alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1141

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat distributions from

publicly traded partnerships as qualifying income of regulated investment

companies, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 29, 2001

Mr. GRAMM (for himself, Mr. NICKLES, Mrs. HUTCHISON, Mr. MURKOWSKI,

and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice

and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat distributions from publicly traded partnerships as qualifying

income of regulated investment companies, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DISTRIBUTIONS FROM PUBLICLY TRADED

4 PARTNERSHIPS TREATED AS QUALIFYING IN5 COME OF REGULATED INVESTMENT COMPA6 NIES.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 851(b)

8 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining regulated
2

•S 1141 IS

1 investment company) is amended by inserting ‘‘distribu2 tions or other income derived from an interest in a publicly

3 traded partnership (as defined in section 7704(b)),’’ after

4 ‘‘dividends, interest,’’.

5 (b) SOURCE FLOW-THROUGH RULE NOT TO

6 APPLY.—The last sentence of section 851(b) of such Code

7 is amended by inserting ‘‘(other than a publicly traded

8 partnership (as defined in section 7704(b)))’’ after ‘‘de9 rived from a partnership’’.

10 SEC. 2. SPECIAL PASSIVE ACTIVITY RULE FOR PUBLICLY

11 TRADED PARTNERSHIPS TO APPLY TO REGU12 LATED INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

13 Subsection (k) of section 469 of the Internal Revenue

14 Code of 1986 (relating to separate application of section

15 in case of publicly traded partnerships) is amended by

16 adding at the end the following new paragraph:

17 ‘‘(4) APPLICATION TO REGULATED INVEST18 MENT COMPANIES.—For purposes of this section, a

19 regulated investment company (as defined in section

20 851) holding an interest in a publicly traded part21 nership shall be treated as a taxpayer described in

22 subsection (a)(2) with respect to items attributable

23 to such interest.’’
3

•S 1141 IS

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

2 The amendments made by this Act shall apply to tax3 able years beginning after the date of the enactment of

4 this Act.

Æ
EXHIBIT 4.37






                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


$10,000                          Milpitas, California              July 28, 2000



For value received, ADATOM.com, Inc., promises to pay Sri Jagannathan the sum of
Ten Thousand and no cents ($10,000) with interest at the rate of Ten Percent per
annum (10%) until paid.  Any unpaid  interest will become part of the principal.
Interest payable  quarterly  commencing on September 30, 2000.  Principal of Ten
thousand one hundred seventy five dollars and thirty-four cents  ($10,175.34) is
due in one payment on September  30, 2000.  Principal may be paid in whole or in
part prior to the due date without penalty or premium.

Should  default be made in payment of principal  and/or  interest  when due, the
whole sum of principal and interest shall become  immediately due, at the option
of the  holder of the note.  If action be  instituted  on this  note,  The maker
promises to pay such sum as a Court may fix as attorney's fees.






Adatom.com, Inc.

By: __________________
Michael M. Wheeler
Controller


                                      E-57
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Central Command

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  ABOUT US    -  COMMAND PRIORITIES             
  -  LEADERSHIP             
  -  COMPONENT COMMANDS             
  -  HISTORY             
  -  POSTURE STATEMENT 
-  CENTCOM AOR    -  CENTCOM COALITION 
-  OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES    -  USMTM 
-  CONTACT    -  OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT             
  -  COMMUNITY RELATIONS             
  -  THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE             
  -  INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL             
  -  MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL 
-  MEDIA    -  SOCIAL MEDIA             
  -  NEWS ARTICLES             
  -  PRESS RELEASES             
  -  STATEMENTS             
  -  IMAGERY             
  -  VIDEOS             
  -  TRANSCRIPTS 
-  VISITORS AND PERSONNEL    -  FAMILY CENTER             
  -  FAMILY READINESS             
  -  CENTCOM WEBMAIL             
  -  SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY             
  -  ACCOUNTABILITY             
  -  EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS             
  -  USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS             
  -  FOIA LIBRARY             
  -  INNOVATION OASIS             
  -  WELCOME GUIDE 

HomeMEDIANEWS ARTICLESNews Article View

# USCENTCOM and Tajikistan discuss security cooperation

U.S. Central Command Public Affairs

                Tampa, Fla.  –              
Representatives of Tajikistan's Ministry of Defense visited USCENTCOM headquarters to finalize a security cooperation program for fiscal year 2019, April 18-19. 

The event is the final step of a two-part process that consists of an action officer working group and consultative staff talks that intend to further cooperation in the following areas:

•             Border security.

•             English language training. 

•             Medical cooperation

•             Continued development of Professional Military Education (PME) system.

•             Defense professionalization. 

•             Regional coordination. 

•             Multi-national exercises.

 

The talks also serve to review the progress of the current year’s joint security cooperation program of activities.

Gen. Maj. Hushvakht Mirovarov, First Deputy Chief of the General Staff of Armed Forces of the Republic of Tajikistan, led the Tajikistan delegation. U.S. Air Force Brig. Gen. Bradley Swanson, deputy director of U.S. Central command's Strategy, Plans, and Policy directorate headed the event.

"This year’s talks represent another successful step forward in deepening and broadening U.S. – Tajikistan security cooperation to advance mutual security and defense interests,” said U.S. Army Maj. Lemar Farhad, U.S. Central Command’s Tajikistan country director.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### Conrad M. Braker, Respondent, *v.*New York Finance Company, Appellant.

*Braker*v. *N. Y. Finance Co.,*148 App. Div., 884, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted April 29, 1912;

decided May 7, 1912.)

Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 29, 1911, which reversed an order of Special Term granting leave to defendant to serve an amended answer.

The motion was made upon the grounds that the order appealed from was not a final order; that it was not shown it was not discretionary, and that permission to appeal had not been obtained.

*Safforcl A. Crummey*for motion.

*Asa L. Garter*opposed.

Motion granted, without costs.
From: geneva@iijima.us

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:35:42 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Geneva Iijima

Oregon City, OR 97045
From: 2tkbrown@cox.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:37:50 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kimberly Brown

Destrehan, LA 70047
Page 1 of 1
ING DIV 1SION

PRUCESSING 2 r Ci (7D —
EiBenion aREANOS FIC E12 IC nig 27 201

As of: August 26, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted

Jrested: August 26, 2010
SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0470
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Gail Patricia Sharpe

Address:
Miami, FL,
General Comment
See attached file(s)

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0470.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/26/2010


August 10, 2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Gail Sharpe
<PAGE>
 
                        Exercisability of Stock Options
                        -------------------------------


     RESOLVED, that the first sentence of paragraph III-4 of the Ameritech Long
Term Incentive Plan is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows:  "Each
Non-Qualified Stock Option granted to a Participant shall terminate no later
than the day following the tenth anniversary of the Option Date or, subject to
the provisions of the following sentence, if earlier, 30 days after the date the
Participant's employment by the Company and its Subsidiaries is terminated for
any reason, except that, if the Participant is a member of the Company's
Management Committee at the time of termination of employment, such Non-
Qualified Stock Option shall terminate on the date on which the Participant's
employment is terminated."; and

     RESOLVED FURTHER, that in addition to the current terms of stock options
heretofore granted under the Ameritech Long Term Incentive Plan or the Ameritech
1989 Long Term Incentive Plan (the "Plans") regarding exercise thereof after
termination of employment, each such stock option heretofore granted under the
Plans shall, to the extent the option is exercisable at the date of termination
of employment, remain exercisable for a period of 30 days after termination of a
Participant's employment for any reason other than cause or willful misconduct,
unless such option terminates earlier under its existing terms (other than terms
relating to termination of employment) and unless the Participant is at the time
of termination of employment a member of the Management Committee of the
Company.
From: Jean Harris

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 12:29:08 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

Birth control access for all women is vital to women's health, quality of life, and capacity to be

financially independent and a player in the health of our nation's economy. So, thank you for supporting

birth control access for all women with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012!

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Jean Harris

134 Spencer Hill Rd

Nicholson, PA 18446
From: kencornelius@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:23:48 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Kenneth Cornelius

Woodbridge, VA 22192
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1404

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the small refiner

exception to the oil depletion deduction.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 5, 2001

Mr. BREAUX introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify

the small refiner exception to the oil depletion deduction.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DETERMINATION OF SMALL REFINER EXCEP4 TION TO OIL DEPLETION DEDUCTION.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (4) of section 613A(d)

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to certain

7 refiners excluded) is amended to read as follows:

8 ‘‘(4) CERTAIN REFINERS EXCLUDED.—If the

9 taxpayer or a related person engages in the refining

10 of crude oil, subsection (c) shall not apply to the
2

•S 1404 IS

1 taxpayer for a taxable year if the average daily refin2 ery runs of the taxpayer and the related person for

3 the taxable year exceed 75,000 barrels. For purposes

4 of this paragraph, the average daily refinery runs for

5 any taxable year shall be determined by dividing the

6 aggregate refinery runs for the taxable year by the

7 number of days in the taxable year.’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

10 December 31, 2001.

Æ
From: Betty and Jim Pontius

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: IOM"s recommendations

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:36:34 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.
From: dvoyles54@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:49:22 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

David Voyles

Salem, IN 47167