alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: John & Ann Shulse

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Recommendations of the IOM

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:53:04 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine

as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care

law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would

provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an

ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health

providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt

from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.
From: Diane Pizza

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: I am apposed to the August 1st, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) new mandates.

Date: Sunday, August 07, 2011 10:42:02 PM

 I would like to express my opposition to the definition of "religious employer"

within the context of a lack of true conscience protection! It is critical that all voices

of conscience be heard and protected in such important and widespread policy

decisions. It is essential that such conscience protection be granted for not only

religious employers, but for all employers, insurers, and policy issuers with moral,

ethical, or religious objections as well.

Thank you. May God bless our country.

Diane and Normand Pizza

3290 City Drive

Slidell, LA 70458
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (6.22 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
# Company sanitized

Does not contain Confidential Business

Information (CBI)

Appendix D



# Draft Facility Report on Product Content

## 2010/15 PFOA Stewardship Program



# Draft Facility Report on Product Content

I. CHEMICAL IDENTIFICATION

Identify the p roduct (e.g fluoropolymer dispersion) for which you are submitting information:

Product name:

___ Fluorinated Surfactant (oligomeric)

_______

Product description (including concentrations of perfluoroalkyl chemicals

identified in Section IV below and year of production):

CBI

II. COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

Identify the company and location of the facility submitting information:

Company name:

_ AGC SEIMI CHEMICAL CO.,LTD

Site location:

: 3

- 2

- 10,Chigasaki, Chigasaki City, Kanagawa, 253

- 8585 Ja pan

2276

- 2, Nada, Hirai, Kashima City, Ibaraki,314

- 0012 Japan

Identify a company technical contact who can respond to inquiries about the information

submitted:

Technical contact:

_ Shunji Odaka

Phone:

Address: _ +81

- 467

- 82

- 4398

____ 3

- 2

- 10, Chigasaki, Chigasaki City, Kanagawa, 253

- 8585 Japan

III. PRODUCTION

Calendar year for which you are reporting: Jan 1, 20 10 to Dec 31, 20 10

( Normalized data based on year end run rate )

Provide the amount of the product for the reporting year at each specific site:

Imported

___ 0 ____kgs/yr

Manufactured

_ CBI

_ kgs/yr (As active ingredients)IV. PRODUCT CONTENT

A. CONCENTRATIONS OF RELEVANT PERFLUOROALKYL CHEMICALS

Please pr ovide the concentrations (ppb) of various perfluoroalkyl chemicals in your product. For

chemicals for which you do not have actual data, please provide range estimates.

CBI

B. ANALYTICAL METHODS

Analyses should be conducted using the most accurate instrumentation and procedures available

as of the time of testing. Please provide detailed information on the methods used (including

analytical standards used, sampling, sample treatment, analysis), assumptions made, uncertainties

and detection limits ( LOD, LOQ) for the data provided.

Active ingredients of the products and solvent/water compose commercial products.
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











Certification of Chief Financial Officer





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Industrial Minerals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gregory Bowes, Chief Financial Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








May 16, 2011          /s/ Gregory Bowes


Gregory Bowes


Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 25.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

  We, the undersigned directors and officers of PACCAR Financial Corp., a
  Washington corporation, hereby severally constitute and appoint A. J. Wold our
  true and lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power to him to sign for us, and
  in our names in the capacities indicated below, a Form 10-K of this
  corporation for fiscal year 1999 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
  Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, together
  with any and all amendments to said Form 10-K, hereby ratifying and confirming
  our signatures as they may be signed by our said attorney-in-fact to said Form
  10-K and any and all amendments thereto.

  IN WITNESS WHEREOF each of the undersigned has executed this power of attorney
as of the 9th of March 2000.

<TABLE>

<S>                             <C>              <C>                               <C>
                                President                                          Chairman of
----------------------------                     -------------------------------   the Board
A. J. Wold                                       M. C. Pigott                      and Director

                                Treasurer                                          Vice Chairman
----------------------------                     -------------------------------   and Director
P. A. Donohoe                                    K. R. Gangl

                                Controller                                         Director
----------------------------                     -------------------------------
M. T. Barkley                                    D. J. Hovind

                                                                                   Director
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 M. A. Tembreull

</TABLE>
From: Laurel Kest

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Monday, August 22, 2011 1:29:04 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Laurel Kest

29326 S.Woodland Rd

cleveland, OH 44124
From: Mary Starr

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: I oppose the Definition of Religious Employer in Health Care Rules

Date: Tuesday, August 09, 2011 1:28:02 PM

The current definition of religious employer does not provide true conscience

protection for those committed to preserving life. Health care plans should not be

forced to violate the moral and religious convictions of providers or employees in

order to participate in the health care system. Requiring such an unacceptable

demand threatens both universal access to health care and religious freedom of

conscience.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CHRISTOPHER D. WARD, DOC #979923, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1778

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed March 15, 2019. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Lee County; Ramiro Manalich, Judge.

Christopher D. Ward, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, SLEET, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
From: Jane Nettleton

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Accept IOM"s Recommendations Pertaining to Coverage of Preventive Care

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:23:18 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine

as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care

law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would

provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While I believe that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an

ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health

providers, so hospitals and schools with religious affiliations would

be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ

people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption

would deny access to thousands of women just because of where they

work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.
From: Linda Martin

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Cc: file copy

Subject: Women"s health care

Date: Thursday, August 18, 2011 6:30:42 PM

I support the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine pertaining to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for "religious employers." These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that "religious refusal" exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so Catholic hospitals would be exempt from the

coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all faiths and

ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work. Women with financial resources will

be able to access any service and/or product they desire. It will be the working

poor who go without.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM's recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions. Thank you,

Linda Martin
Merrimack,

June, 1894.

#### State *v.*Merrick.

*William 11. Sawyer*and *Burleigh $ Adams,*for the prosecutors.

*Nathaniel E. Martin*and *Cornelius E. Clifford,*for the county.

Indictment, for the unlawful sale of liquor. An association called the Law and Order League prosecuted the defendant in the police court and before the grand jury at their own expense for the purpose of obtaining one half the fine. The attorney-general, without their consent and for reasons not stated, nol prossed the indictment The prosecutors moved that their taxable costs in the police court and before the grand jury be allowed them, to be paid by the county. It was held that the motion should prevail.

All concurred.
EPA ICR No. 0155.09 OMB Control No. 2070-0029

ATTACHMENT E

[Placeholder for Record of Consultations Between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Respondents to the Informati on Collection Request: “Certification of Pesticide Applicators” ]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8551

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. CARL EDWARD BENNETT, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (0:07-cv-70021-JFA; 0:04-cr-00657-JFA-2)

Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 4, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl Edward Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Jimmie Ewing, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Carl Edward Bennett seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2008) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bennett has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. ∗ We

∗ To the extent Bennett also seeks to appeal from the district court’s order, lowering his sentence from 360 months of imprisonment to 292 months under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000 & Supp. 2009), we note that he is entitled to no other relief. See United States v. Dunphy , 551 F.3d 247, 251-52 (4th Cir. 2009) (noting that when a sentence is within the Sentencing Guidelines applicable at the time of the original sentencing, a district court is not authorized under § 3582(c)(2) to reduce a defendant’s sentence below the amended sentencing range).

23 dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 23
  CONSENT OF
    INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
  Form 10-K Forms S-8 No. 333-92835, No. 333-101063, No. 333-46656, No. 33-58765, No. 333-107467, No. 333-127747, Forms S-3 No. 333-108182, No. 333-137713 No. 333-
   
 Edison, New Jersey
 February 16, 2010
 74




---



##### 



REPORT OF
    INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
    Healthcare Services Group, Inc.
  Form 10-K
   
 Edison, New Jersey
 February 16, 2010
 75
From: Josan Feathers

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Quality preventative health care for women

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 5:15:35 PM

As a woman and a citizen and active voter, I join with the American Association of

University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of

Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to

reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to necessary health

care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services,

are pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with

religious affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they

employ people of all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA Wind Tunnel Investigation of Three NACA 1-Series Inlets at Mach Numbers up to 0.92Pressure distributions on three NACA 1-series inlets have been obtained in the Langley 16-Foot Transonic Tunnel. The cowl diameter ratio (ratio of cowl highlight diameter to cowl maximum diameter) was 0.85 for all three inlets. The cowl length ratio (ratio of cowl length to cowl maximum diameter) was 1.0 for two of the inlets (NACA 1-85-100) and 0.439 for the other (NACA 1-85-43.9) inlet. One of the inlets with a cowl length ratio of 1.0 had an internal contraction ratio (ratio of highlight area to throat area) of 1.009 and the other had a contraction ratio of 1.250. The inlet with a cowl length ratio of 0.439 also had an internal contraction ratio of 1.250. All three inlets had longitudinal rows of static pressure orifices on the top and bottom external cowl surfaces. The inlet with a contraction ratio of 1.009 also had a row of static pressure orifices on the side of the cowl (external surface). The two inlets with a contraction ratio of 1.250 had a longitudinal row of static pressure orifices on the diffuser surface.Document ID19970010380Acquisition SourceLangley Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsRe, Richard J.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Abeyounis, William K.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1996Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:110300NASA-TM-110300Accession Number97N15601Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 538-13-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19970010380.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Page 1 of
sep 8 2010 REC jIPHI2-/6 Be tof

~pes DIVISION
EGAL PROCESSING (1 ATIONS

N & REGULA'
PUBLICATION RE

As of: September 08, 2010

PUBLIC Bese pes 8.200

Posted: September 08.2010
S U B M I SS I Oo N Comments Due: August 16, 2010)

Submission Type: Web

Docket: IRS-2010-0010
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Rules Relating to Status as a Grandfathered
Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Afforable Care Act

Comment On: IRS-2010-0010-0001
Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage: Interim Final Rules for Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

Document: IRS-2010-0010-0814
Comment on FR Doc # 2010-14488

Ss

Submitter Information

Name: william aaron miller
Address:

2201 w 25 th st ste U

Lawrence, KS, 66047
Email: drmiller0146@sbcglobal.net
Phone: 785-842-1114
Fax: 785 842 7870
Submitter's Representative: Dr william a miller
Organization: Miller chiropractic
Government Agency Type: Federal
Government Agency: AHRQ

General Comment

For the benefit and wellfare of all patients it is imperative that this document be implemented .
Thanking you in advance for the thousands of our patients that are voters. Sincerely Dr . William
A. Miller DCPA

https://fdms.erulemaking.net/fdms-web-agency/component/submitterInfoCoverPage?Call=P... - 9/8/2010