alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                                                                      ----------


                        CML GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       YEAR ENDED JULY 31,
                                         -----------------------------------------------
                                              1997             1996              1995
                                         ------------     -------------     ------------
<S>                                      <C>              <C>               <C>          
Primary loss per share:

Weighted average number of shares
 outstanding:

Common                                     49,732,025        49,234,007       49,659,991

Shares deemed outstanding from:

  Assumed issuance of deferred
   compensation awards                        105,000           105,000          105,000
  Assumed exercise of stock
   options                                    139,870           304,309          616,727
                                         ------------     -------------     ------------

  Total                                    49,976,895        49,643,316       50,381,718
                                         ============     =============     ============
                                                                            
Net loss                                 $(40,214,000)    $(100,424,000)    $(18,920,000)
                                         ------------     -------------     ------------

Primary loss per share                   $      (0.81)    $       (2.04)    $      (0.38)
                                         ============     =============     ============

Fully diluted loss per share:

Weighted average number of shares
 outstanding, as above                     49,976,895        49,643,316       50,381,718

Shares deemed outstanding from
 the assumed conversion of
 convertible subordinated
 debentures                                 1,604,877         1,604,877        1,919,411

Additional shares deemed
 outstanding from the assumed
 exercise of stock options                     50,577            27,529           10,651
                                         ------------     -------------     ------------
  Total                                    51,632,349        51,275,722       52,311,780
                                         ============     =============     ============

Additional income from the
 elimination of the interest cost of
 the convertible subordinated
 debentures, net of income tax effect    $  1,597,957     $   1,565,397     $  1,821,709

Fully diluted loss per share             $      (0.81)    $       (2.04)    $      (0.38)
                                         ============     =============     ============ 
</TABLE>

                                       47
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.14 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000731947
<NAME>                        Swiss Army Brands, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    US Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                     DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                        1
<CASH>                             2,067
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                     34,024
<ALLOWANCES>                       1,032
<INVENTORY>                       29,657
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                  70,933
<PP&E>                             9,928
<DEPRECIATION>                     5,959
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    98,643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>             18,786
<BONDS>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                             882
<OTHER-SE>                        78,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      98,643
<SALES>                          130,030
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 130,030
<CGS>                             89,194
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     46,241
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                  (2,350)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     (57)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  (147)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (7,608)
<INCOME-TAX>                      (2,344)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (5,265)
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                      (5,265)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       (.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                       (.64)




</TABLE>
Exhibit 11

                       Computation of Net Income Per Share
               (In thousands, except share and earnings per share)

                                                     For the Quarter Ended
                                                --------------------------------
                                                March 31, 2000    March 31, 1999
                                                --------------    --------------
Net Income Per Share - Basic

Net income applicable to common stock             $  402,000        $  293,000

Weighted average common shares                     1,792,216         1,926,463

Earnings per common share                         $     0.22        $     0.15


Net Income Per Share - Diluted

Net income applicable to common stock             $  402,000        $  293,000

Weighted average common shares                     1,792,216         1,926,463

Dilutive common stock options                          3,319            18,228
                                                  ----------        ----------

Weighted average common shares - diluted           1,795,535         1,944,691

Earnings per common share                         $     0.22        $     0.15

(1)  Dilutive  common  stock  options  (includes   restricted  stock  under  the
     Company's  ISAP plan and options  under its stock option plan) are based on
     the treasury  stock method using average  market price.  The treasury stock
     method  recognizes the use of assumed proceeds upon the exercise of option,
     and the amount of unearned compensation attributed to future services under
     the Company's  restricted stock plan,  including any tax benefits,  will be
     used to purchase the  Company's  common  stock at the average  market price
     during the period.
H. Res. 552

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

September 26, 2002.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the bill (H.R. 2215) to authorize appropriations for the Department of Justice for fiscal year 2002, and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and

against its consideration are waived. The conference report

shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
___________

No. 96-3153

___________

Rosie Campbell, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * Western District of Arkansas.

*

Blevins Public Schools; Jimmy *

Buck, individually; David * 

[Unpublished]

Banister, individually; Glen * 

Smith, individually, *

*

Appellees. *

*

___________

Submitted: April 15, 1997

 Filed: May 9, 1997

 

___________

Before McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge, HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and Beam,

 Circuit Judge.

___________
2

PER CURIAM.

Rosie Campbell filed this lawsuit against the Blevins (Arkansas)

Public Schools and certain school board members following the December 1993

termination of her contract as a teacher and coach. Campbell asserted that

the termination violated her rights under the due process clause of the

Fourteenth Amendment and under the Arkansas Teacher Fair Dismissal Act.

After a non-jury trial, the district court granted judgment for the school

district and the individual defendants on all claims.

On appeal Campbell expressly chose to abandon her federal

constitutional claim and to challenge only the district court's decision

regarding the Arkansas Teacher Fair Dismissal Act. Ark. Code Ann. §§ 6-17-

1501 through 1510. In the interest of judicial economy and efficiency,

however, we have considered the pendent state claim. Condor Corp. v. City

of St. Paul, 912 F.2d 215, 219-21 (8th Cir. 1990).

The Arkansas Supreme Court has required strict compliance with the

state statute as amended and in general has acted favorably to teachers so

as to assure that dismissals are fair as required by the Arkansas law. Cf.

Lester v. Mount Vernon-Enola School Dist., 917 S.W.2d 540 (Ark. 1996).

However, after a review of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the

opinion of the district court, we find that the decision of the district

court in favor of the defendants contains no error of law, that the

findings of fact by the district court are not clearly erroneous, and that

an extended opinion by our court would have no precedential value. 

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B. 
3

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.81 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
116 STAT. 744 PUBLIC LAW 107–203—JULY 24, 2002

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3971:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):

June 24, considered and passed House.

July 10, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 107–203

107th Congress

An Act

To provide for an independent investigation of Forest Service firefighter deaths

that are caused by wildfire entrapment or burnover.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE INSPECTOR GENERAL

INVESTIGATION OF FOREST SERVICE FIREFIGHTER

DEATHS.

In the case of each fatality of an officer or employee of the

Forest Service that occurs due to wildfire entrapment or burnover,

the Inspector General of the Department of Agriculture shall conduct an investigation of the fatality. The investigation shall not

rely on, and shall be completely independent of, any investigation

of the fatality that is conducted by the Forest Service.

SEC. 2. SUBMISSION OF RESULTS.

As soon as possible after completing an investigation under

section 1, the Inspector General of the Department of Agriculture

shall submit to Congress and the Secretary of Agriculture a report

containing the results of the investigation.

Approved July 24, 2002.

Reports.

7 USC 2270c.

7 USC 2270b.

July 24, 2002

[H.R. 3971]
#### Edward J. Kelsey and others, Respondents, v. James Sargent and others, Appellants.

Order requiring defendant to furnish hill of particulars affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 30, 2013

s0923 

# Order

Clerk September 30, 2013

147293

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHI GAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147293

COA: 315999

Oakland CC: 2011

- 239033

- FC

JOHN CHRISTOPHER MANNION,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 31, 2013 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
From: Bridgett Stagliano

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 9:21:13 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Bridgett Stagliano

325 Spears Creek Church Road

Elgin, SC 29045
O pinion filed November 29 , 2018



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________ No s . 11

- 1 8

- 00 242

- CR , 11

- 18

- 002 43

- CR , 11

- 18

- 00244

- CR, & 11

- 18

- 00 245

- CR

__________ RICHARD DAVID MACK , Appellant
V

. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 266 th District Court Erath County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . CR 12376 , CR 12377 , CR 12378, & CR 12379

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Richard David Mack , Appellant, filed an untimely pro se notice of appeal
from his conviction s for the offense s of capital murder , for which he was sentenced
to confinement for life . We dismiss the appeal s

. The document s on file in th ese appeals indicate that Appellant’ s sentence s

were imposed in 2006 , and that his pro se notice of appeal was filed in the district
clerk’s office on September 13 , 2018. When the appeal s were filed in this court, we2 notified Appellant by letter that his notice of appeal appeared to be unti mely and that
the se appeal s may be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. We requested that Appellant respond to our letter and show grounds to continue these appeals. Appellant has not filed a response showing any grounds upon which th ese appeal s may proceed.
Pu rsuant to T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.2, Appellant’s notice of appeal in each case was due to be filed within thirty days after the date his sentence was imposed in open court. A notice of appeal must be in writing and filed with the clerk of the trial court.
T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(c)(1). The documents on file in this court reflect that Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed with the clerk of the trial court more than
twelve years after his sentence s were imposed. The notice of appeal was, theref ore, untimely. Absent a timely filed notice of appeal or the granting of a timely motion for extension of time, we do not hav e jurisdiction to entertain these appeal s

. Slaton
v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State , 860 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993). Appellant has requested that this court appoint counsel for him in these appeals. We note that t his court has no authority to appoint counsel and that, because
the notice of appeal was untimely , we must dismiss the appeals.
These appeal s are dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

November 29 , 2018 PER CURIAM Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Bailey, C. J., Willson , J., and Wright, S.C.J. 1 Willson, J., not participating.

1 Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, sitting by assignment.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.9 MB)
 
 advisor 1st Security Force Assistance Brigade 1st SFAB deployment Afghanistan Afghan National Army train assist scott jackson AP Lighting FOB Altimur
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### Royal L. Mack and others, Respondents, v. John P. Vidvard and others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by

Barker, J.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Samuel Gold, Appellant.

*People*v. *Gold,*148 App. Div. 896, affirmed.

(Submitted May 2, 1912;

decided May 21, 1912.)

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the ¡Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 29, 1911, which affirmed a judgment of .the Court of Special Sessions of the city of New York con-

*600victing the defendant óf the crime of maintaining a disorderly house.

*Maurice Meyer*for appellant.

*Charles S. Whitman, District Attorney {Stanley L.. Richter*of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Werner, Hiscock and Collin, JJ.