alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

110) IV-C-76 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:57 AM Sheet 110 of 232 
P.2 

r«»"% 

USBy 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Honorable Strom Thurmond 

United States Senate 

Washington, D. C. 20510 

Dear Senator Thurmond: 

Thank you for passing along the comments of your 

constituent, Joseph H. Moore, concerning EPA's proposal to 

require onboard refueling emission controls and proposed 

gasoline volatility regulations. Be assured that these 

comments will be considered in the next phase of our rulemaking 

process. We will also be placing them in the public dockets 

for the rulemaking. 

Thank you again for your concern in this matter. 

Sincerely yours, 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

cc: Docket A-87-11 

Docket A-85-21
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0700 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. BRENNAN ADRIAN JONES ,

Defendant and Appellant
.

GRANT
Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant is given an extension of time until April 13 , 20 20 , to prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court March 10 2020

03/10/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0700
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.41 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 61629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19216]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 7, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
August 31, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
46 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2023-254, CP2023-257.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-19216 Filed 9-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 23.2





Trio-Tech International
Van Nuys, CA


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 333-38082 on Form S-3 and No. 333-40102 on Form S-8 of Trio-Tech
International of our report dated September 7, 2001, appearing in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Trio-Tech International for the year ended June 30, 2003.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP



Los Angeles, California
September 9, 2003
Grafton, )

May 7, 1912.

#### Clark, *Ap’t, v.*Clark, *Adm’r.*

The taking of the deposition of the adverse party by a defendant administrator is an election on his part to testify generally and renders the plaintiff a competent witness in his own behalf at the trial; and this result is not affected by a prior agreement between the parties that the deposition is not to be filed, as required by section 11, chapter 225, Public Statutes.

Probate Appeal, from the disallowance of a claim against the decedent’s estate. After the appeal was taken the defendant sum*431moned the plaintiff to give his deposition. Before it was taken counsel agreed to waive the defendant’s obligation to file the deposition, as required by section 11, chapter 225, Public Statutes. The defendant intended to avoid the right of the plaintiff to use the deposition at the trial by means of this agreement, but the plaintiff had no such understanding. At the trial the defendant did not elect to become a witness. The plaintiff was excluded from testifying generally and excepted. Transferred from the May term, 1911, of the superior court by *Mitchell,*J.

*Alvin F. Wentworth,*for the plaintiff.

*Edward J. Cummings,*for the defendant.

Peaslee, J.

By taking the plaintiff’s deposition, the defendant made the plaintiff a witness in the case. A person giving a deposition is a witness, and his answers to the questions put to him are testimony. The act of the administrator in thus calling the adverse party to testify in the cause was an election on his part to testify generally. The finding in the case that there was no such election at the time of the trial is a conclusion of law and not controlling here. *Palmer*v. *Bass,*69 N. H. 300. Having so elected, he could not withdraw his election to the manifest detriment of his opponent.

The agreement made by counsel before the deposition was taken does not affect the result. It merely relieved the administrator from the duty to file the deposition at once. P. S., c. 225, s. 11. It did not take from the deposition its character as evidence, but merely left it to be dealt with like a deposition of one not a party.

The understanding of the administrator’s counsel, that by this agreement he had avoided the usual legal consequences of calling the adverse party as a witness, is immaterial. The opposing counsel had no such understanding, and the agreement of the parties does not go to such an extent. The plaintiff was a competent witness for himself at the trial.

*Exception sustained.*

All concurred.
From: GALLEYIND@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Health Care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:44:47 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as

pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and

to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless

women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological

distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make

exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the

exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even

though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because

of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.
From: Melanie Wade

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Access to preventative health care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:28:17 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

-- 

Melanie Wade

mwade93@gmail.com
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.14 MB)
 
 Operation Roundup
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
P. 1


# OAR Box 1830 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 114 ) IV-C-8

0 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:57AM Sheet 114 of 232 I I I I n S u II I I 

### l i

l i

i i ' i 0 i i i i

i i t j i ! 11 0 I I i i « j i i i i l 1 | i i n l l 1) .) I I ii i i
« i ! I I i ! » i \ ! l i l n l | jj ii I I j ) i ; ii i i i i i ii li I ! d I I ii l i | i i i i i i i

I I il 

### I
| i i i

. i ii I I i i l i i t i ' i i ii I I i i » !i ; l l'P. 2

+«***% UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO NAGENC Y 

# R-87-li jX 

### -c - %& 5 -AJH M u

j Ul"<lll!iU*)lAlC4JI'l'*"i"""" J 1 "^-'-***' * \ SyjZ Z ° WASHINGTON, D.C . 2046 0

'" V PRO'*- 0

OFFIC E O F AI RAN D RADIATIO N
Honorabl e Michae l Dewin e Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D.C . 2051 5 Dea r Mr . Dewine : Than k yo u fo r passin g along th e comment s fromyou r constituent , Mr . F . J . Hubbard , concernin g EPA' s proposa l t o requir e onboar d refueling emissio n controls . B e assure d tha t thes e comment s wil l b e considere d a s w e prepar e ou r fina l rule , W e wil l als o b e placin g themi n th e publi c docke t fo r th e rulemakin g (Docke t No . A-87-11) . Than k yo u agai n fo r you r concer n i n thi s matter . Sincerel yyours , Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s cc : Docke t A-87-1 1
Prepare d by : For

mLetter:sal:2/19/88:AL88072 3 - Ann Arbor , M I bcc : Regio n 0 5 Congressiona l Liaison/Quin n Docke t A-87-1 1 c/ o Jacki e McManu s
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

LISA CHRISTINA CARONE

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 260

[ August 11, 2022 ]

Appeal from the County Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit,

Indian River County ; Robyn E. Stone , Judge; L.T. Case No.

312021MM001355A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Alan T. Lipson, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendor f

, Senior As sistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, C IKLIN and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
---

---

Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ampal  American Israel Corporation
(the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, Yosef A. Maiman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certifies, to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

March 17, 2008

| |  | By:      /s/ Yosef A. Maiman
Yosef A. MaimanPresident and Chief Executive Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: RICHARD ALAN HA ASE and Richard Alan Haase v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.

, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company , Bank of America, NA, Barrett, Daffin, Turner & Engl el, LLP

, Deutsche Bank

, AG, Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I, Inc., and Certificate Holders of Morgan S t anley ABS Capital I, Inc. Trust 2006

- HE6, Mortgage Pass

Through Certificates, Series 2006

- HE6

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00854

- CV

Trial court case numb er: 07

- DCV

- 161177

Trial court: 400th District Court of Fort Bend County

Appellant

, R ichard Alan Haase, filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed as Indigent and a Statement of Inab ility to Afford Payment of Court Costs or an Appeal Bond. W e abate the appeal

an d refer the m atter to the trial court to d etermin e whether, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1

, appellant ma y proceed as indigent on appeal

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20

. 1 ( b )( 3 ) (B) (providing that appellate c our t may refer matter to trial court)

.

The trial court shall set a hearing on the determination of indigence and give the parties reasonable notice of the hearing

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1 (b)( 3)( B ). The trial court sh all hear evidence du rin g the hearing and shall make such findings of fact and render such orders as the court deems appropriate. The trial court clerk is directed to file with the Clerk of this Court a clerk’s record containing the final judgment, notice (s) of appeal, the tri al court’s signed order determining whether appellant is indigent, and any other documents directly related to appellant ’ s Motion for Leave to Proceed as Indigent and his Statement of Inab ility to Afford Payment of Court Costs or an Appeal Bond

. See T EX

. R

. A PP

. P . 34.5(c)(1). The court reporter is directed to file with the Clerk of t his Court a record of the hearing on appellant ’ s Motion for Leave to Proceed as Indigent

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 34. 6 ( d )

.

The trial court clerk and court reporter must file the requi red record s with the Clerk of this Court no l ater than 45 days from the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated when the appropriate record s ar e f iled with this Court

.It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s s ignature:

___________ /s/ Veronica Rivas

- Molloy_____

_________ Acting individually

Date: February 2, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000732814
<NAME> APPALACHIAN OIL & GAS COMPANY, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          36,954
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,855
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                54,809
<PP&E>                                         466,758
<DEPRECIATION>                                 330,692
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 190,875
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              338
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,358
<OTHER-SE>                                     158,179
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   190,537
<SALES>                                         48,723
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,840
<CGS>                                           35,530
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                99,019
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (81,709)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (82,709)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (82,709)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.10

CONSENT OF Somekh Chaikin CPAs (ISR), INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT

We have issued our report dated
February 24, 2005 for the financial statements of Hod Hasharon Sport Center (1992) Limited
Partnership for the year ended December 31, 2004. We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement Form S-8 (File No. 333-61895 and File No.
333-55970), of our report dated February 24, 2005 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Ampal  American Israel Corporation incorporated by reference
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Tel Aviv, Israel March 13,
2005



---

---



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated
February 27, 2003 for the financial statements of Hod Hasharon Sport Center (1992) Limited
Partnership for the year ended December 31, 2002. We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement Form S-8 (File No. 333-61895 and File No.
333-55970), of our report dated February 27, 2003 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Ampal  American Israel Corporation incorporated by reference
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2004.

|Tel-Aviv, Israel
March 13, 2005 | KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
A Member of Ernst & Young Global
|------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
#### Mary McCall, as Administratrix, etc., of James McCall. Deceased, Respondent, v. Silas H. Witherbee and others, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Landon, J.
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Healthcare
Services Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, James L. DiStefano, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) That information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                                    /s/ James L. DiStefano
                                                    --------------------------
                                                    James L. DiStefano
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                                    February 14, 2006