alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Úřední věstník C 153A/10.

| | ISSN 1725-5163 |
| --- | --- |
| Úřední věstník
  Evropské unie | C 153A |
| | |
| České vydání | Informace a oznámení | Svazek 4710. června 2004 |

ISSN 1725-5163

Úřední věstník

Evropské unie

C 153A

České vydání

Informace a oznámení

Svazek 4710. června 2004

---

| Oznámeníč. | Obsah | Strana |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Oznámení |
| | Rada |
| 2004/C 153A/1 | Volné místo (ref. A/013) | 1 |

Oznámeníč.

Obsah

Strana

III   Oznámení

Rada

2004/C 153A/1

Volné místo (ref. A/013)

1

| CS | |
| --- | --- |

CS

---

III Oznámení

Rada

| 10.6.2004 | CS | Úřední věstník Evropské unie | CA 153/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2004

CS

Úřední věstník Evropské unie

CA 153/1

---

VOLNÉ MÍSTO

(ref. A/013)

RADA

(2004/C 153 A/01)

Generální sekretariát Rady Evropské unie si v rámci společné evropské bezpečnostní a obranné politiky (SEBOP) přeje obsadit volné místo rady třídy A*9 na generálním ředitelství E – vnější vztahy — ředitelství VIII, pověřené otázkami obrany.

Více informací (dostupných v angličtině a francouzštině) a přihlášky lze získat kontaktováním Oddělení pro výběr a nábor na následující e-mailové adrese: service.recrutement@consilium.eu.int nebo na jeho internetové stránce na adrese: http://ue.eu.int/concours.

Lhůta: 9. července 2004, razítko pošty slouží jako důkaz.

---
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

MAR 25 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

KEN SYKES,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

JOHNNY F. DIRCK, individually, and

as Director of the Council on Law

Enforcement Education and Training,

JAMES STOVER, individually, and as

Director of Cleet, BILL

CASSINGHAM, individually, and as

Director of Cleet, BOB RICKS,

individually, and as Director of Cleet,

DAVE BEEN, individually, and as

Director of Cleet, KYLE

GREENFIELD, individually, and as

Director of Cleet, and KENNETH

VAN HOY, individually, and as

Director of Cleet, 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-6131

(W.D. of Oklahoma)

(D.C. No. CIV-95-2037-R)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before BALDOCK, BRORBY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. 
-2-

Ken W. Sykes filed this civil rights action against Johnny F. Dirck, James

Stover, Bill Cassingham, Bob Ricks, Dave Been, Kyle Greenfield, and Kenneth

Van Hoy (“the Defendants”) in their individual capacities and in their official

capacities as directors of the Council on Law Enforcement Education and

Training. The district court granted the defendants’ summary judgment motion,

holding as follows: (1) Defendants were entitled to absolute immunity as to any

claims relating to actions taken in their individual capacities; (2) Defendants were

not persons for purposes of § 1983 when they were acting in their official

capacities as officers of the State of Oklahoma; (3) Sykes had not met his burden

of demonstrating that he was entitled to injunctive relief; and (4) Defendants,

whether acting in their individual or official capacaties, were clothed with

sovereign immunity and were not proper parties to Sykes action under Oklahoma

law. This court exercises jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirms.

We review the grant of summary judgment de novo and apply the same

legal standard used by the district court under Fed. R. C. P. 56(c). Applied

Genetics Int’l, Inc. v. First Affiliated Sec., Inc., 912 F.2d 1238, 1241 (10th Cir.

1990). “Summary judgment is appropriate when there is no genuine dispute over

a material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” 

Russillo v. Scarborough, 935 F.2d 1167, 1170 (10th Cir. 1991).
-3-

This court has reviewed the parties briefs and contentions and has

conducted a de novo review of the district court’s opinion and the record on

appeal. Finding no reversible error, we AFFIRM for substantially the reasons set

out in the district court’s Order dated March 8, 1996.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Michael R. Murphy

Circuit Judge
From: Aamot, Cynthia

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Freedom OF Religion

Date: Monday, August 08, 2011 4:19:39 PM

I am writing to ask that conscience rights be protected for Doctors, Nurses, Pharmacists, and all

other health care personnel. No one should be required by the government to do anything that

violates their well-formed conscience. That would mean we cease to be the United States of

America and are just the same as China, Russia, or any other dictatorship.

Cindy Aamot

Office Specialist lI

Technical Services/Handling

Hennepin County Library

612-543-8576

"If the Lord doesn't open the door, don't push on it."
ANSF lead large operation in Helmand capital ahead of security transition
 By Cpl. Adam Leyendecker , Regional Command Southwest
  
 HELMAND, Afghanistan (July 20, 2011) — More than 400 Afghan National Security Forces rolled through the outskirts of the Helmand provincial capital of Lashkar Gah along Highway 601 during Operation Zmaray Sika, July 17. The Afghan National Police led the operation, which also included forces of the Afghan Border Police, National Army, National Civil Order Police, National Directorate of Security and coalition troops with Task Force Helmand.Afghan security forces have been gradually taking the lead in more operations throughout the capital region over the last year. The operation took place just ahead of the official transfer of authority of security in Lashkar Gah from coalition forces to Afghan July 20 at provincial governor Gulab Mangal’s compound.From the planning to execution of Operation Zmaray Sika, the Afghans were in the lead with no assistance from coalition forces, said Lt. Col. Alistair Aitken, the commanding officer of Combined Forces Lashkar Gah.Afghan National Policeman Col. Kamalladim, chief of security for Lashkar Gah, led the operation and directed the other branches’ assignments.Troops with the 4th Battalion, The Royal Regiment of Scotland, also known as “the Highlanders,” provided air support and counter-improvised explosive device teams.At dawn on the first day of the operation, Afghan security forces gathered at a newly established patrol base outside of the capital. The troops said they were eager to quell an insurgent force which had harassed the local area.Likewise, locals said they were waiting for the Afghan forces to bring stability to the area.“This is important to the people of Lashkar Gah,” said Aitken. “It sends a message that there is an effective Afghan national security force in the area. The locals are tired of being intimidated by outsiders and young men who have been led astray.”As the sun rose and lit up the rural landscape, the Afghan forces conducted mounted and dismounted patrols in hopes of flushing any insurgents.“The goal of the operation was to deny insurgents the range in this area to launch attacks on the city,” said Capt. Andy Magee, battle captain for 4 SCOTS.The Afghan forces rolled through miles of unpatrolled land with ease. The Afghan Border Police patrolled further north of the 601, as the Afghan National Army stretched their forces to the south. The police cleared the heart of the operation while being supported by troops with the NDS and ANCOP.The Afghan security forces made it through the day without firing a shot in an area known for a strong insurgent presence. They also successfully removed a few IED’s from the area to make the land safer for the local populace.“If more people can witness this type of operation they will be convinced of how incredible a force the ANSF really are,” said Aitken. “All these people are a part of a greater Lashkar Gah.”
Exhibit 23





                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 33-42543 dated August 30, 1991) pertaining to the Cognitronics
Corporation 1967 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 33-42544 dated August 30, 1991 and Form S-8 No. 333-05897  dated
June 13, 1996) pertaining to the Cognitronics Corporation 1990 Stock Option
Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-05899 dated June 13,
1996) pertaining to the Cognitronics Corporation Restricted Stock Plan of our
report dated March 2, 2001, with  respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Cognitronics Corporation included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.


                                                     /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Stamford, Connecticut
April 2, 2001
#### Foster M. Ferrin, Appellant, v. Almira J. Ferrin, Respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Opinion by

Follett, J.;

Merwin, J.% not voting.
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1159 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1159

    To direct the Secretary of the Army to repair and expand a wave 
 attenuation system to protect fishermen and other boaters and promote 
                the welfare of the town of Lubec, Maine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 10, 2001

Ms. Collins (for herself and Ms. Snowe) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To direct the Secretary of the Army to repair and expand a wave 
 attenuation system to protect fishermen and other boaters and promote 
                the welfare of the town of Lubec, Maine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lubec Safe Harbor Act of 2001''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds that--
            (1) in 1997, a winter storm caused the deaths of 2 
        fishermen in the town of Lubec, Maine;
            (2) without a safe berth for their boats, the lives of 
        fishermen and other boaters in Lubec are at risk;
            (3) storms in the months preceding the date of enactment of 
        this Act have destabilized the wave attenuation system in Lubec 
        and consequently caused extensive damage to the Lubec marina;
            (4) the damage has been devastating to the small town, the 
        economy of which is dependent on fishing and on tourists who 
        arrive by boat;
            (5) even when in good repair, the wave attenuation system 
        in Lubec was not adequate to provide a safe harbor for the 
        town;
            (6) without a fully effective wave attenuation system, the 
        marina, pier, and harbor will cease to function; and
            (7) since the town can neither support its fishing industry 
        nor provide landing capacity for tour boats without a 
        functional marina, it is imperative that the wave attenuation 
        system be immediately repaired and expanded to provide safe 
        harbor for the fishing and tourist fleet at the Lubec marina.

SEC. 3. WAVE ATTENUATION SYSTEM, LUBEC, MAINE.

    The Secretary of the Army shall repair and expand the wave 
attenuation system at Lubec, Maine, at a total Federal cost of 
$2,200,000.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND
IS QUALIFIED ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       4,000,714
<SECURITIES>                                   307,832
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,474,090
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,036,046
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,892,368
<PP&E>                                       6,098,423
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,049,714
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,156,040
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,690,232
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       195,226
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,270,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,156,040
<SALES>                                      1,521,997
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,595,442
<CGS>                                        1,447,812
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,447,812
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,113,933
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (966,303)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (966,303)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (966,303)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.05)


</TABLE>
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.39 MB)
 
 pj CCT Italians Jordanians KASOTC Amman Special tactics combat control eagerlion17 USCENTCOM Pararescue Jordan
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.1


SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE 
PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC. 
401(k) AND MATCHING PLAN 
(Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2013)


THIS SEVENTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into by Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. (the “Company”):
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Pioneer Natural Resources USA, Inc. 401(k) and Matching Plan (the “Plan”);
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8.3 of the Plan, the Benefit Plan Design Committee (the “Committee”) of the Company maintains the authority to amend the Plan at any time; and
WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Plan to provide for full and immediate vesting in any employer-derived benefits accrued under the Plan for certain employees who are involuntarily terminated in connection with the closing or restructuring of certain offices.
NOW THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows.
1.    Section 5.3(n) is hereby added to the Plan as follows:
(n)    Any provision of this Plan to the contrary notwithstanding, the amounts credited to the Employer Account of a Participant who is specifically designated by the Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of the Company as being involuntarily terminated in connection with the closing of the Victoria, Texas office announced on February 10, 2016 shall become fully vested and nonforfeitable on the date of such involuntary termination.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it further provided that except as provided above, the Plan shall continue to read in its current state.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Seventh Amendment this 8th day of March, 2016, to be effective as specified above.


	
					
	 
	 
	PIONEER NATURAL RESOURCES USA, INC.

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	By:
	/s/ Teresa A. Fairbrook

	 
	Name:
	Teresa A. Fairbrook

	 
	Title:
	Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE UNAUDITED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AND UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,158,824
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,148
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    203,474
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,380,446
<PP&E>                                         164,140
<DEPRECIATION>                                  92,352
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,714,526
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,278,258
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,889
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,432,379
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,714,526
<SALES>                                         36,337
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,337
<CGS>                                           78,772
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  448,714
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              60,424
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (489,818)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (489,818)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                977,136
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   487,318
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
From: Morgan Lawrence

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:43:12 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Morgan Lawrence

5353 Cane Ridge Rd

Apt. 302

Nashville, TN 37013
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 14 , 2018 

# Order

Clerk September 14 , 2018

156389 ( 63 )

GRANT BAUSERMAN, KARL WILLIAMS, and

TEDDY BROE, on Behalf of Themselves and All

Others Similarly Situated,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

SC: 156389

v COA: 333181

Ct of Claims: 15

- 000202

- MM

UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE AGENCY,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiffs

- appellants “requesting the

Court take judicial notice of appellant’s [sic: appellee’s] inconsistent judicial filings and

position such that defendant should be judicially estopped from maintaining its argument

on accrual in this action” is DENIED.
#### Edward W. Hodges v. Eugene H. Hodges’s Estate.

February Term, 1916.

Present: Munson, C. J., Watson, Haselton, Powers, and Taylor, JJ.

Opinion filed May 6, 1916.

*Probate Courts*— Action *of Account*— Jurisdiction—Appellate *Jurisdiction of County Courts*— No. *86, Acts 1915.*

Appeal from a decision of the probate court disallowing the claim of plaintiff presented to the commissioners on Eugene H. Hodges’s estate. Rutland County, March Term, 1915, *Waterman,*J., presiding. Declaration, account. Appeal dismissed on motion of defendant. Plaintiff excepted. This case is controlled by the disposition of the one just preceding.

*Walter 8. Fenton*for the plaintiff.

*Marvelle C. Webber*for the defendant.

Watson, J.

This case involves the same question on a motion to dismiss the appeal, as is determined in *Fenton, Admr., of the Estate of Maria H. Hodges*v. *The Estate of Eugene H. Hodges, Malina S. Hodges, Executrix,*90 Vt. 214, 97 Atl. 676. The claim is against the same estate, and in favor of the third tenant in common named in, but not a party to, that case. The declaration filed in the probate court in taking the appeal, is essentially like the declaration in the other case: it is in account, names the same three tenants in common as having distinct, equal, undivided interests, and describes the same common property, real and personal. It follows that the decision there is controlling here.

*Judgment affirmed. To be certified to the probate coun*