alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.95 MB)
 
 SFAB Spartan Shield
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 171 (Wednesday, September 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 61004]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19198]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

Data Collection Available for Public Comments

ACTION: 60-Day notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Small Business Administration (SBA) intends to request 
approval, from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the 
collection of information described below. The Paperwork Reduction Act 
(PRA) requires federal agencies to publish a notice in the Federal 
Register concerning each proposed collection of information before 
submission to OMB, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response 
to the notice. This notice complies with that requirement.

DATES: Submit comments on or before November 6, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Send all comments to Marybeth Kerrigan, Financial Analyst, 
Secondary Markets Division, Office of Financial Assistance, Small 
Business Administration, Washington, DC 20416.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marybeth Kerrigan, Financial Analyst, 
Secondary Markets Division, Office of Financial Assistance, 
[email protected] 202-205-7552, or Curtis B. Rich, Agency Clearance 
Officer, 202-205-7030, [email protected];

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Small Business Administration collects this 
information from lenders who participate in the secondary market 
program. The information is used to facilitate and administer secondary 
market transactions in accordance with 15 U.S.C. 634(f)3 and to monitor 
the program for compliance with 15 U.S.C. 639(h).

Solicitation of Public Comments

    SBA is removing duplicate sale data, reformatting sale data for 
ease of use, and amending sections for clarity. SBA is requesting 
comments on (a) Whether the collection of information is necessary for 
the agency to properly perform its functions; (b) whether the burden 
estimates are accurate; (c) whether there are ways to minimize the 
burden, including through the use of automated techniques or other 
forms of information technology; and (d) whether there are ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information.

Summary of Information Collection

    OMB Control Number: 3245-0185.
    Title: Secondary Participation Guaranty Agreement.
    Description of Respondents: Small Business Lenders.
    Form Number: SBA Forms 1502, 1086.
    Total Estimated Annual Responses: 4,000.
    Total Estimated Annual Hour Burden: 60,000.

Curtis Rich,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-19198 Filed 9-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```
From: Diana Gray

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Women"s Preventive Care Coverage

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 5:42:37 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as it pertains to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new law

and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services. Those driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive

services are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some

groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so

hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement,

even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger

exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Diana Gray

1128 Webster Street

New Orleans, LA 70118

(504) 309-2516

Change is what it is.....
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1260 KA 10-00723 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, GREEN, GORSKI, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
NOAH SCHAPIRO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (KRISTIN M. PREVE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (J. MICHAEL MARION OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Christopher J. Burns, J.), rendered March 22, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of grand larceny in the second degree and scheme to defraud in the first degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Entered: December 23, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
From: Mike Herbert

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Access to Preventive Care and Contraception

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 12:50:39 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new law

and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access

to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive

services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some

groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so

hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement,

even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger

exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Covered employees should be allowed to make their own decisions, not have to abide by

the beliefs of their employers.

Sincerely,

M. Herbert
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.29 MB)
 
 Soldiers from the 40th Combat Aviation Brigade re-deployed from Camp Buehring Kuwait to Forward Operating Base Dahlke Afghanistan in May 2016.
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
### NUMBER 13 - 1 6 - 00 161 - CR 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ JESUS CASTILLO , Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 36 th District Court of Aransas County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Benavides , Perkes, and Longoria Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Jesus Castillo , attempts to appeal from an order modifying the terms of his community supervision. We dismiss the appeal. On October 24, 2013 , appellant pled guilty or nolo contendere to the offense of prohibited substance in correctional facility and was given a suspended sentence of t hree2

years deferred supervision. On November 5, 2015, the State filed a motion to revoke community service , alleging delivery of marijuana and driving while license suspended/invalid. The State filed an amended motion to revoke following Castillo’s arrest for driving while intoxicated. A hearing on the motion was held on March 15, 201 6

. The trial court found that appellant violated the terms and conditions of his community supervision, but that Castillo’s community supervision should not be revoked. The trial
court ordered the term of community supervision to be extended for a period of two additional years, through October 24, 2018. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on March 22, 2016

. The right to appeal is conferred by the legislature, and a party may appeal only that which the legislature has authorized. Marin v. State , 851 S.W. 2d 275, 278 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993). A defendant has a right to appeal when his community supervision is revoked and he is adjudicated guilty and sentenced. See T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. art. 42.12, § 23(b) . To the contrary, t here is no statutory basis for a n appeal of an order modifying a term or condition of probation. See Christopher v. State , 7 S.W.3d 224, 225 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. ref’d). Case law has long held that an order modifying or refusing to modify probation is not subject to appeal. See Basaldua v. State , 558 S.W.2d 2, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977); Perez v. State , 938 S.W.2d 761, 762

- 63 (Tex. App.

—Austin 1997, pet. ref’d); Eaden v. State 901 S.W.2d 535, 536 (Tex. App.

— El Paso 1995, no pet.). In this case, the record does not contain any order revoking Castillo’s community supervision, adjudicating his guilt, or assessing a jail or prison sentence. The trial court’s
order o f March 15, 2016 , modified the terms of community service by extending the period3

of community service an additional two years. The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a). PER CURIAM Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).
D elivered and filed the 19th day of May, 2016.
H. Res. 585

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

October 16, 2002.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 123)

making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2003, and for other purposes. The joint resolution shall be

considered as read for amendment. The previous question

shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution to final

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of

debate on the joint resolution equally divided and controlled

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.

SEC. 2. House Resolutions 550, 551, and 557 are laid

on the table.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Joseph Nightingale v. State of Nebraska. Philip Norton v. State of Nebraska.

Filed March 11, 1921.

Nos. 21721, 21722.

Error to the district court for Douglas county: Willis G. Sears, Judge.

*Reversed.*

*Gray é Brumbaugh*and *Macfarland $*Macfarland, for plaintiffs in error.

*Olarence A. Davis, Attorney General,*and *O. L. Dort, contra.*

Flansburg, J.

These cases were tried together with the case of *Swanson v. State, ante,*p. 761, are decided upon the same record, and involve the same question. They are controlled by the ruling in the *Swanson*case and are reversed for the reasons given therein.

Reversed.
From: Geralyn Z. Suhor

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Sunday, August 07, 2011 2:37:15 AM

Dear HHS:

I am disappointment with this final Act of HHS, due to its failure to ensure respect for rights of

conscience when developing such mandates. I would like to express opposition to the definition of

“religious employer” within the context of a lack of true conscience protection.

Please reconsider your position for the benefit of the people of the United States of America.

Geralyn Suhor
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7265

TIMOTHY A. COBB,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DIRECTOR, VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.

(CA-99-1965)

Submitted: January 10, 2001 Decided: January 18, 2001

Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy A. Cobb, Appellant Pro Se. Rick Randall Linker, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Timothy A. Cobb appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Cobb’s motion for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See Cobb v. Director, Va. Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-99-1965

(E.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 601 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 234
107th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 601

                          [Report No. 107-774]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

            November 13 (legislative day, November 12), 2002

 Mr. Diaz-Balart, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of Wednesday, November 13, 
2002, providing for consideration or disposition of a bill to establish 
the Department of Homeland Security, and for other purposes.

                                                 House Calendar No. 234

107th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 601

                          [Report No. 107-774]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

            November 13 (legislative day, November 12), 2002

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer





I,
Domenic Gatto, Chief Executive Officer of Atlantic Express Transportation Corp.
(the “Company”), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge:





(i) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company  for the quarter ended
December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Domenic
      GattoDomenic GattoChief
      Executive Officer





Date:
February 23, 2009





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
Exhibit 99.1

Swiss Army Brands, Inc.

One Research Drive
Shelton, Connecticut 06484

LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T

March 29, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549-0408

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Pursuant to Temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X,
Swiss Army Brands, Inc. has obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") stating that the December 31,
2001 audit was subject to their quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide reasonable assurance
that the engagement was conducted in compliance with professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen
personnel working on the audit, availability of consultation at their national office and availability of personnel at foreign
affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.

Very truly yours,
                     
                      
                      
                      
                      
       Swiss Army Brands, Inc.
                     
                      
                      
                      
                      
       /s/ Thomas M. Lupinski
                     
                      
                      
                      
                      
       Thomas M. Lupinski
                     
                      
                      
                      
                      
       Senior Vice President, Chief
                     
                      
                      
                      
                      
       Financial Officer
From: Sarah Buino

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 1:42:22 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

As a therapist who works in a health center in a Chicago Public high school, I know how important it is

for young women to have access to health care and make their own decisions about reproductive health

without restrictions. Bravo.

Sincerely,

Sarah Buino

4730 N. Sheridan

Chicago, IL 60640
Aug 27:  U.S. Military Conducts Airstrikes Against ISIL Near Irbil and Mosul Dam
 By U.S. Central Command News Release
  August 27, 2014 Release #20140830FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE **TAMPA, Fla., Aug. 27, 2014 --**
 U.S. military forces continued to attack ISIL terrorists in support of 
Iraqi security force operations, using fighter, attack, and remotely 
piloted aircraft to conduct three airstrikes in the vicinity of Irbil 
and the Mosul Dam.The strikes destroyed an ISIL Humvee, a supply
 truck, three armored vehicles, and severely damaged an ISIL building.  
All aircraft exited the strike areas safely.The strikes were 
conducted under authority to support Iraqi security force and Kurdish 
defense force operations, as well as to protect critical infrastructure,
 U.S. personnel and facilities, and support humanitarian efforts.Since Aug. 8, U.S. Central Command has conducted a total of 101 airstrikes across Iraq.