alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11



STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
                                                                               Year Ended December 31,
                                                                        -------------------------------------
                                                                           2002          2001         2000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                     <C>           <C>           <C>
Shares of common stock, beginning .................................     1,498,558     1,495,483     1,495,941
                                                                      =======================================

Shares of common stock, ending ....................................     1,501,054     1,498,558     1,495,483
                                                                      =======================================

Computation of weighted average number of basic and diluted shares:
  Common shares outstanding at the beginning of the year ..........     1,498,558     1,495,558     1,495,941
  Weighted average number of net shares issued (redemption) .......           711         1,506           (35)
                                                                      ---------------------------------------
        Weighted average shares outstanding (basic) ...............     1,499,269     1,497,064     1,495,906
  Weighted average of potential dilutive shares
    attributable to stock options granted, computed under
    the treasury stock method .....................................        12,106        12,432        12,875
                                                                      ---------------------------------------
        Weighted average number of shares (diluted) ...............     1,511,375     1,509,496     1,508,781
                                                                      =======================================

Net income (In Thousands) .........................................   $    11,464   $    10,144   $     9,366
                                                                      =======================================

Earnings per share:
  Basic ...........................................................   $      7.65   $      6.78   $      6.26
                                                                      =======================================
  Diluted .........................................................   $      7.58   $      6.72   $      6.21
                                                                      =======================================

Dividends per common share ........................................   $      1.75   $      1.60   $      1.45
                                                                      =======================================
</TABLE>


                                       1
No. 99-40276 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40276 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RIGOBERTO VILLEGAS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-98-CR-330-3

-------------------- March 1, 2000 Before SMITH, BARKSDALE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Rigoberto Villegas appeals from his convictions of conspiring to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and possessing with intent to distribute marijuana. Villegas contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. The jury could have found beyond a reasonable doubt from the evidence at trial that there was an agreement to take marijuana from Texas to Florida; that Villegas knew about the agreement; and that Villegas voluntarily participated in the agreement. TheNo. 99-40276 -2- evidence therefore was sufficient to support Villegas’s conspiracy conviction. United States v. Ayala , 887 F.2d 62, 67 (5th Cir. 1989). The jury also could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that Villegas knowingly had constructive possession of the marijuana and that he intended to distribute it. United States v. Cardenas , 9 F.3d 1139, 1158 (5th Cir. 1993). AFFIRMED.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# miniteb**~tate9'** 

# (!Court of §ppeaI9' for tbejf 

# eberaI (!Circuit

STEVEN CHU, SECRETARY OF ENERGY, Appellant,


### v. THE BOEING COMPANY, (SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST OF ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION), Appellee.**--------.--------------------------------------------- -----~-------**  

### THE BOEING COMPANY, (Successor-in-Interest ofRockwell International Corporation), 

### Appellant,


### v. STEVEN CHU, SECRETARY OF ENERGY, Appellee.
2011·1304, -1317 Appeals from the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in nos. 337, 338, 339, and 978, Administrative Judge R. Anthony McCann.ENERGY v. BOEING CO 2 ON MOTION

ORDER The Boeing Company moves for a 60-day extension of time, until March 9, 2012, to file its reply brief. Upon consideration thereof, 

### IT Is ORDERED 

### THAT: The motion is granted.



## JAN 092012 Date

cc: Domenique Kirchner, Esq Richard J. Ney, Esq. s21 FOR THE COURT
/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbal1 Clerk FILED 

## u.s. COURTOF APPEAlS FOR THE FEDERALCIRCUIT



### JAN 092012

JANHORBAlY CLERK
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           6,382
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   600
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     27,108
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          29,362
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            29,986
<LOANS>                                        122,683
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,775
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 191,200
<DEPOSITS>                                     166,604
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,632
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,511
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,848
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,604
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 191,200
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,497
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,766
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    89
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,352
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,266
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,576
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,776
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      465
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  11
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,013
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,013
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,244
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.32
<LOANS-NON>                                        105
<LOANS-PAST>                                        91
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,438
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      152
<RECOVERIES>                                        24
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,775
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,775
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            584
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1





Multiband Corporation.





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


As Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with this Annual Report Form 10-K, Multiband Corporation (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, James L. Mandel, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:





1.      This Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




2.      The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  April 6, 2011

/s/ James L. MandelJames L. MandelChief Executive Officer
-1- 



    	 



    



 


 


 







    	-2- 



    	 



    



 


 


 







    	-3- 



    	 



    



 


 


 







    	-4- 



    	 



    



 


 


 


 







    	-5-
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 81 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 81

 To provide for the consideration by the United States Court of Claims 
          of a bill for compensation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 6, 2001

Mr. Rohrabacher submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 To provide for the consideration by the United States Court of Claims 
          of a bill for compensation, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That the bill for the compensation of persons suffering 
injury or property loss as a result of the destruction of a 
pharmaceutical plant in the Sudan by the United States on August 20, 
1998, now pending in the House of Representatives is hereby referred to 
the United States Claims Court; that the Chief Judge of the United 
States Claims Court shall proceed with the same in accordance with the 
provision of sections 1492 and 2509 of title 28, United States Code; 
and that the court shall file its reports within 18 months from the 
dates of filing of the claims on behalf of such persons in the court 
giving such findings of fact and conclusions of law therein.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1270 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1270

                      One Hundred Seventh Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
          the twenty-third day of January, two thousand and two

                                 An Act

 
   To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed at 8th 
  Avenue and Mill Street in Eugene, Oregon, as the ``Wayne Lyman Morse 
                       United States Courthouse''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF WAYNE LYMAN MORSE UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE.
    The United States courthouse to be constructed at 8th Avenue and 
Mill Street in Eugene, Oregon, shall be known and designated as the 
``Wayne Lyman Morse United States Courthouse''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Wayne Lyman Morse 
United States Courthouse.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
From: Vic Burton

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: No Religious Employer Exemptions

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:14:53 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine pertaining to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Memorandum 

Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meetings 

From: John Bradfield 

To: Dockets EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-6002, EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0603, and EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0495 

This memorandum summarizes meetings held with stakeholders in the month of April, 2015 

On April 3~ Sector Policy and Programs Division Director Peter Tsirigotis and Associate Directors Kevin 

Culligan and Steve Fruh met with Tom Roberts, Britt Fleming and Stephen Fotis of Hawaiin Electric. EPA 

generally answered basic questions about the clean power plan proposal for existing sources. 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 4412

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. CHICOBE ANTRELL WILLIAMS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Greenville

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 4:17

- cr - 00022

- D

- 1 )

Submitted : April 30, 2019 Decided: May 16, 2019

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. R. Clarke Speaks, Wilmington, North Carolina, for Appellant. Robert J. Higdon, Jr., United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Banumathi Rangarajan, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Chicobe Antrell Williams was sentenced to 151 months’ imprisonment after pleading guilty to distribution of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C) (2012). At sentencing, the district court determined that Williams’ two prior North Carolina convictions for conspiracy to sell cocaine were the predicate controlled substance offenses necessary to support a career offender enhancement under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.1(a) (2016). On appeal, Williams argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to argue that the categorical approach applied to his North Carolina drug conspiracy convictions pursuant to this Court’s decision in United States v. McC o ll u m , 885 F.3d 300 (4th Cir. 2018). Williams argues that under the categorical approach, his drug conspiracy convictions were not predicate controlled
substance offense s because they did not require an overt act. Claims of ineffective assistance generally are not cognizable on direct appeal. United States v. Maynes , 880 F.3d 110, 113 n.1 (4th Cir. 2018). “Unless an attorney’s ineffectiveness conclusively appears on the face of the record,

. . . [ such ] claim [ s ] should be raised, if at all, in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. ” United States v. Faulls , 821 F.3d 502, 508 (4th Cir. 2016) ; Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1987) (providing standard)

. Collateral review proceedings

— rather than direct appeal

— allow the parties to develop the record for ineffective assistance claims, focusing on facts related to t he Strickland test, giving counsel an opportunity to explain the reasons for his action or inaction, and allowing the district court to consider the claims in the first instance. Massaro v. United States , 538 U.S. 500, 504

- 06 (2003).3 I t does not conclusiv ely appear on the face of the record that Williams can satisfy the Strickland test . Accordingly, we decline to address the ineffective assistance claim on direct appeal and dismiss Williams’ appeal of his sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
of Chief Financial Officer





I, Nathan
Schlenker, Chief Financial Officer of Atlantic Express Transportation Corp. (the
“Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:





(i) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company  for the quarter ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Nathan SchlenkerNathan SchlenkerChief Financial Officer





Date:
February 23, 2009





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM "THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS" AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,679
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 6,575
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     37,013
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           2,427
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             2,452
<LOANS>                                         84,752
<ALLOWANCE>                                        215
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 136,954
<DEPOSITS>                                      93,833
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,488
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,546
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,457
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 136,954
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,538
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  726
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,264
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 861
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 993
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,271
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    978
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    534
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         534
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       320
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.95
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                        92
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   167
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       12
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  215
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            215
                                              


</TABLE>
From: Kristina Riemer

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 7:04:05 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Kristina Riemer

991 Butterfield Road

San Anselmo, CA 94960