alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: bjfitz777@msn.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:06:03 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Les Fitzpatrick

Nampa, ID 83651
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.07 MB)
 
 isis Iraq Inherent Resolve
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Wanda Raffety

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Access to Preventive Care and Contraception

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 10:09:32 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.
From: mommyali@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:31:16 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Ali Sanders

Magnolia, TX 77354
REG-120%9])-/0

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
BRANCH

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

Docket: IRS-2010-0017

Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of

Page 1 of 1

As of: August 31, 2011
Received: August 10, 2011
Status: Posted

Posted: August 31, 2011
Tracking No. 80eddSed

‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011

Submission Type: Web

Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0070
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Doris Hershey Dagen
Address:

301 E Newport Rd

Lititz, PA, 17543
Email: dorisdagen@hotmail.com
Phone: 717-625-3176
Submitter's Representative: Joe Pitts

General Comment

Contraceptives are not a medical necessity and pregnancy is not a disease. Birth control is widely
available and publicly funded programs already provide it for women who cannot afford it. The
federal government should not expand religious conscience exemptions, not take them away from

all citizens.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=0900...

8/31/2011
7 Page | of 1
— REG- 20 3G |-/¢
LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION

PUB, 1 5
NICATION & REGULATIONS Received: August 09, 2011
Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 01, 2011

Tracking No. 80edc453
Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

As of: September 01, 2011

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of Preventive
Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services under
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0101
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information

Name: Lisa Clark
Address:
8132 Kraay Ave
Munster, IN,
Email: lisaclark7386@sbcglobal.net

General Comment

As an employee of a Catholic hospital, and a Christian. | find it reprehensible that religious organizations
would be forced to act in a manner which is contradictory to their beliefs in order for some outside group
to further their own agendas. Under our Constitution, we all have religious freedom. Mandating religious
organizations to provide coverage for birth control agents is in direct opposition to those Constitutional
rights. 1 am strongly opposed to any law or group which would take away the freedom of faith-based
organizations to operate in a manner which is consistent with their belief systems. The stand of the
Catholic Church on the subject of birth control and abortion is well publicized. Anyone seeking
employment opportunities at such facilities should also be aware that said facility will not provide
insurance coverage of these services. This is not a secret. There are other avenues that these employees
may utilize if they choose to seek such products. Please DO NOT remove, diminish or delete the conscious
protections for these organizations. If anything, they should be expanded to cover all religious groups, be
they Christian radio stations, or schools and hospitals. Catholic and other religious organizations have a
right to operate as their morals mandate. Surely those who would wish to force birth control coverage on
religious groups have no greater right than anyone else. Please reconsider your stance on this issue. If this
is not reversed, and religious groups are forced to provide birth control, the government and the nation
may risk losing the valuable services of many of these organizations. It is possible that some may close
their doors rather than be forced to turn their backs on their faith. Just as some of the Catholic Charities
organization have ceased doing adoptions rather than be forced to adopt to homosexual couples, you may
see communities losing valuable services if facilities are forced to close. Thank you for your time.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000... 9/1/2011
Exhibit 32

                           COGENCO INTERNATIONAL, INC.

                   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350
                           Principal Executive Officer

         To my knowledge: the annual report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
March 31, 2006, containing financial statements for the period then ended, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Act of 1934;
and the information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cogenco
International, Inc. for the periods presented.


June 29, 2006


/s/ David W. Brenman
-----------------------------------
David W. Brenman, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:45:07 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Claude Stauffer

East Islip, NY 11730
From: BGgr34@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: AAUW

Date: Monday, August 15, 2011 5:04:10 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations

would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and

ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Erin Yarrobino
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**302 CERTIFICATION FOR FORM 10-Q**
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Lisa M. Dillon, certify that:
- I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Vail Banks, Inc. (theregistrant); 
- Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 
- Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this report; 
- The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
- designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared; 
- evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  
- disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and  
- The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
- all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and  
- any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.  

Date:  August 13, 2003
 
/s/ Lisa M.Dillon                                                
 
Lisa M. Dillon
 
President
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Vail Banks, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary S. Judd, Chief
      Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer) of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
      Gary S.
      Judd


Gary
      S.
      Judd


Chief
      Executive Officer and President


August
      11, 2006
From: Angela Marte

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 9:12:57 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Angela Marte

10123 SW 77th Ct

Miami, FL 33146
# Europeiska unionens C 54A/21 f

| | ISSN 1977-1061 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 54A |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 60 årgången21 februari 2017 |

ISSN 1977-1061

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 54A

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

60 årgången21 februari 2017

---

| Informationsnummer | Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Yttranden |
| | ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN |
| | Rådet |
| 2017/C 54 A/01 | Förlängning av giltighetstiden för förteckningar över godkända sökande | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

V   Yttranden

ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN

Rådet

2017/C 54 A/01

Förlängning av giltighetstiden för förteckningar över godkända sökande

1

---

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

V Yttranden

ADMINISTRATIVA FÖRFARANDEN

Rådet

| 21.2.2017 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | CA 54/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2017

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

CA 54/1

---

Förlängning av giltighetstiden för förteckningar över godkända sökande

(2017/C 054 A/01)

Genom beslut av generalsekreteraren för Europeiska unionens råd ska giltighetstiden för de förteckningar över godkända sökande som fastställdes efter följande allmänna uttagningsprov förlängas till och med den 31 december 2019:

| CONS/AD/430


  (två profiler) | Anordnades för att upprätta en reserv för rekrytering av handläggare på området europeisk säkerhets- och försvarspolitik (ESFP). Uttagningsprovet avser två profiler i lönegrad AD 9 (profil 1: strategiska planerare på hög nivå för krishanteringsoperationer och krishanteringsuppdrag, profil 2: planerare på hög nivå för kapacitetsutveckling på det militära och det civila området samt på rymdområdet). Meddelandet offentliggjordes i
  Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 178 A av den 15 juli 2008. |
| --- | --- |
| CONS-COMM/AD/433 | Anordnades för att upprätta en reservlista för enhetschef (AD 12) på översättningsområdet med iriska som huvudsakligt språk. Meddelandet offentliggjordes i
  Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 99 A av den 30 april 2009. |

CONS/AD/430

(två profiler)

Anordnades för att upprätta en reserv för rekrytering av handläggare på området europeisk säkerhets- och försvarspolitik (ESFP). Uttagningsprovet avser två profiler i lönegrad AD 9 (profil 1: strategiska planerare på hög nivå för krishanteringsoperationer och krishanteringsuppdrag, profil 2: planerare på hög nivå för kapacitetsutveckling på det militära och det civila området samt på rymdområdet). Meddelandet offentliggjordes i
  Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 178 A av den 15 juli 2008.

CONS-COMM/AD/433

Anordnades för att upprätta en reservlista för enhetschef (AD 12) på översättningsområdet med iriska som huvudsakligt språk. Meddelandet offentliggjordes i
  Europeiska unionens officiella tidning C 99 A av den 30 april 2009.

---