alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2  Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002    The undersigned hereby certifies, in my capacity as an officer of NSTAR, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:(i)the enclosed Quarterly Report of NSTAR on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(ii)the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of NSTAR.  Dated: August 1, 2007By:/s/ JAMES J. JUDGEJames J. JudgeSenior Vice President,Treasurer and ChiefFinancial Officer
#### Charles J. Bilwiller and another, Respondents, v. Gustave Simon, Appellant.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (13.12 MB)
 
 Grand Slam Wing 379 ESFS 379 AEW C-UAS
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### Louis M. Brock and others, v. Benjamin Knower.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
EXHIBIT 23.1
                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
COMARCO, Inc.

         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statements Nos. 33-37863,  33-44943,  33-45096,  33-50068, and 33-63219 on Forms
S-8 of  COMARCO,  Inc.  of our report  dated  March 25,  1997,  relating  to the
consolidated balance sheets of COMARCO,  Inc. and Subsidiaries as of January 31,
1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated  statements of income and cash flows
and the related  schedule for each of the years in the  three-year  period ended
January 31, 1997,  which report appears in the January 31, 1997 annual report on
Form 10-K of COMARCO, Inc. and Subsidiaries.






                                                      KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

McLean, Virginia
April 25, 1997
From: Gail Grabow

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: human women"s rights

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 5:56:11 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

sincerely ,

Gail Grabow

4610 Bryant Ave SO #304

Minneapolis MN

55419
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C. SECTION
      1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT
      TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
      OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Caribbean American Health Resorts, Inc.,
      a
      Minnesota corporation (the ”Company”), on Form 10-KSB for the period
      ending  December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),  I,
      Halton Martin, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
      knowledge and belief:





1.
      The Annual Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.








/s/
                Halton Martin
            Dated:
                January 8, 2008Halton
                MartinChief
                Executive Officer andPrincipal
                Financial Officer
From: Theresa Lauber

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: HHS Mandate

Date: Thursday, August 04, 2011 1:03:58 AM

I completely disagree with the new HHS mandate requiring all insurance plans 

provide the full range of contraceptives as "preventative health services." The World

Health Organization lists oral contraceptives with arsenic, asbestos and tobacco on 

its list of most dangerous substances that are classified as carcinogenic to humans. 

Furthermore, the mandate completely disregards the conscience rights of millions of 

Americans and tramples religious rights. I'm assuming this mandate is a thank you 

to Planned Parenthood for its support of certain election campaigns. I am against it 

on every level. This mandate is completely at odds with American freedom and 

democracy.
1210-AB32-2-1200.html[7/24/2015 7:32:37 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 09, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jvs-ettz

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1694

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Adam Holdaway

General Comment

I am completely against this rule. I'm smart enough to plan for my own retirement and know how to handle my

 own personal finances. I don't think it's right to put transaction restrictions for anyone living in such a critical

 time of their life, what they've been working all their life for, retirement. It is their money, and the government

 has no place to dictate where they can or can't spend their money, especially retirement money.
No. 467.

#### Alvado et al. *v.*General Motors Corp.

*Harry Montgomery Ijeet, Sidney S. Berman, Frank Montgomery, Sheldon E. Bernstein, Morton Lijtin*and *Joseph M. Stone*for petitioners.

*Aloysius F. Power*and *George A. Brooks*for respondent.

Motion to defer consideration of petition for certiorari and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.
UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





FORM 8-K


CURRENT REPORT





Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934





DATE OF REPORT (Date of earliest event reported): September 21, 2016





CATERPILLAR FINANCIAL SERVICES CORPORATION


(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)





Delaware (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION)001-11241 (COMMISSION FILE NUMBER)37-1105865 (IRS EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)





2120 West End Avenue, Nashville, Tennessee    37203-0001 (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)    (ZIP CODE)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (615) 341-1000





Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:


o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)





o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)





o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))





o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




















---







I tem 8.01 Other Events .


On September 21, 2016, Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation (the “Company”) issued a press release announcing the early results and pricing terms of its private offers to exchange certain of its outstanding series of medium-term notes for a combination of a new issue of the Company’s Medium-Term Notes, Series H due 2021 and cash.  A copy of the press release is filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits .





(d) Exhibits . The following Exhibit is filed as part of this Current Report:


99.1Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated September 21, 2016.














---







SIGNATURE





Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Current Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.





Caterpillar Financial Services CorporationDate: September 21, 2016By:/s/ Leslie S. ZmuggName: Leslie S. Zmugg Title:   Secretary














---







EXHIBIT INDEX








ExhibitNumberDescription99.1Caterpillar Financial Services Corporation press release dated September 21, 2016.
Rockingham, )

April 4, 1911.

#### Rockingham County *v.*Brown.

*Charles H. Batchelder,*solicitor, for the plaintiffs.

*Ernest L. Guptill,*for the defendant.

Walker, J.

This is an agreed case which makes no provision for a final order or other disposition of the case, after the questions of law supposed to be involved are determined. It is not advisable for the court upon such a case, unassisted by brief or argument from either side, to seek to discover the questions of law that may be involved and to decide them, in the absence of any intimation what disposition shall be made of the case, or what effect such a decision is expected to have upon the determination of the controversy. *Conn. Valley Lumber Co.*v. *Monroe,*71 N. H. 473.

*Case discharged.*

All concurred.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.82 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: sklong46@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Date: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 11:50:42 PM

I am very concerned about the HHS intention to recognize church organizations only

as they meet their defiition. Pregnancy is not a disease. Requiring employers

provide insurance that includes contraceptives, sterilizations and education on their

use is a huge infringement upon religious liberty. The government should stay out of

the church. Our first amendment rights demand it.

To curtail the activities of a church ministry by requiring that it serve only people of its

own faith is to deny the mission of the church itself. We are to serve all in need.

There is no litmus test before we render aid. If there were, organizations like the Red

Cross and Salvation Army would not be the first responders to the catastrophies of

the world that they are. We are to reach out in our communities. We meet needs first

and share our faith second.

 

Please stop the HHS attempt to impose requirements that violate the conscience of

the people working for church-related organizations. Conscientious objections by

organizations as well as individuals should be respected by the government.

Sharon Long

10507 SE 11th Street

Vancouver, WA 98664

(360) 944-8823
From: Lois Graf

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: ACCEPT RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE re preventative care/REJECT exemptions for

"religious employers"

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 9:30:40 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care

under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.”

These preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless

women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services,

are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s recommendations

and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-2033

___________ Matthew Joseph Sikora, Jr., * * Appellant, * * v. * * Frank X. Hopkins, Warden, in his * individual and official capacity; * Nebraska State Penitentiary; Joel * Staley, “D” Unit Manager, in his * Appeal from the United States individual and official capacity; Phil * District Court for the Jefferson, Mental Health Staff * District of Nebraska Personnel, in his individual and * official capacity; Rick Hargreaves, * [UNPUBLISHED] Mental Health Staff Personnel, in his * individual and official capacity; John * Does, in their individual and official * capacities; Unknown Williams, * “Buddy”; Tim Knight, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: September 8, 1998 Filed: October 23, 1998

___________ Before McMILLIAN, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________TheHonorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District 1 of Nebraska, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable David L
. Piester, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Nebraska. -2- PER CURIAM. Matthew Jos eph Sikora, Jr., appeals from a final order entered in the Unite d States Dist rict Court for the District of Nebraska, dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 198 3 1 complaint, asserting constitutional violations and a state law tort claim. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm, but amen d the dismissal of the state law property-damage claim to be without prejudice. Sikora, f ormerly a Nebraska prisoner, alleged that prison officials conspired to vio late his constitutional rights, denied him access to the courts, harassed him, an d discriminated

against him; he also claimed defendants violated state tort law by using aforeign device or equipment to “encapsulate his body in a static-magnetic pressure fieldto trac k, monitor, harass, and stalk him on a continual daily basis,” and b y damaging and destroying certain personal property. The district court dismisse d Sikora’s in forma pauperis complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). We agree that Sikora fa

iled to state an access-to-courts claim because he failed to allege actual harm, see Lewis v. Casey , 518 U.S. 343, 351 (1996); Myers v
. Hundley , 101 F.3d 542, 544-45 (8th Cir. 1996), and that Sikora’s claim of bodily injury by defendants’ use of a “foreign device or equipment” is frivolous.
To the e xtent Sikora alleged defendants destroyed his personal property, w e conclude s uch state law claim is not frivolous. See Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 81-8,20 9 to 81-8,235 (1996). Because the claims over which the district court had original jurisdiction were properly dismissed, and the district court may decline to exercise-3-

supplemental jurisdiction over the pendent s tate claim, see 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3), we amend the dismissal of the property-destruction claim to be without prejudice. Accordingly, we affirm but amend the dismissal of the property-destruction claim to be without prejudice. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Page 1 of 1

SWI SfEY/ F- ;
LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION LUEOMEW ALC AUG 2 7 2010
PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS
BRANC

[As of: August 26, 2010

PUBLIC Btatusr Posted,

Posted: August 26, 2010
SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0477
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Submitter Information

Name: Frank W. Ruprich
Address:

35418 Sunset Dr.

Sterling Heights, MI, 48312
Email: dsrfwr@ameritech.net
Phone: 586-764-9181

General Comment

As a consumer wish to comment on the interim final rule regarding
health plans and "grandfathered" status[Doc ID IRS-2010-0010-0001]. I support the total
position that the ACA American Chiropractic Association proposed in it's document submitted to
Office of Consummer Info and Insurance Oversight on Aug 9,2010.

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/26/2010
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6868** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
XAVIER MARCELLUS PAUL , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Easte rn District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. ( 1:98

- cr - 00192

- JCC

- 4 )

Submitted : January 13, 2011 Decided: January 19, 2011

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinio n .
Xavier Marcellus Paul, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Xavier Marcellus Paul appeals the d istrict court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Paul , No. 1:98

- cr - 00192

- JCC

- 4 (E.D. Va. June 10, 2010) **.** We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
From: Rev. Alice Batcher

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 8:13:30 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Rev. Alice Batcher

61 Horseshoe Ct

Amityville, NY 11701