alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm We
consent to the use of our report dated, February 24, 2005 with respect to the consolidated
balance sheet of PRC Member LLC and Subsidiary (the Company) as of
December 31, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, members
capital, and cash flows for the period from September 10, 2004 (date of inception) to
December 31, 2004, in Presidential Realty Corporations Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB, expected to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and be
effective on or about March 31, 2005. The Schonbraun McCann
Group LLC Roseland, New JerseyMarch
30, 2005
Here's how you know
 **Official websites use .mil** .mil
 **Secure .mil websites use HTTPS** lock () https://


Skip to main content (Press Enter).
 Toggle navigation
            
            U.S. Central Command
                CENTCOM
        Search
                    Search CENTCOM:
                        Search
                Search CENTCOM:
                    Search
    Home

    ABOUT US
    
        COMMAND PRIORITIES

    LEADERSHIP

    COMPONENT COMMANDS

    HISTORY

    POSTURE STATEMENT

    CENTCOM AOR
    
        CENTCOM COALITION

    OPERATIONS AND EXERCISES
    
        USMTM

    CIVILIAN CASUALTY REPORT

    CONTACT
    
        OPERATIONAL CONTRACT SUPPORT

    COMMUNITY RELATIONS

    THEATRE MEDICAL CLEARANCE

    INNOVATION VENDOR PORTAL

    MILITARY MEMBER INNOVATION PORTAL

    MEDIA
    
        SOCIAL MEDIA

    NEWS ARTICLES

    PRESS RELEASES

    STATEMENTS

    IMAGERY

    VIDEOS

    TRANSCRIPTS

    VISITORS AND PERSONNEL
    
        FAMILY CENTER

    FAMILY READINESS

    CENTCOM WEBMAIL

    SOCIAL MEDIA SECURITY

    ACCOUNTABILITY

    EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

    USCENTCOM UNCLASSIFIED REGULATIONS

    FOIA LIBRARY

    INNOVATION OASIS

    WELCOME GUIDE  Search
 Search
 All Images All ImagesCommunity RelationsOtherPreviousCommanders
 Upload Date Upload DatePhoto DateTitle
  Share
  
 Small () Medium () Full Size (0.81 MB)
 
 Train camp buehring Warfighter Journalism defend Squad Middle East 204th PAD Protect 204th Public Affairs Detachment Story 1st Armored Division U.S. Army Central Command third army arcent Patton’s Own Public affairs specialist broadcast specialist SOvM Squad Overmatch PEO STRI Simulition VBS3 3rd abct u.s. army central Public Affairs Operation U.S. Army Soldier Army training News Centcom exercise USARCENT Kuwait deployment army reserve
 Photo Gallery
 About UsCommand PrioritiesLeadershipComponent
   CommandsHistoryPosture Statement
   Area of
   ResponsibilityCENTCOM Coalition
   Operations And
   ExercisesOperation Inherent
   ResolveResolute Support
   MediaSocial MediaNews ArticlesPress ReleasesVideo And Imagery
   Visitors And
   PersonnelFamily ReadinessCENTCOM WebmailSocial MediaSecurityAccountabilityEmergency
   Preparedness
   ContactCommunity Relations
                    Stay Connected
                
                Privacy & Security  Inspector General  FOIA  Privacy Act
            

Hosted by Defense Media Activity - WEB.mil
From: Cindy Chauvin

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Please reconsider language of new mandates!

Date: Sunday, August 07, 2011 5:46:56 PM

Thy Kingdom Come!

To Whom It May Concern:

On August 1st, the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued new

mandates concerning preventive health services to be covered by insurance plans.

These mandates - in response to the Institute of Medicine's advisory report issued to

HHS - require that all insurance plans provide coverage for all prescription

contraceptives approved by the FDA, as well as abortifacients such as the "morning

after" pill and "Ella" (a drug similar to RU-486 which can induce an abortion some

weeks into pregnancy).

There are a few exceptions and these include those group health plans which were

in effect before the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Health Care Reform)

was enacted, along with those offered by employers who are deemed by HHS to

qualify as a "religious employer." However, the definition of "religious employer" is

so narrow that its applicability negates most religious employers within the United

States.

The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) has voiced its strict

opposition to and disappointment with this final Act of HHS, due to its failure to

ensure respect for rights of conscience when developing such mandates. The

National Catholic Bioethics Center (NCBC) has also strongly opposed this mandate.

I would like to express my opposition to the definition of "religious

employer" within the context of a lack of true conscience protection. It is

critical that all voices of conscience be heard and protected in such

important and widespread policy decisions.

Please inform of your review of this matter.

Sincerely,

in Christ,

Cindy Chauvin

Prairieville, LA 70769
From: Ellen Fridland

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:32:13 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs. Let's do more!

Sincerely,

Ellen Fridland

365 Clinton Ave. Apt. 8B

Brooklyn, NY 11238
From: Dave Nearman

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: RIN 1210-AB44 Mandatory Birth Control

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 11:38:04 PM

To Whom it May Concern,

I object in the strongest of terms to mandating birth control with no co-pays under

the Affordable Care Act.

Birth control is already widely available to all women, subsidized largely by

taxpayers. Demanding that we further subsidize other people's birth control by

increasing our insurance premiums in these days when families are struggling just to

make ends meet is an outrage. 

The mandate violates my conscience and that of millions of Americans who oppose

birth control on moral and religious grounds. 

It is undisputed that one of the operations of contraceptives is to render the

endometrium hostile to implantation, so that if fertilization occurs, the newly

conceived child may be lost to an early abortion. I also strongly object to the

inclusion of free sterilization as well as abortifacient pills like ella, which can work

weeks after a person's biological beginning to cause an abortion.

And what of Catholic employers and others who oppose birth control, but are now

going to be forced to participate in these plans and/or offer it to their employees?

This flies in the face of the conscience protections that Americans have historically

enjoyed.

The conscience provisions attached to the rule are so narrowly crafted that they

would appear to force Catholic institutions to make free birth control and sterilization

available in health plans, or cease hiring and providing services to non-Catholics. 

It is incomprehensible that such a mandate is being forced upon the people of the

United States.

It is no secret that Planned Parenthood, the largest abortion chain in America, is

behind this mandate, and will reap huge financial benefits from it at a time when

citizens in the United States are working on both the state and federal levels to

defund the abortion giant. 

The majority of Americans are pro-life and we do not want our tax dollars and

insurance premiums supporting the nation's largest abortion chain.

It is imperative that you give credence to my personal objection along with those of

millions of other Americans who do not want to be forced to pay for and provide

medication, devices, and procedures that do not treat or prevent any disease or

illness, but distort and render inoperable a healthy reproductive system. This rule is

unjust, untenable, and un-American--and it should be stricken.

Sincerely,

Dave Nearman
Portland, Oregon
From: Max Magbee

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Support Access to Preventive Care and Contraception!

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:00:20 PM

I join with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you

to accept the recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to

coverage of preventive care under the new health care law, and to reject any

exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive services are a critical

element of the new law and would provide countless women better access to

necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women

access to contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all

contraceptive services, are pushing the government to make exemptions even

larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for the exemption to apply to

religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious affiliations would be

exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of all

faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to

thousands of women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting

IOM’s recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption

provisions.

Thank You,

Max Magbee
From: Liz Baykina

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: In Support of Access to Preventative Care and Contraception

Date: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 6:11:44 PM

To whomever it may concern:

I stand with the American Association of University Women (AAUW) in asking you to accept the

recommendations of the Institute of Medicine as pertain to coverage of preventive care under the

new health care law, and to reject any exemptions for “religious employers.” These preventive

services are a critical element of the new law and would provide countless women better access

to necessary health care.

While AAUW believes that “religious refusal” exemptions unjustly deny women access to

contraceptive services, others, driven by an ideological distaste for all contraceptive services, are

pushing the government to make exemptions even larger. Indeed, some groups are pushing for

the exemption to apply to religiously-run health providers, so hospitals with religious

affiliations would be exempt from the coverage requirement, even though they employ people of

all faiths and ideologies. If granted, this larger exemption would deny access to thousands of

women just because of where they work.

I urge you to ensure women have access to quality preventive care by accepting IOM’s

recommendations and rejecting the proposed religious refusal exemption provisions. This is a

health-care issue, one that is vital to both men and women. 

Thank you for taking the time to hear from the public.
Comments in Response to 

"Final rule; request for comments" 

Docket: FAA-2015-3877 

Directorate Identifier 2015-SW-039-AD 

Comments have been received in response to: "Final rule; request for comments," 

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket and Directorate Identifier entered above. 

(Project engineer: Please review any comments to determine if additional action is warranted. 

Once you have made your determination, please jill in the commenter(s) name(s) and check the 

appropriate response below. Include additional information following the appropriate response, 

~f necessary. Then include your name and the date in the spaces provided, and return it to the 

AD directorate focal. 

The FAA has reviewed comment(s) related to the above FAA Docket that we received from: 

Airbus Helicopters 

(Please check one) 

IZI These comments have not been found to contain any information to warrant reconsideration 

or change of this AD. 

D These comments have been found to contain information that warrants consideration of 

additional regulatory action. (SEE Airworthiness Directives Manual 

F AA-IR-M-8040.1 FOR ADDITIONAL ACTION.) 

Name: 

Rev 0 (9/08) 

Dale 4/28/2016 

Date: 

(This fol1!Il is part of the official docket file for this AD action.)
From: Molly Casteel

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 5:30:06 PM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Molly Casteel

1850 Yale Drive

Louisville, KY 40205
```

[Congressional Bills 107th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 82 Agreed to House (ATH)]

107th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 82

 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2001

Mr. Thune submitted the following resolution; which was considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Designating majority membership on certain standing committees of the 
                                 House.

    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, 
elected to the following standing committees of the House of 
Representatives:
    Appropriations: Mr. Sherwood.
    Committee on the Budget: Mr. Doolittle to rank after Mr. Hastings 
of Washington; Mr. LaHood and Ms. Granger to rank after Mr. Portman.
    Committee on Education and the Workforce: Mr. Goodlatte to rank 
after Mr. Isakson.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 31,181
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   31,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           905,326
<BONDS>                                       1,951,954
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         17,759
<OTHER-SE>                                   (2,843,858)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     31,181
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                          0
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0



</TABLE>
From: amanda savard

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Thursday, August 04, 2011 2:13:34 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This policy places a much-needed importance on women's health that is too-often not a priority in

health care policy. Birth control is a critical part of preventive care, and making contraception available

to all women, regardless of their insurance or ability to pay for it, will significantly reduce long-term

health care costs associated with unplanned pregnancies.

Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

amanda savard

226-355 sutton ave

winnipeg, mb 38474
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alpharma Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated:   March 16, 2006

/s/ Ingrid Wiik
Ingrid Wiik
Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  March 16, 2006/s/ Matthew T. Farrell
Matthew T. Farrell 
Chief Financial Officer
BEFORE THE 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON D.C. 

Petition of: 

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 

OPERATING CERTIFICATE DALA026A 

For Extension of Exemption 10127 

continued relief of certain requirements of 

14 CFR 121.434(c)(l)(ii) 

Exemption 101278 

Docket FAA-2000-8000 

PETITION OF DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 

Ladies/Gentlemen: 

To Extend Exemption 101278 

January 20, 2016 

Pursuant to the provisions of 14 CFR Part 11, Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL), petitions the 

Administrator to extend the effective date of Exemption No. 101278. 

The exemption grants Delta Air Lines relief from § 121.434 (c)(l)(fi) of Title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to permit qualified check 

airmen to perform the FAA inspector's observation of an initial or upgrade pilot in 

command. The current exemption's expiration date is August 31, 2016. 

The conditions and circumstances which warranted the original grant of exemption, in 

regard to public interest and equivalent levels of safety, continue to exist. This petition 

does not seek to change the conditions and limitations of the current exemption. This 

exemption has been in use safely for almost fourteen years. 

The renewal of this exemption is not a controversial issue. For this reason, and the 

reasons stated above, Delta requests that a finding of good cause be made for waiving 

publication in the Federal Register~ (14 CFR §11.87). Granting the requested relief will 

set no precedents. The existence of the exemption is well known and widely accepted. 

Please contact Chuck Schramek, Director - Flight Operations QA, Compliance & Business 

Support at 404-715-1112 (office) if you have questions or require additional information. 

Sincerely, 

cc: Michael Drew, Office Manager, Delta Certificate Office- FAA 

John Brooke, Acting Principal Operations Inspector, Delta CMU - FAA
From: Pallas Stanford

To: E-OHPSCA2713.EBSA

Subject: Thank you for supporting birth control access for all women

Date: Wednesday, August 03, 2011 12:27:18 AM

Dear Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health & Human Services,

I commend the Department of Health & Human Services' landmark decision requiring health insurers to

cover the full cost of contraception, with no co-pay, beginning in August 2012.

This is a plan both wise and compassionate. Thank you for prioritizing women's basic health care needs.

Sincerely,

Pallas Stanford

458 Vivienne Dr

Watsonville, CA 95706
PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: 7/21/15 

Received: July 20, 2015

Status: Pending_Post

Tracking No. 1jz-8k37-ba0r

Comments Due: July 21, 2015

Submission Type: Web

Docket: EBSA-2010-0050

Definition of the Term ‘‘Fiduciary’’; Conflict of Interest Rule—Retirement Investment Advice; 

Notice of proposed rulemaking and withdrawal of previous proposed rule.

Comment On: EBSA-2010-0050-0205

Definition of Fiduciary; Conflict of Interest Rule-Retirement Investment Advice and Related 

Proposed Prohibited Transaction Exemptions; Hearing and Comment Period Extension

Document: EBSA-2010-0050-DRAFT-2554

Comment on FR Doc # 2015-14921

Submitter Information

Name: Anonymous Anonymous

General Comment

Investor choice will be severely limited and financial advisors will make more money. I'm not 

sure how this is a good idea. Dodd Frank has been nothing but a failure in the five years since it 

was signed into law. End the trainwreck that this law has been and go back to the drawing board 

with something that both protects investors and doesn't limit their choices.
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated:  August 5, 2010
    /s/ Eugene B. Shepherd, Jr.Eugene B. Shepherd, Jr.Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer