alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                       9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                   JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                     MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                             7,052
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>               720
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                  15,070
<TRADING-ASSETS>                       0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>       69,851
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>               212
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                 215
<LOANS>                          271,263
<ALLOWANCE>                        2,980
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   384,926
<DEPOSITS>                       293,070
<SHORT-TERM>                      19,329
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                3,715
<LONG-TERM>                       42,451
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            1
<COMMON>                              33
<OTHER-SE>                        26,327
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>   384,926
<INTEREST-LOAN>                    6,251
<INTEREST-INVEST>                  1,101
<INTEREST-OTHER>                     179
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                   7,531
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                 3,035
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 3,992
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>              3,539
<LOAN-LOSSES>                        172
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                     0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                    3,328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    1,060
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>         1,060
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                         763
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                        .28
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                         0
<LOANS-NON>                          900
<LOANS-PAST>                           0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                       0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                      564
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                   2,880
<CHARGE-OFFS>                        168
<RECOVERIES>                          96
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                  2,980
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>               2,980
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                    0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                0
        


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 25, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-21224

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MANUEL CANO-RAMIREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-02-CR-357-ALL

--------------------

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

 Manuel Cano-Ramirez appeals the sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States

after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. CanoRamirez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)

are unconstitutional. He argues that the prior conviction that

resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate

offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have been alleged in

his indictment. Cano-Ramirez maintains that he pleaded guilty to
No. 02-21224

-2-

an indictment which charged only simple reentry under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the maximum term

of imprisonment and supervised release which may be imposed for

that offense. 

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Cano-Ramirez acknowledges that his arguments are foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his arguments for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey F. Joseph, Chief Executive Officer of Presidential Realty Corporation
(the "Company"), certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of the Company;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this annual report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.    The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and
      we have:

      a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
            material information relating to the Company, including its
            consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
            those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual
            report is being prepared;

      b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and
            procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
            effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
            end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
            and

      c)    disclosed in this report any changes in the Company's internal
            control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's
            most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
            reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal
            control over financial reporting; and

5.    The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the Company's auditors and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors:

      a)    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
            reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company's ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
            internal control over financial reporting.


DATE:  March 23, 2004                 By:  /s/ Jeffrey F. Joseph
                                      --------------------------
                                      Jeffrey F. Joseph
                                      Chief Executive Officer
~

FAVORITE BAY

L 0 D G E

Luxury Wildern-ess -Resort I Southeast Alaska

July 24, 2013

Brooke Chapman

Associate Director

Small Community Air Service Development Program

United states Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE

Washington, DC 20590

Dear Ms. Chapman,

L)~~} '.tiS I b A C\: 23

The community of Angoon is remotely located on an island in Southeast Alaska with no connej::tion

to the road system. Accordingly, ferry and air service provide critical lifelines for our community,

allowing usaccess to important services such as medical care.

As such, Iam writing to express support of the 2013 Application from the Southeast Alaska

Consortium of communities under the Small Community Air Service Development grant program.

Our communities' application requests federal funding to support the goal of increased ridership

on these important Essential Air Service routes, The goal is long-term sustainability of local

scheduled air service, which has historically seen fluctuations in pricing and service frequencies,

and the associated ups and downs in passenger use.

By increasing market awareness of our communities and the Consortium's service provider, Alaska

Seaplanes, the Consortium can attract potential visitors who may be unaware of the region's

attractions.

Our partner in this project, Alaska Seaplanes, has recently increased their visibility on global

distribution system (GDS) platforms. Just a year ago, Angoon's flights were not available on any

common travel distribution systems. Today they are, with flights available for purchase through

GDS portals such as CheapoAir.com. Since implementation, this additional access has resulted in

travelers finding these flights who otherwise might not.

The Consortium's plan is to initiate a complementary new marketing campaign targeting potential

visitors to the five communities, and advertising the unparalleled tourism, sporting and leisure

activities we offer.

A grant from the Small Community Air Service Development Program will help our communities

publicize ourselves to inc ase passenger traffic more quickly. make our air service more

sust~~11 and b.rin itional economic benefits to the region.

s"tL, ."'~

~na Durand,

Cfwner and pr~sident

Toll Free 866.788-3344 Tel 907-788-3344 Fax 907-788-3346

917 Killisnoo Ro),d P.O. Box 149, Angoon. AK 99820

em.a.il: myhvorite@favoritehay..com 'lVww.f1voriteh:ay.com
**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
      Form
      S-3 (File No. 333-112150, 333-109750, 333-109785, 333-89364, 333-73766 and
      333-140543), Form S-8 (File No. 333-64618), and Form S-1 (File No. 333-122717,
      333-121775, 333-117268, and 333-129239) of Multiband Corporation and
      subsidiaries of our report dated March 31, 2008, which appears in this annual
      report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.




/s/
      VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP







Minneapolis,
      Minnesota


March
      31,
      2008
From: c. b. brohaugh

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Preventative Care & Contraception

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 7:57:12 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the recommendations 

of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject 

any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new law and 

would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive services, 

others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make 

exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health 

providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though 

they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands 

of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s recommendations and 

rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Frank R. Sherwin, Appellant (three cases).

Judgment and conviction affiimed. Order allowing bill of exceptions* affirmed. Motion to strike out bill of exceptions denied. Form of order to be settled by Bockes, J. Opinions by

Bockes, J.;

Learned, P. J., and Landon, J., concurring as to affirmance of judgment and conviction.
From: Kathy Wawer

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 10:18:05 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs. It's time to disassociate women's health

issues from extreme religious and political thinking. Keep up the good work.

Sincerely,

Kathy Wawer

1731 Elm

Northbrook, IL 60067
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not preceden t except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-31262

Summary Calendar

LENNIE R. ALLEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EAGLE ELECTRIC MACHINERY, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

No. 99-CV-548

April 16, 2001

Before POLITZ, JOLLY, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Lennie Allen ap peals an adverse summary judgment in his action alleging

employment discrimination and asserting claims under Title VII, The Civil Right Act2

of 1991 , the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, and the American with

Disabilities Act.

Allen began his employment as a salesman for Eagle Electric Machinery in 1989.

A year or so lat er he sustained an eye injury rendering him legally blind. Eagle

provided him with a driver to enable him to continue his outside sales contacts.

In January 1998, Eagle put in place a reorganization plan designed to encourage

an incr ease in sales of its products. The plan gave Allen two options. The first

decreased Allen’s base salary but added a one percent commission on all sales. This

option also contained a termination clause if sales fell below a certain volume in a given

quarter. The second option, should Allen chose to discontinue his employment with

Eagle, allowed him to continue with Eagle on retainer, earning his previous weekly

salary. This agreement would last 18 weeks, at which time Eagle would re-evaluate

his “continued employment with the company on a continued retainer basis at a fee

determined at that time.” In response to the institution of this plan, Allen abandoned

his employment contending that he had been constructively discharged because of his

visual impairment.

The instant action was filed, alleging employment discriminatio n as above noted.

The court granted a Rule 12(B) motion, dismissing the ADEA claim. Thereafter the

court considered and granted summary judgment dismissing the remaining claims.3

Having considered the record, briefs, a nd applicable law, and on the facts as

detailed, authorities cited, and analysis made by the d istrict court, the judgment

appealed is AFFIRMED.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.29 MB)
 
 455th AEW 455 Air Expeditionary Wing 455 aew U.S. AIr Forces Central Freedom's sentinel U.S. Air Force USAF AFCENT Centcom 455th Air Expeditionary Wing United States Air Force Resolute Support Bagram Airfield Bagram U.S. Central Command Afghanistan
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.24 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# Europeiska unionens C 153/10 j

| | ISSN 1725-2504 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 153 |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 47 årgången10 juni 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2504

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 153

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

47 årgången10 juni 2004

---

| Informationsnummer | Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Meddelanden |
| | Kommissionen |
| 2004/C 153/1 | Eurons växelkurs | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

I   Meddelanden

Kommissionen

2004/C 153/1

Eurons växelkurs

1

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

I Meddelanden

Kommissionen

| 10.6.2004 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | C 153/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2004

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

C 153/1

---

Eurons växelkurs (1)

9 juni 2004

(2004/C 153/01)

1 euro=

| | Valuta | Kurs |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US-dollar | 1,2157 |
| JPY | japansk yen | 132,57 |
| DKK | dansk krona | 7,4393 |
| GBP | pund sterling | 0,66460 |
| SEK | svensk krona | 9,0925 |
| CHF | schweizisk franc | 1,5197 |
| ISK | isländsk krona | 87,12 |
| NOK | norsk krona | 8,1830 |
| BGN | bulgarisk lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | cypriotiskt pund | 0,58300 |
| CZK | tjeckisk koruna | 31,335 |
| EEK | estnisk krona | 15,6466 |
| HUF | ungersk forint | 251,98 |
| LTL | litauisk litas | 3,4529 |
| LVL | lettisk lats | 0,6568 |
| MTL | maltesisk lira | 0,4255 |
| PLN | polsk zloty | 4,6069 |
| ROL | rumänsk leu | 40 855 |
| SIT | slovensk tolar | 239,1400 |
| SKK | slovakisk koruna | 39,955 |
| TRL | turkisk lira | 1 804 336 |
| AUD | australisk dollar | 1,7442 |
| CAD | kanadensisk dollar | 1,6391 |
| HKD | Hongkongdollar | 9,4773 |
| NZD | nyzeeländsk dollar | 1,9457 |
| SGD | singaporiansk dollar | 2,0738 |
| KRW | sydkoreansk won | 1 403,10 |
| ZAR | sydafrikansk rand | 8,0714 |

Valuta

Kurs

USD

US-dollar

1,2157

JPY

japansk yen

132,57

DKK

dansk krona

7,4393

GBP

pund sterling

0,66460

SEK

svensk krona

9,0925

CHF

schweizisk franc

1,5197

ISK

isländsk krona

87,12

NOK

norsk krona

8,1830

BGN

bulgarisk lev

1,9558

CYP

cypriotiskt pund

0,58300

CZK

tjeckisk koruna

31,335

EEK

estnisk krona

15,6466

HUF

ungersk forint

251,98

LTL

litauisk litas

3,4529

LVL

lettisk lats

0,6568

MTL

maltesisk lira

0,4255

PLN

polsk zloty

4,6069

ROL

rumänsk leu

40 855

SIT

slovensk tolar

239,1400

SKK

slovakisk koruna

39,955

TRL

turkisk lira

1 804 336

AUD

australisk dollar

1,7442

CAD

kanadensisk dollar

1,6391

HKD

Hongkongdollar

9,4773

NZD

nyzeeländsk dollar

1,9457

SGD

singaporiansk dollar

2,0738

KRW

sydkoreansk won

1 403,10

ZAR

sydafrikansk rand

8,0714

---

(1)

Källa: Referensväxelkurs offentliggjord av Europeiska centralbanken.

---