alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: RRemick@GWI.Net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:45:54 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Rogers Remick

, 04092-4729
27 April 1999



Mr. Tom Maxfield
Marsden Hall
Lizard Lane
Marsden
Tyne & Wear

NE34 7AD

Dear Tom

Further to our discussions last week, I would like to confirm the following:

The company is holding bi-monthly  meetings this year. The next meeting is on 20
May 1999. I will send through a pack before the meeting.

Remuneration  for your services is suggested at 10,000  ordinary  shares in Invu
Inc. plus expenses.  In addition,  during 1999, we will be  implementing a share
option scheme, and I suggest that a further 20,000 are reserved for you.

As a  consequence  of Colorado Law it is not possible for ordinary  shares to be
issued to any party for services which have not yet been  performed.  Therefore,
we could agree that the shares are in  consideration of services to be performed
over the next, say, six months, and issued to you at that time.

I hope  this  is  satisfactory.  If you  would  send me a note  signifying  this
together with the questionnaire, I will organize the appropriate documentation.

Yours sincerely

/s/ David Morgan

DAVID MORGAN

Chief Executive
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
EX-27.97
RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00000
<CASH>                                          55,601
<SECURITIES>                                    10,649
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,792
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     27,929
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               168,502
<PP&E>                                         245,153
<DEPRECIATION>                                (86,483)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 567,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,921
<BONDS>                                        168,424
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,522
<OTHER-SE>                                     181,165
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   567,214
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               241,029
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  194,050
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (22,095)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,629
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 60,445
<INCOME-TAX>                                    28,202
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,243
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (3,077)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,166
<EPS-BASIC>                                      1.170
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.140


</TABLE>
From: david3by9@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:20:11 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Woodman

Palmdale, CA 93551
EXHIBIT 10w-3

THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE  BELLSOUTH RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN

THIS THIRD AMENDMENT to the BellSouth Retirement Savings Plan (the "Plan") is made effective as of the dates specified herein, by the BellSouth Savings Plan
Committee (the "Committee").

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, BellSouth Corporation ("BellSouth") maintains the Plan for the benefit of its employees and employees of certain of its affiliates;

WHEREAS,
Section 19.1 of the Plan provides that the Plan may be amended at any time by action of the delegate of the Board of Directors of BellSouth Corporation;

WHEREAS,
the Board has delegated the authority to approve amendments to the Plan to the Executive Nominating and Compensation Committee, which in turn has delegated this authority to the
Committee; and

WHEREAS,
Section 22.4 of the Plan provides that any amendment to this Plan automatically shall be effective as to each Participating Company without any further action by any
Participating Company; and

WHEREAS,
the Committee desires to amend the Plan to provide for the merger of the portions of the BellSouth Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("PAYSOP") that relate to participants or former
participants in the Plan; and

WHEREAS,
the Committee also desires to amend the Plan to modify the loan provisions under the Plan regarding the loan defaults;

NOW,
THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows:

1.

Effective
May 1, 2002, Section 2.1 of the Plan is amended by adding the following sentence to the end of the definition of "BellSouth Shares Account":



2.

Effective
December 10, 2002, Section 10(1)(l)(a) of the Plan is amended by deleting such subsection and replacing it with the following:



3.

Any
other provisions of the Plan not amended herein shall remain in full force and effect.

---

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed by the duly authorized representative of the Committee as of the date first written above.

| |  | BELLSOUTH SAVINGS PLAN COMMITTEE                            
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Richard D. SibbernsenBy: Richard D. Sibbernsen, Chairman

---

QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 175 (Tuesday, September 12, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 62621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19589]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12170]


Determination Under Section 506(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance 
Act of 1961 To Provide Military Assistance to Ukraine

    Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 506(a)(1) of the 
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (the ``Act'') (22 U.S.C. 2318(a)(1)) and 
Presidential Delegation of Authority dated June 13, 2023, I hereby 
determine that:
    <bullet> an unforeseen emergency exists which requires immediate 
military assistance to Ukraine; and
    <bullet> the emergency requirement cannot be met under the 
authority of the Arms Export Control Act or any other provision of law.
    I, therefore, pursuant to authority delegated to me by the 
President, direct the drawdown of up to $325 million in defense 
articles and services of the Department of Defense, and military 
education and training, under the authority of section 506(a)(1) of the 
Act, to provide assistance to Ukraine. The Department of State will 
coordinate implementation of this drawdown.
    This determination shall be reported to the Congress and published 
in the Federal Register.

    Dated: June 13, 2023.
Antony Blinken,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2023-19589 Filed 9-11-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
From: EKTM@VERIZON.NET

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:12:08 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

KERRI LEBARRE

Pembroke, MA 02359
From: Kelly Comeau

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Thursday, August 04, 2011 8:51:40 AM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Kelly Comeau
San Antonio, Texas
From: Jim and Connie Rogers

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: contraceptive coverage

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 1:21:37 AM

Dear HHS Staff,

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the 

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new 

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a 

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health 

care.

AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive 

services. Insurance coverage of contraceptives should be available to ALL women based on their own 

principles, not those of any employer or pharmacist.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s recommendations 

and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Connie Rogers
No. 451.

#### Laudenslager et ux. *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

*Morris J. Oppenheim*for petitioners.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer*and *Joseph Kovner*for respondent.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
No. 640.

#### Edens *v.*Arkansas.

*Gus R. Camp*for petitioner.

Supreme Court of Arkansas. Certiorari denied.
No. 572, Misc.

#### Allocco *v.*United States.

*Leon Polsky*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *J. F. Bishop*for the United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 176 (Wednesday, September 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62784-62785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19786]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of filing of the following 
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may 
submit comments, relevant information, or documents regarding the 
agreements to the Secretary by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1043757362756471626950767d733e777f66"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cc9fa9afbea9b8adbeb58caaa1afe2aba3ba">[email protected]</span></a>, or by mail, 
Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, Washington, DC 
20573. Comments will be most helpful to the Commission if received 
within 12 days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register, 
and the Commission requests that comments be submitted within 7 days on 
agreements that request expedited review. Copies of agreements are 
available through the Commission's website (www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting

[[Page 62785]]

the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#493d3b282d2c28272825303a203a092f242a672e263f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="423630232627232c232e3b312b3102242f216c252d34">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Agreement No.: 011962-020.
    Agreement Name: Consolidated Chassis Management Pool Agreement.
    Parties: Ocean Carrier Equipment Management Association, Inc;; 
Consolidated Chassis Management LLC; Chicago Ohio Valley Consolidated 
Chassis Pool LLC; Denver Consolidated Chassis Pool LLC; Gulf 
Consolidated Chassis Pool LLC; Mid-South Consolidated Chassis Pool LLC; 
Midwest Consolidated Chassis Pool LLC; UIE Pools LLC; United Intermodal 
Enterprises LLC; Maersk A/S and Hamburg Sud (acting as a single party); 
CMA CGM S.A., APL Co. Pte Ltd., and American President Lines, Ltd. 
(acting as a single party); COSCO SHIPPING Lines Co., Ltd.; Evergreen 
Line Joint Service Agreement; Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd.; Hapag-
Lloyd AG and Hapag-Lloyd USA (acting as a single party); HMM Company 
Limited; MSC Mediterranean Shipping Co., S.A.; Zim Integrated Shipping 
Services Ltd.; Matson Navigation Company; Westwood Shipping Lines; and 
Yang Ming Marine Transport Corp.
    Filing Party: Joshua Stein; Cozen O'Connor.
    Synopsis: The Amendment would add authority for an SACP loyalty 
incentive program.
    Proposed Effective Date: 10/22/2023.
    Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/FMC.Agreements.Web/Public/AgreementHistory/454.

    Dated: September 8, 2023.
Jason Guthrie,
Federal Register Alternate Liaison Officer, Federal Maritime 
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-19786 Filed 9-12-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Railroad Administration

          - [Docket No. FRA-2010-0060]

# AGENCY:

Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of Transportation (DOT).

# ACTION:

Notice; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

                        On September 1, 2023, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         announcing the availability of the Norfolk Southern Railway's (NS) request for amendment (RFA), dated August 28, 2023, to its FRA-certified positive train control (PTC) system. This                               ( print page 61006)                            document withdraws that notice, FR Doc. 2023-18996. On August 30, 2023, NS withdrew its RFA.                    

# DATES:

As of September 6, 2023, FR Doc. 2023-18996, published on September 1, 2023, is withdrawn.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For further information, please contact Gabe Neal, Staff Director, Signal, Train Control, and Crossings Division, telephone: 816-516-7168, email:                         *Gabe.Neal@dot.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

FR Doc. 2023-18996, published on September 1, 2023, is withdrawn by this notice.

Issued in Washington, DC.

Carolyn R. Hayward-Williams,

Director, Office of Railroad Systems and Technology.

[FR Doc. 2023-19186 Filed 9-5-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-06-P