alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 21, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 05-50026

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee

v. HECTOR ENRIQUE GODOY-MORAN Defendant - Appellant

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, El Paso

---------------------
Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
IT IS ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the sentence is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee ’s unopposed motion to
remand case to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, El Paso Division, for resentencing is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that appellee’s unopposed motion in the

alternative to extend time to file appellee’s brief until 14 days from the Court’s denial of appellee’s motion to vacate and remand is DENIED as moot.
----------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1 

f LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 

PUBLICATION&. REGULATIONS,_ -.... BRANCH 

As of: August 25, 2010 

Received: August 10, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 25, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2dOf9 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-Q010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Statu~i as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-001O-0368 


Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 


Submitter Information 

Name: Gayle M Lee 

Address: 

320 Henderson Cir 


Harrisburg, Ne, 28075 


General Comment 

See attached file(s) 

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0368.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

https:llfdms.erulemaking.netJfdms-web-agency/componentJsubmitterInfoCoverPage?Call= ... 8/25/2010 
8110/2010 

Office ofConsumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-201 0­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every eff011 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PP ACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grand fathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Gayle M. Lee
Exhibit 4.3


 


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated April 21, 2016, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-209474) of Smart Trust 242,
comprising Smart Trust, Zacks GARP Composite 35 Trust, Series 9.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


April 21, 2016
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1222 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 332
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1222

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 89 River Street in Hoboken, New Jersey, as the ``Frank Sinatra Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 24, 2001

Mr. Torricelli introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
           referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

                            March  21, 2002

              Reported by Mr. Lieberman, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 89 River Street in Hoboken, New Jersey, as the ``Frank Sinatra Post 
                           Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF FRANK SINATRA POST
              OFFICE BUILDING.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 89 
River Street in Hoboken, New Jersey, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Frank Sinatra Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the Frank Sinatra Post Office 
Building.

                                                       Calendar No. 332

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1222

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 89 River Street in Hoboken, New Jersey, as the ``Frank Sinatra Post 
                           Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 21, 2002

                       Reported without amendment
```
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1210

To reauthorize the Native American Housing Assistance and SelfDetermination Act of 1996.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 20, 2001

Mr. CAMPBELL (for himself, Mr. INOUYE, Mr. DASCHLE, Mr. JOHNSON, and

Mr. BURNS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

A BILL

To reauthorize the Native American Housing Assistance and

Self-Determination Act of 1996.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Native American

5 Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Reauthoriza6 tion Act of 2001’’.
2

•S 1210 IS

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE NATIVE AMERICAN

2 HOUSING ASSISTANCE AND SELF-DETER3 MINATION ACT OF 1996.

4 (a) BLOCK GRANTS.—Section 108 of the Native

5 American Housing Assistance and Self-Determination Act

6 of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4117) is amended by striking ‘‘, 1999,

7 2000, and 2001’’ and inserting ‘‘through 2006’’.

8 (b) FEDERAL GUARANTEES.—Subsections (a) and

9 (b) of section 605 of the Native American Housing Assist10 ance and Self-Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C.

11 4195) are each amended by striking ‘‘, 1998, 1999, 2000,

12 and 2001’’ and inserting ‘‘through 2006’’.

13 (c) TRAINING AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.—Sec14 tion 703 of the Native American Housing Assistance and

15 Self-Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4212) is

16 amended by striking ‘‘, 1998, 1999, 2000, and 2001’’ and

17 inserting ‘‘through 2006’’.

Æ
From: Meriel Shire

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 4:56:02 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Meriel Shire

1829 Vermont Ave NW

Washington, DC 20001
#### Isaac McConihe, Respondent, v. Augustus Clark and others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, to be collected out of sale of the property, and of appellants personally. Opinion by

Learned, P. J.;

Landon, J., not acting.
#### Town of East Rome *v.*City of Rome *et al.*

Argued June 22,

Decided August 14, 1907.

Petition for injunction. Before Judge Wright. Floyd superior court. December 31, 1906.

*Ilenry Walker,*for plaintiff.

*John W. & G. E. Maddox,*for defendants.

Cobb, P. J.

1. A municipal corporation can be sued only in the corporate name set forth in the charter. *Town of Dexter*v. *Gay,*115 *Ga.*765 (42 S. E. 94); *Augusta Sou. Ry. Co. v. Tennille,*119 *Ga.*804 (47 S. E. 179).

2. When the General Assembly, by an act incorporating a town, declares that it shall be “known and called the Town of East Rome,” and that the corporate name of said town shall be “The Mayor and Council of the Town of East Rome,” by which name it may sue and be sued, such a town can sue and be sued only in the name last referred to; and a suit brought in the name of “The Town of East Rome” should.be dismissed on demurrer. *Town of Dexter*v. *Gay,*supra; Acts 1882-3, p. 411.

3. A suit of the character above indicated, not being brought in the name of a natural person, a corporation, or a partnership, was a mere nullity; and there was nothing in the petition, in such a suit, to support an amendment of any character whatever. *Western*& *Atlantic R. Co.*v. *Dalton Marble Works,*122 *Ga.*774 (50 S. E. 978), and cases cited.

4. The petition was not amendable, as there was nothing to amend by, and the suit was a nullity; but the court should not have dismissed the same in vacation, before the return term; and the judgment will be reversed, with direction that the order of dismissal be entered in term. *Ivey*v. *Rome,*ante.

*JiMgment reversed, with direction.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Pirate attack thwarted in Gulf of Aden
 By None  , US Naval Forces Central Command
  
 USS MONTEREY, At Sea (Feb. 26, 2008) – The Danish flexible support ship HDMS Absalon (L 16) successfully deterred an attempted pirate attack on the Chinese M/V Yandanghai at approximately 1:30 p.m. Wednesday. Absalon closed on the coordinates given by the Chinese ship following their distress call and spotted a skiff matching the description given by the captain of the motor vessel. A Danish boarding team then boarded the suspected skiff, finding several weapons, including a rocket-propelled grenade (RPG), four AK-47 assault rifles, two grenades and a knife. The weapons were cataloged and confiscated. The suspected pirates were unable to board the vessel due to evasive measures taken by the ship’s crew who engaged their fire hoses to keep the suspected pirates a safe distance from the ship. According to Yandanhai’s captain, two of the motorvessel’s crew sustained minor injuries during the attack. CTF 151 is a multinational task force that conducts counter-piracy operations in and around the Gulf of Aden, Arabian Sea, Indian Ocean and the Red Sea and was established to create a lawful maritime order and develop security in the maritime environment.
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                Certification of the Principal Financial Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with  the  quarterly  report  of  A.B.  Watley  Group  Inc. (the
"Company")  on  Form 10-Q for the nine months ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
Robert  Malin, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:



     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                                 /s/ Robert Malin
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 Robert Malin
                                                 Principal Financial Officer
                                                 Date: August 12, 2003


<PAGE>
From: Jennifer OLeary

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 8:35:07 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Jennifer OLeary

100 Stone Hill Rd

Apt R9

Springfield, NJ 07081
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 10f2 rp6G- JIr41 J- -)6 

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 


PUBLICATION &. REGULATIONS 


BRANCH 


As of: August 20, 2010 

Received: August 09,2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 20, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2c6d5 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and AfforabJe Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-001O-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-001O-0255 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Vallarie Sue Fisher 

Address: 


8303 Braesview Ln. 


Houston, TX, 77071 


Email: vfisher71O@aol.com 


Phone: 713-777-1427 


Organization: none 


------------------------------------------------------------------,--­

General Comment 

8/9/10 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 


Department of Health and Human Services 


Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 


Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 


Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status 

as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-2010­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

https:llfdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agencyIcomponentisubmitterInfoCoverPage ?Call=... 8/20/2010 
Page 20f2 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comment$ 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Vallarie S. Fisher 

https:llfdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency IcomponentisubmitterlnfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/20/2010
---

---

EXHIBIT 23.10



|TO:            | PricewaterhouseCoopers
      - Tel Aviv                    
|-------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------
|RE:            | Ampal American Israel
      Corporation  Subsequent Events
|COMPANY NAME.: | Hod Hasharon Sport
      Center (1992) Limited Partnership 
|COMPANY NO.:   | 55-0012629                                                 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**



As independent public accountants of Hod Hasharon Sports Center (1992) Limited
  Partnership, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our report dated as of
  February 24, 2004, included in Form 10-K of Ampal American Israel Corporation,
  previously filed Registration Statement File No. 333-61895, and No. 333-55970.





Somekh Chaikin
  Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)

Tel Aviv March 28, 2004

---

---

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
  PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
  (Form S-8 No.333-61895 and Form S-8 No.333-55970) of our report dated February
  27, 2003, with respect to the financial statements of Hod Hasharon Sport Center
  (1992) Limited Partnership included in the Annual Report (Form 10K) for 2003
  of Ampal-American Israel Corporation.



| | **Luboshitz
      Kasierer**             
| | -----------------------------------------
| | Certified
      Public Accountants (Isr.)

March 24, 2004

---

---
From: Valerie Gibson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 8:36:44 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Valerie Gibson

P.O. Box 178

Norwood, CO 81423
#### William C. N. Swift, Respondent v. Pacific Mail Steamship Company and others, Appellants.

Judgment and order affirmed. Opinion by

Daniels, J.
From: Cynthia Dear

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Oppose "religious employer"

Date: Saturday, August 06, 2011 9:45:05 AM

I want to express my opposition to the definition of "religious employer" within

the context of a lack of true conscience protection! Please stop providing ways to

abort innocent babies!!!

Cynthia L Dear
LEGAL PRUC DO:

PUBLICATION NCH.

Page 1 of 2

REGULATIONS

sie vivisiJN BECMEM A 0 AUG 2 3 2010

‘ATION &
RANCH

As of: August 20, 2010 10
Received: August 09,

PUBLIC Be sn 20

SUBMISSION Fomsmnedes use Augest 16, 2010

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0293
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

NS SS

Submitter Information

Name: Earl Briggs Allen
Address:
15114 Stonewall Rdg
Bristol, VA, 24202

General Comment

August 9,2010

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight
Department of Health and Human Services

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC

P.O. Box 8016

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Heaith Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status
as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

As a consumer 1 wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on
the interim final rule regarding health plans and “grandfather” status (Document ID IRS-2010-
0010-0001).

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally
important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort
should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would
extend these protections to consumers under currently existing “grandfathered” plans should not
be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments
offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=...

8/20/2010



Page 2 of 2

regulations.

Briggs Allen

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=..._ 8/20/2010
From: Suzanne Oliver

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Grave Concern

Date: Sunday, August 07, 2011 3:02:49 AM

To Whom This May Concern:

I am gravely concerned over the recent Federal mandate that require health plans

to provide the full range of FDA-approved contraceptive methods, as “preventive

health services” for women.” As a tax payer, and as a devout Christian practicing

my faith in ALL areas of my life, I am dumbfounded regarding the lack of respect for

life and lack of respect for counscience which is foundational to a just society.

I am asking, as a taxpayer, for a reconsideration of this mandate. At a minimum I

am requesting that a robust conscience protection be granted, not only for all

religious employers, but also for all employers, insurers, and policy issuers with

moral, ethical, or religious objections. As it is, the limitations contained in the

regulations for religious employers make the exemption virtually meaningless.

To make me pay for, and therefore be a part of, this poor decision to mislead the

american people as well as kill innocent life that can not speak for itself is unjust and

unamerican. Please reconsider.

-- 

Suzanne E. Oliver, Executive Director

Music Therapist-Board Certified

Neurologic Music Therapist, Fellow

Neurologic Music Therapy Services of Arizona

2702 N. Third St., Suite 1000

Phoenix, Arizona 85004

602-840-6410

www.nmtsa.org