will, was that the proceeds of the stocks, bonds, coupons, checks, and note in question should go under the second article of the will *to*the beneficiaries there named, and the executors are so advised.

*Case discharged.*

All concurred.
From: Bernard Brunner

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Sunday, August 28, 2011 10:31:57 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Bernard J. Brunner
Springfield, Pennsylvania
From: Kristine Andarmani

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Please Support Access to Preventive Care and Contraception

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 1:27:45 AM

To whom it may concern:

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I strongly urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Thank you for your time and attention.

Sincerely,

Kristine Andarmani
From: Margery Coffey

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Healthcare for Women

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:27:14 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government

to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage

requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption

would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s recommendations

and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Margery Coffey

Everybody has a right to live.

 --Frederick Douglass Kirkpatrick

Right is right, even if everyone is against it,

and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it.

--William Penn

There is no flag large enough to cover

the shame of killing innocent people

--Howard Zinn

Force may make hypocrites,

but it can never make converts

--William Penn
Exhibit 23







                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-42543 dated August 30, 1991) pertaining to the Cognitronics
Corporation 1967 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-42544  dated August 30, 1991 and Form S-8 No. 333-05897 dated
June 13, 1996) pertaining to the Cognitronics Corporation 1990 Stock Option
Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-05899 dated June 13,
1996) pertaining to the Cognitronics Corporation Restricted Stock Plan of our
report dated March 3, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Cognitronics Corporation included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1999.

                                        /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Stamford, Connecticut
March 29, 2000
Jan. 26: Military Airstrikes Continue Against ISIL in Syria and Iraq
 By CJTF - Operation Inherent Resolve News Release
  January 26, 2015 Release # 2015026FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **SOUTHWEST ASIA –** On Jan. 25, U.S. and Coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in Syria, using attack, fighter, and remotely piloted aircraft to conduct 21 airstrikes. Separately, U.S. and Coalition military forces conducted 13 airstrikes in Iraq, using attack, fighter, and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL terrorists. All strikes took place between 8 a.m., Jan. 25, and 8 a.m., Jan. 26, local time. The following is a summary of the strikes conducted since the last press release: **Syria**•  Near Al Qaim, an airstrike destroyed three ISIL armored vehicles.•  Near Ar Raqqah, two airstrikes destroyed six ISIL armored vehicles and an ISIL vehicle.•  Near Dayr az Zawr, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL armored vehicle.•  Near Kobani, 17 airstrikes struck 14 ISIL tactical units, a large ISIL unit, and two ISIL fighting positions, and destroyed six ISIL fighting positions, an ISIL vehicle, and an ISIL staging area. **Iraq**•  Near Fallujah, an airstrike destroyed an ISIL excavator.•  Near Haditha, an airstrike struck an ISIL tactical unit.•  Near Mosul, four airstrikes struck two ISIL tactical units and destroyed three ISIL bunkers, two ISIL vehicles, and an ISIL armored vehicle.•  Near Tal Afar, seven airstrikes struck a large ISIL unit and destroyed three ISIL mortar firing positions, three ISIL VBIEDs, eight ISIL armored vehicles, an ISIL checkpoint, 15 ISIL vehicles, and three ISIL fighting positions. Airstrike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely. The strikes were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, Syria, the region, and the wider international community. The destruction of ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the terrorist group's ability to project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Iraq include the U.S., Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. Coalition nations conducting airstrikes in Syria include the U.S., Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.
Exhibit 31.2 Sarbanes - Oxley Section 302 Certification  I, James J. Judge, certify that:1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NSTAR;2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of NSTAR as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;4.NSTAR's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for NSTAR and have:a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to NSTAR, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b)designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)evaluated the effectiveness of NSTAR's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, based on such evaluation; andd)disclosed in this quarterly report any change in NSTARs internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, NSTARs internal control over financial reporting.5.NSTAR's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to NSTAR's auditors and the audit committee of NSTAR's board of trustees:a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect NSTAR's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in NSTAR's internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  May 1, 2007By:/s/ JAMES J. JUDGEJames J. JudgeSenior Vice President,Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Communicative Competence (Languages)Curriculum DesignLanguage ProficiencyReading InstructionReading SkillsRecreational ReadingSecond Language InstructionSkill Development

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
From: Merry Guben

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Accept Institute of Medicine recommendations

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:24:08 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger.

Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run

health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the

coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies.

If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

-- 

Merry Guben

215-790-1947 (voice)

215-893-9997 (facsimile)

267-650-6729 (mobile)

"Never, never be afraid to do what's right, especially if the well-being of a person or

animal is at stake. Society's punishments are small compared to the wounds we

inflict on our soul when we look the other way." -- Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.
alks_Ex_10-6



		

			Exhibit 10.6

		





		
			2008 Plan – US Certificate
		

			
					
						
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						Restricted Stock Unit Award Certificate 

					
						(Time Vesting Only) 

					
						 

					
					
						

					
						 

					
						ID: XXXXXXXX

					
						Connaught House

					
						1 Burlington Rd.

					
						Dublin 4, Ireland

				



		
			 
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						«FIRST_NAME» «MIDDLE_NAME» «LAST_NAME»

					
						«ADDRESS_LINE_1»

					
						«ADDRESS_LINE_2»

					
						«ADDRESS_LINE_3»

					
						«CITY»,  «STATE»    «ZIP_CODE»

					
					
						Option Number:

					
						Plan:

					
						 

					
						 

					
						 

					
						ID:

				



		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Effective «GRANT_DATE», you have been granted a Restricted Stock Unit (“RSU”) award.  The RSU award is for a total of «SHARES_GRANTED» shares of Alkermes plc. (the “Company”) ordinary shares. 
		

		
			 
		

		
			The RSU award is granted under and is governed by the terms and conditions of this Restricted Stock Unit Award Certificate and the Alkermes plc Amended and Restated 2008 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).  Unless otherwise defined in this Award Certificate, all capitalized terms shall be as defined in the Plan.
		

		
			 
		

		
			The right to acquire the shares subject to the RSU award will become fully vested according to the following vesting schedule : ***ADD VESTING SCHEDULE***
		

		
			 
		

		
			You must be employed by the Company on a vesting date in order to receive the RSU award shares that vest on that date.  For the purpose of the terms of this RSU award, you will be deemed to be employed by the Company so long as you remain employed by a company which continues to be a subsidiary of the Company.  
		

		
			 
		

		
			In the event of the termination of your employment with the Company (but not the termination of a non-employment relationship with the Company) by reason of death or permanent disability, the RSU award shall vest in full on such termination of employment.  
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

			
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						____________________________________________

					
						Alkermes plc

					
					
						______________________

					
						Date
From: jeffbelmondo@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Feedback - RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:09:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Jeff Belmondo

Kent, WA 98031
#### Edgar T. Brackett, Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. Chester Griswold, Appellant, Impleaded, etc. Eli W. Blake v. The Same.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of

Tappan, J.
From: Marcia Crook

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Religious refusal for contrapception

Date: Saturday, August 20, 2011 12:09:44 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care

under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for "religious employers." These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that "religious refusal" exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services,

are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so Catholic hospitals

would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM's

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions

I have been a member of AAUW for almost forty years and they have done wonderful work

to promote equal access for women in many fields.