alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ARB Home Search Accessibility A-Z Index Contact Us

FACILITY SEARCH ENGINE

Please read the SEARCH HINTS before using the Facility Search Engine

Fill out any or all of the fields below to search

Database Year : Air Basin :

District : County :

Facility Name : City :

Zip Code :

Facility SIC Code :

Facility ID :

 Exclude Gas Stations, Print Shops, Autobody Shops and Dry Cleaners.

Show Criteria Pollutant data

Show Toxic data

Show Facilities that emit : or CAS Id

ARB Homepage

A department of the California Environmental Protection Agency

Air Resources Board: Facility Search Form http://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/facinfo/facinfo.php

1 of 1 5/27/2016 8:09 AM
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John Kunze, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Plumtree Software,
Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report.3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
for the registrant and have:  a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report
our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation;c.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing due equivalent functions):  a.
    
    All significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 6, 2004 By:
    
    /s/ John KunzeName:
    
    John KunzeTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer
 41
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1250 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1250

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve transitional medical 
 and dental care for members of the Armed Forces released from active 
duty to which called or ordered, or for which retained, in support of a 
                         contingency operation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 26, 2001

  Mrs. Carnahan (for herself, Mr. DeWine, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Daschle, Mr. 
 Johnson, Ms. Landrieu, and Ms. Snowe) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve transitional medical 
 and dental care for members of the Armed Forces released from active 
duty to which called or ordered, or for which retained, in support of a 
                         contingency operation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMPROVED TRANSITIONAL MEDICAL AND DENTAL CARE FOR MEMBERS 
              RELEASED FROM ACTIVE DUTY PERFORMED IN SUPPORT OF 
              CONTINGENCY OPERATIONS.

    (a) Increased Period of Coverage.--Subsection (a)(1) of section 
1074b of title 10, United States Code, is amended by striking ``30 
days'' and inserting ``one year''.
    (b) TRICARE Benefits.--Subsection (c)(2) of such section is amended 
by striking ``contracted for under the authority of section 1079(a) of 
this title and'' and inserting ``under the TRICARE program,''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    Section 1 and the amendments made by section 1 shall take effect on 
the first day of the first month that begins more than 180 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act and shall apply with respect to 
releases of members of the Armed Forces described in section 1074b of 
title 10, United States Code, from active duty that are effective on or 
after that effective date.
                                 <all>
```
#### James A. Russell, Respondent, v. Henry F. Taintor, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; papers not submitted according to order. Order reducing referee’s fees reversed and fees allowed by clerk affirmed, with costs of the appeal. Order allowing stenographer’s *642fees affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Pratt, J.;

Dykman, J., not sitting upon the appeals from the orders.
Exhibit 22
                           KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

The Board of Directors
Pacific Capital Bancorp:

      We have audited the  accompanying  consolidated  balance sheets of Pacific
Capital  Bancorp  and  subsidiaries  as of December  31, 1996 and 1995,  and the
related consolidated statements of income,  shareholders' equity, and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year  period ended  December 31, 1996.  These
consolidated  financial  statements  are  the  responsibility  of the  Company's
management.  Our  responsibility is to express an opinion on these  consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.

    We conducted  our audits in  accordance  with  generally  accepted  auditing
standards.  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatements. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.  An audit also includes
assessing the  accounting  principles  used and  significant  estimates  made by
management,  as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      In our opinion,  the consolidated  financial  statements referred to above
present  fairly,  in all material  respects,  the financial  position of Pacific
Capital Bancorp and  subsidiaries at December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1996 in conformity with generally accepted  accounting
principles.

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
-------------------------


January 24, 1997


                                       65
#### Edwin F. Brailey et al., appellees, v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Company, appellant.

Filed November 10, 1920.

No. 21150.

Trial: Instructions. Instructions are to be considered together, to the end that they may be properly understood, and when so construed, if as a whole they fairly state the law applicable to the evidence, error cannot be predicated upon the giving of the same.

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: Charles Leslie, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*John L. Webster*and *William M. Burton,*for appellant.

*J efferis & Tunison*and *A. P. Lillis, contra.*

Letton, J.

The judgment appealed from in this case grew out of the same accident that is involved in the case of *Dorrance v. Omaha & C. B. Street R. Co., ante*p. 196. That action was *202for damages for personal injuries to Dorrance, who was then driving the hearse, while this is by the partnership which owned the hearse, for damages to the vehicle.

Complaint is made of the refusal of the court to direct a verdict for the defendant. The testimony in the case was sufficient to require the submission of the evidence to the jury. This instruction was properly refused.

The next complaint is that the court erred in a general instruction that, if the jury found that the automobile was injured as a result of the collision, and that negligence on the part of the defendant was the proximate cause of the collision, then the verdict should be for the plaintiff. It is objected to this instruction that it is a positive direction to the jury to find for the plaintiffs if the elements named therein existed, irrespective of whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. Standing alone, the instruction is subject'to this criticism, but the jury were" further instructed that it was the plaintiff’s duty “to exercise that degree of care which a person of ordifiary prudence would have exercised under like circumstances to prevent a collision between the automobile he was driving and one of defendant company’s cars;” and, further, that if he or the motorman “omitted to exercise such care as an ordinarily prudent person would have exercised, taking into consideration the surroundings, then such one would be guilty of negligence.” They were fully instructed with respect to the rule of comparative negligence. We are satisfied that the jury did not misinterpret the instructions.

Like complaints are made in this case as in the *Dorrance*case with respect to the instruction relating to a violation of the statute or ordinance. These contentions were overruled in that case. We find no reversible error.

Affirmed.
No. 403.

#### Banco Nacional de Cuba *v.*Sabbatino, Receiver, et al.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief expressing the views of the United States.
No. 87, Misc.

#### Feguer *v.*United States.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg*and *Jerome M. Feit*for the United States.

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Black took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1303.html[7/22/2015 10:11:40 PM]

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: July 16, 2015

Received: July 08, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8jve-gegn

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; Notice of

 proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related Proposed

 Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-1303

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Scott Steinhausen

General Comment

The government is broke! There going to take everything we have in are bank accounts. Why do you think all

 transactions are starting to be done all electronically! Why do you think there pushing this apple pay and things

 like that! That way they have all are information. And at a click of a button they can have all of are savings! We

 are so screwed! This country is in deep trouble. Hope and pray. Stand up for what you believe is right!
#### The Ludlow Realty Company, Respondent, *v.*The City of New York, Appellant.

*Ludlow Realty Co.*v. *City of New York,*144 App. Div. 941, affirmed.

(Argued March 7, 1912;

decided March 26, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 14, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to determine a claim to real property.

*Archibald R. Watson, Corporation Counsel (Francis J. Byrne*and *Theodore Connoly*of counsel), for appellant.

*James L. Bishop, Francis M. Jencks*and *Clarence L. Westcott*for respondent..

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.69 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Maintenance for Marines not machines
 By Sgt. Deanne Hurla , 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing
  CENTCOM
 CAMP BASTION, Afghanistan (Nov. 19, 2010)  — The “Ugly Angels” of Marine Heavy Helicopter Squadron 362, 3rd Marine Aircraft Wing (Forward), spent a portion of their maintenance day competing in some healthy competition at the squadron on the flightline here. Deemed the Ugly Games, the Marines participated in several events, which incorporated fun and physical fitness. The Marines were divided into five teams. The teams completed 10 events that pitted section against section for the honor of being crowned the winner of the Ugly Games. Events included a high mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicle tow, weapons disassembly and reassembly, tire flip, one-mile and three-mile relays, causality evacuation course, kettle bell throw, fireman’s carry relay, grenade toss and a tug-of-war. The break was well-deserved and appreciated by the Marines because they have worked every day since their arrival in September. “It’s been 65 days straight of flyin’ and fixin’,” said Sgt. Maj. Timothy Tackett, the squadron sergeant major. “They needed a break. [The Ugly Games] mixes the spirit of competition and physical fitness as a great way to give them a time out from doing what they’re here to do. Albeit just a couple hours, they’ll be refreshed and ready to get back in the fight.” Ugly Angel Marines work an average of 13 to 14 hours each day. Aircraft crews fly several types of missions to support Afghan National Security and International Security Assistance Forces on the ground. These missions range from delivering supplies to transporting troops throughout Helmand and Nimroz provinces. Maintenance Marines perform routine preventative maintenance and any urgent maintenance that arises. “This was a day to give back to the Marines,” said Lt. Col. Thomas Pecina, the Ugly Angels’ commanding officer. “It was a maintenance day, but the maintenance was on the Marines rather than the machines.” The Marines who participated in the day’s events had more fun than they expected. “Today was very fun, and I had a great time,” said Lance Cpl. Erik Pierce, a tool room Marine. “We work a lot so it doesn’t hurt to take a break every once in a while.” After the events ended and the winning team received their Ugly Games trophy, day crew Marines went to their tents for some needed sleep, and the night crew Marines started their night’s work requirements. The squadron plans to hold another Ugly Games event before the holidays in an effort to once again lift the Marines’ spirits and take a break from their day-to-day work.
Exhibit 32.1

                                   Vicom, Inc.



                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In connection with this Annual Report Form 10-K, Vicom, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003, I, James L. Mandel, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1.    This Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and
2.    The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


Date: March 30, 2004                   By:
                                             ---------------------------
                                                /s/ James L. Mandel
                                               Chief Executive Officer
From: Cynthia Fulmer

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Thursday, August 04, 2011 7:49:51 AM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Cynthia Fulmer
Fort Pierce, Florida
#### Amelia Di Domenico, as Administratrix of the Estate of Salvatore Di Domenico, Deceased, Appellant, *v.*New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Respondent.

*Di Domenico*v. *N. T. C.*<£- *H. R. R. R. Co.,*140 App. Div. 943, appeal withdrawn.

(Argued March 18, 1912;

decided March 19, 1912.)

Motion for leave to withdraw an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November *22,*1910, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and granting a new trial.

The motion was made upon the ground that the appeal had been inadvertently taken.

*Edgar T. Brackett*for motion.

*William L. Visscher*opposed.

Motion granted upon payment of costs that have accrued to date of appeal and ten dollars costs of motion within twenty days; on failure to make such payment appeal dismissed., with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.