alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.81 MB)
 
 Train camp buehring Warfighter Journalism defend Squad Middle East 204th PAD Protect 204th Public Affairs Detachment Story 1st Armored Division U.S. Army Central Command third army arcent Patton’s Own Public affairs specialist broadcast specialist SOvM Squad Overmatch PEO STRI Simulition VBS3 3rd abct u.s. army central Public Affairs Operation U.S. Army Soldier Army training News Centcom exercise USARCENT Kuwait deployment army reserve
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
No. 92, Misc.

#### Gomez *v.*United States.

Petitioner *pro se.*

*Solicitor General Cox*for the United States.

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to
the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-105180, No.
33-51990, No. 333-44333, No. 33-62087, No. 33-57060, No. 33-20880, and No.
33-34619 on Form S-8 of our reports dated September 13, 2011 relating to (1)
the consolidated financial statements of Zygo Corporation and subsidiaries (the
Company) (which report expresses (1) an unqualified opinion on the
consolidated financial statements and (2) an unqualified opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting) and
(3) the consolidated financial statement schedule of the Company appearing in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2011.

|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte
 & Touche LLP               
|                                         
|Hartford, Connecticut
 September 13, 2011

---
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
South Jersey Gas Company (the "Company") for the period ended September 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Edward J. Graham, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
             or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.




/s/ Edward J. Graham
--------------------------------------
Name:  Edward J. Graham
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
November 15, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    JUL-01-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                             3,516,208
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                      1,668,446
<ALLOWANCES>                          26,000
<INVENTORY>                        1,903,532
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   7,157,847
<PP&E>                             4,745,928
<DEPRECIATION>                     4,099,760
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     8,324,435
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                990,723
<BONDS>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                          375,000
<COMMON>                             410,219
<OTHER-SE>                         6,548,493
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       8,324,435
<SALES>                            3,610,077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   3,610,077
<CGS>                              1,983,429
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      1,983,429
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   3,157,790
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   (97,857)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   (1,433,285)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               (1,433,285)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                      (1,433,285)
<EPS-BASIC>                          (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (0.19)



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-2078

ELIZABETH DESTA, Petitioner, versus U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A74-638-996) Submitted: May 18, 1999 Decided: May 27, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rev. Uduak J. Ubom, UBOM, WHITE & ROBERTS, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. David W. Ogden, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Michelle Gluck, Senior Litigation Counsel, MaryJane Candaux, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Elizabeth Desta seeks a review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying relief on her application for asylum and withholding of deportation. The Board’s determination that Desta is not eligible for asylum must be upheld if thedetermination is “supported by reasonable, substantial, and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole.” 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a)(4) (1994). The decision may be reversed only if the evidence presented by Desta was such that a reasonable fact finder would have to conclude that the requisite persecution or fear of persecution existed. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). The Board concluded Desta failed to meet her burden of proving she was persecuted on account of protected grounds. Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Because Desta failed to show entitlement to asylum, she cannot meet the higher standard for withholding deportation. See INS v. CardozaFonseca , 480 U.S. 421, 430-32 (1987).Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
From: Serenity Smile

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Opinion

Date: Thursday, August 11, 2011 8:14:32 AM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept

the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care

under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women

better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services,

are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
From: PsyPsa@aol.com

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Exceptions for Contraception

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 5:59:52 PM

Dear HSS,

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of women

just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Thank you,

Tamar Schwartz

Psypsa@aol.com
ex10_2.htm


Exhibit 10.2








	
Notice of Grant of Award


and Award Agreement

	
Shoe Carnival, Inc.


ID: 35-1736614


7500 E. Columbia Street


Evansville, IN 47715













	
[Name]


[Address]


 

	
Award Number:


Plan:  2000 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2000 Plan”)


ID:


	  	  









Effective [Grant Date] (the “Grant Date”), you have been granted a restricted stock award of [Number of Shares] shares (the “Shares”) of Shoe Carnival, Inc. (the “Company”) common stock. The value of the award on the date of grant is $[            ].


 


The Shares are subject to the performance-based and time-based restrictions and conditions set forth herein during the period from the Grant Date until such Shares become vested and nonforfeitable (the “Restricted Period”).  While the Shares will be registered in your name and you will have the right to vote the Shares, they will be held by the Company until the Restricted Period has expired. Any dividends declared during the Restricted Period will be deferred and paid upon vesting. The Shares may not be sold, assigned, transferred, pledged, or otherwise encumbered until the Restricted Period has expired.


 


Except as otherwise set forth herein or in the 2000 Plan, if the performance target with respect to such Shares, as set forth below, is met in [any of][insert description of performance period(s)] (the “Performance Period[s]”), then such Shares shall become vested and nonforfeitable, meaning that the Restricted Period shall expire with respect to such Shares, on [                         ] (the “Vesting Date”). If the performance target with respect to such Shares is not met in [any of] the Performance Period[s], such Shares and any deferred dividends on such Shares will be forfeited and returned to the Company on the Vesting Date.


 






	
Shares


[             ]

	
Performance Target


[                      ]







 




If you cease to maintain Continuous Service (as defined in the 2000 Plan) prior to the Vesting Date by reason of retirement, all Shares (whether or not the performance target has been met), and any deferred dividends on all Shares, will automatically be forfeited and returned to the Company. In the event of a Change in Control (as defined in the 2000 Plan), all Shares (whether or not the performance target has been met) shall become fully vested along with any deferred dividends, and the Restricted Period on all Shares shall expire.


 









	
By your signature and the Company’s signature below, you and the Company agree that this award is granted under and governed by the terms and conditions of the 2000 Plan and the Award Agreement, all of which are attached and made a part of this document.


 













	
 








Shoe Carnival, Inc.


 


 








[Name of Award Recipient]


 

	
 








Date


 


 








Date
From: Carol Emmett

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Access to Contraception and Preventive Care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:39:47 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT BILLY DAVIS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-4828 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed July 3, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Charles Sniffen, Judge. Billy Davis, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Lee v. State, 679 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. 1996); Reed v. State, 761 So. 2d 1241 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Paris v. State, 156 So. 3d 578 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015); Rutherford v. State, 93 So. 3d 1132 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

KHOUZAM, C.J., and SLEET and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
From: Haley Dayel

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 10:37:23 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Haley Dayel

1890 Arch St

Apt 306

Berkeley, CA 94709
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.64 MB)
 
 USCENTCOM CENTCOM USS Dwight D. Eisenhower CVN 69 USCENTCOMPA
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Patricia Carlton

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:48:52 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Patricia Carlton

500 Rodeo Rd

#1121

Santa Fe, NM 87505
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS236 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
#### In the Matter of the Probate of an Instrument Propounded as the Last Will of Henry Pulver, Deceased.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
       
<S>                                         <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           24,891
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1,287
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 10,326
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                      0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      75,896
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                            8,596
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                              8,662
<LOANS>                                         215,220
<ALLOWANCE>                                       2,397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  353,579
<DEPOSITS>                                      307,819
<SHORT-TERM>                                          0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               2,784
<LONG-TERM>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         31,325
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                       11,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  353,579
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  20,461
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 5,305
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     79
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 25,845
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                7,029
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                7,029
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            18,816
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       135
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (73)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  10,394
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   8,214
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        8,214
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      5,034
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         2
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         2
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        9
<LOANS-NON>                                         993
<LOANS-PAST>                                        141
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                      0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                       0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  2,438
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       321
<RECOVERIES>                                        145
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 2,397
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              2,397
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                               0
        


</TABLE>