alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.22 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Fr. Ralph Caley OSB/OHI

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 10:20:40 AM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Christian employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Christian institutions to make free birth control and

sterilization available in health plans. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Fr. Ralph Caley OSB/OHI
Heber Springs, Arkansas
#### BERESINA SCHOOL DISTRICT, NO. 23, a Public Corporation, Appellant, v. JACOB STEINWANDT, Respondent.

(235 N. W. 348.)

Opinion filed February 18, 1931.

*Franz Shubeck,*for appellant.

*Wishek & Wishek,*and *Jacobsen & Murray,*for respondent.

Burr, J.

This action was commenced in justice court, and, upon demand for change of venue, was transferred to the police magistrate’s court. Here the defendant demurred to the jurisdiction of the police magistrate, and when the demurrer was overruled he withdrew from the case. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff and the defendant appealed to the district court. The notice of appeal states *459that the appeal was taken “on questions of law and fact;” the particular point of law involved being the validity of the demurrer interposed. However, the appellant included in the notice of appeal this statement:

> “You are further expressly notified that should the defendant be ruled against on the above point of law, he desires and hereby requests a new trial in the district court, upon all the issues of law and fact involved in the said action.”

No answer was served with the notice of appeal.

The questions involved in the demurrer were argued in the district court and decided against the defendant. The plaintiff then moved to dismiss the appeal “on the ground and for the reason that said appeal has never been perfected by reason of the failure to serve any pleadings in said action,” thus challenging the jurisdiction of the court. The court denied the motion and again overruled the demurrer, saying: “We will overrule the demurrer to the complaint and permit the defendant to file his answer.” Plaintiff excepted to the ruling of the court in “not allowing the motion to dismiss,” and on plaintiff’s statement that it wanted to test the validity of the court’s ruling, the case was continued and, apparently, is still pending.

The plaintiff then appealed to this court from what is called the “order” of the district court in denying the motion to dismiss. The only “order” shown by the record is the ruling of the court upon the motion to dismiss.

Section 7841 of the Compiled Laws sets forth what orders are appealable. Assuming this ruling to be an order denying a motion *to*dismiss an appeal yet such an order is not appealable. An order dismissing an appeal for want of jurisdiction, or an order refusing to dismiss an action or appeal on the ground of want of jurisdiction is not an appealable order. See Re Weber, 4 N. D. 119, 28 L.R.A. 621, 59 N. W. 523; Strecker v. Railson, 19 N. D. *677,*125 N. W. 560; Jahner v. Kary, 40 N. D. 486, 169 N. W. 31; Quarton v. O’Neil, 51 N. D. 842, 200 N. W. 1010; Security Nat. Bank v. Bothne, 56 N. D. 269, *217*N. W. 148.

The appeal is dismissed.

Christianson, Ch. J., and Nuessle, Birdzell, and Burke, JJ\, concur.
Aussies help Afghan Army boost capability
 By None  , Australian Dept. of Defence
  
 URUZGAN, Afghanistan (May 17, 2010) — The capability of the Afghan National Army to plan and conduct operations in Uruzgan Province continues to grow. The 1st Mentoring Task Force (MTF-1) is the first Australian Defence Force rotation to provide Operational Mentor and Liaison Team (OMLT) support to the ANA 4th Brigade Headquarters. Officer Commanding the Brigade Headquarters OMLT, Maj. Paul Manoel, said that partnered mentoring was delivering critical skills and developing the ANA Brigade to take over security operations in Uruzgan Province.  “Partnered mentoring is paying dividends – we are experiencing real progress in ANA leadership at the Brigade Headquarters thanks to the work of our mentors and eagerness of the ANA personnel,” Manoel said. “Each day the ANA are moving closer to being in a position to assume responsibility for security operations in Uruzgan Province, however there is still a way to go until they can successfully achieve this.” Manoel said the MTF-1 mentors partnering ANA personnel operate in a challenging, but rewarding work environment where cultural differences are overcome on a daily basis. “The difficulties faced when bridging language barriers are complex, so it’s all about breaking through those barriers to instil the guiding principles of military operations.“We see great work from Afghan soldiers on partnered, dismounted patrols across Uruzgan and the use of artillery equipment due to the efforts of Australian mentors," Manoel said. “We will continue these efforts and simultaneously work to enhance the skills and confidence of Afghan headquarters and logistics staff to plan, conduct and sustain these complex and dangerous operations."
From: Rachell Arteaga

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:12:18 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

THANK YOU for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Rachell Arteaga

W127th Street

New York, NY 10027
## SERVED: JANUARY 31, 2013

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF 

### ADDISONJET MANAGEMENT, INC. FAA DOCKETNo. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Case) FDMS No. F AA-2012-0205


### ORDER OF DISMISSAL !} 

### FEB -- I 

### P l: 30

On April 6, 2012, the Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") filed a Complaint. OnMarch 20, 2012, Respondent AddisonJet Management, Inc. ("Respondent") had requested a hearing. On January 30, 2013, Complainant moved to withdraw its Complaint and dismiss the case, citing settlement. 14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint orparty may withdraw a request for a hearing withoutthe consent ofthe administrative lawjudge. Ifan agency attomey withdraws the complaint or a patiy withdrawsthe request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." WHEREFORE, the within filed Withdrawal ofComplaint having been read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows:2



### 1. Complainant's Withdrawal ofComplaint be and is hereby granted; and 2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service ListSERVJ[CE LIST ORIGINAL& ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1 ONE COPY Gerald P. Shaw, Director ofOperations Addison Jet Management, Inc., Respondent 7515 Lemmon Avenue Dallas, TX 75209 AutumnKillingham, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Enforcement Division, AGC-300 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 TEL: 202-267-7728 FAX: 202-267-5106 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 · U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2012-0205 (Civil Penalty Action)

1Servicewas byU.S. Mail. For service inpersonorby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Cleric,AGC-430. 

### -2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          45,520
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,513
<ALLOWANCES>                                       484
<INVENTORY>                                     51,527
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               296,463
<PP&E>                                         250,557
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,365
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 829,293
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          237,411
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           114
<OTHER-SE>                                    (28,242)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   829,293
<SALES>                                        343,948
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               343,948
<CGS>                                          330,393
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  330,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,630
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,553
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,262
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,394)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,394)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.52)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.52)


</TABLE>
# Dziennik Urzędowy C 153A/10 c

| | ISSN 1725-5228 |
| --- | --- |
| Dziennik Urzędowy
  Unii Europejskiej | C 153A |
| | |
| Wydanie polskie | Informacje i zawiadomienia | Tom 4710 czerwca 2004 |

ISSN 1725-5228

Dziennik Urzędowy

Unii Europejskiej

C 153A

Wydanie polskie

Informacje i zawiadomienia

Tom 4710 czerwca 2004

---

| Powiadomienie nr | Spis treśći | Strona |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Powiadomienia |
| | Rada |
| 2004/C 153A/1 | Zawiadomienie o wakacie (nr ref. A/013) | 1 |

Powiadomienie nr

Spis treśći

Strona

III   Powiadomienia

Rada

2004/C 153A/1

Zawiadomienie o wakacie (nr ref. A/013)

1

| PL | |
| --- | --- |

PL

---

III Powiadomienia

Rada

| 10.6.2004 | PL | Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej | CA 153/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2004

PL

Dziennik Urzędowy Unii Europejskiej

CA 153/1

---

ZAWIADOMIENIE O WAKACIE

(nr ref. A/013)

ADMINISTRATOR

(2004/C 153 A/01)

W ramach wspólnej Europejskiej Polityki Bezpieczeństwa i Obrony (EPBiO) Sekretariat Generalny Rady Unii Europejskiej pragnie zatrudnić administratora na szczeblu zaszeregowania A*9 w Dyrekcji Generalnej E — Stosunki zewnętrzne — Dyrekcja VIII, zajmującej się sprawami obrony.

Bardziej wyczerpujące informacje (w języku angielskim i francuskim) oraz formularze wniosków dla kandydatów można otrzymać od służb selekcji i rekrutacji, kontaktując się z nimi poprzez pocztę elektroniczną: service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int, lub odwiedzając ich stronę internetową: http://ue.eu.int/concours.

Termin zgłaszania: 9 lipca 2004 r., liczy się data stempla pocztowego.

---
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.56 MB)
 
 Department of Defense DOD Air Force Military DMA
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
EXHIBIT 11

                              HILLS BANCORPORATION

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON
                          AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARES



                                                       Year Ended December 31,
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                    1995       1994        1993
                                                  --------   --------   --------

Shares of common stock, beginning ..............   487,773    487,622    484,700
                                                  ========   ========   ========
Shares of common stock, ending .................   487,868    487,773    487,622
                                                  ========   ========   ========
Computation of weighted average number of
   common and common equivalent shares:
   Common shares outstanding at the beginning
     of the year ...............................   487,773    487,622    484,700
   Weighted average number of shares issued ....        --         --      1,339
   Weighted average of the common equivalent
      shares attributable to stock options
      granted, computed under the treasury
      stock method .............................     3,155      2,160        651
                                                  --------   --------   --------
               Weighted average number of common
                 and common equivalent shares ..   490,928    489,782    486,690
                                                  ========   ========   ========
Net income (In Thousands) ......................  $  5,257   $  4,934   $  4,673
                                                  ========   ========   ========
Earnings per common and common
   equivalent share ............................  $  10.71   $  10.07   $   9.60
                                                  ========   ========   ========
Dividends per common share .....................  $   2.60   $   2.40   $   2.20
                                                  ========   ========   ========
#### Michael Shaughnessy, Appellant, v. George K. Chase, Respondent.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and with leave to renew the motion to discharge the order of arrest. Opinions by Daniels, J., and Davis, P. J., and by Brady, J., dissenting.
#### Guy W. Bailey *v.*Frank Saunders.

January Term, 1916.

Present: Munson, 'O. J., Watson, Haselton, Powers, and Taylor, JJ.

Opinion filed January 18, 1916.

*Bill of Exceptions*— Amendment—Time *for Amendment.*

§ 12, No. 90, Acts 1915, providing that exceptions to the opinion of the county court on a question of law arising in a civil case shall he signed by the presiding judge and filed with the clerk within 30 days after the rising of the court, provided that a date before or after the expiration of such 30 days may he fixed hy the court, and that, where the court has not otherwise directed, and such exceptions are not filed within that 30 days, nor within the time so fixed hy the court, the clerk shall erase the entry of exceptions made on the docket and issue execution, applies only to an original bill of exceptions, and so where a hill of exceptions, though a skeleton bill, has been filed within the time fixed by law, the amendment thereof is within the control of the presiding judge.

Assumpsit. Plea, the general issue. Heard by agreement, in vacation after the March Term, 1915, Chittenden County, *Slack,*J., presiding. Judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. Heard at the January Term, 1916, of the Supreme Court, on plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the exceptions. The opinion states the case.

*Martin & Bcdley*for the plaintiff.

*Sherman B. Moulton*for the defendant.

*40
      *By the Court.*

This is a motion to dismiss defendant’s exceptions. • The case was tried by agreement before a superior judge in vacation, as provided in No. 81, Acts of 1910. Judgment for plaintiff was entered August 23, 1915. On September 20, 1915, the judge allowed and signed defendant’s skeleton bill of exceptions subject to amendment to be completed within twenty days thereafter, which was filed September 21, 1915. A completed bill of exceptions not having been filed within the time limited, on October 11, 1915, and from time to time thereafter, the judge extended the time for completing the exceptions until December 1, 1915, on which day the amended bill was filed.

Plaintiff claims that the judge had no authority or jurisdiction to make an order extending the time after the expiration of that fixed in the original order, and insists that it was the duty' of the clerk, by virtue of No. 90, Acts of 1915, sec. 12, to erase the entry of exceptions when the time fixed in the bill for amending the exceptions had expired. But this statute relates to the filing of an original bill of exceptions and not to an amendment thereof, which is within the control of the presiding judge where a bill of exceptions, though a skeleton bill, has been filed within the time fixed by law.

The point is made that the skeleton bill did not contain “any point or particulars” and therefore should be dismissed. The original bill of exceptions is not before us and so the point cannot be considered. It will be observed that the cases cited in support of the position relate to exceptions as finally settled and do not touch the question raised by the motion.

*Motion overruled.*