alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Amtsblatt C 64A/28.

| | ISSN 1977-088X |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 64A |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 60. Jahrgang28. Februar 2017 |

ISSN 1977-088X

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 64A

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

60. Jahrgang28. Februar 2017

---

| Informationsnummer | Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Bekanntmachungen |
| | VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN |
| | Europäisches Parlament |
| 2017/C 64 A/01 | Auswahlverfahren PE/195/S — Bediensteter auf Zeit — Referatsleiter (AD 14) — Eignungsliste | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Inhalt

Seite

V   Bekanntmachungen

VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN

Europäisches Parlament

2017/C 64 A/01

Auswahlverfahren PE/195/S — Bediensteter auf Zeit — Referatsleiter (AD 14) — Eignungsliste

1

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

V Bekanntmachungen

VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN

Europäisches Parlament

| 28.2.2017 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 64/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.2.2017

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 64/1

---

AUSWAHLVERFAHREN PE/195/S

Bediensteter auf Zeit — Referatsleiter (AD 14)

EIGNUNGSLISTE

(2017/C 064 A/01)

| 1. | BORDEZ, Emmanuel |
| --- | --- |

1.

BORDEZ, Emmanuel

Die Eignungsliste wurde am 14. Februar 2017 angenommen.

---
From: Mary Nordlund

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Monday, August 22, 2011 9:49:58 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Mary Nordlund
Portland, Oregon
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.38 MB)
 
 JOEP U.S. Army Jordan COVID-19 1-303rd CAV MAP-J
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Exhibit







Exhibit 10.2



FIRST AMENDMENT TO


ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY


DEFERRED STOCK PLAN FOR OUTSIDE DIRECTORS


(As Amended and Restated as of July 29, 2015)


WHEREAS, Erie Indemnity Company (the “Company”) maintains the Erie Indemnity Company Deferred Stock Plan for Outside Directors under an amendment and restatement effective July 29, 2015 (the “Plan”);


WHEREAS, the Plan provides that the Company may amend the Plan; and


WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan as hereinafter set forth.  The purpose of this Amendment is to provide for ad hoc share credits as may be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company.  The provisions of this Amendment shall be effective January 1, 2016.  Words and phrases used herein with initial capital letters which are defined in the Plan are used herein as defined.


NOW, THEREFORE, the Company hereby amends the Plan as follows:


A new section shall be added to Article Four of Appendix B immediately following Section 4.5 thereof and such new section shall read as follows: 


		
	4.6
	AD HOC SHARE CREDIT




With respect to any given Board Tenure Year, the Board may in its discretion decide to provide an ad hoc share credit on behalf of some or all Outside Directors. Such ad hoc share credit made to the Deferred Stock Account of a given Outside Director shall be equal to the quotient obtained by dividing a cash amount determined by the Board by the closing price of Common Stock on the effective date or dates of such ad hoc share credit, as determined by the 








Board.  Unless otherwise determined by the Board, a Participant’s interest in the ad hoc share credit made in any given Board Tenure Year shall vest in accordance with the vesting schedule applicable to Annual Share Credits made in the same Board Tenure Year.




* * * * * * *


Executed at Erie, Pennsylvania this 31st day of March, 2016, effective as of January 1, 2016.




ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY




By: /s/ Sean J. McLaughlin    
Sean J. McLaughlin


Executive Vice President
Title: and General Counsel             






ATTEST:


/s/ Brian Bolash            


15/RET/Outside Directors Plan/First Amend Outside Dir.doc


2
Order entered March 1, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 01049
- CV
LESKEL NICHOLS , Appellant

V. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY , Appellee On Appeal from the 6 8th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 20
- 00690

O RDER By letter filed December 8, 2020, Antoinette Reagor, Official Court Reporter for the 68th Judicial District Court, informed the Court that no record was
made of eith er of the two hearings appellant requested, the hearing held July 20,
2020 , and the hearing held November 30, 2020. In a jurisdictional letter brief filed January 21, 2021, appellant disputes that.
The Court’s jurisdiction having been determined, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing and make written findings of fact concerning whether the tworequested r eporter’s record s exist no later than March 30, 2021 . We further

ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file a supplemental clerk’s
record co n taining t he findings no later than April 5 , 2021. A supplemental reporter’s record of the trial court’s hearing shall also be filed no later than April 5 , 2021.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to the
Honorable Marti n Hoffman, Presiding Judge of the 68th Judicial District Court ; Ms. Pitre; Ms. Reagor; and the parties.
We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court an opportunity to conduct the hearing. The appeal shall be reinstated no later than April 12 , 2021.
/s/ KE N MOLBERG JUSTICE
*Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

___________________________

No. 00-30962

Summary Calendar

___________________________

JAMES M. ROBERTSON, M.D.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

(98-CV-463)

 ___________________________________________________

March 16, 2001

Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

For essentially the reasons stated by the district court in

its Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment of January 18, 2000, we

affirm the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.
#### NATIONAL MOTOR FREIGHT TRAFFIC ASSOCIATION, INC., et al. *v.*UNITED STATES et al.

No. 479.

Decided December 17, 1962.

*Bryce Rea, Jr.*and *Frederick A. Babson, Jr.*for appellants.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane*and *Fritz R. Kahn*for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.

*D. Robert Thomas, Harry C. Ames, Sr., Giles Morrow, S. Sidney Eisen*and *James L. Givan*for appellee freight forwarders.

Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Stewart is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 83 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                   House Calendar No. 6
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 83

                          [Report No. 107-12]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3) to amend the Internal 
      Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce individual income tax rates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2001

   Mr. Reynolds, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3) to amend the Internal 
      Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce individual income tax rates.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 3) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 
reduce individual income tax rates. The bill shall be considered as 
read for amendment. The amendment recommended by the Committee on Ways 
and Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as 
amended, and on any further amendment thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as 
amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; (2) the further 
amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying 
this resolution, if offered by Representative Rangel of New York or his 
designee, which shall be in order without intervention of any point of 
order, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable 
for one hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 
opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

                                                   House Calendar No. 6

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. RES. 83

                          [Report No. 107-12]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3) to amend the Internal 
      Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce individual income tax rates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 7, 2001

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
**Archive**PUTTING CUSTOMERS FIRST
SERVING THE AMERICAN PUBLIC:
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERI, Martin F. Jackson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Select MedicalCorporation, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Select Medical Corporation;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this quarterly report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:November 13, 2006        /s/ Martin F. Jackson   Martin F. Jackson  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS**

 

Eachof the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of ProvidianFinancial Corporation (the “Company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.             The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.             The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Dated:May 10, 2005

 

 
|   | /s/  Joseph W. Saunders                                    |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Joseph  W. Saunders  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                                       |
|   |                                                       |
|   | /s/  Anthony F. Vuoto                                      |   |
|   | Anthony  F. Vuoto  Chief Financial Officer                 |

 

1

----
From: Mr. and Mrs. Lewis Green

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive Care

Date: Monday, August 15, 2011 9:50:16 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new law

and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access

to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive

services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some

groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so

hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement,

even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger

exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 7, 2019

No. 04-19-00669-CR

Joshua SCHECHTER,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 437th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR1922

Honorable Lori I. Valenzuela, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant Joshua Schechter entered into a plea bargain with the State pursuant to which 

he pleaded nolo contendere to possession of a controlled substance. The trial court imposed

sentence in accordance with the agreement and signed a certificate stating this “is a plea-bargain 

case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Appellant

timely filed a notice of appeal, and the district clerk filed a copy of the clerk’s record, which 

includes the trial court’s rule 25.2(a)(2) certification and a written plea bargain agreement. See

id. R. 25.2(d). We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the 

right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id.

Here, the clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the trial court does not 

exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id.

R. 25.2(a)(2). The record also supports the trial court’s certification that appellant does not have 

a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court 

of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is 

accurate). 

Accordingly, appellant is given notice that this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to rule 

25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless an amended certification showing that 

appellant has the right to appeal is made part of the appellate record by or before December 9, 

2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San 

Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, 

pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication).
We ORDER all appellate deadlines are suspended until further order of the court. We 

further ORDER the clerk of this court to serve copies of this order on the attorneys of record and 

the court reporter. 

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 7th day of November, 2019.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
ex1017form10.htm




RAYMOND JAMES







George Longo


Managing Director


Project Finance Group

















March 17, 2014







Mr. Jeremy P. Feakins


Chairman & CEO


Ocean Thermal Energy Corporation


800 South Queen Street


Lancaster, PA 17603-5818







Re: OTE-BM, Ltd. Project Financing







Dear Mr. Feakins,







Pursuant to both the Agreement, dated April 1, 2011 and subsequent amendment dated November 1, 2013, Ocean Thermal Energy Corporation, its affiliates, subsidiaries and/or successors, (“OTEC”) engaged Raymond James & Associates, Inc. (“Raymond James”) to act as its Project Advisor and Sole Debt Placement Agent with respect to the Project, as defined in the Agreement. Since that time, we have drafted numerous project related marketing documents; reviewed materials provided by OTEC; researched the background of related parties; and attended numerous calls and meetings.







In late 2013, Raymond James arranged numerous presentations to potential senior debt lenders for the Project and representatives of OTEC and DCO Energy accompanied Raymond James at their banking office in New York City. Following significant interest arising from those presentations, OTEC selected a large European Bank as its primary prospective lender for the Project and executed a mandate letter with such lender.







We remain confident, subject to market conditions at the time of sale and final approval from the appropriate credit committee of Raymond James, that OTE will have sufficient access to capital for the OTE BM Ltd. Project through the efforts of Raymond James Project Finance and Private Placement Groups.







We look forward to our continuing relationship with Ocean Thermal Energy Corporation and its affiliates.







Very truly yours,







RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC.







By: /s/ George Longo