alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.04 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Nos. 245 and 246.

#### Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. *v.*Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al.

*Paul R. Conaghan*and *Richard B. Ogilvie*for. petitioner.

*Burke Williamson, Jack A. Williamson*and *John J. Naughton*for respondents.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-20340 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. NI C O LAS ANTONIO GUTIERREZ LOPEZ, also known as Nicolas A. Gutierre z , also known as Nicolas Antonio Gutierrez, also known as Nicolas Antonio Gutierrez-Lopez, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:10-CR-761-1 Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Nicolas Antonio Gutierrez Lo p ez (Gutierrez) pleaded guilty of being present in the United States illegally following deportation after conviction of an aggravated felony. In this appeal, Gutierrez c ontends that the district court erred in increasing his Sentencing Guidelines offense level by 16 levels based on its determination that Gutierrez’s 2007 Texas conviction of aggravated assault U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 25 , 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the cour t hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-20340 Document: 00511835356 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/25/2012No. 11-20340

with a deadly weapon c o n s t i t u ted a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). Because Gutierrez’s Texas conviction of aggravated assault qualified as a conviction for the enumerated offense of aggravated assault, the district court did not err in imposing the 16-level enhancement. See United States v. GuillenAlvarez , 489 F.3d 197, 199-201 (5th Cir. 2007); see also U. S

. S

. G

. § 2L1.2, comment. (n.1(B)(iii)). The judgment is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 11-20340 Document: 00511835356 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/25/2012
DATE: February 19. 2015 

SUBJECT: Request for approval urgent ad hoc charter 

Dear Sir or Madam 

GE 

Aviation 

Dove Dauenhauer 

GEnx Manufacturing Programs 

One Neumann Way 

Evendale, OH 45215 

USA 

T (5131552-2541 

c (5131549-3175 

Dave.douenhouer@ge.com 

We (GE Aviation) kindly ask you to grant the traffic rights for an urgent ad hoc flight to operate on 

February 22. 2015 from Rickenbacker. OH (LCK) to Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SEA), details 

as per below: 

Our customer Boeing, has production line work stoppage due to delayed engines from GE. 

They are in need of engines as soon as possible in order to continue their operations. 

Our carrier, Volga-Dnepr Airlines. is set for departure February 22, 2015. 

Sean Ostenberg. The Boeing Company is our contact and can be reached at (425) 965-7375. 

Please do not hesitate to contact us for more information if needed. You can reach me at the above 

phone numbers or via email. 

We thank you for your assistance in this urgent matter 

dilt----

Dave Dauenhauer 

GEnx Manufacturing Programs
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
  





 
 April 28, 2016 

Mr. W. Douglas Parker 
 c/o American Airlines Group Inc.

 4333 Amon Carter Blvd. 
 Fort Worth, Texas 76155 

Dear Doug: 
 We make reference to the Amended and Restated
Employment Agreement entered into as of November 28, 2007 among you, US Airways Group, Inc. and US Airways, Inc., as amended (the “Employment Agreement”), which Employment Agreement was assumed by American Airlines Group Inc. (the
“Company”) on December 9, 2013. Effective as of the date hereof, the Employment Agreement is terminated without any liability to any party thereto except that your obligations under Sections 5 (Confidential Information,
Non-Interference), 6 (Specific Performance) and 7 (Miscellaneous) of the Employment Agreement (the “Continuing Obligations”) shall survive the foregoing referenced termination, and you shall remain bound by such Continuing Obligations in
accordance with their terms. 
 Following the termination of the Employment Agreement, you shall continue to serve as the Company’s Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, provided that your employment with the Company and its subsidiaries shall be at-will. 
 Please acknowledge your acceptance and consent
to the terms described in this letter by signing below. You understand that these terms may not be amended or modified except in a writing signed by you and a representative of the Company duly authorized by the Committee or the Board of Directors.

 Regards, 
 American Airlines Group Inc. 

 

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Stephen L. Johnson

	Name:	 	Stephen L. Johnson
	Title:	 	Executive Vice President, Corporate Affairs








 ACKNOWLEDGED, ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO this 28th of
April 2016. 
  

	
	 /s/ W. Douglas Parker

	W. Douglas Parker

 Signature Page to Letter Agreement re: Employment Agreement Termination
From: Jeanne O"Melia

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: New Health Care Law

Date: Thursday, August 18, 2011 9:51:08 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as

pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to

reject any exemptions for "religious employers." These preventive services are

a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better

access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that "religious refusal" exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological

distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make

exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so Catholic hospitals would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM's recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal

exemption provisions.

Thank you.

Jeanne O’Melia

Milan, IL 61264
From: Margaret De Rose

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: William Heise Park Cabin info

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 2:48:56 PM

Hello,

Can you tell me something about what the cabins at the park are like? Do we need to bring

linens and sleeping bags? Do they have showers and toilets?

Is there a kitchen area? Do we need to bring our own pots and pans? Is there a refrigerator?

Thanks so much for your help.

Margaret De Rose
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.92 MB)
 
 USS Abraham Lincoln CVN 72 USS Kearsarge Arabian Sea LHD 3
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### F AA - 2012 - 1 2 7 3 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 - CE - 0 4 5 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1465 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1465

To authorize the President to provide assistance to Pakistan and India 
                      through September 30, 2003.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2001

Mr. Brownback (for himself and Mr. McConnell) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the President to provide assistance to Pakistan and India 
                      through September 30, 2003.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITED AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE TO PAKISTAN AND 
              INDIA.

    (a) Authority.--
            (1) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        law, the President is authorized, for Pakistan and India, to 
        provide assistance, enter into contracts, take actions in 
        international financial institutions, sell, lease, or authorize 
        the export of defense articles or defense services, authorize 
        the export of dual-use items, or extend other financial 
        assistance, under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, the Arms 
        Export Control Act, the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945, or any 
        other provision of law, if the President determines that it is 
        in the national interest of the United States and important to 
        United States efforts to respond to, deter, or prevent acts of 
        international terrorism.
            (2) Congressional notification required.--The authority of 
        this section may be exercised only after notification to the 
        appropriate committees of Congress.
    (b) Statutory Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be 
construed to authorize the President to provide for nuclear cooperation 
with India or Pakistan.
    (c) Period for Exercise of Authority.--The authority of this 
paragraph may be exercised through September 30, 2003.
                                 <all>
```
From: dairymom@xit.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:17:31 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Lance Detwiler

Dalhart, TX 79022
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of ALCO, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Andrew Liu, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.      By: /s/ Andrew Liu, CEO and Chairman  Date:March 27, 2009
CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION

POWERNOTES (SM)

With Maturities of 9 months or more from Date of Issue


Registration No.  333-35460
Filed Pursuant to Rule 424 (b) (2)
PRICING SUPPLEMENT NO.  036				Trade Date: 01/08/01
(To Prospectus Supplement & Prospectus dated
  September 8, 2000)						Issue Date:  01/17/01
The Date of this Pricing Supplement January 8, 2001

SUBJECT TO REDEMPTION
OR REPAYMENT
  CUSIP									Date and terms of redemption or
     or	Stated				             Interest			repayment (including any
Common	Interest		  Price to	 Discounts &  Payment	Survivor's		applicable
                                                             regular or special
  Code	Rate (1)	Maturity	Public (2)	Commissions Frequency	  Option	Yes/No
                                                                   record dates)

14911QBM2  6.00%      01/15/06	  100%	     1.00%	 Quarterly	  YES	   NO



Original Issue Discount Note:					Total Amount of OID:
____  Yes	  X   No						N/A



(1) The interest rates on the PowerNotes (SM) may be changed by Caterpillar
Financial Services Corporation from time to time, but any such change will not
affect the interest rate on any PowerNotes (SM) offered prior to the
effective date of the change.

(2) Expressed as a percentage of aggregate principal amount.  Actual Price to
Public may be less, and will be determined by prevailing market prices at the
time of purchase as set forth in the confirmation sheet.
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1413

To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to permit

borrowers and grantees to use certain rural development loans and grants

for other purposes under certain circumstances.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 10, 2001

Mr. LUGAR (for himself and Mr. HARKIN) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition,

and Forestry

A BILL

To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development

Act to permit borrowers and grantees to use certain

rural development loans and grants for other purposes

under certain circumstances.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. USE OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT LOANS AND

4 GRANTS FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

5 Subtitle A of the Consolidated Farm and Rural De6 velopment Act (7 U.S.C. 1921 et seq.) is amended by add7 ing at the end the following:
2

•S 1413 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 310F. USE OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT LOANS AND

2 GRANTS FOR OTHER PURPOSES.

3 ‘‘If, after making a loan or a grant described in sec4 tion 381E(d), the Secretary determines that the cir5 cumstances under which the loan or grant was made have

6 sufficiently changed to make the project or activity for

7 which the loan or grant was made available no longer ap8 propriate, the Secretary may allow the loan borrower or

9 grant recipient to use property (real and personal) pur10 chased with the loan or grant funds, or proceeds from the

11 sale of property (real and personal) purchased with such

12 funds, for another project or activity that (as determined

13 by the Secretary)—

14 ‘‘(1) will be carried out in the same area as the

15 original project or activity;

16 ‘‘(2) meets the criteria for a loan or a grant de17 scribed in section 381E(d); and

18 ‘‘(3) satisfies such additional requirements as

19 are established by the Secretary.’’.

Æ
#### Margaret Budd, Appellant, v. Stephen A. Walker, as Executor, Respondent.

Order reversed, without costs ; motion denied.
. 7 i 2-/ : Page 1 of 1
REG EFIE10 SEP 2 2010 .

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISLON
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS

As of: September 02, 2010

PUBLIC Seuus Paste oe

Posted: September 02, 2010
SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0592
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information
Name: Ralph Joseph Mirabal
Address:
Albuquerque, NM, 87111
General Comment
See attached file(s)

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0592.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

https://fdms.erulemaking .net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P..._ 9/2/2010


August 11, 2011

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. | specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Sincerely,
RJ Mirabal

8808 New Hampton Rd NE
Albuquerque, NM 87111