alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.44 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
----

| RATES      EFFECTIVE for Variable Denomination Floating Rate Demand      Notesas      of  April 5, 2010: |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (2.97 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
EX-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 

JOINDER TO AMENDED AND RESTATED GUARANTY 

April 14, 2016 
 Reference is
hereby made to the Amended and Restated Guaranty (the “Guaranty”) made as of October 10, 2013, by and among the Initial Guarantors (along with any additional Subsidiaries of ON Semiconductor Corporation, which become parties
thereto and together with the undersigned, the “Guarantors”) in favor of the Administrative Agent, for the ratable benefit of the Holders of Guaranteed Obligations, under the Credit Agreement. Capitalized terms used herein and not
defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Guaranty. By their execution below, the undersigned Aptina (U.S.) Inc., a Delaware corporation, and Aptina, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (collectively, the “New
Guarantors”), agree to become, and do hereby become, Guarantors under the Guaranty and agree to be bound by such Guaranty as if originally a party thereto. By its execution below, each of the undersigned represents and warrants as to itself
that all of the representations and warranties contained in Section 2 of the Guaranty are true and correct in all respects as of the date hereof. 

  
 [Joinder to Amended and
Restated Guaranty] 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each New Guarantor has executed and delivered this Joinder to the Guaranty as
of the date first set forth above 
  

			
	APTINA (U.S.) INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Keith D. Jackson

	Name:	 	Keith D. Jackson
	Title:	 	President



  
 [Joinder to Amended and
Restated Guaranty] 








 
			
	APTINA, LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Keith D. Jackson

	Name:	 	Keith D. Jackson
	Title:	 	President



  
 [Joinder to Amended and
Restated Guaranty]
II

107TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 1060

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that certain postsecondary educational benefits provided by an employer to children of employees shall be excludable from gross income as part of an educational

assistance program.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 19, 2001

Mr. BAYH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

that certain postsecondary educational benefits provided

by an employer to children of employees shall be excludable from gross income as part of an educational assistance program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 1060 IS

1 SECTION 1. CERTAIN POSTSECONDARY EDUCATIONAL

2 BENEFITS PROVIDED BY AN EMPLOYER TO

3 CHILDREN OF EMPLOYEES EXCLUDABLE

4 FROM GROSS INCOME UNDER EDUCATIONAL

5 ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 127 of the Internal Rev7 enue Code of 1986 (relating to educational assistance pro8 grams) is amended by redesignating subsections (d) and

9 (e) as subsection (e) and (f), respectively, and inserting

10 after subsection (c) the following:

11 ‘‘(d) POST SECONDARY EDUCATIONAL BENEFITS

12 PROVIDED TO CHILDREN OF EMPLOYEES.—

13 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of this sec14 tion, educational assistance provided by the employer

15 to a child (as defined in section 151(c)(3)) of an em16 ployee of such employer pursuant to an educational

17 assistance program shall be treated as educational

18 assistance provided for the exclusive benefit of the

19 employee.

20 ‘‘(2) DOLLAR LIMITATIONS.—The amount ex21 cluded from the gross income of the employee by

22 reason of paragraph (1) for a taxable year with re23 spect to amounts provided to each child of such em24 ployee shall not exceed $2,000.

25 ‘‘(3) LIMITATION ON EDUCATIONAL ASSIST26 ANCE.—Paragraph (1) shall only apply to expenses
3

•S 1060 IS

1 paid or incurred in connection with the enrollment

2 or attendance of a child of an employee at an edu3 cational institution described in section 529(e)(5).’’.

4 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

5 51A(b)(5)(B)(iii) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986

6 is amended by striking ‘‘127(d)’’ and inserting ‘‘127(e)’’.

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

8 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after

9 the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-4729

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DELSHON THOMAS HALL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, District Judge. (CR-05-20) Submitted: May 17, 2006 Decided: June 13, 2006 Before WILLIAMS and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Jonathan D. Byrne, Appellate Counsel, David R. Bungard, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Charles T. Miller, Acting United States Attorney, R. Gregory McVey, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Delshon Thomas Hall pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute at least 5 grams of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1)(2000). Because he had a prior drug conviction, to which he admitted, Hall was sentenced to the statutory mandatory minimum sentence under 21 U.S.C. § 851 (2000) of 120 months of imprisonment. On appeal, Hall challenges the constitutionality of § 851 after United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), because § 851 allows the government to increase the maximum punishment without proving the facts supporting the increase to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt or alleging those facts in an indictment. We find Hall’s allegation that § 851 is unconstitutional foreclosed by the prior conviction exception discussed in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), which was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court in Booker , 543 U.S. at 244 (“Any fact (other than a prior conviction) which is necessary to support a sentence exceeding the maximum authorized by the facts established by a plea of guilty or a jury verdict must be admitted by the defendant or proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt.”). See alsoUnited States v. Cheek , 415 F.3d 349, 351-54 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , ___ U.S. ___, 126 S. Ct. 640 (2005) (recognizing continuing validity of prior conviction exception). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions- 3 - are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1097 Referred in House (RFH)]

  1st Session
                                S. 1097

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 23, 2001

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to issue right-of-way 
  permits for natural gas pipelines within the boundary of the Great 
                     Smoky Mountains National Park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMITS FOR EXISTING NATURAL GAS PIPELINES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior may issue right-of-
way permits for natural gas pipelines that exist as of September 1, 
2001, within the boundary of Great Smoky Mountains National Park.
    (b) Terms and Conditions.--A permit issued under subsection (a) 
shall be--
            (1) issued consistent with laws and regulations generally 
        applicable to utility rights-of-way within units of the 
        National Park System; and
            (2) subject to any terms and conditions that the Secretary 
        deems necessary.

SEC. 2. PERMITS FOR PROPOSED NATURAL GAS PIPELINES.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior may issue rights-of-
way permits for natural gas pipelines within the boundary of Great 
Smoky Mountains National Park that are proposed to be constructed 
across--
            (1) the Foothills Parkway;
            (2) the Foothills Parkway Spur between Pigeon Forge and 
        Gatlinburg; and
            (3) the Gatlinburg Bypass.
    (b) Terms and Conditions.--A permit issued under subsection (a) 
shall be--
            (1) issued consistent with laws and regulations generally 
        applicable to utility rights-of-way within units of the 
        National Park System; and
            (2) subject to any terms and conditions that the Secretary 
        deems necessary, including--
                    (A) provisions for the protection and restoration 
                of park resources that are disturbed by pipeline 
                construction; and
                    (B) assurances that construction and operation of 
                the pipeline will not adversely affect Great Smoky 
                Mountains National Park.

            Passed the Senate October 17, 2001.

            Attest:

                                                  JERI THOMSON,

                                                             Secretary.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



As of the date hereof, I, John Kunze, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Plumtree Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Plumtree Software, Inc.



By:

/s/ John KunzeName:

John KunzeTitle:

Chief Executive OfficerDated:

August 9, 2005




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided by Plumtree Software, Inc. and will be retained by Plumtree Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MISTER IVORY

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 13

- 00 213

- CR

Appeal from the

396th District Court

of Tarrant County , Texas

(TC# 1234891 D )



### O P I N I O N

Appellant Mist e r Ivory waived a trial by jury and pleaded guilty to the offense of burglary

of a habitation

. The trial court deferred adjudication of guilt, placed Appellant on community

supervision for five years, and ordered Appellant to pay $1,600 in restitution , $500 in attorney’s

fees, and $ 27 4 in court costs

.

T he State later filed a petition to proceed to adjudication. After being admonished on the

State’s petition , Appellant entered an open plea of true to the acts alleged in paragraphs 1 and 2 of

the petition. The trial court revoked Appellant’s community supervision , found Appellant guilty

of burglary of a habitation , and sentenced him to imprisonment for six years. Appellant appeal ed

.

We affirm.2

Appel lant’s court

- appointed counsel has moved to withdraw as counsel and has filed a

brief in which he has concluded that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief

meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, reh.

denied , 388 U.S. 924, 87 S.Ct. 2094, 18 L.Ed.2d 137 7 (1967), by presenting a professional

evaluation of the record demonstrating why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to be

advanced. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978); Currie v. State , 516 S.W.2d

684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jac kson v. State , 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex.Crim.App. 1972); Gainous v.

State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). A copy of counsel’s brief has been delivered to

Appellant, and Appellant has been advised of his right to examine the appellate record and file a

pr o se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is

wholly frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support

the appeal and a discussion o f the contentions advanced in counsel’s brief would add nothing to the

jurisprudence of the state.

The judgment is affirmed.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

July 11, 2014

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
EXHIBIT 3.2
 
   
      (b)
 
  70




---



##### 



71




---



##### 



(a)
    
    the name and address of each proposed nominee;(b)
    
    the age of each proposed nominee;(c)
    
    the principal occupation of each proposed nominee;(d)
    
    the number of shares of the Company owned of record, and the number of shares of
the Company beneficially owned by each proposed nominee;(e)
    
    the total number of shares that to the knowledge of the notifying shareholder
will be voted for each proposed nominee;
 72




---



##### 



(f)
    
    the name and residence address of the notifying shareholder;(g)
    
    the number of shares of the Company owned by the notifying shareholder;(h)
    
    the amount of monies borrowed by the proposed nominee from any source or entity
to finance the purchase of any shares of the Company;(i)
    
    any conviction of the proposed nominee of any felony crime; any assessment of a
civil monetary penalty by a federal or state regulatory agency against the proposed
nominee; or the issuance of any cease-and-desist order by a federal or state regulatory
agency against the proposed nominee and a complete explanation thereof; and(j)
    
    a description of any adjudication of bankruptcy of the proposed nominee or any
general assignment made by the proposed nominee for benefit of creditors; and a
description of any entity of which the proposed nominee is or has been an officer,
director, partner or principal which is being or, within the last two years, was
reorganized in bankruptcy, adjudged a bankrupt or made a general assignment for benefit
of creditors.
        73




---



##### 



74




---



##### 



75




---



##### 



76




---



##### 



77




---



##### 



78
No. 493, Misc.

#### Duff *v.*Maryland.

Court of Appeals of Maryland. Certiorari denied.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.2 MB)
 
 NATO chairman
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### Minnie C. Michel, as Executrix of Sophia M. Callahan, Deceased, Respondent, *v.*Camilla Callahan, Appellant, Impleaded with Another.

*Michel*v. Callahan, 145 App. Div. 907, affirmed.

(Argued March 27, 1912;

decided April 12, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 26, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to determine the title to the proceeds of a certificate of life insurance.

*George D. Forsyth*and *Elmer E. Wyckoff*for appellant.

*Eugene Van Voorhis*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Gray, Haight, Vann and Hiscock, JJ. Dissenting: Cullen, Ch. J., Werner and Collin, JJ.
Sanitized Consolidated Chemical Substance 3: Manufacture of 

Pre-Impregnated Substrates
OMNI AIR INTERNATIONAL

P.O. BOX 582527  TULSA, OK 74158  918-836-5393  FAX: 918-831-3098

13 January 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

Washington, DC 20590.

Ladies/Gentlemen:

In accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations, 14 CFR §11.25, Omni Air International is 

petitioning the Administrator for an extension of Exemption No. 10041B. This exemption will expired on 

March 31, 2016

Exemption 10041 provides relief, under certain conditions and limitations, from 14 CFR §

121.613, 121.619(a) and 121.625 to the extent necessary to: (1) dispatch an airplane, under IFR, to a 

destination airport; and (2) list an alternate airport for that destination airport when the Aerodrome 

Forecast (TAF) for either one or both of those airports indicates by the use of conditional language such 

as “BECMG”, “PROB” or “TEMPO”, in the TAF that the weather could be below authorized weather 

minimums at the time of arrival. Dispatch under these circumstances is permitted if the information 

contained in the main body of the TAF used by the certificate holder’s dispatch center shows, for each 

flight to be dispatched, that the weather at the destination airport and alternate airport listed in the 

dispatch release will be at or above authorized weather minimums at the time of arrival.

This exemption has been used to the benefit of the traveling public for many years, with no known 

compromise of safety. With regard to public interest and equivalent levels of safety, the circumstances 

that warranted the initial grant of exemption continue to exist. 

The renewal of this exemption is not a controversial issue. For this reason, and the reasons 

stated above, Omni Air International requests that a finding of good cause be made for waiving 

publication in the Federal Register. Granting the request for relief will set no precedents. The existence of 

the exemption is well known and widely accepted.

If any further information is required, please call me at (918) 831-3067.

Very truly yours,

Robert E. Zeng

Director of Operations

Omni Air International