alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### 582

**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUgllN** 

mm. L L. d4w.n tkwlty Attorlmy **Ltsa5tone htlntf** 

Dear Sir1

tha ahovd **5ta*** llyeonsidsredmabY. to find any statutoryauthoritywhfoh would

allow the oommlrreionsr8 or Umeetone County any exponsee for tripe cut ot the county on 0itLoial busLaineee.

This deptmtuonthaa repeatedlyheld, thut In the absence of a *nlid statute, the dozmioalcmers oourt has no authoritytolow any 8ms of aoney to lte ZHQbera for expsuma.

The oaaei8sfon~ra~ aourt in the absenor of a **VRlItd** statute la unauthorizedto allow autonmblle 0-8 to it8 member8. Sea **letter** Opinionsof this departmsrt,

Vol. 550, page 642, dated Nemh l%th, 1958, wrlttsn by lion. James W. Hair, ksabtant Attmrmy Oanbral, and addreasod to &XI. R. #. %ripllPg, County 3ud@e, S~JI Augustine,Texfm. Opinion I&. O$QO of this department, held Eouae Bill Xo. **806** of the 46th ~gialature at **TOXINS,** relatingto travellugexpensea oi oounty a~slonera **in** oountleahoPias a-population.of nat lms thantZ,lOO an6 not EOXB than 32,500, aooomlingto the last preoediBg ~OdQlWl ce5SU8, WU6 U5~055t~f~ti056~ 15 t&t it **18 a apeolalor loeel lew regulatingthe affairs ofmmnt&as end prohibftedby lseatlon S6 of ArtloleEtX:oi the wl8titutlon of TQxRe.

The eamlasioners? oourt, la the absence of a valid stetute,does not hev'o atxthority

to all&n theatse~expsnae none !'or gesoline spent in disohargeof their dutleti. 300 L tter Opinions of this departroent, dated Juriuary ES, 1935, written by Hon. la05 0. 18em, cOealstant

Attorney General of Texae, addTossedto Hon. W. C. RoEkmeld, Count0Att~ma~, Xoabert ha, Texas. Also see opinionsMos.. HO-?%3, O-890, O-996 and O-1545 of this departwent,

You are, therefore,seeps&fully advlssd Itbatit 1.a the opinion or this de~rtmnt thut your question should be ans?fsreQ in the ne&Htireand 1% is 80 a!umered. Very truly your
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MELINDA S. MURRAY, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4187

)

PINGORA LOAN SERVICES, LLC; )

PLANTATION HOMEOWNRES, INC, )

UNKNOWN TENANT IN POSSESSION 1, )

UNKNOWN TENANT IN POSSESSION 2, )

UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF MELINDA S. )

MURRAY, )

 )

Appellees. )

)

Opinion filed December 6, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Elizabeth G. Rice, 

Judge.

Melinda S. Murray, pro se. 

Charles P. Gufford of McCalla Raymer 

Liebert Pierce, LLC, Orlando, for Appellee

Pingora Loan Services, LLC. 

No appearance for remaining Appellees. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
- 2 -

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
CT Communications, Inc.:

     We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Registration Nos. 33-59641, 33-59643, 33-59645, 333-15537, 333-30125,
333-38895, 333-77323, 333-65818, and 333-65846) of CT Communications, Inc. of
our report dated March 18, 2002, relating to the audited consolidated balance
sheets of Palmetto MobileNet, L.P. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and the
related consolidated statements of income and partners' equity, and cash flows
for each of the three years ended December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999, which
report is included in the December 31, 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K of CT
Communications, Inc.

                                          Bauknight Pietras & Stormer, P.A.

Columbia, South Carolina
March 30, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,826,860
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    389,451
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         388,595
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       762,913
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,367,819
<COMMON>                                        45,553
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      582,710
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            365,995
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,011,191
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           49,160
<PREFERRED>                                     43,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           880,057
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                             191,750
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   66,467
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,126,194
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                3,367,819
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      751,160
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            38,279
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     610,483
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     648,762
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        102,398
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              (3,369)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  99,029
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        43,215
<NET-INCOME>                                    55,814
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      2,980
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   52,834
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        44,569
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                            0
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          70,585
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.14


</TABLE>
I

107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1222

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 9, 2002

Referred to the Committee on Government Reform

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 89 River Street in Hoboken, New Jersey,

as the ‘‘Frank Sinatra Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1222 RFH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF FRANK SINATRA POST

2 OFFICE BUILDING.

3 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo4 cated at 89 River Street in Hoboken, New Jersey, shall

5 be known and designated as the ‘‘Frank Sinatra Post Of6 fice Building’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

10 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

11 to the Frank Sinatra Post Office Building.

Passed the Senate March 22, 2002.

Attest: JERI THOMSON,

Secretary.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.29 MB)
 
 Royal Danish Army trainer COALITION isil british building partner capacity cjtf 4 RIFLES ASSAULT isf iraqi Operation Inherent Resolve Centcom
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
consolidated balance sheets and the consolidated statements of income of Journal
Register  Company for the quarter ended  September 30, 1998, and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                   1,000
       
<S>                            <C>   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                 JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                               9,866  
<SECURITIES>                             0   
<RECEIVABLES>                       65,582    
<ALLOWANCES>                         7,626   
<INVENTORY>                         10,377   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    87,818   
<PP&E>                             225,088   
<DEPRECIATION>                     131,345    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     680,595    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               64,306    
<BONDS>                            782,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0   
<COMMON>                               484     
<OTHER-SE>                        (239,942)   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       680,595  
<SALES>                                  0  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   114,046 
<CGS>                                    0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       66,656 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     6,776     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                     1,878   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  14,133   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     13,707  
<INCOME-TAX>                         5,597  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  8,110  
<DISCONTINUED>                           0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                      4,495   
<CHANGES>                                0   
<NET-INCOME>                         3,615
<EPS-PRIMARY>                         0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                         0.07
                               



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          81,902
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,830
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     32,150
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               202,886
<PP&E>                                       1,725,239
<DEPRECIATION>                               (620,825)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,894,508
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,360,694
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,457
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,359,678
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,894,508
<SALES>                                      1,821,550
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,821,550
<CGS>                                        (811,452)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             (11,473,771)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (36,782)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (10,499,902)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,434,865)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,065,037)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.68)


</TABLE>
From: rhordas@ordas.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Health Care Law

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:36:40 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care

under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services,

are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature

database 6367 (20110810) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
Page 1 of 1

FEMUEUA/ CO SEP 0 8 2yig

LEGAL Fixx
AtiON & REGULATIONS.
PUBLIC: aA

As of: September 08, 2010

PUBLIC Status: Posted

SUBMISSION Tracking No. S0psi651.
Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0854
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Milton Douglas Lynes
Address:
Portage, MI,
Organization: Austin Lake Chiropractic

General Comment

To Whom it my Concern,

The current policies which exist and are managed by some of the largest insurance carriers out
there, ie BCBS, Priority health, United Healthcare include previsions excluding coverage for
preexisting conditions. If these policies were left to continue operations unchanged by being
grandfathered in it would defeat the whole purpose of inclusion for national healthcare. Insurance
companies would continue operating these exclusive policies, and if anything would utilize them
more if they were granted a grandfather status.

I have been in the healthcare field for 14 years and have seen many changes in insurance over
these short years, and I feel this grandfather status should not pass. It would negate all the gains
which were made by the nationa! healthcare coallition.

Douglas Lynes

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=Pr..._ 9/8/2010
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.09 MB)
 
 The U-2S is a single-seat single-engine high-altitude reconnaissance and surveillance aircraft capable of providing signals imagery electronic measurements and signature intelligence to U.S. and coalition forces.
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Consolidated  Resources Health Care Fund
II (the  "Partnership")  on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2000 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, John F. McMullan,  Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the  Partnership,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, subject
to the  qualification  noted  below:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects,  the financial condition and results of the operations of the
Partnership.

This certification is qualified by the fact that the Report was not filed within
90 days after the end of the  Partnership's  fiscal  year as required by General
Instruction A to Form 10-K.

Date:  February 10, 2003                By:  /s/ John F. McMullan
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        John F. McMullan
                                        Chief Financial Officer (chief executive
                                        officer and chief financial officer of
                                        the Partnership)
# Europeiska unionens C 152/9 ju

| | ISSN 1725-2504 |
| --- | --- |
| Europeiska unionens
  officiella tidning | C 152 |
| | |
| Svensk utgåva | Meddelanden och upplysningar | 47 årgången9 juni 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2504

Europeiska unionens

officiella tidning

C 152

Svensk utgåva

Meddelanden och upplysningar

47 årgången9 juni 2004

---

| Informationsnummer | Innehållsförteckning | Sida |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Meddelanden |
| | Kommissionen |
| 2004/C 152/1 | Eurons växelkurs | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Innehållsförteckning

Sida

I   Meddelanden

Kommissionen

2004/C 152/1

Eurons växelkurs

1

| SV | |
| --- | --- |

SV

---

I Meddelanden

Kommissionen

| 9.6.2004 | SV | Europeiska unionens officiella tidning | C 152/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2004

SV

Europeiska unionens officiella tidning

C 152/1

---

Eurons växelkurs (1)

8 juni 2004

(2004/C 152/01)

1 euro=

| | Valuta | Kurs |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US-dollar | 1,2294 |
| JPY | japansk yen | 135,08 |
| DKK | dansk krona | 7,4349 |
| GBP | pund sterling | 0,66840 |
| SEK | svensk krona | 9,1040 |
| CHF | schweizisk franc | 1,5229 |
| ISK | isländsk krona | 87,36 |
| NOK | norsk krona | 8,1885 |
| BGN | bulgarisk lev | 1,9558 |
| CYP | cypriotiskt pund | 0,58300 |
| CZK | tjeckisk koruna | 31,243 |
| EEK | estnisk krona | 15,6466 |
| HUF | ungersk forint | 251,15 |
| LTL | litauisk litas | 3,4527 |
| LVL | lettisk lats | 0,6623 |
| MTL | maltesisk lira | 0,4263 |
| PLN | polsk zloty | 4,5957 |
| ROL | rumänsk leu | 40 758 |
| SIT | slovensk tolar | 239,1500 |
| SKK | slovakisk koruna | 39,870 |
| TRL | turkisk lira | 1 811 841 |
| AUD | australisk dollar | 1,7507 |
| CAD | kanadensisk dollar | 1,6520 |
| HKD | Hongkongdollar | 9,5838 |
| NZD | nyzeeländsk dollar | 1,9568 |
| SGD | singaporiansk dollar | 2,0990 |
| KRW | sydkoreansk won | 1 423,46 |
| ZAR | sydafrikansk rand | 8,0262 |

Valuta

Kurs

USD

US-dollar

1,2294

JPY

japansk yen

135,08

DKK

dansk krona

7,4349

GBP

pund sterling

0,66840

SEK

svensk krona

9,1040

CHF

schweizisk franc

1,5229

ISK

isländsk krona

87,36

NOK

norsk krona

8,1885

BGN

bulgarisk lev

1,9558

CYP

cypriotiskt pund

0,58300

CZK

tjeckisk koruna

31,243

EEK

estnisk krona

15,6466

HUF

ungersk forint

251,15

LTL

litauisk litas

3,4527

LVL

lettisk lats

0,6623

MTL

maltesisk lira

0,4263

PLN

polsk zloty

4,5957

ROL

rumänsk leu

40 758

SIT

slovensk tolar

239,1500

SKK

slovakisk koruna

39,870

TRL

turkisk lira

1 811 841

AUD

australisk dollar

1,7507

CAD

kanadensisk dollar

1,6520

HKD

Hongkongdollar

9,5838

NZD

nyzeeländsk dollar

1,9568

SGD

singaporiansk dollar

2,0990

KRW

sydkoreansk won

1 423,46

ZAR

sydafrikansk rand

8,0262

---

(1)

Källa: Referensväxelkurs offentliggjord av Europeiska centralbanken.

---