alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 21, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 05-50026

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 Plaintiff - Appellee

 v.

HECTOR ENRIQUE GODOY-MORAN

 Defendant - Appellant

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, El Paso

---------------------

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the

sentence is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to

remand case to the United States District Court for the Western

District of Texas, El Paso Division, for resentencing is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion in the

alternative to extend time to file appellee’s brief until 14 days

from the Court’s denial of appellee’s motion to vacate and remand

is DENIED as moot.
EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Journal Register Company
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 26, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, Robert M. Jelenic, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and Jean B. Clifton, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Robert M. Jelenic
---------------------
Robert M. Jelenic
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
November 8, 2004

/s/ Jean B. Clifton
-------------------
Jean B. Clifton
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
November 8, 2004


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange
Act"), or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as may be expressly set forth by
specific reference in any such filing. A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906,
has been provided to Journal Register Company and will be retained by Journal
Register Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
From: Zelia

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 10:03:52 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care

under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services,

are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Remember: You can always help strengthen AAUW’s efforts to support access to

contraception and preventive health care by making a tax-deductible donation to AAUW’s

Public Policy Fund!

Double your impact! Tweet, Facebook, and forward this action alert to friends and family.

Follow AAUW on Twitter, and read our award-winning AAUW Dialog Blog for

discussion, information, and advocacy for women and girls!

General AAUW questions? Please contact connect@aauw.org or call 800/326-2289 between

10 am and 5 pm Eastern, Monday through Friday.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

9:00 a.m. EDT, Friday, September 8, 2023.

# PLACE: 

Virtual meeting.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

                        Enforcement matters. In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.cftc.gov/​.*

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-5964.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: August 30, 2023.

Robert Sidman,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2023-19077 Filed 8-30-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
From: heather nicholson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Health Care Access

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 3:41:34 PM

As a student, future Nurse Practitioner and woman, I join with the American

Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as they pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new

law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for

all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions

even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies - and freedom of religion is a fundamental human right. If

granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal

exemption provisions.

Thank you.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.81 MB)
 
 USS Ronald Reagan; US Navy; Carrier Strike Group 5; CVN 76; Flight Deck; 5th Fleet
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward Lavin, Appellant.

—Judgment reversed. Opinion by

Dykman, J.;

Barnard, P. J., dissenting.
STATEMENT PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gerald E. Sklar, Chief Executive Officer, of Winmax Trading Group, Inc.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as enacted by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September
            30, 2005 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies
            fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   Information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of Winmax Trading Group, Inc.


      Dated: November 14, 2005

                                                /s/ Gerald E. Sklar
                                                ----------------------------
                                                Gerald E. Sklar
                                                Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Winmax Trading Group, Inc. and
will be retained by Winmax Trading Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-92,978-01

EX P ARTE TREKEYMIAN JA MAL ALLISON, App licant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 46569-A-H-1 IN THE 188 DISTRICT COURT FROM GR EGG COUNTY T H

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant was convicted of two counts of possession of a firea rm by a felon and sentenc ed to five y ear s’ imprisonment in eac h count. Applicant filed this appli ca t i o n fo r a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler k forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. On November 3, 2021, t his Court denied this application based on the findi ng s of t he trial court without a hear ing. I t has come to the Court’s attention that the habea s judge who adopted the State’s proposed finding s of fac t was Applicant’s defe nse counsel for the orig inal plea in this cause and so wa s disqualified to consider A pplicant’s habe as applica tion. There fore , this Court now rec onsiders on its own motion the denial without written order on2

the finding s of the trial cou rt an d re mands this application to have a differ ent judge consider the Applicant’s c laims. The newly assig ned judge shall make finding s of fac t a nd conclusions of law within ninety day s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff

idavits, m o t i o n s, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions o f t ime must be reque sted by

the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: Fe bruar y 08, 2023 Do not publish
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1060 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1060

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that certain 
postsecondary educational benefits provided by an employer to children 
   of employees shall be excludable from gross income as part of an 
                    educational assistance program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 19, 2001

   Mr. Bayh introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that certain 
postsecondary educational benefits provided by an employer to children 
   of employees shall be excludable from gross income as part of an 
                    educational assistance program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN POSTSECONDARY EDUCATIONAL BENEFITS PROVIDED BY AN 
              EMPLOYER TO CHILDREN OF EMPLOYEES EXCLUDABLE FROM GROSS 
              INCOME UNDER EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 127 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to educational assistance programs) is amended by 
redesignating subsections (d) and (e) as subsection (e) and (f), 
respectively, and inserting after subsection (c) the following:
    ``(d) Post Secondary Educational Benefits Provided to Children of 
Employees.--
            ``(1) In general.--For purposes of this section, 
        educational assistance provided by the employer to a child (as 
        defined in section 151(c)(3)) of an employee of such employer 
        pursuant to an educational assistance program shall be treated 
        as educational assistance provided for the exclusive benefit of 
        the employee.
            ``(2) Dollar limitations.--The amount excluded from the 
        gross income of the employee by reason of paragraph (1) for a 
        taxable year with respect to amounts provided to each child of 
        such employee shall not exceed $2,000.
            ``(3) Limitation on educational assistance.--Paragraph (1) 
        shall only apply to expenses paid or incurred in connection 
        with the enrollment or attendance of a child of an employee at 
        an educational institution described in section 529(e)(5).''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 51A(b)(5)(B)(iii) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``127(d)'' and 
inserting ``127(e)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Cybersecurity: 'Remain vigilant, be accountable, stand ready' Army major general says

/ Published Oct. 3, 2018

                The Cyber Operations Center at Fort Gordon, Ga., is home to signal and military intelligence noncommissioned officers, who watch for and respond to network attacks from adversaries as varied as nation-states, terrorists and "hacktivists." The center was sanitized of classified information for this photo. (Photo Credit: U.S. Army photo by Michael L. Lewis)            

                Cybersecurity: 'Remain vigilant, be accountable, stand ready' Army major general says            

SHARE IMAGE:

Download Image

Image Details

Photo By: U.S. Army photo by Michael L. Lewis

VIRIN: 181003-M-LM779-001
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 1, 2021

NO. 03-19-00236-CR

James Lee Jobson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, KELLY, AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in 

the judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because 

appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
From: Leah Foster

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 1:53:51 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Leah Foster

1412 General Pershing Street

New Orleans, LA 70115
```

[107th Congress Public Law 203]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ203.107]

[[Page 116 STAT. 744]]

Public Law 107-203
107th Congress

                                 An Act

 
     To provide for an independent investigation of Forest Service 
      firefighter deaths that are caused by wildfire entrapment or 
            burnover. <<NOTE: July 24, 2002 -  [H.R. 3971]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 7 USC 2270b.>> DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE INSPECTOR 
            GENERAL INVESTIGATION OF FOREST SERVICE FIREFIGHTER DEATHS.

    In the case of each fatality of an officer or employee of the Forest 
Service that occurs due to wildfire entrapment or burnover, the 
Inspector General of the Department of Agriculture shall conduct an 
investigation of the fatality. The investigation shall not rely on, and 
shall be completely independent of, any investigation of the fatality 
that is conducted by the Forest Service.

SEC. 2. <<NOTE: Reports. 7 USC 2270c.>> SUBMISSION OF RESULTS.

    As soon as possible after completing an investigation under section 
1, the Inspector General of the Department of Agriculture shall submit 
to Congress and the Secretary of Agriculture a report containing the 
results of the investigation.

    Approved July 24, 2002.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3971:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 148 (2002):
            June 24, considered and passed House.
            July 10, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.2
   1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CCFNB Bancorp, Inc.
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a15 (f) and 15d15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date: March 8, 2011
    /s/ Jeffrey T. ArnoldJeffrey T. ArnoldChief Financial  Officer
and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer) 74
#### Dennis Sullivan, as administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The Buffalo Grape Sugar Company, Appellant.

Judgment and order affirmed. Dissenting opinion by

Barker, J.