alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Carla Spencer

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 10:37:35 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs. Please do not back down or 'wobble' on

this - women need this. Thank you for fighting for us and our health.

Sincerely,

Carla Spencer

906 Historic Route 66 West

Waynesville, MO 65583
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Jack V. Chambers, certifythat: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Texas-New MexicoPower Company; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]

 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and as presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and; 

 

d) disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial. 

 

Date: March 8, 2005
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.43 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Carole Onderdonk

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Women"s Health Care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:33:40 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the

exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would

be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and

ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Carole Onderdonk

P.O. Box 1507

Gypsum, CO 81637

970-524-1016

970-471-9452

conderdonk@centurytel.net

Always do right. This will gratify some of the people and astonish the rest.

Mark Twain
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TANYA GRACE McDANIEL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

THE SECRETARIAT; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-16734

D.C. No. 2:15-cv-00828-GEBCKD

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Garland E. Burrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 25, 2016** 

Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

Tanya Grace McDaniel appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of her civil rights. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s

dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193,

FILED

NOV 03 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed McDaniel’s action because McDaniel

failed to allege facts sufficient to show that defendants were acting under color of

state law, as required to state a plausible claim for relief under § 1983. See

Chudacoff v. Univ. Med. Ctr. of S. Nev., 649 F.3d 1143, 1149-50 (9th Cir. 2011)

(setting forth elements of a § 1983 claim and describing instances in which a

private actor’s conduct constitutes state action); Caviness v. Horizon Cmty.

Learning Ctr., Inc., 590 F.3d 806, 812 (9th Cir. 2010) (“The state-action element

in § 1983 excludes from its reach merely private conduct, no matter how

discriminatory or wrongful.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); see

also Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341-42 (9th Cir. 2010) (although pro se

pleadings are to be liberally construed, a plaintiff must present factual allegations

sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief).

2 15-16734
The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing McDaniel’s

action without providing a third opportunity to amend the complaint because

further amendment would be futile. See Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans,

Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th Cir. 2011) (setting forth standard of review and

explaining that dismissal without leave to amend is proper when amendment would

be futile).

AFFIRMED.

3 15-16734
No. 521.

#### General Electric Co. *v.*United States.

*C. Rudolf Peterson*and *John P. Lipscomb*for petitioner.

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer*and *Harry Marselli*for the United States.

Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.
#mid-section {background: transparent;}#content {border: 0;	  padding: 20px 20px 25px 25px;	  background: white url("researchBackground.gif"/*tpa=http://www.nps.gov/archeology/images/research/researchBackground.gif*/) no-repeat bottom right;	  width: 603px;	  voice-family: "\"}\"";	/* ie5win hack  */	  voice-family: inherit;	  width: 497px;	  font-family: "Times New Roman", Times, serif;}		/* like this, or ie5win chokes on rollover */#content p {font-family:"Times New Roman", Times, serif;}#content h1 {margin: -20px -20px 25px -25px;	     border-bottom: 1px solid #9a9a9a;	     width: 748px;	     background-color: #d4e1d7;}#content h1 img {display: inline;		 margin-bottom: -2px;}#content img#numImg {border-right: 1px solid #9a9a9a;		     background: white;}#content h3 {color: black;	     margin-bottom: -1.0em;}#content h6,#nav a {color: #666666;}#content h6 {font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;	     font-size: 0.8em;	     margin: 0;}#precursor p {font-style: italic;}#content ul {list-style-type: none;	     margin: 0;	     padding: 0;}#content ol {	     margin: 0;	     padding: 0 0 0 0;}#content li h2 {font-size: 0.95em;}#content li p {font-size: 100%;}#content table.std {font: .8em verdana;}#content table.std {border-collapse:collapse; border:0; border-top: 1px solid #9a9a9a; border-right: 1px solid #9a9a9a; margin:0; padding:0;}#content table.std tr {border:0; margin:0; padding:0;}#content table.std td {border:0; border-bottom: 1px solid #9a9a9a; border-left: 1px solid #9a9a9a; padding-left:5px; background-color:#fff;} #content table.std td ul li{margin-top:0; margin-bottom:0;}#content table.std td.yes {background-color:#eee;}		/* |||||||||| FOOTER STYLES ||||||||||| */#bottomNav ul {display: inline;}#bottomNav li {display: inline;	       margin: 0;	       padding: 0 0 0 4px;	       border-right: 1px solid black;}#bottomNav {position: relative;	    left: 0;	    top: 0;	    padding: 0;	    text-align: center;}/* Fix IE5.01. Hide from IE Mac \*/* html #bottomNav li { float: none; height: 1%; }/* ||||| NAVIGATION COLUMN STYLES ||||| */#nav {width: 205px;      top: 117px;      left: 542px;      background: #d4e1d7;      border: 1px solid #9a9a9a;      border-width: 0 0 1px 1px;      text-transform: lowercase;      padding: 0 0 15px 0;}#printLink a {padding-left: 0;	      margin-right: 80px;}
1

The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-4394

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Western District of Missouri.

Todd Andes, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: April 2, 2007

Filed: April 6, 2007

___________

Before COLLOTON, HANSEN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Todd Andes appeals the sentence the district court1

 imposed after he pleaded

guilty to a felon-in-possession offense. In a brief filed under Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), his counsel asserts that Andes’s 188-month sentence is excessive

and that the district court violated Andes’s rights when it enhanced his sentence based

on prior convictions.
-2-

We enforce the broad appeal waiver included in Andes’s plea agreement: the

plea colloquy reflects that Andes understood and voluntarily accepted the terms of the

plea agreement, including the waiver; this appeal falls within the scope of the waiver;

and no injustice would result. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th

Cir. 2003) (en banc) (discussing enforceability of appeal waiver); see also United

States v. Estrada-Bahena, 201 F.3d 1070, 1071 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (enforcing

appeal waiver in Anders case). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal, and we grant counsel leave to withdraw.

______________________________
From: Elizabeth Gregory

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: YES to Birth Control for all Women Who Want It - NO to employer exemptions

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:01:30 PM

Dear Secretary Sebelius,

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

It's the women themselves who should be determining their own religious attitudes toward

contraception. If they don't want to use it, they don't have to.

Allowing employers to foist their views on women (is there an exemption for religious objections to

any other health care -- say, Viagra?) only continues society's failure to allow women to make their

own choices around education, work, sexuality and family.

Thank you for moving us this far on this important protection of women’s health and well being.

Please don’t be swayed to move us backward by the forces of yore.
From: Kasi Spyker

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 4:44:20 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

Thank you! I must commend the DHHS' landmark decision requiring health insurers to cover the full

cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

I cannot thank you enough for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Kasi Spyker

4601 N. Shelburne Dr

Bloomington, IN 47404
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

 

 

The undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Quarterly Report onForm 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 of On StageEntertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,and that the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.

Very truly yours,

 
|                           |
|--------------------------------|
| /s/ Timothy J.  Parrott        |   |
| Timothy J.  Parrott,           |
| Chief Executive  Officer       |
|                           |
|                           |
| /s/ Margaret Ann  Freman       |   |
| Margaret Ann  Freman,          |
| Chief Financial  Officer       |
|                           |
|                           |
| Dated:  November 12, 2002 |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-23-042]

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

 United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE: 

September 8, 2023 at 11:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS: 

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

                        1.                         *Agendas for future meetings:*                         none.                    

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Commission vote on Inv. Nos. 701-TA-570 and 731-TA-1346 (Review) (Aluminum Foil from China). The Commission currently is scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on September 19, 2023.

5. Commission vote on Inv. Nos. 701-TA-693 and 731-TA-1629-1640 (Preliminary) (Mattresses from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Burma, India, Indonesia, Italy, Kosovo, Mexico, Philippines, Poland, Slovenia, Spain, and Taiwan). The Commission currently is scheduled to complete and file its determinations on September 11, 2023; views of the Commission currently are scheduled to be completed and filed on September 18, 2023.

                        6.                         *Outstanding action jackets:*                         none.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Sharon Bellamy, Acting Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, 202-205-2000.

The Commission is holding the meeting under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: August 30, 2023.

Sharon Bellamy,

Acting Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-19106 Filed 8-30-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatement on Forms S-3 (No. 333-105650) and S-8 (No. 333-108974, No. 333-98773,No. 333-83298 and No. 333-43316) of McDATA Corporation of our report datedApril 14, 2004 relating to the financial statements and financial statementschedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

 
| /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
|--------------------------------|
|                           |
| Denver, CO                     |
| April 14, 2004                 |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          32,477
<SECURITIES>                                    27,542
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,186
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     24,908
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               140,720
<PP&E>                                         227,903
<DEPRECIATION>                                (69,436)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 490,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,513
<BONDS>                                        149,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,501
<OTHER-SE>                                     159,972
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   490,712
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               239,112
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  212,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (7,283)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,318
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,385
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,548
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,837
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .74


</TABLE>