Renee Stoll
– Section 333 Exemption Petition Renee Stoll 27070 Esther Drive Bonita Springs, FL 34135 813 - 546 - 8818 

### reneestoll@outlook.com
January 8, 2016 U. S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of the Federal Aviation Regulations from 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. Part 21 subpart H; 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a)&(b); 91.7(a); 91.9(b) (2); 91.103(b); 91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a); 91.203(a)&(b); 91.405(a); 91.407(a) (1); 91.409(a) (2) ; 91.417(a)&(b) Dear Sir or Madam: Renee Stoll writing pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and the procedures contained within 14 C.F.R. Part 11, to request that I , an owner and operator of small unmanned aircraft, be exempted from the Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) listed above so that Renee Stoll may legally operate small light weight unmanned aircraft systems (“UAS”) commercially in airspace regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA” ). Renee Stol l humbly and respectfully requests exemption of the above noted Federal Aviation Regulation s so that Renee Stoll , LLC can legally offer the following services:Renee Stoll
– Section 333 Exemption Petition

1. Aerial photography and/or video for public and/or private use including real estate, architecture, construction, land surveying, land mapping, land acquisition, crop surveying, engineering and other related professional activities. 2. Aerial video and/or photography for public and/or private use including television, public events, cinematography and newsgathering. 3. Aerial inspection/photography of residential/commercial structures under contract with the owners or local government authority. 4. Aerial inspection/photography of residential/commercial utility infrastructure including but not limited to electrical power lines, wind turbines, and cell towers. 5. Aerial video/photography or providing live video feed to assist with search and rescue operations in cases of an emergency or natural disaster only when the local authorities or governme nt has requested it by contract or donation. 6. The ability to offer training to persons individually or belonging to both private and or public organizations that have interests in the use and application of UAS for the purpose of the safe operation of UAS to enhance the safety of the National Airspace System (NAS) as well as for the protection of the persons and property. As described in more detail below, the requested exemption would authorize the operation of small lightweight UAS under controlled co nditions in airspace that is 1) limited 2) p redetermined 3) controlled as to access and 4) would provide safety enhancements to the safe operational protocols that will be followed by Renee Stoll
. Approval of this exemption would thereby enhance safety (by reducing emissions, noise, and the potential large scale accidents single engine planes and helicopters could and would cause) and fulfill the Secretary of Transportation's (the FAA Administrator's) responsibilities to "...establish requirements for the s afe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system." Section 333(c) of the Reform Act.

**The Name and A ddress of Petitioner:** Renee Stoll
– Section 333 Exemption Petition

Renee Stoll 27070 Esther Drive Bonita Springs, FL 34135 Phone: 813 - 546 - 8818 Email: reneestoll@outlook.com Regulations from which the exemption is requested: 14 CFR 45.23 (b) 14 CFR Part 21 subpart H 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b) 14 CFR 91.7 (a) 14 CFR 91.9 (b) (2) 14 CFR 91.103 14 CFR 91.109 14 CFR 91.119 14 CFR 91.121 14 CFR 91.151 (a) 14 CFR 91.203 (a) & (b) 14 CFR 91.405 (a) 14 CFR 91.407 (a) (1) 14 CFR 91.409 (a) (2) 14 CFR 91.417 (a) & (b) **Introduction** Renee Stoll is based in Bonita Springs , Florida. Ms. Stoll has more than 10 years of professional camera experience, and experience as a hobbyist UA pilot. Renee Stoll will employ the use of a prosumer leve l UAS known as the DJI Phantom 3 with intent to offer commercial services upo n approval from the FAA. Renee Stoll requests permission to offer the following services:Renee Stoll
– Section 333 Exemption Petition

1. Aerial photography and/or video for public and/or private use including real estate, a rchitecture, construction, land surveying, land mapping, land acquisition, crop surveying, engineering and other related professional activities. 2. Aerial video and/or photography for public and/or private use including television, public events, cinematography and newsgathering. 3. Aerial inspection/photography of residential/commercial structures under contract with the owners or local government authority. 4. Aerial inspection/photography of res idential/commercial utility infrastructure. 5. Aerial video/photography or providing live video feed to assist with search and rescue operations in cases of an emergency or natural disaster only when the local authorities or government has requested it by contract or donation. 6. The ability to offer training to persons individually or belonging to both private and or public organizations that have interests in the use and application of UAS for the purpose of the safe operation of UAS to enhance the safety of the National Airspace System (NAS) as well as for the protection of the persons and property. Renee Stoll intends to offer services to industries such as real estate professionals, home builders, land brokers, land developers, construction companies, communication tower inspection, news, television, motion picture companies, farmers, and other industries as will be revealed by the natural passing of time and the rapidly maturing UAS technologies following exemption and approval by the FAA. In support of this petition Renee Stoll provides hyperlink’s to the User Manual for the DJI Phantom 3.Renee Stoll
– Section 333 Exemption Petition

**Renee Stoll ’s**  **Proposed Operations Do Not Create Significant Risks or Hazards**  The exemption request would authorize operation of the below- illustrated ultra lightweight UAS(s) in tightly controlled and limited airspace. All instances for hire would take place at predetermined areas away from general public, airports, heliports, vehi cular traffic, and within property boundaries of the hirer with their expressed verbal and or written consent. In addition to following the FAA’s Conditions and Limitations, Renee Stoll has adopted safety protocols and controls to avoid and p revent public hazard, as well as manned aircraft hazards/catastrophe by following a self- imposed process detailed later herein. The proposed commercial use of UAS(s) as compared to commercial use of manned single engine planes, helicopters, and not to mention manned cli mbing for tower inspections offers a significantly safer alternative to the health and welfare of the public. In a Presidential Memorandum published February 15, 2015; President Obama said in part, “As compared to manned aircraft, UAS may provide lower- cost operation and augment existing capabilities while reducing risks to human life. Estimates suggest the positive economic impact to U.S. industry of the integration of UAS into the NAS could be substantial and likely will grow for the foreseeable future.” **The UA S**  The UAS outlined below include s a GPS mode that allows the UAS to hover in place if communication is lost and will subsequently return back to its launched position or “Home” position. In addition; when the UAS reaches 25% of usable battery power, the PIC will return the UAS to its “ Home ” position, if necessary the on board computer will return the UAS automatically.

**Phantom 3 by**

**DJI**Renee Stoll
– Section 333 Exemption Petition

The prosum er grade UAS known as the Phanto m 3 by DJI is equipped with a 2.7K HD camera which is capable of shooting up to 1080p HD video and capture up to 12 m egapixel photos , and weighs less than three pounds. If needed please see the attached Phantom 3 manual for additional specs. 

### AIRCRAFT
Weight (including battery) 1216 g Max Ascent Speed 5 m/s Max Descent Speed 3 m/s Max Speed 16 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind) Max Service Ceiling Above Sea Level 6000 m (Software altitude limit: 120 m above takeoff point) Max Flight Time Approximately 25 minutes Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C Navigation system Built
- in GPS 

### CAMERA

Sensor 1/2.3” Effective pixels:12 M Lens FOV (Field Of View) 94° 20 mm (35 mm format equivalent) f/2.8Renee Stoll
– Section 333 Exemption Petition

ISO Range 100
- 3200 (video) 100
- 1600 (photo) Electronic Shutter Speed 8s
- 1/8000s Image Max Size 4000 x 3000 Still Photography Modes Single Shot Burst Shooting: 3/5/7 frames Auto Exposure Bracketing (AEB): 3/5 Bracketed Frames at 0.7EV Bias Time
- lapse Video Recording Modes 2.7K: 2704 x1520p 24/25/30 (29.97) FHD: 1920x1080p 24/25/30 HD: 1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60 Max.Video Bitrate 40 Mbps Supported File Formats Micro SD Card: FAT32/exFAT Photo: JPEG, DNG Video: MP4, MOV (MPEG
-4 AVC) Supported SD Card Types Micro SD Card 8 GB included Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C 

### REMOTE CONTROLLER
Operating Frequency 5.725 GHz

– 5.825 GHz, 922.7 MHz

– 927.7 MHz (Japan) Max Transmission Distance FCC: 1000 m; CE: 500 m (outdoors and unobstructed, aircraft's altitude at 400 feet (120 m)) Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C Battery 2600 mAh LiPo 18650Renee Stoll
– Section 333 Exemption Petition

Transmitter Power (EIRP) FCC: 19 dBm CE: 14 dBm Working Voltage 600 mA @ 3.7V Charging Port Micro USB 

### INTELLIGENT FLIGHT B**ATTERY ( PH3 -**  **4480 MAH -**  **15.2 V )**
Capacity 4480 mAh Voltage 15.2 V Battery Type LiPo 4S Energy 68 Wh Net Weight 365 g Max Flight Time Approximately 25 minutes Operating Temperature
- 10°C to 40°C Max Charging Power 100 W **Self -**  **Imposed Safety**

**Protocols and Controls** Renee Stoll will fully and voluntarily adhere to the safety guidelines set forth by FAA Policy N 8900.227 Section 14 "Operational Requirements for UAS” with the appropriate exemptions for flying a small UAS. 1. No flight will be made with a UA Gross weight exceeding 20 pounds. 2. Flights will be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet Above Ground Level (AGL) and not more than 200 feet above an elevated platform from which filming is planned.Renee Stoll
– Section 333 Exemption Petition

3. Operations will be restricted to flights over private property with the permission of the written and/or oral permission of the property owner. 4. The owner/operator will file FAA Form 7711 - 1, or its equivalent, as modified in light of the requested exemption, with the appropriate local Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) no more than 72 hours but no less than 48 hours from planned operation. 5. The PIC and VO will have been trained in operation of UAS and receive up -to -date information for the particular UAS to be operated. 6. A briefing will be conducted in regard to the planned UAS operations prior to each day's production activities. It will be mandatory that all personnel who will be performing duties within the boundaries of the safety perimeter be present for this briefing. 7. The owner/operator will obtain verbal and or written consent of all persons involved with the planned operation and ensure that only consenting pe rsons will be allowed within 100 feet of the flight operation, and the radius may be reduced to 30 feet based upon an equivalent level of safety determination. With the advanced permission of the FSDO, operations at closer range may be approved. 8. Maximu m flight time for each operational flight will be 25 minutes. Flights will be terminated at 25% battery power reserve. 9. The UAS will not be operated within 5 NM of an airport or heliport. 10. Operations will be restricted to daytime only and weather co nditions equivalent to VFR. 11. Minimum crew for each operation will consist of the UAS Pilot and at least one Visual Observer (VO), and may include a third, but separate, Camera OperatorRenee Stoll
– Section 333 Exemption Petition

(CO). 12. The PIC will brief the property owner about the operatio n and risk before the first flight at each new location. 13. No operation will take place without both a fully charged battery and a Pre - Flight Inspection by the PIC to establish the UAS is in condition for safe flight. 14. The PIC and VO will be able to communicate by voice or radio at all times. 15. If the UAS loses communications with the remote controller or loses GPS signal, the UAS will have the capability to return to a pre -determined location within a designated location and land autonomously. 16. The UAS will have the capability to abort a flight in case of emergencies with an automated “Return Home and Land” function. 17. The UAS will have the capability to abort a flight in case of unpredicted obstacles, weather, or emergencies such as low b attery. The protocols as outlined above, a re the minimum guidelines Renee Stoll will obey. **14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H: A irw** **orthiness Certificates 14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) (1)**  Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, establishes the procedural requi rements for the issuance of airworthiness certificates as required by FAR §91.203 (a) (1). Given the size and limited operating area associated with the aircraft to be utilized by the petitioner, an exemption from Part 21 Subpart H meets the requirements of an equivalent level of safety under Part 11 and Section 333 of the Reform Act. The Federal Aviation Act (49 U.S.C.§44701 (f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act both authorize the FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement for an airworthiness certificate, upon consideration of the size, weight, speed, operational capability, andRenee Stoll
– Section 333 Exemption Petition

proximity to airports and populated areas of the particular UAS. In all cases, an analysis of these criteria demonstrates that the UAS operated without an airworthiness certificate in the restricted environment and under the conditions proposed will be at least as safe, or safer, than a conventional aircraft (fixed wing or rotorcraft) operating with an airworthiness certificate without the restrictions and conditions proposed. The UAS to be operated hereunder is less than 20 lbs. fully loaded, carries neither a pilot nor passenger, carries no explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and operates exclusively within a secured and designated area. Unlike other civil aircraft, op erations under this exemption will be tightly controlled and monitored by both the operator and under the requirements and in compliance with local public safety requirements. These safety enhancements provide a greater degree of safety to the public and property owners than conventional operations conducted with airworthiness certificates issued under 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Lastly, application of these same criteria demonstrates that there is no credible threat to national security posed by the UAS , due to its size, speed of operation, location of operation, lack of explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and inability to carry a substantial external load. **14 C.F.R. § 45.23 (b): Marking of the A ircraft.**  The regulation requires: When marks in clude only the Roman capital letter "N" and the registration number is displayed on limited, restricted or light-sport category aircraft or experimental or provisionally certificated aircraft, the operator must also display on that aircraft near each entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or pilot station, in letters not less than 2 inches nor more than 6 inches high, the words "limited," "restricted," "light-sport," "experimental," or "provisional," as applicable. Even though the UAS will have no airworthiness certificate, an exemption may be needed as the UAS will have no entrance to the cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which the word “Experimental” can be placed. Given the size of the UAS, two - inch lettering will be impossible. The word “Experimental” will be placed on the fuselage in compliance with §45.29 (f). US Department of Transportation February 20, 2015 The equivalent level of safety will be provided by having the UAS marked on itsRenee Stoll
– Section 333 Exemption Petition

fuselage as required by §45.29 (f) where the pilot, observer and others working with the UAS will see the identification of the UAS as “Experimental.” **14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) and (b): Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: Pilot in Command.**  Pursuant to 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b), no person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire. The proposed UAS operations may achieve an equivalent level of safety as achieved by current Regulations because the petitioner’s UAS(s) do not carry any pilots or passengers or property. The risk associated with the operation of a UAS is far less than the risk levels inherent in the commercial activities outlined in 14 CFR 61. **14 C.F.R. §91.7(a): Civil Ai**  **rcraft Ai**  **rw orthiness.**  The regulation req uires that no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in airworthy condition. As there will be no airworthiness certificate issued for the aircraft, should this exemption be granted, no FAA regulatory standard will exist for determining airworthiness. Given the size of the aircraft for maintenance and use of safety checklists prior to each flight, an equivalent level of safety will be provided. **14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2): Civil Ai**  **rcraft Flight Manual in the A ircraft.**  Section 91.9 (b) (2) p rovides: No person may operate a U.S. registered civil aircraft ... (2) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not required by §21.5 of this chapter, unless there is available in the aircraft a current approved airplane or Rotorcraft Flight M anual, approved manual material, markings, and placards, or any combination thereof. The UAS, given its size and configuration has no ability or place to carry such a flight manual on the aircraft, not only because there is no pilot on board, but because t here is no room or capacity to carry such an item on the aircraft. The equivalent level of safety will be maintained by keeping the flight manual at the ground control point where the PIC flying the UAS will have immediate access to it.Renee Stoll
– Section 333 Exemption Petition

**14 C.F.R. § 91.103 : Preflight A** **ction.** This regulation requires each pilot in command to take certain actions before flight to insure the safety of flight. As FAA approved rotorcraft flight manuals will not be provided for the aircraft an exemption will be needed. The PIC wi ll take all actions as outlined above; including but not limited to a thorough pre -flight inspection of the UAV, reviewing weather, flight battery requirements, landing and takeoff distances, and aircraft performance data before initiation of flight. **14 C .F.R. §91.109: Flight Instruction.**  Section 91.103 provides that no person may operate a civil aircraft (except a manned free balloon) that is being used for flight instruction unless that aircraft has fully functioning dual controls. UAS and remotely piloted aircraft, by their design do not have fully functional dual controls. Flight control is accomplished through the use of a control box that communicates with the aircraft via radio communications. The FAA has approved exemptions for flight training witho ut fully functional dual controls for a number of aircraft and for flight instruction in experimental aircraft. The equivalent level of safety is provided by the fact that neither a pilot nor passengers will be carried in the aircraft and by the size and speed of the aircraft. **14 C.F.R. §91.119: Minimum Safe A ltitudes.**  Section 91.119 establishes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. Section 91.119 (d) allows helicopters to be operated at less than the minimums prescribed, provided the person ope rating the helicopter complies with any route or altitudes prescribed for helicopters by the FAA. As this exemption is for a UAS that is a helicopter and the exemption requests authority to operate at altitudes up to 400 AGL, or not more than 200 above an elevated platform from which filming is planned, an exemption may be needed to allow such operations. As set forth herein, the UAS will never operate at higher than 400 AGL with the exception that in circumstances where the UAS is used to survey or photograph a structure whose height exceeds 400 feet AGL, the UAS will not be operated more than 200 feet above the highest point on the structure. It will however be operated in a restricted area with security perimeter, where buildings and people will not be ex posed to operations without their previous consent. The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size,Renee Stoll
– Section 333 Exemption Petition

weight, and speed of the UAS as well as the location where it is operated. No flight will be taken without the permission of the property ow ner or local officials. Because of the advance notice to the property owner and participants in the filming activity, all affected individuals will be aware of the planned flight operations. Compared to flight operations with aircraft or rotorcraft weighti ng far more than the maximum 55lbs. proposed herein and the lack of flammable fuel, any risk associated with these operations is far less than those presently presented with conventional aircraft operating at or below 500 AGL. In addition, the low- altitud e operations of the UAS will ensure separation between these UAS operations and the operations of conventional aircraft that must comply with Section 91.119. **14 C.F.R. §91.121 A ltimeter Settings.**  This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude by reference to an altimeter that is set “...to the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.” As the UAS may not have a barometric altimeter, but instead a GPS altitude read out, an U.S. exemption may be needed. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by the operator, pursuant to the safety check list and live flight data monitoring, confirming the altitude of the launch site shown on the GPS altitude indicator before flight. **14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions.** Section 91.151 (a) prohibits an individual from beginning “a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing, and, assuming normal cruising speed
– (1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 minutes.” The petitioner believes that an exe mption from 14 CFR §91.151(a) falls within the scope of prior exemptions. Operating the UAS in a tightly controlled area where only people and property owners or official representatives who have signed waivers will be allowed does not produce the type of risks that Section 91.151(a) was intended to alleviate given the size and speed of the small UAS. TheRenee Stoll
– Section 333 Exemption Petition

petitioner believes that an equivalent level of safety can be achieved by limiting flights to 25 minutes or 25% of battery power
— whichever happens first . This restriction would be more than adequate to return the UAS to its planned landing zone from anywhere in its limited operating area. **14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) and (b): Carry ing Civil A** **ircraft Certification and Registration.**  The regulation provides in pertinent part: (a) Except as provided in § 91.715, no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it has within it the following: (1) An appropriate and current airworthiness certificate. . . . (b) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airworthine ss certificate required by paragraph (a) of this section; or a special flight authorization issued under §91.715 is displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that it is legible to passengers or crew. The UAS fully loaded weighs well under the proposed 20 - lb. limit and is operated without an onboard pilot. As such, there is no ability or place to carry certification and registration documents within or on the UAS to display them as contemplated. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by keeping t hese documents at the ground control point where the PIC flying the UAS will have immediate access to them, to the extent they are applicable to the UAS. **14 C.F.R. §91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (2); 417(a) & (b): Maintenance Inspections.**  These regulat ions require that an aircraft operator or owner “shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescrib ed in part 43 of this chapter...,” and others shall inspect or maintain the aircraft in compliance with Part 43. Given that these sections and Part 43 apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, these sections will not apply to the petitioner. Routine maintenance will be accomplished by the owner/operator pursuant to the flight manual and operating handbook. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because the UAS is very limited in size and will carry a small payload and operate only in restricted areas for a limited period of time. If mechanical issues arise the UAS can land immediately and will be operating from no higher than 400 feet AGL. The PIC will ensure that the UAS is in working order prior to initiating flight, perfo rm requiredRenee Stoll
– Section 333 Exemption Petition

maintenance, and keep a log of any maintenance performed. Moreover, the PIC is the person most familiar with the aircraft and best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condition to provide the equivalent level of safety. An equivalen t level of safety will be achieved because maintenance and inspections will be performed in accordance with the UAS Manufacturer's User Manual. As outlined above, the PIC will ensure that the UAS is in working order by completing the pre -flight inspection of the UAS prior to initiating flight and will perform required maintenance needed. **Summary :**  Renee Stoll will not operate UAS(s) near airports. The locations where Renee Stoll will conduct its services will be both limited and p redetermined, which will allow for a controlled environment to operate safely while greatly reducing risk. By allowing Renee Stoll to conduct business with a UAS, it will help the South Florida economy and benefit many other industries including private citizens to market their ho mes; that have not been able to afford to do so prior to UAS technologies. Furthermore, Renee Stoll ’s UAS is considerably lighter than the alternative which could be a helicopter or small plane carrying explosive flammable fuels. Renee Stoll employs the us e of a UAS , which will o perate up to 25 minutes powered by a battery. Therefore, the UAS’ s used by Renee Stoll will typically have a flight time of 10 - 15 minutes at one time, as most photos and video are easily obtained in this flight time window. The likelihood of injury or even death with a small UAS compared to a large manned aircraft is greatly reduced. Granting Aerial Services of Central Florida’s request for exemption comports with the Secretary of Transportation’s (FAA Administrator’s) responsibi lities and authority to not only integrate UAS's into the national airspace system, but to “...establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems [UAS's] in the national airspace system” under Section 333(c) of the Reform Act specific to the use of UAS's as proposed herein. Renee Stoll will conduct operations in full compliance with the protocols described herein or as otherwise established by the FAA.
Please contact me should any additional information be required to satisfy an approval.Renee Stoll
– Section 333 Exemption Petition

Sincerely,

Renee Stoll

1 Appendix-

A
– DJI Phantom 3 User Manual