alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.32 MB)
 
 1st TSC Kuwait Camp Buehring 103rd ESC 1107th TASMG
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
#### In the Matter of John Horr, an Attorney.

Ordered, that he be removed from the office of attorney and counselor and that his name be stricken from the roll. It is further ordered that the clerk cause a certified. copy of this order to be served upon him.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATIONS**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officerof Providian Financial Corporation (the “Company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 
| 1.     |   | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly  period ended June 30, 2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of  1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| 2.     |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company.                                                                                                                   |

 

Dated: August 9, 2004

 

 
|   | /s/ Joseph W. Saunders                                    |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Joseph W. Saunders  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                                      |   |
|   |                                                      |   |
|   | /s/ Anthony F. Vuoto                                      |   |
|   | Anthony F. Vuoto  Chief Financial Officer                 |   |

 

----
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1222

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 89 River Street in Hoboken, New Jersey,

as the ‘‘Frank Sinatra Post Office Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 1222 ES

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF FRANK SINATRA POST

2 OFFICE BUILDING.

3 The facility of the United States Postal Service lo4 cated at 89 River Street in Hoboken, New Jersey, shall

5 be known and designated as the ‘‘Frank Sinatra Post Of6 fice Building’’.

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

10 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference

11 to the Frank Sinatra Post Office Building.

Passed the Senate March 22, 2002.

Attest:

Secretary.
107TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 1222

AN ACT

To redesignate the facility of the United States

Postal Service located at 89 River Street in Hoboken, New Jersey, as the ‘‘Frank Sinatra PostOffice Building’’.
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of South Jersey Gas Company (the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David A. Kindlick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ David A. KindlickName: David A. KindlickTitle: Chief Financial OfficerAugust 7, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Initial Review Group; Career Development For Early Career Investigators Study Section.                    

*Date:*                         October 5-6, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Carmen Moten, Ph.D., MPH, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, RM: 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301 496-8589,                         *cmoten@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: August 16, 2023.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-17963 Filed 8-18-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 99.1

 

 

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

To the Shareholders and Trustees of NSTAR:

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of NSTAR and its subsidiaries as of March 31, 2005, and the related condensed consolidated statements of income, of retained earnings and of cash flows for thethree-month periods ended March 31, 2005 and March 31, 2004.  This interim financial information is the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and makinginquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters.  It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the objective of which is the expression of anopinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.  Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally acceptedin the United States of America.

We previously audited in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, ofretained earnings and of cash flows for the year then ended, management's assessment of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2004; and in our report dated February 18, 2005, we expressed unqualified opinions thereon.  The consolidated financial statements and management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting referredto above are not presented herein.  In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2005, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it hasbeen derived.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPBoston, MassachusettsMay 3, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 7, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on August 30, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 44 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2023-252, CP2023-255.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-19214 Filed 9-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 22

- 405

_____________________________
T HOMAS R ICHARDSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County

. Robert R. Wheeler , Judge

. September 28, 2022

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , M AKAR , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Thomas Richardson, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Holly N. Simcox, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.9

                                 VIACELL, INC.

September 12, 2002

Jan van Heek
Executive Vice President
Genzyme Corporation
One Kendall Square
Cambridge, MA 02139-1562

Dear Jan:

Thank you for your commitment to being a member of ViaCell, Inc.'s Board of
Directors. I look forward to our working relationship and appreciate your
involvement in our company's mission to deliver the highest quality cellular
medicines for the treatment of human disease. This letter is to confirm our
agreement effective August 12, 2002 that ViaCell will compensate you as outlined
below:

         Fee of $3,500, for attending each Board of Directors meeting, paid
         within 30 days of the meeting. Additionally, you will be granted 5,000
         stock options, which will become exercisable one year from the grant
         date.

         You will attend six Board of Director meetings (schedule attached)
         including a dinner the night before plus a half-day meeting.

         Occasional calls, emails and correspondence me will be appreciated.

Alternatively, subject to approval by ViaCell's compensation committee, you may
take your cash compensation outlined above in shares of ViaCell common stock.
Should you choose stock in lieu of cash compensation, the calculation of the
amount of stock for which you are eligible will be based upon a value for
ViaCell common stock of $8.00 per share. For example, if you are owed $7,000,
you would be eligible to receive 875 shares of ViaCell common stock in lieu of
the $7,000 cash payment ($7,000 divided by $8.00).

ViaCell will reimburse you for miscellaneous travel expenses incurred on behalf
of the Company. Mary Landers will arrange your flights and the flight cost will
be billed directly to ViaCell. Other business expenses should be submitted to
Mary Landers. The Company will reimburse you in a timely fashion. I am confident
you will use good prudent business judgment as it relates to business travel
expenses.

It is further understood that while you are serving as a member of ViaCell's
Board of Directors, you will not serve as a consultant, employee, or in any
similar capacity with any entity or individual in competition with ViaCell, Inc.
and its Viacord Cord Blood Banking Service.

Sincerely,

/s/ Marc Beer
                                            Agreed to by:
Marc D. Beer
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer         /s/ Jan van Heek  9/20/02
                                          -------------------------------
                                          Jan van Heek          Date

Please initial to indicate whether you choose the cash or stock compensation as
described above:

_____       Cash compensation               x      Stock compensation
                                          ----

        131 Clarendon Street - Boston, MA 02116 - Phone (617) 266-4373
                              - Fax (617) 266-9391
From: jmbarstow@comcast.net

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: "Religious refusal" exemptions

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:03:16 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to

accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of

preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for

“religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical element of the new law

and would provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access

to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive

services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some

groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so

hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement,

even though they employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger

exemption would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.

Jan Barstow

Decatur

Georgia
From: Laura Fulton

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Thursday, August 04, 2011 5:51:46 AM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Laura Fulton
San Antonio, Texas
From: Sharon Arpoika

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Support Access to Preventive Care and Contraception!

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:22:54 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk October 14, 2009 

# Order

October 14, 2009

138261(63)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 138261 v COA: 277925 Jackson CC: 06-004536-FH DOUGLAS BRENT LAZARUS, Defendant-Appellant.

___________________ _________________

On order of Chief Justice, the motion by defendant-appellant for extension to October 1, 2009 of the time for filing his br ief and appendix is considered and it is

GRANTED.