alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.9 MB)
 
 USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72); Navy; CVN 72; deployment; CENTCOM; USCENTCOM; NAVCENT
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-1736

EMMA V. HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Middle District of NC; FRANK W. BULLOCK, JR., Individually and in his capacity as Honorable Chief Judge; ROMALLUS O. MURPHY, Individually and in his official capacity as attorney for civil right and labor law defendant; J. P. CREEKMORE, Individually and in his capacity as Clerk of United States District Court, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CA-98-97-1) Submitted: October 20, 1998 Decided: November 3, 1998 Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Emma V. Howard, Appellant Pro Se.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Emma V. Howard appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Howard v. United States District Court , No. CA-98-97-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 3, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 170 (Tuesday, September 5, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 60727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19137]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of 
the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the 
Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on 
Wednesday, September 6, 2023 at 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: The meeting will be webcast on the Commission's website at 
www.sec.gov.

STATUS: This meeting will begin at 10:00 a.m. (ET) and will be open to 
the public via webcast on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. The Commission will consider whether to approve a proposed 
amendment to the National Market System Plan Governing the Consolidated 
Audit Trail (``CAT NMS Plan'') to implement a revised funding model 
(``Executed Share Model'') for the consolidated audit trail (``CAT'') 
and to establish a fee schedule for CAT fees for the self-regulatory 
organizations that are participants to the CAT NMS Plan in accordance 
with the Executed Share Model.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information and to 
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, 
please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary 
at (202) 551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: August 30, 2023.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-19137 Filed 8-31-23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 22-0108

__________________________________________________________________

Lung Green, )

)

Plaintiff and Appellant, )

)

vs. ) Order

)

City of Great Falls and Montana Municipal )

Interlocal Authority )

)

Defendants and Appellees. )

__________________________________________________________________

Based on the Stipulation re the Dismissal of Appeal, signed by all parties, 

this appeal is dismissed with prejudice; each party to bear their own costs and 

attorney fees.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 28 2022

07/28/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0108
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of Senesco Technologies, Inc. for the period ended December 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
the undersigned, Joel Brooks, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:




(1)           The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Senesco
Technologies, Inc.




Dated:
      February 10, 2011
              /s/ Joel Brooks *Joel
      BrooksChief
      Financial Officer, Secretary andTreasurer(principal
      financial and accounting
officer)




*  A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to us and will be retained by us and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.57 MB)
 
 USCENTCOM CENTCOM NeonDefender21
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
## BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SIXTH DISTRICT, AT TEXARKANA

No. 06

- 14

- 00040

- CV

Tillerd Ardean Smith, Medallion Transport & Logistics, LLC, Tomy Rushing d/b/a Rushing Transport Services, Inc.

v.

Brandi Williams

(No. 12

- 0889 IN 71ST DISTRIC T COURT OF HARRISON COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

MOTION FEE

REPORTER'S RECORD

SUPP REPORTER'S RECORD

INDIGENT

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING FE E

SUPREME COURT CHAPTE R 51 FEE $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 $5, 430.00 $160.00 $25.00 $100.00 $20.00 $50.00 E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

PAID

UNKNOWN

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID

E

- PAID KIMBERLY CUELLAR

- JIMENEZ

JOHN R MERCY

JOHN R MERCY

KIMBERLY CUELLAR

- JIMENEZ

DEBRA BOSSE TAUNTON, SNYDER & SL ADE

WRIGHT & CLOSE

DEBRA BOSSE

DEBRA BOSSE

DEBRA BOSSE

DEBRA BOSSE



### Balance of costs owing to the Sixth Court of Appeals, Texarkana, Texas: 0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK OF THE SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause,

as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of

the COURT OF APPEALS for the Sixth District of Texas, this August 13, 2015

.

DEBRA AUTREY, CLERK

By ___

________________________ Deputy
# Gen. McKenzie, commander of U.S. Central Command, visits USS Bataan

/ Published Jan. 30, 2020
RED SEA, AT SEA, 

                Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr., commander of U.S. Central Command, shakes the hand of a Sailor while touring the main machinery room onboard the amphibious assault ship USS Bataan (LHD 5). Bataan Amphibious Ready Group, with embarked 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit, is deployed to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations in support of maritime security operations to reassure allies and partners and preserve the freedom of navigation and the free flow of commerce in the region. (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Tanner Seims)            

                U.S. Central Command commander visits USS Bataan            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Cpl. Tanner Seims

VIRIN: 200123-M-KE756-1136
From: Penelope LePome

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Women’s preventive health care and contraception

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 1:40:06 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") of Sistersville Bancorp, Inc., the
("Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Stanley M. Kiser, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                          /s/ Stanley M. Kiser
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Stanley M. Kiser
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer
                                             and Principal Accounting and
                                             Financial Officer)

August 8, 2002
EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-32429) of Ithaca Industries, Inc. of our report
dated March 25, 1999, except as to Note 14 which is as of April 30, 1999,
appearing on page 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule,
which appears on page 41 of this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
May 13, 1999
From: Marilyn Voorhies

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Institute of Medicine"s recommendations for coverage of preventive care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 11:55:25 PM

To whom it may concern:

I enthusiastically join with the American Association of University

Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the recommendations of the

Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under

the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious

employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary

health care.

While AAUW strongly believes that “religious refusal” exemptions

unjustly deny women access to contraceptive services, others, driven

by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers,

so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the

coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths

and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.

Sincerely,

Marilyn Voorhies

38 Clark Point Rd. 

West Tremont, ME 04612
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          24,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  243,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    19,200
<INVENTORY>                                    202,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               492,800
<PP&E>                                         499,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                 236,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,130,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,134,200
<BONDS>                                      1,553,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,794,100)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,130,800
<SALES>                                      1,170,500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,170,500
<CGS>                                          417,500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  417,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             164,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (128,700)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (135,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (135,700)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0





</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     QUARTERLY  REPORT  ON FORM  10-QSB  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            598
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            362
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     3,909
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            960
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              889
<LOANS>                                        46,951
<ALLOWANCE>                                       370
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 53,153
<DEPOSITS>                                     40,663
<SHORT-TERM>                                      600
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               783
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           77
<OTHER-SE>                                     11,030
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 53,153
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 1,780
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 155
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   12
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                1,947
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                944
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                959
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             988
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      18
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   407
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        407
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      257
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.90
<LOANS-NON>                                       276
<LOANS-PAST>                                        0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  352
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       0
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 370
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              370
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>
#### William P. Hickok, Appellant, *v.*The City of Mount Vernon, Respondent.

*Hickok*v. *City of Mount Vernon,*145 App. Div. 599, appeal dismissed.

(Submitted February 4, 1913;

decided February 25, 1913.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 23, 1911, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and granting a new trial in an action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff through the wrongful acts of the defendant in preventing the further removal of plaintiff’s house after the same had been moved upon the street, and revoking the permission granted to plaintiff to move said house.

*Isaac N. Miller*for appellant.

*Frank A. Bennett*for respondent.

Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Cuddeback, Hogan and Miller, JJ.
# - FixJoann e Welc h 21 2 Webste

r S t Eas t Boston , M A 0212 8 

## 0JC
Kennet h L . Kirnmell , Commissione r Departmen

t O f Environmenta

l Protectio n On e Winter Stree t Bosto n Massachusett

s 0210 8 Dea r Commissione

r Kimmell , Pleas e suppor t th e filia l design an

d constructio n o f

th e Red-Blue Connecto

r betwee n Bowdoi n an

d Charle s Stree

t station s i n Boston . Suc

h aconnection wil l be abi g hel p to peopl e o n the Nort h Shor

e wh o nee d t o ge t t o the hospital s lik e MG H an d ge t t o employmen

t i n th e Cambridge area.I

n addition , traveler s t o th e airpor t wil l hav e th e opportunit

y t o hav e adirec t lin k t o th e airpor t withou t changing a

t Par k Stree t whil e carryin g luggage . Thi s i s apiec e o f

mitigatio n fo r

th e Bi g Di g aimed a

t reducin g pollution.I t

too k alo t o f wor k b y environmentalists 5 citizen s an d politica l leader

s t o put togethe r tha t mitigatio n package . I t

i s lon g overdue . A s yo u know , th

e tunne l alread

y exists . Al l tha

t i s necessar

y i s tha t som e structura

l wor k b e don e t o mee t the need s o f amoder n facility . Wit h the technology toda y ther e wil l b e littl e disruptio n o n th

e surfac e or

t o transi t operations . S o I as k tha t yo u approv

e th e fina l design an

d the constructio n o f

thi s much neede

d resource.. ! than

k yo u i n advanc

e fo r you r consideratio n am

d support . Sincerely ,