alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.23



 Exhibit 4.23 

Shares Subscription Agreement 
 (This
Agreement is entered into between the following parties on January 30, 2016 in Beijing) 
 Issuer: China Tower Corporation Limited (“China
Tower”) 
 Subscriber: China Mobile Group Zhejiang Co., Ltd. 

Whereas the issuer and the subscriber have signed the Transaction Agreement of the Existing Telecommunication Tower and related Assets by Issuance of
Shares and Payment of Cash on October 14, 2015. Based on the above agreement and the specific circumstances of delivery of towers and related assets, the issuer has determined to issue a total of 119,344,615,024 shares at a par value of RMB1
per share. 
  

	1.	Subscription Price 

 RMB1 per share. 

 

	2.	Subscription Amount and Quantity 

 The subscriber confirms to pay RMB5,892,494,633 to subscribe
for 5,892,494,633 shares. 
  

	3.	Subscription Method 

 The subscriber agrees to subscribe for the shares issued by investing with
assets. 
  

	4.	Payment Method 

 The subscriber has completed the actual payment of contribution before
December 31, 2015. 
  

	5.	Shareholders’ Rights and Obligations 

 The both parties confirm that the subscriber shall
become the owner of shares subscribed for in this transaction from the effective date of this Agreement, and enjoy its shareholder rights and bear the corresponding obligations for such shares. The both parties agree that the issuer shall complete
the change to register of shareholders, revision of Articles of Association and change to industrial and commercial registration within 30 days after signing this Shares Subscription Agreement. 

 

	6.	Entry into Force and Counterparts 

 This Agreement shall enter into force on December 31,
2015. This agreement is executed in six counterparts, each party holding two copies, and the rest shall be submitted for examination and approval/record filing. 

(Reminder of this page intentionally left blank) 








	
	Issuer: China Tower Corporation Limited (chop)
	Legal representative or authorized representative
	
	 /s/ GAO Chunlei

	
	Subscriber: China Mobile Group Zhejiang Co., Ltd.
	Legal representative or authorized representative
	
	 /s/ ZHENG Jie
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.15 MB)
 
 Capt. Haley Homan Train Assist Command – Air (TAAC-Air) weather adviser is deployed here from Offutt Air Force Base Nebraska to advise the AAF meteorologists and weather forecasters on how to provide weather support to the A Advise
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.34 MB)
 
 JOEP JAF New Jersey National Guard Task Force Spartan interoperability Soldiers Army Guard ceremony Jordan USARCENT National Guard Army National Guard ARCENT coalition ASG-J 102 CAV Jordan Border Guard Force JTC-J Joint Operational Engagement Program
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# CMC visits Marines and Sailors in Bahrain

/ Published June 23, 2017
MANAMA, BAHRAIN, 
Neller is accustomed to speaking to a sea of Marines wearing digital tan utility uniforms, but at TF 51/5, that sea is also combined with Naval expeditionary green utilities worn by the Sailors, who are fully integrated with the Marines at TF 51/5.

“The operational advantage of being organized with Navy and Marine Corps Officers and Staff NCOs is an incredibly powerful thing,” said Neller. “As you all work through this, it is important for all of you to speak up and figure best practices to make it work. “

He mentioned that although TF 51/5 is not a new concept, dating to the composition of 5th Amphibious Corps during World War II, but the Marine and Navy forces have not done this type of full integration in a while.You are the ones who have the most experience in this since you are dealing with it on a day to day basis, added Neller.

TF 51 /5 executes operations, responds to contingencies and crises, and conducts theater security cooperation at sea, from the sea, and ashore in support of USCENTCOM, Fifth Fleet, and MARCENT theater objectives.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Mark L. Wolf, Chief United States District Judge for the **

District of Massachusetts, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VILAY SIRIPHONE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ACCEPTANCE INDEMNITY

INSURANCE COMPANY; DOES 1

THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 09-56504

D.C. No. 3:07-cv-01656-L-JMA

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

M. James Lorenz, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 10, 2011 

Pasadena, California

Before: HAWKINS and FISHER, Circuit Judges, and WOLF, Chief District

Judge.** 

FILED

FEB 22 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

Vilay Siriphone argues Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Company breached

the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing and breached its insurance

contract in determining the policy benefits due to Siriphone after his auto repair

shop was burglarized. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of

Acceptance on both of Siriphone’s claims. We affirm. 

1. Breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Siriphone

contends Acceptance breached the implied covenant by conducting an inadequate

investigation of his claim and unreasonably delaying settlement. We conclude,

however, that there was no genuine issue of material fact as to whether

Acceptance’s investigation was reasonable. There is no evidence that any error

Acceptance may have made in handling the claim resulted from anything more

than “‘honest mistake, bad judgment or negligence.’” Chateau Chamberay

Homeowners Ass’n v. Assoc. Int’l Ins. Co., 90 Cal. App. 4th 335, 346 (Cal. App.

2001) (quoting Careau & Co. v. Sec. Pac. Bus. Credit, Inc., 272 Cal. Rptr. 387,

399-400 (1990)). Moreover, the delay in settling Siriphone’s claim was justified

by genuine disputes over the interpretation of the policy, the value of the shop’s

standing inventory and the value of the tools stolen. See Guebara v. Allstate Ins.

Co., 237 F.3d 987, 995-96 (9th Cir. 2001). The district court correctly concluded

there was no genuine issue of material fact as to Acceptance’s bad faith. 
3

2. Breach of contract. Siriphone’s breach of contract claim is based on the

same claims mishandling conduct as his claim for breach of the implied covenant

of good faith and fair dealing. The breach of contract claim was therefore properly

dismissed for the same reasons the bad faith claim was dismissed. See Archdale v.

Amer. Int’l Specialty Lines Ins. Co., 64 Cal. Rptr. 3d 632, 647 n.19 (Cal. App.

2007).

AFFIRMED.
From: P. Genie Trapp

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: women"s preventive care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:39:30 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

-- 

P. Genie Trapp
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 11  STATEMENT RE:  COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

   Primary earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net earnings
(loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and common
stock equivalents outstanding during the period.  Stock options are
considered to be common stock equivalents and are included in the primary net
earnings (loss) per share calculation for that period unless the effect is
determined to be antidilutive.  Net earnings (loss) for the years ended
December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993 were $1,911,000, $332,000 and ($5,068,000),
respectively.  The weighted average numbers of shares used for the primary
earnings (loss) per share calculations were 2,483,000, 1,262,000 and
1,213,000 in 1995, 1994 and 1993, respectively.

   In the calculation of fully diluted earnings (loss) per share, net
earnings (loss) is adjusted by adding back the interest expense on the
Debentures and deducting the amount of unamortized debt issuance costs as of
the beginning of each period that the Debentures are dilutive.  The adjusted
net earnings (loss) is then divided by the weighted average number of shares
of common stock, common stock equivalents and other potentially dilutive
securities.  The subordinated convertible debentures are considered to be
other potentially dilutive securities and are included in the earnings (loss)
per share calculations unless the effect is determined to be antidilutive.
The adjusted net earnings used for the fully diluted earnings (loss) per
share calculations were $2,175,000, $332,000, and $(5,068,000), respectively,
for the years ended December 31, 1995, 1994 and 1993.  The weighted average
numbers of shares used for the fully diluted earnings (loss) per share
calculations were 3,019,000, 1,269,000 and 1,213,000 in 1995, 1994 and 1993,
respectively.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------

'LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 

PUBLICATION & REGULATIONS 

BRANCH As of: August 20, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Page 1 of2 

PUBLIC 

SUBMISSION 

Posted: August 20, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2c644 

Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-2010-001O-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0193 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Anthony Stiso 

Address: 

6767 Collins Ave 

Apt. 1909 

Miami Beach, FL, 33141 

Email: anthlink@aol.com 

Submitter's Representative: self 

Organization: Self 

General Comment 

August 9, 2010 

Office of Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status 

as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-2010­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

https:llfdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency1component/submitter InfoCoverPage?Call =... 8/20/201 0 
Page 2 of2 

Affordable Care Act (PPACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of thesE! 

regulations. 

Anthony Stiso 

Miami Beach, FL 

https:llfdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency/componentlsubmitterlnfoCoverPage?Call=... 8/20/2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SENTEX SENSING TECHNOLOGY, INC. AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT, FILED ON FORM
10-KSB, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING NOVEMBER 30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,331,981
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,279,180
<ALLOWANCES>                                    30,993
<INVENTORY>                                  1,399,944
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,161,032
<PP&E>                                         472,533
<DEPRECIATION>                                 229,886
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,675,872
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,853,205
<BONDS>                                        515,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,153,489
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,845,822)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,675,872
<SALES>                                      7,504,654
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,587,907
<CGS>                                        3,528,510
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,528,510
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,698,205
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             171,032
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,809,840)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,809,840)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,809,840)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7729

CHRISTOPHER L. BLACKWOOD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GARY D. MAYNARD; BILL WHITE; DON DRISKELL; JOHN MAXY; PERCY JONES; RICHARD HARVEYD; DON LEHMON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-02-1767-3-23BC) Submitted: January 30, 2003 Decided: February 20, 2003 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Christopher L. Blackwood, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., MCKAY, MCKAY & SETTANA, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Christopher L. Blackwood seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying Blackwood’s motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s denial of his motion for appointment of counsel. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Blackwood seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, although we grant Blackwood’s Motion Requesting to Add Supporting Evidence to Informal Brief, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-3470

_____________________________

ALLEN DWAYNE TOWNSEND,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jan Shackelford, Judge.

July 17, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.52 MB)
 
 1CTCS AFCENT F-16 Fighting Falcon B-52 Stratofortress Bomber Task Force
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil