alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Winmax Trading Group,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the period ended March 31,  2004,  as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned  hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C  Section  1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      o     the Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
            of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      o     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


      January 21, 2005

      By: /s/ Gerald E. Sklar
      -----------------------
      Gerald E. Sklar, President, Chief Executive Officer,
      Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
From: Lauren Guicheteau

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 8:03:51 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy is so so so important!

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Lauren Guicheteau

5326 E. Softwood Ct

Boise, ID 83716
From: John Pilaczynski

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Health Care

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 4:58:14 PM

To Whom it may concern:

Health care does not include contraception since pregnancy is not a

disease. This ordinance by a mere department of government is stepping

out of the bounds of reason, and I believe beyond what the true

authority of government intended.

Health care does not include forcing people to act against their

conscience. This ordinance tries to slither around the reality of

taking away the right to practice one's religion and follow one's

conscience freely. Your proposed regulations shoot us in the foot, and

eventually will do the same to you, politically and eternally.

If this note sounds as though I am angry with you people, you will

have understood its import. Stop using our money for immoral purposes

such as murder itself...IUD's, "morning-after" birth control which is

an abortifacient, and preventing what the Creator intended by His gift

of sexuality.

John Pilaczynski, Ph.D.
STATE OF TENNESSEE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION 

April 4, 2008 

J. I. Palmer, Jr. 

Regional Administrator 

US EPA, Region N 

Atlanta Federal Center, 1 2'h Floor 

Division of Air Pollution Control 

9' Floor, L&C Annex 

40 1 Church Street 

Nashville, TN 37243 

61 Forsyth Street, SW 

Atlanta, GA 30303-3 104 

RE: Attainment Demonstration and State Implementation Plan for the Knoxville, Tennessee PM2.5 Nonattainment 

Area 

Dear Mr. Palmer; 

I am pleased to submit the enclosed Attainment Demonstration and State Implementation Plan for the Knoxville PM2,5 

Nonattainment Area. This submittal fulfills the requirements of the Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule (40 CFR 

51 Subpart Z) and Section 110 of the Federal Clean Air Act. The Attainment Demonstration projects that the area will 

attain the NAAQS based on the implementation of existing Federal measures. The Environmental Protection Agency is 

requested to process the enclosed material as part of the federally approved State Implementation Plan. 

We have worked closely with your staff throughout the process and greatly appreciate their timely efforts and 

consideration regarding this matter. 

If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me at (61 5) 532-0554. 

Enclosures 

CC: Beverly Banister, EPA Region N (Letter only) 

Lynarae Benjamin, EPA Region N 

James Hou, EPA Region IV . 

Dick Schutt, EPA Region N 
STATE OF TENNESSEE 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD 

IN THE MATTER OF: 1 ' 1 

PROPOSED STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ) 

ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION ) 

FOR THE KNOXVILLE ANNUAL PM2.s 

NONATTAMNT AREA ) 

ORDER NO. 08-004 

BOARD ORDER 

The Knoxville, Tennessee PM2.5 nonattainment area includes Anderson, Blount, Knox, and Loudon Counties in their 

entirety, as well as the portion of Roane County that falls within the census block that includes the Tennessee Valley 

Authority's Kingston Fossil Plant. Between 2001 and 2003, air quality monitoring at several sites within this region 

indicated that the annual average PMzs concentrations exceeded the 15.0 pg/ms National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard, and the area was designated as nonattainment, effective April 5,2605. 

The Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board finds that the Attainment Demonstration for the Knoxville, Tennessee 

Annual PM2, Nonattainment Area projects that the counties listed above will attain the annual PM2.S National 

Ambient Air Quality Standard and approves the submittal of the Attainment Demonstration to U. S. EPA for 

adoption into Tennessee's State ImpIementation Plan. 

Approved on April 4,2008, by the members of the Tennessee Air Pollution Control Board as follows:
Exhibit 31.1  Sarbanes - Oxley Section 302 Certification  I, Thomas J. May, certify that:1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NSTAR;2.Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of NSTAR as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;4.NSTAR's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for NSTAR and have:a)designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to NSTAR, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;b)designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)evaluated the effectiveness of NSTAR's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, based on such evaluation; andd)disclosed in this quarterly report any change in NSTARs internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, NSTARs internal control over financial reporting.5.NSTAR's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to NSTAR's auditors and the audit committee of NSTAR's board of trustees:a)all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect NSTAR's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in NSTAR's internal control over financial reporting.   Date:  July 28, 2006By:/s/ THOMAS J. MAYThomas J. MayChairman, President andChief Executive Officer
# U.S.-Led Multinational Partnership Launches New Task Force for Maritime Security Training in Middle East

/ Published May 22, 2023
MANAMA, Bahrain , 
The U.S.-led multinational partnership, Combined Maritime Forces (CMF), established a new task force May 22 that will train partner navies and improve operational capabilities to enhance maritime security in the Middle East.

During a ceremony at U.S. 5th Fleet headquarters in Bahrain, leaders commissioned Combined Task Force (CTF) 154. The new staff is CMF’s fifth task force after standing up CTF 153 in April 2022 for maritime security in the Red Sea.

CTF 154 will lead multinational maritime training at locations across the Middle East, enabling more CMF partner-nations to participate in training opportunities without ships or aircraft, particularly during courses that are facilitated ashore.  

“Our navies are at their very best when we train, operate and work together,” said Vice Adm. Brad Cooper, commander of U.S. Naval Forces Central Command, U.S. 5th Fleet and CMF. “Establishing CTF 154 demonstrates our deep commitment to strengthening and expanding partnerships through new training opportunities that will enhance regional maritime security.”

The new task force is commanded by a U.S. Navy captain who will build and lead a multinational staff. Another nation will assume command as early as this fall.

CTF 154’s core staff will be augmented by CMF partners during key training opportunities such as the task force’s inaugural event, Compass Rose. This week, CTF 154 is hosting Compass Rose in the Kingdom of Bahrain. More than 50 participants from Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, the United Kingdom and United States began arriving Sunday to attend courses on first aid and vessel boarding procedures.

“I am excited to lead an international team in this important work,” said Capt. Oliver Herion, CTF 154's first commander. “Collectively, CMF has tremendous experience and expertise with critical skills, tools and relationships.”

CTF 154 will frequently organize training events around five core areas: maritime awareness, maritime law, maritime interdiction, maritime rescue and assistance, and leadership development. Each training opportunity will be tailored to meet partner requests ranging from basic to advanced levels.

“Focusing our efforts to facilitate training for the multinational partnership will refine our skillsets and reinforce our ability to operate together,” said Herion. “We are ‘Stronger Together’ and ‘Ready Together.’ That is what CMF is all about.”

CMF is the largest multinational naval partnership in the world, with 38 nations committed to upholding the international rules-based order at sea. 

CMF’s other task forces include CTF 150 that focuses on maritime security in the Gulf of Oman and Indian Ocean; CTF 151, which leads regional counter-piracy efforts; CTF 152, dedicated to maritime security in the Arabian Gulf; and CTF 153 in the Red Sea.
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1132

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act relating to the

distribution chain of prescription drugs.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 28, 2001

Mr. CRAPO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

A BILL

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

relating to the distribution chain of prescription drugs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PRESCRIPTION DRUG DISTRIBUTION.

4 (a) DEFINITION OF AUTHORIZED DISTRIBUTOR.—

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 503(e)(4) of the

6 Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.

7 353(e)(4)) is amended by striking ‘‘(4) For the pur8 poses’’ and all that follows through ‘‘means distribu9 tion’’ in subparagraph (B) and inserting the fol10 lowing:
2

•S 1132 IS

1 ‘‘(4) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection and

2 subsection (d):

3 ‘‘(A) AUTHORIZED DISTRIBUTOR.—

4 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘author5 ized distributor’ means a distributor to

6 which a manufacturer sells a prescription

7 drug.

8 ‘‘(ii) EFFECTIVE TIME PERIOD.—A

9 distributor that purchases a prescription

10 drug from a manufacturer shall be treated

11 as an authorized distributor with respect to

12 that prescription drug for a period of 12

13 months following the date of the purchase.

14 ‘‘(B) WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTION.—The

15 term ‘wholesale distribution’ means distribu16 tion.’’.

17 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 503

18 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21

19 U.S.C. 353(e)(4)(A)) is amended in subsections (d)

20 and (e)—

21 (A) by striking ‘‘authorized distributor of

22 record’’ each place it appears and inserting

23 ‘‘authorized distributor’’; and
3

•S 1132 IS

1 (B) by striking ‘‘authorized distributors of

2 record’’ each place it appears and inserting

3 ‘‘authorized distributors’’.

4 (b) REQUIRED STATEMENT.—Section 503(e)(1)(A)

5 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.

6 353(e)(1)(A)) is amended by inserting ‘‘a statement that

7 the drug was first purchased from or through an author8 ized distributor or’’ after ‘‘who receives the drug’’.

Æ
EX-4.63



 Exhibit 4.63 

English Summary 
 of

 Supplemental Agreement to the Property Leasing Framework Agreement 

Between 
 China
Telecommunications Corporation 
 and 

China Telecom Corporation Limited 
 China
Telecommunications Corporation (“Party A”) and China Telecom Corporation Limited (“Party B”) entered into the Supplemental Agreement to the Property Leasing Framework Agreement on September 23, 2015. 

The key terms and conditions of the Supplemental Agreement are as follows: 

1. The Parties agree to amend the first paragraph in Sub-article 1 of Article 3 of the Property Leasing Framework Agreement as follows: “The Parties
agree that the rental charges under the Property Leasing Framework Agreement shall be determined according to comparable market rates. Market rates shall mean the rental charges at which the same or similar type of properties or adjacent properties
are leased by Independent Third Parties in the ordinary course of business and under normal commercial terms. When determining the relevant market rates, to the extent practicable, management of the Company shall take into account the rental charges
of at least two similar and comparable transactions entered into with or carried out by Independent Third Parties in the ordinary course of business in the corresponding period for reference.” 

2. The execution, validity, performance, interpretation of this Supplemental Agreement and any relevant dispute resolutions shall be governed by the PRC laws.

 3. This Supplemental Agreement shall become effective on January 1, 2016. If there is any conflict between this Supplemental Agreement and the
Property Leasing Framework Agreement, this Supplemental Agreement shall prevail.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health 

      ( print page 61608)    
                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel, August 28, 2023, 12:00 p.m. to August 28, 2023, 05:00 p.m., National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 21, 2023, 56844.                

The meeting notice is amended to change the start date of the meeting from 08/28/2023, 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. to 10/30/2023, 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. The meeting is closed to the public. 

Dated: August 31, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-19259 Filed 9-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
----

Action brought on 28 January 2004 by João Andrade Sena against European Air Safety Agency

(Case T-30/04)

(2004/C 94/128)

Language of the Case: French

An action against the European Air Safety Agency was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 28 January 2004 by João Andrade Sena, residing at Rhode St Genèse (Belgium), represented by G. Vandersanden, L. Levi and A. Finchelstein, lawyers.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant contests the European Air Safety Agency's (EASA) decision to reject his candidature for the post of Executive Director and to appoint another person to that post.

He points out the fact that the information which he and his lawyers have obtained following their request is fragmentary and has not allowed the applicant a clear and transparent view of the procedure followed.

In support of his claims, he asserts;

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 12.2


                                     NSTAR
               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                   and Preferred Stock Dividend Requirements
                       Twelve Months Ended June 30, 2000
                                 (in thousands)



Net income from continuing operations                          $160,676
Income taxes                                                     70,949
Fixed charges (including securitization certificates)           197,359
                                                               --------
   Total                                                       $428,984
                                                               ========
Interest expense                                               $180,359
Interest component of rentals                                    17,000
                                                               --------
   Subtotal                                                     197,359
                                                               --------
Preferred stock dividend requirements                             8,592
                                                               --------
   Total                                                       $205,951
                                                               ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred                   2.08
stock dividends requirements                                   ========
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Bara Kane, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.), rendered November 24, 2014, after a nonjury trial, convicting him of unlicensed general vending, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Robert M. Mandelbaum, J.), rendered November 24, 2014, reversed, on the law and the facts, and the accusatory instrument is dismissed.</p><p>The verdict convicting defendant of unlicensed general vending was not based on legally sufficient evidence and was, in any event, against the weight of the evidence. There was no evidence indicating that defendant displayed or offered for sale any item, spoke to any passerbys, or personally exchanged any item for currency (<a href="../2016/2016_50538.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Lawson</i>, 51 Misc 3d 134</a>[A], 2016 NY Slip Op 50538[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2016]). The single, circuitous transaction observed - whereby defendant handed a gold watch to a (second) man, who walked east and exchanged the watch for money with another (third) man, and then the second man returned and gave the money to defendant - was, at best, ambiguous as to whether defendant was engaging in the conduct required for acting as a general vendor (<a href="../2012/2012_02804.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Abdurraheem</i>, 94 AD3d 569</a> [2012], <i>lv denied </i>19 NY3d 970 [2012]).</p><p>We have considered and rejected defendant's jurisdictional point.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: November 27, 2017<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
From: John Kummer

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Oppose the proposed definition of "religious employer

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 9:30:44 PM

The current definition of religious employer does not provide true conscience

protection for those committed to preserving life. Healthcare plans should not be

forced to violate the moral and religious convictions of providers or employees in

order to participate in the health care system. Requiring such an unacceptable

demand threatens both universal access to health care and religious freedom of

conscience.

Respectfully,

John Kummer

Happy moments, PRAISE GOD. Difficult moments, SEEK GOD. Quiet moments,

WORSHIP GOD. Painful moments, TRUST GOD. Every moment, THANK GOD.