alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: richarddoliver@juno.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:01:51 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Richard Oliver

Reese, MI 48757
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1233.html[7/22/2015 8:59:40 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-g510

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1233

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Chris Taylor

Address:

15 greenleaf rd

fletcher, 28732

Email: ccbr4t@morrisbb.net

Phone: 8282425517

General Comment

Keep the government out of my hard earned money that I have saved for retirement!!!

Pretty soon you'll be taking my piggy bank!!
From: nrw1943@yahoo.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:29:44 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Neill Walker

Bulverde, TX 78163
5 A tt a c hm e n t s

H e l l o R og er , I h a v e a tt a c h e d t h e dr af

tb i o l og i c a l op i n i on f

o r t h e P i o P i c o p r o

j e c t

. I h a v e c op i e d t h e P P E C , C E C , and C D F G a s w e l l

. W e l ook f o rw a r d t o you r c o mm e n t s. P l e a s e l e t m e kn o w i f you h a v e any qu e s ti ons.

( S e e a tta c h e d fil e: 10B0661

- 12F0275_S DG
_ D ra ft B O- P i o P i c o En e rg

y C e n t e r 8 Aug 2012.pd

f )( S e e a tta c h e d fil e: 10B0661

- 1 2 F 0275_ f i gur e_1_n itrog e n_p l u m e e m a i l .pd f ) ( S e e a t ta c h e d f

i l e : 10B0661- 12F0275_ fi

gu r e _2_qu i no e m a il .pd

f ) ( S e e a t ta c h e d f

i l e : 10B0661

- 12F0275_ fi gur e_3_ c agn e m a i l .pd

f) ( S e e a tta c h e d fil e: 10B0661

- 12F0275_ f i gur e_4_d e c o e m a i l .pd

f)

B e s t R e g ar ds,

E r i c

E r i c P o rt e r C ar l sb a d F i sh and W il d l i f e O f f i ce 6010 H i dd e n V a l l e y R o a d C ar l sb a d, C A 92011 ( 760 ) 431

- 9440 e x t . 285

P i o P i c o D raf

t Bi o l og i c a l O p i n i on E r i c

_ P o r t e r t o : R og e r K oh n 08 / 08 / 2012 10 : 36 A M C c : Ju li e W a l t e r s, A C r i sp, d

j e nk i n s , E S o l o r i o, R F R OD R I G U EZ, K a re n_ G o e b e l , D o r ee n_ S t a d tl and er H i d e D e t a il s F r o m: < E r i c

_ P o rt e r @ fw s.gov> S o r t L i s t

.. . To : R og er K ohn/ R 9 /U S E P A /U S @E P A , C c : Ju l i e W a l t e r s / R 9 /U S E P A / U S @E P A , < A C r i sp@ e n er gy.s t a t e

. ca .us> , < d j e nk i ns@ a p e xpo w e r g r oup. c o m> , < E S o l o r i o@ e n e r gy. c a .gov> , < RFR OD R IGU E Z@d f

g. c a .gov> , < K ar e n_ G o e b e l @ fw s.gov> , < D o re e n_ S t a d t l and e r @ f

w s.gov> H i s t o r y : Th i s m e ss a g e h a s b ee n r e p li e d t o and f o r w ar d e d.

10 B 0661

- 12F0275_S D G

_ D r a f t BO

- P i o P i c o E ne r gy C en t e r 8 A ug 2012

. pdf 10 B 0661

- 12F0275_ fi gu r e_1_n i t r ogen_p l u m e e m a i l

. pdf

10 B 0661

- 12F0275_ fi gu r e_2_qu i no e m a i l

. pdf 10 B 0661

- 12F0275_ fi gu r e_3_cagn e m a i l

. pdf 10 B 0661

- 12F0275_ fi gu r e_4_deco e m a i l

. pdf P a g e 1 o f 1

11 / 7 / 2012 f il e :// C:\ U s er s \ r

kohn\ A pp D a t a

\ Lo c a l \ T e m

p \ no t e s A F 3 A 78 \ ~ w e b4714.h tm
From: pvicalvi@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:52:37 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Paul Vicalvi

Kimberling City, MO 65686
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ALCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Andrew Liu, President and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> 1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
> Act of 1934; and
> 
> 
> 2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's
> financial position and results of operations.

/s/Andrew Liu



Andrew Liu, President and Chairman

November 10, 2006
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT

(Adopted January 9, 1976)(Amended January 5, 1990)

RULE 203. PERMIT TO OPERATE

(a) A person shall not operate or use any equipment, the use of which may cause the issuance of air contaminants, or the use of which may reduce or control the issuance of air contaminants, without first obtaining a written permit to operate from the Execu tive Officer or except as provided in Rule 202.

(b) The equipment shall not be operated contrary to the conditions specified in the permit to operate.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Meyer Lipschitz, Appellant.

*People*v. *Lipschitz,*152 App. Div. 911, affirmed.

(Argued January 23, 1913;

decided February 11, 1913.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered September 10, 1912, which affirmed a judgment of the Kings County Court rendered upon a verdict convicting the defendant of the crime of criminally receiving stolen goods.

*716
      *Alexander Rosenthal*and *David Steckler*appellant.

*James C. Cropsey, District Attorney (Hersey Egginton*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Werner, Hiscock, Collin, Cuddeback and Miller, JJ.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Ancillary School ServicesCollege FacultyCooperative ProgramsEnrichment ActivitiesExtracurricular ActivitiesHigher EducationIntegrated ActivitiesIntegrated CurriculumProgram DevelopmentStudent Personnel Services

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
Exhibit 32





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION





Each of the undersigned, S.W. Yong, President and Chief Executive Officer of Trio-Tech International, a California corporation (the “Company”), and Victor H.M. Ting, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge (1) the annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/  S. W. YONG


Name: S. W. Yong


Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer


Date:  October 2, 2009





/s/  VICTOR H. M. TING


Name: Victor H. M. Ting


Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


Date: October 2 2009








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: Jennifer Scott

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Support Access to Preventive Care and Contraception!

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 1:52:58 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

-- 

Jennifer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: LOUIS C. NEMETH, 

Debtor. 

______________________________ 

LOUIS C. NEMETH, 

Appellant, 

 v. 

AMRANE COHEN, Chapter 13 Trustee; 

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., 

Appellees.

No. 17-60019 

BAP No. 16-1230 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

Taylor, Novack, and Lafferty, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted January 16, 2018**

Before: REINHARDT, TROTT, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Louis C. Nemeth appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). To the extent that Nemeth 

requests oral argument in his opening brief, the request is denied.

FILED

JAN 25 2018

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-60019 

(“BAP”) judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing Nemeth’s 

Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). 

We review de novo BAP decisions, and apply the same standard of review that the 

BAP applied to the bankruptcy court’s ruling. Boyajian v. New Falls Corp. (In re 

Boyajian), 564 F.3d 1088, 1090 (9th Cir. 2009). We affirm.

The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Nemeth’s 

petition because Nemeth failed to make plan payments or post-petition mortgage 

payments. See 11 U.S.C. § 1307(c)(4) (permitting dismissal for failure to make 

payments under the proposed payment plan); Bankr. C.D. Cal. R. 3015-1(m)(2), 

(7) (permitting dismissal for failure to make post-petition mortgage payments).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

We reject as without merit Nemeth’s contention that his due process rights 

were violated and that the 180-day bar to refiling was improper.

AFFIRMED.
From: Vicky Killgore

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:18:02 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Vicky Killgore

910-B Kirschner Place

Austin, TX 78758
From: ohiotreehouse@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:50:17 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Gwen Forrest

, 45036-9424
Exhibit 32.1 to Form 10-QSB

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Cecil a. Brooks does hereby  certify that the  Quarterly  Report of  Cornerstone
Ministries Investments,  Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended June 30,
2005 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 10, 2005
/s/ Cecil A. Brooks, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

John T. Ottinger,  does hereby certify that the Quarterly  Report of Cornerstone
Ministries Investments,  Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended June 30,
2005 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 10, 2005
/s/ John T. Ottinger, Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                              11
#### William H. Ellis, Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.;

Barnard, P. J., not sitting.
No. 253.

#### J. G. Boswell Co. *v.*Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

*Melvin D. Wilson*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, Loring W. Post*and *Charles B. E. Freeman*for respondent.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.