alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1459 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1459

To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 550 West Fort Street in Boise, Idaho, as the ``James A. McClure 
            Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2001

 Mr. Crapo (for himself and Mr. Craig) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building and United States courthouse located 
  at 550 West Fort Street in Boise, Idaho, as the ``James A. McClure 
            Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF JAMES A. MCCLURE FEDERAL BUILDING AND UNITED 
              STATES COURTHOUSE.

    The Federal building and United States courthouse located at 550 
West Fort Street in Boise, Idaho, shall be known and designated as the 
``James A. McClure Federal Building and United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building and United States 
courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 
to the James A. McClure Federal Building and United States Courthouse.
                                 <all>
```
### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL CLOTHES DRYERS AND ROOM AIR CONDITIONERS
Holiday Inn Capitol 550 C Street, SW 

### Washington, DC 20024 October 24, 2007
Purpose The Department will present its methodology for conducting the energy conservation standards rulemaking for residential clothes dryers and room air conditioners. The Department also will seek input from stakeholders on its planned methodologies, assumptions, and data sources. Agenda



### 9:00 - 9:05 a.m. Welcome 

### 9:05 - 9:15 a.m. Opening Remarks , Introductions , and Agenda Review Doug Brookman 

### 9:1 5 - 9:30 a.m. Rulemaking and Analytical Methodology Overview Stephen Witkowski 

### 9:30 - 10 : 30 a.m. Market and Technology Assessment Judith Reich 

### 10:30

- 10:45 a.m. Break 

### 10:45

- 11:30 a.m. Screening Analysis and Engineering Analysis Judith Reich 

### 11:30 a
.m. - 12:00 p.m. Preliminary Manufacturer Impact Analysis Constantin von Wentzel 

### 1 2:00

- 1:00 p.m. Break for Lunch 

### 1:00 2 : 00 p.m. Markups for Equipment Price Determination, Energy Use Determination and Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis Gregory Rosenquist2:00 - 2 : 45 p.m. Shipments Analysis, National Impact Analysis, and LCC Subgroup Analysis Gregory Rosenquist 2:45 - 3:00 p.m. Break 3:00 - 3:15 p.m
. Manufacturer Impact Analysis Constantin von Wentzel 3:15 - 3:45 p.m
. Utility Impact Analysis, Employment Impact Analysis , Environmental Assessment, and Regulatory Impact Analysis Gregory Rosenquist 3:45 - 4 : 30 p.m. Other Issues and Comments / Closing Remarks 

### 4:30 p.m. Adjourn
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Select Medical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
A. Ortenzio, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sections 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 11, 2006

                                /s/  Robert A. Ortenzio
                               -----------------------------------------------
                               Robert A. Ortenzio
                               Chief Executive Officer
-  1 
-  2 
-  3 
-  						...					 
-  							34						 
-                Next >
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Agreements Adopted by the Traffic 

Conferences of the International Air 

Transport Association 

OST-2011- O^/ S 

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AGREEMENTS 

BY THE 

INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION 

JATA AGREEMENT APPROVED & IMMUNIZED / i 

DOCKETOST- / / • ^^1 ^ ACTION DATE /^ ^ ^^ / '^-^If 

Tlii? approval and .p,ranr of antitrust immunity is subject, where applicable, 

to conditions previousl)' im.wsed. 

Tiiis action is effective after 7 days unless a petition is filed under 

14 CFR 385.30 or a review is undertaken on ihe Department's own motion, 

in view of the agreement's noncontrovei^ial nature and the availability of 

the above pMicedure, the^fl-dgy EeHOtCcH^ cfR 303.42 is waived. 

30 November 2011 

Communications with respect to 

this document should be sent to 

Douglas E. Lavin 

Regional Vice President - North America 

International Air Transport Association 

1776 K.St. N.W. #12* Floor 

Washington DC 20006
From: K Wood

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Respect for rights of conscience

Date: Saturday, August 13, 2011 2:23:01 PM

The current definition of religious employer does not provide true conscience protection for

those committed to preserving life. Health care plans should not be forced to violate the

moral and religious convictions of providers or employees in order to participate in the

health care system. Requiring such an unacceptable demand threatens both universal access

to health care and religious freedom of conscience.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1           
       
<S>                            <C>                 <C>                        
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  YEAR                YEAR               
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              SEP-30-1996         SEP-30-1995                                                                
<CASH>                              44,775              86,664
<SECURITIES>                             0                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                      737,457             268,957
<ALLOWANCES>                             0                   0
<INVENTORY>                        538,359             493,671
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                 1,457,430             877,245
<PP&E>                           2,511,226           2,630,148
<DEPRECIATION>                   2,177,573           2,186,881
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   5,816,688           1,420,932
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            2,397,915           2,507,861
<BONDS>                          3,025,733           1,130,982
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0                   0
<PREFERRED>                              0                   0
<COMMON>                           393,040          (2,217,911)                   
<OTHER-SE>                               0                   0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     5,816,688           1,420,932
<SALES>                          3,725,221           1,532,649
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 3,725,221           1,532,649
<CGS>                            3,141,054           2,303,224
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    3,141,054           2,303,224
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         0           5,526,587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    18,697              (5,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 298,821             251,438
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (799,466)         (7,986,247)
<INCOME-TAX>                             0                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (799,466)         (7,986,247)
<DISCONTINUED>                     773,659          (1,621,543)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0                   0
<CHANGES>                                0                   0
<NET-INCOME>                       (25,807)         (9,607,790)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0                (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0                (.42)                

        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned Jose Acevedo, Treasurer of Lotus Capital Corp. hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Derby Resources, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lotus Capital
Corp.


 Dated: April 11, 2005


 /s/ Jose Acevedo
 ----------------
 Jose Acevedo
 Treasurer
 (Principal Financial  Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
From: patrick.cameron@lipscomb.edu

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:56:43 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Patrick Cameron

Fultondale, AL 35068
H0H060576 Analytical Report .............................................. 1

Sample Receipt Documentation .......................................... 34

Wet Chemistry ....................................................................... 39

Sample Summary................................................................ 40

QC Summary ...................................................................... 61

Raw Data ............................................................................ 67

Anions ................................................................................. 68

Sample Receipt Documentation .......................................... 189

Total Number of Pages ......................................................... 193
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE IS INCLUDED IN THIS FORM 10-K IN COMPLIANCE WITH
THE COMMISSIO'S RULES RELATING TO THE EDGAR FILING PROCESS.  THIS SCHEDULE
CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATED AS
OF FISCAL PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFEREN.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,013,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               26,802,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   809,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,275,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,324,000
<PP&E>                                       3,585,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,444,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              71,446,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,611,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    94,625,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                71,446,000
<SALES>                                     34,228,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            81,762,000
<CGS>                                       17,293,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               58,692,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0<F1>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             445,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (13,398,000)<F2>
<INCOME-TAX>                                    21,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (13,419,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (13,419,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.52)
<FN>
<F1>Not shown separately when reporting from 10-K.
<F2>Includes equity interest in Joint Venture Net of tax.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Realmark Property Investors Limited Partnership III for
the year ended December 31, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                                 387,827
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          210,969
<ALLOWANCES>                                           203,157
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     2,360,814
<PP&E>                                              12,525,596
<DEPRECIATION>                                       5,772,493
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       9,113,917
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  305,568
<BONDS>                                              4,970,797
<COMMON>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                                   0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         9,113,917
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     2,432,298
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        2,840,623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     484,938
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (408,325)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          0
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        318,213  
<CHANGES>                                                    0  
<NET-INCOME>                                           (90,112)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            (5.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0
        

</TABLE>
From: mr-buckeye@hotmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:56:51 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Todd Elliott

Grawn, MI 49637
Page 1 of 1

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION EO LAGQKMHI AG
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS PEE AGA AG SEP 1 2011
BRANCH As of: September 01, 2011

Received: August 16, 2011

Status: Posted

PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: September 01, 2011
Tracking No. 80ce1b4f

‘Comments Due: September 30, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0017
Requirement for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers to Provide Coverage of
Preventive Services under the PatientProtection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0017-0038
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services
under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Amendment

Document: IRS-2010-0017-0131
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19684

a aa

Submitter Information

Name: mark d lenfest
Address:

17404 meridian e

pmb 293 ste f

puyalup, WA, 98375
Email: thedwick6@comcast.net
Phone: 253-875-4351

Submitter's Representative: dean reichert sorry to say
—

General Comment

if these politicians don't want to pay for birth control let them take care of the children or get a
vasectomy preferably by an unlicenced doctor in filthy clinic

http://fdms.erulemaking .net/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=09000.... 9/1/2011
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 133

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the exclusion for employer-provided educational assistance programs, and for other

purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 22, 2001

Mr. BAUCUS (for himself and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make

permanent the exclusion for employer-provided educational assistance programs, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Employee Educational

5 Assistance Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. EMPLOYER–PROVIDED EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE

7 PROGRAMS.

8 (a) PERMANENT EXTENSION.—Section 127 of the

9 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to exclusion for
2

S 133 IS

1 educational assistance programs) is amended by striking

2 subsection (d) and by redesignating subsection (e) as sub3 section (d).

4 (b) REPEAL OF LIMITATION ON GRADUATE EDU5 CATION.—The last sentence of section 127(c)(1) of such

6 Code is amended by striking ‘‘, and such term also does

7 not include any payment for, or the provision of any bene8 fits with respect to, any graduate level course of a kind

9 normally taken by an individual pursuing a program lead10 ing to a law, business, medical, or other advanced aca11 demic or professional degree’’.

12 (c) EFFECTIVE DATES.—

13 (1) EXTENSION.—The amendments made by

14 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to expenses

15 relating to courses beginning after the date of enact16 ment of this Act.

17 (2) GRADUATE EDUCATION.—The amendment

18 made by subsection (b) shall apply with respect to

19 expenses relating to courses beginning after Decem20 ber 31, 1998.

Æ