62112 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 173 / Friday, September 8, 2023 / Notices 

1See Docket No. RM2018–3, Order Adopting 

Final Rules Relating to Non-Public Information, 

June 27, 2018, Attachment A at 19–22 (Order No. 

4679). 

adjudicatory documents in Portable 

Document Format. Guidance on 

submissions is available on the NRC’s 

public website at https://www.nrc.gov/ 

site-help/electronic-sub-ref-mat.html. A 

filing is considered complete at the time 

the document is submitted through the 

NRC’s E-Filing system. To be timely, an 

electronic filing must be submitted to 

the E-Filing system no later than 11:59 

p.m. ET on the due date. Upon receipt 

of a transmission, the E-Filing system 

time-stamps the document and sends 

the submitter an email confirming 

receipt of the document. The E-Filing 

system also distributes an email that 

provides access to the document to the 

NRC’s Office of the General Counsel and 

any others who have advised the Office 

of the Secretary that they wish to 

participate in the proceeding, so that the 

filer need not serve the document on 

those participants separately. Therefore, 

applicants and other participants (or 

their counsel or representative) must 

apply for and receive a digital ID 

certificate before adjudicatory 

documents are filed to obtain access to 

the documents via the E-Filing system. 

A person filing electronically using 

the NRC’s adjudicatory E-Filing system 

may seek assistance by contacting the 

NRC’s Electronic Filing Help Desk 

through the ‘‘Contact Us’’ link located 

on the NRC’s public website at https:// 

www.nrc.gov/site-help/esubmittals.html, by email to 

MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov, or by a tollfree call at 1–866–672–7640. The NRC 

Electronic Filing Help Desk is available 

between 9 a.m. and 6 p.m., ET, Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

Participants who believe that they 

have good cause for not submitting 

documents electronically must file an 

exemption request, in accordance with 

10 CFR 2.302(g), with their initial paper 

filing stating why there is good cause for 

not filing electronically and requesting 

authorization to continue to submit 

documents in paper format. Such filings 

must be submitted in accordance with 

10 CFR 2.302(b)-(d). Participants filing 

adjudicatory documents in this manner 

are responsible for serving their 

documents on all other participants. 

Participants granted an exemption 

under 10 CFR 2.302(g)(2) must still meet 

the electronic formatting requirement in 

10 CFR 2.302(g)(1), unless the 

participant also seeks and is granted an 

exemption from 10 CFR 2.302(g)(1). 

Documents submitted in adjudicatory 

proceedings will appear in the NRC’s 

electronic hearing docket, which is 

publicly available at https://

adams.nrc.gov/ehd, unless excluded 

pursuant to an order of the presiding 

officer. If you do not have an NRCissued digital ID certificate as 

previously described, click ‘‘cancel’’ 

when the link requests certificates and 

you will be automatically directed to the 

NRC’s electronic hearing dockets where 

you will be able to access any publicly 

available documents in a particular 

hearing docket. Participants are 

requested not to include personal 

privacy information such as social 

security numbers, home addresses, or 

personal phone numbers in their filings 

unless an NRC regulation or other law 

requires submission of such 

information. With respect to 

copyrighted works, except for limited 

excerpts that serve the purpose of the 

adjudicatory filings and would 

constitute a Fair Use application, 

participants should not include 

copyrighted materials in their 

submission. 

Dated: August 31, 2023. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

John M. Moses, 

Deputy Director, Division of Rulemaking, 

Environmental, and Financial Support, Office 

of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards. 

[FR Doc. 2023–19188 Filed 9–7–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. MC2023–251 and CP2023–254; 

MC2023–252 and CP2023–255; MC2023–253 

and CP2023–256] 

New Postal Products 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recent Postal Service filing for the 

Commission’s consideration concerning 

a negotiated service agreement. This 

notice informs the public of the filing, 

invites public comment, and takes other 

administrative steps. 

DATES: Comments are due: September 8, 

2023. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at https://

www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit 

comments electronically should contact 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section by 

telephone for advice on filing 

alternatives. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 

202–789–6820. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Docketed Proceeding(s) 

I. Introduction 

The Commission gives notice that the 

Postal Service filed request(s) for the 

Commission to consider matters related 

to negotiated service agreement(s). The 

request(s) may propose the addition or 

removal of a negotiated service 

agreement from the Market Dominant or 

the Competitive product list, or the 

modification of an existing product 

currently appearing on the Market 

Dominant or the Competitive product 

list. 

Section II identifies the docket 

number(s) associated with each Postal 

Service request, the title of each Postal 

Service request, the request’s acceptance 

date, and the authority cited by the 

Postal Service for each request. For each 

request, the Commission appoints an 

officer of the Commission to represent 

the interests of the general public in the 

proceeding, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505 

(Public Representative). Section II also 

establishes comment deadline(s) 

pertaining to each request. 

The public portions of the Postal 

Service’s request(s) can be accessed via 

the Commission’s website (https://

www.prc.gov). Non-public portions of 

the Postal Service’s request(s), if any, 

can be accessed through compliance 

with the requirements of 39 CFR 

3011.301.1

The Commission invites comments on 

whether the Postal Service’s request(s) 

in the captioned docket(s) are consistent 

with the policies of title 39. For 

request(s) that the Postal Service states 

concern Market Dominant product(s), 

applicable statutory and regulatory 

requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3622, 39 

U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3030, and 39 

CFR part 3040, subpart B. For request(s) 

that the Postal Service states concern 

Competitive product(s), applicable 

statutory and regulatory requirements 

include 39 U.S.C. 3632, 39 U.S.C. 3633, 

39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3035, and 

39 CFR part 3040, subpart B. Comment 

deadline(s) for each request appear in 

section II. 

II. Docketed Proceeding(s) 

1. Docket No(s).: MC2023–251 and 

CP2023–254; Filing Title: USPS Request 

to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground 

Advantage Contract 43 to Competitive 

Product List and Notice of Filing 

Materials Under Seal; Filing Acceptance 

Date: August 30, 2023; Filing Authority: 

39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 3040.130 

through 3040.135, and 39 CFR 3035.105; 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 173 / Friday, September 8, 2023 / Notices 62113 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 15 U.S.C. 78a. 

3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

4Rule 6.91P–O(a)(7) defines an ‘‘Electronic 

Complex Order’’ or ‘‘ECO’’ to mean any Complex 

Order, as defined in Rule 6.62P–O (f). Rule 6.62P– 

O(f) (providing a Complex Order is ‘‘any order 

involving the simultaneous purchase and/or sale of 

two or more option series in the same underlying 

security, for the same account, in a ratio that is 

equal to or greater than one-to-three (.333) and less 

than or equal to three-to-one (3.00) and for the 

purpose of executing a particular investment 

strategy.’’). 

5See proposed Rule 6.91P–O(g)(1) (Complex 

Strategy Limits). A ‘‘complex strategy’’ means a 

particular combination of leg components and their 

ratios to one another. New complex strategies can 

be created when the Exchange receives either a 

request to create a new complex strategy or an ECO 

with a new complex strategy. See Rule 6.91P– 

O(a)(4). 

6See, e.g., Cboe Rule 5.33(a) (providing, in its 

definition of ‘‘complex strategy’’ that Cboe ‘‘may 

limit the number of new complex strategies that 

may be in the [Cboe] System or entered for any 

EFID (which EFID limit would be the same for all 

Users) at a particular time’’). 

7An Options Trading Permit or ‘‘OTP’’ is issued 

by the Exchange for effecting approved securities 

transactions on the Exchange. See Rule 1.1. An 

‘‘OTP Holder’’ is a natural person, in good standing, 

who has been issued an OTP and an ‘‘OTP Firm’’ 

is a sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, 

limited liability company or other organization in 

good standing that holds an OTP or upon whom an 

individual OTP Holder has conferred trading 

privileges on the Exchange. See id. The Exchange 

notes that an OTP may be acting as a Market Maker, 

which market participant is subject to heightened 

requirements. See, e.g., Rule 6.37AP–O(b), (c). 

8Per Rule 1.1, an MPID refers to the identifier 

assigned to the orders and quotes of a single OTP 

Holder or OTP Firm for the execution and clearing 

of trades on the Exchange by that permit holder. An 

OTP Holder or OTP Firm may obtain multiple 

MPIDs and each such MPID may be associated with 

one or more sub-identifiers of that MPID.’’ See id. 

Public Representative: Jennaca D. 

Upperman; Comments Due: September 

8, 2023. 

2. Docket No(s).: MC2023–252 and 

CP2023–255; Filing Title: USPS Request 

to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground 

Advantage Contract 44 to Competitive 

Product List and Notice of Filing 

Materials Under Seal; Filing Acceptance 

Date: August 30, 2023; Filing Authority: 

39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 3040.130 

through 3040.135, and 39 CFR 3035.105; 

Public Representative: Jennaca D. 

Upperman; Comments Due: September 

8, 2023. 

3. Docket No(s).: MC2023–253 and 

CP2023–256; Filing Title: USPS Request 

to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground 

Advantage Contract 45 to Competitive 

Product List and Notice of Filing 

Materials Under Seal; Filing Acceptance 

Date: August 30, 2023; Filing Authority: 

39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 3040.130 

through 3040.135, and 39 CFR 3035.105; 

Public Representative: Christopher C. 

Mohr; Comments Due: September 8, 

2023. 

This Notice will be published in the 

Federal Register. 

Erica A. Barker, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2023–19360 Filed 9–7–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–98278; File No. SR– 

NYSEARCA–2023–56] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE 

Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and 

Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed 

Rule Change To Modify Rule 6.91P– 

O(g)(1) 

September 1, 2023. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3

notice is hereby given that, on August 

18, 2023, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE 

Arca’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule 

change as described in Items I, II, and 

III below, which Items have been 

prepared by the self-regulatory 

organization. The Commission is 

publishing this notice to solicit 

comments on the proposed rule change 

from interested persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

The Exchange proposes to modify 

Rule 6.91P–O(g)(1) to expand the 

existing Complex Strategy Limit. The 

proposed rule change is available on the 

Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at 

the principal office of the Exchange, and 

at the Commission’s Public Reference 

Room. 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, the 

self-regulatory organization included 

statements concerning the purpose of, 

and basis for, the proposed rule change 

and discussed any comments it received 

on the proposed rule change. The text 

of those statements may be examined at 

the places specified in Item IV below. 

The Exchange has prepared summaries, 

set forth in sections A, B, and C below, 

of the most significant parts of such 

statements. 

A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and the 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

1. Purpose 

The Exchange proposes to modify 

Rule 6.91P–O(g) regarding risk checks of 

Electronic Complex Orders (or ECOs) to 

expand the existing Complex Strategy 

Limit.4 Specifically, the Exchange 

proposes to impose a limit on complex 

strategies per underlying symbol, as 

described below.5 The Exchange also 

notes that at least one other options 

exchange likewise may impose a limit 

on new complex order strategies.6

Rule 6.91P–O(g) describes the ‘‘ECO 

Risk Checks,’’ which are designed to 

help OTP Holders and OTP Firms 

(collectively OTPs) to effectively 

manage risk when trading ECOs.7 Rule 

6.91P–O(g)(1) sets forth the ‘‘Complex 

Strategy Limit,’’ which establishes a 

limit on the maximum number of new 

complex strategies that may be 

requested to be created per Market 

Participant Identifier or MPID, which 

limit would be announced by Trader 

Update.8 Under current functionality, 

when an MPID reaches the limit on the 

maximum number of new complex 

strategies, the Exchange rejects all 

requests to create new complex 

strategies from that MPID for the rest of 

the trading day. 

Notwithstanding the established 

Complex Strategy Limit, Rule 6.91P– 

O(g)(1) also authorizes the Exchange to 

reject a request to create a new complex 

strategy from any MPID whenever the 

Exchange determines it is necessary in 

the interests of a fair and orderly 

market. The established Complex 

Strategy Limit (the ‘‘Strategy Limit’’), 

and the Exchange’s discretion related 

thereto, is a system protection tool that 

enables the Exchange to prevent any 

single MPID from creating more than a 

limited number of complex strategies 

during the trading day. 

The Exchange proposes to modify 

Rule 6.91P–O(g)(1) to adopt another 

limit for the number of permissible 

complex strategies requested to be 

created by an MPID in a trading day, 

except that the new limit would be 

based on the number of complex 

strategies in the same underlying 

symbol (the ‘‘Strategy Limit per 

Symbol’’). Like the existing Strategy 

Limit, the proposed Strategy Limit per 

Symbol would operate as a system 

protection tool that enables the 

Exchange to prevent any single MPID 

from creating more than a limited 

number of complex strategies in a 

particular symbol during the trading 

day. 

The Exchange has observed that the 

high volume of requests to create 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1