alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1



                       Report of Independent Accountants



To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders:


We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of NSTAR
and its subsidiaries as of June 30, 2000 and the related consolidated statement
of income, of comprehensive income and of retained earnings for each of the
three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2000 and June 30, 1999 and the
consolidated statement of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30,
2000 and June 30, 1999.  These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants.  A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analyti8cal procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a
whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements
for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We previously audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards,
the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 1999, and the related
consolidated statements of income, of comprehensive income, of retained earnings
and of cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our
report dated January 26, 2000 we expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements.  In our opinion, the information set forth in
the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2000, is
fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance
sheet from which it has been derived.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
August 11, 2000
#### Viola T. Adams, Appellant, v. James O. Cole, Sheriff, etc., Respondent.

— Order vacating reference reversed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Pratt, J.;

Dykman, J., not sitting.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer**

 

I,Domenic Gatto, Chief Executive Officer of Atlantic Express Transportation Corp.(the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to the best of my knowledge:

 

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of theCompany  for the quarter ended September 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|     | /s/ Domenic Gatto         |   |   |
|----------|---------------------------|--------|--------|
|     | Domenic Gatto             |
| * * | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

Date: December 5,2005

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Reportpursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.

 

----
Exhibit 15.1      May 3, 2004   Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549  Commissioners:   We are aware that our report dated May 3, 2004 on our review of interim financial information of NSTAR for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 and included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
then ended is incorporated by reference in its Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-78285) and in its Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-78285, 333-85559 and 333-87272).   Very truly yours,   PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
No. 480,

October Term, 1961.

#### Morales et al. *v.*City of Galveston et al., 370 U. S. 165.

Motion for leave to file petition for rehearing denied.
#### William H. Ensign and others, Respondents, v. Mills W. Barse and others, Appellants.

Order appointing receiver reversed, with ten 1 dollars costs and disbursements.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.08 MB)
 
 Marine Corps Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr. said Syrian Democratic Front forces and Iraqi security force
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,**

**Petitioner**

**v. PATRICK JOSEPH BRADLEY,**  **Respondent :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **No. 2189 Disciplinary Docket No. 3**

**No. 107 DB 2015 Attorney Registration No. 202416**  **(Montgomery County)**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 15 th**  **day of September, 2016, upon consideration of the Ve rified**  **Statement of Resignation, Patrick Joseph Bradley is disba rred on consent from the Bar**  **of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,** see **Pa.R.D.E. 215, and he shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217. Respondent shall pay**  **costs to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Pa.R.D.E. 208(g).**
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00004-CV

Kelly James Stinson, Appellant

v.

Rissie Owens, Chairperson, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 261ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-05-003850, HONORABLE STEPHEN YELENOSKY, JUDGE PRESIDING 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Kelly James Stinson, acting pro se, filed an appeal from the district court’s dismissal

of his claims against Rissie Owens, Chairperson of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles. On

March 21, 2008, appellant filed a motion seeking a 90-day extension of time to file his brief. That

day the Court granted his motion, extended his brief-filing deadline until June 6, 2008, and notified

him that no further requests for extension would be allowed.

On March 24, 2008, appellant filed an amended motion seeking a 120-day extension

of time to file his brief. The Court dismissed his amended motion on March 31, 2008, and

notified him that his appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution if he did not file his brief

by June 6, 2008. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). The deadline has passed, and we have not received

appellant’s brief. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.3(b), (c).
2

__________________________________________

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Waldrop

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: August 13, 2008
---

---

Exhibit 23.4

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Forms S-8, (File No.
333-61895, File No. 333-55970) and Forms S-3,( File No. 333-140968 , File No. 333-140969
and , File No. 333-140974) of our report dated March 6, 2006 relating to the financial
statements of C.D. Packaging Systemss 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders, which
appears in this Form 10-K of Ampal  American Israel Corporation .

/S/ Kesselman & Kesselman CPAs (ISR)
A member of Pricewaterhouse Coopers International Limited
Haifa, Israel
March 13, 2008



---

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6121

ALFRED DONNIE MARTIN, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BROAD RIVER CORR. INSTITUTION; MAJOR SHARON SUTTON; PVT 

JONES; INMATE RICHARD M. KOUGH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. 

(2:13-cv-01510-TMC)

Submitted: April 17, 2014 Decided: April 23, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alfred Donnie Martin, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jocelyn Newman, 

RICHARDSON, PLOWDEN & ROBINSON, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, 

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Alfred Donnie Martin, Jr., appeals the district 

court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) 

complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Martin 

v. Broad River Corr. Inst., No. 2:13-cv-01510-TMC (D.S.C. Nov. 

19, 2013; Jan. 17, 2014). We deny Martin’s motion for 

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
From: Carol Gilbert

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:11:03 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Carol Gilbert

555 Byron St

Palo Alto, CA 94301
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.59 MB)
 
 Baghdad General Dunford Joseph F. Dunford 19th CJCS Department of Defense Operation Inherent Resolve Iraq CJCS Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Joe Dunford Marine Corps Marines Joint Staff
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### LASSITER et al. *v.*UNITED STATES et al.

No. 116.

Decided October 8, 1962.

*Jack P. F. Gremillion,*Attorney General of Louisiana, *George Ponder*and *William P. Schuler,*Assistant Attorneys General, and *Albín P. Lassiter*for appellants.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Marshall, Howard A. Glickstein*and *Bernard A. Gould*for the United States et al.

Per Curiam.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice White and Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Docket No: FAA-2015-0081 Dir ID: 2014-NM-170-AD
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.27 MB)
 
 USS Mason Sailors Navy NAVCENT VBSS U.S. 5th Fleet
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### Charles Jansen, Appellant, v. Otto Stietz, New York Glass Letter Company, Respondent.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to abide event.
EXHIBIT 32 SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION BY DWIGHT O. SEEGMILLER In connection with the Annual Report
of Hills Bancorporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Dwight O. Seegmiller, Director, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 2.    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:  March 11, 2008
     By: /s/ Dwight O. SeegmillerDwight O. Seegmiller, Director, President and Chief Executive Officer SECTION 906
CERTIFICATION BY JAMES G. PRATT In connection with the Annual Report
of Hills Bancorporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, James G. Pratt, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and 2.    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:  March 11, 2008
     By: /s/ James G. PrattJames G. Pratt, Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer


Page 97 of 97

---

---
From: Deja

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Access to Contraceptives for ALL Women

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 10:44:24 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7421
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JERRELL ANTONIO THOMAS, a/k/a Baby Huey, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-69) Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 3, 1997 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerrell Antonio Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order denying Appellant's Petition for Disclosure of Signed Grand Jury Concurrence Form. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinionand find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Thomas , No. CR-94-69 (E.D. Va. July 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
From: Yara Tethys

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: access to health care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:57:41 PM

Hello,

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Yara Tethys