Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

          - [A-570-051, C-570-052]

# AGENCY:

Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

# SUMMARY:

                        On August 22, 2023, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in                         *Far East American, Inc., et al.,*                         v.                         *United States,*                         Consol. Court no. 22-00049 (                        *Far Eastern*), sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce)'s first remand results of redetermination pertaining to the final scope ruling for the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain hardwood plywood products (hardwood plywood) from the People's Republic of China (China). In the underlying ruling, Commerce determined that hardwood plywood exported into the United States by Vietnam Finewood Company Limited (Finewood) that was produced using two-ply panels imported into Vietnam from China was included in the scope of the orders. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgment is not in harmony with Commerce's final scope ruling on Finewood's two-ply panels from China and is amending its final scope ruling.                    

# DATES:

Applicable September 1, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kabir Archuletta, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2953.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background

                    In response to a U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) covered merchandise referral,[1]                                          on January 21, 2022, Commerce issued its Final Scope Ruling addressing Finewood's two-ply panels imported from China and whether they are covered by the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on hardwood plywood from China.[2]                                          Commerce found that the plain language of the scope of the                     *Orders*                     was ambiguous with respect to the definition of “certain veneered panels,” and, thus, Commerce turned to the sources in 19 CFR 351.225(k)(1) and found those sources indicated that hardwood plywood exported to the United States by Finewood that was produced using two-ply panels imported into Vietnam from China were covered by the scope of the                     *Orders.*[3] 

                    Finewood, Far East American, Inc., Liberty Woods International, Inc., and Consolidated Plaintiff InterGlobal Forest, LLC, appealed Commerce's Final Scope Ruling. On April 20, 2023, the CIT remanded the Final Scope Ruling to Commerce, holding that the scope language, when read together with the 19 CFR 351.225(k)(1) sources, unambiguously establishes that the                     *Orders*                     do not include Chinese two-ply                           ( print page 60644)                        panels.[4]                                          Therefore, the CIT remanded Commerce's determination to Commerce with the instruction that Commerce issue a scope ruling concerning Finewood's two-ply panels that is consistent with the unambiguous meaning of the                     *Orders.*[5] 

                    In its final remand redetermination, issued in June 2023, Commerce adopted the CIT's interpretation of the scope of the                     *Orders*                     and determined that hardwood plywood exported to the United States by Finewood that was produced using two-ply panels imported into Vietnam from China is not subject to the scope of the                     *Orders.*[6]                                          The CIT sustained Commerce's final redetermination.[7] 

## Timken Notice

                    In its decision in                     *Timken,*[8]                                          as clarified by                     *Diamond Sawblades,*[9]                                          the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant to sections 516A(c) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce must publish a notice of court decision that is not “in harmony” with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a “conclusive” court decision. The CIT's August 22, 2023, judgment constitutes a final decision of the CIT that is not in harmony with Commerce's Final Scope Ruling. Thus, this notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of                     *Timken.*

## Amended Final Scope Ruling

                    Because there is now a final court judgment, Commerce is amending its Final Scope Ruling to find that hardwood plywood exported to the United States by Finewood that was produced using two-ply panels imported into Vietnam from China is not subject to the scope of the                     *Orders.*

## Liquidation of Suspended Entries

Commerce will instruct CBP that, pending any appeals, the cash deposit rate will be zero percent for merchandise subject to the scope ruling. In the event that the CIT's final judgment is not appealed or is upheld on appeal, Commerce will notify CBP of our amended scope ruling in response to its covered merchandise referral and will instruct CBP to liquidate any unliquidated entries of hardwood plywood exported to the United States by Finewood that was produced using two-ply panels imported into Vietnam from China without regard to antidumping and countervailing duties and to lift suspension of liquidation of such entries.

## Notification to Interested Parties

This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

Dated: August 29, 2023.

Lisa W. Wang,

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

# Footnotes

1.                                                     *See Certain Hardwood Plywood from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Covered Merchandise Referral*                         and Initiation of Scope Inquiry, 85 FR 3024 (January 17, 2020).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                                                     *See*                         Memorandum, “Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders on Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from the People's Republic of China, Enforcement and Protect Act (EAPA) Investigation No. 7252: Final Scope Ruling,” dated January 21, 2022 (Final Scope Ruling);                         *see also Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from the People's Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, and Antidumping Duty Order,*83 FR 504 (January 4, 2018); and                         *Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from the People's Republic of China: Countervailing Duty Order,*83 FR 513 (January 4, 2018) (collectively, the                         *Orders*).                    
        Back to Citation      

3.                                                     *See*                         Final Scope Ruling at 10-20.                    
        Back to Citation      

4.                                                     *See Vietnam Finewood Co.*                         v.                         *United States,*                         633 F. Supp. 3d 1243, 1255 (CIT 2023).                    
        Back to Citation      

5.                                                     *Id.,*                         633 F. Supp. 3d at 1265.                    
        Back to Citation      

6.                                                     *See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Vietnam Finewood Company Limited, et al.,*                         v.                         *United States,*                         Consol. Court No. 22-00049, Slip-Op. 23-58, dated June 16, 2023 (                        *Final Results*) at 5.                    
        Back to Citation      

7.                                                     *See Far East American, Inc. et al.*                         v.                         *United States,*                         Consol. Court No. 22-00049, Slip Op. 23-122 (CIT August 22, 2023).                    
        Back to Citation      

8.                                                     *See Timken Co.*                         v.                         *United States,*                         893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (                        *Timken*).                    
        Back to Citation      

9.                                                     *See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition*                         v.                         *United States*, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (                        *Diamond Sawblades*).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2023-19043 Filed 9-1-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P