alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 164 (Friday, August 25, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58263-58264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18393]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 6115-016]


Pyrites Hydro, LLC; Notice of Waiver Period for Water Quality 
Certification Application

    On August 3, 2023, Pyrites Hydro, LLC submitted to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) a copy of its application for 
a Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality certification filed 
with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (New 
York DEC), in conjunction with the above captioned project. Pursuant to 
40 CFR 121.6 and section 4.34(b)(5) of the Commission's regulations,\1\ 
we hereby notify New York DEC of the following:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 4.34(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Date of Receipt of the Certification Request: August 3, 2023.
    Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request: One 
year, August 3, 2024.
    If New York DEC fails or refuses to act on the water quality 
certification request on or before the above date, then the

[[Page 58264]]

agency certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 
401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

    Dated: August 21, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-18393 Filed 8-24-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.13 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
March 22: Military airstrikes continue against ISIL terrorists in Syria and Iraq
 
  March 22, 2016Release # 20160322-01FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**SOUTHWEST
 ASIA** **—** On March 21, coalition military forces continued to attack ISIL 
terrorists in Syria and Iraq. In Syria, coalition military forces 
conducted two strikes using attack and fighter aircraft against ISIL 
targets. Additionally in Iraq, coalition military forces conducted 13 
strikes coordinated with and in support of the Government of Iraq using 
rocket artillery and fighter and remotely piloted aircraft against ISIL 
targets.  The following is a summary of the strikes conducted against ISIL since the last press release:**Syria***  Near Ar Raqqah, one strike struck an ISIL weapons storage facility. *  Near Mar'a, one strike destroyed an ISIL fighting position.**Iraq***  Near Al Baghdadi, two strikes struck two ISIL staging facilities. *  Near Habbaniyah, one strike struck an ISIL tactical unit.* 
 Near Hit, two strikes struck a large ISIL tactical unit and destroyed 
an ISIL vehicle borne improvised explosive device (VBIED).*  Near 
Kisik, three strikes struck two separate ISIL tactical units and 
destroyed two ISIL assembly areas and suppressed an ISIL tactical unit. *  Near Mosul, two strikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL tunnel and suppressed an ISIL tactical unit.*  Near Qayyarah, two strikes destroyed ISIL engineering equipment and damaged an ISIL used bridge section.*  Near Sinjar, one strike suppressed an ISIL rocket position.Strike assessments are based on initial reports. All aircraft returned to base safely.A
 strike, as defined in the CJTF releases, means one or more kinetic 
events that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a 
single, sometimes cumulative effect for that location.  So having a 
single aircraft deliver a single weapon against a lone ISIL vehicle is 
one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons 
against a group of buildings and vehicles and weapon systems in a 
compound, for example, having the cumulative effect of making that 
facility (or facilities) harder or impossible to use.  Accordingly, 
CJTF-OIR does not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a 
strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of
 individual munition impact points against a target.The strikes 
were conducted as part of Operation Inherent Resolve, the operation to 
eliminate the ISIL terrorist group and the threat they pose to Iraq, 
Syria, and the wider international community.The destruction of 
ISIL targets in Syria and Iraq further limits the group's ability to 
project terror and conduct operations. Coalition nations which have 
conducted strikes in Iraq include Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, 
France, Jordan, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United 
States. Coalition nations which have conducted strikes in Syria include 
Australia, Bahrain, Canada, France, Jordan, the Netherlands, Saudi 
Arabia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom, and the United
 States.
From: Fritz von Fleckenstein

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:30:44 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Fritz von Fleckenstein

3109 14th St. NE

Washington, DC 20017
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Steve Malin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed  this  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of  A.B.Watley  Group
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c)  disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially  affected,  or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.


                                        /s/
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        Steve Malin
                                        Principal Executive Officer

Date:  July 23, 2004
#### Edward W. Berger, Respondent, *v.*Caroline D. Berger, Appellant.

*Berger*v. *Berger,*142 App. Div. 936, affirmed.

(Argued May 17, 1912;

decided June 4, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered January 31, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee in an action for divorce.

*Thomas J. Bannon*and *Franklin Bien*for appellant.

*Edo E. Mercelis*for respondent. ■

Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hisgock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 61606]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19255]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Library of Medicine; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Biomedical 
Library, Informatics and Data Science Review Committee, November 2-3, 
2023, which was published in the Federal Register on August 2, 2023, 88 
FR 147, Page 50884.
    This notice is being amended to change the meeting times to 9:30 
a.m. to 5:30 p.m. on November 2nd and 9:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. on 
November 3rd. The meeting is closed to the public.

     Dated: August 31, 2023.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-19255 Filed 9-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 11
                                                                      ----------

                                SPIRE CORPORATION


          STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)
                For Years Ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and 1995

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           1997          1996          1995
                                                       ---------------------------------------
<S>                                                    <C>           <C>            <C>

NET EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE - (BASIC)

Net earnings (loss)                                    $1,667,235    $ (599,232)    $    1,131
                                                       =======================================

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding    3,086,326     3,028,850      3,084,067
                                                       =======================================

Net earnings (loss) per common share                   $     0.54    $    (0.20)    $     0.00
                                                       =======================================

NET EARNINGS (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE - (DILUTED)

Net earnings (loss)                                    $1,667,235    $ (599,232)    $    1,131
                                                       =======================================

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding    3,086,326     3,028,850      3,084,067

Add net additional common shares upon exercise of
  common stock options                                    131,141            --             --
                                                       ---------------------------------------

Adjusted average common shares outstanding              3,217,467     3,028,850      3,084,067
                                                       =======================================

Net earnings (loss) per common share                   $     0.52    $    (0.20)    $     0.00
                                                       =======================================
</TABLE>
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.09 MB)
 
 169th Fighter Wing SCANG South Carolina Air National Guard 169th FW 407th Air Expeditionary Group Operation Inherent Resolve F-16 Fighting Falcon deployment crew chief 407th AEG Viper OIR deployed 157th EFS 157th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron fighter pilot Swamp fox
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Hillsborough, *\*

Oct. 3, 1911.

#### Ferguson *& a. v.*O’Brien.

A lessee’s right to remove fixtures continues as long as he remains in possession of the premises by consent of the lessor.

One who accepts a second lease after the first has expired is not thereby estopped from asserting title to fixtures installed by him during the prior tenancy.

Trespass *de bonis.*Trial by the court and verdict for the defendant, to which the plaintiffs excepted. Transferred from the January term, 1911, of the superior court by *Mitchell,*J.

April 1, 1904, the plaintiffs leased a store for the term of two years to Elizabeth Hayes, who installed a steam heater in December of the same year. She intended to remove the heater before the lease expired, but prior to that time an agreement was made by which she was to have the store for a second term of two years, with a right of renewal for a like term. The second lease was not written until after the first expired. Hayes subsequently assigned the second lease and sold the heater to one Gray, and he sold it to the defendant, who removed it while Gray was occupying under the lease.

*Irving E. Forbes,*for the plaintiffs.

*Harry T. Lord,*for the defendant.

Young, J.

1. The authorities do not sustain the plaintiffs' contention that a tenant cannot remove fixtures after his lease expires. His right to remove them continues as long as he remains in possession of the premises by consent of the lessors. *Penton*v. *Robart,*2 East 88.

2. Notwithstanding the weight of authority is in favor of the *193plaintiffs’ contention that Hayes surrendered the heater to them when she accepted the second lease (19 Cyc. 1068; 13 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law 651), the court is inclined to follow the minority view of the law, which makes the ownership of the heater depend on the intention of the parties at the time the second lease was made *(Radey v.*McCurdy, 209 Pa. St. 306, — 103 Am. St. Rep. 1009; *Kerr*v. *Kingsbury,*39 Mich. 150, — 33 Am. Rep. 362; *Second Nat’l Bank*v. *Company,*69 Wis. 501; *Daly*v. *Simonson,*126 Ia. 716; *Thomas*v. *Gayle,*134 Ky. 330; *Ogden*v. *Garrison,*82 Neb. 302; *Bergh*v. *Company,*136 Fed. Rep. 368); for that is the view of the law this court is accustomed to apply to decide the question of ownership. *Dame*v. *Wood,*75 N. H. 38; *Langdon*v. *Buchanan,*62 N. H. 657, 660; *Dana*v. *Burke,*62 N. H. 627, 629; *Cavis*v. *Beckford,*62 N. H. 229; *Cochran*v. *Flint,*57 N. H. 514, 543.

The plaintiffs’ right to maintain this action depends, therefore, on whether Hayes intended to give them the heater when she accepted the second lease, or did anything which estops the defendant to deny that that was her intention; for both parties derive their title to the heater from her. What she intended and whether he is estopped are both questions of fact. Consequently the only question of law raised by the plaintiffs’ exception is whether there was any evidence to sustain the court’s finding. That question is not open to the plaintiffs, for the evidence is not transferred.

*Plaintiffs’ exception overruled.*

All concurred.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.38 MB)
 
 Operation Freedom's Sentinel Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army U.S. Forces Afghanistan U.S. Army Gen. Mark A. Milley Bagram Airfield Afghanistan
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8103

THOMAS LOUIS DAVIS, 

 Plaintiff – Appellant, 

 v. 

ANGELA MCCALL TANNER; KIMBERLY SMITH, Ex Solicitor; MCDUFFEY 

STONE, III, Head Solicitor; ALEXANDER ROBINSON, Solicitor; 

LARRY WEIDNER, Private Attorney; PERRY M. BUCKNER, Judge; 

CARMEN T. MULLEN; JAMES E. LOCKEMY; HOWARD P. KING, Judge; 

J. ERNEST KINARD, Judge; O. G. CHASE, Magistrate Judge; 

NANCY SADLER, Magistrate Judge; BRYANT BEARED, Head Chief 

Detective; LARRY D. EHLER; MICHAEL R. SEWARD, 

 Defendants – Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Beaufort. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (9:08-cv-02248-GRA) 

Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 27, 2009 

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Thomas Louis Davis, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Thomas Louis Davis appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and denying 

reconsideration thereof. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Davis v. Tanner, No. 9:08-cv02248-GRA (D.S.C. Sept. 15, 2008). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
#### Sluman C. Crittenden, Appellant, v. John Bottsford, as Executor, etc, Respondent.

Orders appealed from affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.