alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of2 

.LEOAL PROCESSING DIVISION 

PUbLICATION & REGULATIONS BRA~:C'f As of: August 25, 2010 

Received: August 10, 2010 PUBLIC Status: Posted

SUBMISSION 

Posted: August 25, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2d186 

Comments Due: August 16, :2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0341 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Craig Feller Buhler 

Address: 

1571 Leola 

Kaysville, UT, 84037 

Submitter's Representative: Rob Bishop 

Organization: sales 

Government Agency Type: Federal 

Government Agency: HRSA 

General Comment 

August 11, 2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status 

as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-2010­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

https:llfdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency1componentlsubmitterlnfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/25/2010 
Page 2 of2 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Craig F. Buhler 

1571 Leola 

Kaysville, Utah 84037 

https:/ Ifdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency IcomponentisubmitterInfoCoverPage?Call= ... 8/25/2010
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 7, 2011 

s0131 

Order 

 

February 7, 2011 

141952 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141952 

 COA: 299277 

Clinton CC: 09-008524-FH 

DOUGLAS ROBERT DROSTE, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 3, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Docket: EBSA-2010-0007 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options for Participants and Beneficiaries in 

Retirement Plans 

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0007-0001 

Request for Information Regarding Lifetime Income Options 

Document: EBSA-2010-0007-DRAFT-0021 

Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

Submitter Information 

Name: Jan Lee Ador 

Address: 

965 Mancha Real Dr. 

Orlando, FL, 32807-3089 

General Comment 

LEAVE MY 401K AND ANY OTHER RETIREMENT ALONE!!!!! 

THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT CAPABLE OF INVESTING OUR MONEY 

JUST LOOK WHAT YOU HAVE DONE WITH SOCIAL SECURITY! 

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: February 17, 2010 

Received: February 04, 2010 

Status: Pending_Post 

Tracking No. 80a8e026 

Comments Due: May 03, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 2/17/2010
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            JAN-01-99
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-99
<CASH>                                         447,963
<SECURITIES>                                   183,761
<RECEIVABLES>                                  349,015
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,948)
<INVENTORY>                                    229,970
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,257,357
<PP&E>                                         544,388
<DEPRECIATION>                               (312,751)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,546,594
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          483,464
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,809
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,962,257
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,546,594
<SALES>                                      1,590,354
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,590,354
<CGS>                                        1,135,895
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,135,895
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                155,622
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (56,325)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             99,297
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    99,297
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52


</TABLE>
EX-4.59



 Exhibit 4.59 

Tenth Amendment 
 To The
Exclusive Ragnarok Online License and Distribution Agreement 
 This AMENDMENT (“this Amendment”) is made and
entered into on this 16th of November, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as “Amendment Date”) by and between Gravity Co., Ltd (hereinafter referred to as
“Licensor”) and Gravity Interactive, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as “Licensee”). 
 RECITALS: 

WHEREAS, Licensor and Licensee (“Parties” collectively) entered into the Exclusive Ragnarok Online License and Distribution
Agreement (“the Original Agreement”), dated January 1st, 2006. 

WHEREAS, the Parties has entered into the amendments to the Original Agreement (“Amendments”) Nine times to
amend certain terms and conditions of the Original Agreement(the Original Agreement amended by Amendments until now is hereinafter referred to as “The Agreement”); 

WHEREAS, both Parties to The Agreement now desire to amend The Agreement as set forth below; 

AGREEMENT 
 NOW;
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, Licensor and Licensee agree as follows: 
 1.
Territory 
 The Article 1.12 of The Agreement shall be amended as follows: 

1.12        “Territory” shall mean the following territories: 

(a) United States of America 

(b) Canada 

(c) Australia 

(d) New Zealand 

(e) India 

  
 1 








 (f) Singapore 

(g) Malaysia 

(h) Middle East and North Africa region (UAE, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, Lebanon, Mauritania, Egypt,
Algeria, Morocco, and Tunisia) 
 (i) Philippines 

(j) The Russian Federation, the CIS countries (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan,
Uzbekistan), Georgia, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. 
 (k) South America area except Brazil (including, but not limited to,
Guyana, Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Bolivia, Republic of Suriname, Argentina, Ecuador, Uruguay, Chile, Colombia, Paraguay, Peru) 
  

	3.	 Effective Date 



All the Articles of The Agreement amended by this Amendment shall be effective and applicable on and from the Amendment Date
defined above, and any of them shall not be construed or regarded to be retroactively effective. 
  

	4.	 Continuing Effectiveness of the Agreement 



Except as expressly set forth herein, this Amendment shall not by implication or otherwise alter, modify, amend or in any way
affect any of the terms, conditions, obligations, covenants, or agreements contained in The Agreement, all of which are ratified and affirmed in all respects and shall continue in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment on the day and year first
above-written. 
  

									
	 GRAVITY CO., LTD.
	 		 	 Gravity Interactive Inc.

			
	
By:                      
                      
	 		 	
By:                      
                      

	 Name: Hyun Chul Park
	 		 	 Name: Kitamura Yoshinori

	 Title: CEO
	 		 	 Title: CEO

	 Date:
	 		 	 Date:



  
 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FIRECOM, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENT OF INCOME AND
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW FOR THE PERIOD ENDED APRIL 30, 1996, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      APR-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           APR-30-1996
<CASH>                                 2,165
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                          4,036
<ALLOWANCES>                             319
<INVENTORY>                            1,152
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       7,483
<PP&E>                                 1,064
<DEPRECIATION>                           588
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         8,116
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  1,785
<BONDS>                                    0
<COMMON>                                  52
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                            1,437
<OTHER-SE>                             3,461
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           8,116
<SALES>                               14,884
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      14,884
<CGS>                                  7,713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          7,713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       3,831
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         259
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       115
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        2,966
<INCOME-TAX>                           1,404
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    1,562
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                           1,562
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            .15
<EPS-DILUTED>                            .14

</TABLE>
```

EX- 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Form 10-QSB/A Amended Quarterly Report of Winmax Trading
Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        o   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        o   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

November 25, 2002,
By: /s/ Gerald E. Sklar
Gerald E. Sklar, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification bythe Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer ofGenzyme Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-Kof the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
| /s/ MICHAEL S. WYZGA      |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| *Chief Financial Officer* |
| March 1, 2007        |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Biomedical Library, Informatics and Data Science Review Committee, November 2-3, 2023, which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 2, 2023, 88 FR 147, Page 50884.                

This notice is being amended to change the meeting times to 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on November 2nd and 9:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. on November 3rd. The meeting is closed to the public.

 Dated: August 31, 2023.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-19255 Filed 9-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1121 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1121

    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain R-core transformers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 28, 2001

Mr. Kennedy (for himself and Mr. Kerry) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To suspend temporarily the duty on certain R-core transformers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN R-CORE TRANSFORMERS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.85.04       120 volt/60Hz        Free       No change        No change        On or before 6/
                          electrical                                                        30/03
                          transformers (the
                          foregoing and
                          parts thereof
                          provided for in
                          subheading
                          8504.31.40 and
                          8504.90.95), with
                          dimensions not
                          exceeding 85mm by
                          72mm by 45.7mm but
                          at least 76mm by
                          50mm by 25mm and
                          each containing a
                          layered and uncut
                          round core with
                          two balanced
                          bobbins, the
                          foregoing rated at
                          less than 40 VA
                          but greater than
                          33.2 VA with a
                          rating number of
                          R25...............
 

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### John J. McGlynn, Respondent, *v.*The Pennsylvania Steel Company, Appellant.

*MeGlymiY. Pennsylvania Steel Co.,*144 App. Div. 343, affirmed.

(Argued April 9, 1912;

decided April 30, 1912.)

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 10,1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sus*575tained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant, his employer.

*David Leventritt, H. Snowden Marshall*and *William ■ H. Griffin*for appellant.

*John F. McIntyre*and *David C. Hirsch*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscocic and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Gray and Collin, JJ.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40347

Summary Calendar

__________________

ARNOLD DAVILA,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ARANSAS PASS, CITY OF TEXAS, ET AL.,

 Defendants,

and

BONNIE MCCARTY, ET AL.,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-90-CV-121

- - - - - - - - - -

March 7, 1996

Before KING, SMITH, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Arnold Davila appeals the district court's grant of summary

judgment in favor of the defendants on his civil rights

complaint. Davila argues that the district court erred by

dismissing his claims regarding: (1) the validity of his
No. 95-40347

-2-

conviction; (2) access to the courts; (3) conditions of

confinement; and (4) inadequate diet. 

 We have reviewed the record and the reasons for dismissal

given by the district court and perceive no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we AFFIRM for the reasons stated in the district

court's opinion. AFFIRMED.
#### ANDREW MUDRI, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. UNITED ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS, INCORPORATED, IMPLEADED AS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, AND/OR UNITED ENGINEERS AND CONSTRUCTORS, INCORPORATED, RESPONDENT-PROSECUTOR.

Submitted October 14, 1932

Decided March 31, 1933.

Before Justices Pabkee, Lloyd and IIeliee.

Por the petitioner-respondent, *Joseph F. A. Bubaclcy (Feder & Binzler,*of counsel).

Por the respondent-prosecutor, *Henry II. Fryling (Elmer W. Bomine,*of counsel).

Pee Ctjeiam.

This writ brings up for review the judgment of the workmen’s compensation bureau, awarding to the petitioner eom*274pensation on the basis of fifteen per cent, of total and permanent disability.

It is conceded that the petitioner suffered injury from an accident which arose out of and in the course of his employment, but the prosecutor insists that no permanent disability resulted, and that therefore the findings of the deputy commissioner are not supported by the proofs.

The petitioner undoubtedly sustained severe injuries. While he was in a trench, assisting in the construction of concrete forms, a cave-in occurred, and heavy pieces of timber and sand fell upon him, inflicting head and shoulder injuries. The commissioner found that at the time of the hearing, some eighteen months after the accident occurred, he had a rigidity of the neck, and that his head inclined toward the right shoulder. There was evidence of injury to the cervical nerves and muscles. There was also testimony tending to show impaired hearing of the right ear, and numbness of the right side of the head.

The prosecutor contends (1) that the petitioner does not suffer from these alleged disabilities, and (2) that if he is so afflicted, they did not have a traumatic origin. The commissioner rejected these contentions, and rightly so. We find in the proofs ample support for his conclusion that petitioner suffered permanent injury from the accident in question, and that he was permanently disabled to the extent of fifteen per cent, of total disability. The physicians, as is usual in such cases, gave varying estimates of the extent of petitioner’s disability. We do not understand that it is the prosecutor’s contention that if the petitioner was injured to the extent found by the commissioner, and such injury was the result of an accident which arose out of and in the course of petitioner’s employment, the award is excessive. If so, it is devoid of merit.

The judgment brought up for review will therefore be affirmed, with costs.
From: RR

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Women"s Preventive Health Care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:19:22 PM

I submit to you my comments regarding your pending decision regarding new rules

governing women's preventive health care. Thank you for this opportunity.

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

Religion has no role in governance. It should not be a factor nor have a role in any

law or regulation. I ask you reject any attempt to insert religion into any law or

regulation. I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal

exemption provisions.

-- 

Robert Rosas

This e-mail may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you are

not the intended recipient, or the duly authorized agent of the recipient, notice is

hereby given to you that any use, copying, or distribution of this e-mail is strictly

prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender right

away and immediately delete this e-mail from your system.