alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: KCase

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Accept IoM Recommendations for Preventative Health Care for Women

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 11:48:11 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  This schedule contains summary financial
information extracted from Balance Sheets and Statement
of Operations for the year ended December 31, 1995 Form
10K of Delphi Film Associates III and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
       
<S>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                 155,000
<SECURITIES>                              986,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,143,000
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0
<PP&E>                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         2,872,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       0
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                             2,817,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           2,872,000
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            66,000
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       331,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        1,182,000
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                           1,182,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           121.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.3



	
					
	
	 
	Thomas A. Kennedy
	 
	Raytheon Company

	 
	Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
	 
	870 Winter Street

	 
	781.522.6400  tel
	 
	Waltham, Massachusetts

	 
	781.522.6401  fax
	 
	02451 USA

	 
	 
	tkennedy1@raytheon.com
	 
	 








January 23, 2015


Frank R. Jimenez




Dear Frank:
Your offer letter dated December 16, 2014 incorrectly captured certain elements of your stock ownership guidelines and Change in Control benefits.  Below please find the corrected details pertaining to these elements.
		
	•
	You will be required by the end of your fifth (5th) year in an elected officer capacity to own a minimum of two (2x) times base salary in the form of Raytheon equity. In addition, there is a requirement that each elected officer holds shares of Company "stock owned outright" with a value of at least 1x base salary. Company stock owned outright includes the following Company securities: outright share purchases, shares from restricted stock/unit vestings or acquired upon option exercises; and vested shares or share equivalents in any Company retirement plan (e.g., 401(k), Deferred Compensation Plan).




		
	•
	You will be entitled to a Change in Control Severance Agreement which would provide you with severance benefits equal to one (1) times your annual base salary and target bonus as of the date of the change in control in the event of a change in control of the company as set forth in the attached draft agreement. Please note that the Change in Control Severance Agreement is structured to require both a change in corporate ownership and a loss of employment as those terms are defined in the draft agreement.




If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Randa Newsome directly at 781.522.5097.


Sincerely,


/s/ Thomas A. Kennedy
Thomas A. Kennedy




Acknowledged:


/s/ Frank R. Jimenez
Frank R. Jimenez


January 30, 2015
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-50238 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HUGO RICHARD LUEVANO-GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-02-CR-1597-ALL-PM

-------------------- Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Hugo Richard Luevano-Gomez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Luevano-Gomez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Luevano-Gomez maintains that heNo. 03-50238 -2- pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Luevano-Gomez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
From: Sharon Moss

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Viagra

Date: Friday, September 02, 2011 2:52:20 PM

Why exactly is Viagra covered and not birth control?
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.65 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
**The content you are looking for has moved to a different location. You will be redirected to the new page in a second. If you have bookmarked the page, please update it to the new address:https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/il.html**
EXHIBIT 32 SECTION
906 CERTIFICATION BY DWIGHT O. SEEGMILLER Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2003, Dwight O. Seegmiller hereby certifies that: 1.          this
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
1934 Act, and 2.          the information
contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
registrants financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. Date
 March 9,
 2004
 By
 /s/ Dwight
 O. SeegmillerDwight O.
 Seegmiller, President SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION BY JAMES G. PRATT Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2003, James G. Pratt hereby certifies that: 1.          this
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the 1934
Act, and 2.          the
information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the registrants financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant. Date
 March 9,
 2004
 By
 /s/ James G.
 PrattJames G.
 Pratt,  Treasurer and Chief Accounting
 Officer Page 92 of 92
From: lilactown@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Supporting the new health care law

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 10:52:47 PM

Hello

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) and sensible

people everywhere in asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of

Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care law,

and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are

a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access

to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger.

Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health

providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage

requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted,

this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of

where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Regards,

Ann
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

Received: January 18, 2016

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1k0-8ngr-n2v4

Comments Due: January 19, 2016

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2015-0017

Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits

Comment On: EBSA-2015-0017-0001

Claims Procedure for Plans Providing Disability Benefits

Document: EBSA-2015-0017-DRAFT-0042

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-29295

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

RIN-1210-AB39

I would like to comment on the Department of Labor's proposed ERISA Long Term Disability 

regulations. I support and applaud all the recommendations however would lke to address 

specifically the ones involving potential conflict of interest with any medical experts and claims 

ajudicators. When peoples' lives are at stake especially, it is reprehensible that insurance 

companies could influence the outcome of medical testimony or denial of claims through hiring 

or compensating those who who be likely to support denial of benefits. This practice must stop. 

And any evidence of wrongful denial of benefits should result in dismissal and punitive 

consequences. 

Thank you.
From: Ellen Imsland

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 1:30:31 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Ellen Imsland
From: lindsayamy@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Access to Contraceptive and Preventive Care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:40:07 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
#### Matter of the Judicial Settlement of Augusta Krunan, Administratrix, etc.

—Decree of surrogate reversed. Opinion by

Dykman, J.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Home
  MEDIA
  NEWS ARTICLES
  News Article View
 News
 John C. Stennis’ Security Department Trains with Laser System USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74) 
 
 SHARE
 PRINT
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: feeble@netzero.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: religious exemption of preventive health care to women

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 2:07:13 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.33 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 100 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 100

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the estate and 
                              gift taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2001

  Mr. Allard introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the estate and 
                              gift taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Death Tax Termination Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ESTATE AND GIFT TAXES.

    Subtitle B of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to 
estate, gift, and generation-skipping taxes) is repealed effective with 
respect to estates of decedents dying, and gifts made, after December 
31, 2000.
                                 <all>
```