alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Gerald Noesen

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Birth Control Mania & Maniacs

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 8:06:38 PM

In all my 81 years of life, I have never known such a twisted mind behind a running

mouth as our "president". He seems to thrive on the destruction of our former

long-standing American values. The writers of our Constitution and our Bill of

Rights must be turning over in their graves at the constant undermining of their

sense of Truth, Justice, and the Common Good in the bills he promotes and signs, 

The latest attack by him and his henchwoman Sibelias against the conception of a

child is a stinking crime against humanity! And the very idea of them making all of

us support this mania by our tax money is gross injustice! In fact we should all

simply refuse to pay any taxes until this stupid law , and all others that support

Planned UNparenthood are are rooted out of our country. All logical, reasoning

human beings know that any action that kills a conceived human being is an act of

homicide BY DEFINITION , and genocide BY SPECIFIC CHOICE AND NUMBERS! So

real American government should be taking every penny of tax money from P>U>

and giving it to support Life Care Centers that give loving care to pregnant women

and their unborn child in difficult pregnancy situations. These days the stench

coming out of the White House is of historic proportions! G.L. Noesen, Crookston,

Minnesota.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Review of K99/R00 Applications.                    

*Date:*                         October 24-25, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive Bethesda, Maryland 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Tracy Koretsky, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, MSC 6200, Room 3AN12F, Bethesda, Maryland                               ( print page 60221)                            20892,  301-594-2886,                         *tracy.koretsky@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.859, Biomedical Research and Research Training, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 24, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-18833 Filed 8-30-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (5.11 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Judy Liston

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 8:13:26 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Judy Liston
Des Moines, Iowa
#### Charles A. Burt. Respondent, v. Oneida Community, Limited, and others, Appellants.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Opinion by

Follett, J.
#### Fred Patterson v. The State.

No. 1933.

Decided January 24, 1900.

malicious mischief—Injury to Property—Evidence Insufficient.

See opinion for evidence held insufficient to support a conviction for malicious mischief under article 791, Penal Code, where the prosecution was for injury to and not a destruction of property.

Appeal from the County Court of Hunt. Tried below before Hon. R. D. Thompson, County Judge.

Appeal from a conviction of malicious mischief; penalty, a fine of $1.

The opinion states the case sufficiently.

Ho brief for appellant with the record.

*Rob’t A. John,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSOH, Presiding Judge.

Conviction for malicious mischief. The indictment contains two counts, appellant being convicted under the first, which charges him with' malicious mischief by piling and heaping up plows, scales, wheels, rubbish, and plunder of divers kind in a building of another, which is charged to be worth $100. *413This prosecution was brought under article 791, Penal Code, which prescribes a punishment, among other things, against persons “who shall willfully or mischieviously injure or destroy any real or personal property of any description whatever, in such manner as that, the injury does not come within the description of any of the offenses against property otherwise provided for by this Code.” It is contended the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction. The State did not seek to show the destruction of property, and therefore must rely upon the clause of the statute in regard to injury. In. our opinion, the evidence fails to show any injury. The State’s evidence shows rubbish had been brought from the outside of a blacksmith shop, and stacked up to a height of six or seven feet; and an. old reaper was placed in the hack door with the tongue inside the. shop. It took the owner half an hour to remove this rubbish. No witness testified to any injury other than as above stated. As we understand this statute, there must be some injury shown to the realty,, which, under the indictment herein, would he the house. The evidence does not support the conviction, and the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

*Reversed and remanded.*
From: joyceakramer@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Please consider this!

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 1:09:36 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Joyce A. Kramer, Co-author of the national award-winning book

Saving the Best for Last: Creating Our Lives After 50

www.invisiblenomore.com
1

February 24, 2012

MEMORANDUM

TO: Air Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0542

SUBJECT: Meeting with Wilmar Oleo North America, LLC

On February 8, 2012, EPA met with representatives of Wilmar Oleo North America, LLC to 

discuss the Notice of Data Availability for Renewable Fuels Produced from Palm Oil Under the 

Renewable Fuel Standard Program. The meeting took place at EPA Headquarters in 

Washington, DC.

Discussion topics included methane emissions from palm oil mills, greenhouse gas (GHG) 

emissions associated with land use changes, palm oil yields, GHG emissions from draining peat 

soils and policies to reduce deforestation in Indonesia and Malaysia. Wilmar expressed their 

intention to submit comments to the docket on these topics.

A set of slides that Wilmar distributed during the meeting are attached to this docket entry.

Attendees included:

Aaron Levy, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Benjamin Hengst, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Sharyn Lie, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Paul Argyropoulos, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Robert Larson, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

John Cummings, Wilmar Oleo North America (Houston)

Jeremy Goon, Wilmar International (Singapore)

Ben McMakin, Van Ness Feldman

Janet Anderson, Van Ness Feldman

Tomas Carbonell, Van Ness Feldman
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

# Foreign Trade

Skip top of page navigation

###### You are here: Census.gov › Business & Industry ›Foreign Trade › U.S. International Trade Data

                - Main
                - About
                - Data
                - Outreach
                - AES
                - Regulations
                - Reference
                - Definitions
                - Schedule B
                - FAQs

### More DATA

                          - Trade Highlights
                          - Balance by Partner Country
                          - Country/Product Trade
                          - State/Metropolitan Data
                          - Historical Series
                          - Notices and Corrections
                          - Related Party Trade
                          - Press Releases
                          - Data Products

### Important Links

                          - Global Reach Blog
                          - Newsletters
                          - ACE AESDirect
                          Related Sites- Business and Industry
- Briefing Room
- North American Industry                Classification System (NAICS)
Economic Indicator Database
                          Geographic Concordance - Annual SubscriptionDownload a file- Click on the appropriate month below to download your file.
-  If you are having technical difficulties or need help, feel free to email us at ftd.data.dissemination@census.gov or call 301-763-2311 for immediate assistance.
- Record	      layouts of the files are  available	      online .
Select Statistical Month:- 2014 Geographic Concordance  (Available March 7, 2014)

                          Export Training
Collection of videos to enhance export training.

Spanish Language Webinars 2020-2021 (Seminarios en Línea en Español 2020-2021)
2017 And Prior Year Webinars Archive.
Upcoming Outreach Activities
Upcoming Outreach Activities
Contact Us
				Contact the International Trade Macro Analysis Branch: Email us! or use our feedback form!

                  Call us: (301)763-2311 or 1-800-549-0595 option 4			  
CONNECT WITH US**********- Information Quality
- Data Linkage Infrastructure
- Data Protection and Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- FOIA
- Inspector General
- No FEAR Act
- U.S. Department of Commerce
- USA.gov

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
✕Is this page helpful?YesNo✕NO THANKS255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached✕Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions?  Source: U.S. Census Bureau | Foreign Trade |  ftdwebmaster@census.gov |     Last Revised:  June 17, 2022
#### Winfield S. Taylor et al., Respondents, *v.*Bernard F. Guinan, Appellant.

*Taylor*v. *Quinan,*141 App. Div. 921, affirmed.

(Argued May 13, 1912;

decided June 4, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, *616entered November 28, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict in an action to recover upon an alleged promise to pay for labor performed under a contract with defendant’s principal, the said defendant being one of the sureties upon a certain bond given to secure the performance by his said principal of a government contract.

*H. B. PMlbrooJc*for appellant.

*George Lupton Robinson*for respondents.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ. Not voting: Cullen, Ch. J.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      39,182,841
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               34,763,151
<ALLOWANCES>                                   226,787
<INVENTORY>                                 32,283,412
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           163,215,743
<PP&E>                                     159,685,190
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,862,238
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             924,438,629
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      152,186,522
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       114,015
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,916,595)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               924,438,629
<SALES>                                    316,012,161
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           316,012,161
<CGS>                                      311,360,195
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              311,360,195
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,327,061
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,638,808
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,801,740
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,948,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            853,240
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   853,240
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
From: paul ELMER

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Regarding new mandates in preventative health services

Date: Friday, August 05, 2011 6:15:00 PM

Please reconsider the language and meaning of "religious employer" in the new mandates concerning

preventative health services to be covered by insurance plans. The definition is so narrow that its

applicability negates most religious employers within the US. It really lacks true conscience protection.

We must protect our religious freedom. It is what makes us the United States from our very birth of a

nation. Sincerely, Paul and Darlene Elmer
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 169 (Friday, September 1, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 60451]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19100]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE:  10:00 a.m., Thursday, September 14, 2023.

PLACE:  You may observe this meeting in person at 1501 Farm Credit 
Drive, McLean, Virginia 22102-5090, or virtually. If you would like to 
observe, at least 24 hours in advance, visit FCA.gov, select 
``Newsroom,'' then select ``Events.'' From there, access the linked 
``Instructions for board meeting visitors'' and complete the described 
registration process.

STATUS:  This meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  The following matters will be considered:

 Approval of Minutes for August 10, 2023
 Quarterly Report on Economic Conditions and Farm Credit System 
Condition and Performance

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  If you need more information or 
assistance for accessibility reasons, or have questions, contact Ashley 
Waldron, Secretary to the Board. Telephone: 703-883-4009. TTY: 703-883-
4056.

Ashley Waldron,
Secretary to the Board.
[FR Doc. 2023-19100 Filed 8-30-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
```
From: Cecilia Zamora

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 2:54:14 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I am proud of the position that the Department of Health & Human Services has taken on this issue.

DHSS's landmark decision requiring health insurers to cover the full cost of contraception, with no copay, beginning in August 2012, is a necessary step in protecting women's health across the country.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Cecilia Zamora

35 Sierra Ave

San Anselmo, CA 94960
From: Margo Vanderhill

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Contraception as part of insurance

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 11:33:25 PM

Dear HHS

I strongly support the adoption of the IOM recommendations for insurance coverage without a co-pay.

The adoption of this recommendation would mean that many more women would be able to afford to

space their families and plan their lives more confidently. The coverage should also reduce the need

for abortion, a saving in cost and trauma for all.

While I support religious freedom, the religious freedom to practice contraception or not should lie with

the policy holder, that is the employee, not the institution. Institutionally dictated mandates may conflict

with the patient's own beliefs or medical necessity, as there are many applications of contraceptives

that are health-determined rather than determined by family planning.

Surveys indicate that Catholics overwhelmingly practice birth control, despite church doctrine.

Allowing religious institutions to bar contraceptive coverage puts the majority of Catholic employees at

a disadvantage.

Thank you.

Sincerely

Margo Vanderhill