alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Next Issue

Issue 286 will focus on Victims of Crime. Learn more and read release articles

The *NIJ Journal*features articles to help criminal justice policymakers and practitioners stay informed about new developments. The *NIJ Journal *presents research-based information that can help inform policy decisions and improve understanding of the criminal justice system.

Each issue of the *NIJ Journal* focuses on a single theme, allowing the articles to dive into one specific topic from different scientific points of view. 

## Current Issue: No. 285, Domestic Radicalization, Violent Extremism, and Terrorism

Director's Message

Articles:
                        - Lessons Learned on the Methodological Challenges in Studying Rare Violent Incidents , by Basia E. Lopez, Danielle M. Crimmins, Aisha J. Qureshi, and Nadine Frederique
                        - The Roles of Trauma and Mental Health in Preventing Domestic Radicalization and Violent Extremism , by Alisa B. Miller, David P. Eisenman, Ryan A. Brown, and Steven Weine
                        - Research and Practitioner Perspectives on the Rehabilitation and Reintegration of Criminal and Violent Extremists , by Kevin D. Lowry, Mubin Shaikh, and Raven A. Lewis
                        - Comparing Violent Extremism and Terrorism to Other Forms of Targeted Violence , by B. Heidi Ellis, Edna Erez, John Horgan, Gary LaFree, and Ramón Spaaij
                        - Assessing the Effectiveness of Programs To Prevent and Counter Violent Extremism , by Max Erdemandi; Elena Savoia, M.D.; and Michael J. Williams, Ph.D.
                        - What NIJ Research Tells Us About Domestic Terrorism ,  by Steven Chermak, Matthew DeMichele, Jeff Gruenewald, Michael Jensen, Raven Lewis, and Basia E. Lopez
                        - Advances in Detecting and Identifying Explosives After an Attack , by John Goodpaster and Elizabeth Pearsall

## Past Issues

Curious about the past? Review over 20 years of the NIJ Journal.

 

## Side navigation

-  NIJ Journal    -  286: Victims of Crime 
  -  285: Domestic Radicalization, Violent Extremism, and Terrorism 
  -  284: Justice Systems 
  -  283: Children and Youth 
  -  282: Violent Crime 
  -  281: 50 Years of NIJ 
  -  280: Policing and Law Enforcement 
  -  Subscribe to the NIJ Journal 
  -  Archive of All Issues 
-  Podcasts 
-  NIJ "Five Things" Series 
-  Publications Listing 
-  Multimedia Listing 
-  Rated Practices on CrimeSolutions 
-  Rated Programs on CrimeSolutions 
-  Software & Databases 
-  Datasets 
-  Patents
From: Das Margaret

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Support access to all preventive care for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:38:55 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as they pertain to coverage of preventive

care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.”

These preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless

women better access to necessary health care.

I think “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive services,

and are driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services. If hospitals with

religious affiliations are exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ

people of all faiths and ideologies a large number of women would be without acess to an

essential component of medical care. This would adversely impact not just the women but

also their children and extended family. If granted, this larger religious exemption would

deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting the IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.9 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Shikha Bhatnagar

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:46:53 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Shikha Bhatnagar

1815 A Street, SE

Unit 304

Washington, DC 20003
From: Barrette, Jim

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: I oppose the Definition of Religious Employer in Health Care Rules

Date: Monday, August 08, 2011 6:22:52 PM

Rule Makers, Department of Health and Human Services:

The current definition of religious employer does not provide true conscience protection

for those committed to preserving life. Health care plans should not be forced to violate

the moral and religious convictions of providers or employees in order to participate in the

health care system. Requiring such an unacceptable demand threatens both universal

access to health care and religious freedom of conscience.

Thank you for your urgent consideration to this critical issue.

Regards,

James Barrette
From: Lynda Richards

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:38:02 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that has not always been a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Lynda Richards

15676 CR 7170

65401

Rolla, MO 65401
From: Eileen Bruno

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: New mandate

Date: Sunday, August 07, 2011 6:53:46 PM

To Whom It May Concern:

I am writing about the new mandate to insurance companies to provide complete coverage for all

prescription contraceptives approved by the FDA & abortifacient drugs such as ELLA & the morning after

pill. As far as exceptions are concerned, it should be for anyone who objects for conscience, religious, or

any other reasons.

Sincerely,

Eileen Bruno

109 Woodruff Drive

Slidell, LA 70461
From: Marilyn Casselman

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:11:03 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Marilyn Casselman

P.O. Box 20195

New York, NY 10014
From: Lee Crowley

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Thursday, August 04, 2011 6:36:58 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Lee Crowley
Westborough, Massachusetts
NO. 04 -15- 00304

- CR

IN THE

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

OF TEXAS

AT SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

BRIAN KEITH GORHAM

, Appellant

VS.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AS LEAD COUNSEL

FOR APPELLANT

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:

On May 14 , 2015

, the Honorable Mary Roman , Judge Presiding, 1 75 th

Judicial District of Texas, appointed the Bexar County Public Defender’s Off ice to

represent the Appellant in the direct appeal in the above styled and numbered

cause. Pursuant to Rule 6.1(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, Richard

B. Dulany, Jr.

, Assistant Public Defender, hereby notifies the Court that he enters

his appearance as lead counsel for the Appellant on behalf of the Bexar County

Public Defender’s Office.

Respectfully submitted

,

/s/ Richard B. Dulany, Jr. ACCEPTED

04-15-00304-CR

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

5/21/2015 1:59:02 PM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK2 ____________________________________ RICHARD B. DULANY, JR.

Assistant Public Defender

Bexar Co unty Public Defender’s Office

101 W. Nueva, Suite 310

San Antonio, Texas 78205

(210) 335

- 0701

FAX (210) 335

- 0707

richard.dulany@bexar.org

Texas Bar No. 06196400

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND COMPLIANCE

I HEREBY CERTIFIY that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing

notice has been served electronically on the Bexar County District Attorney’s

Office, Appellate Division, Paul Elizondo Tower, 101 W. Nueva St., Suite 71 0 , San

Antonio, Texas 78205, on May 21 , 2015

. The word count is 22 4

.

/s/ Richard B. Dulany, Jr.

____________________________________ RICHARD B. DULANY, JR.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40230 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus SEAN DEQUINCE BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-97-CR-5-1

-------------------- December 21, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Sean DeQuince Brown (“Brown”) appeals his convictions involving bank robbery and the use of a firearm during the commission of a crime of violence. He argues that (1) his waiver of the right to counsel was (a) involuntarily made because he was forced to choose between proceeding with ineffective counsel and proceeding pro se and (b) unknowingly made because the magistrate judge’s inquiry into the waiver was inadequate; (2) the district court erred in admitting his confession; (3) the district court violated his rights under the Confrontation Clause of the SixthNo. 99-40230 -2- Amendment by admitting hearsay testimony; and (4) the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. This court has reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties. This court rejects Brown’s argument that his waiver of the right to counsel was involuntarily made because the record does not show that he was forced to choose between proceeding with ineffective counsel and proceeding pro se. See Richardson
v. Lucas , 741 F.2d 753, 757 (5th Cir. 1984). This court rejects Brown’s argument that his waiver of the right to counsel was unknowingly made because the magistrate judge’s inquiry into the waiver was adequate. See Neal v. Texas , 870 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir. 1989). This court rejects Brown’s argument that the district court erred in admitting his confession because he did not raise an issue as to the voluntariness of his confession in the district court and does not explain how the evidence in the record would “clearly raise” a question as to the voluntariness of his confession. See United States v. Iwegbu , 6 F.3d 272, 274 (5th Cir. 1993). This court rejects Brown’s argument that the district court violated his rights under the Confrontation Clause by admitting hearsay testimony because the testimony of Agents Angel Martinez and Blake McConnell did not contain hearsay as
Brown asserts. See United States v. Cheramie , 51 F.3d 538, 541 (5th Cir. 1995). This court rejects Brown’s argument that insufficient evidence existed to support his convictions because Brown did not adequately brief his aiding-and-abetting claim, see United States v. Posada-Rios , 158 F.3d 832 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied , 526 U.S. 1031, 1080, 1137 (1999), and Brown’s argumentNo. 99-40230 3 about hearsay is foreclosed by the earlier conclusion that the testimony of Agents Martinez and McConnell did not contain hearsay. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
No. 97, Misc.

#### Ellinger *v.*Warden, Maryland Penitentiary.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
I

104TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 2454

To eliminate automatic pay adjustments for Members of Congress.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 10, 1995

Mr. THORNBERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the

Committee on House Oversight, and in addition to the Committee on

Government Reform and Oversight, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To eliminate automatic pay adjustments for Members of

Congress.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional COLA

5 Elimination Act of 1995’’.
2

•HR 2454 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUSTMENTS

2 FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 601(a)

4 of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C.

5 31(2)) is repealed.

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 601(a)(1)

7 of such Act is amended—

8 (1) by striking ‘‘(a)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a)’’;

9 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B),

10 and (C) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively;

11 and

12 (3) by striking ‘‘, as adjusted by paragraph (2)

13 of this subsection’’.

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act shall take effect on

15 the day after the date of the first election of Representa16 tives (within the meaning of the 27th article of amend17 ment to the Constitution of the United States) occurring

18 after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

              [Letterhead of Deloitte & Touche Brightman Almagor]

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants of Epsilon Investment House Ltd., we hereby
consent to the incorporation of our report dated February 21, 2001, included in
Form 10K of Ampal-American Israel Corporation for the year ended December 31,
2000 (relating to the financial statements of Epsilon Investment House Ltd. --
not included herein), into Ampal-American Israel Corporation's previously filed
registration statements file Nos. 333-61895 and 333-55970.


/s/ Brightman, Almagor & Co.
BRIGHTMAN, ALMAGOR & CO.
Certified Public Accountants

Dated: March 26, 2001
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 As of the date hereof, I, John Kunze, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that the Quarterly Report of Plumtree Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Plumtree Software, Inc. By:
    
    /s/ John KunzeName:
    
    John KunzeTitle:
    
    Chief Executive OfficerDated:
    
    August 6, 2004
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided by Plumtree Software, Inc. and will be retained by Plumtree Software,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. 43
# This Day in CENTCOM History – 28 years ago, CENTCOM announced Operation United Shield.

/ Published Jan. 10, 2023
TAMPA, Fla., 
This Day in CENTCOM History – 28 years ago, CENTCOM announced Operation United Shield. The mission: conduct operations to assist in the final withdrawal of UN peacekeeping troops from Somalia. The decision came in response to a UN request for American protection of its peacekeeping forces serving in the war-torn African nation.

Led by the United States, two ships of the Pakistan Navy, five ships of the Italian Navy and six from the U.S. Navy formed a Combined Task Force ensuring the safe evacuation of all UN Peacekeeping Forces from Somalia.

CENTCOM announced that 4,000 personnel (including 2,600 U.S. Marines) would be deployed to Somalia to assist with Operation United Shield. At that time, 2,500 troops from Pakistan and Bangladesh comprised the UN peacekeeping forces in Somalia. 

Lt Gen Zinni (Commanding General, 1st Marine Expeditionary Force) was given command of the operation, which was to ensure the safe execution of an amphibious withdrawal. A future CENTCOM commander, General Zinni had previously served in Somalia during Operation Restore hope two years earlier and knew most of the top Somali leaders at the time of Operation United Shield.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.66 MB)
 
 55th Signal Company (Combat Camera) 18th Airborne Corps Operation Inherent Resolve Transfer of Authority COMCAM Defeat Daesh III Armored Corps
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil