alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:20:21 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

Thank you for the decision to require health insurers to cover the full cost of contraception with no copay, beginning August 2012.

When I lived overseas, I could receive a year of birth control for free- making it simple to continue a

regular regimen and maintain my health. In America, my health insurance would charge monthly

copays of over $30, and I could only receive one month at a time. If I happened to be traveling or

unable to get to the store during the seven day window at the end of the month, I would not be able to

continue using birth control! And the costs were $360 a year - a significant amount!

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and has many health benefits

removed from pregnancy-prevention - such as cancer prevention, monthly pain minimization that keeps

women at work, and so on.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

R. Kleinfeld
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 292

Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the

House.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

NOVEMBER 16, 2001

Mr. FROST submitted the following resolution; which was considered and

agreed to

RESOLUTION

Designating minority membership on certain standing

committees of the House.

1 Resolved, That the following named Member be, and

2 is hereby, elected to the following standing committee of

3 the House of Representatives:

4 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM: Mr. Lynch

5 of Massachusetts, to rank after Ms. Watson of California.

Æ
[No. 3108.]

#### The Moon Anchor Gold Mining Company v. Board of Commissioners of Teller County.

*Error to the District Court of Teller County.*

*Per Curiam.*

For reasons assigned in No. 3106, decided at the. present term, *ante,*p. 311, writ of error dismissed.- *Dismissed.*
Exhibit







Exhibit 10.2(m)



Amendment to 
Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement
This Amendment, effective March 9, 2016 to the Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of March 3, 2014 is made between Anthem, Inc. (the “Company”) and the Participant set forth in the accompanying Notice of Option Grant to the Agreement.  This Amendment is included in and made part of the Agreement.  
1.A new Section 3(f) is added to read as follows, existing Section 3(f) is renumbered as Section 3(g) and all cross-references are updated accordingly:
(f)    Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason - Cigna Corporation Acquisition.  Unless section 3(e) is applicable and notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement to the contrary, this Section shall apply for the period beginning on the date that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger among Anthem, Anthem Merger Sub Corp., and Cigna Corporation dated as of July 23, 2015 (the “Merger Agreement”) is approved under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 in accordance with Section 3.1(c)(iii)(A) of the Merger Agreement (the “HSR Approval Date”) and ending on the earlier of (1) the third anniversary of the “Closing Date” as defined in the Merger Agreement or (2) the date the acquisition of Cigna Corporation is terminated (the “Cigna Integration Period”).  The Option shall immediately become fully exercisable and shall remain exercisable for a period of forty-five (45) days from the date of a Participant’s Termination, but not later than the Expiration Date noted on the attached Schedule A if the Participant does not otherwise meet the requirements of Retirement as set forth in Section 3(a) above at Termination and, during the Cigna Integration Period, the Participation’s Termination is either (A) by the Company or an Affiliate without Cause or (B) by the Participant for Good Reason (as defined in the Executive Agreement Plan), provided that for clause (B), the Participant participates in the Executive Agreement Plan as of the HSR Approval Date. 
2.    Effect on Agreement.  This Amendment has no effect on the other terms of the Agreement and the Agreement shall otherwise continue in effect.  
	
				
	 
	ANTHEM, INC.

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Printed:
	 
	Jose Thomas

	 
	Its:
	 
	EVP & Chief Human Resources Officer

	 
	 
	 
	Anthem, Inc.










Amendment - Stock Option Agreement - 2014
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 169 (Friday, September 1, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 60526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18952]



[[Page 60526]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #18102 and #18103; Alaska Disaster Number AK-
00062]


Presidential Declaration of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Alaska

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Alaska (FEMA-4730-
DR), dated 08/23/2023.
    Incident: Flooding.
    Incident Period: 05/12/2023 through 06/03/2023.

DATES: Issued on 08/23/2023.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 10/23/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/23/2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 08/23/2023, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Bering Strait REAA, Copper River REAA, Kuspuk REAA, 
Lower Yukon REAA, Yukon Flats REAA.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.375
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.375
For Economic Injury:
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.375
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 18102 6 
and for economic injury is 18103 0.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Francisco S[aacute]nchez, Jr.,
Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2023-18952 Filed 8-31-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1097

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to issue rightof-way permits for natural gas pipelines within the

boundary of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
 †

2

S 1097 ES

1 SECTION 1. PERMITS FOR EXISTING NATURAL GAS PIPE2 LINES.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior may

4 issue right-of-way permits for natural gas pipelines that

5 exist as of September 1, 2001, within the boundary of

6 Great Smoky Mountains National Park.

7 (b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—A permit issued

8 under subsection (a) shall be—

9 (1) issued consistent with laws and regulations

10 generally applicable to utility rights-of-way within

11 units of the National Park System; and

12 (2) subject to any terms and conditions that the

13 Secretary deems necessary.

14 SEC. 2. PERMITS FOR PROPOSED NATURAL GAS PIPELINES.

15 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior may

16 issue rights-of-way permits for natural gas pipelines with17 in the boundary of Great Smoky Mountains National Park

18 that are proposed to be constructed across—

19 (1) the Foothills Parkway;

20 (2) the Foothills Parkway Spur between Pigeon

21 Forge and Gatlinburg; and

22 (3) the Gatlinburg Bypass.

23 (b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—A permit issued

24 under subsection (a) shall be—
†

3

S 1097 ES

1 (1) issued consistent with laws and regulations

2 generally applicable to utility rights-of-way within

3 units of the National Park System; and

4 (2) subject to any terms and conditions that the

5 Secretary deems necessary, including—

6 (A) provisions for the protection and res7 toration of park resources that are disturbed by

8 pipeline construction; and

9 (B) assurances that construction and oper10 ation of the pipeline will not adversely affect

11 Great Smoky Mountains National Park.

Passed the Senate October 17, 2001.

Attest:

Secretary.
107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1097

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to issue

right-of-way permits for natural gas pipelineswithin the boundary of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park.
IV 

House Calendar No. 239

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 607

[Report No. 107–782] 

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 

bill (H.R. 3210) to ensure the continued financial capacity of insurers 

to provide coverage for risks from terrorism. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2002

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be

printed 

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to 

accompany the bill (H.R. 3210) to ensure the continued 

financial capacity of insurers to provide coverage for 

risks from terrorism.

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 3210) to ensure the continued fi4 nancial capacity of insurers to provide coverage for risks 

5 from terrorism. All points of order against the conference 
2

HRES 607 RH 

1 report and against its consideration are waived. The con2 ference report shall be considered as read. 

House Calendar No. 239

107TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 607

[Report No. 107–782] 

RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 3210) to ensure 

the continued financial capacity of insurers to provide coverage for risks from terrorism. 

NOVEMBER 13, 2002

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
From: Richard Strowd

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventive Care and Contraception

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:22:01 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger.

Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run

health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the

coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies.

If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions
* After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is not binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### March 3, 2010 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, No. 09-2248 v. (D. New Mexico) BENIGNO LINAREZ-FLORES, Defendant - Appellant. (D.C. No. 2:09-CR-01697-JAP-1)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before HARTZ , ANDERSON , and TYMKOVICH , Circuit Judges.
Mr. Linarez-Flores pleaded guilty to the charge of re-entry of a deported alien, contrary to 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Because he had committed a felony crime of violence (a vicious attack on his pregnant wife) before his deportation, his adjusted offense level was 24 under the United States Sentencing Guidelines. After adjustments for acceptance of responsibility, his total offense level was 21. With a criminal-history category of I, his advisory guidelines range was 37-46-2- months’ imprisonment. The district court varied downward from the advisory range and imposed a term of imprisonment of 24 months. The court also recommended that “Immigration and Customs Enforcement begin removal proceedings during service of sentence.” R., Vol. 1 at 18. On appeal Mr. Linarez-Flores contends that the district court abused its discretion by not varying downward even further. We construe this contention as a claim that the sentence was substantively unreasonable. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and reject the claim. Under our decision in United States v. Kristl , 437 F.3d 1050, 1054 (10th Cir. 2006), we would presume that a sentence of Mr. Linarez-Flores within the advisory guideline range of 37-46 months was substantively reasonable—that is, neither unreasonably harsh nor unreasonably lenient. Thus, he has an even greater burden to overcome the presumption that the more-lenient sentence of 24 months was unreasonably harsh. Yet his sole argument on appeal to distinguish him from others who committed his offense and have his criminal history is that when he was arrested he was being driven to his home of El Salvador. In our view, that argument does not suffice to overcome the presumption.-3- We AFFIRM the judgment and sentence below.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Harris L Hartz Circuit Judge
Khowst governor hosts release shura for former detainees
 By None  , JTF 435
  100810releaseshura
 KHOWST PROVINCE, Afghanistan (Aug. 9, 2010) – Seven detainees were released from the Detention Facility in Parwan and welcomed back to their communities during a shura Aug. 7 in Khowst province. Khowst Governor Abdul Jabbar Naeemi, welcomed the former detainees back into the community and praised Afghan President Hamid Karzai and the government for releasing the detainees before Ramadan, the Muslim holy month of prayer and fasting. This event was the second at which former detainees from the Detention Facility in Parwan were released to the governor who agreed to be responsible for the men.  Governor Naeemi hosted the shura and advised the released detainees to stay away from violence and to help their families and government resist insurgents. Since January 2010, more than 200 detainees have been released from the Detention Facility in Parwan after signing pledges to renounce violence.  Local leaders sign guarantor statements which state they will monitor the released detainee, support his return to the community and supervise his conduct.  The guarantor statement is an informal, not legally binding document, but is worded to align with the *Pashtunwali* code. The shura was attended by dozens of people, including friends, family members and tribal elders who pledged to assist the former detainees with their reintegration to their communities. Along with Governor Naeemi, Afghan National Army Brig. Gen. Mohebur Rahman, JTF-435 Afghan deputy commander, presided over the shura. The general asked the detainees to keep their promise and obey the government. At the shura, one of the men spoke about his experience at the DFIP.  He said the conditions were good and detainees are treated with respect and dignity. Part of a multi-step approach to detention operations, detainee release shuras are designed to assist individuals in successfully rejoining their communities.  While at the Detention Facility in Parwan, detainees have opportunities to participate in educational and vocational classes. The intent is to provide detainees with skills that will enable them to find work, easing the reentry process and creating economic incentives to keep them from returning to the battlefield. Joint Task Force 435 is responsible for U.S. detention operations in Afghanistan and provides leadership for the Detention Facility in Parwan.  The command was established Sept. 18, 2009, by the Secretary of Defense.  The detention mission includes ensuring safe, secure, humane care and custody of detainees consistent with international law.  Additionally, JTF-435 oversees the detainee review process, implements programs for the peaceful reintegration of detainees into society and coordinates with other agencies and partners for the promotion of the rule of law in Afghanistan.
From: schwieg@roadrunner.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:15:40 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
Rockingham,)

Dec. 3, 1912.

#### Rowell, *Adm’r*, *v.*Sanborn, *Adm’x.*

Where one member of an association lias taken adverse possession of the common property, an action for an accounting brought by a fellow-member is barred by the statute of limitations unless begun within six years from the time the plaintiff knew or should have known of the wrongful act.

Bill in Equity, for an accounting. Trial before a referee, who found the facts. At the January term, 1912, of the superior court *Wallace,*C. J., ordered judgment for the defendant, and the plaintiff excepted.

In October, 1884, Smith A. Rowell, the plaintiff’s intestate, associated himself with Alvah S. Sanborn, the defendant’s intestate, and a number of others, to build a hall. It was a part of the agreement that Sanborn should give the association the land on which to build. The building was begun in 1884, but the association never completed it. All the associates except Rowell and San-born abandoned the undertaking as early as 1886. In 1890 Rowell notified Sanborn that he should have nothing more to do with the building, and Sanborn thereupon took possession of and afterward held it as his own property.

*521*G. K. & B. T. Bartlett,*for the plaintiff.

*Page, Bartlett & Mitchell,*for the defendant.

Young, J.

Although the association forfeited whatever right it may have had to demand a conveyance of the land on which the building stood when it abandoned the undertaking, it did not forfeit the building and could have either moved it to another lot, or sold it and divided the proceeds; but instead of doing either of these things, it suffered Sanborn to take possession of and hold the building as his own property. Any member of the association could have maintained an action against Sanborn for an accounting as soon as he took possession of the building. None of the members, therefore, who either knew or ought to have known how he was holding the building can maintain such an action unless it was begun within six years from the time of his taking possession. *Clark*v. *Slayton,*63 N. H. 402; *Currier*v. *Studley,*159 Mass. 17, 19; P. S., c. 217, s. 3. Powell knew in 1890 that Sanborn was holding the building adversely to him and to the association, but did not begin this action until 1898. Consequently the statute is a bar to its maintenance.

*Exception overruled.*

All concurred.
Order filed, April 27, 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 12

- 00094

- CR

____________ EDMOND DAVIS , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Cour t Cause No. 1239885



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due March 27, 2012 , 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. On March 27, 2012 , this court granted the Linda Hacker's request for
extension of time to file the record until April 26, 2012 . To d ate, the record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record was not filed within the time prescribed in the first request, the court GRANTS your second request and issue s the following order.We order Linda Hacker , the official court reporter, to file the record in this

appeal on or before May 28, 2012

. No further extension will be entertained absent exceptional circumstances . The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely file d. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Linda
Hacker does not timely file the record as ordered, the Court may issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure to file the
record.

PER CURIAM
From: Bill Rosenthal

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: You did the right thing

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:32:27 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Bill Rosenthal

2557 Hot Springs Ct

Colorado Springs, CO 80919