alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

TR BANKS, JR., and SUSAN BANKS, )

)

Appellants, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2303

)

DYCK-O'NEAL, INC., and THE BANK OF )

NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, )

N.A., )

)

Appellees. )

)

Opinion filed September 20, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; Cynthia J. Newton, Judge.

Benjamin Hillard, Alexander R. Allred, and 

Amy E. Cuykendall of Castle Law Group, 

P.A., Largo, for Appellants. 

David M. Snyder of David M. Snyder 

Professional Association, Tampa; and 

Joshua D. Moore of Law Offices of Daniel 

C. Consuegra, Tampa, for Appellee DyckO'Neal, Inc.

No Appearance for Appellee The Bank of

New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         875,080
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,818,411
<ALLOWANCES>                                    93,561
<INVENTORY>                                  8,415,777
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,267,865
<PP&E>                                       1,390,961
<DEPRECIATION>                                 479,973
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,194,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,221,039
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     11,500
<COMMON>                                         2,122
<OTHER-SE>                                  19,272,756
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,194,847
<SALES>                                     25,667,245
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,710,194
<CGS>                                       15,486,763
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,999,520
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               408,271
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                93,561
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             513,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,788,997
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,151,856
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,637,141
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,637,141
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .47
        


</TABLE>
Re: Word omission in Ivar Tombach 's portion of the UARG comments on 

chapter 4 of the 2nd Draft PM Policy Assessment Document

Ivar Tombach to: Phil Lorang 09/20/2010 12:26 PM

Cc: "Aaron M. Flynn", John Jansen, Marc Pitchford, Vicki Sandiford, Beth 

Hassett-Sipple

Phil:

You are correct in that "not" " should appear in the first sentence in the 

first full paragraph on page 28 of my report, so the phrase should read "... 

light extinction does not appear to materially degrade ...."

Thank you for pointing out the error.

Ivar

Ivar Tombach, Ph.D., QEP

753 Grada Ave.

Camarillo, CA 93010-1033

805 388-2341

805 445-9424 fax

itombach@aol.com

itombach@mac.com

On Sep 17, 2010, at 4:52 AM, lorang.phil@epamail.epa.gov wrote:

> 

> Dr. Tombach and Mr. Flynn,

> 

> I believe I have spotted a "not" that was intended to be in a sentence

> of the comments but was omitted. "Not" is a pretty important word, and

> it would avoid confusion later if UARG could clarify this matter.

> 

> In the attached copy of the comments, I have highlighted a sentence on

> each of pages 28 and 30 of the attachment by Dr.Tombach titled "Comments

> Concerning the Visibility-Related Portion of the

> Second External Review Draft of the Policy Assessment for the Review of

> the PM NAAQS." The sentence on page 30 is part of a conclusions

> section, and addresses the same point as the sentence on page 28 in the

> main part of the document, with very similar wording. The sentence on

> page 30 has a "not" that does not appear in the sentence on page 28.

> Given the substance of the material that comes before page 28 and the

> way that the page 28 version starts with "Although" and the page 30

> version continues with "except", my interpretation is that the Dr.

> Tombach's intention was to have the "not" in both sentences. That makes

> the sentences consistent with each other and have a logical flow.

> 

> Page 28 version: Although this analysis suggests that, at least at the

> SEARCH JST site, the EPA’s simplified method of estimating hourly light

> extinction does appear to materially degrade the quality of the

> estimates relative to those made with actual on-site hourly PM2.5

> component concentration data, this exercise does not demonstrate any of

> the following: ...

> 

> Page 30 version: As described in this memo, I found that the simplified
> method did not materially degrade the hourly estimates, particularly

> when they were compared on a percentile basis, except during episodes

> when the relative mix of pollutants deviated greatly from the monthly

> species fractions.

> 

> 

> 

> (See attached file: Filing Copy -- Final UARG Comments on Chapter 4

> Second Draft PM PA.pdf)

> 

> Phil Lorang, Group Leader

> Air Quality Analysis Group, AQAD, OAQPS, EPA

> 919-541-5463

> <Filing Copy -- Final UARG Comments on Chapter 4 Second Draft PM PA.pdf>
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

** **

I, DomenicGatto, Chief Executive Officer of Atlantic Express Transportation Corp. (the“Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best ofmy knowledge:

 

(i)  the Quarterly Report on Form10-Q of the Company  for the quarterended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)  the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   |     /s/ Domenic Gatto                                 |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |         Domenic Gatto             |
|   | *        Chief Executive Officer* |
|   |                                                                 |

Date: February14, 2006

 

The foregoing certification is beingfurnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, andis not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofthe Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of anygeneral incorporation language in such filing.

 

1

----
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Central Command

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  ABOUT US    -  COMMAND PRIORITIES             
  -  LEADERSHIP             
  -  COMPONENT COMMANDS             
  -  HISTORY             
  -  POSTURE STATEMENT 
-  CENTCOM AOR    -  CENTCOM COALITION 
-  OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES    -  USMTM 
-  CONTACT    -  OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT             
  -  COMMUNITY RELATIONS             
  -  THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE             
  -  INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL             
  -  MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL 
-  MEDIA    -  SOCIAL MEDIA             
  -  NEWS ARTICLES             
  -  PRESS RELEASES             
  -  STATEMENTS             
  -  IMAGERY             
  -  VIDEOS             
  -  TRANSCRIPTS 
-  VISITORS AND PERSONNEL    -  FAMILY CENTER             
  -  FAMILY READINESS             
  -  CENTCOM WEBMAIL             
  -  SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY             
  -  ACCOUNTABILITY             
  -  EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS             
  -  USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS             
  -  FOIA LIBRARY             
  -  INNOVATION OASIS             
  -  WELCOME GUIDE 

HomeMEDIANEWS ARTICLESNews Article View

# Army Maritime Service provides logistical support to Operation Spartan Shield

By Staff Sgt. Robert WatersU.S. Army Central

                KUWAIT NAVAL BASE, Kuwait  –              

                Members of the 511th Engineer Dive Detachment prepare to receive additional divers approaching from the front ramp of the U.S. Army Logistic Support Vessel 5 (LSV-5) near Kuwait Naval Base, Kuwait, Oct. 23, 2019. The vessel at the time was hosting joint training between U.S. Amy 511th Engineer Dive Detachment and members of the Kuwait Fire and rescue Service. (U.S. Army photo by Staff Sgt. Robert Waters)            

                Army Maritime Service provides logistical support            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: Staff Sgt. Robert Waters

VIRIN: 191022-A-MP275-467

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT
#### Melvin Smith, Respondent, *v.*Melvin Russell et al., as Trustees of School District No. *17,*Town of Queensbury, Appellants.

*Smith*v. *Russell,*144 App. Div. 847, affirmed.

(Argued December 3, 1012;

decided December 17, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 9, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action on contract.

*Erskine C. Rogers and T. W McArthur*for appellants.

*Howard J. Bush*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1203

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide housing loan benefits

for the purchase of residential cooperative apartment units.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 19, 2001

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide housing

loan benefits for the purchase of residential cooperative

apartment units.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Housing

5 Fairness Act of 2001’’.

6 SEC. 2. RESIDENTIAL COOPERATIVE HOUSING UNITS.

7 (a) HOUSING BENEFITS FOR COOPERATIVE APART8 MENT UNITS.—Section 3710(a) of title 38, United States

9 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new

10 paragraph:
2

•S 1203 IS

1 ‘‘(12) To purchase stock or membership in a

2 development, project, or structure of a cooperative

3 housing corporation in accordance with subsection

4 (h).’’.

5 (b) CONDITIONS OF HOUSING BENEFITS FOR COOP6 ERATIVE APARTMENT UNITS.—Section 3710 of such title

7 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub8 section:

9 ‘‘(h)(1) A loan may not be guaranteed under sub10 section (a)(12) unless the following conditions are met:

11 ‘‘(A) The development, project, or structure of

12 the cooperative housing corporation complies with

13 such criteria as the Secretary prescribes in regula14 tions.

15 ‘‘(B) The dwelling unit that the purchase of

16 stock or membership in the development, project, or

17 structure of the cooperative housing corporation en18 titles the purchaser to occupy is a one-family resi19 dential unit.

20 ‘‘(2) For the purposes of this subsection, the term

21 ‘cooperative housing corporation’ has the same meaning

22 given such term by section 216(b)(1) of the Internal Rev23 enue Code of 1986.

24 ‘‘(3) For the purposes of applying the term ‘value of

25 the property’ to a loan guaranteed under subsection
3

•S 1203 IS

1 (a)(12), such term means the appraised value of the stock

2 or membership entitling the purchaser to the permanent

3 occupancy of the dwelling unit in the development, project,

4 or structure of the cooperative housing corporation.’’.

Æ
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 139 (Wednesday, July 20, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 43149]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: C1-2011-14479]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0131, FRL-9317-9]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
State of California; Regional Haze State Implementation Plan and 
Interstate Transport Plan; Interference With Visibility Requirement

Correction

    In rule document 2011-14479, appearing on pages 34608-34611, in the 
issue of June 14, 2011, make the following correction:
    On page 34608, in the second column, in the Environmental 
Protection Agency document, the subject is corrected to appear as 
above.

[FR Doc. C1-2011-14479 Filed 7-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.78 MB)
 
 Grand Slam Wing AEW 379TH AEW 379TH al udeid al Udeid Air Base Sothwest Asia AF.MIL Public Affairs Department of Defense Operation Inherent Resolve Centcom 379th Air Expeditionary Wing Qatar AIR FORCE
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Order entered April 20, 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-21-00231-CV

IN RE BURNCO TE XAS, LLC, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-05488

ORDER Before Justices Osborne, Ped ersen, III, and Goldstein

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for

writ of mandamus, and we DENY relator’s emergency motion for temporary relief

as moot.

/s/ LESLIE OSBORNE JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT25.1**

 

**POWEROF ATTORNEY**

 

 

 

We,the undersigned directors and officers of PACCAR Financial Corp., a Washingtoncorporation, hereby severally constitute and appoint T. M. Henebry our true andlawful attorney-in-fact, with full power to him to sign for us, and in ournames in the capacities indicated below, a Form 10-K of this corporation forfiscal year 2001 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission underthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, together with any and allamendments to said Form 10-K, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures asthey may be signed by our said attorney-in-fact to said Form 10-K and any andall amendments thereto.

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF each of the undersigned has executed this power of attorney asof the 15th of March 2002.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
| /s/ Timothy M. Henebry  |   | President    |   | /s/ Mark C. Pigott       |   | Chairman of the Board |
|-------------------------|--------|--------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|-----------------------|
| Timothy M. Henebry      |   | and Director |   | Mark C. Pigott           |   | and Director          |
|                    |   |         |   |                     |   |                  |
| /s/ Patricia A. Donohoe |   | Treasurer    |   | /s/ Michael A. Tembreull |   | Vice Chairman         |
| Patricia A. Donohoe     |   |         |   | Michael A. Tembreull     |   | and Director          |
|                    |   |         |   |                     |   |                  |
| /s/  Barry E. Prather   |   | Controller   |   | /s/  Kenneth R. Gangl    |   | Director              |
| Barry  E. Prather       |   |         |   | Kenneth  R. Gangl        |   |                  |
|                    |   |         |   |                     |   |                  |
|                    |   |         |   | /s/  David J. Hovind     |   | Director              |
|                    |   |         |   | David  J. Hovind         |   |                  |

 

 

----
No. 435, Misc.

#### Ross *v.*Willingham, Warden.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Harold H. Greene*and *Gerald P. Choppin*for respondent.

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.
|  | Water Science            Recent Additions                    | Contact                    Us |                    Print                    Version                    Search:                    EPA                    Home > Water > Water                    Science > Publications                    > Newsletters                    > Water                    Quality Criteria and Standards Newsletter |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Water Quality Criteria  and Standards Newsletter Water Quality              Criteria and Standards Newsletter
 (Spring-Summer 2001)              
Water Quality              Criteria and Standards Newsletter
 (Spring-Summer 1999) 

Water Quality              Criteria and Standards Newsletter
 (Winter-Spring 1998)

Water Quality              Criteria and Standards Newsletter
 (Spring-Summer 1997)

Water Quality Criteria              and Standards Newsletter
 (November-December 1996)

Water Quality Criteria              and Standards Newsletter
 (April-June 1996)
Water Quality Criteria              and Standards Newsletter
 (January-February 1996) |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
From: Barbara McAtee

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: I object!

Date: Monday, August 08, 2011 5:54:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern: 

I strenuously object to your tyrannical dictate to insurance carriers as of August 1, 2011

to provide coverage for all prescription contraceptives approved by the FDA. It’s about

time you heard from those of us employed by religious institutions who have always

objected to mandates such as this that do not respect the conscience of individuals.

Through this mandate you show a lack of respect for all of us who object to your

mandate that “all insurance plans provide this coverage for all prescription contraceptives

approved by the FDA [which are not all safe], as well as abortifacients such as the

“morning after pill” and “Ella” (a drug similar to RU-486 which induces an abortion weeks

into a pregnancy, [thereby murdering a living baby]).

Your department’s mis-title “Health and Human Services” actually does a profound

disservice to the most vulnerable among us, those who cannot speak for themselves, and

who, if they could speak, would beg “Let us live!” Legal does not mean moral.

Your disrespect for the individual conscience smacks of a totalitarian atheist state that has

now gone down in smoke. Not only religious employers and employees should be

accorded the respect of the individual conscience, but all persons should be allowed to

follow their consciences, religiously formed or not.

Please rethink your moral stance.

Sincerely,

Barbara J. McAtee

418 Lake Avenue

Metairie, LA 70005

504-287-5847

For those without faith, no amount of evidence is sufficient; for those with faith, no

amount of evidence is necessary...

This message has been scanned by the Archdiocese of New Orleans Virus/Spam

filter.