alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Dan Jay v. The State.

No. 1980.

Decided January 31, 1900.

1. Peace Officer—Marshal of Incorporated Town.

Article 43, Code of Criminal Procedure, expressly declares that the marshal of an incorporated town or city is a peace officer, and his authority is not affected "by the question of the jurisdiction of the city court.

2. Information for Aggravated Assault—Simple Assault.

Under an information charging an aggravated assault upon a peace officer in the discharge of his duty, a conviction may legally be had for a simple assault.

3. Simple Assault—Evidence Sufficient.

Evidence is sufficient to sustain a conviction for ' siipple assault which shows that when a city marshal attempted to arrest defendant’s brother, defendant either struck the officer with his hand or pushed him back and commanded him not to interfere with his brother.

Appeal from the County Court of Bosque. Tried below before Hon. W. B. Thompson, County Judge.

Appeal from a conviction of simple assault; penalty, a fine of $5.

The information charged appellant with an assault upon Henry *452Smith, marshal of the town of Morgan, who was then and there in discharge of the duties of his office.

No statement necessary.

*Word, Diliará & Word,*for appellant..

*RoVt A. John,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of a sim•ple assault on an officer alleged to he in the discharge of his official duties. The evidence discloses the officer was the marshal of an incorporated town. It is contended by appellant that such officer is not a peace officer. There is no merit in this contention. Article 43, Code of Criminal Procedure, expressly declares the marshal of an incor-. porated town or city a peace officer. It would seem that appellant contends, because this court has held that a mayor’s or city court has no jurisdiction of a violation of the Penal Code of our State, that therefore the marshal of such city or town is not a peace officer. This does not follow.. The Legislature can confer authority upon such policemen or marshals to make arrests, whether the city court has or has not jurisdiction of such offenses.

It is further contended that because the information charges the cause of aggravation, to wit, that it was made upon a peace officer in the discharge of his duty, therefore he can not he convicted of a simple assault. There is more plausibility than merit in this proposition.' The question has been decided by this court in Foster v. State, 25 Texas Criminal Appeals, 543, adversely to appellant’s contention. The particular ground of aggravation in the Foster case was that the assault was upon a child. We see no difference in the reasoning of the two cases, and we think the analogy is complete.

The evidence is sufficient. When the officer arrested or attempted to arrest appellant’s brother, he (appellant) either struck the officer with his hand, or pushed him back, and commanded him not to interfere with his brother. The judgment is affirmed.

*Irmed.*
§ 79.3 Application. ( a ) Any person may apply for the award of the medal described in § 79.1, but only on behalf of another person, by writing to the Secretary of Transportation, Attention: Medals of Honor, within two (2) years of the action that is the subject of the application.
( b ) Although no application form is required, the following information must be provided: ( 1 ) Name, address, and telephone number of the person submitting the application.
( 2 ) Name, address, and telephone number of the person on whose behalf the application is submitted.
( 3 ) Date, time, place, and weather conditions of the action that is the subject of the application.
( 4 ) Identification of rail or motor carrier involved, or of operator of motor vehicles involved.
( 5 ) Identification of any public or private authority that investigated the accident/incident involved.
( 6 ) Name, address, and telephone number of any witness to the action that is the subject of the application.
( 7 ) Detailed description of the action that is the subject of the application, including why the person submitting the application thinks that the action merits the extraordinary recognition embodied in the Medal of Honor.
( c ) An application and any documentary or other evidence supporting it must be supported by oath or affirmation, or by the signer's acknowledgment that a knowingly false statement is punishable as perjury.
### Gormas, Michael (OST) From: Sent: To: Ann Kurasaki <akurasaki@ci.show-low.az.us> Wednesday, February 18, 2015 6:49 PM Gormas, Michael (OST) 

### Cc: 

### Subject: emuder@ci.show-low.az.us; Morgan Brown; bkopp@ci.show-low.az.us; Glen Boyd Show Low, AZ's response to EAS proposals 

### Importance: High



### 180 North 9th Street February 

### 18, 2015 U.S. Department ofTransportation Office ofAviation Analysis Essential Air Service and Small Community

Air Service Development Program 

## City of Show Low Show Low, AZ 85901

Subject: Essential Air Service Air Carrier Proposals for Show Low, Arizona Dear Sirs: 

### (928) 532-4000

Thank you for allowingthe City ofShow Low the opportunityto provide comments on your selection ofan air carrierto provide essential airservice to Show Low Regional Airport. The EAS program plays an important role in developing and promotingour rural community and the region around us, providing a key link between Show Low and much more populous markets for both local residents and visitors. On behalfofthe Council and the City, we profferour recommendation of Boutique Air as the preferred carrier. Nevertheless, despite our position, we atthe City keenly understand the value ofthe EAS program and will defer towhateverdecision the DOT thinks is best for Show Low. We knowthere are manyotherfactors and criteria involved in making afinal selection. The City Council invited the two applicant carriers, Boutique Air and Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd., to make presentations and participate in oral interviews on February 

### 17, 2015, a meetingthatwas open to the public. Later, atthe same meeting, all seven Council members discussed each carrier's proposal in orderto develop a recommendation to the Department ofTransportation. Itwas an extremely difficult process because ofthe excellent proposals presented by both carriers. We believe that each applicant has something positive to offerShow Low and theWhite Mountains. Great Lakes Aviation has been the carrier operating underan essential airservice contract in Show Low for many years. We have enjoyed their presence here, although their pilot shortage issues have resulted in some concerns from the passengers about reliability. The Boutique Air representatives impressed the Council with their proactive approach to serve our community and their eagerness to provide excellent service. 1Should you have any questions about our recommendation orourcomments, please contact ourcity manager, Ed Muder, at (928) 532-4015 orvia e-mail at emuder@showlowaz.gov. Sincerely,

Daryl Seymore Mayor

2
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 83 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         March 8, 2001.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 3) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce individual income 
tax rates. The bill shall be considered as read for amendment. The amendment 
recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill shall be 
considered as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as 
amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Ways and Means; (2) the further amendment printed in 
the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if offered by 
Representative Rangel of New York or his designee, which shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order, shall be considered as read, and 
shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2011

- 1095 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2010

-NM

- 241

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into a nd then out of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:** 
Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet


### Modification and Inspection 6 .0 $ 510.00 $346 $ 856.00 

### 69 $59,064.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0 .00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $59,064 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assume d or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### : Indicates related information in AD Manual, FAA

-IR

-M

- 8040.1C . DOUBLE CLICK to follow the link 

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a “ significant regulatory action”? YES * NO
* Explanation:

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? YES * NO
* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO 

### * Explanation 

### :
An official website of the United States government                

----

end of header

# Foreign Trade

Skip top of page navigation

###### You are here: Census.gov › Business & Industry ›Foreign Trade › U.S. International Trade Data

                - Main
                - About
                - Data
                - Outreach
                - AES
                - Regulations
                - Reference
                - Definitions
                - Schedule B
                - FAQs

### More DATA

                          - Trade Highlights
                          - Balance by Partner Country
                          - Country/Product Trade
                          - State/Metropolitan Data
                          - Historical Series
                          - Notices and Corrections
                          - Related Party Trade
                          - Press Releases
                          - Data Products

### Important Links

                          - Global Reach Blog
                          - Newsletters
                          - ACE AESDirect
                          Related Sites- Business and Industry
- Briefing Room
- North American Industry                Classification System (NAICS)
Economic Indicator Database
                          Commodity Concordance - Monthly SubscriptionDownload a file- Click on the appropriate month below to download your file.
-  If you are having technical difficulties or need help, feel free to email us at eid.international.trade.data@census.gov or call 301-763-2311 for immediate assistance.
- Record	      layouts of the files are  available	      online .
Select Statistical Month:-      January 2024  
-      February 2024  
-      March 2024  
-      April 2024  
-      May 2024  
-      June 2024  
-      July 2024  
-      August 2024  
-      September 2024  
-      October 2024  
-      November 2024  
-      December 2024  

                          Export Training
Collection of videos to enhance export training.

Spanish Language Webinars 2020-2021 (Seminarios en Línea en Español 2020-2021)
2017 And Prior Year Webinars Archive.
Upcoming Outreach Activities
Upcoming Outreach Activities
Contact Us
				Contact the International Trade Macro Analysis Branch: Email us! or use our feedback form!

                  Call us: (301)763-2311 or 1-800-549-0595 option 4			  
CONNECT WITH US**********- Information Quality
- Data Linkage Infrastructure
- Data Protection and Privacy Policy
- Accessibility
- FOIA
- Inspector General
- No FEAR Act
- U.S. Department of Commerce
- USA.gov

Measuring America's People, Places, and Economy
✕Is this page helpful?YesNo✕NO THANKS255 characters maximum255 characters maximum reached✕Thank you for your feedback.Comments or suggestions?  Source: U.S. Census Bureau | Foreign Trade |  ftdwebmastet@census.gov |     Last Revised:  July 03, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1179 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1179

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to ensure an 
 adequate level of commodity purchases under the school lunch program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 16, 2001

Mr. Johnson (for himself and Mr. Craig) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 
                        Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to ensure an 
 adequate level of commodity purchases under the school lunch program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Emergency Commodity Distribution Act 
of 2001''.

SEC. 2. COMMODITY PURCHASES UNDER SCHOOL LUNCH PROGRAM.

    Section 6(e) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1755(e)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)--
                    (A) by striking ``in the form of'' and all that 
                follows through ``(A) commodity assistance'' and 
                inserting ``in the form of commodity assistance'';
                    (B) by striking ``; or'' and inserting a period; 
                and
                    (C) by striking subparagraph (B); and
            (2) in paragraph (2)--
                    (A) by striking ``the Secretary shall, to the 
                extent necessary,'' and inserting ``the Secretary--
            ``(A) shall, to the extent necessary,'';
                    (B) by striking the period at the end and inserting 
                ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(B) shall not use commodities provided under the 
        authority of any other Act to meet the requirement for the 
        school year.''.
                                 <all>
```
From: Kate Kissingford

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 12:14:41 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Kate Kissingford

2422 w Argyle Pl

Denver, CO 80211
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          41,795
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,423
<ALLOWANCES>                                       728
<INVENTORY>                                     38,666
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               252,255
<PP&E>                                         193,994
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,227
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 738,157
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          218,306
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           114
<OTHER-SE>                                    (11,883)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   738,157
<SALES>                                        173,393
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               173,393
<CGS>                                          164,642
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  164,642
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,292
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,029
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,293
<INCOME-TAX>                                       972
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                154
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       154
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.21 MB)
 
 French Operation Inherent Resolve Iraq Norway Iraqi artillery
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.34 MB)
 
 Barksdale Air Force Base AFCENT 2nd Bomb Wing CENTCOM Stratofortress
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil