alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Sandy Brown

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:48:50 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Sandy Brown

502 Logan St

WAYNE, NE 68787
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.31 MB)
 
 Green Mountain Boys AEW 380th Air Expeditionary Wing holidays combined Crew isil cjtf-oir F-16 Fighting Falcon isis Liberation MOSUL Defend the region Join Task Force-Operation Inherent Resolve meals crew chief air refueling deliver decisive airpower OIR FOOD REFUELING KC-10 EXTENDER Operation Inherent Resolve USCENTCOM pilot Iraq AFCENT Sortie Boom Operator Christmas
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: William and Grenda Ernst

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Women"s Health

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:43:58 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care

under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services,

are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
IV

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. RES. 95

Expressing the support for a National Week of Reflection and Tolerance.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 20, 2001

Mr. RANGEL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the

Committee on Government Reform

RESOLUTION

Expressing the support for a National Week of Reflection

and Tolerance.

Whereas the United States is a pluralistic country comprised

of different races, genders, ethnic groups, religions, and

creeds;

Whereas our Nation, founded on the principles of tolerance,

diversity, justice, and equality, should affirm these common values and principles; and

Whereas the people of the United States should reflect on the

importance of understanding and tolerance in our pluralistic country: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That a National Week of Reflection and

2 Tolerance should be established encouraging communities

3 and institutions around the Nation to engage in events
2

•HRES 95 IH

1 and activities that are reflective, educational, celebratory,

2 and healing as they relate to diversity among the people

3 of the United States.

Æ
From: Frances Davila

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: reject any exemptions for “religious employers"!

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 11:32:23 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Sincerely,

Frances
From: Binderfly@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Religious employer

Date: Sunday, August 07, 2011 10:52:30 AM

I am opposed to the definition of "religious employer" within the context of a lack of true conscience

protection!

Ruth Binder

Slidell, LA 70458
From: Gary Duncan

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Contraceptives

Date: Saturday, August 13, 2011 5:22:39 PM

Dear HHS - Do not let employers decide about birth control.

It is none of their business and violates religious freedom which this

country definitely has a main interest in defending according to the

constitution. It is also a violation of a women's right to be a first class

citizen.

Sincerely,

Pat Duncan
From: GLORIA PICCHETTI

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 8:01:00 AM

If the government doesn't support birth control & abortion how many poor, unhappy children are going

to fill up schools that have no money?

Gloria Picchetti

Chicago IL
From: Jacquie Osborne

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: preventive care

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 8:25:35 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government

to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage

requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption

would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s recommendations

and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
From: Mauria McClay

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:28:03 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
EXHIBIT 4.36






                                 PROMISSORY NOTE


$20,000                          Milpitas, California             August 8, 2000



For value received,  ADATOM.com,  Inc.,  promises to pay Michele Ware the sum of
Twenty thousand dollars and no cents  ($20,000.00)  with interest at the rate of
Ten Percent per annum (10%) until paid. Any unpaid  interest will become part of
the  principal.  Interest  payable  quarterly  commencing on September 30, 2000.
Principal of $Twenty  thousand two hundred eighty four dollars and  ninety-three
cents ($20,284.93) is due in one payment on September 30, 2000. Principal may be
paid in whole or in part prior to the due date without penalty or premium.

Should  default be made in payment of principal  and/or  interest  when due, the
whole sum of principal and interest shall become  immediately due, at the option
of the  holder of the note.  If action be  instituted  on this  note,  The maker
promises to pay such sum as a Court may fix as attorney's fees.






Adatom.com, Inc.

By: __________________
Michael M. Wheeler
Controller


                                      E-56
From: Lesley Lojko

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Institute of Medicine recommendations

Date: Monday, August 15, 2011 8:38:03 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine

as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care

law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would

provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an

ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health

providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt

from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.
Exhibit 32.1

                Certification of the Principal Executive Officer
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,

      As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


      In  connection  with the quarterly  report of A.B.  Watley Group Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
Steven Malin,  Principal  Executive  Officer of the Company,  hereby  certifies,
pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 202, that:

      1.    The report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                                  /s/ Steven Malin
                                                  ----------------
                                                  Steven Malin
                                                  Principal Executive Officer
                                                  Date: July 6, 2004
#### Warren Beman v. Louis L. Todd.

— Resubmission of the case on the appeal ordered for further consideration. Opinion by

Davis, P. J.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-23-043]

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

United States International Trade Commission.

      ( print page 62106)    

# TIME AND DATE: 

September 14, 2023 at 11:00 a.m.

# PLACE: 

Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS: 

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agendas for future meetings: none.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Commission vote on Inv. No. 731-TA-893 (Fourth Review) (Honey from China). The Commission currently is scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on September 22, 2023.

5. Outstanding action jackets: none.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Sharon Bellamy, Acting Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer, 202-205-2000.

The Commission is holding the meeting under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

By order of the Commission.

 Issued: September 6, 2023.

Sharon Bellamy,

Acting Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-19522 Filed 9-6-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.39 MB)
 
 GazaHA
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 173 (Friday, September 8, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62105-62106]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19522]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-23-043]


Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency Holding the Meeting: United States International Trade 
Commission.

[[Page 62106]]


TIME AND DATE: September 14, 2023 at 11:00 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Agendas for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Commission vote on Inv. No. 731-TA-893 (Fourth Review) (Honey 
from China). The Commission currently is scheduled to complete and file 
its determinations and views of the Commission on September 22, 2023.
    5. Outstanding action jackets: none.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sharon Bellamy, Acting Supervisory 
Hearings and Information Officer, 202-205-2000.
    The Commission is holding the meeting under the Government in the 
Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). In accordance with Commission policy, 
subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, 
may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.
     Issued: September 6, 2023.
Sharon Bellamy,
Acting Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-19522 Filed 9-6-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED January 7, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-30636 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus CALVIN W. PENNYWELL, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 5:03-CR-50124-1

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Calvin W. Penn ywell, Jr., entered a conditional guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute five grams or more of
cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and possession
of firearms in relat ion to drug trafficking, in violation of
18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). He now appeals the district court's denial
of his suppression motion. He argues that the district court erroneously determined that he volunta rily consented to entry by2

police into his residence, where they subsequently found firearms, cash, and drugs.

Voluntary consent to a search is an exception to the general rule that warrantless searches are per se invalid. S ee
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte , 412 U.S. 218, 219 (1973). The Government has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that consent was given freely and voluntarily. Id. at 222. Such

a finding of fact is reviewed for cle ar error. U nited States v. Tompkins , 130 F .3d 117, 121 (5th Cir. 1997). “Voluntarily” means not coerced by threat or force and not granted only in submission to a claim of lawful authority. Schneckloth , 412 U.S. at 233.

Two police officers testified that Pennywell consented to

a request to enter an d look around when officers knocked on his
door in response to a complaint about narcotics activity and

weapons at the residence. Pennywell testified that he responded negatively when police asked if they could enter. We conclude that the district court’s finding of voluntary consent was not clearly

erroneous. See Tompkins , 130 F.3d at 121; see also United States

v. Garza , 118 F.3d 278, 283 (5th Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED

.
From: Stacey Gunderson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Birth control religious exemption

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 2:21:45 PM

No employer has the right to dictate what I can and can't do in my private life! This is

one of the huge problems of our health care system! I am only one of millions of

people who are really sick of the Religious right imposing on our lives. This has to

stop. They do not have the right to dictate anything, on any grounds. Religion is

being used as a cloak to push their anti-woman agenda. Equality scares them, and

god forbid if women make up their own minds about anything! 

Stacey Gunderson

'When did ignorance become a point of view?' -- Dilbert