62098 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 173 / Friday, September 8, 2023 / Notices 

SAMHSA website prior to the meeting 

at https://www.samhsa.gov/about-us/ 

advisory-councils/meetings. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pamela Foote, ISMICC Designated 

Federal Officer, SAMHSA, 5600 Fishers 

Lane, Rockville, MD 20857; telephone: 

240–276–1279; email: pamela.foote@

samhsa.hhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background and Authority 

The ISMICC was established on 

March 15, 2017, in accordance with 

section 6031 of the 21st Century Cures 

Act, and the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app., as 

amended, to report to the Secretary, 

Congress, and any other relevant federal 

department or agency on advances in 

SMI and SED, research related to the 

prevention of, diagnosis of, intervention 

in, and treatment and recovery of SMIs, 

SEDs, and advances in access to services 

and supports for adults with SMI or 

children with SED. In addition, the 

ISMICC will evaluate the effect federal 

programs related to SMI and SED have 

on public health, including public 

health outcomes such as: (A) rates of 

suicide, suicide attempts, incidence and 

prevalence of SMIs, SEDs, and 

substance use disorders, overdose, 

overdose deaths, emergency 

hospitalizations, emergency room 

boarding, preventable emergency room 

visits, interaction with the criminal 

justice system, homelessness, and 

unemployment; (B) increased rates of 

employment and enrollment in 

educational and vocational programs; 

(C) quality of mental and substance use 

disorders treatment services; or (D) any 

other criteria determined by the 

Secretary. Finally, the ISMICC will 

make specific recommendations for 

actions that agencies can take to better 

coordinate the administration of mental 

health services for adults with SMI or 

children with SED. Not later than one 

(1) year after the date of enactment of 

the 21st Century Cures Act, and five (5) 

years after such date of enactment, the 

ISMICC shall submit a report to 

Congress and any other relevant federal 

department or agency. 

II. Membership 

This ISMICC consists of federal 

members listed below or their 

designees, and non-federal public 

members. 

Federal Membership: Members 

include, The Secretary of Health and 

Human Services; The Assistant 

Secretary for Mental Health and 

Substance Use; The Attorney General; 

The Secretary of the Department of 

Veterans Affairs; The Secretary of the 

Department of Defense; The Secretary of 

the Department of Housing and Urban 

Development; The Secretary of the 

Department of Education; The Secretary 

of the Department of Labor; The 

Administrator of the Centers for 

Medicare and Medicaid Services; the 

Administrator of the Administration for 

Community Living, and The 

Commissioner of the Social Security 

Administration. 

Non-Federal Membership: Members 

include, not less than 14 non-federal 

public members appointed by the 

Secretary, representing psychologists, 

psychiatrists, social workers, peer 

support specialists, and other providers, 

patients, family of patients, law 

enforcement, the judiciary, and leading 

research, advocacy, or service 

organizations. 

The ISMICC is required to meet at 

least twice per year. 

To attend virtually, submit written or 

brief oral comments, or request special 

accommodation for persons with 

disabilities, contact Pamela Foote. 

Individuals can also register at https:// 

snacregister.samhsa.gov/. 

The public comment section will be 

scheduled at the conclusion of the 

meeting. Individuals interested in 

submitting a comment, must notify 

Pamela Foote on or before 4:00 p.m., 

September 29, 2023, via email to: 

Pamela.Foote@samhsa.hhs.gov. 

Up to three minutes will be allotted 

for each approved public comment as 

time permits. Written comments 

received in advance of the meeting will 

be considered for inclusion in the 

official record of the meeting. 

Substantive meeting information and 

a roster of Committee members is 

available at the Committee’s website: 

https://www.samhsa.gov/about-us/ 

advisory-councils/ismicc. 

Dated: September 5, 2023. 

Carlos Castillo, 

Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2023–19449 Filed 9–7–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4162–20–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Federal Emergency Management 

Agency 

[Docket ID: FEMA–2023–0024] 

Simplifying FEMA Preparedness 

Grants 

AGENCY: Federal Emergency 

Management Agency, Department of 

Homeland Security. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

information. 

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency 

Management Agency (FEMA) aims to 

improve the management and 

administration of its preparedness grant 

programs to continue to assist the nation 

in building and sustaining capabilities 

to prevent, prepare for, protect against, 

and respond to terrorist attacks and 

other hazards. FEMA is issuing this 

Notice and Request for Information 

(RFI) to seek public input on 

simplifying and streamlining its 

preparedness grant process to improve 

the efficiency and accessibility of its 

suite of preparedness grant programs. 

DATES: Comments must be received no 

later than November 7, 2023. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons may 

submit comments responsive to this RFI 

electronically through the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal at https://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments 

and use Docket ID: FEMA–2023–0024. 

Submitting this information makes it 

public; you may wish to read the 

Privacy and Security Notice on https:// 

www.regulations.gov. 

Commenters are encouraged to 

identify the specific question or 

questions by number to which they are 

responding. All submissions received 

must include the agency name and 

Docket ID, and will be posted, without 

change, to the Federal eRulemaking 

Portal at https://www.regulations.gov 

and will include any personal 

information you provide. Comments 

submitted can be viewed by other 

commenters and interested members of 

the public. Responses should not 

include any personally identifiable 

information or confidential commercial 

information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pamela Williams, Assistant 

Administrator, Grant Programs 

Directorate, Resilience, Federal 

Emergency Management Agency, FemaGrants-Feedback@fema.dhs.gov or 202– 

212–8007. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

On Jan. 25, 2023, the U.S. Department 

of Homeland Security (DHS) released 

the Secretary’s 2023 department-wide 

priorities. FEMA seeks this input as part 

of the DHS 2023 priority to improve 

management and administration of grant 

programs by simplifying application 

processes and improving customer 

service, while ensuring greater 

accessibility and equity for under 

resourced populations. For decades, 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 173 / Friday, September 8, 2023 / Notices 62099 

1https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/ 

documents/fema_2022-2026-strategic-plan.pdf (Last 

accessed 6/2/2023). 

2See Request for Information on FEMA Programs, 

Regulations, and Policies https://

www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/04/22/ 

2021-08444/request-for-information-on-femaprograms-regulations-and-policies (Last accessed 6/ 

7/2023). 

FEMA has provided federal assistance 

to aid states in building and sustaining 

capabilities to measurably improve the 

nation’s readiness in preventing, 

preparing for, protecting against, and 

responding to terrorist attacks and other 

hazards. The federal grants process is a 

critical tool for providing funding to a 

wide range of recipients, including 

state, local, tribal Nations, and territorial 

governments, and nonprofits. However, 

the process is often seen as complex and 

burdensome, which can discourage 

some stakeholders from applying for 

grants and limit program effectiveness. 

The 2022–2026 FEMA Strategic Plan 1

outlines the agency’s approach to 

transform how the agency delivers 

support and enables partners to increase 

their capacity. FEMA must routinely 

evaluate its programs and policies for 

outcome disparities; in keeping with the 

2022–2026 FEMA Strategic Plan. 

II. Maximizing the Value of Public 

Feedback 

The impacts of federal regulations and 

policies tend to be widely dispersed in 

society, making members of the public 

one of the best sources of useful 

information, data and perspectives on 

the benefits and burdens of FEMA’s 

existing programs, regulations, 

information collections and policies. 

FEMA seeks public feedback relevant to 

its grant preparedness programs to 

facilitate FEMA’s review and 

simplification of its preparedness grant 

processes. 

The following is meant to assist 

members of the public in formulating 

comments. This notice contains a list of 

questions, the answers to which will 

assist FEMA in reviewing, modifying 

and simplifying our preparedness grant 

processes and improving engagement 

with stakeholders. FEMA encourages 

public comment and seeks additional 

data commenters believe relevant to 

agency efforts to improve service 

delivery. FEMA finds the most effective 

feedback on agency process identifies 

specific programmatic information and 

policies for improvement; identifies 

specific barriers to participation and/or 

accessibility; offers actionable data; and 

specifies viable alternatives to existing 

approaches that meet statutory 

obligations. 

For example, commentary stating that 

a stakeholder feels strongly that FEMA 

should change the preparedness grant 

application process, without providing 

specific information on how the 

proposed change would impact the cost, 

time and efforts of recipients, is less 

helpful to FEMA than specific 

actionable feedback that provides 

details on how to address identified 

challenges. FEMA is looking for new 

and/or specific information, data and 

perspectives to support any proposed 

changes. Commenters should consider 

these principles as they answer and 

respond to the questions in this notice: 

• Specifically identify any 

administrative burdens, program 

requirements, information collection 

burdens, waiting time, or unnecessary 

complexity in FEMA’s grant processes. 

• Identify meaningful and helpful 

engagements that have been, or should 

be provided to enhance the knowledge 

and accessibility of FEMA’s 

preparedness grant programs. 

• Provide specific data that document 

the costs, burdens and benefits of 

existing requirements to the extent they 

are available. Commenters might also 

address how FEMA can best obtain and 

consider accurate, objective information 

and data about the costs, burdens, and 

benefits of existing programs, and 

whether there are existing sources of 

data that FEMA can use to evaluate its 

programs on a revolving basis. 

• Where comments relate to a 

program’s costs or benefits, consider 

providing data or other information 

about the program to ascertain the 

program’s actual impact. 

FEMA will also conduct several 

listening sessions for public 

commentary during the open comment 

period. Information will be posted on 

https://www.fema.gov/event/publiccomment-period-simplifying-femapreparedness-grants. 

III. FEMA’s Preparedness Programs 

In Fiscal Year 2023, preparedness 

grant programs will provide more than 

two billion dollars in funding to state, 

local, tribal Nations, and territorial 

governments, as well as transportation 

authorities, nonprofit organizations, and 

other eligible entities as outlined in the 

funding notice for each program. FEMA 

preparedness grant programs include: 

1. Assistance to Firefighters Grants 

(AFG); 

2. Emergency Management 

Performance Grant Program (EMPG); 

3. Fire Prevention & Safety (FP&S); 

4. Homeland Security Grant Program 

(HSGP); 

a. State Homeland Security Program 

(SHSP); 

b. Urban Area Security Initiative 

(UASI); 

c. Operation Stonegarden (OPSG); 

5. Intercity Bus Security Grant 

Program (IBSGP); 

6. Intercity Passenger Rail Grant 

Program (IPR); 

7. Nonprofit Security Grant Program 

(NSGP); 

8. Staffing for Adequate Fire and 

Emergency Response (SAFER); 

9. Port Security Grant Program 

(PSGP); 

10. Regional Catastrophic 

Preparedness Grants Program (RCPGP); 

11. State and Local Cybersecurity 

Grant Program (SLCGP); 

12. Tribal Cybersecurity Grant 

Program (TCGP); 

13. Transit Security Grant Program 

(TSGP); and 

14. Tribal Homeland Security Grant 

Program (THSGP). 

FEMA seeks specific input from the 

public regarding the outlined 

preparedness grant programs, collection 

of information, and policies. In 

response, FEMA will work to simplify 

and streamline its grant processes to 

improve efficiencies and accessibility. 

For additional information on the 

programs above, please visit https://

www.fema.gov/grants/preparedness/ 

about. 

IV. Specific Information Requested 

FEMA has divided this request for 

information into three sections: (1) a 

series of general questions which may 

be answered as applicable to any of 

FEMA’s preparedness grant programs, 

(2) specific questions that solicit more 

targeted feedback on individual 

preparedness grant programs, and (3) 

follow up questions from the Request 

for Information concerning equity and 

climate change that FEMA released in 

2021.2

A. General Inquiry 

1. How would you describe the 

cadence of FEMA preparedness grant 

programs communication to your 

stakeholder group? 

D How often is too often, and how 

infrequently is too infrequently? 

D Do you feel that all information 

required to apply for a grant is 

discussed? 

D Is there anything missing from 

FEMA’s communication on grants that 

would be helpful to have? 

2. What other methods and modes of 

engagement (e.g., listening sessions, 

online surveys, written inputs) would 

you like to participate in? Does this 

include regional and/or national 

engagements hosted by FEMA? If so, 

which ones? 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
62100 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 173 / Friday, September 8, 2023 / Notices 

3. If you are responsible for managing 

grant programs from across the federal 

government: 

D Do you believe there are 

opportunities for FEMA to better 

complement and coordinate with other 

federal grant programs? If so, what 

would you recommend? 

D Are there any specific compliance 

elements with FEMA grants that are 

more or less burdensome than other 

federal grants? If so, can you provide 

specific examples? 

4. What are your biggest challenges 

during the application periods? 

Consider the following: 

D Timeframe, including the length of 

the application period, how many 

applications are due at the same time, 

the time of the year the application 

period opens, etc.; 

D Technology including the grant 

application systems (ND Grants, FEMA 

GO, and Grants Reporting Tool); 

D Completing the Biannual Strategy 

Implementation Report (BSIR); 

D Forms; 

D Knowledge of the program 

requirements and priorities; 

D Internal approvals; or 

D Other (please describe). 

5. Compliance vs. Complexity: For the 

following topics, although FEMA must 

ensure compliance with certain grant 

requirements, we would like to simplify 

how these requirements are met and 

seek your feedback on how FEMA can 

make these requirements easier, while 

still achieving compliance. Potential 

topics for feedback include: 

D Reporting requirements, fraud 

awareness, and fraud prevention; 

D Record keeping/questioned costs; 

D Environmental and historic 

preservation; 

D Other Grant Requirements (Civil 

Rights, Drug Free Workplace, etc.); 

D Audits from the DHS Office of 

Inspector General (OIG) or the 

Government Accountability Office, 

(GAO) and FEMA monitoring 

D Procurement rules (e.g., the Build 

American Buy American Act (BABAA)) 

6. FEMA seeks your feedback on your 

experiences with monitoring of FEMA 

preparedness grant programs, including: 

D If you have received monitoring 

from FEMA, from whom did you receive 

it (Region or Headquarters)? Was it 

financial or programmatic monitoring or 

both? 

D How would you describe the 

response time of the feedback you 

received? What did you need to do to 

prepare for the visit? 

D Was the feedback helpful? How was 

your experience trying to close any 

corrective actions? 

7. Measuring for Results: 

D How do you quantify goods and 

services purchased with grant funds? 

D How do you collect information at 

the project level to determine its impact 

on your preparedness capabilities? 

D How can FEMA assist in 

simplifying that process? 

8. What else can FEMA do to help 

balance the needs of emergency 

management, with other state and urban 

area grant recipient stakeholders such as 

fire and emergency medical services, 

public health officials, and law 

enforcement? 

9. Which FEMA preparedness tools or 

products inform your grant investments 

decisions? 

10. Have you identified areas for 

improvement in the grant process for 

which FEMA technical assistance or 

joint technical assistance with other 

jurisdictions could be helpful? If so, 

what are they? 

11. How can FEMA better consolidate 

grant training and technical assistance 

to support a unified presentation of all 

its offerings to recipients and subrecipients? 

12. Are there data reporting elements 

that your organization captures, that you 

believe would be valuable to share with 

FEMA and would help FEMA articulate 

how the nation is better prepared and 

more resilient? If so, what are they? 

13. How does your organization 

capture data on underserved 

communities serviced with 

preparedness grant resources? 

B. Programmatic Questions 

(1) Competitive Grant Programs 

1. Regarding FEMA’s competitive 

preparedness grant programs (AFG, 

FP&S, SAFER, IBSGP, NSGP, OPSG, 

PSGP, RCPGP, TSGP, THSGP): 

a. Are there measures that FEMA 

could take to increase the number of 

entities that are aware of and apply for 

our grant programs? What are the 

specific barriers to submitting grant 

applications? 

2. State Administrative Agencies: For 

the Emergency Management 

Performance Grant and Homeland 

Security Grant Program, what measures 

are being taken at the state level to 

promote equitable sub-awarding of 

federal grant funds? How can FEMA 

support these measures to make them 

simpler and more effective? 

3. Grant subapplicants and 

subrecipients: What are your biggest 

challenges during the application 

process, including FEMA specific 

guidance and timelines and the 

applicant (State) specific guidance and 

timelines? 

(2) Homeland Security Grant Program 

(HSGP) 

4. FEMA and DHS have committed to 

having this year’s six National Priority 

Areas (NPAs) remain consistent next 

year. How has this impacted your 

planning process? As a reminder, the six 

NPAs are: 

a. Enhancing the protection of soft 

targets and crowded places; 

b. Enhancing information sharing and 

intelligence analysis; 

c. Combating domestic violence 

extremism; 

d. Enhancing cybersecurity; 

e. Enhancing community 

preparedness and resilience; and 

f. Enhancing election security. 

5. In what ways do the six NPAs 

accurately or inadequately represent the 

landscape of priorities that are needed 

to further strengthen homeland 

security? 

6. Five of six NPAs provide minimum 

spend percentages required for both the 

State and Urban Area portfolios. The 

minimum spend requirements equated 

to 15% of the total award funds, and 

FEMA further required that an 

additional 15% be spent across any of 

the six NPAs for both the State and 

Urban Area portfolios. 

a. Do you believe this approach 

provides adequate resourcing and 

investments into these priority areas? 

7. Do you have any further 

recommendations for setting NPAs? 

8. How can FEMA help state, local, 

tribal, and territorial partners better 

understand or clarify the risk 

methodology that informs allocations 

for the Homeland Security Grant 

Program? 

9. In what ways does the risk profile 

help you understand your jurisdiction’s 

relative risk? 

10. How might FEMA improve the 

risk profile? 

11. What data elements should be the 

most and least influential in the 

Terrorism Risk Methodology? 

12. Are there any national level 

datasets that FEMA has not included as 

part of the risk assessment analysis? If 

so, please identify the relevant datasets. 

13. Is there a way for FEMA to 

provide the public with a better 

understanding of the HSGP’s priorities 

in advance the Notice of Funding 

Opportunity (NOFO)? 

14. What can FEMA and DHS do to 

strengthen its grant programs to better 

build or sustain state and local 

capabilities to prevent terrorist attacks? 

15. What can FEMA and DHS do to 

ensure that the Homeland Security 

Grant Programs (HSGP, UASI, OSGP) 

adequately meet your needs? 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 173 / Friday, September 8, 2023 / Notices 62101 

16. The HSGP is a resource among a 

limited pool of funding for the 

development of new and sustained 

capabilities. Given the limited funding, 

how do you prioritize building new 

capabilities versus sustaining existing 

capabilities? A complete answer would 

provide examples. 

17. The HSGP contains an element of 

the State Homeland Security Program 

(SHSP) that provides the legislative 

requirement to subaward at least 80% of 

state funds to local units of government. 

Do you believe this an adequate 

measure to help ensure that funds are 

properly invested for building 

capabilities? If not, why not? 

18. What suggestions do you have for 

proper alignment and balancing of 

SHSP funds to build capabilities? 

19. What can FEMA and DHS do to 

help ensure law enforcement needs are 

met while also balancing the needs of 

other state and urban area grant 

recipient stakeholders such as fire and 

emergency management? 

20. The Law Enforcement Terrorism 

Prevention Activity (LETPA) program 

imposes a minimum spend requirement 

on law enforcement terrorism 

prevention. How can FEMA and DHS 

refine LETPA requirement to ensure 

state and local capabilities to prevent 

terrorist attacks are being supported? 

21. What can FEMA and DHS do to 

ensure campus law enforcement 

agencies understand how to access the 

Homeland Security Grant Program 

funding, to include Urban Area Security 

Initiative funding? 

22. What can FEMA and DHS do to 

simplify the grant requirements for 

applicants and recipients to enhance the 

Operation Stonegarden Grant Program? 

(3) Urban Areas Security Initiative 

Program 

The Urban Areas Security Initiative 

Program is subject to the evolving and 

expanding threat landscape. Threats 

faced by the nation have changed 

dramatically over the last twenty years, 

becoming more dispersed in nature and 

often carried out by a single individual 

or small groups using very simple 

tactics. As a result, risk is no longer 

concentrated in the largest urban areas; 

the risk to smaller urban areas has risen, 

as well. 

23. The Urban Areas Security 

Initiative Program must address this 

new threat environment, both in terms 

of eligible urban areas and risk-based 

funding allocations. Please provide your 

input on how this can best be 

accomplished without undermining the 

progress made over the past 20 years in 

building capacity to prevent, protect, 

and respond to terrorist acts. 

(4) Emergency Management 

Performance Grant (EMPG) 

24. Do you find the current EMPG 

work plan template preferable to the 

previous narrative format? 

25. How much does the 50% cost 

share/match, which requires that the 

federal share applied toward the EMPG 

Program be no more than 50% of the 

total budget, factor into the State 

Administrative Agency’s ability and 

approach to pass through EMPG funding 

to subrecipients? 

C. 2021 Request for Information Follow 

Up Questions 

FEMA released an RFI in April 2021 

to receive input from the public on 

specific FEMA programs, regulations, 

collections of information, and policies 

for the agency to consider modifying, 

streamlining, expanding or repealing in 

light of Executive Order 13985, 

‘‘Advancing Racial Equity and Support 

for Underserved Communities Through 

the Federal Government’’, among 

executive actions. The questions in this 

Simplifying FEMA Preparedness Grants 

2023 RFI expands on the 2021 RFI 

feedback, and explores opportunities to 

identify and redress potential inequities 

in how partners access, apply and 

receive preparedness grant funds. 

The 2021 RFI identified areas for 

improving the NSGP Investment 

Justification (IJ) process. As another 

example, one commentator suggested 

that communities that meet the small, 

impoverished community definition 

could use simpler forms or receive 

direct assistance from FEMA staff or 

FEMA-hired contractors to prepare the 

grant application. 

1. What steps can FEMA take to 

improve the application process for our 

preparedness suite of grant programs? 

2. How can FEMA better engage with 

underserved communities about 

national preparedness initiatives and 

grant programs? 

3. Are there entities that are excluded 

from preparedness grant programs that 

could meet the priorities of one or more 

programs and provide a benefit to their 

community? Please provide the name of 

the grant program(s), entity type and 

how they can support a priority of the 

program(s). 

4. How does your organization 

capture data on underserved 

communities serviced with 

preparedness grant resources? 

FEMA notes that this notice is issued 

solely for information and programplanning purposes. Responses to this 

notice do not bind FEMA to any further 

actions related to the response. 

Deanne Criswell, 

Administrator, Federal Emergency 

Management Agency. 

[FR Doc. 2023–19376 Filed 9–7–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9111–78–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration 

Services 

[OMB Control Number 1615–0017] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Revision of a Currently 

Approved Collection: Application for 

Advance Permission to Enter as a 

Nonimmigrant 

AGENCY: U.S. Citizenship and 

Immigration Services, Department of 

Homeland Security. 

ACTION: 30-Day notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland 

Security (DHS), U.S. Citizenship and 

Immigration Services (USCIS) will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and clearance in accordance 

with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995. The purpose of this notice is to 

allow an additional 30 days for public 

comments. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted until October 10, 2023. 

ADDRESSES: Written comments and/or 

suggestions regarding the item(s) 

contained in this notice, especially 

regarding the estimated public burden 

and associated response time, must be 

submitted via the Federal eRulemaking 

Portal website at https://

www.regulations.gov under e-Docket ID 

number USCIS–2008–0009. All 

submissions received must include the 

OMB Control Number 1615–0017 in the 

body of the letter, the agency name and 

Docket ID USCIS–2008–0009. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

USCIS, Office of Policy and Strategy, 

Regulatory Coordination Division, 

Samantha Deshommes, Chief, telephone 

number (240) 721–3000 (This is not a 

toll-free number; comments are not 

accepted via telephone message.). Please 

note contact information provided here 

is solely for questions regarding this 

notice. It is not for individual case 

status inquiries. Applicants seeking 

information about the status of their 

individual cases can check Case Status 

Online, available at the USCIS website 

at https://www.uscis.gov, or call the 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1