alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         2,923
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    6,121
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               13,213
<PP&E>                                         11,605
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 316,626
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          71,393
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       4,954
<OTHER-SE>                                     240,279
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   245,233
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               435,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (948)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (434,422)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (434,422)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (434,422)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.01)



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

WARREN STOKES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 95 EM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23 rd day of February , 2021, the Petition for Leave to File Petition

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Counsel is ORDERED to file a

Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 15 d ays.
From: elizabeth petit

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:42:47 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

elizabeth petit

52 bank street

NEW YORK, NY 10014
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6766

KEVIN M. BARBOUR, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF MARYLAND; THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Brockbridge Correctional Warden,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96-

1013-AMD)

Submitted: June 28, 1996 Decided: August 14, 1996

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin M. Barbour, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action for failure to

either allege that he forewarned Defendants or other prison officials that he was in danger, or provide evidence of a risk of harm

to Appellant to which Defendants were deliberately indifferent. A

dismissal without prejudice is generally not appealable "unless the

grounds for dismissal clearly indicate that `no amendment [in the

complaint] could cure the defects in the [Appellant's] case.'" See

Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064,

1067 (4th Cir. 1993) (quoting Coniston Corp. v. Village of Hoffman

Estates, 844 F.2d 461, 463 (7th Cir. 1988)). Because the district

court's reason for dismissing the action did not clearly indicate

that no amendment could cure the defect, we dismiss the appeal as

interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument, because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The effects of the ChesapeakeBay Impact Crater on the geologic framework and the correlation ofhydrogeologic units of southeastern Virginia, south of the James River**
 
Report | Plate
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.16:1622
Item Number:0624 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001046811
 
February 23, 2018
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.27 MB)
 
 JOEP JAF New Jersey National Guard Task Force Spartan interoperability Soldiers Army Guard ceremony Jordan USARCENT National Guard Army National Guard ARCENT coalition ASG-J 102 CAV Jordan Border Guard Force JTC-J Joint Operational Engagement Program
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
An official website of the United States government         Here's how you know         
**Official websites use .mil**
A **.mil** website belongs to an official U.S. Department of Defense organization in the United States.
**Secure .mil websites use HTTPS**
 A **lock (lock )** or **https://** means you’ve safely connected to the .mil website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Skip to main content (Press Enter).

U.S. Central Command

Search
Search

Search

-  Home		 
-  ABOUT US    -  COMMAND PRIORITIES             
  -  LEADERSHIP             
  -  COMPONENT COMMANDS             
  -  HISTORY             
  -  POSTURE STATEMENT 
-  CENTCOM AOR    -  CENTCOM COALITION 
-  OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES    -  USMTM             
  -  CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT 
-  CONTACT    -  OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT             
  -  COMMUNITY RELATIONS             
  -  THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE             
  -  INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL             
  -  MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL 
-  MEDIA    -  SOCIAL MEDIA             
  -  NEWS ARTICLES             
  -  PRESS RELEASES             
  -  STATEMENTS             
  -  IMAGERY             
  -  VIDEOS             
  -  TRANSCRIPTS 
-  VISITORS AND PERSONNEL    -  FAMILY CENTER             
  -  FAMILY READINESS             
  -  CENTCOM WEBMAIL             
  -  SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY             
  -  ACCOUNTABILITY             
  -  EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS             
  -  USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS             
  -  FOIA LIBRARY             
  -  INNOVATION OASIS             
  -  WELCOME GUIDE 

Search

Search

                            - All Images 
                            - Community Relations 
                            - Other 
                            - PreviousCommanders 

                            - Upload Date
                            - Photo Date
                            - Title

Share

----

Download Image: Small ()Medium ()Full Size (2.08 MB)

Tags:AAVs, Battalion Landing Team 3/1, Kilo Company, VMM 166, Lima Company, Weapons Company, CH-53, ARG, Command Element, USS Anchorage, BLT 3/1, Arty, Heuy, Motivate, Seamen, F-35B Lighting II, VMFA 211, Sailors, U.S. Marines, U.S. Navy, Osprey, F-35, Marine Corps, Marines, BLT, MV-22, CE, Pacific Ocean, Super Stallion, 7th Fleet, UH-60, 13th MEU, 13th Marine Expeditionary Unit, USS Rushmore, Anchorage, Motivation, India Company, Tanks, Bravo Company, Rushmore, Essex, USS Essex, Amphibious Ready Group, Navy Marine Corps Team, Wake Island, 13th MEU CE, 13th Marine Expeditionary Unit Command Element, Assault Amphibious Vehicle Detachment, Artillery Detachment, Bravo, Tank Detachment, Combat Logisitics Battalion 13, CLB 13, Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron 166 Reinforced, Marine Fighter Attack Detachment 211, Motivating, Good Photos, The Essex ARG, The Essex Amphibious Ready Group, Petty Officers, Cpl. Francisco Diaz, Francisco J. Diaz Jr., Francisco Diaz, Cpl Diaz

Photo by:VIRIN: 

Photo Gallery
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.98 MB)
 
 GazaHA
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 24, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

____________

NO. 14-12-00020-CV

____________

GILBERT D. GILES, Appellant

V.

SHUNDA GILES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 247th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1997-47863

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an attempted appeal from an order signed November 10, 2011. Appellant 

filed a notice of appeal on January 9, 2012, seeking to appeal the trial court’s dismissal 

order of November 10, 2011. On April 3, 2012, a clerk’s record was filed in this appeal, 

which did not contain a dismissal order signed November 10, 2011, or any other final 

appealable order. This court ordered the district clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing the dismissal order. On April 24, 2012, the Harris County District Clerk filed a 

supplemental clerk’s record with the notation, “There is no signed dismissal order, dated 
2

November 10, 2011 in this file. The only reference to this date was the Courts [sic] 

Docket Sheet, which is included in this Supplemental Record.” The docket sheet entry 

states, “Nov. 10, 2011 no signed order for new trial as granted 10/11/11.” 

On April 27, 2012, this court informed all parties of the court’s intent to dismiss the 

appeal for want of jurisdiction unless any party filed a response within ten days of the date 

of the letter. Appellant filed no response.

The appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Boyce, and McCally.
Exhibit 32.1

                             Multiband Corporation.
                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      In  connection  with this Annual Report Form 10-K,  Multiband  Corporation
(the  "Company")  for the period ended  December  31, 2004,  I, James L. Mandel,
Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

1.    This Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and

2.    The information  contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,  in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


Date: May 25, 2005                       By: /s/ James L. Mandel
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Chief Executive Officer
From: Susan Hess Logeais

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 9:39:30 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Susan Hess Logeais

9911 SE Cambridge Lane

Milwaukie, OR 97222
From: Janice Peischl

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: support preventative care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:02:32 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new

health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a

critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to contraceptive

services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to

apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from

the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this

larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
#### Arnold Davidson, Respondent, v. John F. Betz and another, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Barnard, P. J.
[No. 2490.]

#### Blum v. Edelstein.

Appellate Practice — Excessive Verdict — Remittitur.

Where plaintiff sued on two causes of action and recovered a verdict on both in an amount in excess of the claim in the *409second cause but less than the aggregate claim of both, and there was no evidence to support the verdict on the second cause of action, a remittitur entered by plaintiff for the amount sued for in the second cause of action cured the error of the jury allowing any sum on the second cause, and a judgment entered on the first cause of action for the remainder of the amount of the verdict will be sustained.

*Appeal from the District Court of Pueblo County.*

Mr. T. B. McDonald, for appellant.

Mr. S. Harrison White, for appellee.

Gunter, J.

The complaint contained two causes of action. One for money had and received by appellant to the use of appellee. The other for money had and received by appellant to the use of a third party, which claim against appellant had, prior to the institution of this action, been assigned to appellee. There was a verdict for appellee upon both causes of action, the verdict being for a sum largely in excess of the amount claimed on the second cause of action, but less than the aggregate amount- claimed upon the two causes of action. Upon the hearing of the motion' for *a*new trial the court found that there was an absence of evidence to sustain the second cause of action. Thereupon appellee entered a remittitur in' an amount equal to the sum sought to be recovered on the second cause of action. In other words, appellee» thereby cured all possible effect of the error of the jury in allowing any sum on the second cause of action. Thereupon the court entered judgment for the plaintiff on the first cause of action for the difference between the sum thus remitted and the amount of the verdict.

It is said that in this action the court committed error.

The only prejudicial error committed against *410appellant in tlie trial was the return of a verdict upon the second cause of action. As all effects of this error were cured by the remittitur entered, the court committed no error in thereupon entering judgment upon the first cause of action for the remainder. Its judgment should be affirmed.

*Affirmed.*
**Exhibit 23****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) ofTemple-Inland Inc. of our report dated February 22, 2007, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Temple-Inland Inc., included in the 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders ofTemple-Inland Inc.We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements: 1) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-130034) of Temple-Inland Inc.  2) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-129545) of Temple-Inland Inc.  3) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-129546) of Temple-Inland Inc.  4) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-129547) of Temple-Inland Inc.  5) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-129548) of Temple-Inland Inc.  6) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-129549) of Temple-Inland Inc.  7) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-113180) of Temple-Inland Inc.  8) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-105072) of Temple-Inland Inc.  9) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-33702) of Temple-Inland Inc.  10) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-27469) of Temple-Inland Inc.  11) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-63104) of Temple-Inland Inc.  12) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-54388) of Temple-Inland Inc.  13) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-48034) of Temple-Inland Inc.  14) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-43802) of Temple-Inland Inc.  15) Registration Statement (Post Effective Amendment Number 1 on Form S-8 No. 33-27286)of Temple-Inland Inc.  16) Registration Statement (Post Effective Amendment Number 2 on Form S-8 No. 33-32124)of Temple-Inland Inc.of our report dated February 22, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofTemple-Inland Inc. incorporated herein by reference, our report dated February 22, 2007, withrespect to Temple-Inland Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofTemple-Inland Inc., included herein, of Temple-Inland Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form10-K)./s/ Ernst & Young