61514 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2023 / Notices 

19See Scott Lumber Sales Letter, ‘‘Requests for 

Clarifications of Review Requests,’’ dated February 

10, 2022, in which Scott Lumber Sales confirmed 

that its complete name is Scott Lumber Sales Ltd. 

20Patrick Lumber submitted information that 

South Coast Reman Ltd. and Southcoast Millwork 

Ltd. are the same company. See Patrick Lumber’s 

Letter, ‘‘Patrick Lumber Company Response to 

Request for Clarification of Review Request,’’ dated 

February 14, 2022; see also Patrick Lumber’s Letter, 

‘‘Company Request for Administrative Review (1/1/ 

2021–12/31/2021),’’ dated January 31, 2022. We 

have added Southcoast Millwork Ltd. to the ACE 

module for case number A–122–857–322. 

1See Certain Metal Lockers and Parts Thereof 

from the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Orders, 86 FR 46826 

(August 20, 2021) (Order). 

2See Petitioner’s Letter, ‘‘Request for Initiation of 

First Administrative Review,’’ dated August 31, 

2022. 

3See Hangzhou Evernew’s Letter, ‘‘Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated August 31, 2022. 

4See Hangzhou Xline’s Letter, ‘‘Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated August 31, 2022. 

5See Hangzhou Zhuoxu’s Letter, ‘‘Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated August 31, 2022. 

6See Kunshan Dongchu’s Letter, ‘‘Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated August 31, 2022. 

7See Tianjin Jia Mei’s Letter, ‘‘Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated August 31, 2022. 

8See Xingyi Metalworking and Zhejiang Xingyi’s 

Letter, ‘‘Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated 

August 31, 2022. 

9 Id. 

10See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 87 FR 

61278 (October 11, 2022) (Initiation Notice). 

11See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated April 3, 2023. 

12See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of the Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review of Certain Metal Lockers 

and Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China and Rescission of Administrative Review, in 

Part; 2020–2021,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum). 

227. Sawarne Lumber Co. Ltd. 

228. Scierie Alexandre Lemay & Fils Inc. 

229. Scierie St-Michel Inc. 

230. Scierie West Brome Inc. 

231. Scott Lumber Sales/Scott Lumber Sales 

Ltd.19

232. Sechoirs de Beauce Inc. 

233. Shakertown Corp. 

234. Sigurdson Forest Products Ltd. 

235. Silvaris Corporation 

236. Sinclar Group Forest Products Ltd. 

237. Skana Forest Products Ltd. 

238. Skeena Sawmills Ltd. 

239. Sonora Logging Ltd. 

240. Source Forest Products 

241. South Beach Trading Inc. 

242. South Coast Reman Ltd./Southcoast 

Millwork Ltd.20

243. South Fraser Container Terminals 

244. Specialiste du Bardeau de Cedre Inc./ 

Specialiste du Bardeau de Cedre Inc. 

(SBC) 

245. Spruceland Millworks Inc. 

246. Star Lumber Canada Ltd. 

247. Suncoast Industries Inc. 

248. Suncoh Custom Lumber Ltd. 

249. Sundher Timber Products Inc. 

250. Surplus G Rioux 

251. Surrey Cedar Ltd. 

252. Swiftwood Forest Products Ltd. 

253. T&P Trucking Ltd. 

254. Taan Forest Limited Partnership (aka 

Taan Forest Products) 

255. Taiga Building Products Ltd. 

256. Tall Tree Lumber Company 

257. Temrex Forest Products LP; Produits 

Forestiers Temrex S.E.C. 

258. Tenryu Canada Corporation 

259. Terminal Forest Products Ltd. 

260. TG Wood Products 

261. The Wood Source Inc. 

262. Tolko Industries Ltd.; Tolko Marketing 

and Sales Ltd.; Gilbert Smith Forest 

Products Ltd. 

263. Top Quality Lumber Ltd. 

264. Trans-Pacific Trading Ltd. 

265. Triad Forest Products Ltd. 

266. Twin Rivers Paper Co. Inc. 

267. Tyee Timber Products Ltd. 

268. Usine Sartigan Inc. 

269. Vaagen Fibre Canada ULC 

270. Valley Cedar 2 Inc. 

271. Vancouver Specialty Cedar Products 

Ltd. 

272. Vanderhoof Specialty Wood Products 

Ltd. 

273. Visscher Lumber Inc. 

274. W.I. Woodtone Industries Inc. 

275. Waldun Forest Product Sales Ltd. 

276. Watkins Sawmills Ltd. 

277. West Bay Forest Products Ltd. 

278. Western Forest Products Inc. 

279. Western Lumber Sales Limited 

280. Western Timber Products, Inc. 

281. Westminster Industries Ltd. 

282. Weston Forest Products Inc. 

283. Weyerhaeuser Co. 

284. White River Forest Products L.P. 

285. Winton Homes Ltd. 

286. Woodline Forest Products Ltd. 

287. Woodstock Forest Products 

288. Woodtone Specialties Inc. 

289. WWW Timber Products Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2023–19210 Filed 9–6–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–134] 

Certain Metal Lockers and Parts 

Thereof From the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of the Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review; 2020–2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

determines that countervailable 

subsidies are being provided to 

producers and exporters of certain metal 

lockers and parts thereof (metal lockers) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(China) during the period of review 

(POR) from December 14, 2020, through 

December 31, 2021. Additionally, 

Commerce is rescinding the review with 

respect to four companies. Interested 

parties are invited to comment on these 

preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable September 7, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alex 

Cipolla, AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4956. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 20, 2021, Commerce 

published the countervailing duty 

(CVD) order on metal lockers from 

China.1 On August 31, 2022, List 

Industries, Inc. (the petitioner), a 

petitioner from the underlying 

investigation, made a timely review 

request for four companies.2 Also on 

August 31, 2022, Commerce received 

timely review requests from Hangzhou 

Evernew Machinery & Equipment 

Company Limited (Hangzhou 

Evernew),3 Hangzhou Xline Machinery 

& Equipment Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou 

Xline),4 Hangzhou Zhuoxu Trading Co., 

Ltd. (Hangzhou Zhuoxu),5 Kunshan 

Dongchu Precision Machinery Co., Ltd. 

(Kunshan Dongchu),6 Tianjin Jia Mei 

Furniture Ltd. (Tianjin Jia Mei),7 Xingyi 

Metalworking Technology (Zhejiang) 

Co., Ltd. (Xingyi Metalworking),8 and 

Zhejiang Xingyi Metal Products Co., 

Ltd. (Zhejiang Xingyi).9 On October 11, 

2022, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(c)(1)(i), Commerce initiated an 

administrative review for Hangzhou 

Evernew, Hangzhou Xline, Hangzhou 

Zhuoxu, Kunshan Dongchu, Pinghu 

Chenda Storage Office Co., Ltd. (Pinghu 

Chenda), Tianjin Jia Mei, Xingyi 

Metalworking, and Zhejiang Xingyi.10

On April 3, 2023, Commerce extended 

the deadline for the preliminary results 

of this administrative review until 

August 31, 2023.11 For a complete 

description of the events that followed 

the initiation of this review, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.12

The Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list of 

topics discussed in the Preliminary 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2023 / Notices 61515 

13See Appendix II (listing the four companies). 

14See Memorandum, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Rescind 

Review, In Part,’’ dated December 2, 2022. 

15See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of 

the Act regarding specificity. 16See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 8– 

38. 

17 Id. at 39. 

18See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 

19See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 

20See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and 351.309(d)(2). 

21See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension 

of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

Decision Memorandum is included as 

Appendix I to this notice. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the Order 

are metal lockers from China. For a 

complete description of the scope of the 

Order, see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Rescission of Administrative Review, In 

Part 

Based on our analysis of U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) 

information, we determine that four 

companies had no entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR.13 On 

December 2, 2022, we notified parties of 

our intent to rescind the administrative 

review with respect to the four 

companies because there are no 

reviewable suspended entries.14 No 

parties commented on the notification 

of intent to rescind the review, in part. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), we 

are rescinding the administrative review 

of these companies. We have included 

a list of these four companies in 

Appendix II of this notice. For 

additional information regarding this 

determination, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act). For each of the subsidy 

programs found countervailable, we 

preliminarily determine that there is a 

subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by 

an ‘‘authority’’ that confers a benefit to 

the recipient, and that the subsidy is 

specific.15 For a full description of the 

methodology underlying our 

preliminary conclusions, including our 

reliance, in part, on adverse facts 

available pursuant to sections 776(a) 

and (b) of the Act, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.16

Preliminary Rate for Non-Selected 

Companies Under Review 

As discussed above, Commerce 

initiated this administrative review for 

eight producers/exporters and is 

rescinding this administrative review, in 

part, with respect to four producers/ 

exporters. In addition, Commerce 

selected Xingyi Metalworking and 

Zhejiang Xingyi for individual 

examination. In these preliminary 

results, we are finding Xingyi 

Metalworking and Zhejiang Xingyi to be 

cross-owned pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.525(b)(6)(vi), and attributed 

subsidies received by Xingyi 

Metalworking and Zhejiang Xingyi to 

the combined sales of both companies, 

i.e., we calculated one subsidy rate for 

the combined entity of Xingyi 

Metalworking and Zhejiang Xingyi. For 

the remaining two companies subject to 

this review, because the preliminary 

subsidy rate calculated for Xingyi 

Metalworking and Zhejiang Xingyi is 

above de minimis and not based entirely 

on facts available, we are preliminarily 

applying to the two non-selected 

companies, identified below, Xingyi 

Metalworking and Zhejiang Xingyi’s 

subsidy rate. The methodology to 

establish the rate for non-selected 

companies is applied pursuant to 

section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act, which 

governs the calculation of the ‘‘allothers’’ rate in an investigation, as 

guidance. For additional information, 

see the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.17

Preliminary Results of the Review 

We preliminarily find the following 

countervailable subsidy rates exist for 

the period of December 14, 2020, 

through December 31, 2021: 

Producer/Exporter 

2020 Subsidy 

rate 

(percent) 

2021 Subsidy 

rate 

(percent) 

Xingyi Metalworking Technology (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd.; Zhejiang Xingyi Metal Products Co., Ltd .......................... 25.78 31.81 

Hangzhou Evernew Machinery & Equipment Company Limited ............................................................................ 25.78 31.81 

Hangzhou Xline Machinery & Equipment Co. Ltd ................................................................................................... 25.78 31.81 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

We intend to disclose to interested 

parties the calculations performed for 

these preliminary results within five 

days of the date of publication of this 

notice in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). 

Case briefs or other written comments 

may be submitted to the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance no later than 30 days after 

the publication of these preliminary 

results of review in the Federal 

Register.18 Rebuttal comments, limited 

to issues raised in case briefs, may be 

submitted no later than seven days after 

the deadline for filing case briefs.19

Parties who submit case or rebuttal 

briefs in this administrative review are 

encouraged to submit with each 

argument: (1) a statement of the issue; 

(2) a brief summary of the argument; 

and (3) a table of authorities.20 Case and 

rebuttal briefs must be filed using 

ACCESS. An electronically filed 

document must be received successfully 

in its entirety by ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. 

Eastern Time on the established 

deadline. Note that Commerce has 

temporarily modified certain of its 

requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.21

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing, limited to issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a 

written request to the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, filed electronically using 

ACCESS. An electronically-filed request 

must be received successfully, and in its 

entirety, by ACCESS by 5 p.m. Eastern 

Time, within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. Hearing 

requests should contain: (1) the party’s 

name, address, and telephone number; 

(2) the number of participants; and (3) 

a list of the issues to be discussed. If a 

request for a hearing is made, parties 

will be notified of the date and time for 

the hearing to be determined. 

Unless extended, we intend to issue 

the final results of this administrative 

review, which will include the results of 

our analysis of the issues raised in the 

case briefs, within 120 days of 

publication of these preliminary results 

in the Federal Register, pursuant to 

section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
61516 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2023 / Notices 

1See Utility Scale Wind Towers from Malaysia: 

Countervailing Duty Order, 86 FR 41950 (August 4, 

2021) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 87 FR 

61278 (October 11, 2022). 

3See Memorandum ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’ 

dated November 15, 2022. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated April 19, 2023. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of the Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review, 2021: Utility Scale Wind 

Towers from Malaysia,’’ dated concurrently with, 

and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum). 

Assessment Rates 

Consistent with section 751(a)(1) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), upon 

issuance of the final results, Commerce 

shall determine, and CBP shall assess, 

countervailing duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review. We 

intend to issue assessment instructions 

to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the 

date of publication of the final results of 

this review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

For the companies for which this 

review is rescinded with these 

preliminary results, we will instruct 

CBP to assess countervailing duties on 

all appropriate entries at a rate equal to 

the cash deposit of estimated 

countervailing duties required at the 

time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, during the 

period December 14, 2020, through 

December 31, 2021, in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.212(c)(l)(i).Cash Deposit 

Requirements 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, Commerce intends, upon 

publication of the final results, to 

instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties in the 

amounts shown (i.e., the rate calculated 

for calendar year 2021) for each of the 

respondents listed above on shipments 

of subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review. If the rate 

calculated in the final results is zero or 

de minimis, no cash deposit will be 

required on shipments of the subject 

merchandise entered or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the date of publication of the final 

results of this review. 

For all non-reviewed firms, CBP will 

continue to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties at the 

all-others rate or the most recent 

company-specific rate applicable to the 

company, as appropriate. These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

These preliminary results and notice 

are issued and published in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of 

the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213 and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: August 31, 2023. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Period of Review 

IV. Scope of the Order 

V. Rescission of Administrative Review, In 

Part 

VI. Diversification of China’s Economy 

VII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and 

Adverse Inferences 

VIII. Subsidies Valuation 

IX. Benchmarks 

X. Analysis of Programs 

XI. Rate for Non-Selected Companies 

XII. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

List of Companies Subject to Rescission of 

Review 

1. Hangzhou Zhuoxu Trading Co., Ltd. 

2. Kunshan Dongchu Precision Machinery 

Co., Ltd. 

3. Pinghu Chengda Storage Office Co., Ltd. 

4. Tianjin Jia Mei Metal Furniture Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2023–19335 Filed 9–6–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–557–822] 

Utility Scale Wind Towers From 

Malaysia: Preliminary Results and 

Partial Rescission of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review, 2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) is conducting an 

administrative review of the 

countervailing duty order on utility 

scale wind towers (wind towers) from 

Malaysia. Commerce preliminarily finds 

that CS Wind Malaysia Sdn Bhd (CS 

Wind) received countervailable 

subsidies during the period of review 

(POR), March 25, 2021, through 

December 31, 2021. We invite interested 

parties to comment on these preliminary 

results. 

DATES: Applicable September 7, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Kelsie Hohenberger, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office V, Enforcement and 

Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–2517. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 11, 2022, Commerce 

initiated an administrative review of the 

countervailing duty order on wind 

towers from Malaysia,1 in accordance 

with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act),2 with 

respect to 11 companies. Commerce 

selected CS Wind for individual 

examination.3 On April 19, 2023, 

Commerce extended the deadline for the 

preliminary results of this 

administrative review until August 31, 

2023.4

For details regarding the events that 

followed the initiation of the review, see 

the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.5 A list of topics included 

in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included as an 

appendix to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is made available to the 

public via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is available at 

https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the Order 

are wind towers from Malaysia. For a 

full description of the scope, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Rescission of Administrative Review, in 

Part 

Based on our analysis of U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) data, we 

determined that there were no 

reviewable entries during the POR for 

the following companies: CS Wind 

Corporation; CS Wind China Co., Ltd; 

CS Wind Taiwan Ltd; CS Wind Turkey 

Kule Imaltati A.S; CS Wind UK Limited; 

CS Wind Vietnam Co., Ltd; GE 

Renewable Energy; GE Renewable 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1