alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 575 Introduced in House (IH)]

107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 575

               Honoring Erika Harold, Miss America 2003.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2002

    Mr. Johnson of Illinois (for himself, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Weller, Mr. 
Shimkus, Mrs. Biggert, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Crane, Mr. Hyde, Ms. 
    Schakowsky, Mr. LaHood, Mr. Gutierrez, Mr. Rush, Mr. Jackson of 
   Illinois, Mr. Phelps, Mr. Costello, Mr. Evans, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. 
  Blagojevich, Mr. Lipinski, and Mr. Hastert) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
               Honoring Erika Harold, Miss America 2003.

Whereas as a result of Erika Harold's remarkable achievements and her resolve to 
        empower youth against violence and degradation, she has been crowned 
        Miss America 2003;
Whereas Miss Harold was named Phi Beta Kappa at the University of Illinois in 
        Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, and was named University of Illinois 
        Chancellor Scholar;
Whereas Miss Harold was named as a finalist for the Truman Scholarship;
Whereas Miss Harold was admitted into the Harvard School of Law;
Whereas Miss Harold has taken up the noble cause of ending youth violence;
Whereas Miss Harold has been named national spokesperson for the Teen Victims 
        Project of the National Center for Victims of Crime;
Whereas Miss Harold has been named National Spokesperson for Fight Crime: Invest 
        in Kids;
Whereas Miss Harold has been named to the National Advisory for Peace Games;
Whereas Miss Harold has been named to the National Board of Directors for the 
        Center of Youth as Resources;
Whereas Miss Harold has been named to the Advisory Council for the Empower 
        Program;
Whereas Miss Harold's achievements and leadership bring an immense sense of 
        pride to the Urbana, Illinois, community and the University of Illinois; 
        and
Whereas Miss Harold's strong will and loving spirit drive her to accomplish her 
        goal of ending youth violence: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates Erika Harold on being crowned Miss 
        America 2003;
            (2) honors her for her vision, determination, and 
        integrity; and
            (3) recognizes her as a strong positive role model for 
        youth in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             356
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,957
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,313
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,313
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          699,941
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (687,628)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,313
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,631
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               230,857
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (127,226)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (127,226)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (127,226)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (11)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1086 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1086

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit 
the conduct of offshore drilling on the Outer Continental Shelf in the 
            Mid-Atlantic and North Atlantic planning areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 21, 2001

 Mr. Corzine (for himself and Mr. Torricelli) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to permanently prohibit 
the conduct of offshore drilling on the Outer Continental Shelf in the 
            Mid-Atlantic and North Atlantic planning areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Clean Ocean and Safe Tourism Anti-
Drilling Act'' or the ``COAST Anti-Drilling Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF OIL AND GAS LEASING IN CERTAIN AREAS OF THE 
              OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF.

    Section 8 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 1337) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(p) Prohibition of Oil and Gas Leasing in Certain Areas of the 
Outer Continental Shelf.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
section or any other law, the Secretary of the Interior shall not issue 
a lease for the exploration, development, or production of oil, natural 
gas, or any other mineral in--
            ``(1) the Mid-Atlantic planning area; or
            ``(2) the North Atlantic planning area.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
10.19


 


Letter
Agreement


 


March
29, 2016


Mr.
Michael J. Hanson


c/o
18671 Lake Drive E.


Southwest
Tech Center A


Minneapolis,
MN 55317


 


RE:
Amendment #1 to Demand Promissory Note


 


Dear
Mike,


 


This
letter confirms our agreement as follows:


 


Michael
J. Hanson hereby agrees to amend the first sentence of section 3 Payments, to read as follows: “The Principal Amount of
this Note and any sums owed hereunder, shall be due and payable at the close of business on January 11, 2017.”


 


If
you are in agreement with the foregoing, please indicate as much by signing in the appropriate space below.


 


CACHET
FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, INC.


 


	By:	/s/
    Jeffrey C. Mack	 	 
	 	Jeffrey
    C. Mack, CEO	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	AGREED
    AND ACCEPTED
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	/s/
    Michael J. Hanson
	 	 	 	Michael
    J. Hanson
From: George Elliott

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 6:38:48 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

George Elliott
Virginia Beach, Virginia
#### LEILA LANGDON, PROSECUTRIX, v. BOROUGH OF NETCONG, DEFENDANT.

Argued January 17, 1933

Decided October 17, 1933.

Before Justices Parker, Lloyd and Hewer.

Por the prosecutrix, *John M. Mills.*

Por the defendant, *Howard F. Barrett.*

Per Curiam.

It is plain on the facts, and is admitted by counsel both on argument and in the briefs, that the prosecutrix held neither an office nor a position, but a mere employment, renewed annually, and from which she was discharged, wrongfully as she claims, while the year was running.

She sued for her salary in the District Court, and there was a nonsuit. Perhaps that was correct; in any event it is not before us for review. But it is clear to us that there is here no case for a certiorari, but rather one of an employer discharging an employe engaged by the year, while that year was running. The relation was contractual, and for breach of that contract an action for damages is the proper remedy. *Cramer*v. *Water*Commissioners, 57 *N. J. L.*478; 31 *Atl. Rep.*384; *Hardy*v. Orange, 61 *N. J. L.*620; 42 *Atl. Rep.*581.

The writ will be dismissed, with costs.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.2 MB)
 
 U.S. BS 17 Bright Star 2017 Exercise Bright Star 17 Centcom
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
No. 233, Misc.

#### Brown *v.*New York.

Court of Appeals of New York. Certiorari denied.
Page 1 of 1

4 REE-NP 412-10

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
BRANCH

As of: September 03, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted

Posted: September 03, 2010

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0689
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Kevin Magill

Address:
Durham, NC,
General Comment
See attached file(s)

Attachments

IRS-2010-0010-0689.1; Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... 9/3/2010


8/12/2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to
Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these
regulations.

Kevin Magill
Durham, NC
Amendment dated 10/8/2003 to Consulting Agreement dated 10/1/1999



 EXHIBIT 10.37 
  
 NEUROLOGIX 
 One Bridge Plaza 
 Fort Lee, New Jersey 07024 
  
 October 8, 2003 
  
 Dr. Matthew During 
  

Dear Dr. During: 
  
 This letter (the “Amendment”) amends that certain Consulting Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1999 (the “Consulting Agreement”),
between yourself and Neurologix, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Neurologix”). Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings assigned to such terms in the Consulting Agreement. 

 
 It is therefore agreed as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 4 of the Consulting Agreement is amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: 

  
 4. Term and Termination. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the date hereof and
shall continue for eight (8) years until September 30, 2007, unless earlier terminated for cause (including breach of any agreement between the parties) by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. 
  

	 	2.	Except as amended above by this Amendment, all of your and Neurologix’s respective rights and obligations under the Consulting Agreement and the related Confidentiality,
Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement, dated as of October 1, 1999, between yourself and Neurologix, shall be deemed preserved by this amendment, without modification or reduction. 

  

	 	3.	This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed pursuant to, the laws of the State of New York applicable to agreements made and to be performed wholly within such State.


  
 (This space intentionally left blank; the
signature page follows) 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first written above.
This Amendment may be executed in counterparts. 
  

			
	 Very truly yours,
  
 NEUROLOGIX, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/    Martin J. Kaplitt

	 	 	

	 	 	 Dr. Martin J. Kaplitt
 President



  
 ACCEPTED AND AGREED: 
  

	
	
	 /s/    Matthew During

	

	Dr. Matthew During

  
  

 -2-
#### William K. Brown, Appellant, v. Albert Vanderwerker, Respondent.

— Motion to go to Court of Appeals denied.
From: Nancy Gronlund

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Reproductive Freedom

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 5:54:46 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) pertaining to coverage of preventive

care under the new health care law, and to reject any and all exemptions for “religious

employers.”

Preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by ideological disgust for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing

for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement - even though they employ

people of all faiths and ideologies. This larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure that women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Thank you.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.3

                                     NSTAR
               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                     Twelve Months Ended December 31, 1999
                                (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                           <C>
Net income from continuing operations                         $146,463

Income taxes                                                    60,141

Fixed charges                                                  145,364
                                                              --------

     Total                                                    $351,968
                                                              ========

Interest expense                                              $128,364
Interest component of rentals                                   17,000
                                                              --------

     Total                                                    $145,364
                                                              ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                2.42
                                                                  ====
</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 609 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     November 14, 2002.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to take 
from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 5063) to amend the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 to provide a special rule for members of the uniformed services in 
determining the exclusion of gain from the sale of a principal residence and to 
restore the tax exempt status of death gratuity payments to members of the 
uniformed services, with the Senate amendments thereto, and to consider in the 
House, without intervention of any point of order, a single motion offered by 
the chairman of the Committee on Ways and Means or his designee that the House 
concur in each of the Senate amendments with the respective amendment printed in 
the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. The Senate 
amendments and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be 
debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the committee on Ways and Means. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to final adoption without 
intervening motion or demand for division of the question.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Estelle S. Deane, Respondent, v. Robert E. Deane, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.
From: Wayne Johnson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:30:21 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

Please ensure that women have access to preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Sincerely,

WEJ

San Francisco, CA