alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Mitch Hefter [mailto:MHefter@kantorlaw.net] 

Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 3:02 PM

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB39

Employee Benefits Security Administration

Room M – 5655

U.S. Dept. of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue NW

Washington D.C. 20210

Re: Claims Procedure Regulations for Plans Providing Disability Benefits Examination

RIN No.: 1210 – AB39

Regulation: 29 C.F.R. §2560.503 – 1

Dear Deputy Assistant Secretary Hauser:

 The new regulations set to go into effect on 1/1/18 are long overdue. Now, through insurance 

company lobbying, these regulations face further delay and uncertainty. This would be comical were it 

not so harmful to the health and well-being of tens of thousands of Americans.

As an attorney who has represented hundreds of ERISA claimants over the years, I know these 

changes are needed now. The new regulations simply codify what insurers should have been doing all 

along. They allow for more transparency in the review process, and give claimants a better opportunity 

to present their claims on a level playing field.

The reason for the delay is highly upsetting. Essentially, a multi-billion dollar industry is 

complaining that costs will rise if they actually have to fulfill the fiduciary duties they were supposed to 

be adhering to all along. While I am obviously biased due to my chosen profession, even an unbiased 

observer would find this excuse laughable. In reality, whatever nominal cost increases arise on the claim 

administration end, there will undoubtedly be massive savings to the insurance industry, claimants, and 

the American taxpayer as fewer claims will make their way to the courts.

Thank you considering my comments.

Warm regards,

Mitchell Hefter

Mitchell O. Hefter

Kantor & Kantor, LLP

19839 Nordhoff St.

Northridge, CA 91324

P: (818) 886-2525

F: (818) 350-6272

mhefter@kantorlaw.net

www.kantorlaw.net
**EXHIBIT23**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (FormS-3 No. 333-111504) of PACCAR Financial Corp. and in the related Prospectus ofour report dated February 18, 2004 with respect to the financial statements ofPACCAR Financial Corp. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended December 31, 2003.

 
|                 | /s/  Ernst & Young LLP |   |
|----------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|                 |                       |
|                 |                       |
| Seattle,  Washington |                       |
| March 9,  2004       |                       |

 

----
From: Renee Botta

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 3:51:09 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Renee Botta

898 Aspen Dr

Evergreen, CO 80439
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.7



AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO 
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


THIS AMENDMENT to The Coca-Cola Company Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated as of December 8, 2010, (the "Plan") is adopted by the Deferred Compensation Plan Management Committee (the “Committee”).


W I T N E S S E T H:


WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.4, the Committee may amend the Plan, provided that the amendment applies to the general population of Participants and does not affect only officers of the Company;


WHEREAS, the Committee wishes to adopt the eligibility criteria for the 2016 Plan Year and to adopt an amendment to the Plan that applies to the general population of Participants; 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Committee hereby amends the Plan as follows, effective as of January 1, 2016:


Paragraph 3.1(b) shall be amended to read as follows:


“Amount of Compensation Eligible for Deferral.  An Eligible Employee may elect to defer up to 95% of his Base Salary and up to 95% of his Annual Incentive.   The total amount deferred by a Participant shall be reduced, if necessary, to satisfy Social Security Tax (including Medicare), income tax withholding for compensation that cannot be deferred and employee benefit plan withholding requirements.  If an Eligible Employee elects to defer Base Salary, the minimum amount of Base Salary that may be deferred for any Plan Year is $5,000.  If an Eligible Employee elects to defer Annual Incentive, the minimum percentage that may be deferred is 10% of such Annual Incentive.”
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.17 MB)
 
 ARG 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit USNAVCENT Amphibious dock landing ship AMA LSD52 AMERICA ARG USS PEARL HARBOR #powerprojection #amaarg #aarg MARCENT IRON MAGIC 18 UAE Union Defense Force U.S. Marine Corps 15th MEU Pearl Harbor America Amphibious Ready Group USCENTCOM U.S. Navy Navy deployment
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 37266

STATE OF IDAHO
,

Plaintiff-Respondent
,

v.

KENNETH BOYD CASE
,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2010 Unpublished Opin ion No. 627

Filed: September 3, 2010

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED
OPINION AND SHALL NOT
BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Deborah A. Bail , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of one and one

- h alf years , for possession of marijuana with
intent to deliver

, affirmed

.

Molly J. Huskey, State Appellate Public Defender; Diane M. Walker, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before LANSING, Chief Judge, GUTIERREZ, Judge

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Kenneth Bo yd Case was convicted of possession of marijuana with intent to deliver

, Idaho Code § 37

- 2732(a). The district court imposed a unified sentence of five years, with a

minimum period of confinement of one and one

- half years

. Case appeals, contending that the

sentence is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of a sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114 , 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

- 15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.2

1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider th e defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Case ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-22-00280-CV

__________________

IN RE SILURIA 

(ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS), LLC

__________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding

284th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 21-03-03166-CV

__________________________________________________________________

ORDER

In Re Siluria (assignment for the benefit of creditors), LLC, Relator, filed a 

petition for a writ of mandamus and a motion for temporary relief. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 52. Relator is a defendant in an interpleader action filed in Trial Cause Number 

21-03-03166-CV, styled Stibbs & Co., PC v. Lummus Technology LLC and Siluria 

(Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors), LLC. Relator seeks a writ compelling the 

Honorable Kristin Bays, Judge of the 284th District Court of Montgomery County, 

Texas, to vacate an order denying a motion to quash a jury demand and grant the 

motion to quash. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221.
2

Relator requests that the jury trial in the trial court be stayed while this Court 

considers the mandamus petition. The Court finds temporary relief is necessary to 

prevent undue prejudice. It is ORDERED that all the jury trial in Trial Cause Number 

21-03-03166 is STAYED until our opinion issues or until further order of this Court. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10(b). No bond is required of Relator as a condition to any 

relief herein granted.

The response of the Real Party in Interest, Lummus Technology LLC, is due

September 12, 2022.

MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RELIEF GRANTED. 

ORDER ENTERED August 31, 2022.

PER CURIAM

Before Kreger, Horton and Johnson, JJ.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

62 

CA 15-00640 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

 

 

PAUL E. GILLETTE AND KIM A. GILLETTE, 

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, 

V ORDER

ESTATE OF IVAN H. ENSTROM, DECEASED, BY 

ELIZABETH P. ENSTROM, AS EXECUTOR, 

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

 

THE LAW FIRM OF JANICE M. IATI, P.C., ROCHESTER (JANICE M. IATI OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

CANNON & VANALLEN, LLP, GENESEO (SCOTT D. CANNON OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Livingston County

(Dennis S. Cohen, A.J.), entered July 8, 2014. The order granted

plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment.

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance

signed by the attorneys for the parties on December 7 and 21, 2015,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed 

without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: February 5, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
***RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE***
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1995 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,701
<ALLOWANCES>                                       204
<INVENTORY>                                      4,224
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,307
<PP&E>                                           2,206
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,482
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,121
<BONDS>                                          1,219
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,475
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,517
<SALES>                                         12,584
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,584
<CGS>                                            6,360
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,360
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,362
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 289
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (431)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (72)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (359)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (359)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>WE HAVE CALCULATED EARNINGS PER SHARE AMOUNTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAS 128
"EARNINGS PER SHARE".  WE HAVE ENTERED BASIC AND DILUTED AMOUNTS IN PLACE OF
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED, RESPECTIVELY.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit









Exhibit 10.2(q)





Amendment to 
Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement
This Amendment, effective March 9, 2016 to the Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of March 2, 2015 is made between Anthem, Inc. (the “Company”) and the Participant set forth in the accompanying Grant Notice to the Agreement.  This Amendment is included in and made part of the Agreement.  
1.A new Section 3(e) is added to read as follows, existing Section 3(e) is renumbered as Section 3(f) and all cross-references are updated accordingly:
(e)    Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason - Cigna Corporation Acquisition.  Unless section 3(d) is applicable, and notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement to the contrary, this Section shall apply for the period beginning on the date that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger among Anthem, Anthem Merger Sub Corp., and Cigna Corporation dated as of July 23, 2015 (the “Merger Agreement”) is approved under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 in accordance with Section 3.1(c)(iii)(A) of the Merger Agreement (the “HSR Approval Date”) and ending on the earlier of (1) the third anniversary of the “Closing Date” as defined in the Merger Agreement or (2) the date the acquisition of Cigna Corporation is terminated (the “Cigna Integration Period”).  The Period of Restriction shall immediately lapse, causing any restrictions which would otherwise remain on the Restricted Stock Units to immediately lapse, and the Shares covered by the Restricted Stock Units shall be immediately delivered if the Participant does not otherwise meet the requirements of Retirement as set forth in Section 3(a) above at Termination, and during the Cigna Integration Period, the Participation’s Termination is either (A) by the Company or an Affiliate without Cause or (B) by the Participant for Good Reason (as defined in the Executive Agreement Plan), provided that for clause (B), the Participant participates in the Executive Agreement Plan as of the HSR Approval Date.
2.    Effect on Agreement.  This Amendment has no effect on the other terms of the Agreement and the Agreement shall otherwise continue in effect.  
	
				
	 
	ANTHEM, INC.

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	Printed:
	 
	Jose Thomas

	 
	Its:
	 
	EVP & Chief Human Resources Officer

	 
	 
	 
	Anthem, Inc.










Amendment - Time-based RSU Agreement - 2015
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (3.28 MB)
 
 Baghdad Night Vision 2017 counter IED ISOF Operation Inherent Resolve Iraq Special Operations
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.05 MB)
 
 Situated at the crossroads of Central and South Asia with a population of more than 200 million peop Pakistan is the most populous country in the CENTCOM area of responsibility and one of few nuclear the United States and Pakistan have maintained diplomatic relations since Pakistan’s founding in 19 but it was the events of 9/11 that led the two nations to conduct closer coordination on security a
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
http:///www.usda.gov/stream_restoration

    - rev: Published October, 1998.  Revised August, 2001.
    - by2: FISRWG (10/1998).  Stream Corridor Restoration:  Principles, Processes, and Practices.  By the Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group (FISRWG)(15 Federal agencies of the US gov't).   GPO Item No. 0120-A; SuDocs No. A 57.6/2:EN3/PT.653.  ISBN-0-934213-59-3.
    - site: See this site for downloads, addenda, and a catalog of the book's images.
    - 653: adopted as Part 653 of the National Engineering Handbook, USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service
    - by: By:  The Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group
    - http://www: 
    usda: 
- gov/stream_restoration: http://www.usda.gov/stream_restoration
#### William H Elliott, Appellant, v. Francis Ano and others, Respondents.

— Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### Daniel S. Hage, Appellant, *v.*John T. Sprague, Respondent.

*Mage*v. Sprague, 141 App. Div, 931, affirmed.

(Argued May 23, 1912;

decided June 4, 1912.)

Appeal, by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 20, 1910, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the alleged malpractice of defendant, a physician.

*Howard B. Bayne*for appellant.

*George M. Pinney*and *Warren O. Van Slyke*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Gray, Willard Bartlett, Hisoock, Chase and Collin, JJ. Not voting: Cullen, Ch. J. Absent: Vann, J. _