alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: mrbussyscathouse@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Support access to preventive care and contraception

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 5:57:20 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Mrbussyscathouse@aol.com
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ALEX PIERRE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-890 

[October 11, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Barbara R. Duffy, Judge; L.T. Case No. 14-000408 

CF10A.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, and Paul O'Neil, Assistant Regional 

Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Fourth 

District, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melanie Dale 

Surber, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GERBER, C.J., LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
From: Judy Miller

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Health Care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:21:40 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
#### The Merchants’ National Bank of the City of New York, v. James F. Sheehan and others.

Older modified by reducing the fine to ninety-four dollars and thirty-five cents, and as so modified affirmed, without costs to either party, ou the ground that while the order remained in force the appellant was obliged to obey its directions.
From: BarbaraB

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Unjust

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 6:30:26 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Sincerely,

 Right to access & choices
---

---

EXHIBIT 23.7



We consent to
  the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.
  333-61895 and Form S-8 No. 333-55970) of our report dated February 4, 2003,
  with respect to the financial statements of **Epsilon Investment House
  Ltd** included in the Annual Report (Form 10K) for 2003 of Ampal American
  Israel Corporation.



|**Kost
        Forer Gabbay & Kasierer**
|----------------------------------------
|A member
      of Ernst & Young Global  

March 28, 2004

---

---
9/5 iz& ^r. RECEIVED IH 15: ao*-cr&rnlmLfype»Ls. comCF^muPPBALS nnzOJexK : RbeLfytistk. M lo 2015
EWH- l%ll*Z-OSj 

## Dot oP &bz*e> &>epv3 ^^be^^^i/^^^^^"^^15 O/* tfe Ah^^^V*3d[ W>eJt; ^VfUu W/J/ lute** rne-orvA 

### Lipidsme-of rt!* Ste&^j ^i^o/AJ^aIL Afpn&iidizJft'.
Exhibit 23**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in each of the following Registration Statements ofTemple-Inland Inc. and in each related Prospectus of our reports dated March 3, 2006, with respectto the consolidated financial statements of Temple-Inland Inc.; and Temple-Inland Inc. management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting of Temple-Inland Inc., included in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.   Registration  Statement No. PurposeNo. 33-27286 Post Effective Amendment Number 1 on Form S-8No. 33-32124 Post Effective Amendment Number 2 on Form S-8No. 33-43802 Registration Statement on Form S-8No. 33-48034 Registration Statement on Form S-8No. 33-54388 Registration Statement on Form S-8No. 33-63104 Registration Statement on Form S-8No. 333-27469 Registration Statement on Form S-8No. 333-33702 Registration Statement on Form S-8No. 333-105072 Registration Statement on Form S-8No. 333-113180 Registration Statement on Form S-8No. 333-129545 Registration Statement on Form S-8No. 333-129546 Registration Statement on Form S-8No. 333-129547 Registration Statement on Form S-8No. 333-129548 Registration Statement on Form S-8No. 333-129549 Registration Statement on Form S-8No. 333-130034 Registration Statement on Form S-3/s/ Ernst & YoungAustin, Texas
1 

### Hutson, Nick

From: Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 3:47 PM To: Hutson, Nick; Culligan, Kevin; Owens, Nicole; Elman , Barry Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments Under EO 12866 and 13563 - New, Modified and Reconstructed Power Plant NSPS RIA Attachments: SummaryofinteragencycommentsunderEO 12866_111(b) Ne w-Mods 2060-AQ91 RIA Final_ 20150520_bulleted.docx; Summaryofinteragencycomment sunderEO 12866_111(b) NewMods 2060-AQ91 RIA Final_20150520.docx



### Attached please find summaries of interagency comme nts under EOs 12866 and 13563 on the RIA for the dr aft final rule, Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissio ns From New, Modified, and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generating Units.

Thank you and please let me know if you have any qu estions.

Nathan
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Michael K. FarrellMichael K. FarrellPresident
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Consolidated Resources Health Care Fund II (the “Partnership”) on  Form 10-K for the period ending  December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John F. McMullan, Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, subject to the qualification noted below:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Partnership.

This certification is qualified by the fact that the Report was not filed within 90 days after the end of the Partnership’s fiscal year as required by General Instruction A to Form 10-K.
|                     |   |                                                                                                       | /s/ John F. McMullan |
|--------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------|
| Date:  February 13, 2006 | By:    | John F. McMullan

Chief Financial Officer (chief executive and chief financial officer of the Partnership) |
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.69 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (4.59 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Robin Clough

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 5:57:55 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care

under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services,

are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
#### James W. Billings, Plaintiff, v. Charles Marsh, as Executor, etc., Defendant. Irene Bird, Plaintiff, v. Charles Marsh, as Executor, etc., Defendant. Charles H. Dutcher, Plaintiff, v. Charles Marsh, as Executor, etc., Defendant.

J udgment for plaintiffs on the agreed case. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
From: Nancy Simpson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 7:36:07 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Nancy Simpson

8944 Jeffery Road

Great Falls, VA 22066
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.96 MB)
 
 Travels Dunford Iraq Chairman
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Charge to Peer Reviewers for the Technical Review of Hydrogen Sulfide

EPA has prepared a technical review docum ent to assess the chemistry, environmental fate, and the potential environmental impacts a ssociated with releases of and exposures to hydrogen sulfide. The purpose of this peer review is to seek comment on the accuracy and completeness of EPA’s assessment.

Peer Review Questions

Chemistry and Fate

1. Are there any other chemical propertie s of hydrogen sulfide that should be

included?

2. Does the technical review accurately a ddress the fate of hydrogen sulfide in the environment including transformations resulting in the formation of toxic

chemicals?

Environmental Effects

1. Does the summary statement and review of the literature present a clear rationale and accurately reflect the conclusions regarding the ecological hazards of hydrogen sulfide?
#### MARY FINK and JOHN *W.*FINK, Respondents, *v.*THOMAS JETTER and HENRY STILLGEBAUER, Appellants.

*A bül'of pwrticula/rs wül not be allowed where the information sought for lies peculiarly within the knowledge of the defendant.*

Appeal from an order, made at a Special Term, denying a motion to compel the plaintiffs to furnish a bill of particulars.

This action was commenced to obtain a decree forfeiting a lease made by the plaintiffs to the defendants, and for a violation of the covenant of the lease, by which the defendants agreed to purchase, all pork which should be sold in the premises demised, from the lessors at regular market prices, and which provided that in the event of their refusal to do so then, and in such case, the lease should cease and terminate at the option of the lessors. The defendants deny that the covenant was violated and ask for a bill of particulars giving the dates and character thereof and the names and addresses of all persons connected with the violations.

The court at General Term said: *“*This action appears to have been commenced on the 14th of March, 1885, and the allegation of *164the complaint in reference to the violation of the covenant is that the plaintiffs are informed that on the 14th of February, 1885, and at various other times, the defendants bought pork of other persons, and which pork was subsequently sold in the premises in violation of the covenant; and thus by this allegation, and.by the affidavit which appears in the papers, the breaches are embraced within the period between February fourteenth and March fourteenth following; and the plaintiff John Fink swears that he could not give the particulars of the breach believing that the facts could be proved on the trial by the defendants or their employees.

*“*It is not deemed necessary to examine the numerous allegations on the subject embraced in this appeal, as to whether the bill should be ordered, for the reason that it must depend upon the circumstances of the case. The gravamen of this action is the violation of the covenant already mentioned, and within a period of twenty-eight days; and this covenant, as it involves the acts of the defendants, is certainly within their own knowledge, because it is founded on their own acts and experience, and it is evident the plaintiffs rely for success upon statements which it is supposed were made by the defendants, or persons in their employment, as to the breach complained of.

It appearing that knowledge of the acts complained of, if they have in fact been committed, is peculiarly and thoroughly with the defendants, it seems to be just that the plaintiffs under the circumstances should not be required to furnish a bill of particulars.”

*Oha/rles A. Flammer,*for the appellants.

*Thomas AlUson,*for the respondents.

Opinion by

Brady, J.;

Davis, P. J., and Daniels, J.,

concurred.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.