alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.07



          Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
            pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Spectrum Organic
Products, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Neil G. Blomquist, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2)   the information contained in the Report presents fairly, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                             /s/ Neil G. Blomquist
                                             -----------------------------------
                                                 Neil G. Blomquist
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 August 2, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1198 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 137
107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1198

             To reauthorize Franchise Fund Pilot Programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 19, 2001

 Mr. Lieberman (for himself and Mr. Thompson) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                          Governmental Affairs

                             August 2, 2001

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To reauthorize Franchise Fund Pilot Programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF FRANCHISE FUND PILOT PROGRAMS.

    Section 403(f) of the Federal Financial Management Act of 1994 (31 
U.S.C. 501 note) is amended by striking ``October 1, 2001'' and 
inserting ``October 1, 2002''.
                                                       Calendar No. 137

107th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1198

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

             To reauthorize Franchise Fund Pilot Programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             August 2, 2001

                       Reported without amendment
```
From: csorrentino@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Funding for pre-natal care and contraception is the right thing to do!

Date: Friday, August 26, 2011 10:54:04 AM

To the Department of Health and Human Services:

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for "religious employers." These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that "religious refusal" exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so Catholic hospitals would be exempt from the

coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and

ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM's recommendations, but NOT rejecting the proposed religious refusal

exemption provisions. There are choices of hospitals and health care options. I

support the religious rights of those opposed to contraception.

 "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure!" We'll save money in the long

run by providing free pre-natal care to enhance the health of mother and child, free

contraception will be the best way to decrease the abomination and pain of abortion.

Claudia Sorrentino

H: 203-453-8365

C: 203-982-3560
From: Robert Gorman

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: religious employer

Date: Sunday, August 07, 2011 10:34:41 PM

I am writing to object to the narrowly defined "religious employer" language in the August

1st US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) mandates concerning preventive

health services to be covered by insurance plans. These mandates - in response to the 

Institute of Medicine's advisory report issued to HHS - require that all insurance plans 

provide coverage for all prescription contraceptives approved by the FDA, as well as 

abortifacients such as the "morning after" pill and "Ella" (a drug similar to RU-486 which 

can induce an abortion some weeks into pregnancy).

Respect for conscience is continually tested and challenged, yet it is essential that such 

conscience protection be granted for not only religious employers, but for all employers, 

insurers, and policy issuers with moral, ethical, or religious objections as well.

I urge reconsideration of the narrow definition of religious employer. Our diocese has 

excellent health insurance coverage and we provide it as a matter of social justice. But we

cannot go beyond the mandates and beliefs of the Catholic church. Attempting to force us

to do so will result in less, not more, health insurance coverage for our employees.

Robert D. Gorman, LCSW, ACSW

Executive Director

Catholic Charities

Diocese of Houma-Thibodaux

1220 Aycock Street

Houma, LA 70360

rgorman@htdiocese.org

http://www.htdiocese.org/ccht

(985) 876-0490

(985) 876-7751 (fax)
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Robert Stoutley, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Industrial Minerals,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  August 11, 2003


/s/ Robert Stoutley
- --------------------------
Robert Stoutley, President/CEO
```

[107th Congress Public Law 207]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ207.107]

[[Page 116 STAT. 926]]

  

  

Public Law 107-207
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To protect infants who are born alive. <<NOTE: Aug. 5, 2002 -  [H.R. 
                                2175]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Born-Alive Infants 
Protection Act of 2002.>> assembled,

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 1 USC 1 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 
2002''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF BORN-ALIVE INFANT.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``Sec. 8. `Person', `human being', `child', and `individual' as 
                        including born-alive infant

    ``(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any 
ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative 
bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words `person', `human 
being', `child', and `individual', shall include every infant member of 
the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.
    ``(b) As used in this section, the term `born alive', with respect 
to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion or 
extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of 
development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a 
beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of 
voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been 
cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a 
result of natural or induced labor, cesarean section, or induced 
abortion.
    ``(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny, 
expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any 
member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being `born 
alive' as defined in this section.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item:

``8. `Person', `human being', `child', and `individual' as including 
           born-alive infant.''.

    Approved August 5, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2175:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 107-186 (Comm. on the Judiciary).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):
            Mar. 12, considered and passed House.
            July 18, considered and passed Senate.
WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 38 (2002):
            Aug. 5, Presidential remarks.

                                  <all>
```
No. 349, Misc.

#### Ray *v.*Missouri.

Supreme Court of Missouri. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of JournalRegister Company (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June  25,  2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the‘‘Report’’), we, Robert M.Jelenic,  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,and Julie A. Beck, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

/s/ RobertM.Jelenic                                                    RobertM.  JelenicChairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficerAugust  04,2006

/s/ Julie A.Beck                                                            JulieA. BeckSenior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust  04,  2006

This certification accompanies theReport pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the ‘‘ExchangeAct’’), or incorporated by reference in any filing underthe Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except asmay be expressly set forth by specific reference in any such filing. Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version ofthis written statement required by Section 906, has been provided toJournal Register Company and will be retained by Journal RegisterCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
#### Mary Sommer, Respondent, *v.*The Armor Gas and Oil Company, Appellant.

*Sommer*v. *Armor Gas & Oil Co., 147*App. Div. 919, affirmed.

(Argued February 7, 1913;

decided February 25, 1913.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 4, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at an Equity Term in an action to compel the defendant to issue to plaintiff a certificate for certain shares of its stock upon payment by her of its value at par.

*Simon Fleischmann*for appellant.

*Thomas R. Stone*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Cuddeback, Hogan and Miller, JJ.
From: Jan W

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: religious exemption

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:11:11 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger.

Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run

health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the

coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies.

If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Sammy Roscoe
From: Gay Hallberg

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: women"s health care provisions of new health care law

Date: Monday, August 15, 2011 6:48:07 PM

-- 

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking

you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for

all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions

even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal

exemption provisions.
Exhibit 32.2  Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    The undersigned hereby certifies, in my capacity as an officer of NSTAR, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:(i)the enclosed Quarterly Report of NSTAR on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(ii)the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NSTAR.  Dated: October 31, 2007By:/s/ JAMES J. JUDGEJames J. JudgeSenior Vice President,Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 4.70


 





Power of Attorney


 


I, Yu Bo, a Chinese citizen
with Chinese Identification Card No. 420106196805034857, and a holder of 50% of the entire registered capital in Shenzhen
Youlanguang Technology Co., Ltd(the “Company”) (“My Shareholding”), hereby irrevocably authorize
E-Sun Sky Computer (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“WFOE”) to exercise the following rights relating to My Shareholding during
the term of this Power of Attorney:


 


WFOE is hereby authorized
to act on behalf of myself as my exclusive agent and attorney with respect of all matters concerning My Shareholding, including
without limitation to: 1) attend shareholder’s meetings of Company; 2) exercise all the shareholders’ rights and shareholders’
voting rights I am entitled to under the laws of China and Company’s Articles of Association during the shareholders’
meeting, including but not limited to decide on the sale or transfer or pledge or disposition of My Shareholding in part or in
whole and execute relevant legal documents; and 3) designate and appoint on behalf of myself the legal representative, the executive
director, supervisor, the manager and other senior management members of Company.


 


Without limiting the
generality of the powers granted hereunder, WFOE shall have the power and authority under this Power of Attorney to execute the
Transfer Contracts stipulated in Exclusive Option Agreement, to which I am required to be a party, on behalf of myself, and to
effect the terms of the Share Pledge Agreement and Exclusive Option Agreement, both dated the date hereof, to which I am a party.


 


All the actions associated
with My Shareholding conducted by WFOE shall be deemed as my own actions, and all the documents related to My Shareholding executed
by WFOE shall be deemed to be executed by me. I hereby acknowledge and ratify those actions and/or documents by WFOE.


 


WFOE is entitled to
re-authorize or assign its rights related to the aforesaid matters to any other person or entity at its own discretion and without
giving prior notice to me or obtaining my consent.


 


This Power of Attorney
is coupled with an interest and shall be irrevocable and continuously valid from the date of execution of this Power of Attorney,
so long as I am a shareholder of Company.


 


This Power of Attorney
is written in Chinese and English; in case there is any conflict between the Chinese version and the English version, the Chinese
version shall prevail.


 


By: /s/ Yu Bo


Date: Nov 18, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,753,918
<SECURITIES>                                    24,831
<RECEIVABLES>                               25,176,359
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,119,107
<INVENTORY>                                  5,040,795
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            36,476,660
<PP&E>                                      40,101,881
<DEPRECIATION>                             (7,076,145)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             150,210,753
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       27,994,344
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,651,867
<COMMON>                                    88,888,863
<OTHER-SE>                                   (914,389)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               150,210,753
<SALES>                                     63,316,622
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            63,316,622
<CGS>                                     (41,593,083)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             (22,799,211)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (826,770)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,805,489)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (319,616)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,485,873)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)



</TABLE>