alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Kira Marrero

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 2:37:10 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Kira Marrero

5110 Music St

New Orleans, LA 70122
---

---

Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8, (File No.
333-61895, File No. 333-55970) and Forms S-3,( File No. 333-140968 , File No. 333-140969
and , File No. 333-140974) of our report dated February 6, 2007 relating to the financial
statements of BAY HEART Ltd which appears in this Form 10-K of Ampal  American
Israel Corporation .

Brightman Almagor & Co.
Certified Public Accountants
Member firm of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
Haifa, Israel, March 29, 2007



---

---
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.69 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### NAPIER *v.*UNITED STATES et al.

No. 452, Misc.

Decided December 3, 1962.

Appellant *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox*for the United States et al.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted *and*the *appeal is*dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Caribbean American Health
      Resorts,Inc  on Form 10-KSB for the period ending  December
      31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange  Commission  on the
      date  hereof,  I, Halton Martin, Chief  Executive
      Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





1.
      The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/*s/
                Halton Martin*
            June
                20, 2007Halton
                MartinChief
                Executive Officer andPrincipal
                Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER ANDPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofVista Medical Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John R. Lyon, President, Chief ExecutiveOfficer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that to my knowledge:

 

1. The Quarterly Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2. That information contained in theQuarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: : November 15, 2004

 
|   |   | /s/ John R. Lyon                    |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|   |   | John R. Lyon                        |
|   |   | President, Chief Executive  Officer |
|   |   | and Director                        |

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofVista Medical Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodended September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, HowardSampson, Vice President of Finance, Chief Financial Officer andSecretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

1. The Quarterly Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

2. That information contained in theQuarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: : November 15, 2004

 
|   |   | /s/ Howard Sampson                             |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Howard  Sampson                                |
|   |   | Vice President of Finance,                     |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer  and Secretary

  |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-11408 

Summary Calendar

JAY SANDON COOPER

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

CITY OF PLANO, TEXAS; THOMAS H MUEHLENBECK, City Manager;

CITY OF PLANO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION; CITY OF

PLANO CITY COUNCIL; CYNTHIA O’BANNER; ROXANNE LUNA;

MACKLIN WRIGHT; CITY OF PLANO PROPERTY STANDARDS

DEPARTMENT

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. 3:06-CV-2065

Before GARWOOD, GARZA and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jan Sandon Cooper appeals the district court’s remand order. The district

court remanded because neither 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nor 42 U.S.C. § 1443

authorizes removal of a case to federal court by a plaintiff. A plaintiff may not

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 21, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 06-11408

1 See also Wright, Miller & Cooper, 14C, Federal Practice and Procedure: Jurisdiction

3d § 3731 at 251 (“The question of which parties may exercise the statutory right of removal

has been answered by Congress. Section 1446(a) of Title 28 authorizes removal only by the

state court defendants . . .”). 

2

remove an action from state court to federal district court. 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a);

see also McKenzie v. United States, 678 F.2d 571, 574 (5th Cir. 1982) (citing §

1441(a); Chicago, Rock Island & Peoria Railroad Co. v. Stude, 346 U.S. 574, 580

(1954); and Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sheets, 313 U.S. 100, 108 (1941).1

AFFIRMED.
EX-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 

Exhibit A 
 Performance Unit
Award Notice 
  

					
	A. Participant:	  	  
	  	
			
	B. Grant Date:	  	February 16, 2016	  	
			
	C. Performance Period:	  	1/1/2016 through 12/31/2018	  	
			
	D. Aggregate Target Performance Units:	  	  
	  	
			
	E. Performance Measure(s):	  		  	

  

	 	1.	Diluted Earnings per Share: “Diluted EPS” means earnings per common share on a fully diluted basis, determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and as derived from
L-3’s audited consolidated financial statements prepared in the ordinary course of business. Diluted EPS shall be adjusted as contemplated by the terms of the Performance Unit Agreement to exclude certain items specified therein, and for 2016,
shall be calculated based on continuing operations. 

  

	 	    	Portion of Aggregate Award for this Performance Measure: 100% 


	 	    	Target Units for this Performance Measure:                             


  

	 	    	Performance Scale: 

  

					
	 Performance

Levels
	  	 Cumulative

Diluted

EPS Required
	  	 Unit

Multiplier

	 Maximum
	  	> $27.50	  	200%
		  	  $26.25	  	150%
	 Target
	  	  $25.00	  	100%
		  	  $23.75	  	  75%
	 Threshold
	  	  $22.50	  	  50%
	 Below Threshold
	  	< $22.50	  	    0%

  

	 	    	In the event that the level of actual performance exceeds the Threshold and falls between two of the stated performance levels listed above, the Unit Multiplier will be calculated on a straight-line basis between the
two stated Unit Multipliers for those performance levels. 









	 	    	Payment Method: Shares of L-3 stock. Subject to the terms of the Performance Unit Agreement, the number of shares will be determined by multiplying (1) the Target Units for this Performance Measure, by (2) the
applicable Unit Multiplier.
From: Janice Myers

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Thursday, August 04, 2011 5:42:11 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

Thank You! Finally someone who is willing to stand up and stay committed for women's health. A great

commonsense decision based on science and the real human needs of people called women. When the

right wing idealogues see the reduction in the number of abortions a few years from now, because

women will be getting the health care family planning they need,.....they will finally see what we have

been trying to tell them!

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Janice Myers

6570 Devonshire Heights Rd

Harrisburg, PA 17111
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2013 - 0556 Directorate ID : 2007 - SW - 30 - AD Helicopter Model: Erickson Air - Crane Incorporated (ty pe certificate previously

held by Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation) Model S - 64E and S - 64F He licopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 27 Helicopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to detect a crack in the main rotor (M/R) blade and prevent blade separation and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $125,000 M/R blade replacement Labor per Helicopter (0.1 work - hour x $ 8 5 /work hour per BIM color check) (0.25 work - hour x $85/work hour per BIM function check) (2 work - hours x $85/work hour for M/R blade replacement) $ 9 $21 $170 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 9 per BIM color check $21 per BIM function check $125,170 M/R blade replacement Total US Fleet Cost $ 230 per BIM color check $574 per BIM function check Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : JC L in
Navy ship disrupts two pirate attacks in one week
 By Lt. j.g. Kyra Lassiter , US Naval Forces Central Command
  GULF OF ADEN (June 1, 2010) — USS San Jacinto disrupted nine Somali pirates from attacking a Maltese-flagged motor vessel May 31, bringing the cruiser's weekly total to 22 pirates interdicted.  USS San Jacinto responded to a distress call from the M/V Avenue Beauty, which was transiting 90 miles north of Somalia when she reported that she was under attack by pirates. Upon hearing gun shots, the vessels master sounded the general alarm and directed the crew to execute counter-piracy measures which caused the pirate skiff to call off their attack and speed away.  USS San Jacinto quickly responded to the attack and followed the pirate skiff with her helicopter, Proud Warrior 433. Aboard the aircraft, Aviation Warfare Systems Operator 2nd Class Casey Halliwell tracked the pirate skiff on radar as it headed south toward the Somali coast at a high rate of speed. The skiff, with nine pirates aboard, failed to comply with Proud Warrior's order to stop. Aviation Warfare Systems Operator 2nd Class Corey Whittle fired warning shots across the bow and stern of the skiff, compelling the pirates to stop their vessel.  In the early morning of June 1, USS San Jacinto sent a boarding team with U.S. Coast Guard Law Enforcement Detachment and USS San Jacinto Sailors to the pirate skiff. The boarding team quickly took control of the vessel and searched the skiff and pirates, who had previously thrown their weapons, ammunition, and pirate paraphernalia overboard. The pirates were released in the skiff after the boarding team confiscated one engine and several gallons of fuel, ensuring they could reach shore while limiting their ability to continue piracy attempts.  Earlier in the month (May 26), USS San Jacinto rescued five Yemeni mariners from 13 Somali pirates, while conducting routine counter narcotics operations 68 miles southeast of Ras Fartak, Yemen. The pirates were turned over to Yemeni Naval Forces. U.S. forces conduct Maritime Security Operations (MSO) to help set the conditions for security in the maritime environment. From security arises stability that results in global economic prosperity. MSO complements the counter-terrorism and security efforts of regional nations and seek to disrupt violent extremists' use of the maritime environment as a venue for attack or to transport personnel, weapons or other material.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Winmax Trading Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended September 30,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      o     the Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
            of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      o     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


      June 23, 2004

      By: /s/ Gerald E. Sklar
      -----------------------
      Gerald E. Sklar, President, Chief Executive Officer,
      Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
From: Bacino, Andrea H

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Object to Mandated Insurance Coverage of Contraceptives and Abortifacients

Date: Monday, August 08, 2011 9:31:03 AM

Respect for conscience is continually tested and challenged, yet it is essential that such conscience

protection be granted for not only religious employers, but for all employers, insurers, and policy

issuers with moral, ethical, or religious objections as well. We oppose the mandated insurance

coverage of Contraceptives and Abortifacients...and we oppose the way government is not

respecting the right of conscience in religious and moral matters.

Andrea and Lucas Bacino

65 Woodlawn Ave.

Metairie, LA 70001

abacino@tulane.edu
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12167]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Degas and the Laundress: Women, Work, and Impressionism” at The Cleveland Museum of Art, Cleveland, Ohio, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-19105 Filed 9-1-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### The North Side News Company, Respondent, *v.*Michael H. Cypres, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term,

January, 1912.)

Offer and acceptance—■ Essentials and necessity of agreement — Necessity for acceptance.

The acceptance of an offer to pay a definite sum for the publication of advertisements during a definite period necessarily implies an agreement on' the part of the publisher to publish the advertisements during the prescribed period.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of Hew York, borough of the Bronx, second district, rendered in favor of the plaintiff.

Bloch & Hoffman (Alexander Bloch, of counsel), for appellant.

Henry W. Kifalfy, for respondent.

*Per Ouriam.*

The plaintiff has recovered judgment for damages for breach of contract. The appellant claims that this contract is void for want of mutuality and relies for authority upon the case of White v. Kingston Motor Car Co., 69 Misc. Rep. 627. The contract contains no express agreement on the part of the plaintiff to perform any act; but: “ Whether a covenant will be read into a contract where there is no express agreement to perform depends upon the intent of the parties gathered from the instrument and the surrounding circumstances.” Commercial Wood *&*Cement Co. v. Northampton Portland Cement Co., 115 App. Div. 388, 393; affd. on other grounds, 190 N. Y. 1. The acceptance of the offer as .evidenced by the insertion of the advertisement authorized by the defendant did not, under the circumstances existing in the White case, bind the plaintiff’s assignor to continúe the insertions. It- was merely the acceptance of the defendant’s offer to pay a certain amount per *130insertion. The acceptance of the whole offer was expressly made dependent upon confirmation by a committee of the corporation owning the newspaper. In this case the accept-. anee of the offer to pay a definite sum for the insertion of advertisements during a ‘definite period necessarily implies that the plaintiff agreed to publish these advertisements during this period. . .

Judgment must, therefore, be affirmed with costs.

Present: Giegkerich, Lehman and Pendleton, JJ.

■ Judgment affirmed, with costs.