alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Hat Sweat Manufacturing Company v. William H. Reinoehl.

Order reversed, cause directed to be placed on preferred calendar on the ground that it is within the spirit of Rule 3Ü.
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File
Nos. 33-61853, 333-51790, 333-63802, 333-100727, 333-109179) and in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 33-58359, 33-60437, 333-10003, 333-33249, 333-83677, 333-51906, 33-30007, 33-68208,
333-33265, 333-10005, 333-33251, 333-83669, 333-33291, 33-21241, 333-55126, 333-42371,
333-81275, 333-87967, 333-81277, 333-83673, 333-64103, 333-83681, 333-51872, 333-52202,
333-66130, 333-70310, 333-76762, 333-76766, 333-76768, 333-76770, 333-100722, 333-90514,
333-90512, 333-90510, 333-64095, 333-106691, 333-106692, 333-111314, 333-116650, 333-116651,
333-116653, 333-114184, 333-125723, 333-125724, 333-125726, 333-139491, 333-139492, 333-143467,
333-143468, 333-143469, 333-153898) of Genzyme Corporation of our report dated February 27, 2009 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation
by reference of our report dated February 27, 2009 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K, and of our report dated February 25,
2008 relating to the financial statements of BioMarin/Genzyme LLC, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

Boston,
Massachusetts
February 27, 2009

---



QuickLinks
From: Kathleen Hooper

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:10:24 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Kathleen Hooper

51 Kenyon Woods Way

Wakefield, RI 02681
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,998,284
<SECURITIES>                                14,249,326
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,778,349
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,985,918
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,220,725
<PP&E>                                       5,148,824
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,173,831
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,635,006
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,674,905
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       134,476
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,825,625
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,635,006
<SALES>                                      1,968,482
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,761,275
<CGS>                                        1,789,608
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,789,608
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,138,873
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,167,206)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,167,206)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,167,206)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)
        

</TABLE>
From: Maureen McGuire

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: New Health Care Exemption Objection

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:28:31 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care. It seems like it would only lead to having the same

religious people in the companies, encouraging those who want contraception

coverage to leave. This encourages people to choose their work place based on

their religion and squelches diversity, a fundamental American value. 

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal

exemption provisions.

Maureen
From: bob segal

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: accept IOM recommendation

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:30:37 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as

pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and

to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless

women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological

distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make

exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the

exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement,

even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted,

this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just

because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-50384

Conference Calendar

 

CAROL JOHNENE MORRIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SYLVIA VILLALBA ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. MO-96-CV-182

- - - - - - - - - -

April 8, 1998

Before JOLLY, JONES, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Carol Johnene Morris, Texas prisoner #488243, appeals from

the district court’s dismissal as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) of her civil rights complaint. Morris’s claim

that her state parole was improperly revoked is legally frivolous

because she has not shown that the revocation has been declared

invalid. See Jackson v. Vannoy, 49 F.3d 175, 177 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 148 (1995). Moreover, members of the

Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles who personally participate in

the quasi-judicial activity of parole revocation proceedings are 
No. 97-50384

-2-

entitled to absolute immunity. See McGrew v. Texas Bd. of

Pardons and Paroles, 47 F.3d 158, 160-61 (5th Cir. 1995). 

Accordingly, the district court did not abuse its discretion by

dismissing Morris’s complaint as frivolous. See Moore v. Mabus,

976 F.2d 268, 270 (5th Cir. 1992). The district court’s judgment

is AFFIRMED. Morris’s motions for summary judgment and for

production of documents and audiotapes are DENIED.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; MOTIONS DENIED.
October 27, 2015

Mr. Timothy Dykstra

165 Grandview Avenue

Holland, MI 49423

Dear Mr

. Dykstra :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

requirements of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We received your exemption request s filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 3248 , but we are

unable to process your request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must

send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and the extent of

the relief you seek.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the ex emption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notif ying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
AUG 15 20m PEC) 2°34)-/8 Page | of |

L PROCESSING DIVISION
ASSLICATION & REGULATIONS As of: August 15, 2011
° BRANCH Received: August 12, 2011
Status: Posted
PUBLIC SUBMISSION Posted: August 15, 2011
Tracking No. 80edf844
Comments Due: October 03, 2011
Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0040
Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of
Preventive Services under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0040-0006
Requirements for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of
Preventive Services under Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0040-0009
Comment on FR Doc # 2011-19685

SS

Submitter Information

Name: Ann Marie Cole
Address:
9924 Vasel Dr
St. Louis, MO, 63123
Email: anncole91475@yahoo.com
Phone: 314-737-8278
Submitter's Representative: Russ Carnahan

General Comment

Please do not include abortion-inducing contraceptives in mandated health coverage, and make
real provision for religious conscience opting out of contraceptive coverage in health plans. It is
not fair to force us to pay for what we believe is killing the tiniest of our brothers and sisters.

http://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/Content Viewer?objectld=0900006480edf84.... 8/15/2011
#### George H. Jones and others v. Mary J. Freeman.

Judgment ordered for plaintiff, without costs. Opinion by Daniels, J.
From: Sr. Mary David Klocek

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:16:16 AM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Sr. Mary David Klocek
Ann Arbor, Michigan
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Brigham Exploration Company
      (the"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Eugene B. Shepherd, Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.







Dated:
                November 4, 2005
            /s/
                EugeneB.
                Shepherd,
                Jr.Eugene
                B. Shepherd, Jr.Executive
                Vice President and Chief Financial
                Officer







This
      certification shall not be deemed to be "filed" for the purpose of Section
      18 of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and will not be incorporated
      by
      reference into any registration statement filed under the Securities Act of
      1933, as amended, unless specifically identified therein as being incorporated
      therein by reference.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided Brigham Exploration Company and will be
      retained by Brigham Exploration Company and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 151 (Friday, August 5, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 47529]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-19874]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

17 CFR Parts 1, 23, and 39

RIN 3038-AD51

Customer Clearing Documentation and Timing of Acceptance for 
Clearing; Correction

AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects incorrect text published in the Federal 
Register of August 1, 2011, regarding Customer Clearing Documentation 
and Timing of Acceptance for Clearing.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John C. Lawton, Deputy Director and 
Chief Counsel, 202-418-5480, jlawton@cftc.gov, or Christopher A. Hower, 
Attorney-Advisor, 202-418-6703, chower@cftc.gov, Division of Clearing 
and Intermediary Oversight, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three 
Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2011-19365 appearing on page 
45737 in the Federal Register issue of Monday, August 1, 2011, the 
following corrections are made:

Sec.  1.72  [Corrected]

    On page 45737, in the left column, in Sec.  1.72(e), the text 
``Prevents compliance with the time frames set forth in Sec.  
1.73(a)(9)(ii), Sec.  23.609(a)(9)(ii),'' is corrected to read, 
``Prevents compliance with the time frames set forth in Sec.  1.74(b), 
Sec.  23.610(b),''.

Sec.  23.608  [Corrected]

    On page 45737, in the middle column, in Sec.  23.608(e), the text 
``Prevents compliance with the time frames set forth in Sec.  
1.73(a)(9)(ii), Sec.  23.609(a)(9)(ii),'' is corrected to read, 
``Prevents compliance with the time frames set forth in Sec.  1.74(b), 
Sec.  23.610(b),''.

    Dated: August 1, 2011.
David A. Stawick,
Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-19874 Filed 8-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.73 MB)
 
 Army Washington National Guard Afghanistan Washington National Guard
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil