alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATE OF CHANGE OF
                   COGNITRONICS CORPORATION

Under Section 805-A of the Business Corporation Law



1. The name of the corporation is
   COGNITRONICS CORPORATION.

If applicable, the original name under which it was formed is

2. The Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation was filed
   by the Department of State on 1/2/62.

3. The address of C T Corporation System as the registered agent
   of said corporation is hereby changed from c/o C T CORPORATION
   SYSTEM, 1633 BROADWAY, NEW YORK, NY 10019 to c/o C T Corporation
   System, 111 Eighth Avenue, New York, New York 10011.

4. Notice of the above changes was mailed to the corporation by C T
   Corporation System not less than 30 days prior to the date of
   delivery to the Department of State and such corporation has not
   objected thereto.

5. Notice of the above changes was mailed to the corporation by C T
   Corporation System not less than 30 days prior to the date of
   delivery to the Department of State and such corporation has not
   objected thereto.

6. C T Corporation System is both the agent of such corporation to
   whose address the Secretary of State of required to mail copies
   of process and the registered agent of such corporation.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate on September 1,
1999 and affirm the statements contained herein as true under
penalties of perjury.


C T CORPORATION SYSTEM

By:  /s/ Kenneth J. Uva
Kenneth J. Uva
Vice President
#### In the Matter of the Application of the New York, West Shore and Buffalo Railway Company to Acquire Lands of Dwight E. Hemingway and others, Respondents.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Bradley, J.
REC- {20 39 J LG

Page 1 of 1

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION

Be ESSING SION As of: September 01, 2011

PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS Received: August 16, 2011
BRANCH Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 01, 2011

Tracking No. 80ee1b51
(Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0114
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

Submitter Information
Name: Nathan James
Address:
838 S. Donovan St.
Seattle, WA, 98108
Email: nathan@alumni.brown.edu

General Comment

I strongly support the new policy requiring health-insurance plans to cover birth control without a
co-pay, CMS-9992-IFC2. Thank you for this important improvement to women's health care.

I also want you to know that I am concerned that certain religious employers may be allowed to
opt out of the requirements. All women should have access to contraceptive coverage, regardless
of where they work.

This policy finally should make near-universal access to birth control a reality for all women who
use it.

Improving women's access to birth control is positive in so many ways. A woman who can plan
when to have a family is able to participate in society more fully. Allowing women to space their
pregnancies contributes to healthy childbearing. And ultimately, fewer unintended pregnancies
can reduce the need for abortion.

Thank you for following science-based recommendations and making women's health a priority.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectId=09000... 9/1/2011
From: David Pluska

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Support AAUW

Date: Monday, August 15, 2011 11:09:45 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
-88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42 44



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 2000 1000 18 12 06 00 06/21 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 21 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
### Aircraft Weight (Including Battery And Propellers) 1280 g Diagonal Size (Including Propellers) 590 mm Max Ascent Speed 5 m/s Max Descent Speed 3 m/s Hover Accuracy • Vertical: +/ - 0.1 m (when Vision Positioning is active) or +/ • Horizontal: +/ - 1.5 m Max Speed 16 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind) Max Altitude Above Sea Level 6000 m Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C Gps Mode GPS/GLONASS 

### Camera Sensor Sony EXMOR 1/2.3” Effective pixels: 12.4 M (total pixels: 12.76 M) Lens FOV 94° 20 mm (35 mm format equivalent) f/2.8, focus at Iso Range 100 - 3200 (video) 100 - 1600 (photo) Shutter Speed 8s - 1/8000s Image Max Size 4000 x 3000 Still Photography

Modes • Single Shot • Burst Shooting: 3/5/7 shots • Auto Exposure Bracketing (AEB): 3/5 • Bracketed Frames at 0.7EV Bias • Time - lapse Video Recording Modes 

### Phantom 3 Professional • UHD: 4096x2160p 24/25, 3840x2160p 24/25/30 • FHD: 1920x1080p 24/25/30/48/50/60 • HD: 1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60 

### Phantom 3 Advanced • FHD: 1920x1080p 24/25/ 30/48/50/60• HD: 1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60 Supported Sd Card Types Micro SD Max capacity : 64 GB. Class 10 or UHS - 1 rating required Max Bitrate Of Video Storage 

### Phantom 3 Professional 60 Mbps 

### Phantom 3 Advanced 40 Mbps Supported File Formats • FAT32/exFAT • Photo: JPEG, DNG • Video: MP4, MOV (MPEG - 4 AVC/H.264) Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C 

### Gimbal Controllable Range Pitch - 90° to +30° Stabilization 3 - axis (pitch, roll, yaw) 

### Vision Positioning Max Velocity Less than 8 m/s (when 2 m above ground) Altitude Range 30 cm - 300 cm Operating Range 30 cm - 300 cm Operating Environment Surface with clear pattern and adequate lighting (Lux > 15) 

### Remote Controller Operating Frequency 2.400 GHz - 2.483 GHz Max Distance 2000m (outdoors and unobstructed) Video Output Port USB Operating Temperature 0°C - 40°C Battery 6000 mAh LiPo 2S Mobile Device Holder For tablet or phone Receiver Sensitivity

(1%Per)

- 101 dBm ±2 dBm Transmitter Power (Eirp)• FCC: 20 dBm • CE: 16 dBm Working Voltage 1.2 A @7.4 V 

### Battery Charger Voltage 17.4 V Rated Power 

### Phantom 3 Professional • 100 W 

### Phantom 3 Advanced • 57 W 

### Intelligent Flight Battery Capacity 4480 mAh Voltage 15.2 V Battery T yp e LiPo 4S Energy 68 Wh Net Weight 365 g Max Flight Time Approximately

23 minutes Operating Temperature

- 10°C to 40°C Max Charging Power 100 W 

### App / Live View Mobile App DJI Pilot Eirp 100mW Live View Working Frequency 2.4GHz ISM Live View Quality 720P @ 30fps (depending on conditions and mobile device) Latenc y 220ms (depending on conditions and mobile device) Required Operating Systems • iOS 8.0 or later • Android 4.1.2 or later Recommended Devices • iOS: iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus, iPad Air, iPad Air WiiPad mini 3 Wi - Fi + Cellular. This app is optimized for iPhone 5s, iPhone 6, • Android: Samsung S5, Note 3, Sony Xperia Z3, Google Nexus 7 II, Google Nexus 9, Mi 3, Nubia Z7 mini • *Support for additional Android devices available as testing and development continues
From: marksalamon@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Support Access to Preventive Care and Contraception

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:23:22 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.
EXHIBIT 23.01

<PAGE>

              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

      As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the
incorporation of our reports dated February 24, 1998 (1997 Annual
Report on Form 10-K and Supplemental Schedules), included in this
Form 10-K,  into  Rio  Hotel & Casino,  Inc.'s  previously  filed
registration  statements on Form S-8 (File No. 33-38752), Form S-
8 (File No. 33-68130),  Form S-8  (File  No. 33-56860),  Form S-8
(File No.  333-12011),  Form  S-3  (File No. 33-70192),  Form S-3
(File  No.  33-51092),  Form  S-3  (File No.  33-36598), Form S-3
(File No. 333-869), and Form S-3 (File No. 333-39279).



                                    ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
March 30, 1998

<PAGE>
No. 204, Misc.

#### Curtin *v.*Illinois.

Supreme Court of Illinois. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1381 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 230
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1381

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 5472 Crenshaw Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the 
         ``Congressman Julian C. Dixon Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 3, 2001

Mrs. Feinstein introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

                           November 16, 2001

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 5472 Crenshaw Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the 
         ``Congressman Julian C. Dixon Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF CONGRESSMAN JULIAN C. DIXON POST OFFICE 
              BUILDING.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 5472 
Crenshaw Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Congressman Julian C. Dixon Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the Congressman Julian C. Dixon 
Post Office Building.

                                                       Calendar No. 230

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1381

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
     at 5472 Crenshaw Boulevard in Los Angeles, California, as the 
         ``Congressman Julian C. Dixon Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 16, 2001

                       Reported without amendment
```
EXHIBIT 10(b)
                                                                   -------------

                           SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE

     This Second Amendment, dated as of December 30, 1999, to that certain
sublease made and entered into as of the 25th day of November, 1985 (hereinafter
the "1985 Sublease") by and between Millipore Corporation, a Massachusetts
Corporation, with an address at 80 Ashby Road, Bedford, Massachusetts 01730 (the
"Lessor") and Spire Corporation, a Massachusetts corporation with an address of
Patriots Park, Bedford, Massachusetts 01730 (the "Tenant").

     In consideration of Lessor not exercising its rights under Section 9 of the
1985 Sublease to recapture approximately 21,275 square feet of the Leased Space
by virtue of the sublease by the Tenant of such portion of the Leased Space to
Methode Electronics, Inc., and of the mutual promises and agreements herein
contained, Lessor and Tenant hereby agree that the following Paragraph 7(h)
shall be added to the 1985 Sublease as of the date first above written.

           (h) Tenant hereby agrees to make advance payment of the Rental
     specified in paragraphs 4(b), 4(c) and 4(d), calculated as herein provided,
     on the first day of every month without demand or invoice. The amount of
     such advance payment or rental shall be calculated by taking one-twelfth
     (1/12) of the aggregate of the Rental due in accordance with paragraphs
     4(b), 4(c) and 4(d) during the preceding calender year. Within thirty (30)
     days following the end of each calendar quarter Lessor agrees to provide
     Tenant with a statement reconciling the advance payments received as
     provided herein against the actual amounts of such Rental for which Lessor
     was billed during such calendar quarter. In the event that such
     reconciliation statement shows that the advance payments made by Tenant
     hereunder exceed the amounts of such Rental for which Tenant was billed,
     then the amount of the advance payment of Rental due on the next succeeding
     monthly payment date shall be reduced by the amount of such excess. In the
     event that such reconciliation statement shows that the advance payments
     made by Tenant hereunder are less than the amounts of such Rental for which
     Lessor was billed, then Tenant shall promptly pay Lessor the amount of such
     shortfall.

     In all other respects the 1985 Sublease shall remain in full force and
effect in accordance with its terms.


SPIRE CORPORATION                       MILLIPORE CORPORATION

By: /s/ Roger G. Little                 By: /s/ Francis J. Lunger
   --------------------------              --------------------------

Name: Roger G. Little                   Name: Francis J. Lunger
     ------------------------                ------------------------

Title: President & CEO                  Title: Executive VP & COO
      -----------------------                 -----------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1306 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1306

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to transfer all excise taxes 
   imposed on alcohol fuels to the Highway Trust Fund, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 2, 2001

   Mr. Baucus (for himself, Mr. Harkin, Mr. Lott, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. 
    Warner, Mrs. Lincoln, Mr. Smith of New Hampshire, Mr. Reid, Mr. 
Voinovich, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Burns, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Bond, Mr. DeWine, Mr. 
   Gramm, Mr. Hutchinson, Mr. Lieberman, Ms. Landrieu, and Mr. Enzi) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to transfer all excise taxes 
   imposed on alcohol fuels to the Highway Trust Fund, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Highway Trust Fund Recovery Act of 
2001''.

SEC. 2. ALL ALCOHOL FUELS TAXES TRANSFERRED TO HIGHWAY TRUST FUND.

    (a) In General.--Section 9503(b)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 (relating to certain taxes not transferred to Highway Trust Fund) 
is amended--
            (1) by adding ``or'' at the end of subparagraph (C),
            (2) by striking the comma at the end of subparagraph 
        (D)(iii) and inserting a period, and
            (3) by striking subparagraphs (E) and (F).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxes received in the Treasury after September 30, 2003.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 15.1   July 31, 2009   Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20549   Commissioners:   We are aware that our report dated July 31, 2009 on our review of interim financial information of NSTAR for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 is incorporated by reference in its Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-155779), Form   S-4 (No. 333-78285) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-142595, 333-160263, and 333-87272).   Very truly yours,  /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
EXHIBIT (10)(A)



 EXHIBIT 10(a) 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 







 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form N-4 of our report dated April 25, 2016, relating to the financial statements of Separate
Account VA B and to the use of our report dated April 25, 2016, relating to the financial statements of Transamerica Life Insurance Company, which appear in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading
“Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in such Registration Statement. 
 /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Chicago, Illinois 
 April 25,
2016 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of
Additional Information and to the use of our report dated April 25, 2016, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company included in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 71 to the
Registration Statement (Form N-4, No. 33-56908) and related Prospectuses of Transamerica Freedom Variable Annuity and MEMBERS Freedom Variable Annuity. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
 Des Moines, IA 

April 25, 2016
```

Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Form 10-QSB Quarterly Report of Winmax Trading Group, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        o   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        o   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

September 9, 2003

By: /s/ Gerald E. Sklar
Gerald E. Sklar, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer
```
Hon. A. J. Hartel Opinion No. M-973 

County Attorney 

P. 0. Box 43I Re: Whether a district 

Liberty, Texas 77575 court bailiff mud 

be deputized as a 

Dear Mr. Hartel: deputy. sheriff. 

You have asked the opinion of this office as to 

whether a district court bailiff must be deputized as a 

deputy sheriff. 

Provision for the furnishing of district court 

bailiffs is covered generally bg Article 36.24, Code of 

Criminal Procedure, 1965, which reads as follows: 

“The sheriff of the dounty shall furnish the court with a bailiff during 

the trial of any case to attend the 

wants of the jury and to act under the 

direction of the court. If the person furnished by the sheriff is to be 

called as a witness in the case he may 

not serve as bailiff.” 

While the foregolng ‘statute places the duty on the 

sherlff’to furnish bailiffs and while there is no restriction 

on the sheriff as to one of his deputies being the bailiff, 

there is equally no requirement imposed that a bailiff be a 

deputy sheriff. 

District courts.may also appoint bailiffs to attend 

grand juries under~the provisions of Article 19.36, Code of 

Criminal Procedure, 1965. Again, this Article imposes no requirement that a bailiff so appointed be a deputy sheriff. 

Additionally, many of the district courts of this 

state have special statutory provisions that govern the appointment of bailiffs intheir courts. ‘See Article 2292a, et seq., 

Vernon’s Civil Statutes and new enactments passed by the last 

legislature setting up bailiffs for particular courts, i.e. 

Acts 62nd Legislature, R.S., 1971, Chapters 112 (page 879) and 

-4x3- 
Hon. A. J. Hartel, page 2. (M-973) 

351 (page 1325). No requirement that a bailiff be a deputy 

sheriff is found in any of these special statutes. 

Since we find no statute which requires a'district 

court bailiff to~be a deputy sher;ff, our opinion is that a 

district court batliff is not required to be a deputy sheriff. 

SUMMARY 

------- 

The bailiff of a district court need 

not be a deputy sheriff. 

General of Texas 

Prepared by Lonny F. Zwiener 

Assistant Attorney General 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE 

Kerns Taylor, Chairman 

W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman 

John Banks 

Austin Bray 

Glenn Brown 

Howard Fender 

SAM MCDANIEL 

Staff Legal Assistant 

ALFRED WALKER 

Executive Assistant 

NOI. WHITE 

First Assistant 

-4754-