alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Genzyme Corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the Company for year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/HENRI A. TERMEERHenri A. Termeer Chief Executive
OfficerMarch 14, 2005 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
#### Emil Schweinburg, Respondent, *v.*Benjamin Altman, Appellant.

*Schweinburg*v. Altman, 145 App. Div. 377, affirmed.

(Argued December 16, 1913;

decided January 31, 1913.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 16, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover upon certain contracts.

*Edmund L. Mooney, Solomon Hanford*and *Frederick A. Card*for appellant.

*Nathan Ottinger*and *William N. Cohen*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Werner, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Gray, Willard Bartlett and Collin, JJ,
exhibit450ett20151109vit







 1   Exhibit 4.50                                 Amendment No. 2 to the Storage Contract   No. 2011-10 dated 30-09-2011      Between         Euro Tank Terminal B.V.          And      Vitol S.A.     





 







 2   THIS AMENDMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2 is made on this 9th day November of 2015       BETWEEN      1. Euro Tank Terminal B.V., a company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands with a   registered office at PO Box 1000, 3180 AA Rozenburg, The Netherlands (“the Company”); and      AND      2. Vitol S.A., a company incorporated under the laws of Switzerland with a registered office at 28   Boulevard du Pont d’Arve 28, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland(“the Client”)      together “the Parties” and individually “the Party”.      WHEREAS      (A) The Company and Client are parties to a Storage Contract No. 2011-10 dated 30-09-2011 (“Storage   Contract”).       (B) The Company and Client have further entered into Amendment Agreement dated 22nd January 2015   (no. 1);       (C) For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged,   the Company and the Client now wish to further amend the Storage Contract in accordance with this   Amendment Agreement No. 2.           NOW THEREFORE it is agreed as follows:      1. The Company and the Client agree to extend the duration from 31 March 2017 to 30 September   2019.      2. The Company and Client further agree to rectify the Contractual Capacity as set forth in Clause 7 of   the Storage Contract from 128,000 cbm to 108,000 cbm.       3. Save to the extent as amended by this Amendment Agreement No. 2, all terms and conditions of the   Storage Contract shall remain in full force and effect. This Amendment Agreement No. 2 may be   executed in counterparts.       4. Clauses 23 and 24 of the Storage Contract shall apply mutatis mutandis to this Amendment   Agreement No. 2 as if references therein to the Storage Contract were to this Amendment   Agreement No. 2.      5. Capitalised terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment Agreement No. 2 have the same   meaning as in the Storage Contract.        





 







 3   IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Client and the Company have caused this Amendment Agreement No. 2 to be   executed by their duly authorized representatives, as of the date first above written.            Eurotank Tank Terminal B.V.                      /s/ Jack de Moel   Name: Jack de Moel   Position: Director   Date: 09 November 2015   Place: Rotterdam   Vitol S.A.                      /s/ David Fransen   Name: David Fransen   Position: Managing Director   Date: 09 November 2015   Place: Geneva
From: Paige Harrison

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: IOM Recommendations

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 12:34:03 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that, “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

College RoleCommunity CollegesCultural PluralismCurriculum DevelopmentEducational ChangeFutures (of Society)Institutional MissionMulticultural EducationStudent NeedsTwo Year Colleges

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
<PAGE>   1

                    [Letterhead of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu]

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants of Bay Heart Ltd, we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our report dated February 14, 2000, included in Form 10-K of
Ampal-American Israel Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1999 (relating
to the financial statements of Bay Heart Ltd. not included herein), into
Ampal-American Israel Corporation's previously filed Registration Statements
file No. 33-51023 and No. 33-55137.


/s/ Brightman Almagor & Co.
Brightman Almagor & Co.
Certified Public Accountants

March 27, 2000
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.46 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
**EXHIBIT32.3**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of New Century Financial Corporation (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, EdwardF. Gotschall, Vice Chairman - Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)               The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/    EDWARD F. GOTSCHALL                   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | **Edward F. Gotschall  Vice Chairman - Finance  August 9, 2004** |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished with the Company’s Form 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2004 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. It is not being filedfor purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company,whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any generalincorporation language in such filing.

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.1
 SELECT MEDICAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION
AND
SELECT MEDICAL CORPORATION
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Select Medical Holdings Corporation and
Select Medical Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  November 13, 2009
    /s/ Robert A. OrtenzioRobert A. OrtenzioChief Executive Officer
From: Donna M. Cotner

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive Medical Care for Women

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 1:06:14 PM

To the HHS:

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

This is a basic human right and no religious group should be able to impose their beliefs on others.

That is what "FREEDOM OF RELIGION" is all about !!

Thank you, Donna Cotner, DDS
From: Mary Hanger

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Monday, August 15, 2011 8:13:43 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Mary Hanger
Union, Kentucky
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Black EducationBlack StudentsEducational HistoryEducationally DisadvantagedElementary Secondary EducationRural EducationRural PopulationSchool DesegregationSchool ResegregationStudent Empowerment

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Identifiers - Laws, Policies, & Programs:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         10,138
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         1,566
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               19,025
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    91,185
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         5,954
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           7,278
<LOANS>                                        276,280
<ALLOWANCE>                                    2,857
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 426,021
<DEPOSITS>                                     316,515
<SHORT-TERM>                                   2,175
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            4,125
<LONG-TERM>                                    43,780
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    2,064
<COMMON>                                       22
<OTHER-SE>                                     57,339
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 426,021
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                6,605
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1,019
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               364
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               7,988
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             3,554
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,818
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          4,170
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  154
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             51
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                4,149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,042
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,042
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   707
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .34
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 0
<LOANS-NON>                                    615
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               85
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                628
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               2,789
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  198
<RECOVERIES>                                   112
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              2,857
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           2,857
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0
        


</TABLE>
From: amber washington

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: I Support Equal Access to Preventive Care and Contraception for All Women!!

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:02:33 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as they pertain to coverage

of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger.

Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run

health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the

coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies.

If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Respectfully,

~Amber Washington

Please consider the environment before printing e-mails.
#### Gaetano Talevi, as Administrator of the Estate of Pietro Talevi, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.

*Talevi*v. *N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co.,*144 App. Div. 914, affirmed.

(Argued April 3, 1912;

decided April 30, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 3, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for the death of plaintiff’s intestate, alleged to have been occasioned through the negligence of defendant, his employer.

*John F. Brennan*for appellant.

*■Thomas J. O’Neill*and *L. F. Fish*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscook and Collin, JJ.