CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District

Rule No(s): 451 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended October 28, 2010

Rule Title(s): Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products

Date Submitted to ARB: December 10, 2010

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): Amended September 25, 2008

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Kevin J. Williams Phone Number: (916) 874-4851 E-mail Address: kjwilliams@airquality.org

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

The adopted amendments will implement RACT for the Mi scellaneous Metal Parts and Products Coating source

category, as required by Section 182(b )(2)(A) of the federal Clean Air Act. T he rule amendments make the rule at

least as stringent as the applicable metal coating requi rements of the Control Techniques Guidelines for

Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings ( EPA-453/R-08-003). The adopted amendments lowered the

VOC limits for three coating categories: aluminum coatings for window frames and door frames, extreme

performance coatings, and non-skid coatings. The adopt ed amendments also added a new coating category for

etching filler and added an exemption for automobile and light-duty truck assembly coating operations.

Pollutant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, w ill result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach referenc e(s) for emission factor(s)

and other information. Attach calculation sheet showi ng how the emission information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: N/A

Inventory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions : N/A Area Affected: Sacramento County

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :

N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 T PY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 0

Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A%

Number of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: N/A%

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large (> 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) 301, 302, 303, 305.3 and 305.4 of the Rule.

Other Methods in the Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: 1) Application equipment requirements in Section 304

2) work practice standards in Sections 305.1, 305.2 and 305.5, and 3) as specified in Section 306, using air pollution

control equipment that provides an over all system efficiency of not less than 90% in lieu of meeting the emissions

standards in Sections 301, 302, 303, 305.3 or 305.4.

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): 301-303, 305.3 and 305.4 Wo rk Practice Standards in Se ction(s): 304, 305.1, 305.2,

and 305.5

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): 501 Reporting Requirements in Section(s): 401CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM -- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

5/1/2002 3

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: No sources subject to Rule 451 in Sacramento County will be required to change their operations as a result

of the amendments to Rule 451. Therefore, t here are no impacts on the air quality plan.