alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 21.1


                           QUESTRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.
                  EXHIBIT 21 - SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                               AT MARCH 31, 1998



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Date of                       State of
                   Name of Subsidiary                   Incorporation                 Incorporation
      ----------------------------------------     -----------------------       -------------------------
      <S>                                             <C>                              <C>
      Quest Electronic Hardware, Inc.                  October 12, 1994                  Delaware

      Questnet Components, Inc.                       February 13, 1996                  Delaware

      CompWare, Inc. d/b/a Webb Distribution          November 21, 1994                  Delaware

      Power Components, Inc.                            July 17, 1997                  Pennsylvania

      Integrated Material Systems, Inc.                January 14, 1997                  Arizona

      California Fasteners, Inc.                       August 17, 1973                  California
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

McDATA Corporation

Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of McDATA Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: April 1, 2005 |  | /s/JOHN A. KELLEY, JR.John A. Kelley, Jr.
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



QuickLinks
#### Wiley, ordinary, for use, etc., *v.*Jones *et al.*

Atkinson, J.

Tlie ordinary, suing for the use of one of the heirs at law of a decedent, brought suit on the bond of the administrator against the heirs at law of the surety, alleging that the estate of the surety had been finally settled and distributed among such heirs, with a prayer for a judgment against each heir for the pro rata amount necessary to discharge the liability of the principal to the use of the plaintiff. One of the defendants was a minor for whom a guardian ad litem was appointed, who accepted the trust .and united in certain demurrers filed by the defendants. The court sustained the demurrers. A bill of exceptions was sued out, assigning error upon the judgment sustaining the demurrers. There is an acknowledgment of service upon the bill of exceptions, by attorneys describing themselves as being “attorneys for defendants in error,” following which are the names of all the defendant heirs at law, including the minor. The acknowledgment of service does not contain the name of the guardian ad litem, nor was a copy of the bill of exceptions served upon him. *Meld:*(1) The guardian ad litem was a'necessary party to the bill of exceptions. (2) The acknowledgment of service in the name of the minor does not bind the ; guardian. (3) The writ of error must be dismissed for a failure to *636serve sueli guardian ad litem. See, in this connection, *Vickers*v. *Hawkins,*128 *Ga.*794 (58 S. E. 44); *Groce*v. *Field,*13 *Ga.*24; 10 Enc. Pl. & Pr. 668-9, and note; Strayer *v.*Long, 83 Va. 715 (3 S. E. 372); Boyer *v.*Boyer, 89 111. 447; Clarke *v.*Gilmanton, 12 N. H. 515; 22 Cyc. 678; Freeman *v.*Carnock, 2 Dickens’ Rep. 439; Taylor *v.*Atwood, 2 P. Wms. 643.

Argued June 7,

Decided November 12,

Rehearing denied December 21, 1907.

Action on bond. Before Judge Felton. Bibb superior court. September 15, 1906.

*B. L. Anderson,*for plaintiff.

*T. J. Cochran*and *-John P. Boss,*for defendants.

*Writ of error dismissed.*
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.77 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1050 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1050

                 To protect infants who are born alive.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 14, 2001

     Mr. Santorum (for himself, Mr. Fitzgerald, and Mr. Voinovich) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 To protect infants who are born alive.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Born-Alive Infants Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF BORN-ALIVE INFANT.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 8. `Person', `human being', `child', and `individual' as 
              including born-alive infant
    ``(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, or of any 
ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative 
bureaus and agencies of the United States, the words `person', `human 
being', `child', and `individual', shall include every infant member of 
the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of development.
    ``(b) As used in this section, the term `born alive', with respect 
to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the complete expulsion 
or extraction from his or her mother of that member, at any stage of 
development, who after such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a 
beating heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of 
voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been 
cut, and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction occurs as a 
result of natural or induced labor, caesarean section, or induced 
abortion.
    ``(c) Nothing in this section shall be construed to affirm, deny, 
expand, or contract any legal status or legal right applicable to any 
member of the species homo sapiens at any point prior to being born 
alive as defined in this section.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
chapter 1 of title 1, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item:

``8. `Person', `human being', `child', and `individual' as including 
                            born-alive infant.''.
                                 <all>
```
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.17 MB)
 
 Moves made last year in the fight against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant have proved effec Defense Secretary Ash Carter told the Senate Armed Services Committee Thursday.
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) of Genesis Solar Corporation (the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2011, the undersigned David Brenman, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:




(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




\s\ David BrenmanDavid Brenman, Chief Executive Officer & Chief   Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          11,322
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,170
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     75,792
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          21,894
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            22,886
<LOANS>                                        161,188
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,033
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 285,493
<DEPOSITS>                                     229,110
<SHORT-TERM>                                    16,908
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,629
<LONG-TERM>                                     10,525
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,800
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,521
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 285,493
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 15,775
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,928
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   423
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                21,126
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,889
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,657
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,469
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      798
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   2
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,008
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,244
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,155
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,155
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.48
<LOANS-NON>                                        399
<LOANS-PAST>                                       150
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,039
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,051
<RECOVERIES>                                       247
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,033
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,033
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,001
        

</TABLE>
From: Kathy Kise

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:54:35 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Kathy Kise

146A Waimairi Road

Chirstchurch, NZ 73112
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.68 MB)
 
 USCENTCOM Tampa food CENTCOM Coalition International holiday cuisine
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Williams, Lila

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Access to Preventive Care and Contraception

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:23:19 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6673

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LLOYD B. CARR, a/k/a Lloyd Carr,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at 

Parkersburg. Joseph R. Goodwin, District Judge. (6:12-cr-00210-1)

Submitted: June 24, 2024 Decided: August 1, 2024

Before WYNN and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lloyd B. Carr, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6673 Doc: 10 Filed: 08/01/2024 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

Lloyd B. Carr appeals the district court’s order granting the Government’s motion 

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k) to adjust his restitution payment schedule. When a 

defendant is ordered to pay restitution, and a “‘material change in the defendant’s economic 

circumstances [] might affect the defendant’s ability to pay restitution,’” the district “court 

is authorized to adjust the payment schedule ‘as the interests of justice require.’” United 

States v. Grant, 715 F.3d 552, 554 (4th Cir. 2013) (quoting 18 U.S.C. § 3664(k)). We have 

reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion in the court’s determination to modify 

Carr’s restitution payment schedule based on a material change in his economic 

circumstances. See United States v. Sweatt, 85 F.4th 1240, 1241-42 (7th Cir. 2023) (stating 

standard of review). 

On appeal, Carr also contends that the district court judge should have recused 

himself. Because Carr did not move the district court for recusal, we review his claim only 

for plain error. See United States v. Chastain, 979 F.3d 586, 594 (8th Cir. 2020) (stating 

standard of review). Carr fails to establish that recusal was required. See Belue v. 

Leventhal, 640 F.3d 567, 572-74 (4th Cir. 2011) (discussing valid bases for bias or 

partiality motion); see also United States v. Lentz, 524 F.3d 501, 530 (4th Cir. 2008) (“The 

presiding judge is not required to recuse himself simply because of unsupported, irrational 

or highly tenuous speculation.” (cleaned up)). 

Accordingly, we deny Carr’s motions to appoint counsel, and we affirm the district 

court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6673 Doc: 10 Filed: 08/01/2024 Pg: 2 of 3
3

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6673 Doc: 10 Filed: 08/01/2024 Pg: 3 of 3