alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1
(CO AUG 2 6 2019

a

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION PLETEUA

PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
BRANCH,

[As of: August 26, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted

Posted: August 26, 2010
SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0408
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information
Name: Lee Curtis
Address:
Trussville, AL,
General Comment
See attached file(s)

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0408.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

http://fdms.erulemaking net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/26/2010


August 10, 2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O, Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Lee Curtis
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-2501

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Lavell Williams

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport

____________

Submitted: January 24, 2019

Filed: February 6, 2019

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

In 2008, Lavell Williams pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute at least 50

grams of cocaine base, and she wassentenced to 262 months in prison consistent with

the parties’ stipulation in the plea agreement. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C)

(allowing the government and a defendant to stipulate a sentence orsentencing range

in a plea agreement). After the Supreme Court’s decision in Hughes v. United States,
138 S. Ct. 1765 (2018), Williams sought relief under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)—not for

the first time—seeking a sentence reduction based on Amendments 750 and 782 to

the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, which retroactively lowered certain base offense

levelsthat were determined by drug quantity. In Hughes, the Supreme Court held that

a sentence imposed under a Rule 11(c)(1)(C) plea agreement “is ‘based on’ the

defendant’s Guidelines range so long as that range was part of the framework the

district court relied on in imposing the sentence or accepting the agreement.” 

Hughes, 138 S. Ct. at 1775. The District Court determined that the Hughes decision 1

did not help Williams because her sentence was driven entirely by her criminal

history, her exposure to a mandatory life sentence, and her status as a career offender. 

The District Court denied relief, and Williams appeals. 

We agree that Williams was not entitled to a sentence reduction. See Koons

v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 1783, 1788 (2018) (holding “that petitioners do not

qualify for sentence reductions under § 3582(c)(2) because their sentences were not

‘based on’ their lowered Guidelines ranges” but were “‘based on’ their mandatory

minimums and on their substantial assistance to the Government”); United States v.

Harris, 688 F.3d 950, 955 (8th Cir. 2012) (holding that a prisoner is ineligible for a

sentencing reduction when the career-offender provision of the Guidelines, not the

drug-quantity table, determined the base-offense level). 

We affirm the judgment, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________

The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

1

the Southern District of Iowa.

-2-
K-9 teams help IED fight in Afghanistan
 By Staff Sgt. Nicolas Morales , 4th Infantry Brigade Combat Team
  Pfc. John Casey, a military dog handler assigned to the 4th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, 1st Infantry Division, and native of Orting, Wash., gets ready to run his partner Roxy through a training lane on Forward Operating Base Sharana, Afghanistan, Aug. 10, 2012. (Photo by Staff Sgt. Nicolas Morales)
 PAKTIKA PROVINCE, Afghanistan (August 13, 2012) — Soldiers on today’s modern battlefield have tools that everyone knows of. People often think of rifles, hand grenades and up-armored vehicles – but what about dogs? Soldiers deployed to Afghanistan with the 4th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, 1st Infantry Division, known as the “Dragons,” are changing the game when it comes to finding roadside bombs in their area of operations.Pfc. John Casey, an infantryman and native of Orting, Wash., is a member of a Tactical Explosive Detector Dog team, or TEDD, supporting operations in Paktika and Ghazni provinces.Missions throughout the provinces are two-fold: routine counter insurgency operations and enabling the Afghan National Security Forces to protect and defend their country’s civilian population against threats by insurgent extremist groups.The training to be a TEDD handler is rigorous, and it doesn’t stop state-side. As enemy tactics change, the TEDDs program adjusts accordingly to continue providing an invaluable service not only to U.S. troops here, but also to the people of Afghanistan.Casey carries himself as a true professional; even during training, he’s got his game face on. Soldiers fighting in today’s Army have more responsibilities than ever before, in particular this 27-year-old private who is responsible for the safety of the men and women he goes on patrols with.On missions, Casey said he focuses on his individual mission of monitoring his K-9, Roxy, as she picks up on scents. At the same time, he remains tactically aware of what is going on. “If someone walks alongside of me, I’ll stop them and wait until the area is cleared,” said Casey. “I just keep pushing forward because my attention is on my dog.”Casey makes the comparison of growing up with hunting dogs to working with his battle-ready K-9 here in Afghanistan.“They both have a desire to work; that’s their sole purpose. Yeah, they’ll go out and play with you, but you can tell it’s a completely different dog. When you’re going out bird hunting or to find a bomb, they just know it’s time to go to work and ‘dad’ doesn’t want me to play right now,” he said.Casey is enthusiastic about his job, and you get a genuine sense that Casey is a guy the “Dragon” troops want on their patrols.“There’s nothing like it,” he said. “You can blow something up, shoot any gun, but at the end of the day you can’t play with a dog out here unless you’re a handler.”
From: Victoria Farnham

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Sunday, August 07, 2011 6:50:00 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Victoria Farnham
Chula Vista, California
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.88 MB)
 
 Memorial Afghanistan
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
```

EX- 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Form 10-QSB/A Amended Quarterly Report of Winmax Trading
Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        o   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        o   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

November 18, 2002,
By: /s/ Gerald E. Sklar
Gerald E. Sklar, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer
and Principal Accounting Officer
```
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 168 (Thursday, August 31, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 60248]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18789]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: August 31, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
August 21, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 5 to Competitive Product List. Documents are 
available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2023-235, CP2023-238.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-18789 Filed 8-30-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.54 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (7.4 MB)
 
 weather Al Dhafra Air Base weather operations 380 OSS
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# USAF conducts ACE capstone event

/ Published March 10, 2021
PRINCE SULTAN AIR BASE, KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA,
From: steven gruber [mailto:fnsg@msn.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 3:32 PM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

Sir: 

I cannot express enough my fear and revulsion at the notion of the federal gov't 

insinuating itself into my 401k/Ira retirement plans, and 

offering/suggesting/advising/defaulting to some annuity option/requirement. I am 

appalled and insulted that you would consider yourself in a better position than I to 

know what is best for me in regard to my own money. 

I assure you, if ever such a change should come about, I will immediately begin 

withdrawing all my retirement funds and depositing them outside of your reach. 

Furthermore, I have already decided to skip both my and my wife's 2009 Roth Ira 

contribution, and I have already ceased contributing to a retirement plan for 2010. 

Unless and until I hear that you are dropping this disastrous plan, I have made my 

last retirement contribution. 

The American people will not stand for this unconstitutional intrusion on private 

property rights, and citizens' groups are already discussing the legal challenges that 

can be made. I implore you to immediately drop this misguided effort. 

Yours truly, 

Steven Gruber 

Syosset, NY
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2042

DAVID E. TAYLOR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FRESH FIELDS MARKETS, INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. James H. Michael, Jr.,

Senior District Judge. (CA-94-55-C)

Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 7, 1997

Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David E. Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Patrick Murphy, Michael

Frank Marino, Eric Anthony Welter, REED, SMITH, SHAW & MCCLAY,

McLean, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order adopting the

magistrate judge's recommendation and dismissing his employment

discrimination action for failure to conduct discovery and failure

to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Taylor v. Fresh

Fields Markets, Inc., No. CA-94-55-C (W.D. Va. June 27, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED