alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000731940
<NAME> THE NEW IBERIA BANCORP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      12,939,531
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     223,036,445
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            17,737,804
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 49,510,056
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      32,928,394
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        34,160,075
<LOANS>                                    181,292,483
<ALLOWANCE>                                  3,546,853
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             299,422,660
<DEPOSITS>                                 269,145,194
<SHORT-TERM>                                 3,575,744
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            868,398
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    14,250,558
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,582,766
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             299,422,660
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             14,575,998
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            5,213,663
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               613,260
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            20,402,921
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           9,057,042
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,147,865
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       11,255,056
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  536,200
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              14,733
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              8,164,205
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,823,103
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,520,723
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.63
<LOANS-NON>                                    435,821
<LOANS-PAST>                                   784,353
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               310,783
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             3,396,531
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  509,004
<RECOVERIES>                                   123,126
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            3,546,853
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         3,546,853
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Clinton: U.S. will stand by Iraq during drawdown
 By Donna Miles , American Forces Press Service
  
 WASHINGTON (April 27, 2009) – Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton assured Iraqi leaders during a visit to Baghdad yesterday that as the United States draws down its troops in Iraq, it won’t draw down its commitment to Iraq’s government and people. Clinton also joined President Barack Obama in condemning the recent spike in violence she said is aimed at derailing progress being made. The secretary met yesterday with Iraqi President Jalal Talabani, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari and Iraqi citizens to get their perspectives on Iraq’s political, security and economic progress. Newly confirmed U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Christopher Hill also participated in the discussions. “It is encouraging to both see and hear about the progress that is being made in Iraq,” Clinton said during a joint news conference with Zebari. “At every stop, I have emphasized President Obama’s message that our strategy working with you may be in a new phase, but we pledge our full and continuing commitment to Iraq and the Iraqi people.” As the United States draws down militarily in Iraq, it will deepen its civilian cooperation in accordance with the strategic framework agreement, Clinton said. “We will work on development and diplomatic initiatives and a regional agenda that includes border security and refugees,” she explained. The United States is committed to ensuring Iraq is sovereign, stable, self-reliant and fully integrated into the region, Clinton said. Toward that end, the U.S. military is working toward an orderly transition of responsibility to the Iraqi security forces. “We continue to help train and equip these forces so they will take the lead in safeguarding their country,” she said. Clinton condemned recent violence she said clearly is traceable to al-Qaida remnants and other violent groups who want to disrupt progress. These attacks have “only reinforced the Iraqi people’s determination to seek a better future for their country,” she said. “Their response and the response of Iraq’s leaders has been united and firm,” Clinton said, noting sacrifices made by Iraqis as well as Americans. “We are proud of the progress that the Iraqi people have made,” she said. “And we will stand with you as you build a future worthy of all of the children in Iraq.” Zebari called Clinton’s message reassuring, particularly as Iraq and the U.S.-Iraqi relationship go through an important transition. “There is no doubt that there are serious security and economic challenges that are facing Iraq,” he said. “Therefore, we will continue to rely on the continuation of U.S. commitment and support to both the Iraqi government and the Iraqi people to enable them to face those challenges.”
From: Stephanie Blevins

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Women"s Healthcare

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 10:45:07 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Thanks you,

S. Blevins
#### Maria E. Howe, Respondent, *v.*International Railway Company of Buffalo, Appellant.

*Howe*v. *International Railway Co.,*145 App. Div. 908, affirmed.

(Argued January 21, 1913;

decided February 4, 1913.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 28, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant.

*Dana L. Spring*for appellant.

*Nathaniel W. Norton*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Werner, Hiscock, Collin, Ouddeback and Miller, JJ.
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (1.02 MB)
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Greg, LaRaine & Justin Rother [mailto:rothers3@embarqmail.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 7:43 AM 

To: EBSA, E-ORI - EBSA 

Subject: RIN 1210-AB33

As a hard working, self-employed American, I find it very upsetting that the government wants to 

take over IRA's and 401Ks. Everything the government touches these days goes broke, and I 

mean EVERYTHING! Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Medicare, Medicade, the US Postal 

Service....the list goes on and on. You can take this idea and shove it where the light don't shine!

 

Greg
From: Ramona Uyeda

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Friday, August 12, 2011 10:36:49 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Ramona Uyeda
Hayward, California
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  FIRST

        

        

        
        3
        
        4
        
        5 (current)
        
        6
        
        7
        

        


        


        LAST
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
Dana D. 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 6, 2014

No. 04-14-00363-CV

Augustine NWABUISHI, Rose Nwabuishi, Resource Health Services, Inc dba Resource Home 

Health Services, Inc. and Resource Care Corp.,

Appellants

v.

Dana D. MOHAMMADI,

Appellee

From the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-05341

Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Third Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. 

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of November, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
From: Kathy

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: women"s health

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:12:41 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in

asking you to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine

as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the new health care

law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These

preventive services are a critical element of the new law and would

provide countless women better access to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny

women access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an

ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are pushing the

government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are

pushing for the exemption to apply to religiously-run health

providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be exempt

from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny

access to thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by

accepting IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious

refusal exemption provisions.
** **

**EXHIBIT 23**

 

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No.333-31502) of PACCAR Financial Corp. and in the related Prospectus of ourreport dated February 18, 2003 with respect to the financial statements ofPACCAR Financial Corp. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended December 31, 2002.

 

 
|                |   |   |   |   |   |   | /s/  Ernst & Young LLP |
|---------------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                |   |   |   |   |   |   |                            |
|                |   |   |   |   |   |   |                            |
| Seattle, Washington |   |   |   |   |   |   |                            |
| March 7, 2003       |   |   |   |   |   |   |                            |

 

 

----
From: Mildred Meyer

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 6:41:40 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

So much of a healthy society rests on women; if poor women have access to birth control, they will be

able to plan their families, and have stronger families.

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Mildred Meyer

119 East Road

High Falls, NY 12440
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 69 Agreed to House (ATH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 69

 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 28, 2001

 Mr. Menendez submitted the following resolution; which was considered 
                             and agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating minority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, 
elected to the following standing committee of the House of 
Representatives:
    Committee on Small Business:
            (1) Mr. Baird of Washington, Mrs. Napolitano of California, 
        and Mr. Udall of Colorado to rank immediately after Mr. 
        Langevin of Rhode Island.
            (2) Mr. Acevedo-Vila of Puerto Rico, Mr. Carson of 
        Oklahoma, and Mr. Ross of Arkansas to rank immediately after 
        Mr. Udall of Colorado.
                                 <all>
```
From: Susan Guilford

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Making contraception available to all at no cost

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:40:36 PM

My husband and I are delighted that HHS is proposing that contraceptives be made available to all

women at no charge. This will help reduce unintended pregnancies as well as the number of abortions

while improving the health and financial stability of women and their families.

Thank you,

Susan and Richard Guilford

Orange CA
#### Margaretha Mullerleile, Respondent, *v.*The City of New York, Appellant.

*Mullerleile*v. *City of New York,*142 App. Div. 936, affirmed.

(Argued May 21, 1912;

decided June 4, 1912.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 2, 1911, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiff through the negligence of defendant.

*Archibald JR. Watson, Corporation Counsel (Terence Farley*and *Loyal Leale*of counsel), for appellant.

*Edwin Cavanaugh, Gerard Roberts*and *Randall Hoyt Stern*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Willard Bartlett, Hisgock, Chase and Collin, JJ. Absent: Vann, J.
From: Brenda

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: women"s care and religion

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:18:02 PM

The health care we get should not in any way be dependent on the religion of the provider. If a

company or an individual has religious objections to providing treatment, they should be in some other

line of work. Their religion has no relation to my health needs.

Instead, use the Insitute of Medicine recommendations for preventive care, and keep our access to

care intact. The present exemptions are already inappropriate and unjust; you would do well to pull

those back, but certainly do not expand them.

The health of millions of women is at stake.