alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to Content

        -   Log in            -  Log inEmailPassword Show Password	            Remember meAlready have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Forgot your password?Email Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Resend confirmation instructionsEmail Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -   Sign Up            -  Sign upEmail Password Passwords must be at least 6 characters and contain at least one lower-case letter, one upper-case letter, one number, and one punctuation mark or symbolPassword confirmation  Show Password            Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 

# Search Publications

- Home

#           National Honey Report            AMSLog in or Sign Up to subscribe        

Division:Specialty Crops Program

----

Frequency of Release:Monthly

----

Category:Animals and Animal Products:Bees and Honey

Keywords:beekeepersexportshoneymarket activitypricesweather

----

## Releases

            -  « Previous 
            -  Next » 
            -  1 
            -  2 
            -  3 
            -  4 
            -  5 
            -  ... 
            -  7 
            -  8 

| Sep 25, 2024 | PDF | Sep 25, 2024: National Honey Report detailsx                Sep 25, 2024: National Honey ReportRelease datetime:Sep 25, 2024Close |
|--------------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Contact office name:Agricultural Marketing Service

Contact email:ams@ams.usda.gov

##         Agency Announcements        
Do you also want to subscribe to all agency announcements from ?
NoYesFooter content with page navigation, site information, and copyright.-  Home 
-  Release Calendar 
×Release CalendarClose
-  About
-  Help 
-  Contact 
-  API 

The USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System (ESMIS) contains over 2,100 publications from five agencies of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). These materials cover U.S. and international agriculture and related      topics. Mann Library at Cornell University developed and maintains this site.

© 2024 USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System
USDA ESMIS partners list with links to their websites.Partners:- Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
- Economic Research Service (ERS)
- Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS)
- National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
- World Agricultural Outlook Board (WAOB)
- 
- Albert R. Mann Library, Cornell University
- United States Department of Agriculture
Cornell development contact information.Developed & supported by:
**Albert R. Mann Library**Cornell UniversityIthaca, NY 14853-4301 Phone: (607) 255-3296 Email: usda-help@cornell.edu
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1202 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1202

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and one

                                 An Act

 
To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) to extend 
the authorization of appropriations for the Office of Government Ethics 
                        through fiscal year 2006.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Office of Government Ethics 
Authorization Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 405 of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) 
is amended by striking ``1997 through 1999'' and inserting ``2002 
through 2006''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**SECTION906 CERTIFICATIONS**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, inhis capacity as an officer of Providian Financial Corporation (the “Company”),for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: August 9, 2005

 
|   | /s/ Joseph W. Saunders                                    |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Joseph W. Saunders  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                                      |
|   |                                                      |
|   | /s/ Anthony F. Vuoto                                      |   |
|   | Anthony F. Vuoto  Chief Financial Officer                 |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1408 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1408

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to standardize the income 
  threshold for copayment for outpatient medications with the income 
 threshold for inability to defray necessary expenses of care, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 6, 2001

Mr. Rockefeller introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to standardize the income 
  threshold for copayment for outpatient medications with the income 
 threshold for inability to defray necessary expenses of care, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans' Copayment Adjustment 
Act''.

SEC. 2. STANDARDIZATION OF INCOME THRESHOLDS FOR COPAYMENT FOR 
              OUTPATIENT MEDICATIONS AND FOR INABILITY TO DEFRAY 
              NECESSARY EXPENSES OF CARE.

    (a) Standardization.--Section 1722A(a)(3)(B) of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended to read as follows:
            ``(B) to a veteran whose attributable income is not greater 
        than the amount provided for in subsection (b) of section 1722 
        of this title, as adjusted from time to time under subsection 
        (c) of that section.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on January 1, 2002, and shall apply with respect to 
calendar years beginning on or after that date.

SEC. 3. LIMITATION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF INCREASE IN COPAYMENTS FOR 
              OUTPATIENT MEDICATIONS PENDING COLLECTION OF COPAYMENTS 
              FOR OUTPATIENT CARE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs may not implement under section 1722A(b)(1) of title 
38, United States Code, an increase in the copayment amount for 
medications furnished on an outpatient basis under section 1722A(a) of 
that title until the Secretary commences collection of amounts for 
outpatient visits for medical services under section 1710(g) of that 
title.
                                 <all>
```
From: Ellen Beschler

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: No Exemptions for Women"s Health

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:55:33 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government

to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage

requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption

would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s recommendations

and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001035826
<NAME> NET.B@NK

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         2511366
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               5039419
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  326593937
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      648826967
<ALLOWANCE>                                    6557998
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              1030336412
<DEPOSITS>                                   486166907
<SHORT-TERM>                                  63000000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           10780404
<LONG-TERM>                                  231762750
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        293939
<OTHER-SE>                                   238332412
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              1030336412
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               11497496
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              4825410
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              16322906
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             6114551
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8865457
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          7457449
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     2000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                6064149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1702749
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1123749
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1123749
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.28
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                    437321
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               5579350
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  1172860
<RECOVERIES>                                     84000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              6557998
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           6557998
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.77 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: w4rev@windstream.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:22:45 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Eddie Moore

Carnesville, GA 30521
From: snberube@gmail.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 12:43:20 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Sarah Brandt

Bay City, MI 48706
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
PATRICK S. McPHERRON, Plaintiff,
v. MARKJ. KAPPELHOFF, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. ) ) ) ) 

### ---------------) MEMORANDUM OPINION l ;\:,''', \; 

# 11 

# 0576

This matter is before the Court for consideration ofplaintiffs application to proceed ill 

### formapauperis and

### prose complaint. The Court will grant the application and dismiss the complaint. Plaintiffbrings this action against the United States Department ofJustice, Comp\. at 1, alleging that it "allows immunityfor criminal behavior from government officials without precedent in the U.S. Constitution or Amendments," 

### id. 

# ,r 17. It appears thatplaintiffs cause of action arises from the Justice Department's refusal to prosecute "public officials for obstructing justice." Id.,r 13. Plaintiffdemands "punitive damages of$5 million dollars." Id.**~** 17. "[T]he question ofwhether and when prosecution is to be instituted is within the discretion ofthe Attorney General." 

### Powell v. Katzenbach, 359 F.2d 234, 234-35 (D.C. Cir. 1965) (per curiam), 

### cert. denied, 384 U.S. 906 (1966). The Court has no powerto compel the Attorney General to prosecute a particularindividual orto investigate a particular matter. 

### See id. ("Mandamus will not lie to control the exercise ofthis discretion."); 

### UnitedStates v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 693 (1974) (acknowledging that the Executive Branch "has exclusive authority andabsolute discretion to decide whetherto prosecute a case"). The Court will dismiss this action for failure to state a claim upon which reliefcan be granted. An Order consistentwith this Memorandum Opinion will be issued separatelyon this
same date.
Unit
From: eleanordowson@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Comment: RIN 1210-AB44

Date: Wednesday, September 07, 2011 11:43:05 AM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing today to ask in the strongest way possible that you rescind the unjust and coercive

mandate that all "contraceptives" and sterilization procedures be covered by private health insurance

with no co-pay to patients. If you do not reverse course I ask you to expand conscience protections for

any organizations that provide individual and group insurance and have moral or religious objections. I

strongly oppose the government forcing free insurance coverage on Americans especially for drugs and

devices that I oppose because some of these can cause an abortion (such as ella and Plan B).

I also ask you to reconsider your definition of religious employer and offer an authentic conscience

protection for any organization and business that has moral or religious objection to providing such

insurance to their employees. This legal mandate clearly violates the spirit of conscience laws which

prohibit government discrimination against those who object to various health services on moral or

religious grounds. The definition of "religious employer" in the regulation is so narrow as to only include

churches, but will still mean that a host of businesses and organizations that have conscience objections

will be required to choose between either violating their conscience or not being able to offer employees

health insurance.

Please protect the conscience rights of insurers, providers and people like me who object to being

forced by the federal government to offer or subsidize contraceptives and sterilization services, especially

when some of these drugs can take the life of early unborn children. No Americans should be forced by

the federal government to essentially subsidize services they object to. I again urge you in the strongest

way possible to reverse course and remove contraceptives and sterilizations from the list of mandatory

preventive services.

Sincerely,

Eleanor Dowson

Bothell, WA 98012