61506 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2023 / Notices 

8See Amended Final Determination, 85 FR at 

35263. 

9Subject merchandise produced and exported by 

Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. 

(Borusan) was excluded from the order effective 

June 1, 2020. See Amended Final Determination, 85 

FR at 35264. Commerce also stated in this notice 

that it would not initiate a new review of Borusan’s 

entries. Accordingly, Borusan is only covered by 

this administrative review for subject merchandise 

produced in Turkey where Borusan acted as either 

the producer or exporter, but not both. 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 87 FR 

61278 (October 11, 2022); see also Certain 

Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires from the 

People’s Republic of China: Amended Final 

Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination and 

Antidumping Duty Order; and Amended Final 

Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and 

Countervailing Duty Order, 80 FR 47902 (August 

10, 2015) (Order). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of the 2021–2022 Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated April 24, 2023. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Certain Passenger Vehicle 

and Light Truck Tires from the People’s Republic 

of China and Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments; 2021–2022,’’ dated concurrently with, 

and hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum). 

4See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 

‘‘Scope of the Order.’’ 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the publication date, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rate for the companies 

listed in the final results of review will 

be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or 

investigated companies not covered by 

this review, the cash deposit will 

continue to be the company-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding in 

which the company participated; (3) if 

the exporter is not a firm covered in this 

review, or the original investigation, but 

the producer is, then the cash deposit 

rate will be the rate established for the 

most recently completed segment for the 

producer of the subject merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers and exporters will continue 

to be 1.57 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the Amended Final 

Determination.8 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to an 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: August 30, 2023. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Companies Not Selected for 

Individual Examination 

1. Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve 

Ticaret A.S.9

2. Borusan Istikbal Ticaret 

3. Cagil Makina San ve Tic A.S. AKA Cagil 

Makina A.S. 

4. Spirally Welded Steel Pipe Inc. 

5. Emek Boru Makina Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. 

6. Erciyas Celik Boru Sanayi A.S. 

7. Mazlum Mangtay Boru Son. Ins. Tar. Urn. 

San. ve Tic. A.S. 

8. Ozbal Celik Boru San. Tic. Ve TAAH A.S. 

9. Umran Celik Boru Sanayii A.S. 

[FR Doc. 2023–19204 Filed 9–6–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–016] 

Certain Passenger Vehicle and Light 

Truck Tires From the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, Partial Rescission, and 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments; 2021–2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

finds that certain exporters of passenger 

vehicle and light truck tires (passenger 

tires) from the People’s Republic of 

China (China) made sales of subject 

merchandise at prices below normal 

value (NV) during the period of review 

(POR) August 1, 2021, through July 31, 

2022. Commerce also preliminarily 

finds that eight companies had no 

shipments of subject merchandise 

during the POR, and that it is 

appropriate to rescind this review with 

respect to six companies because all 

requests for review of these companies 

were withdrawn. We invite interested 

parties to comment on these preliminary 

results. 

DATES: Applicable September 7, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Terre Keaton Stefanova or Caroline 

Carroll, AD/CVD Operations, Office IX, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1280 or 

(202) 482–4948, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On October 11, 2022, based on timely 

requests for review, in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated this 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on passenger 

tires from China.1 This review covers 43 

exporters of the subject merchandise. In 

April 2023, we extended the 

preliminary results of this review to no 

later than August 31, 2023.2

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this administrative review, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum.3

The Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

is a public document and is on file 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. A list 

of topics discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is included in 

Appendix I. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by the Order 

are passenger tires from China. A full 

description of the scope of the Order is 

contained in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum.4


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2023 / Notices 61507 

5See Roadclaw’s and Winrun’s Letter, 

‘‘Withdrawal of Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated November 15, 2022; Petitioner’s 

Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal of One Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated November 23, 2022; 

and Fullrun’s, Junhong’s, and Lakesea’s Letter, 

‘‘Withdrawal of Request for Administrative 

Review,’’ dated December 3, 2022. 

6See Qingdao Nama Industrial Co., Ltd.’s 

(Nama’s) Letter, ‘‘Submission of Statement of No 

Shipments,’’ dated October 26, 2022; Crown 

International Corporation’s (CIC’s) Letter, 

‘‘Submission of Statement of No Shipments,’’ dated 

October 26, 2022; Triangle Tyre Co., Ltd.’s (Triangle 

Tyre’s) Letter, ‘‘No Shipment Certification,’’ dated 

November 4, 2022; Prinx Chengshan (Shandong) 

Tire Company Ltd.’s (PCT’s) Letter, ‘‘Notice of No 

Sales,’’ dated November 8, 2022; Shandong 

Yongsheng Rubber Group Co., Ltd’s (Shandong 

Yongsheng’s) Letter, ‘‘Notice of No Sales,’’ dated 

November 8, 2022; Shandong Changfeng Tyres Co., 

Ltd.’s (Changfeng’s) Letter, ‘‘No Sales Certification,’’ 

dated November 10, 2022; Shandong Duratti Rubber 

Corporation Co. Ltd.’s (Shandong Duratti’s) Letter, 

‘‘No Sales Certification,’’ dated November 10, 2022; 

and Shandong Transtone Tyre Co., Ltd.’s 

(Transtone’s) Letter, ‘‘No Sales Certification,’’ dated 

November 10, 2022. 

7See Memorandum, ‘‘No Shipment Inquiry for 

Triangle Tyre Co., Ltd during the period 08/01/2021 

through 07/31/2022,’’ dated July 31, 2023, and 

Memorandum, ‘‘No Shipment Inquiry for Prinx 

Chengshan (Shandong) Tire Co., Ltd. during the 

period 08/01/2021 through 07/31/2022,’’ dated July 

18, 2023. 

8See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Prinx Chengshan 

(Shandong) Tire Company Ltd. No Shipment 

Certification Supplemental Questionnaire,’’ dated 

November 23, 2022; see Commerce’s Letter, 

‘‘Triangle Tyre Co. Ltd.’s No Shipment Certification 

Supplemental Questionnaire,’’ dated August 3, 

2023. 

9See PCT’s Letter, ‘‘Submission of No Shipment 

Certification Supplemental Questionnaire,’’ dated 

December 22, 2022; and Triangle Tyre’s Letter, 

‘‘Response to Supplemental Questionnaire 

Regarding Triangle Tyre’s No Shipment 

Certification for the Administrative Review,’’ dated 

August 14, 2023. 

10See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694, 65694–95 (October 24, 2011); see also the 

‘‘Assessment Rates’’ section, below. 

11See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 

‘‘Separate Rates.’’ 

12The Giti companies are: Giti Tire Global 

Trading Pte. Ltd.; Giti Radial Tire (Anhui) Company 

Ltd.; Giti Tire (Fujian) Company Ltd.; Giti Tire 

(Hualin) Company, Ltd.; Giti Tire Greatwall 

Company. Ltd.; Giti Tire (Anhui) Company; Giti 

Tire (Yinchuan) Company Ltd.; and Giti Tire 

(Chongqing) Company Ltd. (collectively, Giti). 

13The Sumitomo companies are: Sumitomo 

Rubber Industries Ltd.; Sumitomo Rubber (Hunan) 

Co., Ltd.; and Sumitomo Rubber (Changshu) Co., 

Ltd. (collectively, Sumitomo). 

Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if a party who requested the review 

withdraws the request within 90 days of 

the date of publication of notice of 

initiation of the requested review in the 

Federal Register. In November and 

December 2022, all parties withdrew 

their requests for review by the 90-day 

withdrawal deadline for the following 

companies: 5 (1) Qingdao Fullrun Tyre 

Corp. Ltd. (Fullrun); (2) Qingdao 

Lakesea Tyre Co., Ltd. (Lakesea); (3) 

Roadclaw Tyre (Hong Kong) Limited 

(Roadclaw); (4) Shouguang Firemax 

Tyre Co., Ltd. (Firemax); (5) Winrun 

Tyre Co., Ltd. (Winrun); and (6) 

Zhaoqing Junhong Co., Ltd. (Junhong). 

Because all parties withdrew their 

requests for a review of these exporters, 

consistent with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce is rescinding this review, in 

part, with respect to these companies. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 

(the Act) and 19 CFR 351.213. We 

calculated constructed export prices in 

accordance with section 772(b) of the 

Act. Because China is a non-market 

economy (NME) country, within the 

meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, 

we calculated NV in accordance with 

section 773(c) of the Act. For a full 

description of the methodology 

underlying our conclusions, see the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Preliminary Determination of No 

Shipments 

In October and November 2022, eight 

companies timely filed certifications 

that they had no exports, shipments, 

sales, or entries of subject merchandise 

to the United States during the POR.6

Based on their certifications and our 

analysis of U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) information, we 

preliminarily determine that the 

following companies had no shipments 

of subject merchandise during the POR: 

Changfeng, CIC, Nama, Shandong 

Duratti, Shandong Yongsheng, and 

Transtone. 

In addition, CBP information on the 

record indicated that PCT and Triangle 

Tyre had entries during the POR.7

Therefore, on November 23, 2022, and 

August 3, 2023, respectively, we issued 

supplemental questionnaires regarding 

PCT’s and Triangle Tyre’s POR entries.8

On December 22, 2022, and August 14, 

2023, respectively PCT and Triangle 

Tyre submitted timely responses.9

Based on this information, Commerce 

preliminarily determines that PCT and 

Triangle Tyre had no entries during the 

POR. 

Consistent with Commerce’s practice 

in NME cases, we are not preliminarily 

rescinding this administrative review 

with respect to the companies for which 

we preliminarily found had no 

shipments. Instead, we intend to 

complete the review and issue 

appropriate instructions to CBP based 

on the final results of this review.10

Separate Rates 

As discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum, Commerce 

preliminarily finds that Zhongce Rubber 

Group Co., Ltd. (Zhongce) has not 

established its eligibility for a separate 

rate. Moreover, Commerce preliminarily 

finds that 14 other companies under 

review did not establish their eligibility 

for a separate rate because they failed to 

provide either a separate rate 

application, a separate rate certification, 

or a no-shipment certification (if they 

were already eligible for a separate rate). 

As such, we preliminarily determine 

that Zhongce and these 14 other 

companies are part of the China-wide 

entity. See Appendix III for a complete 

list of these 15 companies. 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that the following companies have 

demonstrated their eligibility for a 

separate rate in this review: 11 (1) Anhui 

Jichi Tire Co., Ltd.; (2) Giti; 12 (3) 

Hankook Tire China Co., Ltd.; (4) 

Jiangsu Hankook Tire Co., Ltd.; (5) 

Qingdao Keter International Co., 

Limited; (6) Koryo International 

Industrial Limited; (7) Mayrun Tyre 

(Hong Kong) Limited; (8) Qingdao 

Sentury Tire Co., Ltd and Sentury (Hong 

Kong) Trading Co., Limited; (9) Qingdao 

Sunfulcess Tyre Co., Ltd.; (10) 

Shandong Haohua Tire Co., Ltd.; (11) 

Shandong Linglong Tyre Co., Ltd.; (12) 

Shandong New Continent Tire Co., Ltd.; 

(13) Shandong Province Sanli Tire 

Manufactured Co., Ltd.; and (14) 

Sumitomo.13

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not identify the dumping 

margin to apply to respondents not 

selected for individual examination 

when Commerce limits its examination 

in an administrative review, pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in an 

investigation, for guidance when 

determining the dumping margin for 

respondents that are not individually 

examined in an administrative review. 

Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act states 

that the all-others rate should be 

calculated by averaging the weightedaverage dumping margins for 

individually-examined respondents, 

excluding dumping margins that are 

zero, de minimis, or based entirely on 

facts available. For these preliminary 

results, we preliminarily calculated a 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

the separate rate respondents using the 

calculated rates of the mandatory 

respondents, Giti and Sumitomo, which 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
61508 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2023 / Notices 

14See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

15See Order, 80 FR at 47906. 

16See Appendix II for the list of these companies. 

17See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). 

18Commerce is exercising its discretion, under 19 

CFR 351.309(d)(1), to alter the time limit for filing 

of rebuttal briefs. 

19See 19 CFR 351.303 (for general filing 

requirements). 

20See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD 

Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension 

of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020). 

21See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

22See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

23See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. 

24See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

25 Id. 

26See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the 

People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 

Preliminary Determination of No Shipments: 2014– 

2015, 81 FR 29528 (May 12, 2016), and 

accompanying PDM at 10–11, unchanged in Drawn 

Stainless Steel Sinks from the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; Final Determination of No 

Shipments; 2014–2015, 81 FR 54042 (August 15, 

2016). 

27See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), for a full discussion 

of this practice. 

are not zero or de minimis, or 

determined entirely on the basis of facts 

available. See Appendix II for the list of 

these companies. 

China-Wide Entity 

Commerce’s policy regarding 

conditional review of the China-wide 

entity applies to this administrative 

review.14 Because no party requested a 

review of the China-wide entity, the 

China-wide entity is not under review. 

Therefore, the rate previously 

established for the China-wide entity 

(i.e., 76.46 percent) remains the Chinawide entity rate this review.15

Preliminary Results of Review 

We preliminarily determine that the 

following estimated weighted-average 

dumping margins exist for the period 

August 1, 2020, through July 31, 2021: 

Exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Giti Tire Global Trading Pte. Ltd.; Giti Radial Tire (Anhui) Company Ltd.; Giti Tire (Fujian) Company Ltd.; Giti Tire (Hualin) Company, Ltd.; Giti Tire Greatwall Company. Ltd.; Giti Tire (Anhui) Company; Giti Tire (Yinchuan) Company Ltd.; and Giti Tire 

(Chongqing) Company Ltd ............................................................................................................................................................... 104.21 

Sumitomo Rubber Industries Ltd.; Sumitomo Rubber (Hunan) Co., Ltd.; and Sumitomo Rubber (Changshu) Co., Ltd ................... 68.48 

Separate Rate Companies 16 .............................................................................................................................................................. 85.66 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations performed for these 

preliminary results to interested parties 

within five days after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.224(b). Interested parties may 

submit case briefs or other written 

comments within 30 days after the date 

of publication of these preliminary 

results of review.17 Rebuttal briefs, 

limited to issues raised in the case 

briefs, may be filed no later than seven 

days after the date for filing case 

briefs.18 Parties who submit case briefs 

or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are 

encouraged to submit with each 

argument: (1) a statement of the issue; 

(2) a brief summary of the argument; 

and (3) a table of authorities. Case and 

rebuttal briefs should be filed using 

ACCESS.19 Note that Commerce has 

temporarily modified certain of its 

requirements for serving documents 

containing business proprietary 

information, until further notice.20

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written request to 

the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement 

and Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice.21 Hearing 

requests should contain: (1) the party’s 

name, address, and telephone number; 

(2) the number of participants; and (3) 

a list of issues to be discussed. Issues 

raised in the hearing will be limited to 

those raised in the respective case and 

rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing 

is made, parties will be notified of the 

time and date for the hearing.22

Final Results 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis of all 

issues raised in any written briefs, not 

later than 120 days after the publication 

of these preliminary results in the 

Federal Register, unless otherwise 

extended.23

Assessment Rates 

Upon issuing the final results, 

Commerce shall determine, and CBP 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review.24

For Giti and Sumitomo, Commerce 

calculated importer-specific ad valorem 

duty assessment rates based on the ratio 

of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the importer’s examined 

sales to the total entered value of those 

sales. Where either a respondent’s 

weighted-average dumping margin is 

zero or de minimis within the meaning 

of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), or an importerspecific rate is zero or de minimis, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate the 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties.25

For respondents not individually 

examined in this administrative review 

that qualified for a separate rate, the 

assessment rate will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

calculated using the rates assigned to 

Giti and Sumitomo in the final results 

of this review.26

Pursuant to Commerce’s assessment 

practice,27 for entries that were not 

reported in the U.S. data submitted by 

Giti and Sumitomo, we will instruct to 

CBP to liquidate such entries at the 

China-wide rate. Additionally, where 

Commerce determines that an exporter 

under review had no shipments of 

subject merchandise to the United 

States during the POR, any suspended 

entries of subject merchandise that 

entered under that exporter’s CBP case 

number during the POR will be 

liquidated at the dumping margin 

assigned to the China-wide entity. 

We intend to liquidate entries 

containing subject merchandise 

exported by the companies under 

review that we determine in the final 

results to be part of the China-wide 

entity at the China-wide assessment rate 

of 76.46 percent. 

In accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the final results 

of this review shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 172 / Thursday, September 7, 2023 / Notices 61509 

28See Order, 80 FR at 47906. 

1See Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel 

Plate from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary 

Results and Preliminary Intent To Rescind, in Part, 

the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 

2021, 88 FR 13433 (March 3, 2023) (Preliminary 

Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated June 7, 2023. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2021: 

Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate 

from the Republic of Korea,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 

Decision Memorandum). 

4See Notice of Amended Final Determination: 

Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate 

from India and the Republic of Korea; and Notice 

of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Cut-toLength Carbon-Quality Steel Plate from France, 

India, Indonesia, Italy, and the Republic of Korea, 

65 FR 6587 (February 10, 2000) (Order). 

entries of merchandise covered by the 

final results of this review and for future 

deposits of estimated antidumping 

duties, where applicable. 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise from China 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided for by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for 

the companies listed above that have a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be that rate established in the final 

results of this review (except, if the rate 

is zero or de minimis, then a cash 

deposit rate of zero will be established 

for that company); (2) for previously 

investigated or reviewed exporters not 

listed in the final results of review that 

have separate rates, the cash deposit rate 

will continue to be the exporter’s 

weighted-average dumping margin 

published of the most recentlycompleted segment of this proceeding; 

(3) for all Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be the rate for Chinawide entity (i.e., 76.46 percent); 28 and 

(4) for all exporters of subject 

merchandise which are not located in 

China and are not eligible for a separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate applicable to Chinese exporter(s) 

that supplied that non-Chinese exporter. 

These deposit requirements, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this POR. Failure 

to comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties and/or an increase 

in the amount of antidumping duties by 

the amount of the countervailing duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.213 and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: August 30, 2023. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of the Methodology 

V. Currency Conversion 

VI. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

Separate Rate Companies 

1. Anhui Jichi Tire Co., Ltd. 

2. Hankook Tire China Co., Ltd. 

3. Jiangsu Hankook Tire Co., Ltd. 

4. Koryo International Industrial Limited 

5. Mayrun Tyre (Hong Kong) Limited 

6. Qingdao Keter International Co., Limited 

7. Qingdao Sentury Tire Co., Ltd.; Sentury 

(Hong Kong) Trading Co., Limited 

8. Qingdao Sunfulcess Tyre Co., Ltd. 

9. Shandong Haohua Tire Co., Ltd. 

10. Shandong Linglong Tyre Co., Ltd. 

11. Shandong New Continent Tire Co., Ltd. 

12. Shandong Province Sanli Tire 

Manufactured Co., Ltd. 

Appendix III 

Companies Preliminary Found To Be Part of 

the China-Wide Entity 

1. Aeolus Tyre Corp., Ltd. 

2. Double Coin Tire Ltd. 

3. Hongtyre Group Co. 

4. Nankang (Zhangjiagang Free Trade Zone) 

Rubber Industrial Co., Ltd. 

5. Qingdao Crowntyre Industries Co., Ltd. 

6. Shandong Habilead Rubber Co., Ltd. 

7. Shangdong Hengfeng Rubber & Plastic Co., 

Ltd. 

8. Shangdong Hengyu Science & Technology 

Co., Ltd. 

9. Shangdong Longyue Rubber Co., Ltd. (aka 

ZODO Tire Co., Ltd.) 

10. Shangdong Yongfeng Tyres Co., Ltd. 

11. Shanghai Tire & Rubber (Group) Ltd. 

12. Tianjin Wanda Tyre Group Company, 

Ltd. 

13. Tyrechamp Group Co., Limited 

14. Wendeng Sanfeng Tyre Co., Ltd. 

15. Zhongce Rubber Group Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2023–19208 Filed 9–6–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–580–837] 

Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality 

Steel Plate From the Republic of 

Korea: Final Results and Rescission, 

in Part, of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review; 2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to certain producers and 

exporters of certain cut-to-length 

carbon-quality steel plate from the 

Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of 

review (POR) is January 1, 2021, 

through December 31, 2021. 

DATES: Applicable September 7, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Lindgren, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1671. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce published the Preliminary 

Results of this review on March 3, 

2023.1 On June 7, 2023, Commerce 

extended the final results of review to 

August 30, 2023.2 For a complete 

description of the events that occurred 

since the Preliminary Results, see the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum.3

Scope of the Order 4

The product covered by this Order is 

certain cut-to-length carbon-quality steel 

plate. For a complete description of the 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1