alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Maggie Davidson

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Accept recommendations of IOM and reject exemptions for religious employers

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 5:59:02 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care

under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services,

are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Thank you.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JORGE HUMBERTO ZARAGOZA 

FUENTES,

Appellant,

V.

PEDRO ZARAGOZA FUENTES, 

RANCHO PRODUCTOR DE LECHE 

ZARAGOZA HERMANOS, S.A. DE 

C.V., AND ZARGEO, INC.,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00288-CV

Appeal from the

448th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2012-DCV04174)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on Appellant Jorge Humberto Zaragoza Fuentes’ and 

Cross-Appellants Pedro Zaragoza Fuentes and Zargeo, Inc.’s motion to dismiss the appeal and 

cross-appeal and concludes that the appeals should be dismissed, in accordance with the opinion 

of this Court. We therefore dismiss the appeals. This decision shall be certified below for 

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2016.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan 

ORDER 

In re A E Graham, Minor 

Docket No. 332240 

LC No. 1-t-516109-NA 

Cynthia Diane Stephens 

Presiding Judge 

I lcnry William Saad 

Patrick M. Meter 

Judges 

The Court orders that the Ocrober 10. 2016 opinion is hereby AMENDED to correct a 

clerical error. The opinion is corrected to read November 10, 20 16 as the date of the opinion. 

In all other respects, the opinion remains unchanged. 

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr .• Chief Clerk, on 

NOV 16 2016 

Date 

~ a _ h~-5.-
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (8.23 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
|                                                                                                                                                               |  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|                                                                                                                                                               |  |
| footer>**Contacting EPP | EPP HomeOPPT Home | EPA Home | Search | Comments
Last Revised:  November 5, 1998URL:  http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/epp/whyepp.html** |
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 107 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 107

   To allow modified bloc voting by cooperative associations of milk 
  producers in connection with a referendum on Federal Milk Marketing 
                             Order reform.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2001

 Mr. Feingold introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To allow modified bloc voting by cooperative associations of milk 
  producers in connection with a referendum on Federal Milk Marketing 
                             Order reform.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    The Act may be cited as the ``Democracy for Dairy Producers Act of 
2001''.

SEC. 2. MODIFIED BLOC VOTING.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding paragraph (12) of section 8c of 
the Agricultural Adjustment Act (7 U.S.C. 608c), reenacted with 
amendments by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, in the 
case of the referendum conducted as part of the consolidation of 
Federal milk marketing orders and related reforms under section 143 of 
the Agricultural Market Transition Act (7 U.S.C. 7253), if a 
cooperative association of milk producers elects to hold a vote on 
behalf of its members as authorized by that paragraph, the cooperative 
association shall provide to each producer, on behalf of which the 
cooperative association is expressing approval or disapproval, written 
notice containing--
            (1) a description of the questions presented in the 
        referendum;
            (2) a statement of the manner in which the cooperative 
        association intends to cast its vote on behalf of the 
        membership; and
            (3) information regarding the procedures by which a 
        producer may cast an individual ballot.
    (b) Tabulation of Ballots.--At the time at which ballots from a 
vote under subsection (a) are tabulated by the Secretary of 
Agriculture, the Secretary shall adjust the vote of a cooperative 
association to reflect individual votes submitted by producers that are 
members of, stockholders in, or under contract with, the cooperative 
association.
                                 <all>
```
From: Mary Bailey

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 5:05:01 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Mary Bailey

3003 Van Ness St, NW, Apt. W201

Washington, DC 20008
Exhibit 15.1   October 29, 2009   Securities and Exchange Commission 100 F Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20549   Commissioners:   We are aware that our report dated October 29, 2009 on our review of interim financial information of NSTAR for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and included in the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 is incorporated by reference in its Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-162401 and 333-155779), Form S-4 (No. 333-78285) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-142595, 333-160263, and 333-87272).   Very truly yours,  /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
-------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 1 

AUG 1 8 2010 

LEGAL PROCESSING DIVISION 

PUBLICATION &. REGULATIONS 

PUBLIC BRANCH 

SUBMISSION 

As of: August 18, 2010 

Received: August 09, 2010 

Status: Posted 

Posted: August 18, 2010 

Tracking No. 80b2cbOe 

Comments Due: August 16, 2010 

Submission Type: Web 

Docket: IRS-2010-0010 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered 

Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act 

Comment On: IRS-201O-001O-0001 

Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as 

a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0156 

Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

Submitter Information 

Name: Linda MacQueen Hill 

Address: 

1091 Brentwood Dr 

Colliinsville, VA, 24078 

Email: frognawth@hotmait.com 

Phone: 276-647-8400 

Organization: Brentwood Galleries 

General Comment 

See attached file(s) 

Attachments 

IRS-2010-0010-0156.1: Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488 

http://fdms.erulemaking.netlfdms-web-agency IcomponentisubmitterInfoCoverPage?Cal1= ... 8/18/2010 
Linda MacQueen Hill 

1091 Brentwood Drive 

Collinsville VA 24078 

August 9, 2010 

Office ofConsumer Information and Insurance Oversight 

Department of Health and Human Services 

Attention: OCIIO-9991-IFC 

P.O. Box 8016 

Baltimore, MD 21244-1850 

Re: Interim Final Rule for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to 

Status as a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 

As a consumer I wish to take this opportunity to formally comment on 

the interim final rule regarding health plans and "grandfather" status (Document ID IRS-201 0­

0010-0001). 

I believe the consumer protections included as part of the new health care law are vitally 

important and should be extended to as many people as possible. Accordingly, every effort 

should be made to increase the number of individuals covered by the Patient Protection and 

Affordable Care Act (PP ACA) via the above regulations. The triggers or conditions that would 

extend these protections to consumers under currently existing "grandfathered" plans should not 

be weakened or reduced in any way. I specifically support the position and detailed comments 

offered by the American Chiropractic Association with respect to the implementation of these 

regulations. 

Linda MacQueen Hill
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 172 (Thursday, September 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61583-61584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-19220]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 10661-051]


Indiana Michigan Power Company; Notice of Denial of Water Quality 
Certification

    On September 30, 2021, Indiana Michigan Power Company (I&M Power) 
filed an application for a new license for the Constantine 
Hydroelectric Project (project). I&M Power filed with the Michigan 
Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (Michigan EGLE) a 
request for water quality certification for the project under section 
401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act on November 30, 2022. On June 1, 2023, 
Michigan EGLE denied certification for the project. I&M Power filed a 
copy of Michigan EGLE's denial of certification on August 11, 2023. 
Pursuant to 40 CFR

[[Page 61584]]

121.8, we are providing notice that Michigan EGLE's denial satisfies 
the requirements of 40 CFR 121.7(e).

    Dated: August 30, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-19220 Filed 9-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
From: Anne Dardis

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: my voice!

Date: Friday, August 05, 2011 11:05:41 PM

I object to what the office of health and Human Services has done in making

contraceptives so available under all insurance plans, with NO CO-PAY!!! Where is

my right, or anyone with a moral conviction, who belives random birth-control is

WRONG???? The morning-after pill is horribly dangerous for women to use at

random. Where are the rights of parents to prevent our children from harming

themselves by making such unwise choices?

Why is this allowed to have no CO-PAY, when just about everyting else is not so

privileged?

I'll tell you why -------- It is a ploy of the liberal agenda!! Well I OBJECT TO

HAVING PEOPLE WITH MORAL CONVICTIONS FORCED INTO HAVING TO HELP PAY

FOR THIS !!! WHERE ARE THE CONSCIENCE PROTECTIONS IN THIS??? Mrs.

Anne Dardis
#### Anna C. Devlin, as Administratrix, etc., Respondent, v. William Kelly, Appellant. Same v. Same.

Judgment affirmed. Opinion by Brady, J.
#### Sadie Bernstein, an Infant, by Abraham Bernstein, Her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, *v.*The Empire Bridge Company, Appellant.

*Bernstein*v. *Empire Bridge*Co., 146 App. Div. 529, affirmed.

(Argued May 7, 1912;

decided May 24, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 14, 1911, affirming a judgment m favor *604of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained through the negligence of defendant.

*Frank Verner Johnson,*for appellant.

*Martin T. Mantón*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.-

Concur: Cullen, Oh. J., Gray,. Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock, Chase and Collin, JJ.
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN**  

## 219rt l p oa n t h t t he 

### wbWOaboubr c f 

### the quadian :i 

### not pnron ty p knowa.



### (1) Do ~1) hsto anr au~Aetlt**iI** 

### uuCor the law wttti0.29a **by** 

### tbr **mrd at**  **CoAtr0 t0**  **whhaia ptyzants**  **in** 

### ttie **Quo poAalng**  

### Batl6raotory **ad juatl!snt**  **ef tbr**  **olda** **Qmb*ntsa** **by** 

### the Cwt.0 **8WDiw t6**  **th0 @lUdi4A?** 

%oatioa 

### 1, cetlrato whittrd 

### tc Ftat9 

### hoarplt*Za 

### an4 6tato p~yolte~tblo hoepita shall br of 

### two *lamw, 

### to witt

## 221

“300. 8, taarr th patlml@ 

### bar I)6 ,uff:- oialt 

### otteta of hlr, m, he 6hall 80 nl6tafIle4 at tha oxpmM1

*Of the trthrr or mother of mob porre~~ 

### Fi rblo to do l



### o*
l fJ* o e a.ëme

Mate l% o aTd or 

### control lo au

### thtwhed to domad rtaa oeaauot intortimlon ti t&o O o unf?

o o ur t 

## to dc to r lsinn

w he the r

or 

### net l pafient 

### 18 an4/oT who

&a cwwcrad of or eatltled to property r ur Aot 6ceLa

other QeMon lr logal18 llrblo for hi6 

### RlpFO+t, malatc&aaal, a&I tressar at l

### n4 to P

### ef thcmier, unl to Isa*0 **oitntlaa** isew@ an4 w tnarsst rtmmnad to be 

### heard on rid 

### lam8tlg4floa~

**Too. 4.**  **36 State**  **Fiwrd of**  

### Control, aireot1Y QT tkl'O&?.h Ul 66tkOl-itO~ l **mAt** O? 6g*nt0, w 

### asko oentnste iixl&x tk ptiioo tot 

### tha rupgport, sw~ntmanao au4 treatma% of patloatn la say Ctate &W&l or p+pEopattblo hoepita of a l 

### m act 

### to araw the ee6t of oma or for mob 

### nrt thoreol on mwh re~peotlro patlona hlr. 

### r*l*tltw or guwxliaa oi h!r meteto mny8a id10 to an4 yrW to W, **@Ad** blatl~ **th8** pC?war ~]rls(l 6t#h **owW6etr** 

### to pfiymmt 

### thot9w4*rr,,i 

## 223
Attachment 1

Manatee Site Visit PresentationAttachment 2

Manatee Water Flow Diagram
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of  Industrial  Minerals,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").  I, Robert
Stoutley President and CEO of the company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 USC Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Robert Stoutley
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Robert Stoutly, President/CEO

Dated:  8/11//03
### NU M BER 13- 08- 0007 9-C V 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I - E DI NBURG

____ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _______ _ A ZTEC FINE HOM ES, INC. A ND OSC A R DU RA N, A pp ellan ts,
v . M A RIA D E L UR DES A LV

A REZ , A pp ellee

.

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ __ On ap pe al f rom th e 9 3rd Dist rict C ou rt o f H ida lgo C ou nty , T exas .

____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON Be fo re Ju stice s Y añ ez, R od rigu ez, an d Vela M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam Ap pe l l an ts , Az te cF i ne H om es , In c . an d Os c ar D uran , pe r

fec te d an a pp ea l from a judgme nt en tered bythe 93rd District Court of Hida lgo Cou nty, T exas, in cause num ber C834- 07- B. Appel lan ts hav e fil ed an amended un oppos ed moti on to dis mis s the a ppeal on2

groun ds t ha t th e pa rti es h av e rea c he d an a g ree me ntt o s ettl e an d c om prom i s e th eir dif feren ces. App ellant s request tha t this Court dism iss the ap pea l. The Co urt, hav ing co nsi dered th e doc uments on fil e an d a p p ell ants ’ amended unoppo s e d mo t i o n t o d i s mi s s t h e a p p e a l , i s o f t h e o p i n i o n t h a t t h e mo t i o n shoul d be g ra nted. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 4 2.1( a) . Appel lan ts’ amended moti on to di smi ss i s g ra nted, and t he appeal is hereby DI SM ISSE D. Cos ts w il l be ta x ed ag ain st appel lan ts. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 4 2.1( d) ( "Abse nt ag re ement of the par ti es, the cour

t w il l tax co sts ag ain st the appel lan t.")

. Hav ing di smi ss ed th e appea l at ap pel lan ts’ req uest , no moti on for re hear ing
w il l be ent ertai ned, and our mandate w il l is sue forthw it h.

PERC UR IAM Me moran dum Opi nio n del iv ered and filed thi s t he 10t h day

of Apr il , 200 8.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 1, 2010 

p1123 

Order 

 

December 1, 2010 

137111 (186) 

 

ANTHONY PELLEGRINO, Individually and as 

Personal Representative of the Estate of 

SHIRLEY ANN PELLEGRINO, 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, 

v SC: 137111 

 COA: 274743 

Wayne CC: 03-325462-NI 

AMPCO SYSTEM PARKING, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for release of the 

award of defendant’s taxed bill of costs and withdrawal of plaintiff’s motion for review 

of taxation of costs is considered, and the motion for review of taxation of costs is 

DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
From: susan carlsen

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 10:44:03 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

susan carlsen

644 old county road

washington, me 04574