Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Commerce International Trade Administration [C-580-884]
 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
 SUMMARY: On August 21, 2023, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) issued its final judgment in 
                        *Hyundai Steel Company*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         Court No. 21-00536, sustaining the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce)'s remand results pertaining to the administrative review of the countervailing duty (CVD) order on certain hot-rolled steel flat products (HRS) from the Republic of Korea (Korea) covering the period January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018. Commerce is notifying the public that the CIT's final judgement is not in harmony with Commerce's final results of the administrative review, and that Commerce is amending the final results with respect to the countervailable subsidy rate assigned to Hyundai Steel Company (Hyundai Steel).
 DATES: Applicable August 31, 2023.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nathan James, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5305.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  Background On August 26, 2021, Commerce published its 
                    *Final Results*
                     of the 2018 CVD administrative review of HRS from Korea.[1]
                    
                     Commerce determined that Hyundai Steel received countervailable subsidies from the Government of Korea (GOK) under various programs, including the Reduction for Sewerage Fees program and the Provision of Port Usage Rights at the Port of Incheon program.[2]
                    
                     With respect to the sewerage fees program, we found that Hyundai Steel's reduced sewerage bill reflected revenue forgone, and we calculated a 0.01 percent 
                    *ad valorem*
                     subsidy rate for the program.[3]
                    
                     With respect to the Port of Incheon program, we found that Hyundai Steel received a financial contribution in the form of revenue forgone, because the GOK gave Hyundai Steel the right to collect berthing income and harbor facility usage fees which otherwise would have been collected by the GOK.[4] Hyundai Steel appealed Commerce's 
                    *Final Results.*
                     On February 10, 2023, the CIT remanded Commerce's determination that the Port of Incheon program conferred a benefit; the CIT also, at Commerce's request, remanded Commerce's determination related to the sewerage fees program.[5] In its final remand redetermination, issued in April 2023, Commerce reexamined the Reduction for Sewerage Fees program and determined that the program was not countervailable. We also provided further explanation for our determination that the Port of Incheon program should be analyzed as a revenue forgone subsidy program and that it conferred a benefit. We adjusted the final subsidy rate calculation from the previous rate of 0.51 percent for Hyundai Steel to a new subsidy rate of 0.50 percent.[6]
                    
                     The CIT sustained Commerce's final results of redetermination.[7] Timken Notice In its decision in 
                    *Timken,*[8]
                    
                     as clarified by 
                    *Diamond Sawblades,*[9]
                    
                     the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant to sections 516A(c) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce must publish a notice of court decision that is not “in harmony” with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a “conclusive” court decision. The CIT's August 21, 2023, judgment constitutes a final decision of the CIT that is not in harmony with Commerce's 
                    *Final Results.*
                     Thus, this notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of 
                    *Timken.* Amended Final Results Because there is now a final court judgment, Commerce is amending its 
                    *Final Results*
                     with respect to the subsidy rate assigned to Hyundai Steel as follows: Company
Subsidy rate 
                             (percent  
                             
                                *ad valorem*)Hyundai Steel Company 10
0.50
 Cash Deposit Requirements Because Hyundai Steel has a superseding cash deposit rate, 
                    *i.e.,*
                     there have been final results published in a subsequent administrative review, we will not issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). This notice will not affect the current cash deposit rate for Hyundai Steel. Liquidation of Suspended Entries At this time, Commerce remains enjoined by CIT order from liquidating entries that: were produced and/or exported by Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd., (a/k/a Hyundai Steel Company or Hyundai Steel), and were entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the period January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018. These entries will remain enjoined pursuant to the terms of the injunction during the pendency of any appeals process. In the event the CIT's ruling is not appealed, or, if appealed, upheld by a final and conclusive court decision, Commerce intends to instruct CBP to assess countervailing duties on unliquidated entries of subject 
                    ( print page 60639)
                    merchandise produced and/or exported by Hyundai Steel in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b). We will instruct CBP to assess countervailing duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review when the 
                    *ad valorem*
                     rate is not zero or 
                    *de minimis.*
                     Where an 
                    *ad valorem*
                     subsidy rate is zero or 
                    *de minimis,*[11]
                    
                     we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to countervailing duties. Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516A(c) and (e) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: August 29, 2023. Lisa W. Wang, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         
                        *See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2018,*86 FR 47621 (August 26, 2021) (
                        *Final Results*), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (IDM). Back to Citation
 2.
    
                         
                        *See Final Results*
                         IDM at Comments 2 and 3. Back to Citation
 3.
    
                         
                        *Id.*
                         at 7 and Comment 3. Back to Citation
 4.
    
                         
                        *Id.*
                         at 7 and Comment 2. Back to Citation
 5.
    
                         
                        *See Hyundai Steel Company*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         Court No. 21-00536, Slip Op. 23-15 (CIT 2023). Back to Citation
 6.
    
                         
                        *See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Hyundai Steel Company*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         Court No. 21-00536, Slip Op. 23-15 (CIT February 10, 2023), dated April 7, 2023, available at 
                        *https://access.trade.gov/​resources/​remands/​23-15.pdf.* Back to Citation
 7.
    
                         
                        *See Hyundai Steel Company*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         Court No. 21-00536, Slip. Op. 23-121, at 13. Back to Citation
 8.
    
                         
                        *See Timken Co.*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (
                        *Timken*). Back to Citation
 9.
    
                         
                        *See Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers Coalition*
                         v. 
                        *United States,*
                         626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (
                        *Diamond Sawblades*). Back to Citation
 10.
    
                         This company is also known as Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd. Back to Citation
 11.
    
                         
                        *See*19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2023-19042 Filed 9-1-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P