Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 12, 2023 / Notices 62539 

1See Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products 

from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments, and Rescission in Part; 2020–2022, 88 

FR 14139 (March 7, 2023) (Preliminary Results), 

and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum (PDM). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Wood Mouldings and 

Millwork Products from the People’s Republic of 

China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 

Final Results of the 2020–2022 Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated concurrently with, 

and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 

Decision Memorandum). 

3See Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products 

from the People’s Republic of China: Amended 

Final Antidumping Duty Determination and 

Antidumping Duty Order, 86 FR 9486 (February 16, 

2021) (Order). 

4See Issues and Decision Memorandum; see also 

Memorandum, ‘‘Final Results Calculation 

Memorandum for Jinquan/Baiyuan,’’ dated 

concurrently with this notice; and Memorandum, 

‘‘Final Results Calculation Memorandum for 

Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., Ltd/Fujian 

Province Youxi City Mangrove Wood Machining 

Co., Ltd.,’’ dated concurrently with this notice. 

5See Preliminary Results, 88 FR at 14140. 

6See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (Assessment Practice 

Refinement). 

Dated: August 30, 2023. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Methodology 

V. Currency Conversion 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2023–19627 Filed 9–11–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–117] 

Wood Mouldings and Millwork 

Products From the People’s Republic 

of China: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; Final 

Determination of No Shipments; and 

Partial Rescission; 2020–2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., Ltd./ 

Fujian Province Youxi City Mangrove 

Wood Machining Co., Ltd. (Yinfeng/ 

Mangrove), Fujian Jinquan Trade Co., 

Ltd./Fujian Province Youxi County 

Baiyuan Wood Machining Co., Ltd. 

(Jinquan/Baiyuan) and 29 nonindividually examined exporters of 

wood mouldings and millworks 

products (WMMP) from the People’s 

Republic of China (China) did not sell 

subject merchandise to the United 

States at prices below normal value 

(NV) during the period of review (POR), 

August 12, 2020, through January 31, 

2022. Commerce further determines that 

Fujian Shunchang Shengsheng Wood 

Industry Limited Company (Shunchang 

Shengsheng), Xiamen Jinxi Building 

Material Co., Ltd. (Xiamen Jinxi), and 

Zhangzhou Green Wood Industry and 

Trade Co., Ltd. (Greenwood) made no 

shipments of subject merchandise 

during the POR and that Gaomi Hongtai 

Home Furniture Co., Ltd. has not 

established eligibility for a separate rate 

and, therefore, is part of the China-wide 

entity. Additionally, we are rescinding 

this administrative review with respect 

to three companies that are not eligible 

for review because they either had no 

reviewable entries during the POR or are 

U.S. resellers. 

DATES: Applicable September 12, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Samantha Kinney or Brian Smith, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office VIII, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2285 or 

(202) 482–1766, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 7, 2023, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results.1 For 

events subsequent to the Preliminary 

Results, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.2

Scope of the Order 3

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is wood mouldings and millwork 

products, which are primarily 

classifiable under subheadings 

4409.10.0500, 4409.10.1020, 

4409.10.1040, 4409.10.1060, 

4409.10.1080, 4409.10.4010, 

4409.10.4090, 4409.10.4500, 

4409.10.5000, 4409.10.9020, 

4409.10.9040, 4409.22.0590, 

4409.22.1000, 4409.22.4000, 

4409.22.5000, 4409.22.5020, 

4409.22.5040, 4409.22.5060, 

4409.22.5090, 4409.22.9000, 

4409.22.9020, 4409.22.9030, 

4409.22.9045, 4409.22.9060, 

4409.22.9090, 4409.29.0665, 

4409.29.1100, 4409.29.4100, 

4409.29.5100, 4409.29.9100, 

4412.99.5115, 4412.99.9500, 

4418.91.9095, and 4421.91.9780 of the 

of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of 

the United States (HTSUS). WMMP may 

also enter under HTSUS numbers 

4409.10.6000, 4409.10.6500, 

4409.22.6000, 4409.22.6500, 

4409.29.6100, 4409.29.6600, 

4412.41.0000, 4412.42.0000, 

4412.49.0000, 4412.91.5115, 

4412.92.5215, 4412.99.9700, 

4418.20.4000, 4418.20.8030, 

4418.20.8060, 4418.91.9195, 

4418.99.9095, 4418.99.9195, 

4421.91.9880, 4421.99.9780, and 

4421.99.9880. While the HTSUS 

subheading and ASTM specification are 

provided for convenience and for 

customs purposes, the written 

description of the subject merchandise 

is dispositive. A full description of the 

scope of the Order is contained in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised by interested parties 

in briefs are addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. A list of the 

issues addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is provided in 

Appendix I to this notice. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our verification findings, 

review of the record, and comments 

received from interested parties 

regarding our Preliminary Results, we 

made changes to the margin calculations 

for Jinquan/Baiyuan and Yinfeng/ 

Mangrove.4

Final Determination of No Shipments 

In the Preliminary Results, we 

preliminarily determined that 

Shunchang Shengsheng, Xiamen Jinxi, 

and Green Wood had no shipments of 

subject merchandise to the United 

States during the POR.5 No party filed 

comments with respect to this 

preliminary finding and we received no 

information to contradict it. Therefore, 

we continue to find that these three 

companies had no shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR and will 

issue appropriate liquidation 

instructions that are consistent with our 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ clarification for 

these final results.6


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
62540 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 12, 2023 / Notices 

7See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 15 for further discussion. 

8 Id. at Comment 16 for further discussion. 

9See Preliminary Results PDM at 10–13. 

10See Appendix II for a list of these companies. 

11See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comments 12 through 19 for further discussion. 

12See Longkou Haimeng Mach. Co. v. United 

States, 581 F. Supp. 2d 1344, 1357–60 (CIT 2008) 

(affirming Commerce’s determination to assign a 

4.22 percent dumping margin to the separate-rate 

respondents in a segment where the three 

mandatory respondents received dumping margins 

of 4.22 percent, 0.03 percent, and zero percent, 

respectively); see also Certain Kitchen Appliance 

Shelving and Racks from the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, 74 FR 36656, 36660 (July 24, 2009). 13See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F.3d 

1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016). 14See Preliminary Results PDM at 14; and section 

735(c)(5)(B) of the Act. 

15See Preliminary Results PDM at 13–14. 

16See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 14 for further discussion. 

17See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963, 65969–70 (November 4, 2013). 

18See Order, 86 FR at 9488. The weighted-average 

dumping margin for the China-wide entity (231.60 

percent) was adjusted for export subsidies to 

determine the cash deposit rate (220.87 percent) for 

companies in the China-wide entity. 

19See Appendix II. 

Partial Rescission 

In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

determined that China Cornici Co. Ltd. 

(China Cornici) had no suspended 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR. After analysis of comments 

received from interested parties and the 

record information, we continue to 

determine that China Cornici had no 

reviewable entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR.7

Therefore, we are rescinding this review 

with respect to China Cornici in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

determined that TL Wood Products Inc. 

(TL Wood) and Aventra, Inc. (Aventra) 

were not eligible for review pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), because record 

evidence indicates that they are U.S. 

resellers. After analysis of the comments 

received from interested parties and the 

record information, we continue to 

determine that TL Wood and Aventra 

are U.S. resellers and not eligible for 

review pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.213(b)(1).8 Therefore, we are 

rescinding this review with respect to 

TL Wood and Aventra in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

Separate Rate Respondents 

In our Preliminary Results, we 

determined that 29 companies 

demonstrated their eligibility for 

separate rates.9 We received arguments 

from interested parties since the 

issuance of the Preliminary Results. 

After an analysis of these comments, we 

continue to find that each of these 29 

companies 10 is eligible for a separate 

rate, as indicated in the table in the 

‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this 

notice.11

Rate for Non-Examined Separate Rate 

Respondents 

The statute and our regulations do not 

address the establishment of a rate to be 

assigned to respondents not selected for 

individual examination when we limit 

our examination of companies subject to 

the administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). Generally, 

we look to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, 

which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in an 

investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the rate for respondents not 

individually examined in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero and de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}.’’ Accordingly, 

Commerce’s usual practice in 

determining the rate for separate-rate 

respondents not selected for individual 

examination, has been to average the 

weighted-average dumping margins of 

the selected companies, excluding rates 

that are zero, de minimis, or based 

entirely on facts available.12 However, 

when the weighted-average dumping 

margins established for all individually 

investigated respondents are zero, de 

minimis, or based entirely on facts 

available, section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act 

permits Commerce to ‘‘use any 

reasonable method to establish the 

estimated all-others rate for exporters 

and producers not individually 

investigated, including averaging the 

estimated weighted-average dumping 

margins determined for the exporters 

and producers individually 

investigated.’’ 13 Because in these final 

results of this review we calculated a 

dumping margin of zero for both 

Yinfeng/Mangrove and Jinquan/ 

Baiyuan, we assigned a zero dumping 

margin to the separate rate respondents 

that we did not individually examine 

consistent with Commerce’s practice 

and section 735(c)(5)(B) of the Act.14

The China-Wide Entity 

In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

found that Gaomi Hongtai did not 

establish eligibility for a separate rate 

because it did not file a timely separate 

rate application or a separate rate 

certification, as appropriate.15 After 

analyzing the comments received from 

interested parties and record 

information, we continue to determine 

that Gaomi Hongtai did not establish its 

eligibility for a separate rate.16

Therefore, for these final results, we 

determine Gaomi Hongtai to be part of 

the China-wide entity. Because no party 

requested a review of the China-wide 

entity, and Commerce no longer 

considers the China-wide entity as an 

exporter conditionally subject to 

administrative reviews,17 we did not 

conduct a review of the China-wide 

entity. Thus, the weighted-average 

dumping margin for the China-wide 

entity, as adjusted for export subsidies 

(i.e., 220.87 percent),18 is not subject to 

change as a result of this review. 

Final Results of Review 

For companies subject to this review 

which established their eligibility for a 

separate rate, Commerce determines that 

the following weighted-average 

dumping margins exist for the period 

August 12, 2020, through January 31, 

2022: 

Exporters 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

Fujian Jinquan Trade Co., Ltd./Baiyuan Wood Machining Co., Ltd .............................................................................................. 0.00 

Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., Ltd./Fujian Province Youxi City Mangrove Wood Machining Co., Ltd ..................................... 0.00 

Non-Selected Companies Under Review Receiving a Separate Rate 19 ..................................................................................... 0.00 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 12, 2023 / Notices 62541 

20See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

21For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Assessment Practice Refinement, 76 FR at 65694. 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed to parties in this proceeding 

within five days of the date of 

publication of this notice in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

has determined, and U.S Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with these final results of 

review. Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of these final results. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

For Yinfeng/Mangrove, Jinquan/ 

Baiyuan and the other respondents 

which were not selected for individual 

examination and which qualified for a 

separate rate, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties.20

For entries that were not reported in the 

U.S. sales databases submitted by 

Yinfeng/Mangrove and Jinquan/Baiyuan 

during this review, Commerce will 

instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at 

the China-wide rate (i.e., 220.87 

percent). 

For the company identified as part of 

the China-wide entity, Gaomi Hontai, 

we will instruct CBP to apply the Chinawide rate (i.e., 220.87 percent) to all 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR which were exported by this 

company. 

For Shunchang Shengsheng, Xiamen 

Jinxi, and Green Wood, which 

Commerce determined had no 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

during the POR, any suspended entries 

that entered under that exporter’s case 

number (i.e., at that exporter’s cash 

deposit rate) will be liquidated at the 

rate for the China-wide entity, 

consistent with Commerce’s assessment 

practice in non-market economy 

cases.21 For China Cornici, TL Wood, 

and Aventra, for which the 

administrative review is rescinded, 

antidumping duties shall be assessed at 

a rate equal to the cash deposit of 

estimated antidumping duties required 

at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise from China 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for Jinquan/ 

Baiyuan, Yinfeng/Mangrove, and the 

other companies which were found 

eligible for a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be zero; (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed 

Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not 

listed above that have separate rates, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

exporter-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding in which they were 

reviewed; (3) for all Chinese exporters of 

subject merchandise that have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

the China-wide entity (i.e., 220.87 

percent); and (4) for all non-Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate applicable to the Chinese 

exporter(s) that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These per-unit cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers Regarding the 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this POR. Failure 

to comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties has occurred and 

the subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties, and/or increase in 

the amount of antidumping duties by 

the amount of the countervailing duties. 

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to an APO of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results of administrative review 

and notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: September 5, 2023. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

General 

Comment 1: Whether to Apply Adverse 

Facts Available to Yinfeng/Mangrove 

Comment 2: Whether to Apply AFA to 

Jinquan/Baiyuan 

Comment 3: Market Economy Inputs 

Comment 4: Importer-Specific Assessment 

Rates 

Comment 5: Valuation of Water-Based 

Paint 

Jinquan/Baiyuan 

Comment 6: Valuation of Power Adhesive 

of Pre-Gelatinized Starch 

Comment 7: Valuation of Polyvinyl 

Alcohol 

Comment 8: Jinquan/Baiyuan’s Electricity 

Offset 

Comment 9: Clerical Errors in Jinquan/ 

Baiyuan’s Margin Calculations 

Yinfeng/Mangrove 

Comment 10: Valuation of Acrylic Polymer 

Comment 11: Yinfeng/Mangrove’s Radiata 

Pine Log Inputs 

Separate Rate Companies 

Comment 12: Whether Raoping HongRong 

Is Eligible for a Separate Rate 

Comment 13: Whether Bel Trade Is Eligible 

for a Separate Rate 

Comment 14: Whether to Rescind the 

Review for Gaomi Hongtai 

Comment 15: Whether China Cornici Is 

Eligible for a Separate Rate 

Comment 16: Whether TL Wood Is Eligible 

for a Separate Rate 

Comment 17: Clarification of Chen Sheng’s 

Separate Rate 

Comment 18: Whether Shenzhen Xinjintai 

Industrial Co., Ltd. Is Eligible for a 

Separate Rate 

Comment 19: Whether Shaxian Hengtong 

Wood Industry Co., Ltd. Is Eligible for a 

Separate Rate 

VI. Recommendation 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
62542 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 175 / Tuesday, September 12, 2023 / Notices 

1See Tin Mill Products from Canada, the People’s 

Republic of China, Germany, the Netherlands, the 

Republic of Korea, Taiwan, the Republic of Turkey, 

and the United Kingdom: Initiation of Less-ThanFair-Value Investigations, 88 FR 9481 (February 14, 

2023) (Initiation Notice). 

2See Tin Mill Products from the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Critical 

Circumstances, 88 FR 57099 (August 22, 2023) 

(Preliminary Determination). 

3The petitioners are Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. and the 

United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, 

Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and 

Service Workers International Union. 

4See Shougang Jingtang’s Letter, ‘‘Request to 

Extend Final Results,’’ dated August 31, 2023. 

5Because Commerce previously aligned the 

deadline for the final determination of the 

companion countervailing duty (CVD) investigation 

of tin mill products from China with the deadline 

for this investigation, the deadline for issuing the 

final determination in the CVD investigation is also 

January 4, 2024. See Tin Mill Products from the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative 

Countervailing Duty Determination, and Alignment 

of Final Determination with Final Antidumping 

Duty Determination, 88 FR 41373 (June 26, 2023). 

Appendix II—Non-Selected Companies 

Under Review Receiving a Separate 

Rate 

1. Anji Huaxin Bamboo & Wood Products 

Co., Ltd. 

2. Baixing Import and Export Trading Co., 

Ltd Youxi Fujian 

3. Bel Trade Wood Industrial Co., Ltd Youxi 

Fujian 

4. Fotiou Frames Limited 

5. Fujian Hongjia Craft Products Co., Ltd. 

6. Fujian Sanming City Donglai Wood Co., 

Ltd 

7. Fujian Wangbin Decorative Material Co., 

Ltd 

8. Fujian Youxi Best Arts & Crafts Co. Ltd 

9. Fujian Zhangping Kimura Forestry 

Products Co., Ltd. 

10. Homebuild Industries Co., Ltd. 

11. Jiangsu Chen Sheng Forestry 

Development Co., Ltd. 

12. Jiangsu Wenfeng Wood Co., Ltd. 

13. Jim Fine Wooden Products Co., Ltd. 

14. Longquan Jiefeng Trade Co., Ltd. 

15. Nanping Huatai Wood & Bamboo Co., Ltd 

16. Omni One, Co., Limited 

17. Putian Yihong Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

18. Raoping HongRong Handicrafts, Co., Ltd. 

19. Shandong Miting Household Co., Ltd. 

20. Shaxian Hengtong Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd 

21. Shaxian Shiyiwood, Ltd 

22. Shenzhen Xinjintai Industrial Co., Ltd. 

23. Shuyang Kevin International Co., Ltd 

24. Sun Valley Shade Co., Ltd. 

25. Suqian Sulu Import & Export Trading Co., 

Ltd 

26. Tim Feng Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 

27. Wuxi Boda Bamboo & Wood Industrial 

Co., Ltd. 

28. Zhangzhou Wangjiamei Industry & Trade 

Co., Ltd. 

29. Zhangzhou Yihong Industrial Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2023–19629 Filed 9–11–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–150] 

Tin Mill Products From the People’s 

Republic of China: Postponement of 

Final Determination in the Less-ThanFair-Value Investigation 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) is postponing 

the deadline for issuing the final 

determination in the less-than-fair-value 

(LTFV) investigation of tin mill 

products from the People’s Republic of 

China (China) until January 4, 2024, and 

is extending the provisional measures 

from a four-month period to a six-month 

period. 

DATES: Applicable September 12, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Samuel Frost, AD/CVD Operations V, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–8180. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On February 14, 2023, Commerce 

initiated an LTFV investigation of 

imports of tin mill products from 

China.1 The period of investigation is 

July 1, 2022, through December 31, 

2022. On August 22, 2023, Commerce 

published the Preliminary 

Determination, in which Commerce 

preliminarily determined that tin mill 

products from China are being, or are 

likely to be, sold in the United States at 

LTFV.2

Postponement of Final Determination 

and Extension of Provisional Measures 

Section 735(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 

351.210(b)(2) provide that a final 

determination may be postponed until 

not later than 135 days after the date of 

the publication of the preliminary 

determination if, in the event of an 

affirmative preliminary determination, a 

request for such postponement is made 

by exporters or producers who account 

for a significant proportion of exports of 

the subject merchandise, or in the event 

of a negative preliminary determination, 

a request for such postponement is 

made by the petitioners.3 Further, 19 

CFR 351.210(e)(2) requires that such 

postponement requests by exporters be 

accompanied by a request for extension 

of provisional measures from a fourmonth period to a period not more than 

six months, in accordance with section 

733(d) of the Act. 

On August 31, 2023, Shougang 

Jingtang United Iron & Steel Co., Ltd. 

(Shougang Jingtang), an exporter and 

producer accounting for a significant 

proportion of exports of subject 

merchandise, requested that Commerce 

postpone the deadline for final 

determination and extend the 

application of the provisional measures 

from a four-month period to a period of 

not more than six months.4 In 

accordance with section 735(a)(2)(A) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(2)(ii), 

because: (1) the preliminary 

determination was affirmative; (2) the 

request for postponement was made by 

an exporter/producer who accounts for 

a significant proportion of exports of the 

subject merchandise; and (3) no 

compelling reasons for denial exist, 

Commerce is postponing the final 

determination until no later than 135 

days after the date of publication of the 

Preliminary Determination, and 

extending the provisional measures 

from a four-month period to a period of 

not more than six months. Accordingly, 

Commerce will issue its final 

determination no later than January 4, 

2024.5

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published 

pursuant to section 735(a)(2) of the Act 

and 19 CFR 351.210(g). 

Dated: September 6, 2023. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2023–19682 Filed 9–11–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–520–804] 

Certain Steel Nails From the United 

Arab Emirates: Continuation of 

Antidumping Duty Order 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of the 

determinations by the U.S. Department 

of Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. 

International Trade Commission (ITC) 

that revocation of the antidumping duty 

(AD) order on certain steel nails (steel 

nails) from the United Arab Emirates 

(UAE) would likely lead to continuation 

or recurrence of dumping and material 

injury to an industry in the United 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1